ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
My Activity
CONTENT TYPES

64Cu-Labeled Inhibitors of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen for PET Imaging of Prostate Cancer

View Author Information
Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, 1550 Orleans Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21287, United States
Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219, United States
*For S.R.B.: phone, 410-955-8697; fax, 410-614-3147; E-mail, [email protected]; address, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, 1550 Orleans Street, 4M07 CRB II, Baltimore, Maryland 21231, United States.
*For M.G.P.: phone, 410-955-2789; fax, 443-817-0990; E-mail, [email protected]; address, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, 1550 Orleans Street, 492 CRB II, Baltimore, Maryland 21231, United States.
Cite this: J. Med. Chem. 2014, 57, 6, 2657–2669
Publication Date (Web):February 17, 2014
https://doi.org/10.1021/jm401921j

Copyright © 2014 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

  • Open Access

Article Views

3782

Altmetric

-

Citations

LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
PDF (3 MB)
Supporting Info (1)»

Abstract

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a well-recognized target for identification and therapy of a variety of cancers. Here we report five 64Cu-labeled inhibitors of PSMA, [64Cu]37, which are based on the lysine–glutamate urea scaffold and utilize a variety of macrocyclic chelators, namely NOTA(3), PCTA(4), Oxo-DO3A(5), CB-TE2A(6), and DOTA(7), in an effort to determine which provides the most suitable pharmacokinetics for in vivo PET imaging. [64Cu]37 were prepared in high radiochemical yield (60–90%) and purity (>95%). Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging studies of [64Cu]37 revealed specific accumulation in PSMA-expressing xenografts (PSMA+ PC3 PIP) relative to isogenic control tumor (PSMA– PC3 flu) and background tissue. The favorable kinetics and high image contrast provided by CB-TE2A chelated [64Cu]6 suggest it as the most promising among the candidates tested. That could be due to the higher stability of [64Cu]CB-TE2A as compared with [64Cu]NOTA, [64Cu]PCTA, [64Cu]Oxo-DO3A, and [64Cu]DOTA chelates in vivo.

Introduction

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is emerging as an attractive target for addressing cancer, whether for diagnosis or therapy, due to its restricted expression within normal tissue, (1) its elevated expression in the epithelium of prostate tumors, and within the neovasculature of most solid tumors tested. (2) With respect to prostate cancer, elevated expression of PSMA is associated with metastasis, (3) castrate resistance, (4, 5) and progression. (6) PSMA has also been used to guide antibody–drug conjugates and nanoparticles to PSMA-expressing tissues, including for human studies, some of which do not involve prostate cancer. (7-11) Radiohalogenated, urea-based, low-molecular-weight inhibitors of PSMA have recently been explored to image expression of PSMA in prostate tumor xenografts (12, 13) as well as in clinical studies. (14-16) Radiometals, including 99mTc, (17-23)111In, (27-29)64Cu, (30)86Y, (31) and 89Zr, (32, 33) have also recently been implemented for imaging PSMA, in part to leverage the longer physical half-life of these nuclides, which will be necessary for tracking large peptides, aptamers, minibodies, antibodies, and nanoparticles. To enable targeting agents to bind with high affinity to PSMA, a spacer of approximately 20 Å is generally employed between the PSMA-targeting group and the metal chelator. (21) Moreover, we have shown that the chelating moiety has a significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of this class of low-molecular-weight PSMA-based imaging agents when radiolabeled with 99mTc. (34) The search for small-molecule, functionalized affinity agents for PSMA that have longer retention and superior pharmacokinetics properties for imaging and therapeutic applications is ongoing.
64Cu-Labeled molecules are promising imaging agents for positron emission tomography (PET) due to the favorable nuclear characteristics of the isotope (t1/2 = 12.7 h, β+ 17.4%, Emax = 0.656 MeV, β 39%, Emax = 0.573 MeV) and its availability in high specific activity. (35) The longer physical half-life of 64Cu compared to 11C (t1/2 = 20 min) and 18F (t1/2 = 110 min) enables imaging at delayed time points, which allows sufficient time for clearance from background tissues, resulting in increased image contrast, particularly for targeting agents that demonstrate long circulation times such as antibodies and nanoparticles. Moreover, 64Cu-based PET radiotracers have demonstrated efficacy for radioimmunotherapy (36) comparable to that for the strictly therapeutic radionuclide, 67Cu (t1/2 = 61.5 h, β 100%, Emax = 0.121 MeV). (37) Accordingly, 64Cu could be used for imaging and therapy concurrently. (38) In vivo stability of 64Cu-labeled targeted biomolecules depends on the stability of the corresponding Cu(II)-chelated coordination complex employed. (39-41) Numerous bifunctional chelating agents have been developed to form stable 64Cu(II) complexes based on well-developed copper coordination chemistry (42) and have been used to functionalize small molecules, (43, 44) peptides, (45-48) aptamers, (49) and antibodies. (50, 51) Acyclic and macrocyclic polyamines tend to have limited stability in vivo with respect to chelation of copper(II). (52, 53) Complexes of copper based on macrocyclic polyamino carboxylates, such as copper chelates of 1,4,8,11-tetraazacyclotetradecane-N,N′,N″,N‴-tetraacetic acid (TETA) and 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclodoadecane-N,N′,N″,N‴-tetraacetic acid (DOTA), have greater kinetic inertness than acyclic analogues, although this has not eliminated transchelation. (53, 54) The cross-bridged tetraamine bicyclic polyaminocarboxylates, specifically 1,4,8,11-tetraazabicyclo[6.6.2]hexadecane-4,11-diacetic acid (CB-TE2A), provide an improvement over the monocyclic counterparts. The superior kinetic stability of the copper(II) cross-bridged complexes relative to DOTA and TETA analogues (55-57) is due to the rigidity of the cross-bridge system. Derivatives of the polyaminocarboxylate NOTA (1,4,7-triazacyclononane-1,4,7-triacetic acid) are encouraging both because of the convenience of radiolabeling with 64Cu(II) and the lack of subsequent transmetalation in vivo. (46, 47, 58)
Here we study the effect of various chelators for labeling 64Cu on PSMA-targeted ureas with respect to pharmacokinetics for imaging prostate tumor xenografts in vivo. Although these low-molecular-weight compounds may clear relatively rapidly from nontarget sites, that is not always the case, and increasingly, larger PSMA-specific probes with slower kinetics are sometimes used as diagnostic and/or therapeutic probes for PSMA, requiring the longer physical half-life of 64Cu. Optimization of the chelator for radiolabeling with 64Cu is an important initial step in its implementation for imaging species that target PSMA. We investigated the in vitro binding affinity, mouse biodistribution, and prostate tumor xenograft uptake of five 64Cu-labeled PSMA inhibitors. To do that, we prepared urea-based PSMA inhibitors that utilize the Lys-Glu urea motif and conjugated them with five different macrocyclic chelating agents, NOTA, CB-TE2A, 3,6,9,15-tetraazabicyclo[9.3.1]-pentadeca-1(15),11,13-triene)-3,6,9-triacetic acid (PCTA), oxa-4,7,1-tetraazacyclododecane-4,7,10-triacetic acid (oxo-DO3A), (59) and DOTA. Each conjugate was labeled with 63/65Cu/64Cu. Imaging and biodistribution studies in NOD/SCID mice harboring prostate tumor xenografts demonstrated that both 64Cu-labeled NOTA- and CB-TE2A-conjugated radiotracers exhibited favorable pharmacokinetics over the PCTA, oxo-DO3A, and DOTA-conjugated compounds. Between the NOTA- and CB-TE2A-chelated compounds, the 64Cu-labeled CB-TE2A conjugated [64Cu]6B exhibited superior tumor-to-background ratios and is the most promising agent from the series.

Results

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Chemical and Radiochemical Syntheses

Macrocyclic Chelator-Conjugated PSMA Inhibitors

We have synthesized two different types of ligands as shown in Figure 1 using Lys-Glu urea as the targeting moiety. For ligands 35 we used a Lys-suberate linker (21) and conjugated the linker with commercially available chelating agents, NOTA-Bn-SCN, PCTA-Bn-SCN, and oxo-DOTA-Bn-SCN via thiourea bond formation. For those three bifunctional chelators, the macrocyclic backbone was functionalized to carry a benzyl isocyanate for conjugation with an amine function. Copper(II) compounds for 35 are predicted to demonstrate distorted octahedron geometry. (41) Because NOTA is a hexadentate N3O3 chelator, [64Cu(II)]3 is expected to carry a negative charge. On the other hand, both PCTA (N4O3) and oxo-DOTA (N3O4) are heptadentate macrocycles and likely form neutral compounds with one pendant acetate arm after complexation. (35, 41) The Lys-suberate linker was extended using two phenylalanine residues to prepare 6 and 7 containing CB-TE2A and DOTA, respectively, as chelating agents. The purpose of attaching those two phenylalanine residues to the linker of 6 and 7 is mainly to compensate for the lipophilicity of the phenylthiourea moiety of compounds 35. (22, 24-26) Note that one of the pendant acetate arms of the CB-TE2A and DOTA chelators has been modified to attach the PSMA targeting moiety via amide bond formation to produce 6 and 7, respectively. [64Cu]CB-TE2A forms a positively charged radiotracer when conjugated to a biomolecule, whereas DOTA-conjugated [64Cu]7 is expected to carry one pendant acetate, providing an overall neutral compound.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Proposed structures of 64Cu-labeled inhibitors of PSMA.

Syntheses of PSMA targeting ligands 3, 4, and 5 are shown in Scheme 1. Compounds 1 and 2 were prepared as previously reported. (28) Compound 2 was conjugated with commercially available NOTA-Bn-SCN, PCTA-Bn-SCN, and oxo-DOTA-Bn-SCN in DMSO in the presence of diisopropylethylamine (DIEA) at 40 °C for 4 h, to give 3, 4, and 5 in ∼30–40% yield, respectively, after purification by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Synthesis of CB-TE2A-conjugated ligand 6 was performed using standard fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl (Fmoc) solid phase peptide synthesis (SPPS), starting from Fmoc-Lys(Boc)-Wang resin according to Scheme 2. After two phenylalanine residues were coupled with the resin bound lysine, CB-TE2A was conjugated at the N-terminal of the second phenylalanine residue, after which the compound was cleaved from the resin by a 1:1 mixture of TFA/CH2Cl2 to produce 8 in moderate yield (∼20%). The free ε-amine of lysine of 8 was then conjugated with 1 (28) to produce 6. DOTA-conjugated 7 was prepared according to our previous report. (26) NMR and mass spectrometry (MS) were used to confirm the identity of newly synthesize compounds. Copper (63/65Cu) complexes were prepared by incubating conjugates 37 with an aqueous solution of Cu(NO3)2 at 95 °C as shown in Schemes 12. The mass spectra of the copper-labeled compounds showed the expected isotope distribution pattern for natural copper, which is a mixture of 63Cu (69%) and 65Cu (31%). The stable copper-labeled conjugates were used as authentic reference material for chromatography to identify the corresponding 64Cu-labeled compounds.

Scheme 1

Scheme 1. Synthesis of [64Cu]35

Scheme 2

Scheme 2. Synthesis of [64Cu]6

Radiochemistry

The radiolabeling of new PSMA ligands with 64Cu is shown in Schemes 12. Briefly, for ligands 35 and 7, radiolabeling was performed at pH ∼5.5–6 in acetate buffer at ∼65 °C for 30 min, whereas for ligand 6, radiolabeling was achieved in a boiling water bath (95 °C) for 1 h at pH ∼7.5–8 in acetate buffer. Radiolabeled products were obtained in high yield (>60%, without decay correction) and radiochemical purity (>95%) as determined by HPLC and radio thin-layer chromatography (radio-TLC). Two radiolabeled peaks were observed for [64Cu]4, likely due to the separation of diastereomers as previously reported for this class of bifunctional chelators. (60) On the other hand, free ligand 6 contained two nearly inseparable isomeric peaks by HPLC. Therefore, radiolabeling of 6 was performed using the isomeric mixture to give two HPLC separable products designated [64Cu]6A and [64Cu]6B, isolated in 45% and 35% yield, respectively. We assumed that the presence of an asymmetric center at the Phe residue of the linker moiety adjacent to CB-TE2A was responsible for producing those two diastereomeric compounds. All radioligands were obtained in specific activities ranging from 2.9 to 9.1 GBq/μmol (78–347 mCi/μmol). The Log Poct/w values for the radioligands were determined by octanol–water partition and are shown in Table 1. Surprisingly, [64Cu]6A and [64Cu]6B were found to be more hydrophilic than [64Cu]3 in spite of possessing two Phe residues on the linker and only one carboxylate groups on the chelator backbone.
Table 1. Radiolabeling Yield, Log Po/w, and PSMA Inhibitory Activity
 yield (%)Log Poct/w Ki (nM)
   32.84
[64Cu]3∼65–70–1.17[63/65Cu]36.23
   42.03
[64Cu]4∼70–90–1.42[63/65Cu]410.76
   53.10
[64Cu]5∼75–85–1.56[63/65Cu]55.47
   60.19
[64Cu]6A∼40–45–2.68[63/65Cu]6A3.98
[64Cu]6B∼30–35–2.31[63/65Cu]6B4.65
   711.07
[64Cu]7∼65–70ND[63/65Cu ]713.26

In Vitro Binding

Ligands and the corresponding stable metal-labeled compounds demonstrated high binding affinity to PSMA, with Ki values ranging from 0.19 to 13.26 nM (Table 1). The known, high-affinity PSMA inhibitor ZJ43 was used as a reference ligand (Supporting Information Figure S1) and exhibits a Ki of 4.3 nM. (61) The low nanomolar affinities displayed by these five new copper compounds are similar to the affinities of the majority PSMA-targeted imaging agents we have synthesized to date. (21, 28)

Small Animal PET-CT Imaging

Whole body PET-CT images were obtained for [64Cu]37 in intact male severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) mice (Figures 24) bearing PSMA+ PC3 PIP and PSMA– PC3 flu xenografts in opposite, upper flanks. Pharmacokinetics derived from the images were used to determine which compound(s) would be further evaluated through ex vivo biodistribution. Irrespective of charge and lipophilicity, all radiotracers, [64Cu]37, enabled visualization of PSMA+ PC3 PIP tumor and kidneys (Figure 2). Renal uptake of the radiotracers is partially due to the route of excretion of these agents as well as to specific uptake from the expression of PSMA in mouse proximal renal tubules. (62) Although [64Cu]4, [64Cu]5, and [64Cu]7 demonstrated moderate to high PSMA+ PC3 PIP tumor uptake, they also showed significant accumulation within liver at 2.5 h postinjection (Figure 2), which remained high until 6 h (data not shown). Radioligands [64Cu]5 and [64Cu]7 exhibited significantly higher background uptake, probably related to lower stability of these 64Cu complexes, (58) resulting in trans-chelation of copper to other, endogenous proteins. (56)

Figure 2

Figure 2. Whole body PET-CT imaging of PSMA+ PC3 PIP and PSMA – PC3 flu tumor-bearing mice with compounds [64Cu]3, [64Cu]4, [64Cu]5, [64Cu]6B, and [64Cu]7 at 2.5 h postinjection, respectively. Mice were injected with ∼11.1 MBq (∼300 μCi) of radiotracer IV. PIP = PSMA+ PC3 PIP (solid arrow); flu = PSMA– PC3 flu (unfilled arrow); K= kidney; B = bladder; L = left; R = right. All images are decay-corrected and adjusted to the same maximum value.

PET-CT images acquired at 20 min, 6 and 28 h postinjection of [64Cu]3 (Figure 3) (n = 2) showed clear uptake in PSMA+ PC3 PIP tumor. At 20 min and 6 h postinjection, the most visible tissues were PSMA+ PC3 PIP tumor and kidneys, with some accumulation of radioactivity observed in liver and urinary bladder. Radioactivity in liver and kidneys cleared significantly by 28 h.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Whole body PET-CT imaging of PC3 PIP and PC3 flu tumor bearing mice with [64Cu]3 at 20 min (left), 6 h (middle), 28 h (right). Abdominal radioactivity is primarily due to uptake within kidneys and bladder. PIP = PC3 PSMA+ PIP (solid arrow); flu = PC3 PSMA– flu (unfilled arrow); K= kidney; L = left; R = right, B = bladder. All images are decay-corrected and adjusted to the same maximum value.

Compounds [64Cu]6A and [64Cu]6B exhibited high radiotracer concentration both within PSMA+ PC3 PIP tumor and kidneys, similar to the distribution profile observed with [64Cu]3. Significantly, both CB-TE2A conjugated diastereomers [64Cu]6A and [64Cu]6B exhibited similar PET imaging profiles as shown in Figure 4. Both compounds showed low liver uptake as early as 20 min after the injection. Consequently, clear delineation of tumor was achieved even at early time points. By 2.5 h postinjection, radioactivity was largely cleared from kidneys for both isomers, producing clear target-to-background contrast for these radiotracers. As a further test of binding specificity, we imaged animals administered [64Cu]6B after pretreating them with 50 mg/kg of ZJ43 30 min prior to radiotracer. (61) ZJ43 proved capable of blocking binding of [64Cu]6B (Supporting Information Figure S2), not only within the tumor but also within the renal cortex, confirming that uptake observed in these tissues is PSMA-mediated. (62)

Figure 4

Figure 4. Whole body PET-CT imaging of PC3 PIP and PC3 flu tumor bearing mice with [64Cu]6A (top row) and [64Cu]6B (bottom row) at 20 min, 2.5 h, 12 and 22 h postinjection. Abdominal radioactivity is primarily due to uptake within kidneys and bladder. PIP = PC3 PSMA+ PIP (solid arrow); flu = PC3 PSMA− flu (unfilled arrow); K= kidney; L = left; R = right, B = bladder. All images are decay-corrected and adjusted to the same maximum value.

Biodistribution

On the basis of PET-CT imaging results, [64Cu]3, [64Cu]6A, and [64Cu]6B were further assessed in a biodistribution assays using the same isogenic human prostate cancer PSMA+ PC3 PIP and PSMA– PC3 flu tumor models (n = 4). Tables 2 and 3 show the pharmacokinetics in percentage of injected dose per gram of tissue (% ID/g) in selected organs for [64Cu]3 and [64Cu]6A at 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, and at 4 or 5 h postinjection, while Table 4 shows the % ID/g at the optimized time point of 2 h for [64Cu]3, [64Cu]4, [64Cu]6A, and[64Cu]6B. All compounds exhibited clear PSMA-dependent binding in PSMA+ PC3 PIP tumor xenografts, with [64Cu]3 demonstrating high tumor uptake as early as 30 min postinjection (33.78 ± 9.68% ID/g), peaking at 2 h (38.51 ± 5.68% ID/g) (Table 2), with extended retention of radioactivity up to 4 h postinjection (20.64 ± 5.06% ID/g). PSMA+ PC3 PIP to PSMA– PC3 flu tumor uptake ratios were 14.03 ± 3.71 and 23.50 ± 4.65 at 30 min at 4 h, respectively. The distribution within normal organs and tissues was also favorable, with low blood and normal tissue uptake and rapid clearance. The highest nonspecific uptake observed was in the liver (7.37 ± 0.40% ID/g) and spleen (28.02 ± 5.82% ID/g) at 30 min postinjection. However, those values decreased to 4.18 ± 1.61% ID/g and 4.72 ± 1.49% ID/g, respectively, by 4 h. Kidney uptake was expectedly high and peaked at 195.44 ± 29.82% ID/g at 30 min and decreased to 108.05 ± 20.50% ID/g by 4 h.
Table 2. Tissue Biodistribution for [64Cu]3 in Tumor-Bearing Micea
 0.5 h1 h2 h4 h
blood2.37 ± 0.901.12 ± 0.210.82 ± 0.200.45 ± 0.20
heart1.78 ± 0.411.39 ± 0.241.11 ± 0.130.71 ± 0.26
lung6.40 ± 0.595.99 ± 0.704.51 ± 0.972.49 ± 0.99
liver7.37 ± 0.407.50 ± 1.436.44 ± 0.834.18 ± 1.61
spleen28.02 ± 5.8227.58 ± 10.0512.33 ± 6.324.72 ± 1.49
fat1.78 ± 0.311.43 ± 0.380.76 ± 0.340.65 ± 0.75
kidney195.44 ± 29.82233.39 ± 22.76199.69 ± 48.44108.05 ± 20.50
muscle0.57 ± 0.320.60 ± 0.140.34 ± 0.120.21 ± 0.10
small intestine4.60 ± 1.425.58 ± 1.433.68 ± 0.412.44 ± 1.30
large intestine4.51 ± 1.646.01 ± 2.543.80 ± 1.672.42 ± 1.19
bladder5.65 ± 2.772.48 ± 0.4213.33 ± 8.351.70 ± 0.97
PC-3 PIP33.79 ± 9.6829.11 ± 3.0238.51 ± 5.6820.64 ± 5.06
PC-3 flu2.40 ± 0.172.02 ± 0.181.92 ± 0.231.04 ± 0.37
PIP:flu14.03 ± 3.7114.37 ± 0.4319.96 ± 0.8123.50 ± 4.65
PIP:blood15.11 ± 5.3826.64 ± 5.1248.75 ± 10.2750.01 ± 15.54
a

Values expressed are in % ID/g ± standard deviation; n = 4 for all tissues.

Table 3 shows the organ-related % ID/g of uptake for [64Cu]6B. Similar to [64Cu]3, [64Cu]6B showed the highest PSMA-dependent tumor uptake with 29.50 ± 8.10% ID/g at 1 h postinjection. Tumor uptake remained high, decreasing to 18.69 ± 2.88% ID/g at 5 h. The PSMA+ PC3 PIP to PSMA– PC3 flu ratios were 19.36 ± 3.98 at 30 min, 79.40 ± 15.83 at 2 h, and 146.79 ± 32.20 at 5 h. The PSMA+ PC3 PIP tumor-to-muscle ratio reached a maximum value of 436.14 ± 202.71 at 5 h, nearly 3-fold higher than those observed with [64Cu]3. Renal uptake for [64Cu]6B was highest at 30 min at 256.11 ± 75.72% ID/g, much higher than that seen for [64Cu]3, however, it cleared much more rapidly, decreasing to 3.54 ± 0.04% ID/g by 5h. Nontarget organs, such as blood, heart, liver, spleen, stomach, and pancreas, showed lower uptake (∼2% ID/g at 1 h) and much faster clearance than for [64Cu]3 and decreased to below 1% ID/g by 5 h.
Table 3. Tissue Biodistribution for [64Cu]6B in Tumor-Bearing Micea
 0.5 h1 h2 h5 h
blood2.50 ± 1.080.64 ± 0.240.26 ± 0.130.06 ± 0.05
heart0.92 ± 0.270.32 ± 0.080.13 ± 0.050.06 ± 0.01
lung2.70 ± 0.730.83 ± 0.110.45 ± 0.210.15 ± 0.01
liver0.73 ± 0.170.42 ± 0.040.30 ± 0.060.21 ± 0.03
stomach1.02 ± 0.470.48 ± 0.280.25 ± 0.060.10 ± 0.03
pancreas0.90 ± 0.230.31 ± 0.190.13 ± 0.050.05 ± 0.04
spleen5.80 ± 2.612.14 ± 0.580.65 ± 0.150.25 ± 0.07
fat0.87 ± 0.150.87 ± 1.320.19 ± 0.100.05 ± 0.05
kidney256.11 ± 75.72148.60 ± 48.4165.39 ± 21.163.54 ± 0.04
muscle0.33 ± 0.011.71 ± 2.290.17 ± 0.050.05 ± 0.02
small intestine0.85 ± 0.411.38 ± 1.890.26 ± 0.070.11 ± 0.10
large intestine0.88 ± 0.420.77 ± 0.650.30 ± 0.080.14 ± 0.05
bladder3.99 ± 0.267.06 ± 3.752.21 ± 0.571.43 ± 1.41
PC-3 PIP23.14 ± 2.2029.50 ± 8.1020.46 ± 2.9018.69 ± 2.88
PC-3 flu1.29 ± 0.120.66 ± 0.260.26 ± 0.040.13 ± 0.03
PIP:flu19.36 ± 3.9848.41 ± 14.2579.40 ± 15.83146.79 ± 32.30
PIP:blood9.13 ± 5.2347.47 ± 7.24101.17 ± 6.701123.96 ± 25.83
PIP:muscle69.35 ± 4.2991.30 ± 93.17132.99 ± 43.97436.14 ± 202.71
a

Values expressed are in % ID/g ± standard deviation; n = 4 for all tissues.

Because [64Cu]3, [64Cu]4, and [64Cu]6 demonstrated superior pharmacokinetics to [64Cu]5 and [64Cu]7, a one-time point (2 h) biodistribution study (Table 4) was performed with [64Cu]3, [64Cu]4, and [64Cu]6B. Syntheses and biodistribution studies were performed on the same day, as close to one another as possible to minimize the changes in specific activity of the radiotracer. The biodistribution and imaging data reveal several important points regarding the in vivo properties of these compounds. The NOTA-chelated radiotracers [64Cu]3, PCTA-chelated [64Cu]4, and CB-TE2A-chelated [64Cu]6B showed high uptake in PSMA+ PC3 PIP tumor, highest for [64Cu]4 (24.13 ± 10.06% ID/g). However, [64Cu]4 also exhibited slightly higher nonspecific uptake in PSMA– PC3 flu tumor and other organs, including blood, muscle, heart, liver, and stomach, resulting in lower tumor-to-organ ratios than for [64Cu]3 and [64Cu]6B. In the imaging studies, [64Cu]4 exhibited considerable background radioactivity primarily due to high liver uptake of [64Cu]4. Diastereomers [64Cu]6A and [64Cu]6B, each containing the CB-TE2A chelating agent, possessed similar in vivo properties and exhibited significantly lower normal tissue uptake, including kidney, than either [64Cu]3 or [64Cu]4.
Table 4. Tissue Biodistibistion for [64Cu]3, [64Cu]4, [64Cu]6A, and [64Cu]6B at 2 h Post-Injection in Tumor-Bearing Micea
 [64Cu]3[64Cu]4[64Cu]6A[64Cu]6B
blood1.06 ± 0.291.87 ± 0.630.20 ± 0.030.20 ± 0.07
heart1.48 ± 0.142.71 ± 0.130.26 ± 0.100.35 ± 0.21
lung5.31 ± 0.7410.16 ± 2.291.17 ± 0.610.89 ± 0.15
liver8.63 ± 0.9217.04 ± 1.441.68 ± 0.381.63 ± 0.72
stomach3.88 ± 0.826.37 ± 0.780.62 ± 0.420.62 ± 0.17
pancreas2.22 ± 0.343.51 ± 0.670.46 ± 0.440.80 ± 0.92
spleen13.42 ± 1.189.27 ± 2.280.39 ± 0.300.90 ± 0.23
fat0.76 ± 0.771.18 ± 0.590.27 ± 0.260.05 ± 0.02
kidney125.40 ± 42.47166.57 ± 42.3923.55 ± 8.9624.87 ± 11.26
muscle0.33 ± 0.080.71 ± 0.320.11 ± 0.050.12 ± 0.05
small intestine6.24 ± 1.4610.95 ± 3.700.74 ± 0.320.68 ± 0.13
large intestine10.13 ± 6.8310.10 ± 4.761.49 ± 0.751.28 ± 0.70
bladder12.47 ± 10.3010.56 ± 6.207.98 ± 8.325.92 ± 4.94
PC-3 PIP16.58 ± 3.1524.13 ± 10.0611.10 ± 5.4216.89 ± 5.73
PC-3 flu2.12 ± 0.253.88 ± 0.620.36 ± 0.090.40 ± 0.12
PIP:flu11.00 ± 0.736.22 ± 1.8630.90 ± 7.9241.75 ± 5.54
PIP:blood16.52 ± 5.1412.87 ± 1.8752.41 ± 17.3486.97 ± 15.22
PIP:muscle46.98 ± 19.0538.34 ± 21.6997.31 ± 42.46138.88 ± 30.86
a

Values expressed are in % ID/g ± standard deviation; n = 4 for all tissues.

Discussion

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

We have evaluated five 64Cu-labeled PSMA-targeted, urea conjugates using different chelating agents with the aim of optimizing in vivo PET imaging properties of this class of compounds for clinical application. It is generally accepted that the overall biologic profile of radiolabeled ligands is determined not only by receptor-specific binding but also by nonspecific interactions. Such off-target effects rely on the overall physicochemical features of the radiolabeled compound, e.g., molecular weight, charge, lipophilicity, and metabolic stability. The chelator used to attach the radionuclide to the targeting agent plays a key role in establishing those physicochemical features, particularly for agents smaller than antibodies and nanoparticles, namely those of relatively low molecular weight (<1500 Da). Two key findings emerged from this study. First, both NOTA and CB2-TE2A-conjugated radiotracers [64Cu]3 and [64Cu]6 demonstrated significantly higher in vivo stability, as evidenced by their lower liver uptake than the other three radiotracers, [64Cu]4, [64Cu]5, and [64Cu]7, which utilized PCTA, oxo-DOTA, and DOTA, respectively. High liver uptake and slow blood clearance for those latter three radiotracers are indicative of free Cu(II), which is sequestered in liver. (56, 63) Second, liver uptake and blood concentration are much lower at all time points for [64Cu]6AB compared to [64Cu]3, suggesting higher in vivo stability of CB-TE2A-conjugated [64Cu]6AB compared to NOTA-conjugated [64Cu]3. That might also be related to the higher hydrophilicity of [64Cu]6AB compared to [64Cu]3 (Log Po/w = −2.68 for [64Cu]6B compared to −1.17 for [64Cu]3). Low liver uptake of CB-TE2A-chelated [64Cu]6 ligands might also be related their higher stability in forming complexes with Cu(II) and Cu(I), assuming Cu(II) reduction is the primary reason for transchelation, as reported previously. (56) It is worth mentioning that [64Cu]3, which possesses an overall negative charge, exhibited higher kidney and spleen uptake that was similar to that observed for 99mTc-oxo labeled PSMA-targeted compounds. (34)
Both kidney and tumor uptake of [64Cu]6B were specifically blocked by ZJ43, demonstrating PSMA-mediated renal uptake, however, much faster renal clearance of [64Cu]6B was observed compared to clearance from PSMA+ PIP tumor. We and others have seen a similar pattern of faster clearance of radioactivity from PSMA-expressing kidney than PSMA+ PIP tumor, presumably associated with more rapid flow through normally organized renal parenchymal vasculature compared to the relatively disorganized vasculature of the xenograft. (26, 64, 65) As an extension of that particular pharmacokinetic feature, [64Cu]6 exhibited the highest tumor-to-normal tissue ratios in this series of agents and the ratios increased with time, thereby providing high image contrast. Moreover, no bone uptake was observed for [64Cu]6, indicating that this agent may find application for detection of prostate cancer metastases, which are preferentially found in bone.
The imaging and biodistribution results demonstrate higher in vivo stability and renal clearance for CB-TE2A-chelated [64Cu]6 compared to NOTA-chelated [64Cu]3, which appears to be in contradistinction to previous reports that involve similar comparison for agents that target somatostatin receptor and αvβ3 integrin. In those reports [64Cu]NOTA-conjugated radiopeptides provided faster renal clearance than those conjugated with [64Cu]CB-TE2A. (46, 47) Although unclear at this time, this difference between 64Cu-labeled species for targeting of PSMA vs somatostatin receptor or integrin may be associated with other physical properties unique to each system such as binding affinity or capacity for internalization of the cognate ligands. It nevertheless underscores the uniqueness of each system and indicates that one chelator cannot be assumed to outperform another in a new, untested system.
There are several classes of imaging agents available for PET-based molecular imaging of PSMA, including antibodies, (4, 5, 32, 66) antibody fragments, (67) aptamers, (49) and low-molecular-weight PSMA-binding affinity agents. (14, 64) They have widely varying pharmacokinetics, however, each class has shown PSMA-specific binding in preclinical studies. Rockey and colleagues have recently optimized conditions for conjugating 64Cu to a PSMA-targeting aptamer with different chelators, which has shown PSMA-mediated uptake in PSMA+ 22Rv1 prostate tumor cells relative to PSMA– PC3 cells. (49) The radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies [64Cu]DOTA-3/A1214 and [89Zr]DFO-J591 (55) both showed values of approximately 3:1 at 48 h post-injection for PSMA+ to PSMA- tumor. Among the long-lived PET radionuclides, 64Cu and 89Zr, the stability of the [89Zr]DFO complex is limited as shown in several in vitro and in vivo in studies, which is reflected in a bone accumulation ranging from 3 to 15% and assumed to be associated with the nonlinear nature of the desferrioxamine (DFO) chelating agent. (68) More recently, studies in biopsy tissue from patients with prostate cancer and cell lines have demonstrated a correlation between PSMA cell–surface expression and androgen activity using 64Cu-labeled anti-PSMA antibody ([64Cu]J591). (20) ImmunoPET detection of PSMA could provide a path for quantitative monitoring of successful androgen blockade in patients. Low-molecular-weight urea-based agent [64Cu]6 could be an inexpensive alternative for those applications. Furthermore, results obtained with [64Cu]6 suggest that delayed imaging with 64Cu-labeled PSMA-targeted ligands using CB-TE2A can improve the visualization of PSMA+ tumors in vivo anywhere outside of central nervous system and may allow imaging of tumors with lower PSMA expression levels than possible with existing 18F- or 68Ga-labeled PSMA-targeted imaging agents.

Conclusion

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

We describe five new low-molecular-weight, urea-based, 64Cu-labeled, PSMA-targeted radiotracers that incorporated well-established chelating agents. All compounds demonstrated high tumor uptake and retention with the choice of chelator having a profound effect on pharmacokinetics. Our data revealed that [64Cu]6, which utilizes the CB-TE2A chelator, demonstrated improved biodistribution with rapid clearance from normal tissues, including kidney, resulting in significantly improved image contrast. Accordingly, [64Cu]6 provides a potentially clinically viable imaging agent for PSMA+ tissues, particularly if delayed imaging, obtainable with a 64Cu-labeled agent, is required.

Experimental Section

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Solvents and chemicals purchased from commercial sources were of analytical grade or better and used without further purification. All 9-fluorenylmethyloxycarbonyl (Fmoc) protected amino acids including the Fmoc-Lys(Boc)-Wang resin, 1-hydroxybenzotriazole monohydrate, and 2-(1H-benzotriazole-1-yl)-1,1,3,3-tetramethyluronium hexafluorophosphate (HBTU) were purchased from Chem Impex International Inc. (Wooddale, IL). [64Cu]CuCl2 was purchased from the University of Wisconsin. DOTA-tris(t-butyl ester)-monoacid, p-SCN-Bn-NOTA, p-SCN-Bn-PCTA, and p-SCN-Bn-oxo-DO3A were received from Macrocyclics Inc. (Dallas, TX). Copper(II) chloride, triethylsilane (Et3SiH), diisopropylethylamine (DIEA), and triethylamine (TEA) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). All other chemicals were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Pittsburgh, PA) unless otherwise specified. Analytical thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was performed using Aldrich aluminum-backed 0.2 mm silica gel Z19, 329-1 plates and visualized by ultraviolet light (254 nm), I2, and 1% ninhydrin in EtOH. Flash chromatography was performed using silica gel (MP SiliTech 32-63 D 60 Å) purchased from Bodman (Aston, PA). All in vitro PSMA binding studies and determination of partition coefficient experiments were performed in triplicate to ensure reproducibility. 1H NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker UltrashieldTM 400 MHz spectrometer. Chemical shifts (δ) are reported in ppm downfield by reference to proton resonances resulting from incomplete deuteration of the NMR solvent. Low resolution ESI mass spectra were obtained on a Bruker Daltonics Esquire 3000 Plus spectrometer. High resolution mass spectra were obtained by the University of Notre Dame Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics Facility, Notre Dame, IN, using ESI either by direct infusion on a Bruker microTOF-II or by LC elution via an ultrahigh pressure Dionex RSLC with C18 column coupled with a Bruker microTOF-Q II.
HPLC purification of compounds 37 was performed using a Phenomenex C18 Luna 10 × 250 mm2 column on a Waters 600E Delta LC system with a Waters 486 variable wavelength UV/vis detector, both controlled by Empower software. HPLC was performed using the following methods. Method 1: solvent A (0.1% TFA in water) and solvent B (0.1% TFA in in acetonitrile), flow rate 8 mL/min. The elution gradient was 90% A and 10% B for 0–5 min and 90% A to 0% A and 10% B to 100% B over 6–30 min. Methods 2–5 were isocrati,c with a flow rate 4 mL/min. Method 2: 85% A and 15% B for 0–50 min. Method 3: 82% A and 18% B for 0–40 min. Method 4: 83% A and 17% B for 0–40 min. Method 5: 78% A and 22% B for 0–30 min. Method 6: 80% A and 20% B for 0–30 min, flow rate 1 mL/min, and a Waters Novapak C18 150 × 3.9 mm2 column was used. HPLC purification of [64Cu]3-7 were performed on a Varian Prostar System (Palo Alto, CA), equipped with a Varian ProStar 325 UV–vis variable wavelength detector and a Bioscan Flow-Count in-line radioactivity detector, all controlled by Galaxie software. The specific radioactivity was calculated as the radioactivity eluting at the retention time of product during the preparative HPLC purification divided by the mass corresponding to the area under the curve of the UV absorption. The purity of tested compounds as determined by analytical HPLC with absorbance at 220 nm were >95%.

Synthesis and Characterization of Compounds 17

Compounds 1, (28) and 2, (26) and 7 (26) were prepared following our previous reports. Compounds 35 were prepared following a general procedure as described for compound 3.

9,16,24-Trioxo-1-thioxo-1-((4-(((S)-1,4,7-tris(carboxymethyl)-1,4,7-triazonan-2-yl)methyl)phenyl)amino)-2,8,17,23,25-pentaazaoctacosane-7,22,26,28-tetracarboxylic Acid, Compound 3

To a solution of 2 (20 mg, 0.33 μmol in 500 μL of DMSO) was added NOTA-Bn-SCN (18.5 mg, 0.33 μmol in 500 μL of DMSO) and DIEA (100 μL), and the solution was kept at 40 °C for 4 h. The reaction mixture was then evaporated to dryness, and the crude residue was dissolved in 2 mL of water and loaded on a prepacked C18 column (5.5 g, Agilent SF10). The product was eluted with 80/20–70/30 H2O (0.1%TFA)/CH3CN (0.1% TFA) solution. The fractions containing the products were combined together and evaporated to dryness to obtain a colorless solid. The solid thus obtained was further purified by HPLC (method 1, retention time, Rt 15.80 min). Yield ∼8 mg (0.076 μmol, ∼23%) after HPLC purification and lyphilization. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ: 8.15 (m, 1H, HNCO(Lys-linker)), 7.75 (m, 1H, HNCO(Lys)), 7.14 (d, 2H, Bz), 6.78 (d, 2H, Bz), 6.34 (m, 2H, NH(CO)NH), 4.40–3.99 (m, 3H, HC(NHCO2(Glu), HC(NHCO2(Lys), HC(NHCO2(Lys)), 3.40–3.30 (m, 7H, NCH2, CHCH2, (NOTA)), 3.21–3.03(m, 16H, (CH2)2(NOTA), H2C-Bz, H2CNH(Lys-linker), H2CNH(Lys)), 2.40–2.09 (m, 6H, H2CCO2(Glu), H2CCO2(linker), H2CCO2(linker)),1.89–1.55 (m, 6H, H2CCH(Glu), H2CCH(Lys-linker), H2CCH(Lys)), 1.55–1.21 (m, 16H, (CH2)2(Lys), (CH2)2(Lys-Linker), (CH2)4(linker)). ESMS m/z: 1054 [M + H]+. HRESI+ MS: calcd for C46H72N9O17S, 1054.4767 [M + H]+; found, 1054.4771.

9,16,24-Trioxo-1-thioxo-1-((4-(((4S)-3,6,9-tris(carboxymethyl)-3,6,9,15-tetraazabicyclo[9.3.1]pentadeca-1(14),12-dien-4-yl)methyl)phenyl)amino)-2,8,17,23,25-pentaazaoctacosane-7,22,26,28-tetracarboxylic Acid, Compound 4

The compound was purified by HPLC (method 1; Rt 15.60 min). Yield ∼12 mg (0.076 μmol, ∼23%) after HPLC purification and lyophilized. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ: 8.14 (m, 1H, HNCO(Lys-linker)), 7.80–7.75 (m, 2H, HNCO(Lys), Py), 7.32 (d, 2H, Py), 7.15 (d, 2H, Bz), 6.78 (d, 2H, Bz), 6.35 (m, 2H, NH(CO)NH), 4.42–3.99 (m, 7H, HC(NHCO2(Glu), HC(NHCO2(Lys), HC(NHCO2(Lys), H2C-Py)), 3.42–3.31 (m, 7H, CHCH2, NCH2(PCTA)), 3.21–3.02 (m, 12H, (CH2)2(PCTA), H2C-Bz, H2CNH(Lys-linker), H2CNH(Lys)), 2.41–2.08 (m, 6H, H2CCO2(Glu), H2CCO2(linker), H2CCO2(linker)), 1.89–1.55 (m, 6H, H2CCH(Glu), H2CCH(Lys-linker), H2CCH(Lys)), 1.55–1.21 (m, 16H, (CH2)2 (Lys), (CH2)2(Lys-Linker), (CH2)4(linker)). ESMS m/z: 1132 [M + H]+. HRESI+ MS: calcd for C51H75N10O17S, 1131.5032 [M + H]+; found, 1131.5011.

9,16,24-Trioxo-1-thioxo-1-((4-((4,7,10-tris(carboxymethyl)-1-oxa-4,7,10-triazacyclododecan-2-yl)methyl)phenyl)amino)-2,8,17,23,25-pentaazaoctacosane-7,22,26,28-tetracarboxylic Acid, Compound 5

The compound was purified by HPLC (method 1; Rt 13.40 min). Yield ∼10 mg (0.076 μmol, ∼23%) after HPLC purification and lyophilization. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ: 8.12 (m, 1H, HNCO(Lys-linker)), 7.80–7.75 (m, 1H, HNCO(Lys)), 7.14 (d, 2H, Bz), 6.79 (d, 2H, Bz), 6.32 (m, 2H, NH(CO)NH), 4.42–3.99 (m, 3H, HC(NHCO2(Glu), HC(NHCO2(Lys), HC(NHCO2(Lys)), 3.49–3.31 (m, 11H, NCH2(DO3A), CHCH2(DO3A), OCH2)), 3.21–3.02 (m, 16H, (CH2)2(DO3A), H2C-Bz, H2CNH(Lys-linker), H2CNH(Lys)), 2.41–2.08 (m, 6H, H2CCO2(Glu), H2CCO2(linker), H2CCO2(linker)), 1.91–1.50 (m, 6H, H2CCH(Glu), H2CCH(Lys-linker), H2CCH(Lys)), 1.50–1.22 (m, 16H, (CH2)2(Lys), (CH2)2(Lys-Linker), (CH2)4(linker). ESMS m/z: 1098 [M + 1]+, HRESI+ MS: calcd for C48H76N9O18S, 1098.5029 [M + H]+; found, 1098.5048.

(14S,29S,33S)-4,7-Dibenzyl-1-(11-(carboxymethyl)-1,4,8,11-tetraazabicyclo[6.6.2]hexadecan-4-yl)-2,5,8,16,23,31-hexaoxo-3,6,9,15,24,30,32-heptaazapentatriacontane-14,29,33,35-tetracarboxylic Acid, Compound 6

Fmoc-Lys(Boc)-Wang resin (100 mg, 0.43 mM) was allowed to swell with CH2Cl2 (3 mL) followed by DMF (3 mL). A solution of 20% piperidine in DMF (3 × 3 mL) was added to the resin that was then shaken gently on a mechanical shaker for 30 min at ambient temperature. The resin was washed with DMF (3 × 3 mL) and CH2Cl2 (3 × 3 mL). Formation of free amine was assessed by the Kaiser test. After swelling the resin in DMF, a solution of Fmoc-Phe-OH (3 equiv), HBTU (3 equiv), HOBt (3 equiv), and DIPEA (4.0 equiv) in DMF was added and gently shaken for 2 h. The resin was then washed with DMF (3 × 3 mL) and CH2Cl2 (3 × 3 mL). The coupling efficiency was assessed by the Kaiser test. The aforementioned sequence was repeated for two more coupling steps with Fmoc-Phe-OH and CB-TE2A, respectively. The final compound was cleaved from the resin using TFA:CH2Cl2 (1:1) and concentrated under vacuum to produce 8. The concentrated product was purified by using a C18 SepPak Vac 2g column. The product was eluted with a solution 70/30 water/acetonitrile (0.1% TFA in each). ESI-MS: 635 [M]+. To a solution of 8 (20 mg, 31 μmol in 500 μL of DMSO) (27 mg, 47 μmol) and DIEA (50 μL) was added 1, and the reaction mixture was left at ambient temperature for 2 h. The solution was diluted in 10 mL of water and was purified by HPLC (method 1, time (Rt), 20 min). Yield ∼10 mg (0.076 μmol, ∼22%) after HPLC purification and lyophilization. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): 9.02–8.07 (m, 12H, HNCO(Lys-linker), HNCO(Lys), PhCH2), 6.34 (m, 2H, NH(CO)NH), 4.62 (m, 2H, NHCO2(Phe)), 4.37–4.28 (m, 3H, (m, 3H, HC(NHCO2(Glu), HC(NHCO2(Lys), HC(NHCO2(Lys)), 3.65–3.01 (m, 14H, CH2 N(CB-TE2A), H2CPhe, H2CNH(Lys), H2CNH(Lys)), 2.74–2.41 (m, 20H, NCH2CH2(CB-TE2A), 2.41–2.08 (m, 6H, H2CCO2(Glu), H2CCO2(linker), H2CCO2(linker)), 1.91–1.50 (m, 10H, CH2(CB-TE2A), H2CCH(Glu), H2CCH(Lys-linker), H2CCH(Lys)), 1.56–1.22 (m, 16H, (CH2)2(Lys), (CH2)2(Lys-Linker), (CH2)4(linker). ESMS m/z: 1222 [M + H]+. HRESI+ MS: calcd for C60H91N11O16, 1221.6645; found, 1221.4951.

Copper Complexes of Ligand 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7

Copper compounds [63/65 Cu]35 and[63/65 Cu]7 were prepared by the same general procedure as presented for compound 3 below. [63/65Cu]6AB were prepared by same conditions as described for their radiosynthesis.
[63/65Cu]3. To a solution of Cu(NO3)2 (1 mg, 20 μmol in 100 μL) in deionized water was added 3 (1 mg, 0.95 μmol) in 500 μL of 0.2 M NaOAc. The resulting solution was heated in boiling water for 0.5 h. The solution was purified by HPLC method 2. The retention time for the product was 34 min. Yield: ∼50%. ESIMS m/z: 1115 [M + H]+. HRMS: calcd for C46H70CuN9O17S, 1115.3906 [M + H]+; found, 1115.3828.
[63/65Cu]4. The compound was purified by HPLC method 3. Retention time for the product was at 22 min. Yield: ∼50%. ESIMS m/z: 1192 [M + H]+. HRMS: calcd for C51H73CuN10O17S, 1192.4172 [M + H]+; found, 1192.4364.
[63/65Cu]5. The compound was purified by HPLC method 4. Retention time for the product was at 14 min. Yield: ∼60%. ESIMS m/z: 1160 [M + H]+. HRMS: calcd for C48H76CuN9O18S, 1160.4247 [M + H]+; found, 1160.3828.
[63/65Cu]6AB .The compound was purified by HPLC method 5. Retention time for the products were at 24 and 26 min. Yield: ∼50%. ESIMS m/z: 1285 [M + H]+. HRMS: calcd for C60H91CuN11O16, 1284.5930 [M + H]+; found, 1284.5786.
[63/65Cu]7. The compound was purified by HPLC method 6. Rt for the product was at 13 min. Yield: ∼55%. ESIMS m/z: 1349 [M + H]+. HRMS: calcd for C60H90CuN11O20, 1348.5650 [M + H]+; found, 1348.5671

64Cu Radiolabeling

Radioligands [64Cu]35 and 7 were prepared by the same general method as described for [64Cu]3. For each radiolabeling reaction, approximately 30–40 μg of ligand and in 200 mM NaOAc (purged under N2 for 2–3 min) was incubated with 3–4 mCi 64CuCl2 at pH 5.5–6 for 0.3 h in a water bath at 65 °C. Radiolabeling was monitored by injecting aliquots of 20–40 μL of the solution onto the HPLC. When the reaction reached completion, the reaction mixture was diluted with 1 mL of water then loaded onto a preparative HPLC for purification using method 2, Rt 41 min, for the desired product and Rt 38 min for the free ligand. The radiolabeled product [64Cu]3 was obtained in ∼60–70% radiochemical yield, and the radiochemical purity was >98% as measured by ITLC (Gelman ITLC strips, 10 mM EDTA). HPLC method 2 was used to purify the radiolabeled product [64Cu]3. Rt 34 min for the desired product and Rt 42 min for the free ligand. The specific activity of the probe was 2.9–9.1 GBq/μmol (n = 4). The acidic eluate was neutralized with 50 μL of 1 M Na2(CO3), and the volume of the eluate was reduced under vacuum to dryness. The solid residue was diluted with saline to the desired radioactivity concentration for biodistribution and imaging studies. HPLC method 3 was used for [64Cu]4, Rt = 20–26 min for [64Cu]4 and Rt = 15 min for the free ligand 4. [64Cu]4 was isolated in two peaks, Rt 20–22 min for the first fraction and 23–26 min for the second fraction. On the basis of the initial results (in PET imaging both fractions displayed similar in vivo distributions), only the second fraction was used for all studies. HPLC method 4 was used for [64Cu]5. Retention times for [64Cu]5 and free ligand were and 14.5 and 9.5 min, respectively. The radiotracer [64Cu]7 was purified by HPLC method 6. Rt for [64Cu]7 was at 13 min.
For [64Cu]6AB, radiolabeling was done in a boiling water bath for 1 h by incubation of 64CuCl2 with the corresponding ligand using 0.2 NaOAc buffer at pH = 7.5–8. HPLC method 5, Rt = 24.9 min (A) and 26.8 min (B) for the desired products and Rt = 19.8 min (A) and 21.5 min (B) for the free ligands. The specific activity of the probe was 2.9 GBq–12.84 GBq/μmol.

NAALADase Assay

The PSMA inhibitory activities of 37 and the corresponding copper-labeled analogues were determined using a fluorescence-based assay according to a previously reported procedure. 28 Briefly, lysates of LNCaP cell extracts (25 μL) were incubated with the inhibitor (12.5 μL) in the presence of 4 μM N-acetylaspartylglutamate (NAAG) (12.5 μL) for 120 min. The amount of the glutamate released by NAAG hydrolysis was measured by incubating with a working solution (50 μL) of the Amplex Red glutamic acid kit (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) for 60 min. Fluorescence was measured with a VICTOR3 V multilabel plate reader (Perkin-Elmer Inc., Waltham, MA) with excitation at 490 nm and emission at 642 nm. Inhibition curves were determined using semilog plots, and IC50 values were determined at the concentration at which enzyme activity was inhibited by 50%. Enzyme inhibitory constants (Ki values) were generated using the Cheng–Prusoff conversion. (69) Assays were performed in triplicate. Data analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism version 4.00 for Windows (GraphPad Software, San Diego, California).

Cell Lines

Sublines of the androgen-independent PC3 human prostate cancer cell line, originally derived from an advanced androgen independent bone metastasis, were used. These sublines have been modified to express high (PC3 PIP) or possess low (PC3 flu) levels of PSMA and were generously provided by Dr. Warren Heston (Cleveland Clinic). PSMA-expressing (PC3 PIP), nonexpressing (PC3 flu) PCa cell lines, were grown in RPMI 1640 medium (Corning Cellgro, Manassas, VA) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Sigma-Aldrich, St.Louis, MO) and 1% penicillin–streptomycin (Corning Cellgro, Manassas, VA) and PC-3 PIP cells were grown under 20 μg/mL of puromycin to maintain PSMA expression. All cell cultures were maintained in an atmosphere containing 5% carbon dioxide (CO2) at 37.0 °C in a humidified incubator.

Tumor Models

Animal studies were carried out in full compliance with the regulations of the Johns Hopkins Animal Care and Use Committee. Six-to-eight-week-old male, nonobese diabetic (NOD)/severe-combined immunodeficient (SCID) mice (Johns Hopkins Immune Compromised Core) were implanted subcutaneously (sc) with PC3 PIP (PSMA+) and PC3 flu (PSMA−) cells (1 × 106 in 100 μL of HBSS (Corning Cellgro, Manassas, VA) at the forward right and left flanks, respectively. Mice were imaged or used in ex vivo biodistribution assays when the xenografts reached 5– 7 mm in diameter.

Small-Animal PET Imaging and Analysis

Dynamic and whole-body PET and CT images were acquired on an eXplore VISTA small-animal PET (GE Healthcare) and an X-SPECT small SPECT/CT system (Gamma Medica Ideas), respectively. For imaging studies, mice were anesthetized with 3% and maintained under 1.5% isoflurane (v/v). PET-CT Imaging studies were performed on NOD/SCID mice bearing PSMA+ PC3 PIP and PSMA– PC3 flu tumors. Immediately after intravenous injection of [64Cu]37, changes in radiotracer accumulation were recorded over the whole body using an imaging sequence consisting of eight frames for a total of 30 min with variable dwell times as described previously. (43, 64) After dynamic imaging, whole-body PET images (two bed positions, 15 min emission per bed position) were acquired at the indicated time points after injection of radiotracer. For binding specificity studies, a mouse was subcutaneously administered with a blocking dose of the known PSMA inhibitor ZJ43 (50 mg/kg) at 30 min before the injection of [64Cu]6B, and another mouse was injected with [64Cu]6B alone. After each PET scan, a CT scan was acquired as 512 projections using a 50 keV beam for anatomic coregistration. PET emission data were corrected for decay and dead time and were reconstructed using the three-dimensional ordered-subsets expectation maximization algorithm. Data were displayed and analyzed using AMIDE software (http://sourceforge.net/amide), and volume-rendered images were generated using Amira 5.2.0 software (Visage Imaging Inc.; http://www.vsg3d.com/amira).

Ex Vivo Biodistribution

Mice bearing PSMA+ PC3 PIP and PSMA– PC3 flu xenografts were injected via the tail vein with 740 kBq (20 μCi) of 64Cu in 200 μL of saline. At 30, 60, 240, and 240 or 300 min postinjection, the mouse was sacrificed by cervical dislocation and the blood immediately collected by cardiac puncture. The heart, lungs, liver, stomach, pancreas, spleen, fat, kidney, muscle, small and large intestines, urinary bladder, PSMA+ PC3 PIP and PSMA– PC3 flu tumors were collected. Each organ was weighed, and the tissue radioactivity was measured with an automated gamma counter (1282 Compugamma CS, Pharmacia/LKBNuclear, Inc., Mt. Waverly, Victoria, Australia). The % ID/g was calculated by comparison with samples of a standard dilution of the initial dose. All measurements were corrected for decay.

Data Analysis

Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Prism software (GraphPAD, San Diego, California) was used to determine statistical significance. Statistical significance was calculated using a paired t test. A P-value <0.0001 was considered significant.

Supporting Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Detailed spectral data and supporting PET-CT blocking study image. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

  • Corresponding Authors
    • Sangeeta Ray Banerjee - Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, 1550 Orleans Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21287, United States Email: [email protected]
    • Martin G. Pomper - Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, 1550 Orleans Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21287, United States Email: [email protected]
  • Authors
    • Mrudula Pullambhatla - Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, 1550 Orleans Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21287, United States
    • Catherine A. Foss - Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, 1550 Orleans Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21287, United States
    • Sridhar Nimmagadda - Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, 1550 Orleans Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21287, United States
    • Riccardo Ferdani - Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219, United States
    • Carolyn J. Anderson - Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219, United States
    • Ronnie C. Mease - Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, 1550 Orleans Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21287, United States
  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgment

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

We thank the University of Wisconsin Cyclotron Research Group for providing [64Cu]CuCl2. We also thank Nordion and Macrocyclics, Inc., for providing PCTA-Bn-SCN and Oxo-DO3A-Bn-SCN chelating agent, Drs. Cara Ferreira and Russell Redshaw for helpful discussion, and James Fox, Gilbert Green, and Dr. Yuchuan Wang for assistance with imaging and image analysis. We are grateful for the following sources of support: K25 CA148901, NIH NCI U54CA151838, NCI CA134675, and NCI R01 CA093375.

Abbreviations Used

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

PSMA

prostate-specific membrane antigen

GCPII

glutamate carboxypeptidase II

NAALADase

N-acetylated-α-linked acidic dipeptidase

PET

positron emission tomography

SPECT

single photon emission computed tomography

NOTA

1,4,7-triazacyclononane-1,4,7-triacetic acid

CB-TE2A

4,11-bis(carboxymethyl)-1,4,8,11-tetraazabicyclo[6.6.2]hexadecane

PCTA

3,6,9,15-tetraazabicyclo[9.3.1]-pentadeca-1(15),11,13-triene)-3,6,9-triacetic acid

oxo-DO3A

oxa-4,7,1-tetraazacyclododecane-4,7,10-triacetic acid

DOTA

1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-N,N′,N″,N‴-tetraacetic acid

References

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article references 69 other publications.

  1. 1
    Ghosh, A.; Heston, W. D. Tumor target prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) and its regulation in prostate cancer J. Cell Biochem. 2004, 91, 528 539
  2. 2
    Rajasekaran, A. K.; Anilkumar, G.; Christiansen, J. J. Is prostate-specific membrane antigen a multifunctional protein? Am. J. Physiol., Cell Physiol. 2005, 288, C975 C981
  3. 3
    Chang, S. S.; Reuter, V. E.; Heston, W. D.; Gaudin, P. B. Comparison of anti-prostate-specific membrane antigen antibodies and other immunomarkers in metastatic prostate carcinoma Urology 2001, 57, 1179 1183
  4. 4
    Wright, G. L., Jr.; Grob, B. M.; Haley, C.; Grossman, K.; Newhall, K.; Petrylak, D.; Troyer, J.; Konchuba, A.; Schellhammer, P. F.; Moriarty, R. Upregulation of prostate-specific membrane antigen after androgen-deprivation therapy Urology 1996, 48, 326 334
  5. 5
    Evans, M. J.; Smith-Jones, P. M.; Wongvipat, J.; Navarro, V.; Kim, S.; Bander, N. H.; Larson, S. M.; Sawyers, C. L. Noninvasive measurement of androgen receptor signaling with a positron-emitting radiopharmaceutical that targets prostate-specific membrane antigen Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2011, 108, 9578 9582
  6. 6
    Perner, S.; Hofer, M. D.; Kim, R.; Shah, R. B.; Li, H.; Moller, P.; Hautmann, R. E.; Gschwend, J. E.; Kuefer, R.; Rubin, M. A. Prostate-specific membrane antigen expression as a predictor of prostate cancer progression Human Pathol. 2007, 38, 696 701
  7. 7
    Sanna, V.; Pintus, G.; Roggio, A. M.; Punzoni, S.; Posadino, A. M.; Arca, A.; Marceddu, S.; Bandiera, P.; Uzzau, S.; Sechi, M. Targeted biocompatible nanoparticles for the delivery of (−)-epigallocatechin 3-gallate to prostate cancer cells J. Med. Chem. 2011, 54, 1321 1332
  8. 8
    DiPippo, V. A.; Magargal, W. W.; Moorji, S. M.; Murga, J. D.; Olson, W. C. Antiandrogen modulation of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA): dynamics and synergy with PSMA-targeted therapy ASCO Meet. Abstr. 2013, 31, e16007
  9. 9
    Petrylak, D. P.; Kantoff, P. W.; Mega, A. E.; Vogelzang, N. J.; Stephenson, J.; Fleming, M. T.; Stambler, N.; Petrini, M.; Blattman, S.; Israel, R. J. Prostate-specific membrane antigen antibody drug conjugate (PSMA ADC): a phase I trial in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) previously treated with a taxane ASCO Meet. Abstr. 2013, 31, 5018
  10. 10
    Rotshteyn, Y.; Mercier, F.; Bruno, R.; Stambler, N.; Israel, R. J.; Wong, V. Correlation of PSMA ADC exposure with reduction in tumor growth rate determined using serial PSA measurements from a phase I clinical trial ASCO Meet. Abstr. 2013, 31, e16047
  11. 11
    Hrkach, J.; Von Hoff, D.; Mukkaram Ali, M.; Andrianova, E.; Auer, J.; Campbell, T.; De Witt, D.; Figa, M.; Figueiredo, M.; Horhota, A.; Low, S.; McDonnell, K.; Peeke, E.; Retnarajan, B.; Sabnis, A.; Schnipper, E.; Song, J. J.; Song, Y. H.; Summa, J.; Tompsett, D.; Troiano, G.; Van Geen Hoven, T.; Wright, J.; LoRusso, P.; Kantoff, P. W.; Bander, N. H.; Sweeney, C.; Farokhzad, O. C.; Langer, R.; Zale, S. Preclinical development and clinical translation of a PSMA-targeted docetaxel nanoparticle with a differentiated pharmacological profile Sci. Transl. Med. 2012, 4, 128ra39
  12. 12
    Hillier, S. M.; Maresca, K. P.; Femia, F. J.; Marquis, J. C.; Foss, C. A.; Nguyen, N.; Zimmerman, C. N.; Barrett, J. A.; Eckelman, W. C.; Pomper, M. G.; Joyal, J. L.; Babich, J. W. Preclinical evaluation of novel glutamate–urea–lysine analogues that target prostate-specific membrane antigen as molecular imaging pharmaceuticals for prostate cancer Cancer Res. 2009, 69, 6932 6940
  13. 13
    Mease, R. C.; Foss, C. A.; Pomper, M. G. PET imaging in prostate cancer: focus on prostate-specific membrane antigen Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2013, 13, 951 962
  14. 14
    Cho, S. Y.; Gage, K. L.; Mease, R. C.; Senthamizhchelvan, S.; Holt, D. P.; Jeffrey-Kwanisai, A.; Endres, C. J.; Dannals, R. F.; Sgouros, G.; Lodge, M.; Eisenberger, M. A.; Rodriguez, R.; Carducci, M. A.; Rojas, C.; Slusher, B. S.; Kozikowski, A. P.; Pomper, M. G. Biodistribution, tumor detection, and radiation dosimetry of 18F–DCFBC, a low-molecular-weight inhibitor of prostate-specific membrane antigen, in patients with metastatic prostate cancer J. Nucl. Med. 2012, 53, 1883 1891
  15. 15
    Afshar-Oromieh, A.; Malcher, A.; Eder, M.; Eisenhut, M.; Linhart, H. G.; Hadaschik, B. A.; Holland-Letz, T.; Giesel, F. L.; Kratochwil, C.; Haufe, S.; Haberkorn, U.; Zechmann, C. M. PET imaging with a [(68)Ga]gallium-labelled PSMA ligand for the diagnosis of prostate cancer: biodistribution in humans and first evaluation of tumour lesions Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2012, 40, 486 495
  16. 16
    Barrett, J. A.; Coleman, R. E.; Goldsmith, S. J.; Vallabhajosula, S.; Petry, N. A.; Cho, S.; Armor, T.; Stubbs, J. B.; Maresca, K. P.; Stabin, M. G.; Joyal, J. L.; Eckelman, W. C.; Babich, J. W. First-in-man evaluation of 2 high-affinity PSMA-avid small molecules for imaging prostate cancer J. Nucl. Med. 2013, 54, 380 387
  17. 17
    Maresca, K. P.; Hillier, S. M.; Lu, G.; Marquis, J. C.; Zimmerman, C. N.; Eckelman, W. C.; Joyal, J. L.; Babich, J. W. Small molecule inhibitors of PSMA incorporating technetium-99m for imaging prostate cancer: effects of chelate design on pharmacokinetics Inorg. Chim. Acta 2012, 389, 168 172
  18. 18
    Nedrow-Byers, J. R.; Moore, A. L.; Ganguly, T.; Hopkins, M. R.; Fulton, M. D.; Benny, P. D.; Berkman, C. E. PSMA-targeted SPECT agents: Mode of binding effect on in vitro performance Prostate 2013, 73, 355 362
  19. 19
    Lu, G.; Maresca, K. P.; Hillier, S. M.; Zimmerman, C. N.; Eckelman, W. C.; Joyal, J. L.; Babich, J. W. Synthesis and SAR of 99mTc/Re-Labeled Small Molecule Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen Inhibitors with Novel Polar Chelates Biorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2013, 23, 1557 1563
  20. 20
    Nedrow-Byers, J. R.; Jabbes, M.; Jewett, C.; Ganguly, T.; He, H.; Liu, T.; Benny, P.; Bryan, J. N.; Berkman, C. E. A phosphoramidate-based prostate-specific membrane antigen-targeted SPECT agent Prostate 2012, 72, 904 912
  21. 21
    Banerjee, S. R.; Foss, C. A.; Castanares, M.; Mease, R. C.; Byun, Y.; Fox, J. J.; Hilton, J.; Lupold, S. E.; Kozikowski, A. P.; Pomper, M. G. Synthesis and evaluation of technetium-99m- and rhenium-labeled inhibitors of the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) J. Med. Chem. 2008, 51, 4504 4517
  22. 22
    Kularatne, S. A.; Zhou, Z.; Yang, J.; Post, C. B.; Low, P. S. Design, synthesis, and preclinical evaluation of prostate-specific membrane antigen targeted (99m)Tc-radioimaging agents Mol. Pharmaceutics 2009, 6, 790 800
  23. 23
    Zhang, Y.; DiFilipp, F.; Doke, A.; Huang, J.; Heston, W.; Huang, S. Preliminary micro-SPECT and biodistribution study of a novel Tc99m-labeled PSMA tracer derived from RBI1033 J. Nucl. Med. Meet. Abstr. 2012, 53 (Suppl 1) 1661
  24. 24
    Schafer, M.; Bauder-Wust, U.; Leotta, K.; Zoller, F.; Mier, W.; Haberkorn, U.; Eisenhut, M.; Eder, M. A dimerized urea-based inhibitor of the prostate-specific membrane antigen for 68Ga-PET imaging of prostate cancer EJNMMI Res. 2012, 2, 23
  25. 25
    Eder, M.; Schafer, M.; Bauder-Wust, U.; Hull, W. E.; Wangler, C.; Mier, W.; Haberkorn, U.; Eisenhut, M. 68Ga-complex lipophilicity and the targeting property of a urea-based PSMA inhibitor for PET imaging Bioconjugate Chem. 2012, 23, 688 697
  26. 26
    Banerjee, S. R.; Pullambhatla, M.; Byun, Y.; Nimmagadda, S.; Green, G.; Fox, J. J.; Horti, A.; Mease, R. C.; Pomper, M. G. 68Ga-labeled inhibitors of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) for imaging prostate cancer J. Med. Chem. 2010, 53, 5333 5341
  27. 27
    Banerjee, S. R.; Pullambhatla, M.; Shallal, H.; Lisok, A.; Mease, R. C.; Pomper, M. G. A Modular Strategy to Prepare Multivalent Inhibitors of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) Oncotarget 2011, 2, 1244 1253
  28. 28
    Banerjee, S. R.; Pullambhatla, M.; Byun, Y.; Nimmagadda, S.; Foss, C. A.; Green, G.; Fox, J. J.; Lupold, S. E.; Mease, R. C.; Pomper, M. G. Sequential SPECT and optical imaging of experimental models of prostate cancer with a dual modality inhibitor of the prostate-specific membrane antigen Angew. Chem. 2011, 50, 9167 9170
  29. 29
    Chen, Z.; Penet, M. F.; Nimmagadda, S.; Li, C.; Banerjee, S. R.; Winnard, P. T., Jr.; Artemov, D.; Glunde, K.; Pomper, M. G.; Bhujwalla, Z. M. PSMA-targeted theranostic nanoplex for prostate cancer therapy ACS Nano 2012, 6, 7752 7762
  30. 30
    Hao, G.; Kumar, A.; Dobin, T.; Oz, O. K.; Hsieh, J. T.; Sun, X. A multivalent approach of imaging probe design to overcome an endogenous anion binding competition for noninvasive assessment of prostate specific membrane antigen Mol. Pharmacol. 2013, 10, 2975 2985
  31. 31
    Banerjee, S. R.; Pullambhatla, M.; Byun, Y.; Nimmagadda, S.; Baidoo, K. E.; Brechbiel, M. W.; Mease, R. C.; Pomper, M. G. Preclinical Evaluation of 86Y-Labeled Inhibitors of Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen. J. Labelled Compd. Radiopharm. 2011, 54, Suppl S1, p S65.
  32. 32
    Holland, J. P.; Divilov, V.; Bander, N. H.; Smith-Jones, P. M.; Larson, S. M.; Lewis, J. S. 89Zr–DFO–J591 for immunoPET of prostate-specific membrane antigen expression in vivo J. Nucl. Med. 2010, 51, 1293 1300
  33. 33
    Viola-Villegas, N.; Evans, H.; Bartlett, D.; Wu, A.; Lewis, J. Preclinical development of Zr-89 labeled anti-PSMA minibody and cys-diabody J Nucl. Med. Meet. Abstr. 2012, 53, 347
  34. 34
    Ray Banerjee, S.; Pullambhatla, M.; Foss, C. A.; Falk, A.; Byun, Y.; Nimmagadda, S.; Mease, R. C.; Pomper, M. G. Effect of chelators on the pharmacokinetics of (99m)Tc-labeled imaging agents for the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) J. Med. Chem. 2013, 56, 6108 6121
  35. 35
    Wadas, T. J.; Wong, E. H.; Weisman, G. R.; Anderson, C. J. Copper chelation chemistry and its role in copper radiopharmaceuticals Curr. Pharm. Des. 2007, 13, 3 16
  36. 36
    Connett, J. M.; Anderson, C. J.; Guo, L. W.; Schwarz, S. W.; Zinn, K. R.; Rogers, B. E.; Siegel, B. A.; Philpott, G. W.; Welch, M. J. Radioimmunotherapy with a 64Cu-labeled monoclonal antibody: a comparison with 67Cu Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1996, 93, 6814 6818
  37. 37
    Blower, P. J.; Lewis, J. S.; Zweit, J. Copper radionuclides and radiopharmaceuticals in nuclear medicine Nucl. Med. Biol. 1996, 23, 957 980
  38. 38
    Guo, Y.; Parry, J. J.; Laforest, R.; Rogers, B. E.; Anderson, C. J. The role of p53 in combination radioimmunotherapy with 64Cu–DOTA–cetuximab and cisplatin in a mouse model of colorectal cancer J. Nucl. Med. 2013, 54, 1621 1629
  39. 39
    Donnelly, P. S. The role of coordination chemistry in the development of copper and rhenium radiopharmaceuticals Dalton Trans. 2011, 40, 999 1010
  40. 40
    Smith, S. V. Molecular imaging with copper-64 J. Inorg. Biochem. 2004, 98, 1874 1901
  41. 41
    Wadas, T. J.; Wong, E. H.; Weisman, G. R.; Anderson, C. J. Molecular imaging of cancer with copper-64 radiopharmaceuticals and positron emission tomography (PET) Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 2858 2902
  42. 42
    Shokeen, M.; Anderson, C. J. Coordinating radiometals of copper, gallium, indium, yttrium, and zirconium for PET and SPECT imaging of disease Acc. Chem. Res. 2009, 110, 832 841
  43. 43
    De Silva, R. A.; Peyre, K.; Pullambhatla, M.; Fox, J. J.; Pomper, M. G.; Nimmagadda, S. Imaging CXCR4 expression in human cancer xenografts: evaluation of monocyclam 64Cu–AMD3465 J. Nucl. Med. 2011, 52, 986 993
  44. 44
    Yuan, H.; Schroeder, T.; Bowsher, J. E.; Hedlund, L. W.; Wong, T.; Dewhirst, M. W. Intertumoral differences in hypoxia selectivity of the PET imaging agent 64Cu(II)-diacetyl-bis(N4-methylthiosemicarbazone) J. Nucl. Med. 2006, 47, 989 998
  45. 45
    Liu, Z.; Li, Z. B.; Cao, Q.; Liu, S.; Wang, F.; Chen, X. Small-animal PET of tumors with (64)Cu-labeled RGD–bombesin heterodimer J. Nucl. Med. 2009, 50, 1168 1177
  46. 46
    Dumont, R. A.; Deininger, F.; Haubner, R.; Maecke, H. R.; Weber, W. A.; Fani, M. Novel (64)Cu- and (68)Ga-labeled RGD conjugates show improved PET imaging of alpha(nu)beta(3) integrin expression and facile radiosynthesis J. Nucl. Med. 2011, 52, 1276 1284
  47. 47
    Fani, M.; Del Pozzo, L.; Abiraj, K.; Mansi, R.; Tamma, M. L.; Cescato, R.; Waser, B.; Weber, W. A.; Reubi, J. C.; Maecke, H. R. PET of somatostatin receptor-positive tumors using 64Cu– and 68Ga–somatostatin antagonists: the chelate makes the difference J. Nucl. Med. 2011, 52, 1110 1118
  48. 48
    Liu, Z.; Li, Z. B.; Cao, Q.; Liu, S.; Wang, F.; Chen, X.; Small-animal, P. E. T. of tumors with (64)Cu-labeled RGD–bombesin heterodimer J. Nucl. Med. 2009, 50, 1168 1177
  49. 49
    Rockey, W. M.; Huang, L.; Kloepping, K. C.; Baumhover, N. J.; Giangrande, P. H.; Schultz, M. K. Synthesis and radiolabeling of chelator–RNA aptamer bioconjugates with copper-64 for targeted molecular imaging Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2011, 19, 4080 4090
  50. 50
    Hou, G. L.; Li, Y. H.; Zhang, Z. L.; Xiong, Y. H.; Chen, X. F.; Yao, K.; Liu, Z. W.; Han, H.; Qin, Z. K.; Zhou, F. J. A modified technique for neourethral anastomosis in orthotopic neobladder reconstruction Urology 2009, 74, 1145 1149
  51. 51
    Cooper, M. S.; Ma, M. T.; Sunassee, K.; Shaw, K. P.; Williams, J. D.; Paul, R. L.; Donnelly, P. S.; Blower, P. J. Comparison of (64)Cu-complexing bifunctional chelators for radioimmunoconjugation: labeling efficiency, specific activity, and in vitro/in vivo stability Bioconjugate Chem. 2012, 23, 1029 1039
  52. 52
    Moi, M. K.; Meares, C. F.; McCall, M. J.; Cole, W. C.; DeNardo, S. J. Copper chelates as probes of biological systems: stable copper complexes with a macrocyclic bifunctional chelating agent Anal. Biochem. 1985, 148, 249 253
  53. 53
    Jones-Wilson, T. M.; Deal, K. A.; Anderson, C. J.; McCarthy, D. W.; Kovacs, Z.; Motekaitis, R. J.; Sherry, A. D.; Martell, A. E.; Welch, M. J. The in vivo behavior of copper-64-labeled azamacrocyclic complexes Nucl. Med. Biol. 1998, 25, 523 530
  54. 54
    Garrison, J. C.; Rold, T. L.; Sieckman, G. L.; Figueroa, S. D.; Volkert, W. A.; Jurisson, S. S.; Hoffman, T. J. In vivo evaluation and small-animal PET/CT of a prostate cancer mouse model using 64Cu bombesin analogs: side-by-side comparison of the CB-TE2A and DOTA chelation systems J. Nucl. Med. 2007, 48, 1327 1337
  55. 55
    Sun, X.; Wuest, M.; Weisman, G. R.; Wong, E. H.; Reed, D. P.; Boswell, C. A.; Motekaitis, R.; Martell, A. E.; Welch, M. J.; Anderson, C. J. Radiolabeling and in vivo behavior of copper-64-labeled cross-bridged cyclam ligands J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 469 477
  56. 56
    Boswell, C. A.; Sun, X.; Niu, W.; Weisman, G. R.; Wong, E. H.; Rheingold, A. L.; Anderson, C. J. Comparative in vivo stability of copper-64-labeled cross-bridged and conventional tetraazamacrocyclic complexes J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 1465 1474
  57. 57
    Sprague, J. E.; Peng, Y.; Sun, X.; Weisman, G. R.; Wong, E. H.; Achilefu, S.; Anderson, C. J. Preparation and biological evaluation of copper-64-labeled tyr3-octreotate using a cross-bridged macrocyclic chelator Clin. Cancer Res. 2004, 10, 8674 8682
  58. 58
    Ait-Mohand, S.; Fournier, P.; Dumulon-Perreault, V.; Kiefer, G. E.; Jurek, P.; Ferreira, C. L.; Benard, F.; Guerin, B. Evaluation of 64Cu-labeled bifunctional chelate–bombesin conjugates Bioconjugate Chem. 2011, 22, 1729 1735
  59. 59
    Ferreira, C. L.; Lamsa, E.; Woods, M.; Duan, Y.; Fernando, P.; Bensimon, C.; Kordos, M.; Guenther, K.; Jurek, P.; Kiefer, G. E. Evaluation of Bifunctional Chelates for the Development of Gallium-Based Radiopharmaceuticals Bioconjugate Chem. 2010, 21, 531 536
  60. 60
    Ferreira, C. L.; Yapp, D. T.; Lamsa, E.; Gleave, M.; Bensimon, C.; Jurek, P.; Kiefer, G. E. Evaluation of novel bifunctional chelates for the development of Cu-64-based radiopharmaceuticals Nucl. Med. Biol. 2008, 35, 875 882
  61. 61
    Olszewski, R. T.; Bukhari, N.; Zhou, J.; Kozikowski, A. P.; Wroblewski, J. T.; Shamimi-Noori, S.; Wroblewska, B.; Bzdega, T.; Vicini, S.; Barton, F. B.; Neale, J. H. NAAG peptidase inhibition reduces locomotor activity and some stereotypes in the PCP model of schizophrenia via group II mGluR J. Neurochem. 2004, 89, 876 885
  62. 62
    Silver, D. A.; Pellicer, I.; Fair, W. R.; Heston, W. D.; Cordon-Cardo, C. Prostate-specific membrane antigen expression in normal and malignant human tissues Clin. Cancer Res. 1997, 3, 81 95
  63. 63
    Prasanphanich, A. F.; Nanda, P. K.; Rold, T. L.; Ma, L.; Lewis, M. R.; Garrison, J. C.; Hoffman, T. J.; Sieckman, G. L.; Figueroa, S. D.; Smith, C. J. [64Cu-NOTA-8-Aoc-BBN(7–14)NH2] targeting vector for positron-emission tomography imaging of gastrin-releasing peptide receptor-expressing tissues Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2007, 104, 12462 12467
  64. 64
    Chen, Y.; Pullambhatla, M.; Foss, C. A.; Byun, Y.; Nimmagadda, S.; Senthamizhchelvan, S.; Sgouros, G.; Mease, R. C.; Pomper, M. G. 2-(3-{1-Carboxy-5-[(6-[18F]fluoro-pyridine-3-carbonyl)-amino]-pentyl}-ureido)-pen tanedioic acid, [18F]DCFPyL, a PSMA-based PET imaging agent for prostate cancer Clin. Cancer Res. 2011, 17, 7645 7653
  65. 65
    Hillier, S. M.; Maresca, K. P.; Lu, G.; Merkin, R. D.; Marquis, J. C.; Zimmerman, C. N.; Eckelman, W. C.; Joyal, J. L.; Babich, J. W. 99mTc-Labeled Small-Molecule Inhibitors of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen for Molecular Imaging of Prostate Cancer J. Nucl. Med. 2013, 54, 1369 1376
  66. 66
    Elsasser-Beile, U.; Reischl, G.; Wiehr, S.; Buhler, P.; Wolf, P.; Alt, K.; Shively, J.; Judenhofer, M. S.; Machulla, H. J.; Pichler, B. J. PET imaging of prostate cancer xenografts with a highly specific antibody against the prostate-specific membrane antigen J. Nucl. Med. 2009, 50, 606 611
  67. 67
    Alt, K.; Wiehr, S.; Ehrlichmann, W.; Reischl, G.; Wolf, P.; Pichler, B. J.; Elsasser-Beile, U.; Buhler, P. High-resolution animal PET imaging of prostate cancer xenografts with three different 64Cu-labeled antibodies against native cell-adherent PSMA Prostate 2010, 70, 1413 1421
  68. 68
    Fischer, G.; Seibold, U.; Schirrmacher, R.; Wangler, B.; Wangler, C. (89)Zr, a radiometal nuclide with high potential for molecular imaging with PET: chemistry, applications and remaining challenges Molecules 2013, 18, 6469 6490
  69. 69
    Cheng, Y.; Prusoff, W. H. Relationship between the inhibition constant (K1) and the concentration of inhibitor which causes 50% inhibition (I50) of an enzymatic reaction Biochem. Pharmacol. 1973, 22, 3099 3108

Cited By

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article is cited by 93 publications.

  1. Ina Hierlmeier, Amaury Guillou, Daniel F. Earley, Anthony Linden, Jason P. Holland, Mark D. Bartholomä. HNODThia: A Promising Chelator for the Development of 64Cu Radiopharmaceuticals. Inorganic Chemistry 2023, Article ASAP.
  2. Alexander M. Brown, Jana L. Butman, Raphael Lengacher, Natasha P. Vargo, Kirsten E. Martin, Angus Koller, Dariusz Śmiłowicz, Eszter Boros, Jerome R. Robinson. N,N-Alkylation Clarifies the Role of N- and O-Protonated Intermediates in Cyclen-Based 64Cu Radiopharmaceuticals. Inorganic Chemistry 2023, 62 (4) , 1362-1376. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c02907
  3. Brett A. Vaughn, Alexander M. Brown, Shin Hye Ahn, Jerome R. Robinson, Eszter Boros. Is Less More? Influence of the Coordination Geometry of Copper(II) Picolinate Chelate Complexes on Metabolic Stability. Inorganic Chemistry 2020, 59 (22) , 16095-16108. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c02314
  4. James M. Kelly, Shashikanth Ponnala, Alejandro Amor-Coarasa, Nicholas A. Zia, Anastasia Nikolopoulou, Clarence Williams, Jr., David J. Schlyer, Stephen G. DiMagno, Paul S. Donnelly, John W. Babich. Preclinical Evaluation of a High-Affinity Sarcophagine-Containing PSMA Ligand for 64Cu/67Cu-Based Theranostics in Prostate Cancer. Molecular Pharmaceutics 2020, 17 (6) , 1954-1962. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.0c00060
  5. Wojciech G. Lesniak, Srikanth Boinapally, Sangeeta Ray Banerjee, Babak Behnam Azad, Catherine A. Foss, Chentian Shen, Ala Lisok, Bryan Wharram, Sridhar Nimmagadda, Martin G. Pomper. Evaluation of PSMA-Targeted PAMAM Dendrimer Nanoparticles in a Murine Model of Prostate Cancer. Molecular Pharmaceutics 2019, 16 (6) , 2590-2604. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.9b00181
  6. Christoph A. Umbricht, Martina Benešová, Roger Hasler, Roger Schibli, Nicholas P. van der Meulen, Cristina Müller. Design and Preclinical Evaluation of an Albumin-Binding PSMA Ligand for 64Cu-Based PET Imaging. Molecular Pharmaceutics 2018, 15 (12) , 5556-5564. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.8b00712
  7. Swarbhanu Sarkar, Nikunj Bhatt, Yeong Su Ha, Phuong Tu Huynh, Nisarg Soni, Woonghee Lee, Yong Jin Lee, Jung Young Kim, Darpan N. Pandya, Gwang Il An, Kyo Chul Lee, Yongmin Chang, and Jeongsoo Yoo . High in Vivo Stability of 64Cu-Labeled Cross-Bridged Chelators Is a Crucial Factor in Improved Tumor Imaging of RGD Peptide Conjugates. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2018, 61 (1) , 385-395. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b01671
  8. Azadeh Pirisedigh, Véronique Blais, Samia Ait-Mohand, Khaled Abdallah, Brian J. Holleran, Richard Leduc, Yves L. Dory, Louis Gendron, and Brigitte Guérin . Synthesis and Evaluation of a 64Cu-Conjugate, a Selective δ-Opioid Receptor Positron Emission Tomography Imaging Agent. Organic Letters 2017, 19 (8) , 2018-2021. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.orglett.7b00575
  9. Ananda Kumar Kanduluru, Madduri Srinivasarao, and Philip S. Low . Design, Synthesis, and Evaluation of a Neurokinin-1 Receptor-Targeted Near-IR Dye for Fluorescence-Guided Surgery of Neuroendocrine Cancers. Bioconjugate Chemistry 2016, 27 (9) , 2157-2165. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.6b00374
  10. Mariane Le Fur, Maryline Beyler, Nicolas Lepareur, Olivier Fougère, Carlos Platas-Iglesias, Olivier Rousseaux, and Raphaël Tripier . Pyclen Tri-n-butylphosphonate Ester as Potential Chelator for Targeted Radiotherapy: From Yttrium(III) Complexation to 90Y Radiolabeling. Inorganic Chemistry 2016, 55 (16) , 8003-8012. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6b01135
  11. Amit Kumar, Tara Mastren, Bin Wang, Jer-Tsong Hsieh, Guiyang Hao, and Xiankai Sun . Design of a Small-Molecule Drug Conjugate for Prostate Cancer Targeted Theranostics. Bioconjugate Chemistry 2016, 27 (7) , 1681-1689. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.6b00222
  12. Sangeeta Ray Banerjee, Zhengping Chen, Mrudula Pullambhatla, Ala Lisok, Jian Chen, Ronnie C. Mease, and Martin G. Pomper . Preclinical Comparative Study of 68Ga-Labeled DOTA, NOTA, and HBED-CC Chelated Radiotracers for Targeting PSMA. Bioconjugate Chemistry 2016, 27 (6) , 1447-1455. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.5b00679
  13. Lye Lin Lock, Claudia D. Reyes, Pengcheng Zhang, and Honggang Cui . Tuning Cellular Uptake of Molecular Probes by Rational Design of Their Assembly into Supramolecular Nanoprobes. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2016, 138 (10) , 3533-3540. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b00073
  14. Xing Yang, Ronnie C. Mease, Mrudula Pullambhatla, Ala Lisok, Ying Chen, Catherine A. Foss, Yuchuan Wang, Hassan Shallal, Hannah Edelman, Adam T. Hoye, Giorgio Attardo, Sridhar Nimmagadda, and Martin G. Pomper . [18F]Fluorobenzoyllysinepentanedioic Acid Carbamates: New Scaffolds for Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Imaging of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA). Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2016, 59 (1) , 206-218. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b01268
  15. Adrian V. Fuchs, Brian W.C. Tse, Amanda K. Pearce, Mei-Chun Yeh, Nicholas L. Fletcher, Steve S. Huang, Warren D. Heston, Andrew K. Whittaker, Pamela J. Russell, and Kristofer J. Thurecht . Evaluation of Polymeric Nanomedicines Targeted to PSMA: Effect of Ligand on Targeting Efficiency. Biomacromolecules 2015, 16 (10) , 3235-3247. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.5b00913
  16. Mengting Li, Sheng Wang, Qunshou Kong, Xinyi Cheng, Huanhuan Yan, Yao Xing, Xiaoli Lan, Dawei Jiang. Advances in macrocyclic chelators for positron emission tomography imaging. VIEW 2023, 4 (5) https://doi.org/10.1002/VIW.20230042
  17. Mohammed Abusalem, Lucia Martiniova, Sarita Soebianto, Louis DePalatis, Gregory Ravizzini. Current Status of Radiolabeled Monoclonal Antibodies Targeting PSMA for Imaging and Therapy. Cancers 2023, 15 (18) , 4537. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15184537
  18. Inki Lee, Min Hwan Kim, Kyongkyu Lee, Keumrok Oh, Hyunwoo Lim, Jae Hun Ahn, Yong Jin Lee, Gi Jeong Cheon, Dae Yoon Chi, Sang Moo Lim. Comparison of the Effects of DOTA and NOTA Chelators on 64Cu-Cudotadipep and 64Cu-Cunotadipep for Prostate Cancer. Diagnostics 2023, 13 (16) , 2649. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13162649
  19. Kirsten E. Martin, Joseph A. Mattocks, Dariusz Śmiłowicz, Eduardo Aluicio-Sarduy, Jennifer N. Whetter, Jonathan W. Engle, Joseph A. Cotruvo, Eszter Boros. Radiolabeling and in vivo evaluation of lanmodulin with biomedically relevant lanthanide isotopes. RSC Chemical Biology 2023, 4 (6) , 414-421. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3CB00020F
  20. Runze Wang, Bernard Ponsard, Hubert Wolterbeek, Antonia Denkova. Core–shell structured gold nanoparticles as carrier for 166Dy/166Ho in vivo generator. EJNMMI Radiopharmacy and Chemistry 2022, 7 (1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s41181-022-00170-3
  21. Norah AlHokbany, Ibrahim AlJammaz, Basem AlOtaibi, Yousif AlMalki, Bander AlJammaz, Subhani M. Okarvi. Development of new copper-64 labeled rhodamine: a potential PET myocardial perfusion imaging agent. EJNMMI Radiopharmacy and Chemistry 2022, 7 (1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s41181-022-00171-2
  22. Sairan Eom, Min Hwan Kim, Ranji Yoo, Goeun Choi, Joo Hyun Kang, Yong Jin Lee, Jin-Ho Choy. Dilute lattice doping of 64 Cu into 2D-nanoplates: its impact on radio-labeling efficiency and stability for target selective PET imaging. Journal of Materials Chemistry B 2022, 10 (45) , 9389-9399. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2TB01165D
  23. Sarah D. Busslinger, Viviane J. Tschan, Olivia K. Richard, Zeynep Talip, Roger Schibli, Cristina Müller. [225Ac]Ac-SibuDAB for Targeted Alpha Therapy of Prostate Cancer: Preclinical Evaluation and Comparison with [225Ac]Ac-PSMA-617. Cancers 2022, 14 (22) , 5651. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14225651
  24. Beshara Sheehan, Christina Guo, Antje Neeb, Alec Paschalis, Shahneen Sandhu, Johann S. de Bono. Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Biology in Lethal Prostate Cancer and its Therapeutic Implications. European Urology Focus 2022, 8 (5) , 1157-1168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2021.06.006
  25. Thomas M. Jeitner, John W. Babich, James M. Kelly. Advances in PSMA theranostics. Translational Oncology 2022, 22 , 101450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2022.101450
  26. Chul-Hee Lee, Ilhan Lim, Sang-Keun Woo, Kwang Il Kim, Kyo Chul Lee, Kanghyon Song, Chang Woon Choi, Sang Moo Lim. The Feasibility of 64 Cu-PSMA I&T PET for Prostate Cancer. Cancer Biotherapy and Radiopharmaceuticals 2022, 37 (6) , 417-423. https://doi.org/10.1089/cbr.2020.4189
  27. Marie-Christine Milot, Ophélie Bélissant Benesty, Véronique Dumulon-Perreault, Samia Ait-Mohand, Patrick O. Richard, Étienne Rousseau, Brigitte Guérin. 64Cu-DOTHA2-PSMA, a Novel PSMA PET Radiotracer for Prostate Cancer with a Long Imaging Time Window. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15 (8) , 996. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph15080996
  28. David G. Calatayud, Sotia Neophytou, Eleni Nicodemou, S. Giuseppe Giuffrida, Haobo Ge, Sofia I. Pascu. Nano-Theranostics for the Sensing, Imaging and Therapy of Prostate Cancers. Frontiers in Chemistry 2022, 10 https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2022.830133
  29. Truc T. Huynh, Sreeja Sreekumar, Cedric Mpoy, Buck E. Rogers. A comparison of 64Cu-labeled bi-terminally PEGylated A20FMDV2 peptides targeting integrin ανβ6. Oncotarget 2022, 13 (1) , 360-372. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.28197
  30. B. Liu, R. Han, C. Yuan, H. Sun, Z. Chen, G. Tian, F. Shi, X. Zhang, P. Luo, H. Jia. Excitation functions of proton induced reactions on titanium and copper. Applied Radiation and Isotopes 2021, 173 , 109713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2021.109713
  31. Andrew Siow, Renata Kowalczyk, Margaret A. Brimble, Paul W.R. Harris. Evolution of Peptide-Based Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) Inhibitors: An Approach to Novel Prostate Cancer Therapeutics. Current Medicinal Chemistry 2021, 28 (19) , 3713-3752. https://doi.org/10.2174/0929867327666201006153847
  32. Lachlan E. McInnes, Carleen Cullinane, Peter D. Roselt, Susan Jackson, Benjamin J. Blyth, Ellen M. van Dam, Nicholas A. Zia, Matthew J. Harris, Rodney J. Hicks, Paul S. Donnelly. Therapeutic Efficacy of a Bivalent Inhibitor of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Labeled with 67 Cu. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2021, 62 (6) , 829-832. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.120.251579
  33. Zeynep Talip, Francesca Borgna, Cristina Müller, Jiri Ulrich, Charlotte Duchemin, Joao P. Ramos, Thierry Stora, Ulli Köster, Youcef Nedjadi, Vadim Gadelshin, Valentin N. Fedosseev, Frederic Juget, Claude Bailat, Adelheid Fankhauser, Shane G. Wilkins, Laura Lambert, Bruce Marsh, Dmitry Fedorov, Eric Chevallay, Pascal Fernier, Roger Schibli, Nicholas P. van der Meulen. Production of Mass-Separated Erbium-169 Towards the First Preclinical in vitro Investigations. Frontiers in Medicine 2021, 8 https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.643175
  34. Mária Bodnár Mikulová, Peter Mikuš. Advances in Development of Radiometal Labeled Amino Acid-Based Compounds for Cancer Imaging and Diagnostics. Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14 (2) , 167. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph14020167
  35. Dhanusha Sabanathan, Maria E. Lund, Douglas H. Campbell, Bradley J. Walsh, Howard Gurney. Radioimmunotherapy for solid tumors: spotlight on Glypican-1 as a radioimmunotherapy target. Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology 2021, 13 , 175883592110229. https://doi.org/10.1177/17588359211022918
  36. Nikhil Mayor, Niranjan J. Sathianathen, James Buteau, Samantha Koschel, Marta Antón Juanilla, Jada Kapoor, Arun Azad, Michael S. Hofman, Declan G. Murphy. Prostate‐specific membrane antigen theranostics in advanced prostate cancer: an evolving option. BJU International 2020, 126 (5) , 525-535. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.15143
  37. Nicholas P. van der Meulen, Roger Hasler, Zeynep Talip, Pascal V. Grundler, Chiara Favaretto, Christoph A. Umbricht, Cristina Müller, Gaia Dellepiane, Tommaso S. Carzaniga, Saverio Braccini. Developments toward the Implementation of 44Sc Production at a Medical Cyclotron. Molecules 2020, 25 (20) , 4706. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25204706
  38. Lukas Greifenstein, Denise Späth, Jean Phillip Sinnes, Tilmann Grus, Frank Rösch. Mild and efficient 64 Cu labeling of perhydro-1, 4-diazepine derivatives for potential use with large peptides, proteins and antibodies. Radiochimica Acta 2020, 108 (7) , 555-563. https://doi.org/10.1515/ract-2019-3167
  39. Mathieu L. Lepage, Hsiou‐Ting Kuo, Áron Roxin, Sungjoon Huh, Zhengxing Zhang, Rajaguru Kandasamy, Helen Merkens, Joel O. Kumlin, Alan Limoges, Stefan K. Zeisler, Kuo‐Shyan Lin, François Bénard, David M. Perrin. Toward 18 F‐Labeled Theranostics: A Single Agent that Can Be Labeled with 18 F, 64 Cu, or 177 Lu. ChemBioChem 2020, 21 (7) , 943-947. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbic.201900632
  40. Thomas L. Andersen, Christina Baun, Birgitte B. Olsen, Johan H. Dam, Helge Thisgaard. Improving Contrast and Detectability: Imaging with [ 55 Co]Co-DOTATATE in Comparison with [ 64 Cu]Cu-DOTATATE and [ 68 Ga]Ga-DOTATATE. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2020, 61 (2) , 228-233. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.119.233015
  41. Brett A. Vaughn, Shin Hye Ahn, Eduardo Aluicio-Sarduy, Justin Devaraj, Aeli P. Olson, Jonathan Engle, Eszter Boros. Chelation with a twist: a bifunctional chelator to enable room temperature radiolabeling and targeted PET imaging with scandium-44. Chemical Science 2020, 11 (2) , 333-342. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9SC04655K
  42. José Carlos dos Santos, Barbro Beijer, Ulrike Bauder-Wüst, Martin Schäfer, Karin Leotta, Matthias Eder, Martina Benešová, Christian Kleist, Frederik Giesel, Clemens Kratochwil, Klaus Kopka, Uwe Haberkorn, Walter Mier. Development of Novel PSMA Ligands for Imaging and Therapy with Copper Isotopes. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2020, 61 (1) , 70-79. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.119.229054
  43. Nadeem Ahmed Lodhi, Ji Yong Park, Kyuwan Kim, Mi Kyung Hong, Young Joo Kim, Yun-Sang Lee, Gi Jeong Cheon, Keon Wook Kang, Jae Min Jeong. Synthesis and Evaluation of 99mTc-Tricabonyl Labeled Isonitrile Conjugates for Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) Image. Inorganics 2020, 8 (1) , 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics8010005
  44. Christoph A. Umbricht, Ulli Köster, Peter Bernhardt, Nadezda Gracheva, Karl Johnston, Roger Schibli, Nicholas P. van der Meulen, Cristina Müller. Alpha-PET for Prostate Cancer: Preclinical investigation using 149Tb-PSMA-617. Scientific Reports 2019, 9 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-54150-w
  45. Sangeeta Ray Banerjee, Vivek Kumar, Ala Lisok, Jian Chen, Il Minn, Mary Brummet, Srikanth Boinapally, Michael Cole, Ethel Ngen, Bryan Wharram, Cory Brayton, Robert F. Hobbs, Martin G. Pomper. 177Lu-labeled low-molecular-weight agents for PSMA-targeted radiopharmaceutical therapy. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 2019, 46 (12) , 2545-2557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-019-04434-0
  46. Xiaoxia Zhu, Xiaye Miao, Xinyue Qin, Xiaohong Zhu. Design of immunogens: The effect of bifunctional chelator on immunological response to chelated copper. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis 2019, 174 , 263-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2019.06.001
  47. Niels J. Rupp, Christoph A. Umbricht, Daniele A. Pizzuto, Daniela Lenggenhager, Antonia Töpfer, Julian Müller, Urs J. Muehlematter, Daniela A. Ferraro, Michael Messerli, Grégoire B. Morand, Gerhard F. Huber, Daniel Eberli, Roger Schibli, Cristina Müller, Irene A. Burger. First Clinicopathologic Evidence of a Non–PSMA-Related Uptake Mechanism for 68 Ga-PSMA-11 in Salivary Glands. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2019, 60 (9) , 1270-1276. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.118.222307
  48. Sagnik Sengupta, Mena Asha Krishnan, Sudeshna Chattopadhyay, Venkatesh Chelvam. Comparison of prostate‐specific membrane antigen ligands in clinical translation research for diagnosis of prostate cancer. Cancer Reports 2019, 2 (4) https://doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.1169
  49. Clemens Kratochwil, Uwe Haberkorn, Frederik L. Giesel. Radionuclide Therapy of Metastatic Prostate Cancer. Seminars in Nuclear Medicine 2019, 49 (4) , 313-325. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2019.02.003
  50. Hans-Jürgen Wester, Margret Schottelius. PSMA-Targeted Radiopharmaceuticals for Imaging and Therapy. Seminars in Nuclear Medicine 2019, 49 (4) , 302-312. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2019.02.008
  51. Sebastian Hoberück, Gerd Wunderlich, Enrico Michler, Tobias Hölscher, Martin Walther, Danilo Seppelt, Ivan Platzek, Klaus Zöphel, Jörg Kotzerke. Dual‐time‐point 64 Cu‐PSMA ‐617‐ PET/CT in patients suffering from prostate cancer. Journal of Labelled Compounds and Radiopharmaceuticals 2019, 62 (8) , 523-532. https://doi.org/10.1002/jlcr.3745
  52. Nadine Leygue, Morgane Enel, Abdel Diallo, Béatrice Mestre‐Voegtlé, Chantal Galaup, Claude Picard. Efficient Synthesis of a Family of Bifunctional Chelators Based on the PCTA[12] Macrocycle Suitable for Bioconjugation. European Journal of Organic Chemistry 2019, 2019 (18) , 2899-2913. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejoc.201900280
  53. Till Wüstemann, Uwe Haberkorn, John Babich, Walter Mier. Targeting prostate cancer: Prostate‐specific membrane antigen based diagnosis and therapy. Medicinal Research Reviews 2019, 39 (1) , 40-69. https://doi.org/10.1002/med.21508
  54. Yeye Zhou, Jihui Li, Xin Xu, Man Zhao, Bin Zhang, Shengming Deng, Yiwei Wu. 64 Cu-based Radiopharmaceuticals in Molecular Imaging. Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment 2019, 18 , 153303381983075. https://doi.org/10.1177/1533033819830758
  55. Amandine Conte‐Daban, Maryline Beyler, Raphaël Tripier, Christelle Hureau. Kinetics Are Crucial When Targeting Copper Ions to Fight Alzheimer's Disease: An Illustration with Azamacrocyclic Ligands. Chemistry – A European Journal 2018, 24 (33) , 8447-8452. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201801520
  56. Tilman Läppchen, Yvonne Kiefer, Jason P. Holland, Mark D. Bartholomä. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of the bifunctional chelator NODIA-Me in combination with a prostate-specific membrane antigen targeting vector. Nuclear Medicine and Biology 2018, 60 , 45-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2018.03.002
  57. Zhihao Zha, Karl Ploessl, Seok Rye Choi, Zehui Wu, Lin Zhu, Hank F. Kung. Synthesis and evaluation of a novel urea-based 68 Ga-complex for imaging PSMA binding in tumor. Nuclear Medicine and Biology 2018, 59 , 36-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2017.12.007
  58. Shankar Vallabhajosula, Berna D. Polack, John W. Babich. Molecular Imaging of Prostate Cancer: Radiopharmaceuticals for Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT). 2018, 475-501. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64096-9_27
  59. Christoph A. Umbricht, Martina Benešová, Raffaella M. Schmid, Andreas Türler, Roger Schibli, Nicholas P. van der Meulen, Cristina Müller. 44Sc-PSMA-617 for radiotheragnostics in tandem with 177Lu-PSMA-617—preclinical investigations in comparison with 68Ga-PSMA-11 and 68Ga-PSMA-617. EJNMMI Research 2017, 7 (1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-017-0257-4
  60. Sara Sheikhbahaei, Ali Afshar-Oromieh, Matthias Eiber, Lilja B. Solnes, Mehrbod S. Javadi, Ashley E. Ross, Kenneth J. Pienta, Mohamad E. Allaf, Uwe Haberkorn, Martin G. Pomper, Michael A. Gorin, Steven P. Rowe. Pearls and pitfalls in clinical interpretation of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted PET imaging. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 2017, 44 (12) , 2117-2136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-017-3780-7
  61. Lingzhou Zhao, Xiangyang Shi, Jinhua Zhao. Dendrimer-based contrast agents for PET imaging. Drug Delivery 2017, 24 (2) , 81-93. https://doi.org/10.1080/10717544.2017.1399299
  62. Tadahiro Kin, Takaya Kawagoe, Shouhei Araki, Yukinobu Watanabe. Production of high-purity medical radio isotope 64 Cu with accelerator-based neutrons generated with 9 and 12 MeV deuterons. Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology 2017, 54 (10) , 1123-1130. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223131.2017.1344585
  63. Aimen Zlitni, Melissa Yin, Nancy Janzen, Samit Chatterjee, Ala Lisok, Kathleen L. Gabrielson, Sridhar Nimmagadda, Martin G. Pomper, F. Stuart Foster, John F. Valliant, . Development of prostate specific membrane antigen targeted ultrasound microbubbles using bioorthogonal chemistry. PLOS ONE 2017, 12 (5) , e0176958. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176958
  64. Xiaoping Xu, Jianping Zhang, Silong Hu, Simin He, Xiao Bao, Guang Ma, Jianmin Luo, Jingyi Cheng, Yingjian Zhang. 99m Tc-labeling and evaluation of a HYNIC modified small-molecular inhibitor of prostate-specific membrane antigen. Nuclear Medicine and Biology 2017, 48 , 69-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2017.01.010
  65. Aviral Singh, Harshad R. Kulkarni, Richard P. Baum. Imaging of Prostate Cancer Using 64 Cu-Labeled Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Ligand. PET Clinics 2017, 12 (2) , 193-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpet.2016.12.001
  66. Eleni Gourni, Gjermund Henriksen. Metal-Based PSMA Radioligands. Molecules 2017, 22 (4) , 523. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22040523
  67. Uwe Haberkorn, Matthias Eder, Klaus Kopka, John W. Babich, Michael Eisenhut. Role of Radiolabelled Small Molecules Binding to PSMA in Diagnosis and Therapy of Prostate Cancer. 2017, 51-58. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57624-4_6
  68. Gerhard Glatting, Carmen Wängler, Björn Wängler. Physikalisch-technische Grundlagen und Tracerentwicklung in der Positronenemissionstomografie. 2017, 19-56. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-50468-0_2
  69. Mariane Le Fur, Maryline Beyler, Enikő Molnár, Olivier Fougère, David Esteban-Gómez, Gyula Tircsó, Carlos Platas-Iglesias, Nicolas Lepareur, Olivier Rousseaux, Raphaël Tripier. The role of the capping bond effect on pyclen nat Y 3+ / 90 Y 3+ chelates: full control of the regiospecific N-functionalization makes the difference. Chemical Communications 2017, 53 (69) , 9534-9537. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7CC05088G
  70. Eleni Gourni, Luigi Del Pozzo, Mark Bartholomä, Yvonne Kiefer, Philipp T. Meyer, Helmut R. Maecke, Jason P. Holland. Radiochemistry and Preclinical PET Imaging of 68 Ga-Desferrioxamine Radiotracers Targeting Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen. Molecular Imaging 2017, 16 , 153601211773701. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536012117737010
  71. Andreas Poschenrieder, Margret Schottelius, Markus Schwaiger, Horst Kessler, Hans-Jürgen Wester. The influence of different metal-chelate conjugates of pentixafor on the CXCR4 affinity. EJNMMI Research 2016, 6 (1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-016-0193-8
  72. James C Evans, Meenakshi Malhotra, John F Cryan, Caitriona M O'Driscoll. The therapeutic and diagnostic potential of the prostate specific membrane antigen/glutamate carboxypeptidase II (PSMA/GCPII) in cancer and neurological disease. British Journal of Pharmacology 2016, 173 (21) , 3041-3079. https://doi.org/10.1111/bph.13576
  73. Ali Afshar-Oromieh, John W. Babich, Clemens Kratochwil, Frederik L. Giesel, Michael Eisenhut, Klaus Kopka, Uwe Haberkorn. The Rise of PSMA Ligands for Diagnosis and Therapy of Prostate Cancer. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2016, 57 (Supplement 3) , 79S-89S. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.115.170720
  74. Eric Wehrenberg-Klee, N. Selcan Turker, Pedram Heidari, Benjamin Larimer, Dejan Juric, José Baselga, Maurizio Scaltriti, Umar Mahmood. Differential Receptor Tyrosine Kinase PET Imaging for Therapeutic Guidance. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2016, 57 (9) , 1413-1419. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.115.169417
  75. Il Minn, Soo Min Koo, Hye Soo Lee, Mary Brummet, Steven P. Rowe, Michael A. Gorin, Polina Sysa-Shah, William D. Lewis, Hye-Hyun Ahn, Yuchuan Wang, Sangeeta Ray Banerjee, Ronnie C. Mease, Sridhar Nimmagadda, Mohamad E. Allaf, Martin G. Pomper, Xing Yang. [64Cu]XYIMSR-06: A dual-motif CAIX ligand for PET imaging of clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Oncotarget 2016, 7 (35) , 56471-56479. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.10602
  76. Ali Afshar-Oromieh, Henrik Hetzheim, Wolfgang Kübler, Clemens Kratochwil, Frederik L. Giesel, Thomas A. Hope, Matthias Eder, Michael Eisenhut, Klaus Kopka, Uwe Haberkorn. Radiation dosimetry of 68Ga-PSMA-11 (HBED-CC) and preliminary evaluation of optimal imaging timing. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 2016, 43 (9) , 1611-1620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-016-3419-0
  77. Jessie R. Nedrow, Joseph D. Latoche, Kathryn E. Day, Jalpa Modi, Tanushree Ganguly, Dexing Zeng, Brenda F. Kurland, Clifford E. Berkman, Carolyn J. Anderson. Targeting PSMA with a Cu-64 Labeled Phosphoramidate Inhibitor for PET/CT Imaging of Variant PSMA-Expressing Xenografts in Mouse Models of Prostate Cancer. Molecular Imaging and Biology 2016, 18 (3) , 402-410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-015-0908-7
  78. Drishty Satpati, Ajit Shinto, K. K. Kamaleshwaran, Surekha Sane, Sharmila Banerjee. Convenient Preparation of [68Ga]DKFZ-PSMA-11 Using a Robust Single-Vial Kit and Demonstration of Its Clinical Efficacy. Molecular Imaging and Biology 2016, 18 (3) , 420-427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-016-0943-z
  79. Vikas Prasad, Ingo G. Steffen, Gerd Diederichs, Marcus R. Makowski, Peter Wust, Winfried Brenner. Biodistribution of [68Ga]PSMA-HBED-CC in Patients with Prostate Cancer: Characterization of Uptake in Normal Organs and Tumour Lesions. Molecular Imaging and Biology 2016, 18 (3) , 428-436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-016-0945-x
  80. Zhihang Chen, Marie-France Penet, Balaji Krishnamachary, Sangeeta R. Banerjee, Martin G. Pomper, Zaver M. Bhujwalla. PSMA-specific theranostic nanoplex for combination of TRAIL gene and 5-FC prodrug therapy of prostate cancer. Biomaterials 2016, 80 , 57-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.11.048
  81. Laura K. van Dijk, Cheng‐Bin Yim, Gerben M. Franssen, Johannes H. A. M. Kaanders, Johan Rajander, Olof Solin, Tove J. Grönroos, Otto C. Boerman, Johan Bussink. PET of EGFR with 64 Cu‐cetuximab‐F(ab′) 2 in mice with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma xenografts. Contrast Media & Molecular Imaging 2016, 11 (1) , 65-70. https://doi.org/10.1002/cmmi.1659
  82. Fan Pu, Mani Salarian, Shenghui Xue, Jingjuan Qiao, Jie Feng, Shanshan Tan, Anvi Patel, Xin Li, Kenza Mamouni, Khan Hekmatyar, Juan Zou, Daqing Wu, Jenny J. Yang. Prostate-specific membrane antigen targeted protein contrast agents for molecular imaging of prostate cancer by MRI. Nanoscale 2016, 8 (25) , 12668-12682. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5NR09071G
  83. Uwe Haberkorn, Matthias Eder, Klaus Kopka, John W. Babich, Michael Eisenhut. New Strategies in Prostate Cancer: Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) Ligands for Diagnosis and Therapy. Clinical Cancer Research 2016, 22 (1) , 9-15. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-0820
  84. Eleni Gourni, Coline Canovas, Victor Goncalves, Franck Denat, Philipp T. Meyer, Helmut R. Maecke, . (R)-NODAGA-PSMA: A Versatile Precursor for Radiometal Labeling and Nuclear Imaging of PSMA-Positive Tumors. PLOS ONE 2015, 10 (12) , e0145755. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145755
  85. Shaik Mohammad Naushad, Parvathaneni Shree Divyya, M. Janaki Ramaiah, Balraj Alex Stanley, S. Prasanna Lakshmi, J. Vishnupriya, Vijay Kumar Kutala. Clinical utility of genetic variants of glutamate carboxypeptidase II in predicting breast cancer and prostate cancer risk. Cancer Genetics 2015, 208 (11) , 552-558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cancergen.2015.09.001
  86. Ali Afshar-Oromieh, Henrik Hetzheim, Clemens Kratochwil, Martina Benesova, Matthias Eder, Oliver C. Neels, Michael Eisenhut, Wolfgang Kübler, Tim Holland-Letz, Frederik L. Giesel, Walter Mier, Klaus Kopka, Uwe Haberkorn. The Theranostic PSMA Ligand PSMA-617 in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer by PET/CT: Biodistribution in Humans, Radiation Dosimetry, and First Evaluation of Tumor Lesions. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2015, 56 (11) , 1697-1705. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.115.161299
  87. Zhengtao Qin. Recent advances of injectable radiopharmaceuticals for nuclear imaging and therapy: a new era in nuclear medicine. Materials Technology 2015, 30 (sup8) , B250-B255. https://doi.org/10.1080/10667857.2015.1104829
  88. Punit Sharma, Rakesh Kumar, Abass Alavi. PET/Computed Tomography Using New Radiopharmaceuticals in Targeted Therapy. PET Clinics 2015, 10 (4) , 495-505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpet.2015.05.007
  89. Shanna Litau, Uwe Seibold, Alicia Vall‐Sagarra, Gert Fricker, Björn Wängler, Carmen Wängler. Comparative Assessment of Complex Stabilities of Radiocopper Chelating Agents by a Combination of Complex Challenge and in vivo Experiments. ChemMedChem 2015, 10 (7) , 1200-1208. https://doi.org/10.1002/cmdc.201500132
  90. T. Maurer, H. Kübler, J.E. Gschwend, M. Eiber. Positronenemissionstomographie bei urologischen Tumorerkrankungen. Der Urologe 2015, 54 (7) , 983-991. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-015-3868-2
  91. Ewen Bodio, Mohammed Boujtita, Karine Julienne, Patricia Le Saec, Sébastien G. Gouin, Jonathan Hamon, Eric Renault, David Deniaud. Synthesis and Characterization of a Stable Copper(I) Complex for Radiopharmaceutical Applications. ChemPlusChem 2014, 79 (9) , 1284-1293. https://doi.org/10.1002/cplu.201402031
  92. Amanda K. Pearce, Barbara E. Rolfe, Pamela J. Russell, Brian W.-C. Tse, Andrew K. Whittaker, Adrian V. Fuchs, Kristofer J. Thurecht. Development of a polymer theranostic for prostate cancer. Polym. Chem. 2014, 5 (24) , 6932-6942. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4PY00999A
  93. Robin C. Cumming, Dag Erlend Olberg, Julie L. Sutcliffe. Rapid 18 F-radiolabeling of peptides from [ 18 F]fluoride using a single microfluidics device. RSC Adv. 2014, 4 (90) , 49529-49534. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA10520F
  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Proposed structures of 64Cu-labeled inhibitors of PSMA.

    Scheme 1

    Scheme 1. Synthesis of [64Cu]35

    Scheme 2

    Scheme 2. Synthesis of [64Cu]6

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Whole body PET-CT imaging of PSMA+ PC3 PIP and PSMA – PC3 flu tumor-bearing mice with compounds [64Cu]3, [64Cu]4, [64Cu]5, [64Cu]6B, and [64Cu]7 at 2.5 h postinjection, respectively. Mice were injected with ∼11.1 MBq (∼300 μCi) of radiotracer IV. PIP = PSMA+ PC3 PIP (solid arrow); flu = PSMA– PC3 flu (unfilled arrow); K= kidney; B = bladder; L = left; R = right. All images are decay-corrected and adjusted to the same maximum value.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Whole body PET-CT imaging of PC3 PIP and PC3 flu tumor bearing mice with [64Cu]3 at 20 min (left), 6 h (middle), 28 h (right). Abdominal radioactivity is primarily due to uptake within kidneys and bladder. PIP = PC3 PSMA+ PIP (solid arrow); flu = PC3 PSMA– flu (unfilled arrow); K= kidney; L = left; R = right, B = bladder. All images are decay-corrected and adjusted to the same maximum value.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. Whole body PET-CT imaging of PC3 PIP and PC3 flu tumor bearing mice with [64Cu]6A (top row) and [64Cu]6B (bottom row) at 20 min, 2.5 h, 12 and 22 h postinjection. Abdominal radioactivity is primarily due to uptake within kidneys and bladder. PIP = PC3 PSMA+ PIP (solid arrow); flu = PC3 PSMA− flu (unfilled arrow); K= kidney; L = left; R = right, B = bladder. All images are decay-corrected and adjusted to the same maximum value.

  • References

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    This article references 69 other publications.

    1. 1
      Ghosh, A.; Heston, W. D. Tumor target prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) and its regulation in prostate cancer J. Cell Biochem. 2004, 91, 528 539
    2. 2
      Rajasekaran, A. K.; Anilkumar, G.; Christiansen, J. J. Is prostate-specific membrane antigen a multifunctional protein? Am. J. Physiol., Cell Physiol. 2005, 288, C975 C981
    3. 3
      Chang, S. S.; Reuter, V. E.; Heston, W. D.; Gaudin, P. B. Comparison of anti-prostate-specific membrane antigen antibodies and other immunomarkers in metastatic prostate carcinoma Urology 2001, 57, 1179 1183
    4. 4
      Wright, G. L., Jr.; Grob, B. M.; Haley, C.; Grossman, K.; Newhall, K.; Petrylak, D.; Troyer, J.; Konchuba, A.; Schellhammer, P. F.; Moriarty, R. Upregulation of prostate-specific membrane antigen after androgen-deprivation therapy Urology 1996, 48, 326 334
    5. 5
      Evans, M. J.; Smith-Jones, P. M.; Wongvipat, J.; Navarro, V.; Kim, S.; Bander, N. H.; Larson, S. M.; Sawyers, C. L. Noninvasive measurement of androgen receptor signaling with a positron-emitting radiopharmaceutical that targets prostate-specific membrane antigen Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2011, 108, 9578 9582
    6. 6
      Perner, S.; Hofer, M. D.; Kim, R.; Shah, R. B.; Li, H.; Moller, P.; Hautmann, R. E.; Gschwend, J. E.; Kuefer, R.; Rubin, M. A. Prostate-specific membrane antigen expression as a predictor of prostate cancer progression Human Pathol. 2007, 38, 696 701
    7. 7
      Sanna, V.; Pintus, G.; Roggio, A. M.; Punzoni, S.; Posadino, A. M.; Arca, A.; Marceddu, S.; Bandiera, P.; Uzzau, S.; Sechi, M. Targeted biocompatible nanoparticles for the delivery of (−)-epigallocatechin 3-gallate to prostate cancer cells J. Med. Chem. 2011, 54, 1321 1332
    8. 8
      DiPippo, V. A.; Magargal, W. W.; Moorji, S. M.; Murga, J. D.; Olson, W. C. Antiandrogen modulation of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA): dynamics and synergy with PSMA-targeted therapy ASCO Meet. Abstr. 2013, 31, e16007
    9. 9
      Petrylak, D. P.; Kantoff, P. W.; Mega, A. E.; Vogelzang, N. J.; Stephenson, J.; Fleming, M. T.; Stambler, N.; Petrini, M.; Blattman, S.; Israel, R. J. Prostate-specific membrane antigen antibody drug conjugate (PSMA ADC): a phase I trial in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) previously treated with a taxane ASCO Meet. Abstr. 2013, 31, 5018
    10. 10
      Rotshteyn, Y.; Mercier, F.; Bruno, R.; Stambler, N.; Israel, R. J.; Wong, V. Correlation of PSMA ADC exposure with reduction in tumor growth rate determined using serial PSA measurements from a phase I clinical trial ASCO Meet. Abstr. 2013, 31, e16047
    11. 11
      Hrkach, J.; Von Hoff, D.; Mukkaram Ali, M.; Andrianova, E.; Auer, J.; Campbell, T.; De Witt, D.; Figa, M.; Figueiredo, M.; Horhota, A.; Low, S.; McDonnell, K.; Peeke, E.; Retnarajan, B.; Sabnis, A.; Schnipper, E.; Song, J. J.; Song, Y. H.; Summa, J.; Tompsett, D.; Troiano, G.; Van Geen Hoven, T.; Wright, J.; LoRusso, P.; Kantoff, P. W.; Bander, N. H.; Sweeney, C.; Farokhzad, O. C.; Langer, R.; Zale, S. Preclinical development and clinical translation of a PSMA-targeted docetaxel nanoparticle with a differentiated pharmacological profile Sci. Transl. Med. 2012, 4, 128ra39
    12. 12
      Hillier, S. M.; Maresca, K. P.; Femia, F. J.; Marquis, J. C.; Foss, C. A.; Nguyen, N.; Zimmerman, C. N.; Barrett, J. A.; Eckelman, W. C.; Pomper, M. G.; Joyal, J. L.; Babich, J. W. Preclinical evaluation of novel glutamate–urea–lysine analogues that target prostate-specific membrane antigen as molecular imaging pharmaceuticals for prostate cancer Cancer Res. 2009, 69, 6932 6940
    13. 13
      Mease, R. C.; Foss, C. A.; Pomper, M. G. PET imaging in prostate cancer: focus on prostate-specific membrane antigen Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2013, 13, 951 962
    14. 14
      Cho, S. Y.; Gage, K. L.; Mease, R. C.; Senthamizhchelvan, S.; Holt, D. P.; Jeffrey-Kwanisai, A.; Endres, C. J.; Dannals, R. F.; Sgouros, G.; Lodge, M.; Eisenberger, M. A.; Rodriguez, R.; Carducci, M. A.; Rojas, C.; Slusher, B. S.; Kozikowski, A. P.; Pomper, M. G. Biodistribution, tumor detection, and radiation dosimetry of 18F–DCFBC, a low-molecular-weight inhibitor of prostate-specific membrane antigen, in patients with metastatic prostate cancer J. Nucl. Med. 2012, 53, 1883 1891
    15. 15
      Afshar-Oromieh, A.; Malcher, A.; Eder, M.; Eisenhut, M.; Linhart, H. G.; Hadaschik, B. A.; Holland-Letz, T.; Giesel, F. L.; Kratochwil, C.; Haufe, S.; Haberkorn, U.; Zechmann, C. M. PET imaging with a [(68)Ga]gallium-labelled PSMA ligand for the diagnosis of prostate cancer: biodistribution in humans and first evaluation of tumour lesions Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2012, 40, 486 495
    16. 16
      Barrett, J. A.; Coleman, R. E.; Goldsmith, S. J.; Vallabhajosula, S.; Petry, N. A.; Cho, S.; Armor, T.; Stubbs, J. B.; Maresca, K. P.; Stabin, M. G.; Joyal, J. L.; Eckelman, W. C.; Babich, J. W. First-in-man evaluation of 2 high-affinity PSMA-avid small molecules for imaging prostate cancer J. Nucl. Med. 2013, 54, 380 387
    17. 17
      Maresca, K. P.; Hillier, S. M.; Lu, G.; Marquis, J. C.; Zimmerman, C. N.; Eckelman, W. C.; Joyal, J. L.; Babich, J. W. Small molecule inhibitors of PSMA incorporating technetium-99m for imaging prostate cancer: effects of chelate design on pharmacokinetics Inorg. Chim. Acta 2012, 389, 168 172
    18. 18
      Nedrow-Byers, J. R.; Moore, A. L.; Ganguly, T.; Hopkins, M. R.; Fulton, M. D.; Benny, P. D.; Berkman, C. E. PSMA-targeted SPECT agents: Mode of binding effect on in vitro performance Prostate 2013, 73, 355 362
    19. 19
      Lu, G.; Maresca, K. P.; Hillier, S. M.; Zimmerman, C. N.; Eckelman, W. C.; Joyal, J. L.; Babich, J. W. Synthesis and SAR of 99mTc/Re-Labeled Small Molecule Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen Inhibitors with Novel Polar Chelates Biorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2013, 23, 1557 1563
    20. 20
      Nedrow-Byers, J. R.; Jabbes, M.; Jewett, C.; Ganguly, T.; He, H.; Liu, T.; Benny, P.; Bryan, J. N.; Berkman, C. E. A phosphoramidate-based prostate-specific membrane antigen-targeted SPECT agent Prostate 2012, 72, 904 912
    21. 21
      Banerjee, S. R.; Foss, C. A.; Castanares, M.; Mease, R. C.; Byun, Y.; Fox, J. J.; Hilton, J.; Lupold, S. E.; Kozikowski, A. P.; Pomper, M. G. Synthesis and evaluation of technetium-99m- and rhenium-labeled inhibitors of the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) J. Med. Chem. 2008, 51, 4504 4517
    22. 22
      Kularatne, S. A.; Zhou, Z.; Yang, J.; Post, C. B.; Low, P. S. Design, synthesis, and preclinical evaluation of prostate-specific membrane antigen targeted (99m)Tc-radioimaging agents Mol. Pharmaceutics 2009, 6, 790 800
    23. 23
      Zhang, Y.; DiFilipp, F.; Doke, A.; Huang, J.; Heston, W.; Huang, S. Preliminary micro-SPECT and biodistribution study of a novel Tc99m-labeled PSMA tracer derived from RBI1033 J. Nucl. Med. Meet. Abstr. 2012, 53 (Suppl 1) 1661
    24. 24
      Schafer, M.; Bauder-Wust, U.; Leotta, K.; Zoller, F.; Mier, W.; Haberkorn, U.; Eisenhut, M.; Eder, M. A dimerized urea-based inhibitor of the prostate-specific membrane antigen for 68Ga-PET imaging of prostate cancer EJNMMI Res. 2012, 2, 23
    25. 25
      Eder, M.; Schafer, M.; Bauder-Wust, U.; Hull, W. E.; Wangler, C.; Mier, W.; Haberkorn, U.; Eisenhut, M. 68Ga-complex lipophilicity and the targeting property of a urea-based PSMA inhibitor for PET imaging Bioconjugate Chem. 2012, 23, 688 697
    26. 26
      Banerjee, S. R.; Pullambhatla, M.; Byun, Y.; Nimmagadda, S.; Green, G.; Fox, J. J.; Horti, A.; Mease, R. C.; Pomper, M. G. 68Ga-labeled inhibitors of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) for imaging prostate cancer J. Med. Chem. 2010, 53, 5333 5341
    27. 27
      Banerjee, S. R.; Pullambhatla, M.; Shallal, H.; Lisok, A.; Mease, R. C.; Pomper, M. G. A Modular Strategy to Prepare Multivalent Inhibitors of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) Oncotarget 2011, 2, 1244 1253
    28. 28
      Banerjee, S. R.; Pullambhatla, M.; Byun, Y.; Nimmagadda, S.; Foss, C. A.; Green, G.; Fox, J. J.; Lupold, S. E.; Mease, R. C.; Pomper, M. G. Sequential SPECT and optical imaging of experimental models of prostate cancer with a dual modality inhibitor of the prostate-specific membrane antigen Angew. Chem. 2011, 50, 9167 9170
    29. 29
      Chen, Z.; Penet, M. F.; Nimmagadda, S.; Li, C.; Banerjee, S. R.; Winnard, P. T., Jr.; Artemov, D.; Glunde, K.; Pomper, M. G.; Bhujwalla, Z. M. PSMA-targeted theranostic nanoplex for prostate cancer therapy ACS Nano 2012, 6, 7752 7762
    30. 30
      Hao, G.; Kumar, A.; Dobin, T.; Oz, O. K.; Hsieh, J. T.; Sun, X. A multivalent approach of imaging probe design to overcome an endogenous anion binding competition for noninvasive assessment of prostate specific membrane antigen Mol. Pharmacol. 2013, 10, 2975 2985
    31. 31
      Banerjee, S. R.; Pullambhatla, M.; Byun, Y.; Nimmagadda, S.; Baidoo, K. E.; Brechbiel, M. W.; Mease, R. C.; Pomper, M. G. Preclinical Evaluation of 86Y-Labeled Inhibitors of Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen. J. Labelled Compd. Radiopharm. 2011, 54, Suppl S1, p S65.
    32. 32
      Holland, J. P.; Divilov, V.; Bander, N. H.; Smith-Jones, P. M.; Larson, S. M.; Lewis, J. S. 89Zr–DFO–J591 for immunoPET of prostate-specific membrane antigen expression in vivo J. Nucl. Med. 2010, 51, 1293 1300
    33. 33
      Viola-Villegas, N.; Evans, H.; Bartlett, D.; Wu, A.; Lewis, J. Preclinical development of Zr-89 labeled anti-PSMA minibody and cys-diabody J Nucl. Med. Meet. Abstr. 2012, 53, 347
    34. 34
      Ray Banerjee, S.; Pullambhatla, M.; Foss, C. A.; Falk, A.; Byun, Y.; Nimmagadda, S.; Mease, R. C.; Pomper, M. G. Effect of chelators on the pharmacokinetics of (99m)Tc-labeled imaging agents for the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) J. Med. Chem. 2013, 56, 6108 6121
    35. 35
      Wadas, T. J.; Wong, E. H.; Weisman, G. R.; Anderson, C. J. Copper chelation chemistry and its role in copper radiopharmaceuticals Curr. Pharm. Des. 2007, 13, 3 16
    36. 36
      Connett, J. M.; Anderson, C. J.; Guo, L. W.; Schwarz, S. W.; Zinn, K. R.; Rogers, B. E.; Siegel, B. A.; Philpott, G. W.; Welch, M. J. Radioimmunotherapy with a 64Cu-labeled monoclonal antibody: a comparison with 67Cu Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1996, 93, 6814 6818
    37. 37
      Blower, P. J.; Lewis, J. S.; Zweit, J. Copper radionuclides and radiopharmaceuticals in nuclear medicine Nucl. Med. Biol. 1996, 23, 957 980
    38. 38
      Guo, Y.; Parry, J. J.; Laforest, R.; Rogers, B. E.; Anderson, C. J. The role of p53 in combination radioimmunotherapy with 64Cu–DOTA–cetuximab and cisplatin in a mouse model of colorectal cancer J. Nucl. Med. 2013, 54, 1621 1629
    39. 39
      Donnelly, P. S. The role of coordination chemistry in the development of copper and rhenium radiopharmaceuticals Dalton Trans. 2011, 40, 999 1010
    40. 40
      Smith, S. V. Molecular imaging with copper-64 J. Inorg. Biochem. 2004, 98, 1874 1901
    41. 41
      Wadas, T. J.; Wong, E. H.; Weisman, G. R.; Anderson, C. J. Molecular imaging of cancer with copper-64 radiopharmaceuticals and positron emission tomography (PET) Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 2858 2902
    42. 42
      Shokeen, M.; Anderson, C. J. Coordinating radiometals of copper, gallium, indium, yttrium, and zirconium for PET and SPECT imaging of disease Acc. Chem. Res. 2009, 110, 832 841
    43. 43
      De Silva, R. A.; Peyre, K.; Pullambhatla, M.; Fox, J. J.; Pomper, M. G.; Nimmagadda, S. Imaging CXCR4 expression in human cancer xenografts: evaluation of monocyclam 64Cu–AMD3465 J. Nucl. Med. 2011, 52, 986 993
    44. 44
      Yuan, H.; Schroeder, T.; Bowsher, J. E.; Hedlund, L. W.; Wong, T.; Dewhirst, M. W. Intertumoral differences in hypoxia selectivity of the PET imaging agent 64Cu(II)-diacetyl-bis(N4-methylthiosemicarbazone) J. Nucl. Med. 2006, 47, 989 998
    45. 45
      Liu, Z.; Li, Z. B.; Cao, Q.; Liu, S.; Wang, F.; Chen, X. Small-animal PET of tumors with (64)Cu-labeled RGD–bombesin heterodimer J. Nucl. Med. 2009, 50, 1168 1177
    46. 46
      Dumont, R. A.; Deininger, F.; Haubner, R.; Maecke, H. R.; Weber, W. A.; Fani, M. Novel (64)Cu- and (68)Ga-labeled RGD conjugates show improved PET imaging of alpha(nu)beta(3) integrin expression and facile radiosynthesis J. Nucl. Med. 2011, 52, 1276 1284
    47. 47
      Fani, M.; Del Pozzo, L.; Abiraj, K.; Mansi, R.; Tamma, M. L.; Cescato, R.; Waser, B.; Weber, W. A.; Reubi, J. C.; Maecke, H. R. PET of somatostatin receptor-positive tumors using 64Cu– and 68Ga–somatostatin antagonists: the chelate makes the difference J. Nucl. Med. 2011, 52, 1110 1118
    48. 48
      Liu, Z.; Li, Z. B.; Cao, Q.; Liu, S.; Wang, F.; Chen, X.; Small-animal, P. E. T. of tumors with (64)Cu-labeled RGD–bombesin heterodimer J. Nucl. Med. 2009, 50, 1168 1177
    49. 49
      Rockey, W. M.; Huang, L.; Kloepping, K. C.; Baumhover, N. J.; Giangrande, P. H.; Schultz, M. K. Synthesis and radiolabeling of chelator–RNA aptamer bioconjugates with copper-64 for targeted molecular imaging Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2011, 19, 4080 4090
    50. 50
      Hou, G. L.; Li, Y. H.; Zhang, Z. L.; Xiong, Y. H.; Chen, X. F.; Yao, K.; Liu, Z. W.; Han, H.; Qin, Z. K.; Zhou, F. J. A modified technique for neourethral anastomosis in orthotopic neobladder reconstruction Urology 2009, 74, 1145 1149
    51. 51
      Cooper, M. S.; Ma, M. T.; Sunassee, K.; Shaw, K. P.; Williams, J. D.; Paul, R. L.; Donnelly, P. S.; Blower, P. J. Comparison of (64)Cu-complexing bifunctional chelators for radioimmunoconjugation: labeling efficiency, specific activity, and in vitro/in vivo stability Bioconjugate Chem. 2012, 23, 1029 1039
    52. 52
      Moi, M. K.; Meares, C. F.; McCall, M. J.; Cole, W. C.; DeNardo, S. J. Copper chelates as probes of biological systems: stable copper complexes with a macrocyclic bifunctional chelating agent Anal. Biochem. 1985, 148, 249 253
    53. 53
      Jones-Wilson, T. M.; Deal, K. A.; Anderson, C. J.; McCarthy, D. W.; Kovacs, Z.; Motekaitis, R. J.; Sherry, A. D.; Martell, A. E.; Welch, M. J. The in vivo behavior of copper-64-labeled azamacrocyclic complexes Nucl. Med. Biol. 1998, 25, 523 530
    54. 54
      Garrison, J. C.; Rold, T. L.; Sieckman, G. L.; Figueroa, S. D.; Volkert, W. A.; Jurisson, S. S.; Hoffman, T. J. In vivo evaluation and small-animal PET/CT of a prostate cancer mouse model using 64Cu bombesin analogs: side-by-side comparison of the CB-TE2A and DOTA chelation systems J. Nucl. Med. 2007, 48, 1327 1337
    55. 55
      Sun, X.; Wuest, M.; Weisman, G. R.; Wong, E. H.; Reed, D. P.; Boswell, C. A.; Motekaitis, R.; Martell, A. E.; Welch, M. J.; Anderson, C. J. Radiolabeling and in vivo behavior of copper-64-labeled cross-bridged cyclam ligands J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 469 477
    56. 56
      Boswell, C. A.; Sun, X.; Niu, W.; Weisman, G. R.; Wong, E. H.; Rheingold, A. L.; Anderson, C. J. Comparative in vivo stability of copper-64-labeled cross-bridged and conventional tetraazamacrocyclic complexes J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 1465 1474
    57. 57
      Sprague, J. E.; Peng, Y.; Sun, X.; Weisman, G. R.; Wong, E. H.; Achilefu, S.; Anderson, C. J. Preparation and biological evaluation of copper-64-labeled tyr3-octreotate using a cross-bridged macrocyclic chelator Clin. Cancer Res. 2004, 10, 8674 8682
    58. 58
      Ait-Mohand, S.; Fournier, P.; Dumulon-Perreault, V.; Kiefer, G. E.; Jurek, P.; Ferreira, C. L.; Benard, F.; Guerin, B. Evaluation of 64Cu-labeled bifunctional chelate–bombesin conjugates Bioconjugate Chem. 2011, 22, 1729 1735
    59. 59
      Ferreira, C. L.; Lamsa, E.; Woods, M.; Duan, Y.; Fernando, P.; Bensimon, C.; Kordos, M.; Guenther, K.; Jurek, P.; Kiefer, G. E. Evaluation of Bifunctional Chelates for the Development of Gallium-Based Radiopharmaceuticals Bioconjugate Chem. 2010, 21, 531 536
    60. 60
      Ferreira, C. L.; Yapp, D. T.; Lamsa, E.; Gleave, M.; Bensimon, C.; Jurek, P.; Kiefer, G. E. Evaluation of novel bifunctional chelates for the development of Cu-64-based radiopharmaceuticals Nucl. Med. Biol. 2008, 35, 875 882
    61. 61
      Olszewski, R. T.; Bukhari, N.; Zhou, J.; Kozikowski, A. P.; Wroblewski, J. T.; Shamimi-Noori, S.; Wroblewska, B.; Bzdega, T.; Vicini, S.; Barton, F. B.; Neale, J. H. NAAG peptidase inhibition reduces locomotor activity and some stereotypes in the PCP model of schizophrenia via group II mGluR J. Neurochem. 2004, 89, 876 885
    62. 62
      Silver, D. A.; Pellicer, I.; Fair, W. R.; Heston, W. D.; Cordon-Cardo, C. Prostate-specific membrane antigen expression in normal and malignant human tissues Clin. Cancer Res. 1997, 3, 81 95
    63. 63
      Prasanphanich, A. F.; Nanda, P. K.; Rold, T. L.; Ma, L.; Lewis, M. R.; Garrison, J. C.; Hoffman, T. J.; Sieckman, G. L.; Figueroa, S. D.; Smith, C. J. [64Cu-NOTA-8-Aoc-BBN(7–14)NH2] targeting vector for positron-emission tomography imaging of gastrin-releasing peptide receptor-expressing tissues Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2007, 104, 12462 12467
    64. 64
      Chen, Y.; Pullambhatla, M.; Foss, C. A.; Byun, Y.; Nimmagadda, S.; Senthamizhchelvan, S.; Sgouros, G.; Mease, R. C.; Pomper, M. G. 2-(3-{1-Carboxy-5-[(6-[18F]fluoro-pyridine-3-carbonyl)-amino]-pentyl}-ureido)-pen tanedioic acid, [18F]DCFPyL, a PSMA-based PET imaging agent for prostate cancer Clin. Cancer Res. 2011, 17, 7645 7653
    65. 65
      Hillier, S. M.; Maresca, K. P.; Lu, G.; Merkin, R. D.; Marquis, J. C.; Zimmerman, C. N.; Eckelman, W. C.; Joyal, J. L.; Babich, J. W. 99mTc-Labeled Small-Molecule Inhibitors of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen for Molecular Imaging of Prostate Cancer J. Nucl. Med. 2013, 54, 1369 1376
    66. 66
      Elsasser-Beile, U.; Reischl, G.; Wiehr, S.; Buhler, P.; Wolf, P.; Alt, K.; Shively, J.; Judenhofer, M. S.; Machulla, H. J.; Pichler, B. J. PET imaging of prostate cancer xenografts with a highly specific antibody against the prostate-specific membrane antigen J. Nucl. Med. 2009, 50, 606 611
    67. 67
      Alt, K.; Wiehr, S.; Ehrlichmann, W.; Reischl, G.; Wolf, P.; Pichler, B. J.; Elsasser-Beile, U.; Buhler, P. High-resolution animal PET imaging of prostate cancer xenografts with three different 64Cu-labeled antibodies against native cell-adherent PSMA Prostate 2010, 70, 1413 1421
    68. 68
      Fischer, G.; Seibold, U.; Schirrmacher, R.; Wangler, B.; Wangler, C. (89)Zr, a radiometal nuclide with high potential for molecular imaging with PET: chemistry, applications and remaining challenges Molecules 2013, 18, 6469 6490
    69. 69
      Cheng, Y.; Prusoff, W. H. Relationship between the inhibition constant (K1) and the concentration of inhibitor which causes 50% inhibition (I50) of an enzymatic reaction Biochem. Pharmacol. 1973, 22, 3099 3108
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    Detailed spectral data and supporting PET-CT blocking study image. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect