ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Design and Control of the Dry Methane Reforming Process

OR SEARCH CITATIONS

My Activity
Publications

Figure 1Loading Img
Download Hi-Res ImageDownload to MS-PowerPointCite This:Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2014, 53, 37, 14423-14439
    Article

    Design and Control of the Dry Methane Reforming Process
    Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

    View Author Information
    Department of Chemical Engineering, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015, United States
    *E-mail: [email protected]. Tel.: 610-758-4256. Fax: 610-758-5057.
    Other Access Options

    Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research

    Cite this: Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2014, 53, 37, 14423–14439
    Click to copy citationCitation copied!
    https://doi.org/10.1021/ie5023942
    Published August 28, 2014
    Copyright © 2014 American Chemical Society
    Request reuse permissions

    Abstract

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

    The much lower cost of natural gas and the desire to reduce carbon dioxide emissions have stimulated interest in the dry methane reforming process in which these two gases react to produce synthesis gas. The ratio of hydrogen to carbon monoxide in the resulting synthesis gas is close to unity, which makes it suitable for feeding to the Fischer–Tropsch process to produce liquid transportation fuel. The dry methane reforming reaction is favored by low pressure, but high pressure synthesis gas is required in the downstream process. Higher reactor pressures reduce compression costs of the synthesis gas. However, higher pressures also require a higher reactor temperature to achieve high methane conversion. When a maximum reactor temperature limitation is encountered, high methane conversion can be maintained by operating with a higher than stoichiometric CO2-to-CH4 ratio. But this means an excess of carbon dioxide must be fed to the reactor and subsequently recycled, which imposes additional compression costs. These competing effects produce interesting design trade-offs, which are explored in this paper. The dynamic control of the process is also studied. The dominant issue is the modeling of the reactor, which is a fired furnace with combustion of fuel providing the endothermic heat of the syngas reaction. Dynamic modeling is achieved by using a tubular process reactor in which the heat flux is determined by the heat generated in a fuel–air combustion reactor.

    Copyright © 2014 American Chemical Society

    Subjects

    what are subjects

    Read this article

    To access this article, please review the available access options below.

    Get instant access

    Purchase Access

    Read this article for 48 hours. Check out below using your ACS ID or as a guest.

    Recommended

    Access through Your Institution

    You may have access to this article through your institution.

    Your institution does not have access to this content. Add or change your institution or let them know you’d like them to include access.

    Cited By

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

    This article is cited by 72 publications.

    1. Prakhar Srivastava, Aayush Gupta, Nitin Kaistha. Synthesis and Integrated Design of a Compact Azeotropic Process for EtAc–MeOH–Water Separation. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2024, 63 (49) , 21466-21478. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.4c03880
    2. Satyam Gupta, Saumya Tiwari, Vaibhav Kumar Arghode, Goutam Deo. Cobalt Promotion and Ni+Co Loading Effects of γ-Al2O3-Supported Ni–Co Catalysts for the Flue Gas Reforming of Methane. Energy & Fuels 2024, 38 (12) , 11022-11036. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c01317
    3. Zeinab Ataya, Mohamed Challiwala, Gasim Ibrahim, Hanif A. Choudhury, Mahmoud M. El-Halwagi, Nimir O. Elbashir. Decarbonizing the Gas-to-Liquid (GTL) Process Using an Advanced Reforming of Methane Process. ACS Engineering Au 2024, 4 (1) , 99-111. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsengineeringau.3c00025
    4. Fahad N. Alotaibi, Abdallah S. Berrouk, Muhammad Saeed. Optimization of Yield and Conversion Rates in Methane Dry Reforming Using Artificial Neural Networks and the Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2023, 62 (42) , 17084-17099. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.3c01813
    5. Kristiano Prifti, Andrea Galeazzi, Flavio Manenti. Plastic Waste Chemical Recycling to Methanol: Combined Experimental and Plant-Wide Simulated Approach. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2023, 62 (15) , 6167-6175. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.2c02665
    6. Rajesh Kumar Parsapur, Sudipta Chatterjee, Kuo-Wei Huang. The Insignificant Role of Dry Reforming of Methane in CO2 Emission Relief. ACS Energy Letters 2020, 5 (9) , 2881-2885. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.0c01635
    7. Jongwon Lee, BeomSik Kim, Myungwan Han. Spatially Patterned Catalytic Reactor for Steam–CO2 Reforming of Methane. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2019, 58 (40) , 18731-18741. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b03091
    8. Jongwon Lee, BeomSik Kim, Myungwan Han. Optimization of an Axial Catalyst Profile in Methane Dry Reformer: Suppression of Coke Formation. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2019, 58 (37) , 17433-17444. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b03090
    9. Pravin P S, Sharad Bhartiya, Ravindra D. Gudi. Modeling and Predictive Control of an Integrated Reformer–Membrane–Fuel Cell–Battery Hybrid Dynamic System. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2019, 58 (26) , 11392-11406. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b00688
    10. Sung Min Kim, Paula M. Abdala, Marcin Broda, Davood Hosseini, Christophe Copéret, Christoph Müller. Integrated CO2 Capture and Conversion as an Efficient Process for Fuels from Greenhouse Gases. ACS Catalysis 2018, 8 (4) , 2815-2823. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.7b03063
    11. Bor-Yih Yu, Meng-Kai Chen, and I-Lung Chien . Assessment on CO2 Utilization through Rigorous Simulation: Converting CO2 to Dimethyl Carbonate. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2018, 57 (2) , 639-652. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.7b02923
    12. Borja Hernández and Mariano Martín . Optimal Integrated Plant for Production of Biodiesel from Waste. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 2017, 5 (8) , 6756-6767. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b01007
    13. Borja Hernández and Mariano Martín . Optimal Process Operation for Biogas Reforming to Methanol: Effects of Dry Reforming and Biogas Composition. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2016, 55 (23) , 6677-6685. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.6b01044
    14. Jonas Baltrusaitis and William L. Luyben . Methane Conversion to Syngas for Gas-to-Liquids (GTL): Is Sustainable CO2 Reuse via Dry Methane Reforming (DMR) Cost Competitive with SMR and ATR Processes?. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 2015, 3 (9) , 2100-2111. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b00368
    15. Yu Qian, Yi Man, Lijuan Peng, and Huairong Zhou . Integrated Process of Coke-Oven Gas Tri-Reforming and Coal Gasification to Methanol with High Carbon Utilization and Energy Efficiency. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2015, 54 (9) , 2519-2525. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie503670d
    16. Ha-Jun Yoon, Tesfalem Aregawi Atsbha, Taeksang Yoon, Dongkyoung Shin, Jihong An, Mohammadamin Zarei, Ali Cherif, Sangwon Suh, Chul-Jin Lee. Sustainable and feasible carbon capture and utilization pathways towards net-zero. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2025, 211 , 115331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2025.115331
    17. Haicui Wang, Zhimin Ma, Jing Bian, Mahdi Pourtadayyon. Development and multi-aspect investigation of an innovative process driven by geothermal energy, involving LNG-based steam reforming and syngas-fueled gas turbine for production of power, heat, and methanol. Energy 2024, 311 , 133324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2024.133324
    18. Mohammod Hafizur Rahman, Mohammad Biswas. Modeling of Dry Reforming of Methane Using Artificial Neural Networks. Hydrogen 2024, 5 (4) , 800-818. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrogen5040042
    19. Alexandre C. Dimian, Costin Sorin Bildea. Integrated syngas biorefinery for manufacturing ethylene, acetic acid and vinyl acetate. Chemical Engineering Research and Design 2024, 75 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2024.10.033
    20. Wenzheng Zhang, Huahua Zhao, Huanling Song, Lingjun Chou. Unbounding the Future: Designing NiAl‐Based Catalysts for Dry Reforming of Methane. Chemistry – An Asian Journal 2024, 19 (17) https://doi.org/10.1002/asia.202400503
    21. Jung Ae Lim, Young-Woo You, Seung Kwon Kang, Jongseon Rho, Suyeon Yeo, Seulgi Han, Mintaek Im, Un Young Kim, Min-Chul Kim, Tae-Sun Chang, Ji Hoon Park, Jinjoo An, Jin Hee Lee. Green process for Polyurethane: From CO2 to isocyanate. Chemical Engineering Journal 2024, 494 , 153012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2024.153012
    22. Alessio Varotto, Umberto Pasqual Laverdura, Marta Feroci, Maria Luisa Grilli. Photo-Thermal Dry Reforming of Methane with PGM-Free and PGM-Based Catalysts: A Review. Materials 2024, 17 (15) , 3809. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17153809
    23. Zhiyuan Zong, Nicole Koers, Genpei Cai, D. Chester Upham. CO2-to-methanol: Economic and environmental comparison of emerging and established technologies with dry reforming and methane pyrolysis. Chemical Engineering Journal 2024, 487 , 150274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2024.150274
    24. Xin Shang, Xiaofeng Yang, Guodong Liu, Tianyu Zhang, Xiong Su. A molecular view of single-atom catalysis toward carbon dioxide conversion. Chemical Science 2024, 15 (13) , 4631-4708. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3SC06863C
    25. Mohamed S. Challiwala, Gasim Ibrahim, Hanif A. Choudhury, Nimir O. Elbashir. Scaling up the advanced dry reforming of methane (DRM) reactor system for multi-walled carbon nanotubes and syngas production: An experimental and modeling study. Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification 2024, 197 , 109693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2024.109693
    26. Hyeokjun Kang, Jeong-Hwan Oh, Yong Hee Lee, Subin Yang, Sooseok Choi. Study on the Value-Added Carbon Products from Methane Pyrolysis with the Thermal Plasma Process. Applied Science and Convergence Technology 2024, 33 (1) , 13-17. https://doi.org/10.5757/ASCT.2024.33.1.13
    27. Xin-Quan Tan, Wuwei Mo, Abdul Rahman Mohamed, Wee-Jun Ong. Synergizing Aspen plus and life cycle assessment of nascent photocatalytic dry methane reforming over thermocatalytic and biomass gasification toward syngas generation. Journal of Cleaner Production 2024, 436 , 140270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140270
    28. Mahmoud Abdalla, Mohammed G. Mohammed, Umer Zahid. Design of carbon neutral methanol production via integration of renewable hydrogen and dry reforming process. 2024, 2137-2142. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-28824-1.50357-4
    29. Oualid Alioui, Michael Badawi, Alessandro Erto, Mohammed A. Amin, Vineet Tirth, Byong-Hun Jeon, Saiful Islam, Marco Balsamo, Mirella Virginie, Barbara Ernst, Yacine Benguerba. Contribution of DFT to the optimization of Ni-based catalysts for dry reforming of methane: a review. Catalysis Reviews 2023, 65 (4) , 1468-1520. https://doi.org/10.1080/01614940.2021.2020518
    30. Sung-Jong Jo, Tae-Ha Kang, Beom-Ju Shin, Ji-Hun Mun, Sijan Devkota, Jin-Young Cha, Shaukat Ali Mazari, Kyung-Min Kim, Ung Lee, Chae-Ho Shin, Jong-Ho Moon. Internal carbon loop strategy for methanol production from natural gas: Multi-objective optimization and process evaluation. Journal of Cleaner Production 2023, 418 , 138140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138140
    31. Jinchen Ma, Xue Zhang, Peng Peng, Xin Tian, Mengshuang Li, Ying Li, Zuwei Xu, Haibo Zhao. Converting ethane to syngas via chemical looping dry reforming with LaFeO3 perovskite oxygen carrier. Fuel Processing Technology 2023, 247 , 107806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2023.107806
    32. Alexander V. Vorontsov, Panagiotis G. Smirniotis. Advancements in hydrogen energy research with the assistance of computational chemistry. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2023, 48 (40) , 14978-14999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.12.356
    33. Zhiyuan Zong, Genpei Cai, Majd Tabbara, D. Chester Upham. CO2-negative fuel production using low-CO2 electricity: Syngas from a combination of methane pyrolysis and dry reforming with techno-economic analysis. Energy Conversion and Management 2023, 277 , 116624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2022.116624
    34. Anahita Soleimani, Nazanin Abrishami Shirazi, Mohammad Reza Rahimpour. Environmental impacts of syngas. 2023, 413-426. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-91878-7.00003-4
    35. Mohammad Farsi. Reforming process design and modeling: Steam, dry, and autothermal reforming. 2023, 123-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-91879-4.00003-5
    36. Wende Tian, Tianshu Wang, Zhe Cui, Haoran Zhang, Yang An. Molecular dynamics and steady-state process simulation coupled research on CCLG system design for cleaner production of EG. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers 2022, 141 , 104597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2022.104597
    37. Masaru Kushida, Akira Yamaguchi, Masahiro Miyauchi. Photocatalytic dry reforming of methane by rhodium supported monoclinic TiO2-B nanobelts. Journal of Energy Chemistry 2022, 71 , 562-571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2022.04.022
    38. Keyan Wei, Shuai Yue, Xiangjun Hou, Yao Jiang, Cairong Jiang, Yali Yao, Jie Yin, Jianjun Ma. Feasibility analysis of Fischer‐Tropsch synthesis tail gas as a fuel for solid oxide fuel cells. International Journal of Energy Research 2022, 46 (8) , 10864-10874. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.7887
    39. Yohanes Kristianto Nugroho, Liandong Zhu, Cathal Heavey. Building an agent-based techno-economic assessment coupled with life cycle assessment of biomass to methanol supply chains. Applied Energy 2022, 309 , 118449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.118449
    40. Edgar Martín-Hernández, Mariano Martín. Anaerobic digestion and nutrient recovery. 2022, 239-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824324-4.00017-2
    41. Muriel Chaghouri, Sara Hany, Haingomalala Lucette Tidahy, Fabrice Cazier, Cédric Gennequin, Edmond Abi-Aad. Dry reforming of methane for catalytic valorization of biogas. 2022, 207-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-85612-6.00008-5
    42. Wende Tian, Haoran Zhang, Zhe Cui, Xiude Hu. Mechanism analysis and simulation of methyl methacrylate production coupled chemical looping gasification system. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering 2021, 37 , 184-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2021.02.024
    43. Yaser Khojasteh-Salkuyeh, Omid Ashrafi, Ehsan Mostafavi, Philippe Navarri. CO2 utilization for methanol production; Part I: Process design and life cycle GHG assessment of different pathways. Journal of CO2 Utilization 2021, 50 , 101608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2021.101608
    44. Jean-François Portha, Wilmar Uribe-Soto, Jean-Marc Commenge, Solène Valentin, Laurent Falk. Techno-Economic and Carbon Footprint Analyses of a Coke Oven Gas Reuse Process for Methanol Production. Processes 2021, 9 (6) , 1042. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9061042
    45. Alexandra Victoria Tavasoli, Mikaela Preston, Geoffrey Ozin. Photocatalytic dry reforming: what is it good for?. Energy & Environmental Science 2021, 14 (5) , 3098-3109. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0EE02809F
    46. José Antonio Delgado Dobladez, Vicente Ismael Águeda Maté, Silvia Álvarez Torrellas, Marcos Larriba, Pablo Brea. Efficient recovery of syngas from dry methane reforming product by a dual pressure swing adsorption process. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46 (33) , 17522-17533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.02.153
    47. Intan Clarissa Sophiana, Tri Partono Adhi, Yogi Wibisono Budhi, . Simulation of Dry Reforming of Methane to Form Synthesis Gas as Feed Stock for Acetic Acid Production. MATEC Web of Conferences 2021, 333 , 06002. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202133306002
    48. Evan Pretti, John Ludy, Carlos Pico, Jonas Baltrusaitis. Simultaneous Process Design of a Cooled Tubular Fischer–Tropsch Reactor. Energy Technology 2020, 8 (12) https://doi.org/10.1002/ente.202000683
    49. Marco Tomatis, Ashak Mahmud Parvez, Muhammad T. Afzal, Sannia Mareta, Tao Wu, Jun He, Tianbiao He. Utilization of CO2 in renewable DME fuel production: A life cycle analysis (LCA)-based case study in China. Fuel 2019, 254 , 115627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.115627
    50. Zulfan Adi Putra, Jundika C. Kurnia, Agus P. Sasmito, Oki Muraza. Process design and techno‐economic analysis of ethyl levulinate production from carbon dioxide and 1,4‐butanediol as an alternative biofuel and fuel additive. International Journal of Energy Research 2019, 43 (11) , 5932-5945. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.4702
    51. Borja Hernández, Mariano Martín. Optimal production of syngas via super-dry reforming. Analysis for natural gas and biogas under different CO2 taxes. Chemical Engineering Research and Design 2019, 148 , 375-392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2019.06.030
    52. Jiawei Hu, Vladimir V. Galvita, Hilde Poelman, Christophe Detavernier, Guy B. Marin. Pressure-induced deactivation of core-shell nanomaterials for catalyst-assisted chemical looping. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 2019, 247 , 86-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.01.084
    53. Jong-Eun Hong, Mushtaq Usman, Seung-Bok Lee, Rak-Hyun Song, Tak-Hyoung Lim. Thermally self-sustaining operation of tubular solid oxide fuel cells integrated with a hybrid partial oxidation reformer using propane. Energy Conversion and Management 2019, 189 , 132-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.04.001
    54. Izabela Wysocka, Jan Hupka, Andrzej Rogala. Catalytic Activity of Nickel and Ruthenium–Nickel Catalysts Supported on SiO2, ZrO2, Al2O3, and MgAl2O4 in a Dry Reforming Process. Catalysts 2019, 9 (6) , 540. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal9060540
    55. Paulina Summa, Bogdan Samojeden, Monika Motak. Dry and steam reforming of methane. Comparison and analysis of recently investigated catalytic materials. A short review.. Polish Journal of Chemical Technology 2019, 21 (2) , 31-37. https://doi.org/10.2478/pjct-2019-0017
    56. Ebrahim Rezaei, Stephen Dzuryk. Techno-economic comparison of reverse water gas shift reaction to steam and dry methane reforming reactions for syngas production. Chemical Engineering Research and Design 2019, 144 , 354-369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2019.02.005
    57. Hussain A Alibrahim, Siddig SeedAhmed, Usama Ahmed, Umer Zahid. Comparative analysis of gasification and reforming technologies for the syngas production. 2019, 1759-1764. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818634-3.50294-0
    58. Saad A. Al‐Sobhi, Munawar A. Shaik, Ali Elkamel, Fatih S. Erenay. Modeling and Optimization of Natural Gas Processing and Production Networks. 2018, 259-303. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119269618.ch11
    59. Borja Hernandez, Mariano Martin. Optimization for biogas to chemicals via tri-reforming. Analysis of Fischer-Tropsch fuels from biogas. Energy Conversion and Management 2018, 174 , 998-1013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.08.074
    60. Yu Yang, Jing Liu, Weifeng Shen, Jie Li, I-Lung Chien. High-efficiency utilization of CO2 in the methanol production by a novel parallel-series system combining steam and dry methane reforming. Energy 2018, 158 , 820-829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.06.061
    61. Kosan Roh, Hyungmuk Lim, Wonseok Chung, Jaewoo Oh, Haeun Yoo, Ali S. Al-Hunaidy, Hasan Imran, Jay H. Lee. Sustainability analysis of CO2 capture and utilization processes using a computer-aided tool. Journal of CO2 Utilization 2018, 26 , 60-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2018.04.022
    62. Nicolas Abdel Karim Aramouni, Jad G. Touma, Belal Abu Tarboush, Joseph Zeaiter, Mohammad N. Ahmad. Catalyst design for dry reforming of methane: Analysis review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2018, 82 , 2570-2585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.076
    63. Saad Al-Sobhi, Ali Elkamel, Fatih Erenay, Munawar Shaik. Simulation-Optimization Framework for Synthesis and Design of Natural Gas Downstream Utilization Networks. Energies 2018, 11 (2) , 362. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11020362
    64. Priyadarshini Balasubramanian, Ishan Bajaj, M.M. Faruque Hasan. Simulation and optimization of reforming reactors for carbon dioxide utilization using both rigorous and reduced models. Journal of CO2 Utilization 2018, 23 , 80-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2017.10.014
    65. Evangelos Delikonstantis, Marco Scapinello, Georgios Stefanidis. Investigating the Plasma-Assisted and Thermal Catalytic Dry Methane Reforming for Syngas Production: Process Design, Simulation and Evaluation. Energies 2017, 10 (9) , 1429. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10091429
    66. Xinhua Gao, Guoguo Liu, Qinhong Wei, Guohui Yang, Mitsunori Masaki, Xiaobo Peng, Ruiqin Yang, Noritatsu Tsubaki. Carbon nanofibers decorated SiC foam monoliths as the support of anti-sintering Ni catalyst for methane dry reforming. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2017, 42 (26) , 16547-16556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.05.164
    67. Borja Hernández, Erick León, Mariano Martín. Bio-waste selection and blending for the optimal production of power and fuels via anaerobic digestion. Chemical Engineering Research and Design 2017, 121 , 163-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2017.03.009
    68. M.S. Challiwala, M.M. Ghouri, P. Linke, M.M. El-Halwagi, N.O. Elbashir. A combined thermo-kinetic analysis of various methane reforming technologies: Comparison with dry reforming. Journal of CO2 Utilization 2017, 17 , 99-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2016.11.008
    69. Kosan Roh, Rebecca Frauzem, Rafiqul Gani, Jay H. Lee. Process systems engineering issues and applications towards reducing carbon dioxide emissions through conversion technologies. Chemical Engineering Research and Design 2016, 116 , 27-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2016.10.007
    70. Yi Man, Siyu Yang, Yu Qian. Integrated process for synthetic natural gas production from coal and coke-oven gas with high energy efficiency and low emission. Energy Conversion and Management 2016, 117 , 162-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.03.040
    71. William L. Luyben. Control of parallel dry methane and steam methane reforming processes for Fischer–Tropsch syngas. Journal of Process Control 2016, 39 , 77-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprocont.2015.11.007
    72. Weeranut Prasertsri, Rebecca Frauzem, Uthaiporn Suriyapraphadilok, Rafiqul Gani. Sustainable DME synthesis-design with CO2 utilization. 2016, 1081-1086. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63428-3.50185-5
    Download PDF
    Go to Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
    Get e-Alerts
    Get e-Alerts

    Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research

    Cite this: Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2014, 53, 37, 14423–14439
    Click to copy citationCitation copied!
    https://doi.org/10.1021/ie5023942
    Published August 28, 2014
    Copyright © 2014 American Chemical Society
    Request reuse permissions

    Article Views

    5682

    Altmetric

    -

    Citations

    72
    Learn about these metrics

    Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

    Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

    The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.