ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
“Tag and Modify” Protein Conjugation with Dynamic Covalent Chemistry
My Activity

Figure 1Loading Img
  • Open Access
Article

“Tag and Modify” Protein Conjugation with Dynamic Covalent Chemistry
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

  • Maksymilian Marek Zegota
    Maksymilian Marek Zegota
    Max-Planck Institute for Polymer Research, Ackermannweg 10, 55128 Mainz, Germany
    Institute of Inorganic Chemistry I, University of Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89081 Ulm, Germany
  • Tao Wang
    Tao Wang
    Institute of Inorganic Chemistry I, University of Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89081 Ulm, Germany
    School of Materials Science and Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, 610031 Chengdu, P.R. China
    More by Tao Wang
  • Christiane Seidler
    Christiane Seidler
    Max-Planck Institute for Polymer Research, Ackermannweg 10, 55128 Mainz, Germany
    Institute of Inorganic Chemistry I, University of Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89081 Ulm, Germany
  • David Yuen Wah Ng
    David Yuen Wah Ng
    Max-Planck Institute for Polymer Research, Ackermannweg 10, 55128 Mainz, Germany
    Institute of Inorganic Chemistry I, University of Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89081 Ulm, Germany
  • Seah Ling Kuan*
    Seah Ling Kuan
    Max-Planck Institute for Polymer Research, Ackermannweg 10, 55128 Mainz, Germany
    Institute of Inorganic Chemistry I, University of Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89081 Ulm, Germany
    *E-mail: [email protected]
  • Tanja Weil*
    Tanja Weil
    Max-Planck Institute for Polymer Research, Ackermannweg 10, 55128 Mainz, Germany
    Institute of Inorganic Chemistry I, University of Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89081 Ulm, Germany
    *E-mail: [email protected]
    More by Tanja Weil
Open PDFSupporting Information (1)

Bioconjugate Chemistry

Cite this: Bioconjugate Chem. 2018, 29, 8, 2665–2670
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.8b00358
Published June 27, 2018

Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The development of small protein tags that exhibit bioorthogonality, bond stability, and reversibility, as well as biocompatibility, holds great promise for applications in cellular environments enabling controlled drug delivery or for the construction of dynamic protein complexes in biological environments. Herein, we report the first application of dynamic covalent chemistry both for purification and for reversible assembly of protein conjugates using interactions of boronic acid with diols and salicylhydroxamates. Incorporation of the boronic acid (BA) tag was performed in a site-selective fashion by applying disulfide rebridging strategy. As an example, a model protein enzyme (lysozyme) was modified with the BA tag and purified using carbohydrate-based column chromatography. Subsequent dynamic covalent “click-like” bioconjugation with a salicylhydroxamate modified fluorescent dye (BODIPY FL) was accomplished while retaining its original enzymatic activity.

Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society

Introduction

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The site-selective modification of native proteins with new synthetic entities that confer desired functions offers immense opportunities for addressing challenges in basic biological and medical applications. (1−3) The attachment of, e.g., chromophores or polymers at distinct sites is nowadays widely used to study protein dynamics in live cells or to stabilize and deliver therapeutic proteins in vivo. (4,5) In recent years, there have been great advances in the identification of efficient synthesis routes to modify native proteins in a site-directed fashion under physiological conditions. (6) However, the separation of the successfully modified proteins from their native precursors can be challenging, particularly if a small substituent has been attached. (7,8) Therefore, the “tag and modify” strategy first proposed by Davis and co-workers (9) has opened new avenues in protein chemistry. It has been subsequently expanded to separate product mixtures by affinity chromatography, (10) for example, biotin–(strept)avidin (11,12) or metal–ligand (10,13) interactions can be exploited and introduce functionalities at the newly introduced reactive site. Still, many currently used binding tags have inherent limitations such as their bulkiness (i.e., LacZ or Galactose-binding protein), (14) binding constants too low to allow further modifications (hydrophobic peptide tags), (15) or excessively strong binding (biotin tags), (11) which require harsh conditions during elution. Therefore, it would be highly desirable to introduce a small reactive tag that serves both as affinity tag as well as reactive handle for further modifications and that allows cleavage under controlled physiological conditions.
In this context, dynamic covalent chemistry has been employed to instill these features (16) and the assembly of bioconjugates via C–N, (17−19) C–S, (19,20) and B–O (21) bonds has been demonstrated successfully. The latter case seems to be especially interesting because of its versatility and tunability of the interaction strength by selection of the binding partner and pH control. Herein, we introduce a new, synthetic approach to incorporate the boronic acid (BA) tag, which subsequently undergoes bioconjugation based on dynamic covalent bond formation providing both weak (Kd in mM range) and stable (low μM range) covalent linkages, serving simultaneously as purification and modification sites that are cleavable under pH-controlled conditions. BAs are eminent candidates for such applications due to their small sizes, bioorthogonality, bond stability, and reversibility that readily react with diols and salicylhydroxamate groups. (22) The BA-diol reaction provides a smart and easy-to-cleave platform for affinity purification based on BA carbohydrate interactions. (21,23) Subsequent site-directed functionalization of BA with salicylhydroxamates yields stable bioconjugates that remain intact in cell media but could be cleaved by slight pH changes (24,25) thus fulfilling the requirements for a “tag and modify” strategy. (9)
Lysozyme was selected as a model protein to demonstrate the applicability of BA as dynamic covalent tag for purification and post-modification reactions. Lysozyme is an O-glycosyl hydrolase that widely occurs both in plants and in animals where it participates in antibacterial defense by disintegrating cell walls of Gram-positive bacteria. An additional interesting feature of lysozyme is its ability to form amyloid fibers (26) rendering it attractive for the fabrication of bionanomaterials. (27−29) It has been shown previously that only one disulfide bond of lysozyme can be reacted with thiol alkylating reagents. (30) Therefore, we have combined the known allyl sulfone bioconjugation motif that reacts with accessible disulfides (31) of cyclic peptides and proteins with the BA “tag and modify” anchor group. The new BA-IC reagent allows purification of BA-lysozyme retaining its structural integrity and catalytic activity (6) as well as subsequent covalent bioconjugation with a salicylhydroxamate functionalized BODIPY-FL dye. Therefore, the approach could be broadly applicable as disulfides occur in many pharmaceutically relevant proteins like antibodies (32,33) or hormones (34) and the BA tag could in principle also be combined with other modification strategies such as N-terminal, (35) lysine, (36) or tyrosine (37) conjugations, as well as react with different ligands such as Schiff bases for further functionalization. (38,39) We believe that BA tags provide a versatile platform to further expand the scope for protein modifications for designing, e.g., responsive protein–drug conjugates or for building dynamic protein architectures based on stable covalent bonds in cellular environments. (40)

Results and Discussion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Synthesis and Purification of BA-Tagged Lysozyme

The BA-containing allyl sulfone intercalator (BA-IC, Scheme 1) was designed to react with the accessible disulfides of peptides and proteins and introduces a single BA by reacting in a sequence of Michael addition and elimination steps. (31)BA-IC was obtained in a five-step synthesis starting from tert-butyl protected, monocarboxylic acid functionalized, triethylene glycol condensation with methacryloyl chloride yielding the corresponding methacrylate 1. A tosyl group was introduced by an iodosulfonylation–dehydroiodination reaction to obtain the allyl sulfone 2, (41) which was subsequently deprotected to liberate the corresponding carboxylic acid. Carboxylic acid rebridging reagent 3 was conjugated with 3-aminophenylboronic acid hydrochloride to transform it into boronic acid reagent BA-IC with a yield of 65% and an overall yield over all five reaction steps of 33% (Scheme 1).

Scheme 1

Scheme 1. Synthesis of Boronic Acid Intercalator (BA-IC)a

aa. methacryloyl chloride, Et3N, CH2Cl2, 99%; b. 1. I2, sodium tosylate, CH2Cl2; 2. Et3N, EA, 52%; c. TFA, CH2Cl2, 99%; d. HBTU, DIEA, 3-aminophenylboronic acid hydrochloride, DMF, 65%.

Lysozyme was selected as model protein as it contains four disulfide bonds, of which three are buried within the molecule and only one (C6–C127) is close to the surface (42) and available for chemical modifications. The accessible disulfide bond was reduced to free thiols using 1.2 equiv of tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine hydrochloride (TCEP) and subsequently reacted with BA-IC (Scheme 2).

Scheme 2

Scheme 2. Incorporation of BA-IC into the Lysozyme
The reaction was conducted at room temperature in an aqueous solution for 24 h. BA-modified lysozyme (BA-lysozyme) was obtained after purification by fast protein liquid chromatography (FPLC) and desalting in 32% yield. Notably, additional 23% of native lysozyme was recovered from the reaction mixture. BA-lysozyme was lyophilized and characterized by MALDI-TOF MS.
Purification of BA-Lysozyme was accomplished by exploiting the interactions of BA with diols of the cross-linked agarose and dextran matrix of Superdex 200 10/300 GL FPLC column. Separation of BA-lysozyme from native lysozyme was achieved by affinity chromatography and not size exclusion, which allows more efficient isolation of the modified protein even from complex mixtures. Low binding affinity of sugar-based ligands like glucose or galactose, ranging from 1 mM to 200 mM in basic conditions, allows BA-lysozyme to be more strongly retained on the carbohydrate-based column compared to lysozyme and at the same time, allows facile elution without acidification. (43) Noteworthy, already a single BA group has a large impact on the retention volume, which increased from 21.46 to 23.48 mL (retention time: 42.92 to 49.96 min) using isocratic flow with basic (pH = 8.6) buffer (Figure 1).

Figure 1

Figure 1. FPLC chromatogram of the reaction mixture with visible separation of lysozyme, modified lysozyme, and a higher molecular weight side product (retention volume = 19.82 mL).

To identify the modification site, tryptic digestion followed by MALDI-TOF-MS characterization was performed. Fragment-containing modified C6–C127 disulfide bond was found ([M+DHB+H]+m/z = 1695.7441, calculated m/z = 1695.7234) and further analyzed via MSMS confirming the expected sequence. Additionally, unmodified fragments containing the remaining disulfide bonds (C30–C115, C64–C180, and C76–C94) were identified indicating site-selectivity of the reaction (Figure 2). Preserved enzymatic activity of modified proteins is crucial for all further applications. (6)

Figure 2

Figure 2. (a) MALDI-TOF-MS interpretation of BA-lysozyme digest. Peak corresponding to modified fragment was selected for MSMS. 2,5-Dihydrobenzoic acid (DHB) was used as a matrix. (b) Interpretation of BA modified fragment’s MSMS spectrum. To simplify, only a, b, and y ion series for 6–13 fragment are annotated. Annotations for a-17, b-17 ion series and 126–128 fragment are included in the Supporting Information.

The catalytic activity of BA-lysozyme was assessed by recording turbidity changes of Micrococcus lysodeikticus lyophilized cells suspension in time. Here, the absorbance decreases when lysozyme hydrolyzes bacterial cell walls, which is proportional to its activity. (44) Enzymatic activity of BA-lysozyme was compared to native lysozyme and retained activity of about 80 ± 4% was observed from the hydrolysis of bacterial cell walls (Figure 3). In comparison, mono- or statistical modifications of lysozyme often resulted in drastic losses of its enzymatic activity. For example, statistical modifications of lysine residues (K1, K13, K33, K96, K97, and K116) reduced activity even though none of the lysine residues is located within the active site. (45)

Figure 3

Figure 3. Rate of decrease in absorbance (slope) is proportional to lysozyme activity. Clearance of cell suspension turbidity proceeds with similar pace in case of both BA-modified (orange) and native lysozyme (red). Data are plotted as n = 4 ± standard errors of the mean (SEM).

Also other modifications such as hexa-, penta-, and tetra- acetylations (46) or multiple phosphopyridoxylations (47) reduced lytic activity to less than 5% even though there was no impact on the conformation of lysozyme. (46) It was speculated that subtle changes in the surface charges had an impact on the interactions of lysozyme with bacterial membranes due to reduced electrostatic interactions by lysine residues. Therefore, BA-monofunctionalization by alkylation of surface accessible reduced disulfides, followed by rebridging, represents an attractive biorthogonal alternative that does not alter surface charges of peptides and proteins.

Reversible Functionalization of BA-Lysozyme

In the previous section, the weaker BA–diol interaction was exploited for purification of BA-lysozyme. However, for post-modification reactions, the formation of more stable bioconjugates would be highly desirable. Therefore, salicylhydroxamate (SHA) residues were selected for fast and efficient modification of BA-lysozyme. Bioconjugation proceeded by simply mixing the reagents in slightly alkaline aqueous buffer. BODIPY-FL (BDP-FL) was selected as fluorescent probe because of its high quantum yield and pH stability and the respective SHA-dye was prepared in a convenient two-step synthesis as depicted in Scheme 3.

Scheme 3

Scheme 3. Synthesis of SHA-BDPa

aa. CuSO4, sodium ascorbate, DMSO, 93%; b. BF3OEt2, MeOH/CH2Cl2, 76%.

Commercially available BDP-FL azide was first conjugated to 4-azido-2-hydroxy-N-(trityloxy)benzamide using copper catalyzed azide–alkyne cycloaddition. Unprotected SHA derivatives are known to coordinate copper ions such as cytotoxic Cu(I). (48) Here, the trityl protection group ensures complete Cu(I) removal through HPLC purification. Detritylation proceeded under mild conditions with boron trifluoride diethyl etherate as Lewis acid (49) and the final product was purified by the HPLC yielding SHA-BDP in 71%. For characterization, 1H NMR and HPLC-ESI-MS have been recorded, which are given in the Supporting Information.
Functionalization of BA-lysozyme with SHA-BDP and the stability of the obtained lysozyme-BDP dye conjugate (Scheme 4) were then studied using microscale thermophoresis (MST), which requires rigorous purification of the SHA-BDP dye for accurate assessment of the dissociation constant. SHA-BDP dye was titrated to BA-lysozyme and a dissociation constant Kd of about 8.0 ± 2.0 μM was obtained in phosphate buffer at high ionic strength (50 mM, pH = 8), which corresponds to previous findings. (50) BA-lysozyme binds and releases SHA-BDP in a dynamic, pH-controlled fashion. The dissolved bioconjugate rapidly responded to slight pH changes such as acidification to pH ∼6, and no binding of SHA-BDP was observed under these conditions (Figure 4). As negative control, native lysozyme was used to exclude any impact of nonspecific interactions between the reagents. In this way, we could demonstrate that the comparatively small BA tag preserved its binding capacity even when employed in a large biomolecule serving as biorthogonal anchor for post-modifications.

Scheme 4

Scheme 4. Dynamic Covalent Bioconjugation of BA-Lysozyme with SHA-BDP and pH-Induced Cleavage of the Bioconjugate

Figure 4

Figure 4. Microscale thermophoresis confirms assembly of BA-lysozyme with SHA-BDP (blue line) and release of SHA-BDP upon acidification (gray dots). No binding was detected for the control (red and green dots). Data are plotted as n = 3 ± SEM.

Conclusion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

We introduce BA as a small, bioorthogonal tag that allows straightforward purification and functionalization of the model protein lysozyme. A novel allyl sulfone bioconjugation reagent with a single BA group (BA-IC) was prepared that modifies accessible disulfides in a site-directed fashion and imparts the new BA moiety. In this way, lysozyme was equipped with a single BA group that significantly changed the retention time allowing purification by affinity chromatography from carbohydrate-based resins. The new BA modification did not influence catalytic activity of the model protein lysozyme that usually is very sensitive to surface modifications. In the next step, the BA group on lysozyme served as reactive anchor for introducing an SHA-modified fluorescent BODYPY dye in a biorthogonal and dynamic covalent “click-like” conjugation reaction. The formed conjugate revealed a KD of about 8.0 ± 2.0 μM at high phosphate buffer strength and remained stable in cell media. (24) However, after slightly reducing the pH to 6, instantaneous cleavage of the bioconjugate occurred.
In comparison to other available protein tags that were summarized by Kimple et al. recently, (14) the BA affinity tag provides comparable small size (0.4 kDa) as biotin (∼0.2 kDa) and it is substantially smaller than the hexahistidine tag (∼1.0 kDa). Small tag sizes are highly desirable for studying protein structure and dynamics by Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) to minimize the influence of the tag on the protein. (51) Additionally, large tag dimensions can distort natural processes of the protein such as their trafficking or their conformational changes, which would limit their applications in FRET imaging. (52) Biotin as purification and bioconjugation tag usually requires the application of (strept)avidin that is bulky and its cleavage can be challenging without denaturation. In contrast, BA reacts with diols for purification and SHA groups for stable functionalization by forming covalent bonds that respond to slight pH changes within the physiological range. BA derivatives (53) further provide high biocompatibility, which represents an additional advantage for in vitro and in vivo usage compared to, e.g., toxicity arising from the metal or transition metal containing reagents complexing to the His-tag.
We envision that dynamic “tag and modify” markers are particularly attractive for drug delivery applications when drug molecules remain attached at neutral pH via stable covalent bonds but are released under the more acidic endosomal compartments inside cells. Therefore, such dynamic covalent interactions would also qualify for tag exchange capitalizing on the different stabilities of BA with catechol and SHA groups, which would be highly attractive for building dynamic protein architectures.

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.8b00358.

  • Full experimental procedures and characterization data for new compounds (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Authors
    • Seah Ling Kuan - Max-Planck Institute for Polymer Research, Ackermannweg 10, 55128 Mainz, GermanyInstitute of Inorganic Chemistry I, University of Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89081 Ulm, Germany Email: [email protected]
    • Tanja Weil - Max-Planck Institute for Polymer Research, Ackermannweg 10, 55128 Mainz, GermanyInstitute of Inorganic Chemistry I, University of Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89081 Ulm, GermanyOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-5906-7205 Email: [email protected]
  • Authors
    • Maksymilian Marek Zegota - Max-Planck Institute for Polymer Research, Ackermannweg 10, 55128 Mainz, GermanyInstitute of Inorganic Chemistry I, University of Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89081 Ulm, Germany
    • Tao Wang - Institute of Inorganic Chemistry I, University of Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89081 Ulm, GermanySchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, 610031 Chengdu, P.R. China
    • Christiane Seidler - Max-Planck Institute for Polymer Research, Ackermannweg 10, 55128 Mainz, GermanyInstitute of Inorganic Chemistry I, University of Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89081 Ulm, Germany
    • David Yuen Wah Ng - Max-Planck Institute for Polymer Research, Ackermannweg 10, 55128 Mainz, GermanyInstitute of Inorganic Chemistry I, University of Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89081 Ulm, Germany
  • Author Contributions

    Maksymilian Marek Zegota and Tao Wang contributed equally.

  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 675007. M. M. Zegota thanks the Marie Curie International Training Network Protein Conjugates for a research scholarship. The authors are grateful to the Max Planck Society, German National Foundation (Sonderforschungsbereich 1149, Project B11, Sonderforschungsbereich 1297, Project C01) and the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA) for the financial support.

Abbreviations

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

BA

boronic acid

BODIPY (BDP)

boron-dipyrromethene

Kd

dissociation constant

SHA

salicylhydroxamate.

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 53 other publications.

  1. 1
    Dozier, J. K. and Distefano, M. D. (2015) Site-Specific PEGylation of Therapeutic Proteins. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 16, 2583125864,  DOI: 10.3390/ijms161025831
  2. 2
    Krall, N., da Cruz, F. P., Boutureira, O., and Bernardes, G. J. (2016) Site-selective protein-modification chemistry for basic biology and drug development. Nat. Chem. 8, 103113,  DOI: 10.1038/nchem.2393
  3. 3
    Kuan, S. L., Wang, T., and Weil, T. (2016) Site-Selective Disulfide Modification of Proteins: Expanding Diversity beyond the Proteome. Chem. - Eur. J. 22, 1711217129,  DOI: 10.1002/chem.201602298
  4. 4
    Cho, H., Daniel, T., Buechler, Y. J., Litzinger, D. C., Maio, Z., Putnam, A.-M. H., Kraynov, V. S., Sim, B.-C., Bussell, S., Javahishvili, T., Kaphle, S., Viramontes, G., Ong, M., Chu, S., Becky, G. C., Lieu, R., Knudsen, N., Castiglioni, P., Norman, T. C., Axelrod, D. W., Hoffman, A. R., Schultz, P. G., DiMarchi, R. D., and Kimmel, B. E. (2011) Optimized clinical performance of growth hormone with an expanded genetic code. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 108, 90605,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1100387108
  5. 5
    Elliott, T. S., Townsley, F. M., Bianco, A., Ernst, R. J., Sachdeva, A., Elsässer, S. J., Davis, L., Lang, K., Pisa, R., Greiss, S., Lilley, K. S., and Chin, J. W. (2014) Proteome labeling and protein identification in specific tissues and at specific developmental stages in an animal. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 465472,  DOI: 10.1038/nbt.2860
  6. 6
    Boutureira, O. and Bernardes, G. J. L. (2015) Advances in chemical protein modification. Chem. Rev. 115, 21742195,  DOI: 10.1021/cr500399p
  7. 7
    Junutula, J. R., Raab, H., Clark, S., Bhakta, S., Leipold, D. D., Weir, S., Chen, Y., Simpson, M., Tsai, S. P., Dennis, M. S., Lu, Y., Meng, Y. G., Ng, C., Yang, J., Lee, C. C., Duenas, E., Gorrell, J., Katta, V., Kim, A., McDorman, K., Flagella, K., Venook, R., Ross, S., Spencer, S. D., Lee Wong, W., Lowman, H. B., Vandlen, R., Sliwkowski, M. X., Scheller, R. H., Polakis, P., and Mallet, W. (2008) Site-specific conjugation of a cytotoxic drug to an antibody improves the therapeutic index. Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 925932,  DOI: 10.1038/nbt.1480
  8. 8
    Stephan, J.-P., Chan, P., Lee, C., Nelson, C., Elliott, J. M., Bechtel, C., Raab, H., Xie, D., Akutagawa, J., Baudys, J., Saad, O., Prabhu, S., Wong, W. L. T., Vandlen, R., Jacobson, F., and Ebens, A. (2008) Anti-CD22-MCC-DM1 and MC-MMAF Conjugates: Impact of Assay Format on Pharmacokinetic Parameters Determination. Bioconjugate Chem. 19, 16731683,  DOI: 10.1021/bc800059t
  9. 9
    Chalker, J. M., Bernardes, G. J. L., and Davis, B. G. (2011) A “Tag-and-Modify” Approach to Site-Selective Protein Modification. Acc. Chem. Res. 44, 730741,  DOI: 10.1021/ar200056q
  10. 10
    Zhang, X., Lu, W., Kwan, K., Bhattacharyya, D., and Wei, Y. (2017) Dual-Functional-Tag-Facilitated Protein Labeling and Immobilization. ACS Omega 2, 522528,  DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.6b00512
  11. 11
    Rybak, J.-N., Scheurer, S. B., Neri, D., and Elia, G. (2004) Purification of biotinylated proteins on streptavidin resin: A protocol for quantitative elution. Proteomics 4, 22962299,  DOI: 10.1002/pmic.200300780
  12. 12
    Campos, S. K., Parrott, M. B., and Barry, M. A. (2004) Avidin-based targeting and purification of a protein IX-modified, metabolically biotinylated adenoviral vector. Mol. Ther. 9, 94254,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2004.03.006
  13. 13
    Bornhorst, J. A. and Falke, J. J. (2000) Purification of proteins using polyhistidine affinity tags. Methods Enzymol. 326, 245254,  DOI: 10.1016/S0076-6879(00)26058-8
  14. 14
    Kimple, M. E., Brill, A. L., and Pasker, R. L. (2013) Overview of Affinity Tags for Protein Purification. Curr. Protoc Protein Sci. 73, 608616,  DOI: 10.1002/0471140864.ps0909s73
  15. 15
    Fexby, S. and Bü Low, L. (2004) Hydrophobic peptide tags as tools in bioseparation. Trends Biotechnol. 22, 511516,  DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.08.005
  16. 16
    Jin, Y., Yu, C., Denman, R. J., and Zhang, W. (2013) Recent advances in dynamic covalent chemistry. Chem. Soc. Rev. 42, 66346654,  DOI: 10.1039/c3cs60044k
  17. 17
    Bartolami, E., Bessin, Y., Gervais, V., Dumy, P., and Ulrich, S. (2015) Dynamic Expression of DNA Complexation with Self-assembled Biomolecular Clusters. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 54, 1018310187,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201504047
  18. 18
    Reuther, J. F., Dees, J. L., Kolesnichenko, I. V., Hernandez, E. T., Ukraintsev, D. V., Guduru, R., Whiteley, M., and Anslyn, E. V. (2017) Dynamic covalent chemistry enables formation of antimicrobial peptide quaternary assemblies in a completely abiotic manner. Nat. Chem. 10, 4550,  DOI: 10.1038/nchem.2847
  19. 19
    Diehl, K. L., Kolesnichenko, I. V., Robotham, S. A., Bachman, J. L., Zhong, Y., Brodbelt, J. S., and Anslyn, E. V. (2016) Click and chemically triggered declick reactions through reversible amine and thiol coupling via a conjugate acceptor. Nat. Chem. 8, 968973,  DOI: 10.1038/nchem.2601
  20. 20
    Wang, T., Ng, D. Y. W., Wu, Y., Thomas, J., TamTran, T., and Weil, T. (2014) Bis-sulfide bioconjugates for glutathione triggered tumor responsive drug release. Chem. Commun. 50, 11161118,  DOI: 10.1039/C3CC47003B
  21. 21
    Brustad, E., Bushey, M. L., Lee, J. W., Groff, D., Liu, W., and Schultz, P. G. (2008) A Genetically Encoded Boronate-Containing Amino Acid. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 47, 82208223,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.200803240
  22. 22
    Arzt, M., Seidler, C., Ng, D. Y. W., and Weil, T. (2014) Reversible Click Reactions with Boronic Acids to Build Supramolecular Architectures in Water. Chem. - Asian J. 9, 1994,  DOI: 10.1002/asia.201402061
  23. 23
    Jackson, T. R., Springall, J. S., Rogalle, D., Masumoto, N., Ching Li, H., D’Hooge, F., Perera, S. P., Jenkins, T. A., James, T. D., Fossey, J. S., and van den Elsen, J. M. H. (2008) Boronate affinity saccharide electrophoresis: A novel carbohydrate analysis tool. Electrophoresis 29, 41854191,  DOI: 10.1002/elps.200800178
  24. 24
    Ng, D. Y. W., Arzt, M., Wu, Y., Kuan, S. L., Lamla, M., and Weil, T. (2014) Constructing Hybrid Protein Zymogens through Protective Dendritic Assembly. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 53, 324328,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201308533
  25. 25
    Seidler, C., Ng, D. Y. W., Wu, Y., and Weil, T. (2016) pH responsive supramolecular core-shell protein hybrids. Supramol. Chem. 28, 742746,  DOI: 10.1080/10610278.2016.1140764
  26. 26
    Swaminathan, R., Ravi, V. K., Kumar, S., Kumar, M. V. S., and Chandra, N. (2011) Lysozyme: A model protein for amyloid research. Adv. Protein Chem. Struct. Biol. 84, 63111,  DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-386483-3.00003-3
  27. 27
    Rambaran, R. N. and Serpell, L. C. (2008) Amyloid fibrils: abnormal protein assembly. Prion 2, 1127,  DOI: 10.4161/pri.2.3.7488
  28. 28
    Mankar, S., Anoop, A., Sen, S., and Maji, S. K. (2011) Nanomaterials: amyloids reflect their brighter side. Nano Rev. 2, 6032,  DOI: 10.3402/nano.v2i0.6032
  29. 29
    Meier, C. and Welland, M. E. (2011) Wet-Spinning of Amyloid Protein Nanofibers into Multifunctional High-Performance Biofibers. Biomacromolecules 12, 34533459,  DOI: 10.1021/bm2005752
  30. 30
    Wang, T., Riegger, A., Lamla, M., Wiese, S., Oeckl, P., Otto, M., Wu, Y., Fischer, S., Barth, H., Kuan, S. L., and Weil, T. (2016) Water-soluble allyl sulfones for dual site-specific labelling of proteins and cyclic peptides. Chem. Sci. 7, 32343239,  DOI: 10.1039/C6SC00005C
  31. 31
    Brocchini, S., Balan, S., Godwin, A., Choi, J.-W., Zloh, M., and Shaunak, S. (2006) PEGylation of native disulfide bonds in proteins. Nat. Chem. Biol. 1, 22412252,  DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2006.346
  32. 32
    Robinson, E., Nunes, J. P. M., Vassileva, V., Maruani, A., Nogueira, J. C. F., Smith, M. E. B., Pedley, R. B., Caddick, S., Baker, J. R., and Chudasama, V. (2017) Pyridazinediones deliver potent, stable, targeted and efficacious antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) with a controlled loading of 4 drugs per antibody. RSC Adv. 7, 90739077,  DOI: 10.1039/C7RA00788D
  33. 33
    Greene, M. K., Richards, D. A., Nogueira, J. C. F., Campbell, K., Smyth, P., Fernández, M., Scott, C. J., and Chudasama, V. (2018) Forming next-generation antibody–nanoparticle conjugates through the oriented installation of non-engineered antibody fragments. Chem. Sci. 9, 7987,  DOI: 10.1039/C7SC02747H
  34. 34
    Trivedi, M. V., Laurence, J. S., and Siahaan, T. J. (2009) The role of thiols and disulfides on protein stability. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 10, 61425,  DOI: 10.2174/138920309789630534
  35. 35
    Rosen, C. B. and Francis, M. B. (2017) Targeting the N terminus for site-selective protein modification. Nat. Chem. Biol. 13, 697705,  DOI: 10.1038/nchembio.2416
  36. 36
    Tanaka, K., Fukase, K., and Katsumura, S. (2011) Exploring a Unique Reactivity of 6p-Azaelectrocyclization to Enzyme Inhibition, Natural Products Synthesis, and Molecular Imaging: An Approach to Chemical Biology by Synthetic Chemists. Synlett 2011, 21152139,  DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1261192
  37. 37
    Ban, H., Nagano, M., Gavrilyuk, J., Hakamata, W., Inokuma, T., and Barbas, C. F. (2013) Facile and Stabile Linkages through Tyrosine: Bioconjugation Strategies with the Tyrosine-Click Reaction. Bioconjugate Chem. 24, 520532,  DOI: 10.1021/bc300665t
  38. 38
    Santos, F. M. F., Rosa, J. N., Candeias, N. R., Carvalho, C. P., Matos, A. I., Ventura, A. E., Florindo, H. F., Silva, L. C., Pischel, U., and Gois, P. M. P. (2016) A Three-Component Assembly Promoted by Boronic Acids Delivers a Modular Fluorophore Platform (BASHY Dyes). Chem. - Eur. J. 22, 16311637,  DOI: 10.1002/chem.201503943
  39. 39
    Cal, P. M. S. D., Sieglitz, F., Santos, F. M. F., Parente Carvalho, C., Guerreiro, A., Bertoldo, J. B., Pischel, U., Gois, P. M. P., and Bernardes, G. J. L. (2017) Site-selective installation of BASHY fluorescent dyes to Annexin V for targeted detection of apoptotic cells. Chem. Commun. 53, 368371,  DOI: 10.1039/C6CC08671C
  40. 40
    Ng, D. Y. W., Vill, R., Wu, Y., Koynov, K., Tokura, Y., Liu, W., Sihler, S., Kreyes, A., Ritz, S., Barth, H., Ziener, U., and Weil, T. (2017) Directing intracellular supramolecular assembly with N-heteroaromatic quaterthiophene analogues. Nat. Commun. 8, 1850,  DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-02020-2
  41. 41
    Najera, C., Baldo, B., and Yus, M. (1988) Regio- and Stereo-selective Synthesis of β-Sulphonyl-a,β- Unsaturated Carbonyl Compounds. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1029,  DOI: 10.1039/P19880001029
  42. 42
    Guez, V., Roux, P., Navon, A., and Goldberg, M. E. (2002) Role of individual disulfide bonds in hen lysozyme early folding steps. Protein Sci. 11, 113651,  DOI: 10.1110/ps.3960102
  43. 43
    Springsteen, G. and Wang, B. (2002) A detailed examination of boronic acid–diol complexation. Tetrahedron 58, 52915300,  DOI: 10.1016/S0040-4020(02)00489-1
  44. 44
    Shugar, D. (1952) The measurement of lysozyme activity and the ultra-violet inactivation of lysozyme. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 8, 3029,  DOI: 10.1016/0006-3002(52)90045-0
  45. 45
    Davies, R. C. and Neuberger, A. (1969) Modification of lysine and arginine residues of lysozyme and the effect of enzymatic activity. Biochim. Biophys. Acta - Enzymol. 178, 306317,  DOI: 10.1016/0005-2744(69)90398-2
  46. 46
    Imoto, T., Moriyama, S., and Yagishita, K. (1976) A Study of the Native-Denatured (N to/from D) Transition in Lysozyme III. Effect of Alteration of Net Charge by Acetylation. J. Biochem. 80, 13191325,  DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a131404
  47. 47
    Masuda, T., Kitabatake, N., and Ide, N. (2005) Effects of Chemical Modification of Lysine Residues on the Sweetness of Lysozyme. Chem. Chem. Senses 30, 253264,  DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bji021
  48. 48
    O’Brien, E. C., Farkas, E., Gil, M. J., Fitzgerald, D., Castineras, A., and Nolan, K. B. (2000) Metal complexes of salicylhydroxamic acid (H2Sha), anthranilic hydroxamic acid and benzohydroxamic acid. Crystal and molecular structure of [Cu(phen)2(Cl)]Cl·H2Sha, a model for a peroxidase-inhibitor complex. J. Inorg. Biochem. 79, 4751,  DOI: 10.1016/S0162-0134(99)00245-7
  49. 49
    Yang, S.-M., Lagu, B., and Wilson, L. J. (2007) Mild and Efficient Lewis Acid-Promoted Detritylation in the Synthesis of N -Hydroxy Amides: A Concise Synthesis of (−)-Cobactin T. J. Org. Chem. 72, 81238126,  DOI: 10.1021/jo701411d
  50. 50
    Shin, S. B. Y., Almeida, R. D., Gerona-Navarro, G., Bracken, C., and Jaffrey, S. R. (2010) Assembling ligands in situ using bioorthogonal boronate ester synthesis. Chem. Biol. 17, 11716,  DOI: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2010.09.008
  51. 51
    Shrestha, D., Jenei, A., Nagy, P., Vereb, G., and Szöllősi, J. (2015) Understanding FRET as a research tool for cellular studies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 16, 671856,  DOI: 10.3390/ijms16046718
  52. 52
    Yano, Y. and Matsuzaki, K. (2009) Tag–probe labeling methods for live-cell imaging of membrane proteins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Biomembr. 1788, 21242131,  DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2009.07.017
  53. 53
    Soriano-Ursúa, M. A., Farfán-García, E. D., López-Cabrera, Y., Querejeta, E., and Trujillo-Ferrara, J. G. (2014) Boron-containing acids: Preliminary evaluation of acute toxicity and access to the brain determined by Raman scattering spectroscopy. NeuroToxicology 40, 815,  DOI: 10.1016/j.neuro.2013.10.005

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
Citation Statements
Explore this article's citation statements on scite.ai

This article is cited by 41 publications.

  1. Ferran Esteve, Jean-Louis Schmitt, Sergii Kolodych, Oleksandr Koniev, Jean-Marie Lehn. Selective Protein (Post-)modifications through Dynamic Covalent Chemistry: Self-activated SNAr Reactions. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2025, 147 (2) , 2049-2060. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.4c15421
  2. Mylène Richard, Soizic Martin Aubert, Caroline Denis, Steven Dubois, Hervé Nozach, Charles Truillet, Bertrand Kuhnast. Fluorine-18 and Radiometal Labeling of Biomolecules via Disulfide Rebridging. Bioconjugate Chemistry 2023, 34 (11) , 2123-2132. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.3c00440
  3. Bente A. Somsen, Rick J.C. Schellekens, Carlo J.A. Verhoef, Michelle R. Arkin, Christian Ottmann, Peter J. Cossar, Luc Brunsveld. Reversible Dual-Covalent Molecular Locking of the 14-3-3/ERRγ Protein–Protein Interaction as a Molecular Glue Drug Discovery Approach. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2023, 145 (12) , 6741-6752. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c12781
  4. Michael J. Swierczynski, Yuxuan Ding, Zachary T. Ball. Dual-Boronic Acid Reagents That Combine Dynamic and Covalent Bioconjugation. Bioconjugate Chemistry 2022, 33 (12) , 2307-2313. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.2c00508
  5. Daniele Melodia, Zachary Di Pietro, Cheng Cao, Martina H. Stenzel, Robert Chapman. Traceless pH-Sensitive Antibody Conjugation Inspired by Citraconic Anhydride. Biomacromolecules 2022, 23 (12) , 5322-5329. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.2c01125
  6. Maksymilian Marek Zegota, Michael Andreas Müller, Bellinda Lantzberg, Gönül Kizilsavas, Jaime A. S. Coelho, Pierpaolo Moscariello, María Martínez-Negro, Svenja Morsbach, Pedro M. P. Gois, Manfred Wagner, David Y. W. Ng, Seah Ling Kuan, Tanja Weil. Dual Stimuli-Responsive Dynamic Covalent Peptide Tags: Toward Sequence-Controlled Release in Tumor-like Microenvironments. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2021, 143 (41) , 17047-17058. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c06559
  7. Michaela Pieszka, Shen Han, Christiane Volkmann, Robert Graf, Ingo Lieberwirth, Katharina Landfester, David Y. W. Ng, Tanja Weil. Controlled Supramolecular Assembly Inside Living Cells by Sequential Multistaged Chemical Reactions. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2020, 142 (37) , 15780-15789. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.0c05261
  8. Min Su, Tao Peng, Yingdi Zhu, Juan Li. Nucleic Acid Covalent Tags. ChemBioChem 2025, 26 (5) https://doi.org/10.1002/cbic.202400805
  9. Yong Ke, Shuangxiu Li, Yan Shao, Qiushi Li, Ying Wang, Zhanzhan Zhang, Yang Liu. Calixarene Modification Strategy for Efficient Intracellular Protein Delivery. Macromolecular Bioscience 2025, 11 https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.202400626
  10. Mengmeng Zheng, Lingchao Kong, Jianmin Gao. Boron enabled bioconjugation chemistries. Chemical Society Reviews 2024, 53 (24) , 11888-11907. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4CS00750F
  11. Kevin Herr, Mark V. Höfler, Henrike Heise, Fabien Aussenac, Felix Kornemann, David Rosenberger, Martin Brodrecht, Marcos de Oliveira, Gerd Buntkowsky, Torsten Gutmann. Biradicals based on PROXYL containing building blocks for efficient dynamic nuclear polarization in biotolerant media. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Open 2024, 20 , 100152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmro.2024.100152
  12. Ferran Esteve, Tanguy Rieu, Jean-Marie Lehn. Key structural features to favour imines over hydrates in water: pyridoxal phosphate as a muse. Chemical Science 2024, 15 (27) , 10408-10415. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4SC02206H
  13. Dominik Schauenburg, Tanja Weil. Chemical Reactions in Living Systems. Advanced Science 2024, 11 (8) https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202303396
  14. Preeti Chauhan, Ragendu V., Mohan Kumar, Rajib Molla, Surya Dev Mishra, Sneha Basa, Vishal Rai. Chemical technology principles for selective bioconjugation of proteins and antibodies. Chemical Society Reviews 2024, 53 (1) , 380-449. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3CS00715D
  15. Florian M. Zielke, Floris P. J. T. Rutjes. Recent Advances in Bioorthogonal Ligation and Bioconjugation. Topics in Current Chemistry 2023, 381 (6) https://doi.org/10.1007/s41061-023-00445-6
  16. Katerina Gavriel, Dustin C. A. van Doeselaar, Daniëlle W. T. Geers, Kevin Neumann. Click’n lock : rapid exchange between unsymmetric tetrazines and thiols for reversible, chemoselective functionalisation of biomolecules with on-demand bioorthogonal locking. RSC Chemical Biology 2023, 4 (9) , 685-691. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3CB00062A
  17. Selina Hollstein, Philipp Erdmann, Andreas Ulmer, Henrik Löw, Lutz Greb, Max von Delius. Trialkoxysilane Exchange: Scope, Mechanism, Cryptates and pH‐Response. Angewandte Chemie 2023, 135 (26) https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.202304083
  18. Selina Hollstein, Philipp Erdmann, Andreas Ulmer, Henrik Löw, Lutz Greb, Max von Delius. Trialkoxysilane Exchange: Scope, Mechanism, Cryptates and pH‐Response. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2023, 62 (26) https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202304083
  19. Samuel L. Scinto, Tyler R. Reagle, Joseph M. Fox. Affinity Bioorthogonal Chemistry (ABC) Tags for Site‐Selective Conjugation, On‐Resin Protein‐Protein Coupling, and Purification of Protein Conjugates. Angewandte Chemie 2022, 134 (45) https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.202207661
  20. Samuel L. Scinto, Tyler R. Reagle, Joseph M. Fox. Affinity Bioorthogonal Chemistry (ABC) Tags for Site‐Selective Conjugation, On‐Resin Protein‐Protein Coupling, and Purification of Protein Conjugates. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2022, 61 (45) https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202207661
  21. Marco Raabe, Astrid Johanna Heck, Siska Führer, Dominik Schauenburg, Michaela Pieszka, Tao Wang, Maksymilian Marek Zegota, Lutz Nuhn, David Y. W. Ng, Seah Ling Kuan, Tanja Weil. Assembly of pH‐Responsive Antibody‐Drug‐Inspired Conjugates. Macromolecular Bioscience 2022, 22 (2) https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.202100299
  22. Fatima Abi-Ghaida. The serendipitous integration of small boron-embedded molecules into medicinal chemistry. 2022, 321-410. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822127-3.00006-5
  23. Kevin Herr, Max Fleckenstein, Martin Brodrecht, Mark V. Höfler, Henrike Heise, Fabien Aussenac, Torsten Gutmann, Michael Reggelin, Gerd Buntkowsky. A novel strategy for site selective spin-labeling to investigate bioactive entities by DNP and EPR spectroscopy. Scientific Reports 2021, 11 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92975-6
  24. Lujuan Xu, Maria J. S. A. Silva, Pedro M. P. Gois, Seah Ling Kuan, Tanja Weil. Chemoselective cysteine or disulfide modification via single atom substitution in chloromethyl acryl reagents. Chemical Science 2021, 12 (40) , 13321-13330. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1SC03250J
  25. Shu Song, Ping Gao, Lin Sun, Dongwei Kang, Jacob Kongsted, Vasanthanathan Poongavanam, Peng Zhan, Xinyong Liu. Recent developments in the medicinal chemistry of single boron atom-containing compounds. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B 2021, 11 (10) , 3035-3059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsb.2021.01.010
  26. Corey. A. Stevens, Kuljeet Kaur, Harm-Anton Klok. Self-assembly of protein-polymer conjugates for drug delivery. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 2021, 174 , 447-460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2021.05.002
  27. Reinder H. de Vries, Jakob H. Viel, Oscar P. Kuipers, Gerard Roelfes. Rapid and Selective Chemical Editing of Ribosomally Synthesized and Post‐Translationally Modified Peptides (RiPPs) via Cu II ‐Catalyzed β‐Borylation of Dehydroamino Acids. Angewandte Chemie 2021, 133 (8) , 3992-3996. https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.202011460
  28. Reinder H. de Vries, Jakob H. Viel, Oscar P. Kuipers, Gerard Roelfes. Rapid and Selective Chemical Editing of Ribosomally Synthesized and Post‐Translationally Modified Peptides (RiPPs) via Cu II ‐Catalyzed β‐Borylation of Dehydroamino Acids. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2021, 60 (8) , 3946-3950. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202011460
  29. Saurav Chatterjee, Eric V. Anslyn, Anupam Bandyopadhyay. Boronic acid based dynamic click chemistry: recent advances and emergent applications. Chemical Science 2021, 12 (5) , 1585-1599. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0SC05009A
  30. Seah Ling Kuan, Marco Raabe. Solid‐Phase Protein Modifications: Towards Precision Protein Hybrids for Biological Applications. ChemMedChem 2021, 16 (1) , 94-104. https://doi.org/10.1002/cmdc.202000412
  31. Guangzhong Yin, Jingjing Wei, Yu Shao, Wen-Hao Wu, Lianjie Xu, Wen-Bin Zhang. Native conjugation between proteins and [60]fullerene derivatives using SpyTag as a reactive handle. Chinese Chemical Letters 2021, 32 (1) , 353-356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2020.04.034
  32. Landa Purushottam, Unnikrishnan V. B., Dattatraya Gautam Rawale, Mansi Gujrati, Surya Dev Mishra, Sajeev T. K., Neelesh C. Reddy, Srinivasa Rao Adusumalli, Ram Kumar Mishra, Vishal Rai. A single amino acid Gly-tag enables metal-free protein purification. Chemical Science 2020, 11 (48) , 13137-13142. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0SC01153C
  33. Roberto Russo, Rita Padanha, Fábio Fernandes, Luis F. Veiros, Francisco Corzana, Pedro M. P. Gois. Engineering Boron Hot Spots for the Site‐Selective Installation of Iminoboronates on Peptide Chains. Chemistry – A European Journal 2020, 26 (66) , 15226-15231. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.202002675
  34. Adam A. Caparco, Bettina R. Bommarius, Andreas S. Bommarius, Julie A. Champion. Protein‐inorganic calcium‐phosphate supraparticles as a robust platform for enzyme co‐immobilization. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 2020, 117 (7) , 1979-1989. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.27348
  35. Jiaming Zhuang, Bo Zhao, Xiangxi Meng, Jessica D. Schiffman, Sarah L. Perry, Richard W. Vachet, S. Thayumanavan. A programmable chemical switch based on triggerable Michael acceptors. Chemical Science 2020, 11 (8) , 2103-2111. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9SC05841A
  36. Christina Picken, Sahar Awwad, Mire Zloh, Hanieh Khalili, Steve Brocchini. Protein modification by bis-alkylation. 2020, 351-385. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-64081-9.00016-4
  37. Cecilia Samaniego Lopez, Jimena H. Martínez, Sofía L. Acebedo, Carla C. Spagnuolo. Benzoxaboroles as dynamic covalent receptors for bioconjugation and transport of nucleosides and related drugs: Proof of action in HeLa cells. Bioorganic Chemistry 2019, 90 , 103059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioorg.2019.103059
  38. João P. M. António, Roberto Russo, Cátia Parente Carvalho, Pedro M. S. D. Cal, Pedro M. P. Gois. Boronic acids as building blocks for the construction of therapeutically useful bioconjugates. Chemical Society Reviews 2019, 48 (13) , 3513-3536. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9CS00184K
  39. Marco Lucchino, Anne Billet, Antoine Versini, Harikrishna Bavireddi, Bhanu‐Das Dasari, Sylvain Debieu, Ludovic Colombeau, Tatiana Cañeque, Alain Wagner, Géraldine Masson, Frédéric Taran, Philippe Karoyan, Muriel Delepierre, Christine Gaillet, Anne Houdusse, Sébastien Britton, Frédéric Schmidt, Jean‐Claude Florent, Philippe Belmont, David Monchaud, Janine Cossy, Christophe Thomas, Arnaud Gautier, Ludger Johannes, Raphaël Rodriguez. 2nd PSL Chemical Biology Symposium (2019): At the Crossroads of Chemistry and Biology. ChemBioChem 2019, 20 (7) , 968-973. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbic.201900092
  40. Emily A. Hoyt, Pedro M. S. D. Cal, Bruno L. Oliveira, Gonçalo J. L. Bernardes. Contemporary approaches to site-selective protein modification. Nature Reviews Chemistry 2019, 3 (3) , 147-171. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41570-019-0079-1
  41. Seah Ling Kuan, Fernando R. G. Bergamini, Tanja Weil. Functional protein nanostructures: a chemical toolbox. Chemical Society Reviews 2018, 47 (24) , 9069-9105. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8CS00590G

Bioconjugate Chemistry

Cite this: Bioconjugate Chem. 2018, 29, 8, 2665–2670
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.8b00358
Published June 27, 2018

Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

Article Views

6108

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Scheme 1

    Scheme 1. Synthesis of Boronic Acid Intercalator (BA-IC)a

    aa. methacryloyl chloride, Et3N, CH2Cl2, 99%; b. 1. I2, sodium tosylate, CH2Cl2; 2. Et3N, EA, 52%; c. TFA, CH2Cl2, 99%; d. HBTU, DIEA, 3-aminophenylboronic acid hydrochloride, DMF, 65%.

    Scheme 2

    Scheme 2. Incorporation of BA-IC into the Lysozyme

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. FPLC chromatogram of the reaction mixture with visible separation of lysozyme, modified lysozyme, and a higher molecular weight side product (retention volume = 19.82 mL).

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. (a) MALDI-TOF-MS interpretation of BA-lysozyme digest. Peak corresponding to modified fragment was selected for MSMS. 2,5-Dihydrobenzoic acid (DHB) was used as a matrix. (b) Interpretation of BA modified fragment’s MSMS spectrum. To simplify, only a, b, and y ion series for 6–13 fragment are annotated. Annotations for a-17, b-17 ion series and 126–128 fragment are included in the Supporting Information.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Rate of decrease in absorbance (slope) is proportional to lysozyme activity. Clearance of cell suspension turbidity proceeds with similar pace in case of both BA-modified (orange) and native lysozyme (red). Data are plotted as n = 4 ± standard errors of the mean (SEM).

    Scheme 3

    Scheme 3. Synthesis of SHA-BDPa

    aa. CuSO4, sodium ascorbate, DMSO, 93%; b. BF3OEt2, MeOH/CH2Cl2, 76%.

    Scheme 4

    Scheme 4. Dynamic Covalent Bioconjugation of BA-Lysozyme with SHA-BDP and pH-Induced Cleavage of the Bioconjugate

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. Microscale thermophoresis confirms assembly of BA-lysozyme with SHA-BDP (blue line) and release of SHA-BDP upon acidification (gray dots). No binding was detected for the control (red and green dots). Data are plotted as n = 3 ± SEM.

  • References


    This article references 53 other publications.

    1. 1
      Dozier, J. K. and Distefano, M. D. (2015) Site-Specific PEGylation of Therapeutic Proteins. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 16, 2583125864,  DOI: 10.3390/ijms161025831
    2. 2
      Krall, N., da Cruz, F. P., Boutureira, O., and Bernardes, G. J. (2016) Site-selective protein-modification chemistry for basic biology and drug development. Nat. Chem. 8, 103113,  DOI: 10.1038/nchem.2393
    3. 3
      Kuan, S. L., Wang, T., and Weil, T. (2016) Site-Selective Disulfide Modification of Proteins: Expanding Diversity beyond the Proteome. Chem. - Eur. J. 22, 1711217129,  DOI: 10.1002/chem.201602298
    4. 4
      Cho, H., Daniel, T., Buechler, Y. J., Litzinger, D. C., Maio, Z., Putnam, A.-M. H., Kraynov, V. S., Sim, B.-C., Bussell, S., Javahishvili, T., Kaphle, S., Viramontes, G., Ong, M., Chu, S., Becky, G. C., Lieu, R., Knudsen, N., Castiglioni, P., Norman, T. C., Axelrod, D. W., Hoffman, A. R., Schultz, P. G., DiMarchi, R. D., and Kimmel, B. E. (2011) Optimized clinical performance of growth hormone with an expanded genetic code. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 108, 90605,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1100387108
    5. 5
      Elliott, T. S., Townsley, F. M., Bianco, A., Ernst, R. J., Sachdeva, A., Elsässer, S. J., Davis, L., Lang, K., Pisa, R., Greiss, S., Lilley, K. S., and Chin, J. W. (2014) Proteome labeling and protein identification in specific tissues and at specific developmental stages in an animal. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 465472,  DOI: 10.1038/nbt.2860
    6. 6
      Boutureira, O. and Bernardes, G. J. L. (2015) Advances in chemical protein modification. Chem. Rev. 115, 21742195,  DOI: 10.1021/cr500399p
    7. 7
      Junutula, J. R., Raab, H., Clark, S., Bhakta, S., Leipold, D. D., Weir, S., Chen, Y., Simpson, M., Tsai, S. P., Dennis, M. S., Lu, Y., Meng, Y. G., Ng, C., Yang, J., Lee, C. C., Duenas, E., Gorrell, J., Katta, V., Kim, A., McDorman, K., Flagella, K., Venook, R., Ross, S., Spencer, S. D., Lee Wong, W., Lowman, H. B., Vandlen, R., Sliwkowski, M. X., Scheller, R. H., Polakis, P., and Mallet, W. (2008) Site-specific conjugation of a cytotoxic drug to an antibody improves the therapeutic index. Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 925932,  DOI: 10.1038/nbt.1480
    8. 8
      Stephan, J.-P., Chan, P., Lee, C., Nelson, C., Elliott, J. M., Bechtel, C., Raab, H., Xie, D., Akutagawa, J., Baudys, J., Saad, O., Prabhu, S., Wong, W. L. T., Vandlen, R., Jacobson, F., and Ebens, A. (2008) Anti-CD22-MCC-DM1 and MC-MMAF Conjugates: Impact of Assay Format on Pharmacokinetic Parameters Determination. Bioconjugate Chem. 19, 16731683,  DOI: 10.1021/bc800059t
    9. 9
      Chalker, J. M., Bernardes, G. J. L., and Davis, B. G. (2011) A “Tag-and-Modify” Approach to Site-Selective Protein Modification. Acc. Chem. Res. 44, 730741,  DOI: 10.1021/ar200056q
    10. 10
      Zhang, X., Lu, W., Kwan, K., Bhattacharyya, D., and Wei, Y. (2017) Dual-Functional-Tag-Facilitated Protein Labeling and Immobilization. ACS Omega 2, 522528,  DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.6b00512
    11. 11
      Rybak, J.-N., Scheurer, S. B., Neri, D., and Elia, G. (2004) Purification of biotinylated proteins on streptavidin resin: A protocol for quantitative elution. Proteomics 4, 22962299,  DOI: 10.1002/pmic.200300780
    12. 12
      Campos, S. K., Parrott, M. B., and Barry, M. A. (2004) Avidin-based targeting and purification of a protein IX-modified, metabolically biotinylated adenoviral vector. Mol. Ther. 9, 94254,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2004.03.006
    13. 13
      Bornhorst, J. A. and Falke, J. J. (2000) Purification of proteins using polyhistidine affinity tags. Methods Enzymol. 326, 245254,  DOI: 10.1016/S0076-6879(00)26058-8
    14. 14
      Kimple, M. E., Brill, A. L., and Pasker, R. L. (2013) Overview of Affinity Tags for Protein Purification. Curr. Protoc Protein Sci. 73, 608616,  DOI: 10.1002/0471140864.ps0909s73
    15. 15
      Fexby, S. and Bü Low, L. (2004) Hydrophobic peptide tags as tools in bioseparation. Trends Biotechnol. 22, 511516,  DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.08.005
    16. 16
      Jin, Y., Yu, C., Denman, R. J., and Zhang, W. (2013) Recent advances in dynamic covalent chemistry. Chem. Soc. Rev. 42, 66346654,  DOI: 10.1039/c3cs60044k
    17. 17
      Bartolami, E., Bessin, Y., Gervais, V., Dumy, P., and Ulrich, S. (2015) Dynamic Expression of DNA Complexation with Self-assembled Biomolecular Clusters. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 54, 1018310187,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201504047
    18. 18
      Reuther, J. F., Dees, J. L., Kolesnichenko, I. V., Hernandez, E. T., Ukraintsev, D. V., Guduru, R., Whiteley, M., and Anslyn, E. V. (2017) Dynamic covalent chemistry enables formation of antimicrobial peptide quaternary assemblies in a completely abiotic manner. Nat. Chem. 10, 4550,  DOI: 10.1038/nchem.2847
    19. 19
      Diehl, K. L., Kolesnichenko, I. V., Robotham, S. A., Bachman, J. L., Zhong, Y., Brodbelt, J. S., and Anslyn, E. V. (2016) Click and chemically triggered declick reactions through reversible amine and thiol coupling via a conjugate acceptor. Nat. Chem. 8, 968973,  DOI: 10.1038/nchem.2601
    20. 20
      Wang, T., Ng, D. Y. W., Wu, Y., Thomas, J., TamTran, T., and Weil, T. (2014) Bis-sulfide bioconjugates for glutathione triggered tumor responsive drug release. Chem. Commun. 50, 11161118,  DOI: 10.1039/C3CC47003B
    21. 21
      Brustad, E., Bushey, M. L., Lee, J. W., Groff, D., Liu, W., and Schultz, P. G. (2008) A Genetically Encoded Boronate-Containing Amino Acid. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 47, 82208223,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.200803240
    22. 22
      Arzt, M., Seidler, C., Ng, D. Y. W., and Weil, T. (2014) Reversible Click Reactions with Boronic Acids to Build Supramolecular Architectures in Water. Chem. - Asian J. 9, 1994,  DOI: 10.1002/asia.201402061
    23. 23
      Jackson, T. R., Springall, J. S., Rogalle, D., Masumoto, N., Ching Li, H., D’Hooge, F., Perera, S. P., Jenkins, T. A., James, T. D., Fossey, J. S., and van den Elsen, J. M. H. (2008) Boronate affinity saccharide electrophoresis: A novel carbohydrate analysis tool. Electrophoresis 29, 41854191,  DOI: 10.1002/elps.200800178
    24. 24
      Ng, D. Y. W., Arzt, M., Wu, Y., Kuan, S. L., Lamla, M., and Weil, T. (2014) Constructing Hybrid Protein Zymogens through Protective Dendritic Assembly. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 53, 324328,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201308533
    25. 25
      Seidler, C., Ng, D. Y. W., Wu, Y., and Weil, T. (2016) pH responsive supramolecular core-shell protein hybrids. Supramol. Chem. 28, 742746,  DOI: 10.1080/10610278.2016.1140764
    26. 26
      Swaminathan, R., Ravi, V. K., Kumar, S., Kumar, M. V. S., and Chandra, N. (2011) Lysozyme: A model protein for amyloid research. Adv. Protein Chem. Struct. Biol. 84, 63111,  DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-386483-3.00003-3
    27. 27
      Rambaran, R. N. and Serpell, L. C. (2008) Amyloid fibrils: abnormal protein assembly. Prion 2, 1127,  DOI: 10.4161/pri.2.3.7488
    28. 28
      Mankar, S., Anoop, A., Sen, S., and Maji, S. K. (2011) Nanomaterials: amyloids reflect their brighter side. Nano Rev. 2, 6032,  DOI: 10.3402/nano.v2i0.6032
    29. 29
      Meier, C. and Welland, M. E. (2011) Wet-Spinning of Amyloid Protein Nanofibers into Multifunctional High-Performance Biofibers. Biomacromolecules 12, 34533459,  DOI: 10.1021/bm2005752
    30. 30
      Wang, T., Riegger, A., Lamla, M., Wiese, S., Oeckl, P., Otto, M., Wu, Y., Fischer, S., Barth, H., Kuan, S. L., and Weil, T. (2016) Water-soluble allyl sulfones for dual site-specific labelling of proteins and cyclic peptides. Chem. Sci. 7, 32343239,  DOI: 10.1039/C6SC00005C
    31. 31
      Brocchini, S., Balan, S., Godwin, A., Choi, J.-W., Zloh, M., and Shaunak, S. (2006) PEGylation of native disulfide bonds in proteins. Nat. Chem. Biol. 1, 22412252,  DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2006.346
    32. 32
      Robinson, E., Nunes, J. P. M., Vassileva, V., Maruani, A., Nogueira, J. C. F., Smith, M. E. B., Pedley, R. B., Caddick, S., Baker, J. R., and Chudasama, V. (2017) Pyridazinediones deliver potent, stable, targeted and efficacious antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) with a controlled loading of 4 drugs per antibody. RSC Adv. 7, 90739077,  DOI: 10.1039/C7RA00788D
    33. 33
      Greene, M. K., Richards, D. A., Nogueira, J. C. F., Campbell, K., Smyth, P., Fernández, M., Scott, C. J., and Chudasama, V. (2018) Forming next-generation antibody–nanoparticle conjugates through the oriented installation of non-engineered antibody fragments. Chem. Sci. 9, 7987,  DOI: 10.1039/C7SC02747H
    34. 34
      Trivedi, M. V., Laurence, J. S., and Siahaan, T. J. (2009) The role of thiols and disulfides on protein stability. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 10, 61425,  DOI: 10.2174/138920309789630534
    35. 35
      Rosen, C. B. and Francis, M. B. (2017) Targeting the N terminus for site-selective protein modification. Nat. Chem. Biol. 13, 697705,  DOI: 10.1038/nchembio.2416
    36. 36
      Tanaka, K., Fukase, K., and Katsumura, S. (2011) Exploring a Unique Reactivity of 6p-Azaelectrocyclization to Enzyme Inhibition, Natural Products Synthesis, and Molecular Imaging: An Approach to Chemical Biology by Synthetic Chemists. Synlett 2011, 21152139,  DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1261192
    37. 37
      Ban, H., Nagano, M., Gavrilyuk, J., Hakamata, W., Inokuma, T., and Barbas, C. F. (2013) Facile and Stabile Linkages through Tyrosine: Bioconjugation Strategies with the Tyrosine-Click Reaction. Bioconjugate Chem. 24, 520532,  DOI: 10.1021/bc300665t
    38. 38
      Santos, F. M. F., Rosa, J. N., Candeias, N. R., Carvalho, C. P., Matos, A. I., Ventura, A. E., Florindo, H. F., Silva, L. C., Pischel, U., and Gois, P. M. P. (2016) A Three-Component Assembly Promoted by Boronic Acids Delivers a Modular Fluorophore Platform (BASHY Dyes). Chem. - Eur. J. 22, 16311637,  DOI: 10.1002/chem.201503943
    39. 39
      Cal, P. M. S. D., Sieglitz, F., Santos, F. M. F., Parente Carvalho, C., Guerreiro, A., Bertoldo, J. B., Pischel, U., Gois, P. M. P., and Bernardes, G. J. L. (2017) Site-selective installation of BASHY fluorescent dyes to Annexin V for targeted detection of apoptotic cells. Chem. Commun. 53, 368371,  DOI: 10.1039/C6CC08671C
    40. 40
      Ng, D. Y. W., Vill, R., Wu, Y., Koynov, K., Tokura, Y., Liu, W., Sihler, S., Kreyes, A., Ritz, S., Barth, H., Ziener, U., and Weil, T. (2017) Directing intracellular supramolecular assembly with N-heteroaromatic quaterthiophene analogues. Nat. Commun. 8, 1850,  DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-02020-2
    41. 41
      Najera, C., Baldo, B., and Yus, M. (1988) Regio- and Stereo-selective Synthesis of β-Sulphonyl-a,β- Unsaturated Carbonyl Compounds. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1029,  DOI: 10.1039/P19880001029
    42. 42
      Guez, V., Roux, P., Navon, A., and Goldberg, M. E. (2002) Role of individual disulfide bonds in hen lysozyme early folding steps. Protein Sci. 11, 113651,  DOI: 10.1110/ps.3960102
    43. 43
      Springsteen, G. and Wang, B. (2002) A detailed examination of boronic acid–diol complexation. Tetrahedron 58, 52915300,  DOI: 10.1016/S0040-4020(02)00489-1
    44. 44
      Shugar, D. (1952) The measurement of lysozyme activity and the ultra-violet inactivation of lysozyme. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 8, 3029,  DOI: 10.1016/0006-3002(52)90045-0
    45. 45
      Davies, R. C. and Neuberger, A. (1969) Modification of lysine and arginine residues of lysozyme and the effect of enzymatic activity. Biochim. Biophys. Acta - Enzymol. 178, 306317,  DOI: 10.1016/0005-2744(69)90398-2
    46. 46
      Imoto, T., Moriyama, S., and Yagishita, K. (1976) A Study of the Native-Denatured (N to/from D) Transition in Lysozyme III. Effect of Alteration of Net Charge by Acetylation. J. Biochem. 80, 13191325,  DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a131404
    47. 47
      Masuda, T., Kitabatake, N., and Ide, N. (2005) Effects of Chemical Modification of Lysine Residues on the Sweetness of Lysozyme. Chem. Chem. Senses 30, 253264,  DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bji021
    48. 48
      O’Brien, E. C., Farkas, E., Gil, M. J., Fitzgerald, D., Castineras, A., and Nolan, K. B. (2000) Metal complexes of salicylhydroxamic acid (H2Sha), anthranilic hydroxamic acid and benzohydroxamic acid. Crystal and molecular structure of [Cu(phen)2(Cl)]Cl·H2Sha, a model for a peroxidase-inhibitor complex. J. Inorg. Biochem. 79, 4751,  DOI: 10.1016/S0162-0134(99)00245-7
    49. 49
      Yang, S.-M., Lagu, B., and Wilson, L. J. (2007) Mild and Efficient Lewis Acid-Promoted Detritylation in the Synthesis of N -Hydroxy Amides: A Concise Synthesis of (−)-Cobactin T. J. Org. Chem. 72, 81238126,  DOI: 10.1021/jo701411d
    50. 50
      Shin, S. B. Y., Almeida, R. D., Gerona-Navarro, G., Bracken, C., and Jaffrey, S. R. (2010) Assembling ligands in situ using bioorthogonal boronate ester synthesis. Chem. Biol. 17, 11716,  DOI: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2010.09.008
    51. 51
      Shrestha, D., Jenei, A., Nagy, P., Vereb, G., and Szöllősi, J. (2015) Understanding FRET as a research tool for cellular studies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 16, 671856,  DOI: 10.3390/ijms16046718
    52. 52
      Yano, Y. and Matsuzaki, K. (2009) Tag–probe labeling methods for live-cell imaging of membrane proteins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Biomembr. 1788, 21242131,  DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2009.07.017
    53. 53
      Soriano-Ursúa, M. A., Farfán-García, E. D., López-Cabrera, Y., Querejeta, E., and Trujillo-Ferrara, J. G. (2014) Boron-containing acids: Preliminary evaluation of acute toxicity and access to the brain determined by Raman scattering spectroscopy. NeuroToxicology 40, 815,  DOI: 10.1016/j.neuro.2013.10.005
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.8b00358.

    • Full experimental procedures and characterization data for new compounds (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.