ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Pressure and Materials Effects on the Selectivity of RuO2 in NH3 Oxidation
My Activity

Figure 1Loading Img
    Article

    Pressure and Materials Effects on the Selectivity of RuO2 in NH3 Oxidation
    Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

    View Author Information
    Institute for Chemical and Bioengineering, Department of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, ETH Zurich, HCI E 125, Wolfgang-Pauli-Strasse 10, CH-8093, Zurich, Switzerland, Institute of Chemical Research of Catalonia (ICIQ), Av. Països Catalans 16, 43007, Tarragona, Spain, and Leibniz Institute for Catalysis at the University of Rostock, Albert-Einstein-Strasse 29a, D-18059, Rostock, Germany
    * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected] (J.P.-R.), [email protected] (N.L.).
    †ETH Zurich.
    ‡Institute of Chemical Research of Catalonia (ICIQ).
    §Leibniz Institute for Catalysis at the University of Rostock.
    Other Access OptionsSupporting Information (1)

    The Journal of Physical Chemistry C

    Cite this: J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 39, 16660–16668
    Click to copy citationCitation copied!
    https://doi.org/10.1021/jp106193w
    Published September 1, 2010
    Copyright © 2010 American Chemical Society

    Abstract

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
    Abstract Image

    The pressure and materials gaps in heterogeneous catalysis often complicate the extrapolation of results from surface science experiments over single crystals to real catalysis at elevated pressures and polycrystalline samples. Previous ammonia oxidation studies reported ca. 100% NO selectivity and the absence of N2O on RuO2(110) in ultrahigh vacuum (UHV) at 530 K, p(NH3) = 10−7 mbar, and O2/NH3 = 20 (Wang, Y.; Jacobi, K.; Schone, W.-D.; Ertl, G. J. Phys. Chem. B2005, 109, 7883). Differently, our steady-state and transient experiments over polycrystalline RuO2 at ambient pressure reveal that N2 is the predominant product. The NO selectivity was as low as 6% at O2/NH3 = 2 and reached a maximum of 65% at the highest temperature (773 K) and effective oxygen-to-ammonia ratio of 140, whereas the maximum N2O selectivity was 25% at 100% NH3 conversion. Density functional theory simulations of the competing paths leading to NO, N2O, and N2 over RuO2(110) and RuO2(101) at different coverages by O- and N-containing species provided insights into the selectivity differences between the extreme operation regimes. Comparison between the (101) and (110) facets reveals that the materials effect is not likely to explain the different product distribution. Instead, the pressure effect (8 orders of magnitude higher at ambient pressure than in UHV) does. Whereas NO is formed by the direct reaction of coadsorbed N and O atoms, N2 can be formed through two different routes: direct N + N recombination or N2O decomposition. The second path is only likely at high pressures because it implies more diffusion steps of surface species, which are highly unlikely at low coverage. Thus, the main pressure effect is to facilitate alternative routes for N2 formation.

    Copyright © 2010 American Chemical Society

    Read this article

    To access this article, please review the available access options below.

    Get instant access

    Purchase Access

    Read this article for 48 hours. Check out below using your ACS ID or as a guest.

    Recommended

    Access through Your Institution

    You may have access to this article through your institution.

    Your institution does not have access to this content. Add or change your institution or let them know you’d like them to include access.

    Supporting Information

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

    Binding energies of intermediates as a function of the coverage for the (110) surface. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

    Cited By

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

    This article is cited by 18 publications.

    1. Yong Liao, Haomiao Xu, Zihao Li, Leipeng Ji, Longlong Wang, Guanqun Gao, Wenjun Huang, Zan Qu, Naiqiang Yan. Boosting RuO2 Surface Reactivity by Cu Active Sites over Ru/Cu-SSZ-13 for Simultaneous Catalytic Oxidation of CO and NH3. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2021, 125 (31) , 17031-17041. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c04100
    2. Allegra A. Latimer, Frank Abild-Pedersen, and Jens K. Nørskov . A Theoretical Study of Methanol Oxidation on RuO2(110): Bridging the Pressure Gap. ACS Catalysis 2017, 7 (7) , 4527-4534. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.7b01417
    3. Xiangzhi Cui, Lisong Chen, Yongxia Wang, Hangrong Chen, Wenru Zhao, Yongsheng Li, and Jianlin Shi . Fabrication of Hierarchically Porous RuO2–CuO/Al–ZrO2 Composite as Highly Efficient Catalyst for Ammonia-Selective Catalytic Oxidation. ACS Catalysis 2014, 4 (7) , 2195-2206. https://doi.org/10.1021/cs500421x
    4. Syed Islamuddin Shah, Sampyo Hong, and Talat S. Rahman . Combined Density Functional Theory and Kinetic Monte Carlo Study of Selective Oxidation of NH3 on Rutile RuO2(110) at Ambient Pressures. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2014, 118 (10) , 5226-5238. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp407865e
    5. Chia-Ching Wang, Jyun-Yi Wu, Thong L. M. Pham, and Jyh-Chiang Jiang . Microkinetic Simulation of Ammonia Oxidation on the RuO2(110) Surface. ACS Catalysis 2014, 4 (2) , 639-648. https://doi.org/10.1021/cs401070n
    6. Chia-Ching Wang, Jyun-Yi Wu, and Jyh-Chiang Jiang . Microkinetic Simulation of Temperature-Programmed Desorption. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2013, 117 (12) , 6136-6142. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp309394p
    7. Feng Shao, Martin W. G. Hoffmann, Joan Daniel Prades, Joan Ramon Morante, Núria López, and Francisco Hernández-Ramírez . Interaction Mechanisms of Ammonia and Tin Oxide: A Combined Analysis Using Single Nanowire Devices and DFT Calculations. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2013, 117 (7) , 3520-3526. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp3085342
    8. Herbert Over. Surface Chemistry of Ruthenium Dioxide in Heterogeneous Catalysis and Electrocatalysis: From Fundamental to Applied Research. Chemical Reviews 2012, 112 (6) , 3356-3426. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr200247n
    9. Chia-Ching Wang, Shih Syong Siao, and Jyh-Chiang Jiang . Density Functional Theory Study of the Oxidation of Ammonia on the IrO2(110) Surface. Langmuir 2011, 27 (23) , 14253-14259. https://doi.org/10.1021/la203339z
    10. Magdalena Jabłońska. Progress on Noble Metal-Based Catalysts Dedicated to the Selective Catalytic Ammonia Oxidation into Nitrogen and Water Vapor (NH3-SCO). Molecules 2021, 26 (21) , 6461. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26216461
    11. Tianwei Lan, Yufei Zhao, Jiang Deng, Jianping Zhang, Liyi Shi, Dengsong Zhang. Selective catalytic oxidation of NH 3 over noble metal-based catalysts: state of the art and future prospects. Catalysis Science & Technology 2020, 10 (17) , 5792-5810. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CY01137A
    12. Jung Hun Shin, Geo Jong Kim, Sung Chang Hong. Reaction properties of ruthenium over Ru/TiO2 for selective catalytic oxidation of ammonia to nitrogen. Applied Surface Science 2020, 506 , 144906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.144906
    13. A. Modvig, A. Riisager. Selective formation of formic acid from biomass-derived glycolaldehyde with supported ruthenium hydroxide catalysts. Catalysis Science & Technology 2019, 9 (16) , 4384-4392. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9CY00271E
    14. Wenhua Chen, Quantong Shen, Robert A. Bartynski. Selective Oxidation of Ammonia by Co-adsorbed Oxygen on Iridium Surfaces: Formation of N2O. Catalysis Letters 2015, 145 (3) , 757-761. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-014-1468-1
    15. Kambiz Shojaee, Brian S. Haynes, Alejandro Montoya. The role of oxygen during the catalytic oxidation of ammonia on Co 3 O 4 (1 0 0). Applied Surface Science 2014, 316 , 355-365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.08.021
    16. Vasile Hulea, Emil Dumitriu. Nano‐oxides. 2013, 375-413. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527656875.ch10
    17. Steven Heylen, Nele Delcour, Christine E. A. Kirschhock, Johan A. Martens. Selective Catalytic Oxidation of Ammonia into Dinitrogen over a Zeolite‐Supported Ruthenium Dioxide Catalyst. ChemCatChem 2012, 4 (8) , 1162-1166. https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.201100489
    18. Marta Santiago, Vita A. Kondratenko, Evgenii V. Kondratenko, Núria López, Javier Pérez-Ramírez. Mechanistic analysis of direct N2O decomposition and reduction with H2 or NH3 over RuO2. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 2011, 110 , 33-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2011.08.019

    The Journal of Physical Chemistry C

    Cite this: J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 39, 16660–16668
    Click to copy citationCitation copied!
    https://doi.org/10.1021/jp106193w
    Published September 1, 2010
    Copyright © 2010 American Chemical Society

    Article Views

    901

    Altmetric

    -

    Citations

    Learn about these metrics

    Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

    Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

    The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.