ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
A Dual Targeting Dendrimer-Mediated siRNA Delivery System for Effective Gene Silencing in Cancer Therapy
My Activity

Figure 1Loading Img
  • Open Access
Article

A Dual Targeting Dendrimer-Mediated siRNA Delivery System for Effective Gene Silencing in Cancer Therapy
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

  • Yiwen Dong
    Yiwen Dong
    State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicines and Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Drug Discovery for Metabolic Diseases, Center of Drug Discovery, Center of Advanced Pharmaceutics and Biomaterials, China Pharmaceutical University, 24 Tong Jia Xiang, 210009 Nanjing, People’s Republic of China
    More by Yiwen Dong
  • Tianzhu Yu
    Tianzhu Yu
    Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS, Centre Interdisciplinaire de Nanoscience de Marseille, UMR 7325, “Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer”, 13288 Marseille, France
    More by Tianzhu Yu
  • Ling Ding
    Ling Ding
    Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS, Centre Interdisciplinaire de Nanoscience de Marseille, UMR 7325, “Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer”, 13288 Marseille, France
    More by Ling Ding
  • Erik Laurini
    Erik Laurini
    Molecular Biology and Nanotechnology Laboratory (MolBNL@UniTS), DEA, University of Trieste, 34127 Trieste, Italy
    More by Erik Laurini
  • Yuanyu Huang
    Yuanyu Huang
    Advanced Research Institute of Multidisciplinary Science and School of Life Science, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, People’s Republic of China
    School of Pharmacy, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha 410208, People’s Republic of China
    More by Yuanyu Huang
  • Mengjie Zhang
    Mengjie Zhang
    Advanced Research Institute of Multidisciplinary Science and School of Life Science, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, People’s Republic of China
  • Yuhua Weng
    Yuhua Weng
    Advanced Research Institute of Multidisciplinary Science and School of Life Science, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, People’s Republic of China
    More by Yuhua Weng
  • Shuting Lin
    Shuting Lin
    State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicines and Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Drug Discovery for Metabolic Diseases, Center of Drug Discovery, Center of Advanced Pharmaceutics and Biomaterials, China Pharmaceutical University, 24 Tong Jia Xiang, 210009 Nanjing, People’s Republic of China
    More by Shuting Lin
  • Peng Chen
    Peng Chen
    State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicines and Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Drug Discovery for Metabolic Diseases, Center of Drug Discovery, Center of Advanced Pharmaceutics and Biomaterials, China Pharmaceutical University, 24 Tong Jia Xiang, 210009 Nanjing, People’s Republic of China
    More by Peng Chen
  • Domenico Marson
    Domenico Marson
    Molecular Biology and Nanotechnology Laboratory (MolBNL@UniTS), DEA, University of Trieste, 34127 Trieste, Italy
  • Yifan Jiang
    Yifan Jiang
    Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS, Centre Interdisciplinaire de Nanoscience de Marseille, UMR 7325, “Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer”, 13288 Marseille, France
    More by Yifan Jiang
  • Suzanne Giorgio
    Suzanne Giorgio
    Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS, Centre Interdisciplinaire de Nanoscience de Marseille, UMR 7325, “Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer”, 13288 Marseille, France
  • Sabrina Pricl
    Sabrina Pricl
    Molecular Biology and Nanotechnology Laboratory (MolBNL@UniTS), DEA, University of Trieste, 34127 Trieste, Italy
  • Xiaoxuan Liu*
    Xiaoxuan Liu
    State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicines and Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Drug Discovery for Metabolic Diseases, Center of Drug Discovery, Center of Advanced Pharmaceutics and Biomaterials, China Pharmaceutical University, 24 Tong Jia Xiang, 210009 Nanjing, People’s Republic of China
    Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS, Centre Interdisciplinaire de Nanoscience de Marseille, UMR 7325, “Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer”, 13288 Marseille, France
    *[email protected]
    More by Xiaoxuan Liu
  • Palma Rocchi
    Palma Rocchi
    Inserm, Aix-Marseille Université, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, CNRS, CRCM, 13009 Marseille, France
    More by Palma Rocchi
  • Ling Peng*
    Ling Peng
    Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS, Centre Interdisciplinaire de Nanoscience de Marseille, UMR 7325, “Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer”, 13288 Marseille, France
    *[email protected]
    More by Ling Peng
Open PDFSupporting Information (1)

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Cite this: J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 47, 16264–16274
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.8b10021
Published October 22, 2018

Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Small interfering RNA (siRNA) is emerging as a novel therapeutic for treating various diseases, provided a safe and efficient delivery is available. In particular, specific delivery to target cells is critical for achieving high therapeutic efficacy while reducing toxicity. Amphiphilic dendrimers are emerging as novel promising carriers for siRNA delivery by virtue of the combined multivalent cooperativity of dendrimers with the self-assembling property of lipid vectors. Here, we report a ballistic approach for targeted siRNA delivery to cancer cells using an amphiphilic dendrimer equipped with a dual targeting peptide bearing an RGDK warhead. According to the molecular design, the amphiphilic dendrimer was expected to deliver siRNA effectively, while the aim of the targeting peptide was to home in on tumors via interaction of its warhead with integrin and the neuropilin-1 receptor on cancer cells. Coating the positively charged siRNA/dendrimer delivery complex with the negatively charged segment of the targeting peptide via electrostatic interactions led to small and stable nanoparticles which were able to protect siRNA from degradation while maintaining the accessibility of RGDK for targeting cancer cells and preserving the ability of the siRNA to escape from endosomes. The targeted system had enhanced siRNA delivery, stronger gene silencing, and more potent anticancer activity compared to nontargeted or covalent dendrimer-based systems. In addition, neither acute toxicity nor induced inflammation was observed. Consequently, this delivery system constitutes a promising nonviral vector for targeted delivery and can be further developed to provide RNAi-based personalized medicine against cancer. Our study also gives new perspectives on the use of nanotechnology based on self-assembling dendrimers in various biomedical applications.

Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society

Introduction

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Gene therapy based on RNA interference (RNAi), a post-transcriptional gene silencing phenomenon triggered by small interfering RNA (siRNA), (1,2) is emerging as a promising therapeutic option for treating various diseases. (3−5) Particularly exciting is the first ever RNAi-based gene-silencing siRNA drug “patisiran”, which was approved by the FDA this year. (6) As siRNA targets and breaks down the corresponding mRNA via Watson–Crick base-pairing, in principle it can be harnessed to target any gene with known sequence, in particular, disease-associated genes for therapeutic purposes. (3−5) However, naked siRNA is not a stable therapeutic agent per se, as it can be rapidly degraded by enzymes such as nucleases or esterases, which pervade body fluids. In addition, siRNA molecules are hydrophilic and highly negatively charged and, hence, cannot readily cross cell membranes to reach the RNAi machinery in the cytosol for gene silencing. Moreover, if administered at high concentration, naked siRNA will often generate off-target effects, which can induce severe adverse effects. Consequently, there is a high demand for safe and effective siRNA delivery systems that are able to protect the nucleic acid from degradation, deliver it to the target cells, and ultimately promote functional gene silencing. (7−10)
Both viral and nonviral delivery vectors have been explored for siRNA delivery. Although viral delivery is more effective, increasing concerns over the immunogenicity and toxicity of viral vectors urge the development and improvement of synthetic carrier systems. (7−10) Lipids and polymers are the most commonly applied nonviral vectors for siRNA delivery. (11−15) Dendrimers, a special family of polymers, have emerged as promising siRNA carriers by virtue of their well-defined structural architecture, cooperative multivalence, and intriguing ability to carry a high cargo payload within a nanosized volume. (16−20) We have recently developed a series of cationic amphiphilic dendrimers (21−24) that couple the multivalent cooperativity of dendrimer vectors with the self-assembling property of lipid vectors, hence capitalizing on the advantageous characteristics of both lipid and dendrimer vectors for effective delivery. (25,26) One of these multivalent self-assembling dendrimers, AD (Scheme 1A), exhibits particularly high performance for siRNA delivery to a wide range of cell types, including highly challenging human primary cells and stem cells. (22) Importantly, AD is also able to deliver siRNA to tumors in xenograft mice for successful in vivo gene silencing and potent anticancer activity. (22)

Scheme 1

Scheme 1. Strategy for Active Delivery of siRNA Using an Amphiphilic Dendrimer AD Vector with the Dual Targeting Peptide: (A) Chemical Structure of the Amphiphilic Dendrimer AD; (B) The Targeting Peptide E16G6RGDK Composed of Three Distinct Functional Segments: RGDK as the Targeting Warhead, Oligo(glutamic acid) E16 as the Negatively Charged Sequence to Interact with Positively Charged siRNA/AD Complexes, and the Neutral Oligo(glycine) G6 as the Linker to Bridge the Targeting Unit and the siRNA Loading Complex; (C) Cartoon Illustration of the Formation of the siRNA/AD/E16G6RGDK Complexes for Targeted siRNA Delivery
With the aim of further improving the AD-mediated siRNA delivery, we wanted to endow AD with an active targeting ability for specific delivery to cancer cells within tumor lesions. In principle, active targeting can be realized by introducing a targeting moiety on the delivery system, which can interact with and bind to ligands or receptors present on the cell surface. (27,28) In this way, the therapeutic cargo can be delivered specifically to the target cells, thereby achieving higher therapeutic efficacy while sparing other cells to reduce toxicity. Different targeting agents such as antibodies, peptides, and small molecular ligands have been applied to construct active targeting systems. (27−31) Among them, the RGDK peptide is particularly appealing for cancer targeting because it has dual targeting capacity within a short peptide segment. (32) On one hand, RGD can target tumor endothelium by interacting with ανβ3 integrin, which is overexpressed in tumor vasculature; (33,34) on the other hand, RGDK is able to bind to the neuropilin-1 (Nrp-1) receptor, which is present on tumor cells, hence promoting cancer cell penetration and uptake. (32,35) In a previous study, we were able to demonstrate the validity of this dual targeting strategy for siRNA delivery and enhanced performance in gene silencing using a poly(amidoamine) PAMAM dendrimer of generation 5 (G5) that was decorated with the same targeting peptide. (36) However, producing a large quantity of pure, high-generation PAMAM dendrimers requires considerable cost, time, and effort. (37,38) Accordingly, in this paper we report the introduction of the dual targeting warhead RGDK to the small amphiphilic dendrimer AD-based delivery system (Scheme 1), which effectively led to targeted siRNA delivery and enhanced gene silencing compared to the nontargeting system. In contrast to our former study, (36) in the present effort we exploit the quintessence of nanotechnology, i.e., the controlled self-assembly of small, synthetically amenable building blocks to generate a nanosystem for siRNA delivery. We further demonstrate that decoration of the resulting siRNA/AD system with this dual targeting peptide not only is feasible but, most importantly, leads to in vitro and in vivo results substantially superior to those achieved with the covalent high-generation dendrimer decorated with the same peptide. This is the first report to explore a targeting strategy for self-assembling dendrimer-mediated siRNA delivery.
In our strategy to append the RGDK targeting moiety on the AD-based delivery system, we used the peptide E16G6RGDK, which is composed of three distinct functional segments: (1) the targeting unit RGDK, (2) the negatively charged oligo(glutamic acid) E16, and (3) the neutral oligo(glycine) G6 (Scheme 1B). The RGDK segment will mediate the dual active targeting function by homing to the tumor vasculature via RGD/integrin binding and, at the same time, targeting cancer cells via binding of RGDK to Nrp-1 receptors on the cell surface. The negatively charged oligo(glutamic acid) segment E16 will serve to promote the attachment of the targeting peptide to the positively charged siRNA/AD complex via electrostatic interaction. (36,39) The neutral oligo(glycine) segment G6 will act as the linker to connect the targeting warhead RGDK to the siRNA/AD delivery complexes (Scheme 1C). To prove the concept of this targeting delivery, we used PC-3 prostate cancer cells as the cancer model, because PC-3 cells have highly overexpressed integrin and Nrp-1 receptors on the surface. (30,40)
Prostate cancer (PCa) has the highest incidence rate and is the major cause of cancer-related deaths in males in Western countries. (41) Although androgen deprivation therapy is beneficial as the standard first-line treatment in early stage hormone-naive PCa, castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) unfortunately often develops within one or two years. (42,43) CRPC is associated with poor prognosis, high apoptosis resistance, and high mortality, (44) and no efficacious treatment for managing CRPC is clinically available to date. (43) Recently, we demonstrated that using AD-mediated siRNA delivery to target the cancer cell survival gene Hsp27, which encodes heat shock protein 27, (45−47) is an effective approach for treating CRPC. (22) In this study, we provide further proof that the AD-based delivery system equipped with the RGDK targeting peptide is much more effective than the nontargeted one and superior to the covalent G5 PAMAM dendrimer decorated with the same peptide for siRNA delivery and gene silencing of Hsp27, (36) ultimately leading to more potent anticancer activity in CRPC models in vitro and in vivo. The superior delivery efficiency can be ascribed to the active dual targeting mechanism via RGD/integrin and RGDK/Nrp-1 receptor interactions in addition to the excellent delivery performance of the amphiphilic dendrimer AD. Therefore, this study demonstrates that the strategy to coat the amphiphilic dendrimer-based siRNA delivery system with the dual targeting RGDK warhead constitutes a powerful approach to achieve effective and specific tumor targeting for more efficient siRNA delivery and potent gene silencing. This approach can be further developed for RNAi-based personalized medicine in fighting cancer.

Results and Discussion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Formation of Small and Stable Peptide-Decorated siRNA/AD/E16G6RGDK Complexes

For effective siRNA delivery, it is important that the delivery system is small and stable. This is because small nanoparticulate complexes can penetrate deep into tumor tissue and be taken up efficiently by cancer cells, and stable delivery complexes effectively protect the siRNA against enzyme degradation. In our system, by simply adding the targeting peptide E16G6RGDK to the siRNA/AD complex in solution, small and spherical nanoparticles were formed, as illustrated by the results obtained using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (Figure 1A) and dynamic light scattering (DLS) analysis (Figure 1B). The dimensions of the peptide-decorated siRNA/AD/E16G6RGDK complexes are around 30–45 nm, which are in the size range required for effective cellular uptake. In addition, the zeta potential of the siRNA/AD/E16G6RGDK nanoparticles is +15 mV, which is lower than the noncoated siRNA/AD complexes (+32 mV). This finding indicates that the negatively charged E16G6RGDK peptide indeed bound to the positively charged siRNA/AD complexes as expected, hence decreasing the positive surface charge.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Small and stable siRNA/AD/E16G6RGDK complexes formed by adding the peptide E16G6RGDK to the siRNA/AD complexes. (A) TEM imaging and (B) DLS analysis of the siRNA/AD/E16G6RGDK complexes (siRNA/AD at an N/P ratio of 10, AD/peptide at a molar ratio of 5.0). (C) Representative integrated ITC profiles for titration of the siRNA/AD complexes with the E16G6RGDK peptide in ultrapure water (T = 25 °C). The solid red lines are data fitted with a sigmoidal function. The inset shows the corresponding ITC raw data. All experiments were run in triplicate. (D) Agarose gel shift analysis of the siRNA/AD/E16G6RGDK complexes versus the siRNA/AD complexes (siRNA/AD at an N/P ratio of 10, AD/peptide ratio varying from 2.0 to 20). (E) The siRNA/AD/E16G6RGDK complexes are able to protect siRNA from RNase A digestion. (siRNA/AD at an N/P ratio of 10; AD/peptide ratio of 5.0).

We further assessed the binding thermodynamics of the E16G6RGDK peptides to the siRNA/AD complexes by carrying out isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) measurements. The binding process is mainly characterized by a favorable enthalpic contribution (ΔΗ = −5.0 ± 0.2 kcal/mol), as testified by the exothermic peaks of the corresponding thermogram (Figure 1C). A small favorable entropy change is also estimated (−TΔS = −1.9 kcal/mol), and, accordingly, the overall complex formation is thermodynamically favored, with a free energy of binding (ΔG) value of −6.8 kcal/mol. The substantial enthalpic nature of the binding supports the fact that the electrostatic forces play the leading role, while the positive entropic term can be reasonably ascribed to stabilizing peptide/complex hydrophobic interactions and water/ion release into the bulk solvent.
We next studied the stability of the siRNA/AD/E16G6RGDK complexes using gel mobility shift assays in the presence of RNase. As shown in Figure 1D, adding the peptide E16G6RGDK to the siRNA/AD complexes at different peptide/AD ratios did not cause any siRNA release, highlighting the formation of stable siRNA/AD/E16G6RGDK complexes and complete encapsulation of siRNA. Further experiments with RNase treatment demonstrate that the siRNA/AD/E16G6RGDK complexes effectively protected siRNA from enzymatic digestion, whereas free siRNA was not stable and was degraded rapidly within 5.0 min (Figure 1E). Collectively, our results show that the peptide-coated siRNA/AD/E16G6RGDK complexes are small and stable and are able to protect siRNA from degradation. All these are important and beneficial features for effective siRNA delivery.

Accessible RGDK Targeting Moieties in the Stable Peptide-Coated Complexes

To get further insight into the peptide-coated siRNA/AD/E16G6RGDK complexes at the molecular level, we performed atomistic molecular dynamics (MD) simulations as we did in our previous work. (21,48) As can be seen in Figure 2A, a stable (1.0 μs) Janus-like nanoparticle was formed, in which four E16G6RGDK peptides are adsorbed onto the siRNA/AD assembly, with the nucleic acids on the opposite side. From the same figure, it is evident that, as initially surmised, the negative tails of the peptides (E16) are in close contact with the positive charges of the PAMAM dendron heads of AD and, most importantly, the RGDK warhead groups protrude well into the solvent (Figure 2A). This qualitative observation is quantitatively supported by the results in Figure 2B, which shows the radial distribution function (RDF) for the positively charged terminals of the AD molecules and the RGDK terminals of the four E16G6RGDK peptides. These curves clearly indicate that the RDGK moieties are located away from the nanoparticle periphery, thus being available for interaction with the cellular receptors. Finally, the targeting peptides are compared in Figure 2C. In agreement with the experimentally determined zeta-potentials, binding of the negatively charged peptides on the surface of the siRNA/AD complex results in a lower positive electrostatic surface compared to the undecorated siRNA/AD binary assembly.

Figure 2

Figure 2. (A) (Left) Cartoon showing the arrangement of the siRNA molecule (gray) and the four E16G6RGDK moieties (colored as in the right panel) on the AD nanomicelle (blue), as derived from the detailed atomistic molecular simulations. (Center) Equilibrated molecular dynamics (MD) snapshot of an siRNA/AD micelle in complex with four E16G6RGDK peptides numbered as E16G6RGDK1 to E16G6RGDK4 and colored as follows: E16G6RGDK1, tail (E16G6) sandy brown, head (RGDK) firebrick; E16G6RGDK2, tail light green, head olive drab; E16G6RGDK3, tail khaki, head golden rod; E16G6RGDK4, tail plum, head magenta. The siRNA molecule is portrayed with its van der Waals surface in gray. The AD micelle is shown in dark slate blue sticks and balls, while the four peptides are depicted as colored spheres, as above precised. Ions and counterions are shown as green and purple hollow spheres; water is shown as a light cyan surface. (Right) Zoomed-in view of the system in panel A showing the RGDK warhead group of E16G6RGDK4 protruding into the solvent as an example. (B) Radial distribution function as a function of the distance from the AD micelle center of mass for the AD positively charged terminal groups (dark slate blue) and for each of the four RGDK warhead groups. Colors as in panel A. (C) Electrostatic surface potential of the siRNA/AD micelle (left) and of the siRNA/AD/(E16G6RGDK)4 complex (right) as extracted from the equilibrated portion of the corresponding MD simulations. Dark blue represents a highly positively charged surface, while red represents a highly negatively charged surface. (D) Free energy of binding (ΔGb) of each E16G6RGDK peptide on the siRNA/AD micelle. Colors as in panel A. The empty color bars (left bar of each pair) represent the value of ΔGb for the entire peptide molecule, while the filled color bars (right bar of each pair) give the contribution to ΔGb from the negatively charged E16G6 tails only.

To estimate the intensity of the interaction between each peptide and the siRNA/AD complex, the MD data were further processed using the MM/PBSA approach. (49−51) The free energy of binding (ΔGb) between each of the four E16G6RGDK peptides and the siRNA/AD complex is shown in Figure 2D. All peptides are characterized by a favorable (i.e., negative) ΔGb value (in the range −7.0 ± 0.2 to −6.1 ± 0.2 kcal/mol, empty bars in Figure 2D). The major contribution to binding is the strong electrostatic interaction between the negatively charged peptide tails (E16) and the protonated amines at the AD terminals (filled bars in Figure 2D). Altogether, our molecular simulation results further support our initial molecular concept and hypothesis that the E16G6RGDK peptides form stable complexes with siRNA/AD, ultimately yielding nanoparticles with a lower positive surface charge while leaving the RGDK warheads available for cellular receptor interactions. All the simulation data are in line with our experimental results.

Enhanced Cell Uptake via Dual Receptor-Mediated Interactions Followed by Effective Endosomal Escape

Our aim in decorating the siRNA/AD delivery complex with the dual targeting peptide E16G6RGDK was to improve the delivery efficiency and specificity by actively targeting cancer cells via both RGD/integrin binding and RGDK/Nrp-1 interaction while also ensuring effective endosomal escape. We therefore first investigated the uptake of the peptide-decorated complexes by PC-3 prostate cancer cells, which are characterized by high expression of both integrin and Nrp-1 receptors. (30,40) Using siRNA labeled with the fluorescent dye Cy5, we found that the internalization of the peptide-coated Cy5-siRNA/AD/E16G6RGDK complexes was significantly (3.0-fold) higher than the noncoated Cy5-siRNA/AD complexes in PC-3 cells (Figure 3A). In addition, the uptake of the peptide-decorated Cy5-siRNA/AD/E16G6RGDK complexes was considerably reduced in the presence of cyclic RGD (cRGD) (Figure 3B), indicating that cRGD competed with the peptide-coated nanoparticles for integrin binding. This confirms that the peptide-decorated delivery complexes indeed bound to integrin via the RGD motif. Also, as shown by confocal microscopic imaging in Figure 3C, cells pretreated with anti-Nrp-1-receptor monoclonal antibody had dramatically reduced internalization of the Cy5-siRNA/AD/E16G6RGDK complexes compared to untreated cells. This highlights that the peptide-decorated complexes are effectively taken up by cells via RGDK/Nrp-1 receptor interaction. Collectively, these results provide evidence that the cellular uptake of the peptide-coated siRNA/dendrimer complexes was indeed mediated by RGD/integrin and RGDK/Nrp-1 receptor interactions, and the uptake of the decorated complexes by PC-3 cells was more efficient than the nondecorated ones.

Figure 3

Figure 3. SiRNA/AD/E16G6RGDK complexes are effectively taken up by PC-3 prostate cancer cells via RGD/integrin and RGDK/neuropilin-1 (Nrp-1) receptor interactions and are then released from endosomes. (A) Flow cytometry analysis of the cellular uptake of siRNA/AD/E16G6RGDK complexes compared to siRNA/AD complexes using Cy5-labeled siRNA. (B) Flow cytometry analysis of the cellular uptake of siRNA/AD/E16G6RGDK complexes in the absence and presence of cyclic RGD (cRGD). (C) Confocal microscopic imaging of the cellular uptake of siRNA/AD/E16G6RGDK complexes in the absence and presence of Nrp-1-receptor antibody. (D) Confocal microscopic imaging of the endosomal escape of the siRNA/AD/E16G6RGDK complexes after incubation times of 0 (control), 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 h. Red channel image shows the Cy5-labeled siRNA/AD/E16G6RGDK complexes, green channel image shows the endosomes marked by LysoTracker red, and blue channel image shows the nuclei of PC-3 cells stained by DAPI (C) or Hoechst33342 (D). The siRNA/AD/E16G6RGDK complexes were formed using 50 nM siRNA, an N/P ratio of 10, and AD/peptide molar ratio of 5.0. Data are presented as mean ± SD. **, p ≤ 0.01 as calculated by Student’s t test.

After cellular uptake, it is important that the peptide-decorated delivery complexes are able to escape from the endosomes and release siRNA for subsequent gene silencing. We therefore further examined the endosomal escape of the fluorescent Cy5-siRNA/AD/E16G6RGDK complexes in the presence of LysoTracker, which fluorescently labels acidic compartments. As we can see in the confocal microscopic images (Figure 3D), after 0.5 h of incubation the fluorescent signals from the LysoTracker and the Cy5 dye colocalized in sharp and clear-cut spots, implying that the Cy5-siRNA/AD/E16G6RGDK complexes were entrapped in the endosomes. Notably, after 1.0 h of incubation, dispersed and smeared Cy5 fluorescent signals were observed, suggesting that the some of the Cy5-siRNA/AD/E16G6RGDK complexes had escaped from the endosomes into the cytoplasm. After 2.0 h, more of the Cy5 fluorescent signals were diffuse in the cytoplasm and there was less colocalization with the LysoTracker, indicating the successful escape of the Cy5-siRNA from the endosomes. Consequently, the peptide-decorated siRNA delivery complexes are able to circumvent endosome trapping and effectively release siRNA in the cytoplasm for subsequent gene silencing.

Targeted Delivery Increases Gene Silencing and Anticancer Activity in Vitro

We next compared the ability of the targeting peptide-decorated siRNA delivery complexes and the nondecorated ones to down-regulate Hsp27 in PC-3 prostate cancer cells. Using a low concentration (20 nM) of siRNA targeting Hsp27, a small chaperone protein involved in cancer cell proliferation and drug resistance, the peptide-coated siRNA/AD/E16G6RGDK complexes were significantly more effective than the noncoated siRNA/AD complexes at knocking down Hsp27 at the mRNA level (Figure 4A), leading to more than 90% inhibition of Hsp27 protein expression (Figure 4B). Of note, a significantly higher siRNA concentration (50 nM) was necessary to produce comparable effects using the generation 5 PAMAM dendrimer decorated with the same peptide. (36) This highlights that the peptide-coated delivery system effectively improved gene silencing. The enhanced down-regulation of Hsp27 by the targeting complexes was reduced in the presence of either cRGD or anti-Nrp-1-receptor antibody (Figure 4C), indicating that cRGD and anti-Nrp-1-receptor antibody competed with the peptide-coated nanoparticles for binding with integrin and Nrp-1 receptors, respectively. This again supports the view that the peptide-decorated delivery complexes indeed act via integrin- and Nrp-1 receptor-mediated targeting. Further assessment of in vitro anticancer activity using the MTT assay revealed that the peptide-decorated siRNA/AD/E16G6RGDK complexes drastically reduced the proliferation of PC-3 cells with respect to the noncoated siRNA/AD complexes (Figure 4D). Collectively, our results demonstrate that actively targeted delivery via the peptide-coated nanosystem is indeed more effective for siRNA-mediated gene silencing of Hsp27 and leads to a more pronounced reduction in proliferation than the nontargeted delivery system.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Targeted siRNA/AD/E16G6RGDK system is much more effective than the nontargeted siRNA/AD system for Hsp27 silencing and antiproliferation in PC-3 prostate cancer cells. Hsp27 silencing at (A) mRNA and (B) protein levels, determined using qRT-PCR and Western blotting, respectively. (C) The improved down-regulation of Hsp27 at the mRNA level by the targeting complexes is reduced in the presence of either cRGD or anti-Nrp-1-receptor antibody. (D) MTT assay of the antiproliferation effect of the complexes on PC-3 cells. Conditions used: 20 nM siRNA, N/P ratio of 10, AD/peptide molar ratio of 5.0. Data are presented as mean ± SD. **, p ≤ 0.01; ***, p ≤ 0.001 as calculated by Student’s t test.

Targeted Delivery Enhances Gene Silencing and Antitumor Activity in Vivo

To investigate the power of the targeting system for siRNA delivery in vivo, we used the PC-3 xenograft nude mouse model. We first assessed the tumor targeting capability of these formulations using fluorescent Cy5-labeled siRNA. Ex vivo imaging of isolated tumors showed that the targeting system siRNA/AD/E16G6RGDK had significantly higher mean florescence intensity (MFI) in tumors than the nontargeting system siRNA/AD (Figure 5A and B). This result demonstrates that decoration with the targeting peptide indeed enhanced the tumor targeting capability of the amphiphilic dendrimer in vivo.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Targeted siRNA/AD/E16G6RGDK delivery system (A, B) accumulates more efficiently in tumor tissues and (C, D) is much more potent than the nontargeted siRNA/AD system for gene silencing and anticancer activity in tumor xenograft mice. Cy5-siRNA/AD complexes and Cy5-siRNA/AD/E16G6RGDK complexes were administered to PC-3 xenograft mice via i.v. injection in PBS buffer (1.0 mg/kg siRNA, N/P ratio 5.0, AD/peptide molar ratio 5). (A) Fluorescence images of siRNAs accumulated in isolated tumors. (B) Fluorescence quantification analysis of tumors in (A) using imaging software. Data were normalized to the tumors from PBS-treated animals. PC-3 xenograft nude mice were administered twice per week with PBS buffer, siRNA/AD complexes, or siRNA/AD/E16G6RGDK complexes (0.25 mg/kg siRNA, N/P ratio 5.0, AD/peptide molar ratio 5). (C) Tumor growth assessed by measuring tumor size. (D) Cancer cell proliferation in tumor tissue revealed by immunohistochemistry using Ki67 staining. (E) Expression of Hsp27 protein in tumors quantified using Western blotting. (F) Mouse body weight monitoring during the treatment. Data are presented as mean ± SD. *, p ≤ 0.05; **, p ≤ 0.01, ***, p ≤ 0.001 as calculated by Student’s t test.

We further examined gene silencing and tumor growth inhibition with both targeting and nontargeting systems. The siRNA delivery complexes were administered twice per week for 4.0 weeks. It is worth mentioning that we applied a very low siRNA concentration of 0.25 mg/kg at an N/P ratio of 5, which is more than 10 times lower than that used when performing the same experiments using the covalent G5 PAMAM dendrimer, (36) i.e., the conventional siRNA concentration used for in vivo siRNA delivery in mice (3.0 mg/kg). Remarkably, the targeted siRNA/AD/E16G6RGDK delivery system reduced the tumor growth much more effectively than the nontargeted siRNA/AD system (Figure 5C). Also, immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis revealed that cancer cell proliferation was inhibited more efficiently in tumors from mice treated with the targeted siRNA/AD/E16G6RGDK complexes than in tumors from mice treated with nontargeted ones (Figure 5D). Further Western blotting analysis of the protein level of Hsp27 in tumor tissue (Figure 5E) confirmed that the silencing of Hsp27 was indeed more effective in mice treated with the targeted siRNA/AD/E16G6RGDK delivery system than the nontargeted one. All these data demonstrate that the targeted delivery approach is more potent in gene silencing than nontargeted delivery, and hence more effective in inhibiting cancer cell proliferation and retarding tumor growth in PC-3 xenografts. In addition, there was no alteration of the body weights of the mice (Figure 5F), which highlights the promising safety profile of this delivery system. Altogether, these results provide strong evidence for enhanced siRNA delivery specifically to cancer cells using the amphiphilic dendrimer AD-based delivery system equipped with the dual targeting peptide.

The Targeted Delivery System Is Safe and Devoid of Toxicity

The superior delivery capacity of the targeted delivery system motivated us to further evaluate its toxicity profile for eventual therapeutic applications. We performed the MTT assay, which measures cell metabolic activity and provides an indication of metabolic toxicity, and the LDH assay, which determines the membrane integrity by quantifying the lactate dehydrogenase released from cells into the extracellular medium. Results from both MTT and LDH assays using a nontargeting scramble siRNA control revealed that neither metabolic toxicity nor membrane damage was induced in cancer cells (PC-3 cells) (Figure 6A and B) and noncancer cells (HEK cells) (Figure 6C and D) after treatment with the targeted siRNA/AD/E16G6RGDK delivery system and the nontargeted one. Neither the targeted siRNA/AD/E16G6RGDK nanoparticles nor the nontargeted siRNA/AD nanoparticles caused any notable hemolytic toxicity at low concentrations. It is noteworthy that the targeted system caused significantly less hemolysis at high concentrations than the nontargeted system (Figure 6E). This finding indicates that coating the positively charged siRNA/AD complexes with the negatively charged E16G6RGDK peptide reduced the hemolytic toxicity. This may be ascribed to the decreased positive surface charge of the peptide-coated delivery system, as revealed by zeta potential measurement and molecular simulations described above.

Figure 6

Figure 6. In vitro toxicity assessment of the targeted siRNA/AD/E16G6RGDK delivery system versus the nontargeted siRNA/AD system. Toxicity assessment using the MTT assay and LDH assay for (A, B) PC-3 prostate cancer cells and (C, D) human embryonic kidney (HEK 293) cells (20 nM siRNA, N/P ratio of 10, AD/peptide molar ratio of 5.0). (E) Left panel: Hemolysis assay of the siRNA/AD complexes and the siRNA/AD/E16G6RGDK complexes in comparison with AD alone at different concentrations of AD (0.50, 1.0, 2.5, 5.0, and 10 μM), which correspond to siRNA concentrations of 10, 20, 50, 100, and 200 nM. Right panel: Quantitative analysis of hemolysis determined by UV absorption at 540 nm. Data are presented as mean ± SD. ***, p ≤ 0.001 as calculated by Student’s t test.

Furthermore, in healthy mice treated with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), the targeted delivery system siRNA/AD/E16G6RGDK and the nontargeted system siRNA/AD did not cause any signs of discomfort, unusual behavior, or body weight change when delivering the scrambled control siRNA. In addition, mice treated with either the targeted or the nontargeted siRNA/AD systems showed no evidence of induced inflammation, whereas mice treated with the positive control lipopolysaccharide (LPS) exhibited significantly elevated levels of inflammatory factors such as IL-6, INF-γ, TNF-α, GM-CSF, MCP-1, KC, and IL-1β (Figure 7A). Moreover, several major serum biochemistry parameters, including alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), total bilirubin (TBIL), urea, total protein (TP), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), triacylglycerol (TG), and total cholesterol (TCHO), remained at normal levels at 24 h postadministration, indicating that the main organs, including the liver and kidneys, function well after treatment with these formulations (Figure 7B). Histological analysis of the main organs collected at 24 h post-treatment revealed that both siRNA/AD and siRNA/AD/E16G6RGDK were devoid of acute toxicity since no significant pathological change was observed in any of the tissue sections (Figure 7C). All these data highlight that the targeted delivery system composed of AD and E16G6RGDK is safe, as judged by the lack of cytotoxic effects, acute toxicity, or inflammatory responses.

Figure 7

Figure 7. In vivo toxicity assessment of the targeted siRNA/AD/E16G6RGDK delivery system versus the nontargeted siRNA/AD system. (A) Cytokine response in mice determined by quantifying the serum levels of IL-6, INF-γ, TNF-α, GM-CSF, MCP-1, KC, and IL-1β at 3 h postinjection using Luminex-detection technology according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) was used as the positive control. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *, p < 0.05, ***, p < 0.001, versus PBS group, as calculated by Student’s t test. (B) Major serum biochemistry parameters measured in mouse serum collected at 24 h postinjection. Alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) are measured as U/L; total bilirubin (TBIL), urea, triacylglycerol (TG), and total cholesterol (TCHO) are measured as mmol/L; total protein (TP) is measured as g/L. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. (C) Histopathological analysis of major organs from mice treated with siRNA/AD and siRNA/AD/E16G6RGDK. Tissue samples were collected at 24 h postadministration. No significant histopathological changes were observed in any of the tissue sections. Images were enlarged 200 times with the microscope.

Conclusions

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

In this study, we established a novel system for targeted siRNA delivery based on the amphiphilic dendrimer AD equipped with the targeting peptide E16G6RGDK, which bears the dual-targeting warhead RGDK, the negatively charged oligo(glutamic acid) E16, and the neutral spacer oligo(glycine) G6. This peptide stably coated the positively charged siRNA/AD delivery complexes via electrostatic interaction with its negatively charged E16 segment. The so-formed nanoparticles were small, stable, and able to protect siRNA from degradation. Furthermore, the targeting segment RGDK was accessible for binding to and interacting with the integrin and the neuropilin-1 receptor molecules on the surface of PC-3 prostate cancer cells. This consequently led to specific and enhanced cellular uptake of siRNA followed by effective endosomal escape of the siRNA, which further promoted much stronger gene silencing and resulted in more potent anticancer activity than the nontargeted system in castration-resistant prostate cancer models in vitro and in vivo. In addition, in vitro cytotoxicity, acute in vivo toxicity, and induced in vivo inflammation were not observed for the targeted delivery system. These results indicate the potential of this targeting system for safe and functional siRNA delivery and consequent gene silencing and anticancer activity. This targeting system hence holds great promise for treating prostate cancer, in particular castration-resistant prostate cancer, for which there is no efficacious treatment yet.
It is worth mentioning that our amphiphilic dendrimer AD has been previously demonstrated to deliver siRNA to tumors in xenograft mice for successful gene silencing and anticancer activity. (22) Those results can mainly be attributed to passive tumor targeting via the enhanced permeation and retention effect in addition to the excellent delivery ability of AD. In this study, we equipped this siRNA delivery system with the dual targeting peptide, further imparting the capacity to specifically target cancer cells for improved gene silencing and hence much more potent anticancer activity at a significantly lower dosage of siRNA. This is the first report to explore a targeting strategy for self-assembling dendrimer-mediated siRNA delivery. Compared with our previous studies using conventional covalent dendrimers, (36,52) this amphiphilic dendrimer system has similar siRNA loading capacity but more than 10-fold greater potency for in vivo siRNA delivery and consequent antitumor activity. We expect that this approach using a dual targeting peptide to decorate the amphiphilic dendrimer-based delivery system (26,27) can be applied for siRNA delivery to develop RNAi-based personalized medicine against various cancers in general. We are actively working in this direction.

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/jacs.8b10021.

  • Materials and methods as well as all experimental protocols for TEM, DLS, computational details, ITC, cell uptake and endosome release, siRNA delivery, gene silencing, anticancer activity and toxicity, etc. (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Authors
    • Xiaoxuan Liu - State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicines and Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Drug Discovery for Metabolic Diseases, Center of Drug Discovery, Center of Advanced Pharmaceutics and Biomaterials, China Pharmaceutical University, 24 Tong Jia Xiang, 210009 Nanjing, People’s Republic of ChinaAix-Marseille Université, CNRS, Centre Interdisciplinaire de Nanoscience de Marseille, UMR 7325, “Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer”, 13288 Marseille, France Email: [email protected]
    • Ling Peng - Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS, Centre Interdisciplinaire de Nanoscience de Marseille, UMR 7325, “Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer”, 13288 Marseille, FranceOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-3990-5248 Email: [email protected]
  • Authors
    • Yiwen Dong - State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicines and Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Drug Discovery for Metabolic Diseases, Center of Drug Discovery, Center of Advanced Pharmaceutics and Biomaterials, China Pharmaceutical University, 24 Tong Jia Xiang, 210009 Nanjing, People’s Republic of China
    • Tianzhu Yu - Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS, Centre Interdisciplinaire de Nanoscience de Marseille, UMR 7325, “Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer”, 13288 Marseille, France
    • Ling Ding - Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS, Centre Interdisciplinaire de Nanoscience de Marseille, UMR 7325, “Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer”, 13288 Marseille, France
    • Erik Laurini - Molecular Biology and Nanotechnology Laboratory (MolBNL@UniTS), DEA, University of Trieste, 34127 Trieste, ItalyOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0001-6092-6532
    • Yuanyu Huang - Advanced Research Institute of Multidisciplinary Science and School of Life Science, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, People’s Republic of ChinaSchool of Pharmacy, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha 410208, People’s Republic of ChinaOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-3935-7245
    • Mengjie Zhang - Advanced Research Institute of Multidisciplinary Science and School of Life Science, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, People’s Republic of China
    • Yuhua Weng - Advanced Research Institute of Multidisciplinary Science and School of Life Science, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, People’s Republic of China
    • Shuting Lin - State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicines and Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Drug Discovery for Metabolic Diseases, Center of Drug Discovery, Center of Advanced Pharmaceutics and Biomaterials, China Pharmaceutical University, 24 Tong Jia Xiang, 210009 Nanjing, People’s Republic of China
    • Peng Chen - State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicines and Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Drug Discovery for Metabolic Diseases, Center of Drug Discovery, Center of Advanced Pharmaceutics and Biomaterials, China Pharmaceutical University, 24 Tong Jia Xiang, 210009 Nanjing, People’s Republic of China
    • Domenico Marson - Molecular Biology and Nanotechnology Laboratory (MolBNL@UniTS), DEA, University of Trieste, 34127 Trieste, Italy
    • Yifan Jiang - Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS, Centre Interdisciplinaire de Nanoscience de Marseille, UMR 7325, “Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer”, 13288 Marseille, France
    • Suzanne Giorgio - Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS, Centre Interdisciplinaire de Nanoscience de Marseille, UMR 7325, “Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer”, 13288 Marseille, France
    • Sabrina Pricl - Molecular Biology and Nanotechnology Laboratory (MolBNL@UniTS), DEA, University of Trieste, 34127 Trieste, Italy
    • Palma Rocchi - Inserm, Aix-Marseille Université, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, CNRS, CRCM, 13009 Marseille, France
  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Financial support from ARTP (L.P., X.L.), La Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer (EL2016.LNCC/LPP) (L.P.), and the French National Research Agency under the frame of EuroNanoMed II (ANR-15-ENM2-0006-02, ANR-16-ENM2-0004-02) (L.P.), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51773227, 81701815) (X.L.), Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20170735) (X.L.), Recruitment Program for Youth Talents (X.L.), the Program for Jiangsu Province Innovative Research Talents (X.L.), the Program for Jiangsu Province Innovative Research Team (X.L.), the Jiangsu Specially-Appointed Professors Program (X.L.), the Six Talent Peaks Project of Jiangsu Province of China (X.L.), the State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicines at China Pharmaceutical University (SKLNMKF201703, SKLNMZZRC201804) (L.P., X.L.), the Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC, IG 17413 to S.P.), Beijing Institute of Technology Research Fund Program for Young Scholars (Y.H.), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Y.H.), the Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (2018JJ1019) (Y.H.), and Huxiang Young Talent Program (Y.H.) is gratefully acknowledged. L.D. is supported by the China Scholarship Council and Y.J. by the Fondation de Recherche Médicale (SPF20160936294).

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 52 other publications.

  1. 1
    Fire, A.; Xu, S.; Montgomery, M.; Kostas, S.; Driver, S.; Mello, C. Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 1998, 391, 806811,  DOI: 10.1038/35888
  2. 2
    Hannon, G. RNA interference. Nature 2002, 418, 244251,  DOI: 10.1038/418244a
  3. 3
    Castanotto, D.; Rossi, J. The promises and pitfalls of RNA-interference-based therapeutics. Nature 2009, 457, 426433,  DOI: 10.1038/nature07758
  4. 4
    Haussecker, D.; Kay, M. RNA interference. Drugging RNAi. Science 2015, 347, 10691070,  DOI: 10.1126/science.1252967
  5. 5
    Wittrup, A.; Lieberman, J. Knocking down disease: a progress report on siRNA therapeutics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2015, 16, 543552,  DOI: 10.1038/nrg3978
  6. 6
    Ledford, H. Gene-silencing technology gets first drug approval after 20-year wait. Nature 2018, 560, 291292,  DOI: 10.1038/d41586-018-05867-7
  7. 7
    Whitehead, K.; Langer, R.; Anderson, D. Knocking down barriers: advances in siRNA delivery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2009, 8, 129138,  DOI: 10.1038/nrd2742
  8. 8
    Kanasty, R.; Dorkin, J.; Vegas, A.; Anderson, D. Delivery materials for siRNA therapeutics. Nat. Mater. 2013, 12, 967977,  DOI: 10.1038/nmat3765
  9. 9
    Yin, H.; Kanasty, R.; Eltoukhy, A.; Vegas, A.; Dorkin, J.; Anderson, D. Non-viral vectors for gene-based therapy. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2014, 15, 541555,  DOI: 10.1038/nrg3763
  10. 10
    Juliano, R. The delivery of therapeutic oligonucleotides. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, 65186548,  DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkw236
  11. 11
    Pack, D.; Hoffman, A.; Pun, S.; Stayton, P. Design and development of polymers for gene delivery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2005, 4, 581593,  DOI: 10.1038/nrd1775
  12. 12
    Lachelt, U.; Wagner, E. Nucleic acid therapeutics using polyplexes: a journey of 50 years (and beyond). Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 1104311078,  DOI: 10.1021/cr5006793
  13. 13
    Tseng, Y.; Mozumdar, S.; Huang, L. Lipid-based systemic delivery of siRNA. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2009, 61, 721731,  DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2009.03.003
  14. 14
    Wagner, E. Polymers for siRNA delivery: inspired by viruses to be targeted, dynamic, and precise. Acc. Chem. Res. 2012, 45, 10051013,  DOI: 10.1021/ar2002232
  15. 15
    Wittrup, A.; Ai, A.; Liu, X.; Hamar, P.; Trifonova, R.; Charisse, K.; Manoharan, M.; Kirchhausen, T.; Lieberman, J. Visualizing lipid-formulated siRNA release from endosomes and target gene knockdown. Nat. Biotechnol. 2015, 33, 870876,  DOI: 10.1038/nbt.3298
  16. 16
    Lee, C.; MacKay, J.; Frechet, J.; Szoka, F. Designing dendrimers for biological applications. Nat. Biotechnol. 2005, 23, 15171526,  DOI: 10.1038/nbt1171
  17. 17
    Khandare, J.; Calderon, M.; Dagia, N.; Haag, R. Multifunctional dendritic polymers in nanomedicine: opportunities and challenges. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 28242848,  DOI: 10.1039/C1CS15242D
  18. 18
    Liu, X.; Rocchi, P.; Peng, L. Dendrimers as non-viral vectors for siRNA delivery. New J. Chem. 2012, 36, 256263,  DOI: 10.1039/C1NJ20408D
  19. 19
    Liu, X.; Liu, C.; Catapano, C.; Peng, L.; Zhou, J.; Rocchi, P. Structurally flexible triethanolamine-core poly(amidoamine) dendrimers as effective nanovectors to deliver RNAi-based therapeutics. Biotechnol. Adv. 2014, 32, 844852,  DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.08.001
  20. 20
    Reebye, V.; Sætrom, P.; Mintz, P.; Huang, K.; Swiderski, P.; Peng, L.; Liu, C.; Liu, X.; Lindkaer-Jensen, S.; Zacharoulis, D. Novel RNA oligonucleotide improves liver function and inhibits liver carcinogenesis in vivo. Hepatology 2014, 59, 216227,  DOI: 10.1002/hep.26669
  21. 21
    Yu, T.; Liu, X.; Bolcato-Bellemin, A.; Wang, Y.; Liu, C.; Erbacher, P.; Qu, F.; Rocchi, P.; Behr, J.; Peng, L. An amphiphilic dendrimer for effective delivery of small interfering RNA and gene silencing in vitro and in vivo. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 84788484,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201203920
  22. 22
    Liu, X.; Zhou, J.; Yu, T.; Chen, C.; Cheng, Q.; Sengupta, K.; Huang, Y.; Li, H.; Liu, C.; Wang, Y.; Posocco, P.; Wang, M.; Cui, Q.; Giorgio, S.; Fermeglia, M.; Qu, F.; Pricl, S.; Shi, Y.; Liang, Z.; Rocchi, P.; Rossi, J.; Peng, L. Adaptive amphiphilic dendrimer-based nanoassemblies as robust and versatile siRNA delivery systems. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 1182211827,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201406764
  23. 23
    Chen, C.; Posocco, P.; Liu, X.; Cheng, Q.; Laurini, E.; Zhou, J.; Liu, C.; Wang, Y.; Tang, J.; Col, V.; Yu, T.; Giorgio, S.; Fermeglia, M.; Qu, F.; Liang, Z.; Rossi, J.; Liu, M.; Rocchi, P.; Pricl, S.; Peng, L. siRNA delivery: mastering dendrimer self-assembly for efficient siRNA delivery: from conceptual design to in vivo efficient gene silencing. Small 2016, 12, 36673676,  DOI: 10.1002/smll.201503866
  24. 24
    Liu, X.; Wang, Y.; Chen, C.; Tintaru, A.; Cao, Y.; Liu, J.; Ziarelli, F.; Tang, J.; Guo, H.; Rosas, R.; Giorgio, S.; Charle, L.; Rocchi, P.; Peng, L. A fluorinated bola-amphiphilic dendrimer for on-demand delivery of siRNA, via specific response to reactive oxygen species. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2016, 26, 85948603,  DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201604192
  25. 25
    Percec, V.; Wilson, D.; Leowanawat, P.; Wilson, C.; Hughes, A.; Kaucher, M.; Hammer, D.; Levine, D.; Kim, A.; Bates, F. Self-assembly of Janus dendrimers into uniform dendrimersomes and other complex architectures. Science 2010, 328, 10091014,  DOI: 10.1126/science.1185547
  26. 26
    Sherman, S.; Xiao, Q.; Percec, V. Mimicking complex biological membranes and their programmable glycan ligands with dendrimersomes and glycodendrimersomes. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 65386631,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00097
  27. 27
    Bertrand, N.; Wu, J.; Xu, X.; Kamaly, N.; Farokhzad, O. Cancer nanotechnology: the impact of passive and active targeting in the era of modern cancer biology. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2014, 66, 225,  DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2013.11.009
  28. 28
    Dai, L.; Liu, J.; Luo, Z.; Li, M.; Cai, K. Tumor therapy: targeted drug delivery system. J. Mater. Chem. B 2016, 4, 67586772,  DOI: 10.1039/C6TB01743F
  29. 29
    Davis, M.; Zuckerman, J.; Choi, C.; Seligson, D.; Tolcher, A.; Alabi, C.; Yen, Y.; Heidel, J.; Ribas, A. Evidence of RNAi in humans from systemically administered siRNA via targeted nanoparticles. Nature 2010, 464, 10671070,  DOI: 10.1038/nature08956
  30. 30
    Sugahara, K.; Teesalu, T.; Karmali, P.; Kotamraju, V.; Agemy, L.; Greenwald, D.; Ruoslahti, E. Co-administration of a tumor-penetrating peptide enhances the efficacy of cancer drugs. Science 2010, 328, 10311035,  DOI: 10.1126/science.1183057
  31. 31
    Wong, P.; Tang, K.; Coulter, A.; Tan, S.; Baker, J.; Choi, S. Multivalent dendrimer vectors with DNA intercalation motifs for gene delivery. Biomacromolecules 2014, 15, 41344415,  DOI: 10.1021/bm501169s
  32. 32
    Sugahara, K.; Teesalu, T.; Karmali, P.; Kotamraju, V.; Agemy, L.; Girard, O.; Hanahan, D.; Mattrey, R.; Ruoslahti, E. Tissue-penetrating delivery of compounds and nanoparticles into tumors. Cancer Cell 2009, 16, 510520,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.10.013
  33. 33
    Desgrosellier, J.; Cheresh, D. Integrins in cancer: biological implications and therapeutic opportunities. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2010, 10, 922,  DOI: 10.1038/nrc2748
  34. 34
    Marelli, U.; Rechenmacher, F.; Sobahi, T.; Mas-Moruno, C.; Kessler, H. Tumor targeting via integrin ligands. Front. Oncol. 2013, 3, 222233,  DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2013.00222
  35. 35
    Teesalu, T.; Sugahara, K.; Kotamraju, V.; Ruoslahti, E. C-end rule peptides mediate neuropilin-1-dependent cell, vascular, and tissue penetration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2009, 106, 1615716162,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0908201106
  36. 36
    Liu, X.; Liu, C.; Chen, C.; Bentobji, M.; Cheillan, F.; Piana, J.; Qu, F.; Rocchi, P.; Peng, L. Targeted delivery of Dicer-substrate siRNAs using a dual targeting peptide decorated dendrimer delivery system. Nanomedicine 2014, 10, 16271636,  DOI: 10.1016/j.nano.2014.05.008
  37. 37
    Svenson, S. The dendrimer paradox--high medical expectations but poor clinical translation. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 46, 41314144,  DOI: 10.1039/C5CS00288E
  38. 38
    Cao, Y.; Liu, X.; Peng, L. Molecular engineering of dendrimer nanovecters for siRNA delivery and gene silencing. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. 2017, 11, 663675,  DOI: 10.1007/s11705-017-1623-5
  39. 39
    Zhou, J.; Liu, J.; Cheng, C.; Patel, T.; Weller, C.; Piepmeier, J.; Jiang, Z.; Saltzman, W. Biodegradable poly(amine-co-ester) terpolymers for targeted gene delivery. Nat. Mater. 2012, 11, 8290,  DOI: 10.1038/nmat3187
  40. 40
    Grandclement, C.; Borg, C. Neuropilins: a new target for cancer therapy. Cancers 2011, 3, 18991928,  DOI: 10.3390/cancers3021899
  41. 41
    Siegel, R.; Miller, K.; Jemal, A. Cancer Statistics, 2017. Ca-Cancer J. Clin. 2017, 67, 730,  DOI: 10.3322/caac.21387
  42. 42
    Grasso, C.; Wu, Y.; Robinson, D.; Cao, X.; Dhanasekaran, S.; Khan, A.; Quist, M.; Jing, X.; Lonigro, R.; Brenner, J.; Asangani, I.; Ateeq, B.; Chun, S.; Siddiqui, J.; Sam, L.; Anstett, M.; Mehra, R.; Prensner, J.; Palanisamy, N.; Ryslik, G.; Vandin, F.; Raphael, B.; Kunju, L.; Rhodes, D.; Pienta, K.; Chinnaiyan, A.; Tomlins, S. The mutational landscape of lethal castration-resistant prostate cancer. Nature 2012, 487, 239243,  DOI: 10.1038/nature11125
  43. 43
    Gundem, G.; Van, P.; Kremeyer, B.; Alexandrov, L.; Tubio, J.; Papaemmanuil, E.; Brewer, D.; Kallio, H.; Hoegnas, G.; Annala, M.; Kivinummi, K.; Goody, V.; Latimer, C.; O’Meara, S.; Dawson, K.; Isaacs, W.; Emmert-Buck, M.; Nykter, M.; Foster, C.; Kote-Jarai, Z.; Easton, D.; Whitaker, H.; Neal, D.; Cooper, C.; Eeles, R.; Visakorpi, T.; Campbell, P.; McDermott, U.; Wedge, D.; Bova, G. The evolutionary history of lethal metastatic prostate cancer. Nature 2015, 520, 353357,  DOI: 10.1038/nature14347
  44. 44
    Lorente, D.; Mateo, J.; Perez-Lopez, R.; de, J.; Attard, G. Sequencing of agents in castration-resistant prostate cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2015, 16, 279292,  DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70033-1
  45. 45
    Cornford, P.; Dodson, A.; Parsons, K.; Desmond, A.; Woolfenden, A.; Fordham, M.; Neoptolemos, J.; Ke, Y.; Foster, C. Heat shock protein expression independently predicts clinical outcome in prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 2000, 60, 70997105
  46. 46
    Rocchi, P.; So, A.; Kojima, S.; Signaevsky, M.; Beraldi, E.; Fazli, L.; Hurtado-Coll, A.; Yamanaka, K.; Gleave, M. Heat shock protein 27 increases after androgen ablation and plays a cytoprotective role in hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 2004, 64, 65956602,  DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-3998
  47. 47
    Jego, G.; Hazoume, A.; Seigneuric, R.; Garrido, C. Targeting heat shock proteins in cancer. Cancer Lett. 2013, 332, 275285,  DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2010.10.014
  48. 48
    Wei, T.; Chen, C.; Liu, J.; Liu, C.; Posocco, P.; Liu, X.; Cheng, Q.; Huo, S.; Liang, Z.; Fermeglia, M.; Pricl, S.; Liang, X.; Rocchic, P.; Peng, L. Anticancer drug nanomicelles formed by self-assembling amphiphilic dendrimer to combat cancer drug resistance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2015, 112, 29782983,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1418494112
  49. 49
    Posocco, P.; Liu, X.; Laurini, E.; Marson, D.; Chen, C.; Liu, C.; Fermeglia, M.; Rocchi, P.; Pricl, S.; Peng, L. Impact of siRNA overhangs for dendrimer-mediated siRNA delivery and gene silencing. Mol. Pharmaceutics 2013, 10, 32623273,  DOI: 10.1021/mp400329g
  50. 50
    Albanyan, B.; Laurini, E.; Posocco, P.; Pricl, S.; Smith, D. Self-assembled multivalent (SAMul) polyanion binding—impact of hydrophobic modifications in the micellar core on DNA and heparin binding at the peripheral cationic ligands. Chem. - Eur. J. 2017, 23, 63916397,  DOI: 10.1002/chem.201700177
  51. 51
    Fechner, L.; Albanyan, B.; Vieira, V.; Laurini, E.; Posocco, P.; Pricl, S.; Smith, D. Electrostatic binding of polyanions using self-assembled multivalent (SAMul) ligand displays - structure-activity effects on DNA/heparin binding. Chem. Sci. 2016, 7, 46534659,  DOI: 10.1039/C5SC04801J
  52. 52
    Qi, C.; Su, Y.; Peng, Y.; Tian, E.; Sun, G.; Zhou, J.; Sun, G.; Liu, X.; Chao, C.; Murai, K.; Zhao, C.; Azizian, K.; Yang, L.; Warden, C.; Wu, X.; D’Apuzzo, M.; Brown, C.; Badie, B.; Peng, L.; Riggs, D.; Rossi, J.; Shi, Y. Downregulation of TLX induces TET3 expression and inhibits glioblastoma stem cell self-renewal and tumorigenesis. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 1063710651,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10637

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article is cited by 171 publications.

  1. Yue Gao, Aiyu Li, Yanying Li, Honghua Guo, Liangyu He, Kangan Li, Dzmitry Shcharbin, Xiangyang Shi, Mingwu Shen. Dendrimer/Copper(II) Complex-Mediated siRNA Delivery Disrupts Lactate Metabolism to Reprogram the Local Immune Microenvironment against Tumor Growth and Metastasis. Biomacromolecules 2024, 25 (12) , 7995-8005. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.4c01249
  2. Yuki Koba, Masahiko Nakamoto, Masanori Nagao, Yoshiko Miura, Michiya Matsusaki. Intrinsic Synergy and Selectivity for the Inhibition of Cancer Cell Growth Generated by a Polymer Ligand of Proximal Enzymes. Nano Letters 2024, 24 (45) , 14206-14214. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c03334
  3. Andrea Mio, Domenico Marson, Gabriele Cavalieri, Maurizio Fermeglia, Erik Laurini, Sabrina Pricl. Beyond the Veil: Free Energy Profiles and Partition Coefficients for Antimelanoma Drugs in Self-Assembled Nanomicelles via COSMOmic and Atomistic Molecular Dynamics Simulations. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data 2024, 69 (10) , 3450-3461. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jced.4c00076
  4. Weiqiang Zhou, Zefeng Long, Chuan Xu, Junge Zhang, Xin Zhou, Xianghai Song, Pengwei Huo, Yi Guo, Wei Xue, Quan Wang, Chen Zhou. Advances in Functionalized Biocomposites of Living Cells Combined with Metal–Organic Frameworks. Langmuir 2024, 40 (29) , 14749-14765. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.4c00404
  5. Dapeng Zhang, Qi Xiao, Mehrnoush Rahimzadeh, Matthew Liu, Cesar Rodriguez-Emmenegger, Yusuke Miyazaki, Wataru Shinoda, Virgil Percec. Self-Assembly of Glycerol-Amphiphilic Janus Dendrimers Amplifies and Indicates Principles for the Selection of Stereochemistry by Biological Membranes. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2023, 145 (7) , 4311-4323. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.3c00389
  6. Zhiqing Zhang, Dongyan Xu, Jiawei Wang, Ruyan Zhang, Huan Du, Ting Zhou, Xiufeng Wang, Fang Wang. Rolling Circle Amplification-Based DNA Nano-Assembly for Targeted Drug Delivery and Gene Therapy. Biomacromolecules 2023, 24 (1) , 439-448. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.2c01271
  7. Dokkari Nagalaxmi Yadav, Mohammad Sadik Ali, Ajinkya Madhukar Thanekar, Sunil Venkanna Pogu, Aravind Kumar Rengan. Recent Advancements in the Design of Nanodelivery Systems of siRNA for Cancer Therapy. Molecular Pharmaceutics 2022, 19 (12) , 4506-4526. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.2c00811
  8. Yuki Koba, Masahiko Nakamoto, Michiya Matsusaki. Fabrication of a Polymeric Inhibitor of Proximal Metabolic Enzymes in Hypoxia for Synergistic Inhibition of Cancer Cell Proliferation, Survival, and Migration. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2022, 14 (46) , 51790-51797. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c16454
  9. Wathsala Liyanage, Tony Wu, Sujatha Kannan, Rangaramanujam M. Kannan. Dendrimer–siRNA Conjugates for Targeted Intracellular Delivery in Glioblastoma Animal Models. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2022, 14 (41) , 46290-46303. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c13129
  10. Jiaxuan Chen, Dandan Zhu, Xiaoxuan Liu, Ling Peng. Amphiphilic Dendrimer Vectors for RNA Delivery: State-of-the-Art and Future Perspective. Accounts of Materials Research 2022, 3 (5) , 484-497. https://doi.org/10.1021/accountsmr.1c00272
  11. Wei Guo, Wenchang Liu, Pengqi Wan, Hao Wang, Chunsheng Xiao, Li Chen, Xuesi Chen. Cationic Amphiphilic Dendrons with Anticancer Activity. ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering 2022, 8 (5) , 2121-2130. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c00181
  12. Dapeng Zhang, Elena N. Atochina-Vasserman, Juncheng Lu, Devendra S. Maurya, Qi Xiao, Matthew Liu, Jasper Adamson, Nathan Ona, Erin K. Reagan, Houping Ni, Drew Weissman, Virgil Percec. The Unexpected Importance of the Primary Structure of the Hydrophobic Part of One-Component Ionizable Amphiphilic Janus Dendrimers in Targeted mRNA Delivery Activity. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2022, 144 (11) , 4746-4753. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c00273
  13. Hao Wang, Ning Liu, Fuxu Yang, Nannan Hu, Mingyue Wang, Meiying Cui, Nico Bruns, Xingang Guan. Bioengineered Protein Nanocage by Small Heat Shock Proteins Delivering mTERT siRNA for Enhanced Colorectal Cancer Suppression. ACS Applied Bio Materials 2022, 5 (3) , 1330-1340. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.1c01221
  14. Siming Huang, Wangshu Zhu, Fang Zhang, Guosheng Chen, Xiaoxue Kou, Xieqing Yang, Gangfeng Ouyang, Jun Shen. Silencing of Pyruvate Kinase M2 via a Metal–Organic Framework Based Theranostic Gene Nanomedicine for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Therapy. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2021, 13 (48) , 56972-56987. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c18053
  15. Dapeng Zhang, Elena N. Atochina-Vasserman, Devendra S. Maurya, Matthew Liu, Qi Xiao, Juncheng Lu, George Lauri, Nathan Ona, Erin K. Reagan, Houping Ni, Drew Weissman, Virgil Percec. Targeted Delivery of mRNA with One-Component Ionizable Amphiphilic Janus Dendrimers. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2021, 143 (43) , 17975-17982. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c09585
  16. Dapeng Zhang, Elena N. Atochina-Vasserman, Devendra S. Maurya, Ning Huang, Qi Xiao, Nathan Ona, Matthew Liu, Hamna Shahnawaz, Houping Ni, Kyunghee Kim, Margaret M. Billingsley, Darrin J. Pochan, Michael J. Mitchell, Drew Weissman, Virgil Percec. One-Component Multifunctional Sequence-Defined Ionizable Amphiphilic Janus Dendrimer Delivery Systems for mRNA. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2021, 143 (31) , 12315-12327. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c05813
  17. Mingshu Chen, Yunqiu Miao, Kun Qian, Xin Zhou, Linmiao Guo, Yu Qiu, Rui Wang, Yong Gan, Xinxin Zhang. Detachable Liposomes Combined Immunochemotherapy for Enhanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Treatment through Reprogramming of Tumor-Associated Macrophages. Nano Letters 2021, 21 (14) , 6031-6041. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c01210
  18. Lei Chen, Gaigai Li, Xingxing Wang, Jinbo Li, Yan Zhang. Spherical Nucleic Acids for Near-Infrared Light-Responsive Self-Delivery of Small-Interfering RNA and Antisense Oligonucleotide. ACS Nano 2021, 15 (7) , 11929-11939. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.1c03072
  19. Haisi Dong, Guangqi Song, Danhui Ma, Tiedong Wang, Shisong Jing, Haimiao Yang, Ye Tao, Yong Tang, Yan Shi, Zhen Dai, Ji-min Zhu, Taotao Liu, Bingmei Wang, Xiangyang Leng, Xizhong Shen, Changfeng Zhu, Yicheng Zhao. Improved Antiviral Activity of Classical Swine Fever Virus-Targeted siRNA by Tetrahedral Framework Nucleic Acid-Enhanced Delivery. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2021, 13 (25) , 29416-29423. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c08143
  20. Qiuhong Zhang, Junmin Zhang, Jun Song, Yizhen Liu, Xiangzhong Ren, Yanli Zhao. Protein-Based Nanomedicine for Therapeutic Benefits of Cancer. ACS Nano 2021, 15 (5) , 8001-8038. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.1c00476
  21. Jiangfan Cao, Orysia T. Zaremba, Qi Lei, Evelyn Ploetz, Stefan Wuttke, Wei Zhu. Artificial Bioaugmentation of Biomacromolecules and Living Organisms for Biomedical Applications. ACS Nano 2021, 15 (3) , 3900-3926. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.0c10144
  22. Serge Mignani, Xiangyang Shi, Maria Zablocka, Jean-Pierre Majoral. Dendritic Macromolecular Architectures: Dendrimer-Based Polyion Complex Micelles. Biomacromolecules 2021, 22 (2) , 262-274. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.0c01645
  23. Yichuan Zhang, Muhammed Üçüncü, Alessia Gambardella, Assel Baibek, Jin Geng, Shuo Zhang, Jessica Clavadetscher, Inga Litzen, Mark Bradley, Annamaria Lilienkampf. Bioorthogonal Swarming: In Situ Generation of Dendrimers. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2020, 142 (52) , 21615-21621. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.0c07869
  24. Zhenbin Lyu, Ling Ding, Aura Tintaru, Ling Peng. Self-Assembling Supramolecular Dendrimers for Biomedical Applications: Lessons Learned from Poly(amidoamine) Dendrimers. Accounts of Chemical Research 2020, 53 (12) , 2936-2949. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.0c00589
  25. Yanjing Yang, Yao He, Zhiwei Deng, Jiacheng Li, Jin Huang, Shian Zhong. Intelligent Nanoprobe: Acid-Responsive Drug Release and In Situ Evaluation of Its Own Therapeutic Effect. Analytical Chemistry 2020, 92 (18) , 12371-12378. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.0c02099
  26. Xiyu Ke, Lillie Shelton, Yizong Hu, Yining Zhu, Emily Chow, Haoyu Tang, José Luis Santos, Hai-Quan Mao. Surface-Functionalized PEGylated Nanoparticles Deliver Messenger RNA to Pulmonary Immune Cells. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2020, 12 (32) , 35835-35844. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c08268
  27. Raut Bholakant, Hongliang Qian, Junmei Zhang, Xin Huang, Dechun Huang, Jan Feijen, Yinan Zhong, Wei Chen. Recent Advances of Polycationic siRNA Vectors for Cancer Therapy. Biomacromolecules 2020, 21 (8) , 2966-2982. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.0c00438
  28. Mengjie Zhang, Yuhua Weng, Ziyang Cao, Shuai Guo, Bo Hu, Mei Lu, Weisheng Guo, Tongren Yang, Chunhui Li, Xianzhu Yang, Yuanyu Huang. ROS-Activatable siRNA-Engineered Polyplex for NIR-Triggered Synergistic Cancer Treatment. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2020, 12 (29) , 32289-32300. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c06614
  29. Marc Heitz, Susanna Zamolo, Sacha Javor, Jean-Louis Reymond. Fluorescent Peptide Dendrimers for siRNA Transfection: Tracking pH Responsive Aggregation, siRNA Binding, and Cell Penetration. Bioconjugate Chemistry 2020, 31 (6) , 1671-1684. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.0c00231
  30. Wei Zhou, Guogui Sun, Zhen Zhang, Libo Zhao, Li Xu, Hongyu Yuan, Shumu Li, Zaizai Dong, Yongmei Song, Xiaohong Fang. Proteasome-Independent Protein Knockdown by Small-Molecule Inhibitor for the Undruggable Lung Adenocarcinoma. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2019, 141 (46) , 18492-18499. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b08777
  31. Jiantao Yu, Jing Li, Shiyao Zhai, Li Lin, Kui Wang, Bin Tang, Hong Meng, Leilei Tian. Enzymatically Synthesized DNA Polymer as Co-carrier for Enhanced RNA Interference. ACS Applied Bio Materials 2019, 2 (11) , 5204-5215. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.9b00862
  32. Rachit Sapra, Ram P. Verma, Govind P. Maurya, Sameer Dhawan, Jisha Babu, V. Haridas. Designer Peptide and Protein Dendrimers: A Cross-Sectional Analysis. Chemical Reviews 2019, 119 (21) , 11391-11441. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00153
  33. Natesan Thirumalaivasan, Parthiban Venkatesan, Ping-Shan Lai, Shu-Pao Wu. In Vitro and In Vivo Approach of Hydrogen-Sulfide-Responsive Drug Release Driven by Azide-Functionalized Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles. ACS Applied Bio Materials 2019, 2 (9) , 3886-3896. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.9b00481
  34. Marc Heitz, Sacha Javor, Tamis Darbre, Jean-Louis Reymond. Stereoselective pH Responsive Peptide Dendrimers for siRNA Transfection. Bioconjugate Chemistry 2019, 30 (8) , 2165-2182. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.9b00403
  35. Yajun Wang, Tian Zhang, Cuilan Hou, Menghang Zu, Yi Lu, Xianbin Ma, Die Jia, Peng Xue, Yuejun Kang, Zhigang Xu. Mitochondria-Specific Anticancer Drug Delivery Based on Reduction-Activated Polyprodrug for Enhancing the Therapeutic Effect of Breast Cancer Chemotherapy. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2019, 11 (32) , 29330-29340. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b10211
  36. Janhavi Bhavsar, Kaustubh Kasture, Bhagyashree V Salvi, Pravin Shende. Strategies for transportation of peptides across the skin for treatment of multiple diseases. Therapeutic Delivery 2025, 16 (1) , 63-86. https://doi.org/10.1080/20415990.2024.2411943
  37. Maya Beena, Purnimajayasree Ramesh, Arunkumar Palaniappan. Poly(amidoamine)-based dendrimers for biomedical applications. 2025, 105-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-95233-0.00017-0
  38. Wangwang Zhang, Leyang Song, Yi Zhou, Jishang Sun, Cuiyao Li, Baoqin Han, Jing Chang, Baosan Han, Ting Wang. Study on the inhibition of non-small cell lung cancer mediated by chitosan-based gene carrier delivering STAT3-shRNA. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 2025, 284 , 138211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.138211
  39. Jose Garcia Coll, Pauline Trousselier, Sachin Dattram Pawar, Yannick Bessin, Laure Lichon, Jeanne Chain Leblond, Emmanuelle Sachon, Nadir Bettache, Sébastien Ulrich. Amphiphilic Dynamic Covalent Polymer Vectors of siRNA. Chemical Science 2025, https://doi.org/10.1039/D4SC07668K
  40. Caden M. Henningfield, Neelakshi Soni, Ryan W. Lee, Rishi Sharma, Jeffrey L. Cleland, Kim N. Green. Selective targeting and modulation of plaque associated microglia via systemic hydroxyl dendrimer administration in an Alzheimer’s disease mouse model. Alzheimer's Research & Therapy 2024, 16 (1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-024-01470-3
  41. Bilan Wang, Shiqi Hu, Yan Teng, Junli Chen, Haoyuan Wang, Yezhen Xu, Kaiyu Wang, Jianguo Xu, Yongzhong Cheng, Xiang Gao. Current advance of nanotechnology in diagnosis and treatment for malignant tumors. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy 2024, 9 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-024-01889-y
  42. Philemon Ubanako, Sheefa Mirza, Paul Ruff, Clement Penny. Exosome-mediated delivery of siRNA molecules in cancer therapy: triumphs and challenges. Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences 2024, 11 https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2024.1447953
  43. Nazgol Karimi Dastgerdi, Nazanin Karimi Dastgerdi, Hulya Bayraktutan, Gabriella Costabile, Fatemeh Atyabi, Rassoul Dinarvand, Giuseppe Longobardi, Cameron Alexander, Claudia Conte. Enhancing siRNA cancer therapy: Multifaceted strategies with lipid and polymer-based carrier systems. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 2024, 663 , 124545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2024.124545
  44. Amrita Ghosh Majumdar, Biswajit Pany, Sankha Subhra Parua, Debdeepto Mukherjee, Agnihotri Panda, Madhuchhanda Mohanty, Biswadeep Das, Satyabrata Si, Priti S. Mohanty. Stimuli-Responsive Nanogel/Microgel Hybrids as Targeted Drug Delivery Systems: A Comprehensive Review. BioNanoScience 2024, 14 (3) , 3496-3521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12668-024-01577-9
  45. Vildan Torun, Elif Degerli, Demet Cansaran-Duman. Revealing the Molecular Signatures of miR-185-5p on Breast Cancer Cells Using Proteomic Analysis. Protein & Peptide Letters 2024, 31 (9) , 681-695. https://doi.org/10.2174/0109298665322427240906060626
  46. Lingxiao Xu, Zhenxuan Shao, Xia Fang, Zengfeng Xin, Shenzhi Zhao, Hongbo Zhang, Yu Zhang, Wenbiao Zheng, Xiaohua Yu, Zengjie Zhang, Lingling Sun. Exploring precision treatments in immune‐mediated inflammatory diseases: Harnessing the infinite potential of nucleic acid delivery. Exploration 2024, 21 https://doi.org/10.1002/EXP.20230165
  47. Rohit Bhatia, Amandeep Singh, Sukhwinder Singh, Navneesh, Ravindra Kumar Rawal. Emerging trends in nano-carrier based gene delivery systems for targeted cancer therapy. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology 2024, 95 , 105546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2024.105546
  48. Jingting Wu, Xiaoqi Zheng, Wenqing Lin, Linhuan Chen, Zai‐Sheng Wu. Persistent Targeting DNA Nanocarrier Made of 3D Structural Unit Assembled from Only One Basic Multi‐Palindromic Oligonucleotide for Precise Gene Cancer Therapy. Advanced Healthcare Materials 2024, 13 (11) https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202303865
  49. Ehsan Lotfi, Azam Kholghi, Fereshteh Golab, Ali Mohammadi, Mahmood Barati. Circulating miRNAs and lncRNAs serve as biomarkers for early colorectal cancer diagnosis. Pathology - Research and Practice 2024, 255 , 155187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prp.2024.155187
  50. Saurabh Shah, Paras Famta, Dadi A. Srinivasarao, Syed Shahrukh, Naitik Jain, Akshay Shinde, Sajja Bhanu Prasad, Ganesh Vambhurkar, Giriraj Pandey, Rajendra Kumar, Shailendra Saraf, Saurabh Srivastava. Nanomedicine-RNAi interface: Architypes in prostate cancer therapeutics. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology 2024, 92 , 105349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2024.105349
  51. K Sai Manogna, B Deva Prasad Raju, G Rajasekhara Reddy, Parashuram Kallem, Mannur Ismail Shaik, N John Sushma. Investigations on anticancer activity of Eu3+ doped hydroxyapatite nanocomposites against MCF7 and 4T1 breast cancer cell lines: A structural and luminescence Perspective. Heliyon 2024, 10 (3) , e25064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25064
  52. Miqdam M. Obaid AL-Jumaili. Transcription Silencing and CpGs Hypermethylation as Therapeutic Gene Editing in Clinical Colorectal Adenocarcinoma Repression. The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology 2024, 83 (1) , 6-16. https://doi.org/10.4166/kjg.2023.132
  53. Susanna Zamolo, Elena Zakharova, Lise Boursinhac, Florian Hollfelder, Tamis Darbre, Jean-Louis Reymond. Peptide dendrimers transfecting CRISPR/Cas9 plasmid DNA: optimization and mechanism. RSC Chemical Biology 2024, 8 https://doi.org/10.1039/D4CB00116H
  54. Savannah R. Brown, Emilie E. Vomhof-DeKrey, Sarmad Al-Marsoummi, Nicholas D. Brown, Kole Hermanson, Marc D. Basson. Schlafen Family Intra-Regulation by IFN-α2 in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Cancers 2023, 15 (23) , 5658. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15235658
  55. Pragati Ramesh Kumbhar, Prakash Kumar, Aarti Lasure, Ravichandiran Velayutham, Debabrata Mandal. An updated landscape on nanotechnology-based drug delivery, immunotherapy, vaccinations, imaging, and biomarker detections for cancers: recent trends and future directions with clinical success. Discover Nano 2023, 18 (1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-023-03913-6
  56. Longjie Li, Yukai Deng, Yonghui Zeng, Bei Yan, Yulian Deng, Ziyang Zheng, Siqi Li, Yuhang Yang, Jinwei Hao, Xianjin Xiao, Xinyu Wang. The application advances of dendrimers in biomedical field. VIEW 2023, 4 (6) https://doi.org/10.1002/VIW.20230023
  57. Yuhe Zhang, Jiahao Shi, Bin Ma, Ya-Nan Zhou, Haiyang Yong, Jianzhong Li, Xiangyi Kong, Dezhong Zhou. Functionalization of polymers for intracellular protein delivery. Progress in Polymer Science 2023, 146 , 101751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2023.101751
  58. Jong Won Lee, Man Kyu Shim, Hyosuk Kim, Hochung Jang, Yuhan Lee, Sun Hwa Kim. RNAi therapies: Expanding applications for extrahepatic diseases and overcoming delivery challenges. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 2023, 201 , 115073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2023.115073
  59. Valentina Andretto, Silvia Dusi, Serena Zilio, Mathieu Repellin, David Kryza, Stefano Ugel, Giovanna Lollo. Tackling TNF-α in autoinflammatory disorders and autoimmune diseases: From conventional to cutting edge in biologics and RNA- based nanomedicines. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 2023, 201 , 115080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2023.115080
  60. Peng Zhang, Zhi Li, Weiling Cao, Jingjie Tang, Yi Xia, Ling Peng, Jing Ma. A PD‐L1 Antibody‐Conjugated PAMAM Dendrimer Nanosystem for Simultaneously Inhibiting Glycolysis and Promoting Immune Response in Fighting Breast Cancer. Advanced Materials 2023, 35 (41) https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202305215
  61. Jie Wang, Ping Li, Chao Wang, Ning Liu, Dongming Xing. Molecularly or atomically precise nanostructures for bio-applications: how far have we come?. Materials Horizons 2023, 10 (9) , 3304-3324. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3MH00574G
  62. Anirban Goutam Mukherjee, Uddesh Ramesh Wanjari, Abilash Valsala Gopalakrishnan, Pragya Bradu, Antara Biswas, Raja Ganesan, Kaviyarasi Renu, Abhijit Dey, Balachandar Vellingiri, Achraf El Allali, Alsamman M. Alsamman, Hatem Zayed, C. George Priya Doss. Evolving strategies and application of proteins and peptide therapeutics in cancer treatment. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 2023, 163 , 114832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2023.114832
  63. Xue Jiang, Jiaojiao Zhang, Pik Kwan Lo, Zhengwei Mao. Polyphenol‐Based Assembly Nanosystems as Multifunctional Biopharmaceutical Platform. Advanced NanoBiomed Research 2023, 3 (6) https://doi.org/10.1002/anbr.202200168
  64. Xiaobin Li, Junyu Liu, Haihong Chen, Yaxin Chen, Yi Wang, Can Yang Zhang, Xin-Hui Xing. Multi-functional engineered polypeptide-based drug delivery systems for improved cancer therapy. Green Chemical Engineering 2023, 4 (2) , 173-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gce.2022.07.010
  65. Jiaxuan Chen, Dandan Zhu, Baoping Lian, Kangjie Shi, Peng Chen, Ying Li, Wenyi Lin, Ling Ding, Qiulin Long, Yang Wang, Erik Laurini, Wenjun Lan, Yun Li, Aura Tintaru, Caoyun Ju, Can Zhang, Sabrina Pricl, Juan Iovanna, Xiaoxuan Liu, Ling Peng. Cargo-selective and adaptive delivery of nucleic acid therapeutics by bola-amphiphilic dendrimers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2023, 120 (21) https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2220787120
  66. Dongdong Guo, Xiaoyong Dai, Kewei Liu, Yuhong Liu, Jiamin Wu, Kun Wang, Shengwei Jiang, Fen Sun, Lijun Wang, Bing Guo, Dongye Yang, Laiqiang Huang. A Self‐Reinforcing Nanoplatform for Highly Effective Synergistic Targeted Combinatary Calcium‐Overload and Photodynamic Therapy of Cancer. Advanced Healthcare Materials 2023, 12 (12) https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202202424
  67. Yiqing Liu, Peiyong Guo, Xinhao Dong, Yina Xu, Dan Li, Hua Zheng, Jianhong Liao. Synchronized delivery of dual-drugs for potentiating combination chemotherapy based on smart triple-responsive polymeric micelles. Biomaterials Advances 2023, 147 , 213344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioadv.2023.213344
  68. Dolly Jain, Shiv Kumar Prajapati, Ankit Jain, Rohit Singhal. Nano-formulated siRNA-based therapeutic approaches for cancer therapy. Nano Trends 2023, 1 , 100006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nwnano.2023.100006
  69. Yingqi Liu, Yunyun Wu, Zhong Luo, Menghuan Li. Designing supramolecular self-assembly nanomaterials as stimuli-responsive drug delivery platforms for cancer therapy. iScience 2023, 26 (3) , 106279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.106279
  70. Ahmed Khaled Abosalha, Waqar Ahmad, Jacqueline Boyajian, Paromita Islam, Merry Ghebretatios, Sabrina Schaly, Rahul Thareja, Karan Arora, Satya Prakash. A comprehensive update of siRNA delivery design strategies for targeted and effective gene silencing in gene therapy and other applications. Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery 2023, 18 (2) , 149-161. https://doi.org/10.1080/17460441.2022.2155630
  71. Anabela Gonçalves, Mário Fernandes, Margarida Lima, João Pedro Gomes, Filipa Silva, Sara Castro, Filipa Sampaio, Andreia Castro Gomes. Nanotechnology to the Rescue: Therapeutic Strategies Based on Brown Algae for Neurodegenerative Diseases. Applied Sciences 2023, 13 (3) , 1883. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13031883
  72. Hallie Gaitsch, Andrew M. Hersh, Safwan Alomari, Betty M. Tyler. Dendrimer Technology in Glioma: Functional Design and Potential Applications. Cancers 2023, 15 (4) , 1075. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15041075
  73. Adina Căta, Ioana Maria Carmen Ienașcu, Mariana Nela Ştefănuț, Dan Roșu, Oana-Raluca Pop. Properties and Bioapplications of Amphiphilic Janus Dendrimers: A Review. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15 (2) , 589. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15020589
  74. Jie Shen, Jingwen Wang, Qiulian Hao, Weihong Ji, Huan Peng, Yanyue Wu, Ruichen Zhao, Xinyu Qiu, Wenli Wang, Jun Yang, Yan Li, Tianlu Zhang, Zhiguo Lu, Xin Zhang. Transformable Nanotheranostics Capable of Sensoring Nucleic Acid Drugs’ Spatiotemporal Behaviors. Advanced Functional Materials 2023, 33 (5) https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202209749
  75. Tao Sun, Chufeng Li, Xuwen Li, Haolin Song, Boyu Su, Haoyu You, Tongyu Zhang, Chen Jiang. Pharmaceutical Nanotechnology. 2023, 179-283. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8984-0_10
  76. Xingya Jiang, Kimia Abedi, Jinjun Shi. Polymeric nanoparticles for RNA delivery. 2023, 555-573. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822425-0.00017-8
  77. Helena Tomás, João Rodrigues. Dendrimers and dendrimer-based nano-objects for oncology applications. 2023, 41-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-85671-3.00002-6
  78. Maria Russi, Rachele Valeri, Domenico Marson, Chiara Danielli, Fulvia Felluga, Aura Tintaru, Natasa Skoko, Suzana Aulic, Erik Laurini, Sabrina Pricl. Some things old, new and borrowed: Delivery of dabrafenib and vemurafenib to melanoma cells via self-assembled nanomicelles based on an amphiphilic dendrimer. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 2023, 180 , 106311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2022.106311
  79. Ahmed Khaled Abosalha, Jacqueline Boyajian, Waqar Ahmad, Paromita Islam, Merry Ghebretatios, Sabrina Schaly, Rahul Thareja, Karan Arora, Satya Prakash. Clinical pharmacology of siRNA therapeutics: current status and future prospects. Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology 2022, 15 (11) , 1327-1341. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512433.2022.2136166
  80. Rongying Zhu, Mengying Hou, Yang Zhou, Huan Ye, Lei Chen, Chenglong Ge, Shanzhou Duan, Lichen Yin, Yongbing Chen. Spherical α-helical polypeptide-mediated E2F1 silencing against myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury (MIRI). Biomaterials Science 2022, 10 (21) , 6258-6266. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2BM01075E
  81. Fei Kuang, De Luo, Mengjia Zhou, Juan Du, Jie Yang, . lncRNAs AC156455.1 and AC104532.2 as Biomarkers for Diagnosis and Prognosis in Colorectal Cancer. Disease Markers 2022, 2022 , 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4872001
  82. Simona Camorani, Silvia Tortorella, Lisa Agnello, Chiara Spanu, Annachiara d’Argenio, Roberto Nilo, Antonella Zannetti, Erica Locatelli, Monica Fedele, Mauro Comes Franchini, Laura Cerchia. Aptamer-Functionalized Nanoparticles Mediate PD-L1 siRNA Delivery for Effective Gene Silencing in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14 (10) , 2225. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14102225
  83. Barbara Ziemba, Maciej Borowiec, Ida Franiak-Pietryga. There and back again: a dendrimer’s tale. Drug and Chemical Toxicology 2022, 45 (5) , 2169-2184. https://doi.org/10.1080/01480545.2021.1915327
  84. Yunfang Xiong, Ran Ke, Qingyu Zhang, Wenjun Lan, Wanjun Yuan, Karol Nga Ieng Chan, Tom Roussel, Yifan Jiang, Jing Wu, Shuai Liu, Alice Sze Tsai Wong, Joong Sup Shim, Xuanjun Zhang, Ruiyu Xie, Nelson Dusetti, Juan Iovanna, Nagy Habib, Ling Peng, Leo Tsz On Lee. Small Activating RNA Modulation of the G Protein‐Coupled Receptor for Cancer Treatment. Advanced Science 2022, 9 (26) https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202200562
  85. Rajat Goyal, Hitesh Chopra, Inderbir singh, Kamal Dua, Rupesh K. Gautam. Insights on prospects of nano-siRNA based approaches in treatment of Cancer. Frontiers in Pharmacology 2022, 13 https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.985670
  86. V. Karthick, Lok Kumar Shrestha, V. Ganesh Kumar, Pranjali Pranjali, Dinesh Kumar, Aniruddha Pal, Katsuhiko Ariga. Nanoarchitectonics horizons: materials for life sciences. Nanoscale 2022, 14 (30) , 10630-10647. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2NR02293A
  87. Xiaowen Guan, Fanqi Meng, Hongwei Tan, Xiaoni Wang, Jingjing Li, Juanjuan Wei, Jin Ouyang, Na Na. Modular and hierarchical self-assembly of siRNAs into supramolecular nanomaterials for soft and homogeneous siRNA loading and precise and visualized intracellular delivery. Chemical Science 2022, 13 (29) , 8657-8666. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2SC02488H
  88. Kaili Deng, Dongxue Yang, Yuping Zhou. Nanotechnology-Based siRNA Delivery Systems to Overcome Tumor Immune Evasion in Cancer Immunotherapy. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14 (7) , 1344. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14071344
  89. Wen Nie, Jing Chen, Bilan Wang, Xiang Gao. Nonviral vector system for cancer immunogene therapy. MedComm – Biomaterials and Applications 2022, 1 (1) https://doi.org/10.1002/mba2.10
  90. Ma. Concepción Peña-Juárez, Omar Rodrigo Guadarrama-Escobar, José Juan Escobar-Chávez. Transdermal Delivery Systems for Biomolecules. Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation 2022, 17 (2) , 319-332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12247-020-09525-2
  91. Orode UV Aniejurengho, Steve T Meikle, Matteo Santin. Poly(epsilon-lysine) dendrons and nucleic acids complexes for non-viral delivery of bacteriophage DNA into bacterial cells. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part N: Journal of Nanomaterials, Nanoengineering and Nanosystems 2022, 1 , 239779142211022. https://doi.org/10.1177/23977914221102291
  92. Xin Song, Xuefeng Zhu, Hao Yao, Weili Shang, Cong Du, Wensheng Lu, Minghua Liu, Wei Tian. Topological-skeleton controlled chirality expression of supramolecular hyperbranched and linear polymers. Fundamental Research 2022, 2 (3) , 422-428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fmre.2021.10.006
  93. Boyang Hu, Ruijie Liu, Qingyue Liu, Zi'an Lin, Yiwei Shi, Jun Li, Lijun Wang, Longjie Li, Xianjin Xiao, Yuzhou Wu. Engineering surface patterns on nanoparticles: new insights into nano-bio interactions. Journal of Materials Chemistry B 2022, 10 (14) , 2357-2383. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1TB02549J
  94. Deblin Jana, Yanli Zhao. Strategies for enhancing cancer chemodynamic therapy performance. Exploration 2022, 2 (2) https://doi.org/10.1002/EXP.20210238
  95. Chi Ma, Dandan Zhu, Wenyi Lin, Ying Li, Yuanzheng Huang, Huiling Zhu, Mengyun Ye, Yang Wang, Ling Peng, Xiaoxuan Liu. A biodegradable amphiphilic poly(aminoester) dendrimer for safe and effective siRNA delivery. Chemical Communications 2022, 58 (26) , 4168-4171. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1CC06655B
  96. Xiuna Jia, Mengmeng Lv, Yunwei Fei, Qing Dong, Hao Wang, Qiong Liu, Dan Li, Jin Wang, Erkang Wang. Facile one-step synthesis of NIR-Responsive siRNA-Inorganic hybrid nanoplatform for imaging-guided photothermal and gene synergistic therapy. Biomaterials 2022, 282 , 121404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121404
  97. Fengjuan Xie, Rongxin Li, Weikang Shu, Liang Zhao, Jingjing Wan. Self-assembly of Peptide dendrimers and their bio-applications in theranostics. Materials Today Bio 2022, 14 , 100239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100239
  98. V. Karthick, Katsuhiko Ariga. Nanostructured Biocompatible Materials. 2022, 135-151. https://doi.org/10.1039/9781788019613-00135
  99. Supusson Pengnam, Samarwadee Plianwong, Boon-ek Yingyongnarongkul, Prasopchai Patrojanasophon, Praneet Opanasopit. Delivery of small interfering RNAs by nanovesicles for cancer therapy. Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics 2022, 42 , 100425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dmpk.2021.100425
  100. Jinho Yoon, Minkyu Shin, Ji-Young Lee, Sang-Nam Lee, Jin-Ha Choi, Jeong-Woo Choi. RNA interference (RNAi)-based plasmonic nanomaterials for cancer diagnosis and therapy. Journal of Controlled Release 2022, 342 , 228-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.01.012
Load all citations

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Cite this: J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 47, 16264–16274
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.8b10021
Published October 22, 2018

Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

Article Views

15k

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Scheme 1

    Scheme 1. Strategy for Active Delivery of siRNA Using an Amphiphilic Dendrimer AD Vector with the Dual Targeting Peptide: (A) Chemical Structure of the Amphiphilic Dendrimer AD; (B) The Targeting Peptide E16G6RGDK Composed of Three Distinct Functional Segments: RGDK as the Targeting Warhead, Oligo(glutamic acid) E16 as the Negatively Charged Sequence to Interact with Positively Charged siRNA/AD Complexes, and the Neutral Oligo(glycine) G6 as the Linker to Bridge the Targeting Unit and the siRNA Loading Complex; (C) Cartoon Illustration of the Formation of the siRNA/AD/E16G6RGDK Complexes for Targeted siRNA Delivery

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Small and stable siRNA/AD/E16G6RGDK complexes formed by adding the peptide E16G6RGDK to the siRNA/AD complexes. (A) TEM imaging and (B) DLS analysis of the siRNA/AD/E16G6RGDK complexes (siRNA/AD at an N/P ratio of 10, AD/peptide at a molar ratio of 5.0). (C) Representative integrated ITC profiles for titration of the siRNA/AD complexes with the E16G6RGDK peptide in ultrapure water (T = 25 °C). The solid red lines are data fitted with a sigmoidal function. The inset shows the corresponding ITC raw data. All experiments were run in triplicate. (D) Agarose gel shift analysis of the siRNA/AD/E16G6RGDK complexes versus the siRNA/AD complexes (siRNA/AD at an N/P ratio of 10, AD/peptide ratio varying from 2.0 to 20). (E) The siRNA/AD/E16G6RGDK complexes are able to protect siRNA from RNase A digestion. (siRNA/AD at an N/P ratio of 10; AD/peptide ratio of 5.0).

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. (A) (Left) Cartoon showing the arrangement of the siRNA molecule (gray) and the four E16G6RGDK moieties (colored as in the right panel) on the AD nanomicelle (blue), as derived from the detailed atomistic molecular simulations. (Center) Equilibrated molecular dynamics (MD) snapshot of an siRNA/AD micelle in complex with four E16G6RGDK peptides numbered as E16G6RGDK1 to E16G6RGDK4 and colored as follows: E16G6RGDK1, tail (E16G6) sandy brown, head (RGDK) firebrick; E16G6RGDK2, tail light green, head olive drab; E16G6RGDK3, tail khaki, head golden rod; E16G6RGDK4, tail plum, head magenta. The siRNA molecule is portrayed with its van der Waals surface in gray. The AD micelle is shown in dark slate blue sticks and balls, while the four peptides are depicted as colored spheres, as above precised. Ions and counterions are shown as green and purple hollow spheres; water is shown as a light cyan surface. (Right) Zoomed-in view of the system in panel A showing the RGDK warhead group of E16G6RGDK4 protruding into the solvent as an example. (B) Radial distribution function as a function of the distance from the AD micelle center of mass for the AD positively charged terminal groups (dark slate blue) and for each of the four RGDK warhead groups. Colors as in panel A. (C) Electrostatic surface potential of the siRNA/AD micelle (left) and of the siRNA/AD/(E16G6RGDK)4 complex (right) as extracted from the equilibrated portion of the corresponding MD simulations. Dark blue represents a highly positively charged surface, while red represents a highly negatively charged surface. (D) Free energy of binding (ΔGb) of each E16G6RGDK peptide on the siRNA/AD micelle. Colors as in panel A. The empty color bars (left bar of each pair) represent the value of ΔGb for the entire peptide molecule, while the filled color bars (right bar of each pair) give the contribution to ΔGb from the negatively charged E16G6 tails only.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. SiRNA/AD/E16G6RGDK complexes are effectively taken up by PC-3 prostate cancer cells via RGD/integrin and RGDK/neuropilin-1 (Nrp-1) receptor interactions and are then released from endosomes. (A) Flow cytometry analysis of the cellular uptake of siRNA/AD/E16G6RGDK complexes compared to siRNA/AD complexes using Cy5-labeled siRNA. (B) Flow cytometry analysis of the cellular uptake of siRNA/AD/E16G6RGDK complexes in the absence and presence of cyclic RGD (cRGD). (C) Confocal microscopic imaging of the cellular uptake of siRNA/AD/E16G6RGDK complexes in the absence and presence of Nrp-1-receptor antibody. (D) Confocal microscopic imaging of the endosomal escape of the siRNA/AD/E16G6RGDK complexes after incubation times of 0 (control), 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 h. Red channel image shows the Cy5-labeled siRNA/AD/E16G6RGDK complexes, green channel image shows the endosomes marked by LysoTracker red, and blue channel image shows the nuclei of PC-3 cells stained by DAPI (C) or Hoechst33342 (D). The siRNA/AD/E16G6RGDK complexes were formed using 50 nM siRNA, an N/P ratio of 10, and AD/peptide molar ratio of 5.0. Data are presented as mean ± SD. **, p ≤ 0.01 as calculated by Student’s t test.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. Targeted siRNA/AD/E16G6RGDK system is much more effective than the nontargeted siRNA/AD system for Hsp27 silencing and antiproliferation in PC-3 prostate cancer cells. Hsp27 silencing at (A) mRNA and (B) protein levels, determined using qRT-PCR and Western blotting, respectively. (C) The improved down-regulation of Hsp27 at the mRNA level by the targeting complexes is reduced in the presence of either cRGD or anti-Nrp-1-receptor antibody. (D) MTT assay of the antiproliferation effect of the complexes on PC-3 cells. Conditions used: 20 nM siRNA, N/P ratio of 10, AD/peptide molar ratio of 5.0. Data are presented as mean ± SD. **, p ≤ 0.01; ***, p ≤ 0.001 as calculated by Student’s t test.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. Targeted siRNA/AD/E16G6RGDK delivery system (A, B) accumulates more efficiently in tumor tissues and (C, D) is much more potent than the nontargeted siRNA/AD system for gene silencing and anticancer activity in tumor xenograft mice. Cy5-siRNA/AD complexes and Cy5-siRNA/AD/E16G6RGDK complexes were administered to PC-3 xenograft mice via i.v. injection in PBS buffer (1.0 mg/kg siRNA, N/P ratio 5.0, AD/peptide molar ratio 5). (A) Fluorescence images of siRNAs accumulated in isolated tumors. (B) Fluorescence quantification analysis of tumors in (A) using imaging software. Data were normalized to the tumors from PBS-treated animals. PC-3 xenograft nude mice were administered twice per week with PBS buffer, siRNA/AD complexes, or siRNA/AD/E16G6RGDK complexes (0.25 mg/kg siRNA, N/P ratio 5.0, AD/peptide molar ratio 5). (C) Tumor growth assessed by measuring tumor size. (D) Cancer cell proliferation in tumor tissue revealed by immunohistochemistry using Ki67 staining. (E) Expression of Hsp27 protein in tumors quantified using Western blotting. (F) Mouse body weight monitoring during the treatment. Data are presented as mean ± SD. *, p ≤ 0.05; **, p ≤ 0.01, ***, p ≤ 0.001 as calculated by Student’s t test.

    Figure 6

    Figure 6. In vitro toxicity assessment of the targeted siRNA/AD/E16G6RGDK delivery system versus the nontargeted siRNA/AD system. Toxicity assessment using the MTT assay and LDH assay for (A, B) PC-3 prostate cancer cells and (C, D) human embryonic kidney (HEK 293) cells (20 nM siRNA, N/P ratio of 10, AD/peptide molar ratio of 5.0). (E) Left panel: Hemolysis assay of the siRNA/AD complexes and the siRNA/AD/E16G6RGDK complexes in comparison with AD alone at different concentrations of AD (0.50, 1.0, 2.5, 5.0, and 10 μM), which correspond to siRNA concentrations of 10, 20, 50, 100, and 200 nM. Right panel: Quantitative analysis of hemolysis determined by UV absorption at 540 nm. Data are presented as mean ± SD. ***, p ≤ 0.001 as calculated by Student’s t test.

    Figure 7

    Figure 7. In vivo toxicity assessment of the targeted siRNA/AD/E16G6RGDK delivery system versus the nontargeted siRNA/AD system. (A) Cytokine response in mice determined by quantifying the serum levels of IL-6, INF-γ, TNF-α, GM-CSF, MCP-1, KC, and IL-1β at 3 h postinjection using Luminex-detection technology according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) was used as the positive control. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *, p < 0.05, ***, p < 0.001, versus PBS group, as calculated by Student’s t test. (B) Major serum biochemistry parameters measured in mouse serum collected at 24 h postinjection. Alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) are measured as U/L; total bilirubin (TBIL), urea, triacylglycerol (TG), and total cholesterol (TCHO) are measured as mmol/L; total protein (TP) is measured as g/L. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. (C) Histopathological analysis of major organs from mice treated with siRNA/AD and siRNA/AD/E16G6RGDK. Tissue samples were collected at 24 h postadministration. No significant histopathological changes were observed in any of the tissue sections. Images were enlarged 200 times with the microscope.

  • References


    This article references 52 other publications.

    1. 1
      Fire, A.; Xu, S.; Montgomery, M.; Kostas, S.; Driver, S.; Mello, C. Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 1998, 391, 806811,  DOI: 10.1038/35888
    2. 2
      Hannon, G. RNA interference. Nature 2002, 418, 244251,  DOI: 10.1038/418244a
    3. 3
      Castanotto, D.; Rossi, J. The promises and pitfalls of RNA-interference-based therapeutics. Nature 2009, 457, 426433,  DOI: 10.1038/nature07758
    4. 4
      Haussecker, D.; Kay, M. RNA interference. Drugging RNAi. Science 2015, 347, 10691070,  DOI: 10.1126/science.1252967
    5. 5
      Wittrup, A.; Lieberman, J. Knocking down disease: a progress report on siRNA therapeutics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2015, 16, 543552,  DOI: 10.1038/nrg3978
    6. 6
      Ledford, H. Gene-silencing technology gets first drug approval after 20-year wait. Nature 2018, 560, 291292,  DOI: 10.1038/d41586-018-05867-7
    7. 7
      Whitehead, K.; Langer, R.; Anderson, D. Knocking down barriers: advances in siRNA delivery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2009, 8, 129138,  DOI: 10.1038/nrd2742
    8. 8
      Kanasty, R.; Dorkin, J.; Vegas, A.; Anderson, D. Delivery materials for siRNA therapeutics. Nat. Mater. 2013, 12, 967977,  DOI: 10.1038/nmat3765
    9. 9
      Yin, H.; Kanasty, R.; Eltoukhy, A.; Vegas, A.; Dorkin, J.; Anderson, D. Non-viral vectors for gene-based therapy. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2014, 15, 541555,  DOI: 10.1038/nrg3763
    10. 10
      Juliano, R. The delivery of therapeutic oligonucleotides. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, 65186548,  DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkw236
    11. 11
      Pack, D.; Hoffman, A.; Pun, S.; Stayton, P. Design and development of polymers for gene delivery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2005, 4, 581593,  DOI: 10.1038/nrd1775
    12. 12
      Lachelt, U.; Wagner, E. Nucleic acid therapeutics using polyplexes: a journey of 50 years (and beyond). Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 1104311078,  DOI: 10.1021/cr5006793
    13. 13
      Tseng, Y.; Mozumdar, S.; Huang, L. Lipid-based systemic delivery of siRNA. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2009, 61, 721731,  DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2009.03.003
    14. 14
      Wagner, E. Polymers for siRNA delivery: inspired by viruses to be targeted, dynamic, and precise. Acc. Chem. Res. 2012, 45, 10051013,  DOI: 10.1021/ar2002232
    15. 15
      Wittrup, A.; Ai, A.; Liu, X.; Hamar, P.; Trifonova, R.; Charisse, K.; Manoharan, M.; Kirchhausen, T.; Lieberman, J. Visualizing lipid-formulated siRNA release from endosomes and target gene knockdown. Nat. Biotechnol. 2015, 33, 870876,  DOI: 10.1038/nbt.3298
    16. 16
      Lee, C.; MacKay, J.; Frechet, J.; Szoka, F. Designing dendrimers for biological applications. Nat. Biotechnol. 2005, 23, 15171526,  DOI: 10.1038/nbt1171
    17. 17
      Khandare, J.; Calderon, M.; Dagia, N.; Haag, R. Multifunctional dendritic polymers in nanomedicine: opportunities and challenges. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 28242848,  DOI: 10.1039/C1CS15242D
    18. 18
      Liu, X.; Rocchi, P.; Peng, L. Dendrimers as non-viral vectors for siRNA delivery. New J. Chem. 2012, 36, 256263,  DOI: 10.1039/C1NJ20408D
    19. 19
      Liu, X.; Liu, C.; Catapano, C.; Peng, L.; Zhou, J.; Rocchi, P. Structurally flexible triethanolamine-core poly(amidoamine) dendrimers as effective nanovectors to deliver RNAi-based therapeutics. Biotechnol. Adv. 2014, 32, 844852,  DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.08.001
    20. 20
      Reebye, V.; Sætrom, P.; Mintz, P.; Huang, K.; Swiderski, P.; Peng, L.; Liu, C.; Liu, X.; Lindkaer-Jensen, S.; Zacharoulis, D. Novel RNA oligonucleotide improves liver function and inhibits liver carcinogenesis in vivo. Hepatology 2014, 59, 216227,  DOI: 10.1002/hep.26669
    21. 21
      Yu, T.; Liu, X.; Bolcato-Bellemin, A.; Wang, Y.; Liu, C.; Erbacher, P.; Qu, F.; Rocchi, P.; Behr, J.; Peng, L. An amphiphilic dendrimer for effective delivery of small interfering RNA and gene silencing in vitro and in vivo. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 84788484,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201203920
    22. 22
      Liu, X.; Zhou, J.; Yu, T.; Chen, C.; Cheng, Q.; Sengupta, K.; Huang, Y.; Li, H.; Liu, C.; Wang, Y.; Posocco, P.; Wang, M.; Cui, Q.; Giorgio, S.; Fermeglia, M.; Qu, F.; Pricl, S.; Shi, Y.; Liang, Z.; Rocchi, P.; Rossi, J.; Peng, L. Adaptive amphiphilic dendrimer-based nanoassemblies as robust and versatile siRNA delivery systems. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 1182211827,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201406764
    23. 23
      Chen, C.; Posocco, P.; Liu, X.; Cheng, Q.; Laurini, E.; Zhou, J.; Liu, C.; Wang, Y.; Tang, J.; Col, V.; Yu, T.; Giorgio, S.; Fermeglia, M.; Qu, F.; Liang, Z.; Rossi, J.; Liu, M.; Rocchi, P.; Pricl, S.; Peng, L. siRNA delivery: mastering dendrimer self-assembly for efficient siRNA delivery: from conceptual design to in vivo efficient gene silencing. Small 2016, 12, 36673676,  DOI: 10.1002/smll.201503866
    24. 24
      Liu, X.; Wang, Y.; Chen, C.; Tintaru, A.; Cao, Y.; Liu, J.; Ziarelli, F.; Tang, J.; Guo, H.; Rosas, R.; Giorgio, S.; Charle, L.; Rocchi, P.; Peng, L. A fluorinated bola-amphiphilic dendrimer for on-demand delivery of siRNA, via specific response to reactive oxygen species. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2016, 26, 85948603,  DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201604192
    25. 25
      Percec, V.; Wilson, D.; Leowanawat, P.; Wilson, C.; Hughes, A.; Kaucher, M.; Hammer, D.; Levine, D.; Kim, A.; Bates, F. Self-assembly of Janus dendrimers into uniform dendrimersomes and other complex architectures. Science 2010, 328, 10091014,  DOI: 10.1126/science.1185547
    26. 26
      Sherman, S.; Xiao, Q.; Percec, V. Mimicking complex biological membranes and their programmable glycan ligands with dendrimersomes and glycodendrimersomes. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 65386631,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00097
    27. 27
      Bertrand, N.; Wu, J.; Xu, X.; Kamaly, N.; Farokhzad, O. Cancer nanotechnology: the impact of passive and active targeting in the era of modern cancer biology. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2014, 66, 225,  DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2013.11.009
    28. 28
      Dai, L.; Liu, J.; Luo, Z.; Li, M.; Cai, K. Tumor therapy: targeted drug delivery system. J. Mater. Chem. B 2016, 4, 67586772,  DOI: 10.1039/C6TB01743F
    29. 29
      Davis, M.; Zuckerman, J.; Choi, C.; Seligson, D.; Tolcher, A.; Alabi, C.; Yen, Y.; Heidel, J.; Ribas, A. Evidence of RNAi in humans from systemically administered siRNA via targeted nanoparticles. Nature 2010, 464, 10671070,  DOI: 10.1038/nature08956
    30. 30
      Sugahara, K.; Teesalu, T.; Karmali, P.; Kotamraju, V.; Agemy, L.; Greenwald, D.; Ruoslahti, E. Co-administration of a tumor-penetrating peptide enhances the efficacy of cancer drugs. Science 2010, 328, 10311035,  DOI: 10.1126/science.1183057
    31. 31
      Wong, P.; Tang, K.; Coulter, A.; Tan, S.; Baker, J.; Choi, S. Multivalent dendrimer vectors with DNA intercalation motifs for gene delivery. Biomacromolecules 2014, 15, 41344415,  DOI: 10.1021/bm501169s
    32. 32
      Sugahara, K.; Teesalu, T.; Karmali, P.; Kotamraju, V.; Agemy, L.; Girard, O.; Hanahan, D.; Mattrey, R.; Ruoslahti, E. Tissue-penetrating delivery of compounds and nanoparticles into tumors. Cancer Cell 2009, 16, 510520,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.10.013
    33. 33
      Desgrosellier, J.; Cheresh, D. Integrins in cancer: biological implications and therapeutic opportunities. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2010, 10, 922,  DOI: 10.1038/nrc2748
    34. 34
      Marelli, U.; Rechenmacher, F.; Sobahi, T.; Mas-Moruno, C.; Kessler, H. Tumor targeting via integrin ligands. Front. Oncol. 2013, 3, 222233,  DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2013.00222
    35. 35
      Teesalu, T.; Sugahara, K.; Kotamraju, V.; Ruoslahti, E. C-end rule peptides mediate neuropilin-1-dependent cell, vascular, and tissue penetration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2009, 106, 1615716162,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0908201106
    36. 36
      Liu, X.; Liu, C.; Chen, C.; Bentobji, M.; Cheillan, F.; Piana, J.; Qu, F.; Rocchi, P.; Peng, L. Targeted delivery of Dicer-substrate siRNAs using a dual targeting peptide decorated dendrimer delivery system. Nanomedicine 2014, 10, 16271636,  DOI: 10.1016/j.nano.2014.05.008
    37. 37
      Svenson, S. The dendrimer paradox--high medical expectations but poor clinical translation. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 46, 41314144,  DOI: 10.1039/C5CS00288E
    38. 38
      Cao, Y.; Liu, X.; Peng, L. Molecular engineering of dendrimer nanovecters for siRNA delivery and gene silencing. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. 2017, 11, 663675,  DOI: 10.1007/s11705-017-1623-5
    39. 39
      Zhou, J.; Liu, J.; Cheng, C.; Patel, T.; Weller, C.; Piepmeier, J.; Jiang, Z.; Saltzman, W. Biodegradable poly(amine-co-ester) terpolymers for targeted gene delivery. Nat. Mater. 2012, 11, 8290,  DOI: 10.1038/nmat3187
    40. 40
      Grandclement, C.; Borg, C. Neuropilins: a new target for cancer therapy. Cancers 2011, 3, 18991928,  DOI: 10.3390/cancers3021899
    41. 41
      Siegel, R.; Miller, K.; Jemal, A. Cancer Statistics, 2017. Ca-Cancer J. Clin. 2017, 67, 730,  DOI: 10.3322/caac.21387
    42. 42
      Grasso, C.; Wu, Y.; Robinson, D.; Cao, X.; Dhanasekaran, S.; Khan, A.; Quist, M.; Jing, X.; Lonigro, R.; Brenner, J.; Asangani, I.; Ateeq, B.; Chun, S.; Siddiqui, J.; Sam, L.; Anstett, M.; Mehra, R.; Prensner, J.; Palanisamy, N.; Ryslik, G.; Vandin, F.; Raphael, B.; Kunju, L.; Rhodes, D.; Pienta, K.; Chinnaiyan, A.; Tomlins, S. The mutational landscape of lethal castration-resistant prostate cancer. Nature 2012, 487, 239243,  DOI: 10.1038/nature11125
    43. 43
      Gundem, G.; Van, P.; Kremeyer, B.; Alexandrov, L.; Tubio, J.; Papaemmanuil, E.; Brewer, D.; Kallio, H.; Hoegnas, G.; Annala, M.; Kivinummi, K.; Goody, V.; Latimer, C.; O’Meara, S.; Dawson, K.; Isaacs, W.; Emmert-Buck, M.; Nykter, M.; Foster, C.; Kote-Jarai, Z.; Easton, D.; Whitaker, H.; Neal, D.; Cooper, C.; Eeles, R.; Visakorpi, T.; Campbell, P.; McDermott, U.; Wedge, D.; Bova, G. The evolutionary history of lethal metastatic prostate cancer. Nature 2015, 520, 353357,  DOI: 10.1038/nature14347
    44. 44
      Lorente, D.; Mateo, J.; Perez-Lopez, R.; de, J.; Attard, G. Sequencing of agents in castration-resistant prostate cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2015, 16, 279292,  DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70033-1
    45. 45
      Cornford, P.; Dodson, A.; Parsons, K.; Desmond, A.; Woolfenden, A.; Fordham, M.; Neoptolemos, J.; Ke, Y.; Foster, C. Heat shock protein expression independently predicts clinical outcome in prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 2000, 60, 70997105
    46. 46
      Rocchi, P.; So, A.; Kojima, S.; Signaevsky, M.; Beraldi, E.; Fazli, L.; Hurtado-Coll, A.; Yamanaka, K.; Gleave, M. Heat shock protein 27 increases after androgen ablation and plays a cytoprotective role in hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 2004, 64, 65956602,  DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-3998
    47. 47
      Jego, G.; Hazoume, A.; Seigneuric, R.; Garrido, C. Targeting heat shock proteins in cancer. Cancer Lett. 2013, 332, 275285,  DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2010.10.014
    48. 48
      Wei, T.; Chen, C.; Liu, J.; Liu, C.; Posocco, P.; Liu, X.; Cheng, Q.; Huo, S.; Liang, Z.; Fermeglia, M.; Pricl, S.; Liang, X.; Rocchic, P.; Peng, L. Anticancer drug nanomicelles formed by self-assembling amphiphilic dendrimer to combat cancer drug resistance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2015, 112, 29782983,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1418494112
    49. 49
      Posocco, P.; Liu, X.; Laurini, E.; Marson, D.; Chen, C.; Liu, C.; Fermeglia, M.; Rocchi, P.; Pricl, S.; Peng, L. Impact of siRNA overhangs for dendrimer-mediated siRNA delivery and gene silencing. Mol. Pharmaceutics 2013, 10, 32623273,  DOI: 10.1021/mp400329g
    50. 50
      Albanyan, B.; Laurini, E.; Posocco, P.; Pricl, S.; Smith, D. Self-assembled multivalent (SAMul) polyanion binding—impact of hydrophobic modifications in the micellar core on DNA and heparin binding at the peripheral cationic ligands. Chem. - Eur. J. 2017, 23, 63916397,  DOI: 10.1002/chem.201700177
    51. 51
      Fechner, L.; Albanyan, B.; Vieira, V.; Laurini, E.; Posocco, P.; Pricl, S.; Smith, D. Electrostatic binding of polyanions using self-assembled multivalent (SAMul) ligand displays - structure-activity effects on DNA/heparin binding. Chem. Sci. 2016, 7, 46534659,  DOI: 10.1039/C5SC04801J
    52. 52
      Qi, C.; Su, Y.; Peng, Y.; Tian, E.; Sun, G.; Zhou, J.; Sun, G.; Liu, X.; Chao, C.; Murai, K.; Zhao, C.; Azizian, K.; Yang, L.; Warden, C.; Wu, X.; D’Apuzzo, M.; Brown, C.; Badie, B.; Peng, L.; Riggs, D.; Rossi, J.; Shi, Y. Downregulation of TLX induces TET3 expression and inhibits glioblastoma stem cell self-renewal and tumorigenesis. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 1063710651,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10637
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/jacs.8b10021.

    • Materials and methods as well as all experimental protocols for TEM, DLS, computational details, ITC, cell uptake and endosome release, siRNA delivery, gene silencing, anticancer activity and toxicity, etc. (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.