ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
My Activity
CONTENT TYPES

Figure 1Loading Img

Photoswitching of DNA Hybridization Using a Molecular Motor

  • Anouk S. Lubbe
    Anouk S. Lubbe
    Stratingh Institute for Chemistry, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands
  • Qing Liu
    Qing Liu
    Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747AG Groningen, The Netherlands
    More by Qing Liu
  • Sanne J. Smith
    Sanne J. Smith
    Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747AG Groningen, The Netherlands
  • Jan Willem de Vries
    Jan Willem de Vries
    Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747AG Groningen, The Netherlands
  • Jos C. M. Kistemaker
    Jos C. M. Kistemaker
    Stratingh Institute for Chemistry, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands
  • Alex H. de Vries
    Alex H. de Vries
    Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747AG Groningen, The Netherlands
    Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology (GBB) Institute, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 7, 9747AG Groningen, The Netherlands
  • Ignacio Faustino
    Ignacio Faustino
    Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology (GBB) Institute, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 7, 9747AG Groningen, The Netherlands
  • Zhuojun Meng
    Zhuojun Meng
    Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology (GBB) Institute, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 7, 9747AG Groningen, The Netherlands
    More by Zhuojun Meng
  • Wiktor Szymanski*
    Wiktor Szymanski
    Stratingh Institute for Chemistry, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands
    Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713GZ Groningen, The Netherlands
    *[email protected]
  • Andreas Herrmann*
    Andreas Herrmann
    Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747AG Groningen, The Netherlands
    DWI-Leibniz Institute for Interactive Materials, Forckenbeckstr. 50, 52056 Aachen, Germany
    Institute of Technical and Macromolecular Chemistry, RWTH Aachen University, Worringerweg 2, 52074 Aachen, Germany
    *[email protected]
  • , and 
  • Ben L. Feringa*
    Ben L. Feringa
    Stratingh Institute for Chemistry, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands
    *[email protected]
Cite this: J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 15, 5069–5076
Publication Date (Web):March 18, 2018
https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.7b09476

Copyright © 2022 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under CC-BY-NC-ND.

  • Open Access

Article Views

15284

Altmetric

-

Citations

LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
PDF (2 MB)
Supporting Info (2)»

Abstract

Reversible control over the functionality of biological systems via external triggers may be used in future medicine to reduce the need for invasive procedures. Additionally, externally regulated biomacromolecules are now considered as particularly attractive tools in nanoscience and the design of smart materials, due to their highly programmable nature and complex functionality. Incorporation of photoswitches into biomolecules, such as peptides, antibiotics, and nucleic acids, has generated exciting results in the past few years. Molecular motors offer the potential for new and more precise methods of photoregulation, due to their multistate switching cycle, unidirectionality of rotation, and helicity inversion during the rotational steps. Aided by computational studies, we designed and synthesized a photoswitchable DNA hairpin, in which a molecular motor serves as the bridgehead unit. After it was determined that motor function was not affected by the rigid arms of the linker, solid-phase synthesis was employed to incorporate the motor into an 8-base-pair self-complementary DNA strand. With the photoswitchable bridgehead in place, hairpin formation was unimpaired, while the motor part of this advanced biohybrid system retains excellent photochemical properties. Rotation of the motor generates large changes in structure, and as a consequence the duplex stability of the oligonucleotide could be regulated by UV light irradiation. Additionally, Molecular Dynamics computations were employed to rationalize the observed behavior of the motor–DNA hybrid. The results presented herein establish molecular motors as powerful multistate switches for application in biological environments.

Introduction

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

DNA carries the genetic information of all known organisms. In the more than 60 years since Watson, Crick, and Franklin unraveled the double helix, (1) immense advances have been made in our understanding of DNA structure and function. Moreover, the programmable nature of DNA has led to its use in nanotechnology, (2) genetic engineering, (3) information storage, (4) and a range of other applications. In the ongoing search to understand and control the key processes of life, the ability to modulate DNA structure and function is highly desired. Various triggers, such as pH change, (5) small molecules, (6) short primers, (7) biological signals, (8) heat, (9) metal ions, (10) and light, (11−13) have been applied to achieve this goal. The use of light has distinct advantages over the other triggers. Light is noninvasive to living tissue, and a high level of spatial and temporal control over its application is possible. (11) Therefore, light-responsive molecular switches (photoswitches) are considered particularly attractive for reversible control over poly- and oligonucleotide structure and function. (12−15)
In photoregulation of oligonucleotides, extensive use is made of hairpin structures, which comprise short loops of hybridized, self-complementary DNA or RNA. They can form naturally and are frequently found in RNA secondary structure, where, among a variety of functions, they guide folding, protect mRNA from degradation and act as recognition sites or substrates for enzymatic reactions. (16,17) Hairpins are short oligonucleotides and are therefore relatively easy to synthesize, while their self-hybridization is a small-scale model for double-stranded DNA hybridization. (18) Typically in preparing photoresponsive hairpins, the bridging nucleotides of the loop are replaced by a molecular photoswitch. (13) The photoswitch is usually incorporated into the phosphate backbone of the oligonucleotide. In one state, the switch stabilizes the double-stranded helix structure. Irradiation causes a conformational change in the structure of the switch, which leads to destabilization of the helix and a lower melting temperature (Tm). Ideally, in a certain temperature range, the oligonucleotide can be fully switched between double- and single-stranded structures. As a result, in that specific temperature range, the structure can exist as a “closed” double-stranded form, or as an “open” single-stranded form, which may engage in interactions with other biomolecules.
Backbone incorporation of photoswitches was pioneered by Letsinger and Wu, (19,20) using stilbenes as photoactive bridging units; subsequently, this method was expanded with the use of azobenzenes by Yamana and co-workers. (21) Both trans-stilbene and trans-azobenzene stabilize the hairpins through π–π interactions with neighboring nucleobases. Upon switching to the nonplanar cis isomer, the extra stabilization is lost, leading to a lower Tm. This effect was enhanced by Sugimoto and co-workers, by precise engineering of the azobenzene backbone linker length. (22) In their design (1, see Figure 1), the cis isomer of the photoswitchable backbone linker is too short to function as a bridgehead for the hairpin. Therefore, the hairpin is distorted upon trans-to-cis isomerization, leading to additional destabilization and lowering of the Tm. The difference in TmTm) between the two isomers was found to be 20 °C for a 5-base-pair (bp) hairpin (5′-AAAAG-1-CTTTT-3′). The ΔTm is highly dependent on hairpin length, and drops to 17.3 °C when the base pair adjacent to the bridgehead is changed to A-T (5′-AAAAA-1-TTTTT-3′) and to 13.9 °C for a 6 bp hairpin (5′-AAAAAA-1-TTTTTT-3′). (23) Regardless, by the use of an ingenious linker design, Sugimoto and co-workers were able to achieve an unusually high ΔTm by the incorporation of only a single molecular photoswitch. (22)

Figure 1

Figure 1. Schematic overview of photoswitchable DNA hairpins. (a) Design by Sugimoto and co-workers based on photoswitchable linker 1. (b) Concept for linker based on first-generation molecular motors. A full conversion from double-stranded to single-stranded is an unlikely overestimation for both designs, but serves to illustrate the general concept of destabilization through contraction (a) or expansion (b) of the linker.

Overcrowded alkene-based rotary molecular motors offer novel opportunities in the field of photoregulation of biologically active molecules due to their unique dynamic properties. The first of this type of responsive molecules was reported in 1999 and was of particular interest because it exhibited repetitive, photochemically driven unidirectional rotation around a carbon–carbon double bond. (24) In recent years, however, molecular motors have found a vast range of applications as multistate switches. (25) The rotary cycle of an overcrowded alkene-based molecular motor consists of four steps and therefore features four different isomers. A detailed description of the rotary cycle and an accompanying scheme can be found in the Supporting Information (SI), in Scheme S1.
The large geometrical changes upon cis-trans isomerization in rotary molecular motors, accompanied by the structural rigidity, are particularly suited to induce a significant structural change in a DNA hairpin upon irradiation. Moreover, the four-state switching cycle and the change in helicity of the motor in each rotary step offer potential for new functionalities and a high degree of photoregulation. With this in mind, we set off to evaluate the possibility of using a molecular motor to reversibly control the hybridization of a DNA hairpin (Figure 1b).
We envisioned that one of the isomers (in this case stable cis) could be accommodated as a loop element of the hairpin. Upon cis-trans isomerization, the motor-bridgehead expands considerably, leading to a destabilization of the hairpin and a corresponding decrease in melting temperature. As a result, at a temperature range around the recorded Tm’s, the equilibrium between the DNA double-helical hairpin structure and the single-stranded form could be shifted toward the former, by a photoinduced isomerization from the cis form (which should form relatively stable hairpins) to the more destabilized trans form. Here, the stable isomers of the motor were synthesized separately to determine the Tm for each isomer after which UV–vis spectroscopy was used to examine the switching behavior of the hybrids.

Results and Discussion

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Computation-Aided Molecular Design of the Linker

Before starting the synthesis of the target motor–hairpin hybrid, calculations were performed to ensure that the design would be optimal for our envisioned application. By analogy to the azobenzene 1 (Figure 1) reported by Sugimoto and co-workers, (22) we designed a double-primary-alcohol-functionalized motor, which could be incorporated in the DNA strand through standard solid-phase DNA synthesis (SPS). Ideally, the cis isomer should have an O–O′ distance of 13.3 Å, which is the optimal bridgehead length. Rigid side chains are necessary to enforce sufficient distortion of the hairpin upon photochemical switching. Our two initially considered designs, linkers 2 and 3, are depicted in Figure 2. We chose to use first generation motors, which are symmetrical, have limited conformational flexibility, and therefore maximize geometrical change. The xylene-based core structure of these designs has excellent photochemical properties and can be readily synthesized. (26)

Figure 2

Figure 2. Structures of proposed motor linkers 2 and 3. The molecules have conformational freedom around the bonds indicated in bold red. (22) Both structures are designed to bring the hydroxy groups closer together upon trans-to-cis isomerization.

Both designs were investigated computationally using Density Functional Theory (DFT; for full computational details see the SI). From these calculations, the potential energy surface (PES) scan of the O–O distance was used to estimate the effectiveness of either possible linker. Figure 3a shows the PES scan for the O–O distance for proposed motor 2. Because motor 2 has conformational freedom around 4 bonds (highlighted in red in Figure 2), the PES of both isomers is very shallow. There is no obvious global minimum, and a range of distances (7–19 Å for cis-2 (blue squares), 12–20 Å for trans-2 (red circles)) between the terminal oxygen atoms is available to both isomers at no extra energetic cost. At 13.3 Å, which represents the ideal O–O bridging distance in a hairpin (green line), both isomers can easily be accommodated. Therefore, switching between the two isomers was not expected to result in sufficient destabilization of the hairpin. Figure 3b shows the PES scan for the O–O distance for proposed motor 3. This structure has much less conformational freedom, which is reflected in a much steeper PES. cis-3 (blue squares) has a global minimum at ∼15 Å. However, the extra energy required to reorganize to an O–O distance of 13.3 Å (green line) is only 1.7 kJ/mol. The trans isomer (red circles) has a global minimum at 17.4 Å. Reorganization to 13.3 Å would require an energy input of 22.9 kJ/mol. For comparison, the ΔG of hairpin formation of the entire 5′-TTTTTTTT-X-AAAAAAAA-3′ strand can be estimated at 310 K as 25.5 kJ/mol by using the nearest neighbor model. (27) Therefore, to accommodate trans-3 as a bridgehead in a hairpin, partial disruption of the B-form helical structure by breaking hydrogen bonding between one or more base pairs seems much more likely than distortion of the motor. Based on these computations, we concluded that switching from cis to trans in a DNA hairpin containing motor 3 as a bridgehead unit will lead to a significant destabilization of the hairpin.

Figure 3

Figure 3. PES scans of the O–O distance in proposed motors 2 and 3, plotted against the self-consistent field (SCF) energy.

Synthesis of the Molecular Motor-Based Linker 3

The synthesis of cis-motor 3 is depicted in Scheme 1, starting from previously reported dibromo-functionalized motor 4. (28) The preparation of the cis isomer is described, but the synthetic route toward the trans isomer is identical (see SI, pages S3–S5). Asymmetric synthesis of motor 4 has been performed previously on preparative scale. (28) However, for the sake of synthetic simplicity, we chose to start our investigation using the racemic starting material. The geometric isomers of motor 4 could be separated in this stage through recrystallization and the synthesis of the trans isomer was followed independently. However, in case of the cis isomer, the mixture of isomers was subjected to the next two steps of the synthesis and separation was performed later on. Immediate coupling of 4 to the acetylene moieties was unsuccessful. Therefore, the bromine substituents were converted to iodines in a Finkelstein-type reaction. The coupling to the acetylene unit was initially attempted using propargyl alcohol, however, with poor results. The yield was much improved by using propargyl acetate for the Sonogashira coupling. Protected motor 6 was obtained in 94% yield. At this stage, the cis isomer was separated from the mixture of isomers through recrystallization. Motor 6 could be converted into target motor 3 by a base-mediated deprotection in 87% yield. Trans-3 was synthesized in an identical manner, however, a note needs to be added regarding the substitution of the bromine moieties for iodine moieties (4 to 5). As this reaction was performed at 130 °C, it caused partial thermal isomerization of trans-5 to cis-5. After several recrystallization cycles, >95% trans-5 could be obtained and the synthesis was continued using trans-5 in the presence of a small amount of cis-5.

Scheme 1

Scheme 1. Synthesis of Motor 3 and Phosphoramidite Motors trans-8 and cis-8a

aOnly synthesis for cis-8 is shown; for trans-8, see SI, pages S3–S5. Isomers of compound 6 were separated through recrystallization, subsequent yields refer the cis isomer only.

For incorporation in DNA using solid-phase synthesis, motor 3 had to be converted into the corresponding phosphoramidite building block 8 in two steps (Scheme 1). First, one of the primary alcohols of motor 3 was protected using one equivalent of dimethoxytrityl (DMT) chloride. From this reaction, a 1:2:1 statistical mixture of starting material 3, monoprotected product 7, and diprotected motor was obtained, which could easily be separated by column chromatography. The resulting monoprotected motor 7 was relatively unstable and therefore had to be immediately converted into phosphoramidite motor 8, through coupling with 2-cyanoethyl-N,N-diisopropylchlorophosphoramidite. This building block was also highly unstable and was therefore purified by quickly flushing over a SiO2 column, dissolved in dichloromethane under an argon atmosphere, and immediately used in SPS. 1H and 31P NMR analysis showed that trans-8 contained only 20% product. The main impurity appeared to be a dimer (structure not shown) resulting from a reaction of the starting material 7 and the product 8, in which the cyanoethyl moiety was replaced by a second motor molecule. As it was established that the hairpin synthesis was not compromised, and to prevent losses by oxidation, a second chromatography was not performed, and this mixture was subjected to SPS. In a similar synthesis for the cis isomer of motor-based phosphoramidite 8, this final step was highly effective, and cis-8 was obtained pure after chromatography.

Photochemistry of the Motor-Based Linker

Prior to SPS of the motor-based hairpin, and to reveal that photoisomerization processes were not compromised, the photochromism and rotary cycle of motor 3 were investigated using UV–vis (see Figure S2) and 1H NMR analysis, revealing excellent photochemical properties. Upon irradiation of stable trans-3 with 312 nm light, a photostationary state (PSS) consisting of 88% unstable cis isomer was formed, which subsequently underwent thermal helix inversion (THI) to stable cis-3 (Figure 4a). No PSS could be observed for the other half of the rotary cycle, since unstable trans-3 readily undergoes THI even at −50 °C, leading to formation of stable trans-3, which can also undergo photoisomerization to unstable cis-3. As a result, all four isomers can be observed in the mixture after irradiation (Figure 4b). Using Eyring analysis, the half-life of the unstable cis isomer 3 was calculated to be 9.7 h at 37 °C. The half-life of unstable trans-3 was not determined, but is expected to be <1 s at 37 °C, based on our earlier studies of related first generation motors. (26) Therefore this isomer (unstable trans-3) is of no practical use. For full experimental details, see SI, pages S7–S10.

Figure 4

Figure 4. 1H NMR analysis of the rotational cycle of motor 3 (part of spectrum, proton indicated by *). Only aromatic proton depicted for clarity; see Figures S3 and S4 for full spectrum. (a) Stable trans-3 (st) to unstable cis-3 (uc) to stable cis-3 (sc). (b) Stable cis-3 (sc) to unstable trans-3 (ut) to stable trans-3 (st). All experiments performed in CD2Cl2 (400 MHz, −50 °C).

DNA Synthesis and Melting Point Analysis

Molecular motor building block 8 was introduced into a 16-mer, self-complementary DNA strand using standard solid-phase oligonucleotide synthesis on a DNA synthesizer. Cis and trans isomers were synthesized separately from stable cis-8 and trans-8, respectively. The product, 5′-TTTTTTTT-3-AAAAAAAA-3′ (8T-3-8A), was purified using reversed-phase chromatography followed by anion exchange chromatography. Product identity was confirmed by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (Figure S10). Duplex formation of two molecules 8T-3-8A was not expected, since this was found to be extremely unfavorable for related oligonucleotides with stilbene backbone linkers. (19) Gel electrophoresis confirmed that both isomers form hairpins (Figure S13). The melting temperature of each hairpin was determined using a SYBR Green I fluorescence assay (Figures S11 and S12). The melting temperature for 8T-cis-3-8A was determined to be 59 °C, and for 8T-trans-3-8A to be 65 °C. The ΔTm is therefore 6 °C, which is a remarkably high value and comparable to the achievement of Sugimoto and co-workers (20 °C/17.8 °C for 5 bp (depending on base pair adjacent to bridgehead), 13.9 °C for 6 bp). (22,23) Comparison with an 8 bp DNA hairpin containing an azobenzene or stilbene linker is not possible. Only three such hybrids were previously reported, and a ΔTm was not reported for any of them. (29−31) Notably, the Tm of the native hairpin 8T8A was determined to be 51.5 °C. The observation that the Tm of the native hairpin is lower than the Tm of the hybrids can be partly attributed to the fact that the loop in this hairpin consists of a few bases, which are therefore not engaging in base pairing. Typically, a four nucleotide loop is found to be most stable. (32) The loss of two base pair interactions is expected to decrease the Tm a few degrees, while the Tm’s of 8T-cis-3-8A and 8T-trans-3-8A are, respectively, 7.5 and 13.5 °C higher than the Tm of 8T8A. It seems therefore that for both isomers, the motor has a significant stabilizing effect on the hairpin. A similar stabilizing effect is observed for trans azobenzenes and stilbenes, where it has been attributed to π stacking interactions. (12,33)

Motion of the Motor in the DNA Scaffold

For any application under biologically relevant conditions, (34,35) and in this case to achieve photocontrol over DNA secondary structure, it is very important that the switching ability of the motor in the hybrid is retained. To investigate the action of the motor without interaction between the two substituent DNA strands, we started our experiments under non-hybridizing conditions: in Milli-Q water and at 67 °C, above the Tm of either isomer. We subjected a 2.65 μM solution of 8T-trans-3-8A in Milli-Q to the standard UV–vis experiment used to follow the isomerization processes of a molecular motor (Figure 5). In the initial absorption spectrum (Figure 5a,b, black line) both components of the hybrid can be clearly distinguished. The major absorption band can be attributed to DNA (λmax = 262 nm), while above ∼300 nm, only the motor units contribute to absorption. The band with two maxima at λmax = 330 and 345 nm is characteristic for the stable trans conformation of xylene-based first generation motors (26,36,37) and is also observed in the UV–vis spectrum of motor 3 (see Figure S2). Because the DNA does not absorb above 300 nm, the motor unit can be irradiated without affecting the DNA part of the hybrid. Irradiation with 312 nm at 67 °C leads to the appearance of a new absorption band at a higher wavelength (λmax = 385 nm), which typically results from the formation of a higher energy motor isomer (8T-unstable-cis-3-8A, Figure 5a). The clear isosbestic point indicates the absence of photodamage or side reactions. After 10 min, a photostationary state was reached, and the irradiation was halted (Figure 5b, red line). Subsequently, the sample was left at 67 °C for several hours to induce thermal helix inversion. As expected, the new band disappeared, and an absorption at a lower wavelength (λmax = 347 nm, Figure 5b, blue line) appeared, most likely corresponding to 8T-cis-3-8A. [We were unable to find separation of the two isomers of 8T-3-8A using chromatography, and not enough material was available to attempt characterization through NMR spectroscopy.] MALDI-TOF analysis showed that the hybrid does not undergo degradation (Figure S18). Although the UV–vis spectra alone clearly indicate a photoisomerization followed by THI, the sample used in this experiment was subjected to a melting temperature analysis by a fluorescence assay. We hypothesized that a mixture of the two hairpins (8T-trans-3-8A and 8T-cis-3-8A) should lead to two maxima in the differentiated curve of the fluorescence spectrum, corresponding to the two different Tm’s. In fact, the main maximum in this curve was found at 59 °C, which corresponds to the Tm of 8T-cis-3-8A (Figure S16). This result, in combination with the UV–vis spectra depicted in Figure 5, leads us to conclude that an efficient photoisomerization and subsequent THI have taken place. To determine the kinetics of the THI, the absorption of the sample was measured at regular intervals (Figure S14). The half-life of the unstable cis isomer of 8T-3-8A is determined to be ∼51 min at 67 °C, about 2.5 times slower than for the motor 3 itself (vide supra, 19.5 min at 67 °C). Therefore, it appears that motor rotation is slightly slowed down but otherwise unhindered when integrated in the backbone of a biomolecule and operated in aqueous conditions. Because these experiments are performed in bulk solution, irradiation had to be performed for 10 min, and we were unable to look into structural dynamics of the hairpin. However, it may be possible that reconfiguration of the hairpin occurs on a slower time scale than photoswitching of the motor, similar to responses observed in peptides. (38−40) Future investigations may include ultrafast IR studies to elucidate the dynamics of hairpin reconfiguration upon photoswitching.

Figure 5

Figure 5. UV–vis spectra of analysis of the photochemical isomerization of stable 8T-trans-3-8A. (a) Changes of the absorption spectrum of 8T-trans-3-8A upon irradiation with 312 nm light for 10 min. Spectra were recorded in 1 min intervals. Inset shows the region 290–450 nm. (b) 8T-trans-3-8A (black line), the sample after irradiation with 312 nm light for 10 min (red line), and the sample after incubation at 67 °C for 6 h (blue line). All spectra recorded in Milli-Q water, 67 °C, ambient atmosphere.

The experiment was also performed under hybridizing conditions at physiological temperature (37 °C, 20 mM Tris-HCl, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2, pH 8.0). 8T-trans-3-8A was again readily photoisomerized without the occurrence of side reactions. However, after several hours at 37 °C, only a slight decrease of the absorption band corresponding to the unstable cis isomer was observed (see Figure S16). Potentially, helix inversion is hindered by the hybridized DNA strands. A two-dimensional representation of the rotary cycle can give the impression that the THI induces a smaller geometry change to the motor than the photochemical isomerization. However, DFT calculations on the parent xylene-based motor have demonstrated that the THI from unstable cis to stable cis proceeds through an asynchronous change of the dihedral angle, in which one half is overall rotated approximately 120° with respect to the other half in a combination of backward and forward movement. (41) This asymmetric behavior arises from the steric hindrance between the two halves and could be the reason that for 8T-3-8A the THI proceeds less readily than the photochemical isomerization at 37 °C. When the sample was heated to 70 °C (above the Tm), THI occurred in a similar manner in aqueous buffer as in water. For full spectra and MALDI-TOF analysis of the irradiated sample, see SI pages S20–S22. Melting temperature analysis revealed a Tm of 59 °C, indicating efficient conversion to the stable cis isomer.
To summarize, the rotational motion of 8T-3-8A can be described as follows. Stable 8T-trans-3-8A forms a hairpin structure with a Tm of 65 °C. Upon irradiation with 312 nm light, photoisomerization to unstable 8T-cis-3-8A occurs with high conversion. Upon heating, THI can be induced, and stable 8T-cis-3-8A is formed. The Tm of this isomer is 59 °C, indicating a destabilization of the hairpin structure. To put the measured melting points into perspective, it is important to mention that at the early stages of the project we have targeted the 4T-cis-3-4A hybrid. However, preliminary melting temperature analysis indicated that the Tm of this compound would be at or around 0 °C. Based on this it was feared that a 5 or 6 bp hairpin would also have a Tm below body temperature, and 8T-3-8A was targeted instead.
Isomerization from 8T-stable-cis-3-8A to 8T-stable-trans-3-8A proved to be challenging due to the very short half-life of the intermediate unstable trans isomer (Figure S17). However, we are pleased to report that the photoisomerization and subsequent THI of 8T-stable-trans-3-8A toward 8T-stable-cis-3-8A occur without degradation (vide supra). Although the elevation to a temperature above the Tm is required to induce THI, the photoisomerization occurs readily under hybridizing conditions and at physiological temperature.

Molecular Dynamics

As discussed above, bridgehead motor 3 was carefully designed to ensure an optimal geometrical change upon cis-trans isomerization. We were intrigued to observe that, in sharp contrast to predictions based on our design, 8T-trans-3-8A proved to have a higher Tm than 8T-cis-3-8A, since DFT calculations suggested the reverse. However, the DFT calculations were only performed on the motor bridgehead, and artificial contraction was used to simulate a DNA hairpin attached to the oxygen atoms. A DFT study of the full hairpin was not considered feasible, due to the excessive computational time such an investigation would require. To explain the difference in hairpin stability, preliminary Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations were performed, exploring the conformations that the stable cis and trans isomers can adopt. The simulations used the well-known AMBER force field for DNA, (42) and that model was extended to include the linker moiety. Native B-DNA hairpin structures were built and bridged by linker 3 in either cis or trans isomer. Water and counterions were added. Briefly, at 300 K the hairpin was observed to remain largely intact, but in both isomers, the base pair closest to the linker was observed to be able to adopt multiple conformations (Figure 6). These include base-flips and stacking of two bases of the first pair on top of each other, apparently engaging in stacking interactions with one of the aromatic rings of the motor. Selected snapshots from the observed conformations are shown in Figure 6. The simulations allow speculation as to the reasons why the trans form of 8T-3-8A is more stable than the cis form (see caption to Figure 6). For example, stacking interactions between the bases and the motor are possible and are energetically more favorable in the trans isomer than in the cis isomer, which was further investigated in 1 μs simulations at 333 and 363 K; see SI (pages S23–S30). More extensive simulations should enable us to determine the free energy differences between the different types of conformations and thereby give more insight into the relative stability of the hairpin; investigations that are currently ongoing.

Figure 6

Figure 6. Selected conformations taken from 90 ns MD simulations of hairpin- constructs with the linker in the stable cis (top row) and trans (bottom row) conformations, respectively. The molecule is visualized using the VMD software, highlighting the switchable bridge (cyan C-atoms). The adenine at the 5′ end is shown entirely in orange and the 3′ thymine in green. H-bonding interactions defined on the basis of the Luzar-Chandler-geometric criterion (donor–acceptor distance within 3.5 Å and donor–H–acceptor angle smaller than 30°) between these two selected base pairs are shown as dashed lines. The leftmost conformation is the starting conformation with a canonical base pairing, obtained after building and briefly equilibrating the model. In the middle, structures in which the thymine base neighboring the switchable bridge flipped out of the hairpin are shown. The rightmost panels show structures in which the base pairs closest to the switchable bridge have stacking interactions instead of base-pairing interaction. In the trans form (right bottom), the thymine appears to be interacting also favorably with one of the aromatic moieties of the switchable linker; this interaction is energetically less favorable in the cis form.

Conclusions

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Aided by computational studies, we have designed a first generation molecular motor-based linker that can function as a photoswitchable bridgehead for an 8-base-pair DNA hairpin. Both cis and trans isomers of a bifunctional linker were prepared and, after establishing their function as a multistate switch, they were incorporated into a 16-mer strand of self-complementary DNA via solid-phase synthesis. Hairpin formation was confirmed, and the DNA–motor hybrid was shown to be able to undergo both photoisomerization and thermal helix inversion processes. The Tm of 8T-trans-3-8A was determined to be 65 °C, and the Tm of 8T-cis-3-8A was 59 °C. An unexpected observation was the destabilization due to trans-cis isomerization, since DFT calculations suggested the opposite. However, more extensive MD investigations will provide better insight into the interactions between the hairpin and the photoswitchable bridgehead. The results and structural insights of this study are very important for the design of even more potent molecular motor–backbone linkers. The measured ΔTm of 6 °C (for an 8 bp hairpin) represents a very promising value which ranks this investigation among the most successful attempts to influence DNA hybridization through the incorporation of a photoswitchable backbone linker. Moreover, the isomerization process was highly efficient, and the bistable switching mode provides a real advance over azobenzenes, for which the thermal cis–trans re-isomerization limits possible applications. This study marks the first time that a molecular motor has been used to control the secondary structure of DNA, and in fact one of the first examples of a molecular motor being applied under physiological conditions, demonstrating the ability to regulate a key biological process such as DNA hybridization.
Finally, it must be noted that molecular motors do not just rival conventional photoswitches in efficiency and power. They also offer a much higher degree of control and precision due to their four-state switching cycle and helicity inversion. This investigation has only begun to uncover the vast range of new possibilities that may be accessed in photoregulated biohybrid systems. It is apparent that the motor unit by itself is powerful enough to significantly influence hybridization behavior of short oligonucleotide hairpins. Moreover, our results showcase the potential of rotary molecular motors and consolidate their position among the most effective photoswitches for use in biological surroundings.

Supporting Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b09476.

  • General methods; synthetic procedures; characterization and 1H/13C NMR spectra of all new compounds; explanation of first-generation molecular motor rotary cycle; UV–vis, NMR, and kinetic analysis of rotation of motor 3; DFT and MD calculations; DNA synthesis; melting temperature analysis; gel electrophoresis; UV–vis and kinetic analysis of motor–DNA hybrid 8T-3-8A; and MALDI-TOF analysis of DNA–motor hybrids; and 1H and 13C NMR spectra of new compounds, including Scheme S1, Figures S1–S22, and Tables S1–S6 (PDF)

  • MD data (ZIP)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

  • Corresponding Authors
    • Wiktor Szymanski - Stratingh Institute for Chemistry, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The NetherlandsDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713GZ Groningen, The NetherlandsOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-9754-9248 Email: [email protected]
    • Andreas Herrmann - Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747AG Groningen, The NetherlandsDWI-Leibniz Institute for Interactive Materials, Forckenbeckstr. 50, 52056 Aachen, GermanyInstitute of Technical and Macromolecular Chemistry, RWTH Aachen University, Worringerweg 2, 52074 Aachen, GermanyOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-8886-0894 Email: [email protected]
    • Ben L. Feringa - Stratingh Institute for Chemistry, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The NetherlandsOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-0588-8435 Email: [email protected]
  • Authors
    • Anouk S. Lubbe - Stratingh Institute for Chemistry, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands
    • Qing Liu - Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747AG Groningen, The Netherlands
    • Sanne J. Smith - Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747AG Groningen, The Netherlands
    • Jan Willem de Vries - Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747AG Groningen, The Netherlands
    • Jos C. M. Kistemaker - Stratingh Institute for Chemistry, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands
    • Alex H. de Vries - Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747AG Groningen, The NetherlandsGroningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology (GBB) Institute, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 7, 9747AG Groningen, The Netherlands
    • Ignacio Faustino - Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology (GBB) Institute, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 7, 9747AG Groningen, The Netherlands
    • Zhuojun Meng - Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology (GBB) Institute, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 7, 9747AG Groningen, The Netherlands
  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

We gratefully acknowledge generous support from NanoNed, The Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO-CW, Top grant to B.L.F. and NWO VIDI Grant no. 723.014.001 for W.S.), the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW), the Ministry of Education, Culture and Science (Gravitation program 024.001.035), the European Research Council (Advanced Investigator Grant no. 694345 to B.L.F. and Advanced Investigator Grant no. 694610 to A.H.), and the China Scholarship Council (CSC) for Q.L. and Z.M. We thank Dowine de Bruijn, Dr. S. J. Wezenberg, and Tom van Leeuwen for valuable discussions.

References

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article references 42 other publications.

  1. 1
    Watson, J. D.; Crick, F. H. C. Nature 1953, 171, 737738,  DOI: 10.1038/171737a0
  2. 2
    Jones, M. R.; Seeman, N. C.; Mirkin, C. A. Science 2015, 347, 1260901,  DOI: 10.1126/science.1260901
  3. 3
    Ledford, H. Nature 2016, 531, 156159,  DOI: 10.1038/531156a
  4. 4
    Goldman, N.; Bertone, P.; Chen, S.; Dessimoz, C.; LeProust, E. M.; Sipos, B.; Birney, E. Nature 2013, 494, 7780,  DOI: 10.1038/nature11875
  5. 5
    Modi, S.; Swetha, M. G.; Goswami, D.; Gupta, G. D.; Mayor, S.; Krishnan, Y. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2009, 4, 325330,  DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2009.83
  6. 6
    Chen, H.; Zhang, H.; Pan, J.; Cha, T.-G.; Li, S.; Andréasson, J.; Choi, J. H. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 49894996,  DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.6b01339
  7. 7
    Zhang, F.; Nangreave, J.; Liu, Y.; Yan, H. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 32903295,  DOI: 10.1021/nl301399z
  8. 8
    Douglas, S. M.; Bachelet, I.; Church, G. M. Science 2012, 335, 831834,  DOI: 10.1126/science.1214081
  9. 9
    Gerling, T.; Wagenbauer, K. F.; Neuner, A. M.; Dietz, H. Science 2015, 347, 14461452,  DOI: 10.1126/science.aaa5372
  10. 10
    Takezawa, Y.; Shionoya, M. Acc. Chem. Res. 2012, 45, 20662076,  DOI: 10.1021/ar200313h
  11. 11
    Weissleder, R.; Ntziachristos, V. Nat. Med. 2003, 9, 123128,  DOI: 10.1038/nm0103-123
  12. 12
    Szymański, W.; Beierle, J. M.; Kistemaker, H. A. V.; Velema, W. A.; Feringa, B. L. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 61146178,  DOI: 10.1021/cr300179f
  13. 13
    Lubbe, A. S.; Szymanski, W.; Feringa, B. L. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 10521079,  DOI: 10.1039/C6CS00461J
  14. 14
    Zhou, M.; Liang, X.; Mochizuki, T.; Asanuma, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 21672170,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.200907082
  15. 15
    Liang, X.; Fujioka, K.; Asanuma, H. Chem. - Eur. J. 2011, 17, 1038810396,  DOI: 10.1002/chem.201100215
  16. 16
    Bevilacqua, P. C.; Blose, J. M. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2008, 59, 79103,  DOI: 10.1146/annurev.physchem.59.032607.093743
  17. 17
    Svoboda, P.; Di Cara, A. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2006, 63, 901908,  DOI: 10.1007/s00018-005-5558-5
  18. 18
    Yin, Y.; Zhao, X. S. Acc. Chem. Res. 2011, 44, 11721181,  DOI: 10.1021/ar200068j
  19. 19
    Letsinger, R. L.; Wu, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 811812,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00081a069
  20. 20
    Letsinger, R. L.; Wu, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 73237328,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00133a005
  21. 21
    Yamana, K.; Yoshikawa, A.; Nakano, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 637640,  DOI: 10.1016/0040-4039(95)02220-1
  22. 22
    Wu, L.; Koumoto, K.; Sugimoto, N. Chem. Commun. 2009, 19151917,  DOI: 10.1039/b819643e
  23. 23
    Wu, L.; Wu, Y.; Jin, H.; Zhang, L.; He, Y.; Tang, X. MedChemComm 2015, 6, 461468,  DOI: 10.1039/C4MD00378K
  24. 24
    Koumura, N.; Zijlstra, R. W.; van Delden, R. A.; Harada, N.; Feringa, B. L. Nature 1999, 401, 152155,  DOI: 10.1038/43646
  25. 25
    Kassem, S.; van Leeuwen, T.; Lubbe, A. S.; Wilson, M. R.; Feringa, B. L.; Leigh, D. A. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 25922621,  DOI: 10.1039/C7CS00245A
  26. 26
    Pollard, M. M.; Meetsma, A.; Feringa, B. L. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2008, 6, 507512,  DOI: 10.1039/B715652A
  27. 27
    SantaLucia, Jr Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1998, 95, 14601465,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.4.1460
  28. 28
    Neubauer, T. M.; van Leeuwen, T.; Zhao, D.; Lubbe, A. S.; Kistemaker, J. C. M.; Feringa, B. L. Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 42204223,  DOI: 10.1021/ol501925f
  29. 29
    Yamana, K.; Yoshikawa, A.; Noda, R.; Nakano, H. Nucleosides, Nucleotides Nucleic Acids 1998, 17, 233242,  DOI: 10.1080/07328319808005172
  30. 30
    Yamana, K.; Kan, K.; Nakano, H. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 1999, 7, 29772983,  DOI: 10.1016/S0968-0896(99)00244-8
  31. 31
    Lewis, F. D.; Wu, Y.; Liu, X. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 1216512173,  DOI: 10.1021/ja026941o
  32. 32
    Antao, V. P.; Lai, S. Y.; Tinoco, I., Jr. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991, 19, 59015905,  DOI: 10.1093/nar/19.21.5901
  33. 33
    Lewis, F. D.; Liu, X.; Wu, Y.; Miller, S. E.; Wasielewski, M. R.; Letsinger, R. L.; Sanishvili, R.; Joachimiak, A.; Tereshko, V.; Egli, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 99059906,  DOI: 10.1021/ja991934u
  34. 34
    Poloni, C.; Stuart, M. C. A.; van der Meulen, P.; Szymanski, W.; Feringa, B. L. Chem. Sci. 2015, 6, 73117318,  DOI: 10.1039/C5SC02735G
  35. 35
    García-López, V.; Chen, F.; Nilewski, L. G.; Duret, G.; Aliyan, A.; Kolomeisky, A. B.; Robinson, J. T.; Wang, G.; Pal, R.; Tour, J. M. Nature 2017, 548, 567572,  DOI: 10.1038/nature23657
  36. 36
    Wang, J.; Hou, L.; Browne, W. R.; Feringa, B. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 81628164,  DOI: 10.1021/ja202882q
  37. 37
    Zhao, D.; Neubauer, T. M.; Feringa, B. L. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 6652,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7652
  38. 38
    Bredenbeck, J.; Helbing, J.; Sieg, A.; Schrader, T.; Zinth, W.; Renner, C.; Behrendt, R.; Moroder, L.; Wachtveitl, J.; Hamm, P. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2003, 100, 64526457,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1036583100
  39. 39
    Ihalainen, J. A.; Bredenbeck, J.; Pfister, R.; Helbing, J.; Chi, L.; van Stokkum, I. H. M.; Woolley, G. A.; Hamm, P. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2007, 104, 53835388,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0607748104
  40. 40
    Regner, N.; Herzog, T. T.; Haiser, K.; Hoppmann, C.; Beyermann, M.; Sauermann, J.; Engelhard, M.; Cordes, T.; Rück-Braun, K.; Zinth, W. J. Phys. Chem. B 2012, 116, 41814191,  DOI: 10.1021/jp300982a
  41. 41
    Pérez-Hernández, G.; Gonzaléz, L. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2010, 12, 1227912289,  DOI: 10.1039/c0cp00324g
  42. 42
    Lindorff-Larsen, K.; Piana, S.; Palmo, K.; Maragakis, P.; Klepeis, J. L.; Dror, R. O.; Shaw, D. E. Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet. 2010, 78, 19501958,  DOI: 10.1002/prot.22711

Cited By

This article is cited by 64 publications.

  1. Laura Wimberger, Felix J. Rizzuto, Jonathon E. Beves. Modulating the Lifetime of DNA Motifs Using Visible Light and Small Molecules. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2023, 145 (4) , 2088-2092. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c13232
  2. Petteri Vainikka, Siewert J. Marrink. Martini 3 Coarse-Grained Model for Second-Generation Unidirectional Molecular Motors and Switches. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2023, 19 (2) , 596-604. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00796
  3. Javier Ramos-Soriano, M Carmen Galan. Photoresponsive Control of G-Quadruplex DNA Systems. JACS Au 2021, 1 (10) , 1516-1526. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacsau.1c00283
  4. Xingye Yang, Guolin Ma, Sisi Zheng, Xiaojun Qin, Xiang Li, Lupei Du, Youjun Wang, Yubin Zhou, Minyong Li. Optical Control of CRAC Channels Using Photoswitchable Azopyrazoles. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2020, 142 (20) , 9460-9470. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.0c02949
  5. Soumalya Bhattacharyya, Manoranjan Maity, Aniket Chowdhury, Manik Lal Saha, Sumit Kumar Panja, Peter J. Stang, Partha Sarathi Mukherjee. Coordination-Assisted Reversible Photoswitching of Spiropyran-Based Platinum Macrocycles. Inorganic Chemistry 2020, 59 (3) , 2083-2091. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b03572
  6. Damien Dattler, Gad Fuks, Joakim Heiser, Emilie Moulin, Alexis Perrot, Xuyang Yao, Nicolas Giuseppone. Design of Collective Motions from Synthetic Molecular Switches, Rotors, and Motors. Chemical Reviews 2020, 120 (1) , 310-433. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00288
  7. Massimo Baroncini, Serena Silvi, Alberto Credi. Photo- and Redox-Driven Artificial Molecular Motors. Chemical Reviews 2020, 120 (1) , 200-268. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00291
  8. Yueyue Zhang, Fan Li, Min Li, Xiuhai Mao, Xinxin Jing, Xiaoguo Liu, Qian Li, Jiang Li, Lihua Wang, Chunhai Fan, Xiaolei Zuo. Encoding Carbon Nanotubes with Tubular Nucleic Acids for Information Storage. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2019, 141 (44) , 17861-17866. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b09116
  9. Keiji Murayama, Yuuhei Yamano, Hiroyuki Asanuma. 8-Pyrenylvinyl Adenine Controls Reversible Duplex Formation between Serinol Nucleic Acid and RNA by [2 + 2] Photocycloaddition. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2019, 141 (24) , 9485-9489. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b03267
  10. Huang Wu, Yong Chen, Xianyin Dai, Peiyu Li, J. Fraser Stoddart, Yu Liu. In Situ Photoconversion of Multicolor Luminescence and Pure White Light Emission Based on Carbon Dot-Supported Supramolecular Assembly. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2019, 141 (16) , 6583-6591. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.8b13675
  11. Soumalya Bhattacharyya, Aniket Chowdhury, Rupak Saha, Partha Sarathi Mukherjee. Multifunctional Self-Assembled Macrocycles with Enhanced Emission and Reversible Photochromic Behavior. Inorganic Chemistry 2019, 58 (6) , 3968-3981. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b00039
  12. Anouk S. Lubbe, Christian Böhmer, Filippo Tosi, Wiktor Szymanski, Ben L. Feringa. Molecular Motors in Aqueous Environment. The Journal of Organic Chemistry 2018, 83 (18) , 11008-11018. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.8b01627
  13. Katya Ahmad, Abid Javed, Conor Lanphere, Peter V. Coveney, Elena V. Orlova, Stefan Howorka. Structure and dynamics of an archetypal DNA nanoarchitecture revealed via cryo-EM and molecular dynamics simulations. Nature Communications 2023, 14 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-38681-5
  14. Kim Kuntze, Daisy R. S. Pooler, Mariangela Di Donato, Michiel F. Hilbers, Pieter van der Meulen, Wybren Jan Buma, Arri Priimagi, Ben L. Feringa, Stefano Crespi. A visible-light-driven molecular motor based on barbituric acid. Chemical Science 2023, 14 (32) , 8458-8465. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3SC03090C
  15. Shaorui Li, Yuanmeng Zhao, Quan Li, Menglian Li, Xu Zhang, Hai‐Bing Xu. Lanthanide‐Functionalized Water‐Soluble Ionic Motors: Synergetically Regulated Rotary Motion by Allostery and Triplet Sensitization. Advanced Optical Materials 2023, 11 (16) https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.202300179
  16. Akanksha Ashok Sangolkar, Mohmmad Faizan, Kadiyam Rama Krishna, Ravinder Pawar. Aza-bicyclooctadiene/tetracyclooctane couples as promising photoswitches for molecular solar thermal energy storage applications. Molecular Systems Design & Engineering 2023, 8 (7) , 853-865. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2ME00274D
  17. Anup Singhania, Sudeshna Kalita, Prerna Chettri, Subrata Ghosh. Accounts of applied molecular rotors and rotary motors: recent advances. Nanoscale Advances 2023, 5 (12) , 3177-3208. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3NA00010A
  18. Mirza Muhammad Faran Ashraf Baig, Xiuli Gao, Awais Farid, Abdul Wasy Zia, Muhammad Abbas, Hongkai Wu. Synthesis of stable 2D micro-assemblies of DNA tiles achieved via intrinsic curvatures in the skeleton of DNA duplexes coupled with the flexible support of the twisted side-arms. Applied Nanoscience 2023, 13 (6) , 4279-4289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-022-02616-1
  19. Gregory T. Carroll, Reed C. Dowling, David L. Kirschman, Mark B. Masthay, Angela Mammana. Intrinsic fluorescence of UV-irradiated DNA. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry 2023, 437 , 114484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2022.114484
  20. Toshihiro Ihara, Yusuke Kitamura, Yousuke Katsuda. Nucleic Acid Conjugates for Biosensing – Design, Preparation, and Application. 2023, 1-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1313-5_58-1
  21. Toshihiro Ihara, Yusuke Kitamura, Yousuke Katsuda. Nucleic Acid Conjugates for Biosensing: Design, Preparation, and Application. 2023, 1623-1658. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9776-1_58
  22. Anouk S. Lubbe, Daisy R. S. Pooler, Ben L. Feringa. Investigating light-driven rotary molecular motors. 2022, 491-520. https://doi.org/10.1039/9781839167676-00491
  23. Lin Xiao, Liang-Liang Wang, Chao-Qun Wu, Han Li, Qiu-Long Zhang, Yang Wang, Liang Xu. Controllable DNA hybridization by host–guest complexation-mediated ligand invasion. Nature Communications 2022, 13 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-33738-3
  24. Zichen Wang, Xiaoyi Li, Fenglei Sun, Wenze Wu, Rui Huang. Making the second generation of molecular motors operate unidirectionally in response to electricity. Materials Today Chemistry 2022, 26 , 101111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtchem.2022.101111
  25. C. Zhang, Z. Jiang, Y. Qin, Y. Fu, Q. Li, Y. Zhang, M.-H. Zeng. Visiblelight-driven benzofuranone-based molecular motors: tuning rotary performance from solution phase to solid state. Materials Today Chemistry 2022, 26 , 101036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtchem.2022.101036
  26. Anirban Mondal, Ryojun Toyoda, Romain Costil, Ben L. Feringa. Chemically Driven Rotatory Molecular Machines. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2022, 61 (40) https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202206631
  27. Anirban Mondal, Ryojun Toyoda, Romain Costil, Ben L. Feringa. Chemically Driven Rotatory Molecular Machines. Angewandte Chemie 2022, 134 (40) https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.202206631
  28. Liwei Chen, Yanfei Liu, Weisheng Guo, Zhenbao Liu. Light responsive nucleic acid for biomedical application. Exploration 2022, 2 (5) https://doi.org/10.1002/EXP.20210099
  29. Ke Mo, Yu Zhang, Zheng Dong, Yuhang Yang, Xiaoqiang Ma, Ben L. Feringa, Depeng Zhao. RETRACTED ARTICLE: Intrinsically unidirectional chemically fuelled rotary molecular motors. Nature 2022, 609 (7926) , 293-298. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05033-0
  30. Brian P. Corbet, Anouk S. Lubbe, Stefano Crespi, Ben L. Feringa. Chiroptical Molecular Switches and Motors. 2022, 213-251. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527827626.ch11
  31. Baihao Shao, Ivan Aprahamian. Arylhydrazones. 2022, 113-129. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527827626.ch6
  32. Anna‐Lena Leistner, Zbigniew L. Pianowski. Smart Photochromic Materials Triggered with Visible Light. European Journal of Organic Chemistry 2022, 2022 (19) https://doi.org/10.1002/ejoc.202101271
  33. Daisy R. S. Pooler, Daniel Doellerer, Stefano Crespi, Ben L. Feringa. Controlling rotary motion of molecular motors based on oxindole. Organic Chemistry Frontiers 2022, 9 (8) , 2084-2092. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2QO00129B
  34. Mengtian Yin, Zachary Alexander Kim, Baoxing Xu. Micro/Nanofluidic‐Enabled Biomedical Devices: Integration of Structural Design and Manufacturing. Advanced NanoBiomed Research 2022, 2 (4) , 2100117. https://doi.org/10.1002/anbr.202100117
  35. Nadja A. Simeth, Paula de Mendoza, Victor R. A. Dubach, Marc C. A. Stuart, Julien W. Smith, Tibor Kudernac, Wesley R. Browne, Ben L. Feringa. Photoswitchable architecture transformation of a DNA-hybrid assembly at the microscopic and macroscopic scale. Chemical Science 2022, 13 (11) , 3263-3272. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1SC06490H
  36. Wen Ann Wee, Hiroshi Sugiyama, Soyoung Park. Photoswitchable single-stranded DNA-peptide coacervate formation as a dynamic system for reaction control. iScience 2021, 24 (12) , 103455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2021.103455
  37. Jana Volarić, Wiktor Szymanski, Nadja A. Simeth, Ben L. Feringa. Molecular photoswitches in aqueous environments. Chemical Society Reviews 2021, 50 (22) , 12377-12449. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CS00547A
  38. Zhihua Chang, Song Mao, Ya Ying Zheng, Jia Sheng. Synthesis and Functionality Study of Photoswitchable Hydrazone Oligodeoxynucleotides. Current Protocols 2021, 1 (11) https://doi.org/10.1002/cpz1.295
  39. Enrique Ortega, Cristina Pérez-Arnaiz, Venancio Rodríguez, Christoph Janiak, Natalia Busto, Begoña García, José Ruiz. A 2-(benzothiazol-2-yl)-phenolato platinum(II) complex as potential photosensitizer for combating bacterial infections in lung cancer chemotherapy†. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2021, 222 , 113600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2021.113600
  40. Ludwig A. Huber, Stefan Thumser, Kerstin Grill, David Voßiek, Nicolai N. Bach, Peter Mayer, Henry Dube. Steric Effects on the Thermal Processes of Hemithioindigo Based Molecular Motor Rotation. Chemistry – A European Journal 2021, 27 (41) , 10758-10765. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.202100950
  41. Nadja A. Simeth, Shotaro Kobayashi, Piermichele Kobauri, Stefano Crespi, Wiktor Szymanski, Kazuhiko Nakatani, Chikara Dohno, Ben L. Feringa. Rational design of a photoswitchable DNA glue enabling high regulatory function and supramolecular chirality transfer. Chemical Science 2021, 12 (26) , 9207-9220. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1SC02194J
  42. Shasha Lu, Jianlei Shen, Chunhai Fan, Qian Li, Xiurong Yang. DNA Assembly‐Based Stimuli‐Responsive Systems. Advanced Science 2021, 8 (13) https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202100328
  43. Song Mao, Zhihua Chang, Ya Ying Zheng, Alexander Shekhtman, Jia Sheng. DNA Functionality with Photoswitchable Hydrazone Cytidine**. Chemistry – A European Journal 2021, 27 (32) , 8372-8379. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.202100742
  44. Anna‐Lena Leistner, Susanne Kirchner, Johannes Karcher, Tobias Bantle, Mariam L. Schulte, Peter Gödtel, Christian Fengler, Zbigniew L. Pianowski. Fluorinated Azobenzenes Switchable with Red Light. Chemistry – A European Journal 2021, 27 (31) , 8094-8099. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.202005486
  45. Jos C. M. Kistemaker, Anouk S. Lubbe, Ben L. Feringa. Exploring molecular motors. Materials Chemistry Frontiers 2021, 5 (7) , 2900-2906. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0QM01091J
  46. Dominic Lauzon, Guichi Zhu, Alexis Vallée‐Bélisle. Engineering DNA Switches for DNA Computing Applications. 2021, 105-124. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527825424.ch7
  47. F. Romeo-Gella, I. Corral, S. Faraji. Theoretical investigation of a novel xylene-based light-driven unidirectional molecular motor. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2021, 154 (6) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0038281
  48. Yu Zhang, Zhe Chang, Heng Zhao, Stefano Crespi, Ben L. Feringa, Depeng Zhao. A Chemically Driven Rotary Molecular Motor Based on Reversible Lactone Formation with Perfect Unidirectionality. Chem 2020, 6 (9) , 2420-2429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chempr.2020.07.025
  49. Qi Zhang, Da-Hui Qu, He Tian, Ben L. Feringa. Bottom-Up: Can Supramolecular Tools Deliver Responsiveness from Molecular Motors to Macroscopic Materials?. Matter 2020, 3 (2) , 355-370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matt.2020.05.014
  50. Jie Xu, Shunichi Miyamoto, Sachiko Tojo, Kiyohiko Kawai. Sulfonated Pyrene as a Photoregulator for Single‐Stranded DNA Looping. Chemistry – A European Journal 2020, 26 (22) , 5075-5084. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.202000184
  51. Eduardo Carrascosa, Christian Petermayer, Michael S. Scholz, James N. Bull, Henry Dube, Evan J. Bieske. Reversible Photoswitching of Isolated Ionic Hemiindigos with Visible Light. ChemPhysChem 2020, 21 (7) , 680-685. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.201900963
  52. Mark W. H. Hoorens, Miroslav Medved’, Adèle D. Laurent, Mariangela Di Donato, Samuele Fanetti, Laura Slappendel, Michiel Hilbers, Ben L Feringa, Wybren Jan Buma, Wiktor Szymanski. Iminothioindoxyl as a molecular photoswitch with 100 nm band separation in the visible range. Nature Communications 2019, 10 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10251-8
  53. Marcos Fernandez‐Villamarin, Laura Brooks, Paula M. Mendes. The Role of Photochemical Reactions in the Development of Advanced Soft Materials for Biomedical Applications. Advanced Optical Materials 2019, 7 (16) https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.201900215
  54. Mohammad S. Askari, Christophe Lachance-Brais, Felix J. Rizzuto, Violeta Toader, Hanadi Sleiman. Remote control of charge transport and chiral induction along a DNA-metallohelicate. Nanoscale 2019, 11 (24) , 11879-11884. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9NR03212F
  55. Hiroyuki Asanuma, Teruchika Ishikawa, Yuuhei Yamano, Keiji Murayama, Xingguo Liang. cis ‐On/ trans ‐Off of DNA Hybridization with Alkylthio‐azobenzene on L‐Threoninol Responding to Visible Light. ChemPhotoChem 2019, 3 (6) , 418-424. https://doi.org/10.1002/cptc.201900060
  56. Aysha Ali, Gemma A. Bullen, Benjamin Cross, Timothy R. Dafforn, Haydn A. Little, Jack Manchester, Anna F. A. Peacock, James H. R. Tucker. Light-controlled thrombin catalysis and clot formation using a photoswitchable G-quadruplex DNA aptamer. Chemical Communications 2019, 55 (39) , 5627-5630. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9CC01540J
  57. Michael P. O'Hagan, Susanta Haldar, Marta Duchi, Thomas A. A. Oliver, Adrian J. Mulholland, Juan C. Morales, M. Carmen Galan. A Photoresponsive Stiff‐Stilbene Ligand Fuels the Reversible Unfolding of G‐Quadruplex DNA. Angewandte Chemie 2019, 131 (13) , 4378-4382. https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.201900740
  58. Michael P. O'Hagan, Susanta Haldar, Marta Duchi, Thomas A. A. Oliver, Adrian J. Mulholland, Juan C. Morales, M. Carmen Galan. A Photoresponsive Stiff‐Stilbene Ligand Fuels the Reversible Unfolding of G‐Quadruplex DNA. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2019, 58 (13) , 4334-4338. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201900740
  59. Benedikt Heinrich, Karim Bouazoune, Matthias Wojcik, Udo Bakowsky, Olalla Vázquez. ortho -Fluoroazobenzene derivatives as DNA intercalators for photocontrol of DNA and nucleosome binding by visible light. Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry 2019, 17 (7) , 1827-1833. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8OB02343C
  60. Kerstin Hoffmann, Peter Mayer, Henry Dube. A hemithioindigo molecular motor for metal surface attachment. Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry 2019, 17 (7) , 1979-1983. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8OB02424C
  61. Lei Zhang, Greta Linden, Olalla Vázquez. In search of visible-light photoresponsive peptide nucleic acids (PNAs) for reversible control of DNA hybridization. Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry 2019, 15 , 2500-2508. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjoc.15.243
  62. Marta Dudek, Marco Deiana, Ziemowit Pokladek, Krzysztof Pawlik, Katarzyna Matczyszyn. Reversible Photocontrol of DNA Melting by Visible‐Light‐Responsive F4‐Coordinated Azobenzene Compounds. Chemistry – A European Journal 2018, 24 (71) , 18963-18970. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201803529
  63. Hongbo Cheng, Juyoung Yoon, He Tian. Recent advances in the use of photochromic dyes for photocontrol in biomedicine. Coordination Chemistry Reviews 2018, 372 , 66-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2018.06.003
  64. Hong Zhang, Haohao Fu, Xueguang Shao, Christophe Chipot, Antonio Monari, François Dehez, Wensheng Cai. Conformational changes of DNA induced by a trans -azobenzene derivative via non-covalent interactions. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 2018, 20 (35) , 22645-22651. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8CP03836H
  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Schematic overview of photoswitchable DNA hairpins. (a) Design by Sugimoto and co-workers based on photoswitchable linker 1. (b) Concept for linker based on first-generation molecular motors. A full conversion from double-stranded to single-stranded is an unlikely overestimation for both designs, but serves to illustrate the general concept of destabilization through contraction (a) or expansion (b) of the linker.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Structures of proposed motor linkers 2 and 3. The molecules have conformational freedom around the bonds indicated in bold red. (22) Both structures are designed to bring the hydroxy groups closer together upon trans-to-cis isomerization.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. PES scans of the O–O distance in proposed motors 2 and 3, plotted against the self-consistent field (SCF) energy.

    Scheme 1

    Scheme 1. Synthesis of Motor 3 and Phosphoramidite Motors trans-8 and cis-8a

    aOnly synthesis for cis-8 is shown; for trans-8, see SI, pages S3–S5. Isomers of compound 6 were separated through recrystallization, subsequent yields refer the cis isomer only.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. 1H NMR analysis of the rotational cycle of motor 3 (part of spectrum, proton indicated by *). Only aromatic proton depicted for clarity; see Figures S3 and S4 for full spectrum. (a) Stable trans-3 (st) to unstable cis-3 (uc) to stable cis-3 (sc). (b) Stable cis-3 (sc) to unstable trans-3 (ut) to stable trans-3 (st). All experiments performed in CD2Cl2 (400 MHz, −50 °C).

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. UV–vis spectra of analysis of the photochemical isomerization of stable 8T-trans-3-8A. (a) Changes of the absorption spectrum of 8T-trans-3-8A upon irradiation with 312 nm light for 10 min. Spectra were recorded in 1 min intervals. Inset shows the region 290–450 nm. (b) 8T-trans-3-8A (black line), the sample after irradiation with 312 nm light for 10 min (red line), and the sample after incubation at 67 °C for 6 h (blue line). All spectra recorded in Milli-Q water, 67 °C, ambient atmosphere.

    Figure 6

    Figure 6. Selected conformations taken from 90 ns MD simulations of hairpin- constructs with the linker in the stable cis (top row) and trans (bottom row) conformations, respectively. The molecule is visualized using the VMD software, highlighting the switchable bridge (cyan C-atoms). The adenine at the 5′ end is shown entirely in orange and the 3′ thymine in green. H-bonding interactions defined on the basis of the Luzar-Chandler-geometric criterion (donor–acceptor distance within 3.5 Å and donor–H–acceptor angle smaller than 30°) between these two selected base pairs are shown as dashed lines. The leftmost conformation is the starting conformation with a canonical base pairing, obtained after building and briefly equilibrating the model. In the middle, structures in which the thymine base neighboring the switchable bridge flipped out of the hairpin are shown. The rightmost panels show structures in which the base pairs closest to the switchable bridge have stacking interactions instead of base-pairing interaction. In the trans form (right bottom), the thymine appears to be interacting also favorably with one of the aromatic moieties of the switchable linker; this interaction is energetically less favorable in the cis form.

  • References

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    This article references 42 other publications.

    1. 1
      Watson, J. D.; Crick, F. H. C. Nature 1953, 171, 737738,  DOI: 10.1038/171737a0
    2. 2
      Jones, M. R.; Seeman, N. C.; Mirkin, C. A. Science 2015, 347, 1260901,  DOI: 10.1126/science.1260901
    3. 3
      Ledford, H. Nature 2016, 531, 156159,  DOI: 10.1038/531156a
    4. 4
      Goldman, N.; Bertone, P.; Chen, S.; Dessimoz, C.; LeProust, E. M.; Sipos, B.; Birney, E. Nature 2013, 494, 7780,  DOI: 10.1038/nature11875
    5. 5
      Modi, S.; Swetha, M. G.; Goswami, D.; Gupta, G. D.; Mayor, S.; Krishnan, Y. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2009, 4, 325330,  DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2009.83
    6. 6
      Chen, H.; Zhang, H.; Pan, J.; Cha, T.-G.; Li, S.; Andréasson, J.; Choi, J. H. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 49894996,  DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.6b01339
    7. 7
      Zhang, F.; Nangreave, J.; Liu, Y.; Yan, H. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 32903295,  DOI: 10.1021/nl301399z
    8. 8
      Douglas, S. M.; Bachelet, I.; Church, G. M. Science 2012, 335, 831834,  DOI: 10.1126/science.1214081
    9. 9
      Gerling, T.; Wagenbauer, K. F.; Neuner, A. M.; Dietz, H. Science 2015, 347, 14461452,  DOI: 10.1126/science.aaa5372
    10. 10
      Takezawa, Y.; Shionoya, M. Acc. Chem. Res. 2012, 45, 20662076,  DOI: 10.1021/ar200313h
    11. 11
      Weissleder, R.; Ntziachristos, V. Nat. Med. 2003, 9, 123128,  DOI: 10.1038/nm0103-123
    12. 12
      Szymański, W.; Beierle, J. M.; Kistemaker, H. A. V.; Velema, W. A.; Feringa, B. L. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 61146178,  DOI: 10.1021/cr300179f
    13. 13
      Lubbe, A. S.; Szymanski, W.; Feringa, B. L. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 10521079,  DOI: 10.1039/C6CS00461J
    14. 14
      Zhou, M.; Liang, X.; Mochizuki, T.; Asanuma, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 21672170,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.200907082
    15. 15
      Liang, X.; Fujioka, K.; Asanuma, H. Chem. - Eur. J. 2011, 17, 1038810396,  DOI: 10.1002/chem.201100215
    16. 16
      Bevilacqua, P. C.; Blose, J. M. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2008, 59, 79103,  DOI: 10.1146/annurev.physchem.59.032607.093743
    17. 17
      Svoboda, P.; Di Cara, A. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2006, 63, 901908,  DOI: 10.1007/s00018-005-5558-5
    18. 18
      Yin, Y.; Zhao, X. S. Acc. Chem. Res. 2011, 44, 11721181,  DOI: 10.1021/ar200068j
    19. 19
      Letsinger, R. L.; Wu, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 811812,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00081a069
    20. 20
      Letsinger, R. L.; Wu, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 73237328,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00133a005
    21. 21
      Yamana, K.; Yoshikawa, A.; Nakano, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 637640,  DOI: 10.1016/0040-4039(95)02220-1
    22. 22
      Wu, L.; Koumoto, K.; Sugimoto, N. Chem. Commun. 2009, 19151917,  DOI: 10.1039/b819643e
    23. 23
      Wu, L.; Wu, Y.; Jin, H.; Zhang, L.; He, Y.; Tang, X. MedChemComm 2015, 6, 461468,  DOI: 10.1039/C4MD00378K
    24. 24
      Koumura, N.; Zijlstra, R. W.; van Delden, R. A.; Harada, N.; Feringa, B. L. Nature 1999, 401, 152155,  DOI: 10.1038/43646
    25. 25
      Kassem, S.; van Leeuwen, T.; Lubbe, A. S.; Wilson, M. R.; Feringa, B. L.; Leigh, D. A. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 25922621,  DOI: 10.1039/C7CS00245A
    26. 26
      Pollard, M. M.; Meetsma, A.; Feringa, B. L. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2008, 6, 507512,  DOI: 10.1039/B715652A
    27. 27
      SantaLucia, Jr Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1998, 95, 14601465,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.4.1460
    28. 28
      Neubauer, T. M.; van Leeuwen, T.; Zhao, D.; Lubbe, A. S.; Kistemaker, J. C. M.; Feringa, B. L. Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 42204223,  DOI: 10.1021/ol501925f
    29. 29
      Yamana, K.; Yoshikawa, A.; Noda, R.; Nakano, H. Nucleosides, Nucleotides Nucleic Acids 1998, 17, 233242,  DOI: 10.1080/07328319808005172
    30. 30
      Yamana, K.; Kan, K.; Nakano, H. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 1999, 7, 29772983,  DOI: 10.1016/S0968-0896(99)00244-8
    31. 31
      Lewis, F. D.; Wu, Y.; Liu, X. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 1216512173,  DOI: 10.1021/ja026941o
    32. 32
      Antao, V. P.; Lai, S. Y.; Tinoco, I., Jr. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991, 19, 59015905,  DOI: 10.1093/nar/19.21.5901
    33. 33
      Lewis, F. D.; Liu, X.; Wu, Y.; Miller, S. E.; Wasielewski, M. R.; Letsinger, R. L.; Sanishvili, R.; Joachimiak, A.; Tereshko, V.; Egli, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 99059906,  DOI: 10.1021/ja991934u
    34. 34
      Poloni, C.; Stuart, M. C. A.; van der Meulen, P.; Szymanski, W.; Feringa, B. L. Chem. Sci. 2015, 6, 73117318,  DOI: 10.1039/C5SC02735G
    35. 35
      García-López, V.; Chen, F.; Nilewski, L. G.; Duret, G.; Aliyan, A.; Kolomeisky, A. B.; Robinson, J. T.; Wang, G.; Pal, R.; Tour, J. M. Nature 2017, 548, 567572,  DOI: 10.1038/nature23657
    36. 36
      Wang, J.; Hou, L.; Browne, W. R.; Feringa, B. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 81628164,  DOI: 10.1021/ja202882q
    37. 37
      Zhao, D.; Neubauer, T. M.; Feringa, B. L. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 6652,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7652
    38. 38
      Bredenbeck, J.; Helbing, J.; Sieg, A.; Schrader, T.; Zinth, W.; Renner, C.; Behrendt, R.; Moroder, L.; Wachtveitl, J.; Hamm, P. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2003, 100, 64526457,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1036583100
    39. 39
      Ihalainen, J. A.; Bredenbeck, J.; Pfister, R.; Helbing, J.; Chi, L.; van Stokkum, I. H. M.; Woolley, G. A.; Hamm, P. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2007, 104, 53835388,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0607748104
    40. 40
      Regner, N.; Herzog, T. T.; Haiser, K.; Hoppmann, C.; Beyermann, M.; Sauermann, J.; Engelhard, M.; Cordes, T.; Rück-Braun, K.; Zinth, W. J. Phys. Chem. B 2012, 116, 41814191,  DOI: 10.1021/jp300982a
    41. 41
      Pérez-Hernández, G.; Gonzaléz, L. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2010, 12, 1227912289,  DOI: 10.1039/c0cp00324g
    42. 42
      Lindorff-Larsen, K.; Piana, S.; Palmo, K.; Maragakis, P.; Klepeis, J. L.; Dror, R. O.; Shaw, D. E. Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet. 2010, 78, 19501958,  DOI: 10.1002/prot.22711
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b09476.

    • General methods; synthetic procedures; characterization and 1H/13C NMR spectra of all new compounds; explanation of first-generation molecular motor rotary cycle; UV–vis, NMR, and kinetic analysis of rotation of motor 3; DFT and MD calculations; DNA synthesis; melting temperature analysis; gel electrophoresis; UV–vis and kinetic analysis of motor–DNA hybrid 8T-3-8A; and MALDI-TOF analysis of DNA–motor hybrids; and 1H and 13C NMR spectra of new compounds, including Scheme S1, Figures S1–S22, and Tables S1–S6 (PDF)

    • MD data (ZIP)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect