ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Glycomimetic, Orally Bioavailable LecB Inhibitors Block Biofilm Formation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
My Activity

Figure 1Loading Img
  • Open Access
  • Editors Choice
Article

Glycomimetic, Orally Bioavailable LecB Inhibitors Block Biofilm Formation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

View Author Information
Chemical Biology of Carbohydrates and Drug Design and Development, Helmholtz Institute for Pharmaceutical Research Saarland (HIPS), Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research (HZI), D-66123 Saarbrücken, Germany
§ Deutsches Zentrum für Infektionsforschung (DZIF), Standort Hannover-Braunschweig, Germany
Chemical Biology and Infection Immunology, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, D-38124 Braunschweig, Germany
# Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Centre de Recherche sur les Macromolécules Végétales (CERMAV), 38000 Grenoble, France
Department of Biomolecular Systems, Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, D-14424 Potsdam, Germany
Department of Biology, Chemistry and Pharmacy, Freie Universität Berlin, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
Roche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, CH-4070 Basel, Switzerland
Biochemical Pharmacology, Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, D-78457 Konstanz, Germany
+ Department of Pharmacy, Saarland University, D-66123 Saarbrücken, Germany
*Tel. +49 681 98806 2500. E-mail: [email protected]
Open PDFSupporting Information (1)

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Cite this: J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 7, 2537–2545
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.7b11133
Published December 22, 2017

Copyright © 2017 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The opportunistic Gram-negative bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a leading pathogen for infections of immuno-compromised patients and those suffering from cystic fibrosis. Its ability to switch from planktonic life to aggregates, forming the so-called biofilms, is a front-line mechanism of antimicrobial resistance. The bacterial carbohydrate-binding protein LecB is an integral component and necessary for biofilm formation. Here, we report a new class of drug-like low molecular weight inhibitors of the lectin LecB with nanomolar affinities and excellent receptor binding kinetics and thermodynamics. This class of glycomimetic inhibitors efficiently blocked biofilm formation of P. aeruginosain vitro while the natural monovalent carbohydrate ligands failed. Furthermore, excellent selectivity and pharmacokinetic properties were achieved. Notably, two compounds showed good oral bioavailability, and high compound concentrations in plasma and urine were achieved in vivo.

Copyright © 2017 American Chemical Society

Note Added after ASAP Publication

This paper was published January 22, 2018. In the article and supporting information, compound 2a related to the X-ray structure has been corrected to 3a. The revised version was posted on February 21, 2018.

Introduction

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The Gram-negative bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa has become a severe threat for hospitalized immuno-compromised patients and is now a critical priority 1 pathogen as stated by the WHO in 2017. (1-4) In persons suffering from cystic fibrosis, chronic infections with this pathogen lead to recurrent pneumonia, sepsis, and lung damage. (5) Infections of various organs and tissues by this pathogen, such as chronic wound (6) or catheter-associated urinary tract infections (7) (caUTI), impose severe clinical challenges which further result from the bacterium’s intrinsic drug resistance and additional acquired resistances often leading to multi-drug-resistant or extremely drug-resistant strains (MDR, XDR). (8) Furthermore, the antimicrobial tolerance of P. aeruginosa is enhanced through formation of biofilms, a self-made environment that protects bacteria against host immune defense and antibiotic treatment. (9, 10) Triggered by the fact that bacteria inside a biofilm are up to 1000-fold more resistant toward antibiotics, (9) the targeting of biofilm formation as therapeutic approach emerged in order to overcome the resistance problem (reviewed in refs 11 and 12).
The two quorum-sensing-regulated (13) virulence factors LecA (14) and LecB (15) (formerly called PA-IL and PA-IIL) are crucial for biofilm formation by P. aeruginosa. These two carbohydrate-binding proteins, i.e., lectins, were initially isolated from the clinical isolate PAO1 by Gilboa-Garber et al. (16) Problematic for therapy, P. aeruginosa shows a high genomic diversity among different isolates. (17, 18) While LecA is relatively conserved among strains, the genomic diversity of LecB varies, and clinical isolates can be grouped into either PAO1- or PA14-like LecB sequence families, with both types covering approximately 50% each of the clinical isolates. (19, 20) However, we could show that despite numerous sequence variations in the two LecB variants, they possess comparable binding specificity which is a prerequisite for targeting a broad range of clinical isolates with one single drug. (20)
The exact mechanism of the lectins’ role in biofilm formation is not fully understood. It is assumed, that these tetravalent lectins act as bridging agents to enable glycan-mediated bacterial adhesion to the cellular glycocalix of the host’s tissue. In addition, they are believed to mediate contact between bacterial cells through cell-surface glycoconjugates and with the bacterially produced multivalent exopolysaccharides for the establishment of bacterial aggregates and biofilms. (11) This biofilm-reinforcing property of the lectins, which results from its multivalency, can be blocked by inhibition of the carbohydrate binding sites.
In a mouse infection model, LecB was shown to be the major determinant for bacterial lung colonization. (21, 22) Furthermore, this protein influences signaling pathways in human lung epithelial cells leading to β-catenin degradation, a host protein that is crucially involved in tissue repair. (23) On a structural level, LecB forms noncovalent homotetramers, and each monomer contains two Ca2+-ions, (20, 24) which mediate the binding to its carbohydrate ligands, l-fucose and d-mannose. It has been shown in humans and mice that inhalation of millimolar concentrations of these natural sugars contributed to clearance of bacteria from the lungs and, furthermore, showed synergistic activities with coadministered antibiotics. (25, 26) Due to higher affinities toward fucosides over mannosides, research focused on fucose-based inhibitors with multivalent presentation to further increase avidity. (27, 28) This approach yielded multivalent glycopeptide dendrimer structures with the ability to efficiently inhibit the formation of and disperse established biofilms of P. aeruginosa. (29) Interestingly, in another case of multivalent fucosides, despite nanomolar affinities for LecB, millimolar concentrations (5 mM) have been reported as necessary for efficient inhibition of biofilm formation, and compounds were inactive at 100 μM. (21) In the same study, these multivalent inhibitors were even shown to promote bacterial aggregation. Thus, it is conceivable that some multivalent lectin inhibitors can act as mimics of the bacterial exopolysaccharides and therefore unintentionally contribute to biofilm integrity rather than to its desired disintegration.
In order to circumvent such a detrimental biofilm-stabilizing effect of multivalent ligands through cross-linking of the tetravalent lectins inside the biofilm, we have focused on monovalent low molecular weight inhibitors of LecB. (30-34) In addition, only small molecules can be developed into drug-like molecules with favorable pharmakokinetic properties, i.e., oral application with systemic drug bioavailability, which is necessary to reach all possible types of the various organ and tissue infections elicited by P. aeruginosa. Thus, small monovalent molecules hold the premise to circumvent both, biofilm-reinforcing effects and the restriction to topical applications for the multivalent systems.
Here, we report two types of monovalent glycomimetic LecB inhibitors, cinnamides 6 and sulfonamides 7. These new low molecular weight C-glycosidic LecB inhibitors showed nanomolar potency against LecB with excellent target selectivity, toxicity, and in vitro ADME properties. Notably, the glycomimetic sulfonamides developed here were potent inhibitors of biofilm formation in stark contrast to the ineffective native carbohydrates. Finally, a murine in vivo pharmacokinetic study revealed the suitability of these glycomimetics for oral application in a proof-of-concept infection model.

Results and Discussion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Design and Synthesis of C-Glycoside LecB Inhibitors

We have previously modified the rather weak LecB ligand methyl α-d-mannoside (1) into derivatives with various aromatic substituents attached to C-6, which increased potency up to a factor of 20 and addressed a new subsite at the target, e.g., 2ac and 3ac, Figures 1 and 2. (30, 32) In contrast to rapidly dissociating 1 (t1/2 = 45 s), these compounds showed extended receptor residence times with complex half-lives in the 5–20 min range, revealing the molecular basis for the increased potency. This property is an important requirement for in vivo efficacy. In order to further optimize target interactions and increase stability toward hydrolases, we merged functional groups establishing attractive interactions with LecB from the natural ligands into one molecule (15, Figure 1). (31) The equatorial methyl group in 5 resulted in C-glycosides with 4- to 6-fold enhanced affinities originating from the reported lipophilic contact of the l-fucose methyl group with the lectin. (20, 24, 35) Despite these numerous improvements, the previously reported molecules display only moderate affinities for LecB in the range of 3.3–16 μM, which is insufficient for application. Now, we aimed to combine the individually optimized structures of mannose-derivatives 2a/3a and C-glycoside 5 into monovalent drug-like molecules 6 and 7 to increase affinity toward the target and assess their biological properties. Furthermore, these new glycomimetic structures, 6 and 7, are expected to be more stable against host metabolism compared to their glycosidic precursors, resulting from the absence of a labile glycosidic linkage. This design should enable higher compound concentrations in vivo.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Rational design of 6 and 7 as monovalent C-glycosidic glycomimetic LecB inhibitors. Derivatives of methyl α-d-mannoside 15 and their inhibitory potency for the binding with LecBPAO1. (30, 31, 35) Moieties colored in blue increase potency by improving binding kinetics. (30, 32) The orange colored methyl group originating from l-fucosides enhances binding to LecB through a lipophilic interaction. (31, 35)

Figure 2

Figure 2. Competitive binding assay of inhibitors with LecBPAO1 and LecBPA14. Means and standard deviations were determined from a minimum of three independent measurements. IC50 values for 1 with both LecB variants and 2ac, 3a,c and 5 with LecBPAO1 were previously published. (20, 30-32) One representative titration with LecBPA14 is depicted for reference pairs 2b/6b and 3a/7a. Gray arrows indicate the increase in activity for C-glycosides.

To access β-C-glycosides 6 and 7, we utilized the previously described synthesis of amine 10, (31) where l-fucose (8) was transformed to β-C-glycoside 9 by Henry addition of nitromethane under basic conditions followed by a reduction to yield amine 10 (Scheme 1). Then, fucose/mannose hybrid-type structures 6 and 7 bearing amide or sulfonamide substituents, respectively, were generated by coupling with different electrophiles.

Scheme 1

Scheme 1. Synthesis of Structures 6a,b and 7a,ba

Scheme aReagents and conditions: (a) MeNO2, DBU, molecular sieves 3 Å, 1,4-dioxane, 50 °C, 3 days; (b) Pt/C, H2, HCl, MeOH, r.t., 2 days; (c) acyl/sulfonyl chloride or carboxylic acid/EDC·HCl, Et3N, DMF, 0 °C. Yields are given over two steps from nitro derivative 9.

Besides the amide-bridged cinnamic acid moiety as present in 2a and 6a or the sulfonamide-bridged trimethylphenyl moiety in 3a and 7a, a thiophenesulfonamide was introduced in mannoside 3b and C-glycoside 7b as a bioisoster of the potent phenylsulfonamide 3c (30) in the mannose-series. The final coupling step yielded amides 6a,b and sulfonamides 7a,b in moderate to good yields (33–72%, over 2 steps).

Improved Binding Properties of C-Glycoside Structures toward LecB

Derivatives 6a,b and 7a,b were then analyzed for their capacity to inhibit the two representative lectin variants of the two clinically occurring strain clades, LecBPAO1 and LecBPA14, based on previously established competitive binding assays (20, 30) (Figure 2). Furthermore, all other glycomimetics (i.e., 2ac, 3ac, 5) were assayed for the first time also toward LecBPA14 and showed stronger binding to the PA14 variant compared to that toward LecBPAO1, with the exception of cinnamides 2a,b. In general, enhanced affinities were detected for C-glycoside derivatives 6a,b and 7a,b compared to those of their respective mannose analogs 2a,b and 3a,b. Cinnamide 6a (IC50[LecBPAO1] 4.21 μM; IC50[LecBPA14] 2.49 μM) showed 9- to 16-fold higher affinities toward both LecB types compared to that of its mannose reference 2a (IC50[LecBPAO1] 37 μM; (30) IC50[LecBPA14] 39 μM). Sulfonamide 7a (IC50[LecBPAO1] 0.97 μM; IC50[LecBPA14] 0.34 μM) was a 3- to 5-fold stronger ligand of LecB compared to that of corresponding mannoside 3a, exceeding the potency of high-affinity natural ligand l-fucose (8) for both lectin types (IC50[LecBPAO1] 2.74 μM; (30) IC50[LecBPA14] 0.91 μM). (20) On the basis of the four reference pairs analyzed, i.e., mannoside versus C-glycoside 2a/6a, 2b/6b, 3a/7a, and 3b/7b, which differ only at the anomeric position of mannose, a strong increase in affinity toward LecB of up to 16-fold was identified for the C-glycosides. In general, the introduction of amide and sulfonamide substituents always improved affinity for LecB compared to that of unsubstituted reference hybrid-structure 5. (31) Importantly, for the first time the two clinically relevant variants (20) of LecB were analyzed with glycomimetic inhibitors, which showed potent inhibition for both strain types.
The thermodynamics of binding of derivatives 6a and 7a,b to both LecB variants was then studied by isothermal titration calorimetry (Figure 3, Table S1–3). All ligands showed Kd values in the low micro- to nanomolar range and a 1:1 binding stoichiometry, confirming the IC50 data obtained. Notably, compared to carbocyclic derivatives 6a and 7aH = −37.8 to −31.4 kJ/mol), thiophene-containing ligand 7b showed an enhanced enthalpy driven binding (ΔH = −50.0 and −48.1 kJ/mol), which was partially compensated by disfavored entropic contributions (−TΔS = 13.4 and 12.7 kJ/mol). Thus, the introduced substituents also significantly enhanced binding enthalpy compared to the unsubstituted congener 5H = −27.5 kJ/mol). An increased enthalpic contribution to binding was previously introduced as a benchmark parameter assigned to a higher degree of target selectivity due to a better quality of the drug-target interaction. (36) Furthermore, physicochemical metrics such as ligand efficiency and related ones, thought to gauge the quality of a drug-target interaction, (37) are promising. Importantly, the most potent compound thiophene, 7b, displayed enthalphy-driven nanomolar affinities toward both LecB variants.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Isothermal titration microcalorimetry of LecBPAO1 and LecBPA14 with ligands 6a and 7a,b. Means and standard deviations were determined from a minimum of three independent titrations. One representative titration graph is depicted for LecBPAO1 only.

We have previously detected a strong increase of the receptor half-lives for inhibitors 2a,b and 3a, compared to that of to natural carbohydrate ligand methyl α-d-mannoside (1). (32) The role of ligand–receptor binding kinetics is becoming increasingly significant for drug discovery and translation of in vitro binding kinetics into cellular or in vivo effects was discussed. (38) For the in vivo efficacy of a drug molecule, prolonged receptor residence times are of importance. Ligand–receptor binding kinetics of C-glycosides 6a and 7a were studied by surface plasmon resonance (SPR) with surface-bound LecBPAO1 (Figure 4). With its affinity of 330 nM obtained from SPR, the hybrid-type structure 7a is a 140-fold more potent ligand of LecB than its carbohydrate ligand 1 and is 10-fold more potent than the natural high affinity ligand l-fucose (8) (see ITC experiments; Kd for 8 2.9 μM). (39) Most importantly, a further increase of the drug-receptor half-lives for the C-glycosides 6a and 7a over those of their mannose-based analogs 2a (t1/2 6.3 min and Kd by SPR 18.1 μM) and 3a (t1/2 18.6 min and Kd by SPR 1.12 μM) (32) was observed. Receptor residence times of 28 min for 6a and 7a resulted from very slow off rates of 4.1 × 10–4 s–1 of these C-glycosides. Thus, these glycomimetics form a 38-fold more stable complex with the protein, compared to the natural ligand methyl α-d-mannoside (1, t1/2 0.75 min, Kd by SPR 47.5 μM). (32) These data validated the results from the competitive binding assay and ITC and further stress the impact of the additional equatorial methyl group in our glycomimetics.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) analysis of direct binding of 6a or 7a to immobilized LecBPAO1. Experimental data in black; calculated fits using a 1:1 binding model in red.

Structure of LecB in Complex with Hybrid Inhibitors

To study the binding mode of the hybrid-type LecB inhibitors, we performed crystallization of these ligands in complex with the lectin. Crystals of two ligands 7a and 7b in complex with LecBPA14 were obtained by the hanging drop cocrystallization method and the structures were solved to 1.65 Å resolution (Figure 5, Table S4). In both complexes, the carbohydrate-binding sites were occupied with the respective inhibitors except one site in the LecB/7a complex.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Crystal structures of LecBPA14 with C-glycoside ligands: (A) Complex with trimethylphenyl sulfonamide 7a (1.65 Å resolution), (B) Complex with thiophene 7b (1.65 Å resolution); For the ligands the 2FobsFcalc electron density is displayed at 1 σ. Ligands and amino acids of the carbohydrate recognition domain (CRD) are depicted as sticks colored by elements (C: gray, N: blue, O: red, S: yellow); protein surface in transparent blue and two Ca2+-ions in the binding sites are shown as green spheres.

Surprisingly, a slightly different binding mode for methyl containing analog 7a was observed in contrast to the previously reported structure (30) of its mannose analog 3a (Figures 5A, S1, and S3). While the carbohydrate-derived ring is in an identical position, the aromatic moiety attached to the exocyclic CH2 is rotated and located in a cleft of the protein surface that is enclosed by two neighboring loops (S68-D75 and E95-D104) of the lectin. The methyl group attached to the aromatic ring interacts with hydrophobic patches formed by V69 and a CH2 group of D96; one sulfonamide oxygen of the ligand establishes a hydrogen bond with the backbone amide of G24. In contrast with mannoside 3a, a lipophilic contact between the protein surface (G24, V69) and the mesitylene-ring was observed together with a hydrogen bond of its sulfonamide nitrogen with the side chain of D96 (Figure S1). The latter interaction results from a conformational change of the C5–C6 bond in the carbohydrate from a gt-orientation (N gauche to O5 and trans to O4), as present in the complex of LecB with d-mannose (PDB code for LecBPAO11OUR (40) or LecBPA145A6Y), (20) to a tg-conformation in the mannoside 3a enabling this observed NH-D96 hydrogen bond. A binding mode comparable to that in C-glycoside 7a was detected for its analog thiophene 7b (Figures 5B, S1, and S3). In the structure of mannoside 3a/LecB, a crystal-lattice-dependent π-stacking of the aromatic moiety with a second ligand from a neighboring LecB tetramer is observed with all ligands in this structure showing the tg-conformation (Figure S2). Therefore, we consider the binding modes reported here with the gt-orientation displayed by C-glycosides 7a and 7b as the relevant ones, where crystal induced contacts are absent. In addition to the sulfonamide substituent interactions, a lipophilic contact of the introduced C-glycosidic methyl group with the protein residues T45 and A23 is observed in both analyzed complexes of hybrid-type ligands providing a molecular basis for the measured affinity enhancement.

Low Molecular Weight Glycomimetics Are Potent Inhibitors of Bacterial Biofilm Formation

We then tested the most promising compounds in a P. aeruginosa biofilm assay. Most published biofilm assays require staining and washing steps which impact the reproducibility in our hands. Therefore, we generated genetically modified P. aeruginosa which constitutively and intracellulary expresses the red-fluorescent protein mCherry from the pMP7605 plasmid. (41) Because fluorescence intensity directly correlated with cell density (Figure S4), mCherry-derived fluorescence was exploited as an internal stain for bacterial visualization and quantification of biofilm formation by confocal laser scanning fluorescence microscopy. By eliminating washing and staining steps, this method improved reproducibility through in situ imaging. A set of selected compounds comprising natural carbohydrates (mannoside 1, fucoside 11), glycomimetic mannose-derivatives (2a, 3a), and C-glycosides (6a, 7a,b) was selected for assessment of their potential to inhibit biofilm formation by P. aeruginosa.
To exclude any unwanted antibiotic effect on biofilm formation, the total fluorescence intensity was recorded after bacterial growth in the presence of compounds for 23 h. Bacteria grew to the same density as the DMSO control under each condition tested (Figure S5). Thus, these results clearly indicated the absence of bactericidal or bacteriostatic effects for the tested compounds.
For inhibition of biofilm formation, culture medium was inoculated with P. aeruginosa PA14/mCherry in the presence of 100 μM compounds, and culture and biofilm growth was allowed for 48 h, when biofilm mass was quantified using a confocal fluorescence microscope (Figure 6). All analyzed compounds reduced biofilm formation by P. aeruginosa. Remarkably, the natural carbohydrate ligands methyl α-d-mannoside (1) and methyl α-l-fucoside (11) showed only a small reduction in biofilm mass which was statistically insignificant. In contrast, all glycomimetics tested showed a significant reduction of biofilm formation with novel sulfonamide C-glycosides 7 as most potent compounds reaching approximately 80–90% of inhibition. Mannose analogs 2a and 3a also inhibited with a reduced potency the formation of biofilms with 54 and 66% observed reduction, respectively.

Figure 6

Figure 6. Inhibition of biofilm formation by P. aeruginosa after 48 h growth in the presence of compounds 1, 2a, 3a, 6a, 7a,b, or methyl α-l-fucoside (11) at 100 μM. DMSO in absence of compounds was used as control. (A) Quantification of biofilm biomass. Averages and standard deviations of biofilm formation from three independent replicates. Statistical significance was calculated using the students t test. (B) Raw data of confocal fluorescence microscopy 3D images show one representative z-stack per condition.

Compound Selectivity for LecB over Host Lectins

Carbohydrate-binding proteins are ubiquitous and many play important roles in host innate immune defense. (42) Thus, inhibitors of LecB carrying natural carbohydrate epitopes may also result in unspecific inhibition of human pathogen-recognition receptors. Langerin is a C-type lectin expressed in human Langerhans cells and CD103+ dermal dendritic cells and recognizes predominantly d-mannose but also l-fucose, N-acetyl-d-glucosamine and sulfated carbohydrates. (43, 44) As the C-glycosides presented here contain structural elements of d-mannose, l-fucose, and sulfonamide moieties, they are potential ligands of Langerin. Therefore, this protein was chosen as one representative host lectin to study compound specificity. In order to assess the compounds’ selectivity, 6a, 7a, and its natural ligand l-fucose (8) were analyzed for Langerin binding in a competitive 19F R2-filtered NMR assay (44) (Figure 7). Natural ligand 8 was recognized by Langerin with slightly decreased affinity (Ki of 7.2 mM) compared to d-mannose (Ki 4.5 mM (44)); C-glycosides 6a and 7a also showed moderate binding to this human protein in the millimolar range. However, both compounds displayed a 1000-fold stronger affinity for LecB and are therefore considered selective for LecB over the host lectin Langerin.

Figure 7

Figure 7. Binding of C-glycosides 6a and 7a and l-fucose (8) to Langerin as determined in a 19F R2-filtered NMR competitive binding assay.

In addition to the direct binding to one host lectin, a more global effect of the glycomimetics on immune homeostasis was investigated. Primary murine spleen cells were stimulated via different pathways using bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS), fungal mannan, or a combination of phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) and ionomycin, and the immune response to these stimuli in presence and absence of compounds 1, 2a, 3a, 6a, 7a, or 11 was monitored by quantifying TNF-α release (Figure S6). No effect of mannoside 1 on the TNF-α levels was observed in comparison to matched DMSO concentrations (Figure S6A), while cinnamide 2a showed a decrease in TNF-α levels (Figure S6B). An immune suppressive effect was exclusively observed for cinnamide 2a at the highest concentration tested (1 mM), while all other tested compounds, 3a, 6a, 7a, and 11, showed no effect on the immune response (Figure S6C). The immune-suppressive effect of 2a is an interesting observation; however, the high concentration needed probably impedes further development toward this effect. Excluding mannose-derived cinnamide 2a, none of the other compounds tested showed any effect on the immune response and provided further supporting evidence for compound selectivity.

In Vitro Metabolic Stability and Toxicity

To achieve effective compound concentrations in vivo, efficient compound uptake and stability toward host metabolism are crucial properties. Compound solubility is not considered problematic for these well-soluble carbohydrate derivatives. Calculated compound lipophilicity (clogP) showed reasonable values (−1.25 < clogP < −0.13) for all compounds selected for early pharmacokinetics and toxicity studies, i.e., sulfonamide C-glycosides 7a,b derivatives and two mannose-based compounds 3a and 3b (Table S5).
In vitro metabolic stability of the LecB inhibitors was studied against mouse and human liver microsomes and murine plasma (Tables S6 and S7, Figure S7). The data obtained revealed a low intrinsic clearance (CLint) by mouse and human liver microsomes for all tested compounds. The metabolic stability of the C-glycoside 7a (CLint 12 μL/min/mg protein) toward mouse microsomes was slightly improved compared to its O-glycoside analog 3a (CLint 19 μL/min/mg protein) supporting the initial rational design of these C-glycosides. In the second group, the stabilities of mannoside 3b and C-glycoside 7b could not be differentiated since both compounds showed highest stability in this assay. Remarkably, all tested compounds showed very low clearance by human liver microsomes, where all substances fell into the highest stability category of this assay. Stability in murine plasma was assessed, and while the positive controls procaine and propoxycaine were rapidly degraded, all analyzed LecB ligands were as stable as the negative control procainamide and were not significantly degraded during the incubation period of 2 h. Therefore, all compounds tested can also be considered stable in murine plasma.
In order to assess a first safety window, toxicity of compounds was studied in vitro using an immortalized human hepatocyte cell line (Hep G2 cells, Figure S8). No toxicity was detected for all compounds tested up to a concentration of 100 μM.

In Vivo Pharmacokinetics of C-Glycosides

The two candidates from sulfonamides 7 with potent antibiofilm effects and favorable ADME properties, i.e., 7a and 7b, were chosen for an in vivo pharmacokinetics study in mice. Male CD-1 mice received a single dose of either 7a or 7b (10 mg/kg; n = 3) intravenously (i.v.) or perorally (p.o.). Plasma and urine levels of the parent compounds were monitored during 24 h (Figure 8) and pharmacokinetic parameters of 7a and 7b were assessed from plasma levels using a one-compartment model (Table S10). (45) In general, thiophene 7b had a superior plasma concentration over that of mesitylene 7a achieving a 2-fold higher calculated initial concentration (C0 = 13.4 μM for 7a (i.v.); C0 = 28.3 μM for 7b (i.v.)); thus, both candidates exceeded the anticipated necessary therapeutic levels (concentration > target Kd) with 10 mg/kg i.v.. Furthermore, 7b showed a slower elimination rate (k10), a prolonged half-life (t1/2) and mean residence time (MRT) and a low clearance (CL) compared to 7a. This resulted in higher compound levels in plasma at later time points. These features also contribute to an overall drug exposure in plasma for 7b at an AUC of 7.4 μg·h/mL using the intravenous administration route, which was around 4-fold higher than for 7a. The p.o. administration of 7a resulted in a bioavailability of nearly 100%, whereas for 7b it was only around 33.5%. However, the p.o. route of administration of 7b still resulted in a higher AUC than that for 7a in the i.v. route. In addition, the p.o. route of 7b showed similar elimination curves as detected for the i.v. route. In general, both compounds 7a and 7b were absorbed rapidly (tmax: 0.26–0.51 h for 7a and 7b, p.o. route), which might be a consequence of the sugar-like structural elements inherited by both compounds facilitating the crossing of barriers. As unmetabolized 7b was detected in urine at high concentrations (Figure 8), its elimination from the systemic circulation likely proceeds via renal clearance rather than liver detoxification. The kidneys did not act as a reservoir, and thiophene 7b did not accumulate in this organ, since its concentration in kidney 24 h post i.v. dosing was below 6 nM. Taken together, both compounds showed good oral bioavailability and thiophene 7b showed a superior pharmacokinetic profile compared to 7a with high compound levels, both in plasma and urine.

Figure 8

Figure 8. In vivo pharmacokinetics of 7a and 7b in CD-1 mice. Mean profile (±) SD of plasma (left column) and urine (right column) concentration in mouse versus time after i.v. (top) or p.o. (bottom) administration of compound 7a or 7b in a single dosing experiment (10 mg/kg, n = 3). Dashed line represents the in vitro IC50 range for both candidates with LecBPA14.

Conclusions

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

We have developed the first low molecular weight LecB inhibitors that potently inhibited biofilm formation by P. aeruginosa, one of the prime mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance of this pathogen of outstanding medical importance. The synthesized glycomimetic C-glycosides showed inhibitory affinities as low as nanomolar for LecB variants from two strains representative for the entire set of clinical isolates. (20) Thus, it can be expected that the devised glycomimetics will be active against LecB-mediated biofilm formation in a broad spectrum of clinical isolates.
The compounds showed excellent biophysical properties with receptor residence times as high as 28 min and fully enthalpy driven binding to the target lectin, which are two important benchmarks for early drug development. In contrast to the ineffective natural carbohydrate ligands, our glycomimetics were potent inhibitors of biofilm formation without affecting bacterial viability. Thus, development of resistances toward these pure antibiofilm substances is likely to be reduced, in contrast to this well-known problem for traditional antibiotics. (12, 46)
Target selectivity was then studied in binding experiments toward Langerin, a human fucose- and mannose-binding C-type lectin, as well as in a more global approach in immune-stimulated primary murine spleen cells, and no impeding effects of the glycomimetics could be observed. All compounds tested showed absence of toxicity. Furthermore, a set of in vitro ADME experiments revealed good metabolic stability of the compounds against liver microsomes and murine and human plasma as well as a balanced lipophilicity that is important for oral availability.
In a first in vivo experiment, the pharmacokinetics of 7a and 7b in mice revealed oral bioavailability with high plasma concentrations and a subsequent primary excretion route via the kidneys. Consequently, high compound concentrations in urine were observed, suggesting but not limiting to an application in a P. aeruginosa urinary tract infection (UTI) model. It will now be of interest to evaluate the compounds’ anti-infective potential in a monotherapy treatment against biofilm-associated infections and their synergy together with antibiotics for efficient eradication of bacteria outside the biofilm.

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b11133.

  • Experimental details and 1H and 13C spectra of new compounds; ITC titration data; X-ray data collection and refinement statistics; crystal structures showing ligand alignment and crystal packing effects; correlation of fluorescence intensities with cfu and OD600 measurements; effects of compounds on total fluorescence intensities; calculated lipophilicity of selected compounds; analysis of TNF-α concentration after stimulation of mouse spleen cells with and without test compounds; microsomal intrinsic clearance (CLint) of 3a, 3b, and C-glycosides 7 in mouse and human liver microsomes; stability of LecB ligands in mouse plasma; m/z search window for plasma stability assay; toxicity of LecB ligands to human liver Hep G2 cells; accuracy, quantification limits, and lower limit of qualification for 7a and 7b in plasma, urine, and kidney matrix; mass spectrometric conditions used for quantification and qualification of 7a, 7b, and the internal standard glipizide; PK parameters of 7a and 7b in mice (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Author
    • Alexander Titz - Chemical Biology of Carbohydrates and ‡Drug Design and Development, Helmholtz Institute for Pharmaceutical Research Saarland (HIPS), Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research (HZI), D-66123 Saarbrücken, GermanyDeutsches Zentrum für Infektionsforschung (DZIF), Standort Hannover-Braunschweig, GermanyDepartment of Pharmacy, Saarland University, D-66123 Saarbrücken, GermanyOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0001-7408-5084 Email: [email protected]
  • Authors
    • Roman Sommer - Chemical Biology of Carbohydrates and ‡Drug Design and Development, Helmholtz Institute for Pharmaceutical Research Saarland (HIPS), Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research (HZI), D-66123 Saarbrücken, GermanyDeutsches Zentrum für Infektionsforschung (DZIF), Standort Hannover-Braunschweig, Germany
    • Stefanie Wagner - Chemical Biology of Carbohydrates and ‡Drug Design and Development, Helmholtz Institute for Pharmaceutical Research Saarland (HIPS), Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research (HZI), D-66123 Saarbrücken, GermanyDeutsches Zentrum für Infektionsforschung (DZIF), Standort Hannover-Braunschweig, Germany
    • Katharina Rox - Deutsches Zentrum für Infektionsforschung (DZIF), Standort Hannover-Braunschweig, Germany
    • Annabelle Varrot - Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Centre de Recherche sur les Macromolécules Végétales (CERMAV), 38000 Grenoble, France
    • Dirk Hauck - Chemical Biology of Carbohydrates and ‡Drug Design and Development, Helmholtz Institute for Pharmaceutical Research Saarland (HIPS), Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research (HZI), D-66123 Saarbrücken, GermanyDeutsches Zentrum für Infektionsforschung (DZIF), Standort Hannover-Braunschweig, Germany
    • Eike-Christian Wamhoff - Department of Biomolecular Systems, Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, D-14424 Potsdam, GermanyDepartment of Biology, Chemistry and Pharmacy, Freie Universität Berlin, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
    • Janine Schreiber - Deutsches Zentrum für Infektionsforschung (DZIF), Standort Hannover-Braunschweig, Germany
    • Thomas Ryckmans - Roche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, CH-4070 Basel, Switzerland
    • Thomas Brunner - Biochemical Pharmacology, Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, D-78457 Konstanz, Germany
    • Christoph Rademacher - Department of Biomolecular Systems, Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, D-14424 Potsdam, GermanyDepartment of Biology, Chemistry and Pharmacy, Freie Universität Berlin, D-14195 Berlin, GermanyOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0001-7082-7239
    • Rolf W. Hartmann - Deutsches Zentrum für Infektionsforschung (DZIF), Standort Hannover-Braunschweig, GermanyDepartment of Pharmacy, Saarland University, D-66123 Saarbrücken, GermanyOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-5871-5231
    • Mark Brönstrup - Deutsches Zentrum für Infektionsforschung (DZIF), Standort Hannover-Braunschweig, Germany
    • Anne Imberty - Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Centre de Recherche sur les Macromolécules Végétales (CERMAV), 38000 Grenoble, France
  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgment

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

We are grateful to Sarah Henrikus and Shelby Newsad for chemistry support and to Dr. Michael Hoffmann for HRMS measurements (all HIPS Saarbrücken). We acknowledge technical assistance from Tatjana Arnold (HZI, Braunschweig) and Astrid Glöckner (Konstanz University); Dr. Aymeric Audfray (CERMAV Grenoble) is acknowledged for instructions to SPR. We thank Dr. Josef Zapp (Saarland University) for performing NMR measurements. Crystal data collection was performed at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Grenoble, France, and we are grateful for access and technical support to beamline FIP-BM30A and ID29. A.I. and A.V. acknowledge support from the ANR projects Glyco@Alps (ANR-15-IDEX-02) and Labex ARCANE (ANR-11-LABX-003). We thank the Helmholtz Association (grant no VH-NG-934, to A.T.), EU COST action BM1003 (to R.S.), DAAD RISE program (to S. Newsad and R.S.) and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (to A.T., grant no. Ti756/2-1, to C.R., grant no. RA1944/2-1) for financial support.

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 46 other publications.

  1. 1
    Nagao, M.; Iinuma, Y.; Igawa, J.; Saito, T.; Yamashita, K.; Kondo, T.; Matsushima, A.; Takakura, S.; Takaori-Kondo, A.; Ichiyama, S. J. Hosp Infect 2011, 79, 49 53 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2011.04.018
  2. 2
    Rice, L. B. J. Infect. Dis. 2008, 197, 1079 1081 DOI: 10.1086/533452
  3. 3
    Tsutsui, A.; Suzuki, S.; Yamane, K.; Matsui, M.; Konda, T.; Marui, E.; Takahashi, K.; Arakawa, Y. J. Hosp. Infect. 2011, 78, 317 322 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2011.04.013
  4. 4
    World Health Organization. WHO publishes list of bacteria for which new antibiotics are urgently needed. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2017/bacteria-antibiotics-needed/en/ (accessed May 2017).
  5. 5
    Hauser, A. R.; Rello, J., Eds. Severe Infections Caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Perspectives on Critical Care Infectious Diseases series; Kluwer Academic Publishers Group: Boston, MA, 2003.
  6. 6
    Serra, R.; Grande, R.; Butrico, L.; Rossi, A.; Settimio, U. F.; Caroleo, B.; Amato, B.; Gallelli, L.; de Franciscis, S. Expert Rev. Anti-Infect. Ther. 2015, 13, 605 613 DOI: 10.1586/14787210.2015.1023291
  7. 7
    Mittal, R.; Aggarwal, S.; Sharma, S.; Chhibber, S.; Harjai, K. J. Infect. Public Health 2009, 2, 101 11 DOI: 10.1016/j.jiph.2009.08.003
  8. 8
    Poole, K. Front. Microbiol. 2011, 2, 65 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00065
  9. 9
    Flemming, H.-C.; Wingender, J. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2010, 8, 623 633 DOI: 10.1038/nrmicro2415
  10. 10
    Davies, D. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2003, 2, 114 122 DOI: 10.1038/nrd1008
  11. 11
    Sommer, R.; Joachim, I.; Wagner, S.; Titz, A. Chimia 2013, 67, 286 290 DOI: 10.2533/chimia.2013.286
  12. 12
    Wagner, S.; Sommer, R.; Hinsberger, S.; Lu, C.; Hartmann, R. W.; Empting, M.; Titz, A. J. Med. Chem. 2016, 59, 5929 5969 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b01698
  13. 13
    Winzer, K.; Falconer, C.; Garber, N. C.; Diggle, S. P.; Camara, M.; Williams, P. J. Bacteriol. 2000, 182, 6401 6411 DOI: 10.1128/JB.182.22.6401-6411.2000
  14. 14
    Diggle, S. P.; Stacey, R. E.; Dodd, C.; Cámara, M.; Williams, P.; Winzer, K. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 8, 1095 1104 DOI: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.001001.x
  15. 15
    Tielker, D.; Hacker, S.; Loris, R.; Strathmann, M.; Wingender, J.; Wilhelm, S.; Rosenau, F.; Jaeger, K.-E. Microbiology 2005, 151, 1313 1323 DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.27701-0
  16. 16
    Gilboa-Garber, N. Methods Enzymol. 1982, 83, 378 385 DOI: 10.1016/0076-6879(82)83034-6
  17. 17
    Klockgether, J.; Cramer, N.; Wiehlmann, L.; Davenport, C. F.; Tümmler, B. Front. Microbiol. 2011, 2, 150 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00150
  18. 18
    Dötsch, A.; Schniederjans, M.; Khaledi, A.; Hornischer, K.; Schulz, S.; Bielecka, A.; Eckweiler, D.; Pohl, S.; Häussler, S. mBio 2015, 6, e00749-15 DOI: 10.1128/mBio.00749-15
  19. 19
    Boukerb, A. M.; Decor, A.; Ribun, S.; Tabaroni, R.; Rousset, A.; Commin, L.; Buff, S.; Doléans-Jordheim, A.; Vidal, S.; Varrot, A.; Imberty, A.; Cournoyer, B. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 811 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00811
  20. 20
    Sommer, R.; Wagner, S.; Varrot, A.; Nycholat, C. M.; Khaledi, A.; Haussler, S.; Paulson, J. C.; Imberty, A.; Titz, A. Chem. Sci. 2016, 7, 4990 5001 DOI: 10.1039/C6SC00696E
  21. 21
    Boukerb, A. M.; Rousset, A.; Galanos, N.; Méar, J.-B.; Thepaut, M.; Grandjean, T.; Gillon, E.; Cecioni, S.; Abderrahmen, C.; Faure, K.; Redelberger, D.; Kipnis, E.; Dessein, R.; Havet, S.; Darblade, B.; Matthews, S. E.; de Bentzmann, S.; Guéry, B.; Cournoyer, B.; Imberty, A.; Vidal, S. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 57, 10275 10289 DOI: 10.1021/jm500038p
  22. 22
    Chemani, C.; Imberty, A.; de Bentzmann, S.; Pierre, M.; Wimmerová, M.; Guery, B. P.; Faure, K. Infect. Immun. 2009, 77, 2065 2075 DOI: 10.1128/IAI.01204-08
  23. 23
    Cott, C.; Thuenauer, R.; Landi, A.; Kühn, K.; Juillot, S.; Imberty, A.; Madl, J.; Eierhoff, T.; Römer, W. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Mol. Cell Res. 2016, 1863, 1106 1118 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2016.02.004
  24. 24
    Mitchell, E.; Houles, C.; Sudakevitz, D.; Wimmerova, M.; Gautier, C.; Pérez, S.; Wu, A. M.; Gilboa-Garber, N.; Imberty, A. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2002, 9, 918 921 DOI: 10.1038/nsb865
  25. 25
    Hauber, H.-P.; Schulz, M.; Pforte, A.; Mack, D.; Zabel, P.; Schumacher, U. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2008, 5, 371 376 DOI: 10.7150/ijms.5.371
  26. 26
    Bucior, I.; Abbott, J.; Song, Y.; Matthay, M. A.; Engel, J. N. Am. J. Physiol Lung Cell Mol. Physiol 2013, 305, L352 363 DOI: 10.1152/ajplung.00387.2012
  27. 27
    Cecioni, S.; Imberty, A.; Vidal, S. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 525 561 DOI: 10.1021/cr500303t
  28. 28
    Bernardi, A.; Jiménez-Barbero, J.; Casnati, A.; De Castro, C.; Darbre, T.; Fieschi, F.; Finne, J.; Funken, H.; Jaeger, K.-E.; Lahmann, M.; Lindhorst, T. K.; Marradi, M.; Messner, P.; Molinaro, A.; Murphy, P. V.; Nativi, C.; Oscarson, S.; Penadés, S.; Peri, F.; Pieters, R. J.; Renaudet, O.; Reymond, J.-L.; Richichi, B.; Rojo, J.; Sansone, F.; Schäffer, C.; Turnbull, W. B.; Velasco-Torrijos, T.; Vidal, S.; Vincent, S.; Wennekes, T.; Zuilhof, H.; Imberty, A. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 4709 4727 DOI: 10.1039/C2CS35408J
  29. 29
    Johansson, E. M. V.; Crusz, S. A.; Kolomiets, E.; Buts, L.; Kadam, R. U.; Cacciarini, M.; Bartels, K.-M.; Diggle, S. P.; Cámara, M.; Williams, P.; Loris, R.; Nativi, C.; Rosenau, F.; Jaeger, K.-E.; Darbre, T.; Reymond, J.-L. Chem. Biol. 2008, 15, 1249 1257 DOI: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2008.10.009
  30. 30
    Hauck, D.; Joachim, I.; Frommeyer, B.; Varrot, A.; Philipp, B.; Möller, H. M.; Imberty, A.; Exner, T. E.; Titz, A. ACS Chem. Biol. 2013, 8, 1775 1784 DOI: 10.1021/cb400371r
  31. 31
    Sommer, R.; Exner, T. E.; Titz, A. PLoS One 2014, 9, e112822 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112822
  32. 32
    Sommer, R.; Hauck, D.; Varrot, A.; Wagner, S.; Audfray, A.; Prestel, A.; Möller, H. M.; Imberty, A.; Titz, A. ChemistryOpen 2015, 4, 756 767 DOI: 10.1002/open.201500162
  33. 33
    Hofmann, A.; Sommer, R.; Hauck, D.; Stifel, J.; Göttker-Schnetmann, I.; Titz, A. Carbohydr. Res. 2015, 412, 34 42 DOI: 10.1016/j.carres.2015.04.010
  34. 34
    Beshr, G.; Sommer, R.; Hauck, D.; Siebert, D. C. B.; Hofmann, A.; Imberty, A.; Titz, A. MedChemComm 2016, 7, 519 530 DOI: 10.1039/C5MD00557D
  35. 35
    Sabin, C.; Mitchell, E. P.; Pokorná, M.; Gautier, C.; Utille, J.-P.; Wimmerová, M.; Imberty, A. FEBS Lett. 2006, 580, 982 987 DOI: 10.1016/j.febslet.2006.01.030
  36. 36
    Tarcsay, A.; Keseru, G. M. Drug Discovery Today 2015, 20, 86 94 DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2014.09.014
  37. 37
    Hopkins, A. L.; Keseru, G. M.; Leeson, P. D.; Rees, D. C.; Reynolds, C. H. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2014, 13, 105 121 DOI: 10.1038/nrd4163
  38. 38
    Tummino, P. J.; Copeland, R. A. Biochemistry 2008, 47, 5481 5492 DOI: 10.1021/bi8002023
  39. 39
    Perret, S.; Sabin, C.; Dumon, C.; Pokorná, M.; Gautier, C.; Galanina, O.; Ilia, S.; Bovin, N.; Nicaise, M.; Desmadril, M.; Gilboa-Garber, N.; Wimmerová, M.; Mitchell, E. P.; Imberty, A. Biochem. J. 2005, 389, 325 332 DOI: 10.1042/BJ20050079
  40. 40
    Loris, R.; Tielker, D.; Jaeger, K.-E.; Wyns, L. J. Mol. Biol. 2003, 331, 861 870 DOI: 10.1016/S0022-2836(03)00754-X
  41. 41
    Lagendijk, E. L.; Validov, S.; Lamers, G. E. M.; de Weert, S.; Bloemberg, G. V. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2010, 305, 81 90 DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2010.01916.x
  42. 42
    Mayer, S.; Raulf, M.-K.; Lepenies, B. Histochem. Cell Biol. 2017, 147, 223 237 DOI: 10.1007/s00418-016-1523-7
  43. 43
    Holla, A.; Skerra, A. Protein Eng., Des. Sel. 2011, 24, 659 669 DOI: 10.1093/protein/gzr016
  44. 44
    Wamhoff, E.-C.; Hanske, J.; Schnirch, L.; Aretz, J.; Grube, M.; Varón Silva, D.; Rademacher, C. ACS Chem. Biol. 2016, 11, 2407 2413 DOI: 10.1021/acschembio.6b00561
  45. 45
    Zhang, Y.; Huo, M.; Zhou, J.; Xie, S. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed 2010, 99, 306 314 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2010.01.007
  46. 46
    Allen, R. C.; Popat, R.; Diggle, S. P.; Brown, S. P. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2014, 12, 300 308 DOI: 10.1038/nrmicro3232

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
Citation Statements
Explore this article's citation statements on scite.ai

This article is cited by 109 publications.

  1. Giulia Antonini, Mario Fares, Dirk Hauck, Patrycja Mała, Emilie Gillon, Laura Belvisi, Anna Bernardi, Alexander Titz, Annabelle Varrot, Sarah Mazzotta. Toward Dual-Target Glycomimetics against Two Bacterial Lectins to Fight Pseudomonas aeruginosa–Burkholderia cenocepacia Infections: A Biophysical Study. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2025, Article ASAP.
  2. Eva Zahorska, Lisa Marie Denig, Stefan Lienenklaus, Sakonwan Kuhaudomlarp, Thomas Tschernig, Peter Lipp, Antje Munder, Emilie Gillon, Saverio Minervini, Varvara Verkhova, Anne Imberty, Stefanie Wagner, Alexander Titz. High-Affinity Lectin Ligands Enable the Detection of Pathogenic Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms: Implications for Diagnostics and Therapy. JACS Au 2024, 4 (12) , 4715-4728. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacsau.4c00670
  3. Daniel Kohnhäuser, Tim Seedorf, Katarina Cirnski, Dominik Heimann, Janetta Coetzee, Sylvie Sordello, Jana Richter, Moritz Stappert, Jean-Francois Sabuco, David Corbett, Eric Bacqué, Katharina Rox, Jennifer Herrmann, Aurelie Vassort, Rolf Müller, Andreas Kirschning, Mark Brönstrup. Optimization of the Central α-Amino Acid in Cystobactamids to the Broad-Spectrum, Resistance-Breaking Antibiotic CN-CC-861. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2024, 67 (19) , 17162-17190. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.4c00927
  4. Patrycja Mała, Eike Siebs, Joscha Meiers, Katharina Rox, Annabelle Varrot, Anne Imberty, Alexander Titz. Discovery of N-β-l-Fucosyl Amides as High-Affinity Ligands for the Pseudomonas aeruginosa Lectin LecB. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2022, 65 (20) , 14180-14200. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c01373
  5. Rafael Bermeo, Kanhaya Lal, Davide Ruggeri, Daniele Lanaro, Sarah Mazzotta, Francesca Vasile, Anne Imberty, Laura Belvisi, Annabelle Varrot, Anna Bernardi. Targeting a Multidrug-Resistant Pathogen: First Generation Antagonists of Burkholderia cenocepacia’s BC2L-C Lectin. ACS Chemical Biology 2022, 17 (10) , 2899-2910. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschembio.2c00532
  6. Kartikey Singh, Suvarn S. Kulkarni. Small Carbohydrate Derivatives as Potent Antibiofilm Agents. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2022, 65 (13) , 8525-8549. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c01039
  7. Hashem Etayash, Morgan Alford, Noushin Akhoundsadegh, Matthew Drayton, Suzana K. Straus, Robert E. W. Hancock. Multifunctional Antibiotic–Host Defense Peptide Conjugate Kills Bacteria, Eradicates Biofilms, and Modulates the Innate Immune Response. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2021, 64 (22) , 16854-16863. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c01712
  8. Robert Wawrzinek, Eike-Christian Wamhoff, Jonathan Lefebre, Mareike Rentzsch, Gunnar Bachem, Gary Domeniconi, Jessica Schulze, Felix F. Fuchsberger, Hengxi Zhang, Carlos Modenutti, Lennart Schnirch, Marcelo A. Marti, Oliver Schwardt, Maria Bräutigam, Mónica Guberman, Dirk Hauck, Peter H. Seeberger, Oliver Seitz, Alexander Titz, Beat Ernst, Christoph Rademacher. A Remote Secondary Binding Pocket Promotes Heteromultivalent Targeting of DC-SIGN. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2021, 143 (45) , 18977-18988. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c07235
  9. Joscha Meiers, Eva Zahorska, Teresa Röhrig, Dirk Hauck, Stefanie Wagner, Alexander Titz. Directing Drugs to Bugs: Antibiotic-Carbohydrate Conjugates Targeting Biofilm-Associated Lectins of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2020, 63 (20) , 11707-11724. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c00856
  10. Xiaoyan Ju, Jun Chen, Mengxue Zhou, Meng Zhu, Zhuang Li, Sijia Gao, Jinzhao Ou, Dandan Xu, Man Wu, Shidong Jiang, Yi Hu, Ye Tian, Zhongwei Niu. Combating Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms by a Chitosan-PEG-Peptide Conjugate via Changes in Assembled Structure. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2020, 12 (12) , 13731-13738. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c02034
  11. Guoqing Tao, Tan Ji, Ning Wang, Guang Yang, Xiaolai Lei, Wei Zheng, Rongying Liu, Xuyang Xu, Ling Yang, Guang-Qiang Yin, Xiaojuan Liao, Xiaopeng Li, Hong-ming Ding, Xiaoming Ding, Jinfu Xu, Hai-Bo Yang, Guosong Chen. Self-Assembled Saccharide-Functionalized Amphiphilic Metallacycles as Biofilms Inhibitor via “Sweet Talking”. ACS Macro Letters 2020, 9 (1) , 61-69. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmacrolett.9b00914
  12. Yu Zhao, Cong Yu, Yunjian Yu, Xiaosong Wei, Xiaozhuang Duan, Xijuan Dai, Xinge Zhang. Bioinspired Heteromultivalent Ligand-Decorated Nanotherapeutic for Enhanced Photothermal and Photodynamic Therapy of Antibiotic-Resistant Bacterial Pneumonia. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2019, 11 (43) , 39648-39661. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b15118
  13. Jonathan Cramer, Christoph P. Sager, Beat Ernst. Hydroxyl Groups in Synthetic and Natural-Product-Derived Therapeutics: A Perspective on a Common Functional Group. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2019, 62 (20) , 8915-8930. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b00179
  14. Roman Sommer, Katharina Rox, Stefanie Wagner, Dirk Hauck, Sarah S. Henrikus, Shelby Newsad, Tatjana Arnold, Thomas Ryckmans, Mark Brönstrup, Anne Imberty, Annabelle Varrot, Rolf W. Hartmann, Alexander Titz. Anti-biofilm Agents against Pseudomonas aeruginosa: A Structure–Activity Relationship Study of C-Glycosidic LecB Inhibitors. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2019, 62 (20) , 9201-9216. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b01120
  15. Marwa Taouai, Khouloud Chakroun, Roman Sommer, Gaelle Michaud, David Giacalone, Mohamed Amine Ben Maaouia, Aurélie Vallin-Butruille, David Mathiron, Rym Abidi, Tamis Darbre, Peter J. Cragg, Catherine Mullié, Jean-Louis Reymond, George A. O’Toole, Mohammed Benazza. Glycocluster Tetrahydroxamic Acids Exhibiting Unprecedented Inhibition of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2019, 62 (17) , 7722-7738. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b00481
  16. Eike-Christian Wamhoff, Jessica Schulze, Lydia Bellmann, Mareike Rentzsch, Gunnar Bachem, Felix F. Fuchsberger, Juliane Rademacher, Martin Hermann, Barbara Del Frari, Rob van Dalen, David Hartmann, Nina M. van Sorge, Oliver Seitz, Patrizia Stoitzner, Christoph Rademacher. A Specific, Glycomimetic Langerin Ligand for Human Langerhans Cell Targeting. ACS Central Science 2019, 5 (5) , 808-820. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.9b00093
  17. Stéphane Baeriswyl, Bee-Ha Gan, Thissa N. Siriwardena, Ricardo Visini, Maurane Robadey, Sacha Javor, Achim Stocker, Tamis Darbre, Jean-Louis Reymond. X-ray Crystal Structures of Short Antimicrobial Peptides as Pseudomonas aeruginosa Lectin B Complexes. ACS Chemical Biology 2019, 14 (4) , 758-766. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschembio.9b00047
  18. François Portier, Anne Imberty, Sami Halila. Expeditious Synthesis of C-Glycosyl Barbiturate Ligands of Bacterial Lectins: From Monomer Design to Glycoclusters and Glycopolymers. Bioconjugate Chemistry 2019, 30 (3) , 647-656. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.8b00847
  19. Tamir Dingjan, Émilie Gillon, Anne Imberty, Serge Pérez, Alexander Titz, Paul A. Ramsland, Elizabeth Yuriev. Virtual Screening Against Carbohydrate-Binding Proteins: Evaluation and Application to Bacterial Burkholderia ambifaria Lectin. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2018, 58 (9) , 1976-1989. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00185
  20. Yincheng Chang, Zehuan Huang, Yang Jiao, Jiang-Fei Xu, Xi Zhang. pH-Induced Charge-Reversal Amphiphile with Cancer Cell-Selective Membrane-Disrupting Activity. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2018, 10 (25) , 21191-21197. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b06660
  21. Elena Di Marzo, Luigi Lay, Giuseppe D’Orazio. Synthesis of N,N-Dimethylaminopropyl Derivative of A Blood Sugar Antigen. Molbank 2025, 2025 (2) , M1985. https://doi.org/10.3390/M1985
  22. Kathrin Siebold, Elena Chikunova, Nils Lorz, Christina Jordan, Alvar D. Gossert, Ryan Gilmour. Fluor‐Fucosylierung ermöglicht die Untersuchung der Le a ‐LecB‐Wechselwirkung durch BioNMR‐Spektroskopie. Angewandte Chemie 2025, 137 (11) https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.202423782
  23. Kathrin Siebold, Elena Chikunova, Nils Lorz, Christina Jordan, Alvar D. Gossert, Ryan Gilmour. Fluoro‐Fucosylation Enables the Interrogation of the Le a ‐LecB Interaction by BioNMR Spectroscopy. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2025, 64 (11) https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202423782
  24. Wenjing Ma, Junyuan Luo, Huan Liu, Qi Du, Tianhui Hao, Yinyu Jiang, Zhengwei Huang, Lefu Lan, Zhonghua Li, Tiehai Li. Chemoenzymatic Synthesis of Highly O ‐Glycosylated MUC7 Glycopeptides for Probing Inhibitory Activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm Formation. Angewandte Chemie 2025, 33 https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.202424312
  25. Wenjing Ma, Junyuan Luo, Huan Liu, Qi Du, Tianhui Hao, Yinyu Jiang, Zhengwei Huang, Lefu Lan, Zhonghua Li, Tiehai Li. Chemoenzymatic Synthesis of Highly O ‐Glycosylated MUC7 Glycopeptides for Probing Inhibitory Activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm Formation. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2025, 33 https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202424312
  26. Giuseppe D’Orazio, Barbara La Ferla. Synthesis of a Hydrogen Isotope-Labeled SGLT1 C-Glucoside Ligand for Distribution and Metabolic Fate Studies. Molbank 2025, 2025 (1) , M1982. https://doi.org/10.3390/M1982
  27. José L. de Paz, Pedro M. Nieto. Fluorescence polarization assays to study carbohydrate–protein interactions. Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry 2025, 23 (9) , 2041-2058. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4OB02021A
  28. Ghamdan Beshr, Asfandyar Sikandar, Julia Gläser, Mario Fares, Roman Sommer, Stefanie Wagner, Jesko Köhnke, Alexander Titz. A fucose-binding superlectin from Enterobacter cloacae with high Lewis and ABO blood group antigen specificity. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2025, 301 (2) , 108151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2024.108151
  29. Marie Hanot, Elodie Lohou, Pascal Sonnet. Anti-Biofilm Agents to Overcome Pseudomonas aeruginosa Antibiotic Resistance. Pharmaceuticals 2025, 18 (1) , 92. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18010092
  30. Helma David, Sahana Vasudevan, Adline Princy Solomon. Mitigating candidiasis with acarbose by targeting Candida albicans α-glucosidase: in-silico, in-vitro and transcriptomic approaches. Scientific Reports 2024, 14 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-62684-x
  31. Paul V. Murphy, Ashis Dhara, Liam S. Fitzgerald, Eoin Hever, Saidulu Konda, Kishan Mandal. Small lectin ligands as a basis for applications in glycoscience and glycomedicine. Chemical Society Reviews 2024, 53 (19) , 9428-9445. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4CS00642A
  32. Chenxiao Wan, Xiaoyan Ju, Dandan Xu, Jinzhao Ou, Meng Zhu, Guojun Lu, Kejia Li, Wei Jiang, Chunyan Li, Xiaohua Hu, Ye Tian, Zhongwei Niu. Escherichia coli exopolysaccharides disrupt Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm and increase its antibiotic susceptibility. Acta Biomaterialia 2024, 185 , 215-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2024.07.028
  33. Christian Vogel, Katharina Rox, Florian Wagenlehner, Alexander Titz. Glycomimetics as Candidates for Treatment and Prevention of Catheter-associated Biofilms Formed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. European Urology Focus 2024, 10 (5) , 720-721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2024.08.011
  34. Lorina Badger-Emeka, Promise Emeka, Krishnaraj Thirugnanasambantham, Abdulaziz S. Alatawi. The Role of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the Pathogenesis of Corneal Ulcer, Its Associated Virulence Factors, and Suggested Novel Treatment Approaches. Pharmaceutics 2024, 16 (8) , 1074. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics16081074
  35. Qiang Zhang, Laurent Soulère, Yves Queneau. Amide bioisosteric replacement in the design and synthesis of quorum sensing modulators. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2024, 273 , 116525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2024.116525
  36. Truong Thanh Tung, Nguyen Quoc Thang, Nguyen Cao Huy, Pham Bao Phuong, Dinh Ngoc Minh, Nguyen Hai Nam, John Nielsen. Identification of novel phenylalanine derivatives bearing a hydroxamic acid moiety as potent quorum sensing inhibitors. RSC Medicinal Chemistry 2024, 15 (4) , 1320-1328. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3MD00670K
  37. Deborah L. Chance, Wei Wang, James K. Waters, Thomas P. Mawhinney. Insights on Pseudomonas aeruginosa Carbohydrate Binding from Profiles of Cystic Fibrosis Isolates Using Multivalent Fluorescent Glycopolymers Bearing Pendant Monosaccharides. Microorganisms 2024, 12 (4) , 801. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12040801
  38. Dong Yu, Zhaoyu Lu, Fengsong Nie, Yang Chong. Integrins regulation of wound healing processes: insights for chronic skin wound therapeutics. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology 2024, 14 https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2024.1324441
  39. Êmily Évelyn Bandeira Batista, Marcelo Antônio de Souza Silva, José Lucas Medeiros Torres, Waldo Silva Mariz, Vanessa Beatriz Jales Rego, André Felipe Dutra Leitão, Abrahão Alves de Oliveira Filho, Veneziano Guedes de Sousa Rêgo. AVALIAÇÃO DA ATIVIDADE ANTIBACTERIANA E ANTIADERENTE DO ÓLEO ESSENCIAL DE Lavandula hybrida grosso CONTRA Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Revista Multidisciplinar do Nordeste Mineiro 2024, 1 (1) https://doi.org/10.61164/rmnm.v1i1.2084
  40. Dong Yu, Zhaoyu Lu, Yang Chong. Integrins as a bridge between bacteria and cells: key targets for therapeutic wound healing. Burns & Trauma 2024, 12 https://doi.org/10.1093/burnst/tkae022
  41. Ting Du, Jiangli Cao, Zhannuo Zhang, Zehui Xiao, Jingbo Jiao, Zhiyong Song, Xinjun Du, Shuo Wang. Thermo-responsive cascade antimicrobial platform for precise biofilm removal and enhanced wound healing. Burns & Trauma 2024, 12 https://doi.org/10.1093/burnst/tkae038
  42. Yu Fan, Ahmed El Rhaz, Stéphane Maisonneuve, Emilie Gillon, Maha Fatthalla, Franck Le Bideau, Guillaume Laurent, Samir Messaoudi, Anne Imberty, Juan Xie. Photoswitchable glycoligands targeting Pseudomonas aeruginosa LecA. Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry 2024, 20 , 1486-1496. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjoc.20.132
  43. Jonathan Cramer1,2, Lijuan Pang3, Beat Ernst1. Antiadhesive Carbohydrates and Glycomimetics. 2023, 131-160. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527831326.ch5
  44. Qianqian Guo, Yijie Cheng, Zheng Fan, Weihui Wu, Zhongming Wu, Xinge Zhang. Zwitterion‐conjugated Topological Glycomimics for Dual‐Blocking Effects to Eradicate Biofilm Infection. Advanced Therapeutics 2023, 6 (12) https://doi.org/10.1002/adtp.202300217
  45. Xiaoxia Kang, Xiaoxiao Yang, Yue He, Conglin Guo, Yuechen Li, Haiwei Ji, Yuling Qin, Li Wu. Strategies and materials for the prevention and treatment of biofilms. Materials Today Bio 2023, 23 , 100827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100827
  46. Rajendra Prasad Janapatla, Anna Dudek, Chyi-Liang Chen, Chih-Hsien Chuang, Kun-Yi Chien, Ye Feng, Yuan-Ming Yeh, Yi-Hsin Wang, Hsin-Ju Chang, Yuan-Chuan Lee, Cheng-Hsun Chiu. Marine prebiotics mediate decolonization of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from gut by inhibiting secreted virulence factor interactions with mucins and enriching Bacteroides population. Journal of Biomedical Science 2023, 30 (1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12929-023-00902-w
  47. Jamuna Bai Aswathanarayan, Ravishankar Rai Vittal. Small molecules as next generation biofilm inhibitors and anti-infective agents. Physical Sciences Reviews 2023, 8 (11) , 4361-4373. https://doi.org/10.1515/psr-2021-0175
  48. Aghiad Bali, Mohamed A. M. Kamal, Glorjen Mulla, Brigitta Loretz, Claus‐Michael Lehr. Functional Materials to Overcome Bacterial Barriers and Models to Advance Their Development. Advanced Functional Materials 2023, 33 (45) https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202304370
  49. Nikhil Sathe, Peter Beech, Larry Croft, Cenk Suphioglu, Arnab Kapat, Eugene Athan. Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Infections and novel approaches to treatment “Knowing the enemy” the threat of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and exploring novel approaches to treatment. Infectious Medicine 2023, 2 (3) , 178-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imj.2023.05.003
  50. Sandra Behren, Jin Yu, Christian Pett, Manuel Schorlemer, Viktoria Heine, Thomas Fischöder, Lothar Elling, Ulrika Westerlind. Fucose Binding Motifs on Mucin Core Glycopeptides Impact Bacterial Lectin Recognition**. Angewandte Chemie 2023, 135 (32) https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.202302437
  51. Sandra Behren, Jin Yu, Christian Pett, Manuel Schorlemer, Viktoria Heine, Thomas Fischöder, Lothar Elling, Ulrika Westerlind. Fucose Binding Motifs on Mucin Core Glycopeptides Impact Bacterial Lectin Recognition**. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2023, 62 (32) https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202302437
  52. Steffen Leusmann, Petra Ménová, Elena Shanin, Alexander Titz, Christoph Rademacher. Glycomimetics for the inhibition and modulation of lectins. Chemical Society Reviews 2023, 52 (11) , 3663-3740. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2CS00954D
  53. Gareth LuTheryn, Elaine M. L. Ho, Victor Choi, Dario Carugo. Cationic Microbubbles for Non-Selective Binding of Cavitation Nuclei to Bacterial Biofilms. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15 (5) , 1495. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15051495
  54. Janina Sponsel, Yubing Guo, Lutfir Hamzam, Alice C Lavanant, Annia Pérez‐Riverón, Emma Partiot, Quentin Muller, Julien Rottura, Raphael Gaudin, Dirk Hauck, Alexander Titz, Vincent Flacher, Winfried Römer, Christopher G Mueller. Pseudomonas aeruginosa LecB suppresses immune responses by inhibiting transendothelial migration. EMBO reports 2023, 24 (4) https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.202255971
  55. Eva Zahorska, Francesca Rosato, Kai Stober, Sakonwan Kuhaudomlarp, Joscha Meiers, Dirk Hauck, Dorina Reith, Emilie Gillon, Katharina Rox, Anne Imberty, Winfried Römer, Alexander Titz. Neutralisation der Auswirkungen des Virulenzfaktors LecA aus Pseudomonas aeruginosa auf Humanzellen durch neue glykomimetische Inhibitoren. Angewandte Chemie 2023, 135 (7) https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.202215535
  56. Eva Zahorska, Francesca Rosato, Kai Stober, Sakonwan Kuhaudomlarp, Joscha Meiers, Dirk Hauck, Dorina Reith, Emilie Gillon, Katharina Rox, Anne Imberty, Winfried Römer, Alexander Titz. Neutralizing the Impact of the Virulence Factor LecA from Pseudomonas aeruginosa on Human Cells with New Glycomimetic Inhibitors. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2023, 62 (7) https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202215535
  57. Ana Marta de Matos. Recent Advances in the Development and Synthesis of Carbohydrate‐Based Molecules with Promising Antibacterial Activity. European Journal of Organic Chemistry 2023, 26 (4) https://doi.org/10.1002/ejoc.202200919
  58. David Elder. Challenges in the development of novel antibiotics. 2023, 65-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-95388-7.00005-X
  59. Lukas Gajdos, Matthew P. Blakeley, Michael Haertlein, V. Trevor Forsyth, Juliette M. Devos, Anne Imberty. Neutron crystallography reveals mechanisms used by Pseudomonas aeruginosa for host-cell binding. Nature Communications 2022, 13 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-27871-8
  60. Oliver Riester, Pia Burkhardtsmaier, Yuna Gurung, Stefan Laufer, Hans-Peter Deigner, Magnus S. Schmidt. Synergy of R-(–)carvone and cyclohexenone-based carbasugar precursors with antibiotics to enhance antibiotic potency and inhibit biofilm formation. Scientific Reports 2022, 12 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22807-8
  61. Elena Shanina, Sakonwan Kuhaudomlarp, Eike Siebs, Felix F. Fuchsberger, Maxime Denis, Priscila da Silva Figueiredo Celestino Gomes, Mads H. Clausen, Peter H. Seeberger, Didier Rognan, Alexander Titz, Anne Imberty, Christoph Rademacher. Targeting undruggable carbohydrate recognition sites through focused fragment library design. Communications Chemistry 2022, 5 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s42004-022-00679-3
  62. Magdolna Csávás, László Kalmár, Petronella Szőke, László Bence Farkas, Bálint Bécsi, Zoltán Kónya, János Kerékgyártó, Anikó Borbás, Ferenc Erdődi, Katalin E. Kövér. A Fucosylated Lactose-Presenting Tetravalent Glycocluster Acting as a Mutual Ligand of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Lectins A (PA-IL) and B (PA-IIL)—Synthesis and Interaction Studies. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2022, 23 (24) , 16194. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232416194
  63. Jack A. Doolan, George T. Williams, Kira L. F. Hilton, Rajas Chaudhari, John S. Fossey, Benjamin T. Goult, Jennifer R. Hiscock. Advancements in antimicrobial nanoscale materials and self-assembling systems. Chemical Society Reviews 2022, 51 (20) , 8696-8755. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1CS00915J
  64. Andreja Jakas, Ramya Ayyalasomayajula, Mare Cudic, Ivanka Jerić. Multicomponent reaction derived small di- and tri-carbohydrate-based glycomimetics as tools for probing lectin specificity. Glycoconjugate Journal 2022, 39 (5) , 587-597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10719-022-10079-3
  65. Marwa Fray, David Mathiron, Serge Pilard, David Lesur, Rym Abidi, Thouraya Barhoumi‐Slimi, Peter J. Cragg, Mohammed Benazza. Heteroglycoclusters through Unprecedented Orthogonal Chemistry Based on N ‐Alkylation of N ‐Acylhydrazone. European Journal of Organic Chemistry 2022, 2022 (33) https://doi.org/10.1002/ejoc.202101537
  66. Delia Boffoli, Federica Bellato, Greta Avancini, Pratik Gurnani, Gokhan Yilmaz, Manuel Romero, Shaun Robertson, Francesca Moret, Federica Sandrelli, Paolo Caliceti, Stefano Salmaso, Miguel Cámara, Giuseppe Mantovani, Francesca Mastrotto. Tobramycin-loaded complexes to prevent and disrupt Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Drug Delivery and Translational Research 2022, 12 (8) , 1788-1810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13346-021-01085-3
  67. Yinglu Wang, Lile Pan, Li Li, Ruipin Cao, Qian Zheng, Zuxian Xu, Chang-Jer Wu, Hu Zhu. Glycosylation increases the anti-QS as well as anti-biofilm and anti-adhesion ability of the cyclo (L-Trp-L-Ser) against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2022, 238 , 114457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2022.114457
  68. Karolina Wojtczak, Joseph P. Byrne. Structural Considerations for Building Synthetic Glycoconjugates as Inhibitors for Pseudomonas aeruginosa Lectins. ChemMedChem 2022, 17 (12) https://doi.org/10.1002/cmdc.202200081
  69. Gheorghe Roman. Thiophene‐containing compounds with antimicrobial activity. Archiv der Pharmazie 2022, 355 (6) https://doi.org/10.1002/ardp.202100462
  70. Yiwen Zhu, Shijing Wu, Yujie Sun, Xuan Zou, Liang Zheng, Shun Duan, Julin Wang, Bingran Yu, Ruifang Sui, Fu‐Jian Xu. Bacteria‐Targeting Photodynamic Nanoassemblies for Efficient Treatment of Multidrug‐Resistant Biofilm Infected Keratitis. Advanced Functional Materials 2022, 32 (14) https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202111066
  71. Eike Siebs, Elena Shanina, Sakonwan Kuhaudomlarp, Priscila da Silva Figueiredo Celestino Gomes, Cloé Fortin, Peter H. Seeberger, Didier Rognan, Christoph Rademacher, Anne Imberty, Alexander Titz. Targeting the Central Pocket of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa Lectin LecA. ChemBioChem 2022, 23 (3) https://doi.org/10.1002/cbic.202100563
  72. Mostafa Dadashi Firouzjaei, Mehdi Pejman, Mohammad Sharifian Gh, Sadegh Aghapour Aktij, Ehsan Zolghadr, Ahmad Rahimpour, Mohtada Sadrzadeh, Ahmad Arabi Shamsabadi, Alberto Tiraferri, Mark Elliott. Functionalized polyamide membranes yield suppression of biofilm and planktonic bacteria while retaining flux and selectivity. Separation and Purification Technology 2022, 282 , 119981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2021.119981
  73. Olga Metelkina, Benedikt Huck, Jonathan S. O'Connor, Marcus Koch, Andreas Manz, Claus-Michael Lehr, Alexander Titz. Targeting extracellular lectins of Pseudomonas aeruginosa with glycomimetic liposomes. Journal of Materials Chemistry B 2022, 10 (4) , 537-548. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1TB02086B
  74. Yi Zhao, Long Chen, Yanan Wang, Xinyu Song, Keyang Li, Xuefeng Yan, Liangmin Yu, Zhiyu He. Nanomaterial-based strategies in antimicrobial applications: Progress and perspectives. Nano Research 2021, 14 (12) , 4417-4441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-021-3417-4
  75. Truong Thanh Tung, Huy Luong Xuan. “Left-hand strategy” for the design, synthesis and discovery of novel triazole–mercaptobenzothiazole hybrid compounds as potent quorum sensing inhibitors and anti-biofilm formation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. New Journal of Chemistry 2021, 45 (46) , 21631-21637. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1NJ04436B
  76. Ana M. Gomez, J. Cristobal Lopez. Bringing Color to Sugars: The Chemical Assembly of Carbohydrates to BODIPY Dyes. The Chemical Record 2021, 21 (11) , 3112-3130. https://doi.org/10.1002/tcr.202100190
  77. Ciamak Ghazaei. Anti-virulence Therapy Against Bacterial Infections: Mechanisms of Action and Challenges. Journal of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences 2021, 25 (3) https://doi.org/10.5812/jkums.111808
  78. Marcus Miethke, Marco Pieroni, Tilmann Weber, Mark Brönstrup, Peter Hammann, Ludovic Halby, Paola B. Arimondo, Philippe Glaser, Bertrand Aigle, Helge B. Bode, Rui Moreira, Yanyan Li, Andriy Luzhetskyy, Marnix H. Medema, Jean-Luc Pernodet, Marc Stadler, José Rubén Tormo, Olga Genilloud, Andrew W. Truman, Kira J. Weissman, Eriko Takano, Stefano Sabatini, Evi Stegmann, Heike Brötz-Oesterhelt, Wolfgang Wohlleben, Myriam Seemann, Martin Empting, Anna K. H. Hirsch, Brigitta Loretz, Claus-Michael Lehr, Alexander Titz, Jennifer Herrmann, Timo Jaeger, Silke Alt, Thomas Hesterkamp, Mathias Winterhalter, Andrea Schiefer, Kenneth Pfarr, Achim Hoerauf, Heather Graz, Michael Graz, Mika Lindvall, Savithri Ramurthy, Anders Karlén, Maarten van Dongen, Hrvoje Petkovic, Andreas Keller, Frédéric Peyrane, Stefano Donadio, Laurent Fraisse, Laura J. V. Piddock, Ian H. Gilbert, Heinz E. Moser, Rolf Müller. Towards the sustainable discovery and development of new antibiotics. Nature Reviews Chemistry 2021, 5 (10) , 726-749. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41570-021-00313-1
  79. Tung Truong Thanh, Huy Luong Xuan, Thang Nguyen Quoc. Benzo[ d ]thiazole-2-thiol bearing 2-oxo-2-substituted-phenylethan-1-yl as potent selective lasB quorum sensing inhibitors of Gram-negative bacteria. RSC Advances 2021, 11 (46) , 28797-28808. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1RA03616E
  80. Michael A. Trebino, Rahul D. Shingare, John B. MacMillan, Fitnat H. Yildiz. Strategies and Approaches for Discovery of Small Molecule Disruptors of Biofilm Physiology. Molecules 2021, 26 (15) , 4582. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26154582
  81. Vishnu C. Damalanka, Amarendar Reddy Maddirala, James W. Janetka. Novel approaches to glycomimetic design: development of small molecular weight lectin antagonists. Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery 2021, 16 (5) , 513-536. https://doi.org/10.1080/17460441.2021.1857721
  82. Roland E. Dolle, Laurel K. McGrane, James W. Janetka, Jared T. Hammill, Rodney Kiplin Guy, Anjan Debnath, Peter M. Cheuka, Claire Le Manach, Kelly Chibale, Ake Elhammer, Martin Handfield, Michael J. Dawson, Stefano Donadio, Jae H. Park, Alan Joslyn. Anti‐Infective Case Histories. 2021, 1-95. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471266949.bmc288
  83. Sakonwan Kuhaudomlarp, Eike Siebs, Elena Shanina, Jérémie Topin, Ines Joachim, Priscila da Silva Figueiredo Celestino Gomes, Annabelle Varrot, Didier Rognan, Christoph Rademacher, Anne Imberty, Alexander Titz. Non‐Carbohydrate Glycomimetics as Inhibitors of Calcium(II)‐Binding Lectins. Angewandte Chemie 2021, 133 (15) , 8185-8195. https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.202013217
  84. Sakonwan Kuhaudomlarp, Eike Siebs, Elena Shanina, Jérémie Topin, Ines Joachim, Priscila da Silva Figueiredo Celestino Gomes, Annabelle Varrot, Didier Rognan, Christoph Rademacher, Anne Imberty, Alexander Titz. Non‐Carbohydrate Glycomimetics as Inhibitors of Calcium(II)‐Binding Lectins. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2021, 60 (15) , 8104-8114. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202013217
  85. Nives Hribernik, Alice Tamburrini, Ermelinda Falletta, Anna Bernardi. One pot synthesis of thio -glycosides via aziridine opening reactions. Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry 2021, 19 (1) , 233-247. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0OB01956A
  86. Jocelyn A. Hammond, Emma A. Gordon, Kayla M. Socarras, Joshua Chang Mell, Garth D. Ehrlich. Beyond the pan-genome: current perspectives on the functional and practical outcomes of the distributed genome hypothesis. Biochemical Society Transactions 2020, 48 (6) , 2437-2455. https://doi.org/10.1042/BST20190713
  87. Isabelle Bertin-Jung, Anne Robert, Nick Ramalanjaona, Sandrine Gulberti, Catherine Bui, Jean-Baptiste Vincourt, Mohamed Ouzzine, Jean-Claude Jacquinet, Chrystel Lopin-Bon, Sylvie Fournel-Gigleux. A versatile strategy to synthesize N -methyl-anthranilic acid-labelled glycoprobes for fluorescence-based screening assays. Chemical Communications 2020, 56 (73) , 10746-10749. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CC03882B
  88. Carmen S. Padilla, Mona B. Damaj, Zhong-Nan Yang, Joe Molina, Brian R. Berquist, Earl L. White, Nora Solís-Gracia, Jorge Da Silva, Kranthi K. Mandadi. High-Level Production of Recombinant Snowdrop Lectin in Sugarcane and Energy Cane. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 2020, 8 https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00977
  89. Eva Zahorska, Sakonwan Kuhaudomlarp, Saverio Minervini, Sultaan Yousaf, Martin Lepsik, Thorsten Kinsinger, Anna K. H. Hirsch, Anne Imberty, Alexander Titz. A rapid synthesis of low-nanomolar divalent LecA inhibitors in four linear steps from d -galactose pentaacetate. Chemical Communications 2020, 56 (62) , 8822-8825. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CC03490H
  90. Roland Thuenauer, Alessia Landi, Anne Trefzer, Silke Altmann, Sarah Wehrum, Thorsten Eierhoff, Britta Diedrich, Jörn Dengjel, Alexander Nyström, Anne Imberty, Winfried Römer, , . The Pseudomonas aeruginosa Lectin LecB Causes Integrin Internalization and Inhibits Epithelial Wound Healing. mBio 2020, 11 (2) https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.03260-19
  91. Joscha Meiers, Eike Siebs, Eva Zahorska, Alexander Titz. Lectin antagonists in infection, immunity, and inflammation. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology 2019, 53 , 51-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2019.07.005
  92. Daniel Passos da Silva, Michael L. Matwichuk, Delaney O. Townsend, Courtney Reichhardt, Doriano Lamba, Daniel J. Wozniak, Matthew R. Parsek. The Pseudomonas aeruginosa lectin LecB binds to the exopolysaccharide Psl and stabilizes the biofilm matrix. Nature Communications 2019, 10 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10201-4
  93. Alessia Landi, Muriel Mari, Svenja Kleiser, Tobias Wolf, Christine Gretzmeier, Isabel Wilhelm, Dimitra Kiritsi, Roland Thünauer, Roger Geiger, Alexander Nyström, Fulvio Reggiori, Julie Claudinon, Winfried Römer. Pseudomonas aeruginosa lectin LecB impairs keratinocyte fitness by abrogating growth factor signalling. Life Science Alliance 2019, 2 (6) , e201900422. https://doi.org/10.26508/lsa.201900422
  94. Pablo Valverde, Ana Ardá, Niels-Christian Reichardt, Jesús Jiménez-Barbero, Ana Gimeno. Glycans in drug discovery. MedChemComm 2019, 10 (10) , 1678-1691. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9MD00292H
  95. Stéphane Baeriswyl, Sacha Javor, Achim Stocker, Tamis Darbre, Jean‐Louis Reymond. X‐Ray Crystal Structure of a Second‐Generation Peptide Dendrimer in Complex with Pseudomonas aeruginosa Lectin LecB. Helvetica Chimica Acta 2019, 102 (9) https://doi.org/10.1002/hlca.201900178
  96. Martin Lepsik, Roman Sommer, Sakonwan Kuhaudomlarp, Mickaël Lelimousin, Emanuele Paci, Annabelle Varrot, Alexander Titz, Anne Imberty. Induction of rare conformation of oligosaccharide by binding to calcium-dependent bacterial lectin: X-ray crystallography and modelling study. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2019, 177 , 212-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2019.05.049
  97. Zhengwei Liu, Faming Wang, Jinsong Ren, Xiaogang Qu. A series of MOF/Ce-based nanozymes with dual enzyme-like activity disrupting biofilms and hindering recolonization of bacteria. Biomaterials 2019, 208 , 21-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.04.007
  98. Son Thai Le, Lenka Malinovska, Michaela Vašková, Erika Mező, Viktor Kelemen, Anikó Borbás, Petr Hodek, Michaela Wimmerová, Magdolna Csávás. Investigation of the Binding Affinity of a Broad Array of l-Fucosides with Six Fucose-Specific Lectins of Bacterial and Fungal Origin. Molecules 2019, 24 (12) , 2262. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24122262
  99. Rachel Hevey. Strategies for the Development of Glycomimetic Drug Candidates. Pharmaceuticals 2019, 12 (2) , 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph12020055
  100. Jo Sing Julia Tang, Sophia Rosencrantz, Lucas Tepper, Sany Chea, Stefanie Klöpzig, Anne Krüger-Genge, Joachim Storsberg, Ruben R. Rosencrantz. Functional Glyco-Nanogels for Multivalent Interaction with Lectins. Molecules 2019, 24 (10) , 1865. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24101865
Load all citations

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Cite this: J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 7, 2537–2545
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.7b11133
Published December 22, 2017

Copyright © 2017 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

Article Views

13k

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Rational design of 6 and 7 as monovalent C-glycosidic glycomimetic LecB inhibitors. Derivatives of methyl α-d-mannoside 15 and their inhibitory potency for the binding with LecBPAO1. (30, 31, 35) Moieties colored in blue increase potency by improving binding kinetics. (30, 32) The orange colored methyl group originating from l-fucosides enhances binding to LecB through a lipophilic interaction. (31, 35)

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Competitive binding assay of inhibitors with LecBPAO1 and LecBPA14. Means and standard deviations were determined from a minimum of three independent measurements. IC50 values for 1 with both LecB variants and 2ac, 3a,c and 5 with LecBPAO1 were previously published. (20, 30-32) One representative titration with LecBPA14 is depicted for reference pairs 2b/6b and 3a/7a. Gray arrows indicate the increase in activity for C-glycosides.

    Scheme 1

    Scheme 1. Synthesis of Structures 6a,b and 7a,ba

    Scheme aReagents and conditions: (a) MeNO2, DBU, molecular sieves 3 Å, 1,4-dioxane, 50 °C, 3 days; (b) Pt/C, H2, HCl, MeOH, r.t., 2 days; (c) acyl/sulfonyl chloride or carboxylic acid/EDC·HCl, Et3N, DMF, 0 °C. Yields are given over two steps from nitro derivative 9.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Isothermal titration microcalorimetry of LecBPAO1 and LecBPA14 with ligands 6a and 7a,b. Means and standard deviations were determined from a minimum of three independent titrations. One representative titration graph is depicted for LecBPAO1 only.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) analysis of direct binding of 6a or 7a to immobilized LecBPAO1. Experimental data in black; calculated fits using a 1:1 binding model in red.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. Crystal structures of LecBPA14 with C-glycoside ligands: (A) Complex with trimethylphenyl sulfonamide 7a (1.65 Å resolution), (B) Complex with thiophene 7b (1.65 Å resolution); For the ligands the 2FobsFcalc electron density is displayed at 1 σ. Ligands and amino acids of the carbohydrate recognition domain (CRD) are depicted as sticks colored by elements (C: gray, N: blue, O: red, S: yellow); protein surface in transparent blue and two Ca2+-ions in the binding sites are shown as green spheres.

    Figure 6

    Figure 6. Inhibition of biofilm formation by P. aeruginosa after 48 h growth in the presence of compounds 1, 2a, 3a, 6a, 7a,b, or methyl α-l-fucoside (11) at 100 μM. DMSO in absence of compounds was used as control. (A) Quantification of biofilm biomass. Averages and standard deviations of biofilm formation from three independent replicates. Statistical significance was calculated using the students t test. (B) Raw data of confocal fluorescence microscopy 3D images show one representative z-stack per condition.

    Figure 7

    Figure 7. Binding of C-glycosides 6a and 7a and l-fucose (8) to Langerin as determined in a 19F R2-filtered NMR competitive binding assay.

    Figure 8

    Figure 8. In vivo pharmacokinetics of 7a and 7b in CD-1 mice. Mean profile (±) SD of plasma (left column) and urine (right column) concentration in mouse versus time after i.v. (top) or p.o. (bottom) administration of compound 7a or 7b in a single dosing experiment (10 mg/kg, n = 3). Dashed line represents the in vitro IC50 range for both candidates with LecBPA14.

  • References


    This article references 46 other publications.

    1. 1
      Nagao, M.; Iinuma, Y.; Igawa, J.; Saito, T.; Yamashita, K.; Kondo, T.; Matsushima, A.; Takakura, S.; Takaori-Kondo, A.; Ichiyama, S. J. Hosp Infect 2011, 79, 49 53 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2011.04.018
    2. 2
      Rice, L. B. J. Infect. Dis. 2008, 197, 1079 1081 DOI: 10.1086/533452
    3. 3
      Tsutsui, A.; Suzuki, S.; Yamane, K.; Matsui, M.; Konda, T.; Marui, E.; Takahashi, K.; Arakawa, Y. J. Hosp. Infect. 2011, 78, 317 322 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2011.04.013
    4. 4
      World Health Organization. WHO publishes list of bacteria for which new antibiotics are urgently needed. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2017/bacteria-antibiotics-needed/en/ (accessed May 2017).
    5. 5
      Hauser, A. R.; Rello, J., Eds. Severe Infections Caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Perspectives on Critical Care Infectious Diseases series; Kluwer Academic Publishers Group: Boston, MA, 2003.
    6. 6
      Serra, R.; Grande, R.; Butrico, L.; Rossi, A.; Settimio, U. F.; Caroleo, B.; Amato, B.; Gallelli, L.; de Franciscis, S. Expert Rev. Anti-Infect. Ther. 2015, 13, 605 613 DOI: 10.1586/14787210.2015.1023291
    7. 7
      Mittal, R.; Aggarwal, S.; Sharma, S.; Chhibber, S.; Harjai, K. J. Infect. Public Health 2009, 2, 101 11 DOI: 10.1016/j.jiph.2009.08.003
    8. 8
      Poole, K. Front. Microbiol. 2011, 2, 65 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00065
    9. 9
      Flemming, H.-C.; Wingender, J. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2010, 8, 623 633 DOI: 10.1038/nrmicro2415
    10. 10
      Davies, D. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2003, 2, 114 122 DOI: 10.1038/nrd1008
    11. 11
      Sommer, R.; Joachim, I.; Wagner, S.; Titz, A. Chimia 2013, 67, 286 290 DOI: 10.2533/chimia.2013.286
    12. 12
      Wagner, S.; Sommer, R.; Hinsberger, S.; Lu, C.; Hartmann, R. W.; Empting, M.; Titz, A. J. Med. Chem. 2016, 59, 5929 5969 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b01698
    13. 13
      Winzer, K.; Falconer, C.; Garber, N. C.; Diggle, S. P.; Camara, M.; Williams, P. J. Bacteriol. 2000, 182, 6401 6411 DOI: 10.1128/JB.182.22.6401-6411.2000
    14. 14
      Diggle, S. P.; Stacey, R. E.; Dodd, C.; Cámara, M.; Williams, P.; Winzer, K. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 8, 1095 1104 DOI: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.001001.x
    15. 15
      Tielker, D.; Hacker, S.; Loris, R.; Strathmann, M.; Wingender, J.; Wilhelm, S.; Rosenau, F.; Jaeger, K.-E. Microbiology 2005, 151, 1313 1323 DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.27701-0
    16. 16
      Gilboa-Garber, N. Methods Enzymol. 1982, 83, 378 385 DOI: 10.1016/0076-6879(82)83034-6
    17. 17
      Klockgether, J.; Cramer, N.; Wiehlmann, L.; Davenport, C. F.; Tümmler, B. Front. Microbiol. 2011, 2, 150 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00150
    18. 18
      Dötsch, A.; Schniederjans, M.; Khaledi, A.; Hornischer, K.; Schulz, S.; Bielecka, A.; Eckweiler, D.; Pohl, S.; Häussler, S. mBio 2015, 6, e00749-15 DOI: 10.1128/mBio.00749-15
    19. 19
      Boukerb, A. M.; Decor, A.; Ribun, S.; Tabaroni, R.; Rousset, A.; Commin, L.; Buff, S.; Doléans-Jordheim, A.; Vidal, S.; Varrot, A.; Imberty, A.; Cournoyer, B. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 811 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00811
    20. 20
      Sommer, R.; Wagner, S.; Varrot, A.; Nycholat, C. M.; Khaledi, A.; Haussler, S.; Paulson, J. C.; Imberty, A.; Titz, A. Chem. Sci. 2016, 7, 4990 5001 DOI: 10.1039/C6SC00696E
    21. 21
      Boukerb, A. M.; Rousset, A.; Galanos, N.; Méar, J.-B.; Thepaut, M.; Grandjean, T.; Gillon, E.; Cecioni, S.; Abderrahmen, C.; Faure, K.; Redelberger, D.; Kipnis, E.; Dessein, R.; Havet, S.; Darblade, B.; Matthews, S. E.; de Bentzmann, S.; Guéry, B.; Cournoyer, B.; Imberty, A.; Vidal, S. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 57, 10275 10289 DOI: 10.1021/jm500038p
    22. 22
      Chemani, C.; Imberty, A.; de Bentzmann, S.; Pierre, M.; Wimmerová, M.; Guery, B. P.; Faure, K. Infect. Immun. 2009, 77, 2065 2075 DOI: 10.1128/IAI.01204-08
    23. 23
      Cott, C.; Thuenauer, R.; Landi, A.; Kühn, K.; Juillot, S.; Imberty, A.; Madl, J.; Eierhoff, T.; Römer, W. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Mol. Cell Res. 2016, 1863, 1106 1118 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2016.02.004
    24. 24
      Mitchell, E.; Houles, C.; Sudakevitz, D.; Wimmerova, M.; Gautier, C.; Pérez, S.; Wu, A. M.; Gilboa-Garber, N.; Imberty, A. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2002, 9, 918 921 DOI: 10.1038/nsb865
    25. 25
      Hauber, H.-P.; Schulz, M.; Pforte, A.; Mack, D.; Zabel, P.; Schumacher, U. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2008, 5, 371 376 DOI: 10.7150/ijms.5.371
    26. 26
      Bucior, I.; Abbott, J.; Song, Y.; Matthay, M. A.; Engel, J. N. Am. J. Physiol Lung Cell Mol. Physiol 2013, 305, L352 363 DOI: 10.1152/ajplung.00387.2012
    27. 27
      Cecioni, S.; Imberty, A.; Vidal, S. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 525 561 DOI: 10.1021/cr500303t
    28. 28
      Bernardi, A.; Jiménez-Barbero, J.; Casnati, A.; De Castro, C.; Darbre, T.; Fieschi, F.; Finne, J.; Funken, H.; Jaeger, K.-E.; Lahmann, M.; Lindhorst, T. K.; Marradi, M.; Messner, P.; Molinaro, A.; Murphy, P. V.; Nativi, C.; Oscarson, S.; Penadés, S.; Peri, F.; Pieters, R. J.; Renaudet, O.; Reymond, J.-L.; Richichi, B.; Rojo, J.; Sansone, F.; Schäffer, C.; Turnbull, W. B.; Velasco-Torrijos, T.; Vidal, S.; Vincent, S.; Wennekes, T.; Zuilhof, H.; Imberty, A. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 4709 4727 DOI: 10.1039/C2CS35408J
    29. 29
      Johansson, E. M. V.; Crusz, S. A.; Kolomiets, E.; Buts, L.; Kadam, R. U.; Cacciarini, M.; Bartels, K.-M.; Diggle, S. P.; Cámara, M.; Williams, P.; Loris, R.; Nativi, C.; Rosenau, F.; Jaeger, K.-E.; Darbre, T.; Reymond, J.-L. Chem. Biol. 2008, 15, 1249 1257 DOI: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2008.10.009
    30. 30
      Hauck, D.; Joachim, I.; Frommeyer, B.; Varrot, A.; Philipp, B.; Möller, H. M.; Imberty, A.; Exner, T. E.; Titz, A. ACS Chem. Biol. 2013, 8, 1775 1784 DOI: 10.1021/cb400371r
    31. 31
      Sommer, R.; Exner, T. E.; Titz, A. PLoS One 2014, 9, e112822 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112822
    32. 32
      Sommer, R.; Hauck, D.; Varrot, A.; Wagner, S.; Audfray, A.; Prestel, A.; Möller, H. M.; Imberty, A.; Titz, A. ChemistryOpen 2015, 4, 756 767 DOI: 10.1002/open.201500162
    33. 33
      Hofmann, A.; Sommer, R.; Hauck, D.; Stifel, J.; Göttker-Schnetmann, I.; Titz, A. Carbohydr. Res. 2015, 412, 34 42 DOI: 10.1016/j.carres.2015.04.010
    34. 34
      Beshr, G.; Sommer, R.; Hauck, D.; Siebert, D. C. B.; Hofmann, A.; Imberty, A.; Titz, A. MedChemComm 2016, 7, 519 530 DOI: 10.1039/C5MD00557D
    35. 35
      Sabin, C.; Mitchell, E. P.; Pokorná, M.; Gautier, C.; Utille, J.-P.; Wimmerová, M.; Imberty, A. FEBS Lett. 2006, 580, 982 987 DOI: 10.1016/j.febslet.2006.01.030
    36. 36
      Tarcsay, A.; Keseru, G. M. Drug Discovery Today 2015, 20, 86 94 DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2014.09.014
    37. 37
      Hopkins, A. L.; Keseru, G. M.; Leeson, P. D.; Rees, D. C.; Reynolds, C. H. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2014, 13, 105 121 DOI: 10.1038/nrd4163
    38. 38
      Tummino, P. J.; Copeland, R. A. Biochemistry 2008, 47, 5481 5492 DOI: 10.1021/bi8002023
    39. 39
      Perret, S.; Sabin, C.; Dumon, C.; Pokorná, M.; Gautier, C.; Galanina, O.; Ilia, S.; Bovin, N.; Nicaise, M.; Desmadril, M.; Gilboa-Garber, N.; Wimmerová, M.; Mitchell, E. P.; Imberty, A. Biochem. J. 2005, 389, 325 332 DOI: 10.1042/BJ20050079
    40. 40
      Loris, R.; Tielker, D.; Jaeger, K.-E.; Wyns, L. J. Mol. Biol. 2003, 331, 861 870 DOI: 10.1016/S0022-2836(03)00754-X
    41. 41
      Lagendijk, E. L.; Validov, S.; Lamers, G. E. M.; de Weert, S.; Bloemberg, G. V. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2010, 305, 81 90 DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2010.01916.x
    42. 42
      Mayer, S.; Raulf, M.-K.; Lepenies, B. Histochem. Cell Biol. 2017, 147, 223 237 DOI: 10.1007/s00418-016-1523-7
    43. 43
      Holla, A.; Skerra, A. Protein Eng., Des. Sel. 2011, 24, 659 669 DOI: 10.1093/protein/gzr016
    44. 44
      Wamhoff, E.-C.; Hanske, J.; Schnirch, L.; Aretz, J.; Grube, M.; Varón Silva, D.; Rademacher, C. ACS Chem. Biol. 2016, 11, 2407 2413 DOI: 10.1021/acschembio.6b00561
    45. 45
      Zhang, Y.; Huo, M.; Zhou, J.; Xie, S. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed 2010, 99, 306 314 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2010.01.007
    46. 46
      Allen, R. C.; Popat, R.; Diggle, S. P.; Brown, S. P. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2014, 12, 300 308 DOI: 10.1038/nrmicro3232
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b11133.

    • Experimental details and 1H and 13C spectra of new compounds; ITC titration data; X-ray data collection and refinement statistics; crystal structures showing ligand alignment and crystal packing effects; correlation of fluorescence intensities with cfu and OD600 measurements; effects of compounds on total fluorescence intensities; calculated lipophilicity of selected compounds; analysis of TNF-α concentration after stimulation of mouse spleen cells with and without test compounds; microsomal intrinsic clearance (CLint) of 3a, 3b, and C-glycosides 7 in mouse and human liver microsomes; stability of LecB ligands in mouse plasma; m/z search window for plasma stability assay; toxicity of LecB ligands to human liver Hep G2 cells; accuracy, quantification limits, and lower limit of qualification for 7a and 7b in plasma, urine, and kidney matrix; mass spectrometric conditions used for quantification and qualification of 7a, 7b, and the internal standard glipizide; PK parameters of 7a and 7b in mice (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.