ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
CONTENT TYPES

Figure 1Loading Img

Examining the Potential for Agricultural Benefits from Pollinator Habitat at Solar Facilities in the United States

  • Leroy J. Walston*
    Leroy J. Walston
    Environmental Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, Illinois 60439, United States
    *L. J. Walston. Email: [email protected]
  • Shruti K. Mishra
    Shruti K. Mishra
    Environmental Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, Illinois 60439, United States
  • Heidi M. Hartmann
    Heidi M. Hartmann
    Environmental Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, Illinois 60439, United States
  • Ihor Hlohowskyj
    Ihor Hlohowskyj
    Environmental Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, Illinois 60439, United States
  • James McCall
    James McCall
    National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado 80401, United States
    More by James McCall
  • , and 
  • Jordan Macknick
    Jordan Macknick
    National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado 80401, United States
Cite this: Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 13, 7566–7576
Publication Date (Web):May 28, 2018
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b00020
Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society
ACS AuthorChoiceACS AuthorChoice
Article Views
8912
Altmetric
-
Citations
LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
Read OnlinePDF (7 MB)
Supporting Info (1)»

Abstract

Abstract Image

Of the many roles insects serve for ecosystem function, pollination is possibly the most important service directly linked to human well-being. However, land use changes have contributed to the decline of pollinators and their habitats. In agricultural landscapes that also support renewable energy developments such as utility-scale solar energy [USSE] facilities, opportunities may exist to conserve insect pollinators and locally restore their ecosystem services through the implementation of vegetation management approaches that aim to provide and maintain pollinator habitat at USSE facilities. As a first step toward understanding the potential agricultural benefits of solar-pollinator habitat, we identified areas of overlap between USSE facilities and surrounding pollinator-dependent crop types in the United States (U.S.). Using spatial data on solar energy developments and crop types across the U.S., and assuming a pollinator foraging distance of 1.5 km, we identified over 3,500 km2 of agricultural land near existing and planned USSE facilities that may benefit from increased pollination services through the creation of pollinator habitat at the USSE facilities. The following five pollinator-dependent crop types accounted for over 90% of the agriculture near USSE facilities, and these could benefit most from the creation of pollinator habitat at existing and planned USSE facilities: soybeans, alfalfa, cotton, almonds, and citrus. We discuss how our results may be used to understand potential agro-economic implications of solar-pollinator habitat. Our results show that ecosystem service restoration through the creation of pollinator habitat could improve the sustainability of large-scale renewable energy developments in agricultural landscapes.

Supporting Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b00020.

  • A detailed summary of results on the amount USSE development and pollinator-dependent agriculture within the 1.5 km foraging zones in each state. Tables summarize for each state: the amount of total 2016 agriculture production, total amount of USSE development and crop area within the 1.5 km foraging zones around USSE facilities, and amount of pollinator-dependent crop types within 1.5 km foraging zones around USSE facilities (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Cited By


This article is cited by 14 publications.

  1. Maggie Graham, Serkan Ates, Andony P. Melathopoulos, Andrew R. Moldenke, Sandra J. DeBano, Lincoln R. Best, Chad W. Higgins. Partial shading by solar panels delays bloom, increases floral abundance during the late-season for pollinators in a dryland, agrivoltaic ecosystem. Scientific Reports 2021, 11 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86756-4
  2. Adam G Dolezal, Jacob Torres, Matthew E O’Neal, . Can Solar Energy Fuel Pollinator Conservation?. Environmental Entomology 2021, 50 (4) , 757-761. https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/nvab041
  3. H. Blaydes, S.G. Potts, J.D. Whyatt, A. Armstrong. Opportunities to enhance pollinator biodiversity in solar parks. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2021, 145 , 111065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111065
  4. John H. Armstrong, Andy J. Kulikowski, Stacy M. Philpott. Urban renewable energy and ecosystems: integrating vegetation with ground-mounted solar arrays increases arthropod abundance of key functional groups. Urban Ecosystems 2021, 24 (3) , 621-631. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-020-01063-6
  5. Carlos Toledo, Alessandra Scognamiglio. Agrivoltaic Systems Design and Assessment: A Critical Review, and a Descriptive Model towards a Sustainable Landscape Vision (Three-Dimensional Agrivoltaic Patterns). Sustainability 2021, 13 (12) , 6871. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126871
  6. Rosa I. Cuppari, Chad W. Higgins, Gregory W. Characklis. Agrivoltaics and weather risk: A diversification strategy for landowners. Applied Energy 2021, 291 , 116809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116809
  7. Karen E. Tanner, Kara A. Moore‐O’Leary, Ingrid M. Parker, Bruce M. Pavlik, Sophia Haji, Rebecca R. Hernandez. Microhabitats associated with solar energy development alter demography of two desert annuals. Ecological Applications 2021, 85 https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2349
  8. Leroy J. Walston, Yudi Li, Heidi M. Hartmann, Jordan Macknick, Aaron Hanson, Chris Nootenboom, Eric Lonsdorf, Jessica Hellmann. Modeling the ecosystem services of native vegetation management practices at solar energy facilities in the Midwestern United States. Ecosystem Services 2021, 47 , 101227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101227
  9. Alexander E. Cagle, Alona Armstrong, Giles Exley, Steven M. Grodsky, Jordan Macknick, John Sherwin, Rebecca R. Hernandez. The Land Sparing, Water Surface Use Efficiency, and Water Surface Transformation of Floating Photovoltaic Solar Energy Installations. Sustainability 2020, 12 (19) , 8154. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198154
  10. Chong Seok Choi, Alexander E. Cagle, Jordan Macknick, Dellena E. Bloom, Joshua S. Caplan, Sujith Ravi. Effects of Revegetation on Soil Physical and Chemical Properties in Solar Photovoltaic Infrastructure. Frontiers in Environmental Science 2020, 8 https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2020.00140
  11. Karl Kosciuch, Daniel Riser-Espinoza, Michael Gerringer, Wallace Erickson, . A summary of bird mortality at photovoltaic utility scale solar facilities in the Southwestern U.S.. PLOS ONE 2020, 15 (4) , e0232034. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232034
  12. Damon M Hall, Dino J Martins. Human dimensions of insect pollinator conservation. Current Opinion in Insect Science 2020, 38 , 107-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cois.2020.04.001
  13. John Waldman, Shailesh Sharma, Shahab Afshari, Balázs Fekete. Solar-power replacement as a solution for hydropower foregone in US dam removals. Nature Sustainability 2019, 2 (9) , 872-878. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0362-7
  14. Rebecca R. Hernandez, Alona Armstrong, Jennifer Burney, Greer Ryan, Kara Moore-O’Leary, Ibrahima Diédhiou, Steven M. Grodsky, Leslie Saul-Gershenz, Rob Davis, Jordan Macknick, Dustin Mulvaney, Garvin A. Heath, Shane B. Easter, Madison K. Hoffacker, Michael F. Allen, Daniel M. Kammen. Techno–ecological synergies of solar energy for global sustainability. Nature Sustainability 2019, 2 (7) , 560-568. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0309-z

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect

This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By continuing to use the site, you are accepting our use of cookies. Read the ACS privacy policy.

CONTINUE