ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Nucleation and Propagation of Heterochromatin by the Histone Methyltransferase PRC2: Geometric Constraints and Impact of the Regulatory Subunit JARID2
My Activity

Figure 1Loading Img
    Article

    Nucleation and Propagation of Heterochromatin by the Histone Methyltransferase PRC2: Geometric Constraints and Impact of the Regulatory Subunit JARID2
    Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

    Other Access OptionsSupporting Information (1)

    Journal of the American Chemical Society

    Cite this: J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 38, 15029–15039
    Click to copy citationCitation copied!
    https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b02321
    Published September 3, 2019
    Copyright © 2019 American Chemical Society

    Abstract

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
    Abstract Image

    Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 (PRC2) catalyzes mono-, di-, and trimethylation of lysine 27 on histone H3 (H3K27me1–3) to control expression of genes important for differentiation and maintenance of cell identity. PRC2 activity is regulated by a number of different inputs, including allosteric activation by its product, H3K27me3. This positive feedback loop is thought to be important for the establishment of large domains of condensed heterochromatin. In addition to other chromatin modifications, ancillary subunits of PRC2, foremost JARID2, affect the rate of H3K27 methylation. Many gaps remain in our understanding of how PRC2 integrates these various signals to determine where and when to deposit H3K27 methyl marks. In this study, we utilize designer chromatin substrates to demonstrate that propagation of H3K27 methylation by the PRC2 core complex has geometrically defined preferences that are overridden by the presence of JARID2. Our studies also show that phosphorylation of JARID2 can partially regulate its ability to stimulate PRC2 activity. Collectively, these biochemical insights further our understanding of the mechanisms that govern PRC2 activity, and highlight a role for JARID2 in de novo deposition of H3K27me3-containing repressive domains.

    Copyright © 2019 American Chemical Society

    Read this article

    To access this article, please review the available access options below.

    Get instant access

    Purchase Access

    Read this article for 48 hours. Check out below using your ACS ID or as a guest.

    Recommended

    Access through Your Institution

    You may have access to this article through your institution.

    Your institution does not have access to this content. Add or change your institution or let them know you’d like them to include access.

    Supporting Information

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

    The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b02321.

    • Experimental details (PDF)

    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

    Cited By

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
    Citation Statements
    Explore this article's citation statements on scite.ai

    This article is cited by 18 publications.

    1. Robert E. Thompson, Tom W. Muir. Chemoenzymatic Semisynthesis of Proteins. Chemical Reviews 2020, 120 (6) , 3051-3126. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00450
    2. Nicholas J. Pederson, Katharine L. Diehl. DNA stimulates the deacetylase SIRT6 to mono-ADP-ribosylate proteins with histidine repeats. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2025, 100 , 108532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2025.108532
    3. Benjamin A. Nacev, Yakshi Dabas, Matthew R. Paul, Christian Pacheco, Michelle Mitchener, Yekaterina Perez, Yan Fang, Alexey A. Soshnev, Douglas Barrows, Thomas Carroll, Nicholas D. Socci, Samantha C. St. Jean, Sagarika Tiwari, Michael J. Gruss, Sebastien Monette, William D. Tap, Benjamin A. Garcia, Tom Muir, C. David Allis. Cancer-associated Histone H3 N-terminal arginine mutations disrupt PRC2 activity and impair differentiation. Nature Communications 2024, 15 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-49486-5
    4. Esmat Hegazi, Tom W. Muir. The spread of chemical biology into chromatin. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2024, 300 (11) , 107776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2024.107776
    5. Angélica Torres-Berrío, Molly Estill, Vishwendra Patel, Aarthi Ramakrishnan, Hope Kronman, Angélica Minier-Toribio, Orna Issler, Caleb J. Browne, Eric M. Parise, Yentl Y. van der Zee, Deena M. Walker, Freddyson J. Martínez-Rivera, Casey K. Lardner, Romain Durand-de Cuttoli, Scott J. Russo, Li Shen, Simone Sidoli, Eric J. Nestler. Mono-methylation of lysine 27 at histone 3 confers lifelong susceptibility to stress. Neuron 2024, 112 (17) , 2973-2989.e10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2024.06.006
    6. Nir Hananya, Shany Koren, Tom W. Muir. Interrogating epigenetic mechanisms with chemically customized chromatin. Nature Reviews Genetics 2024, 25 (4) , 255-271. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-023-00664-z
    7. Yiran Gu, Zhiyun Ding, Qin Zhou, Juan Li, Wenyan Qian. JARID2 regulates epithelial mesenchymal transition through the PTEN/AKT signalling pathways in ovarian endometriosis. Reproductive Biology 2023, 23 (1) , 100729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.repbio.2023.100729
    8. Raymond F. Berkeley, Galia T. Debelouchina. Chemical tools for study and modulation of biomolecular phase transitions. Chemical Science 2022, 13 (48) , 14226-14245. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2SC04907D
    9. Itzel Alejandra Hernández-Romero, Victor Julian Valdes. De Novo Polycomb Recruitment and Repressive Domain Formation. Epigenomes 2022, 6 (3) , 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/epigenomes6030025
    10. Rachel Leicher, Shixin Liu. Probing the Interaction Between Chromatin and Chromatin-Associated Complexes with Optical Tweezers. 2022, 313-327. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2229-2_11
    11. Akhil Gargey Iragavarapu, Liqi Yao, Vignesh Kasinath. Structural insights into the interactions of Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 with chromatin. Biochemical Society Transactions 2021, 49 (6) , 2639-2653. https://doi.org/10.1042/BST20210450
    12. Alexey A. Soshnev, C. David Allis, Ethel Cesarman, Ari M. Melnick. Histone H1 Mutations in Lymphoma: A Link(er) between Chromatin Organization, Developmental Reprogramming, and Cancer. Cancer Research 2021, 81 (24) , 6061-6070. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-21-2619
    13. Michael Uckelmann, Chen Davidovich. Not just a writer: PRC2 as a chromatin reader. Biochemical Society Transactions 2021, 49 (3) , 1159-1170. https://doi.org/10.1042/BST20200728
    14. Xingcheng Lin, Rachel Leicher, Shixin Liu, Bin Zhang. Cooperative DNA looping by PRC2 complexes. Nucleic Acids Research 2021, 49 (11) , 6238-6248. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab441
    15. Yiran Guo, Shuai Zhao, Gang Greg Wang. Polycomb Gene Silencing Mechanisms: PRC2 Chromatin Targeting, H3K27me3 'Readout', and Phase Separation-Based Compaction. Trends in Genetics 2021, 37 (6) , 547-565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2020.12.006
    16. Vignesh Kasinath, Curtis Beck, Paul Sauer, Simon Poepsel, Jennifer Kosmatka, Marco Faini, Daniel Toso, Ruedi Aebersold, Eva Nogales. JARID2 and AEBP2 regulate PRC2 in the presence of H2AK119ub1 and other histone modifications. Science 2021, 371 (6527) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abc3393
    17. Rachel Leicher, Eva J. Ge, Xingcheng Lin, Matthew J. Reynolds, Wenjun Xie, Thomas Walz, Bin Zhang, Tom W. Muir, Shixin Liu. Single-molecule and in silico dissection of the interaction between Polycomb repressive complex 2 and chromatin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2020, 117 (48) , 30465-30475. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2003395117
    18. James E. Longbotham, Meng Yao Zhang, Danica Galonić Fujimori. Domain cross-talk in regulation of histone modifications: Molecular mechanisms and targeting opportunities. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology 2020, 57 , 105-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2020.06.001

    Journal of the American Chemical Society

    Cite this: J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 38, 15029–15039
    Click to copy citationCitation copied!
    https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b02321
    Published September 3, 2019
    Copyright © 2019 American Chemical Society

    Article Views

    2564

    Altmetric

    -

    Citations

    Learn about these metrics

    Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

    Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

    The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.