ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Potentially Poisonous Plastic Particles: Microplastics as a Vector for Cyanobacterial Toxins Microcystin-LR and Microcystin-LF
My Activity

Figure 1Loading Img
  • Open Access
Contaminants in Aquatic and Terrestrial Environments

Potentially Poisonous Plastic Particles: Microplastics as a Vector for Cyanobacterial Toxins Microcystin-LR and Microcystin-LF
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

  • Carlos J. Pestana*
    Carlos J. Pestana
    School of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, Robert Gordon University, Sir Ian Wood Building, Garthdee Road, Aberdeen AB10 7GJ, U.K.
    *Email: [email protected]. Tel.: +44 1224 262847.
  • Diana S. Moura
    Diana S. Moura
    School of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, Robert Gordon University, Sir Ian Wood Building, Garthdee Road, Aberdeen AB10 7GJ, U.K.
    Department of Hydraulic and Environmental Engineering, Federal University of Ceará, Avenida Humberto Monte, Pici Campus Block 713 (first floor), Fortaleza, Ceará 60440-593, Brazil
  • José Capelo-Neto
    José Capelo-Neto
    Department of Hydraulic and Environmental Engineering, Federal University of Ceará, Avenida Humberto Monte, Pici Campus Block 713 (first floor), Fortaleza, Ceará 60440-593, Brazil
  • Christine Edwards
    Christine Edwards
    School of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, Robert Gordon University, Sir Ian Wood Building, Garthdee Road, Aberdeen AB10 7GJ, U.K.
  • Domenic Dreisbach
    Domenic Dreisbach
    Institute of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry, Justus Liebig University, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 17, Giessen D-35392, Germany
  • Bernhard Spengler
    Bernhard Spengler
    Institute of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry, Justus Liebig University, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 17, Giessen D-35392, Germany
  • Linda A. Lawton
    Linda A. Lawton
    School of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, Robert Gordon University, Sir Ian Wood Building, Garthdee Road, Aberdeen AB10 7GJ, U.K.
Open PDFSupporting Information (1)

Environmental Science & Technology

Cite this: Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 55, 23, 15940–15949
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c05796
Published November 10, 2021

Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0 .

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The potential of microplastics to act as a vector for micropollutants of natural or anthropogenic origin is of rising concern. Cyanobacterial toxins, including microcystins, are harmful to humans and wildlife. In this study, we demonstrate for the first time the potential of microplastics to act as vectors for two different microcystin analogues. A concentration of up to 28 times from water to plastic was observed for the combination of polystyrene and microcystin-LF achieving toxin concentrations on the plastic of 142 ± 7 μg g–1. Based on the experimental results, and assuming a worst-case scenario, potential toxin doses for daphnids are calculated based on published microplastic ingestion data. Progressing up through trophic levels, theoretically, the concentration of microcystins in organisms is discussed. The experimental results indicate that adsorption of microcystins onto microplastics is a multifactorial process, depending on the particle size, the variable amino acid composition of the microcystins, the type of plastic, and pH. Furthermore, the results of the current study stressed the limitations of exclusively investigating microcystin-LR (the most commonly studied microcystin congener) as a model compound representing a group of around 250 reported microcystin congeners.

This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0 .
  • cc licence
  • by licence
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society

Synopsis

Microplastics may act as transportation vehicles for highly toxic blue-green algal metabolites in the food web.

Introduction

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Plastics are ubiquitous in the world with estimated 299 million tonnes produced in 2013. (1) According to Plastics Europe, (2) 80% of plastics produced are polyethylene, polyvinyl chloride, polystyrene, polyethylene terephthalate, polypropylene, and polyurethane. At the end of their life cycle, most plastics will enter the environment. Consumer plastic waste can enter wastewater treatment plants, where breakthrough can occur leading to plastic particles reaching the freshwater environment. (1) Larger plastic particles are reduced by physical, chemical, and biological processes; (3) plastic particles thus reduced to sizes of ≤5 mm (in all dimensions) are considered microplastics. Another source of microplastics are particles originally manufactured in microplastic dimensions, for example, beads for abrasive blasting used in coatings and paints. Microplastic occurrence in aquatic systems globally has been recognized as an environmental risk factor (4−8) as it has been found that microplastic particles can be contaminated with organic pollutants. (9) Microplastics act as mobile reservoirs of toxic compounds due to their high surface-to-volume ratio. Adsorption is a surface process and therefore a high surface-to-volume ratio favors adsorption of increased amounts of pollutants. (9−11) Microplastics, including any adsorbed contaminants, can enter the food web by ingestion by aquatic organisms such as fish, zooplankton, and crustaceans where desorption in the gut can lead to bioaccumulation of the contaminants in the food web. (7)
Cyanobacteria and their secondary metabolites are encountered in most aquatic systems globally. During blooms, seasonal or perennial mass occurrences of cyanobacteria, high concentrations of potentially toxic secondary metabolites can be detected in the surrounding water. (12) Evidence suggests that with increasing global warming, the frequency and intensity of blooms will increase. (13,14) One of the most frequently reported groups of cyanobacterial toxins is microcystins (MCs) with over 240 congeners. (15) MCs are hepatotoxic heptapeptides with two variable amino acids that inhibit protein phosphatases and can act as tumor promoters. Different congeners of MC display different chemical behaviors due to their amino acid composition and other chemical differences such as (de)methylation. MC-LR is one of the most commonly reported analogues; however, MC-LF is of increasing concern as it presents similar toxicity but is more hydrophobic and thus more readily enters the target organs (Figure 1). (16−20)

Figure 1

Figure 1. Chemical structures of the two MC congeners used in the present study (MC-LR left and MC-LF right) with variable amino acids indicating leucine (blue) and arginine (green) (MC-LR) and leucine (blue) and phenylalanine (red) (MC-LF). (21,22) The variable amino acids within the MC structure are largely responsible for the overall hydrophobicity of the congener.

The World Health Organization (WHO) has set a recommended maximum allowable level of 1 μg L–1 of total MCs in potable water. (23,24) Currently, little is known about the partitioning of MCs on microplastics. MC-contaminated microplastics could pose a significant environmental risk acting as a concentration vehicle and unlike other natural particulates and sediment microplastics can be mistaken as food by aquatic biota representing a gateway into the food web via ingestion by aquatic organisms.
With increased frequency of toxic cyanobacterial blooms and increasing microplastic presence in freshwater systems, it stands to reason that co-occurrence of microplastic particles and MCs frequently takes place.
Thus, the current study sets out to determine, for the first time, if microplastic particles can act as a vector for MCs. Four different plastics (polystyrene [PS], polyvinyl chloride [PVC], polyethylene [PE], and polyethylene terephthalate [PET]) were exposed to two MC congeners (MC-LR and MC-LF). The effects of pH, exposure time, and particle size were evaluated. Furthermore, an estimate of the amount of toxin that could be transported into the food web by microplastics was made.

Materials and Methods

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

All plastics were obtained from Goodfellows Ltd. (UK) and processed to produce microplastics of known sizes. PVC was received as 1 m rods (5 mm diameter) and cut into approximately 5 mm length with stainless steel shears. The remaining three plastics (PS, PE, and PET) were received as pellets (3–5 mm). The material received was characterized by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy (Nicolet iS10, Thermo Fisher Scientific, UK) to confirm the polymers received. All plastics were reduced in size individually in an industrial stainless steel blender (Waring, USA). Size reduction was achieved by pulsing the blender for 20 s with 1–2 min cooling intervals to avoid thermally altering the plastics. Size-reduced plastics were then sieved to three standardized specific particles sizes of >1 mm (and <5 mm), 0.25–0.5 mm, and 0.09–0.125 mm (sieves from Fisher Scientific, UK; sieving apparatus from Retsch Ltd., UK). Artificial freshwater (AFW), used as the experimental medium, was prepared with ultrapure water (18.2 MΩ) and the addition of CaCl2 2H2O (58.5 mg L–1), MgSO4 7H2O (24.7 mg L–1), NaHCO3 (12.0 mg L–1), and KCl (1.2 mg L–1). (25) The pH was adjusted to the required level (pH 2, pH 5, pH 7, pH 9, and pH 11) either with HNO3 or NaOH. MC (LR or LF) solutions (5 μg mL–1) in AFW were prepared and combined with the individual microplastics (10 g L–1). All pH conditions were tested with the three sizes for each plastic and a control sample containing no plastic particles. Samples were continuously horizontally agitated on an orbital shaker at 250 rpm and 25 °C in the dark for 48 h. Samples (100 μL) were extracted with a glass syringe with a stainless steel needle at time points 0, 2, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h and spin-filtered in microcentrifuge filter tubes (0.22 μm cellulose acetate filters, Corning, USA); these polypropylene filter tubes displayed <2% adsorption of MC congeners (data not shown) and were deemed safe for use. Samples were directly analyzed by HPLC-PDA (Section S2.2). Controls containing no microplastics were prepared for all conditions. All experiments and controls were conducted in triplicate. In all experiments, contact between MCs and any types of plastics other than the tested type of microplastic was eliminated.
To confirm the presence of MC-LF on the surface of PS, samples were prepared for 3D surface matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) according to the study of Kompauer et al.; (26) in short, a sample (2 μL) of a suspension containing 10 g L–1 PS (0.09–0.125 mm particle size) that had been exposed to MC-LF for 48 h was applied to a PTFE-coated glass slide and dried for 30 min in a desiccator. A matrix solution of 30 mg mL–1 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid in acetone/water (0.2% TFA) 1:1 v/v was freshly prepared, and a volume of 80 μL was sprayed onto the sample surface with a flow rate of 10 μL min–1 and a rotation of 500 rpm using an ultrafine pneumatic sprayer system (SMALDIPrep, TransMIT GmbH, Germany). 3D optical microscope images of the sample surface were obtained with a Keyence VHX-5000 digital microscope (Keyence Deutschland GmbH, Germany) before and after matrix application. For data acquisition, Xcalibur software on a Q Exactive HF orbital trapping mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific GmbH, Germany) equipped with an AP-SMALDI5 AF (TransMIT GmbH, Germany) MSI system was used. Ion images of selected m/z values were generated using Mirion imaging software (27) with a mass bin width of Δ(m/z) = 0.01. MS images were normalized to the highest intensity measured for each ion separately. No further image processing steps such as smoothing, interpolation, or TIC normalization were employed.
The zeta potential of the plastics in the experimental medium under pH 3–10 was measured using a Malvern Zetasizer instrument (Nano ZS, UK, Table S3).
A t-test was performed to determine significance testing (Supporting Information S6). Pearson correlation (R2) was used to evaluate the relationship between the variables. For all statistical tests, a significance level (p value) of 5% was set.

Results and Discussion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Microplastics are encountered in aquatic systems globally, (2,28) and a number of studies (4−8,29,30) have demonstrated that microplastics can act as a vehicle for the concentration of organic pollutants such as pyrene, phenanthrene, bis-2-ethylhxyl phthalate, and dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane. In the present study, we were able to demonstrate that three sizes of microplastics, small (0.09–0.125 mm), medium (0.25–0.5 mm), and large size (>1 mm), can also act as a concentration vehicle for MCs (Figure 2). Throughout the study, adsorption of MC was determined by the reduction in the MC concentration in solution compared to controls without microplastics. Typically used in biomedical science, MALDI MSI provides untargeted and label-free analysis of various molecular classes in the spatial context of tissues and cells. Here, recent technical developments in 3D surface MALDI MSI (26) were utilized to confirm the adsorption of MC congeners on plastic surfaces.

Figure 2

Figure 2. 3D surface MALDI MSI of MC-LF adsorbed to the PS microplastic. (a) Optical microscope image of PS particles before matrix application. (b) MS image showing the spatial distribution of [MC-LF + Na]+ at m/z 1008.5053. (c) Single-pixel mass spectrum for a mass range m/z of 985 to 1025 obtained from the PS microplastic. Three different adducts for MC-LF were labeled with measured mass and mass deviation. MS images were generated with 170 × 174 pixels, a pixel size of 12 μm, and an image bin width of Δ(m/z) = 0.01. The scale bar is 500 μm.

The obtained 3D surface MALDI MSI results clearly show the adsorption of MC-LF on the surface of the PS particles. All three adducts (H+, Na+, and K+) of MC-LF were detected and assigned, based on accurate mass measurements (Figure 2c), showing identical spatial distributions (Figure 2b for [MC-LF + Na]+ and Figure S5 for [MC-LF + H]+ and [MC-LF + K]+). By comparing the optical image with the ion images, the MSI results demonstrate that MC-LF was primarily detected on PS particles, thus unambiguously confirming adsorption to the surface of the plastic particle and directly visualizing MCs adsorbed to the microplastic for the first time.
The adsorption behavior of both MC-LR and MC-LF onto four different microplastics was investigated by monitoring the diminishing toxin concentration in solution, and a control containing no microplastic particles was also analyzed at each pH to monitor the toxin stability at the corresponding pH concentration (Figure 3). The MC-LR concentration was stable under all tested pH concentrations with a maximum toxin loss of 20% at pH 2 and no more than 9% loss at pH 5–11. The MC-LF concentration was also comparatively stable at pH 5–11 with a decrease of no more than 14% over time. At pH 2, the toxin concentration decreased by 43% over the first 6 h of the experiment with a final loss of 44% after 48 h. Harada et al. (31) had previously reported on the detrimental effect of low pH concentrations on the stability of MCs.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Influence of pH on MC-LR and MC-LF adsorption onto PS, PVC, PE, and PET particles of different sizes (>1 mm [red], 0.25–0.50 mm [blue], and 0.009–0.125 mm [yellow]) (Test conditions: 10 g L–1 plastics, 5 μg mL–1 MC, 48 h agitation time, 25 °C, and control [black] contained no microplastic). %RSD ≤ 10%, n = 3.

For MC-LR, equilibrium was achieved after approximately 2 h (pH 5–11) for all three size ranges investigated. After an initial decrease, concentrations remained stable with little to no additional adsorption occurring onto any of the microplastics of any size. At pH 2, equilibrium was only achieved for the large- and medium-sized particles of PS. For all four plastics, the greatest adsorption of MC-LR was observed at pH 2 for the smallest size with the highest adsorption occurring with PE (∼21% at pH 2, p value = 0.02) and the least with PET (∼1% at pH 9, p value = 0.15). At pH 2, the initial concentration rapidly declined over the first 6 h, and this loss is likely caused by a combination of the acidic conditions (decline is mirrored in the control samples─Figure 3) and adsorption to the microplastic particles as the decrease is dependent on the type of the microplastic. For PE and PS, a 20% concentration decrease was observed (compared to 10% in the control); for PVC, the decrease was 17% and for PET 13%, showing greater adsorption to PE and PS.
Adsorption of MC-LF was observed for all four types of plastic with equilibrium achieved by 48 h for most of the large-sized plastics (PE, PET, and PVC), for some of the medium-sized plastics (PVC and PE), and none for any of the small-sized plastic particles. The highest degree of adsorption was observed for the small particle sizes for all plastics at all pH values investigated. Most adsorption occurred onto PS (∼60% at pH 7 when adjusted with the control) and the least onto PET (∼10% at pH 5–11). As was observed for MC-LR at pH 2, there was a rapid initial decrease of the toxin concentration in the first 6 h of the experiment. Most adsorption in this initial phase occurred onto PE (83%) and PS (85%) compared to the control (43%), PVC (76%), and PET (65%), which also showed marked decreases in toxin concentration. With the exception of PET, all microplastic types showed significant differences for the MC-LF concentration at pH 2 compared with the control after 48 h contact. The adsorption of MC-LF follows a similar pattern (rapid initial decrease in toxin concentration followed by a slower decrease) across the other pH concentrations investigated.
During cyanobacterial bloom events, pH in the surrounding water frequently increases to above pH 9. (32) Thus, when focusing on what could be considered the most environmentally relevant pH concentrations of pH 5–9, markedly more MC-LF than MC-LR is adsorbed onto microplastic particles. This becomes particularly apparent when considering the total amounts of MC-LR and MC-LF adsorbed over 48 h (Figure 4).

Figure 4

Figure 4. Effect of particle size and pH on the amount of MC-LR and MC-LF adsorbed onto four different microplastics (green: PET, yellow: PVC, blue: PE, and red: PS) (Test conditions: 10 g L–1 plastics, 5 μg mL–1 MCs, 48 h agitation time, and 25 °C). %RSD ≤ 10%, n = 3.

Across all pH levels, particle sizes, and types of microplastics, more MC-LF than MC-LR was adsorbed in the environmentally relevant range of pH 5–9. On average, 130 μg g–1 MC-LF adsorbed onto the smallest particle size of PS, with 89 μg g–1 MC-LF adsorbed to PE, 99 μg g–1 MC-LF adsorbed onto PVC, and 12 μg g–1 MC-LF adsorbed onto PET, with maximum adsorption of MC-LF of 156 μg g–1 achieved with PS. The maximum adsorption of MC-LR in the environmentally important range (pH 5–9) was achieved with PS at pH 5 (56 μg g–1) and average adsorption of MC-LR was achieved with PS of 28 μg g–1, PE of 8 μg g–1, PVC of 14 μg g–1, and PET of 6 μg g–1. From these results, it is apparent that the hydrophobicity, due to variable amino acid composition of the MC congener, strongly determines the amount of adsorption. (17) In the current study, MC-LR and MC-LF differ in the fact that the arginine (R) in MC-LR is replaced with the more hydrophobic phenylalanine (F) in MC-LF. Therefore, as would be expected, MC-LF adsorbs more readily to the microplastic particles than MC-LR (Table 1 and Figures 1 and 2). Connected to the hydrophobicity of the sorbent, the pH of the surrounding matrix will affect the behavior of the MCs. As de Maagd et al. (33) and McCord et al. (34) have demonstrated, the hydrophobicity of MCs, expressed as the pH-dependent octanol–water partitioning coefficient (DOW), changes as the pH of the test matrix is altered. As the pH decreases, the log10(DOW) as a function of the hydrophobicity increases, increasing the likelihood of the MC analogue to adsorb onto the microplastic. The log10(DOW) of MC-LR increases from −1.2 (pH 7) to 1.67 (pH 2), whereas the log10(DOW) of MC-LF increases from 0.06 (pH 7) to 2.75 (pH 2). (33,34) Increasing adsorption with decreasing surrounding pH was also observed in this investigation (Figures 2 and 3) with maximum adsorption for both MC-LR (small-sized PE: 181.6 μg g–1) and MC-LF (small-sized PET: 187.5 μg g–1) occurring at pH 2. Altaner et al. (35) also found a correlation between the pH of an MC-containing solution and the amount of adsorption onto polypropylene (PP) laboratory pipette tips, observed after repeated use (eight times) of the tip. The more acidic the solution, the more likely MCs adsorbed to the PP pipette tips, similar to the observations made for the microplastics studied in the current investigation. Altaner et al.’s (35) observation is explained with the fact that at low pH, most MCs tend to be positively charged due to carboxyl and guanidine moieties being protonated; (33,34,36,37) while the surface of PE, for example, is negatively charged due to the dissociation of carboxyl groups as part of oxidation processes during polymerization. (38) Similar observations were made by Hyenstrand et al. (37) when they tested adsorption of MC-LR onto laboratory PP tips. According to Kamp et al. (39) the change of surface charge is an important factor affecting the adsorption potential of contaminants on microplastics. The plastics investigated showed a negatively charged surface under all pH values measured (Table S3). Although the surface charge of the microplastics changed under different pH conditions, no correlation between the surface charge of plastics and the adsorption behavior of MC-LR and MC-LF was apparent. In the pH range tested in their study (pH 6–10), pH did not markedly affect the adsorption behavior, which correlates to the observations made for the microplastics investigated in the current study (albeit both studies are not directly comparable). Observations made in the current study are further corroborated by a study testing different materials for MC sampling in which Kamp et al. (39) found that MC-LF more readily adsorbed onto bottles made from a range of plastics (PE, PS, PP, polyethylene terephthalate glycol, and polycarbonate) in drinking water compared to MC-LR at near neutral pH. After 48 h in the study by Hüffer and Hofmann, (40) MC-LR adsorption onto PS and PE occurred to a similar degree (<10% adsorption), while for MC-LF, less adsorption occurred (∼20% adsorption) compared with small-sized microplastics in the current study (PS ∼63% adsorption and PE ∼43% adsorption). Compared to large-sized microplastic particles, greater adsorption was observed by Hüffer and Hofmann, (40) since, in the current study, no adsorption occurred on any of the plastics of size >1–5 mm. However, our investigation and the study by Kamp et al. (39) are again not directly comparable as there were marked differences in the study design (size of the exposed surface, agitation, and temperature during storage).
Table 1. Comparison of Maximum MC-LR and MC-LF Adsorption onto Four Types of Microplasticsa
plasticmaximum MC-LR adsorption (μg g–1)maximum MC-LF adsorption (μg g–1)ASCRTg (°C)
polyethylene terephthalate (PET)0.000.00469
polyethylene (PE)0.8976.641.7–125
polyvinyl chloride (PVC)11.6481.222.781
polystyrene (PS)22.10119.541.8100
a

Experimental conditions: 10 g L–1 plastics, 5 μg mL–1 MCs, pH 7, particle size 0.009–0.125 mm, 48 h, and 25 °C. ASCR (44) is reported in the literature studies (n = 12 studies). For ASCR, a score of 1 indicates the highest sorption capacity and increasing values indicate types of plastics that exhibit lower sorption capacities as reported in the Tg of the polymers used in the current study, (42) giving an indication of the prevalence of amorphous or glassy regions of a given polymer.

While in the majority of cases the highest degree of adsorption was observed for the small particle size, this was not true in all instances (e.g., maximum adsorption of MC-LR onto PVC at pH 2 was observed for the medium-sized particles, Figure 3). As partitioning of organic compounds onto microplastics is a surface process, logic would dictate that the smaller the particle, the higher the potential adsorption that can be achieved. This was largely observed in the present study; however, Hüffer and Hofmann (40) determined that sorption of organic compounds to microplastic particles in aqueous solutions did not exclusively occur according to the particle size as their model sorbents (seven hydrophobic aromatic and nonaromatic hydrocarbons) preferably adsorbed to the largest particle size of PS in their study. Hydrophobicity of the sorbent and π–π interactions between the PS and the model sorbents were proposed as potential explanations for this observation. Hu et al., (41) however, determined increased adsorption as a function of particle size. Their (41) findings are however difficult to compare to the current study or to the study by Hüffer and Hofmann (40) as Hu et al. (41) investigated the adsorption of lubrication oil on micro- and nanoparticulate plastic particles. Hu et al. (41) did not find a significant impact of pH on the partitioning behavior of lubrication oil to either type of microplastic tested (PE and PS), illustrating that in the case of MCs, pH influences the sorbate (MCs) more than the sorbent (microplastics).
As established in the current study, the chemical properties of the adsorbent and the particle size of the receiving material critically affect the adsorption of MCs onto microplastic particles. The type of microplastics showed a strong correlation (R2 > 0.9) regarding adsorption of MC-LR and MC-LF. A further factor is the chemical composition and surface morphology of this receiving material, specifically, in the case of microplastics, whether the surface of the constituent polymer is glassy or amorphous. (42) By far, most adsorption occurs on the amorphous regions of the surface. The glass transition temperature (Tg) of a polymer is a measure of whether a polymer is considered rubber-like or glass-like. If the ambient temperature is higher than the Tg of a given polymer, it is considered rubber-like at that temperature. If the ambient temperature is lower than the Tg of a given polymer, it is considered glass-like. For example, under the experimental conditions of the current study (25 °C), only PE would be considered rubber-like (Table 1). For the other three microplastics, ambient temperature was <Tg; thus, PS, PET, and PVC would be considered glass-like. Guo et al. (43) found that by decreasing the glassiness and increasing the abundance of amorphous sites on PS, the sorption capacity for organic compounds could be increased, confirming that glassiness plays an important part in the reduced partitioning of organic compounds onto microplastics. In a survey of 12 published studies, Alimi et al. (44) have created average sorption capacity ranking (ASCR; from 1 = highest sorption potential to >1 decreasing sorption potential) for key plastics.
The results of the current investigation follow the proposed ASCR (Table 1), especially for MC-LF that showed a strong negative correlation (R2 > −0.8) between the sorption capacity ranking and the adsorption on microplastics. For PET, with an ASCR score of 4, almost no adsorption of either MC analogue could be detected, whereas PS, which has a comparatively low ASCR score of 1.8, showed the greatest adsorption potential for both MC analogues investigated. Despite having a higher ASCR score (2.7 compared to 1.7) than PE, PVC showed similar or higher adsorption of MCs across all samples evaluated. While the ASCR score is derived from a number of studies, there are exceptions for each of the plastics where they display a higher or a lower adsorption capacity than would be expected from their ASCR score and glassiness as a function of Tg. These exceptions are explained by the individual chemistry of the polymer and the specific interaction with the chemistry of sorbate as well as the surface morphology of the microplastic particle. (44) Investigating the surface of the microplastic particles applied in the current study shows that PS, PE, and PET present a comparatively smooth surface, while PVC presents a pockmarked surface (10,000× magnification, Figure 5). Increased adsorption to PVC could thus, in part, be explained by the rougher surface.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) imaging of the plastics utilized in the current study clearly displaying the surface morphology of each type. For each type of plastic, a particle size of 1–5 mm was investigated.

At 500× magnification, it can be observed that all the plastics except PET present a rough morphology with crevasses and ridges, which could further contribute to the increased adsorption of those types of microplastic compared to PET, which presents a comparatively smooth surface. The effect of surface morphology on adsorption was also observed by Fotopoulou and Karapanagioti (45) when comparing the surface morphologies of virgin and eroded PE, PP, and PVC. Comparing the SEM images of the surface morphology in our study and the study by Fotopoulou and Karapanagioti, (45) similarities between our microplastic and the eroded plastic in their studies are apparent.
The overriding parameter for MC adsorption onto the selected plastics, however, appears to be the hydrophobicity of the MC analogue determined by the variable amino acid rather than the type of microplastic (e.g., PVC over PET) and particle size (small over large). However, establishing a clear hierarchical order of factors determining the adsorption of MCs onto microplastics is difficult as the effects of MC hydrophobicity, particle size, and pH are all interwoven and interdependent representing a multifactorial system. While on the one hand, the surface area-to-volume ratio of the plastic will influence adsorption onto the surface of the microplastic, (9) on the other hand, the hydrophobicity, that is, the variable amino acid composition of the MC molecule will strongly influence adsorption. Additionally, surface morphology, availability of amorphous regions on the polymers, and pH concentration will also influence adsorption.
The results of the current study have demonstrated that under all conditions investigated, MC-LF is more likely to adsorb onto microplastic particles compared to MC-LR. This finding should be viewed in an environmental context: MC-LR is the most frequently studied MC congener and most countries’ legislature relating to maximal allowable levels of MCs in, for example, drinking water are often maybe based solely on MC-LR presence or MC-LR toxicity equivalence. However, in recent years, it has repeatedly been demonstrated that MC-LF presents greater toxicity than MC-LR. (16,19) In light of this, the WHO has recently amended its guidelines for maximum allowable levels of MCs in drinking water to use the total MC concentration rather than toxicity equivalence. (24) As demonstrated in the present study, MC-LF preferably adsorbed to microplastic particles compared to MC-LR, which is concerning in light of its greater toxicity. The results of the current study demonstrate the limitations of exclusively using MC-LR as a single representative of the wider group of MCs.
Generally, eutrophicated waters, that is, water bodies with a high nutrient load, are preferred habitats of aquatic cyanobacteria. Wastewater treatment plants and effluents are good examples with routine mass occurrences (blooms) of cyanobacteria. (46,47) Microplastic particles are likely to be encountered in wastewaters, and co-occurrence of microplastic particles and MCs frequently takes place. Having demonstrated the presence of MCs on microplastics (Figure 5) and the load per mass of plastic determined (Figure 3), theoretical exposure of aquatic organisms to MC on microplastic particles can be calculated as there is a concern that pollutants adsorbed to microplastics could enter the food web. (4,6) Assuming that all MCs adsorbed onto the microplastic particles will desorb in the gut of biota and all desorbed toxin will be bioavailable, the following worse-case scenario could be imagined: a recent study by Canniff and Hoang (3) has demonstrated that the water flea Daphnia magna can consume microplastic particles in a size range of 63–75 μm. The smallest particle size investigated in the current study is in the range of 90 to 125 μm. While this is larger than the particles used in the Canniff and Hoang (3) study, it was used to predict a theoretical MC uptake by Daphnia sp. by means of feeding on MC-laden particles. Canniff and Hoang (3) demonstrated that up to 15 particles were ingested by individual Daphnia magna in 21 days of exposure (with the first particles being ingested within 6 h); by calculating the amount of the two different MC congeners per plastic particle in the current study (Supporting Information S4), it was possible to predict the MC load per individual Daphnia (Table 2). Correlating this toxin load to the published lethal concentrations of MC-LR for Daphnia demonstrated that the amount of MC-LR would not constitute a lethal dose for Daphnia. However, assuming a similar, or even higher, toxicity of MC-LF compared to MC-LR (as proposed by Faassen and Lürling (16)), it could be demonstrated that ingestion of 15 MC-LF-laden particles would be lethal if desorbed from the microplastic (with the caveat that the reported lethal concentration does not directly correspond to the lethal ingested dose). While this prediction is based on a number of assumptions and data based on different species of Daphnia, it nonetheless demonstrates the potential of biologically relevant amounts of MCs entering the food web by means of toxin-laden microplastic ingestion.
Table 2. Predicted MC-LR and MC-LF Amounts per Plastic Particle after 48 h of Exposure, Hypothetical Amounts of MCs Ingested by Daphnia sp., and Lethal Doses (LD50) of MC-LR in Daphnia sp.a
plastictoxin (μg g–1) on plastic after 48 htoxin (pg) per particletheoretical toxin amount (pg) ingested by daphnidsblethal ingested dose of MC (pg) for daphnidsc
MC-LR
PET000510–915
PVC13.8512.4186
PE1.060.6496
PS26.3123.6354
MC-LF
PET000510–915d
PVC96.6986.71300
PE91.2355.1826
PS142.311271910
a

Experimental conditions: 10 g L–1 plastics, 5 μg mL–1 MCs, and horizontal agitation in the dark at pH 7.

b

Derived from the study of Canniff and Hoang (3) which observed uptake of up to 15 microplastic particles per Daphnia sp. individual in a feeding study.

c

Derived from the study of Rohrlack et al. (48) which state MC-LR toxicity as 10.2 to 18.3 ng mg–1 wet weight in Daphnia sp. and from the study of Badouin and Ravera (49) stating the dry weight of individual mature Daphnia sp. as 21.33 μg wet weight, which was assumed to be 200% of the dry weight.

d

Assuming similar toxicity to MC-LR as proposed by Faassen and Lürling. (16)

In a feeding study, Christoffersen (50) demonstrated that the arctic tadpole shrimp (Lepidurus arcticus (L. arcticus)) was capable of predating on a Daphnia species. Larger L. arcticus was shown to have consumed 5 to 15 Daphnia. Extrapolating from the data in Table 2, this would represent concentrations of 1.77 to 5.31 ng and 9.55 to 28.65 ng of MC-LR and MC-LF, respectively (adsorbed to PS particles). While there are no toxicity data of the effect of MCs on tadpole shrimp, this example demonstrates the theoretical accumulation of toxin in the food web, with increasing trophic level, with plastics as a vector.

Implications

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The current study has, for the first time, demonstrated that at least three types of microplastics (PVC, PE, and PS) can act as vectors for MCs; an almost 40-fold concentration compared to the dissolved concentration was observed for some MC congener-microplastic combinations (e.g., MC-LF + PS). Adsorption of MCs to microplastic particles is a multifactor process. The current study demonstrated that the particle size of the microplastics, pH conditions, the type of polymer, and the MC congener affect adsorption. Even under environmentally relevant pH conditions (pH 7), MC-LF adsorbed to microplastic particles. A theoretical worst-case scenario demonstrated that the amount of MC adsorbed onto certain types of plastics, if desorbed, would constitute a lethal dose to daphnids. Furthermore, this study highlights that adopting MC-LR as a model for all MCs is a poor choice as the chemical diversity created by the two variable amino acids can lead to widely varying adsorption behaviors. This was demonstrated by the significantly greater adsorption of MC-LF compared to MC-LR under the same experimental conditions. Microplastics could act as a vector for MCs, highlighting an, as of yet, unexplored pathway for cyanobacterial toxins to enter the food web.

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.1c05796.

  • Chemical structures of the four plastic monomers; list of chemicals, materials, devices, and auxiliaries; 3D surface MALDI imaging of MC-LF bound to PET microplastic particles; calculations for prediction of amount of toxin per individual plastic particle; evaluation of the electrostatic charge of each type of microplastic under five pH conditions; and statistical analysis (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Author
  • Authors
    • Diana S. Moura - School of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, Robert Gordon University, Sir Ian Wood Building, Garthdee Road, Aberdeen AB10 7GJ, U.K.Department of Hydraulic and Environmental Engineering, Federal University of Ceará, Avenida Humberto Monte, Pici Campus Block 713 (first floor), Fortaleza, Ceará 60440-593, Brazil
    • José Capelo-Neto - Department of Hydraulic and Environmental Engineering, Federal University of Ceará, Avenida Humberto Monte, Pici Campus Block 713 (first floor), Fortaleza, Ceará 60440-593, Brazil
    • Christine Edwards - School of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, Robert Gordon University, Sir Ian Wood Building, Garthdee Road, Aberdeen AB10 7GJ, U.K.
    • Domenic Dreisbach - Institute of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry, Justus Liebig University, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 17, Giessen D-35392, Germany
    • Bernhard Spengler - Institute of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry, Justus Liebig University, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 17, Giessen D-35392, GermanyOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0179-5653
    • Linda A. Lawton - School of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, Robert Gordon University, Sir Ian Wood Building, Garthdee Road, Aberdeen AB10 7GJ, U.K.
  • Notes
    The authors declare the following competing financial interest(s): B.S. is a consultant and D.D. is a part-time employee of TransMIT GmbH (Giessen, Germany).

Acknowledgments

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The authors would like to thank the Engineering and Physical Science Research Council UK [EP/P029280/1] and the Newton Mobility Grant [NMG\R2\170134] for funding this research project. In addition, the authors would like to thank Len Montgomery for proof-reading the manuscript and Iain Tough for the SEM imaging. Furthermore, technical support provided by TransMIT GmbH and by Thermo Fisher Scientific (Bremen) GmbH and financial support by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG [Sp314/23-1] are gratefully acknowledged.

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 50 other publications.

  1. 1
    van Wezel, A.; Caris, I.; Kools, S. A. E. Release of Primary Microplastics from Consumer Products to Wastewater in the Netherlands. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2016, 35, 16271631,  DOI: 10.1002/etc.3316
  2. 2
    Plastics Europe. Plastics – the Facts 2017; 2017.
  3. 3
    Canniff, P. M.; Hoang, T. C. Microplastic Ingestion by Daphnia Magna and Its Enhancement on Algal Growth. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 633, 500507,  DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.176
  4. 4
    Bakir, A.; O’Connor, I. A.; Rowland, S. J.; Hendriks, A. J.; Thompson, R. C. Relative Importance of Microplastics as a Pathway for the Transfer of Hydrophobic Organic Chemicals to Marine Life. Environ. Pollut. 2016, 219, 5665,  DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.09.046
  5. 5
    Eerkes-Medrano, D.; Thompson, R. C.; Aldridge, D. C. Microplastics in Freshwater Systems: A Review of the Emerging Threats, Identification of Knowledge Gaps and Prioritisation of Research Needs. Water Res. 2015, 75, 6382,  DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.02.012
  6. 6
    Teuten, E. L.; Saquing, J. M.; Knappe, D. R. U.; Barlaz, M. A.; Jonsson, S.; Björn, A.; Rowland, S. J.; Thompson, R. C.; Galloway, T. S.; Yamashita, R.; Ochi, D.; Watanuki, Y.; Moore, C.; Viet, P. H.; Tana, T. S.; Prudente, M.; Boonyatumanond, R.; Zakaria, M. P.; Akkhavong, K.; Ogata, Y.; Hirai, H.; Iwasa, S.; Mizukawa, K.; Hagino, Y.; Imamura, A.; Saha, M.; Takada, H. Transport and Release of Chemicals from Plastics to the Environment and to Wildlife. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2009, 364, 20272045,  DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0284
  7. 7
    Li, J.; Liu, H.; Paul Chen, J. Microplastics in Freshwater Systems: A Review on Occurrence, Environmental Effects, and Methods for Microplastics Detection. Water Res. 2018, 137, 362374,  DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.12.056
  8. 8
    Anderson, J. C.; Park, B. J.; Palace, V. P. Microplastics in Aquatic Environments: Implications for Canadian Ecosystems. Environ. Pollut. 2016, 218, 269280,  DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.06.074
  9. 9
    Crawford, C. B.; Quinn, B. Microplastic Pollutants; Elsevier Ltd: Amsterdam, 2017, 131154.
  10. 10
    Massos, A.; Turner, A. Cadmium, Lead and Bromine in Beached Microplastics. Environ. Pollut. 2017, 227, 139145,  DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.04.034
  11. 11
    Rochman, C. M.; Hoh, E.; Hentschel, B. T.; Kaye, S. Long-Term Field Measurement of Sorption of Organic Contaminants to Five Types of Plastic Pellets: Implications for Plastic Marine Debris. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 16461654,  DOI: 10.1021/es303700s
  12. 12
    Bláha, L.; Babica, P.; Maršálek, B. Toxins Produced in Cyanobacterial Water Blooms - Toxicity and Risks. Interdiscip. Toxicol. 2009, 2, 3641,  DOI: 10.2478/v10102-009-0006-2
  13. 13
    Visser, P. M.; Verspagen, J. M. H.; Sandrini, G.; Stal, L. J.; Matthijs, H. C. P.; Davis, T. W.; Paerl, H. W.; Huisman, J. How Rising CO2 and Global Warming May Stimulate Harmful Cyanobacterial Blooms. Harmful Algae 2016, 54, 145159,  DOI: 10.1016/j.hal.2015.12.006
  14. 14
    Paerl, H. W.; Paul, V. J. Climate Change: Links to Global Expansion of Harmful Cyanobacteria. Water Res. 2012, 46, 13491363,  DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.08.002
  15. 15
    Spoof, L.; Catherine, A. Appendix 3, Tables of Microcystins and Nodularins. In Handbook of Cyanobacterial Monitoring and Cyanotoxin Analysis; Meriluoto, J., Spoof, L., Codd, G. A., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, UK, 2017; 526537,  DOI: 10.1002/9781119068761.app3 .
  16. 16
    Faassen, E. J.; Lürling, M. Occurrence of the Microcystins MC-LW and MC-LF in Dutch Surface Waters and Their Contribution to Total Microcystin Toxicity. Mar. Drugs 2013, 11, 26432654,  DOI: 10.3390/md11072643
  17. 17
    Vesterkvist, P. S. M.; Misiorek, J. O.; Spoof, L. E. M.; Toivola, D. M.; Meriluoto, J. A. O. Comparative Cellular Toxicity of Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Microcystins on Caco-2 Cells. Toxins 2012, 4, 10081023,  DOI: 10.3390/toxins4111008
  18. 18
    Fischer, A.; Hoeger, S. J.; Stemmer, K.; Feurstein, D. J.; Knobeloch, D.; Nussler, A.; Dietrich, D. R. The Role of Organic Anion Transporting Polypeptides (OATPs/SLCOs) in the Toxicity of Different Microcystin Congeners in Vitro: A Comparison of Primary Human Hepatocytes and OATP-Transfected HEK293 Cells. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2010, 245, 920,  DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2010.02.006
  19. 19
    Feurstein, D.; Holst, K.; Fischer, A.; Dietrich, D. R. Oatp-Associated Uptake and Toxicity of Microcystins in Primary Murine Whole Brain Cells. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2009, 234, 247255,  DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2008.10.011
  20. 20
    Vesterkvist, P. S. M.; Meriluoto, J. A. O. Interaction between Microcystins of Different Hydrophobicities and Lipid Monolayers. Toxicon 2003, 41, 349355,  DOI: 10.1016/S0041-0101(02)00315-X
  21. 21
    Royal Society of Chemistry. Microcystin-LR structure.
  22. 22
    Royal Society of Chemistry. Microcystin-LF structure.
  23. 23
    WHO. Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality; WHO Press: Geneva, Switzerland, 2008.
  24. 24
    WHO, Cyanobacterial Toxins : Microcystins. Background Document for Drinking-Water Quality and Guidelines for Safe Recreational Water Environments; W. H. O. Geneva, 2020.
  25. 25
    Akkanen, J.; Kukkonen, J. V. K. Biotransformation and Bioconcentration of Pyrene in Daphnia Magna. Aquat. Toxicol. 2003, 64, 5361,  DOI: 10.1016/S0166-445X(03)00023-7
  26. 26
    Kompauer, M.; Heiles, S.; Spengler, B. Autofocusing MALDI Mass Spectrometry Imaging of Tissue Sections and 3D Chemical Topography of Nonflat Surfaces. Nat. Methods 2017, 14, 11561158,  DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.4433
  27. 27
    Paschke, C.; Leisner, A.; Hester, A.; Maass, K.; Guenther, S.; Bouschen, W.; Spengler, B. Mirion - A Software Package for Automatic Processing of Mass Spectrometric Images. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2013, 24, 12961306,  DOI: 10.1007/s13361-013-0667-0
  28. 28
    Dris, R.; Imhof, H.; Sanchez, W.; Gasperi, J.; Galgani, F.; Tassin, B.; Laforsch, C. Beyond the Ocean: Contamination of Freshwater Ecosystems with (Micro-)Plastic Particles. Environ. Chem. 2015, 12, 539,  DOI: 10.1071/en14172
  29. 29
    Wang, J.; Tan, Z.; Peng, J.; Qiu, Q.; Li, M. The Behaviors of Microplastics in the Marine Environment. Mar. Environ. Res. 2016, 113, 717,  DOI: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2015.10.014
  30. 30
    Wang, W.; Wang, J. Comparative Evaluation of Sorption Kinetics and Isotherms of Pyrene onto Microplastics. Chemosphere 2018, 193, 567573,  DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.11.078
  31. 31
    Harada, K.; Tsuji, K.; Watanabe, M. F.; Kondo, F. Stability of Microcystins from Cyanobacteria – III. Effect of PH and Temperature. Phycologia 1996, 35, 8388,  DOI: 10.2216/i0031-8884-35-6S-83.1
  32. 32
    Wilhelm, S. W.; Bullerjahn, G. S.; McKay, R. M. L. The Complicated and Confusing Ecology of Microcystis Blooms. MBio 2020, 11, 15,  DOI: 10.1128/MBIO.00529-20
  33. 33
    De Maagd, P. G. J.; Hendriks, A. J.; Seinen, W.; Sijm, D. T. H. M. PH-Dependent Hydrophobicity of the Cyanobacteria Toxin Microcystin-LR. Water Res. 1999, 33, 677680,  DOI: 10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00258-9
  34. 34
    McCord, J.; Lang, J. R.; Hill, D.; Strynar, M.; Chernoff, N. PH Dependent Octanol–Water Partitioning Coefficients of Microcystin Congeners. J. Water Health 2018, 16, 340345,  DOI: 10.2166/wh.2018.257
  35. 35
    Altaner, S.; Puddick, J.; Wood, S. A.; Dietrich, D. R. Adsorption of Ten Microcystin Congeners to Common Laboratory-Ware Is Solvent and Surface Dependent. Toxins 2017, 9, 129,  DOI: 10.3390/toxins9040129
  36. 36
    Liang, G.; Xie, P.; Chen, J.; Yu, T. Comparative Studies on the PH Dependence of DOW of Microcystin-RR and -LR Using LC-MS. Sci. World J. 2011, 11, 2026,  DOI: 10.1100/tsw.2011.17
  37. 37
    Hyenstrand, P.; Metcalf, J. S.; Beattie, K. A.; Codd, G. A. Effects of Adsorption to Plastics and Solvent Conditions in the Analysis of the Cyanobacterial Toxin Microcystin-LR by High Performance Liquid Chromatography. Water Res. 2001, 35, 35083511,  DOI: 10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00068-9
  38. 38
    Beneš, P.; Paulenová, M. Surface Charge and Adsorption Properties of Polyethylene in Aqueous Solutions of Inorganic Electrolytes - II. Radiochemical Investigation. Colloid Polym. Sci. 1974, 252, 472477,  DOI: 10.1007/BF01554753
  39. 39
    Kamp, L.; Church, J. L.; Carpino, J.; Faltin-Mara, E.; Rubio, F. The Effects of Water Sample Treatment, Preparation, and Storage Prior to Cyanotoxin Analysis for Cylindrospermopsin, Microcystin and Saxitoxin. Chem.-Biol. Interact. 2016, 246, 4551,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cbi.2015.12.016
  40. 40
    Hüffer, T.; Hofmann, T. Sorption of Non-Polar Organic Compounds by Micro-Sized Plastic Particles in Aqueous Solution. Environ. Pollut. 2016, 214, 194201,  DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.04.018
  41. 41
    Hu, J. Q.; Yang, S. Z.; Guo, L.; Xu, X.; Yao, T.; Xie, F. Microscopic Investigation on the Adsorption of Lubrication Oil on Microplastics. J. Mol. Liq. 2017, 227, 351355,  DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2016.12.043
  42. 42
    Endo, S.; Koelmans, A. A. Sorption of Hydrophobic Organic Compounds to Plastics in the Marine Environment: Equilibrium. In Hazardous Chemicals Associated with Plastics in the Marine Environment; Takada, H., Karapanagioti, H., Eds.; Springer: Switzerland, 2016.
  43. 43
    Guo, X.; Wang, X.; Zhou, X.; Kong, X.; Tao, S.; Xing, B. Sorption of Four Hydrophobic Organic Compounds by Three Chemically Distinct Polymers: Role of Chemical and Physical Composition. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 72527259,  DOI: 10.1021/es301386z
  44. 44
    Alimi, O. S.; Farner Budarz, J.; Hernandez, L. M.; Tufenkji, N. Microplastics and Nanoplastics in Aquatic Environments: Aggregation, Deposition, and Enhanced Contaminant Transport. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 17041724,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b05559
  45. 45
    Fotopoulou, K. N.; Karapanagioti, H. K. Surface Properties of Beached Plastics. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 1102211032,  DOI: 10.1007/s11356-015-4332-y
  46. 46
    Pestana, C. J.; Hobson, P.; Robertson, P. K. J.; Lawton, L. A.; Newcombe, G. Removal of Microcystins from a Waste Stabilisation Lagoon: Evaluation of a Packed-Bed Continuous Flow TiO2 Reactor. Chemosphere 2020, 245, 125575  DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125575
  47. 47
    Praptiwi, R. A.; Pestana, C. J.; Sawade, E. T.; Swain, N.; Schroeder, G.; Newcombe, G. Treatment Challenge of a Cyanobacterium Romeria Elegans Bloom in a South Australian Wastewater Treatment Plant – a Case Study. Environ. Technol. 2017, 38, 782788,  DOI: 10.1080/09593330.2016.1262454
  48. 48
    Rohrlack, T.; Christoffersen, K.; Dittmann, E.; Nogueira, I.; Vasconcelos, V.; Börner, T. Ingestion of Microcystins by Daphnia: Intestinal Uptake and Toxic Effects. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2005, 50, 440448,  DOI: 10.4319/lo.2005.50.2.0440
  49. 49
    Baudouin, M. F.; Ravera, O. Weight, Size, and Chemical Composition of Some Freshwater Zooplankters: Daphnia Hyalina (Leydig). Limnol. Oceanogr. 1972, 17, 645649,  DOI: 10.4319/lo.1972.17.4.0645
  50. 50
    Christoffersen, K. Predation on Daphnia Pulex by Lepidurus Arcticus. Hydrobiologia 2001, 442, 223229,  DOI: 10.1023/A:1017584928657

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
Citation Statements
Explore this article's citation statements on scite.ai

This article is cited by 61 publications.

  1. Lujian Lin, Shuai Tang, Yuqi Chen, Bo Yuan, Hanyi Li, Shanle Liu, Haoliang Lu, Jingchun Liu, Hualong Hong, Chongling Yan, Yaping Zhao. Biofouling Promotes Higher Concentration of Heavy Metal on Disposable Face Masks than Microplastic Films and Particles in Seawater: Mechanisms and Potential Ecological Risks. ACS ES&T Water 2024, 4 (2) , 377-387. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestwater.3c00372
  2. Yixin He, Ai Shen, Muhammad Salam, Mengzi Liu, Yanyan Wei, Yongchuan Yang, Hong Li. Microcystins-Loaded Aged Nanoplastics Provoke a Metabolic Shift in Human Liver Cells. Environmental Science & Technology 2023, 57 (29) , 10521-10531. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c00990
  3. Jie Wang, Jianguo Tao, Jianghao Ji, Mochen Wu, Yuanze Sun, Jun Li, Jay Gan. Use of a Dual-Labeled Bioaccumulation Method to Quantify Microplastic Vector Effects for Hydrophobic Organic Contaminants in Soil. ACS Environmental Au 2023, 3 (4) , 233-241. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenvironau.3c00024
  4. C. Amaneesh, Shankari Anna Balan, P. S. Silpa, Ji Won Kim, Kozhumal Greeshma, A. Aswathi Mohan, Aiswarya Robert Antony, Hans-Peter Grossart, Hee-Sik Kim, Rishiram Ramanan. Gross Negligence: Impacts of Microplastics and Plastic Leachates on Phytoplankton Community and Ecosystem Dynamics. Environmental Science & Technology 2023, 57 (1) , 5-24. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c05817
  5. Siyuan Jing, Yu Huang, Yinjuan Chen, Xueqing He, Zhong Chen, Xingyu Lu, Minghuo Wu, Thomas C. Wanger. Non-Destructive Extraction and Separation of Nano- and Microplastics from Environmental Samples by Density Gradient Ultracentrifugation. Analytical Chemistry 2022, 94 (44) , 15280-15287. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.2c02543
  6. Esther Ugo Alum. The role of toxicology in climate change: Understanding the risks of novel environmental toxins. Sustainable Environment 2025, 11 (1) https://doi.org/10.1080/27658511.2025.2467485
  7. Junlan Yu, Wenjie Li, Jiachen Zhao, Guijie Hao, Zhe Feng, Fangkai Han, Jiahua Wang, Xiaodan Liu, Fuwei Pi, Huang Dai, Xin Liu, Yafang Shen. A MOF-818-based nanozyme-linked aptasensor for microcystin-LR detection in edible algae powder. Talanta 2025, 295 , 128257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2025.128257
  8. Hyunki Cho, Si-Eun Sung, Hyunsoo Lim, Seonyong Chung, Young Jun Kim, Heung-Bin Lim, Youngsam Kim. Toxicological assessment of cigarette filter-derived microplastics in Daphnia magna. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2025, 493 , 138368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.138368
  9. Reza Nozari asl, Neamatollah Jaafarzadeh Haghighi Fard, Faezeh Jahedi, Mohammad Ali Khaksar, Bamshad Shenavar. Systematic review of pulmonary toxicity induced by microplastics and nanoplastics: Insights from in vivo and in vitro studies. Toxicologie Analytique et Clinique 2025, 37 (2) , 223-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxac.2024.12.002
  10. Tangjian Peng, Yanqing Tang, Shengyu Zhang, Lihui Huang, Yali Chen, Ziyuan Yu, Xiaoya Ren, Xizi Long, Fei Yang. Short-term effects and mechanisms of micro/nanoplastics on the degradation of microcystin-LR by Sphingopyxis sp. YF1. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 2025, 13 (3) , 116422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2025.116422
  11. Yuewei Wang, Hongwei Yu, Xiaofeng Cao, Weixiao Qi, Jianfeng Peng, Huijuan Liu, Jiuhui Qu. Coexistence of cyanobacteria and microplastics in eutrophic lake ecosystems: Interactions and combined effects. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 2025, 360 , 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2025.2502372
  12. Mayra Carolina Reyes-Santillán, S. Nandini, S. S. S. Sarma. The combined effect of temperature and microplastics on Daphnia pulex Leydig, 1860 (Cladocera). Inland Waters 2025, , 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/20442041.2025.2450945
  13. Yinghua Li, Yiyan Wang, Shutong Yang, Terun Bao, Fei Su, Jie Qian. Adsorption behavior of levofloxacin hydrochloride on non‐degradable microplastics aging with H 2 O 2. Water Environment Research 2025, 97 (2) https://doi.org/10.1002/wer.70021
  14. Robert Mkuye, Chuangye Yang, Fortunatus Masanja, Salifu Ibrahim, Xiuyan Yang, Happiness Mwemi, Peter Mrope, Muhammed Salman, Alma Alfatat, Yuewen Deng. Omics insights in responses of bivalves exposed to plastic pollution. Aquatic Toxicology 2025, 279 , 107224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2024.107224
  15. Christian Pacher-Deutsch, Natascha Schweighofer, Mark Hanemaaijer, Wioleta Marut, Kristina Žukauskaitė, Angela Horvath, Vanessa Stadlbauer. The microplastic-crisis: Role of bacteria in fighting microplastic-effects in the digestive system. Environmental Pollution 2025, 366 , 125437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2024.125437
  16. Fuad J Shatara, Azul Kothari, Liyuan Hou, Kiyoko Yokota, Erica L -W Majumder. Microplastic characteristics differentially influence cyanobacterial harmful algal bloom microbial community membership, growth, and toxin production. Sustainable Microbiology 2025, 2 (1) https://doi.org/10.1093/sumbio/qvaf003
  17. An Lao, Shiqi Zhang, Xuhui Huang, Dunfeng Feng, Yujie Xiong, Zunqing Du, Zheng Zheng, Hanqi Wu. Evaluating physiological responses of microalgae towards environmentally coexisting microplastics: A meta-analysis. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2024, 480 , 135890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.135890
  18. Lin Cao, Hao Wu, Xiang Wu, Yaru Feng, Wentao Ye, Jiaqi Fan, Quping Yang. Effects of cyanotoxins on nitrogen transformation in aquaculture systems with microplastics coexposure: Adsorption behavior, bacterial communities and functional genes. Science of The Total Environment 2024, 955 , 177079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.177079
  19. Cesar Alejandro Zamora-Barrios, S. Nandini, S.S.S. Sarma. Effect of microplastics on the demography of Brachionus calyciflorus Pallas (Rotifera) over successive generations. Aquatic Toxicology 2024, 275 , 107061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2024.107061
  20. Carlos Sánchez-Zamora, S. Nandini, S.S.S. Sarma. Synergistic effects of microplastics and cyanotoxins on the demography of the rotifer Brachionus calyciflorus Pallas. Chemosphere 2024, 365 , 143355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.143355
  21. Muthuchamy Maruthupandy, Jun Hui Jeon, Jiyeon Noh, Sung Ik Yang, Wan-Seob Cho. Mitigated toxicity of polystyrene nanoplastics in combination exposure with copper ions by transformation into copper (I) oxide: Inhibits the oxidative potential of nanoplastics. Chemosphere 2024, 364 , 143288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.143288
  22. Wei Cheng, Hange Chen, Yue Zhou, Yifei You, Dong Lei, Yan Li, Yan Feng, Yan Wang. Aged fragmented-polypropylene microplastics induced ageing statues-dependent bioenergetic imbalance and reductive stress: In vivo and liver organoids-based in vitro study. Environment International 2024, 191 , 108949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2024.108949
  23. Zhonghui Guo, Mingxia Zhang, Jieming Li. Modifying luteolin’s algicidal effect on Microcystis by virgin and diversely-aged polystyrene microplastics: Unveiling novel mechanisms through microalgal adaptive strategies. Environmental Pollution 2024, 356 , 124237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2024.124237
  24. Mayra Carolina Reyes-Santillán, S. Nandini, S. S. S. Sarma. Combined effects of microplastics and temperature on the competition between Brachionus havanaensis and Brachionus calyciflorus (Rotifera). Hydrobiologia 2024, 851 (12-13) , 3199-3211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-023-05410-4
  25. Siyuan Jing, Yanting Wang, Jiaying Zheng, Xin Li, Yinjuan Chen, Minghuo Wu, Weiping Liu, Thomas C. Wanger. Size-classifiable quantification of nanoplastic by rate zonal centrifugation coupled with pyrolysis-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Analytica Chimica Acta 2024, 1314 , 342752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2024.342752
  26. Yuchun Xiao, Liwen Hu, Jiayao Duan, Huimin Che, Wenxin Wang, Yuan Yuan, Jiayi Xu, Daojun Chen, Sujuan Zhao. Polystyrene microplastics enhance microcystin-LR-induced cardiovascular toxicity and oxidative stress in zebrafish embryos. Environmental Pollution 2024, 352 , 124022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2024.124022
  27. Qi Sui, Xiaobin Yang, Xuemei Sun, Lin Zhu, Xinguo Zhao, Zhihua Feng, Bin Xia, Keming Qu. Bioaccumulation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and their human health risks depend on the characteristics of microplastics in marine organisms of Sanggou Bay, China. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2024, 473 , 134622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.134622
  28. Xianjin An, Yanling Wang, Muhammad Adnan, Wei Li, Yaqin Zhang. Natural Factors of Microplastics Distribution and Migration in Water: A Review. Water 2024, 16 (11) , 1595. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16111595
  29. Charlotte E. Sofield, Ryan S. Anderton, Anastazja M. Gorecki. Mind over Microplastics: Exploring Microplastic-Induced Gut Disruption and Gut-Brain-Axis Consequences. Current Issues in Molecular Biology 2024, 46 (5) , 4186-4202. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb46050256
  30. Qing Yang, Lanlan Huang, Ning Yang, Hongyang Cui, Yanbin Zhao, Zipeng Li, Yindong Tong. Transgenerational effects of extracts containing Microcystin-LR exposure on reproductive toxicity and offspring growth inhibition in a model organism zebrafish. Aquatic Toxicology 2024, 268 , 106860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2024.106860
  31. Siqun Tang, Jilai Gong, Biao Song, Weicheng Cao, Juan Li. Remediation of biochar-supported effective microorganisms and microplastics on multiple forms of heavy metals in eutrophic lake. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2024, 465 , 133098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.133098
  32. Chaonan Zhang, Feifan Bao, Fei Wang, Zhihao Xue, Daohui Lin. Toxic effects of nanoplastics and microcystin-LR coexposure on the liver-gut axis of Hypophthalmichthys molitrix. Science of The Total Environment 2024, 916 , 170011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170011
  33. Xiaoya Ren, Meiyi Mao, Mengqi Feng, Tangjian Peng, Xizi Long, Fei Yang. Fate, abundance and ecological risks of microcystins in aquatic environment: The implication of microplastics. Water Research 2024, 251 , 121121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2024.121121
  34. Diana S. Moura, Carlos J. Pestana, Colin F. Moffat, Nikoletta Gkoulemani, Jianing Hui, John T.S. Irvine, Linda A. Lawton. Aging microplastics enhances the adsorption of pharmaceuticals in freshwater. Science of The Total Environment 2024, 912 , 169467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169467
  35. Chenhao Zhou, Zhonghao Chen, Mahmoud Nasr, Ahmed I. Osman, Zhi Ying Lai, Chung Loong Yiin, Bridgid Lai Fui Chin, Pow-Seng Yap. Monitoring and Assessment Techniques for Microplastics. 2024, 601-646. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-64253-1_26
  36. Prakash Kumar, Sanjeev Gautam, Deepika Bansal, Ravneet Kaur. Starch-based antibacterial food packaging with ZnO nanoparticle. Journal of Food Science and Technology 2024, 61 (1) , 178-191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-023-05834-9
  37. Tayyiba Habib, Murad Muhammad, Yong-Hong Liu, Bao-Zhu Fang, Wen-Jun Li. Biodegradation of plastics—An overview. 2024, 171-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-21911-5.00011-8
  38. Fanmeng Meng, Liju Tan, Peining Cai, Jiangtao Wang. Effects of polystyrene nanoplastics on growth and hemolysin production of microalgae Karlodinium veneficum. Aquatic Toxicology 2024, 266 , 106810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2023.106810
  39. Udomratana Vattanasit, Jira Kongpran, Atsuko Ikeda. Airborne microplastics: A narrative review of potential effects on the human respiratory system. Science of The Total Environment 2023, 904 , 166745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166745
  40. Kishore Kumar Gopalakrishnan, Rohith Sivakumar, Donna Kashian. The Microplastics Cycle: An In-Depth Look at a Complex Topic. Applied Sciences 2023, 13 (19) , 10999. https://doi.org/10.3390/app131910999
  41. Kishore K. Gopalakrishnan, Donna R. Kashian. Complex interactions among temperature, microplastics and cyanobacteria may facilitate cyanobacteria proliferation and microplastic deposition. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 2023, 263 , 115259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.115259
  42. Yucong Shi, Husein Almuhtaram, Robert C. Andrews. Adsorption of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) and Microcystins by Virgin and Weathered Microplastics in Freshwater Matrices. Polymers 2023, 15 (18) , 3676. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15183676
  43. Diana S. Moura, Carlos J. Pestana, Colin F. Moffat, Jianing Hui, John T.S. Irvine, Linda A. Lawton. Characterisation of microplastics is key for reliable data interpretation. Chemosphere 2023, 331 , 138691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.138691
  44. Wang Lin, Huimin Luo, Jingyi Wu, Xiangli Liu, Beibei Cao, Yuqing Liu, Pinhong Yang, Jifeng Yang. Polystyrene microplastics enhance the microcystin-LR-induced gonadal damage and reproductive endocrine disruption in zebrafish. Science of The Total Environment 2023, 876 , 162664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162664
  45. Claude Kiki, Adénikè Bernice Eloise Adéoyé, Xi Li, Xiaopeng Yan, Jinlu Feng, Chang-Ping Yu, Qian Sun. Contrasting effects of phytoplankton aging on microplastic antibiotic adsorption depending on species tolerance, and biofouling level. Water Research 2023, 237 , 119992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2023.119992
  46. Xiang Wan, Yanyan Zhao, Xiaoguang Xu, Zongrui Li, Liqiang Xie, Guoxiang Wang, Fei Yang. Microcystin bound on microplastics in eutrophic waters: A potential threat to zooplankton revealed by adsorption-desorption processes. Environmental Pollution 2023, 321 , 121146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.121146
  47. Namyeon Kim, So Yoon Kim, Seung-Woo Lee, Eun-Hee Lee. Adsorption behavior of polyamide microplastics as a vector of the cyanotoxin microcystin-LR in environmental freshwaters. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2023, 446 , 130683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.130683
  48. Xingde Du, Haohao Liu, Zhihui Tian, Shiyu Zhang, Linjia Shi, Yongshui Wang, Xing Guo, Bingyu Zhang, Shumeng Yuan, Xin Zeng, Huizhen Zhang. PI3K / AKT / mTOR pathway mediated‐cell cycle dysregulation contribute to malignant proliferation of mouse spermatogonia induced by microcystin‐leucine arginine. Environmental Toxicology 2023, 38 (2) , 343-358. https://doi.org/10.1002/tox.23691
  49. Yadiris García, Myleidi Vera, Verónica A. Jiménez, Luis F. Barraza, Joao Aguilar, Susana Sánchez, Eduardo D. Pereira. Molecularly imprinted nanoparticle-based assay (MINA) for microcystin-LR detection in water. The Analyst 2023, 148 (2) , 305-315. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2AN01680J
  50. Eden K. Hataley, René S. Shahmohamadloo, Xavier Ortiz Almirall, Anna L. Harrison, Chelsea M. Rochman, Shan Zou, Diane M. Orihel. Experimental Evidence from the Field that Naturally Weathered Microplastics Accumulate Cyanobacterial Toxins in Eutrophic Lakes. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 2022, 41 (12) , 3017-3028. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5485
  51. Jiayu Cao, Qing Yang, Jie Jiang, Tatenda Dalu, Aliaksei Kadushkin, Joginder Singh, Rawil Fakhrullin, Fangjun Wang, Xiaoming Cai, Ruibin Li. Coronas of micro/nano plastics: a key determinant in their risk assessments. Particle and Fibre Toxicology 2022, 19 (1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12989-022-00492-9
  52. Mauro Vilar, Aloysio Ferrão-Filho. (Eco)Toxicology of Cyanobacteria and Cyanotoxins: From Environmental Dynamics to Adverse Effects. Toxics 2022, 10 (11) , 648. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics10110648
  53. Lujian Lin, Hanyi Li, Hualong Hong, Bo Yuan, Xuan Sun, Le He, Chengwen Xue, Haoliang Lu, Jingchun Liu, Chongling Yan. Enhanced heavy metal adsorption on microplastics by incorporating flame retardant hexabromocyclododecanes: Mechanisms and potential migration risks.. Water Research 2022, 225 , 119144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2022.119144
  54. Xingli Zhang, Jingyi Zhao, Tiantian Gan, Caixia Jin, Xiaokang Li, Zhiguo Cao, Kai Jiang, Wei Zou. Aging relieves the promotion effects of polyamide microplastics on parental transfer and developmental toxicity of TDCIPP to zebrafish offspring. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2022, 437 , 129409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129409
  55. Chan Seo, Joo Won Lee, Won-Kyo Jung, Yoon-Mi Lee, Seungjun Lee, Sang Gil Lee. Examination of Microcystin Adsorption by the Type of Plastic Materials Used during the Procedure of Microcystin Analysis. Toxins 2022, 14 (9) , 625. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins14090625
  56. Elena Molina, Sara Benedé. Is There Evidence of Health Risks From Exposure to Micro- and Nanoplastics in Foods?. Frontiers in Nutrition 2022, 9 https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.910094
  57. Diana S. Moura, Carlos J. Pestana, Colin F. Moffat, Jianing Hui, John T.S. Irvine, Christine Edwards, Linda A. Lawton. Adsorption of cyanotoxins on polypropylene and polyethylene terephthalate: Microplastics as vector of eight microcystin analogues. Environmental Pollution 2022, 303 , 119135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119135
  58. Yixin He, Guining Wei, Bingran Tang, Muhammad Salam, Ai Shen, Yanyan Wei, Xin Zhou, Mengzi Liu, Yongchuan Yang, Hong Li, Yufeng Mao. Microplastics benefit bacteria colonization and induce microcystin degradation. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2022, 431 , 128524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.128524
  59. Bingran Tang, Ying Tang, Xin Zhou, Mengzi Liu, Hong Li, Jun Qi. The Inhibition of Microcystin Adsorption by Microplastics in the Presence of Algal Organic Matters. Toxics 2022, 10 (6) , 339. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics10060339
  60. Yixue Xu, Jiyuan Cui, Huiqun Yu, Wansong Zong. Insight into the Molecular Mechanism for the Discrepant Inhibition of Microcystins (MCLR, LA, LF, LW, LY) on Protein Phosphatase 2A. Toxins 2022, 14 (6) , 390. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins14060390
  61. Tengda Ding, Liyan Wei, Zhangming Hou, Juying Li, Chunlong Zhang, Daohui Lin. Microplastics altered contaminant behavior and toxicity in natural waters. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2022, 425 , 127908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127908

Environmental Science & Technology

Cite this: Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 55, 23, 15940–15949
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c05796
Published November 10, 2021

Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0 .

Article Views

8291

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Chemical structures of the two MC congeners used in the present study (MC-LR left and MC-LF right) with variable amino acids indicating leucine (blue) and arginine (green) (MC-LR) and leucine (blue) and phenylalanine (red) (MC-LF). (21,22) The variable amino acids within the MC structure are largely responsible for the overall hydrophobicity of the congener.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. 3D surface MALDI MSI of MC-LF adsorbed to the PS microplastic. (a) Optical microscope image of PS particles before matrix application. (b) MS image showing the spatial distribution of [MC-LF + Na]+ at m/z 1008.5053. (c) Single-pixel mass spectrum for a mass range m/z of 985 to 1025 obtained from the PS microplastic. Three different adducts for MC-LF were labeled with measured mass and mass deviation. MS images were generated with 170 × 174 pixels, a pixel size of 12 μm, and an image bin width of Δ(m/z) = 0.01. The scale bar is 500 μm.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Influence of pH on MC-LR and MC-LF adsorption onto PS, PVC, PE, and PET particles of different sizes (>1 mm [red], 0.25–0.50 mm [blue], and 0.009–0.125 mm [yellow]) (Test conditions: 10 g L–1 plastics, 5 μg mL–1 MC, 48 h agitation time, 25 °C, and control [black] contained no microplastic). %RSD ≤ 10%, n = 3.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. Effect of particle size and pH on the amount of MC-LR and MC-LF adsorbed onto four different microplastics (green: PET, yellow: PVC, blue: PE, and red: PS) (Test conditions: 10 g L–1 plastics, 5 μg mL–1 MCs, 48 h agitation time, and 25 °C). %RSD ≤ 10%, n = 3.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) imaging of the plastics utilized in the current study clearly displaying the surface morphology of each type. For each type of plastic, a particle size of 1–5 mm was investigated.

  • References


    This article references 50 other publications.

    1. 1
      van Wezel, A.; Caris, I.; Kools, S. A. E. Release of Primary Microplastics from Consumer Products to Wastewater in the Netherlands. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2016, 35, 16271631,  DOI: 10.1002/etc.3316
    2. 2
      Plastics Europe. Plastics – the Facts 2017; 2017.
    3. 3
      Canniff, P. M.; Hoang, T. C. Microplastic Ingestion by Daphnia Magna and Its Enhancement on Algal Growth. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 633, 500507,  DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.176
    4. 4
      Bakir, A.; O’Connor, I. A.; Rowland, S. J.; Hendriks, A. J.; Thompson, R. C. Relative Importance of Microplastics as a Pathway for the Transfer of Hydrophobic Organic Chemicals to Marine Life. Environ. Pollut. 2016, 219, 5665,  DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.09.046
    5. 5
      Eerkes-Medrano, D.; Thompson, R. C.; Aldridge, D. C. Microplastics in Freshwater Systems: A Review of the Emerging Threats, Identification of Knowledge Gaps and Prioritisation of Research Needs. Water Res. 2015, 75, 6382,  DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.02.012
    6. 6
      Teuten, E. L.; Saquing, J. M.; Knappe, D. R. U.; Barlaz, M. A.; Jonsson, S.; Björn, A.; Rowland, S. J.; Thompson, R. C.; Galloway, T. S.; Yamashita, R.; Ochi, D.; Watanuki, Y.; Moore, C.; Viet, P. H.; Tana, T. S.; Prudente, M.; Boonyatumanond, R.; Zakaria, M. P.; Akkhavong, K.; Ogata, Y.; Hirai, H.; Iwasa, S.; Mizukawa, K.; Hagino, Y.; Imamura, A.; Saha, M.; Takada, H. Transport and Release of Chemicals from Plastics to the Environment and to Wildlife. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2009, 364, 20272045,  DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0284
    7. 7
      Li, J.; Liu, H.; Paul Chen, J. Microplastics in Freshwater Systems: A Review on Occurrence, Environmental Effects, and Methods for Microplastics Detection. Water Res. 2018, 137, 362374,  DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.12.056
    8. 8
      Anderson, J. C.; Park, B. J.; Palace, V. P. Microplastics in Aquatic Environments: Implications for Canadian Ecosystems. Environ. Pollut. 2016, 218, 269280,  DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.06.074
    9. 9
      Crawford, C. B.; Quinn, B. Microplastic Pollutants; Elsevier Ltd: Amsterdam, 2017, 131154.
    10. 10
      Massos, A.; Turner, A. Cadmium, Lead and Bromine in Beached Microplastics. Environ. Pollut. 2017, 227, 139145,  DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.04.034
    11. 11
      Rochman, C. M.; Hoh, E.; Hentschel, B. T.; Kaye, S. Long-Term Field Measurement of Sorption of Organic Contaminants to Five Types of Plastic Pellets: Implications for Plastic Marine Debris. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 16461654,  DOI: 10.1021/es303700s
    12. 12
      Bláha, L.; Babica, P.; Maršálek, B. Toxins Produced in Cyanobacterial Water Blooms - Toxicity and Risks. Interdiscip. Toxicol. 2009, 2, 3641,  DOI: 10.2478/v10102-009-0006-2
    13. 13
      Visser, P. M.; Verspagen, J. M. H.; Sandrini, G.; Stal, L. J.; Matthijs, H. C. P.; Davis, T. W.; Paerl, H. W.; Huisman, J. How Rising CO2 and Global Warming May Stimulate Harmful Cyanobacterial Blooms. Harmful Algae 2016, 54, 145159,  DOI: 10.1016/j.hal.2015.12.006
    14. 14
      Paerl, H. W.; Paul, V. J. Climate Change: Links to Global Expansion of Harmful Cyanobacteria. Water Res. 2012, 46, 13491363,  DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.08.002
    15. 15
      Spoof, L.; Catherine, A. Appendix 3, Tables of Microcystins and Nodularins. In Handbook of Cyanobacterial Monitoring and Cyanotoxin Analysis; Meriluoto, J., Spoof, L., Codd, G. A., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, UK, 2017; 526537,  DOI: 10.1002/9781119068761.app3 .
    16. 16
      Faassen, E. J.; Lürling, M. Occurrence of the Microcystins MC-LW and MC-LF in Dutch Surface Waters and Their Contribution to Total Microcystin Toxicity. Mar. Drugs 2013, 11, 26432654,  DOI: 10.3390/md11072643
    17. 17
      Vesterkvist, P. S. M.; Misiorek, J. O.; Spoof, L. E. M.; Toivola, D. M.; Meriluoto, J. A. O. Comparative Cellular Toxicity of Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Microcystins on Caco-2 Cells. Toxins 2012, 4, 10081023,  DOI: 10.3390/toxins4111008
    18. 18
      Fischer, A.; Hoeger, S. J.; Stemmer, K.; Feurstein, D. J.; Knobeloch, D.; Nussler, A.; Dietrich, D. R. The Role of Organic Anion Transporting Polypeptides (OATPs/SLCOs) in the Toxicity of Different Microcystin Congeners in Vitro: A Comparison of Primary Human Hepatocytes and OATP-Transfected HEK293 Cells. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2010, 245, 920,  DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2010.02.006
    19. 19
      Feurstein, D.; Holst, K.; Fischer, A.; Dietrich, D. R. Oatp-Associated Uptake and Toxicity of Microcystins in Primary Murine Whole Brain Cells. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2009, 234, 247255,  DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2008.10.011
    20. 20
      Vesterkvist, P. S. M.; Meriluoto, J. A. O. Interaction between Microcystins of Different Hydrophobicities and Lipid Monolayers. Toxicon 2003, 41, 349355,  DOI: 10.1016/S0041-0101(02)00315-X
    21. 21
      Royal Society of Chemistry. Microcystin-LR structure.
    22. 22
      Royal Society of Chemistry. Microcystin-LF structure.
    23. 23
      WHO. Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality; WHO Press: Geneva, Switzerland, 2008.
    24. 24
      WHO, Cyanobacterial Toxins : Microcystins. Background Document for Drinking-Water Quality and Guidelines for Safe Recreational Water Environments; W. H. O. Geneva, 2020.
    25. 25
      Akkanen, J.; Kukkonen, J. V. K. Biotransformation and Bioconcentration of Pyrene in Daphnia Magna. Aquat. Toxicol. 2003, 64, 5361,  DOI: 10.1016/S0166-445X(03)00023-7
    26. 26
      Kompauer, M.; Heiles, S.; Spengler, B. Autofocusing MALDI Mass Spectrometry Imaging of Tissue Sections and 3D Chemical Topography of Nonflat Surfaces. Nat. Methods 2017, 14, 11561158,  DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.4433
    27. 27
      Paschke, C.; Leisner, A.; Hester, A.; Maass, K.; Guenther, S.; Bouschen, W.; Spengler, B. Mirion - A Software Package for Automatic Processing of Mass Spectrometric Images. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2013, 24, 12961306,  DOI: 10.1007/s13361-013-0667-0
    28. 28
      Dris, R.; Imhof, H.; Sanchez, W.; Gasperi, J.; Galgani, F.; Tassin, B.; Laforsch, C. Beyond the Ocean: Contamination of Freshwater Ecosystems with (Micro-)Plastic Particles. Environ. Chem. 2015, 12, 539,  DOI: 10.1071/en14172
    29. 29
      Wang, J.; Tan, Z.; Peng, J.; Qiu, Q.; Li, M. The Behaviors of Microplastics in the Marine Environment. Mar. Environ. Res. 2016, 113, 717,  DOI: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2015.10.014
    30. 30
      Wang, W.; Wang, J. Comparative Evaluation of Sorption Kinetics and Isotherms of Pyrene onto Microplastics. Chemosphere 2018, 193, 567573,  DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.11.078
    31. 31
      Harada, K.; Tsuji, K.; Watanabe, M. F.; Kondo, F. Stability of Microcystins from Cyanobacteria – III. Effect of PH and Temperature. Phycologia 1996, 35, 8388,  DOI: 10.2216/i0031-8884-35-6S-83.1
    32. 32
      Wilhelm, S. W.; Bullerjahn, G. S.; McKay, R. M. L. The Complicated and Confusing Ecology of Microcystis Blooms. MBio 2020, 11, 15,  DOI: 10.1128/MBIO.00529-20
    33. 33
      De Maagd, P. G. J.; Hendriks, A. J.; Seinen, W.; Sijm, D. T. H. M. PH-Dependent Hydrophobicity of the Cyanobacteria Toxin Microcystin-LR. Water Res. 1999, 33, 677680,  DOI: 10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00258-9
    34. 34
      McCord, J.; Lang, J. R.; Hill, D.; Strynar, M.; Chernoff, N. PH Dependent Octanol–Water Partitioning Coefficients of Microcystin Congeners. J. Water Health 2018, 16, 340345,  DOI: 10.2166/wh.2018.257
    35. 35
      Altaner, S.; Puddick, J.; Wood, S. A.; Dietrich, D. R. Adsorption of Ten Microcystin Congeners to Common Laboratory-Ware Is Solvent and Surface Dependent. Toxins 2017, 9, 129,  DOI: 10.3390/toxins9040129
    36. 36
      Liang, G.; Xie, P.; Chen, J.; Yu, T. Comparative Studies on the PH Dependence of DOW of Microcystin-RR and -LR Using LC-MS. Sci. World J. 2011, 11, 2026,  DOI: 10.1100/tsw.2011.17
    37. 37
      Hyenstrand, P.; Metcalf, J. S.; Beattie, K. A.; Codd, G. A. Effects of Adsorption to Plastics and Solvent Conditions in the Analysis of the Cyanobacterial Toxin Microcystin-LR by High Performance Liquid Chromatography. Water Res. 2001, 35, 35083511,  DOI: 10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00068-9
    38. 38
      Beneš, P.; Paulenová, M. Surface Charge and Adsorption Properties of Polyethylene in Aqueous Solutions of Inorganic Electrolytes - II. Radiochemical Investigation. Colloid Polym. Sci. 1974, 252, 472477,  DOI: 10.1007/BF01554753
    39. 39
      Kamp, L.; Church, J. L.; Carpino, J.; Faltin-Mara, E.; Rubio, F. The Effects of Water Sample Treatment, Preparation, and Storage Prior to Cyanotoxin Analysis for Cylindrospermopsin, Microcystin and Saxitoxin. Chem.-Biol. Interact. 2016, 246, 4551,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cbi.2015.12.016
    40. 40
      Hüffer, T.; Hofmann, T. Sorption of Non-Polar Organic Compounds by Micro-Sized Plastic Particles in Aqueous Solution. Environ. Pollut. 2016, 214, 194201,  DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.04.018
    41. 41
      Hu, J. Q.; Yang, S. Z.; Guo, L.; Xu, X.; Yao, T.; Xie, F. Microscopic Investigation on the Adsorption of Lubrication Oil on Microplastics. J. Mol. Liq. 2017, 227, 351355,  DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2016.12.043
    42. 42
      Endo, S.; Koelmans, A. A. Sorption of Hydrophobic Organic Compounds to Plastics in the Marine Environment: Equilibrium. In Hazardous Chemicals Associated with Plastics in the Marine Environment; Takada, H., Karapanagioti, H., Eds.; Springer: Switzerland, 2016.
    43. 43
      Guo, X.; Wang, X.; Zhou, X.; Kong, X.; Tao, S.; Xing, B. Sorption of Four Hydrophobic Organic Compounds by Three Chemically Distinct Polymers: Role of Chemical and Physical Composition. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 72527259,  DOI: 10.1021/es301386z
    44. 44
      Alimi, O. S.; Farner Budarz, J.; Hernandez, L. M.; Tufenkji, N. Microplastics and Nanoplastics in Aquatic Environments: Aggregation, Deposition, and Enhanced Contaminant Transport. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 17041724,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b05559
    45. 45
      Fotopoulou, K. N.; Karapanagioti, H. K. Surface Properties of Beached Plastics. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 1102211032,  DOI: 10.1007/s11356-015-4332-y
    46. 46
      Pestana, C. J.; Hobson, P.; Robertson, P. K. J.; Lawton, L. A.; Newcombe, G. Removal of Microcystins from a Waste Stabilisation Lagoon: Evaluation of a Packed-Bed Continuous Flow TiO2 Reactor. Chemosphere 2020, 245, 125575  DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125575
    47. 47
      Praptiwi, R. A.; Pestana, C. J.; Sawade, E. T.; Swain, N.; Schroeder, G.; Newcombe, G. Treatment Challenge of a Cyanobacterium Romeria Elegans Bloom in a South Australian Wastewater Treatment Plant – a Case Study. Environ. Technol. 2017, 38, 782788,  DOI: 10.1080/09593330.2016.1262454
    48. 48
      Rohrlack, T.; Christoffersen, K.; Dittmann, E.; Nogueira, I.; Vasconcelos, V.; Börner, T. Ingestion of Microcystins by Daphnia: Intestinal Uptake and Toxic Effects. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2005, 50, 440448,  DOI: 10.4319/lo.2005.50.2.0440
    49. 49
      Baudouin, M. F.; Ravera, O. Weight, Size, and Chemical Composition of Some Freshwater Zooplankters: Daphnia Hyalina (Leydig). Limnol. Oceanogr. 1972, 17, 645649,  DOI: 10.4319/lo.1972.17.4.0645
    50. 50
      Christoffersen, K. Predation on Daphnia Pulex by Lepidurus Arcticus. Hydrobiologia 2001, 442, 223229,  DOI: 10.1023/A:1017584928657
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.1c05796.

    • Chemical structures of the four plastic monomers; list of chemicals, materials, devices, and auxiliaries; 3D surface MALDI imaging of MC-LF bound to PET microplastic particles; calculations for prediction of amount of toxin per individual plastic particle; evaluation of the electrostatic charge of each type of microplastic under five pH conditions; and statistical analysis (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.