Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect
ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
The Importance of the Scaffold for de Novo Enzymes: A Case Study with Kemp Eliminase
My Activity

Figure 1Loading Img
    Article

    The Importance of the Scaffold for de Novo Enzymes: A Case Study with Kemp Eliminase
    Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

    View Author Information
    † ‡ § Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Department of Chemistry, and §Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, United States
    Chemical Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratories, Berkeley, California 94720, United States
    Other Access OptionsSupporting Information (1)

    Journal of the American Chemical Society

    Cite this: J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 16, 5793–5800
    Click to copy citationCitation copied!
    https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b12265
    Published April 6, 2017
    Copyright © 2017 American Chemical Society

    Abstract

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
    Abstract Image

    We report electric field values relevant to the reactant and transition states of designed Kemp eliminases KE07 and KE70 and their improved variants from laboratory directed evolution (LDE), using atomistic simulations with the AMOEBA polarizable force field. We find that the catalytic base residue contributes the most to the electric field stabilization of the transition state of the LDE variants of the KE07 and KE70 enzymes, whereas the electric fields of the remainder of the enzyme and solvent disfavor the catalytic reaction in both cases. By contrast, we show that the electrostatic environment plays a large and stabilizing role for the naturally occurring enzyme ketosteroid isomerase (KSI). These results suggest that LDE is ultimately a limited strategy for improving de novo enzymes since it is largely restricted to optimization of chemical positioning in the active site, thus yielding a ∼3 order magnitude improvement over the uncatalyzed reaction, which we suggest may be an absolute upper bound estimate based on LDE applied to comparable de novo Kemp eliminases and other enzymes like KSI. Instead de novo enzymatic reactions could more productively benefit from optimization of the electrostatics of the protein scaffold in early stages of the computational design, utilizing electric field optimization as guidance.

    Copyright © 2017 American Chemical Society

    Read this article

    To access this article, please review the available access options below.

    Get instant access

    Purchase Access

    Read this article for 48 hours. Check out below using your ACS ID or as a guest.

    Recommended

    Access through Your Institution

    You may have access to this article through your institution.

    Your institution does not have access to this content. Add or change your institution or let them know you’d like them to include access.

    Supporting Information

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

    The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/jacs.6b12265.

    • Parameterization, dipole moment and active site residue details. Tables for sequence of KE07/KE70, dipole moments, preorganization/reorganization energy breakup, field values for specific residues, scaffold, and solvent at the three bonds (PDF)

    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

    Cited By

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

    This article is cited by 56 publications.

    1. Ningning Li, Shengheng Yan, Peng Wu, Junfeng Li, Binju Wang. Local Electric Fields Drives the Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer within Cytochrome P450 Reductase. ACS Catalysis 2024, 14 (10) , 7893-7900. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.4c02215
    2. Steffen Murke, Wanlin Chen, Simone Pezzotti, Martina Havenith. Tuning Acid–Base Chemistry at an Electrified Gold/Water Interface. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2024, 146 (18) , 12423-12430. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.3c13633
    3. Hira Jabeen, Michael Beer, James Spencer, Marc W. van der Kamp, H. Adrian Bunzel, Adrian J. Mulholland. Electric Fields Are a Key Determinant of Carbapenemase Activity in Class A β-Lactamases. ACS Catalysis 2024, 14 (9) , 7166-7172. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.3c05302
    4. J. Javier Ruiz-Pernía, Katarzyna Świderek, Joan Bertran, Vicent Moliner, Iñaki Tuñón. Electrostatics as a Guiding Principle in Understanding and Designing Enzymes. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2024, 20 (5) , 1783-1795. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.3c01395
    5. Yaoyukun Jiang, Ning Ding, Qianzhen Shao, Sebastian L. Stull, Zihao Cheng, Zhongyue J. Yang. Substrate Positioning Dynamics Involves a Non-Electrostatic Component to Mediate Catalysis. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2023, 14 (50) , 11480-11489. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.3c02444
    6. Xiaoliang Pan, Richard Van, Jingzhi Pu, Kwangho Nam, Yuezhi Mao, Yihan Shao. Free Energy Profile Decomposition Analysis for QM/MM Simulations of Enzymatic Reactions. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2023, 19 (22) , 8234-8244. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00973
    7. Zhongyue J. Yang, Qianzhen Shao, Yaoyukun Jiang, Christopher Jurich, Xinchun Ran, Reecan J. Juarez, Bailu Yan, Sebastian L. Stull, Anvita Gollu, Ning Ding. Mutexa: A Computational Ecosystem for Intelligent Protein Engineering. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2023, 19 (21) , 7459-7477. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00602
    8. Qianzhen Shao, Yaoyukun Jiang, Zhongyue J. Yang. EnzyHTP Computational Directed Evolution with Adaptive Resource Allocation. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2023, 63 (17) , 5650-5659. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.3c00618
    9. Shengheng Yan, Xinwei Ji, Wei Peng, Binju Wang. Evaluating the Transition State Stabilization/Destabilization Effects of the Electric Fields from Scaffold Residues by a QM/MM Approach. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2023, 127 (19) , 4245-4253. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.3c01054
    10. Mark E. Eberhart, Timothy R. Wilson, Nathaniel W. Johnston, Anastassia N. Alexandrova. Geometry of Charge Density as a Reporter on the Role of the Protein Scaffold in Enzymatic Catalysis: Electrostatic Preorganization and Beyond. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2023, 19 (3) , 694-704. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.2c01060
    11. Wei Peng, Shengheng Yan, Xuan Zhang, Langxing Liao, Jinyan Zhang, Sason Shaik, Binju Wang. How Do Preorganized Electric Fields Function in Catalytic Cycles? The Case of the Enzyme Tyrosine Hydroxylase. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2022, 144 (44) , 20484-20494. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c09263
    12. Tomasz K. Piskorz, Vicente Martí-Centelles, Tom A. Young, Paul J. Lusby, Fernanda Duarte. Computational Modeling of Supramolecular Metallo-organic Cages–Challenges and Opportunities. ACS Catalysis 2022, 12 (10) , 5806-5826. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.2c00837
    13. Yaoyukun Jiang, Bailu Yan, Yu Chen, Reecan J. Juarez, Zhongyue J. Yang. Molecular Dynamics-Derived Descriptor Informs the Impact of Mutation on the Catalytic Turnover Number in Lactonase Across Substrates. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2022, 126 (13) , 2486-2495. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c00142
    14. Wan-Lu Li, Hongxia Hao, Teresa Head-Gordon. Optimizing the Solvent Reorganization Free Energy by Metal Substitution for Nanocage Catalysis. ACS Catalysis 2022, 12 (7) , 3782-3788. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.1c05980
    15. Qianzhen Shao, Yaoyukun Jiang, Zhongyue J. Yang. EnzyHTP: A High-Throughput Computational Platform for Enzyme Modeling. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2022, 62 (3) , 647-655. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.1c01424
    16. Josep Maria Bofill, Wolfgang Quapp, Guillermo Albareda, Ibério de P. R. Moreira, Jordi Ribas-Ariño. Controlling Chemical Reactivity with Optimally Oriented Electric Fields: A Generalization of the Newton Trajectory Method. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2022, 18 (2) , 935-952. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00943
    17. Kaixuan Chen, Wan-Lu Li, Teresa Head-Gordon. Linear Combination of Atomic Dipoles to Calculate the Bond and Molecular Dipole Moments of Molecules and Molecular Liquids. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2021, 12 (51) , 12360-12369. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c03476
    18. Samuel H. Schneider, Jacek Kozuch, Steven G. Boxer. The Interplay of Electrostatics and Chemical Positioning in the Evolution of Antibiotic Resistance in TEM β-Lactamases. ACS Central Science 2021, 7 (12) , 1996-2008. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.1c00880
    19. Pau Besalú-Sala, Miquel Solà, Josep M. Luis, Miquel Torrent-Sucarrat. Fast and Simple Evaluation of the Catalysis and Selectivity Induced by External Electric Fields. ACS Catalysis 2021, 11 (23) , 14467-14479. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.1c04247
    20. Xin Xu, Shengheng Yan, Xiaodong Hou, Wei Song, Lei Wang, Tianfu Wu, Mengya Qi, Jing Wu, Yijian Rao, Binju Wang, Liming Liu. Local Electric Field Modulated Reactivity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Acid Phosphatase for Enhancing Phosphorylation of l-Ascorbic Acid. ACS Catalysis 2021, 11 (21) , 13397-13407. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.1c04200
    21. Wan-Lu Li, Teresa Head-Gordon. Catalytic Principles from Natural Enzymes and Translational Design Strategies for Synthetic Catalysts. ACS Central Science 2021, 7 (1) , 72-80. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.0c01556
    22. Sergio Martí, Iñaki Tuñón, Vicent Moliner, Joan Bertran. Are Heme-Dependent Enzymes Always Using a Redox Mechanism? A Theoretical Study of the Kemp Elimination Catalyzed by a Promiscuous Aldoxime Dehydratase. ACS Catalysis 2020, 10 (19) , 11110-11119. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.0c02215
    23. Rory M. Crean, Jasmine M. Gardner, Shina C. L. Kamerlin. Harnessing Conformational Plasticity to Generate Designer Enzymes. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2020, 142 (26) , 11324-11342. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.0c04924
    24. Wiktor Beker, W. Andrzej Sokalski. Bottom-Up Nonempirical Approach To Reducing Search Space in Enzyme Design Guided by Catalytic Fields. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2020, 16 (5) , 3420-3429. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.0c00139
    25. Valerie Vaissier Welborn, Teresa Head-Gordon. Fluctuations of Electric Fields in the Active Site of the Enzyme Ketosteroid Isomerase. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2019, 141 (32) , 12487-12492. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b05323
    26. Zhongyue Yang, Fang Liu, Adam H. Steeves, Heather J. Kulik. Quantum Mechanical Description of Electrostatics Provides a Unified Picture of Catalytic Action Across Methyltransferases. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2019, 10 (13) , 3779-3787. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b01555
    27. Valerie Vaissier Welborn, Teresa Head-Gordon. Computational Design of Synthetic Enzymes. Chemical Reviews 2019, 119 (11) , 6613-6630. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00399
    28. Jack Fuller, III, Tim R. Wilson, Mark E. Eberhart, Anastassia N. Alexandrova. Charge Density in Enzyme Active Site as a Descriptor of Electrostatic Preorganization. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2019, 59 (5) , 2367-2373. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00958
    29. Alja Prah, Eric Frančišković, Janez Mavri, Jernej Stare. Electrostatics as the Driving Force Behind the Catalytic Function of the Monoamine Oxidase A Enzyme Confirmed by Quantum Computations. ACS Catalysis 2019, 9 (2) , 1231-1240. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.8b04045
    30. Mark Dittner, Bernd Hartke. Globally Optimal Catalytic Fields – Inverse Design of Abstract Embeddings for Maximum Reaction Rate Acceleration. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2018, 14 (7) , 3547-3564. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00151
    31. Saurabh Belsare, Viren Pattni, Matthias Heyden, Teresa Head-Gordon. Solvent Entropy Contributions to Catalytic Activity in Designed and Optimized Kemp Eliminases. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2018, 122 (21) , 5300-5307. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b07526
    32. Valerie Vaissier, Sudhir C. Sharma, Karl Schaettle, Taoran Zhang, and Teresa Head-Gordon . Computational Optimization of Electric Fields for Improving Catalysis of a Designed Kemp Eliminase. ACS Catalysis 2018, 8 (1) , 219-227. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.7b03151
    33. Lu Wang, Stephen D. Fried, and Thomas E. Markland . Proton Network Flexibility Enables Robustness and Large Electric Fields in the Ketosteroid Isomerase Active Site. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2017, 121 (42) , 9807-9815. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b06985
    34. Valerie Vaissier Welborn. Electric Fields in Enzyme Catalysis. 2024, 755-766. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-821978-2.00018-0
    35. Josep Maria Bofill, Marco Severi, Wolfgang Quapp, Jordi Ribas-Ariño, Ibério de P. R. Moreira, Guillermo Albareda. An algorithm to find the optimal oriented external electrostatic field for annihilating a reaction barrier in a polarizable molecular system. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2023, 159 (11) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0167749
    36. Josep Maria Bofill, Wolfgang Quapp, Guillem Albareda, Ibério de P. R. Moreira, Jordi Ribas-Ariño, Marco Severi. A catastrophe theory-based model for optimal control of chemical reactions by means of oriented electric fields. Theoretical Chemistry Accounts 2023, 142 (2) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-023-02959-0
    37. Yaoyukun Jiang, Sebastian L Stull, Qianzhen Shao, Zhongyue J Yang. Convergence in determining enzyme functional descriptors across Kemp eliminase variants. Electronic Structure 2022, 4 (4) , 044007. https://doi.org/10.1088/2516-1075/acad51
    38. Shengyu Zhang, Jun Zhang, Wenjia Luo, Pengyu Wang, Yushan Zhu. A preorganization oriented computational method for de novo design of Kemp elimination enzymes. Enzyme and Microbial Technology 2022, 160 , 110093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2022.110093
    39. Adam H Steeves, Heather J Kulik. Insights into the stability of engineered mini-proteins from their dynamic electronic properties. Electronic Structure 2022, 4 (3) , 034005. https://doi.org/10.1088/2516-1075/ac8c73
    40. Wen Jun Xie, Arieh Warshel. Natural Evolution Provides Strong Hints about Laboratory Evolution of Designer Enzymes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2022, 119 (31) https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2207904119
    41. Ziheng Cui, Shiding Zhang, Shengyu Zhang, Biqiang Chen, Yushan Zhu, Tianwei Tan. Green biomanufacturing promoted by automatic retrobiosynthesis planning and computational enzyme design. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering 2022, 41 , 6-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2021.08.017
    42. Valerie Vaissier Welborn. Structural dynamics and computational design of synthetic enzymes. Chem Catalysis 2022, 2 (1) , 19-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.checat.2021.10.009
    43. Alja Prah, Janez Mavri, Jernej Stare. An electrostatic duel: subtle differences in the catalytic performance of monoamine oxidase A and B isoenzymes elucidated at the residue level using quantum computations. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 2021, 23 (46) , 26459-26467. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1CP03993H
    44. H. Adrian Bunzel, J. L. Ross Anderson, Donald Hilvert, Vickery L. Arcus, Marc W. van der Kamp, Adrian J. Mulholland. Evolution of dynamical networks enhances catalysis in a designer enzyme. Nature Chemistry 2021, 13 (10) , 1017-1022. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-021-00763-6
    45. Jiawei Zhang, Kaimin Kong, Xiangjun Li, Qian Zhang. Kemp-type elimination of 1-arylsulfonyl-3-iodo-1 H -indazoles. Synthetic Communications 2021, 51 (15) , 2365-2376. https://doi.org/10.1080/00397911.2021.1939053
    46. Zhongyue Yang, Natalia Hajlasz, Adam H. Steeves, Heather J. Kulik. Quantifying the Long‐Range Coupling of Electronic Properties in Proteins with ab initio Molecular Dynamics**. Chemistry–Methods 2021, 1 (8) , 362-373. https://doi.org/10.1002/cmtd.202100012
    47. H. Adrian Bunzel, J.L. Ross Anderson, Adrian J. Mulholland. Designing better enzymes: Insights from directed evolution. Current Opinion in Structural Biology 2021, 67 , 212-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2020.12.015
    48. Valerie Vaissier Welborn, Wan-Lu Li, Teresa Head-Gordon. Interplay of water and a supramolecular capsule for catalysis of reductive elimination reaction from gold. Nature Communications 2020, 11 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-14251-6
    49. Carles Acosta‐Silva, Joan Bertran, Vicenç Branchadell, Antoni Oliva. Catalytic Effect of Electric Fields on the Kemp Elimination Reactions with Neutral Bases. ChemPhysChem 2020, 21 (22) , 2594-2604. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.202000667
    50. Mark Dittner, Bernd Hartke. Globally optimal catalytic fields for a Diels–Alder reaction. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2020, 152 (11) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5142839
    51. Carles Acosta‐Silva, Joan Bertran, Vicenç Branchadell, Antoni Oliva. Kemp Elimination Reaction Catalyzed by Electric Fields. ChemPhysChem 2020, 21 (4) , 295-306. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.201901155
    52. Katarzyna Świderek, J. Javier Ruiz-Pernía, Iñaki Tuñón, Vicent Moliner. Computational Insights Into Enzyme Catalysis. 2020, 560-577. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409547-2.14629-3
    53. Yashraj Kulkarni, Shina Caroline Lynn Kamerlin. Computational physical organic chemistry using the empirical valence bond approach. 2019, 69-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.apoc.2019.07.001
    54. Anna Krylov, Theresa L. Windus, Taylor Barnes, Eliseo Marin-Rimoldi, Jessica A. Nash, Benjamin Pritchard, Daniel G. A. Smith, Doaa Altarawy, Paul Saxe, Cecilia Clementi, T. Daniel Crawford, Robert J. Harrison, Shantenu Jha, Vijay S. Pande, Teresa Head-Gordon. Perspective: Computational chemistry software and its advancement as illustrated through three grand challenge cases for molecular science. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2018, 149 (18) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5052551
    55. Valerie Vaissier Welborn, Luis Ruiz Pestana, Teresa Head-Gordon. Computational optimization of electric fields for better catalysis design. Nature Catalysis 2018, 1 (9) , 649-655. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-018-0109-2
    56. Erum Mansoor, Jeroen Van der Mynsbrugge, Martin Head-Gordon, Alexis T. Bell. Impact of long-range electrostatic and dispersive interactions on theoretical predictions of adsorption and catalysis in zeolites. Catalysis Today 2018, 312 , 51-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2018.02.007

    Journal of the American Chemical Society

    Cite this: J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 16, 5793–5800
    Click to copy citationCitation copied!
    https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b12265
    Published April 6, 2017
    Copyright © 2017 American Chemical Society

    Article Views

    2978

    Altmetric

    -

    Citations

    Learn about these metrics

    Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

    Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

    The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.