ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
My Activity
CONTENT TYPES

Figure 1Loading Img

Elucidation of the Reaction Mechanism for High-Temperature Water Gas Shift over an Industrial-Type Copper–Chromium–Iron Oxide Catalyst

  • Felipe Polo-Garzon
    Felipe Polo-Garzon
    Chemical Sciences Division and Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United States
  • Victor Fung
    Victor Fung
    Chemical Sciences Division and Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United States
    Department of Chemistry, University of California, Riverside, California 92521, United States
    More by Victor Fung
  • Luan Nguyen
    Luan Nguyen
    Departments of Chemical Engineering and Chemistry, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66047, United States
    More by Luan Nguyen
  • Yu Tang
    Yu Tang
    Departments of Chemical Engineering and Chemistry, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66047, United States
    More by Yu Tang
  • Franklin Tao
    Franklin Tao
    Departments of Chemical Engineering and Chemistry, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66047, United States
    More by Franklin Tao
  • Yongqiang Cheng
    Yongqiang Cheng
    Neutron Scattering Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United States
  • Luke L. Daemen
    Luke L. Daemen
    Neutron Scattering Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United States
  • Anibal J. Ramirez-Cuesta
    Anibal J. Ramirez-Cuesta
    Neutron Scattering Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United States
  • Guo Shiou Foo
    Guo Shiou Foo
    Chemical Sciences Division and Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United States
  • Minghui Zhu
    Minghui Zhu
    Operando Molecular Spectroscopy & Catalysis Laboratory, Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015, United States
    More by Minghui Zhu
  • Israel E. Wachs
    Israel E. Wachs
    Operando Molecular Spectroscopy & Catalysis Laboratory, Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015, United States
  • De-en Jiang
    De-en Jiang
    Department of Chemistry, University of California, Riverside, California 92521, United States
    More by De-en Jiang
  • , and 
  • Zili Wu*
    Zili Wu
    Chemical Sciences Division and Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United States
    *[email protected]
    More by Zili Wu
Cite this: J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 19, 7990–7999
Publication Date (Web):April 25, 2019
https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b03516
Copyright © 2019 American Chemical Society

    Article Views

    4434

    Altmetric

    -

    Citations

    LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
    Read OnlinePDF (3 MB)
    Supporting Info (1)»

    Abstract

    Abstract Image

    The water gas shift (WGS) reaction is of paramount importance for the chemical industry, as it constitutes, coupled with methane reforming, the main industrial route to produce hydrogen. Copper–chromium–iron oxide-based catalysts have been widely used for the high-temperature WGS reaction industrially. The WGS reaction mechanism by the CuCrFeOx catalyst has been debated for years, mainly between a “redox” mechanism involving the participation of atomic oxygen from the catalyst and an “associative” mechanism proceeding via a surface formate-like intermediate. In the present work, advanced in situ characterization techniques (infrared spectroscopy, temperature-programmed surface reaction (TPSR), near-ambient pressure XPS (NAP-XPS), and inelastic neutron scattering (INS)) were applied to determine the nature of the catalyst surface and identify surface intermediate species under WGS reaction conditions. The surface of the CuCrFeOx catalyst is found to be dynamic and becomes partially reduced under WGS reaction conditions, forming metallic Cu nanoparticles on Fe3O4. Neither in situ IR not INS spectroscopy detect the presence of surface formate species during WGS. TPSR experiments demonstrate that the evolution of CO2 and H2 from the CO/H2O reactants follows different kinetics than the evolution of CO2 and H2 from HCOOH decomposition (molecule mimicking the associative mechanism). Steady-state isotopic transient kinetic analysis (SSITKA) (CO + H216O → CO + H218O) exhibited significant 16O/18O scrambling, characteristic of a redox mechanism. Computed activation energies for elementary steps for the redox and associative mechanism by density functional theory (DFT) simulations indicate that the redox mechanism is favored over the associative mechanism. The combined spectroscopic, computational, and kinetic evidence in the present study finally resolves the WGS reaction mechanism on the industrial-type high-temperature CuCrFeOx catalyst that is shown to proceed via the redox mechanism.

    Supporting Information

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b03516.

    • SSITKA-reactor scheme, NAP-XPS for RWGS, INS spectra for formic acid, simulated vibrational modes of formic acid, DFT calculations, and SSITKA (PDF)

    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

    Cited By

    This article is cited by 55 publications.

    1. Jin-Ying Li, Qiang Fu, Chun-Jiang Jia. First-Principles Simulations of H2O Dissociation at the Interfacial Region Formed by a Molybdenum Oxide Cluster and a Reduced MoO3–x Surface. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2023, 127 (29) , 14177-14184. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c01923
    2. Xinbin Yu, Yongqiang Cheng, Yuanyuan Li, Felipe Polo-Garzon, Jue Liu, Eugene Mamontov, Meijun Li, David Lennon, Stewart F. Parker, Anibal J. Ramirez-Cuesta, Zili Wu. Neutron Scattering Studies of Heterogeneous Catalysis. Chemical Reviews 2023, 123 (13) , 8638-8700. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00101
    3. Hui Wang, Lisha Wei, Yueyue Jiao, Xiaodong Wen, Haijun Jiao. Metal–Support Interaction from Single Atoms to Single Clusters on the Fully Dehydrated Silica Surface. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2023, 127 (19) , 8963-8977. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c08309
    4. Yinming Wang, Ziqi Tian, Qihao Yang, Kaicheng Tong, Xuan Tang, Nian Zhang, Jing Zhou, Linjuan Zhang, Qiuju Zhang, Sheng Dai, Yichao Lin, Zhiyi Lu, Liang Chen. Atomically Dispersed Dual Metal Sites Boost the Efficiency of Olefins Epoxidation in Tandem with CO2 Cycloaddition. Nano Letters 2022, 22 (20) , 8381-8388. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c03087
    5. Huayu Gu, Jintong Lan, Yi Liu, Cancan Ling, Kai Wei, Guangming Zhan, Furong Guo, Falong Jia, Zhihui Ai, Lizhi Zhang, Xiao Liu. Water Enables Lattice Oxygen Activation of Transition Metal Oxides for Volatile Organic Compound Oxidation. ACS Catalysis 2022, 12 (18) , 11272-11280. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.2c03552
    6. Dongjae Shin, Rui Huang, Myeong Gon Jang, Seokhyun Choung, Youngbi Kim, Kiheon Sung, Tae Yong Kim, Jeong Woo Han. Role of an Interface for Hydrogen Production Reaction over Size-Controlled Supported Metal Catalysts. ACS Catalysis 2022, 12 (13) , 8082-8093. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.2c02370
    7. Yu Jin, Hui Yang, Xin Yu, Pengju Ren, Yong Yang, Hongwei Xiang, Yong-Wang Li, Haijun Jiao, Xiaodong Wen. Unraveling the Synergetic Effect of the FeOx–Cu Model System in Catalyzing the Water–Gas Shift Reaction. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2022, 126 (14) , 6241-6248. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c00350
    8. Pan Yin, Jun Yu, Lei Wang, Jian Zhang, Yao Jie, Li-Fang Chen, Xiao-Jie Zhao, Hai-Song Feng, Yu-Sen Yang, Ming Xu, Xin Zhang, Jing-Bin Han, Hong Yan, Min Wei. Water-Gas-Shift Reaction on Au/TiO2–x Catalysts with Various TiO2 Crystalline Phases: A Theoretical and Experimental Study. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2021, 125 (37) , 20360-20372. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c06381
    9. Liuqingqing Yang, Laura Pastor-Pérez, Juan Jose Villora-Pico, Antonio Sepúlveda-Escribano, Feixiang Tian, Minghui Zhu, Yi-Fan Han, Tomas Ramirez Reina. Highly Active and Selective Multicomponent Fe–Cu/CeO2–Al2O3 Catalysts for CO2 Upgrading via RWGS: Impact of Fe/Cu Ratio. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 2021, 9 (36) , 12155-12166. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c03551
    10. Jiao-Jiao Chen, Xiao-Na Li, Qing-Yu Liu, Gong-Ping Wei, Yuan Yang, Zi-Yu Li, Sheng-Gui He. Water Gas Shift Reaction Catalyzed by Rhodium–Manganese Oxide Cluster Anions. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2021, 12 (35) , 8513-8520. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c02267
    11. Pengfei Tian, Mengwei Gu, Runfa Qiu, Zixu Yang, Fuzhen Xuan, Minghui Zhu. Tunable Carbon Dioxide Activation Pathway over Iron Oxide Catalysts: Effects of Potassium. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2021, 60 (24) , 8705-8713. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.1c01592
    12. Minghui Zhu, Pengfei Tian, Michael E. Ford, Jiacheng Chen, Jing Xu, Yi-Fan Han, Israel E. Wachs. Nature of Reactive Oxygen Intermediates on Copper-Promoted Iron–Chromium Oxide Catalysts during CO2 Activation. ACS Catalysis 2020, 10 (14) , 7857-7863. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.0c01311
    13. James Kammert, Jisue Moon, Yongqiang Cheng, Luke Daemen, Stephan Irle, Victor Fung, Jue Liu, Katharine Page, Xiaohan Ma, Vincent Phaneuf, Jianhua Tong, Anibal J. Ramirez-Cuesta, Zili Wu. Nature of Reactive Hydrogen for Ammonia Synthesis over a Ru/C12A7 Electride Catalyst. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2020, 142 (16) , 7655-7667. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.0c02345
    14. Jiawei Huang, Shuai He, Justin L. Goodsell, Justin R. Mulcahy, Wenxiao Guo, Alexander Angerhofer, Wei David Wei. Manipulating Atomic Structures at the Au/TiO2 Interface for O2 Activation. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2020, 142 (14) , 6456-6460. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b13453
    15. Pan Yin, Yu-Sen Yang, Li-Fang Chen, Ming Xu, Chun-Yuan Chen, Xiao-Jie Zhao, Xin Zhang, Hong Yan, Min Wei. DFT Study on the Mechanism of the Water Gas Shift Reaction Over NixPy Catalysts: The Role of P. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2020, 124 (12) , 6598-6610. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b11142
    16. Miguel A. Bañares, Marco Daturi. Understanding catalysts by time-/space-resolved operando methodologies. Catalysis Today 2023, 423 , 114255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2023.114255
    17. Jingjing Li, Sarayute Chansai, Christopher Hardacre, Xiaolei Fan. Non thermal plasma assisted water-gas shift reactions under mild conditions: state of the art and a future perspective. Catalysis Today 2023, 423 , 113956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2022.11.017
    18. Pilsun Yoo, Peilin Liao. Multiple redox mechanisms for water-gas shift reaction on Fe3O4 (1 1 1) surface: A density functional theory and mean-field microkinetic modeling study. Applied Surface Science 2023, 630 , 157501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2023.157501
    19. Tian-Yao Shen, Pan Yin, Ying-Jie Lai, Jia-Ming Xu, Jing-Yi Guo, Wei Zhang, Min Pu, Hong Yan, Min Wei. Water-gas-shift reaction over Au single-atom catalysts with reversible oxide supports: A density functional theory study. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2023, 48 (64) , 24951-24960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.01.017
    20. Franklin Tao, Yuting Li. A new type of catalysts: catalysts of singly dispersed bimetallic sites. Trends in Chemistry 2023, 5 (6) , 486-499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trechm.2023.03.006
    21. Pan Yin, Yusen Yang, Hong Yan, Min Wei. Theoretical Calculations on Metal Catalysts Toward Water‐Gas Shift Reaction: a Review. Chemistry – A European Journal 2023, 29 (24) https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.202203781
    22. Andrea Zachariou, Alexander P. Hawkins, Paul Collier, Russell F. Howe, Stewart F. Parker, David Lennon. Neutron scattering studies of the methanol-to-hydrocarbons reaction. Catalysis Science & Technology 2023, 13 (7) , 1976-1990. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2CY02154D
    23. Anders Holmen, Jia Yang, De Chen. Steady-State Isotopic Transient Kinetic Analysis (SSITKA). 2023, 935-965. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07125-6_41
    24. Huijun Chen, Rui Huang, Myeong Gon Jang, Chaesung Lim, Dongjae Shin, Qiuyu Liu, Heejae Yang, Yan Chen, Jeong Woo Han. Modulating the water gas shift reaction via strong interfacial interaction between a defective oxide matrix and exsolved metal nanoparticles. Journal of Materials Chemistry A 2022, 10 (47) , 24995-25008. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2TA08217A
    25. Shuang Xiang, Lin Dong, Zhi-Qiang Wang, Xue Han, Luke L. Daemen, Jiong Li, Yongqiang Cheng, Yong Guo, Xiaohui Liu, Yongfeng Hu, Anibal J. Ramirez-Cuesta, Sihai Yang, Xue-Qing Gong, Yanqin Wang. A unique Co@CoO catalyst for hydrogenolysis of biomass-derived 5-hydroxymethylfurfural to 2,5-dimethylfuran. Nature Communications 2022, 13 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-31362-9
    26. Yutao Hu, Xiaolong Liu, Yang Zou, Haijiao Xie, Tingyu Zhu. Nature of support plays vital roles in H2O promoted CO oxidation over Pt catalysts. Journal of Catalysis 2022, 416 , 364-374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2022.11.020
    27. Shenghong Wang, Changan Zhou, Yongda Cao, Lei Song, Lirong Zheng, Kui Ma, Hairong Yue. Pt-O-Cu Anchored on Fe2O3 Boosting Electrochemical Water-gas Shift Reaction for Highly Efficient H2 Generation. Journal of Catalysis 2022, 130 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2022.11.033
    28. Han Yan, Xuetao Qin, Jin-Cheng Liu, Lihua Cai, Peng Xu, Jian-Jun Song, Chao Ma, Wei-Wei Wang, Zhao Jin, Chun-Jiang Jia. Releasing the limited catalytic activity of CeO2-supported noble metal catalysts via UV-induced deep dechlorination. Journal of Catalysis 2022, 413 , 703-712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2022.07.024
    29. Pan Yin, Hao Meng, Lei Wang, Yingjie Lai, Yao Jie, Jun Yu, Wei Liu, Xiaojie Zhao, Tianyao Shen, Xin Zhang, Jingbin Han, Yusen Yang, Hong Yan, Min Wei. Theoretical and experimental exploration of NiM(111) (M = Fe, Co, Cu, Zn) bimetallic catalysts for the water-gas shift reaction. Journal of Materials Chemistry A 2022, 10 (31) , 16610-16619. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2TA00991A
    30. Shule Wang, Hanmin Yang, Ziyi Shi, Ilman Nuran Zaini, Yuming Wen, Jianchun Jiang, Pär Göran Jönsson, Weihong Yang. Renewable hydrogen production from the organic fraction of municipal solid waste through a novel carbon-negative process concept. Energy 2022, 252 , 124056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.124056
    31. Yu Meng, Xiaoyan Liu, Yajun Ma, Xinhua Gao, Xiaodong Wen. Investigation of water gas shift reactivity on Fe5C2 (111): A DFT study. Molecular Catalysis 2022, 529 , 112538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcat.2022.112538
    32. Shangbo Ning, Yanhui Sun, Shuxin Ouyang, Yuhang Qi, Jinhua Ye. Solar light-induced injection of hot electrons and photocarriers for synergistically enhanced photothermocatalysis over Cu-Co/SrTiO3 catalyst towards boosting CO hydrogenation into C2–C4 hydrocarbons. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 2022, 310 , 121063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121063
    33. Eugenio Meloni, Marco Martino, Giuseppina Iervolino, Concetta Ruocco, Simona Renda, Giovanni Festa, Vincenzo Palma. The Route from Green H2 Production through Bioethanol Reforming to CO2 Catalytic Conversion: A Review. Energies 2022, 15 (7) , 2383. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15072383
    34. Milan Babu Poudel, Miyeon Shin, Han Joo Kim. Interface engineering of MIL-88 derived MnFe-LDH and MnFe2O3 on three-dimensional carbon nanofibers for the efficient adsorption of Cr(VI), Pb(II), and As(III) ions. Separation and Purification Technology 2022, 287 , 120463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2022.120463
    35. Łukasz Kotyrba, Anna Chrobok, Agnieszka Siewniak. Synthesis of Propylene Carbonate by Urea Alcoholysis—Recent Advances. Catalysts 2022, 12 (3) , 309. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12030309
    36. Yifan Sun, Felipe Polo‐Garzon, Zhenghong Bao, Jisue Moon, Zhennan Huang, Hao Chen, Zitao Chen, Zhenzhen Yang, Miaofang Chi, Zili Wu, Jue Liu, Sheng Dai. Manipulating Copper Dispersion on Ceria for Enhanced Catalysis: A Nanocrystal‐Based Atom‐Trapping Strategy. Advanced Science 2022, 9 (8) , 2104749. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202104749
    37. Shenghong Wang, Changan Zhou, Yongda Cao, Lei Song, Lirong Zheng, Kui Ma, Hairong Yue. Pt-O-Cu Anchored on Fe₂O₃ Boosting Electrochemical Water-Gas Shift Reaction for Highly Efficient H₂ Generation. SSRN Electronic Journal 2022, 130 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4178394
    38. Longfei Lin, Qingqing Mei, Xue Han, Stewart F. Parker, Sihai Yang. Investigations of Hydrocarbon Species on Solid Catalysts by Inelastic Neutron Scattering. Topics in Catalysis 2021, 64 (9-12) , 593-602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11244-020-01389-7
    39. Javier Castells-Gil, Samy Ould-Chikh, Adrian Ramírez, Rafia Ahmad, Gonzalo Prieto, Alberto Rodríguez Gómez, Luis Garzón-Tovar, Selvedin Telalovic, Lingmei Liu, Alessandro Genovese, Natalia M. Padial, Antonio Aguilar-Tapia, Pierre Bordet, Luigi Cavallo, Carlos Martí-Gastaldo, Jorge Gascon. Unlocking mixed oxides with unprecedented stoichiometries from heterometallic metal-organic frameworks for the catalytic hydrogenation of CO2. Chem Catalysis 2021, 1 (2) , 364-382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.checat.2021.03.010
    40. Junhao Lin, Shichang Sun, Juan Luo, Chongwei Cui, Rui Ma, Lin Fang, Xiangli Liu. Effects of oxygen vacancy defect on microwave pyrolysis of biomass to produce high-quality syngas and bio-oil: Microwave absorption and in-situ catalytic. Waste Management 2021, 128 , 200-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2021.05.002
    41. Tahmin Lais, Liliana Lukashuk, Leon van de Water, Timothy I. Hyde, Matteo Aramini, Gopinathan Sankar. Elucidation of copper environment in a Cu–Cr–Fe oxide catalyst through in situ high-resolution XANES investigation. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 2021, 23 (10) , 5888-5896. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CP06468H
    42. Milan Babu Poudel, Han Joo Kim. Interface Engineering of MIL-88 Derived MnFe-LDH and MnFe 2O 3 on Three-Dimensional Carbon Nanofibers for the Efficient Adsorption of Cr(VI), Pb(II), and As(III) Ions. SSRN Electronic Journal 2021, 7 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3974851
    43. Hirosuke Matsui, Nozomu Ishiguro, Youya Suzuki, Kouhei Wakamatsu, Chiharu Yamada, Kanako Sato, Naoyuki Maejima, Tomoya Uruga, Mizuki Tada. Reversible structural transformation and redox properties of Cr-loaded iron oxide dendrites studied by in situ XANES spectroscopy. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 2020, 22 (48) , 28093-28099. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CP04416D
    44. Yanting Liu, Dehui Deng, Xinhe Bao. Catalysis for Selected C1 Chemistry. Chem 2020, 6 (10) , 2497-2514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chempr.2020.08.026
    45. Chengcheng Shi, Dachao Yuan, Luping Ma, Yaguang Li, Yangfan Lu, Linjie Gao, Xingyuan San, Shufang Wang, Guangsheng Fu. Outdoor sunlight-driven scalable water-gas shift reaction through novel photothermal device-supported CuO x /ZnO/Al 2 O 3 nanosheets with a hydrogen generation rate of 192 mmol g −1 h −1. Journal of Materials Chemistry A 2020, 8 (37) , 19467-19472. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0TA07190K
    46. Minghui Zhu, Jiacheng Chen, Liang Shen, Michael E. Ford, Jian Gao, Jing Xu, Israel E. Wachs, Yi-Fan Han. Probing the surface of promoted CuO-Cr2O3-Fe2O3 catalysts during CO2 activation. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 2020, 271 , 118943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.118943
    47. Janko Popovic, Lorenz Lindenthal, Raffael Rameshan, Thomas Ruh, Andreas Nenning, Stefan Löffler, Alexander Karl Opitz, Christoph Rameshan. High Temperature Water Gas Shift Reactivity of Novel Perovskite Catalysts. Catalysts 2020, 10 (5) , 582. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal10050582
    48. Xianglin Liu, Chenxi Cao, Pengfei Tian, Minghui Zhu, Yulong Zhang, Jing Xu, Yun Tian, Yi-Fan Han. Resolving CO2 activation and hydrogenation pathways over iron carbides from DFT investigation. Journal of CO2 Utilization 2020, 38 , 10-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2019.12.014
    49. Zhenghong Bao, Victor Fung, Felipe Polo-Garzon, Zachary D. Hood, Shaohong Cao, Miaofang Chi, Lei Bai, De-en Jiang, Zili Wu. The interplay between surface facet and reconstruction on isopropanol conversion over SrTiO3 nanocrystals. Journal of Catalysis 2020, 384 , 49-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2020.02.014
    50. Hoang Tran Bui, Song Min Im, Ki-jeong Kim, Wooyul Kim, Hangil Lee. Photocatalytic degradation of phenolic compounds of defect engineered Fe3O4: An alternative approach to solar activation via ligand-to-metal charge transfer. Applied Surface Science 2020, 509 , 144853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.144853
    51. Yun Lang, Chun Du, Yuanting Tang, Yongjie Chen, Yunkun Zhao, Rong Chen, Xiao Liu, Bin Shan. Highly efficient copper-manganese oxide catalysts with abundant surface vacancies for low-temperature water-gas shift reaction. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45 (15) , 8629-8639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.01.108
    52. Sagar Sourav, Israel E. Wachs. Cr-Free, Cu Promoted Fe Oxide-Based Catalysts for High-Temperature Water-Gas Shift (HT-WGS) Reaction. Catalysts 2020, 10 (3) , 305. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal10030305
    53. Ning Liu, Pan Yin, Ming Xu, Yusen Yang, Shaomin Zhang, Junbo Zhang, Xiaoyu Meng, Jian Zhang, Jun Yu, Yi Man, Xin Zhang, Min Wei. The catalytic mechanism of the Au@TiO 2−x /ZnO catalyst towards a low-temperature water-gas shift reaction. Catalysis Science & Technology 2020, 10 (3) , 768-775. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9CY02077B
    54. Xiao-Qing Cao, Jun Zhou, Song Li, Gao-Wu Qin. Ultra-stable metal nano-catalyst synthesis strategy: a perspective. Rare Metals 2020, 39 (2) , 113-130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12598-019-01350-y
    55. Minghui Zhu, Pengfei Tian, Jiacheng Chen, Michael E. Ford, Jing Xu, Israel E. Wachs, Yi‐Fan Han. Activation and deactivation of the commercial‐type CuO–Cr 2 O 3 –Fe 2 O 3 high temperature shift catalyst. AIChE Journal 2020, 66 (1) https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.16846

    Pair your accounts.

    Export articles to Mendeley

    Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

    Pair your accounts.

    Export articles to Mendeley

    Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

    You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

    STEP 1:
    Click to create an ACS ID

    Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

    Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

    Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

    MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
    Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect