In Situ Temperature-Dependent Transmission Electron Microscopy Studies of Pseudobinary mGeTe·Bi2Te3 (m = 3–8) Nanowires and First-Principles CalculationsClick to copy article linkArticle link copied!
- Chan Su Jung
- Han Sung Kim
- Hyung Soon Im
- Kidong Park
- Jeunghee Park
- Jae-Pyoung Ahn
- Seung Jo Yoo
- Jin-Gyu Kim
- Jae Nyeong Kim
- Ji Hoon Shim
Abstract
Phase-change nanowires (NWs) have emerged as critical materials for fast-switching nonvolatile memory devices. In this study, we synthesized a series of mGeTe·Bi2Te3 (GBT) pseudobinary alloy NWs—Ge3Bi2Te6 (m = 3), Ge4Bi2Te7 (m = 4), Ge5Bi2Te8 (m = 5), Ge6Bi2Te9 (m = 6), and Ge8Bi2Te11 (m = 8)—and investigated their composition-dependent thermal stabilities and electrical properties. As m decreases, the phase of the NWs evolves from the cubic (C) to the hexagonal (H) phase, which produces unique superlattice structures that consist of periodic 2.2–3.8 nm slabs for m = 3–8. In situ temperature-dependent transmission electron microscopy reveals the higher thermal stability of the compositions with lower m values, and a phase transition from the H phase into the single-crystalline C phase at high temperatures (400 °C). First-principles calculations, performed for the superlattice structures (m = 1–8) of GBT and mGeTe·Sb2Te3 (GST), show an increasing stability of the H phase (versus the C phase) with decreasing m; the difference in stability being more marked for GBT than for GST. The calculations explain remarkably the phase evolution of the GBT and GST NWs as well as the composition-dependent thermal stabilities. Measurement of the current–voltage curves for individual GBT NWs shows that the resistivity is in the range 3–25 mΩ·cm, and the resistivity of the H phase is lower than that of the C phase, which has been supported by the calculations.
Cited By
This article is cited by 12 publications.
- Naor Madar, Yatir Sadia, Yaniv Gelbstein. Thermoelectric Preferred Orientation of (GeTe)0.962(Bi2Te3)0.038. ACS Applied Electronic Materials 2024, 6
(5)
, 2862-2869. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaelm.3c00790
- Shijian Zheng, Longbing He. In-Situ Heating TEM. 2023, 83-104. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-6845-7_4
- T. M. Alakbarova, Hans-Jürgen Meyer, E. N. Orujlu, I. R. Amiraslanov, M. B. Babanly. Phase equilibria of the GeTe−Bi
2
Te
3
quasi-binary system in the range 0–50 mol% Bi
2
Te
3. Phase Transitions 2021, 94
(5)
, 366-375. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411594.2021.1937625
- Andriy Lotnyk, Torben Dankwort, Isom Hilmi, Lorenz Kienle, Bernd Rauschenbach. In situ
observations of the reversible vacancy ordering process in van der Waals-bonded Ge–Sb–Te thin films and GeTe–Sb
2
Te
3
superlattices. Nanoscale 2019, 11
(22)
, 10838-10845. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9NR02112D
- Andriy Lotnyk, Torben Dankwort, Isom Hilmi, Lorenz Kienle, Bernd Rauschenbach. Atomic-scale observation of defects motion in van der Waals layered chalcogenide based materials. Scripta Materialia 2019, 166 , 154-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2019.03.024
- Massimo Longo. Advances in nanowire PCM. 2019, 443-518. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102584-0.00013-9
- Laura Lazzarini, Enzo Rotunno. Crystal structure assessment of Ge-Sb-Te nanowires. Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing 2017, 65 , 77-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2016.07.008
- Jamo Momand, Ruining Wang, Jos E. Boschker, Marcel A. Verheijen, Raffaella Calarco, Bart J. Kooi. Dynamic reconfiguration of van der Waals gaps within GeTe–Sb
2
Te
3
based superlattices. Nanoscale 2017, 9
(25)
, 8774-8780. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7NR01684K
- Naor Madar, Tom Givon, Dmitry Mogilyansky, Yaniv Gelbstein. High thermoelectric potential of Bi2Te3 alloyed GeTe-rich phases. Journal of Applied Physics 2016, 120
(3)
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4958973
- Jae Nyeong Kim, Massoud Kaviany, Ji-Hoon Shim. Optimized
Z
T
of
B
i
2
T
e
3
−
GeTe
compounds from first principles guided by homogeneous data. Physical Review B 2016, 93
(7)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.93.075119
- Qi Zhang, Huiqiao Li, Lin Gan, Ying Ma, Dmitri Golberg, Tianyou Zhai. In situ fabrication and investigation of nanostructures and nanodevices with a microscope. Chemical Society Reviews 2016, 45
(9)
, 2694-2713. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6CS00161K
- Jamo Momand, Ruining Wang, Jos E. Boschker, Marcel A. Verheijen, Raffaella Calarco, Bart J. Kooi. Interface formation of two- and three-dimensionally bonded materials in the case of GeTe–Sb
2
Te
3
superlattices. Nanoscale 2015, 7
(45)
, 19136-19143. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5NR04530D
Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.
Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.
The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.