ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Rational Selection of Gold Nanorod Geometry for Label-Free Plasmonic Biosensors
My Activity
  • Open Access
Article

Rational Selection of Gold Nanorod Geometry for Label-Free Plasmonic Biosensors
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

View Author Information
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708
* Address correspondence to [email protected]
Open PDFSupporting Information (1)

ACS Nano

Cite this: ACS Nano 2009, 3, 4, 795–806
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/nn8006465
Published March 18, 2009

Copyright © 2009 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

We present the development of an analytical model that can be used for the rational design of a biosensor based on shifts in the local surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) of individual gold nanoparticles. The model relates the peak wavelength of light scattered by an individual plasmonic nanoparticle to the number of bound analyte molecules and provides an analytical formulation that predicts relevant figures-of-merit of the sensor such as the molecular detection limit (MDL) and dynamic range as a function of nanoparticle geometry and detection system parameters. The model calculates LSPR shifts for individual molecules bound by a nanorod, so that the MDL is defined as the smallest number of bound molecules that is measurable by the system, and the dynamic range is defined as the maximum number of molecules that can be detected by a single nanorod. This model is useful because it will allow a priori design of an LSPR sensor with figures-of-merit that can be optimized for the target analyte. This model was used to design an LSPR sensor based on biotin-functionalized gold nanorods that offers the lowest MDL for this class of sensors. The model predicts a MDL of 18 streptavidin molecules for this sensor, which is in good agreement with experiments and estimates. Further, we discuss how the model can be utilized to guide the development of future generations of LSPR biosensors.

Copyright © 2009 American Chemical Society

The unique optical properties of plasmonic nanoparticles have led to the development of a novel class of label-free biomolecular sensors. These biosensors exploit the phenomenon of localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) which endows unique light scattering and absorption properties to noble metal nanoparticles that are a function of the local environment. This behavior transduces binding events at the nanoparticle surface into a macroscopically measurable optical signal (1-6) and forms the basis of LSPR biosensors. Herein, we report the derivation and experimental verification of an analytical model that predicts the figures-of-merit of nanoparticle LSPR biosensors operating at the single particle limit and provides guidance for the rational design of LSPR biosensors.
LSPR arises from the resonant oscillation of conduction electrons on the surface of metal nanoparticles. The energy associated with this resonance is a function of the nanoparticle composition, size, shape, and the surrounding dielectric environment. (7-12) Noble metal nanoparticles with features in the 10−100 nm size scale exhibit plasmonic resonances at optical frequencies. Consequently, such nanoparticles exhibit a characteristic LSPR spectrum, with one or more peaks in the visible light range that correspond to specific electron oscillation resonances. The LSPR peak location and intensity are sensitive to the local refractive index (RI) surrounding the nanoparticle and are the basis of their utility as biosensors. Binding of analyte molecules to nanoparticles that are decorated with a receptor specific for that analyte alters the local RI in the vicinity of the plasmonic nanostructure, resulting in a shift of the LSPR spectrum. This shift can be measured either as a change in the peak intensity of the scattered light or as a shift in the LSPR peak wavelength (λ*).
This approach to biomolecular detection was initially proposed for plasmonic particles in suspension, (13) was then demonstrated for an ensemble of gold nanoparticles that were immobilized on a transparent substrate in a chip-based format by our group, (14, 15) and was subsequently validated by other groups (16-18) and extended to the limit of single nanoparticles. (5, 19-25) By miniaturizing the sensor down to a single nanoparticle, the detection system is reduced to the size-scale that is commensurate with the size of biomolecular analytes. To further understand the mechanics of single-nanoparticle detection, investigators have also been studying the specific details of plasmonic nanostructures that are responsible for their use in sensors such as the distance dependence of sensitivity (26-28) and the resonant electric field enhancement distribution. (29, 30) However, to date, these developments have not been integrated into a coherent quantitative framework that allows the effect of these parameters on relevant figures-of-merit of biosensors, such as their limit of detection and dynamic range, to be predicted.
Motivated by the goal of rationally designing LSPR sensors, in this paper, we integrate recent progress in understanding the structural details of metal nanoparticles that control their plasmonic behavior with various measurement system parameters that impact measurement uncertainty into a quantitative model that is capable of predicting the response of a single, receptor-functionalized nanoparticle to discrete analyte binding events. The result is an analytical model that quantifies the LSPR shift of a gold nanorod caused by the local refractive index increase from the presence of a target biomolecule. The principle of this work is similar to that of Stemberg et al. who describe an analytical model to quantify the surface concentration of bound protein on plasmon resonant planar gold (31) and to that of Vollmer et al. who estimate the surface density of bound proteins based on wavelength shifts of a resonant microcavity. (32)
The utility of this model is two-fold. First, it provides an analytical model that allows a priori design of an LSPR sensor with figures-of-merit, such as the molecular detection limit (MDL) and dynamic range, that can be analytically calculated completely as a function of sensor components for a given receptor−analyte pair. Because the model calculates LSPR shifts for individual bound molecules, the MDL is defined as the smallest number of bound molecules that is measurable by the system, and the dynamic range is the maximum number of detectable molecules. To illustrate its experimental utility, the model was used to identify the optimal gold nanorod geometry (length and diameter) that was predicted by the model to yield the lowest MDL for the detection of streptavidin by gold nanorod LSPR sensors. An LSPR sensor was fabricated from biotin-functionalized gold nanorods, and the experimental results were compared with the prediction of the model to investigate its accuracy. Second, this model is useful because it allows the contribution of different system parameters to overall sensitivity to be individually parsed. With the ultimate goal of label-free, single molecule detection by LSPR sensors, we conclude with a discussion of optimization of the system within realistic physical and current technological constraints that might allow the fabrication of an LSPR sensor and dark-field microspectrometer that are capable of detecting the binding of individual analyte molecules.

Results and Discussion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

As a first approximation, the MDL of nanoparticle sensors is determined by their composition, size, and shape of the NPs. Recognizing that the development of a generalized model that could account for the dependence of the MDL of an LSPR sensor on all of these parameters was likely to prove computationally intensive and possibly intractable, we focused instead on developing a model that was applicable to gold nanorods as plasmonic transducers of binding events for the following reasons. First, although silver particles are more sensitive than gold particles of the same shape and size, (33) the greater reactivity of silver as compared to gold makes it less suitable for use in biologically relevant media as silver can be easily oxidized, altering the plasmonic behavior of the particle. Second, gold nanorods can be conveniently synthesized with a range of dimensions via established chemical synthesis methods, which allows the model to be experimentally tested—and the sensor optimized—at the structural level. (34-36) Third, gold nanorods can be conveniently synthesized to exhibit plasmon resonances with peak wavelengths ranging from 700 to 900 nm and beyond simply by tuning their aspect ratio and size. (34, 37-40) This spectral region is particularly useful for biosensing because the background absorption and scattering of endogeneous chromophores from biological mixtures (e.g., serum and blood) and of water are minimal in this wavelength range. (41, 42) We note that LSPR of several other geometries of gold nanoparticles such as nanoshells, nanodiscs, (43) and nanorings (44) can also be tuned via synthesis methods to exhibit plasmon bands in the wavelength range of gold nanorods. Nanorods, however, have a higher bulk RI sensitivity (45) and also a narrower line width than these geometries, (43, 44, 46) which allows more accurate determination of peak shifts as described later in the model details. Additionally, the line widths of gold nanorod scattering spectra have been shown to be a function of the length and aspect ratio of the gold nanorods (47) as well as end-cap shape, (48) parameters that can be controlled in their chemical synthesis.

Model Development

We sought to develop an analytical model that estimates the MDL of an LSPR sensor for a specific analyte−receptor pair based on the geometric dimensions of the gold nanorod using a specified spectral detection system. Thus, the model is an equation that predicts the minimum number of detectable analyte molecules based on input parameters that consist of the nanorod dimensions and optical system parameters. Building the model involved several steps; first, the spectral detection system and data analysis algorithms were analyzed to determine the measurement uncertainty in detecting LSPR peak wavelengths. Then, the average number of analyte molecules that must bind to induce an LSPR shift equal to the measurement uncertainty for a given nanorod geometry was determined. This is the smallest number of bound molecules that can be reliably be detected by the proposed system and is defined as its MDL. It is important to note that we define the MDL by the amount of material bound to the surface of the nanoparticle, and not the concentration of the analyte in the surrounding medium. This choice was made so that the focus of the model is the interaction of the bound analyte with the plasmonic nanoparticles and the subsequent LSPR signal generated, and not the mass transport kinetics of the sensor system. Therefore, the optimal nanoparticle can be determined for a proposed analyte strictly by using the model to predict which geometry will offer the lowest MDL.
The first step in the derivation of the model was estimation of the minimum LSPR shift that can be reliably measured for a particular detection system. We assumed that the total uncertainty is the sum of uncertainties induced by two factors as represented in eq 1: uncertainty introduced by the detection system, Usystem, and uncertainty introduced by the peak fitting to the gathered nanoparticle scattering spectrum, Ufit. (1)
A thorough discussion of the Usystem of the microspectroscopy system utilized in this work has been reported elsewhere. (49) That study, which incorporated considerations of image focus, physical sample stability, and overall repeatability of the measurements, concluded that Usystem was ∼0.3 nm for the optical detection system described in that work. The same experimental setup was used in this study; hence we assume that Usystem is 0.3 nm.
Next, uncertainty due to the data analysis method must be considered. The measurement noise was modeled as a Gaussian distribution. Although the physical model of noise in an optical measurement is a Poisson distribution due to shot noise, it can be accurately and conveniently modeled by a Gaussian distribution for a large number of photons because it is merely a counting problem. This yields the following relationship for Ufit(2) where FWHM is the line width of the spectrum being fit and SNR is the signal-to-noise ratio of the data being fit. (49) The SNR depends on photoelectron signal magnitude, M, the integration time, t, and the spectrometer camera’s dark current specification, Nd, and read noise, Nr, according to the following: (3)
For a shot noise-limited measurement (SNR = √M), the shot noise dominates over the dark and read noise. The system used for this study has a dark current of less than 0.0025 electrons·pixel−1·s−1 and read noise of less than 4 electrons RMS such that a shot noise-limited measurement (defined here as a measurement for which shot noise exceeds dark and read noise sources by an order of magnitude) will have an SNR > 13 for a typical integration time of 20 s. The role of the nanoparticle geometry in affecting measurement uncertainty becomes apparent as the signal level; that is, the amount of light scattered is proportional to the nanoparticle’s scattering cross section, Csca. Thus in the shot noise-limited regime, the following relationship holds for SNR: (4) where A is a constant that accounts for the input photon flux, the integration time, and the quantum efficiency of the measurement system. The parameter A can be calculated for a microspectroscopy system by making a shot noise-limited measurement of the SNR of a nanoparticle with known Csca. (50) We measured the scattering spectrum of an 80 nm diameter gold sphere under typical operating parameters and observed a SNR of 100. Using the Csca predicted by Mie theory of the sphere, a value of 0.385 is determined for A for the microspectroscopy system described in this work. With the value for A known, the SNR for an arbitrary nanoparticle of known Csca may be calculated by rewriting eq 7 as follows: (5)
Now, with eqs 2 and 5, it is possible to calculate total peak measurement uncertainty for an arbitrary particle based on the FWHM and Csca of the particle, even if the measurement is not shot noise-limited. Csca can be determined analytically as a function of nanorod geometry by applying the model developed by Kuwata et al. (51) Further details of the specific application of this model are reported below. Therefore, U can now be calculated entirely as a function of nanorod length and diameter. It is worth noting that the constant A is dependent upon the measurement system, but not upon the measured nanoparticle. Thus, it must only be empirically determined once for a specific experimental setup.
The next step in the development of the model was to analytically translate this uncertainty limit from units of wavelength shift to number of bound molecules as a function of nanorod geometry. In order to formulate this relationship in a manner that is analytically simple, several approximations and assumptions were made. First, we assumed that the nanorods are cylindrical in shape with a length (l) and diameter (d). We recognize that the assumption that the nanorods are perfect cylinders is an approximation because transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of chemically synthesized nanorods indicate that the nanorods are only approximately cylindrical, as they have “end-caps” with visible curvature on their ends. This approximation will introduce some error as it has been shown that end-cap geometry has an impact on the optical scattering spectra of nanorods. (48, 52) We also assumed that the LSPR peak shift, ΔλLSPR, resulting from a bound analyte is proportional to the total LSPR shift that is expected if the entire surrounding medium increased to the RI of the analyte. The proportionality constant is the ratio of the analyte volume to the total sensing volume of the nanorod. This assumption yields the following relationship: (6) where VS is the total sensing volume of the nanorod, VD is the volume of the detected analyte, S(r) is the spatially dependent RI sensitivity of the nanoparticle, and r is the distance of the bound molecule from the surface of the nanorod. Because the RI sensitivity decreases away from the nanoparticle surface, the sensing volume is defined as the fixed volume surrounding the nanorod that contains 95% of its sensitivity. Recognizing that the optical mass of the bound molecules is responsible for inducing the observed LSPR shifts, the optical mass increase induced by bound analyte is defined as the product VD·ΔRI, where VD is the volume of analyte bound to the nanorod and ΔRI is the difference between the RI of the analyte and that of the surrounding medium. In the case where the approximate size of the analyte is known, the detection volume VD can be replaced with the product N·VA where VA is the volume of the analyte molecule and N is the number of bound molecules to the nanorod. Substituting this parameter in eq 6 and rearranging for ΔλLSPR yields an expression relating the measured peak shift of the LSPR spectrum to the optical detection mass: (7)
Solving eq 7 for N yields an expression that can be used to translate an observed LSPR peak shift into the number of bound molecules. (8)
In order to determine the MDL of the system, we replace ΔλLSPR in eq 8 with U, the uncertainty of the optical system in detecting wavelength shifts. Thus, the right-hand side of eq 8 becomes an expression of the bound optical mass that would induce the minimum detectable LSPR wavelength shift. In this case, solving for N yields an expression for LM, the MDL of the system in terms of the minimum detectable number of bound biomolecules. (9) where LM is a function of the length l and diameter d of the nanorod. From eq 9, we observe that the function LM is determined by several parameters on the right-hand side. Careful examination of these parameters is required to fully understand the dependence of each on the nanorod geometry and the effect each has on the overall MDL of the system. We note that LM is dependent upon the detection system employed for measuring the LSPR shifts of single nanoparticles because of the dependence on the peak measurement uncertainty U. LM is also a function of the spatially dependent RI sensitivity S(r) of the nanoparticle, where r is the location of the bound molecule with respect to the surface of the nanorod.
In order to determine the function LM analytically, we next sought to define the parameters U and S(r) based solely on the length and diameter of the nanorod, as follows: first, we utilized a model developed by Kuwata and co-workers to approximate the wavelength-dependent scattering cross section (Csca) of gold nanorods as a function of nanorod geometry. This model provides the complete LSPR scattering spectrum of the nanorod with a simple analytical formula based on nanorod length and diameter. The model is based on fits to finite-difference time-domain with the depolarization factor calculated by electrostatic approximation. (51) We employed this formula to determine the location of the LSPR peak (λ*) and scattering cross section Csca at the peak wavelength for nanorods of arbitrary length and diameter. A second analytical model, based on Gans’s extension of Mie theory that simulates LSPR spectra as a function of the nanorod aspect ratio, (53-55) was also used to simulate spectra as a means of validation. These two models provided consistent results within the geometric range of nanorods studied (length 50−100 nm and diameter 15−50 nm). These predictions were then further verified experimentally by comparison to scattering spectra of individual, chemically synthesized nanorods as shown in Figure 1. The good agreement between experimentally collected LSPR spectra and simulated spectra further indicates the utility of the analytical model.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Comparison of simulated versus experimental spectra. Scattering spectra collected from single nanorods from synthesized batches characterized by TEM to be (63.3 ± 8.2) × (24.9 ± 4.9) nm (n = 319, yellow dotted line) and (74 ± 9) × (33 ± 6) nm (n > 100, green dotted line). Simulated spectra for nanorods with dimensions of 64.5 × 24.7 nm (blue line) and 75 × 32 nm (red line) via the Kuwata method are also shown.

It has been shown that LSPR shifts induced by local RI have a strong distance dependence as a result of the exponential decrease in field enhancement further from the nanoparticle surface. (26) This distance dependence of sensitivity has been experimentally measured for nanospheres (56) as well as anisotropic triangular nanoparticles. (57) Additionally, it has been shown that the LSPR associated electric field is enhanced near the ends of nanorods. (29, 30) These observations suggest that the location at which a target analyte binds to the nanorod (i.e., along the sides or at the ends) will affect the magnitude of the induced LSPR shift. The detector−analyte system described in this work provides reasonable certainty in estimating the average binding distance, which is determined by the length of the receptor conjugated to the nanorod (biotin in the experimental case tested herein) and its binding site. Hence, we model sensitivity as being a function solely of the distance r from the surface of the nanorod S(r). The effect of this assumption is that the model effectively outputs the LSPR response of the average bound analyte at a fixed distance r from the surface of the nanorod. This is a simplification of the physical phenomenon because of the known complexity of the electric field enhancement distribution. Nevertheless, this model is the closest representation to the actual detection experiments because the actual binding locations cannot be controlled nor can the fraction of analytes that bind along the nanorod ends versus sides be accurately estimated.
With these assumptions clarified, we sought to generate an analytical function that describes S(r) purely as a function of nanorod geometry. This was accomplished by first experimentally measuring S(r) for several nanorod geometries spanning the dimensions of interest. This was done by using a procedure previously reported to probe the sensing volume of gold nanospheres by adsorbing sequential layers of oppositely charged polyelectrolytes to the nanoparticle surface. (14) These experiments provided data on the dependence of S(r) on nanorod geometry. These data were then curve-fit to describe S(r) for nanorods of arbitrary length and diameter. From this fit, the sensing volume of the nanorod VS and the decay length of electric field enhancement ld were also determined as a function of nanorod geometry. VS is defined as the fixed distance from the nanorod surface containing 95% of S(r), and the decay length is the distance from the nanorod surface at which the electric field enhancement is reduced by a factor of e. Figure 2 shows the excellent agreement obtained between the model and experimental data. Details of this fitting procedure are further described in the Supporting Information. With the results of this fit, it is possible to write every parameter on the right-hand side of eq 8 as an analytical function of the length and diameter of the nanorod such that the MDL, LM, of an arbitrary nanorod can be analytically estimated from the length and diameter of the nanorod. (10) where VS is the sensing volume, VA is the analyte volume, ΔRI is the RI difference between the analyte and the surrounding medium, Usystem is the peak measurement uncertainty resulting from uncertainty in the physical detection of the LSPR peak, Ufit is peak determination uncertainty due to data fitting, S0 is the bulk RI sensitivity, r is the distance from the nanorod surface that the analyte binds, and ld is the decay length of the resonant electric field.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Right axis: experimental wavelength shift of a nanorod (63.3 ± 8.2 nm × 24.9 ± 4.9 nm) as a function of deposited polyelectrolyte thickness (red dots) and shifts predicted by eq 7 (green line). Left axis: corresponding calculated distance dependence of the nanorod LSPR sensitivity (blue line).

Equation 10 is especially useful because it allows an analysis of the overall performance of a single nanoparticle based on a variety of parameters, only one of which is the nanoparticle bulk RI sensitivity S0. We emphasize this point because much work in the field has been devoted to synthesizing nanoparticles with different geometries and compositions in order to optimize the RI sensitivity of the nanoparticle. (45, 58, 59) Clearly, the nanoparticle bulk sensitivity is an important contributor to the overall MDL; however, it is not necessarily the most important. In fact, Miller et al. have shown that the bulk RI sensitivities of nanoparticles can be predicted from the wavelength of the LSPR peak, independent of nanoparticle shape. (60, 61) The parameter U is also clearly important in determining MDL but has largely been ignored on discussions of MDL. (49) Obviously the sensitivity of the detection system depends not only on the signal generated by the nanoparticles but also how precisely it can be measured. This parameter is primarily dependent on optical detection system parameters and data analysis techniques. However, U also depends on nanoparticle geometry because spectra for nanoparticles with higher Csca can be measured more accurately due to their increased scattering signal as seen in eq 10. Other parameters, such as the effective sensing volume of the nanoparticles (i.e., the electric field enhancement localization) can vary a great deal across geometries and have a large impact on the sensing characteristics of a nanoparticle. Nanoparticles with more confined electric field enhancements maintain smaller sensing volumes, resulting in larger shifts upon analyte binding within the sensing volume. However, nanoparticles with smaller detection volumes have a smaller dynamic range because they saturate upon the binding of fewer analytes. The proposed model offers a means to collectively analyze the effects of these parameters on overall sensor performance to deduce the optimal nanoparticle geometry for an LSPR sensor that is designed for a specific application.
Figure 3A shows the theoretical MDL for streptavidin binding to biotin decorated gold nanorods as predicted by eq 10 for single nanorods of arbitrary dimensions when measured in the described micro-spectroscopy system for which U has been previously characterized. We chose this analyte−receptor pair because their interaction is one of the best characterized and most commonly used model receptor−analyte systems. The simulation was restricted to nanoparticles that have LSPR peak wavelengths in the range of 300−900 nm because that is the range observable in the microspectroscopy system. We also applied a minimum SNR threshold of 30 to exclude particles with small Csca that cannot produce enough scattered light to be visualized in the dark-field microscopy setup. For this reason, no data are shown for nanorods with LSPR peaks outside of this range or with SNR below the cutoff of 30. We assumed the streptavidin molecules have a volume (62) of 114 nm3 and RI of 1.57. (63) From Figure 3A, we can see that nanorods with lengths between 55 and 65 nm and diameters between 25 and 33 nm offer the lowest MDL of ∼18 streptavidin molecules. It is important to note that the nanorod MDLs predicted by eq 10 are a monotonic function of several detection system and analyte parameters. Although the absolute value of the MDL will vary across detection systems and receptor−analyte pairs, the relative performance of a nanorod with a specified geometry will not vary, so that once the optimal rod geometry has been identified for a target analyte it will always offer the lowest MDL across detection systems and receptor−ligand configurations.

Figure 3

Figure 3. (A) Calculated molecular limits of detection for gold nanorods of arbitrary dimension based on eq 10. (B) Composite figures of merit (FOM) for nanorods of arbitrary dimensions. The composite FOM is calculated as the maximum number of bound molecules divided by the minimum number of detectable molecules. The surrounding gray regions in both are indicative of nanorod geometries that were not considered in this model because they either had resonances outside the visible spectrum or had scattering cross sections that are insufficient to collect spectra with SNR greater than 30.

In addition to the absolute MDL, the dynamic range (DR) is an important figure-of-merit (FOM) of a biomolecular sensor. For the purposes of this model, the DR is defined as the theoretical maximum number of analyte molecules that are detectable by a single nanorod. This definition was chosen because it is consistent with the model output, which is quantified as the number of bound molecules. The DR was determined by calculating the total surface area available for binding and dividing it by the footprint of a bound analyte molecule. This value was then scaled by a factor of 0.9, which assumes a hexagonal packing density of hard spheres yielding the highest possible coverage that could be achieved in practice. By this definition, a larger nanorod will obviously exhibit a higher DR because of its larger surface area. However, larger nanorods also tend to have higher MDLs because of the increased sensing volume. To balance these considerations, we calculate a composite FOM for nanorods that includes both the DR and MDL of these nanorod plasmonic sensors operating in the single nanorod mode. The composite FOM is calculated simply as the ratio of the DR versus its MDL. Figure 3B shows the composite FOM for nanorods of arbitrary dimensions. Figure 3B shows that rods with a length of 85 nm and a diameter of 40 nm offer the highest composite FOM with the potential to bind ∼35 times as many molecules as is required to generate its lowest detectable signal. So although nanorods of those dimensions may exhibit a MDL of ∼22, their higher dynamic range indicates they may be more useful as a streptavidin sensor over a wider range of analyte concentrations.

Experimental Application of Model

To experimentally test the results provided by the model, gold nanorods were synthesized with dimensions that were as close to the geometry predicted by eq 9 (and visually represented by Figure 3A) to have the lowest streptavidin MDL. To experimentally test the predictions of the model, streptavidin binding experiments were performed using biotin-functionalized gold nanorods that were shown by TEM to have a length of 63.3 ± 8.2 nm and a diameter of 24.9 ± 4.9 nm (n = 319) (Figure 4). Equation 10 calculates that these rods have a mean MDL of 20 molecules and mean FOM of 22.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Left: TEM of rods used in this study. Nanorod length is measured to be 63.3 ± 8.2 nm and diameter 24.9 ± 4.9 nm (n = 319). Scale bar corresponds to 50 nm. Right: LSPR peak shift of individual, biotin-activated gold nanorods versus concentration of streptavidin. Open circles are the mean LSPR shift of approximately 15 nanorods per measurement at each concentration, and the error bars indicate 95% confidence interval. The solid line is a sigmoidal fit to the data. The dotted line indicates where the fit line crosses 0.3 nm shift, the measurement detection uncertainty as calculated above. This occurs at a concentration of 160 pM.

A dose−response curve was determined by incubating identical samples of biotin-functionalized gold nanorods that were chemisorbed on glass slides in streptavidin solutions that spanned a range of protein concentration. Figure 4 (right panel) shows the steady-state LSPR shift of single nanorods as a function of streptavidin concentration. A sigmoidal fit was applied to these data, and the concentration at which the fit crosses the LSPR peak measurement uncertainty of 0.3 nm was defined as the experimental detection limit. For the experiments shown in Figure 4, the detection limit is 160 pM.
To investigate the relationship between the experimental detection limit measured by analyte concentration and the MDL predicted by eq 10, we specifically looked at the detection of 100 pM streptavidin. Figure 5 shows fits to scattering spectra collected from a single nanorod incubated in 100 pM streptavidin. The blue line is the nanorod LSPR scattered spectrum in water, the red line is the spectrum after the binding of biotin, and the black line is the spectrum after incubation in 100 pM streptavidin. The ∼3 nm shift between the blue and green lines observed upon biotin functionalization is consistent with the adsorption of a thin dielectric layer. The length of the biotin−amine is estimated to be 2.39 nm (Chem3d, Cambridgesoft) and the SAM to which the biotin is conjugated has a thickness of 2.78 nm and RI of 1.464. (64) Using eq 6 to simulate the LSPR response of the addition of dielectric layers yields an expected LSPR peak shift of 3.59 nm. This value is in good agreement with the experimental mean LSPR shift of 3.23 ± 1.2 nm observed upon the incubation of biotin for all nanorods used in the streptavidin detection experiments.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Fits to scattering spectra of a single nanorod in water (blue), after biotin conjugation (green), and subsequently in 100 pM streptavidin (red). The 0.52 nm shift corresponds to approximately 27 streptavidin molecules by eq 8.

A 0.52 nm shift was observed upon incubation of the biotin-functionalized gold nanorods in 100 pM streptavidin, which translates to ∼27 streptavidin molecules bound by a single nanorod, by use of eq 8. Lower streptavidin concentrations were tested in order to establish the detection limit in terms of concentration but did not yield results that were statistically significant from negative control experiments, (19) so the lowest streptavidin concentration that was experimentally detected is 100 pM. This experimentally detected minimum of approximately 27 molecules is reasonably close to the theoretical MDL of 20 streptavidin molecules per nanorod predicted by the model for the nanorods used. Thus, by utilizing the proposed model (eq 10), specifically, to select the optimal nanorod geometry for streptavidin detection, we are able to observe binding in the picomolar range. To our knowledge, this is the lowest reported concentration of biomolecule detected with a single particle LSPR sensor.
As a further check of the relevance of the MDLs predicted by our model, we observed that the mean LSPR shift at saturation is 5.4 nm (Figure 4). Using eq 8, we calculate that this shift arises from the binding of approximately 280 streptavidin molecules to the nanorod surface. For the nanorods used in these experiments, approximately 8000 nm2 of biotin-activated surface is available for the binding of streptavidin molecules. Each streptavidin molecule is a tetramer of four identical biotin binding subunits, and the entire tetramer is roughly ellipsoidal with axes of 5.4 nm × 5.8 nm × 4.8 nm. (65, 66) Thus, the footprint that a streptavidin molecule would occupy on the binding surface is approximately 25 nm2. In this orientation, a maximum of only 320 molecules would be expected to fit on the nanorod surface. Approximating the streptavidin molecules as hard spheres, the model of random sequential adsorption (67) predicts a packing ratio of 0.54, which would translate to only 170 bound molecules, whereas the highly ordered method of hexagonal packing predicts a packing ratio of 0.9, allowing for up to 290 streptavidin molecules. Therefore, the 280 molecules bound at saturation as determined by eq 8 is reasonable and suggests a more ordered arrangement of bound streptavidin molecules.
Additionally, we compare the mass of streptavidin presumed bound at saturation by eq 8 with that of streptavidin adlayers that were experimentally measured. Densities of 240 and 231 ng/cm2 have been experimentally determined for streptavidin layers formed over biotin layers on flat substrates. (68, 69) These binding densities yield an estimated ∼220 bound streptavidin molecules to the available nanorod binding area of 8000 nm2. Again, these estimates are slightly lower than the 280 molecules estimated from eq 8 to be responsible for the 5.29 nm shift observed at saturation but are close enough to justify the validity of our calculations.

Prospects for Single Molecule Detection

We systematically explored the parameters in eq 10 within physically realistic limits to determine which parameters can be modified in order to develop an LSPR sensor with a single molecule MDL.
The product VA·ΔRI is a parameter of the analyte and of the surrounding medium. For proteins with a RI commonly near 1.57, detection in water (RI = 1.33) yields a typical ΔRI of 0.24. By drying the samples and taking measurements in air (RI = 1.00), ΔRI can be increased to 0.57. Thus, a factor of 2.4 improvement in MDL is possible through this method. We note that this approach would preclude real-time detection and require further processing steps of the sample, which detracts from the strength of label-free detection. However, this drying methodology has been successfully utilized by Van Duyne and co-workers. (16)
The total sensing volume VS of the nanoparticle is determined by the nanoparticle shape and decay length ld. Smaller VS and ld are indicative of nanostructures with small, intense electric field enhancements. In general, the sensing volume will vary proportionally with the cube of the decay length simply because it is a three-dimensional volume subtended by the decay length. In the case of rods, smaller rods have shorter decay lengths. So ideally, one would want to use the smallest nanorods possible. However, smaller rods also exhibit smaller scattering cross sections Csca, which means they scatter less light under dark-field illumination. For rods in particular, Csca varies approximately as the square of the rod length and proportionately to rod diameter. (51) So if the length and diameter of a nanorod were both reduced by a factor of 2, Csca would be reduced by about a factor of 8. On the other hand, to maintain an adequate SNR of the collected spectra, the intensity of the illumination source must be increased. An upper limit to this intensity exists because at some point the nanorods will melt due to photothermal effects. (70, 71) The use of a broadband illumination source, such as a supercontinuum fiber laser, would allow the complete scattering spectrum to be collected and would provide a light output that is 6−10-fold more intense than the tungsten filament used in the experimental setup used here. Hence, eq 10 predicts that a physically realistic increase in illumination intensity by a factor of 10 could enable the visualization of smaller nanorods, effectively reducing the size of observable nanorods by about 1.5, thereby reducing the sensing volume and decay length, which would ultimately reduce the MDL by a factor of 7.
The decay length of the electric field enhancement ld is determined by the geometry of the nanoparticles. Equation 10 assumes a uniform decay length for nanorods. The actual electric field enhancement has a more complicated geometry and, in particular, has been shown to exhibit larger enhancements near the ends of the rod. (30, 55, 72) Thus, analyte molecules that bind near the end of the nanorod will cause a greater LSPR shift than those binding on the lateral portion. For this reason, eq 10 is applicable to a MDL that stems from the LSPR response of individual biomolecules that are spatially averaged around the nanorod surface. It is reasonable to make this approximation for the experiments described here because the streptavidin molecules are adsorbed a fixed distance r from the nanorod surface, but no further spatial localization is possible. It has been shown through finite element modeling that the ends of nanorods exhibit much higher field enhancement than the spatial average. (73) Thus, if analyte binding can be limited to only within these regions, it is reasonable to assume a concurrent sensitivity increase greater than a factor of 10 due to the reduction of sensing volume. Some recent reports offer compelling end-to-end assembly of nanorods, (74) which could soon provide a route to site-specific functionalization of nanorods.
The binding distance r is the physical distance that the analyte binds from the surface of the nanoparticle. It is determined by the length of the receptor, which is approximated to be 2.4 nm for the experiments presented herein. EDC-NHS coupling is used to conjugate amine-terminated biotin to the carboxyl-terminated monolayer applied to the gold surface. We employ this binding moiety because it offers easy translation to other amine-terminated receptors, such as antibodies or aptamers. (36) It would be possible to employ a physically shorter receptor that would cause the target analyte to bind closer to the surface of the nanoparticle where the field enhancement, and thus RI sensitivity, is greater. For example, using thiol-terminated biotin has been successfully employed as a receptor for streptavidin detection with single nanoparticles. (75) This would reduce r by as much as a factor of 2, which in return reduces the overall MDL by a factor of exp(ld−1). For the case of nanorods with decay length ld generally on the order of 10−20 nm, this results in a factor of 1.1 improvement (i.e., 10% decrease in MDL). In most practical situations, however, the size of the receptor−analyte pair is likely to be significantly larger than the model biotin−streptavidin pair used here (e.g., antibody−protein), so that some of the gains realized from the optimization of the parameters discussed here are likely to be offset by the size of the receptor−analyte pair. Nevertheless, these results suggest that minimizing the size of the receptor while retaining high binding affinity and specificity for its analyte is an important factor in extracting the minimum MDL of which LSPR sensors are capable. In this regard, the use of smaller receptors such as aptamers or smaller, engineered antibody fragments such as single chain antibodies are preferable to intact antibodies, which to date are the most commonly used class of receptors in biosensors.
The bulk RI sensitivity of a nanostructure S0 is dependent on its size, shape, and material composition. However, Miller and Lazarides have observed that S0 is correlated with the LSPR peak wavelength, regardless of nanoparticle shape. (60, 61) Thus, for a nanostructure of known material composition, its bulk RI sensitivity can be predicted simply by characterizing its LSPR peak. Because longer wavelength resonances exhibit higher bulk RI sensitivities, the highest sensitivities will be from particles with LSPR peaks in the red end of the spectrum. Assuming the detection is to remain in the visible light spectrum, LSPR peaks at wavelengths up to 800 nm could be measured. Thus, bulk RI sensitivities as high as 600 nm/RIU could be expected. This is more than a two-fold improvement over the 260 nm/RIU sensitivity of nanorods used in this study. However, it is worth noting that, for the case of nanorods, longer resonances correspond to larger rods with larger sensing volumes and longer decay lengths. Equation 10 was used to balance the contributions for these effects to optimize sensor performance using the nanorod geometry. Thus, for this factor of 2 increase to be realistic, an alternative nanoparticle geometry would be sought that could indeed have a resonance far into the red without such large geometries. Additional sensitivity could be achieved by structuring the sensor to operate in near-IR wavelengths where the bulk RI sensitivities are higher, although the optics and instrumentation could be potentially more challenging. Also, silver nanoparticles exhibit sensitivities typically 1.5-fold higher than gold particles at similar resonant wavelengths. However, as mentioned above, the high reactivity of silver makes it less suitable as a sensor for use in biologically relevant media.
The peak measurement uncertainties Ufit and Usystem represent the most direct way at improving sensor detection limits. Obviously, the smaller the wavelength shifts that can be reliably detected, the greater the accuracy and lower the overall MDL will be. For the system used in these experiments, Ufit was found to be approximately 0.02 nm while Usystem was found to be 0.3 nm. Thus, the contribution to MDL is dominated by Usystem, whereas Ufit acts more as an absolute limit for noise levels as discussed above. We performed an in-depth analysis of the contributing factors to Usystem and found that a large portion of the uncertainty is the result of physical system stability. (49) In particular, it was found that stability in microscope focus and sample stage drift account for the largest contributions in uncertainty. It is proposed that, by using active feedback hardware to control microscope focus and XY-sample location, Usystem can be reduced to the order of 0.005 nm. (49) Thus, the total uncertainty would then be dominated by Ufit resulting in a 15-fold decrease in MDL.
These possible enhancement factors are displayed in Table 1. From here, we see that the estimated possible enhancement factors could potentially provide an 800-fold improvement over the 18 molecule detection limit described herein. Thus, we show that the ultimate limit of label-free detection of single molecule binding events is theoretically possible within the framework of eq 10.
Table 1. Theoretical Improvement Factors That Can Reduce the Molecular Detection Limit of a Label-Free, Single Particle LSPR Sensor Based on the Modulation of Parameters from Equation 10
technique summaryvariable from eq 10 involvedpotential enhancement factor
dryingΔRI2.4
brighter illumination sourceCsca, VS, and ld7
shorter binding moietyr1.1
LSPR peaks in IRS02
silver nanoparticlesS01.5
high spectral resolution detection systemUsystem15
 total∼800
In conclusion, we have presented a simple mathematical model that analytically relates physical detection parameters of a single nanoparticle LSPR sensor to the minimum number of detectable analyte molecules. The utility of this model is two-fold. It can be used to select the optimum nanoparticle geometry for a desired detection system completely analytically, forgoing otherwise necessary comprehensive, experimental characterization. The minimum number of detectable molecules can be estimated as well as the number of molecules detected at saturation, which provides insight into the dynamic range of the system. Additionally, the model provides a framework through which the effects of potential system improvements can be assessed. Analysis of the theoretical limits of the dependent variables of eq 10 indicates that an 800-fold reduction of the MDL for the detection system described herein is possible. Clearly, not all of these potential avenues for MDL reduction can be realized concurrently. However, because our current MDL is 18 streptavidin molecules, we propose it is theoretically possible to design a system capable of detecting single molecule binding events by careful optimization of system parameters, as described herein.

Experimental Section

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Materials

Hydrogen tetrachloroaurate trihydrate (HAuCl4), sodium borohydride, ascorbic acid, phosphate buffered saline (PBS) tablets, poly(allylamine hydrochloride) (PAH), poly(4-styrenesulfonate, sodium salt) (PSS), silver nitrate, and mercaptohexadecanoic acid (MHA) were purchased from Sigma. Glass coverslips, ethanol, methanol, sodium chloride (NaCl), and hydrochloric acid (HCl) were purchased from VWR. Cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) was purchased from Fluka. (+)-Biotinyl-3,6,9-trioxaundecanediamine (biotin−amine), 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide (EDC), N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS), and streptavidin were purchased from Pierce. Mercaptopropyltriethoxysilane (MPTES) was purchased from Gelest. (1-Mercaptoundec-11-yl)tri(ethylene glycol) (EG3SH) was purchased from Prochimia. Distilled water purified by a reverse-osmosis filtration system (18 MΩ·cm, PureFlow Inc.) was used for all experiments.

Nanorod Synthesis

Gold nanorods were chemically synthesized by a seed-mediated growth procedure (34, 76) similar to that described previously. (19, 36) Spherical gold seed particles were prepared as follows: to a mixture of 7.5 mL of 0.1 M CTAB in water and 0.250 mL of 0.01 M HAuCl4 was added under vigorous stirring 0.6 mL of chilled 0.01 M NaBH4. The brown suspension was then gently heated and stirred for a few minutes. Gold nanorods were synthesized in a water bath at 29 °C as follows. To 95 mL of 0.1 M CTAB in water were added 0.6 mL of silver nitrate and 0.64 mL of 0.1 M ascorbic acid. The mixture was swirled after the addition of each reagent to ensure mixing. Sixty microliters of gold seed particles was added, and the mixture was inverted and allowed to sit overnight, resulting in a purple-colored suspension of gold nanorods. Excess CTAB was removed from the gold rod suspension by centrifugation twice at 4500 rpm for 30 min. The gold nanorods were resuspended in water to a total volume of 10 mL and stored at room temperature until further use.

Polyelectrolyte Deposition

Number 1 thickness rectangular 9 × 26 mm coverglasses were cleaned via the same method reported previously by Nath et al. for producing nanosphere biosensor chips. (15) First, they were cleaned by sonication for 20 min in a 1:1 HCl/methanol mixture. Then the coverglasses were rinsed with water and ethanol and then dried overnight at 65 °C. They were then incubated in a solution of 10% (v/v) MPTES in ethanol for 15 min followed by rinsing in ethanol and drying at 120 °C for 3 h. The coverglasses were incubated in the nanorod suspension overnight to ensure optimal coverage. The resulting nanorod-covered substrates were immersed in a solution of PAH (0.003 monomol/L in 1 M NaCl) for 30 min, rinsed with water, rinsed with 1 M NaCl, then immersed in a solution of PSS (0.003 monomol/L in 1 M NaCl). This procedure was repeated 13 times to deposit a total of 26 polymer layers. Each polyelectrolyte layer deposited is approximately 2 nm thick and has a RI of 1.52. (14, 77, 78) Between each polymer incubation step, an extinction spectrum was collected with a Varian Cary 300Bio UV−visible spectrophotometer. In this manner, plots were generated of λ*versus adsorbed layer thickness for two samples from each of the four different geometries for a total of eight plots. These eight plots were then used as the basis for the determination of S(r).

Single Particle Detection

Scattering spectra were collected from individual nanorods using the Zeiss Axiovert 200 (Plan Neofluor 100X objective) dark-field illumination microspectroscopy system described previously. (19, 50) Scattering spectra of individual nanorods were collected by imaging the microscope field of view to a line-imaging spectrometer (Acton Research SpectraPro 2150i). Streptavidin detection experiments with single gold nanorods were also performed as previously reported. (19) Briefly, the nanorods were immobilized onto 25 mm diameter, round No.1 glass coverslips, which were cleaned and incubated in MPTES as described above. The nanorod suspension was diluted in water to 1:15 (v/v), and then a 20 μL aliquot of the suspension was pipetted onto the center of the coverglass and immediately rinsed off with water. The nanorods were then modified by immersion of the chip in an ethanol solution of 0.5 mM EG3SH and 0.5 mM MHA. The EG3SH molecules of the mixed monolayer serve two purposes. They prevent nonspecific adsorption as well as modulate the surface density of the MHA molecules and hence of biotin that is subsequently chemically conjugated to the −COOH groups. Biotin was conjugated to the nanorods by incubating the SAM-functionalized nanorods in an aqueous solution of 0.4 M EDC and 0.1 M NHS for 7 min to convert the COOH groups to NHS esters. The chips were rinsed with water and were then immediately incubated in biotin−amine for 2 h and rinsed with water again. Streptavidin binding was performed by incubating the biotin-functionalized nanorods with a continuous flow of a streptavidin solution in PBS for 2 h. LSPR shifts were measured as the difference between the λ* of fits to the measured scattering spectra. To ensure the observed LSPR shifts resulted from specific interaction between biotin and streptavidin, controls for the binding experiments were performed by incubating biotin-functionalized gold nanorods in streptavidin solution that had been presaturated with excess (1 mM) free biotin. (19)

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

An in-depth derivation of the distance dependence of nanoparticle sensitivity to local refractive index is available. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Author
    • Ashutosh Chilkoti - Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 Email: [email protected]
  • Authors
    • Greg J. Nusz - Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708
    • Adam C. Curry - Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708
    • Stella M. Marinakos - Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708
    • Adam Wax - Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708

Acknowledgment

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This work was supported by a grant from the Centers for Disease Control (NCID; R01 CI-00097) to A.C. G.J.N. acknowledges the support of a graduate fellowship from the NIH through a Biotechnology training grant (GM8555) awarded to the Center of Biomolecular and Tissue Engineering at Duke University. The authors also wish to thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive suggestions that, we believe, helped improve this paper.

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 78 other publications.

  1. 1
    Yguerabide, J.; Yguerabide, E. E. Light-Scattering Submicroscopic Particles as Highly Fluorescent Analogs and Their Use as Tracer Labels in Clinical and Biological Applications. Ii. Experimental Characterization Anal. Biochem. 1998, 262, 157 176
  2. 2
    Alivisatos, P. The Use of Nanocrystals in Biological Detection Nat. Biotechnol. 2004, 22, 47 52
  3. 3
    Penn, S. G.; He, L.; Natan, M. J. Nanoparticles for Bioanalysis Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2003, 7, 609 615
  4. 4
    Iqbal, S. S.; Mayo, M. W.; Bruno, J. G.; Bronk, B. V.; Batt, C. A.; Chambers, J. P. A Review of Molecular Recognition Technologies for Detection of Biological Threat Agents Biosens. Bioelectron. 2000, 15, 549 578
  5. 5
    Mirkin, C. A.; Ivanisevic, A.; Taton, T. A.; Letsinger, R. L.; Viswanadham, G. PCR-Less Detection of Genomic DNA with Nanoparticle Probes. Abstracts of Papers; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 2001; Vol. 222, p U578.
  6. 6
    Schultz, D. A.; Mock, J. J.; Schultz, S.; Smith, D. R. Single-Target Molecule Detection with Nonbleaching Multicolor Optical Immunolabels Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2000, 97, 996 1001
  7. 7
    Mie, G. Beiträge Zur Optik Trüber Medien, Speziell Kolloidaler Metallösungen Ann. Phys. 1908, 25, 377 445
  8. 8
    Yguerabide, J.; Yguerabide, E. E. Light-Scattering Submicroscopic Particles as Highly Fluorescent Analogs and Their Use as Tracer Labels in Clinical and Biological Applications. I. Theory Anal. Biochem. 1998, 262, 137 156
  9. 9
    Kelly, K. L.; Coronado, E.; Zhao, L. L.; Schatz, G. C. The Optical Properties of Metal Nanoparticles: The Influence of Size, Shape, and Dielectric Environment J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 668 677
  10. 10
    Khlebtsov, N. G.; Trachuk, L. A.; Mel’nikov, A. G. The Effect of the Size, Shape, and Structure of Metal Nanoparticles on the Dependence of Their Optical Properties on the Refractive Index of a Disperse Medium Opt. Spectrosc. 2005, 98, 77 83
  11. 11
    Mock, J. J.; Barbic, M.; Smith, D. R.; Schultz, D. A.; Schultz, S. Shape Effects in Plasmon Resonance of Individual Colloidal Silver Nanoparticles J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 116
  12. 12
    Mock, J. J.; Smith, D. R.; Schultz, S. Local Refractive Index Dependence of Plasmon Resonance Spectra from Individual Nanoparticles Nano Lett. 2003, 3, 485 491
  13. 13
    Englebienne, P. Use of Colloidal Gold Surface Plasmon Resonance Peak Shift to Infer Affinity Constants from the Interactions between Protein Antigens and Antibodies Specific for Single or Multiple Epitopes Analyst 1998, 123, 1599 1603
  14. 14
    Nath, N.; Chilkoti, A. Label Free Colorimetric Biosensing Using Nanoparticles J. Fluoresc. 2004, 14, 377 389
  15. 15
    Nath, N.; Chilkoti, A. A Colorimetric Gold Nanoparticle Sensor to Interrogate Biomolecular Interactions in Real Time on a Surface Anal. Chem. 2002, 74, 504 509
  16. 16
    Haes, A. J.; Stuart, D. A.; Nie, S. M.; Van Duyne, R. P. Using Solution-Phase Nanoparticles, Surface-Confined Nanoparticle Arrays and Single Nanoparticles as Biological Sensing Platforms J. Fluoresc. 2004, 14, 355 367
  17. 17
    Frederix, F.; Friedt, J. M.; Choi, K. H.; Laureyn, W.; Campitelli, A.; Mondelaers, D.; Maes, G.; Borghs, G. Biosensing Based on Light Absorption of Nanoscaled Gold and Silver Particles Anal. Chem. 2003, 75, 6894 6900
  18. 18
    Dahlin, A.; Zach, M.; Rindzevicius, T.; Kall, M.; Sutherland, D. S.; Hook, F. Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance Sensing of Lipid-Membrane-Mediated Biorecognition Events J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 5043 5048
  19. 19
    Nusz, G. J.; Marinakos, S. M.; Curry, A. C.; Dahlin, A.; Höök, F.; Wax, A.; Chilkoti, A. Label-Free Plasmonic Detection of Biomolecular Binding by a Single Gold Nanorod Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 984 989
  20. 20
    Raschke, G.; Kowarik, S.; Franzl, T.; Sonnichsen, C.; Klar, T. A.; Feldmann, J.; Nichtl, A.; Kurzinger, K. Biomolecular Recognition Based on Single Gold Nanoparticle Light Scattering Nano Lett. 2003, 3, 935 938
  21. 21
    McFarland, A. D.; Van Duyne, R. P. Single Silver Nanoparticles as Real-Time Optical Sensors with Zeptomole Sensitivity Nano Lett. 2003, 3, 1057 1062
  22. 22
    Rindzevicius, T.; Alaverdyan, Y.; Dahlin, A.; Hook, F.; Sutherland, D. S.; Kall, M. Plasmonic Sensing Characteristics of Single Nanometric Holes Nano Lett. 2005, 5, 2335 2339
  23. 23
    Sherry, L. J.; Jin, R. C.; Mirkin, C. A.; Schatz, G. C.; Van Duyne, R. P. Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance Spectroscopy of Single Silver Triangular Nanoprisms Nano Lett. 2006, 6, 2060 2065
  24. 24
    van Dijk, M. A.; Lippitz, M.; Orrit, M. Far-Field Optical Microscopy of Single Metal Nanoparticles Acc. Chem. Res. 2005, 38, 594 601
  25. 25
    Sonnichsen, C.; Geier, S.; Hecker, N. E.; von Plessen, G.; Feldmann, J.; Ditlbacher, H.; Lamprecht, B.; Krenn, J. R.; Aussenegg, F. R.; Chan, V. Z. H.; Spatz, J. P.; Moller, M. Spectroscopy of Single Metallic Nanoparticles Using Total Internal Reflection Microscopy Appl. Phys. Lett. 2000, 77, 2949 2951
  26. 26
    Haes, A. J.; Van Duyne, R. P.; Zou, S. L.; Schatz, G. C. Nanoscale Optical Biosensor: Short Range Distance Dependence of the Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance of Noble Metal Nanoparticles J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 6961 6968
  27. 27
    Haes, A. J.; Van Duyne, R. P.; Zou, S. L.; Schatz, G. C. A Nanoscale Optical Biosensor: The Long Range Distance Dependence of the Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance of Noble Metal Nanoparticles J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 109 116
  28. 28
    Evanoff, D. D.; White, R. L.; Chumanov, G. Measuring the Distance Dependence of the Local Electromagnetic Field from Silver Nanoparticles J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 1522 1524
  29. 29
    Hao, E.; Schatz, G. C. Electromagnetic Fields around Silver Nanoparticles and Dimers J. Chem. Phys. 2004, 120, 357 366
  30. 30
    Imura, K.; Okamoto, H.; Nagahra, T. Plasmon Mode Imaging of Single Gold Nanorods J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 12730 12731
  31. 31
    Stenberg, E.; Persson, B.; Roos, H.; Urbaniczky, C. Quantitative Determination of Surface Concentration of Protein with Surface Plasmon Resonance Using Radiolabeled Proteins J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1991, 143, 513 526
  32. 32
    Vollmer, F.; Braun, D.; Libchaber, A.; Khoshsima, M.; Teraoka, I.; Arnold, S. Protein Detection by Optical Shift of a Resonant Microcavity Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002, 80, 4057 4059
  33. 33
    Chumanov, G.; Sokolov, K.; Gregory, B. W.; Cotton, T. M. Colloidal Metal Films as a Substrate for Surface-Enhanced Spectroscopy J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 9466 9471
  34. 34
    Nikoobakht, B.; El-Sayed, M. A. Preparation and Growth Mechanism of Gold Nanorods (NRs) Using Seed-Mediated Growth Method Chem. Mater. 2003, 15, 1957 1962
  35. 35
    Chen, C.-D.; Cheng, S.-F.; Chau, L.-K.; Wang, C. R. C. Sensing Capability of the Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance of Gold Nanorods Biosens. Bioelectron. 2007, 22, 926 932
  36. 36
    Marinakos, S. M.; Chen, S.; Chilkoti, A. Plasmonic Detection of a Model Analyte in Serum by a Gold Nanorod Sensor Anal. Chem. 2007, 79, 5278 5283
  37. 37
    Jana, N. R.; Gearheart, L.; Murphy, C. J. Wet Chemical Synthesis of High Aspect Ratio Cylindrical Gold Nanorods J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105, 4065 4067
  38. 38
    Busbee, B. D.; Obare, S. O.; Murphy, C. J. An Improved Synthesis of High-Aspect-Ratio Gold Nanorods Adv. Mater. 2003, 15, 414 416
  39. 39
    Sau, T. K.; Murphy, C. J. Room Temperature, High-Yield Synthesis of Multiple Shapes of Gold Nanoparticles in Aqueous Solution J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 8648 8649
  40. 40
    Link, S.; Mohamed, M. B.; El-Sayed, M. A. Simulation of the Optical Absorption Spectra of Gold Nanorods as a Function of Their Aspect Ratio and the Effect of the Medium Dielectric Constant J. Phys. Chem. B 1999, 103, 3073 3077
  41. 41
    Weissleder, R. A Clearer Vision for In Vivo Imaging Nat. Biotechnol. 2001, 19, 316 317
  42. 42
    Jackson, J. B.; Westcott, S. L.; Hirsch, L. R.; West, J. L.; Halas, N. J. Controlling the Surface Enhanced Raman Effect via the Nanoshell Geometry Appl. Phys. Lett. 2003, 82, 257 259
  43. 43
    Hanarp, P.; Kall, M.; Sutherland, D. S. Optical Properties of Short Range Ordered Arrays of Nanometer Gold Disks Prepared by Colloidal Lithography J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 5768 5772
  44. 44
    Aizpurua, J.; Hanarp, P.; Sutherland, D. S.; Kall, M.; Bryant, G. W.; de Abajo, F. J. G. Optical Properties of Gold Nanorings Phys. Rev. Lett. 2003, 90
  45. 45
    Raschke, G.; Brogl, S.; Susha, A. S.; Rogach, A. L.; Klar, T. A.; Feldmann, J.; Fieres, B.; Petkov, N.; Bein, T.; Nichtl, A.; Kurzinger, K. Gold Nanoshells Improve Single Nanoparticle Molecular Sensors Nano Lett. 2004, 4, 1853 1857
  46. 46
    Hafner, J. H.; Nehl, C. L.; Grady, N. K.; Goodrich, G. P.; Tam, F.; Halas, N. J. Scattering Spectra of Single Gold Nanoshells Nano Lett. 2004, 4, 2355 2359
  47. 47
    Novo, C.; Gomez, D.; Perez-Juste, J.; Zhang, Z. Y.; Petrova, H.; Reismann, M.; Mulvaney, P.; Hartland, G. V. Contributions from Radiation Damping and Surface Scattering to the Linewidth of the Longitudinal Plasmon Band of Gold Nanorods: A Single Particle Study Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2006, 8, 3540 3546
  48. 48
    Prescott, S. W.; Mulvaney, P. Gold Nanorod Extinction Spectra J. Appl. Phys. 2006, 99
  49. 49
    Curry, A.; Nusz, G.; Chilkoti, A.; Wax, A. Analysis of Total Uncertainty in Spectral Peak Measurements for Plasmonic Nanoparticle-Based Biosensors Appl. Opt. 2007, 46, 1931 1939
  50. 50
    Curry, A.; Nusz, G.; Chilkoti, A.; Wax, A. Substrate Effect on Refractive Index Dependence of Plasmon Resonance for Individual Silver Nanoparticles Observed Using Darkfield Micro-Spectroscopy Opt. Express 2005, 13, 2668 2677
  51. 51
    Kuwata, H.; Tamaru, H.; Esumi, K.; Miyano, K. Resonant Light Scattering from Metal Nanoparticles: Practical Analysis Beyond Rayleigh Approximation Appl. Phys. Lett. 2003, 83, 4625 4627
  52. 52
    Xu, X. D.; Cortie, M. B. Shape Change and Color Gamut in Gold Nanorods, Dumbbells, and Dog Bones Adv. Funct. Mater. 2006, 16, 2170 2176
  53. 53
    Yan, B. H.; Yang, Y.; Wang, Y. C. Comment On “Simulation of the Optical Absorption Spectra of Gold Nanorods as a Function of Their Aspect Ratio and the Effect of the Medium Dielectric Constant” J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 9159 9159
  54. 54
    Link, S.; El-Sayed, M. A.; Mohamed, M. B. Simulation of the Optical Absorption Spectra of Gold Nanorods as a Function of Their Aspect Ratio and the Effect of the Medium Dielectric Constant (Vol 103b, Pg 3073, 1999) J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 10531 10532
  55. 55
    Link, S.; Mohamed, M. B.; El-Sayed, M. A. Simulation of the Optical Absorption Spectra of Gold Nanorods as a Function of Their Aspect Ratio and the Effect of the Medium Dielectric Constant J. Phys. Chem. B 1999, 103, 3073 3077
  56. 56
    Nath, N.; Chilkoti, A. Label-Free Biosensing by Surface Plasmon Resonance of Nanoparticles on Glass: Optimization of Nanoparticle Size Anal. Chem. 2004, 76, 5370 5378
  57. 57
    Whitney, A. V.; Elam, J. W.; Zou, S. L.; Zinovev, A. V.; Stair, P. C.; Schatz, G. C.; Van Duyne, R. P. Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance Nanosensor: A High-Resolution Distance-Dependence Study Using Atomic Layer Deposition J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 20522 20528
  58. 58
    Hicks, E. M.; Zhang, X. Y.; Zou, S. L.; Lyandres, O.; Spears, K. G.; Schatz, G. C.; Van Duyne, R. P. Plasmonic Properties of Film over Nanowell Surfaces Fabricated by Nanosphere Lithography J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 22351 22358
  59. 59
    Haes, A. J.; Van Duyne, R. P. A Nanoscale Optical Biosensor: Sensitivity and Selectivity of an Approach Based on the Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance Spectroscopy of Triangular Silver Nanoparticles J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 10596 10604
  60. 60
    Miller, M. M.; Lazarides, A. A. Sensitivity of Metal Nanoparticle Plasmon Resonance Band Position to the Dielectric Environment as Observed in Scattering J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. 2006, 8, S239 S249
  61. 61
    Miller, M. M.; Lazarides, A. A. Sensitivity of Metal Nanoparticle Surface Plasmon Resonance to the Dielectric Environment J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 21556 21565
  62. 62
    Neish, C. S.; Martin, I. L.; Henderson, R. M.; Edwardson, J. M. Direct Visualization of Ligand-Protein Interactions Using Atomic Force Microscopy Br. J. Pharmacol. 2002, 135, 1943 1950
  63. 63
    Jung, L. S.; Campbell, C. T.; Chinowsky, T. M.; Mar, M. N.; Yee, S. S. Quantitative Interpretation of the Response of Surface Plasmon Resonance Sensors to Adsorbed Films Langmuir 1998, 14, 5636 5648
  64. 64
    Chien, F. C.; Chen, S. J. Direct Determination of the Refractive Index and Thickness of a Biolayer Based on Coupled Waveguide-Surface Plasmon Resonance Mode Opt. Lett. 2006, 31, 187 189
  65. 65
    Weber, P. C.; Ohlendorf, D. H.; Wendoloski, J. J.; Salemme, F. R. Structural Origins of High-Affinity Biotin Binding to Streptavidin Science 1989, 243, 85 88
  66. 66
    Hendrickson, W. A.; Pahler, A.; Smith, J. L.; Satow, Y.; Merritt, E. A.; Phizackerley, R. P. Crystal-Structure of Core Streptavidin Determined from Multiwavelength Anomalous Diffraction of Synchrotron Radiation Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1989, 86, 2190 2194
  67. 67
    Hinrichsen, E. L.; Feder, J.; Jossang, T. Geometry of Random Sequential Adsorption J. Stat. Phys. 1986, 44, 793 827
  68. 68
    Jung, L. S.; Nelson, K. E.; Stayton, P. S.; Campbell, C. T. Binding and Dissociation Kinetics of Wild-Type and Mutant Streptavidins on Mixed Biotin-Containing Alkylthiolate Monolayers Langmuir 2000, 16, 9421 9432
  69. 69
    Kim, Y. P.; Hong, M. Y.; Kim, J.; Oh, E.; Shon, H. K.; Moon, D. W.; Kim, H. S.; Lee, T. G. Quantitative Analysis of Surface-Immobilized Protein by Tof-Sims: Effects of Protein Orientation and Trehalose Additive Anal. Chem. 2007, 79, 1377 1385
  70. 70
    Link, S.; El-Sayed, M. A. Spectroscopic Determination of the Melting Energy of a Gold Nanorod J. Chem. Phys. 2001, 114, 2362 2368
  71. 71
    Chang, S. S.; Shih, C. W.; Chen, C. D.; Lai, W. C.; Wang, C. R. C. The Shape Transition of Gold Nanorods Langmuir 1999, 15, 701 709
  72. 72
    Link, S.; El-Sayed, M. A. Spectral Properties and Relaxation Dynamics of Surface Plasmon Electronic Oscillations in Gold and Silver Nanodots and Nanorods J. Phys. Chem. B 1999, 103, 8410 8426
  73. 73
    Muskens, O. L.; Bachelier, G.; Del Fatti, N.; Vallee, F.; Brioude, A.; Jiang, X. C.; Pileni, M. P. Quantitative Absorption Spectroscopy of a Single Gold Nanorod J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 8917 8921
  74. 74
    Park, H. S.; Agarwal, A.; Kotov, N. A.; Lavrentovich, O. D. Controllable Side-by-Side and End-to-End Assembly of Au Nanorods by Lyotropic Chromonic Materials Langmuir 2008, 24, 13833 13837
  75. 75
    Dahlin, A. B.; Tegenfeldt, J. O.; Hook, F. Improving the Instrumental Resolution of Sensors Based on Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance Anal. Chem. 2006, 78, 4416 4423
  76. 76
    Jana, N. R.; Gearheart, L.; Murphy, C. J. Seed-Mediated Growth Approach for Shape-Controlled Synthesis of Spheroidal and Rod-Like Gold Nanoparticles Using a Surfactant Template Adv. Mater. 2001, 13, 1389 1393
  77. 77
    Caruso, F.; Lichtenfeld, H.; Giersig, M.; Mohwald, H. Electrostatic Self-Assembly of Silica Nanoparticle-Polyelectrolyte Multilayers on Polystyrene Latex Particles J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 8523 8524
  78. 78
    Buscher, K.; Graf, K.; Ahrens, H.; Helm, C. A. Influence of Adsorption Conditions on the Structure of Polyelectrolyte Multilayers Langmuir 2002, 18, 3585 3591

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article is cited by 224 publications.

  1. Jiacheng He, Siqi Wu, Wu Chen, Albert Kim, Wen Yang, Chuanyu Wang, Zhengyang Gu, Jialiang Shen, Siyuan Dai, Weiqiang Chen, Pengyu Chen. Calligraphy of Nanoplasmonic Bioink-Based Multiplex Immunosensor for Precision Immune Monitoring and Modulation. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2023, 15 (43) , 50047-50057. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.3c11417
  2. Stephen Palani, John P. Kenison, Sinan Sabuncu, Tao Huang, Fehmi Civitci, Sadik Esener, Xiaolin Nan. Multispectral Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance (msLSPR) Reveals and Overcomes Spectral and Sensing Heterogeneities of Single Gold Nanoparticles. ACS Nano 2023, 17 (3) , 2266-2278. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.2c08702
  3. Jiacheng He, Lang Zhou, Gangtong Huang, Jialiang Shen, Wu Chen, Chuanyu Wang, Albert Kim, Zhuoyu Zhang, Weiqiang Cheng, Siyuan Dai, Feng Ding, Pengyu Chen. Enhanced Label-Free Nanoplasmonic Cytokine Detection in SARS-CoV-2 Induced Inflammation Using Rationally Designed Peptide Aptamer. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2022, 14 (43) , 48464-48475. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c14748
  4. Adrianna N. Masterson, Rajesh Sardar. Selective Detection and Ultrasensitive Quantification of SARS-CoV-2 IgG Antibodies in Clinical Plasma Samples Using Epitope-Modified Nanoplasmonic Biosensing Platforms. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2022, 14 (23) , 26517-26527. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c06599
  5. Narima Eerqing, Sivaraman Subramanian, Jesús Rubio, Tobias Lutz, Hsin-Yu Wu, Janet Anders, Christian Soeller, Frank Vollmer. Comparing Transient Oligonucleotide Hybridization Kinetics Using DNA-PAINT and Optoplasmonic Single-Molecule Sensing on Gold Nanorods. ACS Photonics 2021, 8 (10) , 2882-2888. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.1c01179
  6. Sumon Hati, Sarah R. Langlais, Adrianna N. Masterson, Thakshila Liyanage, Barry B. Muhoberac, Hristos Kaimakliotis, Merrell Johnson, Rajesh Sardar. Photoswitchable Machine-Engineered Plasmonic Nanosystem with High Optical Response for Ultrasensitive Detection of microRNAs and Proteins Adaptively. Analytical Chemistry 2021, 93 (41) , 13935-13944. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.1c02990
  7. Raheleh Pardehkhorram, Fida’A. Alshawawreh, Vinicius R. Gonçales, N. Alice Lee, Richard D. Tilley, J. Justin Gooding. Functionalized Gold Nanorod Probes: A Sophisticated Design of SERS Immunoassay for Biodetection in Complex Media. Analytical Chemistry 2021, 93 (38) , 12954-12965. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.1c02557
  8. Xian Luo, Jun Xie, Zonglang Zhou, Sihan Ma, Li Wang, Mengqi Li, Jiajing Liu, Peiyuan Wang, Yang Li, Fanghong Luo, Jianghua Yan. Virus-Inspired Gold Nanorod-Mesoporous Silica Core–Shell Nanoparticles Integrated with tTF-EG3287 for Synergetic Tumor Photothermal Therapy and Selective Therapy for Vascular Thrombosis. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2021, 13 (37) , 44013-44027. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c11947
  9. Teresa Staniszewska, Maciej Szkulmowski, Seweryn Morawiec. Computational Optimization of the Size of Gold Nanorods for Single-Molecule Plasmonic Biosensors Operating in Scattering and Absorption Modes. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2021, 125 (27) , 14765-14777. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c02510
  10. Adrianna N. Masterson, Barry B. Muhoberac, Adnan Gopinadhan, David J. Wilde, Frédérique T. Deiss, Chandy C. John, Rajesh Sardar. Multiplexed and High-Throughput Label-Free Detection of RNA/Spike Protein/IgG/IgM Biomarkers of SARS-CoV-2 Infection Utilizing Nanoplasmonic Biosensors. Analytical Chemistry 2021, 93 (25) , 8754-8763. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.0c05300
  11. Sirin Celiksoy, Weixiang Ye, Karl Wandner, Katharina Kaefer, Carsten Sönnichsen. Intensity-Based Single Particle Plasmon Sensing. Nano Letters 2021, 21 (5) , 2053-2058. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c04702
  12. Duncan John Mowbray, Vito Despoja. Tailoring a Molecule’s Optical Absorbance Using Surface Plasmonics. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2019, 123 (43) , 26498-26508. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b05770
  13. Mena N. Gadalla, Andrew S. Greenspon, Michele Tamagnone, Federico Capasso, Evelyn L. Hu. Excitation of Strong Localized Surface Plasmon Resonances in Highly Metallic Titanium Nitride Nano-Antennas for Stable Performance at Elevated Temperatures. ACS Applied Nano Materials 2019, 2 (6) , 3444-3452. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.9b00370
  14. Huzeyfe Yilmaz, Sang Hyun Bae, Sisi Cao, Zheyu Wang, Baranidharan Raman, Srikanth Singamaneni. Gold-Nanorod-Based Plasmonic Nose for Analysis of Chemical Mixtures. ACS Applied Nano Materials 2019, 2 (6) , 3897-3905. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.9b00765
  15. Thakshila Liyanage, Adrianna N. Masterson, Hector H. Oyem, Hristos Kaimakliotis, Hang Nguyen, Rajesh Sardar. Plasmoelectronic-Based Ultrasensitive Assay of Tumor Suppressor microRNAs Directly in Patient Plasma: Design of Highly Specific Early Cancer Diagnostic Technology. Analytical Chemistry 2019, 91 (3) , 1894-1903. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.8b03768
  16. Benjamin Foerster, Jens Rutten, Hieu Pham, Stephan Link, Carsten Sönnichsen. Particle Plasmons as Dipole Antennas: State Representation of Relative Observables. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2018, 122 (33) , 19116-19123. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06350
  17. Hae Won Lee, Dong-Ho Kang, Jeong Ho Cho, Sungjoo Lee, Dong-Hwan Jun, Jin-Hong Park. Highly Sensitive and Reusable Membraneless Field-Effect Transistor (FET)-Type Tungsten Diselenide (WSe2) Biosensors. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2018, 10 (21) , 17639-17645. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b03432
  18. Adam Taylor, René Verhoef, Michael Beuwer, Yuyang Wang, and Peter Zijlstra . All-Optical Imaging of Gold Nanoparticle Geometry Using Super-Resolution Microscopy. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2018, 122 (4) , 2336-2342. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b12473
  19. Adam B. Taylor and Peter Zijlstra . Single-Molecule Plasmon Sensing: Current Status and Future Prospects. ACS Sensors 2017, 2 (8) , 1103-1122. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.7b00382
  20. Kyoungweon Park, Ming-siao Hsiao, Yoon-Jae Yi, Sarah Izor, Hilmar Koerner, Ali Jawaid, and Richard A. Vaia . Highly Concentrated Seed-Mediated Synthesis of Monodispersed Gold Nanorods. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2017, 9 (31) , 26363-26371. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b08003
  21. Massimo Rippa, Riccardo Castagna, Marianna Pannico, Pellegrino Musto, Giorgia Borriello, Rubina Paradiso, Giorgio Galiero, Sergio Bolletti Censi, Jun Zhou, Joseph Zyss, and Lucia Petti . Octupolar Metastructures for a Highly Sensitive, Rapid, and Reproducible Phage-Based Detection of Bacterial Pathogens by Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering. ACS Sensors 2017, 2 (7) , 947-954. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.7b00195
  22. Pedro M. R. Paulo, Peter Zijlstra, Michel Orrit, Emilio Garcia-Fernandez, Tamara C. S. Pace, Ana S. Viana, and Sílvia M. B. Costa . Tip-Specific Functionalization of Gold Nanorods for Plasmonic Biosensing: Effect of Linker Chain Length. Langmuir 2017, 33 (26) , 6503-6510. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b00422
  23. Kyoungweon Park, Ming-Siao Hsiao, Hilmar Koerner, Ali Jawaid, Justin Che, and Richard A. Vaia . Optimizing Seed Aging for Single Crystal Gold Nanorod Growth: The Critical Role of Gold Nanocluster Crystal Structure. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2016, 120 (49) , 28235-28245. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b08509
  24. Gayatri K. Joshi, Sarah L. White, Merrell A. Johnson, Rajesh Sardar, and Prashant K. Jain . Ultrashort, Angstrom-Scale Decay of Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering at Hot Spots. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2016, 120 (43) , 24973-24981. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b08242
  25. Ju-Won Jeon, Jing Zhou, Jeffrey A. Geldmeier, James F. Ponder, Jr., Mahmoud A. Mahmoud, Mostafa El-Sayed, John R. Reynolds, and Vladimir V. Tsukruk . Dual-Responsive Reversible Plasmonic Behavior of Core–Shell Nanostructures with pH-Sensitive and Electroactive Polymer Shells. Chemistry of Materials 2016, 28 (20) , 7551-7563. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b04026
  26. Christina Lambertz, Ariadna Martos, Andreas Henkel, Andreas Neiser, Torben-Tobias Kliesch, Andreas Janshoff, Petra Schwille, and Carsten Sönnichsen . Single Particle Plasmon Sensors as Label-Free Technique To Monitor MinDE Protein Wave Propagation on Membranes. Nano Letters 2016, 16 (6) , 3540-3544. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b00507
  27. Xiao-Fang Lai, Yu-Xiu Zou, Shan-Shan Wang, Meng-Jie Zheng, Xiao-Xiao Hu, Hao Liang, Yi-Ting Xu, Xue-Wei Wang, Ding Ding, Long Chen, Zhuo Chen, and Weihong Tan . Modulating the Morphology of Gold Graphitic Nanocapsules for Plasmon Resonance-Enhanced Multimodal Imaging. Analytical Chemistry 2016, 88 (10) , 5385-5391. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.6b00714
  28. Ju-Won Jeon, Petr A. Ledin, Jeffrey A. Geldmeier, James F. Ponder, Jr., Mahmoud A. Mahmoud, Mostafa El-Sayed, John R. Reynolds, and Vladimir V. Tsukruk . Electrically Controlled Plasmonic Behavior of Gold Nanocube@Polyaniline Nanostructures: Transparent Plasmonic Aggregates. Chemistry of Materials 2016, 28 (8) , 2868-2881. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b00882
  29. Neus G. Bastús, Jordi Piella, and Víctor Puntes . Quantifying the Sensitivity of Multipolar (Dipolar, Quadrupolar, and Octapolar) Surface Plasmon Resonances in Silver Nanoparticles: The Effect of Size, Composition, and Surface Coating. Langmuir 2016, 32 (1) , 290-300. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b03859
  30. Mohsen Bahramipanah, Shourya Dutta-Gupta, Banafsheh Abasahl, and Olivier J. F. Martin . Cavity-Coupled Plasmonic Device with Enhanced Sensitivity and Figure-of-Merit. ACS Nano 2015, 9 (7) , 7621-7633. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.5b02977
  31. Pengyu Chen, Meng Ting Chung, Walker McHugh, Robert Nidetz, Yuwei Li, Jianping Fu, Timothy T. Cornell, Thomas P. Shanley, and Katsuo Kurabayashi . Multiplex Serum Cytokine Immunoassay Using Nanoplasmonic Biosensor Microarrays. ACS Nano 2015, 9 (4) , 4173-4181. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.5b00396
  32. Jiaqi Li, Jian Ye, Chang Chen, Yi Li, Niels Verellen, Victor V. Moshchalkov, Liesbet Lagae, and Pol Van Dorpe . Revisiting the Surface Sensitivity of Nanoplasmonic Biosensors. ACS Photonics 2015, 2 (3) , 425-431. https://doi.org/10.1021/ph5004779
  33. Gayatri K. Joshi, Samantha Deitz-McElyea, Merrell Johnson, Sonali Mali, Murray Korc, and Rajesh Sardar . Highly Specific Plasmonic Biosensors for Ultrasensitive MicroRNA Detection in Plasma from Pancreatic Cancer Patients. Nano Letters 2014, 14 (12) , 6955-6963. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl503220s
  34. Ofer Kedem, Alexander Vaskevich, and Israel Rubinstein . Critical Issues in Localized Plasmon Sensing. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2014, 118 (16) , 8227-8244. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp409954s
  35. Laurel L. Kegel, Devon Boyne, and Karl S. Booksh . Sensing with Prism-Based Near-Infrared Surface Plasmon Resonance Spectroscopy on Nanohole Array Platforms. Analytical Chemistry 2014, 86 (7) , 3355-3364. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac4035218
  36. Kyoungweon Park, Sushmita Biswas, Sushil Kanel, Dhriti Nepal, and Richard A. Vaia . Engineering the Optical Properties of Gold Nanorods: Independent Tuning of Surface Plasmon Energy, Extinction Coefficient, and Scattering Cross Section. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2014, 118 (11) , 5918-5926. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp5013279
  37. Gayatri K. Joshi, Karl N. Blodgett, Barry B. Muhoberac, Merrell A. Johnson, Kimberly A. Smith, and Rajesh Sardar . Ultrasensitive Photoreversible Molecular Sensors of Azobenzene-Functionalized Plasmonic Nanoantennas. Nano Letters 2014, 14 (2) , 532-540. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl403576c
  38. Erik Martinsson, Mohammad Mehdi Shahjamali, Karin Enander, Freddy Boey, Can Xue, Daniel Aili, and Bo Liedberg . Local Refractive Index Sensing Based on Edge Gold-Coated Silver Nanoprisms. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2013, 117 (44) , 23148-23154. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp408187e
  39. Kamendra P. Sharma, Anal Kumar Ganai, Debasis Sen, B. L. V. Prasad, and Guruswamy Kumaraswamy . Exclusion from Hexagonal Mesophase Surfactant Domains Drives End-to-End Enchainment of Rod-Like Particles. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2013, 117 (41) , 12661-12668. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp407403a
  40. Laurel L. Kegel, Nicola Menegazzo, and Karl S. Booksh . Adsorbate–Metal Bond Effect on Empirical Determination of Surface Plasmon Penetration Depth. Analytical Chemistry 2013, 85 (10) , 4875-4883. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac400006j
  41. Liang Tang, Justin Casas, and Meenakshi Venkataramasubramani . Magnetic Nanoparticle Mediated Enhancement of Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance for Ultrasensitive Bioanalytical Assay in Human Blood Plasma. Analytical Chemistry 2013, 85 (3) , 1431-1439. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac302422k
  42. Limei Tian, Enze Chen, Naveen Gandra, Abdennour Abbas, and Srikanth Singamaneni . Gold Nanorods as Plasmonic Nanotransducers: Distance-Dependent Refractive Index Sensitivity. Langmuir 2012, 28 (50) , 17435-17442. https://doi.org/10.1021/la3034534
  43. Guowei Lu, Lei Hou, Tianyue Zhang, Jie Liu, Hongming Shen, Chunxiong Luo, and Qihuang Gong . Plasmonic Sensing via Photoluminescence of Individual Gold Nanorod. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2012, 116 (48) , 25509-25516. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp309450b
  44. Limei Tian, Jeremiah J. Morrissey, Ramesh Kattumenu, Naveen Gandra, Evan D. Kharasch, and Srikanth Singamaneni . Bioplasmonic Paper as a Platform for Detection of Kidney Cancer Biomarkers. Analytical Chemistry 2012, 84 (22) , 9928-9934. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac302332g
  45. Gayatri K. Joshi, Phillip J. McClory, Barry B. Muhoberac, Amar Kumbhar, Kimberly A. Smith, and Rajesh Sardar . Designing Efficient Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance-Based Sensing Platforms: Optimization of Sensor Response by Controlling the Edge Length of Gold Nanoprisms. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2012, 116 (39) , 20990-21000. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp302674h
  46. Garam Park, Chanhyoung Lee, Daeha Seo, and Hyunjoon Song . Full-Color Tuning of Surface Plasmon Resonance by Compositional Variation of Au@Ag Core–Shell Nanocubes with Sulfides. Langmuir 2012, 28 (24) , 9003-9009. https://doi.org/10.1021/la300154x
  47. Jack J. Mock, Ryan T. Hill, Yu-Ju Tsai, Ashutosh Chilkoti, and David R. Smith . Probing Dynamically Tunable Localized Surface Plasmon Resonances of Film-Coupled Nanoparticles by Evanescent Wave Excitation. Nano Letters 2012, 12 (4) , 1757-1764. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl204596h
  48. Giuliano Bellapadrona, Alexander B. Tesler, Dan Grünstein, Laila H. Hossain, Raghavendra Kikkeri, Peter H. Seeberger, Alexander Vaskevich, and Israel Rubinstein . Optimization of Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance Transducers for Studying Carbohydrate–Protein Interactions. Analytical Chemistry 2012, 84 (1) , 232-240. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac202363t
  49. Guowei Lu, Lei Hou, Tianyue Zhang, Wenqiang Li, Jie Liu, Pascal Perriat, and Qihuang Gong . Anisotropic Plasmonic Sensing of Individual or Coupled Gold Nanorods. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2011, 115 (46) , 22877-22885. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp2081066
  50. Kathryn M. Mayer and Jason H. Hafner . Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance Sensors. Chemical Reviews 2011, 111 (6) , 3828-3857. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr100313v
  51. Srinivas R. Beeram and Francis P. Zamborini . Effect of Protein Binding Coverage, Location, and Distance on the Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance Response of Purified Au Nanoplates Grown Directly on Surfaces. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2011, 115 (15) , 7364-7371. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp2010869
  52. Longhua Guo, Abdul Rahim Ferhan, Kijoon Lee, and Dong-Hwan Kim . Nanoarray-Based Biomolecular Detection Using Individual Au Nanoparticles with Minimized Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance Variations. Analytical Chemistry 2011, 83 (7) , 2605-2612. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac200432c
  53. Ofer Kedem, Alexander B. Tesler, Alexander Vaskevich, and Israel Rubinstein . Sensitivity and Optimization of Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance Transducers. ACS Nano 2011, 5 (2) , 748-760. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn102617d
  54. Srujan K. Dondapati, Tapan K. Sau, Calin Hrelescu, Thomas A. Klar, Fernando D. Stefani, and Jochen Feldmann . Label-free Biosensing Based on Single Gold Nanostars as Plasmonic Transducers. ACS Nano 2010, 4 (11) , 6318-6322. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn100760f
  55. Hao Jiang and Jayshri Sabarinathan. Effects of Coherent Interactions on the Sensing Characteristics of Near-Infrared Gold Nanorings. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2010, 114 (36) , 15243-15250. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp1003598
  56. Meikun Fan, Matthew Thompson, Maria Luiza Andrade and Alexandre G. Brolo. Silver Nanoparticles on a Plastic Platform for Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance Biosensing. Analytical Chemistry 2010, 82 (15) , 6350-6352. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac101495m
  57. Srinivas R. Beeram and Francis P. Zamborini. Purification of Gold Nanoplates Grown Directly on Surfaces for Enhanced Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance Biosensing. ACS Nano 2010, 4 (7) , 3633-3646. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn1007397
  58. Abdul Rahim Ferhan, Longhua Guo and Dong-Hwan Kim. Influence of Ionic Strength and Surfactant Concentration on Electrostatic Surfacial Assembly of Cetyltrimethylammonium Bromide-Capped Gold Nanorods on Fully Immersed Glass. Langmuir 2010, 26 (14) , 12433-12442. https://doi.org/10.1021/la101105t
  59. Longhua Guo, Guonan Chen and Dong-Hwan Kim. Three-Dimensionally Assembled Gold Nanostructures for Plasmonic Biosensors. Analytical Chemistry 2010, 82 (12) , 5147-5153. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac100346z
  60. Laurent Feuz, Peter Jönsson, Magnus P. Jonsson and Fredrik Höök. Improving the Limit of Detection of Nanoscale Sensors by Directed Binding to High-Sensitivity Areas. ACS Nano 2010, 4 (4) , 2167-2177. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn901457f
  61. Marinus A. Otte, Borja Sepúlveda, Weihai Ni, Jorge Pérez Juste, Luis M. Liz-Marzán and Laura M. Lechuga . Identification of the Optimal Spectral Region for Plasmonic and Nanoplasmonic Sensing. ACS Nano 2010, 4 (1) , 349-357. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn901024e
  62. Mikael Svedendahl, Si Chen, Alexandre Dmitriev and Mikael Käll. Refractometric Sensing Using Propagating versus Localized Surface Plasmons: A Direct Comparison. Nano Letters 2009, 9 (12) , 4428-4433. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl902721z
  63. Srinivas R. Beeram and Francis P. Zamborini. Selective Attachment of Antibodies to the Edges of Gold Nanostructures for Enhanced Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance Biosensing. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2009, 131 (33) , 11689-11691. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja904387j
  64. Andreas B. Dahlin, Si Chen, Magnus P. Jonsson, Linda Gunnarsson, Mikael Käll and Fredrik Höök. High-Resolution Microspectroscopy of Plasmonic Nanostructures for Miniaturized Biosensing. Analytical Chemistry 2009, 81 (16) , 6572-6580. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac901175k
  65. A. Unger and M. Kreiter. Analyzing the Performance of Plasmonic Resonators for Dielectric Sensing. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2009, 113 (28) , 12243-12251. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp9027047
  66. Ruiguang Peng, JingDa Wen, Qian Zhao. A single dielectric nanoparticle for refractive index sensing. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 2025, 58 (4) , 045102. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/ad8b56
  67. M. P. Mcoyi, K. T. Mpofu, M. Sekhwama, P. Mthunzi-Kufa. Developments in Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance. Plasmonics 2024, 4 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11468-024-02620-x
  68. Sarah R. Langlais, Sumon Hati, M. Vitoria Simas, Jingzhi Pu, Barry B. Muhoberac, Rajesh Sardar. Design of Light‐Induced Solid‐State Plasmonic Rulers via Tethering Photoswitchable Molecular Machines to Gold Nanostructures Displaying Angstrom Length Resolution. Advanced Optical Materials 2024, 12 (24) https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.202400801
  69. Ankush D. Sontakke, Shreya Tiwari, Mihir K. Purkait. Surface modifications of graphene oxide nanomaterials for analytical applications. 2024, 1-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.coac.2024.04.002
  70. Liyun Ding, Gang Long, Haowen Zhang, Yumei Zhang, Xingdong Jiang, Juanjuan Zuo. Simulation of the spectral properties and photothermal effects of homogeneously dispersed solution of gold nanorods. Materials Today Communications 2023, 37 , 106876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.106876
  71. Zhichao Li, Ciril S. Prasad, Xielin Wang, Ding Zhang, Rosemary Lach, Gururaj V. Naik. Balancing detectivity and sensitivity of plasmonic sensors with surface lattice resonance. Nanophotonics 2023, 12 (19) , 3721-3727. https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2023-0225
  72. Chandreyee Manas Das, Fan Yang, Zhenxu Yang, Xiaochen Liu, Quang Thien Hoang, Zhejun Xu, Shabana Neermunda, Kien Voon Kong, Ho‐Pui Ho, Lining Arnold Ju, Jiaqing Xiong, Ken‐Tye Yong. Computational Modeling for Intelligent Surface Plasmon Resonance Sensor Design and Experimental Schemes for Real‐Time Plasmonic Biosensing: A Review. Advanced Theory and Simulations 2023, 6 (9) https://doi.org/10.1002/adts.202200886
  73. Daria Semeniak, Daniela F. Cruz, Ashutosh Chilkoti, Maiken H. Mikkelsen. Plasmonic Fluorescence Enhancement in Diagnostics for Clinical Tests at Point‐of‐Care: A Review of Recent Technologies. Advanced Materials 2023, 35 (34) https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202107986
  74. Vincent Pellas, Fadoua Sallem, Juliette Blanchard, Antoine Miche, Sara Martinez Concheso, Christophe Méthivier, Michèle Salmain, Souhir Boujday. Silica-coated gold nanorods biofunctionalization for localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) biosensing. Talanta 2023, 255 , 124245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2022.124245
  75. Andrew Kirk. Plasmonic Nanostructures for Sensing. 2023, 176-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819728-8.00011-5
  76. Hao Xie, Minghuai Yu, Ruiqing Xing, Cheng Wang, Weixiang Ye. Parallel frequency-domain detection of molecular affinity kinetics by single nanoparticle plasmon sensors. Applied Physics Letters 2022, 121 (24) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0127261
  77. Abdolkarim Afroozeh. Design and Computational Analysis of Optical Fiber Sensor for Refractive Index Monitoring Using FDTD Method. Plasmonics 2022, 17 (6) , 2431-2440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11468-022-01739-z
  78. Yuan Liang, Hao Yu, Hong Wang, Hao Chi Zhang, Tie Jun Cui. Terahertz metadevices for silicon plasmonics. Chip 2022, 1 (4) , 100030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chip.2022.100030
  79. Shuo Jia, Aiwen Ma, Hanpeng Dong, Shanhong Xia. Quantifiable Effect of Interparticle Plasmonic Coupling on Sensitivity and Tuning Range for Wavelength-Mode LSPR Fiber Sensor Fabricated by Simple Immobilization Method. Sensors 2022, 22 (23) , 9075. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22239075
  80. Youngkyu Hwang, Dong Jun Koo, Abdul Rahim Ferhan, Tun Naw Sut, Bo Kyeong Yoon, Nam-Joon Cho, Joshua A. Jackman. Optimizing Plasmonic Gold Nanorod Deposition on Glass Surfaces for High-Sensitivity Refractometric Biosensing. Nanomaterials 2022, 12 (19) , 3432. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12193432
  81. Debolina Chakraborty, Amitava Mukherjee, K. R. Ethiraj. Gold nanorod-based multiplex bioanalytical assay for the detection of CYFRA 21-1 and CA-125: towards oral cancer diagnostics. Analytical Methods 2022, 14 (37) , 3614-3622. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2AY01216B
  82. David B. Lioi, Sarah N. Izor, Vikas Varshney, Hugh M. DeJarnette, Pedro A. Derosa, W. Joshua Kennedy. Effective medium approximation for the dielectric environment of coated gold nanorods. Optical Materials Express 2022, 12 (9) , 3577. https://doi.org/10.1364/OME.463241
  83. Matteo Beggiato, Rishabh Rastogi, Christine Dupont-Gillain, Sivashankar Krishnamoorthy. Confined adsorption within nanopatterns as generic means to drive high adsorption efficiencies on affinity sensors. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 2022, 366 , 131945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2022.131945
  84. Seong Eun Heo, Ji Won Ha. Single-Particle Study: Refractive Index Sensitivity of Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance Inflection Points in Mesoporous Silica-Coated Gold Nanorods. BioChip Journal 2022, 16 (2) , 183-190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13206-022-00061-4
  85. Bailin Dai, Yue Xu, Tao Wang, Shasha Wang, Li Tang, Jianxin Tang. Recent Advances in Agglomeration Detection and Dual-Function Application of Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering (SERS). Journal of Biomedical Nanotechnology 2022, 18 (5) , 1257-1275. https://doi.org/10.1166/jbn.2022.3356
  86. Redmar C. Vlieg, John van Noort. Multiplexed two-photon excitation spectroscopy of single gold nanorods. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2022, 156 (9) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0073208
  87. Yi Ren, Jingjing Zhang, Xinxin Gao, Xin Zheng, Xinyu Liu, Tie Jun Cui. Active spoof plasmonics: from design to applications. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 2022, 34 (5) , 053002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648X/ac31f7
  88. Matteo Beggiato, Rishabh Rastogi, Christine Dupont-Gillan, Sivashankar Krishnamoorthy. Confined Adsorption within Nanopatterns as Generic Means to Drive High Adsorption Efficiencies on Affinity Sensors. SSRN Electronic Journal 2022, 7 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4010326
  89. Kyeong Rim Ryu, Geun Wan Kim, Ji Won Ha. Localized surface plasmon resonance inflection points for improved detection of chemisorption of 1-alkanethiols under total internal reflection scattering microscopy. Scientific Reports 2021, 11 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92410-w
  90. Hasan Kurt, Parsa Pishva, Zeki Semih Pehlivan, Elif Gül Arsoy, Qandeel Saleem, Mustafa Kemal Bayazıt, Meral Yüce. Nanoplasmonic biosensors: Theory, structure, design, and review of recent applications. Analytica Chimica Acta 2021, 1185 , 338842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2021.338842
  91. Paul H. Bittorf, Fatemeh Davoodi, Masoud Taleb, Nahid Talebi. Mapping optical Bloch modes of a plasmonic square lattice in real and reciprocal spaces using cathodoluminescence spectroscopy. Optics Express 2021, 29 (21) , 34328. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.437984
  92. Milica Velimirovic, Alessia Pancaro, Robert Mildner, Panagiotis G. Georgiou, Kristof Tirez, Inge Nelissen, Christoph Johann, Matthew I. Gibson, Frank Vanhaecke. Characterization of Gold Nanorods Conjugated with Synthetic Glycopolymers Using an Analytical Approach Based on spICP-SFMS and EAF4-MALS. Nanomaterials 2021, 11 (10) , 2720. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11102720
  93. Hemant Ramakant Hegde, Santhosh Chidangil, Rajeev K. Sinha. Review of synthesis and sensing applications of anisotropic silver and gold nanostructures. Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B, Nanotechnology and Microelectronics: Materials, Processing, Measurement, and Phenomena 2021, 39 (5) https://doi.org/10.1116/6.0001292
  94. Zhe Zhang, Leona Nest, Suo Wang, Si-Yi Wang, Ren-Min Ma. Lasing-enhanced surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy and sensing. Photonics Research 2021, 9 (9) , 1699. https://doi.org/10.1364/PRJ.431612
  95. Reza Hadjiaghaie Vafaie, Hamid Heidarzadeh. AC electrothermal assisted plasmonic biosensor for detection of low-concentration biological analytes. Optics & Laser Technology 2021, 140 , 107078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2021.107078
  96. Michael A. Beuwer, Peter Zijlstra. Correlative microscopy of single self-assembled nanorod dimers for refractometric sensing. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2021, 155 (4) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0055135
  97. Alessia Pancaro, Michal Szymonik, Panagiotis G. Georgiou, Alexander N. Baker, Marc Walker, Peter Adriaensens, Jelle Hendrix, Matthew I. Gibson, Inge Nelissen. The polymeric glyco-linker controls the signal outputs for plasmonic gold nanorod biosensors due to biocorona formation. Nanoscale 2021, 13 (24) , 10837-10848. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1NR01548F
  98. Marina Santana Vega, François Brisset, Guillaume Laurent. Optimized Silica Shell Synthesis Surrounding Gold Nanorods for Enhanced Spectroscopies. Plasmonics 2021, 16 (3) , 635-642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11468-020-01332-2
  99. Yun-Chu Chen, Jing-Jie Chen, Yang-Jyun Hsiao, Cheng-Zhe Xie, Chien-Chung Peng, Yi-Chung Tung, Yih-Fan Chen. Plasmonic gel films for time-lapse LSPR detection of hydrogen peroxide secreted from living cells. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 2021, 336 , 129725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2021.129725
  100. Kyeong Rim Ryu, Ji Won Ha. Enhanced detection sensitivity of the chemisorption of pyridine and biotinylated proteins at localized surface plasmon resonance inflection points in single gold nanorods. The Analyst 2021, 146 (11) , 3543-3548. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1AN00489A
Load more citations

ACS Nano

Cite this: ACS Nano 2009, 3, 4, 795–806
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/nn8006465
Published March 18, 2009

Copyright © 2009 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

Article Views

7206

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Comparison of simulated versus experimental spectra. Scattering spectra collected from single nanorods from synthesized batches characterized by TEM to be (63.3 ± 8.2) × (24.9 ± 4.9) nm (n = 319, yellow dotted line) and (74 ± 9) × (33 ± 6) nm (n > 100, green dotted line). Simulated spectra for nanorods with dimensions of 64.5 × 24.7 nm (blue line) and 75 × 32 nm (red line) via the Kuwata method are also shown.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Right axis: experimental wavelength shift of a nanorod (63.3 ± 8.2 nm × 24.9 ± 4.9 nm) as a function of deposited polyelectrolyte thickness (red dots) and shifts predicted by eq 7 (green line). Left axis: corresponding calculated distance dependence of the nanorod LSPR sensitivity (blue line).

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. (A) Calculated molecular limits of detection for gold nanorods of arbitrary dimension based on eq 10. (B) Composite figures of merit (FOM) for nanorods of arbitrary dimensions. The composite FOM is calculated as the maximum number of bound molecules divided by the minimum number of detectable molecules. The surrounding gray regions in both are indicative of nanorod geometries that were not considered in this model because they either had resonances outside the visible spectrum or had scattering cross sections that are insufficient to collect spectra with SNR greater than 30.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. Left: TEM of rods used in this study. Nanorod length is measured to be 63.3 ± 8.2 nm and diameter 24.9 ± 4.9 nm (n = 319). Scale bar corresponds to 50 nm. Right: LSPR peak shift of individual, biotin-activated gold nanorods versus concentration of streptavidin. Open circles are the mean LSPR shift of approximately 15 nanorods per measurement at each concentration, and the error bars indicate 95% confidence interval. The solid line is a sigmoidal fit to the data. The dotted line indicates where the fit line crosses 0.3 nm shift, the measurement detection uncertainty as calculated above. This occurs at a concentration of 160 pM.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. Fits to scattering spectra of a single nanorod in water (blue), after biotin conjugation (green), and subsequently in 100 pM streptavidin (red). The 0.52 nm shift corresponds to approximately 27 streptavidin molecules by eq 8.

  • References


    This article references 78 other publications.

    1. 1
      Yguerabide, J.; Yguerabide, E. E. Light-Scattering Submicroscopic Particles as Highly Fluorescent Analogs and Their Use as Tracer Labels in Clinical and Biological Applications. Ii. Experimental Characterization Anal. Biochem. 1998, 262, 157 176
    2. 2
      Alivisatos, P. The Use of Nanocrystals in Biological Detection Nat. Biotechnol. 2004, 22, 47 52
    3. 3
      Penn, S. G.; He, L.; Natan, M. J. Nanoparticles for Bioanalysis Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2003, 7, 609 615
    4. 4
      Iqbal, S. S.; Mayo, M. W.; Bruno, J. G.; Bronk, B. V.; Batt, C. A.; Chambers, J. P. A Review of Molecular Recognition Technologies for Detection of Biological Threat Agents Biosens. Bioelectron. 2000, 15, 549 578
    5. 5
      Mirkin, C. A.; Ivanisevic, A.; Taton, T. A.; Letsinger, R. L.; Viswanadham, G. PCR-Less Detection of Genomic DNA with Nanoparticle Probes. Abstracts of Papers; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 2001; Vol. 222, p U578.
    6. 6
      Schultz, D. A.; Mock, J. J.; Schultz, S.; Smith, D. R. Single-Target Molecule Detection with Nonbleaching Multicolor Optical Immunolabels Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2000, 97, 996 1001
    7. 7
      Mie, G. Beiträge Zur Optik Trüber Medien, Speziell Kolloidaler Metallösungen Ann. Phys. 1908, 25, 377 445
    8. 8
      Yguerabide, J.; Yguerabide, E. E. Light-Scattering Submicroscopic Particles as Highly Fluorescent Analogs and Their Use as Tracer Labels in Clinical and Biological Applications. I. Theory Anal. Biochem. 1998, 262, 137 156
    9. 9
      Kelly, K. L.; Coronado, E.; Zhao, L. L.; Schatz, G. C. The Optical Properties of Metal Nanoparticles: The Influence of Size, Shape, and Dielectric Environment J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 668 677
    10. 10
      Khlebtsov, N. G.; Trachuk, L. A.; Mel’nikov, A. G. The Effect of the Size, Shape, and Structure of Metal Nanoparticles on the Dependence of Their Optical Properties on the Refractive Index of a Disperse Medium Opt. Spectrosc. 2005, 98, 77 83
    11. 11
      Mock, J. J.; Barbic, M.; Smith, D. R.; Schultz, D. A.; Schultz, S. Shape Effects in Plasmon Resonance of Individual Colloidal Silver Nanoparticles J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 116
    12. 12
      Mock, J. J.; Smith, D. R.; Schultz, S. Local Refractive Index Dependence of Plasmon Resonance Spectra from Individual Nanoparticles Nano Lett. 2003, 3, 485 491
    13. 13
      Englebienne, P. Use of Colloidal Gold Surface Plasmon Resonance Peak Shift to Infer Affinity Constants from the Interactions between Protein Antigens and Antibodies Specific for Single or Multiple Epitopes Analyst 1998, 123, 1599 1603
    14. 14
      Nath, N.; Chilkoti, A. Label Free Colorimetric Biosensing Using Nanoparticles J. Fluoresc. 2004, 14, 377 389
    15. 15
      Nath, N.; Chilkoti, A. A Colorimetric Gold Nanoparticle Sensor to Interrogate Biomolecular Interactions in Real Time on a Surface Anal. Chem. 2002, 74, 504 509
    16. 16
      Haes, A. J.; Stuart, D. A.; Nie, S. M.; Van Duyne, R. P. Using Solution-Phase Nanoparticles, Surface-Confined Nanoparticle Arrays and Single Nanoparticles as Biological Sensing Platforms J. Fluoresc. 2004, 14, 355 367
    17. 17
      Frederix, F.; Friedt, J. M.; Choi, K. H.; Laureyn, W.; Campitelli, A.; Mondelaers, D.; Maes, G.; Borghs, G. Biosensing Based on Light Absorption of Nanoscaled Gold and Silver Particles Anal. Chem. 2003, 75, 6894 6900
    18. 18
      Dahlin, A.; Zach, M.; Rindzevicius, T.; Kall, M.; Sutherland, D. S.; Hook, F. Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance Sensing of Lipid-Membrane-Mediated Biorecognition Events J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 5043 5048
    19. 19
      Nusz, G. J.; Marinakos, S. M.; Curry, A. C.; Dahlin, A.; Höök, F.; Wax, A.; Chilkoti, A. Label-Free Plasmonic Detection of Biomolecular Binding by a Single Gold Nanorod Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 984 989
    20. 20
      Raschke, G.; Kowarik, S.; Franzl, T.; Sonnichsen, C.; Klar, T. A.; Feldmann, J.; Nichtl, A.; Kurzinger, K. Biomolecular Recognition Based on Single Gold Nanoparticle Light Scattering Nano Lett. 2003, 3, 935 938
    21. 21
      McFarland, A. D.; Van Duyne, R. P. Single Silver Nanoparticles as Real-Time Optical Sensors with Zeptomole Sensitivity Nano Lett. 2003, 3, 1057 1062
    22. 22
      Rindzevicius, T.; Alaverdyan, Y.; Dahlin, A.; Hook, F.; Sutherland, D. S.; Kall, M. Plasmonic Sensing Characteristics of Single Nanometric Holes Nano Lett. 2005, 5, 2335 2339
    23. 23
      Sherry, L. J.; Jin, R. C.; Mirkin, C. A.; Schatz, G. C.; Van Duyne, R. P. Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance Spectroscopy of Single Silver Triangular Nanoprisms Nano Lett. 2006, 6, 2060 2065
    24. 24
      van Dijk, M. A.; Lippitz, M.; Orrit, M. Far-Field Optical Microscopy of Single Metal Nanoparticles Acc. Chem. Res. 2005, 38, 594 601
    25. 25
      Sonnichsen, C.; Geier, S.; Hecker, N. E.; von Plessen, G.; Feldmann, J.; Ditlbacher, H.; Lamprecht, B.; Krenn, J. R.; Aussenegg, F. R.; Chan, V. Z. H.; Spatz, J. P.; Moller, M. Spectroscopy of Single Metallic Nanoparticles Using Total Internal Reflection Microscopy Appl. Phys. Lett. 2000, 77, 2949 2951
    26. 26
      Haes, A. J.; Van Duyne, R. P.; Zou, S. L.; Schatz, G. C. Nanoscale Optical Biosensor: Short Range Distance Dependence of the Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance of Noble Metal Nanoparticles J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 6961 6968
    27. 27
      Haes, A. J.; Van Duyne, R. P.; Zou, S. L.; Schatz, G. C. A Nanoscale Optical Biosensor: The Long Range Distance Dependence of the Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance of Noble Metal Nanoparticles J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 109 116
    28. 28
      Evanoff, D. D.; White, R. L.; Chumanov, G. Measuring the Distance Dependence of the Local Electromagnetic Field from Silver Nanoparticles J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 1522 1524
    29. 29
      Hao, E.; Schatz, G. C. Electromagnetic Fields around Silver Nanoparticles and Dimers J. Chem. Phys. 2004, 120, 357 366
    30. 30
      Imura, K.; Okamoto, H.; Nagahra, T. Plasmon Mode Imaging of Single Gold Nanorods J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 12730 12731
    31. 31
      Stenberg, E.; Persson, B.; Roos, H.; Urbaniczky, C. Quantitative Determination of Surface Concentration of Protein with Surface Plasmon Resonance Using Radiolabeled Proteins J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1991, 143, 513 526
    32. 32
      Vollmer, F.; Braun, D.; Libchaber, A.; Khoshsima, M.; Teraoka, I.; Arnold, S. Protein Detection by Optical Shift of a Resonant Microcavity Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002, 80, 4057 4059
    33. 33
      Chumanov, G.; Sokolov, K.; Gregory, B. W.; Cotton, T. M. Colloidal Metal Films as a Substrate for Surface-Enhanced Spectroscopy J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 9466 9471
    34. 34
      Nikoobakht, B.; El-Sayed, M. A. Preparation and Growth Mechanism of Gold Nanorods (NRs) Using Seed-Mediated Growth Method Chem. Mater. 2003, 15, 1957 1962
    35. 35
      Chen, C.-D.; Cheng, S.-F.; Chau, L.-K.; Wang, C. R. C. Sensing Capability of the Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance of Gold Nanorods Biosens. Bioelectron. 2007, 22, 926 932
    36. 36
      Marinakos, S. M.; Chen, S.; Chilkoti, A. Plasmonic Detection of a Model Analyte in Serum by a Gold Nanorod Sensor Anal. Chem. 2007, 79, 5278 5283
    37. 37
      Jana, N. R.; Gearheart, L.; Murphy, C. J. Wet Chemical Synthesis of High Aspect Ratio Cylindrical Gold Nanorods J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105, 4065 4067
    38. 38
      Busbee, B. D.; Obare, S. O.; Murphy, C. J. An Improved Synthesis of High-Aspect-Ratio Gold Nanorods Adv. Mater. 2003, 15, 414 416
    39. 39
      Sau, T. K.; Murphy, C. J. Room Temperature, High-Yield Synthesis of Multiple Shapes of Gold Nanoparticles in Aqueous Solution J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 8648 8649
    40. 40
      Link, S.; Mohamed, M. B.; El-Sayed, M. A. Simulation of the Optical Absorption Spectra of Gold Nanorods as a Function of Their Aspect Ratio and the Effect of the Medium Dielectric Constant J. Phys. Chem. B 1999, 103, 3073 3077
    41. 41
      Weissleder, R. A Clearer Vision for In Vivo Imaging Nat. Biotechnol. 2001, 19, 316 317
    42. 42
      Jackson, J. B.; Westcott, S. L.; Hirsch, L. R.; West, J. L.; Halas, N. J. Controlling the Surface Enhanced Raman Effect via the Nanoshell Geometry Appl. Phys. Lett. 2003, 82, 257 259
    43. 43
      Hanarp, P.; Kall, M.; Sutherland, D. S. Optical Properties of Short Range Ordered Arrays of Nanometer Gold Disks Prepared by Colloidal Lithography J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 5768 5772
    44. 44
      Aizpurua, J.; Hanarp, P.; Sutherland, D. S.; Kall, M.; Bryant, G. W.; de Abajo, F. J. G. Optical Properties of Gold Nanorings Phys. Rev. Lett. 2003, 90
    45. 45
      Raschke, G.; Brogl, S.; Susha, A. S.; Rogach, A. L.; Klar, T. A.; Feldmann, J.; Fieres, B.; Petkov, N.; Bein, T.; Nichtl, A.; Kurzinger, K. Gold Nanoshells Improve Single Nanoparticle Molecular Sensors Nano Lett. 2004, 4, 1853 1857
    46. 46
      Hafner, J. H.; Nehl, C. L.; Grady, N. K.; Goodrich, G. P.; Tam, F.; Halas, N. J. Scattering Spectra of Single Gold Nanoshells Nano Lett. 2004, 4, 2355 2359
    47. 47
      Novo, C.; Gomez, D.; Perez-Juste, J.; Zhang, Z. Y.; Petrova, H.; Reismann, M.; Mulvaney, P.; Hartland, G. V. Contributions from Radiation Damping and Surface Scattering to the Linewidth of the Longitudinal Plasmon Band of Gold Nanorods: A Single Particle Study Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2006, 8, 3540 3546
    48. 48
      Prescott, S. W.; Mulvaney, P. Gold Nanorod Extinction Spectra J. Appl. Phys. 2006, 99
    49. 49
      Curry, A.; Nusz, G.; Chilkoti, A.; Wax, A. Analysis of Total Uncertainty in Spectral Peak Measurements for Plasmonic Nanoparticle-Based Biosensors Appl. Opt. 2007, 46, 1931 1939
    50. 50
      Curry, A.; Nusz, G.; Chilkoti, A.; Wax, A. Substrate Effect on Refractive Index Dependence of Plasmon Resonance for Individual Silver Nanoparticles Observed Using Darkfield Micro-Spectroscopy Opt. Express 2005, 13, 2668 2677
    51. 51
      Kuwata, H.; Tamaru, H.; Esumi, K.; Miyano, K. Resonant Light Scattering from Metal Nanoparticles: Practical Analysis Beyond Rayleigh Approximation Appl. Phys. Lett. 2003, 83, 4625 4627
    52. 52
      Xu, X. D.; Cortie, M. B. Shape Change and Color Gamut in Gold Nanorods, Dumbbells, and Dog Bones Adv. Funct. Mater. 2006, 16, 2170 2176
    53. 53
      Yan, B. H.; Yang, Y.; Wang, Y. C. Comment On “Simulation of the Optical Absorption Spectra of Gold Nanorods as a Function of Their Aspect Ratio and the Effect of the Medium Dielectric Constant” J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 9159 9159
    54. 54
      Link, S.; El-Sayed, M. A.; Mohamed, M. B. Simulation of the Optical Absorption Spectra of Gold Nanorods as a Function of Their Aspect Ratio and the Effect of the Medium Dielectric Constant (Vol 103b, Pg 3073, 1999) J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 10531 10532
    55. 55
      Link, S.; Mohamed, M. B.; El-Sayed, M. A. Simulation of the Optical Absorption Spectra of Gold Nanorods as a Function of Their Aspect Ratio and the Effect of the Medium Dielectric Constant J. Phys. Chem. B 1999, 103, 3073 3077
    56. 56
      Nath, N.; Chilkoti, A. Label-Free Biosensing by Surface Plasmon Resonance of Nanoparticles on Glass: Optimization of Nanoparticle Size Anal. Chem. 2004, 76, 5370 5378
    57. 57
      Whitney, A. V.; Elam, J. W.; Zou, S. L.; Zinovev, A. V.; Stair, P. C.; Schatz, G. C.; Van Duyne, R. P. Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance Nanosensor: A High-Resolution Distance-Dependence Study Using Atomic Layer Deposition J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 20522 20528
    58. 58
      Hicks, E. M.; Zhang, X. Y.; Zou, S. L.; Lyandres, O.; Spears, K. G.; Schatz, G. C.; Van Duyne, R. P. Plasmonic Properties of Film over Nanowell Surfaces Fabricated by Nanosphere Lithography J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 22351 22358
    59. 59
      Haes, A. J.; Van Duyne, R. P. A Nanoscale Optical Biosensor: Sensitivity and Selectivity of an Approach Based on the Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance Spectroscopy of Triangular Silver Nanoparticles J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 10596 10604
    60. 60
      Miller, M. M.; Lazarides, A. A. Sensitivity of Metal Nanoparticle Plasmon Resonance Band Position to the Dielectric Environment as Observed in Scattering J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. 2006, 8, S239 S249
    61. 61
      Miller, M. M.; Lazarides, A. A. Sensitivity of Metal Nanoparticle Surface Plasmon Resonance to the Dielectric Environment J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 21556 21565
    62. 62
      Neish, C. S.; Martin, I. L.; Henderson, R. M.; Edwardson, J. M. Direct Visualization of Ligand-Protein Interactions Using Atomic Force Microscopy Br. J. Pharmacol. 2002, 135, 1943 1950
    63. 63
      Jung, L. S.; Campbell, C. T.; Chinowsky, T. M.; Mar, M. N.; Yee, S. S. Quantitative Interpretation of the Response of Surface Plasmon Resonance Sensors to Adsorbed Films Langmuir 1998, 14, 5636 5648
    64. 64
      Chien, F. C.; Chen, S. J. Direct Determination of the Refractive Index and Thickness of a Biolayer Based on Coupled Waveguide-Surface Plasmon Resonance Mode Opt. Lett. 2006, 31, 187 189
    65. 65
      Weber, P. C.; Ohlendorf, D. H.; Wendoloski, J. J.; Salemme, F. R. Structural Origins of High-Affinity Biotin Binding to Streptavidin Science 1989, 243, 85 88
    66. 66
      Hendrickson, W. A.; Pahler, A.; Smith, J. L.; Satow, Y.; Merritt, E. A.; Phizackerley, R. P. Crystal-Structure of Core Streptavidin Determined from Multiwavelength Anomalous Diffraction of Synchrotron Radiation Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1989, 86, 2190 2194
    67. 67
      Hinrichsen, E. L.; Feder, J.; Jossang, T. Geometry of Random Sequential Adsorption J. Stat. Phys. 1986, 44, 793 827
    68. 68
      Jung, L. S.; Nelson, K. E.; Stayton, P. S.; Campbell, C. T. Binding and Dissociation Kinetics of Wild-Type and Mutant Streptavidins on Mixed Biotin-Containing Alkylthiolate Monolayers Langmuir 2000, 16, 9421 9432
    69. 69
      Kim, Y. P.; Hong, M. Y.; Kim, J.; Oh, E.; Shon, H. K.; Moon, D. W.; Kim, H. S.; Lee, T. G. Quantitative Analysis of Surface-Immobilized Protein by Tof-Sims: Effects of Protein Orientation and Trehalose Additive Anal. Chem. 2007, 79, 1377 1385
    70. 70
      Link, S.; El-Sayed, M. A. Spectroscopic Determination of the Melting Energy of a Gold Nanorod J. Chem. Phys. 2001, 114, 2362 2368
    71. 71
      Chang, S. S.; Shih, C. W.; Chen, C. D.; Lai, W. C.; Wang, C. R. C. The Shape Transition of Gold Nanorods Langmuir 1999, 15, 701 709
    72. 72
      Link, S.; El-Sayed, M. A. Spectral Properties and Relaxation Dynamics of Surface Plasmon Electronic Oscillations in Gold and Silver Nanodots and Nanorods J. Phys. Chem. B 1999, 103, 8410 8426
    73. 73
      Muskens, O. L.; Bachelier, G.; Del Fatti, N.; Vallee, F.; Brioude, A.; Jiang, X. C.; Pileni, M. P. Quantitative Absorption Spectroscopy of a Single Gold Nanorod J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 8917 8921
    74. 74
      Park, H. S.; Agarwal, A.; Kotov, N. A.; Lavrentovich, O. D. Controllable Side-by-Side and End-to-End Assembly of Au Nanorods by Lyotropic Chromonic Materials Langmuir 2008, 24, 13833 13837
    75. 75
      Dahlin, A. B.; Tegenfeldt, J. O.; Hook, F. Improving the Instrumental Resolution of Sensors Based on Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance Anal. Chem. 2006, 78, 4416 4423
    76. 76
      Jana, N. R.; Gearheart, L.; Murphy, C. J. Seed-Mediated Growth Approach for Shape-Controlled Synthesis of Spheroidal and Rod-Like Gold Nanoparticles Using a Surfactant Template Adv. Mater. 2001, 13, 1389 1393
    77. 77
      Caruso, F.; Lichtenfeld, H.; Giersig, M.; Mohwald, H. Electrostatic Self-Assembly of Silica Nanoparticle-Polyelectrolyte Multilayers on Polystyrene Latex Particles J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 8523 8524
    78. 78
      Buscher, K.; Graf, K.; Ahrens, H.; Helm, C. A. Influence of Adsorption Conditions on the Structure of Polyelectrolyte Multilayers Langmuir 2002, 18, 3585 3591
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    An in-depth derivation of the distance dependence of nanoparticle sensitivity to local refractive index is available. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.