ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Osmotic Pressure beyond Concentration Restrictions
My Activity

Figure 1Loading Img
    Article

    Osmotic Pressure beyond Concentration Restrictions
    Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

    View Author Information
    Dipartimento di Meccanica, Politecnico di Torino, C.so Duca degli Abruzzi, 24, 10129 Torino, Italy
    Brown Foundation Institute of Molecular Medicine, Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Suite 537, 1825 Pressler Street, Houston, Texas 77030, Department of Experimental Therapeutics, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, and Department of Bioengineering, Rice University , Houston, Texas
    Other Access OptionsSupporting Information (1)

    The Journal of Physical Chemistry B

    Cite this: J. Phys. Chem. B 2007, 111, 40, 11770–11775
    Click to copy citationCitation copied!
    https://doi.org/10.1021/jp075834j
    Published September 19, 2007
    Copyright © 2007 American Chemical Society

    Abstract

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

    Osmosis is a fundamental physical process that involves the transit of solvent molecules across a membrane separating two liquid solutions. Osmosis plays a role in many biological processes such as fluid exchange in animal cells (Cell Biochem. Biophys.2005, 42, 277−345; 1J. Periodontol.2007, 78, 757−763 2) and water transport in plants. It is also involved in many technological applications such as drug delivery systems (Crit. Rev. Ther. Drug.2004, 21, 477−520; 3J. Micro-Electromech. Syst. 2004, 13, 75−82 4) and water purification. Extensive attention has been dedicated in the past to the modeling of osmosis, starting with the classical theories of van't Hoff and Morse. These are predictive, in the sense that they do not involve adjustable parameters; however, they are directly applicable only to limited regimes of dilute solute concentrations. Extensions beyond the domains of validity of these classical theories have required recourse to fitting parameters, transitioning therefore to semiempirical, or nonpredictive models. A novel approach was presented by Granik et al., which is not a priori restricted in concentration domains, presents no adjustable parameters, and is mechanistic, in the sense that it is based on a coupled diffusion model. In this work, we examine the validity of predictive theories of osmosis, by comparison with our new experimental results, and a meta-analysis of literature data.

    Copyright © 2007 American Chemical Society

    Read this article

    To access this article, please review the available access options below.

    Get instant access

    Purchase Access

    Read this article for 48 hours. Check out below using your ACS ID or as a guest.

    Recommended

    Access through Your Institution

    You may have access to this article through your institution.

    Your institution does not have access to this content. Add or change your institution or let them know you’d like them to include access.

     Current address:  Brown Foundation Institute of Molecular Medicine, Department of Nanomedicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 1825 Pressler St., Houston, TX, 77030. E-mail:  [email protected].

     E-mail:  [email protected].

    *

     Corresponding author. Tel:  (713)-500-2444. Fax:  (713)-500-2462. E-mail:  [email protected].

    Supporting Information Available

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

    Detailed description of the membrane osmometer and results of the experimental test error analysis. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

    Cited By

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

    This article is cited by 27 publications.

    1. Mostafa Fakhraee, Omid Akhavan. Ultrahigh Permeable C2N-Inspired Graphene Nanomesh Membranes versus Highly Strained C2N for Reverse Osmosis Desalination. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2019, 123 (41) , 8740-8752. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.9b07015
    2. Asuka Inada, Tomoki Takahashi, Kazuo Kumagai, Hideto Matsuyama. Morpholine Derivatives as Thermoresponsive Draw Solutes for Forward Osmosis Desalination. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2019, 58 (27) , 12253-12260. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b01712
    3. Haiyang Yan, Chunyan Xu, Yonghui Wu, Abhishek N. Mondal, Yaoming Wang, and Tongwen Xu . Integrating Diffusion Dialysis with Membrane Electrolysis for Recovering Sodium Hydroxide from Alkaline Sodium Metavanadate Solution. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 2017, 5 (6) , 5382-5393. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b00688
    4. Jason T. Arena, Seetha S. Manickam, Kevin K. Reimund, Pavel Brodskiy, and Jeffrey R. McCutcheon . Characterization and Performance Relationships for a Commercial Thin Film Composite Membrane in Forward Osmosis Desalination and Pressure Retarded Osmosis. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2015, 54 (45) , 11393-11403. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.5b02309
    5. Andriy Yaroshchuk. Comment on “Osmotic Pressure beyond Concentration Restrictions”. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2008, 112 (49) , 15941-15942. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp8031995
    6. Alessandro Grattoni and Mauro Ferrari. Reply to “Comment on Osmotic Pressure beyond Concentration Restrictions’”. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2008, 112 (49) , 15943-15943. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp807289x
    7. Ilaria Facchi, Nicola Di Trani, Nathanael Hernandez, Ashley L. Joubert, Anthony M. Wood, Danilo Demarchi, Alessandro Grattoni. Quantifying interstitial fluid by direct osmotic pressure measurements in vivo via telemetry-enabled Nanofluidic implants. Journal of Controlled Release 2025, 377 , 735-743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2024.11.068
    8. Jannis Bosse, Wolfgang Durner, Andre Peters. Effect of salt concentration on osmotic potential in drying soils — Measurement and models. European Journal of Soil Science 2024, 75 (5) https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.70001
    9. Vítor Geraldes, Patrícia Henriques, Maria Diná Afonso, Ana Maria Alves, Rita F. Pires, Mónica Faria, Bart Van der Bruggen, Miguel Rodrigues. Designing Centrifugal Membrane Filters with uniform-pressure for UF/NF/RO separations. Journal of Membrane Science 2024, 702 , 122752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2024.122752
    10. Jan Frauholz, Hannah Roth, Matthias Wessling. Seawater desalination by forward-osmosis-assisted temperature swing solvent extraction. Desalination 2023, 564 , 116697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2023.116697
    11. Vladimir Raim, Simcha Srebnik. Simulation of osmotic pressure across an amorphous semipermeable membrane. Journal of Membrane Science 2018, 563 , 183-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2018.05.058
    12. Lindsay C. Todman, Anaïs Chhang, Hannah J. Riordan, Dawn Brooks, Adrian P. Butler, Michael R. Templeton. Soil Osmotic Potential and Its Effect on Vapor Flow from a Pervaporative Irrigation Membrane. Journal of Environmental Engineering 2018, 144 (7) https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001379
    13. Sayed Ul Alam Shibly, Chiranjib Ghatak, Mohammad Abu Sayem Karal, Md. Moniruzzaman, Masahito Yamazaki. Experimental Estimation of Membrane Tension Induced by Osmotic Pressure. Biophysical Journal 2016, 111 (10) , 2190-2201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2016.09.043
    14. Zhiping Li, Fanglin Yu, Zhong Di, Xiqing Zhao, Shiqing Zhao, Yan Liu, Ying Li, Zhiyuan Wang, Wei Gong, Hui Zhang, Yang Yang, Xiangyang Xie, Xingguo Mei. Development and uniform evaluation of ropinirole osmotic pump tablets with REQUIP XL both in vitro and in beagle dogs. Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy 2016, 42 (1) , 12-18. https://doi.org/10.3109/03639045.2015.1020219
    15. Chinmaya Keshari Sahoo, Nalini Kanta Sahoo, Surepalli Ram Mohan Rao, Muvvala Sudhakar, Kokkula Satyanarayana. A review on controlled porosity osmotic pump tablets and its evaluation. Bulletin of Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University 2015, 53 (2) , 195-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bfopcu.2015.10.004
    16. Wei Gong, Yan Liu, Dan-Yu Mei, Meiyan Yang, Xing-Guo Mei. Preparation, release and pharmacokinetics of a risperidone elementary osmotic pump system. Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy 2015, 41 (3) , 464-469. https://doi.org/10.3109/03639045.2013.877923
    17. Tahir Majeed, Fezeh Lotfi, Sherub Phuntsho, Joon Khee Yoon, Kwonil Kim, Ho Kyong Shon. Performances of PA hollow fiber membrane with the CTA flat sheet membrane for forward osmosis process. Desalination and Water Treatment 2015, 53 (7) , 1744-1754. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2013.859103
    18. Divina D. Kaombe, May-Britt Hägg. Forward osmosis for the dewatering of pyrolysis oil aqueous phase. Separation and Purification Technology 2014, 138 , 92-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2014.10.002
    19. Emil D. Manev, Kiril H. Kolikov, Ivan L. Minkov, Boryan P. Radoev. Modeling of osmotic kinetics in aqueous solutions, based on experimental data. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 2014, 460 , 454-459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2014.01.006
    20. Wei Gong, Rui Ma, Danyu Mei, Pei Jing, Xiao Dong, Bingsheng Li, Yanfang Yang, Lina Du, Xing-Guo Mei, Fu-Qiang Hu. A novel subcutaneous infusion delivery system based on osmotic pump: in vitro and in vivo evaluation. Drug Delivery 2014, 21 (1) , 1-7. https://doi.org/10.3109/10717544.2013.838718
    21. Teiichiro Okawa, Yoshihiko Ushida, Masayuki Shimada, Nobuo Seki, Naoki Watai, Hirokatu Kanehara, Shigefumi Kitagawa, Masatoshi Ohnishi, Motonori Toyoda, Yoshitaka Tamura, Akira Ito. Theoretical Analysis of Flux Change during Whey Nanofiltration in a Batch Concentration System with a Circulation Loop. KAGAKU KOGAKU RONBUNSHU 2014, 40 (5) , 382-395. https://doi.org/10.1252/kakoronbunshu.40.382
    22. Bob Eisenberg. Ionic interactions in biological and physical systems: a variational treatment. Faraday Discuss. 2013, 160 , 279-296. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2FD20066J
    23. Ivan L. Minkov, Emil D. Manev, Svetla V. Sazdanova, Kiril H. Kolikov, , . Equilibrium and Dynamic Osmotic Behaviour of Aqueous Solutions with Varied Concentration at Constant and Variable Volume. The Scientific World Journal 2013, 2013 (1) https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/876897
    24. Simon Herrlich, Sven Spieth, Stephan Messner, Roland Zengerle. Osmotic micropumps for drug delivery. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 2012, 64 (14) , 1617-1627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2012.02.003
    25. Nobuo Seki, Kie Kinoshita, Hitoshi Saitoh, Hiroshi Ochi, Keiji Iwatsuki, Teiichiro Okawa, Masatoshi Ohnishi, Yoshitaka Tamura, Akira Ito. Analysis of Flux Change on Nanofiltration of Dairy Whey. KAGAKU KOGAKU RONBUNSHU 2012, 38 (2) , 90-101. https://doi.org/10.1252/kakoronbunshu.38.90
    26. Xu Zhang, Chuanrun Li, Huchuan Wang, Tongwen Xu. Recovery of hydrochloric acid from simulated chemosynthesis aluminum foil wastewater by spiral wound diffusion dialysis (SWDD) membrane module. Journal of Membrane Science 2011, 384 (1-2) , 219-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2011.09.036
    27. Akira Igarashi, Lamberto Rondoni, Antonio Botrugno, Marco Pizzi. Nonlinear Diffusion and Transient Osmosis. Communications in Theoretical Physics 2011, 56 (2) , 352-366. https://doi.org/10.1088/0253-6102/56/2/28

    The Journal of Physical Chemistry B

    Cite this: J. Phys. Chem. B 2007, 111, 40, 11770–11775
    Click to copy citationCitation copied!
    https://doi.org/10.1021/jp075834j
    Published September 19, 2007
    Copyright © 2007 American Chemical Society

    Article Views

    2105

    Altmetric

    -

    Citations

    Learn about these metrics

    Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

    Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

    The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.