Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect
ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Persistence of Plant DNA Sequences in the Blood of Dairy Cows Fed with Genetically Modified (Bt176) and Conventional Corn Silage
My Activity

Figure 1Loading Img
    Article

    Persistence of Plant DNA Sequences in the Blood of Dairy Cows Fed with Genetically Modified (Bt176) and Conventional Corn Silage
    Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

    View Author Information
    Agence Française de Sécurité Sanitaire des Aliments (AFSSA), Laboratoire d’Etudes et de Recherches sur la Qualité des Aliments et les Procédés Agro-Alimentaires, 23 avenue du Général De Gaulle, 94700 Maisons-Alfort, France, INRA (Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique), Route de St Cyr, 78026 Versailles cedex, France, Institut de l’Elevage, 9 rue André Brouard, BP 70510, 49105 Angers cedex 02, France, CNIEL, 42 rue de Châteaudun, 75314 Paris cedex 09, France, INRA (Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique), Unité Mathématiques & Informatique Appliquées, Domaine de Vilvert, 78352 Jouy-en-Josas cedex, France, and INRA (Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique), Unité Génomique et Physiologie de la Lactation (GPL), Equipe Génomique Expressionnelle & Lait (GEL)-PiCT, Domaine de Vilvert, 78352 Jouy-en-Josas cedex, France
    * Corresponding authors. E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]
    †INRA, Route de St Cyr.
    ‡INRA, Unité Génomique et Physiologie de la Lactation (GPL), Equipe Génomique Expressionnelle & Lait (GEL)-PiCT.
    §AFSSA, Laboratoire d’Etudes et de Recherches sur la Qualité des Aliments et les Procédés Agro-Alimentaires.
    ∥INRA, Unité Mathématiques & Informatique Appliquées.
    ⊥Institut de l’Elevage.
    #CNIEL.
    Other Access Options

    Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

    Cite this: J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 2, 509–516
    Click to copy citationCitation copied!
    https://doi.org/10.1021/jf802262c
    Published January 5, 2009
    Copyright © 2009 American Chemical Society

    Abstract

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

    To determine whether plant sequences, including transgenic sequences, are present in animal blood, we tested blood samples from Holstein cows fed with either Bt176 genetically modified corn or conventional corn. We used previously described sensitive real-time PCR assays targeting transgenic sequences (35S promoter and Bt176 specific junction sequence), a monocopy maize-specific sequence (ADH promoter), and two multicopy sequences from plant nucleus (26S rRNA gene) and chloroplast (psaB gene). The presence of Cry1A(b) protein in bovine blood samples was also tested using a sandwich ELISA kit. Our study shows the ability of plant nuclear and/or chloroplast DNA fragments to enter bovine blood circulation. However, maize nuclear DNA, both mono- and multicopy sequences, was less detected than chloroplast DNA, probably because the higher number of chloroplast copies and also possibly because nuclear DNA might be less protected by the nuclear membrane. Despite our data confirm the ability of small (ca.150 bp) plant DNA fragments to cross the intestinal barrier, we were unable to demonstrate clearly the presence of transgenic DNA or proteins in bovine blood. No sample tested positive with the two real-time PCR assays targeting transgenic sequences (35S promoter and Bt176 specific junction sequence). Only faint punctual positive results occurred randomly and were probably due to postsample collection or laboratory contamination or can be considered as artifact as they have never been confirmed. Our data highlight the difficulties to detect transgenic sequences in blood of dairy cows fed genetically modified corn (Bt176) silage. Those results show that in order to meet the consumers’ demand of animals fed with GM products there is currently no cost-effective analytical procedure to replace documentary traceability.

    Copyright © 2009 American Chemical Society

    Read this article

    To access this article, please review the available access options below.

    Get instant access

    Purchase Access

    Read this article for 48 hours. Check out below using your ACS ID or as a guest.

    Recommended

    Access through Your Institution

    You may have access to this article through your institution.

    Your institution does not have access to this content. Add or change your institution or let them know you’d like them to include access.

    Cited By

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

    This article is cited by 18 publications.

    1. Anna Pozzi, Nelson Nazzicari, Rossana Capoferri, Slobodanka Radovic, Graziella Bongioni, . Assessment of residual plant DNA in bulk milk for Grana Padano PDO production by a metabarcoding approach. PLOS ONE 2023, 18 (7) , e0289108. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289108
    2. Shanshan Dong, Dini Zhang, Cigang Yu, Zhenhua Zhang, Yan Liu. Using droplet digital PCR to detect plant DNA in tissues of zebrafish ( Danio rerio ) fed genetically modified maize. Aquaculture Research 2021, 52 (9) , 4467-4474. https://doi.org/10.1111/are.15285
    3. Jacob Matovu, Ahmet Alçiçek. Investigations and Concerns about the Fate of Transgenic DNA and Protein in Livestock. 2021https://doi.org/10.52460/issc.2021.011
    4. Anna Nadal, Marzia De Giacomo, Ralf Einspanier, Gijs Kleter, Esther Kok, Sarah McFarland, Roberta Onori, Alain Paris, Mònica Toldrà, Jeroen van Dijk, Jean-Michel Wal, Maria Pla. Exposure of livestock to GM feeds: Detectability and measurement. Food and Chemical Toxicology 2018, 117 , 13-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2017.08.032
    5. Barbara de Santis, Norbert Stockhofe, Jean-Michel Wal, Eefke Weesendorp, Jean-Paul Lallès, Jeroen van Dijk, Esther Kok, Marzia De Giacomo, Ralf Einspanier, Roberta Onori, Carlo Brera, Paul Bikker, Jan van der Meulen, G. Kleter. Case studies on genetically modified organisms (GMOs): Potential risk scenarios and associated health indicators. Food and Chemical Toxicology 2018, 117 , 36-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2017.08.033
    6. Kevin Smith, German Spangenberg. Considerations for Managing Agricultural Co-Existence between Transgenic and Non-Transgenic Cultivars of Outcrossing Perennial Forage Plants in Dairy Pastures. Agronomy 2016, 6 (4) , 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy6040059
    7. Rodrick J. Chiodini, Scot E. Dowd, Susan Galandiuk, Brian Davis, Angela Glassing. The predominant site of bacterial translocation across the intestinal mucosal barrier occurs at the advancing disease margin in Crohn's disease. Microbiology 2016, 162 (9) , 1608-1619. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.000336
    8. S.V. Ramesh, Shelly Praveen. Noncoding RNA-Based Genetically Modified Crops. 2016, 51-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802259-7.00006-3
    9. Meabh Beatty, Jasenka Guduric-Fuchs, Eoin Brown, Stephen Bridgett, Usha Chakravarthy, Ruth Esther Hogg, David Arthur Simpson. Small RNAs from plants, bacteria and fungi within the order Hypocreales are ubiquitous in human plasma. BMC Genomics 2014, 15 (1) https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-933
    10. A. L. Van Eenennaam, A. E. Young. Prevalence and impacts of genetically engineered feedstuffs on livestock populations1. Journal of Animal Science 2014, 92 (10) , 4255-4278. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2014-8124
    11. Alison L Van Eenennaam. GMOs in animal agriculture: time to consider both costs and benefits in regulatory evaluations. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology 2013, 4 (1) https://doi.org/10.1186/2049-1891-4-37
    12. S. V. Ramesh. Non-coding RNAs in Crop Genetic Modification: Considerations and Predictable Environmental Risk Assessments (ERA). Molecular Biotechnology 2013, 55 (1) , 87-100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12033-013-9648-6
    13. Aurora Rizzi, Noura Raddadi, Claudia Sorlini, Lise Nordgrd, Kaare Magne Nielsen, Daniele Daffonchio. The Stability and Degradation of Dietary DNA in the Gastrointestinal Tract of Mammals: Implications for Horizontal Gene Transfer and the Biosafety of GMOs. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 2012, 52 (2) , 142-161. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2010.499480
    14. Yves Bertheau. OGM : de la traçabilité et de la coexistence des filières à l’aménagement du territoire. Territoire en mouvement 2012, (12) , 56-80. https://doi.org/10.4000/tem.1476
    15. Y. Bertheau. Detection and traceability of genetically modified organisms in food supply chains. 2011, 189-213. https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857090621.2.189
    16. Wayne Parrott, Bruce Chassy, Jim Ligon, Linda Meyer, Jay Petrick, Junguo Zhou, Rod Herman, Bryan Delaney, Marci Levine. Application of food and feed safety assessment principles to evaluate transgenic approaches to gene modulation in crops. Food and Chemical Toxicology 2010, 48 (7) , 1773-1790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2010.04.017
    17. Patrick Guertler, Vijay Paul, Kerstin Steinke, Steffi Wiedemann, Wolfgang Preißinger, Christiane Albrecht, Hubert Spiekers, Frieder J. Schwarz, Heinrich H.D. Meyer. Long-term feeding of genetically modified corn (MON810) — Fate of cry1Ab DNA and recombinant protein during the metabolism of the dairy cow. Livestock Science 2010, 131 (2-3) , 250-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2010.04.010
    18. Marta Hernández, Alejandro Ferrando, David Rodríguez‐Lázaro. Assessment of Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) in Meat Products by PCR. 2010, 501-518. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780813820897.ch29

    Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

    Cite this: J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 2, 509–516
    Click to copy citationCitation copied!
    https://doi.org/10.1021/jf802262c
    Published January 5, 2009
    Copyright © 2009 American Chemical Society

    Article Views

    920

    Altmetric

    -

    Citations

    Learn about these metrics

    Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

    Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

    The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.