ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Mechanistic Insights into the Alternating Copolymerization of Epoxides and Cyclic Anhydrides Using a (Salph)AlCl and Iminium Salt Catalytic System
My Activity

Figure 1Loading Img
  • Open Access
Article

Mechanistic Insights into the Alternating Copolymerization of Epoxides and Cyclic Anhydrides Using a (Salph)AlCl and Iminium Salt Catalytic System
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

View Author Information
Department of Chemistry, Center for Sustainable Polymers, Chemical Theory Center, and Minnesota Supercomputing Institute, University of Minnesota, 207 Pleasant Street SE, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States
§ Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Baker Laboratory, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, United States
Open PDFSupporting Information (1)

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Cite this: J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 42, 15222–15231
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.7b09079
Published October 6, 2017

Copyright © 2017 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Mechanistic studies involving synergistic experiment and theory were performed on the perfectly alternating copolymerization of 1-butene oxide and carbic anhydride using a (salph)AlCl/[PPN]Cl catalytic pair. These studies showed a first-order dependence of the polymerization rate on the epoxide, a zero-order dependence on the cyclic anhydride, and a first-order dependence on the catalyst only if the two members of the catalytic pair are treated as a single unit. Studies of model complexes showed that a mixed alkoxide/carboxylate aluminum intermediate preferentially opens cyclic anhydride over epoxide. In addition, ring-opening of epoxide by an intermediate comprising multiple carboxylates was found to be rate-determining. On the basis of the experimental results and analysis by DFT calculations, a mechanism involving two catalytic cycles is proposed wherein the alternating copolymerization proceeds via intermediates that have carboxylate ligation in common, and a secondary cycle involving a bis-alkoxide species is avoided, thus explaining the lack of side reactions until the polymerization is complete.

Copyright © 2017 American Chemical Society

Introduction

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The alternating copolymerization of epoxides and cyclic anhydrides is a burgeoning route to new polyesters (Scheme 1). (1, 2) The wide range of available monomers, including ones that are renewably sourced, and the opportunities for functionalization of these polyesters via postpolymerization modification enable access to myriad new materials with unique properties that are not available through condensation reactions or ring-opening of lactones. (Salen)MX complexes (M = Cr, Co, Al, Mn, and Fe) are a particularly widely used class of catalysts for the copolymerization. (3-23) In general, (salen)MX complexes require addition of a nucleophilic cocatalyst to achieve high activity, with bis(triphenylphosphine)iminium salts ([PPN]X) being the most widely used and effective. (8) Undesirable side reactions include epimerization, transesterification, and homopolymerization of epoxides; for most catalysts, these occur only when the limiting monomer is consumed and the polymerization is complete. (15, 23)

Scheme 1

Scheme 1. Alternating Copolymerization of Epoxides and Cyclic Anhydrides
While a generalized mechanistic picture has been developed for the copolymerization reaction, questions remain that are critical to answer in order to understand the molecular details and, ultimately, use that knowledge to design more effective catalysts. Prior studies focused mostly on the Cr-catalyzed copolymerization of phthalic anhydride and cyclohexene oxide and revealed that maximal rate was achieved with one equivalent of [PPN]Cl as the cocatalyst and that the rate is first-order in [epoxide], consistent with ring-opening of epoxide being rate-determining. (6, 24) On the basis of these findings and in analogy to what is known for CO2/epoxide copolymerizations, (25) a simplified reaction pathway has been proposed (Scheme 2). According to this postulate, an epoxide binds to an open coordination site on the metal center and is activated for subsequent attack by a [PPN] carboxylate in the rate-determining step. The resulting alkoxide then ring-opens an anhydride. While intuitively appealing, evidence supporting this mechanism is sparse, and many questions about the details remain unanswered. For example: Is this mechanism applicable to catalysts with metal centers other than chromium and for other epoxide/anhydride combinations? What is the identity of X in the various intermediates, and does it change during the catalytic cycle? What is the role of the cocatalyst? How are polymer chains initiated? What underlies the high degree of polymerization control? Why do side reactions primarily occur when the polymerization is complete? And what are the transition state structures and energetics of the key ring-opening steps?

Scheme 2

Scheme 2. Simplified Mechanism of Epoxide/Cyclic Anhydride Copolymerization with a (Salen)AlX Complex, Where X Is an Alkoxide, Carboxylate, or Halide, and P Is a Growing Polymer Chain
Herein we report the results of a detailed study aimed at answering the aforementioned questions, with the ultimate goal of developing insights useful for the design of improved catalysts. We selected the catalytic pair (salph)AlCl and [PPN]Cl (Scheme 3) for mechanistic study because (a) it has been shown to exhibit reactivity toward a variety of epoxides and tricyclic anhydrides, producing new polyesters with good molecular weight control and desirable high glass transition temperature (Tg) values with negligible side reactions until the polymerization is complete, (15, 22, 23) and (b) (salph)AlCl derivatives are diamagnetic, in contrast to other common copolymerization catalysts such as (salen)Cr and Co species, thus rendering 1H NMR experiments convenient. We chose 1-butene oxide (BO) as the epoxide since it has a high enough boiling point (63 °C) to safely perform NMR experiments at the temperature required to observe reactions at reasonable rates (50 °C). Carbic anhydride (CPMA) was selected due to its higher polymerization rate compared to bulkier substrates (23) and its symmetry, which facilitates NMR analysis. We performed bulk polymerization and NMR studies to establish the rate law and order in each component, and mass spectrometric (MS) and NMR studies to investigate the individual epoxide and anhydride ring-opening and initiation steps using relevant model complexes. In addition, we undertook computational studies to characterize the most energetically favorable pathway(s) and to help characterize various proposed intermediates at the atomic level of detail. Through this synergistic experimental and theoretical work, we have developed a detailed understanding of the epoxide/anhydride mechanism that will assist future catalyst design efforts.

Scheme 3

Scheme 3. Copolymerization System Chosen for Mechanistic Study

Results and Discussion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Initiation

Previous studies showed that the majority of polymers have end groups consistent with the polymer chains being initiated via ring-opening of an epoxide by a chloride ion. (23) We extended this work in order to better define the nature of the species responsible for initiation of the copolymerization reaction. Treatment of (salph)AlCl (0.02 M in CDCl3) with BO (1 equiv) at ∼22 °C quantitatively yielded (salph)AlOR within minutes, with preferential attack on the sterically unhindered carbon of the epoxide indicated by NMR spectroscopy (Scheme 4, Figure S26). This regioselectivity is in agreement with that previously reported. (15, 25f)

Scheme 4

Scheme 4. Reaction of (Salph)AlCl with 1-Butene Oxide
Further experiments were performed to test initiation by [PPN]Cl. No reaction was observed upon heating solutions of BO and [PPN]Cl at 50 °C for 6 h, although it has been reported that the copolymerization is catalyzed by [PPN]Cl at high temperatures (>100 °C). (26) To test the idea that [PPN]Cl might initiate epoxide ring-opening in the presence of an aluminum species, and surmising that that species might be the rapidly formed (salph)AlOR complex, we evaluated whether that complex reacted with BO and/or CPMA in the presence of [PPN]Cl. To this end, we mixed (salph)AlCl (0.02 M in CDCl3) with BO (2 equiv) and CPMA (1 equiv), which yielded (salph)AlOR within minutes plus 1 equiv each of unreacted BO and CPMA. To this solution was injected a solution of [PPN]Cl (1 equiv, 0.02 M in CDCl3), and the resulting mixture was heated to 50 °C and monitored by NMR spectroscopy for 14 h. During this time, BO was slowly consumed (initial rate 1 × 10–8 M/s, ∼10% consumed after 14 h), but CPMA remained unreacted (Figure S28).
To explain these results, two routes for consumption of additional BO may be envisioned. Epoxide could be activated by binding to (salph)AlOR and then ring-opened by [PPN]Cl (Scheme 5a). Alternatively, (salph)AlOR and [PPN]Cl could undergo a salt metathesis reaction, regenerating (salph)AlCl which would open BO rapidly, likely through a bimetallic pathway as found for other (salen)MX complexes (Scheme 5b). (25a, 27) Either route generates the same species, formally an aluminum alkoxide and [PPN][OR] which may or may not interact with each other (i.e., [PPN][(salph)Al(OR)2] or (salph)AlOR/[PPN][OR], which we term “AA” to signify the presence of two alkoxide units). A similar initiation process has been suggested for the polymerization of lactide, in which a combination of (salcy)AlCl and [PPN]Cl was reacted with propylene oxide to form a proposed bis(alkoxide) species, [(salcy)Al(OR)2], as the reactive catalyst. (28) In our attempts to isolate the AA species, a 1:1 ratio of (salph)AlCl and [PPN]Cl was combined with BO at various concentrations. The solutions were deep red, consistent with formation of a 6-coordinate [(salph)Al(OR)2] moiety, as theory predicts anionic 6-coordinate Al compounds to absorb further into the visible region of the spectrum than related uncharged aluminum complexes (see below). However, 1H NMR spectra of these mixtures contained peaks associated with multiple ring-opened products and no one species could be isolated and fully characterized (Figure S31).

Scheme 5

Scheme 5. Proposed Initiation Routes for [PPN]Cl
The failure to isolate a single AA species notwithstanding, we postulate that reaction of the bis(alkoxide) complex with CPMA would give the first repeat unit. However, no CPMA reacted in the experiment involving reaction of (salph)AlOR with equimolar BO and CPMA. To rationalize this observation, we postulate that the rate of reaction with CPMA is low in this case because the reactive species is present at low concentrations, as only 10% of the BO has reacted after 14 h, and neither BO or CPMA is present in a large excess as is the case under polymerization conditions. Consistent with this rationale, under conditions similar to the polymerization, albeit with the epoxide concentration lower than typical (1:1:100:100 (salph)AlCl:[PPN]Cl:CPMA:BO, where 1 equiv = 13 μmol, 19 mM), polymerization is not observed for the first ∼2 h (Figure S29). NMR spectra show that (salph)AlOR forms immediately and then slowly converts to a new species (likely the steady state catalyst for polymerization) (Figure S30). Polymerization did not occur at a discernible rate until (salph)AlOR was completely converted, consistent with the hypothesis that the catalytic polymerization cycle begins only after AA has fully formed and then reacted with CPMA.
In complementary work, the pathway to species AA was evaluated by theory. In order to simplify the computations, propylene oxide and succinic anhydride were used as model monomers. In the absence of [PPN]Cl, initiation would likely require either a bimetallic process or the chloride ligand on the neutral aluminum complex to dissociate in order to act as a nucleophile. With respect to autoionization, starting from the 5-coordinate aluminum chloride precatalyst, there is little change in free energy associated with binding of epoxide to the precatalyst. Subsequent chloride dissociation was found to be highly endergonic with an overall activation barrier of 26.5 kcal/mol for the first epoxide-opening step. This is inconsistent with the experimentally observed rate (within minutes at room temperature) (Figure 1, orange line; see Supporting Information (SI) for calculated mechanism). Based on prior work with salen-based chromium complexes, (25a, 29) it is possible that a more complicated bimetallic pathway is available in the absence of [PPN]Cl, but we have not investigated this further.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Initiation mechanism with 333 K relative Gibbs free energies (kcal/mol) computed at the SMD(THF)/M06-2X/6-311+G(d,p)//SMD(THF)/M06-L/6-31+G(d,p) level of theory. All stoichiometries are balanced through appropriate inclusion of [PPN]+, Cl, and/or propylene oxide. The orange line corresponds to reaction in the absence of [PPN]Cl, i.e., through autoionization. The blue line corresponds to reaction with exogenous Cl from ionization of [PPN]Cl.

Turning next to initiation in the presence of [PPN]Cl, we viewed the role of [PPN]+ to be to act as a large, and thus non-coordinating, counterion for the anionic species present during copolymerization (see SI for computed relative energies of different separated or associated anion–cation pairs). Ring-opening by attack of free Cl from dissociated [PPN]Cl can occur with a predicted free energy of activation of 23.0 kcal/mol. The resulting 6-coordinate aluminate species spontaneously dissociates the chloride ligand, leaving a site that is available for coordination of another propylene oxide (predicted now to be somewhat endergonic). Following truncation of the 1-chloroisopropoxide ligand to isopropoxide, both for computational simplicity and to be consistent with the calculated propagation mechanism discussed below, a second ring-opening reaction involving chloride is predicted to be possible with a free energy of activation of 30.7 kcal/mol. The resulting bis(alkoxide) species (AA) is that found at the start of the proposed propagation mechanism, as discussed later. It should be noted that the relatively high free energy predicted for AA is a standard-state free energy, i.e., it is the free energy when all components are at 1 M concentration. However, the enormous excess of propylene oxide compared to chloride renders the free energy of reaction for the second epoxide opening considerably more favorable under actual reaction conditions.

Polymerization Kinetics

The dependence of the rate of copolymerization on the monomer, catalyst, and cocatalyst concentrations was determined using multiple methods and conditions in order to obtain the most accurate results. Two approaches were taken: (a) large scale “bulk” polymerizations monitored by quenching aliquots and (b) polymerizations monitored by 1H NMR spectroscopy using both initial rate measurements and COPASI (30) fitting of full kinetic runs. We obtained high quality 1H NMR spectra in neat epoxide by placing sealed capillaries filled with a deuterated solvent and 1,4-bis(trimethylsilyl)benzene as an internal standard inside the NMR tubes, which allowed for locking, shimming and accurate determination of the reactant concentrations. Triplicate measurements indicated good agreement between runs (Table S5).
The results from analysis of quenched bulk polymerizations using a (salph)AlCl:[PPN]Cl:BO:CPMA ratio of 1:0.9:500:100 are shown in Figure 2 (orange triangles). The 1:0.9 ratio of (salph)AlCl:[PPN]Cl was chosen based on previous work which showed that a slight excess of metal complex relative to cocatalyst resulted in the optimal balance of rate and control of side reactions. (23) The same reaction was performed in an NMR tube and monitored by 1H NMR spectroscopy (condition 1, Table 1) and the data were also plotted in Figure 2 (blue circles). The conversions of CPMA over time for both methods are in good agreement, suggesting the conclusions made from NMR kinetics studies can be related to larger scale reactions. Notably, under these conditions of excess BO, CPMA decays linearly over time, indicating a zero order dependence of the rate on [CPMA]. A key observation was that the initially yellow polymerization solution darkens to deep red as the reaction nears completion, a result with implications for the nature of the complexes present in the reaction solution (see below).

Figure 2

Figure 2. (a) Conversion of CPMA over time for copolymerization with (salph)AlCl:[PPN]Cl:BO:CPMA ratio of 1:0.9:500:100 (1 equiv = 13 μmol). Results from polymerizations monitored in bulk are shown as orange triangles, and those from a single kinetic experiment monitored by 1H NMR are shown as blue circles. (b) Photographs of reaction solutions at the indicated time points.

Table 1. Effects of Varying BO and CPMA Concentrations on Copolymerization Rates and Rate Constantsa
cond. #BO/CPMA exptlbBO:CPMA theorinitial rate (×10–4 M s–1)ckobs (×10–5s–1)d
15.0(5)500:1002.3(3)2.5(6)
24.4(4)475:1002.3(1)2.9(2)
33.4(5)400:1002.0(5)3.2(5)
42.8(1)300:1001.5(2)3.0(3)
51.8(1)200:1001.1(1)3.4(7)
66.1(4)475:752.0(4)2.4(6)
710(1)475:502.1(6)3.3(4)
a

The target concentration for 1 equiv of (salph)AlCl was 19 mM (13 μmol in ∼700 μL measured total volume). A constant 1:0.9 ratio of (salph)AlCl:[PPN]Cl was used. Each condition was measured in triplicate, with average values listed.

b

Determined by 1H NMR using an internal standard.

c

Calculated initial rate at 20% conversion of anhydride.

d

Calculated using the equation d[Pol]/dt = kobs[BO] in the COPASI fitting software.

Next, a series of polymerizations was performed in which the epoxide concentration was varied from ∼5 to 8 M (200–475 equiv) and initial rates were measured (20% completion, Table 1, conditions 2–5). A linear relationship was observed between the initial rates of the polymerization and the concentration of BO (Figure 3a), indicating a first-order dependence on [BO]. Similarly, the amount of CPMA was varied (Table 1, conditions 2, 6, 7) and initial rates were measured that did not significantly change (Figure 3b), indicating a zero-order dependence on CPMA that agrees with the results of the bulk polymerization experiments. The data thus are consistent with an overall rate law d[Pol]/dt = kobs[BO] with an observed pseudo-first-order rate constant (kobs) of 3 × 10–5 s–1. We verified the results of the initial rate measurements by fitting the entire collected kinetic data using COPASI. (30) Data for all 10 different conditions were plotted with the suggested rate law d[Pol]/dt = kobs[BO], and good agreement was found between the predicted reaction profiles and the experimental data as illustrated by the representative case shown in Figure 4 (see Figures S6–S15 for remaining data). Additionally, the rate constant was calculated for each condition as shown in Table 1, with an average kobs = 3.1(5) × 10–5 s–1, in excellent agreement with the kobs calculated using initial rates. Taken together, the data conclusively support the pseudo-first-order rate law.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Initial rates of reaction (20% completion) versus (a) initial BO concentrations (red) and (b) initial CPMA concentrations (blue).

Figure 4

Figure 4. Representative kinetic plot for the copolymerization reaction under condition 1 (Table 1). Concentration data for BO (red), CPMA (blue), and polymer repeat unit (Pol, gray) are displayed as calculated from integrations of 1H NMR data, calibrated with an internal standard, and with COPASI fits displayed as black lines.

Because both [PPN]Cl and an Al complex must be present to observe activity, we sought to determine the kinetic order in each individually and as a cooperative pair. Experiments involving both quenching of bulk polymerizations and NMR analysis were performed. In the bulk polymerization experiments, reactions were run at 50 °C and quenched after 1 h, starting from a constant [BO]:[CPMA] ratio of 500:100 with (a) (salph)AlCl kept constant at 1 equiv (1 equiv = 13 μmol) and [PPN]Cl varied from 0.25 to 4 equiv, (b) [PPN]Cl kept constant at 1 equiv and (salph)AlCl varied from 0.25 to 3 equiv, and (c) (salph)AlCl and [PPN]Cl both varied concurrently from 0.25 to 1.5 equiv. When one concentration was kept constant and the other increased (situations (a) and (b)), the rate increased, but only to a point (roughly 1–2 equiv) after which the rate remained constant (Figure 5a). These results prompted us to view the metal complex and cocatalyst as a cooperative catalytic pair, leading to a series of experiments where both were varied together keeping their relative concentrations the same. Ideally, if the catalyst and cocatalyst worked together as a cohesive unit (i.e., generated a single active species), a first-order dependence of the rate on the pair would be observed. If the catalyst and cocatalyst worked independently, the rate would exhibit a separate first-order dependence on each and an overall second-order dependence on the pair. Indeed, when varied as a pair, CPMA conversion increased linearly as the catalyst/cocatalyst concentration was increased, suggesting a first-order dependence on the catalytic pair (Figure 5b). (31) Such ion pairing in the moderately polar medium of BO as effective solvent is not unexpected.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Plots of polymerization conversion with [BO]:[CPMA] = 500:100 (1 equiv = 13 μmol) in which (a) (salph)AlCl is kept constant at 1 equiv and [PPN]Cl is varied (teal circles) and [PPN]Cl is kept constant at 1 equiv and (salph)AlCl is varied (orange squares), and (b) (salph)AlCl and [PPN]Cl are varied concurrently, with linear fit shown. All reactions were quenched after heating at 50 °C for 1 h.

This conclusion was further verified through NMR kinetics analysis using initial rates, COPASI analysis of full data sets, and the normalized time scale method (32, 33) for reactions with 650:100 BO:CPMA and 1–3 equiv of the pair (details provided in the SI). Together, the data support a complete rate law of d[Pol]/dt = kp[Cat][BO], where [Cat] is the concentration of (salph)AlCl or [PPN]Cl (i.e., the catalytic pair) and kp = 1.5(2) × 10–3 M–1 s–1.

Synthesis and Reactivity of Intermediates

In order to gain insight into the individual reaction steps involved in the catalytic copolymerization, we targeted model complexes of possible intermediates comprising alkoxide and/or carboxylate moieties for synthesis and studies of their reactivity. The complexes (salph)AlOiPr and (salph)AlO2CAd (Ad = adamantyl) were prepared from reaction of salphH2 with Al(OiPr)3 or (salph)AlCl with NaO2CAd, respectively, and were characterized by 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy and high-resolution mass spectrometry (Figure 6). While [PPN][O2CAd] could be synthesized, (12) [PPN][OR] species could not be made due to their known instability. (34)

Figure 6

Figure 6. Model complexes studied as possible copolymerization intermediates.

A series of experiments was performed to probe the reactivity of individual aluminum complexes, [PPN][O2CAd], and combinations of the two. In order to maintain concentrations analogous to those of a bulk polymerization, BO (500 equiv) or CPMA (25 equiv) and one equiv (13 μmol) of each complex and/or [PPN][O2CAd] were used. These mixtures were heated at 50 °C for 1 h, quenched with methanol, and then analyzed by Direct Analysis in Real Time (DART)-HRMS for ring-opened product (Figure 7). For the reactions with BO, the expected adamantoate opened epoxide was only observed when [PPN][O2CAd] was combined with either (salph)AlOiPr or (salph)AlO2CAd. This suggests that epoxide ring-opening requires an interaction between both the Al complex and [PPN][O2CAd]. Presumably the epoxide is activated through binding to the Lewis acidic metal center prior to attack from the carboxylate. For the reactions with CPMA, ring-opening only occurred when (salph)AlOiPr and [PPN][O2CAd] were combined. It is notable that an Al alkoxide alone is insufficient and that both an Al alkoxide species and a [PPN]+ carboxylate are required for anhydride ring-opening. We note that computations indicate that the thermodynamic sink for the combination of Al alkoxide and a [PPN]+ carboxylate is a 6-coordinate Al anion (denoted as “AC”, Figure 8) together with [PPN]+, or perhaps a weakly coordinated ion pair as suggested by the kinetic order in combined catalyst/[PPN] salt.

Figure 7

Figure 7. Ring-opening reactions analyzed by DART-MS.

Figure 8

Figure 8. Targeted 6-coordinate Al complexes.

Since the (salph)AlOiPr and [PPN][O2CAd] mixture (AC) is capable of ring-opening both BO and CPMA, a key question concerns the rates of these two reactions, which would have to be different if AC can be considered the active species in the copolymerization. We addressed this question through two types of experiments. A competition study was conducted at 50 °C in which a mixture of (salph)AlOiPr and [PPN][O2CAd] was treated with an equimolar mixture of BO and CPMA (1 equiv each), and monitored by 1H NMR spectroscopy. This AC mixture reacted rapidly with CPMA while leaving the BO untouched, but after ∼50% of CPMA was consumed, BO began to react. In a second set of experiments, the combination of (salph)AlOiPr and [PPN][O2CAd] was reacted with each monomer separately and the reaction rates were measured. Both reactions showed an approximate first-order decay of monomer, with initial rates for the reactions with BO and CPMA equal to 1.03(2) × 10–7 and 5.4 × 10–6 M/s, respectively. Thus, anhydride ring-opening is an order of magnitude (∼50×) faster than epoxide ring-opening. At the typical bulk polymerization ratio of 500:100 epoxide to anhydride, the reaction would need to reach ∼92% completion for the rates of ring-opening of epoxide and anhydride to be comparable.
We also evaluated the rate of BO ring-opening by the mixture of [PPN][O2CAd] and (salph)AlO2CAd (carboxylate-carboxylate, CC, again as a preferred 6-coordinate anionic Al complex with a weakly associated [PPN]+ counterion). The initial rate was found to be 4.4(4) × 10–7 M/s, only slightly (∼4×) faster than the ring-opening of BO by AC. We hypothesize that this rate difference is due to a trans influence. In the case of CC, BO would bind trans to a weakly donating carboxylate anion, while with AC, the trans ligand is a more strongly donating alkoxide anion, attenuating the Lewis acidity of the Al3+ center and raising the barrier for ring-opening.
To obtain further insight into the nature of the active species responsible for ring-opening of BO or CPMA, we examined the mixture of (salph)AlOiPr and [PPN][O2CAd] (AC) and the mixture of (salph)AlO2CAd and [PPN][O2CAd] (CC) by NMR spectroscopy and DFT calculations, noting diagnostic solution color changes under specific sets of conditions. When a 1:1 ratio of [PPN][O2CAd] and (salph)AlO2CAd was mixed overnight at room temperature, the solution remained yellow/orange (Figure 9F). 1H NMR spectroscopy indicated one set of broad ligand peaks, which we interpret as indicating a rapid equilibrium between (salph)AlO2CAd and “free” [PPN][O2CAd] (for full discussion, see SI). When a 1:1 ratio of (salph)AlOiPr and [PPN][O2CAd] was mixed, the initially yellow color of (salph)AlOiPr (Figure 9B) immediately became dark orange and gradually turned dark red (Figure 9E), the same color as observed at the end of the copolymerization (Figure 2, bottom). Monitoring of the reaction at 50 °C by 1H NMR spectroscopy showed the salph ligand peaks of (salph)AlOiPr converted to new ones associated with a different (salph)Al species that reaches an equilibrium with the starting (salph)AlOiPr at an approximate 1:1 ratio (Figures S33 and S34). This new species could arise from salt metathesis between (salph)AlOiPr and [PPN][O2CAd] to form (salph)AlO2CAd and [PPN][OiPr] or a 6-coordinate anionic aluminum species, [PPN][(salph)Al(OiPr)(O2CAd)] (AC). While neither option can be definitively ruled out, the latter product is expected to be more probable since the alkoxide is likely to bind more strongly to Al than is a carboxylate and thus exchange is unlikely. 31P NMR showed no degradation of the [PPN]+ cation, which would be expected upon the formation of an unstable [PPN][OiPr] salt. (34) Regardless of which product is formed, both [PPN][OiPr] and [PPN][(salph)Al(OiPr)(O2CAd)] would be expected to have a highly reactive alkoxide that could rapidly ring-open a cyclic anhydride. While all attempts to make an AA species led to dark red solutions (for example, Figure 9D), no single species could be isolated.

Figure 9

Figure 9. Solutions of Al complexes with/without added [PPN]salts: (A) (salph)AlCl, (B) (salph)AlOiPr, (C) (salph)AlO2CAd, (D) 1:1 (salph)AlCl and [PPN]Cl with excess BO, (E) 1:1 (salph)AlOiPr and [PPN][O2CAd], (F) 1:1 (salph)AlO2CAd and [PPN][O2CAd].

As previously noted, when excess epoxide is used the color changes from pale yellow to deep red when all anhydride is consumed (Figure 2). To explore further the potential chromophores present in solution, linear response time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT) calculations of proposed 5- and 6-coordinate intermediates were performed at the PBE0/6-31+G(d,p) level of theory. (26, 27) Intense absorptions were predicted for the HOMO to LUMO transitions of AA, AC, and CC with λmax values in the visible range of the spectrum at 466, 453, and 435 nm, respectively. By contrast, HOMO–LUMO transitions for the 5-coordinate complexes (salph)AlOiPr and (salph)AlOAc (truncated representations of the species present during the polymerization used for simplicity’s sake) were predicted to be higher in energy at 415 and 412 nm, respectively. Tests with other density functionals provided uniform agreement on the hypsochromic shift of the 5-coordinate species relative to the 6-coordinate, although individual λmax values varied. This suggests that the bright red color observed during polymerization may be attributed to the presence of AA and/or AC intermediates. However, UV–vis spectra of the solutions shown in Figure 9, which clearly showed a difference in color by visual inspection at typical polymerization concentrations, when diluted ∼600× in order to bring the absorbance values into measurable range, all displayed the same absorption spectrum (Figure S40). We attribute this finding for the AC mimic (Figure 9E) to the effect of dilution on the equilibrium between (salph)AlOiPr and [PPN][O2CAd] which would reduce the absorbance of the red product by a factor of 360 000—well below the detection limit given similar expected extinction coefficients for 5- and 6-coordinate complexes as discussed below.

Mechanistic Hypotheses and Evaluation by Theory

The combined experimental results may be interpreted by postulating that the copolymerization reaction is initiated by reaction of (salph)AlCl and [PPN]Cl with excess BO to yield [PPN][(salph)Al(OR)2] or (salph)AlOR/[PPN][OR] (AAinit; Figure 10). This species is drawn with a dashed line between one alkoxide and the Al3+ ion to acknowledge the uncertainty in our understanding of this interaction. In addition, we propose that a similar bis(alkoxide) species may be a catalytic intermediate, and indicate this by drawing an equivalent structure with polymeric alkoxides instead of the initially formed chlorinated species (AA).

Figure 10

Figure 10. Proposed copolymerization initiation to yield bis(alkoxide) species, AAinit and AA (P = polymer chain; R1 and R2 used to simplify drawing of ring-opened CPMA).

The only reasonable fate for AA is to react with anhydride to yield AC (Figure 11), again drawn with one of its ligands bound to Al via a dashed line to signify possible weak association (arbitrarily, the alkoxide). This central intermediate, AC, can revert back to AA via binding, activation, and ring-opening of epoxide (cycle 1), or can react with anhydride to yield CC (cycle 2), which we choose to draw with one carboxylate bound and the other free as a [PPN]+ salt, thus poised to bind and ring-open epoxide (consistent with our finding that the CC model reacts with BO ∼4× faster than AC). Our finding that the AC model complex ring-opens CPMA ∼50× faster than BO indicates that cycle 2 is preferred when anhydride concentrations are sufficiently high, with cycle 1 only becoming important as polymerization nears completion. Accordingly, the rate-determining step involves the ring-opening of an epoxide by the CC mixture, which is also the likely steady state species formed upon initiation. This hypothesis leads to another: that as polymerization completes and anhydride is depleted the concentration of AA increases, and that this species is responsible for the red color and the tendency for side-reactions to occur at the end of the reaction. This indicates that alkoxide end groups are capable of engaging in side reactions, while carboxylate end groups are not. The productive copolymerization proceeding through cycle 2 with ring-opening of anhydride being faster than epoxide and the intimate involvement of [PPN]+ at every stage yields a rate law consistent with that observed by experiment (first-order in [BO] and in the combination of [Al] and [PPN]Cl, zero-order in [CPMA]).

Figure 11

Figure 11. Proposed mechanism for copolymerization of BO and CPMA (depicted by a simplified succinic anhydride).

To evaluate these mechanistic hypotheses and gain further insights, extensive DFT calculations were performed on simplified systems (lacking paratBu groups on salph ligand, isopropoxide as alkoxide, propylene oxide as epoxide, and whenever possible, acetate instead of more complicated carboxylates; Figure 12). The analogous cycle to that drawn in Figure 11 is predicted, with 333 K relative free energies provided for all stationary points and several key observations we now highlight.

Figure 12

Figure 12. Calculated mechanism for copolymerization of propylene oxide and succinic anhydride with 333 K relative Gibbs free energies (kcal/mol) computed at the SMD(THF)//M06-2X/6-311+G(d,p)//M06-L/6-31+G(d,p) level of theory. AA and AC represent the starting species for each cycle (1 and 2, respectively), while AA′ and AC′ represent the ending species after an epoxide is opened.

Ring-opening of anhydride by AA and AC involves direct attack by the alkoxide bound to Al in 6-coordinate anionic species, with coordination of acetate to the 5-coordinate Al–OiPr species being favored by 4.6 kcal/mol. Note that, while the anhydride opening would likely be faster with an uncoordinated alkoxide, as was noted in a similar polymerization reaction study, (28) dissociation of an alkoxide from the aluminum center is predicted to be an extremely endergonic process (see SI for details). Considering the predicted energetics for the coupled reaction cycles, partitioning from reactive intermediate AC involves either a free energy of activation of 32.4 kcal/mol to return to AA (left cycle) or a free energy of activation of 27.0 kcal/mol to proceed to CC (right cycle). This is consistent with the observed experimental preference noted above for an isolated AC to preferentially open anhydride compared to epoxide, albeit by a somewhat higher free-energy margin than would be associated with a 50-fold preference at 323 K (∼2.7 kcal/mol). The free energy of activation to return to AC by ring-opening of propylene oxide is predicted to be 33.3 kcal/mol. Interestingly, this is a higher free energy of activation for epoxide opening than that associated with going from AC to AA, which is to be expected given the weaker activating power of a trans carboxylate ligand compared to a trans alkoxide ligand, but, as it is the only pathway forward from intermediate CC as reverse reaction is uphill by more than 46 kcal/mol, it becomes the turnover-limiting step for propagation. Indeed, these energetics are consistent with the experimental observation that the reaction is zero-order in anhydride and first-order in propylene oxide, as regeneration of CC by proceeding around the right reaction cycle occurs with low activation free energy compared to the turnover-limiting step involving epoxide. The overall driving force for one revolution around cycle 2 is predicted to be 14.7 kcal/mol (cf. relative free energy values associated with AC and AC′ in Figure 12). Finally, once the anhydride is fully consumed, AA can reform and ultimately be quenched upon workup. As noted above, however, experimental attempts to isolate 6-coordinate aluminum intermediates were not successful. While these species have not been ruled out as reactive intermediates during polymerization, the predicted prevalence and stability of these species, relative to 5-coordinate aluminum species, could not be experimentally confirmed.

Conclusions

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Important mechanistic insights into the copolymerization of 1-butene oxide and carbic anhydride by a (salph)AlCl/[PPN]Cl catalytic pair have been obtained through synergistic kinetics studies, model reaction experiments, and DFT calculations. As reported in previous work on a related system, (6) we identified a first-order dependence on epoxide concentration, indicating that the turnover-limiting step is either epoxide binding or opening. We propose a bind and insert pathway, in which a free carboxylate can attack an epoxide that is activated by the metal. Theory predicts this pathway to be significantly more favorable than a concerted pathway previously proposed for epoxide/CO2 copolymerizations. (25) While 6-coordinate anionic Cr species have been successfully isolated and proposed as active intermediates in the copolymerization of epoxides with both CO2 and anhydrides, (6) the analogous intermediates with aluminum were not isolable; instead, combinations of (salph)AlX and [PPN]X (X = alkoxide or carboxylate) appear to exist as dynamic mixtures that include anionic 6-coordinate aluminum species in equilibrium at high concentrations, as judged by NMR and UV–vis experiments, with the latter interpreted with the assistance of time-dependent density functional theory calculations.
When the ratio of [PPN]Cl to (salph)AlCl was varied, a maximum rate was observed with a slight excess of iminium cocatalyst (∼1.5:1). A similar result was reported for (salph)CrCl/[PPN]Cl and (salph)AlCl/DMAP pairs. (8) We observed a first-order dependence when both catalyst and cocatalyst were varied together in a 1:1 ratio, indicating that they need to be considered as a single catalytic unit instead of separate components, as found for an epoxide/CO2 copolymerization. (6) This result, when taken with the first-order dependence on [epoxide] and zero-order dependence on [anhydride], leads us to conclude that the rate-determining step is the ring-opening of epoxide activated by coordination to the Al complex by a [PPN] carboxylate species.
An important factor discovered in this study is the importance of the anions present during propagation. With a 1:1 ratio of catalyst to cocatalyst, there are two anions per aluminum center which could be in three combinations: two alkoxides (AA), a mixed alkoxide/carboxylate (AC), or two carboxylates (CC). The propagating mechanism could alternate between AA and AC or AC and CC. Studies of initiation indicated ring-opening of epoxides by all sources of chloride, to form an AA mixture. One ring-opening of anhydride leads to an AC mixture, which could either open epoxide to reform AA or could open anhydride to form CC. Experiment and theory both indicated a strong preference for the latter, followed by turnover-limiting opening of epoxide by CC (cycle 2). Once anhydride is fully consumed, the AC mixture opens one more equivalent of epoxide, apparently generating a deep red AA species. We propose that the preference for cycle 2 during most of the polymerization suppresses side reactions such as epimerization and transesterification which are associated with the more reactive alkoxide end groups, until such time as polymerization is complete and the concentration of AA increases. (15, 23)
These mechanistic conclusions have potential implications for future catalyst design. For example, it is evident that enhancing the rate of epoxide opening by CC will increase the overall catalytic copolymerization rate. Moreover, we hypothesize that changes to the catalyst system that keep it operating in cycle 2 and prevent it from entering cycle 1 will circumvent deleterious side reactions. Efforts to test these hypotheses and develop superior catalysts for epoxide/anhydride copolymerizations are underway.

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b09079.

  • Experimental and computational details, including Figures S1–S54, Tables S1–S21, and Scheme S1 (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Authors
    • Christopher J. Cramer - Department of Chemistry, Center for Sustainable Polymers, Chemical Theory Center, and Minnesota Supercomputing Institute, University of Minnesota, 207 Pleasant Street SE, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United StatesOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0001-5048-1859 Email: [email protected]
    • Geoffrey W. Coates - Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Baker Laboratory, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, United StatesOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-3400-2552 Email: [email protected]
    • William B. Tolman - Department of Chemistry, Center for Sustainable Polymers, Chemical Theory Center, and Minnesota Supercomputing Institute, University of Minnesota, 207 Pleasant Street SE, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United StatesOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-2243-6409 Email: [email protected]
  • Authors
    • Megan E. Fieser - Department of Chemistry, Center for Sustainable Polymers, Chemical Theory Center, and Minnesota Supercomputing Institute, University of Minnesota, 207 Pleasant Street SE, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United StatesOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-0623-3406
    • Maria J. Sanford - Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Baker Laboratory, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, United StatesOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0001-5265-6886
    • Lauren A. Mitchell - Department of Chemistry, Center for Sustainable Polymers, Chemical Theory Center, and Minnesota Supercomputing Institute, University of Minnesota, 207 Pleasant Street SE, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United StatesOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-1311-0108
    • Christine R. Dunbar - Department of Chemistry, Center for Sustainable Polymers, Chemical Theory Center, and Minnesota Supercomputing Institute, University of Minnesota, 207 Pleasant Street SE, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United StatesOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0001-9948-4583
    • Mukunda Mandal - Department of Chemistry, Center for Sustainable Polymers, Chemical Theory Center, and Minnesota Supercomputing Institute, University of Minnesota, 207 Pleasant Street SE, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United StatesOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-5984-465X
    • Nathan J. Van Zee - Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Baker Laboratory, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, United StatesOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-7899-9163
    • Devon M. Urness - Department of Chemistry, Center for Sustainable Polymers, Chemical Theory Center, and Minnesota Supercomputing Institute, University of Minnesota, 207 Pleasant Street SE, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States
  • Author Contributions

    M.E.F. and M.J.S. contributed equally.

  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgment

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Funding for this project was provided by the Center for Sustainable Polymers, an NSF Center for Chemical Innovation (CHE-1413862). This work made use of the NMR facility at Cornell University which is supported, in part, by the NSF under award number CHE-1531632. The authors acknowledge the Minnesota Supercomputing Institute (MSI) at the University of Minnesota for providing resources that contributed to the research results reported within this paper. We also thank the Minnesota NMR Center and the UMN Chemistry NMR Center for their assistance with kinetics experiments and Kiley Schmidt for assistance with the TOC graphic.

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 34 other publications.

  1. 1
    Longo, J. M.; Sanford, M. J.; Coates, G. W. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 15167 15197 DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00553
  2. 2
    Paul, S.; Zhu, Y.; Romain, C.; Brooks, R.; Saini, P. K.; Williams, C. K. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 6459 6479 DOI: 10.1039/C4CC10113H
  3. 3
    DiCiccio, A. M.; Coates, G. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 10724 10727 DOI: 10.1021/ja203520p
  4. 4
    Huijser, S.; Nejad, E. H.; Sablong, R.; de Jong, C.; Koning, C. E.; Duchateau, R. Macromolecules 2011, 44, 1132 1139 DOI: 10.1021/ma102238u
  5. 5
    Robert, C.; de Montigny, F.; Thomas, C. M. Nat. Commun. 2011, 2, 586 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms1596
  6. 6
    Darensbourg, D. J.; Poland, R. R.; Escobedo, C. Macromolecules 2012, 45, 2242 2248 DOI: 10.1021/ma2026385
  7. 7
    Nejad, E. H.; Paoniasari, A.; Koning, C. E.; Duchateau, R. Polym. Chem. 2012, 3, 1308 1313 DOI: 10.1039/c2py20026k
  8. 8
    Nejad, E. H.; van Melis, C. G. W.; Vermeer, T. J.; Koning, C. E.; Duchateau, R. Macromolecules 2012, 45, 1770 1776 DOI: 10.1021/ma2025804
  9. 9
    Nejad, E. H.; Paoniasari, A.; van Melis, C. G. W.; Koning, C. E.; Duchateau, R. Macromolecules 2013, 46, 631 637 DOI: 10.1021/ma301904y
  10. 10
    Duan, Z.; Wang, X.; Gao, Q.; Zhang, L.; Liu, B.; Kim, I. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2014, 52, 789 795 DOI: 10.1002/pola.27057
  11. 11
    Jeon, J. Y.; Eo, S. C.; Varghese, J. K.; Lee, B. Y. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2014, 10, 1787 1795 DOI: 10.3762/bjoc.10.187
  12. 12
    Longo, J. M.; DiCiccio, A. M.; Coates, G. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 15897 15900 DOI: 10.1021/ja509440g
  13. 13
    Mundil, R.; Hošt’álek, Z.; Šedenková, I.; Merna, J. Macromol. Res. 2015, 23, 161 166 DOI: 10.1007/s13233-015-3022-4
  14. 14
    Si, G.; Zhang, L.; Han, B.; Duan, Z.; Liu, B.; Dong, J.; Li, X.; Liu, B. Polym. Chem. 2015, 6, 6372 6377 DOI: 10.1039/C5PY01040C
  15. 15
    Van Zee, N. J.; Coates, G. W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 2665 2668 DOI: 10.1002/anie.201410641
  16. 16
    Winkler, M.; Romain, C.; Meier, M. A. R.; Williams, C. K. Green Chem. 2015, 17, 300 306 DOI: 10.1039/C4GC01353K
  17. 17
    Liu, J.; Bao, Y.-Y.; Liu, Y.; Ren, W.-M.; Lu, X.-B. Polym. Chem. 2013, 4, 1439 1444 DOI: 10.1039/C2PY20842C
  18. 18
    Liu, D.-F.; Zhu, L.-Q.; Wu, J.; Wu, L.-Y.; Lu, X.-Q. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 3854 3859 DOI: 10.1039/C4RA08969C
  19. 19
    Biermann, U.; Sehlinger, A.; Meier, M. A. R.; Metzger, J. O. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2016, 118, 104 110 DOI: 10.1002/ejlt.201400631
  20. 20
    DiCiccio, A. M.; Longo, J. M.; Rodríguez-Calero, G. G.; Coates, G. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 7107 7113 DOI: 10.1021/jacs.6b03113
  21. 21
    Liu, D.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, X.; Lü, X. Aust. J. Chem. 2016, 69, 47 55 DOI: 10.1071/CH15162
  22. 22
    Sanford, M. J.; Peña Carrodeguas, L.; Van Zee, N. J.; Kleij, A. W.; Coates, G. W. Macromolecules 2016, 49, 6394 6400 DOI: 10.1021/acs.macromol.6b01425
  23. 23
    Van Zee, N. J.; Sanford, M. J.; Coates, G. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 2755 2761 DOI: 10.1021/jacs.5b12888
  24. 24
    Nejad, E. H.; van Melis, C. G. W.; Vermeer, T. J.; Koning, C. E.; Duchateau, R. Macromolecules 2012, 45, 1770 1776 DOI: 10.1021/ma2025804
  25. 25
    (a) Darensbourg, D. J.; Yarbrough, J. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 6335 6342 DOI: 10.1021/ja012714v
    (b) Darensbourg, D. J.; Yarbrough, J. C.; Ortiz, C.; Fang, C. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 7586 7591 DOI: 10.1021/ja034863e
    (c) Darensbourg, D. J.; Mackiewicz, R. M.; Rodgers, J. L.; Phelps, A. L. Inorg. Chem. 2004, 43, 1831 1833 DOI: 10.1021/ic0352856
    (d) Darensbourg, D. J.; Mackiewicz, R. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 14026 14038 DOI: 10.1021/ja053544f
    (e) Darensbourg, D. J.; Yeung, A. D. Polym. Chem. 2015, 6, 1103 1117 DOI: 10.1039/C4PY01322K
    (f) Chisholm, M. H.; Zhou, Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 11030 11039 DOI: 10.1021/ja0394232
  26. 26
    Han, B.; Zhang, L.; Liu, B.; Dong, X.; Kim, I.; Duan, Z.; Theato, P. Macromolecules 2015, 48, 3431 3437 DOI: 10.1021/acs.macromol.5b00555
  27. 27
    Nakano, K.; Hashimoto, S.; Nozaki, K. Chem. Sci. 2010, 1, 369 373 DOI: 10.1039/c0sc00220h
  28. 28
    Robert, C.; Schmid, T. E.; Richard, V.; Haquette, P.; Raman, S. K.; Rager, M.-N.; Gauvin, R. M.; Morin, Y.; Trivelli, X.; Guérineau, V.; Del Rosal, I.; Maron, L.; Thomas, C. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 6217 6225 DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b01749
  29. 29
    Martínez, L. E.; Leighton, J. L.; Carsten, D. H.; Jacobsen, E. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 5897 5898 DOI: 10.1021/ja00126a048
  30. 30
    Hoops, S.; Sahle, S.; Gauges, R.; Lee, C.; Pahle, J.; Simus, N.; Singhal, M.; Xu, L.; Mendes, P.; Kummer, U. Bioinformatics 2006, 22, 3067 3074 DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl485
  31. 31

    We hypothesize that the nonzero intercept of the indicated linear fit results from slow initiation at low concentrations of cocatalysts.

  32. 32
    Burés, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 2028 2031 DOI: 10.1002/anie.201508983
  33. 33

    According to this method, the decay of CPMA was plotted against the normalized time scale, t[Cat]N, where t is time, [Cat] is the initial concentrations of both the catalyst and cocatalyst, (salph)AlCl and [PPN]Cl, and N is the order. The three conditions were plotted against possible reaction orders of zero, first, and second, on the normalized time scale, with the best overlay found for the first-order case (Figure S20).

  34. 34
    Martinsen, A.; Songstad, J. Acta Chem. Scand. 1977, 31, 645 650 DOI: 10.3891/acta.chem.scand.31a-0645

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article is cited by 129 publications.

  1. Yajun Zhao, Xiaohui Zhang, Zhuang Li, Zhaokun Li, Shan Tang. Functional and Degradable Polyester-co-polyethers from CO2, Butadiene, and Epoxides. ACS Macro Letters 2024, 13 (3) , 315-321. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmacrolett.4c00071
  2. Hyuk-Joon Jung, Chatura Goonesinghe, Ziyue Zhang, Joseph Chang, Kudzanai Nyamayaro, Hassan A. Baalbaki, Savvas G. Hatzikiriakos, Parisa Mehrkhodavandi. Synthesis of High-Molecular-Weight Poly(ether-alt-ester) by Selective Double Ring-Opening Polymerization of Spiroorthoesters. ACS Macro Letters 2024, 13 (2) , 266-272. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmacrolett.3c00758
  3. Xianmin Wu, Gaojie Yan, Huining Ding, Yeqian Wen, Kening Guo, Xiaojie Zhang, Binyuan Liu. Stereoselective Copolymerization of Ring-Strained Pentacyclic Anhydride with Cyclohexene Oxide: Cocatalyst-to-Catalyst Ratio Dependence of Polymerization Mechanism. Macromolecules 2023, 56 (19) , 7771-7781. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.3c01597
  4. Mei-Ling Lin, Chen-Yen Tsai. High-Activity and High-Selectivity Air-Stable Nickel and Copper Complexes for Copolymerization of Epoxides with Anhydrides. Inorganic Chemistry 2023, 62 (31) , 12298-12307. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c01255
  5. Zhenjie Yang, Chenyang Hu, Zan Gao, Ranlong Duan, Zhiqiang Sun, Yanchuan Zhou, Xuan Pang, Xuesi Chen. Precise Synthesis of Sequence-Controlled Oxygen-Rich Multiblock Copolymers via Reversible Carboxylation of a Commercial Salen-Mn(III) Catalyst. Macromolecules 2023, 56 (6) , 2370-2378. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.3c00154
  6. David Merckle, Olivia King, Andrew C. Weems. Ring-Opening Copolymerization of Four-Dimensional Printable Polyesters Using Supramolecular Thiourea/Organocatalysis. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 2023, 11 (6) , 2219-2228. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c05552
  7. Ranlong Duan, Chenyang Hu, Yanlong Liu, Xinchao Bian, Xuan Pang, Xuesi Chen. In Situ Initiation of Epoxides: Activated Metal Salt Catalysts for Cyclic Ester Polymerization. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2022, 61 (51) , 18712-18719. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.2c03594
  8. Nattiya Laiwattanapaisarn, Arnut Virachotikul, Phongnarin Chumsaeng, Tiphanan Jaenjai, Khamphee Phomphrai. Ring-Opening Co- and Terpolymerization of Epoxides, Cyclic Anhydrides, and l-Lactide Using Constrained Aluminum Inden Complexes. Inorganic Chemistry 2022, 61 (50) , 20616-20628. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c03532
  9. Yanchuan Zhou, Zan Gao, Chenyang Hu, Shuaiming Meng, Ranlong Duan, Zhiqiang Sun, Xuan Pang. Facile Synthesis of Gradient Polycarbonate–Polyester Terpolymers from Monomer Mixtures Mediated by an Asymmetric Chromium Complex. Macromolecules 2022, 55 (22) , 9951-9959. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.2c01680
  10. Bai-Hao Ren, Yong-Qiang Teng, Si-Nuo Wang, Shang Wang, Ye Liu, Wei-Min Ren, Xiao-Bing Lu. Mechanistic Basis for the High Enantioselectivity and Activity in the Multichiral Bimetallic Complex-Mediated Enantioselective Copolymerization of meso-Epoxides. ACS Catalysis 2022, 12 (19) , 12268-12280. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.2c03659
  11. Claire A. L. Lidston, Sarah M. Severson, Brooks A. Abel, Geoffrey W. Coates. Multifunctional Catalysts for Ring-Opening Copolymerizations. ACS Catalysis 2022, 12 (18) , 11037-11070. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.2c02524
  12. Wilfred T. Diment, Wouter Lindeboom, Francesca Fiorentini, Arron C. Deacy, Charlotte K. Williams. Synergic Heterodinuclear Catalysts for the Ring-Opening Copolymerization (ROCOP) of Epoxides, Carbon Dioxide, and Anhydrides. Accounts of Chemical Research 2022, 55 (15) , 1997-2010. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.2c00197
  13. Yanay Popowski, Yiye Lu, Geoffrey W. Coates, William B. Tolman. Stereocomplexation of Stereoregular Aliphatic Polyesters: Change from Amorphous to Semicrystalline Polymers with Single Stereocenter Inversion. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2022, 144 (18) , 8362-8370. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c02981
  14. Xiao-Lu Chen, Bin Wang, Li Pan, Yue-Sheng Li. Synthesis of Unsaturated (Co)polyesters from Ring-Opening Copolymerization by Aluminum Bipyridine Bisphenolate Complexes with Improved Protonic Impurities Tolerance. Macromolecules 2022, 55 (9) , 3502-3512. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.2c00034
  15. Lei Cui, Ye Liu, Bai-Hao Ren, Xiao-Bing Lu. Preparation of Sequence-Controlled Polyester and Polycarbonate Materials via Epoxide Copolymerization Mediated by Trinuclear Co(III) Complexes. Macromolecules 2022, 55 (9) , 3541-3549. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.2c00501
  16. Warrick Ma, Xiaochu Ding, Ying Chen, Yadong Wang. Synthesis and Characterization of Alkyne-Functionalized Photo-Cross-Linkable Polyesters. ACS Omega 2022, 7 (18) , 15540-15546. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c00272
  17. Yvonne Manjarrez, Mary Dana Czarinah L. Cheng-Tan, Megan E. Fieser. Perfectly Alternating Copolymerization of Cyclic Anhydrides and Epoxides with Yttrium β-Diketiminate Complexes. Inorganic Chemistry 2022, 61 (18) , 7088-7094. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c00529
  18. Ryan W. F. Kerr, Charlotte K. Williams. Zr(IV) Catalyst for the Ring-Opening Copolymerization of Anhydrides (A) with Epoxides (B), Oxetane (B), and Tetrahydrofurans (C) to Make ABB- and/or ABC-Poly(ester-alt-ethers). Journal of the American Chemical Society 2022, 144 (15) , 6882-6893. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c01225
  19. Arianna Brandolese, Francesco Della Monica, Miquel À. Pericàs, Arjan W. Kleij. Catalytic Ring-Opening Copolymerization of Fatty Acid Epoxides: Access to Functional Biopolyesters. Macromolecules 2022, 55 (7) , 2566-2573. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.2c00321
  20. Farihah M. Haque, Jacob S. A. Ishibashi, Claire A. L. Lidston, Huiling Shao, Frank S. Bates, Alice B. Chang, Geoffrey W. Coates, Christopher J. Cramer, Paul J. Dauenhauer, William R. Dichtel, Christopher J. Ellison, Ethan A. Gormong, Leslie S. Hamachi, Thomas R. Hoye, Mengyuan Jin, Julia A. Kalow, Hee Joong Kim, Gaurav Kumar, Christopher J. LaSalle, Stephanie Liffland, Bryce M. Lipinski, Yutong Pang, Riffat Parveen, Xiayu Peng, Yanay Popowski, Emily A. Prebihalo, Yernaidu Reddi, Theresa M. Reineke, Daylan T. Sheppard, Jeremy L. Swartz, William B. Tolman, Bess Vlaisavljevich, Jane Wissinger, Shu Xu, Marc A. Hillmyer. Defining the Macromolecules of Tomorrow through Synergistic Sustainable Polymer Research. Chemical Reviews 2022, 122 (6) , 6322-6373. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00173
  21. Alex J. Plajer, Charlotte K. Williams. Heterotrinuclear Ring Opening Copolymerization Catalysis: Structure–activity Relationships. ACS Catalysis 2021, 11 (24) , 14819-14828. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.1c04449
  22. Wilfred T. Diment, Georgina L. Gregory, Ryan W. F. Kerr, Andreas Phanopoulos, Antoine Buchard, Charlotte K. Williams. Catalytic Synergy Using Al(III) and Group 1 Metals to Accelerate Epoxide and Anhydride Ring-Opening Copolymerizations. ACS Catalysis 2021, 11 (20) , 12532-12542. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.1c04020
  23. Hongyuan Bai, Li Han, Chao Li, Songbo Zhang, Xuefei Wang, Yu Yin, Xiaolu Zhang, Hongwei Ma. Alternating Copolymerization Realized with Alternating Transformation of Anion-Migrated Ring-Opening Polymerization and Anionic Polymerization Mechanisms. Macromolecules 2021, 54 (15) , 7269-7281. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.1c00814
  24. Guifu Si, Meizhou Qi, Chen Tan, Changle Chen. Tandem Catalysts Combining Polymer Synthesis, Postpolymerization Modification, and Vitrimer Formation. Macromolecules 2021, 54 (13) , 6153-6160. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.1c00716
  25. Thomas M. McGuire, Ella F. Clark, Antoine Buchard. Polymers from Sugars and Cyclic Anhydrides: Ring-Opening Copolymerization of a d-Xylose Anhydrosugar Oxetane. Macromolecules 2021, 54 (11) , 5094-5105. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.1c00365
  26. Xiaochao Xia, Ryota Suzuki, Kaoru Takojima, Dai-Hua Jiang, Takuya Isono, Toshifumi Satoh. Smart Access to Sequentially and Architecturally Controlled Block Polymers via a Simple Catalytic Polymerization System. ACS Catalysis 2021, 11 (10) , 5999-6009. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.1c00382
  27. Steven J. Gray, Karen Brown, Francis Y. T. Lam, Jennifer A. Garden, Polly L. Arnold. Dinuclear Ce(IV) Aryloxides: Highly Active Catalysts for Anhydride/Epoxide Ring-Opening Copolymerization. Organometallics 2021, 40 (7) , 948-958. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.organomet.1c00055
  28. Sami Gesslbauer, George Hutchinson, Andrew J. P. White, Jordi Burés, Charles Romain. Chirality-Induced Catalyst Aggregation: Insights into Catalyst Speciation and Activity Using Chiral Aluminum Catalysts in Cyclic Ester Ring-Opening Polymerization. ACS Catalysis 2021, 11 (7) , 4084-4093. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.0c05245
  29. Zhaowei Jia, Jinxing Jiang, Xiaofei Zhang, Yaqin Cui, Zhichun Chen, Xiaobo Pan, Jincai Wu. Isotactic-Alternating, Heterotactic-Alternating, and ABAA-Type Sequence-Controlled Copolyester Syntheses via Highly Stereoselective and Regioselective Ring-Opening Polymerization of Cyclic Diesters. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2021, 143 (11) , 4421-4432. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c00902
  30. Claire A. L. Lidston, Brooks A. Abel, Geoffrey W. Coates. Bifunctional Catalysis Prevents Inhibition in Reversible-Deactivation Ring-Opening Copolymerizations of Epoxides and Cyclic Anhydrides. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2020, 142 (47) , 20161-20169. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.0c10014
  31. Zhaowei Jia, Sicheng Chen, Jinxing Jiang, Xiaoyang Mao, Xiaobo Pan, Jincai Wu. Ring-Opening Alternating Copolymerization of O-Carboxyanhydrides of Lactic Acid and Malic Acid Using Hafnium Alkoxide Initiators with Different Stereo Selectivities and Activities. Inorganic Chemistry 2020, 59 (14) , 10353-10360. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c01499
  32. Arnut Virachotikul, Nattiya Laiwattanapaisarn, Phonpimon Wongmahasirikun, Parichat Piromjitpong, Kittipong Chainok, Khamphee Phomphrai. Ring-Opening Copolymerizaton of Cyclohexene Oxide and Succinic Anhydride by Zinc and Magnesium Schiff-Base Complexes Containing Alkoxy Side Arms. Inorganic Chemistry 2020, 59 (13) , 8983-8994. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c00839
  33. Felipe de la Cruz-Martínez, Marc Martínez de Sarasa Buchaca, Javier Martínez, Juan Tejeda, Juan Fernández-Baeza, Carlos Alonso-Moreno, Ana M. Rodríguez, José A. Castro-Osma, Agustín Lara-Sánchez. Bimetallic Zinc Catalysts for Ring-Opening Copolymerization Processes. Inorganic Chemistry 2020, 59 (12) , 8412-8423. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c00835
  34. Sumesh K. Raman, Arron C. Deacy, Leticia Pena Carrodeguas, Natalia V. Reis, Ryan W. F. Kerr, Andreas Phanopoulos, Sebastian Morton, Matthew G. Davidson, Charlotte K. Williams. Ti(IV)–Tris(phenolate) Catalyst Systems for the Ring-Opening Copolymerization of Cyclohexene Oxide and Carbon Dioxide. Organometallics 2020, 39 (9) , 1619-1627. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.organomet.9b00845
  35. Kenson Ambrose, Jennifer N. Murphy, Christopher M. Kozak. Chromium Amino-bis(phenolate) Complexes as Catalysts for Ring-Opening Polymerization of Cyclohexene Oxide. Macromolecules 2019, 52 (19) , 7403-7412. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.9b01381
  36. Brooks A. Abel, Claire A. L. Lidston, Geoffrey W. Coates. Mechanism-Inspired Design of Bifunctional Catalysts for the Alternating Ring-Opening Copolymerization of Epoxides and Cyclic Anhydrides. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2019, 141 (32) , 12760-12769. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b05570
  37. Fu-Peng Liu, Jie Li, Ye Liu, Wei-Min Ren, Xiao-Bing Lu. Alternating Copolymerization of trans-Internal Epoxides and Cyclic Anhydrides Mediated by Dinuclear Chromium Catalyst Systems. Macromolecules 2019, 52 (15) , 5652-5657. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.9b00989
  38. Yanchuan Zhou, Chenyang Hu, Tianhui Zhang, Xiaowei Xu, Ranlong Duan, Yi Luo, Zhiqiang Sun, Xuan Pang, Xuesi Chen. One-Pot Synthesis of Diblock Polyesters by Catalytic Terpolymerization of Lactide, Epoxides, and Anhydrides. Macromolecules 2019, 52 (9) , 3462-3470. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.9b00001
  39. Gereon M. Yee, Tong Wang, Marc A. Hillmyer, Ian A. Tonks. Mechanistic Study of Palladium-Catalyzed Hydroesterificative Copolymerization of Vinyl Benzyl Alcohol and CO. Organometallics 2019, 38 (8) , 1778-1786. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.organomet.9b00091
  40. Jie Li, Bai-Hao Ren, Shi-Yu Chen, Guang-Hui He, Ye Liu, Wei-Min Ren, Hui Zhou, Xiao-Bing Lu. Development of Highly Enantioselective Catalysts for Asymmetric Copolymerization of meso-Epoxides and Cyclic Anhydrides: Subtle Modification Resulting in Superior Enantioselectivity. ACS Catalysis 2019, 9 (3) , 1915-1922. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.9b00113
  41. Marc Martínez de Sarasa Buchaca, Felipe de la Cruz-Martínez, Javier Martínez, Carlos Alonso-Moreno, Juan Fernández-Baeza, Juan Tejeda, Enrique Niza, José A. Castro-Osma, Antonio Otero, Agustín Lara-Sánchez. Alternating Copolymerization of Epoxides and Anhydrides Catalyzed by Aluminum Complexes. ACS Omega 2018, 3 (12) , 17581-17589. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b02759
  42. Arnaud Thevenon, Anish Cyriac, Dominic Myers, Andrew J. P. White, Christopher B. Durr, Charlotte K. Williams. Indium Catalysts for Low-Pressure CO2/Epoxide Ring-Opening Copolymerization: Evidence for a Mononuclear Mechanism?. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2018, 140 (22) , 6893-6903. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.8b01920
  43. Heng Li, Huitong Luo, Junpeng Zhao, Guangzhao Zhang. Well-Defined and Structurally Diverse Aromatic Alternating Polyesters Synthesized by Simple Phosphazene Catalysis. Macromolecules 2018, 51 (6) , 2247-2257. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.8b00159
  44. Ye Liu, Jia-Zhi Guo, Hui-Wen Lu, Hui-Bo Wang, and Xiao-Bing Lu . Making Various Degradable Polymers from Epoxides Using a Versatile Dinuclear Chromium Catalyst. Macromolecules 2018, 51 (3) , 771-778. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.7b02042
  45. Enrique Francés-Poveda, Marc Martínez de Sarasa Buchaca, Carmen Moya-López, Iñigo J. Vitorica-Yrezabal, Isabel López-Solera, José A. Castro-Osma, Felipe de la Cruz-Martínez, Agustín Lara-Sánchez. Calcium-catalysed ring-opening copolymerisation of epoxides and cyclic anhydrides. Polymer Chemistry 2024, 15 (32) , 3238-3245. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4PY00379A
  46. Christoph Fornacon-Wood, Merlin R. Stühler, Alexandre Millanvois, Luca Steiner, Christiane Weimann, Dorothee Silbernagl, Heinz Sturm, Beate Paulus, Alex J. Plajer. Fluoride recovery in degradable fluorinated polyesters. Chemical Communications 2024, 60 (58) , 7479-7482. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4CC02513J
  47. Sriparna Sarkar, Sourav Singha Roy, Shobhana Krishnaswamy, Debashis Chakraborty. Phenoxy-imine supported hexacoordinate tetravalent titanium compounds: Synthesis, characterization and catalytic applications for ROP and ROCOP reactions. European Polymer Journal 2024, 358 , 113281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2024.113281
  48. Simona Russo, Florence Isnard, Chiara Costabile, Marina Lamberti, Mina Mazzeo. Schiff‐Base Aluminum Complexes as Bifunctional Catalysts for the Selective Ring‐Opening Co‐Polymerization of Cyclohexene Oxide and Succinic Anhydride. ChemCatChem 2024, 8 https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.202400508
  49. Rui Xie, Guan-Wen Yang, Yao-Yao Zhang, Chenjie Lu, Wei Li, Jingdai Wang, Guang-Peng Wu. A direct comparison between ring-opening copolymerization and polycondensation to produce polyesters using poly(ethylene succinate) as an example. Polymer Chemistry 2024, 15 (5) , 412-421. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3PY01314F
  50. Congyi Hu, Xinyu Wang, Yunhong Lan, Longqiang Xiao, Shurong Tang, Linxi Hou. UiO-type MOFs catalyzed ring-opening copolymerization of epoxides and cyclic anhydrides. European Polymer Journal 2024, 203 , 112695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2023.112695
  51. Haicheng Wang, Haiyan Ma. Ring-opening Copolymerization of Epoxides and Anhydride Mediated by Claw-type Aminophenolate Zinc Chlorides. Acta Chimica Sinica 2024, 82 (6) , 577. https://doi.org/10.6023/A24040122
  52. Max Hirschmann, Rachele Zunino, Sara Meninno, Laura Falivene, Tiziana Fuoco. Bi-functional and mono-component organocatalysts for the ring-opening alternating co-polymerisation of anhydride and epoxide. Catalysis Science & Technology 2023, 13 (24) , 7011-7021. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3CY01424J
  53. Xiaowei Xu, Hao Li, Andleeb Mehmood, Kebin Chi, Dejun Shi, Zhuozheng Wang, Bin Wang, Yuesheng Li, Yi Luo. Mechanistic Studies on Aluminum-Catalyzed Ring-Opening Alternating Copolymerization of Maleic Anhydride with Epoxides: Ligand Effects and Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Model. Molecules 2023, 28 (21) , 7279. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28217279
  54. Nattawat Jabprakon, Phongnarin Chumsaeng, Khamphee Phomphrai. Synthesis of AB x and AB x C poly(ester-ether) polymers: polymer sequences and effects of B x and B x C units on thermal properties. Polymer Chemistry 2023, 14 (36) , 4169-4181. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3PY00605K
  55. Wouter Lindeboom, Arron C. Deacy, Andreas Phanopoulos, Antoine Buchard, Charlotte K. Williams. Correlating Metal Redox Potentials to Co(III)K(I) Catalyst Performances in Carbon Dioxide and Propene Oxide Ring Opening Copolymerization. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2023, 62 (37) https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202308378
  56. Wouter Lindeboom, Arron C. Deacy, Andreas Phanopoulos, Antoine Buchard, Charlotte K. Williams. Correlating Metal Redox Potentials to Co(III)K(I) Catalyst Performances in Carbon Dioxide and Propene Oxide Ring Opening Copolymerization. Angewandte Chemie 2023, 135 (37) https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.202308378
  57. Lanlan Zheng, Jiabing Feng, Hongyan Xie, Zhiguang Xu. Organocatalytic synthesis of sugar‐derived polyesters via ring‐opening alternating copolymerization of anhydrosugar oxetane and anhydrides. Journal of Polymer Science 2023, 61 (14) , 1430-1438. https://doi.org/10.1002/pol.20230036
  58. Guang‐Hui He, Bai‐Hao Ren, Shang Wang, Ye Liu, Xiao‐Bing Lu. Sequence Control in Asymmetric Terpolymerizations of meso ‐Epoxides, CO 2 , and Phthalic Anhydride: Unprecedented Statistical Ester–Carbonate Distributions. Angewandte Chemie 2023, 135 (27) https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.202304943
  59. Guang‐Hui He, Bai‐Hao Ren, Shang Wang, Ye Liu, Xiao‐Bing Lu. Sequence Control in Asymmetric Terpolymerizations of meso ‐Epoxides, CO 2 , and Phthalic Anhydride: Unprecedented Statistical Ester–Carbonate Distributions. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2023, 62 (27) https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202304943
  60. Taylor B. Young, Owaen G. Guppy, Alysia J. Draper, Joshua M. Whitington, Benson M. Kariuki, Alison Paul, Mark Eaton, Simon J. A. Pope, Benjamin D. Ward. Chemically recyclable fluorescent polyesters via the ring-opening copolymerization of epoxides and anhydrides. Polymer Chemistry 2023, 14 (20) , 2478-2484. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3PY00209H
  61. Peter Deglmann, Sara Machleit, Cesare Gallizioli, Susanne M. Rupf, Alex J. Plajer. Lithium catalysed sequence selective ring opening terpolymerisation: a mechanistic study. Catalysis Science & Technology 2023, 13 (10) , 2937-2945. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3CY00301A
  62. Diego Jaraba Cabrera, Ryan D. Lewis, Carlos Díez-Poza, Lucía Álvarez-Miguel, Marta E. G. Mosquera, Alex Hamilton, Christopher J. Whiteoak. Group 13 salphen compounds (In, Ga and Al): a comparison of their structural features and activities as catalysts for cyclic carbonate synthesis. Dalton Transactions 2023, 52 (18) , 5882-5894. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3DT00089C
  63. Hongyan Xie, Lanlan Zheng, Jiabing Feng, Xinyu Wang, Suping Kuang, Li Zhou, Jia Jiang, Yaling Xu, Yan Zhao, Zhiguang Xu. Alkali metal carbonate catalyzed copolymerization of anhydrides and epoxides: a simple, efficient and versatile approach to well-defined alternating polyesters. Polymer Chemistry 2023, 14 (14) , 1630-1638. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2PY01507B
  64. Zachary A. Wood, Megan E. Fieser. Understanding differences in rate versus product determining steps to enhance sequence control in epoxide/cyclic anhydride copolymers. Polymer Chemistry 2023, 14 (7) , 821-827. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3PY00048F
  65. Yeolib Jeong, Min Ki Cho, Sanghyup Seo, Heyjin Cho, Kyung‐sun Son, Hyunwoo Kim. Electronic Tuning of Iminotriphenolate Ligands for Titanium(IV)‐catalyzed Ring‐opening Copolymerization of Cyclic Anhydrides and Epoxides. ChemCatChem 2023, 15 (3) https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.202201086
  66. Xiaoqing Dou, Xiao‐Hui Liu, Bin Wang, Yue‐Sheng Li. Potassium Acetate/ 18‐Crown ‐6 Pair: Robust and Versatile Catalyst for Synthesis of Polyols from Ring‐Opening Copolymerization of Epoxides and Cyclic Anhydrides †. Chinese Journal of Chemistry 2023, 41 (1) , 83-92. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjoc.202200556
  67. Mingqian Wang, Zhiqiang Ding, Bin Wang, Yuesheng Li. (Bipyridine bisphenolate)-aluminum/onium salt pair: a highly active binary catalyst for ring-opening polymerization of lactide with improved thermostability and protic tolerance. Polymer Chemistry 2022, 14 (1) , 45-54. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2PY01273A
  68. Jiwen Hui, Xiaowu Wang, Xiaoqian Yao, Zhibo Li. A one-component phosphonium borane Lewis pair serves as a dual initiator and catalyst in the ring-opening alternating copolymerization of anhydrides and epoxides. Polymer Chemistry 2022, 13 (47) , 6551-6563. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2PY01001A
  69. Hongyan Xie, Jiabing Feng, Xiaoxia Yang, Yan Zhao, Pingan Song, Hao Wang, Zhiguang Xu. One‐pot sequence‐selective synthesis of polylactone‐containing block terpolymers based on renewable terpenoid‐derived monomer and a simple organocatalyst. Journal of Polymer Science 2022, 60 (20) , 2889-2898. https://doi.org/10.1002/pol.20220188
  70. Anjaneyulu Kummari, Sreenath Pappuru, Sourav Singha Roy, Debashis Chakraborty. Iodine and alkali metal alkoxides: a simple and versatile catalytic system for fully alternating polyester synthesis from phthalic anhydride and epoxides. Polymer Chemistry 2022, 13 (32) , 4684-4691. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2PY00411A
  71. Matthew S. Shaw, Morgan R. Bates, Matthew D. Jones, Benjamin D. Ward. Metallocene catalysts for the ring-opening co-polymerisation of epoxides and cyclic anhydrides. Polymer Chemistry 2022, 13 (22) , 3315-3324. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2PY00335J
  72. Susanne Rupf, Patrick Pröhm, Alex J. Plajer. Lithium achieves sequence selective ring-opening terpolymerisation (ROTERP) of ternary monomer mixtures. Chemical Science 2022, 13 (21) , 6355-6365. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2SC01776H
  73. Hyuk-Joon Jung, Chatura Goonesinghe, Parisa Mehrkhodavandi. Temperature triggered alternating copolymerization of epoxides and lactones via pre-sequenced spiroorthoester intermediates. Chemical Science 2022, 13 (13) , 3713-3718. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1SC06634J
  74. Wipavee Thumrongpatanaraks, Tanyawan Pongpanit, Phongnarin Chumsaeng, Tiphanan Jaenjai, Supajittra Yimthachote, Khamphee Phomphrai. Ring‐Opening Copolymerization of Cyclic Anhydrides and Epoxides by bis (amidinate)tin(II) Complex via Binary Catalyst System. ChemistrySelect 2022, 7 (12) https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.202104450
  75. Zhenjie Yang, Chenyang Hu, Fengchao Cui, Xuan Pang, Yuezhou Huang, Yanchuan Zhou, Xuesi Chen. One‐Pot Precision Synthesis of AB, ABA and ABC Block Copolymers via Switchable Catalysis. Angewandte Chemie 2022, 134 (12) https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.202117533
  76. Zhenjie Yang, Chenyang Hu, Fengchao Cui, Xuan Pang, Yuezhou Huang, Yanchuan Zhou, Xuesi Chen. One‐Pot Precision Synthesis of AB, ABA and ABC Block Copolymers via Switchable Catalysis. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2022, 61 (12) https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202117533
  77. Ya-Qiong Zhang, Ying-Ying Li, Feliu Maseras, Rong-Zhen Liao. Mechanism and selectivity of photocatalyzed CO 2 reduction by a function-integrated Ru catalyst. Dalton Transactions 2022, 51 (9) , 3747-3759. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1DT03825G
  78. Alex J. Plajer, Charlotte K. Williams. Heterocycle/Heteroallene Ring‐Opening Copolymerization: Selective Catalysis Delivering Alternating Copolymers. Angewandte Chemie 2022, 134 (1) https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.202104495
  79. Alex J. Plajer, Charlotte K. Williams. Heterocycle/Heteroallene Ring‐Opening Copolymerization: Selective Catalysis Delivering Alternating Copolymers. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2022, 61 (1) https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202104495
  80. Donald J. Darensbourg, Gulzar A. Bhat. Polymerization of Epoxides. 2022, 431-455. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-820206-7.00123-2
  81. David J. Liptrot, Laura E. English. Main Group Complexes in Polymer Synthesis. 2022, 626-640. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-820206-7.00136-0
  82. Jiaxi Xu, Xin Wang, Nikos Hadjichristidis. Diblock dialternating terpolymers by one-step/one-pot highly selective organocatalytic multimonomer polymerization. Nature Communications 2021, 12 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-27377-3
  83. Yumei Zhou, Shujie Ming, Liuyan Tang, Jinqing Qu. Synthesis of UV-curable polyesters with lateral double bonds by ring-opening polymerization and their properties. Journal of Coatings Technology and Research 2021, 18 (6) , 1591-1601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11998-021-00513-w
  84. Wouter Lindeboom, Duncan A. X. Fraser, Christopher B. Durr, Charlotte K. Williams. Heterodinuclear Zn(II), Mg(II) or Co(III) with Na(I) Catalysts for Carbon Dioxide and Cyclohexene Oxide Ring Opening Copolymerizations. Chemistry – A European Journal 2021, 27 (47) , 12224-12231. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.202101140
  85. Nattiya Laiwattanapaisarn, Arnut Virachotikul, Khamphee Phomphrai. Cycloaddition of carbon dioxide to epoxides by highly active constrained aluminum chloride complexes. Dalton Transactions 2021, 50 (32) , 11039-11048. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1DT01903A
  86. Lei Cui, Bai‐Hao Ren, Xiao‐Bing Lu. Trinuclear salphen–chromium( III )chloride complexes as catalysts for the alternating copolymerization of epoxides and cyclic anhydrides. Journal of Polymer Science 2021, 59 (16) , 1821-1828. https://doi.org/10.1002/pol.20210334
  87. Ilaria D'Auria, Federica Santulli, Francesca Ciccone, Alessia Giannattasio, Mina Mazzeo, Daniela Pappalardo. Synthesis of Semi‐Aromatic Di‐Block Polyesters by Terpolymerization of Macrolactones, Epoxides, and Anhydrides. ChemCatChem 2021, 13 (14) , 3303-3311. https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.202100434
  88. Alex J. Plajer, Charlotte K. Williams. Heterotrimetallic Carbon Dioxide Copolymerization and Switchable Catalysts: Sodium is the Key to High Activity and Unusual Selectivity. Angewandte Chemie 2021, 133 (24) , 13484-13491. https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.202101180
  89. Alex J. Plajer, Charlotte K. Williams. Heterotrimetallic Carbon Dioxide Copolymerization and Switchable Catalysts: Sodium is the Key to High Activity and Unusual Selectivity. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2021, 60 (24) , 13372-13379. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202101180
  90. Wiktor Bukowski, Agnieszka Bukowska, Aleksandra Sobota, Maciej Pytel, Karol Bester. Copolymerization of Phthalic Anhydride with Epoxides Catalyzed by Amine-Bis(Phenolate) Chromium(III) Complexes. Polymers 2021, 13 (11) , 1785. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13111785
  91. Arron C. Deacy, Christopher B. Durr, Ryan W. F. Kerr, Charlotte K. Williams. Heterodinuclear catalysts Zn( ii )/M and Mg( ii )/M, where M = Na( i ), Ca( ii ) or Cd( ii ), for phthalic anhydride/cyclohexene oxide ring opening copolymerisation. Catalysis Science & Technology 2021, 11 (9) , 3109-3118. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1CY00238D
  92. Felipe de la Cruz-Martínez, Marc Martínez de Sarasa Buchaca, Almudena del Campo-Balguerías, Juan Fernández-Baeza, Luis F. Sánchez-Barba, Andrés Garcés, Carlos Alonso-Moreno, José A. Castro-Osma, Agustín Lara-Sánchez. Ring-Opening Copolymerization of Cyclohexene Oxide and Cyclic Anhydrides Catalyzed by Bimetallic Scorpionate Zinc Catalysts. Polymers 2021, 13 (10) , 1651. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13101651
  93. Wilfred T. Diment, Tim Stößer, Ryan W. F. Kerr, Andreas Phanopoulos, Christopher B. Durr, Charlotte K. Williams. Ortho -vanillin derived Al( iii ) and Co( iii ) catalyst systems for switchable catalysis using ε-decalactone, phthalic anhydride and cyclohexene oxide. Catalysis Science & Technology 2021, 11 (5) , 1737-1745. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CY02164D
  94. Tian‐Jun Yue, Bai‐Hao Ren, Wen‐Jian Zhang, Xiao‐Bing Lu, Wei‐Min Ren, Donald J. Darensbourg. Randomly Distributed Sulfur Atoms in the Main Chains of CO 2 ‐Based Polycarbonates: Enhanced Optical Properties. Angewandte Chemie 2021, 133 (8) , 4361-4367. https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.202012565
  95. Tian‐Jun Yue, Bai‐Hao Ren, Wen‐Jian Zhang, Xiao‐Bing Lu, Wei‐Min Ren, Donald J. Darensbourg. Randomly Distributed Sulfur Atoms in the Main Chains of CO 2 ‐Based Polycarbonates: Enhanced Optical Properties. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2021, 60 (8) , 4315-4321. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202012565
  96. Ranlong Duan, Yanchuan Zhou, Yuezhou Huang, Zhiqiang Sun, Han Zhang, Xuan Pang, Xuesi Chen. A trinuclear salen–Al complex for copolymerization of epoxides and anhydride: mechanistic insight into a cocatalyst-free system. Chemical Communications 2021, 57 (1) , 133-136. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CC06874H
  97. Maria Strianese, Daniela Pappalardo, Mina Mazzeo, Marina Lamberti, Claudio Pellecchia. Salen-type aluminum and zinc complexes as two-faced Janus compounds: contribution to molecular sensing and polymerization catalysis. Dalton Transactions 2020, 49 (46) , 16533-16550. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0DT02639E
  98. Ho Kyun Ryu, Jeongmin Cha, Namsik Yu, Eunsung Lee, Kyung-sun Son. Semi-aromatic polyester synthesis via alternating ring-opening copolymerization using a chromium complex based on a pentapyridine ligand. Inorganic Chemistry Communications 2020, 122 , 108278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inoche.2020.108278
  99. Yanay Popowski, Juan J. Moreno, Asa W. Nichols, Shelby L. Hooe, Caitlin J. Bouchey, Nigam P. Rath, Charles W. Machan, William B. Tolman. Mechanistic insight into initiation and regioselectivity in the copolymerization of epoxides and anhydrides by Al complexes. Chemical Communications 2020, 56 (90) , 14027-14030. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CC05652A
  100. Boru Zhang, Heng Li, Huitong Luo, Junpeng Zhao. Ring-opening alternating copolymerization of epichlorohydrin and cyclic anhydrides using single- and two-component metal-free catalysts. European Polymer Journal 2020, 134 , 109820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2020.109820
Load all citations

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Cite this: J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 42, 15222–15231
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.7b09079
Published October 6, 2017

Copyright © 2017 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

Article Views

9196

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Scheme 1

    Scheme 1. Alternating Copolymerization of Epoxides and Cyclic Anhydrides

    Scheme 2

    Scheme 2. Simplified Mechanism of Epoxide/Cyclic Anhydride Copolymerization with a (Salen)AlX Complex, Where X Is an Alkoxide, Carboxylate, or Halide, and P Is a Growing Polymer Chain

    Scheme 3

    Scheme 3. Copolymerization System Chosen for Mechanistic Study

    Scheme 4

    Scheme 4. Reaction of (Salph)AlCl with 1-Butene Oxide

    Scheme 5

    Scheme 5. Proposed Initiation Routes for [PPN]Cl

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Initiation mechanism with 333 K relative Gibbs free energies (kcal/mol) computed at the SMD(THF)/M06-2X/6-311+G(d,p)//SMD(THF)/M06-L/6-31+G(d,p) level of theory. All stoichiometries are balanced through appropriate inclusion of [PPN]+, Cl, and/or propylene oxide. The orange line corresponds to reaction in the absence of [PPN]Cl, i.e., through autoionization. The blue line corresponds to reaction with exogenous Cl from ionization of [PPN]Cl.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. (a) Conversion of CPMA over time for copolymerization with (salph)AlCl:[PPN]Cl:BO:CPMA ratio of 1:0.9:500:100 (1 equiv = 13 μmol). Results from polymerizations monitored in bulk are shown as orange triangles, and those from a single kinetic experiment monitored by 1H NMR are shown as blue circles. (b) Photographs of reaction solutions at the indicated time points.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Initial rates of reaction (20% completion) versus (a) initial BO concentrations (red) and (b) initial CPMA concentrations (blue).

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. Representative kinetic plot for the copolymerization reaction under condition 1 (Table 1). Concentration data for BO (red), CPMA (blue), and polymer repeat unit (Pol, gray) are displayed as calculated from integrations of 1H NMR data, calibrated with an internal standard, and with COPASI fits displayed as black lines.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. Plots of polymerization conversion with [BO]:[CPMA] = 500:100 (1 equiv = 13 μmol) in which (a) (salph)AlCl is kept constant at 1 equiv and [PPN]Cl is varied (teal circles) and [PPN]Cl is kept constant at 1 equiv and (salph)AlCl is varied (orange squares), and (b) (salph)AlCl and [PPN]Cl are varied concurrently, with linear fit shown. All reactions were quenched after heating at 50 °C for 1 h.

    Figure 6

    Figure 6. Model complexes studied as possible copolymerization intermediates.

    Figure 7

    Figure 7. Ring-opening reactions analyzed by DART-MS.

    Figure 8

    Figure 8. Targeted 6-coordinate Al complexes.

    Figure 9

    Figure 9. Solutions of Al complexes with/without added [PPN]salts: (A) (salph)AlCl, (B) (salph)AlOiPr, (C) (salph)AlO2CAd, (D) 1:1 (salph)AlCl and [PPN]Cl with excess BO, (E) 1:1 (salph)AlOiPr and [PPN][O2CAd], (F) 1:1 (salph)AlO2CAd and [PPN][O2CAd].

    Figure 10

    Figure 10. Proposed copolymerization initiation to yield bis(alkoxide) species, AAinit and AA (P = polymer chain; R1 and R2 used to simplify drawing of ring-opened CPMA).

    Figure 11

    Figure 11. Proposed mechanism for copolymerization of BO and CPMA (depicted by a simplified succinic anhydride).

    Figure 12

    Figure 12. Calculated mechanism for copolymerization of propylene oxide and succinic anhydride with 333 K relative Gibbs free energies (kcal/mol) computed at the SMD(THF)//M06-2X/6-311+G(d,p)//M06-L/6-31+G(d,p) level of theory. AA and AC represent the starting species for each cycle (1 and 2, respectively), while AA′ and AC′ represent the ending species after an epoxide is opened.

  • References


    This article references 34 other publications.

    1. 1
      Longo, J. M.; Sanford, M. J.; Coates, G. W. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 15167 15197 DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00553
    2. 2
      Paul, S.; Zhu, Y.; Romain, C.; Brooks, R.; Saini, P. K.; Williams, C. K. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 6459 6479 DOI: 10.1039/C4CC10113H
    3. 3
      DiCiccio, A. M.; Coates, G. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 10724 10727 DOI: 10.1021/ja203520p
    4. 4
      Huijser, S.; Nejad, E. H.; Sablong, R.; de Jong, C.; Koning, C. E.; Duchateau, R. Macromolecules 2011, 44, 1132 1139 DOI: 10.1021/ma102238u
    5. 5
      Robert, C.; de Montigny, F.; Thomas, C. M. Nat. Commun. 2011, 2, 586 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms1596
    6. 6
      Darensbourg, D. J.; Poland, R. R.; Escobedo, C. Macromolecules 2012, 45, 2242 2248 DOI: 10.1021/ma2026385
    7. 7
      Nejad, E. H.; Paoniasari, A.; Koning, C. E.; Duchateau, R. Polym. Chem. 2012, 3, 1308 1313 DOI: 10.1039/c2py20026k
    8. 8
      Nejad, E. H.; van Melis, C. G. W.; Vermeer, T. J.; Koning, C. E.; Duchateau, R. Macromolecules 2012, 45, 1770 1776 DOI: 10.1021/ma2025804
    9. 9
      Nejad, E. H.; Paoniasari, A.; van Melis, C. G. W.; Koning, C. E.; Duchateau, R. Macromolecules 2013, 46, 631 637 DOI: 10.1021/ma301904y
    10. 10
      Duan, Z.; Wang, X.; Gao, Q.; Zhang, L.; Liu, B.; Kim, I. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2014, 52, 789 795 DOI: 10.1002/pola.27057
    11. 11
      Jeon, J. Y.; Eo, S. C.; Varghese, J. K.; Lee, B. Y. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2014, 10, 1787 1795 DOI: 10.3762/bjoc.10.187
    12. 12
      Longo, J. M.; DiCiccio, A. M.; Coates, G. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 15897 15900 DOI: 10.1021/ja509440g
    13. 13
      Mundil, R.; Hošt’álek, Z.; Šedenková, I.; Merna, J. Macromol. Res. 2015, 23, 161 166 DOI: 10.1007/s13233-015-3022-4
    14. 14
      Si, G.; Zhang, L.; Han, B.; Duan, Z.; Liu, B.; Dong, J.; Li, X.; Liu, B. Polym. Chem. 2015, 6, 6372 6377 DOI: 10.1039/C5PY01040C
    15. 15
      Van Zee, N. J.; Coates, G. W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 2665 2668 DOI: 10.1002/anie.201410641
    16. 16
      Winkler, M.; Romain, C.; Meier, M. A. R.; Williams, C. K. Green Chem. 2015, 17, 300 306 DOI: 10.1039/C4GC01353K
    17. 17
      Liu, J.; Bao, Y.-Y.; Liu, Y.; Ren, W.-M.; Lu, X.-B. Polym. Chem. 2013, 4, 1439 1444 DOI: 10.1039/C2PY20842C
    18. 18
      Liu, D.-F.; Zhu, L.-Q.; Wu, J.; Wu, L.-Y.; Lu, X.-Q. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 3854 3859 DOI: 10.1039/C4RA08969C
    19. 19
      Biermann, U.; Sehlinger, A.; Meier, M. A. R.; Metzger, J. O. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2016, 118, 104 110 DOI: 10.1002/ejlt.201400631
    20. 20
      DiCiccio, A. M.; Longo, J. M.; Rodríguez-Calero, G. G.; Coates, G. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 7107 7113 DOI: 10.1021/jacs.6b03113
    21. 21
      Liu, D.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, X.; Lü, X. Aust. J. Chem. 2016, 69, 47 55 DOI: 10.1071/CH15162
    22. 22
      Sanford, M. J.; Peña Carrodeguas, L.; Van Zee, N. J.; Kleij, A. W.; Coates, G. W. Macromolecules 2016, 49, 6394 6400 DOI: 10.1021/acs.macromol.6b01425
    23. 23
      Van Zee, N. J.; Sanford, M. J.; Coates, G. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 2755 2761 DOI: 10.1021/jacs.5b12888
    24. 24
      Nejad, E. H.; van Melis, C. G. W.; Vermeer, T. J.; Koning, C. E.; Duchateau, R. Macromolecules 2012, 45, 1770 1776 DOI: 10.1021/ma2025804
    25. 25
      (a) Darensbourg, D. J.; Yarbrough, J. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 6335 6342 DOI: 10.1021/ja012714v
      (b) Darensbourg, D. J.; Yarbrough, J. C.; Ortiz, C.; Fang, C. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 7586 7591 DOI: 10.1021/ja034863e
      (c) Darensbourg, D. J.; Mackiewicz, R. M.; Rodgers, J. L.; Phelps, A. L. Inorg. Chem. 2004, 43, 1831 1833 DOI: 10.1021/ic0352856
      (d) Darensbourg, D. J.; Mackiewicz, R. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 14026 14038 DOI: 10.1021/ja053544f
      (e) Darensbourg, D. J.; Yeung, A. D. Polym. Chem. 2015, 6, 1103 1117 DOI: 10.1039/C4PY01322K
      (f) Chisholm, M. H.; Zhou, Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 11030 11039 DOI: 10.1021/ja0394232
    26. 26
      Han, B.; Zhang, L.; Liu, B.; Dong, X.; Kim, I.; Duan, Z.; Theato, P. Macromolecules 2015, 48, 3431 3437 DOI: 10.1021/acs.macromol.5b00555
    27. 27
      Nakano, K.; Hashimoto, S.; Nozaki, K. Chem. Sci. 2010, 1, 369 373 DOI: 10.1039/c0sc00220h
    28. 28
      Robert, C.; Schmid, T. E.; Richard, V.; Haquette, P.; Raman, S. K.; Rager, M.-N.; Gauvin, R. M.; Morin, Y.; Trivelli, X.; Guérineau, V.; Del Rosal, I.; Maron, L.; Thomas, C. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 6217 6225 DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b01749
    29. 29
      Martínez, L. E.; Leighton, J. L.; Carsten, D. H.; Jacobsen, E. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 5897 5898 DOI: 10.1021/ja00126a048
    30. 30
      Hoops, S.; Sahle, S.; Gauges, R.; Lee, C.; Pahle, J.; Simus, N.; Singhal, M.; Xu, L.; Mendes, P.; Kummer, U. Bioinformatics 2006, 22, 3067 3074 DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl485
    31. 31

      We hypothesize that the nonzero intercept of the indicated linear fit results from slow initiation at low concentrations of cocatalysts.

    32. 32
      Burés, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 2028 2031 DOI: 10.1002/anie.201508983
    33. 33

      According to this method, the decay of CPMA was plotted against the normalized time scale, t[Cat]N, where t is time, [Cat] is the initial concentrations of both the catalyst and cocatalyst, (salph)AlCl and [PPN]Cl, and N is the order. The three conditions were plotted against possible reaction orders of zero, first, and second, on the normalized time scale, with the best overlay found for the first-order case (Figure S20).

    34. 34
      Martinsen, A.; Songstad, J. Acta Chem. Scand. 1977, 31, 645 650 DOI: 10.3891/acta.chem.scand.31a-0645
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b09079.

    • Experimental and computational details, including Figures S1–S54, Tables S1–S21, and Scheme S1 (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.