logo
CONTENT TYPES

Figure 1Loading Img

Quantum Mechanical Calculation of Noncovalent Interactions: A Large-Scale Evaluation of PMx, DFT, and SAPT Approaches

View Author Information
Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, California 92093-0736, United States
Department of Bioengineering, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, California 92093-0419, United States
*Phone: (858) 822-0622. E-mail: [email protected]
Cite this: J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2014, 10, 4, 1563–1575
Publication Date (Web):February 25, 2014
https://doi.org/10.1021/ct401111c
Copyright © 2014 American Chemical Society
ACS AuthorChoiceACS AuthorChoice
Article Views
2765
Altmetric
-
Citations
LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
Read OnlinePDF (5 MB)
Supporting Info (1)»

Abstract

Abstract Image

Quantum mechanical (QM) calculations of noncovalent interactions are uniquely useful as tools to test and improve molecular mechanics force fields and to model the forces involved in biomolecular binding and folding. Because the more computationally tractable QM methods necessarily include approximations, which risk degrading accuracy, it is essential to evaluate such methods by comparison with high-level reference calculations. Here, we use the extensive Benchmark Energy and Geometry Database (BEGDB) of CCSD(T)/CBS reference results to evaluate the accuracy and speed of widely used QM methods for over 1200 chemically varied gas-phase dimers. In particular, we study the semiempirical PM6 and PM7 methods; density functional theory (DFT) approaches B3LYP, B97-D, M062X, and ωB97X-D; and symmetry-adapted perturbation theory (SAPT) approach. For the PM6 and DFT methods, we also examine the effects of post hoc corrections for hydrogen bonding (PM6-DH+, PM6-DH2), halogen atoms (PM6-DH2X), and dispersion (DFT-D3 with zero and Becke–Johnson damping). Several orders of the SAPT expansion are also compared, ranging from SAPT0 up to SAPT2+3, where computationally feasible. We find that all DFT methods with dispersion corrections, as well as SAPT at orders above SAPT2, consistently provide dimer interaction energies within 1.0 kcal/mol RMSE across all systems. We also show that a linear scaling of the perturbative energy terms provided by the fast SAPT0 method yields similar high accuracy, at particularly low computational cost. The energies of all the dimer systems from the various QM approaches are included in the Supporting Information, as are the full SAPT2+(3) energy decomposition for a subset of over 1000 systems. The latter can be used to guide the parametrization of molecular mechanics force fields on a term-by-term basis.

Supporting Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Material as mentioned in the text. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Cited By


This article is cited by 70 publications.

  1. Zhengdan Zhu, Zhijian Xu, Weiliang Zhu. Interaction Nature and Computational Methods for Halogen Bonding: A Perspective. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2020, 60 (6) , 2683-2696. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00032
  2. Pál D. Mezei, O. Anatole von Lilienfeld. Noncovalent Quantum Machine Learning Corrections to Density Functionals. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2020, 16 (4) , 2647-2653. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.0c00181
  3. Jun-Yi Wu, Po-Yuan Cheng. Ultrafast Protonation of an Amide: Photoionization-Induced Proton Transfer in Phenol-Dimethylformamide Complex Cation. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 2019, 123 (50) , 10700-10713. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.9b09651
  4. Théo Leduc, Emmanuel Aubert, Enrique Espinosa, Christian Jelsch, Cristian Iordache, Benoît Guillot. Polarization of Electron Density Databases of Transferable Multipolar Atoms. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 2019, 123 (32) , 7156-7170. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.9b05051
  5. Chengwen Liu, Jean-Philip Piquemal, Pengyu Ren. AMOEBA+ Classical Potential for Modeling Molecular Interactions. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2019, 15 (7) , 4122-4139. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00261
  6. Kevin Carter-Fenk, Ka Un Lao, Kuan-Yu Liu, John M. Herbert. Accurate and Efficient ab Initio Calculations for Supramolecular Complexes: Symmetry-Adapted Perturbation Theory with Many-Body Dispersion. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2019, 10 (11) , 2706-2714. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b01156
  7. Jeong Ju Park, Sang Yun Han. Alternated Branching Ratios by Anomaly in Collision-Induced Dissociation of Proton-Bound Hoogsteen Base Pairs of 1-Methylcytosine with 1-Methylguanine and 9-Methylguanine. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry 2019, 30 (5) , 846-854. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13361-019-02161-2
  8. Lawrence Lai, Sarah Khanniche, William H. Green. Thermochemistry and Group Additivity Values for Fused Two-Ring Species and Radicals. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 2019, 123 (15) , 3418-3428. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.9b01065
  9. Lijuan Song, Juliane Schoening, Christoph Wölper, Stephan Schulz, Peter R. Schreiner. Role of London Dispersion Interactions in Ga-Substituted Dipnictenes. Organometallics 2019, 38 (7) , 1640-1647. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.organomet.9b00072
  10. Shih-Chun Wei, Jr-Wei Ho, Hung-Chien Yen, Hui-Qi Shi, Li-Hao Cheng, Chih-Nan Weng, Wei-Kuang Chou, Chih-Chung Chiu, Po-Yuan Cheng. Ultrafast Excited-State Dynamics of Hydrogen-Bonded Cytosine Microsolvated Clusters with Protic and Aprotic Polar Solvents. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 2018, 122 (49) , 9412-9425. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.8b09526
  11. Ka Un Lao, John M. Herbert. Atomic Orbital Implementation of Extended Symmetry-Adapted Perturbation Theory (XSAPT) and Benchmark Calculations for Large Supramolecular Complexes. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2018, 14 (6) , 2955-2978. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00058
  12. Andreas Heßelmann. DFT-SAPT Intermolecular Interaction Energies Employing Exact-Exchange Kohn–Sham Response Methods. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2018, 14 (4) , 1943-1959. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.7b01233
  13. Viki Kumar Prasad, Alberto Otero-de-la-Roza, and Gino A. DiLabio . Atom-Centered Potentials with Dispersion-Corrected Minimal-Basis-Set Hartree–Fock: An Efficient and Accurate Computational Approach for Large Molecular Systems. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2018, 14 (2) , 726-738. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.7b01158
  14. Muhammad Ali Hashmi and Matthias Lein . Carbon Nano-onions as Photosensitizers: Stacking-Induced Red-Shift. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2018, 122 (4) , 2422-2431. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b11421
  15. Ofer Reany, Amanda Li, Maayan Yefet, Michael K. Gilson, and Ehud Keinan . Attractive Interactions between Heteroallenes and the Cucurbituril Portal. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2017, 139 (24) , 8138-8145. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b13005
  16. Steve Scheiner . Assembly of Effective Halide Receptors from Components. Comparing Hydrogen, Halogen, and Tetrel Bonds. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 2017, 121 (18) , 3606-3615. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.7b02305
  17. Steven Vandenbrande, Michel Waroquier, Veronique Van Speybroeck, and Toon Verstraelen . The Monomer Electron Density Force Field (MEDFF): A Physically Inspired Model for Noncovalent Interactions. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2017, 13 (1) , 161-179. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.6b00969
  18. Chih-Chung Chiu, Chih-Chang Hung, and Po-Yuan Cheng . Ultrafast Charge Recombination Dynamics in Ternary Electron Donor–Acceptor Complexes: (Benzene)2-Tetracyanoethylene Complexes. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2016, 120 (48) , 12390-12403. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b10593
  19. Michal H. Kolář and Pavel Hobza . Computer Modeling of Halogen Bonds and Other σ-Hole Interactions. Chemical Reviews 2016, 116 (9) , 5155-5187. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00560
  20. Anders S. Christensen, Tomáš Kubař, Qiang Cui, and Marcus Elstner . Semiempirical Quantum Mechanical Methods for Noncovalent Interactions for Chemical and Biochemical Applications. Chemical Reviews 2016, 116 (9) , 5301-5337. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00584
  21. Ulf Ryde and Pär Söderhjelm . Ligand-Binding Affinity Estimates Supported by Quantum-Mechanical Methods. Chemical Reviews 2016, 116 (9) , 5520-5566. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00630
  22. Takashi Kamachi and Kazunari Yoshizawa . Low-Mode Conformational Search Method with Semiempirical Quantum Mechanical Calculations: Application to Enantioselective Organocatalysis. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2016, 56 (2) , 347-353. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00671
  23. Rebecca Sure and Stefan Grimme . Comprehensive Benchmark of Association (Free) Energies of Realistic Host–Guest Complexes. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2015, 11 (8) , 3785-3801. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00296
  24. Yu-hong Lam and K. N. Houk . Origins of Stereoselectivity in Intramolecular Aldol Reactions Catalyzed by Cinchona Amines. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2015, 137 (5) , 2116-2127. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja513096x
  25. Jan Gerit Brandenburg, Manuel Hochheim, Thomas Bredow, and Stefan Grimme . Low-Cost Quantum Chemical Methods for Noncovalent Interactions. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2014, 5 (24) , 4275-4284. https://doi.org/10.1021/jz5021313
  26. Michael J. Turner, Simon Grabowsky, Dylan Jayatilaka, and Mark A. Spackman . Accurate and Efficient Model Energies for Exploring Intermolecular Interactions in Molecular Crystals. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2014, 5 (24) , 4249-4255. https://doi.org/10.1021/jz502271c
  27. Marcin Modrzejewski, Grzegorz Chałasiński, and Małgorzata M. Szczęśniak . Range-Separated meta-GGA Functional Designed for Noncovalent Interactions. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2014, 10 (10) , 4297-4306. https://doi.org/10.1021/ct500707w
  28. Mark A. Vincent and Ian H. Hillier . Accurate Prediction of Adsorption Energies on Graphene, Using a Dispersion-Corrected Semiempirical Method Including Solvation. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2014, 54 (8) , 2255-2260. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci5003729
  29. Antiope T. Politi, Achilleas Politis, Linda Seton. Molecular Structure Effects on the Aggregation Motif of Porphyrins: Computational Insights. Advanced Theory and Simulations 2021, 43 , 2100050. https://doi.org/10.1002/adts.202100050
  30. Sara M. Elgengehi, Sabry El-Taher, Mahmoud A.A. Ibrahim, Khaled E. El-Kelany. Unexpected favourable noncovalent interaction between chlorine oxyanions (ClO−; x  = 1–4) and benzene: Benchmarking DFT and SAPT methods with respect to CCSD(T). Computational and Theoretical Chemistry 2021, 1199 , 113214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comptc.2021.113214
  31. Milica Elek, Nemanja Djokovic, Annika Frank, Slavica Oljacic, Aleksandra Zivkovic, Katarina Nikolic, Holger Stark. Synthesis, in silico, and in vitro studies of novel dopamine D 2 and D 3 receptor ligands. Archiv der Pharmazie 2021, 26 https://doi.org/10.1002/ardp.202000486
  32. A. C. L. Pereira, K. S. Bezerra, J. L. S. Santos, J. I. N. Oliveira, V. N. Freire, U. L. Fulco. In silico approach of modified melanoma peptides and their immunotherapeutic potential. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 2021, 23 (4) , 2836-2845. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CP05322H
  33. Sidra Khan, Muhammad Yar, Naveen Kosar, Khurshid Ayub, Muhammad Arshad, Muhammad Nauman Zahid, Tariq Mahmood. First-principles study for exploring the adsorption behavior of G-series nerve agents on graphdyine surface. Computational and Theoretical Chemistry 2020, 1191 , 113043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comptc.2020.113043
  34. Frederik Philippi, David Pugh, Daniel Rauber, Tom Welton, Patricia A. Hunt. Conformational design concepts for anions in ionic liquids. Chemical Science 2020, 11 (25) , 6405-6422. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0SC01379J
  35. Zelig Chernia, Yoav Tsori. Hydrogen bonding of dimethylpyridine clusters in water: Correlation between the lower consolute solution temperature and electron interaction energy. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2020, 152 (20) , 204304. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5143847
  36. Konrad Patkowski. Recent developments in symmetry‐adapted perturbation theory. WIREs Computational Molecular Science 2020, 10 (3) https://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.1452
  37. Richard A. Bryce. What Next for Quantum Mechanics in Structure-Based Drug Discovery?. 2020,,, 339-353. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0282-9_20
  38. Николай Алексеевич Аникин, Александр Юрьевич Мускатин, Михаил Борисович Кузьминский, Сергей Николаевич Леднев, Александр Валерьевич Смирнов, Александр Ильич Русаков, . Cardinal acceleration of calculations of giant biomolecules by quantum chemistry methods, requiring the use of supercomputers and / or GRID systems. Program Systems: Theory and Applications 2020, 11 (2) , 75-92. https://doi.org/10.25209/2079-3316-2020-11-2-75-92
  39. Roniel L. Araújo, Manoel S. Vasconcelos, Carlos A. Barboza, José X. Lima Neto, Eudenilson L. Albuquerque, Umberto L. Fulco. DFT calculations of the structural, electronic, optical and vibrational properties of anhydrous orthorhombic L-threonine crystals. Computational and Theoretical Chemistry 2019, 1170 , 112621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comptc.2019.112621
  40. Paulo J. Costa, Rafael Nunes, Diogo Vila-Viçosa. Halogen bonding in halocarbon-protein complexes and computational tools for rational drug design. Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery 2019, 14 (8) , 805-820. https://doi.org/10.1080/17460441.2019.1619692
  41. Michael Pfletscher, Janek Wysoglad, Jochen S. Gutmann, Michael Giese. Polymorphism of hydrogen-bonded star mesogens – a combinatorial DFT-D and FT-IR spectroscopy study. RSC Advances 2019, 9 (15) , 8444-8453. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RA09458F
  42. Tamara Husch, Alain C. Vaucher, Markus Reiher. Semiempirical molecular orbital models based on the neglect of diatomic differential overlap approximation. International Journal of Quantum Chemistry 2018, 118 (24) , e25799. https://doi.org/10.1002/qua.25799
  43. Aranthya H. Lima Costa, Washington S. Clemente, Katyanna S. Bezerra, José X. Lima Neto, Eudenilson L. Albuquerque, Umberto L. Fulco. Computational biochemical investigation of the binding energy interactions between an estrogen receptor and its agonists. New Journal of Chemistry 2018, 42 (24) , 19801-19810. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8NJ03521K
  44. Marina A. Korolyova, Sergey A. Vakarov, Dmitry N. Kozhevnikov, Dmitry A. Gruzdev, Galina L. Levit, Victor P. Krasnov. Mutual Kinetic Resolution of Racemic 3,4-Dihydro-3-methyl-2 H -[1,4]benzoxazines with Acyl Chlorides of Racemic O -Phenyllactic Acids and DFT Modelling of Transition States. European Journal of Organic Chemistry 2018, 2018 (33) , 4577-4585. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejoc.201800656
  45. Ola Engkvist, Per-Ola Norrby, Nidhal Selmi, Yu-hong Lam, Zhengwei Peng, Edward C. Sherer, Willi Amberg, Thomas Erhard, Lynette A. Smyth. Computational prediction of chemical reactions: current status and outlook. Drug Discovery Today 2018, 23 (6) , 1203-1218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2018.02.014
  46. R. Radhika, R. Shankar, S. Vijayakumar, P. Kolandaivel. Role of 6-Mercaptopurine in the potential therapeutic targets DNA base pairs and G-quadruplex DNA: insights from quantum chemical and molecular dynamics simulations. Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics 2018, 36 (6) , 1369-1401. https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2017.1323013
  47. Zelig Chernia, Yoav Tsori. Complexation reactions in pyridine and 2,6-dimethylpyridine-water system: The quantum-chemical description and the path to liquid phase separation. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2018, 148 (10) , 104306. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5010177
  48. Kiran Kumar, Shin M. Woo, Thomas Siu, Wilian A. Cortopassi, Fernanda Duarte, Robert S. Paton. Cation–π interactions in protein–ligand binding: theory and data-mining reveal different roles for lysine and arginine. Chemical Science 2018, 9 (10) , 2655-2665. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7SC04905F
  49. Tomasz Sierański. Discovering the stacking landscape of a pyridine-pyridine system. Journal of Molecular Modeling 2017, 23 (12) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-017-3496-4
  50. M.L. Perrotta, G. Saielli, G. Casella, F. Macedonio, L. Giorno, E. Drioli, A. Gugliuzza. An ultrathin suspended hydrophobic porous membrane for high-efficiency water desalination. Applied Materials Today 2017, 9 , 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2017.04.009
  51. Ching-Chi Shen, Tsung-Ting Tsai, Jun-Yi Wu, Jr-Wei Ho, Yi-Wei Chen, Po-Yuan Cheng. Watching proton transfer in real time: Ultrafast photoionization-induced proton transfer in phenol-ammonia complex cation. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2017, 147 (16) , 164302. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5001375
  52. Milana M. Zarić, Branko Bugarski, Mirjana Lj. Kijevčanin. Best methods for calculating interaction energies in 2-butene and butane systems. Computational and Theoretical Chemistry 2017, 1117 , 150-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comptc.2017.08.001
  53. B.G. de Sousa, J.I.N. Oliveira, E.L. Albuquerque, U.L. Fulco, V.E. Amaro, C.A.G. Blaha. Molecular modelling and quantum biochemistry computations of a naturally occurring bioremediation enzyme: Alkane hydroxylase from Pseudomonas putida P1. Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling 2017, 77 , 232-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmgm.2017.08.021
  54. Patricia A. Hunt. Quantum Chemical Modeling of Hydrogen Bonding in Ionic Liquids. Topics in Current Chemistry 2017, 375 (3) https://doi.org/10.1007/s41061-017-0142-7
  55. Konrad Patkowski. Benchmark Databases of Intermolecular Interaction Energies: Design, Construction, and Significance. 2017,,, 3-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.arcc.2017.06.004
  56. Steve Scheiner. Comparison of halide receptors based on H, halogen, chalcogen, pnicogen, and tetrel bonds. Faraday Discussions 2017, 203 , 213-226. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7FD00043J
  57. Loraine Morete Dutra, Osmair Vital de Oliveira, José Divino dos Santos. Computational Studies on the Encapsulation of 1,4-Dihydropyridine Derivatives into CNT(10,10). Australian Journal of Chemistry 2017, 70 (3) , 252. https://doi.org/10.1071/CH16165
  58. Steve Scheiner. Highly Selective Halide Receptors Based on Chalcogen, Pnicogen, and Tetrel Bonds. Chemistry - A European Journal 2016, 22 (52) , 18850-18858. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201603891
  59. Pierre Baillargeon, Édouard Caron-Duval, Émilie Pellerin, Simon Gagné, Yves Dory. Isomorphous Crystals from Diynes and Bromodiynes Involved in Hydrogen and Halogen Bonds. Crystals 2016, 6 (4) , 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst6040037
  60. Binod Nepal, Steve Scheiner. Building a Better Halide Receptor: Optimum Choice of Spacer, Binding Unit, and Halosubstitution. ChemPhysChem 2016, 17 (6) , 836-844. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.201501149
  61. Francisco Adasme-Carreño, Camila Muñoz-Gutierrez, Jans H. Alzate-Morales. Halogen bonding in drug-like molecules: a computational and systematic study of the substituent effect. RSC Advances 2016, 6 (66) , 61837-61847. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA14837A
  62. Jr‐Wei Ho, Hung‐Chien Yen, Hui‐Qi Shi, Li‐Hao Cheng, Chih‐Nan Weng, Wei‐Kuang Chou, Chih‐Chung Chiu, Po‐Yuan Cheng. Microhydration Effects on the Ultrafast Photodynamics of Cytosine: Evidences for a Possible Hydration‐Site Dependence. Angewandte Chemie 2015, 127 (49) , 14985-14989. https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.201507524
  63. Jr‐Wei Ho, Hung‐Chien Yen, Hui‐Qi Shi, Li‐Hao Cheng, Chih‐Nan Weng, Wei‐Kuang Chou, Chih‐Chung Chiu, Po‐Yuan Cheng. Microhydration Effects on the Ultrafast Photodynamics of Cytosine: Evidences for a Possible Hydration‐Site Dependence. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2015, 54 (49) , 14772-14776. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201507524
  64. Bogdan A. Marekha, Marc Bria, Myriam Moreau, Isabelle De Waele, François-Alexandre Miannay, Yevheniia Smortsova, Toshiyuki Takamuku, Oleg N. Kalugin, Mikael Kiselev, Abdenacer Idrissi. Intermolecular interactions in mixtures of 1-n-butyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate and water: Insights from IR, Raman, NMR spectroscopy and quantum chemistry calculations. Journal of Molecular Liquids 2015, 210 , 227-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2015.05.015
  65. Zhijun Yang, Quanli Gu, Carl O. Trindle, J. L. Knee. Influences of the propyl group on the van der Waals structures of 4-propylaniline complexes with one and two argon atoms studied by electronic and cationic spectroscopy. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2015, 143 (3) , 034308. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4927004
  66. Ming Huang, Timothy J. Giese, Darrin M. York. Nucleic acid reactivity: Challenges for next-generation semiempirical quantum models. Journal of Computational Chemistry 2015, 36 (18) , 1370-1389. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.23933
  67. Bogdan A. Marekha, Volodymyr A. Koverga, Myriam Moreau, Mikhail Kiselev, Toshiyuki Takamuku, Oleg N. Kalugin, Abdenacer Idrissi. Intermolecular interactions, ion solvation, and association in mixtures of 1- n -butyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate and γ-butyrolactone: insights from Raman spectroscopy. Journal of Raman Spectroscopy 2015, 46 (3) , 339-352. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrs.4640
  68. Nusret Duygu Yilmazer, Martin Korth. Enhanced semiempirical QM methods for biomolecular interactions. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal 2015, 13 , 169-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2015.02.004
  69. Bogdan A. Marekha, Oleg N. Kalugin, Abdenacer Idrissi. Non-covalent interactions in ionic liquid ion pairs and ion pair dimers: a quantum chemical calculation analysis. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 2015, 17 (26) , 16846-16857. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CP02197A
  70. Carlos T. Nieto, David Díez, Narciso M. Garrido. To be or not to be butterfly: New mechanistic insights in the Aza-Michael asymmetric addition of lithium ( R )- N -benzyl- N -(α-methylbenzyl)amide. Journal of Computational Chemistry 2014, 35 (25) , 1846-1853. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.23694

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect

This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By continuing to use the site, you are accepting our use of cookies. Read the ACS privacy policy.

CONTINUE