ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
My Activity
CONTENT TYPES

Figure 1Loading Img

Oxazines: A New Class of Second-Order Nonlinear Optical Switches

View Author Information
University of Namur, Laboratoire de Chimie Théorique, Unité de Chimie Physique Théorique et Structurale, rue de Bruxelles, 61, B-5000 Namur, Belgium
Université de Bordeaux, Institut des Sciences Moléculaires (ISM), UMR 5255 CNRS, Cours de la Libération 351, F-33405 Talence Cedex, France
§ Laboratory for Molecular Photonics, Department of Chemistry, University of Miami, 1301 Memorial Drive, Coral Gables, Florida 33146-0431, United States
Cite this: J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 15, 5052–5062
Publication Date (Web):March 20, 2016
https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5b13243

Copyright © 2016 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

  • Open Access

Article Views

5089

Altmetric

-

Citations

LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
PDF (1 MB)
Supporting Info (1)»

Abstract

A combined experimental–theoretical investigation has revealed that oxazine-based compounds are multiaddressable, multistate, and multifunctional molecular switches exhibiting contrasts of both linear and second-order nonlinear optical properties. The switching properties are particularly large when the substituent is a donor group. In this study, the cleavage of the C–O bond at the junction of the indole and oxazine cycles (of the closed a forms) is acido-triggered, leading to an open form (b+) characterized by larger first hyperpolarizabilities (βHRS) and smaller excitation energies than in the closed form. These results are confirmed and interpreted utilizing ab initio calculations that have been carried out on a broad set of compounds to unravel the role of the substituent. With respect to acceptor groups, oxazines bearing donor groups are characterized not only by larger βHRS and βHRS contrast ratios but also by smaller excitation energies, larger opening-induced charge transfer, and reduction of the bond length alternation, as well as smaller Gibbs energies of the opening reaction. Compared to protonated open forms (b+), calculations on the zwitterionic open forms (b) have pointed out similarities in the long-wavelength UV/vis absorption spectra, whereas their βHRS values might differ strongly as a function of the substituent. Indeed, the open forms present two NLOphores, the indoleninium-substituent entity and the nitrophenol (present in the protonated open form, b+) or nitrophenolate (present in the zwitterionic open form, b) moiety. Then, nitrophenolate displays a larger first hyperpolarizability than nitrophenol and the β tensor of the two entities might reinforce or cancel each other.

1 Introduction

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Several families of molecules can exhibit structural changes in response to external stimuli. Such dynamical systems offer advantages because selected properties can reversibly be turned “on” and “off”, with ensuing exploitations in devices such as sensors, actuators, or memories as well as in imaging. (1) The switching events can be triggered in many ways, including by irradiation at specific frequencies as well as by changing the pH, the temperature, or the redox potential. When these produce a spectral change, typically, but not necessarily, of visible color, these compounds are referred to as photochromes, acidochromes or halochromes, thermochromes, and electrochromes, respectively. Besides modifications of the linear optical properties (absorption and emission of light), of the reactivity, or of the complexation behavior, the stimuli can also trigger a variation of the nonlinear optical (NLO) properties such as second-harmonic generation (SHG), two-photon absorption (TPA), and third-harmonic generation (THG). (2) These compounds are known as NLO switches, opening the way toward multiaddressable, multistate, and multifunctional compounds. Still, a majority of them show a contrast of the first hyperpolarizability (β), the molecular property at the origin of SHG, rather than of higher-order responses. (3) To achieve large contrasts, one or several forms has to present a large NLO response. Molecules exhibiting large β are generally built from donor−π–acceptor (D−π–A) moieties, organized in noncentrosymmetric patterns. Linear NLOphores contain a unique D−π–A moiety, Λ-shape NLOphores contain two D−π–A units, sharing the same A or D group, and octupolar NLOphores contain three or four units, giving rise to C3h- or Td-like structures. Many studies have addressed the interplay between the D/A strength, the nature and length of the π-conjugated linker, and the first as well as second hyperpolarizabilities. (4) Based on these structure–property relationships, efficient NLO switching mechanisms consist, upon starting from a large-β form, in reducing the acceptor character of A, in reducing the donor character of D, or in breaking the π-conjugation between the D and A, any of these leading to a strong reduction of β. So far, many D−π–A compounds have been shown to exhibit β contrasts, including azobenzenes, (5) diarylethenes, (6) nitrobenzylpyridines, (7)N-salicylidene-aniline, (8) organometallic complexes with Ru, Fe, Zn, and Pt transition metal atoms, (9) azafulleroids, (10) benzazolooxazolidines, (11) dithiazolylethenes, (12) spiropyrans, (13) dihydroazulene-vinylheptafulvene, (14) dicyanoimidazole, (15) styrilpyridines, (16) flavylium, (17) and quinolinium (18) ions as well as fluorescent proteins. (19) Among them, indolinooxazolidine (11) and spiropyran (13) derivatives were demonstrated to behave as highly efficient NLO switches, exhibiting large contrasts of first hyperpolarizability, and two of their representatives are used as reference compounds in this study (Scheme 1).

Scheme 1

Scheme 1. Reference Indolinooxazolidine (1a) and Spiropyran (2a) NLO Switches Together with the Equilibria with Their Open Forms, As Triggered by Acid/Base Addition (1b+/2b+) or by Irradiation (1b/2b)
In this paper, the NLO switching performances of [1,3]-benzoxazine derivatives are revealed by means of a joint experimental–theoretical investigation. Several of these molecules, which fuse 2H,3H-indole and 2H,4H-benzo[1,3]oxazine heterocycles, have recently been synthesized by one of the authors and his collaborators (20) as well as by Zhu et al. (21) Based on their structural similarity with indolinooxazolidine and their switching optical properties, these compounds are expected to exhibit significant β contrasts. However, their structural differences with the later systems call for a detailed investigation of their NLO switching properties. Indeed, it was already observed that oxazines can undergo three types of opening mechanism by cleavage of the C–O bond at the junction of the two heterocycles: photochemical, redox, (21) or induced by acidic addition. (20) This opening leads to the formation of a phenolate (photochemical and redox) or a phenol (pH) chromophoric moiety while it allows for π-conjugation between the R1 substituent and the indoleninium unit (Scheme 2). Both b and b+ open forms exhibit considerable changes in their UV/vis absorption spectra compared to their associated closed form. The opening mechanisms have already been the subject of theoretical and experimental investigations. (22)
Based on refs 2021, 10 oxazine derivatives were selected, with R1 substituents covering a broad range of D/A character (Scheme 2). Note that three of these have not been synthesized so far (7, 9, and 10) while they constitute alternative substitution patterns. In a first step, together with the two reference compounds, the structural, electronic, thermodynamic, linear, and nonlinear optical properties of these oxazines were determined by employing quantum chemistry methods. The simulations allowed establishing structure–property relationships and design guidelines to enhance the β contrasts of this new family of NLO switches. From these, four compounds have been selected because they are representatives of oxazines having large (11 and 12) or intermediate (3 and 4) βHRS responses in their open forms and because their βHRS contrast ratios are clearly distinct from one. These compounds were then subjected to experimental characterizations of their nonlinear optical properties by means of hyper-Rayleigh scattering (HRS) (23) measurements as well as of their UV/vis absorption spectra while further interpretations were carried out using ab initio calculations. Only the closed and protonated open forms were experimentally characterized, since the photogenerated species have too short lifetimes (μs). The paper is organized as follows. After describing the essentials of the experimental and quantum chemistry methods, we start by presenting the experimental results on the four selected compounds (34 and 1112) and by interpreting these utilizing theoretical results. Then, the detailed theoretical investigations on the complete set of compounds are reported and discussed in terms of structure–property relationships, before conclusions are drawn.

Scheme 2

Scheme 2. Oxazines (312) in Their Closed (a), Zwitterionic Open (b), and Protonated Open (b+) Forms

2 Methods

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

2.1 Synthesis and Preparation of the Solutions

Details about the synthesis of compounds 34 and 1112 can be found in ref 20c. HRS measurements were performed with diluted solutions in chloroform with chromophore concentrations ranging from 10–3 to 10–4 M for 3a, 4a, and 12a, from 5 × 10–4 to 5 × 10–5 M for 11a, and from 10–4 to 10–5 for 3b+, 4b+, 11b+, and 12b+. All solutions were centrifuged during 20 min to prevent spurious scattering from particles.

2.2 Linear and Nonlinear Optical Property Characterizations

Following the methodology of Raymo et al., (20) the closed forms were stabilized using small quantities of triethylamine (Et3N) while the protonated open form was obtained by adding trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) in small excess (indeed, vapors of TFA failed to trigger the closed form). Note that the pKa of the substituents of 11 and 12 are below the one of TFA (0.52), so they undergo no protonation during the opening process, as would have been evidenced, for 12, by the appearance of a new band at ca. 430 nm. UV/vis absorption spectra were recorded on a PerkinElmer Lambda 650 spectrophotometer in chloroform.
The experimental procedure to gain the HRS quantities has been previously reported by Rodriguez and co-workers, (24) performed on diluted solutions with an incident radiation of 1064 nm. The HRS signal originates from individual scatterers without any phase relations between each other in solution. This signal, I, is therefore related to the individual molecular first hyperpolarizability and can be expressed, for incoherent and uncorrelated scatterers, as(1)where Iω is the incident intensity, ⟨βHRS2⟩ is the orientational average of the first hyperpolarizability tensor over all possible molecular orientations, G is a constant containing the parameters of the experimental setup, C is the concentration of the solution, and fL is a local field correction approximated using the high-frequency Lorentz–Lorenz spherical cavity expression (with refractive index of the liquid for both optical frequencies ω and 2ω). In the setup, a 90° angle is fixed between the directions of propagation of the incident and of the scattered SHG beams. The fundamental light beam is propagating in the Y-direction and analyzed in the X-direction (note that X, Y, and Z stand for the laboratory coordinates system, while the molecular coordinates are written as x, y, and z). Assuming these conditions, the impact of the incident light polarization on the intensity of the Z-polarized (vertical) scattered beam was derived by Bersohn et al.: (25)(2)where Ψ and δ characterize the state of polarization of a general elliptically polarized incident light. The experimental setup contains a quarter-wave plate (λ/4, which converts linearly polarized light into left/right elliptical, circular polarized light) after a rotatable half-wave plate (λ/2, which rotates the plane of linear polarization), providing a phase retardation of δ = π/2 and allowing the change of polarization from vertical (V, parallel to Z, Ψ = π/2) to horizontal (H, parallel to X, Ψ = 0) via left and right circular polarization (±π/4) and elliptic polarization (although all values of Ψ can be obtained). The relationships between the orientationnal averages (in the laboratory frame) and the molecular tensor components (in the molecular frame) read as follows:(3)(4)Note that these expressions are simplified if Kleinman’s conditions are used. Since for nonpolarized/natural incident light both H and V polarizations have equal weights, the orientational average is the sum of the two previous equations, determining therefore the full HRS response, as(5)The associated depolarization ratio (DR), which gives information on the geometry of the NLOphore, i.e. the part of the molecule responsible for the NLO response, reads as follows:(6)β is also typically decomposed into the sum of dipolar (J = 1) and octupolar (J = 3) tensorial components. Assuming Kleinman’s conditions,(7)(8)The nonlinear anisotropy parameter ρ = |βJ=3|/|βJ=1| compares the relative contributions of the octupolar and dipolar components to the first hyperpolarizability tensor β while it is linked to the depolarization ratio:(9)Finally, using these expressions, βHRS can be rewritten under the following form:(10)For a solution of two components (solute and solvent) where both give rise to a β response, I originates from both and is given by(11)where the subscripts S and X stand for the solvent and the chromophore, respectively. εX accounts for the one-photon absorption of the chromophore at the second harmonic frequency, d is the optical path of the scattered harmonic light, and CΨV is the orientational average of the spherical components of the molecular first hyperpolarizability, given by(12)In the current procedure, the determination of βHRS goes through the evaluation of |βJ=1| and ρ for each compound. |βJ=1|2CVVX is then obtained via eq 11 by varying the incident intensity Iω for different concentrations, with vertical (V) incident polarization (Ψ = π/2). Following ref 24a, the values for chloroform, used as solvent and internal reference, are |βJ=1|S = 25.3 au and ρS = 1.836 at 1064 nm, giving thus CVVS = 0.393. Taking CS = 12.47 mol L–1, it gives CSJ=1|S2CVVS = 3140 mol L–1 (a.u.)2. Then, the anisotropy factor of the chromophore, ρX, is evaluated by polarization scan of the scattered light with a constant incident power for both the solvent and the chromophore solution at a given concentration. This allows determining CVVX and then |βJ=1|X. Finally, βHRS and DR are evaluated using eqs 10 and 9, respectively.
HRS measurements were performed with diluted solutions (ranging from 10–3 M to 5 × 10–5 M) in chloroform. The incident radiation at 1064 nm is obtained from a Nd:YVO4 laser that produces trains of about 65 ps, ≤ 50 μJ pulses at a repetition rate of 2 kHz (PL2200 Laser, EKSPLA). The polarized incident laser beam is focused into the sample cell with a 5X Mitutoyo Plan APO NIR objective (infinity-corrected with NA = 0.14) and positioned to pass at a distance of ∼1–2 mm from the inside of the cell wall facing the collecting lens. The incident laser beam waist has a diameter of approximately 10 μm with a Rayleigh range of about 200 μm. The scattered light at the double frequency (532 nm) is collected at 90° with f/1.2 optics and focused into a modified Horiba spectrograph, with vertical (V) polarization selection. The entrance slits of the spectrograph are closed to fit the full beam waist image. The spectrally dispersed light (using an 1800 grooves per mm grating), detected by a nitrogen-cooled CCD camera (2048 × 512 pixels) in a continuous acquisition mode, is collected around the 532 nm harmonic light scattering and covered a spectral range of about 1800 cm–1 with a spectral slit width of about 15 cm–1. The spatial resolution is estimated using the CCD image mode, and in any case, the HRS signal is confined to dimensions less than the Rayleigh range so that no correction for the effect of a finite collection angle is required. Typical acquisition times to achieve good signal-to-noise spectra are 3 × 20 s. The hyper-Rayleigh intensity is obtained by integrating the signal from −200 to +200 cm–1 after eliminating the background, which was extrapolated by a linear law obtained by excluding this spectral range. (17)
Since the measurements are performed at 1064 nm, the βHRS responses of some chromophores are impacted by electronic resonance, which prevents comparisons between equivalent compounds. Therefore, the 1064 nm values have been extrapolated to 1907 nm by using the homogeneously damped two-level model, (26) which is an approximation to the sum-over-states expression of β. (27) This method accounts for the relative position of the incident and SHG photon energies with respect to the position of the UV/vis absorption band maximum as well as for the width of the absorption band.

2.3 Quantum Chemical Calculations

All geometry optimizations were carried out at the density functional theory (DFT) level using the M06 exchange correlation (XC) functional (28) and the 6-311G(d) basis set. This XC functional contains 27% of Hartree–Fock exchange. For all compounds and forms, a search for the most stable geometries was carried out by sampling the conformational space. This was achieved by considering several starting geometries, differing mostly by the values of the torsion angles around the single bonds. A detailed conformational investigation was carried out for 3b+ to confirm that the most stable conformer is sufficient to provide an accurate estimate of β of a given compound/form. In that case, 9 minima were located on the potential energy surface within an energy range of 50 kJ/mol and their βHRS responses were calculated at the IEF-PCM(chloroform)/TDHF/6-311+G(d) level (vide infra). Using the Maxwell–Boltzmann expression, the average value amounts to 3373 au, which only differs by 0.3% from the value of the most stable conformer, which substantiates the use of the “one conformer” approach. For all compounds and forms the optimized structures are characterized by 3N-6 real vibrational frequencies (with N as the number of atoms). The latter were subsequently used in a thermochemistry analysis (T = 298.15 K, P = 1 atm), where the standard enthalpy (H0), entropy (S0), and Gibbs free energy (G0) are calculated in order to characterize the cleavage reactions.
Excitation energies (ΔE = hυ = hc/λ) and corresponding oscillator strengths (f) of the dominant low-energy electronic transitions were calculated at the time-dependent DFT (TDDFT) level with the M06-2X (28) XC functional together with the 6-311+G(d) basis set. The M06-2X XC functional has been selected owing to its good performance for calculating the excitation energies of the closed and open forms of oxazine, of which the excitations present small- and medium-range charge transfer character, (29) in agreement with recent investigations on NLOphores (4f) whereas M06 is a general-purpose XC functional for geometry optimization. (28)
The first hyperpolarizabilities were evaluated at several levels of approximation, i.e. with the time-dependent Hartree–Fock (TDHF) method (30) to gain the dynamic responses, with the coupled-perturbed Hartree–Fock (CPHF) scheme to obtain their static equivalents, and with the second-order Møller–Plesset perturbation theory (MP2) approach to account for electron correlation effects. Several investigations on push–pull π-conjugated systems have indeed shown that the largest part of electron correlation effects is included at the MP2 level. (31) The MP2 values were calculated using the finite field (FF) procedure (32) implying a Romberg scheme to improve the accuracy on the numerical derivatives. (33) This is now performed by following an automatic procedure described in ref 33b. The numerical accuracy on these third-order derivatives of the energy (the opposite of which gives the β tensor components) attains typically 0.5 au or better, compared to analytical calculations performed at the same level of approximation. To account for frequency dispersion and electron correlation simultaneously, the multiplicative scheme was applied. (33b, 34) It consists of multiplying the static FF/MP2 values by the ratio between the TDHF and CPHF responses:(13)All reported β values are given in au [1 au of β = 3.6213 × 10–42 m4 V–1 = 3.2064 × 10–53 C3 m3 J–2 = 8.639 × 10–33 esu] within the T convention. (35)
Solvent effects were consistently included in all the calculations (geometry optimizations, thermochemistry, linear and nonlinear optical property calculations) using the polarizable continuum model within the integral equation formalism (IEF-PCM). (36) In this model, the solute is placed in a cavity defined by interlocking spheres centered on the nuclei with atomic van der Waals radii from the Universal Force Field, this cavity being in a structureless continuum, characterized by a dielectric constant, ε. The solute–solvent interactions are described by surface charges located on the outer surface of the cavity, adjusted iteratively according the electron density of the solute. Two solvents were used, following those employed in the experimental characterizations, i.e. (i) chloroform, employed in the measurements reported here (ε0 = 4.711 and ε = 2.091), and (ii) acetonitrile (ε0 = 35.688 and ε = 1.807) employed in ref 20 for the photochemical studies. Both static (ε0) and infinite-frequency (ε) dielectric values are necessary to determine the dynamic dielectric constant at any frequency (εω), using the relationship εω = ε + (ε0 – ε)/(1 – iωτD), where τD = 0.85 × 10–11 s is a characteristic time associated with the solvent reorganization. All the calculations were performed using the Gaussian09 package. (37)

3 Results and Discussion

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

3.1 Experimental and Theoretical Studies of Compounds 34 and 1112

The UV/vis absorption spectra were recorded in chloroform solutions for the closed and protonated open forms of compounds 3, 4, 11, and 12. They are presented in Figure S1 while the maximum absorption wavelengths (λmax) of the lowest-energy transitions are listed in Table 1 together with the vertical transition wavelengths (λvert) and associated oscillator strengths (f) calculated at the IEP-PCM(chloroform)/TDDFT/M06-2X/6-311+G(d) level of approximation. Both experiment and calculations display the same trends: (i) opening the oxazine leads to a large reduction of the excitation energy, from 0.96 eV for 4 to 2.02 eV for 12; (ii) the ordering of the absorption wavelengths changes between the closed (12a < 3a < 4a < 11a) and open (4b+ < 3b+ < 12b+ < 11b+) form, evidencing the effects of the increase of the π-conjugated path upon C–O cleavage (vide infra).
Table 1. UV/vis Absorption Spectra of Closed and Protonated Open Forms of 3, 4, 11, and 12: Experimental Maximum Absorption Wavelengths (nm), Energies (eV), and Extinction Coefficients (103 M–1 cm–1) As Well As Vertical Transition Wavelengths (nm), Energies (eV), and Associated Oscillator Strengths Calculated at the TDDFT/M06-2X Level
 expt λmax, ΔEmax (ε)calcd λvert, ΔEvert (f)
3a292, 4.25 (7.8)273, 4.54 (0.680)
3b+446, 2.78 (23.4)418, 2.96 (1.064)
   
4a318, 3.90 (11.6)280, 4.42 (0.480)
4b+421, 2.94 (26.0)393, 3.15 (1.000)
   
11a408, 3.04 (11.5)359, 3.46 (1.317)
11b+610, 2.03 (21.5)493, 2.52 (1.990)
   
12a289, 4.29 (21.6)266, 4.66 (0.990)
12b+545, 2.27 (31.2)456, 2.72 (1.453)
The calculated vertical excitation energies (wavelengths) are systematically larger (smaller) than the experimental maximum absorption values, but the experimental changes between compounds are well reproduced by the calculations carried out at the TDDFT/M06-2X level. So, the slope of the TDDFT versus experimental least-squares linear regression relationship is close to 1 as well as the R2 correlation coefficient (Table S1). In addition to the low-energy peak (450–610 nm), the protonated open forms also present a second and less-intense absorption that peaks near 320 nm. It is attributed to the electronic excitation of the nitrophenol moiety. This spectral feature is also reproduced by the TDDFT calculations.
The βHRS and DR were determined for both forms in chloroform (Table 2), leading to contrast ratios ranging from 2.2 to 28. The corresponding power scans and polarization scans are given in Figures S2–S5. As expected, the acido-triggered oxazine opening gives rise to a π-conjugated segment linking the indoleninium acceptor group with moieties exhibiting various donor characters, inducing a large increase of the first hyperpolarizability. All DRs are close to 5, the typical value of one-dimensional push–pull π-conjugated systems, and this is even more obvious in the case of open forms. Nevertheless, the discussion on the relative βHRS and contrast amplitudes is not straightforward because it is impacted by resonance, in particular in the case of compound 12b+ that presents a maximum absorption at 545 nm whereas the 532 nm SHG wavelength is within the absorption band. Note that for 11a there are possible perturbations from additional forms that hamper a good evaluation of the response of that closed form (see polarization scan, Figure S4). As a consequence, the amplitude of the βHRS response reported in Table 2 is likely underestimated, while the DR value is likely overestimated. Solvent effects (chloroform) or impurities on the coumarin part are probably at the origin of these perturbations, as indicated by variations of ρ as a function of concentration (not shown). To allow more reliable comparisons between the intrinsic NLO properties of the compounds, the βHRS values measured at 1064 nm were extrapolated to 1907 nm, i.e. far from resonance, by using the homogeneously damped two-level model (vide supra). Since the absorption bandwidth changes from one compound/form to another, the damping factor (Γ) was determined by least-squares fitting a Gaussian function to the absorption band. The Γ values are listed in Table S2, together with the frequency dispersion factors F defined as F = βHRS (1064)/βHRS (1907). Γ is systematically larger for the compounds with a thiophene moiety and decreases upon C–O cleavage. Combining these relative values with the excitation energies gives dispersion factors of ∼1.35 for 3a, 4a, and 12a and of ∼2.0 for 11a, 3b+, 4b+, and 11b+, whereas F gets larger for 12b+ (3.05). This reflects on the βHRS(open)/βHRS(closed) contrasts at 1907 nm, which become smaller for compounds 3, 4, and 12 but remain unchanged for compound 11. Still, the contrasts are clearly sufficient to evidence the acido-triggered switching (Table 3).
Table 2. βHRS (au) and DR of Closed and Protonated-Open Forms of Compounds 34 and 1112 As Determined Experimentally in Chloroform (λ = 1064 nm) As Well As Their βHRS(open)/βHRS(closed) Ratios
 closed (a)open (b+) 
 βHRSDRβHRSDRopen/closed βHRS ratio
319104.3348204.762.45
420505.1244805.172.18
1152106.7552 8204.9410.1
1219704.0654 5305.0327.7
Ab initio calculations of βHRS were used to rationalize these data. In these calculations, electron correlation was included at the MP2 level, frequency dispersion was approximated using the multiplicative scheme (eq 13), and solvent (chloroform) effects were accounted for within IEF-PCM (vide supra). The intermediate quantities to evaluate βHRSMP2 (1907) are listed in Table S3, substantiating once again that electron correlation effects as determined at the MP2 level typically account for an increase of βHRS by a factor of 2 or more compared to uncorrelated HF calculations. The final ab initio values as well as the contrast ratios are given in Table 3 with the experimental values, while the close relationship between experiment and calculations is highlighted in Figure 1. The main observations are as follows: (i) the open forms have larger βHRS values than the closed forms; (ii) compounds 11 and 12 have larger βHRS values—and βHRS contrasts—especially in their open forms than compounds 3 and 4; (iii) compound 11b+ possesses the largest βHRS response but the largest contrast ratio is associated with compound 12. Besides, there are some differences between the two sets of results. In particular, the calculated βHRS responses are noticeably larger than the measured ones for 11a, 3b+, and 4b+. This might originate from the approximations used in the calculations, in particular the description of frequency dispersion, as well as in the treatment of the experimental data when extrapolating the βHRS response from 1064 to 1907 nm. For 11a, as mentioned above, it is also possible that the measured βHRS is underestimated.
Table 3. Experiment (Extrapolated) versus Theoretical βHRS of the Closed and Protonated-Open Forms of Compounds 34 and 1112 As Well As Their βHRS(b+)/βHRS(a) Ratiosa
 ExperimentCalculations
 Closed (a)Open (b+)βHRS(b+)/βHRS(a)Closed (a)Open (b+)βHRS(b+)/βHRS(a)
3141023301.65130847343.62
4152022401.47128339393.07
11260026 40010.1641631 5884.92
12146017 88012.2209217 2578.25
a

All values correspond to a 1907 nm wavelength, far from resonance, which enables estimation of the intrinsic molecular responses and comparison of calculations with experiments.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Experimental versus ab initio βHRS values (λ = 1907 nm).

3.2 Theoretical Study of Oxazines 312 in Comparison to Reference Systems 12

The geometries of the closed and (zwitterionic and protonated) open forms of 112 in their electronic ground state were optimized at the M06/6-311G(d) level of approximation with the IEF-PCM approach (solvent = chloroform). For oxazines, when the R1 substituent contains a vinylene linker, the bond length alternation [BLA = (d1 – 2d2 + d3)/2) along this latter was evaluated (Table 4), highlighting the relationship with the D/A nature of the terminal group R1′. Indeed, in the open form, the double bond is in resonance with the indoleninium function, which leads to a substantial reduction of BLA from 0.14 ± 0.01 Å to 0.05 ± 0.03 Å. In particular, owing to the acceptor character of the indoleninium, the smallest BLA values are obtained when R1′ is a donor group (compounds 5 and 8 as well as 11 and 12) whereas the largest are obtained with acceptor groups (compounds 9 and 10). We also note that the BLA values of the protonated b+ forms are overall smaller than those of the phototriggered open forms, which is attributed to stronger electrostatic effects in the zwitterionic forms.
For both opening reactions, the Gibbs energies (T = 298.15 K, P = 1 atm) were evaluated at the IEF-PCM(chloroform)/M06/6-311G(d) level of approximation (Table 5). These reactions are endergonic, and ΔG0 is smaller for small donor substituents (5, 8) than for acceptor ones (9, 10) or large donor ones (11, 12). The largest ΔG0 values are obtained for the smallest substituents, without a vinylic linker (6, 7).
Table 4. M06/6-311G(d) Optimized BLA = (d1 – 2d2 + d3)/2 (Å) for Compounds 35 and 812 As Obtained from Geometry Optimizations within IEFPCM (Solvent = Chloroform)
 34589101112
closed (a)0.1360.1400.1420.1390.1460.1450.1360.143
open (b)0.0520.0630.0480.0400.0850.0810.0530.055
open (b+)0.0440.0610.0300.0250.0830.0750.0340.042
Table 5. M06/6-311G(d) ΔG0 of the Opening Reactions (kJ mol–1) and ΔS0 (J mol–1 K–1) in Parenthesesa
 a ⇌ ba + CF3COOH b+ + CF3COO
1152.5 (11.5)63.8 (13.9)
232.9 (46.9)106.8 (11.0)
338.0 (18.0)126.4 (14.4)
426.9 (31.6)104.5 (19.8)
522.0 (23.7)97.5 (30.1)
660.1 (42.8)125.2 (35.0)
776.7 (25.3)150.3 (10.3)
813.1 (16.5)89.7 (24.5)
941.6 (24.6)123.4 (23.6)
1044.2 (12.1)137.2 (13.2)
1144.4 (19.0)98.8 (18.4)
1237.0 (25.3)83.4 (23.3)
a

Solvent (chloroform) effects were accounted for using the IEF-PCM model.

The Mulliken, Hirshfeld, and Natural Population charge analyses, carried out by considering six molecular moieties (S1–S5 and R1) (Figure 2, Table S4, and Figure S6a–c), describe consistently the redistribution of the charge upon opening. For the closed forms, the nitrophenol moiety (S5) is electron-rich, which is attributed to the nitro acceptor group. The nitrogen (S3) is strongly negative, owing to its large electronegativity. In contrast, the benzene ring (S1), the carbon bearing the substituent (S4), and the substituent (R1) are positively charged. The phototriggered opening leads mainly to electron transfer from the benzene ring (S1), the C═N group (S3 + S4), and the substituent (R1) to the nitrophenol (S5). This results from the fact that opening the oxazine involves the formation of a phenolate and the appearance of a polar C═N+ group π-conjugated with R1. The S2 group plays the role of spectator and is almost unaffected by the ring opening. Specific behaviors are observed (i) for compounds 6 and 7, for which S3 becomes slightly less negative, and (ii) for compounds 5, 8, 11, and 12, of which the donor R1 moiety gets more positive, whereas (iii) the charge on the acceptor group R1 of compounds 9 and 10 hardly changes. Besides S5 bearing the proton, similar charge variations are observed upon acido-triggered opening. Indeed, from comparison of forms b and b+ (Figure S6), about 90% of the proton charge is located on the nitrophenol moiety whereas the remainder of the excess charge goes to R1 (with the exception of compounds 6 and 7, where there is no π-conjugation between R1 and the rest of the molecule).

Figure 2

Figure 2. Spatial distribution on the S1–S5 and R1 molecular moieties of the variations of the Mulliken charges when opening the oxazine, as determined at the IEF-PCM/M06/6-311G(d) level (in chloroform). (Top) Phototriggered opening, Δq = q(b) – q(a); (Bottom) acido-triggered opening, Δq = q(b+) – q(a).

The TDDFT/M06-2X vertical excitation energies of the dominant low-energy dipole-allowed excited state of compounds 112 are listed in Table 6, together with their oscillator strengths and the main character of the excitations. The corresponding simulated spectra as well as additional data are provided in the Supporting Information (Figure S7.1–S7.12). With the exception of compounds 5, 8, 10, and 11 where they are localized on the R1 substituent, the electronic excitations of the closed forms are localized on the nitro-phenol moiety and therefore the excitation energies are very similar. For the former, the excitation energies decrease in parallel with the donor character of R1. In agreement with the results presented in the previous section, the excitation energy decreases upon opening. With the exception of compounds 6 and 7, for a given R1, the dominant low-energy band of the zwitterionic-open and protonated-open forms has a similar position. This is attributed to the same character of the excitations, which are delocalized over the indoleninium ring and the R1 substituent. Nevertheless, the first band of the b+ forms is slightly red-shifted with respect to that of the b forms, consistently with the larger electron conjugation along the vinylene linker, as indicated by the BLA values reported in Table 4. The ordering of the ΔE values for the forms b is 511 < 8 < 12 < 3 < 4 < 109 < 67 whereas for forms b+ it is 115 < 8 < 12 < 3 < 4 < 10 < 9 < 6 < 7. The smallest ΔE and largest f values are obtained for donor R1 substituents and are similar to those of 1 and 2. In the presence of acceptor groups, the excitation energies are larger and the oscillator strengths smaller. Compounds 3 and 4 exhibit intermediate ΔE values between those of compounds with substituents having donor and acceptor character. Finally, when R1 = H or Ph, the excitation energies are even larger while the oscillator strengths do not change much with respect to the closed form. This is attributed to the lack of delocalization of the excitation. The simulated spectra (Figure S7.1–S7.12) also display the signatures of the nitro-phenol and nitro-phenolate groups with characteristic excitations close to 260 and 340 nm, respectively.
Static and dynamic HRS first hyperpolarizabilities and depolarization ratios are listed in Table 7 for the closed and open forms of 112 together with their βHRS contrasts for the two types of opening. Additional data are given in the Supporting Information (Tables S5 and S6). With the exception of 11a where R1 contains acceptor and donor chemical functions, the TDHF βHRS of the closed forms are smaller than 2000 au, and even smaller than 1000 au for 3a and 4a (thiophene substituent) and for 6a and 7a (in which the R1 substituent has no donor or acceptor character). The oxazine βHRS responses are similar to those of the reference compounds (1a and 2a). For most compounds the octupolar component of β is larger than the dipolar part (DR < 4.26 or ρ > 1).
Phototriggered opening of the oxazine leads to an increase of βHRS that goes from 40% (9) to 1050% (5). This broad range of βHRS(b)/βHRS(a) contrasts originates from the nature of the substituent. So, donor substituents in 5 and 8 lead to large βHRS responses and therefore to large βHRS(b)/βHRS(a) contrasts, which go together with a strong reduction of the BLA, a larger opening-induced charge transfer, and a smaller excitation energy. On the other hand, the contrast ratios are much smaller when R1 is an acceptor group (9 and 10) or a small substituent (6, 7). Compounds 3 and 4 with thiophene rings present intermediate enhancement ratios. Opening the oxazine to gain the b+ forms is also associated with a substantial increase of βHRS with respect to the closed form when R1 is a donor group. The situation is more contrasted for the other compounds. For compounds 6, 7, and 9, βHRS decreases whereas it increases slightly for compound 10. In the case of the thiophene-containing compounds, βHRS increases but less than in the case of the phototriggered open forms. Note that reference compounds 1 and 2 also display a substantial βHRS increase upon forming the open zwitterionic forms, but in the case of its protonated form, the βHRS(b+)/βHRS(a) contrast ratio for 2 is much smaller. This is attributed to a large change of geometry, corresponding to the increase of the torsion angle between the rings, from 29.1° (2b) to 43.6° (2b+). It is interesting to note that, although the excitation energies are not the only factor governing β, as shown in the sum-over-state Orr–Ward–Bishop expression, (27) the ordering of the βHRS values is indeed almost opposite to that of the ΔE: for the b forms it is 115 > 8 > 12 > 3 > 4 > 10 > 7 > 96, whereas, for the forms b+, it is 115 > 812 > 3 > 4 > 10 > 9 > 76. Still, owing to the more complex effect of the substituent on βHRS of the closed form, the orderings for the βHRS(b)/βHRS(a) and βHRS(b+)/βHRS(a) contrast ratios are different: 5 > 12 > 8 > 113 > 4 > 7106 > 9 for phototriggered opening and 5 > 12 > 8 > 11 > 3 > 4 > 10 > 9 > 76 for acido-triggered opening. Nevertheless, the compounds can be classified in three main groups, those with donor substituents (5, 8, 11, and 12), those with thiophene units (3 and 4), and those with acceptor or small substituents (6, 7, 9, and 10). This explains our selection of four compounds, 3, 4, 11, and 12, for the experimental investigation. Upon opening DR generally increases and becomes larger than 4.26, demonstrating a dominant dipolar contribution to βHRS. Compounds 6, 7, and 9 are exceptions to this.
Table 6. Vertical Excitation Energies (ΔEvert, eV), Oscillator Strengths (f, in Parentheses), and Main Character of the Dominant Low-Energy Dipole-Allowed Excited States of Compounds 112 in Their Closed and Open Forms, As Obtained at the IEF-PCM/TDDFT/M06-2X/6-311+G(d) Level of Approximation (in Chloroform)a
 closed (a)open (b)open (b+)
 ΔEvert (f)characterΔEvert (f)characterΔEvert (f)character
14.20 (0.75)Intra nBz2.40 (0.49)Deloc. Ind/nBz2.70 (1.65)Deloc. Ind/nBz
24.04 (0.17)Bzt to nBz + Intra nBz2.46 (0.92)nBz to Bzt3.78 (0.76)nBz to Bzt
 4.11 (0.11)Intra nBz    
34.38 (0.55)Intra nPhol3.03 (1.06)Deloc. R1/Ind2.96 (1.06)Deloc. R1/Ind
 4.54 (0.68)Intra R1    
44.42 (0.48)Intra nPhol3.19 (0.94)Intra nPhol3.15 (1.00)Deloc. R1/Ind
53.78 (0.91)Intra R12.59 (1.15)nPhol to Br + Ind2.53 (1.71)Deloc. R1/Ind
   2.70 (0.50)R1 to Br + Ind  
64.43 (0.49)Intra nPhol3.61 (0.46)Intra nPhol4.29 (0.32)Intra nPhol + nPhol to Ind
74.40 (0.49)Intra nPhol3.65 (0.50)Intra nPhol4.80 (0.22)Intra nPhol
84.16 (0.83)Intra R12.69 (1.15)Deloc. R1/Ind + Ph to Deloc. R1/Ind2.65 (1.52)Deloc. R1/Ind
   2.81 (0.34)Deloc. R1/Ind + Ph to Deloc. R1/Ind  
94.30 (0.74)Intra nPhol + Ind. to nPhol3.30 (1.16)Deloc. R1/Ind3.26 (1.13)Deloc. R1/Ind
104.37 (0.63)Ind to R1 + intra R13.27 (1.23)Deloc. R1/Ind3.19 (1.20)Deloc. R1/Ind
113.46 (1.32)Intra R12.61 (1.95)Deloc. R1/Ind2.50 (2.06)Deloc. R1/Ind
124.41 (0.51)Intra nPhol + Intra R12.81 (1.39)Deloc. R1/Ind2.72 (1.45)Deloc. R1/Ind
 4.66 (0.99)Intra R1    
a

Deloc: delocalized. nBz: substituted nitro-benzene. Bzt: benzothiazole/benzothiazolium. nPhol: nitro-phenol or nitro-phenolate. Ind: indoleninium. Br: CH2═CH2 bridge of R1.

Table 7. Dynamic (1064 nm) Hyper-Rayleigh Scattering First Hyperpolarizabilities (βHRS, au) and Depolarization Ratios (DR) of the Closed and Open Forms of Compounds 112 As Well As Their βHRS(open)/βHRS(closed) Contrast Ratios for the Photo- and Acido-Triggered Openings, As Obtained at the IEF-PCM/TDHF/6-311+G(d) Level (in Chloroform)
 closed (a)open (b)open (b+)  
 βHRSDRβHRSDRβHRSDRβHRS(b)/βHRS(a)βHRS(b+)/βHRS(a)
114424.7913 3754.5715 0444.699.2810.43
26613.1993303.659722.6914.121.47
39023.9147705.9335224.835.293.91
48623.8636816.0124054.754.272.79
517643.7820 2985.1722 9274.8411.5113.00
67903.3018023.644083.872.280.52
77963.2319593.684253.792.460.53
819475.0715 2155.2814 2854.767.817.34
913102.9218302.708142.931.400.62
1010152.8123404.7412394.602.311.22
1139294.6221 3924.6724 8914.555.446.33
1214374.5811 6524.8913 4994.718.119.39
Besides HF calculations, βHRS of the a, b, and b+ forms of compounds 3, 4, 11, and 12 were also evaluated at the MP2 level using the FF procedure (Table S3). A nice linear relationship between the MP2 and HF static βHRS was obtained [βHRS(MP2) = −1266 + 2.70 × βHRS(HF)], leading to enhancement of the βHRS(b)/βHRS(a) and βHRS(b+)/βHRS(a) contrasts with respect to HF (besides for compounds 6 and 7).
The substituent–substrate synergy effect was then quantified by referring to the ΔβHRS quantity, defined as the βHRS difference with respect to the oxazine 7, where R1 = H (Figure 3). While ΔβHRS is small for the closed forms, it is exalted for the open forms, especially when R1 is a donor group, π-conjugated to the indoleninium ring, highlighting π-conjugation and charge transfer between the two entities.
A complement to analyze the βHRS responses of the b and b+ forms as a function of R1 consists of considering the open forms as built from two NLOphores, a substituted indoleninium and nitrophenol (b+) or nitrophenolate (b). Then, since βHRS of phenolate is larger than that of phenol, 2442 au versus 647 au as evaluated at the IEFPCM(acetonitrile)/TDHF(λ = 1064 nm)/6-311+G(d) level, its combination with the substituted indoleninium might lead to a decrease or an increase of βHRS as a function of the donor or acceptor strength of R1 as well as of the relative orientation of the two moieties. For acceptor R1, the β-polarity of indoleninium and phenol(ate) is opposite, leading to partial cancellation of βHRS. On the other hand for donor substituents, the two NLOphores are in-phase, leading to larger βHRS. Still, there might be partial cancellation or damping of the βHRS response owing to the relative orientation of the two moieties and to inter-NLOphore electrostatic interactions, as those found in aggregates or molecular crystals. Indeed, packing chromophores in the direction perpendicular to the dominant β component usually leads to reduction of β per unit. (38) This was substantiated in the case of 3b and 3b+. Indeed, their IEFPCM(acetonitrile)/TDHF(λ = 1064 nm)/6-311+G(d) βHRS responses amount to 4292 and 3191 au whereas the sums of the βHRS values of their components are 32% and 21% larger (5654 and 3859 au), respectively.

Figure 3

Figure 3. IEF-PCM/TDHF/6-311+G(d) dynamic (1064 nm) ΔβHRS(X) = βHRSX– βHRS7 for the closed (a), protonated (b+), and zwitterionic (b) open forms of 36 and 812 (in chloroform).

4 Conclusions and Outlook

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

A combined experimental–theoretical investigation has revealed that oxazine derivatives are efficient second-order NLO molecular switches, in particular when their substituent is a donor group. In this study, the cleavage of the C–O bond at the junction of the indole and oxazine cycles (of the closed a forms) is triggered by pH reduction, leading to a protonated open form (b+) characterized by larger first hyperpolarizabilities (βHRS) and smaller excitation energies than the closed form. These results are confirmed and interpreted utilizing ab initio calculations that have been carried out beforehand on a broader set of compounds to unravel the role of donor and acceptor substituents on the linear and nonlinear optical properties as well as on structural, electronic, and thermodynamical properties and therefore to select four representative species for an experimental–theoretical characterization. These have highlighted that donor groups are characterized by larger βHRS and βHRS contrast ratios, smaller excitation energies, larger opening-induced charge transfer and reduction of the bond length alternation, and smaller Gibbs energies of opening than in the case of acceptor groups. Calculations have also extended the study to the zwitterionic-open forms (b), pointing out similarities in the long-wavelength UV/vis absorption spectra of both (b and b+) open forms whereas their βHRS values might strongly differ as a function of the nature of the substituent. The latter effect has been attributed to the presence of two molecular moieties contributing to the first hyperpolarizability of the open forms and to the fact that the nitrophenol moiety (present in the protonated-open form, b+) presents a smaller βHRS response than its deprotonated nitrophenolate (present in the zwitterionic open form, b) analog. Together with previous studies on the optical responses as well as on redox- and photochemical-triggering, the present work demonstrates the multiaddressable, multistate, and multifunctional character of oxazine-based molecular switches.

Supporting Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/jacs.5b13243.

  • Experimental UV/vis absorption spectra of the closed and protonated open forms of 3, 4, 11, and 12 recorded in chloroform together with characteristics of their main low-energy bands and frequency dispersion factors; Simulated UV/vis absorption spectra of the closed and open forms of compounds 112 together with the excitation energies, oscillator strengths, and molecular orbitals involved in the major singly excited determinants for the dominant low-energy transitions; Parameters of the linear regression relationships between the experimental and simulated UV/vis absorption spectra of compounds 3, 4, 11, and 12 in their closed and protonated open forms; HRS power and polarization scans of the closed and protonated open forms of 3, 4, 11, and 12; first hyperpolarizabilities of the protonated open and closed forms of compounds 112 as calculated at different levels of approximation and their contrast ratios; Spatial distribution on the S1–S5 and R1 molecular moieties of the Mulliken, Hirshfeld, and NPA charge distributions and their variations for the closed, zwitterionic, and protonated open forms of compounds 112; Cartesian coordinates and absolute energies of all compounds (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

  • Corresponding Authors
    • Françisco M. Raymo - Laboratory for Molecular Photonics, Department of Chemistry, University of Miami, 1301 Memorial Drive, Coral Gables, Florida 33146-0431, United States
    • Frédéric Castet - Université de Bordeaux, Institut des Sciences Moléculaires (ISM), UMR 5255 CNRS, Cours de la Libération 351, F-33405 Talence Cedex, France
    • Vincent Rodriguez - Université de Bordeaux, Institut des Sciences Moléculaires (ISM), UMR 5255 CNRS, Cours de la Libération 351, F-33405 Talence Cedex, France
    • Benoît Champagne - University of Namur, Laboratoire de Chimie Théorique, Unité de Chimie Physique Théorique et Structurale, rue de Bruxelles, 61, B-5000 Namur, Belgium Email: [email protected]
  • Authors
    • Pierre Beaujean - University of Namur, Laboratoire de Chimie Théorique, Unité de Chimie Physique Théorique et Structurale, rue de Bruxelles, 61, B-5000 Namur, Belgium
    • Flavie Bondu - Université de Bordeaux, Institut des Sciences Moléculaires (ISM), UMR 5255 CNRS, Cours de la Libération 351, F-33405 Talence Cedex, France
    • Aurélie Plaquet - University of Namur, Laboratoire de Chimie Théorique, Unité de Chimie Physique Théorique et Structurale, rue de Bruxelles, 61, B-5000 Namur, Belgium
    • Jaume Garcia-Amorós - Laboratory for Molecular Photonics, Department of Chemistry, University of Miami, 1301 Memorial Drive, Coral Gables, Florida 33146-0431, United States
    • Janet Cusido - Laboratory for Molecular Photonics, Department of Chemistry, University of Miami, 1301 Memorial Drive, Coral Gables, Florida 33146-0431, United States
  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgment

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This work was supported by funds from the Belgian Government (IUAP No P7/5 “Functional Supramolecular Systems”), the Francqui Foundation, by grants from the ANR (PHOEBUS) and the National Science Foundation (CHE-1049860). It has also been done in the frame of the Centre of Excellence LAPHIA (Investments for the future: Programme IdEx Bordeaux − LAPHIA (ANR-10-IDEX-03-02)). V.R. is grateful to F. Adamietz for HRS experimental support and technical developments as well as to the CNRS and the Région Aquitaine for funding supports. We thank V. Liégeois for the use of DrawMol, employed to make the TOC. The calculations were performed on the computers of the Consortium des Équipements de Calcul Intensif, including those of the Technological Platform of High-Performance Computing, for which we gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the FNRS-FRFC (Convention Nos. 2.4.617.07.F and 2.5020.11) and of the University of Namur, as well as on zenobe, the Tier-1 facility of the Walloon Region (Convention 1117545).

References

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article references 38 other publications.

  1. 1
    (a) Berkovic, G.; Krongauz, V.; Weiss, V. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 1741 1754 DOI: 10.1021/cr9800715
    (b) Bouas-Laurent, H.; Dürr, H. Pure Appl. Chem. 2001, 73, 639 665 DOI: 10.1351/pac200173040639
    (c) Cusido, J.; Deniz, E.; Raymo, F. M. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 2009, 2031 2045 DOI: 10.1002/ejoc.200801244
    (d) Feringa, B. L.; Browne, W. R., Eds. Molecular Switches, 2nd ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2011.
    (e) Zhang, J.; Zou, Q.; Tian, H. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 378 399 DOI: 10.1002/adma.201201521
  2. 2
    (a) Coe, B. J. Chem. - Eur. J. 1999, 5, 2464 2471 DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3765(19990903)5:9<2464::AID-CHEM2464>3.0.CO;2-L
    (b) Delaire, J. A.; Nakatani, K. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 1817 1845 DOI: 10.1021/cr980078m
    (c) Castet, F.; Rodriguez, V.; Pozzo, J.-L.; Ducasse, L.; Plaquet, A.; Champagne, B. Acc. Chem. Res. 2013, 46, 2656 2665 DOI: 10.1021/ar4000955
  3. 3
    Okuno, K.; Shigeta, Y.; Kishi, R.; Nakano, M. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2013, 4, 2418 2422 DOI: 10.1021/jz401228c
  4. 4
    (a) Kanis, D. R.; Ratner, M. A.; Marks, T. J. Chem. Rev. 1994, 94, 195 242 DOI: 10.1021/cr00025a007
    (b) Brédas, J. L.; Adant, C.; Tackx, P.; Persoons, A.; Pierce, B. M. Chem. Rev. 1994, 94, 243 278 DOI: 10.1021/cr00025a008
    (c) Verbiest, T.; Houbrechts, S.; Kauranen, M.; Clays, C.; Persoons, A. J. Mater. Chem. 1997, 7, 2175 2189 DOI: 10.1039/a703434b
    (d) Nonlinear Optical Properties of Matter: From Molecules to Condensed Phases; Papadopoulos, M. G.; Leszczynski, J.; Sadlej, A. J., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, 2006.
    (e) Murugan, N. A.; Kongsted, J.; Rinkevicius, Z.; Ågren, H. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2010, 107, 16453 16458 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1006572107
    (f) Johnson, L. E.; Dalton, L. R.; Robinson, B. H. Acc. Chem. Res. 2014, 47, 3258 3265 DOI: 10.1021/ar5000727
  5. 5
    Loucif-Saïbi, R.; Nakatani, K.; Delaire, J.; Dumont, M.; Sekkat, Z. Chem. Mater. 1993, 5, 229 236 DOI: 10.1021/cm00026a014
  6. 6
    (a) Gilat, S. L.; Kawaï, S. H.; Lehn, J. M. Chem. - Eur. J. 1995, 1, 275 284 DOI: 10.1002/chem.19950010504
    (b) Aubert, V.; Guerchais, V.; Ishow, E.; Hoang-Thi, K.; Ledoux, I.; Nakatani, K.; Le Bozec, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 577 580 DOI: 10.1002/anie.200704138
  7. 7
    Houbrechts, S.; Clays, K.; Persoons, A.; Pikramenou, Z.; Lehn, J.-M. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1996, 258, 485 489 DOI: 10.1016/0009-2614(96)00676-8
  8. 8
    (a) Nakatani, K.; Delaire, J. A. Chem. Mater. 1997, 9, 2682 2684 DOI: 10.1021/cm970369w
    (b)

    (a)

    Sliwa, M.; Létard, S.; Malfant, I.; Nierlich, M.; Lacroix, P. G.; Asahi, T.; Masuhara, H.; Yu, P.; Nakatani, K. Chem. Mater. 2005, 17, 4727 4735 DOI: 10.1021/cm050929o
    (c) Bogdan, E.; Plaquet, A.; Antonov, L.; Rodriguez, V.; Ducasse, L.; Champagne, B.; Castet, F. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 12760 12768 DOI: 10.1021/jp103556c
  9. 9
    (a) Coe, B. J.; Houbrechts, S.; Asselberghs, I.; Persoons, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 366 369 DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3773(19990201)38:3<366::AID-ANIE366>3.0.CO;2-D
    (b) Averseng, F.; Lepetit, C.; Lacroix, P. G.; Tuchagues, J. P. Chem. Mater. 2000, 12, 2225 2229 DOI: 10.1021/cm001015z
    (c) Asselberghs, I.; Clays, K.; Persoons, A.; McDonagh, A. M.; Ward, M. D.; McCleverty, J. A. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2003, 368, 408 411 DOI: 10.1016/S0009-2614(02)01890-0
    (d) Aubert, V.; Guerchais, V.; Ishow, E.; Hoang-Thi, K.; Ledoux, I.; Nakatani, K.; Le Bozec, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 577 580 DOI: 10.1002/anie.200704138
    (e) Boubekeur–Lecaque, L.; Coe, B. J.; Harris, J. A.; Helliwell, M.; Asselberghs, I.; Clays, K.; Foerier, S.; Verbiest, T. Inorg. Chem. 2011, 50, 12886 12899 DOI: 10.1021/ic202145b
    (f) Green, K. A.; Cifuentes, M. P.; Samoc, M.; Humphrey, M. G. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2011, 255, 2530 2544 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2011.02.021
    (g) Di Bella, S.; Oliveri, I. P.; Colombo, A.; Dragonetti, C.; Righetto, S.; Roberto, D. Dalton Trans. 2012, 41, 7013 7016 DOI: 10.1039/c2dt30702b
    (h) Zhang, Y. R.; Castet, F.; Champagne, B. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2013, 574, 42 46 DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2013.04.071
    (i) Boixel, J.; Guerchais, V.; LeBozec, H.; Jacquemin, D.; Amar, A.; Boucekkine, A.; Colombo, A.; Dragonetti, C.; Marinotto, D.; Roberto, D.; Righetto, S.; De Angelis, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 5367 5375 DOI: 10.1021/ja4131615
    (j) Wang, W. Y.; Ma, N. N.; Sun, S. L.; Qiu, Y. Q. Organometallics 2014, 33, 3341 3352 DOI: 10.1021/om500224g
    (k) Boixel, J.; Guerchais, V.; Le Bozec, H.; Chantzis, A.; Jacquemin, D.; Colombo, A.; Dragonetti, C.; Marinotto, D.; Roberto, D. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 7805 7808 DOI: 10.1039/C5CC01893E
  10. 10
    Asselberghs, I.; Zhao, Y.; Clays, K.; Persoons, A.; Comito, A.; Rubin, Y. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2002, 364, 279 283 DOI: 10.1016/S0009-2614(02)01346-5
  11. 11
    (a) Sanguinet, L.; Pozzo, J.-L.; Rodriguez, V.; Adamietz, F.; Castet, F.; Ducasse, L.; Champagne, B. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 11139 11150 DOI: 10.1021/jp0442450
    (b) Mançois, F.; Pozzo, J.-L.; Adamietz, F.; Rodriguez, V.; Ducasse, L.; Castet, F.; Plaquet, A.; Champagne, B. Chem. - Eur. J. 2009, 15, 2560 2571 DOI: 10.1002/chem.200801967
    (c) Szaloki, G.; Alévêque, O.; Pozzo, J. L.; Hadji, R.; Levillain, E.; Sanguinet, L. J. Phys. Chem. B 2015, 119, 307 315 DOI: 10.1021/jp511825f
    (d) Bondu, F.; Hadji, R.; Szalóki, G.; Alévêque, O.; Sanguinet, L.; Pozzo, J. L.; Cavagnat, D.; Buffeteau, T.; Rodriguez, V. J. Phys. Chem. B 2015, 119, 6758 6765 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b03070
  12. 12
    Giraud, M.; Léaustic, A.; Guillot, R.; Yu, P.; Lacroix, P. G.; Nakatani, K.; Pansu, R.; Maurel, F. J. Mater. Chem. 2007, 17, 4414 4425 DOI: 10.1039/b704806h
  13. 13
    Plaquet, A.; Guillaume, M.; Champagne, B.; Castet, F.; Ducasse, L.; Pozzo, J. L.; Rodriguez, V. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2008, 10, 6223 6232 DOI: 10.1039/b806561f
  14. 14
    (a) Plaquet, A.; Champagne, B.; Castet, F.; Ducasse, L.; Bogdan, E.; Rodriguez, V.; Pozzo, J.-L. New J. Chem. 2009, 33, 1349 1356 DOI: 10.1039/b900432g
    (b) Broman, S. L.; Jevric, M.; Bond, A. D.; Nielsen, M. B. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 79, 41 64 DOI: 10.1021/jo4020326
  15. 15
    (a) Plaquet, A.; Champagne, B.; Kulhánek, J.; Bures, F.; Bogdan, E.; Castet, F.; Ducasse, L.; Rodriguez, V. ChemPhysChem 2011, 12, 3245 3252 DOI: 10.1002/cphc.201100299
    (b) Bures, F.; Cermakova, A.; Kulhánek, J.; Ludwig, M.; Kuznik, W.; Kityk, I. V.; Mikysek, T.; Ruzicka, A. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 2012, 529 538 DOI: 10.1002/ejoc.201101226
  16. 16
    Cariati, E.; Dragonetti, C.; Lucenti, E.; Nisic, F.; Righetto, S.; Roberto, D.; Tordin, E. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 1608 1610 DOI: 10.1039/c3cc48149b
  17. 17
    Castet, F.; Champagne, B.; Pina, F.; Rodriguez, V. ChemPhysChem 2014, 15, 2221 2224 DOI: 10.1002/cphc.201402190
  18. 18
    van Bezouw, S.; Campo, J.; Lee, S. H.; Kwon, O. P.; Wenseleers, W. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 21658 21663 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b06968
  19. 19
    Asselberghs, I.; Flors, C.; Ferrighi, L.; Botek, E.; Champagne, B.; Mizuno, H.; Ando, R.; Miyawaki, A.; Hofkens, J.; Van der Auweraer, M.; Clays, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 15713 15719 DOI: 10.1021/ja805171q
  20. 20
    (a) Tomasulo, M.; Sortino, S.; White, A. J. P.; Raymo, F. M. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 8180 8189 DOI: 10.1021/jo051417w
    (b) Deniz, E.; Tomasulo, M.; Cusido, J.; Sortino, S.; Raymo, F. M. Langmuir 2011, 27, 11773 11783 DOI: 10.1021/la201062h
    (c) Deniz, E.; Cusido, J.; Swaminathan, S.; Battal, M.; Impellizzeri, S.; Sortino, S.; Raymo, F. M. J. Photochem. Photobiol., A 2012, 229, 20 28 DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2011.11.008
    (d) Deniz, E.; Tomasulo, M.; Cusido, J.; Yildiz, I.; Petriella, M.; Bossi, M. L.; Sortino, S.; Raymo, F. M. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 6058 6068 DOI: 10.1021/jp211796p
    (e) Garcia-Amorós, J.; Swami-Nathan, S.; Raymo, F. M. Dyes Pigm. 2014, 106, 71 73 DOI: 10.1016/j.dyepig.2014.02.019
  21. 21
    Zhu, S.; Li, M.; Tang, S.; Zhang, Y.-M.; Yang, B.; Zhang, S. X.-A. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 2014, 1227 1235 DOI: 10.1002/ejoc.201301182
  22. 22
    (a) Raymo, F. M. J. Phys. Chem. A 2012, 116, 11888 95 DOI: 10.1021/jp3095787
    (b) Toliautas, S.; Sulskus, J.; Valkunas, L.; Vengris, M. Chem. Phys. 2012, 404, 64 73 DOI: 10.1016/j.chemphys.2012.03.006
    (c) Redeckas, K.; Martynaitis, V.; Šačkus, A.; Vengris, M. J. Photochem. Photobiol., A 2014, 285, 7 15 DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2014.04.010
    (d) Redeckas, K.; Voiciuk, V.; Steponavičiute, R.; Martynaitis, V.; Šačkus, A.; Vengris, M. J. Phys. Chem. A 2014, 118, 5642 51 DOI: 10.1021/jp505723q
  23. 23
    Verbiest, T.; Clays, K.; Rodriguez, V. Second-Order Nonlinear Optical Characterization Techniques: An Introduction; Taylor & Francis: Boca Raton, FL, 2009.
  24. 24
    (a) Castet, F.; Bogdan, E.; Plaquet, A.; Ducasse, L.; Champagne, B.; Rodriguez, V. J. Chem. Phys. 2012, 136, 024506 DOI: 10.1063/1.3675848
    (b) Castet, F.; Blanchard-Desce, M.; Adamietz, F.; Poronik, Y. M.; Gryko, D. T.; Rodriguez, V. ChemPhysChem 2014, 15, 2575 81 DOI: 10.1002/cphc.201402083
  25. 25
    Bersohn, R. J. Chem. Phys. 1966, 45, 3184 3198 DOI: 10.1063/1.1728092
  26. 26
    (a) Oudar, J. L.; Chemla, D. S. J. Chem. Phys. 1977, 66, 2664 2668 DOI: 10.1063/1.434213
    (b) Campo, J.; Wenseleers, W.; Goovaerts, E.; Szablewski, M.; Cross, G. H. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 287 296 DOI: 10.1021/jp0758824
  27. 27
    (a) Orr, B.; Ward, J. Mol. Phys. 1971, 20, 513 526 DOI: 10.1080/00268977100100481
    (b) Bishop, D. M. J. Chem. Phys. 1994, 100, 6535 6542 DOI: 10.1063/1.467062
  28. 28
    Zhao, Y.; Truhlar, D. G. Theor. Chem. Acc. 2008, 120, 215 241 DOI: 10.1007/s00214-007-0310-x
  29. 29
    Li, R.; Zheng, J.; Truhlar, D. G. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2010, 12, 12697 12701 DOI: 10.1039/c0cp00549e
  30. 30
    (a) Sekino, H.; Bartlett, R. J. J. Chem. Phys. 1986, 85, 976 989 DOI: 10.1063/1.451255
    (b) Karna, S. P.; Dupuis, M. J. Comput. Chem. 1991, 12, 487 504 DOI: 10.1002/jcc.540120409
  31. 31
    (a) Champagne, B.; Kirtman, B. J. Chem. Phys. 2006, 125, 024101 DOI: 10.1063/1.2206181
    (b) de Wergifosse, M.; Champagne, B. J. Chem. Phys. 2011, 134, 074113 DOI: 10.1063/1.3549814
    (c) Hidalgo Cardenuto, M.; Champagne, B. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 23634 23642 DOI: 10.1039/C5CP03455H
  32. 32
    Cohen, H. D.; Roothaan, C. C. J. J. Chem. Phys. 1965, 43, S34 DOI: 10.1063/1.1701512
  33. 33
    (a) Mohammed, A. A. K.; Limacher, P. A.; Champagne, B. J. Comput. Chem. 2013, 34, 1497 1503 DOI: 10.1002/jcc.23285
    (b) de Wergifosse, M.; Liégeois, V.; Champagne, B. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2014, 114, 900 910 DOI: 10.1002/qua.24685
  34. 34
    (a) Sekino, H.; Bartlett, R. J. J. Chem. Phys. 1986, 84, 2726 2733 DOI: 10.1063/1.450348
    (b) Rice, J. E.; Handy, N. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 1992, 43, 91 118 DOI: 10.1002/qua.560430110
    (c) Sekino, H.; Bartlett, R. J. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1995, 234, 87 93 DOI: 10.1016/0009-2614(95)00007-Q
    (d) Jacquemin, D.; Champagne, B.; Hättig, C. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2000, 319, 327 334 DOI: 10.1016/S0009-2614(00)00155-X
  35. 35
    Willetts, A.; Rice, J. E.; Burland, D. M.; Shelton, D. P. J. Chem. Phys. 1992, 97, 7590 7599 DOI: 10.1063/1.463479
  36. 36
    (a) Mennucci, B.; Cammi, R.; Tomasi, J. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 1999, 75, 767 781 DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-461X(1999)75:4/5<767::AID-QUA43>3.0.CO;2-L
    (b) Tomasi, J.; Mennucci, B.; Cammi, R. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 2999 3094 DOI: 10.1021/cr9904009
  37. 37
    Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V.; Mennucci, B.; Petersson, G. A.; Nakatsuji, H.; Caricato, M.; Li, X.; Hratchian, H. P.; Izmaylov, A. F.; Bloino, J.; Zheng, G.; Sonnenberg, J. L.; Hada, M.; Ehara, M.; Toyota, K.; Fukuda, R.; Hasegawa, J.; Ishida, M.; Nakajima, T.; Honda, Y.; Kitao, O.; Nakai, H.; Vreven, T.; Montgomery, J. A., Jr.; Peralta, J. E.; Ogliaro, F.; Bearpark, M.; Heyd, J. J.; Brothers, E.; Kudin, K. N.; Staroverov, V. N.; Kobayashi, R.; Normand, J.; Raghavachari, K.; Rendell, A.; Burant, J. C.; Iyengar, S. S.; Tomasi, J.; Cossi, M.; Rega, N.; Millam, N. J.; Klene, M.; Knox, J. E.; Cross, J. B.; Bakken, V.; Adamo, C.; Jaramillo, J.; Gomperts, R.; Stratmann, R. E.; Yazyev, O.; Austin, A. J.; Cammi, R.; Pomelli, C.; Ochterski, J. W.; Martin, R. L.; Morokuma, K.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Voth, G. A.; Salvador, P.; Dannenberg, J. J.; Dapprich, S.; Daniels, A. D.; Farkas, O.; Foresman, J. B.; Ortiz, J. V.; Cioslowski, J.; Fox, D. J.Gaussian 09, Revision D01; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford, CT, 2009.
  38. 38
    (a) Castet, F.; Champagne, B. J. Phys. Chem. A 2001, 105, 1366 1370 DOI: 10.1021/jp003746s
    (b) Suponitsky, K. Y.; Masunov, A. E. J. Chem. Phys. 2013, 139, 094310 DOI: 10.1063/1.4819265

Cited By

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article is cited by 99 publications.

  1. Simon Dubuis, Angela Dellai, Chloé Courdurié, Josianne Owona, Apostolos Kalafatis, Luc Vellutini, Emilie Genin, Vincent Rodriguez, Frédéric Castet. Nonlinear Optical Responses of Photoswitchable Donor–Acceptor Stenhouse Adducts. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2023, 145 (19) , 10861-10871. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.3c02778
  2. Frédéric Castet, Claire Tonnelé, Luca Muccioli, Benoît Champagne. Predicting the Second-Order Nonlinear Optical Responses of Organic Materials: The Role of Dynamics. Accounts of Chemical Research 2022, 55 (24) , 3716-3726. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.2c00616
  3. Qingbao Gong, Xinfu Zhang, Wanwan Li, Xing Guo, Qinghua Wu, Changjiang Yu, Lijuan Jiao, Yi Xiao, Erhong Hao. Long-Wavelength Photoconvertible Dimeric BODIPYs for Super-Resolution Single-Molecule Localization Imaging in Near-Infrared Emission. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2022, 144 (48) , 21992-21999. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c08947
  4. Lucas F. Sciuti, Luis M. G. Abegão, Carlos H. D. dos Santos, Leandro H. Zucolotto Cocca, Rafaela G. M. da Costa, Jones Limberger, Lino Misoguti, Cleber R. Mendonça, Leonardo De Boni. Modeling the First-Order Molecular Hyperpolarizability Dispersion from Experimentally Obtained One- and Two-Photon Absorption. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 2022, 126 (14) , 2152-2159. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.1c10559
  5. Fangfang Meng, Jie Niu, Huamiao Zhang, Rui Yang, Qing Lu, Guangle Niu, Zhiqiang Liu, Xiaoqiang Yu. A pH-Sensitive Spirocyclization Strategy for Constructing a Single Fluorescent Probe Simultaneous Two-Color Visualizing of Lipid Droplets and Lysosomes and Monitoring of Lipophagy. Analytical Chemistry 2021, 93 (34) , 11729-11735. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.1c01842
  6. Jean Quertinmont, Pierre Beaujean, Julien Stiennon, Youssef Aidibi, Philippe Leriche, Vincent Rodriguez, Lionel Sanguinet, Benoît Champagne. Combining Benzazolo-Oxazolidine Twins toward Multi-state Nonlinear Optical Switches. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2021, 125 (15) , 3918-3931. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.1c01962
  7. Amin Abdollahi, Hossein Roghani-Mamaqani, Bahareh Razavi, Mehdi Salami-Kalajahi. Photoluminescent and Chromic Nanomaterials for Anticounterfeiting Technologies: Recent Advances and Future Challenges. ACS Nano 2020, 14 (11) , 14417-14492. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.0c07289
  8. Martina Canton, Angela B. Grommet, Luca Pesce, Julius Gemen, Shiming Li, Yael Diskin-Posner, Alberto Credi, Giovanni M. Pavan, Joakim Andréasson, Rafal Klajn. Improving Fatigue Resistance of Dihydropyrene by Encapsulation within a Coordination Cage. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2020, 142 (34) , 14557-14565. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.0c06146
  9. Jin-Ting Ye, Hong-Qiang Wang, Yuan Zhang, Yong-Qing Qiu. Regulation of the Molecular Architectures on Second-Order Nonlinear Optical Response and Thermally Activated Delayed Fluorescence Property: Homoconjugation and Twisted Donor–Acceptor. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2020, 124 (1) , 921-931. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b10067
  10. Clément Guerrin, Youssef Aidibi, Lionel Sanguinet, Philippe Leriche, Stéphane Aloise, Maylis Orio, Stéphanie Delbaere. When Light and Acid Play Tic-Tac-Toe with a Nine-State Molecular Switch. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2019, 141 (48) , 19151-19160. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b11048
  11. Claire Tonnelé, Benoît Champagne, Luca Muccioli, Frédéric Castet. Nonlinear Optical Contrast in Azobenzene-Based Self-Assembled Monolayers. Chemistry of Materials 2019, 31 (17) , 6759-6769. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b01241
  12. Kornelia Pielak, Claire Tonnelé, Lionel Sanguinet, Elena Cariati, Stefania Righetto, Luca Muccioli, Frédéric Castet, Benoît Champagne. Dynamical Behavior and Second Harmonic Generation Responses in Acido-Triggered Molecular Switches. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2018, 122 (45) , 26160-26168. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b08697
  13. Baihao Shao, Massimo Baroncini, Hai Qian, Laura Bussotti, Mariangela Di Donato, Alberto Credi, Ivan Aprahamian. Solution and Solid-State Emission Toggling of a Photochromic Hydrazone. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2018, 140 (39) , 12323-12327. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.8b07108
  14. L. Kortekaas, J. Chen, D. Jacquemin, W. R. Browne. Proton-Stabilized Photochemically Reversible E/Z Isomerization of Spiropyrans. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2018, 122 (24) , 6423-6430. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.8b03528
  15. Wei-Ming Sun, Bi-Lian Ni, Di Wu, Jian-Ming Lan, Chun-Yan Li, Ying Li, and Zhi-Ru Li . Designing Alkalides with Considerable Nonlinear Optical Responses and High Stability Based on the Facially Polarized Janus all-cis-1,2,3,4,5,6-Hexafluorocyclohexane. Organometallics 2017, 36 (17) , 3352-3359. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.organomet.7b00491
  16. Miquel Torrent-Sucarrat, Sara Navarro, Enrique Marcos, Josep M. Anglada, and Josep M. Luis . Design of Hückel–Möbius Topological Switches with High Nonlinear Optical Properties. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2017, 121 (35) , 19348-19357. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b05900
  17. Pedro R. Florindo, Paulo J. Costa, M. F. M. Piedade, and M. Paula Robalo . pH-Switchability and Second-Order Nonlinear Optical Properties of Monocyclopentadienylruthenium(II)/iron(II) Tetrazoles/Tetrazolates: Synthesis, Characterization, and Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory Calculations. Inorganic Chemistry 2017, 56 (12) , 6849-6863. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b00138
  18. Salahuddin Attar, Davide Espa, Flavia Artizzu, Luca Pilia, Angela Serpe, Maddalena Pizzotti, Gabriele Di Carlo, Luciano Marchiò, and Paola Deplano . Optically Multiresponsive Heteroleptic Platinum Dithiolene Complex with Proton-Switchable Properties. Inorganic Chemistry 2017, 56 (12) , 6763-6767. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b00238
  19. Chengmin Ji, Sasa Wang, Sijie Liu, Zhihua Sun, Jing Zhang, Lina Li, and Junhua Luo . Exceptional Three-Level Switching Behaviors of Quadratic Nonlinear Optical Properties in a Tristable Molecule-Based Dielectric. Chemistry of Materials 2017, 29 (7) , 3251-3256. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00524
  20. Jean Quertinmont, Andrea Carletta, Nikolay A. Tumanov, Tom Leyssens, Johan Wouters, and Benoît Champagne . Assessing Density Functional Theory Approaches for Predicting the Structure and Relative Energy of Salicylideneaniline Molecular Switches in the Solid State. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2017, 121 (12) , 6898-6908. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b00580
  21. Kornelia Pielak, Flavie Bondu, Lionel Sanguinet, Vincent Rodriguez, Benoît Champagne, and Frédéric Castet . Second-Order Nonlinear Optical Properties of Multiaddressable Indolinooxazolidine Derivatives: Joint Computational and Hyper-Rayleigh Scattering Investigations. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2017, 121 (3) , 1851-1860. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b11082
  22. M. Chattopadhyaya, N. Arul Murugan, and Zilvinas Rinkevicius . Origin of the Absorption Band of Bromophenol Blue in Acidic and Basic pH: Insight from a Combined Molecular Dynamics and TD-DFT/MM Study. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 2016, 120 (36) , 7175-7182. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.6b07660
  23. Ye-xuan Li, Chang-Zhe Sun, Hong-Liang Xu. The solvation effect of photochromic nonlinear optical properties switch. Computational and Theoretical Chemistry 2024, 1231 , 114419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comptc.2023.114419
  24. Angela Dellai, Chloé Courdurié, Simon Dubuis, Komlanvi Sèvi Kaka, Benoît Champagne, Luc Vellutini, Emilie Genin, Vincent Rodriguez, Frédéric Castet. Second harmonic responses of clickable azobenzenes in solution: Comparative Hyper-Rayleigh scattering and density functional theory studies. Dyes and Pigments 2023, 220 , 111744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dyepig.2023.111744
  25. O. Esquivel-González, R.A. Vázquez-García, M.A. Veloz-Rodríguez, J.E. Muñoz-Pérez, E. Rueda-Soriano, O.J. Hernández-Ortiz. Synthesis, photophysical properties and nonlinear response of a bisquinoline A-D-A with aggregation-induced emission for potential application in optoelectronic devices. Chemical Physics Impact 2023, 7 , 100398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chphi.2023.100398
  26. Fengyi Yang, Jiali Chen, Junwen Wang, Jinjian Liu. Five novel supramolecular assemblies constructed from the thiazolothiazole extended viologen moiety. CrystEngComm 2023, 25 (38) , 5461-5469. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3CE00650F
  27. Ajeet Kumar, Satish Kumar. Light-controlled receptors for environmentally and biologically relevant anions. Chemical Engineering Journal 2023, 474 , 145493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.145493
  28. Cheng Ma, Lijing Gong, Xiangyu Zhang, Hongmei Liu. Investigation of linear and second-order nonlinear optical properties of donor-acceptor interaction derivatives based on acceptor DCPPr core. Journal of Molecular Structure 2023, 1282 , 135203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2023.135203
  29. Carmelo Naim, Raphaël Vangheluwe, Isabelle Ledoux-Rak, Benoît Champagne, Claire Tonnelé, Mireille Blanchard-Desce, Eduard Matito, Frédéric Castet. Electric-field induced second harmonic generation responses of push–pull polyenic dyes: experimental and theoretical characterizations. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 2023, 25 (20) , 13978-13988. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3CP00750B
  30. Francisco A. Santos, Carlos E. R. Cardoso, José J. Rodrigues, Leonardo De Boni, Luis M. G. Abegão. Nonlinear Optical Materials: Predicting the First-Order Molecular Hyperpolarizability of Organic Molecular Structures. Photonics 2023, 10 (5) , 545. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics10050545
  31. Bethany R. Hood, Yovan de Coene, Afonso V. Torre Do Vale Froes, Claire F. Jones, Pierre Beaujean, Vincent Liégeois, Fraser MacMillan, Benoît Champagne, Koen Clays, John Fielden. Electrochemically‐Switched 2nd Order Non‐Linear Optical Response in an Arylimido‐Polyoxometalate with High Contrast and Cyclability. Angewandte Chemie 2023, 135 (5) https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.202215537
  32. Bethany R. Hood, Yovan de Coene, Afonso V. Torre Do Vale Froes, Claire F. Jones, Pierre Beaujean, Vincent Liégeois, Fraser MacMillan, Benoît Champagne, Koen Clays, John Fielden. Electrochemically‐Switched 2nd Order Non‐Linear Optical Response in an Arylimido‐Polyoxometalate with High Contrast and Cyclability. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2023, 62 (5) https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202215537
  33. Milad Babazadeh-Mamaqani, Hossein Roghani-Mamaqani, Hossein Alidaei-Sharif, Mehdi Salami-Kalajahi. Development of pH sensing colloidal nanoparticles and oil/water separating electrospun membranes containing oxazolidine from functional polymers. Journal of Materials Chemistry C 2023, 11 (2) , 685-697. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2TC04546J
  34. Tárcius N. Ramos, Benoît Champagne. Investigation of the Second Harmonic Generation at the Water–Vacuum Interface by Using Multi‐Scale Modeling Methods. ChemistryOpen 2023, 12 (1) https://doi.org/10.1002/open.202200045
  35. Bahareh Razavi, Hossein Roghani-Mamaqani, Mehdi Salami-Kalajahi. Colorimetric/fluorometric optical chemosensors based on oxazolidine for highly selective detection of Fe3+ and Ag+ in aqueous media: Development of ionochromic security papers. Journal of Molecular Structure 2023, 1271 , 134021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2022.134021
  36. Hossein Roghani‐Mamaqani, Zeinab Tajmoradi. Photoresponsive Polymers. 2022, 53-134. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527832385.ch2
  37. Bahareh Razavi, Hossein Roghani-Mamaqani, Mehdi Salami-Kalajahi. Development of highly sensitive metal-ion chemosensor and key-lock anticounterfeiting technology based on oxazolidine. Scientific Reports 2022, 12 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05098-x
  38. Lijing Gong, Cheng Ma, Wanfeng Lin, Huan Guo, Hongliang Zhao. Linear and second‐order nonlinear optical properties of B,N‐embedded double hetero[7]helicenes. International Journal of Quantum Chemistry 2022, 122 (21) https://doi.org/10.1002/qua.26974
  39. Bicheng Zhang, Zaitian Cheng, Jianhua Hou. The electronic structures and nonlinear optical properties of Alkali and Alkali earth metal atoms doped C6H6Cl6: A density functional theoretical study. Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling 2022, 116 , 108263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmgm.2022.108263
  40. Bicheng Zhang, Ruiting Zheng, Chao Wang, Jianhua Hou. The Alkaline-earthides based parallel-stacked dimer and trimer of Janus face C6H6F6 showing extremely large nonlinear optical responses. Polyhedron 2022, 227 , 116119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poly.2022.116119
  41. Na Hou, Ran Feng, Xiao‐Hui Fang. A theoretical comparison of the electrical and nonlinear optical properties of GDY – π – TPA : The important role of π ‐conjugated bridge. International Journal of Quantum Chemistry 2022, 122 (19) https://doi.org/10.1002/qua.26965
  42. Yao Yao, Hong-Liang Xu, Zhong-Min Su. A novel acid-controlled second-order nonlinear optical switch based on dimethyldihydropyrene/cyclophanediene photoswitch. Journal of Materials Chemistry C 2022, 10 (34) , 12338-12349. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2TC02521C
  43. Chun-Lei Li, Yu-He Sun, Ming-Sheng Wang, Xiu-Shuang Xing. A crystalline photochromic metalloviologen compound with a chiral ligand: Synthetic strategy and SHG-photoswitching property. Inorganic Chemistry Communications 2022, 140 , 109448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inoche.2022.109448
  44. Pierre Beaujean, Lionel Sanguinet, Vincent Rodriguez, Frédéric Castet, Benoît Champagne. Multi-State Second-Order Nonlinear Optical Switches Incorporating One to Three Benzazolo-Oxazolidine Units: A Quantum Chemistry Investigation. Molecules 2022, 27 (9) , 2770. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27092770
  45. S. Grande-Sánchez, O. J. Hernández-Ortiz, F. M. Muñoz-Pérez, J. M. Sausedo-Solorio, J. G. Ortega-Mendoza, J. R. Villagómez-Ibarra, M. A. Veloz-Rodríguez, A. Espinosa-Roa, C. H. Escalante, R. A. Vázquez-García. Functionalization of carminic acid, the study of its electrochemical, linear, and nonlinear optical properties as a potential material for optoelectronic applications. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics 2022, 33 (9) , 6226-6239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-022-07797-7
  46. Geping Zhang, Dandan Lu, Keyang Yin, Nicolas Godbert, Renhao Dong, Hongguang Li, Jingcheng Hao. Alkylated, naphthalimide-containing ionic compounds with rich thermotropic behaviour and nonlinear optical response. Journal of Materials Chemistry C 2022, 10 (8) , 3061-3070. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1TC05039G
  47. Flavia Artizzu, Davide Espa, Luciano Marchiò, Luca Pilia, Angela Serpe, Paola Deplano. Progress and perspectives on strategies to control photochemical properties in Metallo-Dithiolene Donor-Acceptor systems. Inorganica Chimica Acta 2022, 531 , 120731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ica.2021.120731
  48. Lijing Gong, Xiangyu Zhang, Cheng Ma. Computational study on the optical and NLO properties of donor–acceptor interaction molecules containing a triazolobenzothiadiazole or benzothiadiazole central acceptor core. New Journal of Chemistry 2021, 45 (48) , 22824-22832. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1NJ04538E
  49. Muhammed Jeneesh Kariyottu Kuniyil, Ramanathan Padmanaban. Anti‐Stokes Fluorescence and Nonlinear Optical Properties of the Functionalized Phenoxazine‐based Dye: A computational study. ChemistrySelect 2021, 6 (42) , 11706-11717. https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.202103286
  50. Lijing Gong, Cheng Ma, Jian Zhang, Xiangyu Zhang, Kun Jin. Optical and NLO properties of zigzag carbon nanobelt compounds. Journal of Molecular Structure 2021, 1244 , 130936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2021.130936
  51. Wenning Jiang, Lulu Han, Ting Xu, Zhenhua Chao, Ziyu Liu, Chong Zhang, Lingyun Jia. Fossil-like pollen grains for construction of UV-responsive photochromic and fluorogenic dual-functional film. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 2021, 625 , 126944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.126944
  52. Gurleen Kaur Gulati, Loveleen Kaur Gulati, Satish Kumar. Recent progress in multi-stimulable photochromic oxazines with their wide-ranging applications. Dyes and Pigments 2021, 192 , 109445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dyepig.2021.109445
  53. Huimin Kang, Jinting Ye, Hongqiang Wang, Yuan Zhang, Yongqing Qiu. DFT study of effect of substituents on second-order NLO response of novel BODIPY dyes. Theoretical Chemistry Accounts 2021, 140 (5) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-021-02758-5
  54. Lin Zhang, Hongjun Li, Huajun He, Yu Yang, Yuanjing Cui, Guodong Qian. Structural Variation and Switchable Nonlinear Optical Behavior of Metal–Organic Frameworks. Small 2021, 17 (6) https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202006649
  55. Steven Wild, Nathan Tice. DFT study of structural and electronic properties of 1,4-diarylcyclopenta[d] pyridazines and oxazines for non-linear optical applications. Journal of Molecular Modeling 2021, 27 (2) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-021-04676-6
  56. Roger Bresolí-Obach, Walter A. Massad, Abasi Abudulimu, Larry Lüer, Cristina Flors, Javier G. Luis, Laura I. Rosquete, Teresa A. Grillo, Ommid Anamimoghadam, Götz Bucher, Santi Nonell. 9-Aryl-phenalenones: Bioinspired thermally reversible photochromic compounds for photoswitching applications in the pico-to milliseconds range. Dyes and Pigments 2021, 186 , 109060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dyepig.2020.109060
  57. Huamiao Zhang, Minggang Tian, Rui Yang, Xiuquan He, Xiaoqiang Yu. A general strategy to increase emission shift of two-photon ratiometric pH probes using a reversible intramolecular reaction of spiro-oxazolidine. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy 2021, 246 , 119035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2020.119035
  58. Frédéric Castet, Adrien Gillet, Filip Bureš, Aurélie Plaquet, Vincent Rodriguez, Benoît Champagne. Second-order nonlinear optical properties of Λ -shaped pyrazine derivatives. Dyes and Pigments 2021, 184 , 108850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dyepig.2020.108850
  59. Shivani, Ishpreet Kaur, Karthika Chemmanghattu, Paramjit Kaur, Kamaljit Singh. Non-linear optical behavior of benzothiazole based chromophores: Second harmonic generation. Dyes and Pigments 2020, 183 , 108739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dyepig.2020.108739
  60. Lijing Gong, Cheng Ma, Tiejun Liu, Jinkai Lv, Xianchao Xun. Theoretical study on functionalized acrylonitrile compounds with a large second-order nonlinear optical response. New Journal of Chemistry 2020, 44 (45) , 19623-19629. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0NJ04575F
  61. Amin Abdollahi, Hossein Roghani-Mamaqani, Mehdi Salami-Kalajahi, Bahareh Razavi. Encryption and authentication of security patterns by ecofriendly multi-color photoluminescent inks containing oxazolidine-functionalized nanoparticles. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 2020, 580 , 192-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2020.06.121
  62. Guo-Chen Zhao, Chun-Guang Liu. Twisted chromophore assist to tetrathiafulvalene-spiropyran hybrid driving four-state molecular switch. Computational and Theoretical Chemistry 2020, 1186 , 112915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comptc.2020.112915
  63. Laurie Lescos, Sebastian P. Sitkiewicz, Pierre Beaujean, Mireille Blanchard-Desce, Benoît Champagne, Eduard Matito, Frédéric Castet. Performance of DFT functionals for calculating the second-order nonlinear optical properties of dipolar merocyanines. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 2020, 22 (29) , 16579-16594. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CP02992K
  64. Yanling Si, Guochun Yang. The photophysical properties of cycloparaphenylene-based compounds with figure-eight configurations. New Journal of Chemistry 2020, 44 (28) , 12185-12193. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0NJ02637A
  65. Li-jing Gong, Cheng Ma, Chun-ping Li, Jin-kai Lv, Xiang-yu Zhang. Electronic structure and second-order nonlinear optical properties of linear [3]spirobifluorenylene compounds. New Journal of Chemistry 2020, 44 (25) , 10484-10491. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0NJ02454F
  66. Li-jing Gong, Cheng Ma, Wan-feng Lin, Jin-kai Lv, Xiang-yu Zhang. Electronic structure and second-order nonlinear optical properties of lemniscular [16]cycloparaphenylene compounds. RSC Advances 2020, 10 (24) , 13984-13990. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RA01323D
  67. Francisco A. Santos, Luis M. G. Abegão, Ruben D. Fonseca, Aline M. Alcântara, Cleber R. Mendonça, Márcio A. R. C. Alencar, Marcelo S. Valle, Kenji Kamada, Leonardo De Boni, José J. Rodrigues. Nonlinear Optical Study in a Set of Dibenzylideneacetone Derivatives with Potential for Optical Frequency Conversion. Photonics 2020, 7 (1) , 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics7010008
  68. Amin Abdollahi, Ata Herizchi, Hossein Roghani-Mamaqani, Hossein Alidaei-Sharif. Interaction of photoswitchable nanoparticles with cellulosic materials for anticounterfeiting and authentication security documents. Carbohydrate Polymers 2020, 230 , 115603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115603
  69. Amin Abdollahi, Hossein Roghani-Mamaqani, Bahareh Razavi. Stimuli-chromism of photoswitches in smart polymers: Recent advances and applications as chemosensors. Progress in Polymer Science 2019, 98 , 101149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.101149
  70. Claire Tonnelé, Frédéric Castet. Nonlinear optical properties of spirocyclohexadine photochromes: insights from DFT calculations. Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences 2019, 18 (11) , 2759-2765. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9pp00312f
  71. Amin Abdollahi, Hossein Roghani-Mamaqani, Bahareh Razavi, Mehdi Salami-Kalajahi. The light-controlling of temperature-responsivity in stimuli-responsive polymers. Polymer Chemistry 2019, 10 (42) , 5686-5720. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9PY00890J
  72. Jinjian Liu, Jing Li, Wenbo Lu. Effect of counter cations on the photochromic behaviors of three Zn–viologen complexes. New Journal of Chemistry 2019, 43 (32) , 12678-12683. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9NJ03022K
  73. Ali Muhammad Arif, Afifa Yousaf, Rong-Lin Zhong, Mansoor Akhtar, Shabbir Muhammad, Hong-liang Xu, Zhong-Min Su. Metal ions doped into merocyanine form of coumarin derivatives: nonlinear optical molecular switches. Journal of Molecular Modeling 2019, 25 (8) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-019-4068-6
  74. Lijing Gong, Chunyu Liu, Xin Du, Cong Wang, Guochun Yang. Electronic structure and second-order nonlinear optical property of chiral peropyrenes. Journal of Molecular Modeling 2019, 25 (8) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-019-4106-4
  75. Li-jing Gong, Chun-yu Liu, Cheng Ma, Wan-feng Lin, Jin-kai Lv, Xiang-yu Zhang. Theoretical study on the electronic structure and second-order nonlinear optical properties of benzannulated or selenophene-annulated expanded helicenes. RSC Advances 2019, 9 (30) , 17382-17390. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RA01136F
  76. Jin-jian Liu, Jing Li, Guo-zheng Zhao. Photochromism of supramolecular assemblies based on benzenecarboxylate donors and viologen acceptors. New Journal of Chemistry 2019, 43 (17) , 6607-6614. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9NJ00796B
  77. Bodo Alexander Voigt, Torben Steenbock, Carmen Herrmann. Structural diradical character. Journal of Computational Chemistry 2019, 40 (7) , 854-865. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.25768
  78. Jin-jian Liu, Jing Li, Guo-zheng Zhao. Photochromism of three supramolecular assemblies derived from benzenecarboxylate donors and viologen acceptors. Polyhedron 2019, 161 , 237-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poly.2019.01.014
  79. Jin‐jian Liu. Photochromism and decolorization controlled by auxiliary ligands of complexes derived from 1‐methyl‐4,4′‐bipyridinium cation. Applied Organometallic Chemistry 2019, 33 (1) https://doi.org/10.1002/aoc.4578
  80. Kornelia Pielak, Flavie Bondu, Lionel Sanguinet, Vincent Rodriguez, Frédéric Castet, Benoît Champagne. Acido-triggered switching of the second-order nonlinear optical properties of a ferrocenyl-containing indolino-oxazolidine derivative. Dyes and Pigments 2019, 160 , 641-646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dyepig.2018.07.007
  81. Claire Tonnelé, Benoît Champagne, Luca Muccioli, Frédéric Castet. Second-order nonlinear optical properties of Stenhouse photoswitches: insights from density functional theory. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 2018, 20 (43) , 27658-27667. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8CP05843A
  82. Chunyu Liu, Xue Zhang, Xiumei Pan, Guochun Yang. Unveiling the Photophysical Properties of Boron Heptaaryldipyrromethene Derivatives. ChemPhysChem 2018, 19 (20) , 2751-2757. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.201800452
  83. Masahiro Oe, Koji Miki, Huiying Mu, Hiroshi Harada, Akiyo Morinibu, Kouichi Ohe. pH-Responsive Cy5 dyes having nucleophilic substituents for molecular imaging. Tetrahedron Letters 2018, 59 (35) , 3317-3321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tetlet.2018.07.044
  84. . Introduction. 2018, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527801916.ch1
  85. . Nonlinear Optical Response of ICT Molecules. 2018, 149-195. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527801916.ch5
  86. Jinjian Liu. Novel photo- and/or hydrochromic organometallics derived from methyl viologen cations. Dyes and Pigments 2018, 154 , 92-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dyepig.2018.02.040
  87. Xiaojun Wang, Chang Gu, Hongzhi Zheng, Yu‐Mo Zhang, Sean Xiao‐An Zhang. A Multi‐Stimuli‐Responsive Oxazine Molecular Switch: A Strategy for the Design of Electrochromic Materials. Chemistry – An Asian Journal 2018, 13 (9) , 1206-1212. https://doi.org/10.1002/asia.201800282
  88. Pierre Beaujean, Benoît Champagne. Coupled cluster evaluation of the second and third harmonic scattering responses of small molecules. Theoretical Chemistry Accounts 2018, 137 (4) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-018-2219-y
  89. Venkatakrishnan Parthasarathy, Ravindra Pandey, Puspendu Kumar Das, Frédéric Castet, Mireille Blanchard‐Desce. Linear and Nonlinear Optical Properties of Tricyanopropylidene‐Based Merocyanine Dyes: Synergistic Experimental and Theoretical Investigations. ChemPhysChem 2018, 19 (2) , 187-197. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.201701143
  90. Stein van Bezouw, Min-Jeong Koo, Seung-Chul Lee, Seung-Heon Lee, Jochen Campo, O-Pil Kwon, Wim Wenseleers. Three-stage pH-switchable organic chromophores with large nonlinear optical responses and switching contrasts. Chemical Communications 2018, 54 (56) , 7842-7845. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8CC03495H
  91. Qi Shi, Meng Sun, Jinmei Tian, Wenjie Zhang, Guochun Yang. Photophysical properties of chiral covalent organic cages. Computational and Theoretical Chemistry 2017, 1120 , 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comptc.2017.09.016
  92. Frédéric Castet, Timothée Lerychard, Kornelia Pielak, György Szalóki, Clément Dalinot, Philippe Leriche, Lionel Sanguinet, Benoît Champagne, Vincent Rodriguez. How Dimerization Through a Spiro Junction Modifies the Nonlinear Optical Properties of a Push–Pull Organic Dye: Insights from Theory and Hyper‐Rayleigh Scattering. ChemPhotoChem 2017, 1 (3) , 93-101. https://doi.org/10.1002/cptc.201600039
  93. Yiwen Tang, Hui Liu, Hui Zhang, Dandan Li, Jian Su, Shengyi Zhang, Hongping Zhou, Shengli Li, Jieying Wu, Yupeng Tian. A series of stilbazolium salts with A-π-A model and their third-order nonlinear optical response in the near-IR region. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy 2017, 175 , 92-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2016.12.017
  94. Ariel Adamski, Małgorzata Osińska, Maciej Kubicki, Zbigniew Hnatejko, Giuseppe Consiglio, Violetta Patroniak. Molecular Switching of Copper Complexes with Quaterpyridine. European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry 2017, 2017 (5) , 859-872. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejic.201601148
  95. Koji Miki, Kentaro Kojima, Kazuaki Oride, Hiroshi Harada, Akiyo Morinibu, Kouichi Ohe. pH-Responsive near-infrared fluorescent cyanine dyes for molecular imaging based on pH sensing. Chemical Communications 2017, 53 (55) , 7792-7795. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7CC03035E
  96. E. Cariati, X. Liu, Y. Geng, A. Forni, E. Lucenti, S. Righetto, S. Decurtins, S.-X. Liu. Stimuli-responsive NLO properties of tetrathiafulvalene-fused donor–acceptor chromophores. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 2017, 19 (33) , 22573-22579. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7CP04687A
  97. Xiu-Shuang Xing, Rong-Jian Sa, Pei-Xin Li, Ning-Ning Zhang, Zhong-Yuan Zhou, Bin-Wen Liu, Jie Liu, Ming-Sheng Wang, Guo-Cong Guo. Second-order nonlinear optical switching with a record-high contrast for a photochromic and thermochromic bistable crystal. Chem. Sci. 2017, 8 (11) , 7751-7757. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7SC01228D
  98. Chunyu Liu, Guochun Yang, Yanling Si, Youjun Liu, Xiumei Pan. Understanding photophysical properties of chiral conjugated corrals for organic photovoltaics. Journal of Materials Chemistry C 2017, 5 (14) , 3495-3502. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7TC00337D
  99. Pierre Beaujean, Benoît Champagne. Coupled cluster evaluation of the frequency dispersion of the first and second hyperpolarizabilities of water, methanol, and dimethyl ether. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2016, 145 (4) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4958736
  • Abstract

    Scheme 1

    Scheme 1. Reference Indolinooxazolidine (1a) and Spiropyran (2a) NLO Switches Together with the Equilibria with Their Open Forms, As Triggered by Acid/Base Addition (1b+/2b+) or by Irradiation (1b/2b)

    Scheme 2

    Scheme 2. Oxazines (312) in Their Closed (a), Zwitterionic Open (b), and Protonated Open (b+) Forms

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Experimental versus ab initio βHRS values (λ = 1907 nm).

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Spatial distribution on the S1–S5 and R1 molecular moieties of the variations of the Mulliken charges when opening the oxazine, as determined at the IEF-PCM/M06/6-311G(d) level (in chloroform). (Top) Phototriggered opening, Δq = q(b) – q(a); (Bottom) acido-triggered opening, Δq = q(b+) – q(a).

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. IEF-PCM/TDHF/6-311+G(d) dynamic (1064 nm) ΔβHRS(X) = βHRSX– βHRS7 for the closed (a), protonated (b+), and zwitterionic (b) open forms of 36 and 812 (in chloroform).

  • References

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    This article references 38 other publications.

    1. 1
      (a) Berkovic, G.; Krongauz, V.; Weiss, V. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 1741 1754 DOI: 10.1021/cr9800715
      (b) Bouas-Laurent, H.; Dürr, H. Pure Appl. Chem. 2001, 73, 639 665 DOI: 10.1351/pac200173040639
      (c) Cusido, J.; Deniz, E.; Raymo, F. M. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 2009, 2031 2045 DOI: 10.1002/ejoc.200801244
      (d) Feringa, B. L.; Browne, W. R., Eds. Molecular Switches, 2nd ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2011.
      (e) Zhang, J.; Zou, Q.; Tian, H. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 378 399 DOI: 10.1002/adma.201201521
    2. 2
      (a) Coe, B. J. Chem. - Eur. J. 1999, 5, 2464 2471 DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3765(19990903)5:9<2464::AID-CHEM2464>3.0.CO;2-L
      (b) Delaire, J. A.; Nakatani, K. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 1817 1845 DOI: 10.1021/cr980078m
      (c) Castet, F.; Rodriguez, V.; Pozzo, J.-L.; Ducasse, L.; Plaquet, A.; Champagne, B. Acc. Chem. Res. 2013, 46, 2656 2665 DOI: 10.1021/ar4000955
    3. 3
      Okuno, K.; Shigeta, Y.; Kishi, R.; Nakano, M. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2013, 4, 2418 2422 DOI: 10.1021/jz401228c
    4. 4
      (a) Kanis, D. R.; Ratner, M. A.; Marks, T. J. Chem. Rev. 1994, 94, 195 242 DOI: 10.1021/cr00025a007
      (b) Brédas, J. L.; Adant, C.; Tackx, P.; Persoons, A.; Pierce, B. M. Chem. Rev. 1994, 94, 243 278 DOI: 10.1021/cr00025a008
      (c) Verbiest, T.; Houbrechts, S.; Kauranen, M.; Clays, C.; Persoons, A. J. Mater. Chem. 1997, 7, 2175 2189 DOI: 10.1039/a703434b
      (d) Nonlinear Optical Properties of Matter: From Molecules to Condensed Phases; Papadopoulos, M. G.; Leszczynski, J.; Sadlej, A. J., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, 2006.
      (e) Murugan, N. A.; Kongsted, J.; Rinkevicius, Z.; Ågren, H. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2010, 107, 16453 16458 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1006572107
      (f) Johnson, L. E.; Dalton, L. R.; Robinson, B. H. Acc. Chem. Res. 2014, 47, 3258 3265 DOI: 10.1021/ar5000727
    5. 5
      Loucif-Saïbi, R.; Nakatani, K.; Delaire, J.; Dumont, M.; Sekkat, Z. Chem. Mater. 1993, 5, 229 236 DOI: 10.1021/cm00026a014
    6. 6
      (a) Gilat, S. L.; Kawaï, S. H.; Lehn, J. M. Chem. - Eur. J. 1995, 1, 275 284 DOI: 10.1002/chem.19950010504
      (b) Aubert, V.; Guerchais, V.; Ishow, E.; Hoang-Thi, K.; Ledoux, I.; Nakatani, K.; Le Bozec, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 577 580 DOI: 10.1002/anie.200704138
    7. 7
      Houbrechts, S.; Clays, K.; Persoons, A.; Pikramenou, Z.; Lehn, J.-M. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1996, 258, 485 489 DOI: 10.1016/0009-2614(96)00676-8
    8. 8
      (a) Nakatani, K.; Delaire, J. A. Chem. Mater. 1997, 9, 2682 2684 DOI: 10.1021/cm970369w
      (b)

      (a)

      Sliwa, M.; Létard, S.; Malfant, I.; Nierlich, M.; Lacroix, P. G.; Asahi, T.; Masuhara, H.; Yu, P.; Nakatani, K. Chem. Mater. 2005, 17, 4727 4735 DOI: 10.1021/cm050929o
      (c) Bogdan, E.; Plaquet, A.; Antonov, L.; Rodriguez, V.; Ducasse, L.; Champagne, B.; Castet, F. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 12760 12768 DOI: 10.1021/jp103556c
    9. 9
      (a) Coe, B. J.; Houbrechts, S.; Asselberghs, I.; Persoons, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 366 369 DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3773(19990201)38:3<366::AID-ANIE366>3.0.CO;2-D
      (b) Averseng, F.; Lepetit, C.; Lacroix, P. G.; Tuchagues, J. P. Chem. Mater. 2000, 12, 2225 2229 DOI: 10.1021/cm001015z
      (c) Asselberghs, I.; Clays, K.; Persoons, A.; McDonagh, A. M.; Ward, M. D.; McCleverty, J. A. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2003, 368, 408 411 DOI: 10.1016/S0009-2614(02)01890-0
      (d) Aubert, V.; Guerchais, V.; Ishow, E.; Hoang-Thi, K.; Ledoux, I.; Nakatani, K.; Le Bozec, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 577 580 DOI: 10.1002/anie.200704138
      (e) Boubekeur–Lecaque, L.; Coe, B. J.; Harris, J. A.; Helliwell, M.; Asselberghs, I.; Clays, K.; Foerier, S.; Verbiest, T. Inorg. Chem. 2011, 50, 12886 12899 DOI: 10.1021/ic202145b
      (f) Green, K. A.; Cifuentes, M. P.; Samoc, M.; Humphrey, M. G. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2011, 255, 2530 2544 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2011.02.021
      (g) Di Bella, S.; Oliveri, I. P.; Colombo, A.; Dragonetti, C.; Righetto, S.; Roberto, D. Dalton Trans. 2012, 41, 7013 7016 DOI: 10.1039/c2dt30702b
      (h) Zhang, Y. R.; Castet, F.; Champagne, B. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2013, 574, 42 46 DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2013.04.071
      (i) Boixel, J.; Guerchais, V.; LeBozec, H.; Jacquemin, D.; Amar, A.; Boucekkine, A.; Colombo, A.; Dragonetti, C.; Marinotto, D.; Roberto, D.; Righetto, S.; De Angelis, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 5367 5375 DOI: 10.1021/ja4131615
      (j) Wang, W. Y.; Ma, N. N.; Sun, S. L.; Qiu, Y. Q. Organometallics 2014, 33, 3341 3352 DOI: 10.1021/om500224g
      (k) Boixel, J.; Guerchais, V.; Le Bozec, H.; Chantzis, A.; Jacquemin, D.; Colombo, A.; Dragonetti, C.; Marinotto, D.; Roberto, D. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 7805 7808 DOI: 10.1039/C5CC01893E
    10. 10
      Asselberghs, I.; Zhao, Y.; Clays, K.; Persoons, A.; Comito, A.; Rubin, Y. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2002, 364, 279 283 DOI: 10.1016/S0009-2614(02)01346-5
    11. 11
      (a) Sanguinet, L.; Pozzo, J.-L.; Rodriguez, V.; Adamietz, F.; Castet, F.; Ducasse, L.; Champagne, B. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 11139 11150 DOI: 10.1021/jp0442450
      (b) Mançois, F.; Pozzo, J.-L.; Adamietz, F.; Rodriguez, V.; Ducasse, L.; Castet, F.; Plaquet, A.; Champagne, B. Chem. - Eur. J. 2009, 15, 2560 2571 DOI: 10.1002/chem.200801967
      (c) Szaloki, G.; Alévêque, O.; Pozzo, J. L.; Hadji, R.; Levillain, E.; Sanguinet, L. J. Phys. Chem. B 2015, 119, 307 315 DOI: 10.1021/jp511825f
      (d) Bondu, F.; Hadji, R.; Szalóki, G.; Alévêque, O.; Sanguinet, L.; Pozzo, J. L.; Cavagnat, D.; Buffeteau, T.; Rodriguez, V. J. Phys. Chem. B 2015, 119, 6758 6765 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b03070
    12. 12
      Giraud, M.; Léaustic, A.; Guillot, R.; Yu, P.; Lacroix, P. G.; Nakatani, K.; Pansu, R.; Maurel, F. J. Mater. Chem. 2007, 17, 4414 4425 DOI: 10.1039/b704806h
    13. 13
      Plaquet, A.; Guillaume, M.; Champagne, B.; Castet, F.; Ducasse, L.; Pozzo, J. L.; Rodriguez, V. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2008, 10, 6223 6232 DOI: 10.1039/b806561f
    14. 14
      (a) Plaquet, A.; Champagne, B.; Castet, F.; Ducasse, L.; Bogdan, E.; Rodriguez, V.; Pozzo, J.-L. New J. Chem. 2009, 33, 1349 1356 DOI: 10.1039/b900432g
      (b) Broman, S. L.; Jevric, M.; Bond, A. D.; Nielsen, M. B. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 79, 41 64 DOI: 10.1021/jo4020326
    15. 15
      (a) Plaquet, A.; Champagne, B.; Kulhánek, J.; Bures, F.; Bogdan, E.; Castet, F.; Ducasse, L.; Rodriguez, V. ChemPhysChem 2011, 12, 3245 3252 DOI: 10.1002/cphc.201100299
      (b) Bures, F.; Cermakova, A.; Kulhánek, J.; Ludwig, M.; Kuznik, W.; Kityk, I. V.; Mikysek, T.; Ruzicka, A. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 2012, 529 538 DOI: 10.1002/ejoc.201101226
    16. 16
      Cariati, E.; Dragonetti, C.; Lucenti, E.; Nisic, F.; Righetto, S.; Roberto, D.; Tordin, E. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 1608 1610 DOI: 10.1039/c3cc48149b
    17. 17
      Castet, F.; Champagne, B.; Pina, F.; Rodriguez, V. ChemPhysChem 2014, 15, 2221 2224 DOI: 10.1002/cphc.201402190
    18. 18
      van Bezouw, S.; Campo, J.; Lee, S. H.; Kwon, O. P.; Wenseleers, W. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 21658 21663 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b06968
    19. 19
      Asselberghs, I.; Flors, C.; Ferrighi, L.; Botek, E.; Champagne, B.; Mizuno, H.; Ando, R.; Miyawaki, A.; Hofkens, J.; Van der Auweraer, M.; Clays, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 15713 15719 DOI: 10.1021/ja805171q
    20. 20
      (a) Tomasulo, M.; Sortino, S.; White, A. J. P.; Raymo, F. M. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 8180 8189 DOI: 10.1021/jo051417w
      (b) Deniz, E.; Tomasulo, M.; Cusido, J.; Sortino, S.; Raymo, F. M. Langmuir 2011, 27, 11773 11783 DOI: 10.1021/la201062h
      (c) Deniz, E.; Cusido, J.; Swaminathan, S.; Battal, M.; Impellizzeri, S.; Sortino, S.; Raymo, F. M. J. Photochem. Photobiol., A 2012, 229, 20 28 DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2011.11.008
      (d) Deniz, E.; Tomasulo, M.; Cusido, J.; Yildiz, I.; Petriella, M.; Bossi, M. L.; Sortino, S.; Raymo, F. M. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 6058 6068 DOI: 10.1021/jp211796p
      (e) Garcia-Amorós, J.; Swami-Nathan, S.; Raymo, F. M. Dyes Pigm. 2014, 106, 71 73 DOI: 10.1016/j.dyepig.2014.02.019
    21. 21
      Zhu, S.; Li, M.; Tang, S.; Zhang, Y.-M.; Yang, B.; Zhang, S. X.-A. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 2014, 1227 1235 DOI: 10.1002/ejoc.201301182
    22. 22
      (a) Raymo, F. M. J. Phys. Chem. A 2012, 116, 11888 95 DOI: 10.1021/jp3095787
      (b) Toliautas, S.; Sulskus, J.; Valkunas, L.; Vengris, M. Chem. Phys. 2012, 404, 64 73 DOI: 10.1016/j.chemphys.2012.03.006
      (c) Redeckas, K.; Martynaitis, V.; Šačkus, A.; Vengris, M. J. Photochem. Photobiol., A 2014, 285, 7 15 DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2014.04.010
      (d) Redeckas, K.; Voiciuk, V.; Steponavičiute, R.; Martynaitis, V.; Šačkus, A.; Vengris, M. J. Phys. Chem. A 2014, 118, 5642 51 DOI: 10.1021/jp505723q
    23. 23
      Verbiest, T.; Clays, K.; Rodriguez, V. Second-Order Nonlinear Optical Characterization Techniques: An Introduction; Taylor & Francis: Boca Raton, FL, 2009.
    24. 24
      (a) Castet, F.; Bogdan, E.; Plaquet, A.; Ducasse, L.; Champagne, B.; Rodriguez, V. J. Chem. Phys. 2012, 136, 024506 DOI: 10.1063/1.3675848
      (b) Castet, F.; Blanchard-Desce, M.; Adamietz, F.; Poronik, Y. M.; Gryko, D. T.; Rodriguez, V. ChemPhysChem 2014, 15, 2575 81 DOI: 10.1002/cphc.201402083
    25. 25
      Bersohn, R. J. Chem. Phys. 1966, 45, 3184 3198 DOI: 10.1063/1.1728092
    26. 26
      (a) Oudar, J. L.; Chemla, D. S. J. Chem. Phys. 1977, 66, 2664 2668 DOI: 10.1063/1.434213
      (b) Campo, J.; Wenseleers, W.; Goovaerts, E.; Szablewski, M.; Cross, G. H. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 287 296 DOI: 10.1021/jp0758824
    27. 27
      (a) Orr, B.; Ward, J. Mol. Phys. 1971, 20, 513 526 DOI: 10.1080/00268977100100481
      (b) Bishop, D. M. J. Chem. Phys. 1994, 100, 6535 6542 DOI: 10.1063/1.467062
    28. 28
      Zhao, Y.; Truhlar, D. G. Theor. Chem. Acc. 2008, 120, 215 241 DOI: 10.1007/s00214-007-0310-x
    29. 29
      Li, R.; Zheng, J.; Truhlar, D. G. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2010, 12, 12697 12701 DOI: 10.1039/c0cp00549e
    30. 30
      (a) Sekino, H.; Bartlett, R. J. J. Chem. Phys. 1986, 85, 976 989 DOI: 10.1063/1.451255
      (b) Karna, S. P.; Dupuis, M. J. Comput. Chem. 1991, 12, 487 504 DOI: 10.1002/jcc.540120409
    31. 31
      (a) Champagne, B.; Kirtman, B. J. Chem. Phys. 2006, 125, 024101 DOI: 10.1063/1.2206181
      (b) de Wergifosse, M.; Champagne, B. J. Chem. Phys. 2011, 134, 074113 DOI: 10.1063/1.3549814
      (c) Hidalgo Cardenuto, M.; Champagne, B. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 23634 23642 DOI: 10.1039/C5CP03455H
    32. 32
      Cohen, H. D.; Roothaan, C. C. J. J. Chem. Phys. 1965, 43, S34 DOI: 10.1063/1.1701512
    33. 33
      (a) Mohammed, A. A. K.; Limacher, P. A.; Champagne, B. J. Comput. Chem. 2013, 34, 1497 1503 DOI: 10.1002/jcc.23285
      (b) de Wergifosse, M.; Liégeois, V.; Champagne, B. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2014, 114, 900 910 DOI: 10.1002/qua.24685
    34. 34
      (a) Sekino, H.; Bartlett, R. J. J. Chem. Phys. 1986, 84, 2726 2733 DOI: 10.1063/1.450348
      (b) Rice, J. E.; Handy, N. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 1992, 43, 91 118 DOI: 10.1002/qua.560430110
      (c) Sekino, H.; Bartlett, R. J. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1995, 234, 87 93 DOI: 10.1016/0009-2614(95)00007-Q
      (d) Jacquemin, D.; Champagne, B.; Hättig, C. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2000, 319, 327 334 DOI: 10.1016/S0009-2614(00)00155-X
    35. 35
      Willetts, A.; Rice, J. E.; Burland, D. M.; Shelton, D. P. J. Chem. Phys. 1992, 97, 7590 7599 DOI: 10.1063/1.463479
    36. 36
      (a) Mennucci, B.; Cammi, R.; Tomasi, J. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 1999, 75, 767 781 DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-461X(1999)75:4/5<767::AID-QUA43>3.0.CO;2-L
      (b) Tomasi, J.; Mennucci, B.; Cammi, R. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 2999 3094 DOI: 10.1021/cr9904009
    37. 37
      Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V.; Mennucci, B.; Petersson, G. A.; Nakatsuji, H.; Caricato, M.; Li, X.; Hratchian, H. P.; Izmaylov, A. F.; Bloino, J.; Zheng, G.; Sonnenberg, J. L.; Hada, M.; Ehara, M.; Toyota, K.; Fukuda, R.; Hasegawa, J.; Ishida, M.; Nakajima, T.; Honda, Y.; Kitao, O.; Nakai, H.; Vreven, T.; Montgomery, J. A., Jr.; Peralta, J. E.; Ogliaro, F.; Bearpark, M.; Heyd, J. J.; Brothers, E.; Kudin, K. N.; Staroverov, V. N.; Kobayashi, R.; Normand, J.; Raghavachari, K.; Rendell, A.; Burant, J. C.; Iyengar, S. S.; Tomasi, J.; Cossi, M.; Rega, N.; Millam, N. J.; Klene, M.; Knox, J. E.; Cross, J. B.; Bakken, V.; Adamo, C.; Jaramillo, J.; Gomperts, R.; Stratmann, R. E.; Yazyev, O.; Austin, A. J.; Cammi, R.; Pomelli, C.; Ochterski, J. W.; Martin, R. L.; Morokuma, K.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Voth, G. A.; Salvador, P.; Dannenberg, J. J.; Dapprich, S.; Daniels, A. D.; Farkas, O.; Foresman, J. B.; Ortiz, J. V.; Cioslowski, J.; Fox, D. J.Gaussian 09, Revision D01; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford, CT, 2009.
    38. 38
      (a) Castet, F.; Champagne, B. J. Phys. Chem. A 2001, 105, 1366 1370 DOI: 10.1021/jp003746s
      (b) Suponitsky, K. Y.; Masunov, A. E. J. Chem. Phys. 2013, 139, 094310 DOI: 10.1063/1.4819265
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/jacs.5b13243.

    • Experimental UV/vis absorption spectra of the closed and protonated open forms of 3, 4, 11, and 12 recorded in chloroform together with characteristics of their main low-energy bands and frequency dispersion factors; Simulated UV/vis absorption spectra of the closed and open forms of compounds 112 together with the excitation energies, oscillator strengths, and molecular orbitals involved in the major singly excited determinants for the dominant low-energy transitions; Parameters of the linear regression relationships between the experimental and simulated UV/vis absorption spectra of compounds 3, 4, 11, and 12 in their closed and protonated open forms; HRS power and polarization scans of the closed and protonated open forms of 3, 4, 11, and 12; first hyperpolarizabilities of the protonated open and closed forms of compounds 112 as calculated at different levels of approximation and their contrast ratios; Spatial distribution on the S1–S5 and R1 molecular moieties of the Mulliken, Hirshfeld, and NPA charge distributions and their variations for the closed, zwitterionic, and protonated open forms of compounds 112; Cartesian coordinates and absolute energies of all compounds (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect