ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
The Future of Bioorthogonal Chemistry
My Activity
  • Open Access
Outlook

The Future of Bioorthogonal Chemistry
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

Open PDF

ACS Central Science

Cite this: ACS Cent. Sci. 2018, 4, 8, 952–959
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.8b00251
Published July 23, 2018

Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Bioorthogonal reactions have found widespread use in applications ranging from glycan engineering to in vivo imaging. Researchers have devised numerous reactions that can be predictably performed in a biological setting. Depending on the requirements of the intended application, one or more reactions from the available toolkit can be readily deployed. As an increasing number of investigators explore and apply chemical reactions in living systems, it is clear that there are a myriad of ways in which the field may advance. This article presents an outlook on the future of bioorthogonal chemistry. I discuss currently emerging opportunities and speculate on how bioorthogonal reactions might be applied in research and translational settings. I also outline hurdles that must be cleared if progress toward these goals is to be made. Given the incredible past successes of bioorthogonal chemistry and the rapid pace of innovations in the field, the future is undoubtedly very bright.

Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society

Synopsis

Bioorthogonal reactions have found widespread use in chemical biology. This article gives a brief outlook on the future of the field, outlining emerging areas and key challenges to overcome.

Introduction

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Although chemists have been making molecules that interact with life since the dawn of modern chemistry, the actual chemical reactions used to assemble the molecules were kept as far away from life as possible. They were performed in organic solvents where water, and often oxygen, were to be avoided. Impurities were anathema. This all changed with the introduction of bioorthogonal chemistry by Bertozzi and co-workers. (1−3) The concept is elegant. Can we design reactions that are so selective they can be performed reliably even in a complex biological environment? These reactions must proceed efficiently in the presence of the multitude of functional groups found in living systems such nucleophiles, electrophiles, reductants, oxidants, and of course the solvent of life water. Simultaneously, these reactions should have a minimal impact on the biology itself. The transformation bioorthogonal chemistry triggered in the field of chemical biology was monumental. Suddenly, reactions that previous generations performed in refluxing toluene, were now being done in an aqueous mixture of proteins and sugars. Cancer cells and zebrafish replaced round-bottom flasks. (4,5) Bioorthogonal reactions have already made a tremendous scientific impact, helping us understand glycosylation in cells and animals, (6) providing tools for conjugating functional groups to therapeutically relevant proteins such as antibodies, (7) and enabling the assembly of molecular imaging agents in vivo to detect disease. (8)

The transformation bioorthogonal chemistry triggered in the field of chemical biology was monumental. Suddenly, reactions that previous generations performed in refluxing toluene, were now being done in an aqueous mixture of proteins and sugars. Cancer cells and zebrafish replaced round-bottom flasks.

The concept of bioorthogonal chemistry has inspired a generation of chemical biologists to think about how classic organic reactions can be performed in concert with living systems and how such reactions could lead to the development of tools to help understand biology. I think one of the greatest contributions of bioorthogonal chemistry has been its ability to challenge our imagination regarding the kinds of reactions that can be performed in living systems and how this enables us to ask extremely interesting and ambitious questions. Can pharmaceuticals be synthesized inside humans? (9) Can we co-opt bioorthogonal reactions to detect metabolites in situ? (10) How many orthogonal reactions can be performed simultaneously? (11)
Over the last several years, our ability to combine chemistry and biology has accelerated through improved tools and resources. Therefore, I believe there are numerous future prospects for how bioorthogonal chemistry will have an increasing impact on chemical biology and medicine. In this short Outlook, I will describe my opinion of the future of bioorthogonal chemistry and explore what I believe are some outstanding opportunities in the field. I also outline many of the challenges that will need to be overcome for some of these opportunities to be realized.

The Development of New Bioorthogonal Reactions

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Undoubtedly there will be continued development of new bioorthogonal reactions. Bioorthogonal chemistry has encouraged chemists to consider how a vast number of organic transformations might be adapted to work in living systems. In just the last year alone, there has been the introduction of several new bioorthogonal reactions. (12−15) However, while there are a multitude of possible reactions that could be developed into bioorthogonal processes, it is worthwhile pointing out some of the desired properties of new bioorthogonal reactions that would significantly advance the field. For instance, the continued development of very rapid bioorthogonal reactions is desirable. Rapid reactions are useful because they, in principle, allow one to perform bioconjugations on a practical time scale using a lower concentration of reactants. This is important from a cost perspective. It also may not be practical to achieve high concentrations of a reactant, for instance, when working with proteins or attempting to perform reactions in living cells and animals. Previous work has made notable gains in improving the rate of bioorthogonal reactions, perhaps most notably through the development of tetrazine ligations, which have reported second order rate constants often exceeding 1000 M–1 s–1. (16,17) For comparison, Staudinger ligations or strain-promoted cycloadditions typically have reported rates between 1 × 10–3 and 1 M–1 s–1. (4,18,19) However, rate constants greater than 10 000 M–1 s–1 would be extremely useful. While there have been reports of very rapid reactions with rate constants approaching or exceeding these levels, the reactants themselves are often prone to degradation through side reaction, calling the “orthogonality” of these reactions into question. Development of more stable reactants that can still react very rapidly or the development of entirely new reactions will be highly welcome. There have been some recent inroads in these directions. Triazines have been explored as more stable alternatives to tetrazines, though the reaction rates are modest in comparison. (20) Additionally, researchers have shown that modified strained trans-cyclooctenes can avoid cycloisomerization back to the cis isomer, (21,22) a phenomenon that occurs frequently in the presence of thiols and essentially renders the reagents inactive.
Another area where there is room for future improvement is the size and physical properties of the reaction partners. One of the great advantages of the classic azide-cyclooctyne bioorthogonal reaction is the unobtrusive size of the azide functional group. Azides have been shown to be readily incorporated into analogs of biological metabolites, oftentimes with minor effects on overall function. This feature has enabled applications in metabolic imaging of glycans (4,23) and the incorporation and modification of reactive unnatural amino acids. (24,25) On the other hand, the cyclooctyne reactive group is a bulky probe that is hydrophobic and thus might accumulate nonspecifically in membranes and other cellular structures. Future reactions that use two coupling partners that are both of a lower molecular weight comparable to azides would be advantageous, as the reactive functionalities would be expected to have minimum impact on the molecules that they are appended to (Figure 1A). Recent studies exploring smaller bioorthogonal handles such as cyclopropenes (26,27) and diazo groups are promising directions toward this goal. (28)

Figure 1

Figure 1. (A) Examples of bioorthogonal functional groups and their approximate molecular weights. (B) Mutually orthogonal bioorthogonal reactions for metabolic imaging. Tetrazines and cyclooctynes can selectively label cyclopropenes and azides, respectively. In this instance, the application is to visualize metabolic incorporation of two different sugars onto cell surface glycans. Image reproduced from ref (30).

There has also been growing interest in developing new bioorthogonal reactions that are orthogonal to preexisting bioorthogonal reactions. (11) For instance, several investigators have shown the use of tetrazine/dienophile reactions in parallel with azide/cyclooctyne reactions (Figure 1B). (27,29−31) With careful design of precursors and considering relative rate constants, reactions can be designed to be mutually orthogonal. The benefits of such selectivity are several. For instance, mutually orthogonal reactions enable one to perform metabolic imaging of two different processes by introduction of two differently tagged metabolites. Another exemplary application is the introduction of two reactive unnatural amino acids which can then be tagged using orthogonal chemistries. (32) Such an approach can be used to introduce FRET probes site-specifically on a protein to potentially monitor dynamics. It will be intriguing to see how many different bioorthogonal reactions can be reliably performed simultaneously. It will also be important to understand what the unique applications of such an approach would be and how to implement multiplexed bioorthogonal conjugations for answering biological questions.

Assembling Bioactive Compounds for in Situ Drug Delivery

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The ability to stitch together organic molecules in vivo enables applications that involve the assembly of bioactive small molecules in situ. An exciting future goal might be the in situ assembly of pharmaceuticals at the site of their action. (9) The concept that therapeutic molecules might predictably self-assemble within living systems has been discussed for decades. There have been some notable examples, including the seminal work of Rideout, which demonstrated that aldehyde and hydrazine fragments could assemble into bioactive hydrazones within cells. (33) Since bioorthogonal reactions are robust methods for assembling molecules together, it stands to reason that they might have application toward in situ bioactive small molecule assembly. There is some prior art that suggests this might be feasible. First off, based on the strength and success of fragment based approaches for drug discovery, (34) there has been significant effort in using bioorthogonal chemistry, particularly azide–alkyne cycloadditions, to stitch together drug fragments in situ. Remarkably, it has been found that protein targets can be used to catalyze the formation of their own inhibitors by templating bioorthogonal reactions between reactive fragments that bind in close proximity to one another (Figure 2A). (35) Potent inhibitors for enzymes such as acetylcholinesterase, carbonic anhydrase, and HIV protease have been discovered by screening libraries of compounds bearing reactive handles and analyzing what products are formed through templated reaction. (36−38)

Figure 2

Figure 2. Assembling bioactive molecules in situ using bioorthogonal reactions. (A) A target biomolecule such as an enzyme can bind to two fragments bearing bioorthogonal functional groups. If the fragments are bound such that the functional groups are brought into close proximity to one another, reaction occurs, and a tighter binding compound is formed. This method has been used for in situ discovery of enzyme inhibitors, but it will be interesting to see if such reactions can take place within living cells and in vivo. (B) Researchers have used bioorthogonal reactions to form druglike molecules inside cells. Here, a heterobifunctional compound is formed by tetrazine ligation which enables the degradation of BRD4 through the ubiquitin pathway. Figure reproduced from ref (39).

In principle, templated synthesis of inhibitors might be extended beyond a tool for drug discovery and be used to trigger drug formation in vivo in response to specific protein targets. (9) There are, of course, several hurdles to realizing this vision. In some notable previous examples of in situ click chemistry, the templated thermal azide–alkyne cycloadditions were sluggish, and reagents were incubated over lengthy time scales. (36) For these reactions to work in vivo, the rate of product formation should be much faster, ideally within hours at physiological temperature. Fortunately, the development of biorthogonal reactions with highly tunable reaction rates (39) should enable control over the rate of fragment assembly such that product would form in short enough time scales to be therapeutically meaningful. Other hurdles include the complexity involved in having to optimize pharmacokinetics and delivery for two reagents versus one. However, the benefits could be enormous since bioactive compounds would in principle only be accumulating at high concentrations in cells that have appreciable concentration of protein targets. This would likely mean lower side effects due to off target engagement and potentially the ability to have a larger therapeutic window, which could be very valuable in the case of delivery of cytotoxic chemotherapeutics. (33) Additionally, the concept of delivering two smaller agents that later assemble to form a larger bioactive compound would represent a novel drug delivery strategy and potentially have advantages in terms of the ability of the smaller precursors to pass through cell membranes and the blood–brain barrier.
Recent work has made progress toward using bioorthogonal reactions to assemble functional therapeutics. There has been recent excitement in proteolysis inducing chimeras (PROTACS), which are heterobifunctional drugs that can trigger the degradation of proteins by linking a target protein with the cellular ubiquitinating machinery. However, the required bifunctional compounds are often of high molecular weight (800–1000 Da) and can have less than desirable pharmacokinetics for penetrating cell membranes or accumulating in the central nervous system. Recently, Astex Pharmaceutical has shown that tetrazine bioorthogonal reactions can be used to stitch together functional PROTACS for degrading oncology targets BRD4 and ERK1/2 within living cells (Figure 2B). (40) They were also able to demonstrate that in situ assembly of two small molecules within a cell showed greater efficacy than simply adding the preassembled molecule. However, a major challenge that remains to be addressed is how to selectively trigger formation within the cell versus outside the cell. In the described approach, bioorthogonal assembly would also rapidly take place in the bloodstream. Templated chemistry or perhaps small molecule targeting to specific cell types might alleviate this problem and lead to future translational applications.

Bioorthogonal Uncaging Reactions

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

A recent innovative direction for the coupling of bioorthogonal reactions to biological activity has been the use of bioorthogonal chemistry to uncage substrates, a strategy that has been termed “click to release.” (41) This is an area of accelerating excitement, and applications are continuously expanding. The concept is similar to the well-known uncaging of small molecules in response to light. However, when using light as a stimuli, there is limited depth penetration. Therefore, optical techniques are often restricted to research applications or translational applications that do not require significant depth penetration or systemic activation. In contrast, the use of bioorthogonally reactive small molecules to trigger uncaging offers the potential to activate on the systemic level and in theory could be translatable to patients. Uncaging is typically done by using a reactive handle to mask an amine or alcohol (Figure 3). A prominent example is the use of the highly strained alkene trans-cyclooctene to mask an amine, which is then released upon reaction with a tetrazine. Several investigators have already applied “click to release” strategies to trigger the formation of drugs in vitro and in vivo. (42−45) Furthermore, researchers have shown that, by incorporating a masked lysine residue through site-specific unnatural amino acid incorporation, bioorthogonal reaction can be used to trigger protein activation. (46,47) This strategy provides a mechanism to pharmacologically activate proteins in live animals and could reveal insights on the effects of protein activity on physiology. Additional work has shown that bioorthogonal masks can be used to activate fluorophores for imaging to detect biomolecules such as RNA. (48) Recent studies have even shown the ability to release gases such as carbon monoxide, indicating that bioorthogonal prodrugs of gasotransmitters are on the horizon. (49) I imagine that the use of bioorthogonal strategies to uncage biologically relevant molecules will continue to expand and see continued translation in vivo, potentially to humans. To aid applications, future studies may focus on improving the rate and yield of the release reaction, and recent efforts are promising in this direction. (50)

Figure 3

Figure 3. General examples of bioorthogonal uncaging reactions. Dienophiles act to mask functional groups such as amines and alcohols. Upon bioorthogonal reaction with tetrazine, the functional group is released. This enables the uncaging of drugs, imaging agents, and even enzymes.

Bioorthogonal Reactions that Lead to Natural Linkages

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Most bioorthogonal reactions result in the formation of unnatural linkages. This makes sense since one would expect that exotic, abiological functional groups would have less chance of interacting with biological systems and thus contribute to the chemoselectivity of the reaction. There has been an interest in using bioorthogonal reactions to create analogs of natural compounds such as sugars, lipids, and nucleic acids. (51−53) However, the presence of unnatural linkages such as triazoles does cause concerns regarding whether the compounds formed are truly analogous in function. Thus, a future avenue of exploration would be the development of bioorthogonal coupling reactions that can be performed in vivo selectively but result in the formation of native linkages such as amides, esters, phosphodiesters, etc. A closely related class of reactions are the native chemical ligation, traceless Staudinger ligation, and associated coupling reactions that lead to amide bond formation. (54−57) The native chemical ligation involves the coupling of N-terminal cysteines to thioesters to form a native cysteine linkage. Unfortunately, these reactions have been for the most part limited to use in in vitro settings with purified components. However, one can imagine that the next generation of reactions will have appropriate selectivity and kinetics to be feasible for use in living cells and perhaps even in vivo. Strategies that template reactants could be one way to improve rates and selectivity, transforming chemoselective ligations into bioorthogonal reactions that can be performed in living systems. (58) Researchers could also take advantage of elegant reactions that use abiotic functional groups that come together to rapidly form peptide linkages. (59) For instance, recently our group has built on selective peptide forming ligations to synthesize bioactive lipids in living cells. (60) With such tools at our disposal, it seems likely that we would be able to use bioorthogonal coupling reactions to form native molecules inside living cells and test the effect of forming these molecules on cellular function. This would have tremendous benefits over genetic approaches, where pleiotropic effects and enzyme promiscuity can obscure observations and make it unclear if the activity observed is actually due to a change in concentration of the molecule of interest. As previously discussed, assembling molecules in situ would represent a novel mechanism of cellular delivery. The ability to shuttle in two molecules of lower molecular weight, which assemble at the site of action, could bypass physiological barriers such as cellular membranes.

a future avenue of exploration would be the development of bioorthogonal coupling reactions that can be performed in vivo selectively but result in the formation of native linkages such as amides, esters, phosphodiesters, etc.

In Situ Formation of Bioorthogonal Handles

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Currently, bioorthogonal functional groups must be synthesized using standard organic chemistry methods and then introduced onto a biological molecule or metabolite, which is then introduced to the living system. This exogenous application of functional groups suffers occasionally from drawbacks including delivery issues, which are potentially problematic for in vivo applications. It would be very interesting if organisms could be engineered to synthesize bioorthogonal handles in situ. Past work from the Schultz lab has demonstrated that organisms can be engineered to synthesize unnatural amino acids, which can subsequently be incorporated into proteins site-specifically. (61) Would it be possible to do this but in a manner that the unnatural amino acid contained a reactive handle such as an azide, tetrazine, or strained dienophile? One ripe area for exploration might be the biosynthesis of strained cyclopropenes, dienophiles that are known to be useful bioorthogonal handles for reaction with tetrazines. Cyclopropenes are found in natural products, for instance, in the fatty acids malvalic acid and sterculic acid. (62) Unfortunately, the full details regarding the biosynthesis of cyclopropene fatty acids are still unclear, though future studies are likely to illuminate the pathway. (63) In the meantime, another approach might be to express enzymes specifically engineered to synthesize bioorthogonal handles. Recent work from the Arnold lab has demonstrated that enzymes can be engineered to catalyze the synthesis of cyclopropenes. (64) Adapting such systems to function in living cells might enable the in situ production of strained dienophiles which can then be incorporated into biological molecules and subsequently labeled.

In Vivo Chemistry

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The ultimate frontier for performing reactions in a biological context would be conducting reactions in living animals and ultimately humans. While performing bioorthogonal reactions on and within living cells has become almost a routine phenomenon, the ability to conduct highly efficient reactions inside multicellular organisms remains nontrivial. Zebrafish are excellent model vertebrate organisms since developing zebrafish are optically transparent, and therefore visualization of bioorthogonal reactions through the use of fluorescent imaging probes is feasible. (5) Furthermore, reagents can be delivered either by injecting compounds directly into zebrafish embryos or bathing developing zebrafish in reactive precursors. However, performing bioorthogonal reactions in mammalian model organisms such as mice presents a slew of daunting challenges. First and foremost are optimizing the pharmacokinetics of the reagents to be reacted. There has to be some matching between the rate of the reaction and the lifetime of the precursors at the desired site of action. (8) For this reason, very rapid reactions are likely to find future application, since in many cases the attainable concentrations achievable are in the micromolar range, and lower still when one considers tracer imaging agents. (39) Pharmacokinetics also dictates whether the reagents even make it to the desired site of action. High doses of reagents have little benefit if a reaction desired should occur at a tumor but the reagents never make it there. In vivo chemistry is complicated by the fact that there are two reagents that will need to be delivered. While this may offer some benefits in terms of triggering the formation of drugs or bioactive compounds (see above), it also presents a number of challenges. For instance, the dosing, pharmacokinetics, stability, and toxicity will need to be optimized for not one but two reagents. However, despite these challenges, recent innovations and encouraging preclinical animal results suggest that these issues are likely surmountable, and one would expect to see applications potentially entering the clinic. (45,65,66)

The ultimate frontier for performing reactions in a biological context would be conducting reactions in living animals and ultimately humans. While performing bioorthogonal reactions on and within living cells has become almost a routine phenomenon, the ability to conduct highly efficient reactions inside multicellular organisms remains nontrivial.

Ultimately, I imagine that bioorthogonal chemistry will go beyond research applications and preclinical testing and will be translated to applications in humans. What are some of the emerging applications that we might see translated initially? Arguably, one of the most developed applications is for pretargeted imaging or therapy using reactive monoclonal antibodies (Figure 4). The rationale for pretargeted approaches, which were pioneered by Goodwin and Meares, is compelling. (67) Monoclonal antibodies are excellent affinity ligands that show exceptional selectivity for homing to tissues expressing target antigens and achieving high signal to background. However, monoclonal antibodies also are cleared very slowly, often taking days for clearance in mice and longer still in humans. This long lifetime of monoclonal antibodies can present problems with trying to use antibody drug conjugates, particularly if the conjugate is a radiopharmaceutical used for imaging or therapy. In the case of imaging, the most commonly used radioisotopes are short-lived radioisotopes such as 18F, which has a half-life of just under 2 h. Unfortunately, labeling of antibodies with 18F is not useful since one needs to wait for days to allow sufficient antibody to clear to achieve appropriate target to background ratios for imaging antibody accumulation. By this time, the vast majority of the radionuclide will have decayed and imaging would not be possible. In a pretargeting approach, one would instead deliver a nonradioactive antibody conjugate bearing a bioorthogonal handle. This antibody will be allowed to accumulate and clear after which point a small molecule chaser with a much quicker clearance rate will be delivered. The chaser would possess the radionuclide and a complementary bioorthogonal handle, enabling reaction to the pretargeted antibody. Because the chaser is a small molecule and clears readily, appropriate target to background ratios in principle can be achieved quickly. Similar benefits can be achieved with therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals to avoid systemic toxicity and potentially maximize dose delivery to the target.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Bioorthogonal pretargeted therapy. Cartoon depicting the direct versus multistep labeling approach. (A) Target cells (blue) are exposed to an affinity ligand directly modified by a chemotherapeutic or imaging agent. The affinity ligand binds, but an excess of long circulating affinity ligand persists, contributing to toxicity or background signal. The latter problem prevents the use of short-lived radioisotopes (e.g., fluorine-18) with commonly used affinity ligands such as antibodies. (B) In the multistep approach, an affinity ligand directly connected to a nontherapeutic bioorthogonally reactive element (trans-cyclooctene) is delivered. Again, background is initially high, but this background is inactive. After time has passed to allow for clearance, a small molecule that reacts with the affinity ligand (tetrazine) and possesses a chemotherapeutic or imaging agent is delivered. The small molecule reacts rapidly with available trans-cyclooctene. The molecule also clears rapidly due to its small size thus lowering background side effects or signal.

There have already been some outstanding developments toward achieving pretargeting imaging using bioorthogonal reagents. (65,66,68−70) Past work has shown promise using a variety of long-lived and short-lived radioisotopes. Most of these studies utilize fast tetrazine ligations, since very rapid kinetics is likely necessary to achieve efficient in vivo reaction with tracer quantities of imaging agent. However, while early work is encouraging, there are still several potential challenges that will need to be overcome in the future for such techniques to be translated to the clinic. Perhaps most restrictive is the current emphasis on targeting extracellular targets. (8,68) If the target antibody internalizes, then it will be more difficult for the bioorthogonal reaction to take place, as one of the reactants will be trapped within the cell. It would be simpler if the reactions were to take place extracellularly, but this presents the challenge of choosing appropriate targets that do not internalize once bound by antibodies, even after many hours. Additionally, it will be necessary to further improve the stability of the reactive partners while maintaining high rate constants. Recent studies have shown that highly strained alkenes that are often used in such bioorthogonal strategies may be prone to side reaction in physiological media. (21,26) Despite these challenges, current efforts by several clinical and commercial groups suggest that future improvements and clinical translation might lie ahead.

Conclusions

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Bioorthogonal chemistries have enabled researchers to perform controlled chemistry in the presence of biological functional groups and in situ within living cells and organisms. Since its introduction, the toolkit of bioorthogonal reactions has steadily expanded and will definitely grow larger. New reactions will enable new opportunities and applications, particularly as kinetics, stability, and reactive handle size are further optimized. It seems likely that future studies will further emphasize the use of bioorthogonal couplings to trigger the formation of biologically active components, whether by direct in situ synthesis of drugs or through triggered drug release. Finally, continued applications in vivo will take place, and ultimately bioorthogonal reactions will find their way into the clinic. The predictions I have outlined are obviously just a small part of the future of bioorthogonal chemistry. Indeed, I am confident that some of the most exciting applications will come as a surprise and be driven by the need to address pressing biological and medical problems. Given the flexibility and power of the bioorthogonal approach, controlling chemistry within biological systems may soon only be limited by our imaginations.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Author
    • Notes
      The author declares no competing financial interest.

    Acknowledgments

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

    N.K.D. acknowledges the University of California, San Diego, National Institutes of Health, Department of Defense, and the Camille and Henry Dreyfus foundation for supporting research related to bioorthogonal reactions.

    References

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

    This article references 70 other publications.

    1. 1
      Hang, H. C.; Yu, C.; Kato, D. L.; Bertozzi, C. R. A metabolic labeling approach toward proteomic analysis of mucin-type O-linked glycosylation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2003, 100, 1484614851,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2335201100
    2. 2
      Bertozzi, C. R. A decade of bioorthogonal chemistry. Acc. Chem. Res. 2011, 44, 651653,  DOI: 10.1021/ar200193f
    3. 3
      Sletten, E. M.; Bertozzi, C. R. Bioorthogonal chemistry: fishing for selectivity in a sea of functionality. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 69746998,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.200900942
    4. 4
      Baskin, J. M.; Prescher, J. A.; Laughlin, S. T.; Agard, N. J.; Chang, P. V.; Miller, I. A.; Lo, A.; Codelli, J. A.; Bertozzi, C. R. Copper-free click chemistry for dynamic in vivo imaging. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2007, 104, 1679316797,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0707090104
    5. 5
      Laughlin, S. T.; Baskin, J. M.; Amacher, S. L.; Bertozzi, C. R. In vivo imaging of membrane-associated glycans in developing zebrafish. Science 2008, 320, 664667,  DOI: 10.1126/science.1155106
    6. 6
      Agarwal, P.; Beahm, B. J.; Shieh, P.; Bertozzi, C. R. Systemic Fluorescence Imaging of Zebrafish Glycans with Bioorthogonal Chemistry. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 1150411510,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201504249
    7. 7
      Oller-Salvia, B.; Kym, G.; Chin, J. W. Rapid and Efficient Generation of Stable Antibody-Drug Conjugates via an Encoded Cyclopropene and an Inverse-Electron-Demand Diels-Alder Reaction. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 28312834,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201712370
    8. 8
      Devaraj, N. K.; Thurber, G. M.; Keliher, E. J.; Marinelli, B.; Weissleder, R. Reactive polymer enables efficient in vivo bioorthogonal chemistry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2012, 109, 47624767,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1113466109
    9. 9
      Antonow, D. Fragment-based approaches and the prospect of fragmented prodrugs. Drug Discovery Today 2010, 15, 801803,  DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2010.08.015
    10. 10
      Zengeya, T. T.; Garlick, J. M.; Kulkarni, R. A.; Miley, M.; Roberts, A. M.; Yang, Y.; Crooks, D. R.; Sourbier, C.; Linehan, W. M.; Meier, J. L. Co-opting a Bioorthogonal Reaction for Oncometabolite Detection. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 1581315816,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.6b09706
    11. 11
      Patterson, D. M.; Prescher, J. A. Orthogonal bioorthogonal chemistries. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2015, 28, 141149,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2015.07.006
    12. 12
      Yu, J.; Shen, D.; Zhang, H.; Yin, Z. Rapid, Stoichiometric, Site-Specific Modification of Aldehyde-Containing Proteins Using a Tandem Knoevenagel-Intra Michael Addition Reaction. Bioconjugate Chem. 2018, 29, 10161020,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.8b00086
    13. 13
      An, P.; Lewandowski, T. M.; Erbay, T. G.; Liu, P.; Lin, Q. Sterically Shielded, Stabilized Nitrile Imine for Rapid Bioorthogonal Protein Labeling in Live Cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 48604868,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.8b00126
    14. 14
      Matsuo, K.; Nishikawa, Y.; Masuda, M.; Hamachi, I. Live-Cell Protein Sulfonylation Based on Proximity-driven N-Sulfonyl Pyridone Chemistry. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 659662,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201707972
    15. 15
      Fang, Y. Z.; Zhang, H.; Huang, Z.; Scinto, S. L.; Yang, J. C.; Ende, C. W. A.; Dmitrenko, O.; Johnson, D. S.; Fox, J. M. Photochemical syntheses, transformations, and bioorthogonal chemistry of trans-cycloheptene and sila trans-cycloheptene Ag(I) complexes. Chem. Sci. 2018, 9, 19531963,  DOI: 10.1039/C7SC04773H
    16. 16
      Blackman, M. L.; Royzen, M.; Fox, J. M. Tetrazine ligation: fast bioconjugation based on inverse-electron-demand Diels-Alder reactivity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 1351813519,  DOI: 10.1021/ja8053805
    17. 17
      Devaraj, N. K.; Upadhyay, R.; Haun, J. B.; Hilderbrand, S. A.; Weissleder, R. Fast and sensitive pretargeted labeling of cancer cells through a tetrazine/trans-cyclooctene cycloaddition. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 70137016,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.200903233
    18. 18
      Agard, N. J.; Baskin, J. M.; Prescher, J. A.; Lo, A.; Bertozzi, C. R. A comparative study of bioorthogonal reactions with azides. ACS Chem. Biol. 2006, 1, 644648,  DOI: 10.1021/cb6003228
    19. 19
      Dommerholt, J.; van Rooijen, O.; Borrmann, A.; Guerra, C. F.; Bickelhaupt, F. M.; van Delft, F. L. Highly accelerated inverse electron-demand cycloaddition of electron-deficient azides with aliphatic cyclooctynes. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5378,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6378
    20. 20
      Kamber, D. N.; Liang, Y.; Blizzard, R. J.; Liu, F.; Mehl, R. A.; Houk, K. N.; Prescher, J. A. 1,2,4-Triazines Are Versatile Bioorthogonal Reagents. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 83888391,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.5b05100
    21. 21
      Hoffmann, J. E.; Plass, T.; Nikic, I.; Aramburu, I. V.; Koehler, C.; Gillandt, H.; Lemke, E. A.; Schultz, C. Highly Stable trans-Cyclooctene Amino Acids for Live-Cell Labeling. Chem. - Eur. J. 2015, 21, 1226612270,  DOI: 10.1002/chem.201501647
    22. 22
      Rossin, R.; van den Bosch, S. M.; Ten Hoeve, W.; Carvelli, M.; Versteegen, R. M.; Lub, J.; Robillard, M. S. Highly reactive trans-cyclooctene tags with improved stability for Diels-Alder chemistry in living systems. Bioconjugate Chem. 2013, 24, 12101217,  DOI: 10.1021/bc400153y
    23. 23
      Sletten, E. M.; Bertozzi, C. R. From mechanism to mouse: a tale of two bioorthogonal reactions. Acc. Chem. Res. 2011, 44, 666676,  DOI: 10.1021/ar200148z
    24. 24
      Link, A. J.; Vink, M. K.; Tirrell, D. A. Presentation and detection of azide functionality in bacterial cell surface proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 1059810602,  DOI: 10.1021/ja047629c
    25. 25
      Tian, F.; Tsao, M. L.; Schultz, P. G. A phage display system with unnatural amino acids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 1596215963,  DOI: 10.1021/ja045673m
    26. 26
      Yang, J.; Seckute, J.; Cole, C. M.; Devaraj, N. K. Live-cell imaging of cyclopropene tags with fluorogenic tetrazine cycloadditions. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 74767479,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201202122
    27. 27
      Patterson, D. M.; Nazarova, L. A.; Xie, B.; Kamber, D. N.; Prescher, J. A. Functionalized cyclopropenes as bioorthogonal chemical reporters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 1863818643,  DOI: 10.1021/ja3060436
    28. 28
      Andersen, K. A.; Aronoff, M. R.; McGrath, N. A.; Raines, R. T. Diazo groups endure metabolism and enable chemoselectivity in cellulo. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 24122415,  DOI: 10.1021/ja5095815
    29. 29
      Karver, M. R.; Weissleder, R.; Hilderbrand, S. A. Bioorthogonal reaction pairs enable simultaneous, selective, multi-target imaging. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 920922,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201104389
    30. 30
      Cole, C. M.; Yang, J.; Seckute, J.; Devaraj, N. K. Fluorescent live-cell imaging of metabolically incorporated unnatural cyclopropene-mannosamine derivatives. ChemBioChem 2013, 14, 205208,  DOI: 10.1002/cbic.201200719
    31. 31
      Spate, A. K.; Busskamp, H.; Niederwieser, A.; Schart, V. F.; Marx, A.; Wittmann, V. Rapid labeling of metabolically engineered cell-surface glycoconjugates with a carbamate-linked cyclopropene reporter. Bioconjugate Chem. 2014, 25, 147154,  DOI: 10.1021/bc4004487
    32. 32
      Sachdeva, A.; Wang, K.; Elliott, T.; Chin, J. W. Concerted, rapid, quantitative, and site-specific dual labeling of proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 77857788,  DOI: 10.1021/ja4129789
    33. 33
      Rideout, D. Self-assembling cytotoxins. Science 1986, 233, 561563,  DOI: 10.1126/science.3523757
    34. 34
      Murray, C. W.; Rees, D. C. The rise of fragment-based drug discovery. Nat. Chem. 2009, 1, 187192,  DOI: 10.1038/nchem.217
    35. 35
      Thirumurugan, P.; Matosiuk, D.; Jozwiak, K. Click chemistry for drug development and diverse chemical-biology applications. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 49054979,  DOI: 10.1021/cr200409f
    36. 36
      Lewis, W. G.; Green, L. G.; Grynszpan, F.; Radic, Z.; Carlier, P. R.; Taylor, P.; Finn, M. G.; Sharpless, K. B. Click chemistry in situ: acetylcholinesterase as a reaction vessel for the selective assembly of a femtomolar inhibitor from an array of building blocks. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 10531057,  DOI: 10.1002/1521-3773(20020315)41:6<1053::AID-ANIE1053>3.0.CO;2-4
    37. 37
      Mocharla, V. P.; Colasson, B.; Lee, L. V.; Roper, S.; Sharpless, K. B.; Wong, C. H.; Kolb, H. C. In situ click chemistry: enzyme-generated inhibitors of carbonic anhydrase II. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 116120,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.200461580
    38. 38
      Whiting, M.; Muldoon, J.; Lin, Y. C.; Silverman, S. M.; Lindstrom, W.; Olson, A. J.; Kolb, H. C.; Finn, M. G.; Sharpless, K. B.; Elder, J. H.; Fokin, V. V. Inhibitors of HIV-1 protease by using in situ click chemistry. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 14351439,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.200502161
    39. 39
      Devaraj, N. K.; Weissleder, R. Biomedical applications of tetrazine cycloadditions. Acc. Chem. Res. 2011, 44, 816827,  DOI: 10.1021/ar200037t
    40. 40
      Lebraud, H.; Wright, D. J.; Johnson, C. N.; Heightman, T. D. Protein Degradation by In-Cell Self-Assembly of Proteolysis Targeting Chimeras. ACS Cent. Sci. 2016, 2, 927934,  DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.6b00280
    41. 41
      Versteegen, R. M.; Rossin, R.; ten Hoeve, W.; Janssen, H. M.; Robillard, M. S. Click to release: instantaneous doxorubicin elimination upon tetrazine ligation. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 1411214116,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201305969
    42. 42
      Xu, M.; Tu, J.; Franzini, R. M. Rapid and efficient tetrazine-induced drug release from highly stable benzonorbornadiene derivatives. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 62716274,  DOI: 10.1039/C7CC03477F
    43. 43
      Neumann, K.; Jain, S.; Gambardella, A.; Walker, S. E.; Valero, E.; Lilienkampf, A.; Bradley, M. Tetrazine-Responsive Self-immolative Linkers. ChemBioChem 2017, 18, 9195,  DOI: 10.1002/cbic.201600560
    44. 44
      Jimenez-Moreno, E.; Guo, Z.; Oliveira, B. L.; Albuquerque, I. S.; Kitowski, A.; Guerreiro, A.; Boutureira, O.; Rodrigues, T.; Jimenez-Oses, G.; Bernardes, G. J. Vinyl Ether/Tetrazine Pair for the Traceless Release of Alcohols in Cells. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 243247,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201609607
    45. 45
      Mejia Oneto, J. M.; Khan, I.; Seebald, L.; Royzen, M. In Vivo Bioorthogonal Chemistry Enables Local Hydrogel and Systemic Pro-Drug To Treat Soft Tissue Sarcoma. ACS Cent. Sci. 2016, 2, 476482,  DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.6b00150
    46. 46
      Zhang, G.; Li, J.; Xie, R.; Fan, X.; Liu, Y.; Zheng, S.; Ge, Y.; Chen, P. R. Bioorthogonal Chemical Activation of Kinases in Living Systems. ACS Cent. Sci. 2016, 2, 325331,  DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.6b00024
    47. 47
      Li, J.; Jia, S.; Chen, P. R. Diels-Alder reaction-triggered bioorthogonal protein decaging in living cells. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2014, 10, 10031005,  DOI: 10.1038/nchembio.1656
    48. 48
      Wu, H.; Alexander, S. C.; Jin, S.; Devaraj, N. K. A Bioorthogonal Near-Infrared Fluorogenic Probe for mRNA Detection. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 1142911432,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.6b01625
    49. 49
      Ji, X.; Zhou, C.; Ji, K.; Aghoghovbia, R. E.; Pan, Z.; Chittavong, V.; Ke, B.; Wang, B. Click and Release: A Chemical Strategy toward Developing Gasotransmitter Prodrugs by Using an Intramolecular Diels-Alder Reaction. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 1584615851,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201608732
    50. 50
      Carlson, J. C. T.; Mikula, H.; Weissleder, R. Unraveling Tetrazine-Triggered Bioorthogonal Elimination Enables Chemical Tools for Ultrafast Release and Universal Cleavage. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 36033612,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b11217
    51. 51
      El-Sagheer, A. H.; Brown, T. Synthesis and polymerase chain reaction amplification of DNA strands containing an unnatural triazole linkage. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 39583964,  DOI: 10.1021/ja8065896
    52. 52
      Budin, I.; Devaraj, N. K. Membrane assembly driven by a biomimetic coupling reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 751753,  DOI: 10.1021/ja2076873
    53. 53
      Cendret, V.; Francois-Heude, M.; Mendez-Ardoy, A.; Moreau, V.; Fernandez, J. M.; Djedaini-Pilard, F. Design and synthesis of a ″click″ high-mannose oligosaccharide mimic emulating Man8 binding affinity towards Con A. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 37333735,  DOI: 10.1039/c2cc30773a
    54. 54
      Dawson, P. E.; Muir, T. W.; Clark-Lewis, I.; Kent, S. B. Synthesis of proteins by native chemical ligation. Science 1994, 266, 776779,  DOI: 10.1126/science.7973629
    55. 55
      de Figueiredo, R. M.; Suppo, J. S.; Campagne, J. M. Nonclassical Routes for Amide Bond Formation. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 1202912122,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00237
    56. 56
      Nilsson, B. L.; Kiessling, L. L.; Raines, R. T. High-yielding Staudinger ligation of a phosphinothioester and azide to form a peptide. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 912,  DOI: 10.1021/ol006739v
    57. 57
      Saxon, E.; Armstrong, J. I.; Bertozzi, C. R. A ″traceless″ Staudinger ligation for the chemoselective synthesis of amide bonds. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 21412143,  DOI: 10.1021/ol006054v
    58. 58
      Erben, A.; Grossmann, T. N.; Seitz, O. DNA-triggered synthesis and bioactivity of proapoptotic peptides. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 28282832,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201007103
    59. 59
      Noda, H.; Eros, G.; Bode, J. W. Rapid ligations with equimolar reactants in water with the potassium acyltrifluoroborate (KAT) amide formation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 56115614,  DOI: 10.1021/ja5018442
    60. 60
      Rudd, A. K.; Devaraj, N. K. Traceless Synthesis of Ceramides in Living Cells Reveals Saturation-Dependent Apoptotic Effects. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA , 2018, In Press. DOI:  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1804266115 .
    61. 61
      Mehl, R. A.; Anderson, J. C.; Santoro, S. W.; Wang, L.; Martin, A. B.; King, D. S.; Horn, D. M.; Schultz, P. G. Generation of a bacterium with a 21 amino acid genetic code. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 935939,  DOI: 10.1021/ja0284153
    62. 62
      Bohannon, M. B.; Kleiman, R. Cyclopropene fatty acids of selected seed oils from bombacaceae, malvaceae, and sterculiaceae. Lipids 1978, 13, 270273,  DOI: 10.1007/BF02533669
    63. 63
      Bao, X.; Katz, S.; Pollard, M.; Ohlrogge, J. Carbocyclic fatty acids in plants: biochemical and molecular genetic characterization of cyclopropane fatty acid synthesis of Sterculiafoetida. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2002, 99, 71727177,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.092152999
    64. 64
      Chen, K.; Huang, X.; Kan, S. B. J.; Zhang, R. K.; Arnold, F. H. Enzymatic construction of highly strained carbocycles. Science 2018, 360, 7175,  DOI: 10.1126/science.aar4239
    65. 65
      Lappchen, T.; Rossin, R.; van Mourik, T. R.; Gruntz, G.; Hoeben, F. J. M.; Versteegen, R. M.; Janssen, H. M.; Lub, J.; Robillard, M. S. DOTA-tetrazine probes with modified linkers for tumor pretargeting. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2017, 55, 1926,  DOI: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2017.09.001
    66. 66
      Houghton, J. L.; Membreno, R.; Abdel-Atti, D.; Cunanan, K. M.; Carlin, S.; Scholz, W. W.; Zanzonico, P. B.; Lewis, J. S.; Zeglis, B. M. Establishment of the In Vivo Efficacy of Pretargeted Radioimmunotherapy Utilizing Inverse Electron Demand Diels-Alder Click Chemistry. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2017, 16, 124133,  DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-16-0503
    67. 67
      Goodwin, D. A.; Meares, C. F.; McCall, M. J.; McTigue, M.; Chaovapong, W. Pre-targeted immunoscintigraphy of murine tumors with indium-111-labeled bifunctional haptens. J. Nucl. Med. 1988, 29 (2), 226234
    68. 68
      Zeglis, B. M.; Sevak, K. K.; Reiner, T.; Mohindra, P.; Carlin, S. D.; Zanzonico, P.; Weissleder, R.; Lewis, J. S. A pretargeted PET imaging strategy based on bioorthogonal Diels-Alder click chemistry. J. Nucl. Med. 2013, 54, 13891396,  DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.112.115840
    69. 69
      Rossin, R.; Verkerk, P. R.; van den Bosch, S. M.; Vulders, R. C.; Verel, I.; Lub, J.; Robillard, M. S. In vivo chemistry for pretargeted tumor imaging in live mice. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 33753378,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.200906294
    70. 70
      Devaraj, N. K.; Weissleder, R.; Hilderbrand, S. A. Tetrazine-based cycloadditions: application to pretargeted live cell imaging. Bioconjugate Chem. 2008, 19, 22972299,  DOI: 10.1021/bc8004446

    Cited By

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

    This article is cited by 390 publications.

    1. Mengxue Zheng, Wenxiu Gao, Lei Zhang, Kaiyu Yan, Zhenguo Zhang, Peizhong Xie, Teck-Peng Loh. Allylation of Lactol in Water. Organic Letters 2024, 26 (47) , 10201-10206. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.orglett.4c04189
    2. Krishna Vippala, Shreyas Shankar Wagle, Parul Rathee, Keerthana Mulamukkil, Yousif Ayoub, Arthur Komlosh, Sharon Gazal, Bianca Avramovitch, Roey J. Amir. Micellar “Click” Nanoreactors: Spiking Pluronic-Based Micelles with Polymeric Ligands. Macromolecules 2024, 57 (22) , 10557-10566. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.4c01425
    3. Ranjan Sasmal, Arka Som, Pratibha Kumari, Resmi V. Nair, Sushanta Show, Nisha Sanjay Barge, Meenakshi Pahwa, Nilanjana Das Saha, Sushma Rao, Sheeba Vasu, Rachit Agarwal, Sarit S. Agasti. Supramolecular Guest Exchange in Cucurbit[7]uril for Bioorthogonal Fluorogenic Imaging across the Visible Spectrum. ACS Central Science 2024, 10 (10) , 1945-1959. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.4c01080
    4. Veronika Šlachtová, Simona Bellová, Milan Vrabel. Synthesis of C3-Substituted N1-tert-Butyl 1,2,4-Triazinium Salts via the Liebeskind–Srogl Reaction for Fluorogenic Labeling of Live Cells. The Journal of Organic Chemistry 2024, 89 (20) , 14634-14640. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.3c02454
    5. Cheng Yang, Kai Lu, Jie Li, Haoxing Wu, Wei Chen. Rapid Construction of 18F-Triazolyl-tetrazines through the Click Reaction. The Journal of Organic Chemistry 2024, 89 (20) , 14673-14678. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.4c00574
    6. Balasaheb R. Borade, Ming Fang, Qing Lin. Synthesis of Hydrazonyl Sultones via Phosphine-Mediated Cyclodehydration of Vicinal Sulfo-acyl Hydrazides. Organic Letters 2024, 26 (39) , 8239-8243. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.orglett.4c02687
    7. Haojie Yang, Hongbao Sun, Yinghan Chen, Yayue Wang, Cheng Yang, Fang Yuan, Xiaoai Wu, Wei Chen, Ping Yin, Yong Liang, Haoxing Wu. Enabling Universal Access to Rapid and Stable Tetrazine Bioorthogonal Probes through Triazolyl-Tetrazine Formation. JACS Au 2024, 4 (8) , 2853-2861. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacsau.3c00843
    8. Soraya Learte-Aymamí, Laura Martínez-Castro, Carmen González-González, Miriam Condeminas, Pau Martin-Malpartida, María Tomás-Gamasa, Sandra Baúlde, José R. Couceiro, Jean-Didier Maréchal, Maria J. Macias, José L. Mascareñas, M. Eugenio Vázquez. De Novo Engineering of Pd-Metalloproteins and Their Use as Intracellular Catalysts. JACS Au 2024, 4 (7) , 2630-2639. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacsau.4c00379
    9. Mohsen Khodadadi Yazdi, Farzad Seidi, Aleksander Hejna, Payam Zarrintaj, Navid Rabiee, Justyna Kucinska-Lipka, Mohammad Reza Saeb, Sidi A. Bencherif. Tailor-Made Polysaccharides for Biomedical Applications. ACS Applied Bio Materials 2024, 7 (7) , 4193-4230. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.3c01199
    10. Nathan Noël, Agathe Martinez, Fabien Massicot, Jean-Luc Vasse, Jean-Bernard Behr. Kinetics of Strain-Promoted Alkyne-Nitrone Cycloadditions (SPANC) with Unprotected Carbohydrate Scaffolded Nitrones. Organic Letters 2024, 26 (18) , 3917-3922. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.orglett.4c01098
    11. Murat Işık, Mehmet Ali Kısaçam. Readily Accessible and Brightly Fluorogenic BODIPY/NBD–Tetrazines via SNAr Reactions. The Journal of Organic Chemistry 2024, 89 (9) , 6513-6519. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.3c02864
    12. Aysun Degirmenci, Rana Sanyal, Amitav Sanyal. Metal-Free Click-Chemistry: A Powerful Tool for Fabricating Hydrogels for Biomedical Applications. Bioconjugate Chemistry 2024, 35 (4) , 433-452. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.4c00003
    13. Yun Hu, Rachel Spiegelhoff, Ken S. Lee, Kyana M. Sanders, Jennifer M. Schomaker. A Synthetic Strategy toward S-, N-, and O-Heterocyclooctynes Facilitates Bioconjugation Using Multifunctional Handles. The Journal of Organic Chemistry 2024, 89 (7) , 4512-4522. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.3c02747
    14. Zhiguo Gao, Yaojia Li, Jiaqi Xing, Yougong Lu, Quanlin Shao, Jinzhong Hu, Shan Zhao, Wei He, Baiwang Sun. Transition Metal Ru(II) Catalysts Immobilized Nanoreactors for Conditional Bioorthogonal Catalysis in Cells. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2024, 16 (13) , 15870-15878. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.3c19133
    15. Amit Sharma, Peter Verwilst, Mingle Li, Dandan Ma, Nem Singh, Jiyoung Yoo, Yujin Kim, Ying Yang, Jing-Hui Zhu, Haiqiao Huang, Xi-Le Hu, Xiao-Peng He, Lintao Zeng, Tony D. James, Xiaojun Peng, Jonathan L. Sessler, Jong Seung Kim. Theranostic Fluorescent Probes. Chemical Reviews 2024, 124 (5) , 2699-2804. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00778
    16. Yang Yang, Xiaoyang Liu, Xiaofeng Wu, Gaolin Liang. Enzyme-Instructed CBT-Cys-like Click Cyclization Reactions for Bioimaging. Chemical & Biomedical Imaging 2024, 2 (2) , 98-116. https://doi.org/10.1021/cbmi.3c00117
    17. Andrew M. Giltrap, Yizhi Yuan, Benjamin G. Davis. Late-Stage Functionalization of Living Organisms: Rethinking Selectivity in Biology. Chemical Reviews 2024, 124 (3) , 889-928. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00579
    18. Cinzia D’Avino, Sara Gutiérrez, Max J. Feldhaus, María Tomás-Gamasa, José Luis Mascareñas. Intracellular Synthesis of Indoles Enabled by Visible-Light Photocatalysis. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2024, 146 (5) , 2895-2900. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.3c13647
    19. Amit Kumar, In Su Lee. Designer Nanoreactors for Bioorthogonal Catalysis. Accounts of Chemical Research 2024, 57 (3) , 413-427. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.3c00735
    20. Houqi Guo, Xin Ruan, Zekun Xu, Kai Wang, Xiang Li, Jun Jiang. Visible-Light-Mediated Dual Functionalization of Allenes: Regio- and Stereoselective Synthesis of Vinylsulfone Azides. The Journal of Organic Chemistry 2024, 89 (1) , 665-675. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.3c02515
    21. Qingqiang Min, Xingyue Ji. Bioorthogonal Bond Cleavage Chemistry for On-demand Prodrug Activation: Opportunities and Challenges. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2023, 66 (24) , 16546-16567. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.3c01459
    22. Zhicheng Yan, Yiyao Pan, Guofeng Jiao, Mengyu Xu, Dongguang Fan, Ziwei Hu, Jiarui Wu, Tao Chen, Miao Liu, Xiaoguang Bao, Hengte Ke, Xingyue Ji. A Bioorthogonal Decaging Chemistry of N-Oxide and Silylborane for Prodrug Activation both In Vitro and In Vivo. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2023, 145 (45) , 24698-24706. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.3c08012
    23. Giulia Mazzoccanti, Roberta Franzini, Alessia Ciogli, Marco Pierini, Fabio Buonsenso, Cristina Faggi, Antonio Francioso, Simone Manetto, Claudio Villani. Theoretically Predicted and Experimentally Detected Chirality of Dibenzocyclooctynes and Their Triazole Adducts with Azides. The Journal of Organic Chemistry 2023, 88 (21) , 15097-15105. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.3c01557
    24. Chau Ngo, William Fried, Saba Aliyari, Joshua Feng, Chao Qin, Shilei Zhang, Hanjing Yang, Jean Shanaa, Pinghui Feng, Genhong Cheng, Xiaojiang S. Chen, Chao Zhang. Alkyne as a Latent Warhead to Covalently Target SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2023, 66 (17) , 12237-12248. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.3c00810
    25. Athanasios Markos, Maurice Biedermann, Johannes Heimgärtner, Adeline Schmitt, Kathrin Lang, Helma Wennemers. Introducing Azomethine Imines to Chemical Biology: Bioorthogonal Reaction with Isonitriles. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2023, 145 (36) , 19513-19517. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.3c07006
    26. Cunyuan Zhao, Yuankai Wang, Quan Pham, Changhang Dai, Abhishek Chatterjee, Masayuki Wasa. Chemical Tagging of Bioactive Amides by Cooperative Catalysis: Applications in the Syntheses of Drug Conjugates. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2023, 145 (26) , 14233-14250. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.3c00169
    27. Yuanhang Xiang, Hui Zhang, Hao Lu, Binqi Wei, Cuiyun Su, Xiaojie Qin, Min Fang, Xinchun Li, Fan Yang. Bioorthogonal Microbubbles with Antifouling Nanofilm for Instant and Suspended Enrichment of Circulating Tumor Cells. ACS Nano 2023, 17 (10) , 9633-9646. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.3c03194
    28. Ming Fang, Gangam Srikanth Kumar, Stefano Racioppi, Heyang Zhang, Johnathan D. Rabb, Eva Zurek, Qing Lin. Hydrazonyl Sultones as Stable Tautomers of Highly Reactive Nitrile Imines for Fast Bioorthogonal Ligation Reaction. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2023, 145 (18) , 9959-9964. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c12325
    29. Yuanyuan Li, Hongling Zhou, Huili Liu, Youfang Gan, Yaying Zheng, Jia Sheng, Rui Wang. Development of Nitroso-Based Probes for Labeling and Regulation of RAS Proteins in Cancer Cells via Sequential Ene-Ligation and Oxime Condensation. The Journal of Organic Chemistry 2023, 88 (3) , 1762-1771. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.2c02922
    30. Kern Hast, M. Rhia L. Stone, Zhaojun Jia, Melih Baci, Tushar Aggarwal, Enver Cagri Izgu. Bioorthogonal Functionalization of Material Surfaces with Bioactive Molecules. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2023, 15 (4) , 4996-5009. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c20942
    31. Zhi-Chen Wu, Dale L. Boger. 1,2,3,5-Tetrazines: A General Synthesis, Cycloaddition Scope, and Fundamental Reactivity Patterns. The Journal of Organic Chemistry 2022, 87 (24) , 16829-16846. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.2c02687
    32. Dongxia Chen, Yaying Lin, Ao Li, Xiangjie Luo, Chaoyong Yang, Jinhao Gao, Hongyu Lin. Bio-orthogonal Metabolic Fluorine Labeling Enables Deep-Tissue Visualization of Tumor Cells In Vivo by 19F Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Analytical Chemistry 2022, 94 (48) , 16614-16621. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.2c02443
    33. Natsumi Ueda, Shiho Sawada, Fumiya Yuasa, Karen Kato, Koji Nagahama. Covalent Stem Cell-Combining Injectable Materials with Enhanced Stemness and Controlled Differentiation In Vivo. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2022, 14 (47) , 52618-52633. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c12918
    34. Jianbing Wu, Yihui Hu, Hui Ye, Sheng Zhang, Jie Zhu, Duorui Ji, Yihua Zhang, Ya Ding, Zhangjian Huang. One Stone Two Birds: Redox-Sensitive Colocalized Delivery of Cisplatin and Nitric Oxide through Cascade Reactions. JACS Au 2022, 2 (10) , 2339-2351. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacsau.2c00390
    35. Yayue Wang, Guohua Shen, Jie Li, Wuyu Mao, Hongbao Sun, Ping Feng, Haoxing Wu. Bioorthogonal Cleavage of Tetrazine-Caged Ethers and Esters Triggered by trans-Cyclooctene. Organic Letters 2022, 24 (29) , 5293-5297. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.orglett.2c01873
    36. Samira Sadeghi, Nihar D. Masurkar, Girish Vallerinteavide Mavelli, Siddharth Deshpande, Warren Kok Yong Tan, Sherman Yee, Shin-Ae Kang, Yoon-Pin Lim, Edward Kai-Hua Chow, Chester L. Drum. Bioorthogonal Catalysis for Treatment of Solid Tumors Using Thermostable, Self-Assembling, Single Enzyme Nanoparticles and Natural Product Conversion with Indole-3-acetic Acid. ACS Nano 2022, 16 (7) , 10292-10301. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.1c11560
    37. Rui Huang, Cristina-Maria Hirschbiegel, Xianzhi Zhang, Aarohi Gupta, Stefano Fedeli, Yisheng Xu, Vincent M. Rotello. Engineered Polymer-Supported Biorthogonal Nanocatalysts Using Flash Nanoprecipitation. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2022, 14 (28) , 31594-31600. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c04496
    38. Amit Dahiya, Franziska Schoenebeck. Orthogonal and Modular Arylation of Alkynylgermanes. ACS Catalysis 2022, 12 (13) , 8048-8054. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.2c02179
    39. Tyler K. Heiss, Robert S. Dorn, Andrew. J. Ferreira, Anna C. Love, Jennifer A. Prescher. Fluorogenic Cyclopropenones for Multicomponent, Real-Time Imaging. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2022, 144 (17) , 7871-7880. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c02058
    40. Umberto M. Battisti, Rocío García-Vázquez, Dennis Svatunek, Barbara Herrmann, Andreas Löffler, Hannes Mikula, Matthias Manfred Herth. Synergistic Experimental and Computational Investigation of the Bioorthogonal Reactivity of Substituted Aryltetrazines. Bioconjugate Chemistry 2022, 33 (4) , 608-624. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.2c00042
    41. Alessia Battigelli, Bethany Almeida, Anita Shukla. Recent Advances in Bioorthogonal Click Chemistry for Biomedical Applications. Bioconjugate Chemistry 2022, 33 (2) , 263-271. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.1c00564
    42. Guopan Liu, Ming Ho Choi, Haiying Ma, Xuejiao Guo, Pui-Chi Lo, Jinyong Kim, Liang Zhang. Bioorthogonal Conjugation-Assisted Purification Method for Profiling Cell Surface Proteome. Analytical Chemistry 2022, 94 (3) , 1901-1909. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.1c05187
    43. Gangam Srikanth Kumar, Stefano Racioppi, Eva Zurek, Qing Lin. Superfast Tetrazole–BCN Cycloaddition Reaction for Bioorthogonal Protein Labeling on Live Cells. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2022, 144 (1) , 57-62. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c10354
    44. Angus S. Mackay, Richard J. Payne, Lara R. Malins. Electrochemistry for the Chemoselective Modification of Peptides and Proteins. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2022, 144 (1) , 23-41. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c11185
    45. Shahar Tevet, Shreyas S. Wagle, Gadi Slor, Roey J. Amir. Tuning the Reactivity of Micellar Nanoreactors by Precise Adjustments of the Amphiphile and Substrate Hydrophobicity. Macromolecules 2021, 54 (24) , 11419-11426. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.1c01755
    46. Robert E. Bird, Steven A. Lemmel, Xiang Yu, Qiongqiong Angela Zhou. Bioorthogonal Chemistry and Its Applications. Bioconjugate Chemistry 2021, 32 (12) , 2457-2479. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.1c00461
    47. Fa-Guang Zhang, Zhen Chen, Xiaodong Tang, Jun-An Ma. Triazines: Syntheses and Inverse Electron-demand Diels–Alder Reactions. Chemical Reviews 2021, 121 (23) , 14555-14593. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00611
    48. Anna Kataki-Anastasakou, Selena Hernandez, Ellen M. Sletten. Cell-surface Labeling via Bioorthogonal Host–Guest Chemistry. ACS Chemical Biology 2021, 16 (11) , 2124-2129. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschembio.1c00494
    49. Umberto M. Battisti, Klas Bratteby, Jesper T. Jørgensen, Lars Hvass, Vladimir Shalgunov, Hannes Mikula, Andreas Kjær, Matthias Manfred Herth. Development of the First Aliphatic 18F-Labeled Tetrazine Suitable for Pretargeted PET Imaging—Expanding the Bioorthogonal Tool Box. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2021, 64 (20) , 15297-15312. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c01326
    50. Carolina Carrillo-Carrión, Raquel Martínez, Ester Polo, María Tomás-Gamasa, Paolo Destito, Manuel Ceballos, Beatriz Pelaz, Fernando López, José L. Mascareñas, Pablo del Pino. Plasmonic-Assisted Thermocyclizations in Living Cells Using Metal–Organic Framework Based Nanoreactors. ACS Nano 2021, 15 (10) , 16924-16933. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.1c07983
    51. Suhail A. Rather, Mohammad Yaqoob Bhat, Feroze Hussain, Qazi Naveed Ahmed. Sulfonyl-Promoted Michaelis–Arbuzov-Type Reaction: An Approach to S/Se–P Bonds. The Journal of Organic Chemistry 2021, 86 (19) , 13644-13663. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.1c01681
    52. Christopher J. Addonizio, Brant D. Gates, Matthew J. Webber. Supramolecular “Click Chemistry” for Targeting in the Body. Bioconjugate Chemistry 2021, 32 (9) , 1935-1946. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.1c00326
    53. Aaditya Govindarajan, Vasuki Gnanasambandam. Toward Intracellular Bioconjugation Using Transition-Metal-Free Techniques. Bioconjugate Chemistry 2021, 32 (8) , 1431-1454. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.1c00173
    54. Trang Huyen Le-Kim, Bon Il Koo, Sung Duk Jo, Nai-Wen Liang, Moon Young Yang, In Cho, Jae Byum Chang, Tzu-Wei Wang, Yoon Sung Nam. Artificial Taste Buds: Bioorthogonally Ligated Gustatory–Neuronal Multicellular Hybrids Enabling Intercellular Taste Signal Transmission. ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering 2021, 7 (8) , 3783-3792. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c00247
    55. Chuanqi Wang, He Zhang, Tao Zhang, Xiaoyu Zou, Hui Wang, Julia E. Rosenberger, Raghu Vannam, William S. Trout, Jonathan B. Grimm, Luke D. Lavis, Colin Thorpe, Xinqiao Jia, Zibo Li, Joseph M. Fox. Enabling In Vivo Photocatalytic Activation of Rapid Bioorthogonal Chemistry by Repurposing Silicon-Rhodamine Fluorophores as Cytocompatible Far-Red Photocatalysts. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2021, 143 (28) , 10793-10803. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c05547
    56. Mohammad Shafee Alkanawati, Marina Machtakova, Katharina Landfester, Héloïse Thérien-Aubin. Bio-Orthogonal Nanogels for Multiresponsive Release. Biomacromolecules 2021, 22 (7) , 2976-2984. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.1c00378
    57. Didier A. Bilodeau, Kaitlyn D. Margison, Mariam Serhan, John Paul Pezacki. Bioorthogonal Reactions Utilizing Nitrones as Versatile Dipoles in Cycloaddition Reactions. Chemical Reviews 2021, 121 (12) , 6699-6717. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00832
    58. Titas Deb, Julian Tu, Raphael M. Franzini. Mechanisms and Substituent Effects of Metal-Free Bioorthogonal Reactions. Chemical Reviews 2021, 121 (12) , 6850-6914. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01013
    59. Brian J. Levandowski, Ronald T. Raines. Click Chemistry with Cyclopentadiene. Chemical Reviews 2021, 121 (12) , 6777-6801. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01055
    60. Tyler K. Heiss, Robert S. Dorn, Jennifer A. Prescher. Bioorthogonal Reactions of Triarylphosphines and Related Analogues. Chemical Reviews 2021, 121 (12) , 6802-6849. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00014
    61. Jie Wang, Xin Wang, Xinyuan Fan, Peng R. Chen. Unleashing the Power of Bond Cleavage Chemistry in Living Systems. ACS Central Science 2021, 7 (6) , 929-943. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.1c00124
    62. Amol D. Pagar, Mahesh D. Patil, Dillon T. Flood, Tae Hyeon Yoo, Philip E. Dawson, Hyungdon Yun. Recent Advances in Biocatalysis with Chemical Modification and Expanded Amino Acid Alphabet. Chemical Reviews 2021, 121 (10) , 6173-6245. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01201
    63. Zhiguo Gao, Yaojia Li, Zhikun Liu, Yu Zhang, Fanghui Chen, Peijing An, Wenjun Lu, Jinzhong Hu, Chaoqun You, Jun Xu, Xiangyang Zhang, Baiwang Sun. Small-Molecule-Selective Organosilica Nanoreactors for Copper-Catalyzed Azide–Alkyne Cycloaddition Reactions in Cellular and Living Systems. Nano Letters 2021, 21 (8) , 3401-3409. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c04930
    64. Al-Mahmnur Alam, Young-Seok Shon. Water-Soluble Noble Metal Nanoparticle Catalysts Capped with Small Organic Molecules for Organic Transformations in Water. ACS Applied Nano Materials 2021, 4 (4) , 3294-3318. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.1c00335
    65. Dahye Kang, Justin Kim. Bioorthogonal Retro-Cope Elimination Reaction of N,N-Dialkylhydroxylamines and Strained Alkynes. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2021, 143 (15) , 5616-5621. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c00885
    66. Chandra Kanth Bandi, Kyle S. Skalenko, Ayushi Agrawal, Neelan Sivaneri, Margaux Thiry, Shishir P. S. Chundawat. Engineered Regulon to Enable Autonomous Azide Ion Biosensing, Recombinant Protein Production, and in Vivo Glycoengineering. ACS Synthetic Biology 2021, 10 (4) , 682-689. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.0c00449
    67. Xiangzhao Ai, Shuyan Wang, Yaou Duan, Qiangzhe Zhang, Maggie S. Chen, Weiwei Gao, Liangfang Zhang. Emerging Approaches to Functionalizing Cell Membrane-Coated Nanoparticles. Biochemistry 2021, 60 (13) , 941-955. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.0c00343
    68. Andrea Peier, Lan Ge, Nicolas Boyer, John Frost, Ruchia Duggal, Kaustav Biswas, Scott Edmondson, Jeffrey D. Hermes, Lin Yan, Chad Zimprich, Ahmad Sadruddin, Hung Yi Kristal Kaan, Arun Chandramohan, Christopher J. Brown, Dawn Thean, Xue Er Lee, Tsz Ying Yuen, Fernando J. Ferrer-Gago, Charles W. Johannes, David P. Lane, Brad Sherborne, Cesear Corona, Matthew B. Robers, Tomi K. Sawyer, Anthony W. Partridge. NanoClick: A High Throughput, Target-Agnostic Peptide Cell Permeability Assay. ACS Chemical Biology 2021, 16 (2) , 293-309. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschembio.0c00804
    69. Zhigang Lyu, Yue Zhao, Zakey Yusuf Buuh, Nicole Gorman, Aaron R. Goldman, Md Shafiqul Islam, Hsin-Yao Tang, Rongsheng E. Wang. Steric-Free Bioorthogonal Labeling of Acetylation Substrates Based on a Fluorine–Thiol Displacement Reaction. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2021, 143 (3) , 1341-1347. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.0c05605
    70. Vera F. C. Ferreira, Bruno L. Oliveira, Alice D’Onofrio, Carlos M. Farinha, Lurdes Gano, António Paulo, Gonçalo J. L. Bernardes, Filipa Mendes. In Vivo Pretargeting Based on Cysteine-Selective Antibody Modification with IEDDA Bioorthogonal Handles for Click Chemistry. Bioconjugate Chemistry 2021, 32 (1) , 121-132. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.0c00551
    71. Jessica Hersh, David Broyles, José Manuel Condor Capcha, Emre Dikici, Lina A. Shehadeh, Sylvia Daunert, Sapna Deo. Peptide-Modified Biopolymers for Biomedical Applications. ACS Applied Bio Materials 2021, 4 (1) , 229-251. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.0c01145
    72. Yichuan Zhang, Muhammed Üçüncü, Alessia Gambardella, Assel Baibek, Jin Geng, Shuo Zhang, Jessica Clavadetscher, Inga Litzen, Mark Bradley, Annamaria Lilienkampf. Bioorthogonal Swarming: In Situ Generation of Dendrimers. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2020, 142 (52) , 21615-21621. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.0c07869
    73. Rajdip Chowdhury, Zhunzhun Yu, My Linh Tong, Stefanie V. Kohlhepp, Xiang Yin, Abraham Mendoza. Decarboxylative Alkyl Coupling Promoted by NADH and Blue Light. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2020, 142 (47) , 20143-20151. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.0c09678
    74. Tao Zhang, Jianhua Cai, Hui Wang, Mengzhe Wang, Hong Yuan, Zhanhong Wu, Xiaofen Ma, Zibo Li. RXH-Reactive 18F-Vinyl Sulfones as Versatile Agents for PET Probe Construction. Bioconjugate Chemistry 2020, 31 (11) , 2482-2487. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.0c00487
    75. Martin Wilkovitsch, Maximilian Haider, Barbara Sohr, Barbara Herrmann, Jenna Klubnick, Ralph Weissleder, Jonathan C. T. Carlson, Hannes Mikula. A Cleavable C2-Symmetric trans-Cyclooctene Enables Fast and Complete Bioorthogonal Disassembly of Molecular Probes. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2020, 142 (45) , 19132-19141. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.0c07922
    76. Yun Hu, Jessica M. Roberts, Henry R. Kilgore, Amirah S. Mat Lani, Ronald T. Raines, Jennifer M. Schomaker. Triple, Mutually Orthogonal Bioorthogonal Pairs through the Design of Electronically Activated Sulfamate-Containing Cycloalkynes. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2020, 142 (44) , 18826-18835. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.0c06725
    77. Dillon T. Flood, Kyle W. Knouse, Julien C. Vantourout, Seiya Kitamura, Brittany B. Sanchez, Emily J. Sturgell, Jason S. Chen, Dennis W. Wolan, Phil S. Baran, Philip E. Dawson. Synthetic Elaboration of Native DNA by RASS (SENDR). ACS Central Science 2020, 6 (10) , 1789-1799. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.0c00680
    78. Sandeep Palvai, Jasmine Bhangu, Burcin Akgun, Christopher T. Moody, Dennis G. Hall, Yevgeny Brudno. In Vivo Targeting Using Arylboronate/Nopoldiol Click Conjugation. Bioconjugate Chemistry 2020, 31 (10) , 2288-2292. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.0c00453
    79. Yanira Méndez, Aldrin V. Vasco, Ana R. Humpierre, Bernhard Westermann. Isonitriles: Versatile Handles for the Bioorthogonal Functionalization of Proteins. ACS Omega 2020, 5 (40) , 25505-25510. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c03728
    80. Jerrin Thomas George, Mohd. Azhar, Meghali Aich, Dipanjali Sinha, Uddhav B. Ambi, Souvik Maiti, Debojyoti Chakraborty, Seergazhi G. Srivatsan. Terminal Uridylyl Transferase Mediated Site-Directed Access to Clickable Chromatin Employing CRISPR-dCas9. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2020, 142 (32) , 13954-13965. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.0c06541
    81. Julia Moschny, Wolfram Lorenzen, Alexandra Hilfer, Robert Eckenstaler, Stefan Jahns, Heike Enke, Dan Enke, Philipp Schneider, Ralf A. Benndorf, Timo H. J. Niedermeyer. Precursor-Directed Biosynthesis and Fluorescence Labeling of Clickable Microcystins. Journal of Natural Products 2020, 83 (6) , 1960-1970. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jnatprod.0c00251
    82. Miguel Macias-Contreras, Huan He, Kevin N. Little, Justin P. Lee, Ryan P. Campbell, Maksim Royzen, Lei Zhu. SNAP/CLIP-Tags and Strain-Promoted Azide–Alkyne Cycloaddition (SPAAC)/Inverse Electron Demand Diels–Alder (IEDDA) for Intracellular Orthogonal/Bioorthogonal Labeling. Bioconjugate Chemistry 2020, 31 (5) , 1370-1381. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.0c00107
    83. Jordi Agramunt, Rebecca Ginesi, Enrique Pedroso, Anna Grandas. Inverse Electron-Demand Diels–Alder Bioconjugation Reactions Using 7-Oxanorbornenes as Dienophiles. The Journal of Organic Chemistry 2020, 85 (10) , 6593-6604. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.0c00583
    84. Eduardo Ruivo, Filipe Elvas, Karuna Adhikari, Christel Vangestel, Glenn Van Haesendonck, Filip Lemière, Steven Staelens, Sigrid Stroobants, Pieter Van der Veken, Leonie wyffels, Koen Augustyns. Preclinical Evaluation of a Novel 18F-Labeled dTCO-Amide Derivative for Bioorthogonal Pretargeted Positron Emission Tomography Imaging. ACS Omega 2020, 5 (9) , 4449-4456. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b03584
    85. Wenqi Yu, Rui Liu, Yang Zhou, Huile Gao. Size-Tunable Strategies for a Tumor Targeted Drug Delivery System. ACS Central Science 2020, 6 (2) , 100-116. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.9b01139
    86. Mary R. Adams, Christopher T. Moody, Jennifer L. Sollinger, Yevgeny Brudno. Extracellular-Matrix-Anchored Click Motifs for Specific Tissue Targeting. Molecular Pharmaceutics 2020, 17 (2) , 392-403. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.9b00589
    87. M. Soledad Garre, Raúl Losantos, Sara Gutiérrez, David Sucunza, Patricia García-García, Diego Sampedro, Juan J. Vaquero. Synthesis and Photophysical Behavior of a Highly Fluorescent Family of Unsymmetrical Organoboron Complexes Containing 5-(Pyridin-2-ylmethylene)imidazolidine-2,4-dione Moieties. The Journal of Organic Chemistry 2020, 85 (2) , 441-448. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.9b02451
    88. Suttipong Suttapitugsakul, Fangxu Sun, Ronghu Wu. Recent Advances in Glycoproteomic Analysis by Mass Spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry 2020, 92 (1) , 267-291. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.9b04651
    89. Shuang Song Kaitlyn Ngo Kathryn Uhrich . Green Chemistry Principles In Advancing Hierarchical Functionalization of Polymer-Based Nanomedicines. 2020, 135-157. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2020-1372.ch008
    90. Yulin Tian, Qing Lin. Fitness Factors for Bioorthogonal Chemical Probes. ACS Chemical Biology 2019, 14 (12) , 2489-2496. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschembio.9b00755
    91. Rebecca J. B. Schäfer, Mattia R. Monaco, Mao Li, Alina Tirla, Pablo Rivera-Fuentes, Helma Wennemers. The Bioorthogonal Isonitrile–Chlorooxime Ligation. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2019, 141 (47) , 18644-18648. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b07632
    92. Gaochan Wu, Tong Zhao, Dongwei Kang, Jian Zhang, Yuning Song, Vigneshwaran Namasivayam, Jacob Kongsted, Christophe Pannecouque, Erik De Clercq, Vasanthanathan Poongavanam, Xinyong Liu, Peng Zhan. Overview of Recent Strategic Advances in Medicinal Chemistry. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2019, 62 (21) , 9375-9414. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b00359
    93. Valerio Sabatino, Johannes G. Rebelein, Thomas R. Ward. “Close-to-Release”: Spontaneous Bioorthogonal Uncaging Resulting from Ring-Closing Metathesis. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2019, 141 (43) , 17048-17052. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b07193
    94. Sen Yang, Shuangyu Zhu, Dengfu Lu, Yuefa Gong. Polarity-Reversed Addition of Enol Ethers to Imines under Visible Light: Redox-Neutral Access to Azide-Containing Amino Acids. Organic Letters 2019, 21 (20) , 8464-8468. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.orglett.9b03238
    95. Han Gu, Saptarshi Ghosh, Richard J. Staples, Susan L. Bane. β-Hydroxy-Stabilized Boron–Nitrogen Heterocycles Enable Rapid and Efficient C-Terminal Protein Modification. Bioconjugate Chemistry 2019, 30 (10) , 2604-2613. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.9b00534
    96. Evan B. Glass, Shirin Masjedi, Stephanie O. Dudzinski, Andrew J. Wilson, Craig L. Duvall, Fiona E. Yull, Todd D. Giorgio. Optimizing Mannose “Click” Conjugation to Polymeric Nanoparticles for Targeted siRNA Delivery to Human and Murine Macrophages. ACS Omega 2019, 4 (16) , 16756-16767. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b01465
    97. Elena Petit, Lluís Bosch, Anna M. Costa, Jaume Vilarrasa. (Z)-Oxopropene-1,3-diyl, a Linker for the Conjugation of the Thiol Group of Cysteine with Amino-Derivatized Drugs. The Journal of Organic Chemistry 2019, 84 (17) , 11170-11176. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.8b02686
    98. Ulrike Reisacher, Bastian Groitl, Ralf Strasser, Gergely B. Cserép, Péter Kele, Hans-Achim Wagenknecht. Triazine-Modified 7-Deaza-2′-deoxyadenosines: Better Suited for Bioorthogonal Labeling of DNA by PCR than 2′-Deoxyuridines. Bioconjugate Chemistry 2019, 30 (6) , 1773-1780. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.9b00295
    99. Tyler K. Heiss, Jennifer A. Prescher. Cyclopropeniminium Ions Exhibit Unique Reactivity Profiles with Bioorthogonal Phosphines. The Journal of Organic Chemistry 2019, 84 (11) , 7443-7448. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.9b00518
    100. Yuanwei Dai, Jiaping Weng, Justin George, Huan Chen, Qishan Lin, Jun Wang, Maksim Royzen, Qiang Zhang. Three-Component Protein Modification Using Mercaptobenzaldehyde Derivatives. Organic Letters 2019, 21 (10) , 3828-3833. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.orglett.9b01294
    Load more citations

    ACS Central Science

    Cite this: ACS Cent. Sci. 2018, 4, 8, 952–959
    Click to copy citationCitation copied!
    https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.8b00251
    Published July 23, 2018

    Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

    Article Views

    47k

    Altmetric

    -

    Citations

    Learn about these metrics

    Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

    Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

    The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

    • Abstract

      Figure 1

      Figure 1. (A) Examples of bioorthogonal functional groups and their approximate molecular weights. (B) Mutually orthogonal bioorthogonal reactions for metabolic imaging. Tetrazines and cyclooctynes can selectively label cyclopropenes and azides, respectively. In this instance, the application is to visualize metabolic incorporation of two different sugars onto cell surface glycans. Image reproduced from ref (30).

      Figure 2

      Figure 2. Assembling bioactive molecules in situ using bioorthogonal reactions. (A) A target biomolecule such as an enzyme can bind to two fragments bearing bioorthogonal functional groups. If the fragments are bound such that the functional groups are brought into close proximity to one another, reaction occurs, and a tighter binding compound is formed. This method has been used for in situ discovery of enzyme inhibitors, but it will be interesting to see if such reactions can take place within living cells and in vivo. (B) Researchers have used bioorthogonal reactions to form druglike molecules inside cells. Here, a heterobifunctional compound is formed by tetrazine ligation which enables the degradation of BRD4 through the ubiquitin pathway. Figure reproduced from ref (39).

      Figure 3

      Figure 3. General examples of bioorthogonal uncaging reactions. Dienophiles act to mask functional groups such as amines and alcohols. Upon bioorthogonal reaction with tetrazine, the functional group is released. This enables the uncaging of drugs, imaging agents, and even enzymes.

      Figure 4

      Figure 4. Bioorthogonal pretargeted therapy. Cartoon depicting the direct versus multistep labeling approach. (A) Target cells (blue) are exposed to an affinity ligand directly modified by a chemotherapeutic or imaging agent. The affinity ligand binds, but an excess of long circulating affinity ligand persists, contributing to toxicity or background signal. The latter problem prevents the use of short-lived radioisotopes (e.g., fluorine-18) with commonly used affinity ligands such as antibodies. (B) In the multistep approach, an affinity ligand directly connected to a nontherapeutic bioorthogonally reactive element (trans-cyclooctene) is delivered. Again, background is initially high, but this background is inactive. After time has passed to allow for clearance, a small molecule that reacts with the affinity ligand (tetrazine) and possesses a chemotherapeutic or imaging agent is delivered. The small molecule reacts rapidly with available trans-cyclooctene. The molecule also clears rapidly due to its small size thus lowering background side effects or signal.

    • References


      This article references 70 other publications.

      1. 1
        Hang, H. C.; Yu, C.; Kato, D. L.; Bertozzi, C. R. A metabolic labeling approach toward proteomic analysis of mucin-type O-linked glycosylation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2003, 100, 1484614851,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2335201100
      2. 2
        Bertozzi, C. R. A decade of bioorthogonal chemistry. Acc. Chem. Res. 2011, 44, 651653,  DOI: 10.1021/ar200193f
      3. 3
        Sletten, E. M.; Bertozzi, C. R. Bioorthogonal chemistry: fishing for selectivity in a sea of functionality. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 69746998,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.200900942
      4. 4
        Baskin, J. M.; Prescher, J. A.; Laughlin, S. T.; Agard, N. J.; Chang, P. V.; Miller, I. A.; Lo, A.; Codelli, J. A.; Bertozzi, C. R. Copper-free click chemistry for dynamic in vivo imaging. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2007, 104, 1679316797,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0707090104
      5. 5
        Laughlin, S. T.; Baskin, J. M.; Amacher, S. L.; Bertozzi, C. R. In vivo imaging of membrane-associated glycans in developing zebrafish. Science 2008, 320, 664667,  DOI: 10.1126/science.1155106
      6. 6
        Agarwal, P.; Beahm, B. J.; Shieh, P.; Bertozzi, C. R. Systemic Fluorescence Imaging of Zebrafish Glycans with Bioorthogonal Chemistry. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 1150411510,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201504249
      7. 7
        Oller-Salvia, B.; Kym, G.; Chin, J. W. Rapid and Efficient Generation of Stable Antibody-Drug Conjugates via an Encoded Cyclopropene and an Inverse-Electron-Demand Diels-Alder Reaction. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 28312834,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201712370
      8. 8
        Devaraj, N. K.; Thurber, G. M.; Keliher, E. J.; Marinelli, B.; Weissleder, R. Reactive polymer enables efficient in vivo bioorthogonal chemistry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2012, 109, 47624767,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1113466109
      9. 9
        Antonow, D. Fragment-based approaches and the prospect of fragmented prodrugs. Drug Discovery Today 2010, 15, 801803,  DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2010.08.015
      10. 10
        Zengeya, T. T.; Garlick, J. M.; Kulkarni, R. A.; Miley, M.; Roberts, A. M.; Yang, Y.; Crooks, D. R.; Sourbier, C.; Linehan, W. M.; Meier, J. L. Co-opting a Bioorthogonal Reaction for Oncometabolite Detection. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 1581315816,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.6b09706
      11. 11
        Patterson, D. M.; Prescher, J. A. Orthogonal bioorthogonal chemistries. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2015, 28, 141149,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2015.07.006
      12. 12
        Yu, J.; Shen, D.; Zhang, H.; Yin, Z. Rapid, Stoichiometric, Site-Specific Modification of Aldehyde-Containing Proteins Using a Tandem Knoevenagel-Intra Michael Addition Reaction. Bioconjugate Chem. 2018, 29, 10161020,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.8b00086
      13. 13
        An, P.; Lewandowski, T. M.; Erbay, T. G.; Liu, P.; Lin, Q. Sterically Shielded, Stabilized Nitrile Imine for Rapid Bioorthogonal Protein Labeling in Live Cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 48604868,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.8b00126
      14. 14
        Matsuo, K.; Nishikawa, Y.; Masuda, M.; Hamachi, I. Live-Cell Protein Sulfonylation Based on Proximity-driven N-Sulfonyl Pyridone Chemistry. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 659662,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201707972
      15. 15
        Fang, Y. Z.; Zhang, H.; Huang, Z.; Scinto, S. L.; Yang, J. C.; Ende, C. W. A.; Dmitrenko, O.; Johnson, D. S.; Fox, J. M. Photochemical syntheses, transformations, and bioorthogonal chemistry of trans-cycloheptene and sila trans-cycloheptene Ag(I) complexes. Chem. Sci. 2018, 9, 19531963,  DOI: 10.1039/C7SC04773H
      16. 16
        Blackman, M. L.; Royzen, M.; Fox, J. M. Tetrazine ligation: fast bioconjugation based on inverse-electron-demand Diels-Alder reactivity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 1351813519,  DOI: 10.1021/ja8053805
      17. 17
        Devaraj, N. K.; Upadhyay, R.; Haun, J. B.; Hilderbrand, S. A.; Weissleder, R. Fast and sensitive pretargeted labeling of cancer cells through a tetrazine/trans-cyclooctene cycloaddition. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 70137016,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.200903233
      18. 18
        Agard, N. J.; Baskin, J. M.; Prescher, J. A.; Lo, A.; Bertozzi, C. R. A comparative study of bioorthogonal reactions with azides. ACS Chem. Biol. 2006, 1, 644648,  DOI: 10.1021/cb6003228
      19. 19
        Dommerholt, J.; van Rooijen, O.; Borrmann, A.; Guerra, C. F.; Bickelhaupt, F. M.; van Delft, F. L. Highly accelerated inverse electron-demand cycloaddition of electron-deficient azides with aliphatic cyclooctynes. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5378,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6378
      20. 20
        Kamber, D. N.; Liang, Y.; Blizzard, R. J.; Liu, F.; Mehl, R. A.; Houk, K. N.; Prescher, J. A. 1,2,4-Triazines Are Versatile Bioorthogonal Reagents. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 83888391,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.5b05100
      21. 21
        Hoffmann, J. E.; Plass, T.; Nikic, I.; Aramburu, I. V.; Koehler, C.; Gillandt, H.; Lemke, E. A.; Schultz, C. Highly Stable trans-Cyclooctene Amino Acids for Live-Cell Labeling. Chem. - Eur. J. 2015, 21, 1226612270,  DOI: 10.1002/chem.201501647
      22. 22
        Rossin, R.; van den Bosch, S. M.; Ten Hoeve, W.; Carvelli, M.; Versteegen, R. M.; Lub, J.; Robillard, M. S. Highly reactive trans-cyclooctene tags with improved stability for Diels-Alder chemistry in living systems. Bioconjugate Chem. 2013, 24, 12101217,  DOI: 10.1021/bc400153y
      23. 23
        Sletten, E. M.; Bertozzi, C. R. From mechanism to mouse: a tale of two bioorthogonal reactions. Acc. Chem. Res. 2011, 44, 666676,  DOI: 10.1021/ar200148z
      24. 24
        Link, A. J.; Vink, M. K.; Tirrell, D. A. Presentation and detection of azide functionality in bacterial cell surface proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 1059810602,  DOI: 10.1021/ja047629c
      25. 25
        Tian, F.; Tsao, M. L.; Schultz, P. G. A phage display system with unnatural amino acids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 1596215963,  DOI: 10.1021/ja045673m
      26. 26
        Yang, J.; Seckute, J.; Cole, C. M.; Devaraj, N. K. Live-cell imaging of cyclopropene tags with fluorogenic tetrazine cycloadditions. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 74767479,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201202122
      27. 27
        Patterson, D. M.; Nazarova, L. A.; Xie, B.; Kamber, D. N.; Prescher, J. A. Functionalized cyclopropenes as bioorthogonal chemical reporters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 1863818643,  DOI: 10.1021/ja3060436
      28. 28
        Andersen, K. A.; Aronoff, M. R.; McGrath, N. A.; Raines, R. T. Diazo groups endure metabolism and enable chemoselectivity in cellulo. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 24122415,  DOI: 10.1021/ja5095815
      29. 29
        Karver, M. R.; Weissleder, R.; Hilderbrand, S. A. Bioorthogonal reaction pairs enable simultaneous, selective, multi-target imaging. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 920922,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201104389
      30. 30
        Cole, C. M.; Yang, J.; Seckute, J.; Devaraj, N. K. Fluorescent live-cell imaging of metabolically incorporated unnatural cyclopropene-mannosamine derivatives. ChemBioChem 2013, 14, 205208,  DOI: 10.1002/cbic.201200719
      31. 31
        Spate, A. K.; Busskamp, H.; Niederwieser, A.; Schart, V. F.; Marx, A.; Wittmann, V. Rapid labeling of metabolically engineered cell-surface glycoconjugates with a carbamate-linked cyclopropene reporter. Bioconjugate Chem. 2014, 25, 147154,  DOI: 10.1021/bc4004487
      32. 32
        Sachdeva, A.; Wang, K.; Elliott, T.; Chin, J. W. Concerted, rapid, quantitative, and site-specific dual labeling of proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 77857788,  DOI: 10.1021/ja4129789
      33. 33
        Rideout, D. Self-assembling cytotoxins. Science 1986, 233, 561563,  DOI: 10.1126/science.3523757
      34. 34
        Murray, C. W.; Rees, D. C. The rise of fragment-based drug discovery. Nat. Chem. 2009, 1, 187192,  DOI: 10.1038/nchem.217
      35. 35
        Thirumurugan, P.; Matosiuk, D.; Jozwiak, K. Click chemistry for drug development and diverse chemical-biology applications. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 49054979,  DOI: 10.1021/cr200409f
      36. 36
        Lewis, W. G.; Green, L. G.; Grynszpan, F.; Radic, Z.; Carlier, P. R.; Taylor, P.; Finn, M. G.; Sharpless, K. B. Click chemistry in situ: acetylcholinesterase as a reaction vessel for the selective assembly of a femtomolar inhibitor from an array of building blocks. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 10531057,  DOI: 10.1002/1521-3773(20020315)41:6<1053::AID-ANIE1053>3.0.CO;2-4
      37. 37
        Mocharla, V. P.; Colasson, B.; Lee, L. V.; Roper, S.; Sharpless, K. B.; Wong, C. H.; Kolb, H. C. In situ click chemistry: enzyme-generated inhibitors of carbonic anhydrase II. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 116120,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.200461580
      38. 38
        Whiting, M.; Muldoon, J.; Lin, Y. C.; Silverman, S. M.; Lindstrom, W.; Olson, A. J.; Kolb, H. C.; Finn, M. G.; Sharpless, K. B.; Elder, J. H.; Fokin, V. V. Inhibitors of HIV-1 protease by using in situ click chemistry. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 14351439,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.200502161
      39. 39
        Devaraj, N. K.; Weissleder, R. Biomedical applications of tetrazine cycloadditions. Acc. Chem. Res. 2011, 44, 816827,  DOI: 10.1021/ar200037t
      40. 40
        Lebraud, H.; Wright, D. J.; Johnson, C. N.; Heightman, T. D. Protein Degradation by In-Cell Self-Assembly of Proteolysis Targeting Chimeras. ACS Cent. Sci. 2016, 2, 927934,  DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.6b00280
      41. 41
        Versteegen, R. M.; Rossin, R.; ten Hoeve, W.; Janssen, H. M.; Robillard, M. S. Click to release: instantaneous doxorubicin elimination upon tetrazine ligation. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 1411214116,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201305969
      42. 42
        Xu, M.; Tu, J.; Franzini, R. M. Rapid and efficient tetrazine-induced drug release from highly stable benzonorbornadiene derivatives. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 62716274,  DOI: 10.1039/C7CC03477F
      43. 43
        Neumann, K.; Jain, S.; Gambardella, A.; Walker, S. E.; Valero, E.; Lilienkampf, A.; Bradley, M. Tetrazine-Responsive Self-immolative Linkers. ChemBioChem 2017, 18, 9195,  DOI: 10.1002/cbic.201600560
      44. 44
        Jimenez-Moreno, E.; Guo, Z.; Oliveira, B. L.; Albuquerque, I. S.; Kitowski, A.; Guerreiro, A.; Boutureira, O.; Rodrigues, T.; Jimenez-Oses, G.; Bernardes, G. J. Vinyl Ether/Tetrazine Pair for the Traceless Release of Alcohols in Cells. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 243247,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201609607
      45. 45
        Mejia Oneto, J. M.; Khan, I.; Seebald, L.; Royzen, M. In Vivo Bioorthogonal Chemistry Enables Local Hydrogel and Systemic Pro-Drug To Treat Soft Tissue Sarcoma. ACS Cent. Sci. 2016, 2, 476482,  DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.6b00150
      46. 46
        Zhang, G.; Li, J.; Xie, R.; Fan, X.; Liu, Y.; Zheng, S.; Ge, Y.; Chen, P. R. Bioorthogonal Chemical Activation of Kinases in Living Systems. ACS Cent. Sci. 2016, 2, 325331,  DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.6b00024
      47. 47
        Li, J.; Jia, S.; Chen, P. R. Diels-Alder reaction-triggered bioorthogonal protein decaging in living cells. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2014, 10, 10031005,  DOI: 10.1038/nchembio.1656
      48. 48
        Wu, H.; Alexander, S. C.; Jin, S.; Devaraj, N. K. A Bioorthogonal Near-Infrared Fluorogenic Probe for mRNA Detection. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 1142911432,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.6b01625
      49. 49
        Ji, X.; Zhou, C.; Ji, K.; Aghoghovbia, R. E.; Pan, Z.; Chittavong, V.; Ke, B.; Wang, B. Click and Release: A Chemical Strategy toward Developing Gasotransmitter Prodrugs by Using an Intramolecular Diels-Alder Reaction. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 1584615851,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201608732
      50. 50
        Carlson, J. C. T.; Mikula, H.; Weissleder, R. Unraveling Tetrazine-Triggered Bioorthogonal Elimination Enables Chemical Tools for Ultrafast Release and Universal Cleavage. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 36033612,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b11217
      51. 51
        El-Sagheer, A. H.; Brown, T. Synthesis and polymerase chain reaction amplification of DNA strands containing an unnatural triazole linkage. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 39583964,  DOI: 10.1021/ja8065896
      52. 52
        Budin, I.; Devaraj, N. K. Membrane assembly driven by a biomimetic coupling reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 751753,  DOI: 10.1021/ja2076873
      53. 53
        Cendret, V.; Francois-Heude, M.; Mendez-Ardoy, A.; Moreau, V.; Fernandez, J. M.; Djedaini-Pilard, F. Design and synthesis of a ″click″ high-mannose oligosaccharide mimic emulating Man8 binding affinity towards Con A. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 37333735,  DOI: 10.1039/c2cc30773a
      54. 54
        Dawson, P. E.; Muir, T. W.; Clark-Lewis, I.; Kent, S. B. Synthesis of proteins by native chemical ligation. Science 1994, 266, 776779,  DOI: 10.1126/science.7973629
      55. 55
        de Figueiredo, R. M.; Suppo, J. S.; Campagne, J. M. Nonclassical Routes for Amide Bond Formation. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 1202912122,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00237
      56. 56
        Nilsson, B. L.; Kiessling, L. L.; Raines, R. T. High-yielding Staudinger ligation of a phosphinothioester and azide to form a peptide. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 912,  DOI: 10.1021/ol006739v
      57. 57
        Saxon, E.; Armstrong, J. I.; Bertozzi, C. R. A ″traceless″ Staudinger ligation for the chemoselective synthesis of amide bonds. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 21412143,  DOI: 10.1021/ol006054v
      58. 58
        Erben, A.; Grossmann, T. N.; Seitz, O. DNA-triggered synthesis and bioactivity of proapoptotic peptides. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 28282832,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201007103
      59. 59
        Noda, H.; Eros, G.; Bode, J. W. Rapid ligations with equimolar reactants in water with the potassium acyltrifluoroborate (KAT) amide formation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 56115614,  DOI: 10.1021/ja5018442
      60. 60
        Rudd, A. K.; Devaraj, N. K. Traceless Synthesis of Ceramides in Living Cells Reveals Saturation-Dependent Apoptotic Effects. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA , 2018, In Press. DOI:  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1804266115 .
      61. 61
        Mehl, R. A.; Anderson, J. C.; Santoro, S. W.; Wang, L.; Martin, A. B.; King, D. S.; Horn, D. M.; Schultz, P. G. Generation of a bacterium with a 21 amino acid genetic code. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 935939,  DOI: 10.1021/ja0284153
      62. 62
        Bohannon, M. B.; Kleiman, R. Cyclopropene fatty acids of selected seed oils from bombacaceae, malvaceae, and sterculiaceae. Lipids 1978, 13, 270273,  DOI: 10.1007/BF02533669
      63. 63
        Bao, X.; Katz, S.; Pollard, M.; Ohlrogge, J. Carbocyclic fatty acids in plants: biochemical and molecular genetic characterization of cyclopropane fatty acid synthesis of Sterculiafoetida. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2002, 99, 71727177,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.092152999
      64. 64
        Chen, K.; Huang, X.; Kan, S. B. J.; Zhang, R. K.; Arnold, F. H. Enzymatic construction of highly strained carbocycles. Science 2018, 360, 7175,  DOI: 10.1126/science.aar4239
      65. 65
        Lappchen, T.; Rossin, R.; van Mourik, T. R.; Gruntz, G.; Hoeben, F. J. M.; Versteegen, R. M.; Janssen, H. M.; Lub, J.; Robillard, M. S. DOTA-tetrazine probes with modified linkers for tumor pretargeting. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2017, 55, 1926,  DOI: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2017.09.001
      66. 66
        Houghton, J. L.; Membreno, R.; Abdel-Atti, D.; Cunanan, K. M.; Carlin, S.; Scholz, W. W.; Zanzonico, P. B.; Lewis, J. S.; Zeglis, B. M. Establishment of the In Vivo Efficacy of Pretargeted Radioimmunotherapy Utilizing Inverse Electron Demand Diels-Alder Click Chemistry. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2017, 16, 124133,  DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-16-0503
      67. 67
        Goodwin, D. A.; Meares, C. F.; McCall, M. J.; McTigue, M.; Chaovapong, W. Pre-targeted immunoscintigraphy of murine tumors with indium-111-labeled bifunctional haptens. J. Nucl. Med. 1988, 29 (2), 226234
      68. 68
        Zeglis, B. M.; Sevak, K. K.; Reiner, T.; Mohindra, P.; Carlin, S. D.; Zanzonico, P.; Weissleder, R.; Lewis, J. S. A pretargeted PET imaging strategy based on bioorthogonal Diels-Alder click chemistry. J. Nucl. Med. 2013, 54, 13891396,  DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.112.115840
      69. 69
        Rossin, R.; Verkerk, P. R.; van den Bosch, S. M.; Vulders, R. C.; Verel, I.; Lub, J.; Robillard, M. S. In vivo chemistry for pretargeted tumor imaging in live mice. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 33753378,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.200906294
      70. 70
        Devaraj, N. K.; Weissleder, R.; Hilderbrand, S. A. Tetrazine-based cycloadditions: application to pretargeted live cell imaging. Bioconjugate Chem. 2008, 19, 22972299,  DOI: 10.1021/bc8004446