Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect
ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Detection and Characterization of Rapidly Equilibrating Glycosylation Reaction Intermediates Using Exchange NMR
My Activity

Figure 1Loading Img
  • Open Access
Article

Detection and Characterization of Rapidly Equilibrating Glycosylation Reaction Intermediates Using Exchange NMR
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

  • Frank F. J. de Kleijne
    Frank F. J. de Kleijne
    Institute for Molecules and Materials (IMM), Synthetic Organic Chemistry, Radboud University, 6525 AJ Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  • Floor ter Braak
    Floor ter Braak
    Institute for Molecules and Materials (IMM), Synthetic Organic Chemistry, Radboud University, 6525 AJ Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  • Dimitrios Piperoudis
    Dimitrios Piperoudis
    Institute for Molecules and Materials (IMM), Synthetic Organic Chemistry, Radboud University, 6525 AJ Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  • Peter H. Moons
    Peter H. Moons
    Institute for Molecules and Materials (IMM), Synthetic Organic Chemistry, Radboud University, 6525 AJ Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  • Sam J. Moons
    Sam J. Moons
    Institute for Molecules and Materials (IMM), Synthetic Organic Chemistry, Radboud University, 6525 AJ Nijmegen, The Netherlands
    More by Sam J. Moons
  • Hidde Elferink
    Hidde Elferink
    Institute for Molecules and Materials (IMM), Synthetic Organic Chemistry, Radboud University, 6525 AJ Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  • Paul B. White*
    Paul B. White
    Institute for Molecules and Materials (IMM), Synthetic Organic Chemistry, Radboud University, 6525 AJ Nijmegen, The Netherlands
    *Email: [email protected]
  • Thomas J. Boltje*
    Thomas J. Boltje
    Institute for Molecules and Materials (IMM), Synthetic Organic Chemistry, Radboud University, 6525 AJ Nijmegen, The Netherlands
    *Email: [email protected]
Open PDFSupporting Information (1)

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Cite this: J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145, 48, 26190–26201
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.3c08709
Published November 26, 2023

Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0 .

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The stereoselective introduction of glycosidic bonds (glycosylation) is one of the main challenges in the chemical synthesis of carbohydrates. Glycosylation reaction mechanisms are difficult to control because, in many cases, the exact reactive species driving product formation cannot be detected and the product outcome cannot be explained by the primary reaction intermediate observed. In these cases, reactions are expected to take place via other low-abundance reaction intermediates that are in rapid equilibrium with the primary reaction intermediate via a Curtin–Hammett scenario. Despite this principle being well-known in organic synthesis, mechanistic studies investigating this model in glycosylation reactions are complicated by the challenge of detecting the extremely short-lived reactive species responsible for product formation. Herein, we report the utilization of the chemical equilibrium between low-abundance reaction intermediates and the stable, readily observed α-glycosyl triflate intermediate in order to infer the structure of the former species by employing exchange NMR. Using this technique, we enabled the detection of reaction intermediates such as β-glycosyl triflates and glycosyl dioxanium ions. This demonstrates the power of exchange NMR to unravel reaction mechanisms as we aim to build a catalog of kinetic parameters, allowing for the understanding and eventual prediction of glycosylation reactions.

This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0 .
  • cc licence
  • by licence
Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society

Introduction

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The stereoselective introduction of glycosidic bonds (glycosylation) is one of the main challenges in the chemical synthesis of carbohydrates. In a chemical glycosylation reaction, an electrophile (the glycosyl donor) is activated by a chemical promoter and reacts with a nucleophile (the glycosyl acceptor). The nucleophile can add to the α- or β-face of reactive intermediates, thereby leading to the formation of α- or β-diastereoisomers, respectively. Controlling the diastereoselectivity of glycosylation reactions can be achieved by the application of two main strategies.
First, a stereo-directing group present on the donor molecule can be employed to stabilize the glycosyl cation formed upon activation. An example of this principle is neighboring group participation (NGP) of an acyl group at the C-2 position affording a bicyclic dioxolanium ion intermediate 3 that reacts in a stereospecific manner with a glycosyl acceptor to afford a 1,2-trans product (Figure 1A). (1−4) Extension of this principle to acyl functionalities positioned on the C-3, C-4, or C-6 hydroxyl groups via NGP has also been suggested to direct the stereoselectivity of glycosylation reactions. However, whether selectivity can be attributed to NGP of the acyl group or other stereoelectronic effects is a subject of much debate. (4−19) The second main strategy utilizes glycosyl donors that contain protecting groups that are less capable of neighboring group participation, e.g., benzyl ethers. In this case, the glycosyl cation is trapped by the promotor system counterion or a solvent additive to afford quasi-stable intermediates that can be displaced in an SN2-like reaction pathway to afford a glycosylation product. (20−22) Most modern promotor systems give rise to the formation of glycosyl triflates and since these covalent adducts can exist in the α- (1) or β-form (6), reactions proceeding via these intermediates can in principle form the β- or α-product via an SN2-like reaction pathway, respectively. (22,23) The nucleophilic displacement of α-glycosyl triflates 1 is likely to take place via an intermediate α-contact ion pair (CIP) 2 which maintains its stereochemical memory to form the β-product. (24) Full dissociation of the triflate would lead to the solvent-separated ion pair (SSIP) 4, which can afford glycosylation products via an SN1-like pathway. (25−27) The conformation of monosaccharide-derived SSIPs is dictated by the relative stereochemistry of its substituents (10) and is a crucial determinant of their stereoselectivity in glycosylation reactions. (25) Finally, β-glycosyl triflate CIP 5 and its corresponding covalent adduct 6 can form during glycosylation reactions from the SSIP or SN2-like displacement of the α-glycosyl triflate 1 by another triflate anion. (20) The equatorial β-glycosyl triflates (on d-sugars) are not stabilized by the anomeric effect and hence are less stable and more reactive. Since glycosylation reactions take place in a mechanistic continuum between these SN1- and SN2-like reaction pathways, they are difficult to predict and control and very sensitive to parameters such as solvent, (28,29) type of monosaccharide, (17,30) strength of the nucleophile, (31) reaction solvent, (32) and temperature. (33,34)

Figure 1

Figure 1. (A) Glycosylation reaction intermediates and their characteristic resonances monitored by exchange NMR. (B) Glycosyl donors used in this study.

To address this challenge, the characterization of reaction intermediates that drive product formation in glycosylation reactions is required. Glycosylation reaction intermediates can be characterized by employing nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and infrared-ion spectroscopy (IRIS), for example. (26,35,36) These techniques have allowed for the characterization of intermediates such as glycosyl triflates, (22,23,35) dioxolanium ions, (18,37,38) dioxanium ions, (17) and even oxocarbenium ions. (25,26,37,39) However, IRIS is performed in the gas phase, and the structure of reaction intermediates under these conditions may not always be relevant to those formed in solution. NMR can be used to detect reaction intermediates in solution under relevant reaction conditions and is a powerful tool for studying reaction mechanisms. (40) However, a challenge in studying glycosylation reactions is that observing a reaction intermediate does not automatically mean it is a reactive intermediate and, hence, relevant to product formation. In many cases, the exact reactive species driving glycoside product formation remains unknown as the product outcome cannot be explained by the primary reaction intermediate observed. In these cases, glycosylation reactions are expected to take place via other low-abundance reaction intermediates that are in rapid equilibrium with the primary reaction intermediate via a Curtin–Hammett scenario (Figure 1). (20,41) Therefore, the stereochemical outcome of the reaction does not necessarily depend on the population of the intermediate leading to a given product but rather the overall barrier height when the barrier to intermediate interconversion is lower than the irreversible product-forming step. (20) Despite this principle being well-known in organic synthesis, mechanistic studies investigating this model in glycosylation reactions are complicated by the challenge of detecting the extremely short-lived reactive species responsible for product formation and measuring their exchange kinetics. The low abundance and short lifetime of these intermediates, such as 26, complicate their characterization as they readily equilibrate back to form the more stable, readily observable but less reactive α-glycosyl triflate intermediate 1. Elegant studies by Taylor and co-workers, and Asensio and co-workers, have employed exchange NMR spectroscopy (EXSY) to characterize the dynamic equilibrium of α- and β-glycosyl sulfonate intermediates. (23,42) The use of EXSY is unfortunately limited to readily observed species and hence applies only to rather stable β-glycosyl sulfonates. We have recently overcome this challenge by utilizing the chemical equilibrium between low-abundance reaction intermediates and the stable, readily observed α-glycosyl triflate intermediate in order to infer the structure of the former species. (17) Using chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) NMR, we demonstrated that high-energy or “invisible” mannosyl dioxanium ions, which are formed by intramolecular stabilization of a C-3 ester, are in chemical exchange with the highly populated α-glycosyl triflate intermediate. (17)
Herein, we report the application of this principle to detect the presence of other virtually undetectable high-energy reaction intermediates relevant to product formation such as β-triflates and dioxanium ions formed by internal stabilization. We characterized the reactive intermediates for a systematic set of eight frequently used glycosyl donors 7–14 (Figure 1B). Not only the presence of reactive intermediates but also their exchange kinetics were measured, thereby providing valuable quantitative data to elucidate the formation mechanism of the reactive intermediates. We report an integrated exchange NMR workflow to measure the reactivity of α-glycosyl triflates by monitoring the dissociation of the triflate ion using 19F exchange NMR spectroscopy (EXSY NMR). In addition, we established the mechanism of triflate dissociation with the same technique. A clear difference between mannose and glucose monosaccharides was observed in their triflate dissociation kinetics and mechanism. Mannosides were able to form dioxanium ions 7d and 8d via the participation of a C-3 acyl group, whereas their glucoside counterparts were not and formed β-glycosyl triflates 11βOTf and 12βOTf instead. We were able to indirectly detect the presence of these low-population intermediates via their chemical equilibrium with the observable α-glycosyl triflate using 13C CEST, 1H CEST, and 19F CEST NMR. Finally, we were also able to characterize selected examples of the dioxanium ion and β-glycosyl triflate using more classical NMR techniques to unequivocally establish their structure. These results demonstrate the power of chemical exchange NMR to detect fleeting reaction intermediates to build a catalog of kinetic parameters that allow for the understanding and ultimately prediction of glycosylation reactions. We expect this technique to be applicable to various other types of glycosylation reaction intermediates such as additives and solvents commonly used in glycosylation reactions, both of which tend to be rich in NMR-active nuclei that are sensitive to changes in the chemical environment. Finally, the application of the workflow laid out herein should be applicable to other types of reactions that are under Curtin–Hammett control.

Results and Discussion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

We started by investigating the stability and reactivity of glycosyl triflates derived from 7 to 14 to assess their likelihood of acting as reactive intermediates in glycosylation reactions. Previous experiments have investigated the decomposition temperature of glycosyl triflates as a measure of their stability/reactivity. While indicative of their thermal stability, such metrics do not necessarily speak to their relevance in product formation during a glycosylation event. (43) In addition, 1H EXSY NMR has been used to monitor the interconversion of α- and β-glycosyl triflates (23) and mesylates (42) providing kinetics of their interconversion. However, a major limitation of 1H EXSY is that it requires both interconverting species to be visible in 1D NMR. This means that for the vast majority of glycosyl donors, intermediate exchange kinetics cannot be recorded due to the low-populated state of the highly reactive β-triflate intermediates. Another means of measuring α-glycosyl triflate stability and reactivity is by observing the kinetics of triflate dissociation in the absence of an acceptor using 19F EXSY NMR. Since both the α-glycosyl triflate and unbound triflate anion, which results from the activation step (vide infra), are always observed and exist as strong signals, we reasoned that if we could observe the interconversion between bound and free triflate, then that would indicate the presence of an unobserved intermediate. Hence, we started by investigating the stability and reactivity of eight glycosyl triflates derived from 714 using 19F EXSY NMR, which revealed that all eight species underwent triflate exchange. The preparation of the thioglycoside precursors used to generate glycosyl triflates 7αOTf14αOTf is described in the Supporting Information (SI pages S12–S31). The glycosyl triflates were generated by activating the corresponding glycosyl sulfoxide donor with triflic anhydride (Tf2O) in the presence of the non-nucleophilic base 2,4,6-tritert-butyl-pyrimidine (TTBP) in CD2Cl2 at −80 °C inside an NMR tube (please see pages S7–S10). (44) Clean formation of glycosyl triflates (7αOTf14αOTf) was observed in all cases (Figures S4–S11). Dissociation of the anomeric triflate to unbound triflate could be monitored using selective 19F EXSY NMR (SI pages S2–S4, S7). Magnetization of the selectively excited CF3 resonance of the α-glycosyl triflate is transferred to the unbound triflate ion upon triflate dissociation during the ZZ-exchange mix time (Figure 2A). By plotting the mix time vs the extent of magnetization transfer, the rate of triflate dissociation was measured, which we propose is an indicator of α-glycosyl triflate stability (Figure 2B). In order to compare measurements across different sugars and samples while also taking into account multiple mechanisms, the reported rates in Figure 2 are normalized by dividing the measured rate by the initial α-triflate concentration (see SI pages S2–S4). By subsequently repeating this process at different temperatures, the normalized rate of triflate dissociation as a function of temperature was established (Figures 2C and S50–S86). A few important considerations are needed to ensure that reliable kinetic data emerge from the 19F EXSY experiments. First, the exchanging system needs to be in the slow-exchange regime which is defined by the rate of exchange being much lower than the frequency difference between the interconverting species (k1 + k–1 ≪ ΔωA-B). Second, to reduce the complexity of modeling the kinetics, we chose to measure initial rates for the exchange processes, which puts a rough limit on the maximum normalized rate of ∼100 s–1 (10% conversion at 1 ms mix time). Furthermore, the slowest measurable rate is related to the T1 of the observed nucleus. Hence, the T1 of the nuclei, and more importantly, the difference in T1 between the resonances of interest, should be taken into consideration when setting the maximum mix time. For 19F, the T1s of the α-triflate 10αOTf and soluble triflate salt were measured at −80 °C where the exchange was frozen and found to be roughly identical (0.31 and 0.42 s, respectively, Figure S49). This allowed us to make the approximation that T1 losses for each were roughly equivalent and hence could be ignored thereby allowing us to extend our mix range past T1. Therefore, we were able to measure normalized rates accurately down to ∼0.1 s–1. Third, the population of the α-glycosyl triflate and free triflate should not significantly change from the beginning to the end of the experiment. Therefore, once thermal decomposition begins to take hold, these experiments become unreliable and thus limit the upper limit of the temperature window.

Figure 2

Figure 2. (A) Working principle behind 19F EXSY NMR to monitor triflate dissociation. The α-glycosyl triflate is selectively excited and then observed over time to transform into free triflate. (B) Determination of the initial rate of triflate dissociation. (C) Summary of normalized triflate dissociation rates (s–1) across the studied glycoside series as a function of temperature.

Keeping in mind these considerations, the rates of dissociation of triflate from the parent α-glycosyl triflates 7αOTf14αOTf at various temperatures were obtained (Figure 2C). Interestingly, clear differences in triflate dissociation were observed related to the relative stereochemistry of the monosaccharide (mannose vs glucose) and the protecting group pattern. Mannosyl triflates 7αOTf and 8αOTf carrying a single benzoate ester at C-3 showed the fastest triflate dissociation. Interestingly, the benzylidene-protected mannosyl analogue 8αOTf carrying a C-3 benzoate ester was the second fastest in the mannose series. Benzylidene-protected monosaccharides are typically classified as disarmed due to the torsional (45,46) and electronic effects (47) induced by the fused benzylidene ring system. (43) Indeed triflate dissociation for 8αOTf was slower than that of the corresponding benzylated analogue 7αOTf but still faster than that of the fully benzylated compound 9αOTf. This suggests a role of the C-3 ester in driving triflate release, overpowering the disarming effect induced by the benzylidene. This is confirmed by the fact that the benzylidene-protected mannosyl triflate containing benzyl ethers at C-2 and C-3 was the slowest in the mannose series in triflate dissociation. Interestingly, the opposite trend was observed in the glucose series. The difference in rate for the C-3 benzoyl 11αOTf and 12αOTf vs C-3 benzyl 13αOTf and 14αOTf analogues was much smaller with the former being slower, particularly at higher temperatures. As expected, the benzylidene-protected analogues 12αOTf and 14αOTf showed slower triflate dissociation compared to that of their benzylated counterparts 11αOTf and 13αOTf. Overall, these results indicate that the presence of a benzylidene acetal compared to the benzylated analogue slows down triflate dissociation for both the mannose and glucose series. However, the introduction of a C-3 benzoyl group speeds up triflate dissociation in the mannose series and slows down triflate release in the glucose series.
The striking differences in triflate dissociation rates are likely the result of a different mechanism of triflate dissociation, but these cannot be established from the rates alone. Hence, we set out to investigate the mechanism of triflate dissociation of 7αOTf14αOTf to explain their dissociation rate differences. We foresee three main equilibria that would lead to the dissociation of the triflate anion (Figure 3A). First, dissociation of the triflate anion could lead to an SSIP. Second, NGP of the C-3 acyl substituent present in molecules 7αOTf8αOTf could take place to form a dioxanium ion with or without an intermediary SSIP. Third, a triflate anion could displace the α-glycosyl triflate in an SN2-like manner to form the corresponding β-triflate. To dissect the mechanism(s) responsible for triflate dissociation, we investigated the rate of this process as a function of the triflate anion concentration. The rate of triflate dissociation from the α-glycosyl triflate via SSIP or dioxanium ion formation should be insensitive to the triflate concentration. The rate of triflate dissociation from the α-glycosyl triflate via SN2-like displacement to form the corresponding β-glycosyl triflate should be first order with respect to the triflate concentration. In case both processes operate simultaneously, the sum of the rates would constitute the overall rate of triflate dissociation (Figure 3A). The temperature for the study was chosen so that if a first-order dependence was found, it would not move the kinetics outside the window for EXSY and at the same time would be suitably fast enough to study if no dependence was discovered. Next, using the aforementioned 19F EXSY scheme, we measured the triflate dissociation as a function of triflate concentration at a single temperature by the addition of tetrabutylammonium triflate (TBAT).

Figure 3

Figure 3. (A) SN1 and SN2-like triflate dissociation mechanisms. (B) Reaction order determination for triflate dissociation in the mannose series and (C) glucose series.

To this end, the triflate concentration was increased in steps by taking the sample out of the probe and adding 1 M TBAT solution to dry CD2Cl2 at −80 °C to approximately double the triflate concentration in each step. The exact triflate concentration was determined by comparison to the trimethyl(4-(trifluoromethyl)-phenyl)silane internal standard. The results are plotted in Figure 3B,C and show a clear dichotomy in the mechanism of triflate dissociation, consistent with the observed temperature-dependent rate differences listed in Figure 2C and Tables S1–S4. C-3 Benzoyl-containing mannosides 7αOTf8αOTf showed a zeroth-order rate dependence with respect to the triflate concentration. These results indicate that internal stabilization of the C-3 benzoyl, which forms the dioxanium ion, drives triflate dissociation. In contrast, all glucosides (11αOTf14αOTf) and both mannosides lacking the C-3 benzoyl group (9αOTf10αOTf) show a first-order triflate concentration dependence for the rate of triflate dissociation (Figure 3B, C). These data suggest that these molecules likely undergo an SN2-like triflate displacement to form the β-glycosyl triflate. Furthermore, this demonstrates that internal stabilization by the C-3 acyl group is reserved for the mannose donors, while the glucose counterparts likely form β-glycosyl triflates.
The above 19F EXSY studies established the rates of triflate dissociation as well as provided evidence for its mechanism but did not confirm the presence of the intermediates proposed in such mechanisms. Since EXSY can only be applied if both intermediates are readily visible in 1D NMR, it cannot be used to study the expected dioxanium ions and/or β-glycosyl triflate intermediates due to their low population at equilibrium. Hence, to solve this challenge, a different technique is needed. As mentioned above, CEST NMR is well suited to detect a very low population of “invisible” reaction intermediates that are in a chemical equilibrium with a visible reaction intermediate. This technique, originally developed as a contrasting approach in MRI, (48) has been applied by Gschwind and co-workers to detect iminium ions and by us to detect mannosyl dioxanium ions, for example. (17,49) The main advantage of CEST NMR is that no prior information about the chemical shift of the low-populated intermediate resonance is required since the experiment scans a given frequency domain by incrementing the saturation offset frequency while monitoring the transfer of saturation to the main observable species via chemical exchange (Figure 4A). To detect the formation of dioxanium ions, we used the 13C-labeled C-3 benzoyl signal belonging to the α-triflate species as the reporter peak. By plotting the degree of saturation transfer toward this reporter peak at a given frequency offset, a CEST profile is obtained (Figure 4A). In the case where saturation transfer is observed at a frequency offset different to that of the reporter peak, it shows up as a dip in the CEST profile and indicates the presence of a species that is in chemical exchange with the reporter species. Notably, the degree of saturation transfer is dependent on the observed nucleus, resonance frequency, frequency difference between the two species, the exchange rates between exchanging species, the field strength, saturation width, and saturation time. Hence, by plotting the saturation time versus the degree of saturation transfer, the interconversion kinetics of the equilibrating intermediates can be quantified. (50) The limitations of CEST are similar to EXSY: the chemical exchange is slow on the NMR time scale (k1 + k–1 ≪ ΔωA-B), and the detection window is defined by a combination of relative population exchanging species and longitudinal relaxation rate (R1). (48,51) Since the dioxanium ions can only form from the C-3 benzoyl-containing compounds 78, we investigated this set using 13C CEST NMR. To this end, 13C-labeled substrates 713C and 813C were prepared to enable the sensitive detection of the carbonyl quaternary carbon (SI pages S12–S31). By incrementing the saturation offset frequency while monitoring the transfer of saturation to a reporter peak (13C═O) on the main observable species (α-glycosyl triflate) via a chemical exchange, we investigated the detection of mannosyl and glucosyl dioxanium ion formation (Figures 4A and S13–S17). Apart from the use of a 13C-labeled starting material, the CEST NMR experiments were performed under identical conditions as the EXSY experiments. As expected, the mannosyl triflate 713CαOTf showed saturation transfer at the chemical shift expected for the dioxanium ion (δC = 177 ppm, Figure 4B). In contrast, the mannosyl benzylidene derivative 813CαOTf did not (Figure 4C), even though the formation of a dioxanium ion was expected based on an observed zeroth-order triflate dependence.

Figure 4

Figure 4. (A) Mechanism of 13C CEST NMR to detect neighboring group participation. (B–E) CEST profiles for 13C-labeled C-3 acyl-protected mannosyl and glucosyl donors. (F) Characterization of the mannosyl dioxanium ion using HMBC and COSY.

Due to the presence of the benzylidene, the molecule is less flexible and requires the formation of a tricyclic dioxanium ion which is likely much slower and less stable than the nonbenzylidene derivative 7d. This may explain why CEST NMR was unable to pick up the dioxanium ion as the CEST NMR technique is limited by the population of the minor exchanging species and the rates of dioxanium ion formation and consumption (kα→d and kd→α, respectively). If the population of the intermediate is well below 1% or the exchange has moved into the intermediate or fast regime (kα→d + kd→α > Δϖ), then the minor exchanging species cannot be detected. Due to the intrinsically high reactivity of a tricyclic dioxanium ion, it is likely that dioxanium ion consumption (kd→α) is exceedingly fast, hence limiting detection of the ion by 13C CEST NMR. The corresponding glucose series (1113C and 1213C) did not show dioxanium ion formation via CEST (Figures S14 and S16), fully consistent with the first-order triflate dependence (Figure 3C). In light of the conflicting CEST results with the triflate order in the case of mannosyl triflate 8αOTf, we reasoned that we could approach the limitation of the CEST NMR viewing window outlined above. Therefore, we wanted to boost the observable population of the dioxanium ion by preparing the corresponding p-anisoyl derivatives 1513C and 1613C of the mannose series, as the electron-donating methoxy group should increase the stability of the dioxanium ion and slow down the α-glycosyl triflate formation. Additionally, we performed the activation of 1513C and 1613C in the absence of TTBP to minimize the free triflate anion concentration in an effort to further boost the population of dioxanium ions. (17) Under these conditions, saturation transfer of the dioxanium ion was observed in both cases (Figure 4D, E) at ∼175 ppm. For benzylidene derivative 1613C, it was now possible to detect the dioxanium ion with 13C CEST NMR, which aligned with its zeroth-order triflate dependence. Furthermore, mannosyl donor 1513C showed a much higher population (∼45%) of dioxanium ion compared to benzoyl derivative 7. Due to the very high population of dioxanium upon activating donor 1513C, we were able to use the dioxanium ion signal as the reporter peak of the CEST NMR experiment in order to detect if there were additional intermediates in chemical exchange with it. Identical to the benzoyl derivative, the α-glycosyl triflate was the only detectable species in chemical exchange with the dioxanium ion. Fortunately, due to the high population of ion 1513Cd, we could fully characterize it using 1H–13C HMBC and 1H–1H COSY experiments (Figure 4F). We had previously reported the characterization of a similar 3-benzoyl-2,4,6-trimethylated mannosyl dioxanium ion, but these results now demonstrate its formation with relevant protecting groups, which are routinely used in oligosaccharide synthesis. Hence, although not directly characterized, we expect the characteristic saturation transfer at δC of 175 ppm for benzylidene derivative 1613C to correspond to the tricyclic mannosyl dioxanium ion 1613Cd. Calculations were performed to compute the chemical shift of the 13C-labeled dioxanium bridge which was in very good agreement with the observed chemical shift (computational chemical shift: δC 173.7 ppm, experimental chemical shift: δC 174.5 ppm, Figure S35). To further solidify this hypothesis, we measured the triflate dissociation of 1613CαOTf with 19F EXSY and dioxanium ion formation using 1H and 13C CEST NMR (pages S4 and S5). The measured rate from these techniques was 0.28 ± 0.02, 0.28 ± 0.01, and 0.26 ± 0.004 s–1, respectively, indicating that the processes for forming the dioxanium and dissociating the triflate group are clearly coupled (Figure 4E). From these results, it is clear that mannoside 1513C and 1613C showed the formation of the C-3 dioxanium ion, which is consistent with the α-selective glycosylation behavior of 7 and 8 and the observation that their triflate dissociation rates are irrespective of the triflate anion concentration. The C-3 acylated mannosides are a privileged class of glycosides, as all of the other cases (9αOTf14αOT) displayed a first-order triflate anion concentration dependence for triflate dissociation. These observations are consistent with an equilibrium between an α- and β-glycosyl triflate. β-glycosyl triflates are exceedingly difficult to detect and have only been observed in the case of benzylidene-protected methylated glucose and allose donors using 13C-labeled monosaccharides. (23) Only in the case of the allose, a large enough population of β-glycosyl triflate was formed that allowed for the investigation of its exchange kinetics using 1H EXSY. (23) Furthermore, an equatorial triflate not stabilized by the anomeric effect formed via a conformational ring flip was observed by Van der Marel and co-workers. (52) To the best of our knowledge, these two reports form the summative collection of observed glycosyl triflates not stabilized by the anomeric effect. To enable the detection of unstable and very-low-populated β-glycosyl triflates, we again applied CEST NMR but focused on the 1H and 19F nuclei. For 1H CEST NMR, the H-1 signal belonging to the α-glycosyl triflate was used as a reporter peak, and the saturation offset frequency was scanned while monitoring saturation transfer to this peak (Figure 5A). Upon detection of a possible β-glycosyl triflate, saturation transfer from an upfield peak position (δH ∼ 5.5–5.7 ppm) would be expected to be observed. None of the mannoside donors displayed a chemical equilibrium with an upfield resonance with the exception of benzylidene derivative 10, which we tentatively assigned as β-glycosyl triflate 10βOTf (Figures 5B–I and S27–S34). These results are consistent with the triflate orders obtained for three of these compounds, 7 and 8 (zeroth order, no β-glycosyl triflate detected) and 10 (first order, β-glycosyl triflate detected). Only for perbenzyl mannosyl donor 9, we did not detect a β-glycosyl triflate even though its triflate dissociation rate is on the order of first in triflate concentration. This could be due to a very low population of β-glycosyl triflate at equilibrium or the system has moved out of the slow-exchange regime, in which case it would be difficult or impossible to detect with 1H CEST NMR. In contrast, all of the glucose series donors (1114) showed clear saturation transfer via an upfield peak that we presume is a β-glycosyl triflate. These results are fully consistent with their first-order triflate dependence (Figure 3B, C). We validated these results by repeating β-glycosyl triflate detection using the 19F channel. For 19F CEST NMR, the CF3 signal belonging to the triflate ion was used as a reporter peak, and the saturation offset frequency was scanned while monitoring saturation transfer to this peak (Figures S19–S26).

Figure 5

Figure 5. (A) Mechanism of 1H CEST NMR to detect β-glycosyl triflates. (B–I) 1H CEST profiles for 7αOTf14αOTf..

As a consequence, all 19F CEST NMR spectra identify chemical exchange with the “free” triflate anion pool, which can arise from either the α- or β-glycosyl triflate. The 19F CEST NMR results are fully consistent with those obtained from the 1H CEST NMR experiments. For the mannose series, the chemical exchange of the α-glycosyl triflate with the unbound triflate anion could be clearly observed via saturation transfer monitored from the α-glycosyl triflate at −75.9 ppm. Only for the benzylidene derivative 10, an additional saturation transfer from a presumed β-glycosyl triflate was observed at δF −75.0 ppm, similar to the 1H CEST NMR. Moreover, in the case of the glucose series, saturation transfer from β-glycosyl triflates could be detected in all cases using 19F CEST NMR as was the case for the corresponding 1H experiments.
To obtain additional proof that the saturation transfer originates from exchange with the β-glycosyl triflate, we set out to further characterize this low-population species. From the glucose set, benzylidene derivative 14 displayed the clearest formation of this species, and we thus investigated this molecule further. The only reported direct spectroscopic evidence of a β-glycosyl triflate was obtained for a very similar compound, 4,6-benzylidene-2,3-di-O-methyl glucosyl-β-triflate, by Asensio and co-workers. (23) We prepared the corresponding benzyl protected compound with a C-1 13C isotope label (1413C-1) in order to measure the 1JC1–H1 and 3JH1–H2 coupling constants, which are indicative of the stereochemistry at C-1. Upon activation, this derivative formed a small (≈1%, SI, Figures S46 and S47) population of β-glucosyl triflate that could be characterized using a 1H–13C HSQC NMR experiment, when the 13C decoupler was not applied during the acquisition period (Figure 6). This experiment serves as a simple method for measuring the 1JCH as well as allowing for long F2 acquisition times to obtain high-resolution peaks in the 1H dimension suitable for measuring 1H–1H couplings. The 1JC1–H1 coupling constant for the minor species was determined to be 175 Hz compared to 183 Hz for the corresponding α-derivative (Figure 6). This 8 Hz decrease in coupling constant is indicative of an axial H-1 found in β-configured molecules. (53) Most importantly, the 3JH1–H2 coupling constant was measured to be 7.1 Hz, which is consistent with the axial–axial coupling expected for a β-glycosyl triflate intermediate. Lastly, the chemical shifts of C-1 and H-1 are also consistent with a glycosyl triflate species, and the two 13C resonances at δC 106.4 ppm (α-triflate) and δC 104.3 ppm (β-triflate) as determined from the HSQC were shown to undergo chemical exchange via 13C CEST NMR (Figure S48).

Figure 6

Figure 6. Characterization of β-glycosyl triflate 14 using HSQC without 13C decoupling in order to measure 1JC1–H1 and 3JH1–H2.

The systematic set of exchange NMR experiments described above allows for the development of a rationale for the reaction pathways leading to the stereoselective formation of glycosylation product(s) for each of the eight glycosyl donors 714 studied. For all eight examples, the main reaction intermediate formed after activation is α-glycosyl triflate. A baseline of SN2-like displacement pathway leading to the β-product can therefore be expected in all cases. The SSIPs involved in the reactions could not be detected due to their instability, but both the mannose (10,25) and glucose (25) series are expected to react via their α-selective 4H3 half-chair conformers. Additional pathways proceeding via C-3 participation and the β-glycosyl triflate intermediate can also lead to α-selective product formation. The applied exchange NMR techniques have enabled the (indirect) detection of the unstable, reactive, and low-population mannosyl dioxanium ion and β-glucosyl triflate reaction intermediates. Even though these are low-population reaction intermediates and their exact abundance at equilibrium remains unknown, they can be the main product-forming species if the barrier to reaction intermediate interconversion is smaller than the barrier to product formation according to the Curtin–Hammett principle. Therefore, the rate differences of reaction intermediate interconversion and the ensuing product-forming step dictate the stereospecific outcome as outlined by Lemieux and co-workers. (20) The stereoselectivity for all eight glycosyl donors 714 as a function of acceptor reactivity was investigated separately. (18,54)
Starting with the mannose series, C-3 benzoyl mannosyl donor 7 provides α-mannosides upon glycosylation. (17,18) The corresponding α-glycosyl triflate 7αOTf is the main observable reaction intermediate but does not give direct access to the α-product via an SN2-like pathway. Hence, glycosylation likely takes place via rapidly equilibrating dioxanium ion 7d and/or β-glycosyl triflate 7βOTf which would afford the α-product. Dioxanium ion 7d was observed via CEST NMR, while the β-glycosyl triflate was not nor was it expected to be based on its zeroth-order triflate dependence. Therefore, we confidently propose that the reactive intermediate in this case is the dioxanium ion and that the system is under Curtin–Hammett control (Figure 7).

Figure 7

Figure 7. Spectroscopic summary of mannosyl intermediates.

The corresponding C-3 benzoyl-4,6-benzylidene mannoside 8 shows a similar profile. The α-mannoside is formed upon glycosylation which cannot be explained via the observable α-glycosyl triflate intermediate. (55) CEST NMR was unable to confirm the presence of dioxanium ion 8d or β-triflate 8βOTf. However, the rate of triflate dissociation from 8αOTf was independent of the triflate concentration pointing toward triflate dissociation via C-3 participation. By substituting the C-3 benzoyl for anisoyl in order to further stabilize the cation, the resulting dioxanium ion was detected for the first time. The existence of this intermediate has long been debated but was never characterized. (5,6) (5,14,55) However, the experiments reported herein now support the formation of 8d as the chemical shift, triflate order, and glycosylation stereoselectivity all support its existence and role as a product-forming intermediate (Figure 7).
Perbenzyl mannoside 9 is a much less selective glycosylation donor. The first order of the triflate concentration on triflate dissociation supports the formation of a β-glycosyl triflate although this species could not be detected via the exchange NMR experiments. We hypothesize that a dynamic equilibrium of α- and β-glycosyl triflates and possibly the SSIP is present leading to various product-forming pathways and hence mixed stereoselectivity.
4,6-Benzylidene mannoside 10 is known to provide β-products upon glycosylation. (41) This can be explained by an SN2-like displacement of the corresponding α-contact ion pair. (24) Hence, in this case, the main observed reaction intermediate is assigned to the reactive intermediate. Interestingly, CEST NMR did show the presence of an equilibrium with the β-triflate intermediate, which is consistent with its first-order triflate dependence. This equilibrium is not relevant for product formation with most nucleophiles and therefore represents a situation in which the β-triflate is the less reactive species (Figure 7).
The glucose series showed very different stereoselectivity in glycosylations compared to the corresponding mannose series as noted earlier by Crich and co-workers. (30) In sharp contrast to the mannose series, no evidence for dioxanium ion formation by a C-3 acyl neighboring group in 11 and 12 was found (Figure 8). The origin of this striking difference was investigated further in a separate study. (54) Both molecules form β-glycosyl triflates, whereas the mannosides do not, but these lead to a lower α-selectivity than the dioxanium ions in the case of their mannose counterparts. (18) Also the origin of this clear divergence was investigated further in a separate study. (54)

Figure 8

Figure 8. Spectroscopic summary of glucosyl intermediates.

A role for the SSIP, which is expected to adopt an 4H3 half-chair conformer and drives the formation of α-product as reported by Codée and co-workers, cannot be excluded. (25) The simultaneous operation of multiple product-forming pathways likely leads to lower stereoselectivity in these cases. The two glucosides 13 and 14 lacking the C-3 benzoyl group show a similar, moderate stereoselectivity compared to their C-3 benzoyl counterparts (Figure 8). (18) This underscores the lack of stereo-directing capability of the C-3 substituent in glucose. (18) The benzylidene derivative 14 has been demonstrated to be α-selective in contrast to its mannose derivative. (30) Since 14 also clearly showed to be in equilibrium with the β-glycosyl triflate, we assign this as a major reactive intermediate driving α-product formation (Figure 8).

Conclusions

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

We were able to directly and indirectly detect the presence of low-population reaction intermediates via their chemical equilibrium with the readily observable α-glycosyl triflate for a collection of eight gluco- and mannosides bearing either C-3 acyl or benzyl substituent. The stability of α-glycosyl triflates and their mechanism for dissociation could be readily measured by using 19F EXSY NMR. This allowed for their role in glycosylation reactions to be ascertained. Furthermore, equilibria with low-population intermediates such as dioxanium ions and β-glycosyl triflates could be detected using 13C CEST, 1H CEST, and 19F CEST NMR. Finally, selected examples of the dioxanium ion and β-glycosyl triflate were characterized using classical NMR techniques to unequivocally establish their identity. The results provide the first mechanistic proof for the existence of mannosyl dioxanium ions and β-glucosyl triflates utilizing relevant protecting groups under actual reaction conditions. These observations allow for the rationalization of their observed α-selectivity and demonstrate the power of chemical exchange NMR to detect transient intermediates. Ultimately, we aim to build a catalog of kinetic parameters, allowing for the understanding and eventual prediction of glycosylation reactions. We expect this technique to be applicable to various other types of glycosylation reaction intermediates such as additives (e.g., DMF, PPh3O) and coordinating solvents (e.g., Et2O, MeCN). Finally, the application of the workflow laid out herein should be applicable to other types of reactions that are under Curtin–Hammett control.

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jacs.3c08709.

  • Synthetic procedures for the synthesis of donors 7-14, 1513C, 1613C, and the precursor for 14αOTf(13C-1). Theoretical and practical description of the EXSY and CEST experiments, VT-NMR procedures, and additional variable temperature NMR spectra and raw 19F EXSY, 13C CEST, and 1H CEST NMR data (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Authors
    • Paul B. White - Institute for Molecules and Materials (IMM), Synthetic Organic Chemistry, Radboud University, 6525 AJ Nijmegen, The Netherlands Email: [email protected]
    • Thomas J. Boltje - Institute for Molecules and Materials (IMM), Synthetic Organic Chemistry, Radboud University, 6525 AJ Nijmegen, The NetherlandsOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9141-8784 Email: [email protected]
  • Authors
    • Frank F. J. de Kleijne - Institute for Molecules and Materials (IMM), Synthetic Organic Chemistry, Radboud University, 6525 AJ Nijmegen, The Netherlands
    • Floor ter Braak - Institute for Molecules and Materials (IMM), Synthetic Organic Chemistry, Radboud University, 6525 AJ Nijmegen, The Netherlands
    • Dimitrios Piperoudis - Institute for Molecules and Materials (IMM), Synthetic Organic Chemistry, Radboud University, 6525 AJ Nijmegen, The Netherlands
    • Peter H. Moons - Institute for Molecules and Materials (IMM), Synthetic Organic Chemistry, Radboud University, 6525 AJ Nijmegen, The NetherlandsOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0009-0002-6425-8273
    • Sam J. Moons - Institute for Molecules and Materials (IMM), Synthetic Organic Chemistry, Radboud University, 6525 AJ Nijmegen, The Netherlands
    • Hidde Elferink - Institute for Molecules and Materials (IMM), Synthetic Organic Chemistry, Radboud University, 6525 AJ Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  • Author Contributions

    F.F.J.d.K. and F.t.B. contributed equally.

  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

We thank Pepijn Geutjes, dr. Tom Bloemberg, and Luuk van Summeren from the Radboud University Faculty of Science teaching laboratories for allowing us to use their Bruker 300 MHz Avance III HD nanobay NMR spectrometer for conducting this research. Additionally, we would like to thank Luuk van Summeren for helping with the synthesis of 4-methoxy-[α-13C]-benzoic acid. We would also like to thank Dr. Adolfo Botana from the JEOL UK applications group for providing the CEST and modified EXSY pulse sequences and assisting in their implementation. This work was supported by a Dutch Research Council NWO-VIDI grant (VI.Vidi.192.070) awarded to T.J.B.

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 55 other publications.

  1. 1
    Boltje, T. J.; Buskas, T.; Boons, G.-J. Opportunities and challenges in synthetic oligosaccharide and glycoconjugate research. Nature Chem. 2009, 1 (8), 611622,  DOI: 10.1038/nchem.399
  2. 2
    Lemieux, R. U. Some implications in carbohydrate chemistry of theories relating to the mechanisms of replacement reactions. Adv. Carbohydr. Chem. 1954, 9, 157,  DOI: 10.1016/S0096-5332(08)60371-9
  3. 3
    Frush, H. L.; Isbell, H. S. Sugar acetates, acetylglycosyl halides and orthoacetates in relation to the Walden inversion. Journal of research of the National Bureau of Standards 1941, 27, 413,  DOI: 10.6028/jres.027.028
  4. 4
    Hettikankanamalage, A. A.; Lassfolk, R.; Ekholm, F. S.; Leino, R.; Crich, D. Mechanisms of Stereodirecting Participation and Ester Migration from Near and Far in Glycosylation and Related Reactions. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120 (15), 71047151,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00243
  5. 5
    Crich, D.; Hu, T.; Cai, F. Does neighboring group participation by non-vicinal esters play a role in glycosylation reactions? Effective probes for the detection of bridging intermediates. Journal of organic chemistry 2008, 73 (22), 89428953,  DOI: 10.1021/jo801630m
  6. 6
    Baek, J. Y.; Lee, B.-Y.; Jo, M. G.; Kim, K. S. β-Directing Effect of Electron-Withdrawing Groups at O-3, O-4, and O-6 Positions and α-Directing Effect by Remote Participation of 3-O-Acyl and 6-O-Acetyl Groups of Donors in Mannopyranosylations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131 (48), 1770517713,  DOI: 10.1021/ja907252u
  7. 7
    Lei, J.-C.; Ruan, Y.-X.; Luo, S.; Yang, J.-S. Stereodirecting Effect of C3-Ester Groups on the Glycosylation Stereochemistry of L-Rhamnopyranose Thioglycoside Donors: Stereoselective Synthesis of α- and β-L-Rhamnopyranosides. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2019, 2019 (37), 63776382,  DOI: 10.1002/ejoc.201901186
  8. 8
    Demchenko, A. V.; Rousson, E.; Boons, G.-J. Stereoselective 1,2-cis-galactosylation assisted by remote neighboring group participation and solvent effects. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40 (36), 65236526,  DOI: 10.1016/S0040-4039(99)01203-4
  9. 9
    Baek, J. Y.; Kwon, H.-W.; Myung, S. J.; Park, J. J.; Kim, M. Y.; Rathwell, D. C. K.; Jeon, H. B.; Seeberger, P. H.; Kim, K. S. Directing effect by remote electron-withdrawing protecting groups at O-3 or O-4 position of donors in glucosylations and galactosylations. Tetrahedron 2015, 71 (33), 53155320,  DOI: 10.1016/j.tet.2015.06.014
  10. 10
    Ayala, L.; Lucero, C. G.; Romero, J. A.; Tabacco, S. A.; Woerpel, K. A. Stereochemistry of nucleophilic substitution reactions depending upon substituent: evidence for electrostatic stabilization of pseudoaxial conformers of oxocarbenium ions by heteroatom substituents. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125 (50), 155218,  DOI: 10.1021/ja037935a
  11. 11
    Ma, Y.; Lian, G.; Li, Y.; Yu, B. Identification of 3,6-di-O-acetyl-1,2,4-O-orthoacetyl-α-d-glucopyranose as a direct evidence for the 4-O-acyl group participation in glycosylation. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47 (26), 75157517,  DOI: 10.1039/c1cc11680k
  12. 12
    Komarova, B. S.; Orekhova, M. V.; Tsvetkov, Y. E.; Nifantiev, N. E. Is an acyl group at O-3 in glucosyl donors able to control α-stereoselectivity of glycosylation? The role of conformational mobility and the protecting group at O-6. Carbohydr. Res. 2014, 384, 7086,  DOI: 10.1016/j.carres.2013.11.016
  13. 13
    Dejter-juszynski, M.; Flowers, H. M. Studies on the koenigs-knorr reaction: Part IV: The effect of participating groups on the stereochemistry of disaccharide formation. Carbohydr. Res. 1973, 28 (1), 6174,  DOI: 10.1016/S0008-6215(00)82857-8
  14. 14
    Mcmillan, T. F.; Crich, D. Influence of 3-Thio Substituents on Benzylidene-Directed Mannosylation. Isolation of a Bridged Pyridinium Ion and Effects of 3-O-Picolyl and 3-S-Picolyl Esters. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2022, 2022 (20), e202200320  DOI: 10.1002/ejoc.202200320
  15. 15
    Elferink, H.; Remmerswaal, W. A.; Houthuijs, K. J.; Jansen, O.; Hansen, T.; Rijs, A. M.; Berden, G.; Martens, J.; Oomens, J.; Codée, J. D. C.; Boltje, T. J. Competing C-4 and C-5-Acyl Stabilization of Uronic Acid Glycosyl Cations. Chem. – Eur. J. 2022, 28 (63), e202201724  DOI: 10.1002/chem.202201724
  16. 16
    Remmerswaal, W. A.; Houthuijs, K. J.; Van de ven, R.; Elferink, H.; Hansen, T.; Berden, G.; Overkleeft, H. S.; Van der marel, G. A.; Rutjes, F. P. J. T.; Filippov, D. V.; Boltje, T. J.; Martens, J.; Oomens, J.; Codée, J. D. C. Stabilization of Glucosyl Dioxolenium Ions by “Dual Participation” of the 2,2-Dimethyl-2-(ortho-nitrophenyl)acetyl (DMNPA) Protection Group for 1,2-cis-Glucosylation. Journal of Organic Chemistry 2022, 87 (14), 91399147,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.2c00808
  17. 17
    De kleijne, F. F. J.; Elferink, H.; Moons, S. J.; White, P. B.; Boltje, T. J. Characterization of Mannosyl Dioxanium Ions in Solution Using Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer NMR Spectroscopy. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2022, 61 (6), e202109874  DOI: 10.1002/anie.202109874
  18. 18
    Hansen, T.; Elferink, H.; Van hengst, J. M. A.; Houthuijs, K. J.; Remmerswaal, W. A.; Kromm, A.; Berden, G.; Van der vorm, S.; Rijs, A. M.; Overkleeft, H. S.; Filippov, D. V.; Rutjes, F. P. J. T.; Van der marel, G. A.; Martens, J.; Oomens, J.; Codée, J. D. C.; Boltje, T. J. Characterization of glycosyl dioxolenium ions and their role in glycosylation reactions. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11 (1), 2664,  DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-16362-x
  19. 19
    Elferink, H.; Mensink, R. A.; Castelijns, W. W. A.; Jansen, O.; Bruekers, J. P. J.; Martens, J.; Oomens, J.; Rijs, A. M.; Boltje, T. J. The Glycosylation Mechanisms of 6,3-Uronic Acid Lactones. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2019, 58 (26), 87468751,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201902507
  20. 20
    Lemieux, R. U.; Hendriks, K. B.; Stick, R. V.; James, K. Halide ion catalyzed glycosidation reactions. Syntheses of.alpha.-linked disaccharides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97 (14), 40564062,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00847a032
  21. 21
    Lu, S.-R.; Lai, Y.-H.; Chen, J.-H.; Liu, C.-Y.; Mong, K.-K. T. Dimethylformamide: An Unusual Glycosylation Modulator. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50 (32), 73157320,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201100076
  22. 22
    Crich, D.; Sun, S. Are Glycosyl Triflates Intermediates in the Sulfoxide Glycosylation Method? A Chemical and 1H, 13C, and 19F NMR Spectroscopic Investigation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119 (46), 1121711223,  DOI: 10.1021/ja971239r
  23. 23
    Santana, A. G.; Montalvillo-jiménez, L.; Díaz-casado, L.; Corzana, F.; Merino, P.; Cañada, F. J.; Jiménez-osés, G.; Jiménez-barbero, J.; Gómez, A. M.; Asensio, J. L. Dissecting the Essential Role of Anomeric β-Triflates in Glycosylation Reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142 (28), 1250112514,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.0c05525
  24. 24
    Crich, D.; Chandrasekera, N. S. Mechanism of 4,6-O-Benzylidene-Directed β-Mannosylation as Determined by α-Deuterium Kinetic Isotope Effects. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43 (40), 53865389,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.200453688
  25. 25
    Hansen, T.; Lebedel, L.; Remmerswaal, W. A.; Van der vorm, S.; Wander, D. P. A.; Somers, M.; Overkleeft, H. S.; Filippov, D. V.; Désiré, J.; Mingot, A.; Bleriot, Y.; Van der marel, G. A.; Thibaudeau, S.; Codée, J. D. C. Defining the SN1 Side of Glycosylation Reactions: Stereoselectivity of Glycopyranosyl Cations. ACS Central Science 2019, 5 (5), 781788,  DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.9b00042
  26. 26
    Franconetti, A.; Ardá, A.; Asensio, J. L.; Blériot, Y.; Thibaudeau, S.; Jiménez-barbero, J. Glycosyl Oxocarbenium Ions: Structure, Conformation, Reactivity, and Interactions. Acc. Chem. Res. 2021, 54 (11), 25522564,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.accounts.1c00021
  27. 27
    Huang, M.; Retailleau, P.; Bohé, L.; Crich, D. Cation Clock Permits Distinction Between the Mechanisms of α- and β-O- and β-C-Glycosylation in the Mannopyranose Series: Evidence for the Existence of a Mannopyranosyl Oxocarbenium Ion. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134 (36), 1474614749,  DOI: 10.1021/ja307266n
  28. 28
    Chatterjee, S.; Moon, S.; Hentschel, F.; Gilmore, K.; Seeberger, P. H. An Empirical Understanding of the Glycosylation Reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140 (38), 1194211953,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.8b04525
  29. 29
    Satoh, H.; Hansen, H. S.; Manabe, S.; Van gunsteren, W. F.; Hünenberger, P. H. Theoretical Investigation of Solvent Effects on Glycosylation Reactions: Stereoselectivity Controlled by Preferential Conformations of the Intermediate Oxacarbenium-Counterion Complex. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2010, 6 (6), 17831797,  DOI: 10.1021/ct1001347
  30. 30
    Crich, D.; Cai, W. Chemistry of 4,6-O-Benzylidene-d-glycopyranosyl Triflates: Contrasting Behavior between the Gluco and Manno Series. Journal of Organic Chemistry 1999, 64 (13), 49264930,  DOI: 10.1021/jo990243d
  31. 31
    Van der vorm, S.; Hansen, T.; Van hengst, J. M. A.; Overkleeft, H. S.; Van der marel, G. A.; Codée, J. D. C. Acceptor reactivity in glycosylation reactions. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48 (17), 46884706,  DOI: 10.1039/C8CS00369F
  32. 32
    Andreana, P. R.; Crich, D. Guidelines for O-Glycoside Formation from First Principles. ACS Central Science 2021, 7 (9), 14541462,  DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.1c00594
  33. 33
    Crich, D. En route to the transformation of glycoscience: A chemist’s perspective on internal and external crossroads in glycochemistry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143 (1), 1734,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.0c11106
  34. 34
    Adero, P. O.; Amarasekara, H.; Wen, P.; Bohé, L.; Crich, D. The Experimental Evidence in Support of Glycosylation Mechanisms at the S(N)1-S(N)2 Interface. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118 (17), 82428284,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00083
  35. 35
    Frihed, T. G.; Bols, M.; Pedersen, C. M. Mechanisms of glycosylation reactions studied by low-temperature nuclear magnetic resonance. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115 (11), 49635013,  DOI: 10.1021/cr500434x
  36. 36
    Braak, F. t.; Elferink, H.; Houthuijs, K. J.; Oomens, J.; Martens, J.; Boltje, T. J. Characterization of Elusive Reaction Intermediates Using Infrared Ion Spectroscopy: Application to the Experimental Characterization of Glycosyl Cations. Acc. Chem. Res. 2022, 55, 16691679,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.accounts.2c00040
  37. 37
    Elferink, H.; Severijnen, M. E.; Martens, J.; Mensink, R. A.; Berden, G.; Oomens, J.; Rutjes, F. P. J. T.; Rijs, A. M.; Boltje, T. J. Direct Experimental Characterization of Glycosyl Cations by Infrared Ion Spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140 (19), 60346038,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.8b01236
  38. 38
    Mucha, E.; Marianski, M.; Xu, F.-F.; Thomas, D. A.; Meijer, G.; Von helden, G.; Seeberger, P. H.; Pagel, K. Unravelling the structure of glycosyl cations via cold-ion infrared spectroscopy. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9 (1), 4174,  DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-07184-z
  39. 39
    Martin, A.; Arda, A.; Désiré, J.; Martin-mingot, A.; Probst, N.; Sinaÿ, P.; Jiménez-barbero, J.; Thibaudeau, S.; Blériot, Y. Catching elusive glycosyl cations in a condensed phase with HF/SbF5 superacid. Nat. Chem. 2016, 8 (2), 18691,  DOI: 10.1038/nchem.2399
  40. 40
    Ben-tal, Y.; Boaler, P. J.; Dale, H. J. A.; Dooley, R. E.; Fohn, N. A.; Gao, Y.; García-domínguez, A.; Grant, K. M.; Hall, A. M. R.; Hayes, H. L. D.; Kucharski, M. M.; Wei, R.; Lloyd-jones, G. C. Mechanistic analysis by NMR spectroscopy: A users guide. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 2022, 129, 28106,  DOI: 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2022.01.001
  41. 41
    Crich, D. Mechanism of a chemical glycosylation reaction. Accounts of chemical research 2010, 43 (8), 11441153,  DOI: 10.1021/ar100035r
  42. 42
    D’angelo, K. A.; Taylor, M. S. Borinic Acid Catalyzed Stereo- and Regioselective Couplings of Glycosyl Methanesulfonates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138 (34), 1105811066,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.6b06943
  43. 43
    Aubry, S.; Sasaki, K.; Sharma, I.; Crich, D. Influence of protecting groups on the reactivity and selectivity of glycosylation: chemistry of the 4,6-o-benzylidene protected mannopyranosyl donors and related species. Top Curr. Chem. 2010, 301, 14188,  DOI: 10.1007/128_2010_102
  44. 44
    Kahne, D.; Walker, S.; Cheng, Y.; Van engen, D. Glycosylation of unreactive substrates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111 (17), 68816882,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00199a081
  45. 45
    Fraser-reid, B.; Wu, Z.; Andrews, C. W.; Skowronski, E.; Bowen, J. P. Torsional effects in glycoside reactivity: saccharide couplings mediated by acetal protecting groups. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113 (4), 14341435,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00004a066
  46. 46
    Andrews, C. W.; Rodebaugh, R.; Fraser-reid, B. A Solvation-Assisted Model for Estimating Anomeric Reactivity. Predicted versus Observed Trends in Hydrolysis of n-Pentenyl Glycosides1. Journal of Organic Chemistry 1996, 61 (16), 52805289,  DOI: 10.1021/jo9601223
  47. 47
    Jensen, H. H.; Nordstro̷m, L. U.; Bols, M. The Disarming Effect of the 4,6-Acetal Group on Glycoside Reactivity: Torsional or Electronic?. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126 (30), 92059213,  DOI: 10.1021/ja047578j
  48. 48
    Van zijl, P. C.; Yadav, N. N. Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST): what is in a name and what isn’t?. Magn Reson Med. 2011, 65 (4), 92748,  DOI: 10.1002/mrm.22761
  49. 49
    Lokesh, N.; Seegerer, A.; Hioe, J.; Gschwind, R. M. Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer in Chemical Reactions: A Mechanistic Tool for NMR Detection and Characterization of Transient Intermediates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140 (5), 18551862,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b12343
  50. 50
    Serianni, A. S.; Pierce, J.; Huang, S. G.; Barker, R. Anomerization of furanose sugars: kinetics of ring-opening reactions by proton and carbon-13 saturation-transfer NMR spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104 (15), 40374044,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00379a001
  51. 51
    Woods, M.; Woessner, D. E.; Sherry, A. D. Paramagnetic lanthanide complexes as PARACEST agents for medical imaging. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2006, 35 (6), 500511,  DOI: 10.1039/b509907m
  52. 52
    Walvoort, M. T. C.; Lodder, G.; Mazurek, J.; Overkleeft, H. S.; Codée, J. D. C.; Van der marel, G. A. Equatorial Anomeric Triflates from Mannuronic Acid Esters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131 (34), 1208012081,  DOI: 10.1021/ja905008p
  53. 53
    Bock, K.; Pedersen, C. A study of 13CH coupling constants in hexopyranoses. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1974, 3, 293297,  DOI: 10.1039/p29740000293
  54. 54
    Remmerswaal, W.; Elferink, H.; Houthuijs, K.; Hansen, T.; Ter braak, F.; Berden, G.; Van der vorm, S.; Martens, J.; Oomens, J.; Van der marel, G.; Boltje, T.; Codée, J. Anomeric Triflates vs Dioxanium ions: Different Product-Forming Intermediates from 1-Thiophenyl-2-O-Benzyl-3-O-Benzoyl-4, 6-O-Benzylidene-Mannose and Glucose. ChemRxiv 2023,  DOI: 10.26434/chemrxiv-2023-t45q6
  55. 55
    Crich, D.; Cai, W.; Dai, Z. Highly Diastereoselective α-Mannopyranosylation in the Absence of Participating Protecting Groups. Journal of Organic Chemistry 2000, 65 (5), 12911297,  DOI: 10.1021/jo9910482

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article is cited by 2 publications.

  1. Vanessa A. Jones, Gideon Q. Bennett, Jennifer R. Pierre-Louis, Clay S. Bennett. Development of a Cryogenic Flow Reactor to Optimize Glycosylation Reactions Based on the Active Donor Intermediate. Organic Process Research & Development 2024, 28 (7) , 2819-2826. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.4c00140
  2. Wouter A. Remmerswaal, Hidde Elferink, Kas J. Houthuijs, Thomas Hansen, Floor ter Braak, Giel Berden, Stefan van der Vorm, Jonathan Martens, Jos Oomens, Gijsbert A. van der Marel, Thomas J. Boltje, Jeroen D. C. Codée. Anomeric Triflates versus Dioxanium Ions: Different Product-Forming Intermediates from 3-Acyl Benzylidene Mannosyl and Glucosyl Donors. The Journal of Organic Chemistry 2024, 89 (3) , 1618-1625. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.3c02262
Open PDF

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Cite this: J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145, 48, 26190–26201
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.3c08709
Published November 26, 2023

Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0 .

Article Views

4317

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. (A) Glycosylation reaction intermediates and their characteristic resonances monitored by exchange NMR. (B) Glycosyl donors used in this study.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. (A) Working principle behind 19F EXSY NMR to monitor triflate dissociation. The α-glycosyl triflate is selectively excited and then observed over time to transform into free triflate. (B) Determination of the initial rate of triflate dissociation. (C) Summary of normalized triflate dissociation rates (s–1) across the studied glycoside series as a function of temperature.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. (A) SN1 and SN2-like triflate dissociation mechanisms. (B) Reaction order determination for triflate dissociation in the mannose series and (C) glucose series.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. (A) Mechanism of 13C CEST NMR to detect neighboring group participation. (B–E) CEST profiles for 13C-labeled C-3 acyl-protected mannosyl and glucosyl donors. (F) Characterization of the mannosyl dioxanium ion using HMBC and COSY.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. (A) Mechanism of 1H CEST NMR to detect β-glycosyl triflates. (B–I) 1H CEST profiles for 7αOTf14αOTf..

    Figure 6

    Figure 6. Characterization of β-glycosyl triflate 14 using HSQC without 13C decoupling in order to measure 1JC1–H1 and 3JH1–H2.

    Figure 7

    Figure 7. Spectroscopic summary of mannosyl intermediates.

    Figure 8

    Figure 8. Spectroscopic summary of glucosyl intermediates.

  • References


    This article references 55 other publications.

    1. 1
      Boltje, T. J.; Buskas, T.; Boons, G.-J. Opportunities and challenges in synthetic oligosaccharide and glycoconjugate research. Nature Chem. 2009, 1 (8), 611622,  DOI: 10.1038/nchem.399
    2. 2
      Lemieux, R. U. Some implications in carbohydrate chemistry of theories relating to the mechanisms of replacement reactions. Adv. Carbohydr. Chem. 1954, 9, 157,  DOI: 10.1016/S0096-5332(08)60371-9
    3. 3
      Frush, H. L.; Isbell, H. S. Sugar acetates, acetylglycosyl halides and orthoacetates in relation to the Walden inversion. Journal of research of the National Bureau of Standards 1941, 27, 413,  DOI: 10.6028/jres.027.028
    4. 4
      Hettikankanamalage, A. A.; Lassfolk, R.; Ekholm, F. S.; Leino, R.; Crich, D. Mechanisms of Stereodirecting Participation and Ester Migration from Near and Far in Glycosylation and Related Reactions. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120 (15), 71047151,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00243
    5. 5
      Crich, D.; Hu, T.; Cai, F. Does neighboring group participation by non-vicinal esters play a role in glycosylation reactions? Effective probes for the detection of bridging intermediates. Journal of organic chemistry 2008, 73 (22), 89428953,  DOI: 10.1021/jo801630m
    6. 6
      Baek, J. Y.; Lee, B.-Y.; Jo, M. G.; Kim, K. S. β-Directing Effect of Electron-Withdrawing Groups at O-3, O-4, and O-6 Positions and α-Directing Effect by Remote Participation of 3-O-Acyl and 6-O-Acetyl Groups of Donors in Mannopyranosylations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131 (48), 1770517713,  DOI: 10.1021/ja907252u
    7. 7
      Lei, J.-C.; Ruan, Y.-X.; Luo, S.; Yang, J.-S. Stereodirecting Effect of C3-Ester Groups on the Glycosylation Stereochemistry of L-Rhamnopyranose Thioglycoside Donors: Stereoselective Synthesis of α- and β-L-Rhamnopyranosides. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2019, 2019 (37), 63776382,  DOI: 10.1002/ejoc.201901186
    8. 8
      Demchenko, A. V.; Rousson, E.; Boons, G.-J. Stereoselective 1,2-cis-galactosylation assisted by remote neighboring group participation and solvent effects. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40 (36), 65236526,  DOI: 10.1016/S0040-4039(99)01203-4
    9. 9
      Baek, J. Y.; Kwon, H.-W.; Myung, S. J.; Park, J. J.; Kim, M. Y.; Rathwell, D. C. K.; Jeon, H. B.; Seeberger, P. H.; Kim, K. S. Directing effect by remote electron-withdrawing protecting groups at O-3 or O-4 position of donors in glucosylations and galactosylations. Tetrahedron 2015, 71 (33), 53155320,  DOI: 10.1016/j.tet.2015.06.014
    10. 10
      Ayala, L.; Lucero, C. G.; Romero, J. A.; Tabacco, S. A.; Woerpel, K. A. Stereochemistry of nucleophilic substitution reactions depending upon substituent: evidence for electrostatic stabilization of pseudoaxial conformers of oxocarbenium ions by heteroatom substituents. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125 (50), 155218,  DOI: 10.1021/ja037935a
    11. 11
      Ma, Y.; Lian, G.; Li, Y.; Yu, B. Identification of 3,6-di-O-acetyl-1,2,4-O-orthoacetyl-α-d-glucopyranose as a direct evidence for the 4-O-acyl group participation in glycosylation. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47 (26), 75157517,  DOI: 10.1039/c1cc11680k
    12. 12
      Komarova, B. S.; Orekhova, M. V.; Tsvetkov, Y. E.; Nifantiev, N. E. Is an acyl group at O-3 in glucosyl donors able to control α-stereoselectivity of glycosylation? The role of conformational mobility and the protecting group at O-6. Carbohydr. Res. 2014, 384, 7086,  DOI: 10.1016/j.carres.2013.11.016
    13. 13
      Dejter-juszynski, M.; Flowers, H. M. Studies on the koenigs-knorr reaction: Part IV: The effect of participating groups on the stereochemistry of disaccharide formation. Carbohydr. Res. 1973, 28 (1), 6174,  DOI: 10.1016/S0008-6215(00)82857-8
    14. 14
      Mcmillan, T. F.; Crich, D. Influence of 3-Thio Substituents on Benzylidene-Directed Mannosylation. Isolation of a Bridged Pyridinium Ion and Effects of 3-O-Picolyl and 3-S-Picolyl Esters. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2022, 2022 (20), e202200320  DOI: 10.1002/ejoc.202200320
    15. 15
      Elferink, H.; Remmerswaal, W. A.; Houthuijs, K. J.; Jansen, O.; Hansen, T.; Rijs, A. M.; Berden, G.; Martens, J.; Oomens, J.; Codée, J. D. C.; Boltje, T. J. Competing C-4 and C-5-Acyl Stabilization of Uronic Acid Glycosyl Cations. Chem. – Eur. J. 2022, 28 (63), e202201724  DOI: 10.1002/chem.202201724
    16. 16
      Remmerswaal, W. A.; Houthuijs, K. J.; Van de ven, R.; Elferink, H.; Hansen, T.; Berden, G.; Overkleeft, H. S.; Van der marel, G. A.; Rutjes, F. P. J. T.; Filippov, D. V.; Boltje, T. J.; Martens, J.; Oomens, J.; Codée, J. D. C. Stabilization of Glucosyl Dioxolenium Ions by “Dual Participation” of the 2,2-Dimethyl-2-(ortho-nitrophenyl)acetyl (DMNPA) Protection Group for 1,2-cis-Glucosylation. Journal of Organic Chemistry 2022, 87 (14), 91399147,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.2c00808
    17. 17
      De kleijne, F. F. J.; Elferink, H.; Moons, S. J.; White, P. B.; Boltje, T. J. Characterization of Mannosyl Dioxanium Ions in Solution Using Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer NMR Spectroscopy. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2022, 61 (6), e202109874  DOI: 10.1002/anie.202109874
    18. 18
      Hansen, T.; Elferink, H.; Van hengst, J. M. A.; Houthuijs, K. J.; Remmerswaal, W. A.; Kromm, A.; Berden, G.; Van der vorm, S.; Rijs, A. M.; Overkleeft, H. S.; Filippov, D. V.; Rutjes, F. P. J. T.; Van der marel, G. A.; Martens, J.; Oomens, J.; Codée, J. D. C.; Boltje, T. J. Characterization of glycosyl dioxolenium ions and their role in glycosylation reactions. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11 (1), 2664,  DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-16362-x
    19. 19
      Elferink, H.; Mensink, R. A.; Castelijns, W. W. A.; Jansen, O.; Bruekers, J. P. J.; Martens, J.; Oomens, J.; Rijs, A. M.; Boltje, T. J. The Glycosylation Mechanisms of 6,3-Uronic Acid Lactones. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2019, 58 (26), 87468751,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201902507
    20. 20
      Lemieux, R. U.; Hendriks, K. B.; Stick, R. V.; James, K. Halide ion catalyzed glycosidation reactions. Syntheses of.alpha.-linked disaccharides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97 (14), 40564062,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00847a032
    21. 21
      Lu, S.-R.; Lai, Y.-H.; Chen, J.-H.; Liu, C.-Y.; Mong, K.-K. T. Dimethylformamide: An Unusual Glycosylation Modulator. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50 (32), 73157320,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201100076
    22. 22
      Crich, D.; Sun, S. Are Glycosyl Triflates Intermediates in the Sulfoxide Glycosylation Method? A Chemical and 1H, 13C, and 19F NMR Spectroscopic Investigation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119 (46), 1121711223,  DOI: 10.1021/ja971239r
    23. 23
      Santana, A. G.; Montalvillo-jiménez, L.; Díaz-casado, L.; Corzana, F.; Merino, P.; Cañada, F. J.; Jiménez-osés, G.; Jiménez-barbero, J.; Gómez, A. M.; Asensio, J. L. Dissecting the Essential Role of Anomeric β-Triflates in Glycosylation Reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142 (28), 1250112514,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.0c05525
    24. 24
      Crich, D.; Chandrasekera, N. S. Mechanism of 4,6-O-Benzylidene-Directed β-Mannosylation as Determined by α-Deuterium Kinetic Isotope Effects. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43 (40), 53865389,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.200453688
    25. 25
      Hansen, T.; Lebedel, L.; Remmerswaal, W. A.; Van der vorm, S.; Wander, D. P. A.; Somers, M.; Overkleeft, H. S.; Filippov, D. V.; Désiré, J.; Mingot, A.; Bleriot, Y.; Van der marel, G. A.; Thibaudeau, S.; Codée, J. D. C. Defining the SN1 Side of Glycosylation Reactions: Stereoselectivity of Glycopyranosyl Cations. ACS Central Science 2019, 5 (5), 781788,  DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.9b00042
    26. 26
      Franconetti, A.; Ardá, A.; Asensio, J. L.; Blériot, Y.; Thibaudeau, S.; Jiménez-barbero, J. Glycosyl Oxocarbenium Ions: Structure, Conformation, Reactivity, and Interactions. Acc. Chem. Res. 2021, 54 (11), 25522564,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.accounts.1c00021
    27. 27
      Huang, M.; Retailleau, P.; Bohé, L.; Crich, D. Cation Clock Permits Distinction Between the Mechanisms of α- and β-O- and β-C-Glycosylation in the Mannopyranose Series: Evidence for the Existence of a Mannopyranosyl Oxocarbenium Ion. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134 (36), 1474614749,  DOI: 10.1021/ja307266n
    28. 28
      Chatterjee, S.; Moon, S.; Hentschel, F.; Gilmore, K.; Seeberger, P. H. An Empirical Understanding of the Glycosylation Reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140 (38), 1194211953,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.8b04525
    29. 29
      Satoh, H.; Hansen, H. S.; Manabe, S.; Van gunsteren, W. F.; Hünenberger, P. H. Theoretical Investigation of Solvent Effects on Glycosylation Reactions: Stereoselectivity Controlled by Preferential Conformations of the Intermediate Oxacarbenium-Counterion Complex. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2010, 6 (6), 17831797,  DOI: 10.1021/ct1001347
    30. 30
      Crich, D.; Cai, W. Chemistry of 4,6-O-Benzylidene-d-glycopyranosyl Triflates: Contrasting Behavior between the Gluco and Manno Series. Journal of Organic Chemistry 1999, 64 (13), 49264930,  DOI: 10.1021/jo990243d
    31. 31
      Van der vorm, S.; Hansen, T.; Van hengst, J. M. A.; Overkleeft, H. S.; Van der marel, G. A.; Codée, J. D. C. Acceptor reactivity in glycosylation reactions. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48 (17), 46884706,  DOI: 10.1039/C8CS00369F
    32. 32
      Andreana, P. R.; Crich, D. Guidelines for O-Glycoside Formation from First Principles. ACS Central Science 2021, 7 (9), 14541462,  DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.1c00594
    33. 33
      Crich, D. En route to the transformation of glycoscience: A chemist’s perspective on internal and external crossroads in glycochemistry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143 (1), 1734,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.0c11106
    34. 34
      Adero, P. O.; Amarasekara, H.; Wen, P.; Bohé, L.; Crich, D. The Experimental Evidence in Support of Glycosylation Mechanisms at the S(N)1-S(N)2 Interface. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118 (17), 82428284,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00083
    35. 35
      Frihed, T. G.; Bols, M.; Pedersen, C. M. Mechanisms of glycosylation reactions studied by low-temperature nuclear magnetic resonance. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115 (11), 49635013,  DOI: 10.1021/cr500434x
    36. 36
      Braak, F. t.; Elferink, H.; Houthuijs, K. J.; Oomens, J.; Martens, J.; Boltje, T. J. Characterization of Elusive Reaction Intermediates Using Infrared Ion Spectroscopy: Application to the Experimental Characterization of Glycosyl Cations. Acc. Chem. Res. 2022, 55, 16691679,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.accounts.2c00040
    37. 37
      Elferink, H.; Severijnen, M. E.; Martens, J.; Mensink, R. A.; Berden, G.; Oomens, J.; Rutjes, F. P. J. T.; Rijs, A. M.; Boltje, T. J. Direct Experimental Characterization of Glycosyl Cations by Infrared Ion Spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140 (19), 60346038,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.8b01236
    38. 38
      Mucha, E.; Marianski, M.; Xu, F.-F.; Thomas, D. A.; Meijer, G.; Von helden, G.; Seeberger, P. H.; Pagel, K. Unravelling the structure of glycosyl cations via cold-ion infrared spectroscopy. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9 (1), 4174,  DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-07184-z
    39. 39
      Martin, A.; Arda, A.; Désiré, J.; Martin-mingot, A.; Probst, N.; Sinaÿ, P.; Jiménez-barbero, J.; Thibaudeau, S.; Blériot, Y. Catching elusive glycosyl cations in a condensed phase with HF/SbF5 superacid. Nat. Chem. 2016, 8 (2), 18691,  DOI: 10.1038/nchem.2399
    40. 40
      Ben-tal, Y.; Boaler, P. J.; Dale, H. J. A.; Dooley, R. E.; Fohn, N. A.; Gao, Y.; García-domínguez, A.; Grant, K. M.; Hall, A. M. R.; Hayes, H. L. D.; Kucharski, M. M.; Wei, R.; Lloyd-jones, G. C. Mechanistic analysis by NMR spectroscopy: A users guide. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 2022, 129, 28106,  DOI: 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2022.01.001
    41. 41
      Crich, D. Mechanism of a chemical glycosylation reaction. Accounts of chemical research 2010, 43 (8), 11441153,  DOI: 10.1021/ar100035r
    42. 42
      D’angelo, K. A.; Taylor, M. S. Borinic Acid Catalyzed Stereo- and Regioselective Couplings of Glycosyl Methanesulfonates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138 (34), 1105811066,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.6b06943
    43. 43
      Aubry, S.; Sasaki, K.; Sharma, I.; Crich, D. Influence of protecting groups on the reactivity and selectivity of glycosylation: chemistry of the 4,6-o-benzylidene protected mannopyranosyl donors and related species. Top Curr. Chem. 2010, 301, 14188,  DOI: 10.1007/128_2010_102
    44. 44
      Kahne, D.; Walker, S.; Cheng, Y.; Van engen, D. Glycosylation of unreactive substrates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111 (17), 68816882,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00199a081
    45. 45
      Fraser-reid, B.; Wu, Z.; Andrews, C. W.; Skowronski, E.; Bowen, J. P. Torsional effects in glycoside reactivity: saccharide couplings mediated by acetal protecting groups. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113 (4), 14341435,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00004a066
    46. 46
      Andrews, C. W.; Rodebaugh, R.; Fraser-reid, B. A Solvation-Assisted Model for Estimating Anomeric Reactivity. Predicted versus Observed Trends in Hydrolysis of n-Pentenyl Glycosides1. Journal of Organic Chemistry 1996, 61 (16), 52805289,  DOI: 10.1021/jo9601223
    47. 47
      Jensen, H. H.; Nordstro̷m, L. U.; Bols, M. The Disarming Effect of the 4,6-Acetal Group on Glycoside Reactivity: Torsional or Electronic?. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126 (30), 92059213,  DOI: 10.1021/ja047578j
    48. 48
      Van zijl, P. C.; Yadav, N. N. Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST): what is in a name and what isn’t?. Magn Reson Med. 2011, 65 (4), 92748,  DOI: 10.1002/mrm.22761
    49. 49
      Lokesh, N.; Seegerer, A.; Hioe, J.; Gschwind, R. M. Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer in Chemical Reactions: A Mechanistic Tool for NMR Detection and Characterization of Transient Intermediates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140 (5), 18551862,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b12343
    50. 50
      Serianni, A. S.; Pierce, J.; Huang, S. G.; Barker, R. Anomerization of furanose sugars: kinetics of ring-opening reactions by proton and carbon-13 saturation-transfer NMR spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104 (15), 40374044,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00379a001
    51. 51
      Woods, M.; Woessner, D. E.; Sherry, A. D. Paramagnetic lanthanide complexes as PARACEST agents for medical imaging. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2006, 35 (6), 500511,  DOI: 10.1039/b509907m
    52. 52
      Walvoort, M. T. C.; Lodder, G.; Mazurek, J.; Overkleeft, H. S.; Codée, J. D. C.; Van der marel, G. A. Equatorial Anomeric Triflates from Mannuronic Acid Esters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131 (34), 1208012081,  DOI: 10.1021/ja905008p
    53. 53
      Bock, K.; Pedersen, C. A study of 13CH coupling constants in hexopyranoses. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1974, 3, 293297,  DOI: 10.1039/p29740000293
    54. 54
      Remmerswaal, W.; Elferink, H.; Houthuijs, K.; Hansen, T.; Ter braak, F.; Berden, G.; Van der vorm, S.; Martens, J.; Oomens, J.; Van der marel, G.; Boltje, T.; Codée, J. Anomeric Triflates vs Dioxanium ions: Different Product-Forming Intermediates from 1-Thiophenyl-2-O-Benzyl-3-O-Benzoyl-4, 6-O-Benzylidene-Mannose and Glucose. ChemRxiv 2023,  DOI: 10.26434/chemrxiv-2023-t45q6
    55. 55
      Crich, D.; Cai, W.; Dai, Z. Highly Diastereoselective α-Mannopyranosylation in the Absence of Participating Protecting Groups. Journal of Organic Chemistry 2000, 65 (5), 12911297,  DOI: 10.1021/jo9910482
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jacs.3c08709.

    • Synthetic procedures for the synthesis of donors 7-14, 1513C, 1613C, and the precursor for 14αOTf(13C-1). Theoretical and practical description of the EXSY and CEST experiments, VT-NMR procedures, and additional variable temperature NMR spectra and raw 19F EXSY, 13C CEST, and 1H CEST NMR data (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.