ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Nonradiative Electronic Relaxation Rate Constants from Approximations Based on Linearizing the Path-Integral Forward−Backward Action
My Activity

Figure 1Loading Img
    Article

    Nonradiative Electronic Relaxation Rate Constants from Approximations Based on Linearizing the Path-Integral Forward−Backward Action
    Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

    View Author Information
    Department of Chemistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1055
    Other Access Options

    The Journal of Physical Chemistry A

    Cite this: J. Phys. Chem. A 2004, 108, 29, 6109–6116
    Click to copy citationCitation copied!
    https://doi.org/10.1021/jp049547g
    Published June 25, 2004
    Copyright © 2004 American Chemical Society

    Abstract

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

    We consider two different semiclassical approximations for nonadiabatic quantum-mechanical correlation functions of the form Tr[Â eiĤet/ℏe-iĤgt/ℏ], where ĤgĤe represent the nuclear Hamiltonians of two different electronic states. The first approximation is based on direct linearization (DL) of the forward−backward (FB) action in the exact path integral expression for this correlation function. The second approximation is based on linearizing the FB action in an equivalent quantum expression for this correlation function, which is given in terms of the Meyer−Miller mapping Hamiltonian (MML). The two approximations have several features in common, namely:  (1) They are given in terms of an integral over a classical-like phase space; (2) The relevant operators are replaced by their Wigner transforms; (3) The dynamics is purely classical and governed by a Hamiltonian that represents an average over Hg and He; (4) The fact that ĤgĤe gives rise to a phase factor of the form dτ, where U = HeHg. The main differences between the two approximations are:  (1) The MML approximation involves an additional phase-space integral and Wigner transforms that correspond to the continuous variables representing the electronic degree of freedom; (2) The DL and MML approximations involve different averaged Hamiltonians, namely, Ĥav = (Ĥg + Ĥe)/2 in the case of the DL approximation, as opposed to different relative weights of Ĥg and Ĥe, which depend on the electronic degree of freedom, in the case of the MML approximation. The two approximations are tested within the framework of a nonradiative electronic relaxation (NRER) benchmark problem. Although the NRER rate constants are accurately reproduced by both methods, the DL approximation is consistently found to perform somewhat better. A discussion is provided of a feasible scheme for implementing those approximations in the case of anharmonic systems as well as the relationship to previous work.

    Copyright © 2004 American Chemical Society

    Read this article

    To access this article, please review the available access options below.

    Get instant access

    Purchase Access

    Read this article for 48 hours. Check out below using your ACS ID or as a guest.

    Recommended

    Access through Your Institution

    You may have access to this article through your institution.

    Your institution does not have access to this content. Add or change your institution or let them know you’d like them to include access.

    *

    In papers with more than one author, the asterisk indicates the name of the author to whom inquiries about the paper should be addressed.

    Cited By

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

    This article is cited by 82 publications.

    1. Hao Zeng, Yitian Kou, Xiang Sun. How Sophisticated Are Neural Networks Needed to Predict Long-Term Nonadiabatic Dynamics?. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2024, 20 (22) , 9832-9848. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.4c01223
    2. Jonathan R. Mannouch, Aaron Kelly. Toward a Correct Description of Initial Electronic Coherence in Nonadiabatic Dynamics Simulations. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2024, 15 (46) , 11687-11695. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.4c02418
    3. Lauren E. Cook, Johan E. Runeson, Jeremy O. Richardson, Timothy J. H. Hele. Which Algorithm Best Propagates the Meyer–Miller–Stock–Thoss Mapping Hamiltonian for Non-Adiabatic Dynamics?. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2023, 19 (18) , 6109-6125. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00709
    4. Maximilian A. C. Saller, Yifan Lai, Eitan Geva. Cavity-Modified Fermi’s Golden Rule Rate Constants from Cavity-Free Inputs. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2023, 127 (6) , 3154-3164. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c08996
    5. Kunni Lin, Jiawei Peng, Chao Xu, Feng Long Gu, Zhenggang Lan. Trajectory Propagation of Symmetrical Quasi-classical Dynamics with Meyer-Miller Mapping Hamiltonian Using Machine Learning. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2022, 13 (50) , 11678-11688. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c02159
    6. Zhubin Hu, Xiang Sun. All-Atom Nonadiabatic Semiclassical Mapping Dynamics for Photoinduced Charge Transfer of Organic Photovoltaic Molecules in Explicit Solvents. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2022, 18 (10) , 5819-5836. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00631
    7. Shreyas Malpathak, Matthew S. Church, Nandini Ananth. A Semiclassical Framework for Mixed Quantum Classical Dynamics. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 2022, 126 (37) , 6359-6375. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.2c03467
    8. Maximilian A. C. Saller, Yifan Lai, Eitan Geva. An Accurate Linearized Semiclassical Approach for Calculating Cavity-Modified Charge Transfer Rate Constants. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2022, 13 (10) , 2330-2337. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c00122
    9. Maximilian A. C. Saller, Aaron Kelly, Eitan Geva. Benchmarking Quasiclassical Mapping Hamiltonian Methods for Simulating Cavity-Modified Molecular Dynamics. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2021, 12 (12) , 3163-3170. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c00158
    10. Xing Gao, Eitan Geva. Improving the Accuracy of Quasiclassical Mapping Hamiltonian Methods by Treating the Window Function Width as an Adjustable Parameter. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 2020, 124 (52) , 11006-11016. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.0c09750
    11. Xing Gao, Yifan Lai, Eitan Geva. Simulating Absorption Spectra of Multiexcitonic Systems via Quasiclassical Mapping Hamiltonian Methods. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2020, 16 (10) , 6465-6480. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.0c00709
    12. Xing Gao, Eitan Geva. A Nonperturbative Methodology for Simulating Multidimensional Spectra of Multiexcitonic Molecular Systems via Quasiclassical Mapping Hamiltonian Methods. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2020, 16 (10) , 6491-6502. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.0c00843
    13. Xing Gao, Maximilian A. C. Saller, Yudan Liu, Aaron Kelly, Jeremy O. Richardson, Eitan Geva. Benchmarking Quasiclassical Mapping Hamiltonian Methods for Simulating Electronically Nonadiabatic Molecular Dynamics. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2020, 16 (5) , 2883-2895. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.9b01267
    14. Kush Patel, Eric R. Bittner. Mixed Quantum Classical Simulations of Charge-Transfer Dynamics in a Model Light-Harvesting Complex. I. Charge-Transfer Dynamics. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2020, 124 (11) , 2149-2157. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c00202
    15. Xiang Sun, Pengzhi Zhang, Yifan Lai, Kyle L. Williams, Margaret S. Cheung, Barry D. Dunietz, Eitan Geva. Computational Study of Charge-Transfer Dynamics in the Carotenoid–Porphyrin–C60 Molecular Triad Solvated in Explicit Tetrahydrofuran and Its Spectroscopic Signature. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2018, 122 (21) , 11288-11299. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b02697
    16. Farnaz A. Shakib and Pengfei Huo . Ring Polymer Surface Hopping: Incorporating Nuclear Quantum Effects into Nonadiabatic Molecular Dynamics Simulations. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2017, 8 (13) , 3073-3080. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b01343
    17. Xiang Sun and Eitan Geva . Nonequilibrium Fermi’s Golden Rule Charge Transfer Rates via the Linearized Semiclassical Method. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2016, 12 (6) , 2926-2941. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.6b00236
    18. Xiang Sun and Eitan Geva . Equilibrium Fermi’s Golden Rule Charge Transfer Rate Constants in the Condensed Phase: The Linearized Semiclassical Method vs Classical Marcus Theory. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 2016, 120 (19) , 2976-2990. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.5b08280
    19. Salvatore Mandrà, Joshua Schrier, and Michele Ceotto . Helium Isotope Enrichment by Resonant Tunneling through Nanoporous Graphene Bilayers. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 2014, 118 (33) , 6457-6465. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp502548r
    20. Myeong H. Lee, Eitan Geva, and Barry D. Dunietz . Calculation from First-Principles of Golden Rule Rate Constants for Photoinduced Subphthalocyanine/Fullerene Interfacial Charge Transfer and Recombination in Organic Photovoltaic Cells. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2014, 118 (18) , 9780-9789. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp501199u
    21. Kijeong Kwac and Eitan Geva . Mixed Quantum-Classical Molecular Dynamics Study of the Hydroxyl Stretch in Methanol/Carbon-Tetrachloride Mixtures II: Excited State Hydrogen Bonding Structure and Dynamics, Infrared Emission Spectrum, and Excited State Lifetime. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2012, 116 (9) , 2856-2866. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp211792j
    22. Porscha L. McRobbie and Eitan Geva. A Benchmark Study of Different Methods for Calculating One- And Two-Dimensional Optical Spectra. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 2009, 113 (39) , 10425-10434. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp905305t
    23. Porscha L. McRobbie, Gabriel Hanna, Qiang Shi and Eitan Geva . Signatures of Nonequilibrium Solvation Dynamics on Multidimensional Spectra. Accounts of Chemical Research 2009, 42 (9) , 1299-1309. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar800280s
    24. Ed Bukhman and Nancy Makri. Mixed Quantum and Forward−Backward Semiclassical Dynamics. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 2009, 113 (26) , 7183-7188. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp809741x
    25. William H. Miller. Electronically Nonadiabatic Dynamics via Semiclassical Initial Value Methods. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 2009, 113 (8) , 1405-1415. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp809907p
    26. Michael F. Herman and, Feng Ding. On the Importance of the Classically Forbidden Region in Calculations of the Relaxation Rate for High-Frequency Vibrations:  A Model Calculation. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 2007, 111 (41) , 10186-10190. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp072035s
    27. Igor Uspenskiy,, Birgit Strodel, and, Gerhard Stock. Classical Calculation of Transient Absorption Spectra Monitoring Ultrafast Electron Transfer Processes. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2006, 2 (6) , 1605-1617. https://doi.org/10.1021/ct6002127
    28. Zengkui Liu, Dominikus Brian, Xiang Sun. PyCTRAMER: A Python package for charge transfer rate constant of condensed-phase systems from Marcus theory to Fermi’s golden rule. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2024, 161 (6) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0224524
    29. Zengkui Liu, Ningyi Lyu, Zhubin Hu, Hao Zeng, Victor S. Batista, Xiang Sun. Benchmarking various nonadiabatic semiclassical mapping dynamics methods with tensor-train thermo-field dynamics. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2024, 161 (2) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0208708
    30. Thomas P. Fay. Extending non-adiabatic rate theory to strong electronic couplings in the Marcus inverted regime. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2024, 161 (1) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0218653
    31. Maximlian A. C. Saller, Yifan Lai, Eitan Geva. Cavity-modified Fermi’s golden rule rate constants: Beyond the single mode approximation. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2023, 159 (15) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0172265
    32. Mohammad Shakiba, Brendan Smith, Wei Li, Matthew Dutra, Amber Jain, Xiang Sun, Sophya Garashchuk, Alexey Akimov. Libra: A modular software library for quantum nonadiabatic dynamics. Software Impacts 2022, 14 , 100445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpa.2022.100445
    33. Deping Hu, Arkajit Mandal, Braden M. Weight, Pengfei Huo. Quasi-diabatic propagation scheme for simulating polariton chemistry. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2022, 157 (19) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0127118
    34. Justin Provazza, Roel Tempelaar. Perturbation theory under the truncated Wigner approximation: How system-environment entanglement formation drives quantum decoherence. Physical Review A 2022, 106 (4) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.106.042406
    35. Zengkui Liu, Wen Xu, Mark E. Tuckerman, Xiang Sun. Imaginary-time open-chain path-integral approach for two-state time correlation functions and applications in charge transfer. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2022, 157 (11) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0098162
    36. Duncan Bossion, Wenxiang Ying, Sutirtha N. Chowdhury, Pengfei Huo. Non-adiabatic mapping dynamics in the phase space of the SU ( N ) Lie group. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2022, 157 (8) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0094893
    37. Roger F. Loring. Calculating Multidimensional Optical Spectra from Classical Trajectories. Annual Review of Physical Chemistry 2022, 73 (1) , 273-297. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physchem-082620-021302
    38. Jonathan R. Mannouch, Jeremy O. Richardson. A partially linearized spin-mapping approach for simulating nonlinear optical spectra. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2022, 156 (2) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0077744
    39. Zhubin Hu, Dominikus Brian, Xiang Sun. Multi-state harmonic models with globally shared bath for nonadiabatic dynamics in the condensed phase. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2021, 155 (12) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0064763
    40. Justin Provazza, Roel Tempelaar, David F. Coker. Analytic and numerical vibronic spectra from quasi-classical trajectory ensembles. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2021, 155 (1) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0053735
    41. Yuanheng Wang, Jiajun Ren, Zhigang Shuai. Evaluating the anharmonicity contributions to the molecular excited state internal conversion rates with finite temperature TD-DMRG. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2021, 154 (21) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0052804
    42. Sutirtha N. Chowdhury, Pengfei Huo. Non-adiabatic Matsubara dynamics and non-adiabatic ring-polymer molecular dynamics. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2021, 154 (12) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0042136
    43. Maximilian A. C. Saller, Johan E. Runeson, Jeremy O. Richardson. Path‐Integral Approaches to Non‐Adiabatic Dynamics. 2020, 629-653. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119417774.ch20
    44. Jonathan R. Mannouch, Jeremy O. Richardson. A partially linearized spin-mapping approach for nonadiabatic dynamics. I. Derivation of the theory. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2020, 153 (19) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0031168
    45. Jonathan R. Mannouch, Jeremy O. Richardson. A partially linearized spin-mapping approach for nonadiabatic dynamics. II. Analysis and comparison with related approaches. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2020, 153 (19) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0031173
    46. Zhengqing Tong, Xing Gao, Margaret S. Cheung, Barry D. Dunietz, Eitan Geva, Xiang Sun. Charge transfer rate constants for the carotenoid-porphyrin-C60 molecular triad dissolved in tetrahydrofuran: The spin-boson model vs the linearized semiclassical approximation. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2020, 153 (4) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0016160
    47. Eric R. Heller, Jeremy O. Richardson. Semiclassical instanton formulation of Marcus–Levich–Jortner theory. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2020, 152 (24) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0013521
    48. Jie Zheng, Yu Xie, Shengshi Jiang, Yunze Long, Xin Ning, Zhenggang Lan. Initial sampling in symmetrical quasiclassical dynamics based on Li–Miller mapping Hamiltonian. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 2019, 21 (48) , 26502-26514. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9CP03975A
    49. Justin Provazza, David F. Coker. Multi-level description of the vibronic dynamics of open quantum systems. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2019, 151 (15) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5120253
    50. Ellen Mulvihill, Xing Gao, Yudan Liu, Alexander Schubert, Barry D. Dunietz, Eitan Geva. Combining the mapping Hamiltonian linearized semiclassical approach with the generalized quantum master equation to simulate electronically nonadiabatic molecular dynamics. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2019, 151 (7) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5110891
    51. Johan E. Runeson, Jeremy O. Richardson. Spin-mapping approach for nonadiabatic molecular dynamics. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2019, 151 (4) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5100506
    52. Sutirtha N. Chowdhury, Pengfei Huo. State dependent ring polymer molecular dynamics for investigating excited nonadiabatic dynamics. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2019, 150 (24) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5096276
    53. Yu Xie, Jie Zheng, Zhenggang Lan. Performance evaluation of the symmetrical quasi-classical dynamics method based on Meyer-Miller mapping Hamiltonian in the treatment of site-exciton models. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2018, 149 (17) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5047002
    54. Matthew S. Church, Timothy J. H. Hele, Gregory S. Ezra, Nandini Ananth. Nonadiabatic semiclassical dynamics in the mixed quantum-classical initial value representation. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2018, 148 (10) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5005557
    55. Alexei A. Kananenka, Xiang Sun, Alexander Schubert, Barry D. Dunietz, Eitan Geva. A comparative study of different methods for calculating electronic transition rates. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2018, 148 (10) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4989509
    56. Joseph R. Cendagorta, Zlatko Bačić, Mark E. Tuckerman. An open-chain imaginary-time path-integral sampling approach to the calculation of approximate symmetrized quantum time correlation functions. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2018, 148 (10) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5005543
    57. Sutirtha N. Chowdhury, Pengfei Huo. Coherent state mapping ring polymer molecular dynamics for non-adiabatic quantum propagations. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2017, 147 (21) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4995616
    58. Stephen J. Cotton, Ruibin Liang, William H. Miller. On the adiabatic representation of Meyer-Miller electronic-nuclear dynamics. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2017, 147 (6) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4995301
    59. Chiara Aieta, Michele Ceotto. A quantum method for thermal rate constant calculations from stationary phase approximation of the thermal flux-flux correlation function integral. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2017, 146 (21) , 214115. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4984099
    60. Xiang Sun, Eitan Geva. Non-Condon nonequilibrium Fermi’s golden rule rates from the linearized semiclassical method. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2016, 145 (6) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4960337
    61. Xiang Sun, Eitan Geva. Non-Condon equilibrium Fermi’s golden rule electronic transition rate constants via the linearized semiclassical method. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2016, 144 (24) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4954509
    62. Jiří Vaníček, Doron Cohen. Path integral approach to the quantum fidelity amplitude. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 2016, 374 (2069) , 20150164. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0164
    63. Mi Kyung Lee, Pengfei Huo, David F. Coker. Semiclassical Path Integral Dynamics: Photosynthetic Energy Transfer with Realistic Environment Interactions. Annual Review of Physical Chemistry 2016, 67 (1) , 639-668. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physchem-040215-112252
    64. Sergey V. Antipov, Ziyu Ye, Nandini Ananth. Dynamically consistent method for mixed quantum-classical simulations: A semiclassical approach. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2015, 142 (18) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4919667
    65. Tomáš Zimmermann, Jiří Vaníček. Efficient on-the-fly ab initio semiclassical method for computing time-resolved nonadiabatic electronic spectra with surface hopping or Ehrenfest dynamics. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2014, 141 (13) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4896735
    66. Jeremy O. Richardson, Michael Thoss. Non-oscillatory flux correlation functions for efficient nonadiabatic rate theory. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2014, 141 (7) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4892865
    67. Pengfei Huo, Thomas F. Miller, David F. Coker. Communication: Predictive partial linearized path integral simulation of condensed phase electron transfer dynamics. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2013, 139 (15) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4826163
    68. Salvatore Mandrà, Stéphanie Valleau, Michele Ceotto. Deep nuclear resonant tunneling thermal rate constant calculations. International Journal of Quantum Chemistry 2013, 113 (12) , 1722-1734. https://doi.org/10.1002/qua.24395
    69. Pengfei Huo, David F. Coker. Consistent schemes for non-adiabatic dynamics derived from partial linearized density matrix propagation. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2012, 137 (22) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4748316
    70. Jörg Tatchen, Eli Pollak, Guohua Tao, William H. Miller. Renormalization of the frozen Gaussian approximation to the quantum propagator. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2011, 134 (13) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3573566
    71. Sara Bonella, Giovanni Ciccotti, Raymond Kapral. Linearization approximations and Liouville quantum–classical dynamics. Chemical Physics Letters 2010, 484 (4-6) , 399-404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2009.11.056
    72. S. Bonella, D. F. Coker, D. Mac Kernan, R. Kapral, G. Ciccotti. Trajectory Based Simulations of Quantum-Classical Systems. 2009, 415-436. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02306-4_13
    73. E. R. Dunkel, S. Bonella, D. F. Coker. Iterative linearized approach to nonadiabatic dynamics. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2008, 129 (11) , 114106. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2976441
    74. Hyojoon Kim, Raymond Kapral. Quantum equilibrium structure for strong nonadiabatic coupling: Reaction rate enhancement. Chemical Physics Letters 2007, 440 (4-6) , 215-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2007.04.039
    75. G. Ciccotti, D. F. Coker, Raymond Kapral. Quantum Statistical Dynamics with Trajectories. 2007, 275-293. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-34460-5_12
    76. D. F. Coker, S. Bonella. Linearized Nonadiabatic Dynamics in the Adiabatic Representation. 2007, 321-340. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-34460-5_14
    77. Igor Uspenskiy, Birgit Strodel, Gerhard Stock. Classical description of the dynamics and time-resolved spectroscopy of nonadiabatic cis–trans photoisomerization. Chemical Physics 2006, 329 (1-3) , 109-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemphys.2006.07.047
    78. Being J. Ka, Ming-Liang Zhang, Eitan Geva. Homogeneity and Markovity of electronic dephasing in liquid solutions. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2006, 125 (12) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2354155
    79. Jeanne M. Riga, Erick Fredj, Craig C. Martens. Simulation of vibrational dephasing of I2 in solid Kr using the semiclassical Liouville method. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2006, 124 (6) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2162878
    80. S. Bonella, D. F. Coker. LAND-map, a linearized approach to nonadiabatic dynamics using the mapping formalism. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2005, 122 (19) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1896948
    81. Sara Bonella, Daniel Montemayor, David F. Coker. Linearized path integral approach for calculating nonadiabatic time correlation functions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2005, 102 (19) , 6715-6719. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0408326102
    82. Qiang Shi, Eitan Geva. A comparison between different semiclassical approximations for optical response functions in nonpolar liquid solutions. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2005, 122 (6) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1843813

    The Journal of Physical Chemistry A

    Cite this: J. Phys. Chem. A 2004, 108, 29, 6109–6116
    Click to copy citationCitation copied!
    https://doi.org/10.1021/jp049547g
    Published June 25, 2004
    Copyright © 2004 American Chemical Society

    Article Views

    459

    Altmetric

    -

    Citations

    Learn about these metrics

    Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

    Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

    The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.