ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Automated Selection of Synthetic Biology Parts for Genetic Regulatory Networks
My Activity
    Research Article

    Automated Selection of Synthetic Biology Parts for Genetic Regulatory Networks
    Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

    View Author Information
    Raytheon BBN Technologies, 10 Moulton St., Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
    ‡ § Departments of Electrical and Computer Engineering and §Bioinformatics, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
    Other Access OptionsSupporting Information (2)

    ACS Synthetic Biology

    Cite this: ACS Synth. Biol. 2012, 1, 8, 332–344
    Click to copy citationCitation copied!
    https://doi.org/10.1021/sb300032y
    Published July 6, 2012
    Copyright © 2012 American Chemical Society

    Abstract

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
    Abstract Image

    Raising the level of abstraction for synthetic biology design requires solving several challenging problems, including mapping abstract designs to DNA sequences. In this paper we present the first formalism and algorithms to address this problem. The key steps of this transformation are feature matching, signal matching, and part matching. Feature matching ensures that the mapping satisfies the regulatory relationships in the abstract design. Signal matching ensures that the expression levels of functional units are compatible. Finally, part matching finds a DNA part sequence that can implement the design. Our software tool MatchMaker implements these three steps.

    Copyright © 2012 American Chemical Society

    Read this article

    To access this article, please review the available access options below.

    Get instant access

    Purchase Access

    Read this article for 48 hours. Check out below using your ACS ID or as a guest.

    Recommended

    Access through Your Institution

    You may have access to this article through your institution.

    Your institution does not have access to this content. Add or change your institution or let them know you’d like them to include access.

    Supporting Information

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

    (1) Detailed complexity discussion including the proof of the feature matching problem and (2) sample feature and signal Clotho databases used with MatchMaker as an SQL file (MatchMaker.sql). This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

    Cited By

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

    This article is cited by 45 publications.

    1. Rachel M. Hartfield, Kelly A. Schwarz, Joseph J. Muldoon, Neda Bagheri, and Joshua N. Leonard . Multiplexing Engineered Receptors for Multiparametric Evaluation of Environmental Ligands. ACS Synthetic Biology 2017, 6 (11) , 2042-2055. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.6b00279
    2. Swapnil P. Bhatia, Michael J. Smanski, Christopher A. Voigt, and Douglas M. Densmore . Genetic Design via Combinatorial Constraint Specification. ACS Synthetic Biology 2017, 6 (11) , 2130-2135. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.7b00154
    3. Vishal Gupta, Jesús Irimia, Iván Pau, and Alfonso Rodríguez-Patón . BioBlocks: Programming Protocols in Biology Made Easier. ACS Synthetic Biology 2017, 6 (7) , 1230-1232. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.6b00304
    4. Nicholas Roehner, Eric M. Young, Christopher A. Voigt, D. Benjamin Gordon, and Douglas Densmore . Double Dutch: A Tool for Designing Combinatorial Libraries of Biological Systems. ACS Synthetic Biology 2016, 5 (6) , 507-517. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.5b00232
    5. Nicholas Roehner, Zhen Zhang, Tramy Nguyen, and Chris J. Myers . Generating Systems Biology Markup Language Models from the Synthetic Biology Open Language. ACS Synthetic Biology 2015, 4 (8) , 873-879. https://doi.org/10.1021/sb5003289
    6. Nicholas Roehner, Ernst Oberortner, Matthew Pocock, Jacob Beal, Kevin Clancy, Curtis Madsen, Goksel Misirli, Anil Wipat, Herbert Sauro, and Chris J. Myers . Proposed Data Model for the Next Version of the Synthetic Biology Open Language. ACS Synthetic Biology 2015, 4 (1) , 57-71. https://doi.org/10.1021/sb500176h
    7. Nicholas Roehner and Chris J. Myers . Directed Acyclic Graph-Based Technology Mapping of Genetic Circuit Models. ACS Synthetic Biology 2014, 3 (8) , 543-555. https://doi.org/10.1021/sb400135t
    8. Linh Huynh and Ilias Tagkopoulos . Optimal Part and Module Selection for Synthetic Gene Circuit Design Automation. ACS Synthetic Biology 2014, 3 (8) , 556-564. https://doi.org/10.1021/sb400139h
    9. Matthew T. Weinstock . Keystone Symposia Conference on Precision Genome Engineering and Synthetic Biology Brings Together Players from Both Disciplines. ACS Synthetic Biology 2013, 2 (6) , 296-300. https://doi.org/10.1021/sb400045k
    10. Guillermo Rodrigo and Alfonso Jaramillo . AutoBioCAD: Full Biodesign Automation of Genetic Circuits. ACS Synthetic Biology 2013, 2 (5) , 230-236. https://doi.org/10.1021/sb300084h
    11. Linh Huynh, Athanasios Tsoukalas, Matthias Köppe, and Ilias Tagkopoulos . SBROME: A Scalable Optimization and Module Matching Framework for Automated Biosystems Design. ACS Synthetic Biology 2013, 2 (5) , 263-273. https://doi.org/10.1021/sb300095m
    12. Jacob Beal, Ron Weiss, Douglas Densmore, Aaron Adler, Evan Appleton, Jonathan Babb, Swapnil Bhatia, Noah Davidsohn, Traci Haddock, Joseph Loyall, Richard Schantz, Viktor Vasilev, and Fusun Yaman . An End-to-End Workflow for Engineering of Biological Networks from High-Level Specifications. ACS Synthetic Biology 2012, 1 (8) , 317-331. https://doi.org/10.1021/sb300030d
    13. Richard Matzko, Savas Konur. Technologies for design-build-test-learn automation and computational modelling across the synthetic biology workflow: a review. Network Modeling Analysis in Health Informatics and Bioinformatics 2024, 13 (1) https://doi.org/10.1007/s13721-024-00455-4
    14. Attia Iram, Yueming Dong, Codruta Ignea. Synthetic biology advances towards a bio-based society in the era of artificial intelligence. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 2024, 87 , 103143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2024.103143
    15. Blaine A. Pfeifer, Marie Beitelshees, Andrew Hill, Justin Bassett, Charles H. Jones. Harnessing synthetic biology for advancing RNA therapeutics and vaccine design. npj Systems Biology and Applications 2023, 9 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41540-023-00323-3
    16. Timothy S. Jones, Samuel M. D. Oliveira, Chris J. Myers, Christopher A. Voigt, Douglas Densmore. Genetic circuit design automation with Cello 2.0. Nature Protocols 2022, 17 (4) , 1097-1113. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-021-00675-2
    17. Mohammed Eslami, Aaron Adler, Rajmonda S. Caceres, Joshua G. Dunn, Nancy Kelley-Loughnane, Vanessa A. Varaljay, Hector Garcia Martin. Artificial intelligence for synthetic biology. Communications of the ACM 2022, 65 (5) , 88-97. https://doi.org/10.1145/3500922
    18. Tianchi Chen, M. Ali Al-Radhawi, Christopher A. Voigt, Eduardo D. Sontag. A synthetic distributed genetic multi-bit counter. iScience 2021, 24 (12) , 103526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2021.103526
    19. Hasan Baig, Jan Madsen. Fundamentals of Molecular Biology and Genetic Circuits. 2020, 11-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52355-8_2
    20. Xiangyang Liu, Sanjan T P Gupta, Devesh Bhimsaria, Jennifer L Reed, José A Rodríguez-Martínez, Aseem Z Ansari, Srivatsan Raman. De novo design of programmable inducible promoters. Nucleic Acids Research 2019, 47 (19) , 10452-10463. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz772
    21. Tramy Nguyen, Timothy S. Jones, Pedro Fontanarrosa, Jeanet V. Mante, Zach Zundel, Douglas Densmore, Chris Myers. Design of Asynchronous Genetic Circuits. Proceedings of the IEEE 2019, 107 (7) , 1356-1368. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2019.2916057
    22. Fusun Yaman, Aaron Adler, Jacob Beal. Opportunities and Challenges in Applying Artificial Intelligence to Bioengineering. 2019, 425-452. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17297-8_16
    23. Nathan Braniff, Matthew Scott, Brian Ingalls. Component Characterization in a Growth-Dependent Physiological Context: Optimal Experimental Design. Processes 2019, 7 (1) , 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7010052
    24. Jiaoyun Yang, Song Yu, Bowen Gong, Ning An, Gil Alterovitz. Biobrick chain recommendations for genetic circuit design. Computers in Biology and Medicine 2017, 86 , 31-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2017.04.019
    25. Evan Appleton, Curtis Madsen, Nicholas Roehner, Douglas Densmore. Design Automation in Synthetic Biology. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 2017, 9 (4) , a023978. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a023978
    26. Jovan Tanevski, Ljupčo Todorovski, Sašo Džeroski. Process-based design of dynamical biological systems. Scientific Reports 2016, 6 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34107
    27. Miriam Leon, Mae L. Woods, Alex J. H. Fedorec, Chris P. Barnes. A computational method for the investigation of multistable systems and its application to genetic switches. BMC Systems Biology 2016, 10 (1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12918-016-0375-z
    28. Jacob Beal, Aaron Adler, Fusun Yaman. Managing bioengineering complexity with AI techniques. Biosystems 2016, 148 , 40-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2015.08.006
    29. Alec A. K. Nielsen, Bryan S. Der, Jonghyeon Shin, Prashant Vaidyanathan, Vanya Paralanov, Elizabeth A. Strychalski, David Ross, Douglas Densmore, Christopher A. Voigt. Genetic circuit design automation. Science 2016, 352 (6281) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac7341
    30. Elise Rosati, Morgan Madec, Abir Rezgui, Quentin Colman, Nicolas Toussaint, Christophe Lallement, Pierre Collet. Application of Evolutionary Algorithms for the Optimization of Genetic Regulatory Networks. 2016, 184-200. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31204-0_13
    31. Prashant Vaidyanathan, Bryan S. Der, Swapnil Bhatia, Nicholas Roehner, Ryan Silva, Christopher A. Voigt, Douglas Densmore. A Framework for Genetic Logic Synthesis. Proceedings of the IEEE 2015, 103 (11) , 2196-2207. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2015.2443832
    32. Jacob Beal. Bridging the Gap: A Roadmap to Breaking the Biological Design Barrier. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 2015, 2 https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2014.00087
    33. Michael Pedersen, Boyan Yordanov. Programming Languages for Circuit Design. 2015, 81-104. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1878-2_5
    34. Chris Myers, Kevin Clancy, Goksel Misirli, Ernst Oberortner, Matthew Pocock, Jacqueline Quinn, Nicholas Roehner, Herbert M. Sauro. The Synthetic Biology Open Language. 2015, 323-336. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1878-2_16
    35. Goksel Misirli, Jennifer Hallinan, Anil Wipat. Composable Modular Models for Synthetic Biology. ACM Journal on Emerging Technologies in Computing Systems 2014, 11 (3) , 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1145/2631921
    36. Chris J. Myers, Herbert Sauro, Anil Wipat. Introduction to the Special Issue on Computational Synthetic Biology. ACM Journal on Emerging Technologies in Computing Systems 2014, 11 (3) , 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1145/2668126
    37. Daniel D. Lewis, Fernando D. Villarreal, Fan Wu, Cheemeng Tan. Synthetic Biology Outside the Cell: Linking Computational Tools to Cell-Free Systems. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 2014, 2 https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2014.00066
    38. Mario Andrea Marchisio. Parts & Pools: A Framework for Modular Design of Synthetic Gene Circuits. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 2014, 2 https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2014.00042
    39. Jennifer A N Brophy, Christopher A Voigt. Principles of genetic circuit design. Nature Methods 2014, 11 (5) , 508-520. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2926
    40. Yves Gendrault, Morgan Madec, Christophe Lallement, Jacques Haiech. Modeling Biology With HDL Languages: A First Step Toward a Genetic Design Automation Tool Inspired From Microelectronics. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 2014, 61 (4) , 1231-1240. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2014.2298559
    41. Douglas M. Densmore, Swapnil Bhatia. Bio-design automation: software + biology + robots. Trends in Biotechnology 2014, 32 (3) , 111-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.10.005
    42. Miha Moskon, Miha Mraz. Systematic Approach to Computational Design of Gene Regulatory Networks with Information Processing Capabilities. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics 2014, 11 (2) , 431-440. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCBB.2013.2295792
    43. Nathan Crook, Hal S. Alper. Model-based design of synthetic, biological systems. Chemical Engineering Science 2013, 103 , 2-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2012.12.022
    44. Boyan Yordanov, Christoph M. Wintersteiger, Youssef Hamadi, Hillel Kugler. SMT-Based Analysis of Biological Computation. 2013, 78-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38088-4_6
    45. Ezio Bartocci, Luca Bortolussi, Laura Nenzi. A Temporal Logic Approach to Modular Design of Synthetic Biological Circuits. 2013, 164-177. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40708-6_13

    ACS Synthetic Biology

    Cite this: ACS Synth. Biol. 2012, 1, 8, 332–344
    Click to copy citationCitation copied!
    https://doi.org/10.1021/sb300032y
    Published July 6, 2012
    Copyright © 2012 American Chemical Society

    Article Views

    1323

    Altmetric

    -

    Citations

    Learn about these metrics

    Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

    Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

    The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.