Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect
ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
My Activity

Proposed Model Structures for Upper Freeport and Lewiston-Stockton Vitrinites

View Author Information
The Energy Institute & The Department of Energy & GeoEnvironmental Engineering, 151 Hosler Building, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802
Cite this: Energy Fuels 2001, 15, 4, 863–873
Publication Date (Web):June 5, 2001
Copyright © 2001 American Chemical Society

    Article Views





    Other access options
    Supporting Info (2)»


    Molecular models of vitrinites (obtained from obvious tree remains) from the Upper Freeport and Lewiston-Stockton coal seams are presented. Utilizing pure telocollinite reduced the complexity of the model and resulted in more realistic molecular structures than from whole coal analyses. The structures presented are in agreement with experimentally determined bulk chemical parameters. These were easily achieved with current software and computational expense. However, it was more difficult to produce model structure's which have calculated physical parameters (of the global minimum structure determined from molecular mechanics and dynamics) in agreement with experimentally determined parameters. For these bituminous vitrinites, the addition of physical parameters severely constrained the type of model structures that could be produced. The molecular structures presented are covalently linked aromatic and hydroaromatic structures with a distribution of cross-link densities. Despite being very close in maturation (as determined from vitrinite reflectance) the structural differences have a significant impact on behavior. The current models are not yet consistent with some behavioral aspects such as solvent swelling. It is suggested that a greater molecular scale is needed before multiple facets of coals behavior can be explained.

    Read this article

    To access this article, please review the available access options below.

    Get instant access

    Purchase Access

    Read this article for 48 hours. Check out below using your ACS ID or as a guest.


    Access through Your Institution

    You may have access to this article through your institution.

    Your institution does not have access to this content. You can change your affiliated institution below.


     Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

     Current Address. Department of Chemistry, Newman & Wolfrom Building, 100 W. 18th Ave., The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210-1185.

    Supporting Information Available

    Jump To

    3D Models. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at

    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system:

    Cited By

    This article is cited by 28 publications.

    1. Zhiqiang Zhang, Qiannan Kang, Shuai Wei, Tao Yun, Guochao Yan, and Kefeng Yan . Large Scale Molecular Model Construction of Xishan Bituminous Coal. Energy & Fuels 2017, 31 (2) , 1310-1317.
    2. Fidel Castro-Marcano and Jonathan P. Mathews . Constitution of Illinois No. 6 Argonne Premium Coal: A Review. Energy & Fuels 2011, 25 (3) , 845-853.
    3. Tim J. Tambach, Jonathan P. Mathews and Frank van Bergen. Molecular Exchange of CH4 and CO2 in Coal: Enhanced Coalbed Methane on a Nanoscale. Energy & Fuels 2009, 23 (10) , 4845-4847.
    4. G. Domazetis, B. D. James and J. Liesegang. High-Level Computer Molecular Modeling for Low-Rank Coal Containing Metal Complexes and Iron-Catalyzed Steam Gasification. Energy & Fuels 2008, 22 (6) , 3994-4005.
    5. Marielle R. Narkiewicz and Jonathan P. Mathews. Improved Low-Volatile Bituminous Coal Representation: Incorporating the Molecular-Weight Distribution. Energy & Fuels 2008, 22 (5) , 3104-3111.
    6. S. R. Kelemen,, M. Afeworki,, M. L. Gorbaty,, M. Sansone,, P. J. Kwiatek,, C. C. Walters,, H. Freund, and, M. Siskin, , A. E. Bence, , D. J. Curry, , M. Solum and, R. J. Pugmire, , M. Vandenbroucke,, M. Leblond, and, F. Behar. Direct Characterization of Kerogen by X-ray and Solid-State 13C Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Methods. Energy & Fuels 2007, 21 (3) , 1548-1561.
    7. Toshimasa Takanohashi and, Hiroyuki Kawashima. Construction of a Model Structure for Upper Freeport Coal Using 13C NMR Chemical Shift Calculations. Energy & Fuels 2002, 16 (2) , 379-387.
    8. He Li, Yucui Hou, Zhuoli Song, Shuhang Ren, Weize Wu. Novel insights into the molecular structure of lignite and its oxidation characteristics: A comprehensive characterization from single molecule of intermediates to complex coal. Powder Technology 2024, 440 , 119784.
    9. Zihan You, Jin Xiao, Qiuyun Mao, Xiuzhen Zhang, Qifan Zhong. Microstructural features transformation at various temperature stages and multi-scale atomistic representations of calcined petroleum coke based on HRTEM. Fuel 2022, 330 , 125521.
    10. Mohana Rao Kadagala, Suresh Nikkam, Sunil Kumar Tripathy. A review on flotation of coal using mixed reagent systems. Minerals Engineering 2021, 173 , 107217.
    11. M. Onifade, A.I. Lawal, J. Abdulsalam, B. Genc, S. Bada, K.O. Said, A.R. Gbadamosi. Development of multiple soft computing models for estimating organic and inorganic constituents in coal. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology 2021, 31 (3) , 483-494.
    12. Xin Cui, Huang Yan, Peitao Zhao, Yuxin Yang, Yuntong Xie. Modeling of molecular and properties of anthracite base on structural accuracy identification methods. Journal of Molecular Structure 2019, 1183 , 313-323.
    13. Yuannan Zheng, Qingzhao Li, Desheng Yuan, Guiyun Zhang, Junfeng Liu, Chuangchuang Yuan, Qinglin Tao. Chemical structure of coal surface and its effects on methane adsorption under different temperature conditions. Adsorption 2018, 24 (7) , 613-628.
    14. Xiongchao Lin, Meng Luo, Shouyi Li, Yuanping Yang, Xujun Chen, Bin Tian, Yonggang Wang. The evolutionary route of coal matrix during integrated cascade pyrolysis of a typical low-rank coal. Applied Energy 2017, 199 , 335-346.
    15. Nils Keno Lünsdorf. Raman spectroscopy of dispersed vitrinite — Methodical aspects and correlation with reflectance. International Journal of Coal Geology 2016, 153 , 75-86.
    16. Mokone J. Roberts, Raymond C. Everson, Hein W.J.P. Neomagus, Daniel Van Niekerk, Jonathan P. Mathews, David J. Branken. Influence of maceral composition on the structure, properties and behaviour of chars derived from South African coals. Fuel 2015, 142 , 9-20.
    17. Fidel Castro-Marcano, Michael F. Russo, Adri C.T. van Duin, Jonathan P. Mathews. Pyrolysis of a large-scale molecular model for Illinois no. 6 coal using the ReaxFF reactive force field. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis 2014, 109 , 79-89.
    18. Xing Fan, Xian-Yong Wei, Zhi-Min Zong. Application of gas chromatography/mass spectrometry in studies on separation and identification of organic species in coals. Fuel 2013, 109 , 28-32.
    19. Jonathan P. Mathews, Alan L. Chaffee. The molecular representations of coal – A review. Fuel 2012, 96 , 1-14.
    20. Fidel Castro-Marcano, Vladislav V. Lobodin, Ryan P. Rodgers, Amy M. McKenna, Alan G. Marshall, Jonathan P. Mathews. A molecular model for Illinois No. 6 Argonne Premium coal: Moving toward capturing the continuum structure. Fuel 2012, 95 , 35-49.
    21. Jian-hua XIANG, Fan-gui ZENG, Hu-zhen LIANG, Bei-lei SUN, Li ZHANG, Mei-fen LI, Jian-bo JIA. Model construction of the macromolecular structure of Yanzhou Coal and its molecular simulation. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology 2011, 39 (7) , 481-488.
    22. Jonathan P. Mathews, Adri C.T. van Duin, Alan L. Chaffee. The utility of coal molecular models. Fuel Processing Technology 2011, 92 (4) , 718-728.
    23. Daniel Van Niekerk, Jonathan P. Mathews. Molecular representations of Permian-aged vitrinite-rich and inertinite-rich South African coals. Fuel 2010, 89 (1) , 73-82.
    24. Wenhua Geng, Tsunenori Nakajima, Hirokazu Takanashi, Akira Ohki. Analysis of carboxyl group in coal and coal aromaticity by Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectrometry. Fuel 2009, 88 (1) , 139-144.
    25. George Domazetis, Bruce D. James, John Liesegang. Computer molecular models of low-rank coal and char containing inorganic complexes. Journal of Molecular Modeling 2008, 14 (7) , 581-597.
    26. Xiao-Yan Zhao, Zhi-Min Zong, Jing-Pei Cao, Yu-Miao Ma, Li Han, Guang-Feng Liu, Wei Zhao, Wen-Ying Li, Ke-Chang Xie, Xiang-Fei Bai, Xian-Yong Wei. Difference in chemical composition of carbon disulfide-extractable fraction between vitrinite and inertinite from Shenfu-Dongsheng and Pingshuo coals. Fuel 2008, 87 (4-5) , 565-575.
    27. Matthias W. Haenel. Catalysis in Direct Coal Liquefaction. 2008, 3023-3036.
    28. Tim Petersen, Irene Yarovsky, Ian Snook, Dougal G. McCulloch, George Opletal. Microstructure of an industrial char by diffraction techniques and Reverse Monte Carlo modelling. Carbon 2004, 42 (12-13) , 2457-2469.