ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Permutationally Invariant, Reproducing Kernel-Based Potential Energy Surfaces for Polyatomic Molecules: From Formaldehyde to Acetone
My Activity

Figure 1Loading Img
    Dynamics

    Permutationally Invariant, Reproducing Kernel-Based Potential Energy Surfaces for Polyatomic Molecules: From Formaldehyde to Acetone
    Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

    Other Access OptionsSupporting Information (1)

    Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation

    Cite this: J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2020, 16, 9, 5474–5484
    Click to copy citationCitation copied!
    https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.0c00535
    Published July 30, 2020
    Copyright © 2020 American Chemical Society

    Abstract

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
    Abstract Image

    Constructing accurate, high-dimensional molecular potential energy surfaces (PESs) for polyatomic molecules is challenging. Reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS) interpolation is an efficient way to construct such PESs. However, RKHS interpolation is computationally most effective when the input energies are available on a regular grid. Thus, the number of reference energies required can become very large even for pentaatomic systems making such an approach computationally prohibitive when using high-level electronic structure calculations. Here, an efficient and robust scheme is presented to overcome these limitations and is applied to constructing high-dimensional PESs for systems with up to 10 atoms. Using energies as well as gradients reduces the number of input data required and thus keeps the number of coefficients at a manageable size. The correct implementation of permutational symmetry in the kernel products is tested and explicitly demonstrated for the highly symmetric CH4 molecule.

    Copyright © 2020 American Chemical Society

    Read this article

    To access this article, please review the available access options below.

    Get instant access

    Purchase Access

    Read this article for 48 hours. Check out below using your ACS ID or as a guest.

    Recommended

    Access through Your Institution

    You may have access to this article through your institution.

    Your institution does not have access to this content. Add or change your institution or let them know you’d like them to include access.

    Supporting Information

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

    The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jctc.0c00535.

    • Explicit methodologies for making symmetric kernel polynomial for CH2O, equivalent structures for benzene (Figure S2) and acetone (Figure S3), and results for CH4 (Figures S4–S6) (PDF)

    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

    Cited By

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
    Citation Statements
    Explore this article's citation statements on scite.ai

    This article is cited by 44 publications.

    1. Suman Bhaumik, Dayou Zhang, Yinan Shu, Donald G. Truhlar. Dual-Level Parametrically Managed Neural Network Method for Learning a Potential Energy Surface for Efficient Dynamics. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2025, 21 (5) , 2153-2164. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.4c01546
    2. Kai Töpfer, Eric Boittier, Mike Devereux, Andrea Pasti, Peter Hamm, Markus Meuwly. Force Fields for Deep Eutectic Mixtures: Application to Structure, Thermodynamics and 2D-Infrared Spectroscopy. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2024, 128 (44) , 10937-10949. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.4c05480
    3. Wonmuk Hwang, Steven L. Austin, Arnaud Blondel, Eric D. Boittier, Stefan Boresch, Matthias Buck, Joshua Buckner, Amedeo Caflisch, Hao-Ting Chang, Xi Cheng, Yeol Kyo Choi, Jhih-Wei Chu, Michael F. Crowley, Qiang Cui, Ana Damjanovic, Yuqing Deng, Mike Devereux, Xinqiang Ding, Michael F. Feig, Jiali Gao, David R. Glowacki, James E. Gonzales, II, Mehdi Bagerhi Hamaneh, Edward D. Harder, Ryan L. Hayes, Jing Huang, Yandong Huang, Phillip S. Hudson, Wonpil Im, Shahidul M. Islam, Wei Jiang, Michael R. Jones, Silvan Käser, Fiona L. Kearns, Nathan R. Kern, Jeffery B. Klauda, Themis Lazaridis, Jinhyuk Lee, Justin A. Lemkul, Xiaorong Liu, Yun Luo, Alexander D. MacKerell, Jr., Dan T. Major, Markus Meuwly, Kwangho Nam, Lennart Nilsson, Victor Ovchinnikov, Emanuele Paci, Soohyung Park, Richard W. Pastor, Amanda R. Pittman, Carol Beth Post, Samarjeet Prasad, Jingzhi Pu, Yifei Qi, Thenmalarchelvi Rathinavelan, Daniel R. Roe, Benoit Roux, Christopher N. Rowley, Jana Shen, Andrew C. Simmonett, Alexander J. Sodt, Kai Töpfer, Meenu Upadhyay, Arjan van der Vaart, Luis Itza Vazquez-Salazar, Richard M. Venable, Luke C. Warrensford, H. Lee Woodcock, Yujin Wu, Charles L. Brooks, III, Bernard R. Brooks, Martin Karplus. CHARMM at 45: Enhancements in Accessibility, Functionality, and Speed. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2024, 128 (41) , 9976-10042. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.4c04100
    4. Farideh Badichi Akher, Yinan Shu, Zoltan Varga, Suman Bhaumik, Donald G. Truhlar. Parametrically Managed Activation Function for Fitting a Neural Network Potential with Physical Behavior Enforced by a Low-Dimensional Potential. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 2023, 127 (24) , 5287-5297. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.3c02627
    5. Yi-Fan Hou, Fuchun Ge, Pavlo O. Dral. Explicit Learning of Derivatives with the KREG and pKREG Models on the Example of Accurate Representation of Molecular Potential Energy Surfaces. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2023, 19 (8) , 2369-2379. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.2c01038
    6. Eric D. Boittier, Mike Devereux, Markus Meuwly. Molecular Dynamics with Conformationally Dependent, Distributed Charges. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2022, 18 (12) , 7544-7554. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00693
    7. Silvan Käser, Jeremy O. Richardson, Markus Meuwly. Transfer Learning for Affordable and High-Quality Tunneling Splittings from Instanton Calculations. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2022, 18 (11) , 6840-6850. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00790
    8. Jingbai Li, Steven A. Lopez. A Look Inside the Black Box of Machine Learning Photodynamics Simulations. Accounts of Chemical Research 2022, 55 (14) , 1972-1984. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.2c00288
    9. Markus Meuwly. Atomistic Simulations for Reactions and Vibrational Spectroscopy in the Era of Machine Learning─Quo Vadis?. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2022, 126 (11) , 2155-2167. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c00212
    10. Daniel R. Moberg, Ahren W. Jasper, Michael J. Davis. Parsimonious Potential Energy Surface Expansions Using Dictionary Learning with Multipass Greedy Selection. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2021, 12 (37) , 9169-9174. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c02721
    11. Daniel R. Moberg, Ahren W. Jasper. Permutationally Invariant Polynomial Expansions with Unrestricted Complexity. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2021, 17 (9) , 5440-5455. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00352
    12. Markus Meuwly. Machine Learning for Chemical Reactions. Chemical Reviews 2021, 121 (16) , 10218-10239. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00033
    13. Silvan Käser, Eric D. Boittier, Meenu Upadhyay, Markus Meuwly. Transfer Learning to CCSD(T): Accurate Anharmonic Frequencies from Machine Learning Models. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2021, 17 (6) , 3687-3699. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00249
    14. Silvan Käser, Debasish Koner, Anders S. Christensen, O. Anatole von Lilienfeld, Markus Meuwly. Machine Learning Models of Vibrating H2CO: Comparing Reproducing Kernels, FCHL, and PhysNet. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 2020, 124 (42) , 8853-8865. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.0c05979
    15. Kentaro Hino, Yuki Kurashige. Neural network matrix product operator: A multi-dimensionally integrable machine learning potential. Physical Review Research 2025, 7 (2) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.7.023217
    16. Ye Min Thant, Taishiro Wakamiya, Methawee Nukunudompanich, Keisuke Kameda, Manabu Ihara, Sergei Manzhos. Kernel regression methods for prediction of materials properties: Recent developments. Chemical Physics Reviews 2025, 6 (1) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0242118
    17. Manuel S. Drehwald, Asma Jamali, Rodrigo A. Vargas-Hernández. MOLPIPx: An end-to-end differentiable package for permutationally invariant polynomials in Python and Rust. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2025, 162 (8) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0250837
    18. Kai Töpfer, Jingchun Wang, Shimoni Patel, Markus Meuwly. Structure and dynamics of deep eutectic systems from cluster-optimized energy functions. 2025https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aiq.2025.03.011
    19. Karl P. Horn, Luis Itza Vazquez-Salazar, Christiane P. Koch, Markus Meuwly. Improving potential energy surfaces using measured Feshbach resonance states. Science Advances 2024, 10 (9) https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adi6462
    20. Sergei Manzhos, Manabu Ihara. Degeneration of kernel regression with Matern kernels into low-order polynomial regression in high dimension. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2024, 160 (2) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0187867
    21. Jingbai Li, Steven A. Lopez. Computational Chemistry for Photochemical Reactions. 2024, 658-698. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-821978-2.00012-X
    22. Albert P. Bartók. Molecular dynamics calculations: Machine learning. 2024, 543-552. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-90800-9.00162-1
    23. Sergei Manzhos, Manabu Ihara. A controlled study of the effect of deviations from symmetry of the potential energy surface (PES) on the accuracy of the vibrational spectrum computed with collocation. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2023, 159 (21) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0182373
    24. Jingbai Li, Steven A. Lopez. Machine learning accelerated photodynamics simulations. Chemical Physics Reviews 2023, 4 (3) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0159247
    25. Soumyadip Ray, Debasish Koner, Padmabati Mondal. High-resolution electronic and vibrational spectroscopy of small-to-medium sized molecules with ab initio potential energy surface. Electronic Structure 2023, 5 (1) , 013001. https://doi.org/10.1088/2516-1075/acb7b8
    26. Paul L. Houston, Chen Qu, Qi Yu, Riccardo Conte, Apurba Nandi, Jeffrey K. Li, Joel M. Bowman. PESPIP: Software to fit complex molecular and many-body potential energy surfaces with permutationally invariant polynomials. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2023, 158 (4) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0134442
    27. Sergei Manzhos, Manabu Ihara, Tucker Carrington. Machine learning for vibrational spectroscopy. 2023, 355-390. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-90049-2.00027-5
    28. Jingbai Li, Morgane Vacher, Pavlo O. Dral, Steven A. Lopez. Machine learning methods in photochemistry and photophysics. 2023, 163-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-91738-4.00002-6
    29. Marcel F. Langer, Alex Goeßmann, Matthias Rupp. Representations of molecules and materials for interpolation of quantum-mechanical simulations via machine learning. npj Computational Materials 2022, 8 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-022-00721-x
    30. Luis Itza Vazquez-Salazar, Eric D. Boittier, Markus Meuwly. Uncertainty quantification for predictions of atomistic neural networks. Chemical Science 2022, 13 (44) , 13068-13084. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2SC04056E
    31. Ryan Snyder, Bryant Kim, Xiaoliang Pan, Yihan Shao, Jingzhi Pu. Facilitating ab initio QM/MM free energy simulations by Gaussian process regression with derivative observations. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 2022, 24 (41) , 25134-25143. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2CP02820D
    32. Hao Li, Musen Zhou, Jessalyn Sebastian, Jianzhong Wu, Mengyang Gu. Efficient force field and energy emulation through partition of permutationally equivalent atoms. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2022, 156 (18) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0088017
    33. Silvan Käser, Markus Meuwly. Transfer learned potential energy surfaces: accurate anharmonic vibrational dynamics and dissociation energies for the formic acid monomer and dimer. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 2022, 24 (9) , 5269-5281. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1CP04393E
    34. Vladimír Krajňák, Shibabrat Naik, Stephen Wiggins. Predicting trajectory behaviour via machine-learned invariant manifolds. Chemical Physics Letters 2022, 789 , 139290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2021.139290
    35. You Li, Jingmin Liu, Jiarui Li, Yu Zhai, Jitai Yang, Zexing Qu, Hui Li. A new permutation-symmetry-adapted machine learning diabatization procedure and its application in MgH 2 system. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2021, 155 (21) , 214102. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0072004
    36. He Zhang, John Harlim, Xiantao Li. Error bounds of the invariant statistics in machine learning of ergodic Itô diffusions. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 2021, 427 , 133022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physd.2021.133022
    37. Stefan Klus, Patrick Gelß, Feliks Nüske, Frank Noé. Symmetric and antisymmetric kernels for machine learning problems in quantum physics and chemistry. Machine Learning: Science and Technology 2021, 2 (4) , 045016. https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-2153/ac14ad
    38. Max Pinheiro, Fuchun Ge, Nicolas Ferré, Pavlo O. Dral, Mario Barbatti. Choosing the right molecular machine learning potential. Chemical Science 2021, 12 (43) , 14396-14413. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1SC03564A
    39. O. V. Egorov, A. K. Tretyakov. Excitation and Quencing of Rotational Energy Levels of the О3 Ozone Molecule by Collisions with Noble Gas Atoms (Ar and He). Russian Physics Journal 2021, 64 (7) , 1363-1372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11182-021-02462-8
    40. Yahya Saleh, Vishnu Sanjay, Armin Iske, Andrey Yachmenev, Jochen Küpper. Active learning of potential-energy surfaces of weakly bound complexes with regression-tree ensembles. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2021, 155 (14) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0057051
    41. Yulia N. Kalugina, Oleg Egorov, Ad van der Avoird. Ab initio study of the O3–N2 complex: Potential energy surface and rovibrational states. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2021, 155 (5) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0061749
    42. Pavlo O. Dral, Fuchun Ge, Bao-Xin Xue, Yi-Fan Hou, Max Pinheiro, Jianxing Huang, Mario Barbatti. MLatom 2: An Integrative Platform for Atomistic Machine Learning. Topics in Current Chemistry 2021, 379 (4) https://doi.org/10.1007/s41061-021-00339-5
    43. Debasish Koner. Quantum and quasiclassical dynamical simulations for the Ar2H+ on a new global analytical potential energy surface. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2021, 154 (5) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0039252
    44. Janus J. Eriksen. Mean-field density matrix decompositions. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2020, 153 (21) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0030764

    Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation

    Cite this: J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2020, 16, 9, 5474–5484
    Click to copy citationCitation copied!
    https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.0c00535
    Published July 30, 2020
    Copyright © 2020 American Chemical Society

    Article Views

    928

    Altmetric

    -

    Citations

    Learn about these metrics

    Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

    Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

    The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.