logo
My Activity
Recently Viewed
You have not visited any articles yet, Please visit some articles to see contents here.
CONTENT TYPES

Figure 1Loading Img

Contributions of Local Farming to Urban Sustainability in the Northeast United States

View Author Information
Technical University of Denmark, Quantitative Sustainability Assessment Division, Produktionstorvet, Building 424, Kongens Lyngby, 2800, Denmark
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Architecture, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, 5-419, Cambridge, 02139, United States
*Phone: +45 45254561; fax: +45 45933435; e-mail: [email protected]
Cite this: Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 13, 7340–7349
Publication Date (Web):June 21, 2017
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b01011
Copyright © 2017 American Chemical Society
Article Views
1651
Altmetric
-
Citations
LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

Read OnlinePDF (4 MB)
Supporting Info (1)»

Abstract

Abstract Image

Food consumption is an important contributor to a city’s environmental impacts (carbon emissions, land occupation, water use, etc.) Urban farming (UF) has been advocated as a means to increase urban sustainability by reducing food-related transport and tapping into local resources. Taking Boston as an illustrative Northeast U.S. city, we developed a novel method to estimate sub-urban, food-borne carbon and land footprints using multiregion-input-output modeling and nutritional surveys. Computer simulations utilizing primary data explored UF’s ability to reduce these footprints using select farming technologies, building on previous city-scale UF assessments which have hitherto been dependent on proxy data for UF. We found that UF generated meagre food-related carbon footprint reductions (1.1–2.9% of baseline 2211 kg CO2 equivalents/capita/annum) and land occupation increases (<1% of baseline 9000 m2 land occupation/capita/annum) under optimal production scenarios, informing future evidence-based urban design and policy crafting in the region. Notwithstanding UF’s marginal environmental gains, UF could help Boston meet national nutritional guidelines for vegetable intake, generate an estimated $160 million U.S. in revenue to growers and act as a pedagogical and community building tool, though these benefits would hinge on large-scale UF proliferation, likely undergirded by environmental remediation of marginal lands in the city.

Supporting Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b01011.

  • Background data for the development of the food borne environmental footprints. Description of methods for urban agriculture area estimates, urban agriculture life cycle assessment and algorithms for urban farming proliferation in the city. Raw results from the models of impacts of urban farming in the city (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. The American Chemical Society holds a copyright ownership interest in any copyrightable Supporting Information. Files available from the ACS website may be downloaded for personal use only. Users are not otherwise permitted to reproduce, republish, redistribute, or sell any Supporting Information from the ACS website, either in whole or in part, in either machine-readable form or any other form without permission from the American Chemical Society. For permission to reproduce, republish and redistribute this material, requesters must process their own requests via the RightsLink permission system. Information about how to use the RightsLink permission system can be found at http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Cited By


This article is cited by 15 publications.

  1. Zhongxiao Sun, Arnold Tukker, Paul Behrens. Going Global to Local: Connecting Top-Down Accounting and Local Impacts, A Methodological Review of Spatially Explicit Input–Output Approaches. Environmental Science & Technology 2019, 53 (3) , 1048-1062. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b03148
  2. Dana Boyer and Anu Ramaswami . What Is the Contribution of City-Scale Actions to the Overall Food System’s Environmental Impacts?: Assessing Water, Greenhouse Gas, and Land Impacts of Future Urban Food Scenarios. Environmental Science & Technology 2017, 51 (20) , 12035-12045. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b03176
  3. Giuseppe Feola, Jaime Suzunaga, Jenny Soler, Amanda Wilson. Peri-urban agriculture as quiet sustainability: Challenging the urban development discourse in Sogamoso, Colombia. Journal of Rural Studies 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.04.032
  4. Sally Brown, James A. Ippolito, Lakhwinder S. Hundal, Nicholas T. Basta. Municipal biosolids — A resource for sustainable communities. Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health 2020, 14 , 56-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coesh.2020.02.007
  5. Giuseppe Feola, Marlyne Sahakian, Claudia R. Binder, Patricia Zundritsch. Sustainability Assessment of Urban Agriculture. 2020,,, 417-437. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108574334.019
  6. Dana Boyer, Anu Ramaswami. Comparing urban food system characteristics and actions in US and Indian cities from a multi‐environmental impact perspective: Toward a streamlined approach. Journal of Industrial Ecology 2020, 37 https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12985
  7. Till Weidner, Aidong Yang. The potential of urban agriculture in combination with organic waste valorization: Assessment of resource flows and emissions for two european cities. Journal of Cleaner Production 2020, 244 , 118490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118490
  8. Helen, Alexandros Gasparatos. . Agriculture 2020,,, 140. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10050140
  9. D. Boyer, J. Sarkar, A. Ramaswami. Diets, Food Miles, and Environmental Sustainability of Urban Food Systems: Analysis of Nine Indian Cities. Earth's Future 2019, 7 (8) , 911-922. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018EF001048
  10. Till Weidner, Aidong Yang, Michael W. Hamm. Consolidating the current knowledge on urban agriculture in productive urban food systems: Learnings, gaps and outlook. Journal of Cleaner Production 2019, 209 , 1637-1655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.004
  11. Ana Moragues-Faus, Alizée Marceau. Measuring Progress in Sustainable Food Cities: An Indicators Toolbox for Action. Sustainability 2019, 11 (1) , 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010045
  12. Anders Bjørn, Pradip Kalbar, Simon Elsborg Nygaard, Simon Kabins, Charlotte Louise Jensen, Morten Birkved, Jannick Schmidt, Michael Zwicky Hauschild. Pursuing necessary reductions in embedded GHG emissions of developed nations: Will efficiency improvements and changes in consumption get us there?. Global Environmental Change 2018, 52 , 314-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.08.001
  13. Esther Sanyé-Mengual, Francesco Orsini, Giorgio Gianquinto. Revisiting the Sustainability Concept of Urban Food Production from a Stakeholders’ Perspective. Sustainability 2018, 10 (7) , 2175. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072175
  14. Howard Frumkin, Kristie L. Ebi, Jeremy J. Hess. 10. Climate Change and Environmental Public Health. 2018,,https://doi.org/10.2105/9780875532943ch10
  15. Eugene Mohareb, Martin Heller, Paige Novak, Benjamin Goldstein, Xavier Fonoll, Lutgarde Raskin. Considerations for reducing food system energy demand while scaling up urban agriculture. Environmental Research Letters 2017, 12 (12) , 125004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa889b

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

OOPS

You have to login with your ACS ID befor you can login with your Mendeley account.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect

This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By continuing to use the site, you are accepting our use of cookies. Read the ACS privacy policy.

CONTINUE