Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect
ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Structure-Based Design of Novel Boronic Acid-Based Inhibitors of Autotaxin
My Activity
  • Open Access
Article

Structure-Based Design of Novel Boronic Acid-Based Inhibitors of Autotaxin
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

View Author Information
‡ § Division of Cell Biology, §Netherlands Proteomics Centre, and Division of Biochemistry, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Huib Ovaa, Division of Cell Biology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Phone: +31-20-5121979. E-mail: [email protected]
Open PDFSupporting Information (1)

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry

Cite this: J. Med. Chem. 2011, 54, 13, 4619–4626
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/jm200310q
Published May 26, 2011

Copyright © 2011 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Autotaxin (ATX) is a secreted phosphodiesterase that hydrolyzes the abundant phospholipid lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) to produce lysophosphatidic acid (LPA). The ATX-LPA signaling axis has been implicated in inflammation, fibrosis, and tumor progression, rendering ATX an attractive drug target. We recently described a boronic acid-based inhibitor of ATX, named HA155 (1). Here, we report the design of new inhibitors based on the crystal structure of ATX in complex with inhibitor 1. Furthermore, we describe the syntheses and activities of these new inhibitors, whose potencies can be explained by structural data. To understand the difference in activity between two different isomers with nanomolar potencies, we performed molecular docking experiments. Intriguingly, molecular docking suggested a remarkable binding pose for one of the isomers, which differs from the original binding pose of inhibitor 1 for ATX, opening further options for inhibitor design.

Copyright © 2011 American Chemical Society

 Author-Status

Deceased.

Introduction

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The secreted glycoprotein autotaxin (ATX) is a phosphodiesterase responsible for the hydrolysis of lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) into lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) and choline, as depicted in Scheme 1. (1, 2) The bioactive lipid LPA stimulates migration, proliferation and survival of cells by activating specific G protein-coupled receptors. (3) The ATX-LPA signaling axis is involved in cancer, inflammation and fibrotic disease. (4-6) Potent and selective ATX inhibitors are needed to elucidate the contribution of ATX action to signaling cascades that may result in disease in case of malfunction.

Scheme 1

Scheme 1. Autotaxin (ATX) is Responsible for Hydrolyzing the Lipid Lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) into Lysophosphatidic Acid (LPA) and Choline
ATX, also known as eNPP2, is a unique member of the ecto-nucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase (eNPP) family of proteins. It is the only family member capable of producing LPA by hydrolysis of LPC. (7) Recently reported crystal structures of mouse (8) and rat (9) ATX confirmed that a threonine residue and two zinc ions are necessary for activity of ATX. (10) From these structures, it could be concluded that ATX hydrolyzes its substrates through a typical alkaline phosphatase/phosphodiesterase mechanism. (11, 12) Furthermore, these structures showed that ATX specifically binds its lipid substrates in a hydrophobic pocket extending from the active site of ATX. This pocket accommodates the alkyl chain of the lipids in different poses as was also shown in various crystal structures. (8)
Recently, we described the discovery of a boronic acid-based ATX inhibitors that helped to reveal the short half-life (∼5 min) of LPA in vivo. (13, 14) We introduced a boronic acid moiety in the inhibitor structure to rationally target the threonine oxygen nucleophile of ATX with a hard matching Lewis acid. The crystal structure of ATX in complex with HA155 (1) (9) confirmed our hypothesis that this inhibitor targets the threonine oxygen nucleophile in the ATX active site via the boronic acid moiety, while the hydrophobic 4-fluorobenzyl moiety of inhibitor 1 targets the hydrophobic pocket responsible for lipid binding (Figure 1).

Figure 1

Figure 1. ATX structure liganded with inhibitor 1 (PDB ID 2XRG). (A) Surface representation of ATX with inhibitor 1 (magenta). (B) Binding of inhibitor 1 to the threonine oxygen nucleophile and two zinc ions. (C) Visualizing the ether linker of inhibitor 1 bound to ATX. (D) Visualizing the degree of freedom for the thiazolidine-2,4-dione core of inhibitor 1 in the ATX binding site.

Here, we report a number of synthetic routes, systematically substituting linkers and the thiazolidine-2,4-dione core in 1, while keeping the boronic acid moiety untouched. The observed structure–activity relations could well be explained from the ATX structure in complex with inhibitor 1. A remarkable binding pose of a novel inhibitor, as predicted from molecular docking experiments, suggests additional avenues for further inhibitor design.

Results and Discussion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Design of Inhibitors

The structure of inhibitor 1 bound to the ATX active site (Figure 1) showed that its 4-fluorobenzyl moiety binds into the hydrophobic lipid binding pocket of ATX (Figure 1C,D). (9) This pocket also accommodates the lipid tail of LPA, the hydrolysis product of LPC. (8) The thiazolidine-2,4-dione core of 1 and the conjugated aromatic ring are located between the hydrophobic pocket and the catalytic site (Figure 1D). The ether linker, bridging the two aromatic rings in 1, and especially a methylene and arylboronic acid moiety are well accessible to solvent (Figure 1C). Binding of inhibitor 1 to the ATX active site is predominately driven by hydrophobic interactions (the interaction interface is approximately 500 Å2) and by the boronic acid binding to the threonine oxygen nucleophile of ATX. (9) The boron–oxygen distance observed is ∼1.6 Å, which is consistent with a covalent bond. As expected, this binding is reversible evidenced by the fact that ATX activity can be fully restored upon washing out the inhibitor. (13) In addition, one of the boronic acid hydroxyl moieties is tethered by the two zinc ions in the ATX active site. Thus, the boronic acid moiety targets not only the threonine oxygen nucleophile, but also the two zinc ions that are essential for catalytic activity of ATX (Figure 1B). Remarkably, there are no hydrogen bonds or salt bridges that participate in binding of inhibitor 1 to ATX. Inhibitor 1 is locked in a pose with reduced molecular flexibility, forming an ideal starting point for a structure-based approach to further modifications.
Previously, we determined that the 4-fluorobenzyl moiety is preferred from over 40 benzylic substituents tested. (13) For this reason, we left the 4-fluorobenzyl moiety untouched in this study. We investigated new design options, starting by modifying the ether linker in inhibitor 1. We decided to replace the ether linkage (OCH2) with various amides, an amine, and an E-configured double bond (CONH (17), CONCH2 (18), NHCO (19), NHCH2 (36), and (E)-CH═CH (20); see Table 1). The thiazolidine-2,4-dione core was investigated next. We substituted the sulfur atom present with (substituted) amino and methylene moieties (NH (26), NCH3 (28), or CH2 (32)) (Table 2). The carbon double bond conjugated to the thiazolidine-2,4-dione carbonyl moiety forms a possible Michael acceptor. Although this Michael acceptor is resistant to nucleophilic additions in vitro (Supporting Information Figure S1) it may be a biologically active Michael acceptor in vivo, and therefore, we investigated its removal.
Table 1. IC50 Values of the Inhibitors Resulting from the Linker Modification
Table a

IC50 values have been determined in the choline release assay using 40 μM LPC and 10 nM ATX. The dose–response curve of inhibitor 17 shows biphasic curve (see Supporting Information Figure S2).

Table 2. IC50 Values of the Inhibitors Resulting from the Core Modification
Table a

IC50 values have been determined in the choline release assay using 40 μM LPC and 10 nM ATX. E-28 contains 20% of the Z-isomer.

Chemical Synthesis of Modified Inhibitors

We first explored synthetic routes to replace the ether linkage in 1. The synthesis of target molecules 1720 (Scheme 2) starts with palladium catalyzed borylation of appropriate aldehydes via a Suzuki-Miyaura reaction (15) as depicted in Scheme 2 (for syntheses of aldehydes 26 see Supporting Information). This reaction smoothly provided intermediates 711. Next, the pinacol protecting group was hydrolyzed under acidic conditions and oxidatively destroyed by NaIO4 giving boronic acid aldehydes 1216. In the final step 3-(4-fluorobenzyl)thiazolidine-2,4-dione is reacted with the boronic acid aldehyde by Knoevenagel condensation to selectively give the Z-isomer of the final products (1 and 1720).

Scheme 2

Scheme 2. Synthetic Route Towards Linker Modified Inhibitors
In order to remove the potential Michael acceptor present, we reduced the double bond in inhibitor 1 using hydrogen and palladium on carbon (Scheme 3A), to give compound 21. To reduce the carbonyl moiety also in the thiazolidine-2,4-dione core of 1, we used NaBH4 resulting in hemiaminal 22. After addition of sulfuric acid to the reaction mixture to eliminate the hydroxyl moiety in 22, unsaturated inhibitor 23 was obtained.

Scheme 3

Scheme 3. Synthetic Routes Towards Core Modified Inhibitors
For the syntheses of imidazolidine-2,4-dione-based inhibitors 26 and 28, imidazolidine-2,4-dione (24) was mono N-alkylated with 4-fluorobenzyl bromide to give intermediate 25 (Scheme 3B). Reaction of 25 by a Knoevenagel condensation with aldehyde 12 selectively resulted in the formation of the Z-isomer of 26. In parallel, intermediate 25 was methylated to give compound 27. Finally, 27 was condensed with aldehyde 12 resulting in target molecule 28. Both the Z- and E-isomers were formed in a 1:4 (Z:E) ratio. To obtain and isolate solely the Z-isomer 28, we N-methylated compound 26.
Core-hopping from thiazolidine-2,4-dione to pyrrolidine-2,5-dione is depicted in Scheme 3C. The route starts with the formation of a Wittig reagent starting from 2,5-pyrroledione (29), which is reacted with triphenylphosphine to form ylide 30. (16) The Wittig reaction of the carbonyl stabilized ylide 30 with aldehyde 12 selectively leads to the E-isomer of intermediate 31 as expected. Finally, compound 31 is N-alkylated with 4-fluorobenzyl bromide resulting in the pyrrolidine-2,5-dione product 32.
For the synthesis of a final tetrahydroisoquinoline-based core with a more rigid structure, the secondary amine in R- or S-tetrahydroisoquinoline 33 is reacted with 4-fluorobenzyl isocyanate in the presence of sodium hydroxide to form a urea intermediate. The imidazolidine ring is then formed upon acidification with hydrochloric acid, resulting in compound R- or S-34. In the final step, intermediate 34 is O-alkylated with 4-(bromomethyl)phenylboronic acid resulting in R- or S-35.

Structure–Activity Relations of Inhibitors and Autotaxin

Activity of the new molecules resulting from the linker and core modifications were determined in an LPC hydrolysis assay described previously, (13, 17) in which ATX-mediated release of choline from LPC is detected by a two-step enzymatic colorimetric reaction. The IC50 values observed for inhibitors with modified linkers and cores are listed in Tables 1 and 2.
When we replaced the ether moiety (OCH2, inhibitor 1, IC50 = 5.7 nM) for an amide linker (CONH, 17), we observed a significant loss of activity (IC50 = 147 nM). The dose–response curve of inhibitor 17 shows a biphasic curve (18) that could suggest several binding sites of this inhibitor for ATX (Supporting Information Figure S2). Expanding the CONH linker (17) to a more flexible CONHCH2 linker (18) improved the IC50 value (71 nM) by 2-fold compared to inhibitor 17. Reversing the amide linker in 17 to yield compound 19, results in high potency (IC50 = 10 nM), similar to inhibitor 1. However, inhibitor 19 is not able to achieve full inhibition, and 10% residual ATX activity is observed (Supporting Information Figure S3). Apparently, a more rigid amide linker results in suboptimal binding of the inhibitor. Therefore, we synthesized the more flexible amine analogue 36 (for the synthesis of inhibitor 36 see Supporting Information). This resulted indeed in a potent inhibitor (IC50 = 8.3 nM), similar to 1, and with no residual ATX activity (Supporting Information Figure S3). Introduction of an (E)-CH═CH linker resulted in compound 20, which was inactive in the nanomolar range (IC50 > 5 μM). This observation can be explained by the fact that the two aromatic rings linked with a flexible OCH2 linker in inhibitor 1 are positioned in an angle of roughly 90° in the ATX structure (see Figure 1B) which cannot be achieved by the (E)-CH═CH linker due to its rigid planar conformation.
Next, we explored the activity of compounds with a modified core. Reducing the carbon double bond in 1 resulted in little loss of activity in 21 with an IC50 value of 25 nM. Thus, although rigidity is preferred, the Michael acceptor can easily be removed without significant loss in activity. Reducing both the carbon double bond and the neighboring carbonyl in inhibitor 1 to hemiaminal 22, led to a significant loss in potency (IC50 = 1.6 μM). Inhibitor 23, where the hydroxyl moiety in compound 22 is removed is not very potent either (IC50 = 683 nM), indicates that the carbonyl moiety is important for binding. It appears from the crystal structure of inhibitor 1 bound to ATX that π-stacking between the phenyl ring of phenylalanine residue 274 (F274) and the carbonyl moiety in 1 is very likely seen their distance (4.1 Å, Supporting Information Figure S4). (19) By removing the carbonyl moiety in 1 or by changing it into a hydroxyl moiety, π-stacking will be lost resulting in lower potencies as observed for inhibitor 22 and 23.
The sulfur heteroatom in the thiazolidine-2,4-dione core was replaced with other atoms and moieties. We started by replacing the sulfur atom in 1 with a methylene moiety gives compound 32 with an IC50 value of 7.3 nM, comparable to inhibitor 1. Replacement of the sulfur atom for an amino group (26, IC50 = 26 nM) resulted in little loss in activity compared to inhibitor 1. When the amine in compound 26 is methylated, potency for the resulting inhibitor Z-28 (IC50 = 6.7 nM) is slightly increased. Interestingly, the E-isomer of 28 (IC50 = 5.3 nM) is marginally more potent than Z-28 or inhibitor 1, a finding that we did not anticipate.
Intrigued by the characteristics of inhibitors Z-28 and E-28, we decided to calculate likely binding poses. For this purpose, we used the Glide docking software. (20-22) To validate our docking approach where we constrain the boronic acid moiety, we first docked inhibitor 1 back into the ATX active site, resulting in a pose (Figure 2B) very similar to the original crystal structure (Figure 2A) with a rmsd value of 1.1 Å (for superimposed image see Supporting Information Figure S5). Next, we docked the Z- and E-isomers of inhibitor 28 (the three best docking poses are depicted in Figure 2C and D). The docking poses of Z-28 correspond to the pose of inhibitor 1 in the ATX structure. However, two of the best three docking poses for E-28 suggest that the 4-fluorobenzyl moiety likely binds to a different area in the hydrophobic pocket (Figure 2D). The imidazolidine-2,4-dione core of E-28 is flipped around the double bond axis in the ATX binding site compared to its Z-isomer (compare Figure 2C with D). This observation is in agreement with the conformations of both isomers. In addition, the binding poses of Z-28 and E-28 resulting from our docking study suggest that the current 4-fluorobenzyl moiety could be expanded from the methylene moiety in the 4-fluorobenzyl substituent with other substituents in future ATX inhibitors.

Figure 2

Figure 2. (A) Focus from inside the protein on the thiazolidine-2,4-dione core of inhibitor 1 bound to ATX. (B) Inhibitor 1 docked into the active site of ATX to validate our docking approach. (C) The three best docking poses for the Z-isomer of 28. (D) The three best docking poses for the E-isomer of 28. Docking poses were generated using the docking program Glide.

Finally, we evaluated inhibitors in which we introduced a rigidified three-ring system (Table 2) incorporating a tetrahydroisoquinoline motif that we deemed likely to bind. This modification avoids the presence of a Michael acceptor, while introducing rigidity and a new core structure. This modification resulted in the chiral inhibitor 35, which is still very potent although some activity is lost compared to 1. No significant difference is observed in potency for either the S or R enantiomers of inhibitor 35, with IC50 values of 55 and 59 nM, respectively.
In summary, we explored structure–activity relations building on boronic acid-based ATX inhibitor 1, which resulted in a number of potent inhibitors. We used the crystal structure of ATX liganded with inhibitor 1 (9) to explain the structure–activity relationships observed for a rational inhibitor modification approach. Our results suggest that this approach allows rapid structure guided modification. Finally, molecular docking efforts proved useful to explain unexpected high potency of E-isomer 28 and suggested that the lipophilic pocket near the ATX active site may be better exploited in the future for the design of new inhibitors.

Experimental Section

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Chemistry

The R and S enantiomers of building block 33 were purchased from CSPS Pharmaceuticals, San Diego, USA. All other chemicals were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich and used without further purification unless otherwise noted. Analytical thin layer chromatography was performed on aluminum sheets precoated with silica gel 60 F254. Column chromatography was carried out on silica gel (0.035–0.070, 90 Å, Acros).
For isolation by centrifugation a Heraeus Multifuge 3 S-R centrifuge was used. Products were spun at 4400g, at 298 K for 5 min. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectra (1H and 13C NMR) were determined in deuterated dimethyl sulfoxide (d6-DMSO) using a Bruker Avance 300 (1H, 300 MHz; 13C, 75 MHz) at 298 K, unless indicated otherwise. Peak shapes are indicated with the symbols ‘d’ (doublet), ‘dd’ (double doublet), ‘s’ (singlet), ‘bs’ (broad singlet), and ‘m’ (multiplet). Chemical shifts (δ) are given in ppm and coupling constants J in Hz. Dimethyl sulfoxide (δH = 2.50 ppm; δC = 39.51 ppm) was used as internal reference.
The purity of all tested compounds was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS) and was greater than 95%. HPLC-MS measurements were performed on a system equipped with a Waters 2795 Separation Module (Alliance HT), Waters 2996 Photodiode Array Detector (190–750 nm), Atlantis T3 C18 column (2.1 × 100 mm, 3 μm), and an LCT Orthogonal Acceleration Time of Flight Mass Spectrometer. Samples were run at a flow rate of 0.40 mL min–1 at 313 K, using gradient elution (water/acetonitrile/formic acid) from 950/50/1 (v/v/v) to 50/950/1 (v/v/v).
The preparative HPLC system was equipped with a Waters 1525 Binary HPLC Pump, a Waters 2487 Dual λ Absorbance Detector, and an Atlantis C18 column (19 × 250 mm, 10 μm). Samples were run at a flow rate of 18 mL min–1 using gradient elution (water/acetonitrile) from 60/40 (v/v) to 10/90 (v/v).

General Procedure for Borylation of Aldehydes and Pinacol Deprotection (1216)

In a dry flask, bis(pinacolato)diboron (1.34 g, 5.28 mmol), the appropriate aldehyde (1.80 mmol) and potassium acetate (0.542 g, 5.52 mmol) were added to a solution of Pd(dppf)Cl2 (46.6 mg, 0.0637 mmol) in dimethylformamide (15 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred under an atmosphere of argon for 18 h at 353 K. The reaction mixture was filtered over Hyflo Super Cel medium and diluted with ethyl acetate (100 mL). The solution was washed with brine (50 and 25 mL), dried over magnesium sulfate, and concentrated.
The crude product was dissolved in tetrahydrofuran (11 mL) and sodium periodate (2.22 g, 10.4 mmol) and water (2.8 mL) were added. After stirring for 30 min, 1 M hydrochloric acid (1.1 mL) was added, and after 2 h, additional sodium periodate (1.17 g, 5.47 mmol) was added and the solution was stirred for another 2 h. The reaction mixture was diluted with ethyl acetate (20 mL) and washed with water (10 mL). The water layer was extracted with ethyl acetate (15 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with brine (15 mL), dried over magnesium sulfate, and the solution was concentrated under vacuum resulting in a light yellow solid. The resulting product was used without further purification.

(4-((4-Formylphenoxy)methyl)phenyl)boronic Acid (12)

Yield: 70%. 1H NMR: δ = 9.86 (s, 1H), 8.09 (s, 1H), 7.87 (d, J = 8.8, 1H), 7.82 (d, J = 8.1, 1H), 7.42 (d, J = 8.1, 1H), 7.20 (d, J = 8.7, 1H), 5.24 (s, 1H). 13C NMR: δ = 191.75, 163.73, 138.49, 134.74, 132.26, 130.22, 127.15, 115.76, 70.09, 39.95 (C–B(OH)2 not visible). MS: m/z [M+H]+ calc. 257.10, obs. 257.10.
For experimental details of compounds 1316, see Supporting Information.

General Method for Knoevenagel Condensation (1, 1720, 26, and E-28)

To a solution of 3-(4-fluorobenzyl)thiazolidine-2,4-dione (0.293 mmol) in ethanol (2.5 mL), piperidine (20 μL, 0.207 mmol), and the appropriate aldehyde (0.352 mmol) were added and the solution was refluxed for 22 h.

(Z)-4-[(4-{[3-(4-Fluorobenzyl)-2,4-dioxo-1,3-thiazolan-5-yliden]methyl}phenoxy) methyl]benzene Boronic Acid (1)

Upon cooling the reaction mixture to room temperature, the product precipitated out of solution. Dissolving the product in dimethyl sulfoxide and precipitating it with 0.5 M hydrochloric acid resulted in pure compound. Yield: 81%. 1H NMR: δ = 8.03 (s, 2H), 7.92 (s, 1H), 7.80 (d, J = 8.1, 2H), 7.60 (d, J = 8.9, 2H), 7.41 (d, J = 8.0, 2H), 7.39–7.31 (m, J = 5.5, 8.8, 2H), 7.26–7.09 (m, J = 4.5, 8.9, 4H), 5.21 (s, 2H), 4.82 (s, 2H). 13C NMR: δ = 167.38, 165.59, 161.66 (d, 1JCF = 244), 160.33, 138.19, 134.28, 133.48, 132.33, 131.81 (d, 4JCF = 3), 129.95 (d, 3JCF = 8), 126.67, 125.55, 117.89, 115.81, 115.47 (d, 2JCF = 21), 69.52, 43.90 (C–B(OH)2 not visible). MS: m/z [M+H]+ calc. 464.11, obs. 464.19.
For experimental details of compounds 1720, 26, and E-28 see Supporting Information.

(4-((4-((3-(4-Fluorobenzyl)-2,4-dioxothiazolidin-5-yl)methyl)phenoxy)methyl) phenyl)boronic Acid (21)

A mixture of compound 1 (50.1 mg, 0.108 mmol) and 10 wt % Pd/C (24.0 mg) in degassed methanol (3 mL) was stirred under a hydrogen atmosphere for 2 h. Extra 10 wt % Pd/C was added (12.0 mg) and the reaction was allowed to continue for one night. The mixture was filtrated and concentrated to dryness. Preparative HPLC afforded the title compound. Yield: 18.3 mg, 77%. 1H NMR: δ = 8.03 (s, 2H), 7.80 (d, J = 8.1, 2H), 7.39 (d, J = 8.1, 2H), 7.28–6.99 (m, 6H), 6.88 (d, J = 8.7, 2H), 5.06 (s, 2H), 5.00 (dd, J = 4.4, 8.0, 1H), 4.60 (dd, J = 15.0, 21.5, 2H), 3.14 (dd, J = 8.0, 14.2, 1H). 13C NMR: δ = 173.71, 171.00, 161.50 (d, 1JCF = 244), 157.44, 138.74, 134.16, 131.58 (d, 4JCF = 3), 130.56, 129.66 (d, 3JCF = 8), 127.98, 126.52, 115.21 (d, 2JCF = 21), 114.57, 69.12, 50.94, 43.56, 35.79 (C–B(OH)2 not visible). MS: m/z [M+H]+ calc. 466.13, obs. 466.25, [M-H2O+H]+ calc. 448.12, obs. 448.23.

(4-((4-((3-(4-Fluorobenzyl)-4-hydroxy-2-oxothiazolidin-5-yl)methyl)phenoxy) methyl)phenyl)boronic Acid (22)

To a solution of compound 1 (50.0 mg, 0.108 mmol) in dimethyl sulfoxide (0.5 mL), sodium borohydride (16.3 mg, 0.430 mmol) was slowly added. After 9 h of stirring, the reaction mixture was diluted with ethyl acetate (4 mL) and was washed with water (2 × 2 mL). The organic layer was dried over calcium chloride and concentrated in vacuo, resulting in the title compound. Yield: 30.2 mg, 60%. 1H NMR: δ = 8.06 (s, 2H), 7.80 (d, J = 8.1, 2H), 7.39 (d, J = 8.0, 2H), 7.36 – 7.11 (m, 5H), 6.94 (d, J = 8.7, 2H), 6.87 (d, J = 8.7, 2H), 6.71 (d, J = 6.2, 1H), 5.06 (s, 2H), 4.72 (dd, J = 7.7, 15.1, 1H), 4.10 (d, J = 15.1, 1H), 3.67 (t, J = 7.9, 1H), 3.35 (s, 1H), 2.81 (dd, J = 7.3, 13.9, 1H), 2.70 (dd, J = 8.4, 13.9, 1H). 13C NMR: δ = 169.70, 161.55 (d, 1JCF = 244), 157.13, 138.85, 134.15, 133.14 (d, 4JCF = 3.0), 130.01, 130.00 (d, 3JCF = 8), 129.73, 126.54, 115.38 (d, 2JCF = 21), 114.64, 84.02, 69.11, 51.42, 44.02, 39.65. (C–B(OH)2 not visible). MS: m/z [M+H]+ calc. 468.15, obs. 468.23.

(4-((4-((3-(4-Fluorobenzyl)-2-oxo-2,3-dihydrothiazol-5-yl)methyl)phenoxy) methyl)phenyl)boronic Acid (23)

To a solution of compound 1 (45.7 mg, 0.0989 mmol) in dimethyl sulfoxide (0.75 mL), sodium borohydride (29.1 mg, 0.769 mmol) was slowly added. After 7 h of stirring the reaction mixture, concentrated sulfuric acid (2 × 50 μL) was added over a 15 min interval. The reaction mixture was stirred for an additional 5 h. Ethyl acetate (25 mL) was added and the mixture was washed with water (4 × 10 mL). The organic layer was dried over calcium chloride and concentrated in vacuo, affording pure compound 23. Yield: 31.8 mg, 72%. 1H NMR: δ = 8.05 (s, 2H), 7.79 (d, J = 8.1, 2H), 7.38 (d, J = 8.1, 2H), 7.36–7.16 (m, 4H), 7.13 (d, J = 8.7, 2H), 6.95 (d, J = 8.7, 2H), 6.87 (s, 1H), 5.07 (s, 2H), 4.80 (s, 2H), 3.73 (s, 2H). 13C NMR: δ = 170.43, 161.61 (d, 1JCF = 244), 157.13, 138.85, 134.17, 133.10 (d, 4JCF = 3), 130.63, 130.63, 129.76 (d, 3JCF = 8), 129.42, 126.48, 121.56, 117.78, 115.50 (d, 2JCF = 21), 114.86, 69.16, 46.78, 32.91 (C–B(OH)2 not visible). MS: m/z [M+H]+ calc. 450.13, obs. 450.22.

3-(4-Fluorobenzyl)imidazolidine-2,4-dione (25)

To a cooled solution (273 K) of hydantoin (8.01 g, 80.1 mmol) in dimethylformamide (140 mL) sodium hydride (60% in oil, 1.80 g, 45.0 mmol) was added. A solution of 1-(bromomethyl)-4-fluorobenzene (5.0 mL, 41 mmol) in dimethylformamide (5 mL) was added to the reaction mixture. The mixture was allowed to warm up to room temperature and was stirred for 6 h. Then, the mixture was poured into water (200 mL) and hexane (200 mL) was added. After a night at 277 K, the precipitate was filtered and dried to give a white solid. Yield: 4.7 g, 56%. 1H NMR: δ = 8.14 (s, 1H), 7.45–7.21 (m, 1H), 7.26–7.09 (m, 1H), 4.51 (s, 2H), 3.97 (s, 2H). 13C NMR: δ = 171.91, 161.45 (d, 1JCF = 244), 157.29, 133.04 (d, 4JCF = 3), 129.66 (d, 3JCF = 8), 115.21 (d, 2JCF = 21), 46.00, 40.29. MS: m/z [M+H]+ calc. 209.07, obs. 208.93.

3-(4-Fluorobenzyl)-1-methylimidazolidine-2,4-dione (27)

To a cooled solution (273 K) of 3-(4-fluorobenzyl)imidazolidine-2,4-dione (98.1 mg, 0.471 mmol) in dimethylformamide (0.5 mL), sodium hydride (60% in oil, 21.1 mg, 0.530 mmol) was added. Subsequently, iodomethane (33 μL, 0.53 mmol) was added to the reaction mixture. The mixture was allowed to warm up to room temperature and was stirred for 3 h. Then, the mixture was poured into ice water (2.5 mL) and hexane (2.5 mL) was added. After a night at 277 K, the precipitate was filtered and dried to give a white solid. Yield: 75 mg, 72%. 1H NMR: δ = 7.34–7.12 (m, 4H), 4.52 (s, 2H), 4.01 (s, 2H), 2.86 (s, 3H). 13C NMR: δ = 170.20, 161.46 (d, 1JCF = 244), 156.24, 132.92 (d, 4JCF = 3), 129.68 (d, 3JCF = 8), 115.21 (d, 2JCF = 21), 51.36, 40.74, 29.21. MS: m/z [M+H]+ calc. 223.09, obs. 223.06.

(Z)-(4-((4-((1-(4-Fluorobenzyl)-3-methyl-2,5-dioxoimidazolidin-4-ylidene)methyl) phenoxy)methyl)phenyl)boronic Acid (Z-28)

To a cooled solution (273 K) of hydantoine 26 (10.1 mg, 0.0224 mmol) and sodium hydride (60% in oil, 1.46 mg, 0.0365 mmol) in DMF (0.15 mL), iodomethane (2.25 μL, 0.0361 mmol) was added. The mixture was allowed to warm up to room temperature and was stirred for 4 h. Final product was isolated by using preparative HPLC. Z-configuration confirmed by the chemical shift of the vinyl and methyl proton reported in literature. (23)
Yield: 6.97 mg, 68%. 1H NMR: δ = 8.11 (s, 1H), 7.80 (d, J = 8.1, 2H), 7.50–7.30 (m, 6H), 7.26–7.10 (m, 2H), 7.05 (d, J = 8.8, 2H), 6.76 (s, 1H), 5.14 (s, 2H), 4.67 (s, 2H), 2.92 (s, 3H). 13C NMR: δ = 163.01, 159.92, 156.78 (d, 1JCF = 249), 138.52, 134.19, 132.55 (d, 4JCF = 3), 131.28, 129.75 (d, 3JCF = 8), 128.50, 126.58, 124.66, 115.31 (d, 2JCF = 21), 114.55, 111.56, 69.30, 41.12, 30.35 (C–B(OH)2 not visible). MS: m/z [M+H]+ calc. 461.17, obs. 461.12.

(E)-(4-((4-((2,5-Dioxopyrrolidin-3-ylidene)methyl)phenoxy)methyl)phenyl)boronic Acid (31)

To a heated (343 K) solution of compound 30 (159 mg, 0.442 mmol) (16) in methanol (5 mL) aldehyde 12 (106 mg, 0.414 mmol) was added. After 1 h of heating, the reaction mixture was cooled using an ice bath resulting in precipitation of the title compound. The precipitate was filtered and washed with ice-cold methanol resulting in compound 31. Yield: 88 mg, 63%. 1H NMR: δ = 11.34 (s, 1H), 8.04 (s, 2H), 7.80 (d, J = 8.0, 2H), 7.57 (d, J = 8.9, 2H), 7.41 (d, J = 8.0, 2H), 7.33 (t, 4J = 2.1, 1H), 7.10 (d, J = 8.8, 2H), 5.19 (s, 2H), 3.60 (d, 4J = 2.2, 2H). 13C NMR: δ = 175.80, 172.09, 159.47, 138.42, 134.22, 132.00, 131.31, 126.96, 126.54, 124.16, 115.31, 69.31, 34.71 (C–B(OH)2 not visible). MS: m/z [M+H]+ calc. 338.12, obs. 338.11.

(E)-(4-((4-((1-(4-Fluorobenzyl)-2,5-dioxopyrrolidin-3-ylidene)methyl)phenoxy) methyl)phenyl)boronic Acid (32)

To a solution of compound 31 (30 mg, 0.0890 mmol) in dimethylformamide (0.3 mL) sodium hydride (60% in oil, 3.65 mg, 0.0913 mmol) was added. After addition of 4-fluorobenzyl bromide (24 μL, 0.19 mmol), the reaction mixture was stirred for 4 h. In addition, potassium carbonate (2.04 mg, 0.0148 mmol) was added and the reaction mixture was stirred overnight. Then, the mixture was poured into ice water (0.9 mL) and hexane (0.3 mL) was added. After a night at 277 K, the precipitate was filtered, dried, and purified using preparative HPLC to give a white solid. E-Configuration confirmed by the chemical shift of the vinyl proton reported in literature. (16) Yield: 13 mg, 32%. 1H NMR: δ = 8.04 (s, 2H), 7.80 (d, J = 8.1, 2H), 7.61 (d, J = 8.9, 2H), 7.45 (t, 4J = 2.1, 1H), 7.41 (d, J = 8.0, 2H), 7.38–7.29 (m, 2H), 7.23–7.04 (m, 4H), 5.19 (s, 2H), 4.66 (s, 2H), 3.74 (d, 4J = 2.1, 2H). 13C NMR: δ = 174.19, 170.59, 161.44 (d, 1JCF = 244), 159.65, 138.39, 134.22, 132.59 (d, 4JCF = 3), 132.31, 132.17, 129.73 (d, 3JCF = 8), 126.85, 126.54, 122.27, 115.36, 115.22 (d, 2JCF = 21), 69.33, 40.71, 33.74 (C–B(OH)2 not visible). MS: m/z [M+H]+ calc. 446.16, obs. 446.12.

(S)-2-(4-Fluorobenzyl)-7-hydroxy-10,10a-dihydroimidazo[1,5-b]isoquinoline-1,3(2H,5H)-dione (S-34)

Compound S-33 (100 mg, 0.518 mmol) was dissolved in a mixture of dioxane and water (3:1, 4 mL) and 30 wt % of sodium hydroxide solution was used to adjust the pH to 14. The reaction mixture was heated to 313 K and 4-fluorobenzyl isocyanate (100 μL, 0.785 mmol) was added. After 2 h of stirring, the mixture was cooled to room temperature and the resulting solid was removed using centrifugation. From the resulting solution, dioxane was evaporated and concentrated hydrochloric acid was used to adjust the pH to 1. After refluxing the reaction mixture for 2 h 30 min, it was cooled to 278 K affording a white precipitate. Washing the precipitate with ice-cold water (3 × 1 mL) afforded pure compound S-34. Yield: 30 mg, 18%. 1H NMR: δ = 9.37 (s, 1H), 7.35–7.30 (m, 2H), 7.18–7.12 (m, 2H), 7.06–7.03 (m, 1H), 6.65–6.63 (m, 2H), 4.77 (d, J = 16.8, 1H), 4.58 (s, 2H), 4.32–4.27 (m, 2H), 3.05 (m, 1H), 2.82–2.64 (m, 1H). 13C NMR: δ = 172.76, 161.44 (d, 1JCF = 244), 156.07, 154.60, 132.82 (d, 4JCF = 3), 132.35, 130.13, 129.51 (d, 3JCF = 8), 121.45, 115.26 (d, 2JCF = 21), 114.30, 112.67, 54.54, 41.23, 40.56, 29.02. MS: m/z [M+H]+ calc. 327.11, obs. 327.09.

(R)-2-(4-Fluorobenzyl)-7-hydroxy-10,10a-dihydroimidazo[1,5-b]isoquinoline-1,3(2H,5H)-dione (R-34)

For reaction details, see compound S-34. Yield: 29%. 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and MS, see Supporting Information.

(S)-(4-(((2-(4-Fluorobenzyl)-1,3-dioxo-1,2,3,5,10,10a-hexahydroimidazo[1,5-b]isoquinolin-7-yl)oxy)methyl)phenyl)boronic Acid (S-35)

To a heated solution (323 K) of compound S-34 (15.3 mg, 0.0469 mmol) in acetone (0.3 mL), potassium carbonate (10.2 mg, 0.0738 mmol) and 4-(bromomethyl)phenylboronic acid (12.4 mg, 0.0577 mmol) were added. After 4 h of stirring and heating, additional potassium carbonate (10.1 mg, 0.0730 mmol) was added and the suspension was stirred overnight. Finally, the reaction mixture was diluted with ethyl acetate and the organic layer was washed with 1 M hydrochloric acid (2 × 0.5 mL) and brine (0.5 mL), dried over sodium sulfate, and concentrated in vacuo. The resulting solid was further purified using preparative HPLC affording pure compound S-35. Yield: 11 mg, 52%. 1H NMR: δ = 8.06 (s, 2H), 7.78 (d, J = 8.1, 2H), 7.50–7.27 (m, 4H), 7.27–7.05 (m, 3H), 7.02–6.76 (m, 2H), 5.09 (s, 2H), 4.82 (d, J = 17.0, 1H), 4.58 (s, 2H), 4.42–4.20 (m, 2H), 3.19–3.02 (m, 1H), 2.80–2.71 (m, 1H). 13C NMR: δ = 172.72, 161.46 (d, 1JCF = 244), 157.09, 154.60, 138.74, 134.17, 132.81 (d, 4JCF = 3), 132.60, 130.23, 129.55 (d, 3JCF = 8), 126.49, 123.60, 115.28 (d, 2JCF = 21), 113.87, 112.47, 69.20, 54.40, 41.30, 40.60, 29.00 (C–B(OH)2 not visible). MS: m/z [M+H]+ calc. 461.17, obs. 461.14.

(R)-(4-(((2-(4-Fluorobenzyl)-1,3-dioxo-1,2,3,5,10,10a-hexahydroimidazo[1,5-b]isoquinolin-7-yl)oxy)methyl)phenyl)boronic acid (R-35)

For reaction details, see compound S-35. Yield: 56%. 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and MS, see Supporting Information.

Choline Release Assay. (13)

Measuring ATX activity using LPC (18:1) as substrate was determined as follows. In an opaque flat-bottom 96-wells plate (Greiner) was added 0.5 μL dimethyl sulfoxide containing inhibitor, to 25 μL recombinant ATX (∼20 nM) in Tris-HCl buffer (0.01% Triton X-100 and 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4). Finally, 25 μL of 80 μM LPC (18:1) in Tris-HCl buffer (10 mM MgCl2, 10 mM CaCl2, 0.01% Triton X-100 and 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4) was added to each well and the plate was incubated at 310 K. The above-described mixture with dimethyl sulfoxide alone was used as a control. LPC without ATX was taken as control for autohydrolysis of LPC. For each inhibitor, ten concentrations were measured covering a range of 0.01 to 30 μM to determine IC50 values. After 4 h of incubation, 50 μL ABTS (2 mM) and horseradish peroxidase (5 U mL–1) was added to the reaction mixture and absorbance was measured and used to correct for absorbance of the molecules. Finally, 50 μL choline oxidase (5 U mL–1) in Tris-HCl (0.01% Triton X-100 and 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4) was added for colorimetric reaction. Absorbance was measured in a Perkin-Elmer Envision plate reader (λ = 405 nm). Data were analyzed using Graphpad Prism software.
In addition, the effect of the inhibitors on the enzymatic coloring reaction was investigated using 40 μM choline at 30 μM inhibitor using the above-described coloring reagents. The enzymatic coloring reaction was not effected by the inhibitors.

Docking Experiments, Protein, and Ligand Preparation

The X-ray structure of ATX in complex with inhibitor 1 (PDB ID: 2XRG) was used for the docking studies. The protein structure was prepared using the Schrödinger Suite 2010 Protein Preparation Wizard (with Epik 2.1, (24) Impact 5.6, and Prime 2.2). The initial 3D structures of the ligands were generated using LigPrep 2.4 and the ligand partial charges were ascribed using the OPLS2005 force-field as performed by Glide 5.6. (20-22) We defined the binding region by a 20 Å × 20 Å × 20 Å box centered on the central position of inhibitor 1 in the crystal ATX complex. We used positional constraints for the two oxygen atoms of the boronic acid and the arylic carbon direct next to the boron atom in inhibitor 1. The Glide Emodel score was used to rank the docking poses. Pictures were made using PyMOL 1.3.

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Contains Michael acceptor study of inhibitor 1, dose–response curves of inhibitors 17, 19, and 36, image visualizing π-stacking of carbonyl inhibitor 1 with ATX residue F274, image of docked and X-ray pose of inhibitor 1 superimposed, experimental details of compounds 1320, 26, and E-28, details on the syntheses of aldehydes 26 and amine linker-based inhibitor 36, and spectral data of all intermediates and target molecules. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Author
    • Huib Ovaa - ‡Division of Cell Biology, §Netherlands Proteomics Centre, and ∇Division of Biochemistry, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands Email: [email protected]
  • Authors
    • Harald M. H. G. Albers - ‡Division of Cell Biology, §Netherlands Proteomics Centre, and ∇Division of Biochemistry, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    • Loes J. D. Hendrickx - ‡Division of Cell Biology, §Netherlands Proteomics Centre, and ∇Division of Biochemistry, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    • Rob J. P. van Tol - ‡Division of Cell Biology, §Netherlands Proteomics Centre, and ∇Division of Biochemistry, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    • Jens Hausmann - ‡Division of Cell Biology, §Netherlands Proteomics Centre, and ∇Division of Biochemistry, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    • Anastassis Perrakis - ‡Division of Cell Biology, §Netherlands Proteomics Centre, and ∇Division of Biochemistry, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Acknowledgment

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

In memory of Loes J. D. Hendrickx 06-01-1986/28-05-2010. We want to thank Irene Farre Gutierrez for helpful discussions. This work was supported by grants from The Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO), the Dutch Cancer Society (KWF), and The Netherlands Proteomics Centre supported by The Netherlands Genomics Initiative.

Non-Standard Abbreviations

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

ABTS

2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulfonic acid)

ATX

autotaxin

HPLC-MS

high-performance liquid chromatography mass spectrometry

LPA

lysophosphatidic acid

LPC

lysophosphatidylcholine

eNPP

ectonucleotide pyrophosphatase and phosphodiesterase

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 24 other publications.

  1. 1
    Tokumura, A.; Majima, E.; Kariya, Y.; Tominaga, K.; Kogure, K.; Yasuda, K.; Fukuzawa, K. Identification of human plasma lysophospholipase D, a lysophosphatidic acid-producing enzyme, as autotaxin, a multifunctional phosphodiesterase J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 39436 39442
  2. 2
    Umezu-Goto, M.; Kishi, Y.; Taira, A.; Hama, K.; Dohmae, N.; Takio, K.; Yamori, T.; Mills, G. B.; Inoue, K.; Aoki, J.; Arai, H. Autotaxin has lysophospholipase D activity leading to tumor cell growth and motility by lysophosphatidic acid production J. Cell Biol. 2002, 158, 227 233
  3. 3
    Moolenaar, W. H.; van Meeteren, L. A.; Giepmans, B. N. The ins and outs of lysophosphatidic acid signaling Bioessays 2004, 26, 870 881
  4. 4
    Kanda, H.; Newton, R.; Klein, R.; Morita, Y.; Gunn, M.; Rosen, S. Autotaxin, an ectoenzyme that produces lysophosphatidic acid, promotes the entry of lymphocytes into secondary lymphoid organs Nat. Immunol. 2008, 9, 415 423
  5. 5
    van Meeteren, L.; Moolenaar, W. Regulation and biological activities of the autotaxin-LPA axis Prog. Lipid Res. 2007, 46, 145 160
  6. 6
    Tager, A.; LaCamera, P.; Shea, B.; Campanella, G.; Selman, M.; Zhao, Z.; Polosukhin, V.; Wain, J.; Karimi-Shah, B.; Kim, N.; Hart, W.; Pardo, A.; Blackwell, T.; Xu, Y.; Chun, J.; Luster, A. The lysophosphatidic acid receptor LPA1 links pulmonary fibrosis to lung injury by mediating fibroblast recruitment and vascular leak Nat. Med. 2008, 14, 45 54
  7. 7
    Stefan, C.; Jansen, S.; Bollen, M. Modulation of purinergic signaling by NPP-type ectophosphodiesterases Purinergic. Signal 2006, 2, 361 370
  8. 8
    Nishimasu, H.; Okudaira, S.; Hama, K.; Mihara, E.; Dohmae, N.; Inoue, A.; Ishitani, R.; Takagi, J.; Aoki, J.; Nureki, O. Crystal structure of autotaxin and insight into GPCR activation by lipid mediators Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2011, 18, 205 212
  9. 9
    Hausmann, J.; Kamtekar, S.; Christodoulou, E.; Day, J.; Wu, T.; Fulkerson, Z.; Albers, H.; van Meeteren, L.; Houben, A.; van Zeijl, L.; Jansen, S.; Andries, M.; Hall, T.; Pegg, L.; Benson, T.; Kasiem, M.; Harlos, K.; Kooi, C.; Smyth, S.; Ovaa, H.; Bollen, M.; Morris, A.; Moolenaar, W.; Perrakis, A. Structural basis of substrate discrimination and integrin binding by autotaxin Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2011, 18, 198 204
  10. 10
    Gijsbers, R.; Aoki, J.; Arai, H.; Bollen, M. The hydrolysis of lysophospholipids and nucleotides by autotaxin (NPP2) involves a single catalytic site FEBS Lett. 2003, 538, 60 64
  11. 11
    Gijsbers, R.; Ceulemans, H.; Stalmans, W.; Bollen, M. Structural and catalytic similarities between nucleotide pyrophosphatases/phosphodiesterases and alkaline phosphatases J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 1361 1368
  12. 12
    Zalatan, J.; Fenn, T.; Brunger, A.; Herschlag, D. Structural and functional comparisons of nucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase and alkaline phosphatase: implications for mechanism and evolution Biochemistry 2006, 45, 9788 9803
  13. 13
    Albers, H.; van Meeteren, L.; Egan, D.; van Tilburg, E.; Moolenaar, W.; Ovaa, H. Discovery and optimization of boronic acid based inhibitors of autotaxin J. Med. Chem. 2010, 53, 4958 4967
  14. 14
    Albers, H. M.; Dong, A.; van Meeteren, L. A.; Egan, D. A.; Sunkara, M.; van Tilburg, E. W.; Schuurman, K.; van Tellingen, O.; Morris, A. J.; Smyth, S. S.; Moolenaar, W. H.; Ovaa, H. Boronic acid-based inhibitor of autotaxin reveals rapid turnover of LPA in the circulation Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2010, 107, 7257 7262
  15. 15
    Miyaura, N.; Suzuki, A. Palladium-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions of organoboron compounds Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 2457 2483
  16. 16
    Mizufune, H.; Nakamura, M.; Mitsudera, H. Process research on arylnaphthalene lignan aza-analogues: a new palladium-catalyzed benzannulation of [alpha],[beta]-bisbenzylidenesuccinic acid derivatives Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 8539 8549
  17. 17
    Cui, P.; Tomsig, J.; McCalmont, W.; Lee, S.; Becker, C.; Lynch, K.; Macdonald, T. Synthesis and biological evaluation of phosphonate derivatives as autotaxin (ATX) inhibitors Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2007, 17, 1634 1640
  18. 18
    Fischer, G.; Mutel, V.; Trube, G.; Malherbe, P.; Kew, J. N. C.; Mohacsi, E.; Heitz, M. P.; Kemp, J. A. Ro 25–6981, a highly potent and selective blocker of N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors containing the NR2B subunit. characterization in vitro J. Pharmacol. Exp. Therapeutics 1997, 283, 1285 1292
  19. 19
    Jain, A.; Purohit, C.; Verma, S.; Sankararamakrishnan, R. Close contacts between carbonyl oxygen atoms and aromatic centers in protein structures: π-π or lone-pair-π interactions? J. Phys. Chem. B 2007, 111, 8680 8683
  20. 20
    Friesner, R.; Banks, J.; Murphy, R.; Halgren, T.; Klicic, J.; Mainz, D.; Repasky, M.; Knoll, E.; Shelley, M.; Perry, J.; Shaw, D.; Francis, P.; Shenkin, P. Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. method and assessment of docking accuracy J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 1739 1749
  21. 21
    Friesner, R.; Murphy, R.; Repasky, M.; Frye, L.; Greenwood, J.; Halgren, T.; Sanschagrin, P.; Mainz, D. Extra precision glide: docking and scoring incorporating a model of hydrophobic enclosure for protein-ligand complexes J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 6177 6196
  22. 22
    Halgren, T.; Murphy, R.; Friesner, R.; Beard, H.; Frye, L.; Pollard, W. T.; Banks, J. Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 2. enrichment factors in database screening J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 1750 1759
  23. 23
    Tan, S.; Ang, K.; Fong, Y. (Z)- and (E)-5-Arylmethylenehydantoins: spectroscopic properties and configuration assignment J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1986, 1941 1944
  24. 24
    Shelley, J.; Cholleti, A.; Frye, L.; Greenwood, J.; Timlin, M.; Uchimaya, M. Epik: a software program for pKa prediction and protonation state generation for drug-like molecules J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2007, 21, 681 691

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article is cited by 76 publications.

  1. R. Justin Grams, Webster L. Santos, Ion Romulus Scorei, Antonio Abad-García, Carol Ann Rosenblum, Andrei Bita, Hugo Cerecetto, Clara Viñas, Marvin A. Soriano-Ursúa. The Rise of Boron-Containing Compounds: Advancements in Synthesis, Medicinal Chemistry, and Emerging Pharmacology. Chemical Reviews 2024, 124 (5) , 2441-2511. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00663
  2. Yurii V. Ostapiuk, Oksana V. Barabash, Mary Y. Ostapiuk, Evgeny Goreshnik, Mykola D. Obushak, Andreas Schmidt. Thiocyanatoarylation of Methyl Vinyl Ketone under Meerwein Conditions for the Synthesis of 2-Aminothiazole-Based Heterocyclic Systems. Organic Letters 2022, 24 (25) , 4575-4579. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.orglett.2c01677
  3. Jennifer M. Clark, Fernando Salgado-Polo, Simon J. F. Macdonald, Tim N. Barrett, Anastassis Perrakis, Craig Jamieson. Structure-Based Design of a Novel Class of Autotaxin Inhibitors Based on Endogenous Allosteric Modulators. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2022, 65 (8) , 6338-6351. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c00368
  4. Bin Ma, Lei Zhang, Lihong Sun, Zhili Xin, Gnanasambandam Kumaravel, Douglas Marcotte, Jayanth V. Chodaparambil, Qin Wang, Angela Wehr, Jing Jing, Victor Sukbong Hong, Ti Wang, Carol Huang, Zhaohui Shao, Sha Mi. Discovery of Potent Selective Nonzinc Binding Autotaxin Inhibitor BIO-32546. ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters 2021, 12 (7) , 1124-1129. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmedchemlett.1c00211
  5. Mitsuyasu Kawaguchi, Takayoshi Okabe, Shinichi Okudaira, Kotaro Hama, Kuniyuki Kano, Hiroshi Nishimasu, Hidehiko Nakagawa, Ryuichiro Ishitani, Hirotatsu Kojima, Osamu Nureki, Junken Aoki, Tetsuo Nagano. Identification of Potent In Vivo Autotaxin Inhibitors that Bind to Both Hydrophobic Pockets and Channels in the Catalytic Domain. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2020, 63 (6) , 3188-3204. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b01967
  6. Aikaterini Nikolaou, Ioanna Ninou, Maroula G. Kokotou, Eleanna Kaffe, Antreas Afantitis, Vassilis Aidinis, George Kokotos. Hydroxamic Acids Constitute a Novel Class of Autotaxin Inhibitors that Exhibit in Vivo Efficacy in a Pulmonary Fibrosis Model. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2018, 61 (8) , 3697-3711. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b00232
  7. Christian A. Kuttruff, Marco Ferrara, Tom Bretschneider, Stefan Hoerer, Sandra Handschuh, Bernd Nosse, Helmut Romig, Paul Nicklin, and Gerald J. Roth . Discovery of BI-2545: A Novel Autotaxin Inhibitor That Significantly Reduces LPA Levels in Vivo. ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters 2017, 8 (12) , 1252-1257. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmedchemlett.7b00312
  8. Laure Konnert, Frédéric Lamaty, Jean Martinez, and Evelina Colacino . Recent Advances in the Synthesis of Hydantoins: The State of the Art of a Valuable Scaffold. Chemical Reviews 2017, 117 (23) , 13757-13809. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00067
  9. Milan Klikar, Pascal le Poul, Aleš Růžička, Oldřich Pytela, Alberto Barsella, Kokou D. Dorkenoo, Françoise Robin-le Guen, Filip Bureš, and Sylvain Achelle . Dipolar NLO Chromophores Bearing Diazine Rings as π-Conjugated Linkers. The Journal of Organic Chemistry 2017, 82 (18) , 9435-9451. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.7b01442
  10. Souvik Banerjee, Derek D. Norman, Sue Chin Lee, Abby L. Parrill, Truc Chi T. Pham, Daniel L. Baker, Gabor J. Tigyi, and Duane D. Miller . Highly Potent Non-Carboxylic Acid Autotaxin Inhibitors Reduce Melanoma Metastasis and Chemotherapeutic Resistance of Breast Cancer Stem Cells. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2017, 60 (4) , 1309-1324. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b01270
  11. Diana Castagna, David C. Budd, Simon J. F. Macdonald, Craig Jamieson, and Allan J. B. Watson . Development of Autotaxin Inhibitors: An Overview of the Patent and Primary Literature. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2016, 59 (12) , 5604-5621. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b01599
  12. Harald M. H. G. Albers, Coenraad Kuijl, Jeroen Bakker, Loes Hendrickx, Sharida Wekker, Nadha Farhou, Nora Liu, Bernat Blasco-Moreno, Tiziana Scanu, Jeroen den Hertog, Patrick Celie, Huib Ovaa, and Jacques Neefjes . Integrating Chemical and Genetic Silencing Strategies To Identify Host Kinase-Phosphatase Inhibitor Networks That Control Bacterial Infection. ACS Chemical Biology 2014, 9 (2) , 414-422. https://doi.org/10.1021/cb400421a
  13. Kalyan Dhara, Ganesh Chandra Midya, and Jyotirmayee Dash . A Diversity-Oriented Approach to Spirocyclic and Fused Hydantoins via Olefin Metathesis. The Journal of Organic Chemistry 2012, 77 (18) , 8071-8082. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo301234r
  14. Harald M. H. G. Albers and Huib Ovaa . Chemical Evolution of Autotaxin Inhibitors. Chemical Reviews 2012, 112 (5) , 2593-2603. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr2003213
  15. John W. Tomsho and Stephen J. Benkovic . Elucidation of the Mechanism of the Reaction between Phenylboronic Acid and a Model Diol, Alizarin Red S. The Journal of Organic Chemistry 2012, 77 (5) , 2098-2106. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo202250d
  16. Carmelo Laface, Angela Dalia Ricci, Simona Vallarelli, Carmela Ostuni, Alessandro Rizzo, Francesca Ambrogio, Matteo Centonze, Annalisa Schirizzi, Giampiero De Leonardis, Rosalba D’Alessandro, Claudio Lotesoriere, Gianluigi Giannelli. Autotaxin–Lysophosphatidate Axis: Promoter of Cancer Development and Possible Therapeutic Implications. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024, 25 (14) , 7737. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25147737
  17. Trinath Biswal. Current Trends in Liquid Crystal Polymers and Their Applications: A Review. Journal of Molecular and Engineering Materials 2024, 153 https://doi.org/10.1142/S2251237324300031
  18. Jacopo Simonetti, Marco Ficili, Giacomo Sgalla, Luca Richeldi. Experimental autotaxin inhibitors for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs 2024, 48 , 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/13543784.2024.2305126
  19. Mathias Christophe Eymery, Kim-Anh Nguyen, Shibom Basu, Jens Hausmann, Viet-Khoa Tran-Nguyen, Hans Peter Seidel, Lola Gutierrez, Ahcène Boumendjel, Andrew Aloysius McCarthy. Discovery of potent chromone-based autotaxin inhibitors inspired by cannabinoids. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2024, 263 , 115944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2023.115944
  20. Namrashee V. Mehta, Arundhati Abhyankar, Mariam S. Degani. Elemental exchange: Bioisosteric replacement of phosphorus by boron in drug design. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2023, 260 , 115761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2023.115761
  21. Cheng Zhang, Yue Liu, Qinjiang Zhou, Hongze Fan, Xiaoxiao Liu, Jinxing Hu. Recent research advances in ATX inhibitors: An overview of primary literature. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry 2023, 90 , 117374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2023.117374
  22. Tiantong He, Heping Wei, Yuanbo Zhou, Li-ya Jiang, Jonathan B. Baell, Yang Yu, Fei Huang. Visible light-induced borylation and arylation of small organic molecules using carbon dots. Organic Chemistry Frontiers 2023, 10 (12) , 2918-2926. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3QO00458A
  23. Ayman M. Ibrahim, Mai E. Shoman, Mamdouh F. A. Mohamed, Alaa M. Hayallah, Gamal El‐Din A. Abuo‐Rahma. Chemistry and Applications of Functionalized 2,4‐Thiazolidinediones. European Journal of Organic Chemistry 2023, 26 (19) https://doi.org/10.1002/ejoc.202300184
  24. Mathias C Eymery, Andrew A McCarthy, Jens Hausmann. Linking medicinal cannabis to autotaxin–lysophosphatidic acid signaling. Life Science Alliance 2023, 6 (2) , e202201595. https://doi.org/10.26508/lsa.202201595
  25. Qin Shi, Yuqing Tong, Yuzhao Zheng, Yanqi Liu, Tingjie Yin. PDT-sensitized ROS-responsive dextran nanosystem for maximizing antitumor potency of multi-target drugs. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 2023, 633 , 122567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.122567
  26. Souvik Banerjee, Suechin Lee, Derek D. Norman, Gabor J. Tigyi. Designing Dual Inhibitors of Autotaxin-LPAR GPCR Axis. Molecules 2022, 27 (17) , 5487. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27175487
  27. Di ZHANG, JunJie ZHANG. Expression regulation mechanisms and biological functionsof Autotaxin. SCIENTIA SINICA Vitae 2022, 52 (8) , 1148-1162. https://doi.org/10.1360/SSV-2022-0140
  28. Inés Manjón‐Mata, M. Teresa Quirós, Elena Velasco‐Juárez, Elena Buñuel, Diego J. Cárdenas. Nickel‐Catalyzed Hydroborylative Polycyclization of Allenynes: an Atom‐Economical and Diastereoselective Synthesis of Bicyclic 5‐5 Fused Rings. Advanced Synthesis & Catalysis 2022, 364 (10) , 1716-1723. https://doi.org/10.1002/adsc.202101462
  29. Conor Horgan, Timothy P. O’Sullivan. Recent Developments in the Practical Application of Novel Carboxylic Acid Bioisosteres. Current Medicinal Chemistry 2022, 29 (13) , 2203-2234. https://doi.org/10.2174/0929867328666210820112126
  30. Ashis Roy, Tonmoy Sarkar, Sebak Datta, Arup Maiti, Monali Chakrabarti, Trisha Mondal, Chaitali Mondal, Apurba Banerjee, Subhasis Roy, Soumen Mukherjee, Pragati Muley, Sabyasachi Chakraborty, Manish Banerjee, Mrinalkanti Kundu, Kuldeep K. Roy. Structure‐based discovery of ( S )‐2‐amino‐6‐(4‐fluorobenzyl)‐5,6,11,11a‐tetrahydro‐1H‐imidazo[1′,5′:1,6]pyrido[3,4‐b]indole‐1,3(2H)‐dione as low nanomolar, orally bioavailable autotaxin inhibitor. Chemical Biology & Drug Design 2022, 99 (3) , 496-503. https://doi.org/10.1111/cbdd.14017
  31. Xiaodan Ding, Ethan Zahid, Daniel K. Unruh, Kristin M. Hutchins. Differences in thermal expansion and motion ability for herringbone and face-to-face π-stacked solids. IUCrJ 2022, 9 (1) , 31-42. https://doi.org/10.1107/S2052252521009593
  32. Ferah Comert Onder, Serdar Durdagi, Nermin Kahraman, Tugce Nur Uslu, Hakan Kandemir, Esen Bellur Atici, Bulent Ozpolat, Mehmet Ay. Novel inhibitors of eukaryotic elongation factor 2 kinase: In silico, synthesis and in vitro studies. Bioorganic Chemistry 2021, 116 , 105296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioorg.2021.105296
  33. Yi Jia, Yan Li, Xu-Dong Xu, Yu Tian, Hai Shang. Design and Development of Autotaxin Inhibitors. Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14 (11) , 1203. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph14111203
  34. Gopalakrishnan Thamilselvan, Hema Bhagavathi Sarveswari, Sahana Vasudevan, Alex Stanley, Karthi Shanmugam, Pothiappan Vairaprakash, Adline Princy Solomon. Development of an Antibiotic Resistance Breaker to Resensitize Drug-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: In Silico and In Vitro Approach. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology 2021, 11 https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2021.700198
  35. Xiaotian Zhang, Mengmiao Li, Nan Yin, Junjie Zhang. The Expression Regulation and Biological Function of Autotaxin. Cells 2021, 10 (4) , 939. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10040939
  36. Souvik Banerjee, Derek D. Norman, Shanshan Deng, Sayo O. Fakayode, Sue Chin Lee, Abby L. Parrill, Wei Li, Duane D. Miller, Gabor J. Tigyi. Molecular modelling guided design, synthesis and QSAR analysis of new small molecule non-lipid autotaxin inhibitors. Bioorganic Chemistry 2020, 103 , 104188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioorg.2020.104188
  37. Christiana Magkrioti, Eleanna Kaffe, Elli-Anna Stylianaki, Camelia Sidahmet, Georgia Melagraki, Antreas Afantitis, Alexios N. Matralis, Vassilis Aidinis. Structure-Based Discovery of Novel Chemical Classes of Autotaxin Inhibitors. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2020, 21 (19) , 7002. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21197002
  38. Mariana Pereira Silva, Lucília Saraiva, Madalena Pinto, Maria Emília Sousa. Boronic Acids and Their Derivatives in Medicinal Chemistry: Synthesis and Biological Applications. Molecules 2020, 25 (18) , 4323. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25184323
  39. Keisuke Yanagida, William J. Valentine. Druggable Lysophospholipid Signaling Pathways. 2020, 137-176. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50621-6_7
  40. Deron R. Herr, Wee Siong Chew, R. L. Satish, Wei-Yi Ong. Pleotropic Roles of Autotaxin in the Nervous System Present Opportunities for the Development of Novel Therapeutics for Neurological Diseases. Molecular Neurobiology 2020, 57 (1) , 372-392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-019-01719-1
  41. Dimitrios Triantafyllos Gerokonstantis, Aikaterini Nikolaou, Christiana Magkrioti, Antreas Afantitis, Vassilis Aidinis, George Kokotos, Panagiota Moutevelis-Minakakis. Synthesis of novel 2-pyrrolidinone and pyrrolidine derivatives and study of their inhibitory activity against autotaxin enzyme. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry 2020, 28 (2) , 115216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2019.115216
  42. Kristina Kraljić, Dubravko Jelić, Dinko Žiher, Adam Cvrtila, Snježana Dragojević, Verona Sinković, Milan Mesić. Benzoxaboroles—Novel Autotaxin Inhibitors. Molecules 2019, 24 (19) , 3419. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24193419
  43. Fernando Salgado-Polo, Anastassis Perrakis. The Structural Binding Mode of the Four Autotaxin Inhibitor Types that Differentially Affect Catalytic and Non-Catalytic Functions. Cancers 2019, 11 (10) , 1577. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11101577
  44. Yue Zhu, Qilin Wang, Haofan Luo, Zijuan Wang, Guolin Zhang, Yongping Yu. A facile and efficient approach for the synthesis of 3-arylthiazol-2(3 H )-one. Synthetic Communications 2019, 49 (16) , 2066-2072. https://doi.org/10.1080/00397911.2019.1615099
  45. Sotirios Katsamakas, Anastasios G Papadopoulos, Maria G Kouskoura, Catherine K Markopoulou, Dimitra Hadjipavlou-Litina. Examining Barbiturate Scaffold for the Synthesis of New Agents with Biological Interest. Future Medicinal Chemistry 2019, 11 (16) , 2063-2079. https://doi.org/10.4155/fmc-2018-0541
  46. Yaghoub Pourshojaei, Ardavan Abiri, Razieh Eskandari, Fatemeh Dourandish, Khalil Eskandari, Ali Asadipour. Synthesis, biological evaluation, and computational studies of novel fused six-membered O-containing heterocycles as potential acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. Computational Biology and Chemistry 2019, 80 , 249-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2019.04.004
  47. Wenming Wang, Fengmei Zhao, Yarui Zhao, Weiwei Pan, Pengcheng Cao, Lintao Wu, Zhijun Wang, Xuan Zhao, Yi Zhao, Hongfei Wang. Design, Synthesis, and Preliminary Bioactivity Evaluation of 2,7-Substituted Carbazole Derivatives as Potent Autotaxin Inhibitors and Antitumor Agents†. Anti-Cancer Agents in Medicinal Chemistry 2019, 19 (2) , 256-264. https://doi.org/10.2174/1871520618666180830161821
  48. Alexios N. Matralis, Antreas Afantitis, Vassilis Aidinis. Development and therapeutic potential of autotaxin small molecule inhibitors: From bench to advanced clinical trials. Medicinal Research Reviews 2019, 39 (3) , 976-1013. https://doi.org/10.1002/med.21551
  49. Yaghoub Pourshojaei, Mohammad-Hossein Jadidi, Khalil Eskandari, Alireza Foroumadi, Ali Asadipour. An eco-friendly synthesis of 4-aryl-substituted pyrano-fuzed coumarins as potential pharmacological active heterocycles using molybdenum oxide nanoparticles as an effective and recyclable catalyst. Research on Chemical Intermediates 2018, 44 (7) , 4195-4212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11164-018-3363-7
  50. Yoshikazu Nakamura. Aptamers as therapeutic middle molecules. Biochimie 2018, 145 , 22-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biochi.2017.10.006
  51. Wenhua Huang, Ning Xu. Synthesis of pinacol acetals catalyzed by (2-carboxyphenyl)diphenylphosphonium bromide. Synthetic Communications 2017, 47 (22) , 2133-2138. https://doi.org/10.1080/00397911.2017.1368082
  52. Diego B. Diaz, Andrei K. Yudin. The versatility of boron in biological target engagement. Nature Chemistry 2017, 9 (8) , 731-742. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.2814
  53. Antigoni Kotali, Anna Maniadaki, Elvira Kotali, Philip A. Harris, Ewa Różycka-Sokołowska, Piotr Bałczewski, John A. Joule. New tetrahedral boron heterobicycles: Cyclocondensation of phenylboronic acid with β-keto butanoic acid N-acyl hydrazones. Tetrahedron Letters 2017, 58 (6) , 512-515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tetlet.2016.12.060
  54. Babette Fuss. Autotaxin in Stem Cell Biology and Neurodevelopment. 2017, 41-63. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49343-5_3
  55. Lauren E. Ragle, Dilip J. Palanisamy, Margaux J. Joe, Rachel S. Stein, Derek D. Norman, Gabor Tigyi, Daniel L. Baker, Abby L. Parrill. Discovery and synthetic optimization of a novel scaffold for hydrophobic tunnel-targeted autotaxin inhibition. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry 2016, 24 (19) , 4660-4674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2016.08.004
  56. Sotirios Katsamakas, Anastasios Papadopoulos, Dimitra Hadjipavlou-Litina. Boronic Acid Group: A Cumbersome False Negative Case in the Process of Drug Design. Molecules 2016, 21 (9) , 1185. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21091185
  57. Kazuki Kato, Hisako Ikeda, Shin Miyakawa, Satoshi Futakawa, Yosuke Nonaka, Masatoshi Fujiwara, Shinichi Okudaira, Kuniyuki Kano, Junken Aoki, Junko Morita, Ryuichiro Ishitani, Hiroshi Nishimasu, Yoshikazu Nakamura, Osamu Nureki. Structural basis for specific inhibition of Autotaxin by a DNA aptamer. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 2016, 23 (5) , 395-401. https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.3200
  58. Reiya Taniguchi, Osamu Nureki. Structural Biology of Chronic Inflammation-Associated Signalling Pathways: Toward Structure-Guided Drug Development. 2016, 77-88. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-56068-5_6
  59. Lorenzo Federico, Kang Jin Jeong, Christopher P. Vellano, Gordon B. Mills. Thematic Review Series: Phospholipases: Central Role in Lipid Signaling and Disease Autotaxin, a lysophospholipase D with pleomorphic effects in oncogenesis and cancer progression. Journal of Lipid Research 2016, 57 (1) , 25-35. https://doi.org/10.1194/jlr.R060020
  60. Rajesh Kumar Kesharwani, Vandana Srivastava, Prabhakar Singh, Syed Ibrahim Rizvi, Kuruba Adeppa, Krishna Misra. A Novel Approach for Overcoming Drug Resistance in Breast Cancer Chemotherapy by Targeting new Synthetic Curcumin Analogues Against Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 1 (ALDH1A1) and Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3 β (GSK-3β). Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 2015, 176 (7) , 1996-2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-015-1696-x
  61. Efrosini Barbayianni, Eleanna Kaffe, Vassilis Aidinis, George Kokotos. Autotaxin, a secreted lysophospholipase D, as a promising therapeutic target in chronic inflammation and cancer. Progress in Lipid Research 2015, 58 , 76-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plipres.2015.02.001
  62. Biljana M. Šmit, Radoslav Z. Pavlović. Three-step synthetic pathway to fused bicyclic hydantoins involving a selenocyclization step. Tetrahedron 2015, 71 (7) , 1101-1108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tet.2014.12.088
  63. Diana Castagna, Emma L. Duffy, Dima Semaan, Louise C. Young, John M. Pritchard, Simon J. F. Macdonald, David C. Budd, Craig Jamieson, Allan J. B. Watson. Identification of a novel class of autotaxin inhibitors through cross-screening. MedChemComm 2015, 6 (6) , 1149-1155. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5MD00081E
  64. Biljana M Šmit, Radoslav Z Pavlović, Dejan A Milenković, Zoran S Marković. Mechanism, kinetics and selectivity of selenocyclization of 5-alkenylhydantoins: an experimental and computational study. Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry 2015, 11 , 1865-1875. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjoc.11.200
  65. Alok Jain, R.N.V. Krishna Deepak, Ramasubbu Sankararamakrishnan. Oxygen–aromatic contacts in intra-strand base pairs: Analysis of high-resolution DNA crystal structures and quantum chemical calculations. Journal of Structural Biology 2014, 187 (1) , 49-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsb.2014.04.008
  66. Alexander Draganov, Danzhu Wang, Binghe Wang. The Future of Boron in Medicinal Chemistry: Therapeutic and Diagnostic Applications. 2014, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/7355_2014_65
  67. Dingyi Tong, Haifeng Duan, Hejing Zhuang, Jungang Cao, Zhonglin Wei, Yingjie Lin. Using T–Hg–T and C–Ag–T: a four-input dual-core molecular logic gate and its new application in cryptography. RSC Advances 2014, 4 (11) , 5363. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ra44650f
  68. David C Budd, Yimin Qian. Development of Lysophosphatidic Acid Pathway Modulators as Therapies for Fibrosis. Future Medicinal Chemistry 2013, 5 (16) , 1935-1952. https://doi.org/10.4155/fmc.13.154
  69. Darla Mark Manidhar, Rajesh Kumar Kesharwani, N. Bakthavatchala Reddy, C. Suresh Reddy, Krishna Misra. Designing, synthesis, and characterization of some novel coumarin derivatives as probable anticancer drugs. Medicinal Chemistry Research 2013, 22 (9) , 4146-4157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00044-012-0299-0
  70. Efrosini Barbayianni, Victoria Magrioti, Panagiota Moutevelis-Minakakis, George Kokotos. Autotaxin inhibitors: a patent review. Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Patents 2013, 23 (9) , 1123-1132. https://doi.org/10.1517/13543776.2013.796364
  71. Nigel J. Pyne, Gerald Dubois, Susan Pyne. Role of sphingosine 1-phosphate and lysophosphatidic acid in fibrosis. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids 2013, 1831 (1) , 228-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbalip.2012.07.003
  72. Francesco Montalbano, Pedro M. S. D. Cal, Marta A. B. R. Carvalho, Lídia M. Gonçalves, Susana D. Lucas, Rita C. Guedes, Luís F. Veiros, Rui Moreira, Pedro M. P. Gois. Discovery of new heterocycles with activity against human neutrophile elastase based on a boron promoted one-pot assembly reaction. Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry 2013, 11 (27) , 4465. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ob40614h
  73. Rajesh Kumar Kesharwani, Durg Vijay Singh, Krishna Misra, Syed Ibrahim Rizvi. Plant polyphenols as electron donors for erythrocyte plasma membrane redox system: validation through in silico approach. Organic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters 2012, 2 (1) https://doi.org/10.1186/2191-2858-2-12
  74. Edyta Gendaszewska-Darmach, Edyta Laska, Przemysław Rytczak, Andrzej Okruszek. The chemical synthesis of metabolically stabilized 2-OMe-LPA analogues and preliminary studies of their inhibitory activity toward autotaxin. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters 2012, 22 (8) , 2698-2700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2012.03.008
  75. Hiroshi Nishimasu, Ryuichiro Ishitani, Junken Aoki, Osamu Nureki. A 3D view of autotaxin. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences 2012, 33 (3) , 138-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tips.2011.12.004
  76. Thomas S. Elliott, Aine Slowey, Yulin Ye, Stuart J. Conway. The use of phosphate bioisosteres in medicinal chemistry and chemical biology. MedChemComm 2012, 3 (7) , 735. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2md20079a
Open PDF

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry

Cite this: J. Med. Chem. 2011, 54, 13, 4619–4626
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/jm200310q
Published May 26, 2011

Copyright © 2011 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

Article Views

6570

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Scheme 1

    Scheme 1. Autotaxin (ATX) is Responsible for Hydrolyzing the Lipid Lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) into Lysophosphatidic Acid (LPA) and Choline

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. ATX structure liganded with inhibitor 1 (PDB ID 2XRG). (A) Surface representation of ATX with inhibitor 1 (magenta). (B) Binding of inhibitor 1 to the threonine oxygen nucleophile and two zinc ions. (C) Visualizing the ether linker of inhibitor 1 bound to ATX. (D) Visualizing the degree of freedom for the thiazolidine-2,4-dione core of inhibitor 1 in the ATX binding site.

    Scheme 2

    Scheme 2. Synthetic Route Towards Linker Modified Inhibitors

    Scheme 3

    Scheme 3. Synthetic Routes Towards Core Modified Inhibitors

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. (A) Focus from inside the protein on the thiazolidine-2,4-dione core of inhibitor 1 bound to ATX. (B) Inhibitor 1 docked into the active site of ATX to validate our docking approach. (C) The three best docking poses for the Z-isomer of 28. (D) The three best docking poses for the E-isomer of 28. Docking poses were generated using the docking program Glide.

  • References


    This article references 24 other publications.

    1. 1
      Tokumura, A.; Majima, E.; Kariya, Y.; Tominaga, K.; Kogure, K.; Yasuda, K.; Fukuzawa, K. Identification of human plasma lysophospholipase D, a lysophosphatidic acid-producing enzyme, as autotaxin, a multifunctional phosphodiesterase J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 39436 39442
    2. 2
      Umezu-Goto, M.; Kishi, Y.; Taira, A.; Hama, K.; Dohmae, N.; Takio, K.; Yamori, T.; Mills, G. B.; Inoue, K.; Aoki, J.; Arai, H. Autotaxin has lysophospholipase D activity leading to tumor cell growth and motility by lysophosphatidic acid production J. Cell Biol. 2002, 158, 227 233
    3. 3
      Moolenaar, W. H.; van Meeteren, L. A.; Giepmans, B. N. The ins and outs of lysophosphatidic acid signaling Bioessays 2004, 26, 870 881
    4. 4
      Kanda, H.; Newton, R.; Klein, R.; Morita, Y.; Gunn, M.; Rosen, S. Autotaxin, an ectoenzyme that produces lysophosphatidic acid, promotes the entry of lymphocytes into secondary lymphoid organs Nat. Immunol. 2008, 9, 415 423
    5. 5
      van Meeteren, L.; Moolenaar, W. Regulation and biological activities of the autotaxin-LPA axis Prog. Lipid Res. 2007, 46, 145 160
    6. 6
      Tager, A.; LaCamera, P.; Shea, B.; Campanella, G.; Selman, M.; Zhao, Z.; Polosukhin, V.; Wain, J.; Karimi-Shah, B.; Kim, N.; Hart, W.; Pardo, A.; Blackwell, T.; Xu, Y.; Chun, J.; Luster, A. The lysophosphatidic acid receptor LPA1 links pulmonary fibrosis to lung injury by mediating fibroblast recruitment and vascular leak Nat. Med. 2008, 14, 45 54
    7. 7
      Stefan, C.; Jansen, S.; Bollen, M. Modulation of purinergic signaling by NPP-type ectophosphodiesterases Purinergic. Signal 2006, 2, 361 370
    8. 8
      Nishimasu, H.; Okudaira, S.; Hama, K.; Mihara, E.; Dohmae, N.; Inoue, A.; Ishitani, R.; Takagi, J.; Aoki, J.; Nureki, O. Crystal structure of autotaxin and insight into GPCR activation by lipid mediators Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2011, 18, 205 212
    9. 9
      Hausmann, J.; Kamtekar, S.; Christodoulou, E.; Day, J.; Wu, T.; Fulkerson, Z.; Albers, H.; van Meeteren, L.; Houben, A.; van Zeijl, L.; Jansen, S.; Andries, M.; Hall, T.; Pegg, L.; Benson, T.; Kasiem, M.; Harlos, K.; Kooi, C.; Smyth, S.; Ovaa, H.; Bollen, M.; Morris, A.; Moolenaar, W.; Perrakis, A. Structural basis of substrate discrimination and integrin binding by autotaxin Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2011, 18, 198 204
    10. 10
      Gijsbers, R.; Aoki, J.; Arai, H.; Bollen, M. The hydrolysis of lysophospholipids and nucleotides by autotaxin (NPP2) involves a single catalytic site FEBS Lett. 2003, 538, 60 64
    11. 11
      Gijsbers, R.; Ceulemans, H.; Stalmans, W.; Bollen, M. Structural and catalytic similarities between nucleotide pyrophosphatases/phosphodiesterases and alkaline phosphatases J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 1361 1368
    12. 12
      Zalatan, J.; Fenn, T.; Brunger, A.; Herschlag, D. Structural and functional comparisons of nucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase and alkaline phosphatase: implications for mechanism and evolution Biochemistry 2006, 45, 9788 9803
    13. 13
      Albers, H.; van Meeteren, L.; Egan, D.; van Tilburg, E.; Moolenaar, W.; Ovaa, H. Discovery and optimization of boronic acid based inhibitors of autotaxin J. Med. Chem. 2010, 53, 4958 4967
    14. 14
      Albers, H. M.; Dong, A.; van Meeteren, L. A.; Egan, D. A.; Sunkara, M.; van Tilburg, E. W.; Schuurman, K.; van Tellingen, O.; Morris, A. J.; Smyth, S. S.; Moolenaar, W. H.; Ovaa, H. Boronic acid-based inhibitor of autotaxin reveals rapid turnover of LPA in the circulation Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2010, 107, 7257 7262
    15. 15
      Miyaura, N.; Suzuki, A. Palladium-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions of organoboron compounds Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 2457 2483
    16. 16
      Mizufune, H.; Nakamura, M.; Mitsudera, H. Process research on arylnaphthalene lignan aza-analogues: a new palladium-catalyzed benzannulation of [alpha],[beta]-bisbenzylidenesuccinic acid derivatives Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 8539 8549
    17. 17
      Cui, P.; Tomsig, J.; McCalmont, W.; Lee, S.; Becker, C.; Lynch, K.; Macdonald, T. Synthesis and biological evaluation of phosphonate derivatives as autotaxin (ATX) inhibitors Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2007, 17, 1634 1640
    18. 18
      Fischer, G.; Mutel, V.; Trube, G.; Malherbe, P.; Kew, J. N. C.; Mohacsi, E.; Heitz, M. P.; Kemp, J. A. Ro 25–6981, a highly potent and selective blocker of N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors containing the NR2B subunit. characterization in vitro J. Pharmacol. Exp. Therapeutics 1997, 283, 1285 1292
    19. 19
      Jain, A.; Purohit, C.; Verma, S.; Sankararamakrishnan, R. Close contacts between carbonyl oxygen atoms and aromatic centers in protein structures: π-π or lone-pair-π interactions? J. Phys. Chem. B 2007, 111, 8680 8683
    20. 20
      Friesner, R.; Banks, J.; Murphy, R.; Halgren, T.; Klicic, J.; Mainz, D.; Repasky, M.; Knoll, E.; Shelley, M.; Perry, J.; Shaw, D.; Francis, P.; Shenkin, P. Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. method and assessment of docking accuracy J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 1739 1749
    21. 21
      Friesner, R.; Murphy, R.; Repasky, M.; Frye, L.; Greenwood, J.; Halgren, T.; Sanschagrin, P.; Mainz, D. Extra precision glide: docking and scoring incorporating a model of hydrophobic enclosure for protein-ligand complexes J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 6177 6196
    22. 22
      Halgren, T.; Murphy, R.; Friesner, R.; Beard, H.; Frye, L.; Pollard, W. T.; Banks, J. Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 2. enrichment factors in database screening J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 1750 1759
    23. 23
      Tan, S.; Ang, K.; Fong, Y. (Z)- and (E)-5-Arylmethylenehydantoins: spectroscopic properties and configuration assignment J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1986, 1941 1944
    24. 24
      Shelley, J.; Cholleti, A.; Frye, L.; Greenwood, J.; Timlin, M.; Uchimaya, M. Epik: a software program for pKa prediction and protonation state generation for drug-like molecules J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2007, 21, 681 691
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    Contains Michael acceptor study of inhibitor 1, dose–response curves of inhibitors 17, 19, and 36, image visualizing π-stacking of carbonyl inhibitor 1 with ATX residue F274, image of docked and X-ray pose of inhibitor 1 superimposed, experimental details of compounds 1320, 26, and E-28, details on the syntheses of aldehydes 26 and amine linker-based inhibitor 36, and spectral data of all intermediates and target molecules. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.