ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
International Interlaboratory Digital PCR Study Demonstrating High Reproducibility for the Measurement of a Rare Sequence Variant
My Activity
    Article

    International Interlaboratory Digital PCR Study Demonstrating High Reproducibility for the Measurement of a Rare Sequence Variant
    Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

    View Author Information
    Molecular and Cell Biology Team, LGC, Queens Road, Teddington, Middlesex TW11 0LY, United Kingdom
    Digital Biology Center, Bio-Rad Laboratories, 5731 West Las Positas, Pleasanton, California 94588, United States
    § Statistics Team, LGC, Queens Road, Teddington, Middlesex TW11 0LY, United Kingdom
    Chronix Biomedical, Goetheallee 8, 37073 Goettingen, Germany
    Department of Internal Medicine I, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany
    # Laboratoire de Recherche Translationnelle, Centre Léon-Bérard, Lyon, F-69008, France
    Sjællands Universitetshospital, Klinisk Biokemisk Afdeling, Molekylærenhed, Sygehusvej 10, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark
    Genoptix Inc., 1811 Aston Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008, United States
    Service de Transfert d’Oncologie Biologique, Laboratoire de Biologie Médicale, Faculte de médecine Nord, Boulevard Pierre Dramard, Marseille 13916 cedex 20, France
    UCL Cancer Institute, Paul O’Gorman Building, 72 Huntley Street, London WC1E 6DD, United Kingdom
    Department of Clinical Immunology and Biochemistry, Vejle Hospital, Kabbeltoft 25, 7100 Vejle, Denmark
    Division of Genetics and Cell Biology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milano, Italy
    Department of Pediatrics and CIMA LAB Diagnostics, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Avenida Pío XII 36, 31008 Pamplona, Spain
    Michael Smith Laboratories, University of British Columbia, 301 Michael Smith Building, 2185 East Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
    The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Clinical Trials Program), 1515 Holcombe Boulevard 0455, Houston, Texas 77030, United States
    Solid Tumours Genomics Unit, Tenon Hospital, APHP and Université Pierre et Marie Curie, 4 rue de la Chine, 75970 Paris, France
    Johns Hopkins, 1650 Orleans St., Baltimore, Maryland 21287, United States
    Department of Cancer Studies, University of Leicester, Robert Kilpatrick Clinical Sciences Building, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester LE2 7LX, United Kingdom
    Lung Cancer Group, Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, 123 Old Brompton Road, London SW7 3RP, United Kingdom
    Institut Claudius Regaud − IUCTO, Laboratoire de Biologie Medicale Oncologique, 1 avenue Irène Joliot-Curie, Toulouse 31059 cedex 9, France
    Institut Curie, PSL Research University, SiRIC, Laboratory of Circulating Tumor Biomarkers, 26 rue d’Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
    Department of Oncology and Pathology, Lund University, Scheelevägen 2, MV 404-B2, SE-22381, Lund, Sweden
    Department of Pediatrics, Benioff Children’s Hospital, UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1450 Third Street, San Francisco, California 94158, United States
    Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Belfer Center for Applied Cancer Science and Department of Medical Oncology, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States
    School of Biosciences & Medicine, Faculty of Health & Medical Science, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey GU2 7XH, United Kingdom
    *Phone: +44 (0)20 8943 7655. Fax: +44 (0)20 8943 2767. E-mail: [email protected]
    Other Access OptionsSupporting Information (6)

    Analytical Chemistry

    Cite this: Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 3, 1724–1733
    Click to copy citationCitation copied!
    https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.6b03980
    Published December 9, 2016
    Copyright © 2016 American Chemical Society

    Abstract

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
    Abstract Image

    This study tested the claim that digital PCR (dPCR) can offer highly reproducible quantitative measurements in disparate laboratories. Twenty-one laboratories measured four blinded samples containing different quantities of a KRAS fragment encoding G12D, an important genetic marker for guiding therapy of certain cancers. This marker is challenging to quantify reproducibly using quantitative PCR (qPCR) or next generation sequencing (NGS) due to the presence of competing wild type sequences and the need for calibration. Using dPCR, 18 laboratories were able to quantify the G12D marker within 12% of each other in all samples. Three laboratories appeared to measure consistently outlying results; however, proper application of a follow-up analysis recommendation rectified their data. Our findings show that dPCR has demonstrable reproducibility across a large number of laboratories without calibration. This could enable the reproducible application of molecular stratification to guide therapy and, potentially, for molecular diagnostics.

    Copyright © 2016 American Chemical Society

    Read this article

    To access this article, please review the available access options below.

    Get instant access

    Purchase Access

    Read this article for 48 hours. Check out below using your ACS ID or as a guest.

    Recommended

    Access through Your Institution

    You may have access to this article through your institution.

    Your institution does not have access to this content. Add or change your institution or let them know you’d like them to include access.

    Supporting Information

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

    The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b03980.

    • dMIQE checklist for authors, reviewers and editors; submitted values for each sample from the 21 participant laboratories; analysis parameters for each sample from the 21 participant laboratories; resubmitted values for the 4 participant laboratories; number of positive partitions per well of the nine negative control reactions; number of positive partitions per well of the eight no template control reactions (PDF)

    • Overview of the workflow applied to the study; KRAS G12D and wt study materials; homogeneity study; short and long term stability; interlaboratory comparison of control samples; effect of threshold positioning on the quantification of the KRAS G12D and wt molecules in the same data set; quantification of KRAS wt following threshold setting guidelines and effect on the G12D fractional abundance; effect of different protocol procedures (PDF)

    • Invitation to participate in a droplet digital PCR interlaboratory study: Measurement of rare sequence variants (PDF)

    • Packing slip and delivery form (PDF)

    • Protocol for KRAS interlab study (PDF)

    • Guidelines for classifying droplets in rare mutation quantification experiments in the KRAS interlab study (PDF)

    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

    Cited By

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

    This article is cited by 49 publications.

    1. Hee-Bong Yoo, Sang-Ryoul Park, Kee-Suk Hong, Inchul Yang. Precise RNA Quantification by Counting Individual RNA Molecules Using High-Sensitivity Capillary Flow Cytometry. Analytical Chemistry 2022, 94 (3) , 1752-1759. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.1c04355
    2. Mariia Dekaliuk, Xue Qiu, Frédéric Troalen, Pierre Busson, Niko Hildebrandt. Discrimination of the V600E Mutation in BRAF by Rolling Circle Amplification and Förster Resonance Energy Transfer. ACS Sensors 2019, 4 (10) , 2786-2793. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.9b01420
    3. Andrew E. Rodda, Bradyn J. Parker, Andrew Spencer, Simon R. Corrie. Extending Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis to Ultralow Abundance Mutations: Techniques and Challenges. ACS Sensors 2018, 3 (3) , 540-560. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.7b00953
    4. Florence Busato, Sylvain Ursuegui, Jean-François Deleuze, Jorg Tost. Multiplex digital PCR for the simultaneous quantification of a miRNA panel. Analytica Chimica Acta 2025, 1335 , 343440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2024.343440
    5. David Gleerup, Wim Trypsteen, Stephanie I. Fraley, Ward De Spiegelaere. Digital PCR in Virology: Current Applications and Future Perspectives. Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy 2025, 29 (1) , 43-54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40291-024-00751-9
    6. Alessia Mirabile, Giuseppe Sangiorgio, Paolo Giuseppe Bonacci, Dalida Bivona, Emanuele Nicitra, Carmelo Bonomo, Dafne Bongiorno, Stefania Stefani, Nicolò Musso. Advancing Pathogen Identification: The Role of Digital PCR in Enhancing Diagnostic Power in Different Settings. Diagnostics 2024, 14 (15) , 1598. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14151598
    7. Ingeborg L.A. Boxman, Ramia Molin, Sofia Persson, Anna Juréus, Claudia C.C. Jansen, Nils P. Sosef, Soizick F. Le Guyader, Joanna Ollivier, Maija Summa, Maria Hautaniemi, Elisabetta Suffredini, Simona Di Pasquale, Mette Myrmel, Mamata Khatri, Urska Jamnikar-Ciglenecki, Darja Kusar, Dominik Moor, Lisa Butticaz, James A. Lowther, David I. Walker, Tina Stapleton, Magnus Simonsson, René A.M. Dirks. An international inter-laboratory study to compare digital PCR with ISO standardized qPCR assays for the detection of norovirus GI and GII in oyster tissue. Food Microbiology 2024, 120 , 104478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2024.104478
    8. Megan H. Cleveland, Hua-Jun He, Mojca Milavec, Young-Kyung Bae, Peter M. Vallone, Jim F. Huggett. Digital PCR for the characterization of reference materials. Molecular Aspects of Medicine 2024, 96 , 101256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mam.2024.101256
    9. Kyung Hee Han, NohHyun Park, Maria Lee, Cheol Lee, Hyojin Kim. The new 2023 FIGO staging system for endometrial cancer: what is different from the previous 2009 FIGO staging system?. Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2024, 35 (5) https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2024.35.e59
    10. J. Petit, G. Carroll, J. Zhao, E. Roper, P. Pockney, R. J. Scott. Evaluation of epigenetic methylation biomarkers for the detection of colorectal cancer using droplet digital PCR. Scientific Reports 2023, 13 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-35631-5
    11. Dong U Ju, Dongju Park, Il-Hwan Kim, Seil Kim, Hee Min Yoo. Development of Human Rhinovirus RNA Reference Material Using Digital PCR. Genes 2023, 14 (12) , 2210. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14122210
    12. Alison Devonshire, Gerwyn Jones, Ana Fernandez Gonzalez, Olga Kofanova, Johanna Trouet, Pamela Pinzani, Stefania Gelmini, Serena Bonin, Carole Foy. Interlaboratory evaluation of quality control methods for circulating cell-free DNA extraction. New Biotechnology 2023, 78 , 13-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2023.09.005
    13. Alexandra Bogožalec Košir, Sabine Muller, Jana Žel, Mojca Milavec, Allison C. Mallory, David Dobnik. Fast and Accurate Multiplex Identification and Quantification of Seven Genetically Modified Soybean Lines Using Six-Color Digital PCR. Foods 2023, 12 (22) , 4156. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12224156
    14. Silvia Calabrese, Anja M. Markl, Maximilian Neugebauer, Stefanie J. Krauth, Nadine Borst, Felix von Stetten, Michael Lehnert. Reporter emission multiplexing in digital PCRs (REM-dPCRs): direct quantification of multiple target sequences per detection channel by population specific reporters. The Analyst 2023, 148 (20) , 5243-5254. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3AN00191A
    15. Derek Hoerres, Qunsheng Dai, Sandra Elmore, Siddharth Sheth, Gaorav P Gupta, Sunil Kumar, Margaret L Gulley. Calibration of cell-free DNA measurements by next-generation sequencing. American Journal of Clinical Pathology 2023, 160 (3) , 314-321. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqad055
    16. Tejas Shegekar, Sahitya Vodithala, Anup Juganavar. The Emerging Role of Liquid Biopsies in Revolutionising Cancer Diagnosis and Therapy. Cureus 2023, 20 https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.43650
    17. M.A. Motalib Hossain, Siti Aimi Sarah Zainal Abidin, Aishah Bujang, Mohd Nasir Taib, Suresh Sagadevan, Mohd Rafie Johan, Nina Naquiah Ahmad Nizar. TaqMan multiplex qPCR for detecting animal species in meat and meat products: Development, recent advances and future prospects. Food Control 2023, 150 , 109761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2023.109761
    18. Morten Borg, Sara Witting Christensen Wen, Rikke Fredslund Andersen, Signe Timm, Torben Frøstrup Hansen, Ole Hilberg. Methylated Circulating Tumor DNA in Blood as a Tool for Diagnosing Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers 2023, 15 (15) , 3959. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15153959
    19. Megan H. Cleveland, Erica L. Romsos, Carolyn R. Steffen, Nathan D. Olson, Stephanie L. Servetas, William G. Valiant, Peter M. Vallone. Rapid production and free distribution of a synthetic RNA material to support SARS-CoV-2 molecular diagnostic testing. Biologicals 2023, 82 , 101680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biologicals.2023.101680
    20. Line Bechsgaard Andersen, Marit Sofie Kjær Mahler, Rikke Fredslund Andersen, Lars Henrik Jensen, Louise Raunkilde. The Clinical Impact of Methylated Homeobox A9 ctDNA in Patients with Non-Resectable Biliary Tract Cancer Treated with Erlotinib and Bevacizumab. Cancers 2022, 14 (19) , 4598. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14194598
    21. Daniel Burke, Leonardo Pinheiro, Ella Somerville Glover, Fiona Moon, Zandra Deans, Adam Corner. Between Laboratory Reproducibility of DNA Extraction from Human Blood and Fresh Frozen Tissue. The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics 2022, 24 (9) , 1041-1049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoldx.2022.06.003
    22. Yanzhen Han, Jianchang Wang, Shuhong Zhang, Shuopeng Yang, Xiangji Wang, Yanqing Han, Zhixin Shen, Xiangdong Xu. Simultaneous quantification of hepatitis A virus and norovirus genogroup I and II by triplex droplet digital PCR. Food Microbiology 2022, 103 , 103933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2021.103933
    23. Shadma Fatima, Yafeng Ma, Azadeh Safrachi, Sana Haider, Kevin J. Spring, Fatemeh Vafaee, Kieran F. Scott, Tara L. Roberts, Therese M. Becker, Paul de Souza. Harnessing Liquid Biopsies to Guide Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy. Cancers 2022, 14 (7) , 1669. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14071669
    24. Tigst Demeke, Sung-Jong Lee, Monika Eng. Increasing the Efficiency of Canola and Soybean GMO Detection and Quantification Using Multiplex Droplet Digital PCR. Biology 2022, 11 (2) , 201. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11020201
    25. Irina Palacín-Aliana, Noemí García-Romero, Adrià Asensi-Puig, Josefa Carrión-Navarro, Víctor González-Rumayor, Ángel Ayuso-Sacido. Clinical Utility of Liquid Biopsy-Based Actionable Mutations Detected via ddPCR. Biomedicines 2021, 9 (8) , 906. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9080906
    26. Loic Lindner, Pauline Cayrou, Sylvie Jacquot, Marie-Christine Birling, Yann Herault, Guillaume Pavlovic. Reliable and robust droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) and RT-ddPCR protocols for mouse studies. Methods 2021, 191 , 95-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2020.07.004
    27. Anders Jakobsen, Rikke F. Andersen, Torben F. Hansen, Lars H. Jensen, Louise Faaborg, Karina D. Steffensen, Caroline B. Thomsen, Sara W.C. Wen. Early ctDNA response to chemotherapy. A potential surrogate marker for overall survival. European Journal of Cancer 2021, 149 , 128-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2021.03.006
    28. Carolyn Reifsnyder. Counting DNA in the Clinic Using Digital PCR. Clinical OMICs 2021, 8 (2) , 24-25. https://doi.org/10.1089/clinomi.08.02.20
    29. Meiqing Sun, Hong Wang, Xiaoyan Li. Modification of cellulose microfibers by polyglutamic acid and mesoporous silica nanoparticles for Enterovirus 71 adsorption. Materials Letters 2020, 277 , 128320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2020.128320
    30. , Alexandra S Whale, Ward De Spiegelaere, Wim Trypsteen, Afif Abdel Nour, Young-Kyung Bae, Vladimir Benes, Daniel Burke, Megan Cleveland, Philippe Corbisier, Alison S Devonshire, Lianhua Dong, Daniela Drandi, Carole A Foy, Jeremy A Garson, Hua-Jun He, Jan Hellemans, Mikael Kubista, Antoon Lievens, Mike G Makrigiorgos, Mojca Milavec, Reinhold D Mueller, Tania Nolan, Denise M O’Sullivan, Michael W Pfaffl, Stefan Rödiger, Erica L Romsos, Gregory L Shipley, Valerie Taly, Andreas Untergasser, Carl T Wittwer, Stephen A Bustin, Jo Vandesompele, Jim F Huggett. The Digital MIQE Guidelines Update: Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Digital PCR Experiments for 2020. Clinical Chemistry 2020, 66 (8) , 1012-1029. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaa125
    31. Caroline B Thomsen, Anders Jakobsen. Circulating Tumor-Specific Dna: A Stony Road to Clinical Utility. Biomarkers in Medicine 2020, 14 (5) , 331-333. https://doi.org/10.2217/bmm-2019-0552
    32. Andrea Forschner, Stephanie Weißgraeber, Dirk Hadaschik, Martin Schulze, Maria Kopp, Sabine Kelkenberg, Tobias Sinnberg, Claus Garbe, Saskia Biskup, Florian Battke. <p>Circulating Tumor DNA Correlates with Outcome in Metastatic Melanoma Treated by BRAF and MEK Inhibitors – Results of a Prospective Biomarker Study</p>. OncoTargets and Therapy 2020, Volume 13 , 5017-5032. https://doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S248237
    33. Andrea Forschner, Florian Battke, Dirk Hadaschik, Martin Schulze, Stephanie Weißgraeber, Chung-Ting Han, Maria Kopp, Maximilian Frick, Bernhard Klumpp, Nicola Tietze, Teresa Amaral, Peter Martus, Tobias Sinnberg, Thomas Eigentler, Ulrike Keim, Claus Garbe, Dennis Döcker, Saskia Biskup. Tumor mutation burden and circulating tumor DNA in combined CTLA-4 and PD-1 antibody therapy in metastatic melanoma – results of a prospective biomarker study. Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer 2019, 7 (1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s40425-019-0659-0
    34. Ben O'Leary, Sarah Hrebien, Matthew Beaney, Charlotte Fribbens, Isaac Garcia-Murillas, John Jiang, Yuan Li, Cynthia Huang Bartlett, Fabrice André, Sibylle Loibl, Sherene Loi, Massimo Cristofanilli, Nicholas C Turner. Comparison of BEAMing and Droplet Digital PCR for Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis. Clinical Chemistry 2019, 65 (11) , 1405-1413. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2019.305805
    35. Chen-Yin Ou, Tam Vu, Jonathan T. Grunwald, Michael Toledano, Jan Zimak, Melody Toosky, Byron Shen, Jason A. Zell, Enrico Gratton, Timothy J. Abram, Weian Zhao. An ultrasensitive test for profiling circulating tumor DNA using integrated comprehensive droplet digital detection. Lab on a Chip 2019, 19 (6) , 993-1005. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8LC01399C
    36. Timothy J Peters, Hugh J French, Stephen T Bradford, Ruth Pidsley, Clare Stirzaker, Hilal Varinli, Shalima Nair, Wenjia Qu, Jenny Song, Katherine A Giles, Aaron L Statham, Helen Speirs, Terence P Speed, Susan J Clark, . Evaluation of cross-platform and interlaboratory concordance via consensus modelling of genomic measurements. Bioinformatics 2019, 35 (4) , 560-570. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bty675
    37. Silvia Galbiati, Francesco Damin, Valentina Burgio, Angela Brisci, Nadia Soriani, Bernadette Belcastro, Chiara Di Resta, Luca Gianni, Marcella Chiari, Monica Ronzoni, Maurizio Ferrari. Evaluation of three advanced methodologies, COLD-PCR, microarray and ddPCR, for identifying the mutational status by liquid biopsies in metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Clinica Chimica Acta 2019, 489 , 136-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2018.12.004
    38. Pauline Romanet, Pascal Philibert, Frédéric Fina, Thomas Cuny, Catherine Roche, L'houcine Ouafik, Françoise Paris, Rachel Reynaud, Anne Barlier. Using Digital Droplet Polymerase Chain Reaction to Detect the Mosaic GNAS Mutations in Whole Blood DNA or Circulating Cell-Free DNA in Fibrous Dysplasia and McCune-Albright Syndrome. The Journal of Pediatrics 2019, 205 , 281-285.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.09.070
    39. C. B. Thomsen, T. F. Hansen, R. F. Andersen, J. Lindebjerg, L. H. Jensen, A. Jakobsen. Monitoring the effect of first line treatment in RAS/RAF mutated metastatic colorectal cancer by serial analysis of tumor specific DNA in plasma. Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research 2018, 37 (1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s13046-018-0723-5
    40. Haowen Yang, Zhu Chen, Xiaobao Cao, Zhiyang Li, Stavros Stavrakis, Jaebum Choo, Andrew J. deMello, Philip D. Howes, Nongyue He. A sample-in-digital-answer-out system for rapid detection and quantitation of infectious pathogens in bodily fluids. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 2018, 410 (27) , 7019-7030. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-018-1335-9
    41. Alexandra S Whale, Gerwyn M Jones, Jernej Pavšič, Tanja Dreo, Nicholas Redshaw, Sema Akyürek, Müslüm Akgöz, Carla Divieto, Maria Paola Sassi, Hua-Jun He, Kenneth D Cole, Young-Kyung Bae, Sang-Ryoul Park, Liesbet Deprez, Philippe Corbisier, Sonia Garrigou, Valérie Taly, Raquel Larios, Simon Cowen, Denise M O'Sullivan, Claire A Bushell, Heidi Goenaga-Infante, Carole A Foy, Alison J Woolford, Helen Parkes, Jim F Huggett, Alison S Devonshire. Assessment of Digital PCR as a Primary Reference Measurement Procedure to Support Advances in Precision Medicine. Clinical Chemistry 2018, 64 (9) , 1296-1307. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2017.285478
    42. Tigst Demeke, David Dobnik. Critical assessment of digital PCR for the detection and quantification of genetically modified organisms. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 2018, 410 (17) , 4039-4050. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-018-1010-1
    43. Charles Decraene, Amanda B Silveira, François-Clément Bidard, Audrey Vallée, Marc Michel, Samia Melaabi, Anne Vincent-Salomon, Adrien Saliou, Alexandre Houy, Maud Milder, Olivier Lantz, Marc Ychou, Marc G Denis, Jean-Yves Pierga, Marc-Henri Stern, Charlotte Proudhon. Multiple Hotspot Mutations Scanning by Single Droplet Digital PCR. Clinical Chemistry 2018, 64 (2) , 317-328. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2017.272518
    44. George Karlin-Neumann, Francisco Bizouarn. Entering the Pantheon of 21st Century Molecular Biology Tools: A Perspective on Digital PCR. 2018, 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7778-9_1
    45. George Karlin-Neumann. Concerns with conclusions in the article by Sherwood et al ‘Key differences between 13 KRAS mutation detection technologies and their relevance for clinical practice’. ESMO Open 2018, 3 (1) , e000287. https://doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2017-000287
    46. James Sherwood. Response: Concerns with conclusions in the article by Sherwood et al ‘Key differences between 13 KRAS mutation detection technologies and their relevance for clinical practice’. ESMO Open 2018, 3 (1) , e000294. https://doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2017-000294
    47. Anna Katharina Seitz, Silvia Thoene, Andreas Bietenbeck, Roman Nawroth, Robert Tauber, Mark Thalgott, Sebastian Schmid, Ramona Secci, Margitta Retz, Jürgen E. Gschwend, Jürgen Ruland, Christof Winter, Matthias M. Heck. AR-V7 in Peripheral Whole Blood of Patients with Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: Association with Treatment-specific Outcome Under Abiraterone and Enzalutamide. European Urology 2017, 72 (5) , 828-834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.07.024
    48. Nathan G. Schoepp, Travis S. Schlappi, Matthew S. Curtis, Slava S. Butkovich, Shelley Miller, Romney M. Humphries, Rustem F. Ismagilov. Rapid pathogen-specific phenotypic antibiotic susceptibility testing using digital LAMP quantification in clinical samples. Science Translational Medicine 2017, 9 (410) https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aal3693
    49. Yicun Cai, Yuping He, Rong Lv, Hongchao Chen, Qiang Wang, Liangwen Pan, . Detection and quantification of beef and pork materials in meat products by duplex droplet digital PCR. PLOS ONE 2017, 12 (8) , e0181949. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181949

    Analytical Chemistry

    Cite this: Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 3, 1724–1733
    Click to copy citationCitation copied!
    https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.6b03980
    Published December 9, 2016
    Copyright © 2016 American Chemical Society

    Article Views

    1228

    Altmetric

    -

    Citations

    Learn about these metrics

    Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

    Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

    The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.