logo

OR SEARCH CITATIONS

My Activity
Recently Viewed
You have not visited any articles yet, Please visit some articles to see contents here.
Publications
CONTENT TYPES

Figure 1Loading Img
Download Hi-Res ImageDownload to MS-PowerPointCite This:Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 7, 3482-3489
RETURN TO ISSUEPREVArticleNEXT

Energy Balance of the Global Photovoltaic (PV) Industry - Is the PV Industry a Net Electricity Producer?

View Author Information
† Global Climate and Energy Project, Stanford University, United States, and
‡ Energy Resources Engineering, Stanford University, United States
*Phone: 650-725-8579. Fax: 650-723-9190. E-mail: [email protected]
Cite this: Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 7, 3482–3489
Publication Date (Web):February 26, 2013
https://doi.org/10.1021/es3038824
Copyright © 2013 American Chemical Society
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Article Views
4276
Altmetric
-
Citations
70
LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

Read OnlinePDF (2 MB)
Get e-Alerts
Supporting Info (2)»
SUBJECTS:

Abstract

Abstract Image

A combination of declining costs and policy measures motivated by greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction and energy security have driven rapid growth in the global installed capacity of solar photovoltaics (PV). This paper develops a number of unique data sets, namely the following: calculation of distribution of global capacity factor for PV deployment; meta-analysis of energy consumption in PV system manufacture and deployment; and documentation of reduction in energetic costs of PV system production. These data are used as input into a new net energy analysis of the global PV industry, as opposed to device level analysis. In addition, the paper introduces a new concept: a model tracking energetic costs of manufacturing and installing PV systems, including balance of system (BOS) components. The model is used to forecast electrical energy requirements to scale up the PV industry and determine the electricity balance of the global PV industry to 2020. Results suggest that the industry was a net consumer of electricity as recently as 2010. However, there is a >50% that in 2012 the PV industry is a net electricity provider and will “pay back” the electrical energy required for its early growth before 2020. Further reducing energetic costs of PV deployment will enable more rapid growth of the PV industry. There is also great potential to increase the capacity factor of PV deployment. These conclusions have a number of implications for R&D and deployment, including the following: monitoring of the energy embodied within PV systems; designing more efficient and durable systems; and deploying PV systems in locations that will achieve high capacity factors.

Supporting Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Tables S1–S3, Figures S1–S3, and text. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

Terms & Conditions

Electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. The American Chemical Society holds a copyright ownership interest in any copyrightable Supporting Information. Files available from the ACS website may be downloaded for personal use only. Users are not otherwise permitted to reproduce, republish, redistribute, or sell any Supporting Information from the ACS website, either in whole or in part, in either machine-readable form or any other form without permission from the American Chemical Society. For permission to reproduce, republish and redistribute this material, requesters must process their own requests via the RightsLink permission system. Information about how to use the RightsLink permission system can be found at http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Cited By

This article is cited by 70 publications.

  1. Jinli Yang and Timothy L. Kelly . Decomposition and Cell Failure Mechanisms in Lead Halide Perovskite Solar Cells. Inorganic Chemistry 2017, 56 (1) , 92-101. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6b01307
  2. Prashant V. Kamat, Jeffrey A. Christians, and James G. Radich . Quantum Dot Solar Cells: Hole Transfer as a Limiting Factor in Boosting the Photoconversion Efficiency. Langmuir 2014, 30 (20) , 5716-5725. https://doi.org/10.1021/la500555w
  3. Jeffrey A. Christians, Raymond C. M. Fung, and Prashant V. Kamat . An Inorganic Hole Conductor for Organo-Lead Halide Perovskite Solar Cells. Improved Hole Conductivity with Copper Iodide. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2014, 136 (2) , 758-764. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja411014k
  4. Yannick-Serge Zimmermann, Andreas Schäffer, Philippe F.-X. Corvini, and Markus Lenz . Thin-Film Photovoltaic Cells: Long-Term Metal(loid) Leaching at Their End-of-Life. Environmental Science & Technology 2013, 47 (22) , 13151-13159. https://doi.org/10.1021/es402969c
  5. Prashant V. Kamat (Deputy Editor) . Evolution of Perovskite Photovoltaics and Decrease in Energy Payback Time. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2013, 4 (21) , 3733-3734. https://doi.org/10.1021/jz402141s
  6. Vadim V. Davydov, Alexandr V. Bobyl, Andrei G. Zabrodskii, Vladislav G. Malyshkin. Alternative Energy: from Economy to Agro-Photovoltaics. 2020,,, 238-241. https://doi.org/10.1109/EExPolytech50912.2020.9243994
  7. M. Diesendorf, T. Wiedmann. Implications of Trends in Energy Return on Energy Invested (EROI) for Transitioning to Renewable Electricity. Ecological Economics 2020, 176 , 106726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106726
  8. Thamyres Machado David, Paloma Maria Silva Rocha Rizol, Marcela Aparecida Guerreiro Machado, Gilberto Paschoal Buccieri. Future research tendencies for solar energy management using a bibliometric analysis, 2000–2019. Heliyon 2020, 6 (7) , e04452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04452
  9. Florian Knobloch, Steef V. Hanssen, Aileen Lam, Hector Pollitt, Pablo Salas, Unnada Chewpreecha, Mark A. J. Huijbregts, Jean-Francois Mercure. Net emission reductions from electric cars and heat pumps in 59 world regions over time. Nature Sustainability 2020, 3 (6) , 437-447. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0488-7
  10. Carlos de Castro, Iñigo Capellán-Pérez. Standard, Point of Use, and Extended Energy Return on Energy Invested (EROI) from Comprehensive Material Requirements of Present Global Wind, Solar, and Hydro Power Technologies. Energies 2020, 13 (12) , 3036. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13123036
  11. Bart Hawkins Kreps. Energy Sprawl in the Renewable‐Energy Sector: Moving to Sufficiency in a Post‐Growth Era. American Journal of Economics and Sociology 2020, 79 (3) , 719-749. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajes.12346
  12. Graham Palmer, Joshua Floyd. Electricity: A New Challenge for Storage. 2020,,, 71-88. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33093-4_5
  13. Dustin Mulvaney. Sustainable Energy Indicators. 2020,,, 145-167. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48912-0_6
  14. Michael Carbajales-Dale. When is EROI Not EROI?. BioPhysical Economics and Resource Quality 2019, 4 (4) https://doi.org/10.1007/s41247-019-0065-8
  15. Gunnar Luderer, Michaja Pehl, Anders Arvesen, Thomas Gibon, Benjamin L. Bodirsky, Harmen Sytze de Boer, Oliver Fricko, Mohamad Hejazi, Florian Humpenöder, Gokul Iyer, Silvana Mima, Ioanna Mouratiadou, Robert C. Pietzcker, Alexander Popp, Maarten van den Berg, Detlef van Vuuren, Edgar G. Hertwich. Environmental co-benefits and adverse side-effects of alternative power sector decarbonization strategies. Nature Communications 2019, 10 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13067-8
  16. Christopher J Rhodes. Endangered elements, critical raw materials and conflict minerals. Science Progress 2019, 102 (4) , 304-350. https://doi.org/10.1177/0036850419884873
  17. Jun Jin, Zhengyi Zhang, Liying Wang. From the Host to the Home Country, the International Upgradation of EMNEs in Sustainability Industries—The Case of a Chinese PV Company. Sustainability 2019, 11 (19) , 5269. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195269
  18. Jordan L. Musetta-Lambert, Eric M. Enanga, Sonja Teichert, Irena F. Creed, Karen A. Kidd, David P. Kreutzweiser, Paul K. Sibley. Industrial innovation and infrastructure as drivers of change in the Canadian boreal zone 1. Environmental Reviews 2019, 27 (3) , 275-294. https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2018-0056
  19. Piyush Choudhary, Rakesh Kumar Srivastava. Sustainability perspectives- a review for solar photovoltaic trends and growth opportunities. Journal of Cleaner Production 2019, 227 , 589-612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.107
  20. Paul E. Brockway, Anne Owen, Lina I. Brand-Correa, Lukas Hardt. Estimation of global final-stage energy-return-on-investment for fossil fuels with comparison to renewable energy sources. Nature Energy 2019, 4 (7) , 612-621. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-019-0425-z
  21. Dhana Lakshmi Busipalli, Santhanamoorthi Nachimuthu, Jyh‐Chiang Jiang. Theoretical study on halide and mixed halide Perovskite solar cells: Effects of halide atoms on the stability and electronic properties. Journal of the Chinese Chemical Society 2019, 66 (6) , 575-582. https://doi.org/10.1002/jccs.201800443
  22. Simon Davidsson Kurland, Sally M. Benson. The energetic implications of introducing lithium-ion batteries into distributed photovoltaic systems. Sustainable Energy & Fuels 2019, 3 (5) , 1182-1190. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9SE00127A
  23. Ali Khatibi, Fatemeh Razi Astaraei, Mohammad Hossein Ahmadi. Generation and combination of the solar cells: A current model review. Energy Science & Engineering 2019, 7 (2) , 305-322. https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.292
  24. Da Liu, Jinchen Liu, Shoukai Wang, Ming Xu, Syed Junaid Akbar. Contribution of international photovoltaic trade to global greenhouse gas emission reduction: the example of China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 2019, 143 , 114-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.12.015
  25. Bjarne Steffen, Dominique Hischier, Tobias S. Schmidt. Historical and projected improvements in net energy performance of power generation technologies. Energy & Environmental Science 2018, 11 (12) , 3524-3530. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8EE01231H
  26. Michael R.W. Walmsley, Timothy G. Walmsley, Martin J. Atkins. Linking greenhouse gas emissions footprint and energy return on investment in electricity generation planning. Journal of Cleaner Production 2018, 200 , 911-921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.268
  27. Matthew Kuperus Heun, Anne Owen, Paul E. Brockway. A physical supply-use table framework for energy analysis on the energy conversion chain. Applied Energy 2018, 226 , 1134-1162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.05.109
  28. Sourabh Jain, Nikunj Kumar Jain, W. Jamie Vaughn. Challenges in meeting all of India's electricity from solar: An energetic approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2018, 82 , 1006-1013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.099
  29. Saria Bukhary, Sajjad Ahmad, Jacimaria Batista. Analyzing land and water requirements for solar deployment in the Southwestern United States. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2018, 82 , 3288-3305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.10.016
  30. Anders Arvesen, Gunnar Luderer, Michaja Pehl, Benjamin Leon Bodirsky, Edgar G. Hertwich. Deriving life cycle assessment coefficients for application in integrated assessment modelling. Environmental Modelling & Software 2018, 99 , 111-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.09.010
  31. Z. Zhou, M. Carbajales-Dale. Assessing the photovoltaic technology landscape: efficiency and energy return on investment (EROI). Energy & Environmental Science 2018, 11 (3) , 603-608. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7EE01806A
  32. Mathilde Fajardy, Niall Mac Dowell. The energy return on investment of BECCS: is BECCS a threat to energy security?. Energy & Environmental Science 2018, 11 (6) , 1581-1594. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7EE03610H
  33. Graham Palmer, Joshua Floyd. An Exploration of Divergence in EPBT and EROI for Solar Photovoltaics. BioPhysical Economics and Resource Quality 2017, 2 (4) https://doi.org/10.1007/s41247-017-0033-0
  34. Michaja Pehl, Anders Arvesen, Florian Humpenöder, Alexander Popp, Edgar G. Hertwich, Gunnar Luderer. Understanding future emissions from low-carbon power systems by integration of life-cycle assessment and integrated energy modelling. Nature Energy 2017, 2 (12) , 939-945. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-017-0032-9
  35. Graham Palmer. A Framework for Incorporating EROI into Electrical Storage. BioPhysical Economics and Resource Quality 2017, 2 (2) https://doi.org/10.1007/s41247-017-0022-3
  36. Arkaitz Usubiaga, José Acosta-Fernández, Will McDowall, Francis G.N. Li. Exploring the macro-scale CO 2 mitigation potential of photovoltaics and wind energy in Europe's energy transition. Energy Policy 2017, 104 , 203-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.01.056
  37. Lina Brand-Correa, Paul Brockway, Claire Copeland, Timothy Foxon, Anne Owen, Peter Taylor. Developing an Input-Output Based Method to Estimate a National-Level Energy Return on Investment (EROI). Energies 2017, 10 (4) , 534. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10040534
  38. Charles A. S. Hall. Methods and Critiques for EROI Applied to Modern Fuels. 2017,,, 119-143. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47821-0_11
  39. Charles A. S. Hall. The History, Future, and Implications of EROI for Society. 2017,,, 145-169. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47821-0_12
  40. Michael Carbajales-Dale. Life Cycle Assessment. 2017,,, 439-473. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809451-8.00021-7
  41. Atse Louwen, Wilfried G. J. H. M. van Sark, André P. C. Faaij, Ruud E. I. Schropp. Re-assessment of net energy production and greenhouse gas emissions avoidance after 40 years of photovoltaics development. Nature Communications 2016, 7 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13728
  42. Zhaoyang Kong, Xiucheng Dong, Guixian Liu. Coal-based synthetic natural gas vs. imported natural gas in China: a net energy perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production 2016, 131 , 690-701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.111
  43. Sgouris Sgouridis, Denes Csala, Ugo Bardi. The sower’s way: quantifying the narrowing net-energy pathways to a global energy transition. Environmental Research Letters 2016, 11 (9) , 094009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/9/094009
  44. Enrica Leccisi, Marco Raugei, Vasilis Fthenakis. The Energy and Environmental Performance of Ground-Mounted Photovoltaic Systems—A Timely Update. Energies 2016, 9 (8) , 622. https://doi.org/10.3390/en9080622
  45. Ferruccio Ferroni, Robert J. Hopkirk. Energy Return on Energy Invested (ERoEI) for photovoltaic solar systems in regions of moderate insolation. Energy Policy 2016, 94 , 336-344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.03.034
  46. Tianwen Zhan, Yingchao Zhang, Wusong Wen, Ruiwei Zhang, Zhong He. A novel passive lossless snubber for current-fed half-bridge isolated dc/dc converter. 2016,,, 1146-1150. https://doi.org/10.1109/IPEMC.2016.7512449
  47. Miklós Antal, Jeroen C.J.M. Van Den Bergh. Green growth and climate change: conceptual and empirical considerations. Climate Policy 2016, 16 (2) , 165-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2014.992003
  48. Nicola Armaroli, Vincenzo Balzani. Solar Electricity and Solar Fuels: Status and Perspectives in the Context of the Energy Transition. Chemistry - A European Journal 2016, 22 (1) , 32-57. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201503580
  49. Carey King, John Maxwell, Alyssa Donovan. Comparing World Economic and Net Energy Metrics, Part 1: Single Technology and Commodity Perspective. Energies 2015, 8 (11) , 12949-12974. https://doi.org/10.3390/en81112346
  50. Carey King, John Maxwell, Alyssa Donovan. Comparing World Economic and Net Energy Metrics, Part 2: Total Economy Expenditure Perspective. Energies 2015, 8 (11) , 12975-12996. https://doi.org/10.3390/en81112347
  51. Carey King. Comparing World Economic and Net Energy Metrics, Part 3: Macroeconomic Historical and Future Perspectives. Energies 2015, 8 (11) , 12997-13020. https://doi.org/10.3390/en81112348
  52. Federica Cucchiella, Idiano D’Adamo. Residential photovoltaic plant: environmental and economical implications from renewable support policies. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy 2015, 17 (7) , 1929-1944. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-015-0913-1
  53. Mahinda Vilathgamuwa, Dulika Nayanasiri, Shantha Gamini. Power Electronics for Photovoltaic Power Systems. Synthesis Lectures on Power Electronics 2015, 5 (2) , 1-131. https://doi.org/10.2200/S00638ED1V01Y201504PEL008
  54. Khagendra P. Bhandari, Jennifer M. Collier, Randy J. Ellingson, Defne S. Apul. Energy payback time (EPBT) and energy return on energy invested (EROI) of solar photovoltaic systems: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2015, 47 , 133-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.057
  55. Michael Carbajales-Dale, Marco Raugei, Vasilis Fthenakis, Charles Barnhart. Energy Return on Investment (EROI) of Solar PV: An Attempt at Reconciliation [Point of View]. Proceedings of the IEEE 2015, 103 (7) , 995-999. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2015.2438471
  56. D. R. Nayanasiri, Gilbert Hock Beng Foo, D. M. Vilathgamuwa, D. L. Maskell. A Switching Control Strategy for Single- and Dual-Inductor Current-Fed Push–Pull Converters. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics 2015, 30 (7) , 3761-3771. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2014.2348800
  57. Robert A. Herendeen. Connecting net energy with the price of energy and other goods and services. Ecological Economics 2015, 109 , 142-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.10.011
  58. Anders Arvesen, Edgar G. Hertwich. More caution is needed when using life cycle assessment to determine energy return on investment (EROI). Energy Policy 2015, 76 , 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.11.025
  59. D. R. Nayanasiri, Gilbert Foo, D. L. Maskell, D. M. Vilathgamuwa. Micro inverter with a front-end current-fed converter. 2014,,, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIAFS.2014.7069555
  60. Simon Davidsson, Leena Grandell, Henrik Wachtmeister, Mikael Höök. Growth curves and sustained commissioning modelling of renewable energy: Investigating resource constraints for wind energy. Energy Policy 2014, 73 , 767-776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.05.003
  61. Girija Page, Bradley Ridoutt, Bill Bellotti. Location and technology options to reduce environmental impacts from agriculture. Journal of Cleaner Production 2014, 81 , 130-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.06.055
  62. Michael Carbajales-Dale, Charles J. Barnhart, Adam R. Brandt, Sally M. Benson. A better currency for investing in a sustainable future. Nature Climate Change 2014, 4 (7) , 524-527. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2285
  63. Sgouris Sgouridis, Denes Csala. A Framework for Defining Sustainable Energy Transitions: Principles, Dynamics, and Implications. Sustainability 2014, 6 (5) , 2601-2622. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6052601
  64. . Bibliography. 2014,,, 441-447. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-397021-3.00023-5
  65. C. J. M. Emmott, N. J. Ekins-Daukes, J. Nelson. Dynamic carbon mitigation analysis: the role of thin-film photovoltaics. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7 (6) , 1810-1818. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4EE00646A
  66. Kotaro Kawajiri, Timothy G. Gutowski, Stanley B. Gershwin. Net CO 2 emissions from global photovoltaic development. RSC Adv. 2014, 4 (102) , 58652-58659. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA08596E
  67. Adam R. Brandt, Michael Dale, Charles J. Barnhart. Calculating systems-scale energy efficiency and net energy returns: A bottom-up matrix-based approach. Energy 2013, 62 , 235-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.09.054
  68. Michael Dale. A Comparative Analysis of Energy Costs of Photovoltaic, Solar Thermal, and Wind Electricity Generation Technologies. Applied Sciences 2013, 3 (2) , 325-337. https://doi.org/10.3390/app3020325
  69. Charles J. Barnhart, Michael Dale, Adam R. Brandt, Sally M. Benson. The energetic implications of curtailing versus storing solar- and wind-generated electricity. Energy & Environmental Science 2013, 6 (10) , 2804. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ee41973h
  70. Klaus Sylvester Friesenbichler. Innovation in the Energy Sector. SSRN Electronic Journal 2013, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2388869

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

OOPS

You have to login with your ACS ID befor you can login with your Mendeley account.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect

This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By continuing to use the site, you are accepting our use of cookies. Read the ACS privacy policy.

CONTINUE