ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
My Activity
CONTENT TYPES

Figure 1Loading Img

Two-Phase Improves Performance of Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactor Treatment of Food Waste at High Organic Loading Rates

  • Yamrot M. Amha
    Yamrot M. Amha
    Astani Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Southern California, 3620 South Vermont Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90089, United States
  • Michael Corbett
    Michael Corbett
    Divert, Inc., 23 Bradford Street, 3rd Floor, Concord, Massachusetts 01742, United States
  • , and 
  • Adam L. Smith*
    Adam L. Smith
    Astani Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Southern California, 3620 South Vermont Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90089, United States
    *Phone: +1 213.740.0473. E-mail: [email protected]
Cite this: Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 16, 9572–9583
Publication Date (Web):July 29, 2019
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b02639
Copyright © 2019 American Chemical Society

Article Views

1487

Altmetric

-

Citations

LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
Read OnlinePDF (3 MB)
Supporting Info (1)»

Abstract

Abstract Image

Anaerobic membrane bioreactors (AnMBRs) are in use at the full-scale for energy recovery from food waste (FW). In this study, the potential for two-phase (acid/gas) AnMBR treatment of FW was investigated as a strategy to increase microbial diversity, thereby improving performance. Two bench-scale AnMBRs were operated in single-phase (SP) and two-phase (TP) mode across incremental increases in organic loading rate (OLR) from 2.5 to 15 g total chemical oxygen demand (COD) L·d–1. The TP acid-phase (TP-AP) enriched total VFAs by 3-fold compared to influent FW and harbored a distinct microbial community enriched in fermenters that thrived in the low pH environment. The TP methane phase (TP-MP) showed increased methane production and resilience relative to SP as OLR increased from 3.5 to 10 g COD L·d–1. SP showed signs of inhibition (i.e., rapid decrease in methane production per OLR) at 10 g COD L·d–1, whereas both systems were inhibited at 15 g COD L·d–1. At 10 g COD L·d–1, where the highest difference in performance was observed (20.3% increase in methane production), activity of syntrophic bacteria in TP-MP was double that of SP. Our results indicate that AnMBRs in TP mode could effectively treat FW at OLRs up to 10 g COD·L day–1 by improving hydrolysis rates, microbial diversity, and syntroph activity, and enriching resistant communities to high OLRs relative to AnMBRs in SP mode.

Supporting Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b02639.

  • Additional details on AnMBR operation, performance, and microbial community data (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Cited By

This article is cited by 32 publications.

  1. Yeyuan Xiao, Saisai Fu, Hira Waheed, Tao Teng, Xucai Wang. Biofouling Control in an Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactor with Indigenous Quorum Quenching Bacterium Micrococcus luteus Strain AnQ-m1. ACS ES&T Water 2022, 2 (12) , 2312-2322. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestwater.2c00186
  2. Mei Chen, Yanli Li, Xinyi Sun, Ruobin Dai, Junjian Zheng, Xin Wang, Zhiwei Wang. Recent advances in electrochemical processes integrated with anaerobic membrane bioreactor in wastewater treatment. Chemical Engineering Journal 2023, 468 , 143822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.143822
  3. Ravi Kumar Parihar, Satyendra Prasad Chaurasia, Md Oayes Midda. An overview of anaerobic membrane bioreactors' evolving research statistics for treating wastewater. Materials Today: Proceedings 2023, 145 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.03.156
  4. Anwar Ahmad, Roomana Ghufran, Qazi Nasir, Fathima Shahitha, Mohammed Al-Sibani, Amal S. Al-Rahbi. Enhanced anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and solid poultry slaughterhouse waste using fixed bed digester: Performance and energy recovery. Environmental Technology & Innovation 2023, 12 , 103099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2023.103099
  5. Ronghua Xu, Yuanyuan Yao, Zhongbo Zhou, Yu-Xi Huang, Shanshan Zhao, Fangang Meng. Immobilization of hydrolytic/fermentative bacteria to achieve ultra-low fouling in anaerobic membrane bioreactor. Chemical Engineering Journal 2023, 452 , 138821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.138821
  6. S. Dangol, A. Ghimire, S. Tuladhar, A. Khadka, B. Thapa, L. Sapkota. Biohythane and organic acid production from food waste by two-stage anaerobic digestion: a review within biorefinery framework. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 2022, 19 (12) , 12791-12824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-022-03937-y
  7. Emmanuel Sunday Okeke, Timothy Prince Chidike Ezeorba, Charles Obinwanne Okoye, Yao Chen, Guanghua Mao, Weiwei Feng, Xiangyang Wu. Environmental and health impact of unrecovered API from pharmaceutical manufacturing wastes: A review of contemporary treatment, recycling and management strategies. Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy 2022, 30 , 100865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scp.2022.100865
  8. Yanxu Liu, Yuanyuan Lv, Hui Cheng, Lianpei Zou, Yu-You Li, Jianyong Liu. High-efficiency anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and mature leachate using expanded granular sludge blanket reactor. Bioresource Technology 2022, 362 , 127847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127847
  9. Wanjiang Li, Teng Cai, Xueqin Lu, Yule Han, Dilibaierkezi kudisi, Guohua Chang, Ke Dong, Guangyin Zhen. Two-Phase Improves Bio-hydrogen and Bio-methane Production of Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactor from Waste Activated Sludge with Digestate Recirculation. Chemical Engineering Journal 2022, 288 , 139547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.139547
  10. Chen-Yeon Chu, Jin-Long Zheng, Prakash Bhuyar. Enhancement of biohydrogen production by employing a packed-filter bioreactor (PFBR) utilizing sulfite-rich organic effluent obtained from a washing process of beverage manufactures. Biomass and Bioenergy 2022, 161 , 106451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2022.106451
  11. Yisong Hu, Xuli Cai, Runda Du, Yuan Yang, Chao Rong, Yu Qin, Yu-You Li. A review on anaerobic membrane bioreactors for enhanced valorization of urban organic wastes: Achievements, limitations, energy balance and future perspectives. Science of The Total Environment 2022, 820 , 153284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153284
  12. Yuanyuan Yao, Zhihao Gan, Zhongbo Zhou, Yu-Xi Huang, Fangang Meng. Carbon sources driven supernatant micro-particles differentiate in submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactors (AnMBRs). Chemical Engineering Journal 2022, 430 , 133020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.133020
  13. Wanjiang Li, Teng Cai, Xueqin Lu, Yule Han, Dilibaierkezi kudisi, Guohua Chang, Guangyin Zhen. Two-Phase Improves Bio-Hydrogen and Bio-Methane Production of Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactor from Waste Activated Sludge with Digestate Recirculation. SSRN Electronic Journal 2022, 288 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4076671
  14. Maria C. Veiga, Ruth Iglesias-Iglesias, Borja Lagoa-Costa, Cristian Kennes. Acidogenic Fermentation of Grape Marc with Sewage Sludge to Produce Volatile Fatty Acids. SSRN Electronic Journal 2022, 70 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4117183
  15. Yanxu Liu, Yuanyuan LV, Hui Cheng, Lianpei Zou, Yu-You Li, Jianyong Liu. High-Efficiency Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Food Waste and Mature Leachate Using an Expanded Granular Sludge Reactor: Performance, Mechanisms, and Energy Potential. SSRN Electronic Journal 2022, 53 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4129000
  16. Jin Sun, Yasunori Kosaki, Koji Kawamura, Nobuhisa Watanabe. Operational load enhancement for an anaerobic membrane bioreactor through ethanol fermentation pretreatment of food waste. Energy Conversion and Management 2021, 249 , 114840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114840
  17. Ángel Robles, Joaquín Serralta, Nuria Martí, José Ferrer, Aurora Seco. Anaerobic membrane bioreactors for resource recovery from municipal wastewater: a comprehensive review of recent advances. Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology 2021, 7 (11) , 1944-1965. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1EW00217A
  18. Roger Jay De Vela. A review of the factors affecting the performance of anaerobic membrane bioreactor and strategies to control membrane fouling. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology 2021, 20 (3) , 607-644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-021-09580-2
  19. Xinyu Xie, Yihan Wang, Zimin Wei, Yutong Zhang, Chuang Zhang, Shubo Zhang, Hongyu Yang, Xu Zhang, Yue Zhao. Continuous insulation strategy of organic waste composting in cold region: Based on cold-adapted consortium. Bioresource Technology 2021, 335 , 125257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125257
  20. Tao Wang, Gefu Zhu, Bin Kuang, Jianbo Jia, Changyu Liu, Guanjing Cai, Chunxing Li. Novel insights into the anaerobic digestion of propionate via Syntrophobacter fumaroxidans and Geobacter sulfurreducens: Process and mechanism. Water Research 2021, 200 , 117270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2021.117270
  21. Mads Borgbjerg Jensen, Nadieh de Jonge, Maja Duus Dolriis, Caroline Kragelund, Christian Holst Fischer, Martin Rosenørn Eskesen, Karoline Noer, Henrik Bjarne Møller, Lars Ditlev Mørck Ottosen, Jeppe Lund Nielsen, Michael Vedel Wegener Kofoed. Cellulolytic and Xylanolytic Microbial Communities Associated With Lignocellulose-Rich Wheat Straw Degradation in Anaerobic Digestion. Frontiers in Microbiology 2021, 12 https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.645174
  22. Syeed Md Iskander, Yamrot M. Amha, Phillip Wang, Qin Dong, Juhe Liu, Michael Corbett, Adam L. Smith. Investigation of Fats, Oils, and Grease Co-digestion With Food Waste in Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactors and the Associated Microbial Community Using MinION Sequencing. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 2021, 9 https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.613626
  23. Fatima Anjum, Irfan M. Khan, Jeonghwan Kim, Muhammad Aslam, Gaetan Blandin, Marc Heran, Geoffroy Lesage. Trends and progress in AnMBR for domestic wastewater treatment and their impacts on process efficiency and membrane fouling. Environmental Technology & Innovation 2021, 21 , 101204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2020.101204
  24. Javkhlan Ariunbaatar, Robert Bair, Onur Ozcan, Harish Ravishankar, Giovanni Esposito, Piet N. L. Lens, Daniel H. Yeh. Performance of AnMBR in Treatment of Post-consumer Food Waste: Effect of Hydraulic Retention Time and Organic Loading Rate on Biogas Production and Membrane Fouling. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 2021, 8 https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.594936
  25. Bao-Shan Xing, Yule Han, Xiaochang C. Wang, Sifan Cao, Junwei Wen, Kaidi Zhang. Acclimatization of anaerobic sludge with cow manure and realization of high-rate food waste digestion for biogas production. Bioresource Technology 2020, 315 , 123830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123830
  26. Sara Arabi, Marie‐Laure Pellegrin, Jorge Aguinaldo, Mary E. Sadler, Robert McCandless, Sara Sadreddini, Joseph Wong, Marie S. Burbano, Srikanth Koduri, Karla Abella, Jeff Moskal, Sirwan Alimoradi, Yaldah Azimi, Andrew Dow, Leila Tootchi, Karla Kinser, Vishakha Kaushik, Valetta Saldanha. Membrane processes. Water Environment Research 2020, 92 (10) , 1447-1498. https://doi.org/10.1002/wer.1385
  27. Val S. Frenkel, Gregg A. Cummings, Kris Y. Maillacheruvu, Walter Z. Tang. Food‐processing wastes. Water Environment Research 2020, 92 (10) , 1726-1740. https://doi.org/10.1002/wer.1428
  28. Esther Ge Lou, Moustapha Harb, Adam L. Smith, Lauren B. Stadler. Livestock manure improved antibiotic resistance gene removal during co-treatment of domestic wastewater in an anaerobic membrane bioreactor. Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology 2020, 6 (10) , 2832-2842. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0EW00387E
  29. Michael Lim, Dominique Patureau, Marc Heran, Geoffroy Lesage, Jeonghwan Kim. Removal of organic micropollutants in anaerobic membrane bioreactors in wastewater treatment: critical review. Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology 2020, 6 (5) , 1230-1243. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9EW01058K
  30. Moustapha Harb, Noel Ermer, Christelle BouNehme Sawaya, Adam L. Smith. Increased applied voltage in the presence of GAC enhances microbial activity and methane production during anaerobic digestion of food waste. Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology 2020, 6 (3) , 737-746. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9EW01000A
  31. Min-Ju Park, Gyu-Tae Seo. A Study on Membrane Filtration Characteristics of Methanogenic Mixed Liquor in Two Phase Anaerobic Digestion of Food Waste. Journal of Korean Society of Environmental Engineers 2020, 42 (3) , 151-163. https://doi.org/10.4491/KSEE.2020.42.3.151
  32. Jin Sun, Yasunori Kosaki, Nobuhisa Watanabe. An anaerobic membrane bioreactor using a hollow fiber membrane and biogas agitation. MethodsX 2020, 7 , 101018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2020.101018

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect