ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
My Activity

Figure 1Loading Img

Three Lessons for the Microplastics Voyage

Cite this: Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 14, 7747–7748
Publication Date (Web):July 10, 2017
Copyright © 2017 American Chemical Society
  • Free to Read

Article Views





PDF (270 KB)

Whether it is DDT, perchlorate, perfluoroalkyl substances, or pharmaceuticals, the process through which a contaminant emerges follows a predictable pattern. First, researchers stumble upon a previously unknown contaminant or observe effects on the health of humans or wildlife that they cannot readily explain. Driven by curiosity and a desire to protect the environment, the researchers, operating on a shoestring budget, publish a paper documenting their initial findings. The attention that their research receives results in a wave of papers on detection, occurrence and toxicology of a now-emerging contaminant.

About a decade after the first wave of papers appears the emerging contaminant reaches a crossroads. If the research does not seem to justify action, the funding tide ebbs and the community moves onto other issues. But if there is sufficient ground for concern, a second wave of research starts, with an expansion into policy-relevant questions related to establishing regulatory standards, implementing treatment technologies, and reformulating products to minimize future releases.

Microplastics are our newest emerging contaminant. Although scientists have expressed concerns about the impacts of plastic pollution for over four decades, microplastics did not become emerging contaminants until 2007. The issue gained momentum about five years later, when researchers reported the presence of microbeads from consumer products in wastewater effluent-receiving waters. Facing negative publicity for a nonessential ingredient, leading manufacturers voluntarily eliminated microbeads and accepted the decision to ban them in the United States in 2015. Now that we are into the second wave of research that will determine whether or not the remaining sources of microplastics will be controlled, it is worth considering lessons learned from other emerging contaminants.

The first lesson is that occurrence data and laboratory toxicology studies alone are not enough to bring about action when the effects being studied do not involve humans. When it comes to wildlife, adverse effects must be documented in the field. In the case of DDT, the direct link between tissue levels and reproductive failure of bald eagles and brown pelicans turned the tide on a product that was considered essential to farmers. In contrast, the widespread occurrence of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) and perfluoroalkyl substances in polar bears garnered plenty of media attention, but without field evidence of adverse effects, regulatory actions were hard to justify. For microplastics, the public might not be as motivated if the adverse effects are limited to decreased feeding by microscopic creatures living near the bottom of the food web. Furthermore, waterways with the highest concentrations of microplastics are also subject to other pollutant stresses that could make it difficult to attribute compromised wildlife health to microplastics. To prove adverse effects of microplastics under realistic conditions, dosing of entire lakes, using methods similar than those used to document the effects of ethinyl estradiol on fish populations, might be needed. Because the addition of microplastics to pristine ocean waters would be impractical, such large-scale manipulations would require researchers to devise clever ways of removing microplastics from already contaminated marine waters.

Turning our attention to people, the second lesson is that contaminants are more likely to emerge if there is a reasonable possibility that their use is endangering human health. For example, when PBDEs were reported in human serum and breast milk, regulators took action before health effects were documented. As long as we consider human health as our top environmental priority, occurrence data and toxicology studies suggesting that contaminant concentrations are approaching a level of concern can bring about action. In the case of microplastics, human health risks have been posited, but the complexities associated with microplastic uptake as well as the simultaneous exposure of people to a myriad of other particles are going to challenge researchers seeking to assess the health risks of microplastics. Furthermore, one of the human health concerns that is frequently discussed—namely that microplastics expose people to lipophilic chemicals—is likely to be seen as an issue that is best handled by controlling the lipophilic chemicals rather than the media that increase their uptake.

The third lesson is that the likelihood that society will control an emerging contaminant is inversely proportional to the cost of solving the problem as well as the degree to which blame can be affixed on a small number of companies. The first part of this lesson is intuitive: expensive regulatory action requires a high threshold of evidence. Replacing microbeads in facial scrubs is a lot easier than rethinking the thousands of uses of plastics in the economy. The second part is less obvious but just as relevant: product bans and requirements to clean up contamination are more likely when only a few companies manufacture and use the chemical. For example, Monsanto, Westinghouse, and General Electric spent over $10 billion cleaning up PCB-contaminated sites. In contrast, the hundreds of companies that mine and use copper in construction materials, electronics and brake pads have not funded upgrades to sewage treatment plants or the installation of stormwater treatment systems in places where waterways are contaminated with the metal.

If it turns out that a specific use of plastic accounts for a disproportionate share of the microplastics detected in the environment, action is more likely. As long as researchers focus on a suite of sources that would be nearly impossible to eliminate, control options implemented in the near term are likely to be restricted to relatively inexpensive practices (e.g., litter control campaigns, marketing of biodegradable plastics to eco-friendly consumers) that might ultimately have little impact. Although we are all responsible for microplastics in the environment, getting the entire world to rethink the way it uses synthetic polymers would be a long, arduous process requiring compelling evidence of severe environmental risks.

The science and engineering of microplastics will be different from that of the chemical contaminants that preceded them. Nevertheless, we should learn our emerging contaminant history lessons. As we embark on our second decade of microplastics research, we need to set our sights on how best to provide society with the information needed to decide what to do about our newest emerging contaminant.

Author Information

Jump To

  • Corresponding Author
    • Notes
      Views expressed in this editorial are those of the author and not necessarily the views of the ACS.
      The author declares no competing financial interest.

    Cited By

    This article is cited by 44 publications.

    1. Colette A. Preston, Cheryl L. McKenna Neuman, Julian Aherne. Effects of Shape and Size on Microplastic Atmospheric Settling Velocity. Environmental Science & Technology 2023, 57 (32) , 11937-11947.
    2. Chu Peng, Xiaofei Zhang, Xinyi Zhang, Chunguang Liu, Zeyou Chen, Hongwen Sun, Lei Wang. Bacterial Community under the Influence of Microplastics in Indoor Environment and the Health Hazards Associated with Antibiotic Resistance Genes. Environmental Science & Technology 2022, 56 (1) , 422-432.
    3. Chu Peng, Xuejiao Tang, Xinying Gong, Yuanyuan Dai, Hongwen Sun, Lei Wang. Development and Application of a Mass Spectrometry Method for Quantifying Nylon Microplastics in Environment. Analytical Chemistry 2020, 92 (20) , 13930-13935.
    4. Kayla C. Brignac, Melissa R. Jung, Cheryl King, Sarah-Jeanne Royer, Lauren Blickley, Megan R. Lamson, James T. Potemra, Jennifer M. Lynch. Marine Debris Polymers on Main Hawaiian Island Beaches, Sea Surface, and Seafloor. Environmental Science & Technology 2019, 53 (21) , 12218-12226.
    5. Michael S. Bank, Sophia V. Hansson. The Plastic Cycle: A Novel and Holistic Paradigm for the Anthropocene. Environmental Science & Technology 2019, 53 (13) , 7177-7179.
    6. Ulrich M. Hanke, Collin P. Ward, Christopher M. Reddy. Leveraging Lessons Learned from Black Carbon Research to Study Plastics in the Environment. Environmental Science & Technology 2019, 53 (12) , 6599-6600.
    7. Kevin Bruyninckx, Michiel Dusselier. Sustainable Chemistry Considerations for the Encapsulation of Volatile Compounds in Laundry-Type Applications. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 2019, 7 (9) , 8041-8054.
    8. Nanna B. Hartmann, Thorsten Hüffer, Richard C. Thompson, Martin Hassellöv, Anja Verschoor, Anders E. Daugaard, Sinja Rist, Therese Karlsson, Nicole Brennholt, Matthew Cole, Maria P. Herrling, Maren C. Hess, Natalia P. Ivleva, Amy L. Lusher, Martin Wagner. Are We Speaking the Same Language? Recommendations for a Definition and Categorization Framework for Plastic Debris. Environmental Science & Technology 2019, 53 (3) , 1039-1047.
    9. Jennifer M. Lynch. Quantities of Marine Debris Ingested by Sea Turtles: Global Meta-Analysis Highlights Need for Standardized Data Reporting Methods and Reveals Relative Risk. Environmental Science & Technology 2018, 52 (21) , 12026-12038.
    10. Melissa R. Jung, George H. Balazs, Thierry M. Work, T. Todd Jones, Sara V. Orski, Viviana Rodriguez C., Kathryn L. Beers, Kayla C. Brignac, K. David Hyrenbach, Brenda A. Jensen, Jennifer M. Lynch. Polymer Identification of Plastic Debris Ingested by Pelagic-Phase Sea Turtles in the Central Pacific. Environmental Science & Technology 2018, 52 (20) , 11535-11544.
    11. Lei Wang, Junjie Zhang, Shaogang Hou, and Hongwen Sun . A Simple Method for Quantifying Polycarbonate and Polyethylene Terephthalate Microplastics in Environmental Samples by Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Environmental Science & Technology Letters 2017, 4 (12) , 530-534.
    12. G. Allen Burton, Jr. . Stressor Exposures Determine Risk: So, Why Do Fellow Scientists Continue To Focus on Superficial Microplastics Risk?. Environmental Science & Technology 2017, 51 (23) , 13515-13516.
    13. Albert A. Koelmans, Ellen Besseling, Edwin Foekema, Merel Kooi, Svenja Mintenig, Bernadette C. Ossendorp, Paula E. Redondo-Hasselerharm, Anja Verschoor, Annemarie P. van Wezel, and Marten Scheffer . Risks of Plastic Debris: Unravelling Fact, Opinion, Perception, and Belief. Environmental Science & Technology 2017, 51 (20) , 11513-11519.
    14. Chu Peng, Xinyi Zhang, Mengxi Li, Yuan Lu, Chunguang Liu, Lei Wang. Source apportionment of microplastics in indoor dust: Two strategies based on shape and composition. Environmental Pollution 2023, 334 , 122178.
    15. Mehta Bulbul, Sunil Kumar, Kumar Ajay, Ambili Anoop. Spatial distribution and characteristics of microplastics and associated contaminants from mid-altitude lake in NW Himalaya. Chemosphere 2023, 326 , 138415.
    16. S. Ravikumar, A. Jeyameenakshi, M. Syed Ali, King Solomon Ebenezer. Assessment of microplastics in edible salts from solar saltpans and commercial salts. Total Environment Research Themes 2023, 6 , 100032.
    17. Zhenping Tang, Feiyu Zhu, Tianyun Jiang, Fuxing Wei, Yuanyuan Gao, Chao Xiang, Yi Duan, Yilong Hua, Shuai Zhou, Yayi Wang. Oxygen-containing functional groups enhance uranium adsorption by aged polystyrene microplastics: Experimental and theoretical perspectives. Chemical Engineering Journal 2023, 465 , 142730.
    18. Sirui Huang, Ruitong Jiang, Nicholas J. Craig, Hua Deng, Wenhui He, Juan-Ying Li, Lei Su. Accumulation and re-distribution of microplastics via aquatic plants and macroalgae - A review of field studies. Marine Environmental Research 2023, 187 , 105951.
    19. Myreya De-La-Cruz-Diaz, Aldo Alvarez-Risco, Micaela Jaramillo-Arévalo, María de las Mercedes Anderson-Seminario, Shyla Del-Aguila-Arcentales. Strategies in Small Businesses to Combat Plastic Overproduction. 2023, 117-145.
    20. Himani Yadav, S. Sethulekshmi, Amritanshu Shriwastav. Estimation of microplastic exposure via the composite sampling of drinking water, respirable air, and cooked food from Mumbai, India. Environmental Research 2022, 214 , 113735.
    21. John E. Weinstein, Bonnie M. Ertel, Austin D. Gray. Accumulation and depuration of microplastic fibers, fragments, and tire particles in the eastern oyster, Crassostrea virginica: A toxicokinetic approach. Environmental Pollution 2022, 308 , 119681.
    22. Patricia Aguila-Torres, Mauricio González, Jonathan E. Maldonado, Richard Miranda, Liqing Zhang, Roxana González-Stegmaier, Luis Antonio Rojas, Alexis Gaete. Associations between bacterial communities and microplastics from surface seawater of the Northern Patagonian area of Chile. Environmental Pollution 2022, 217 , 119313.
    23. Amalie Thit, Sara Nicoline Grønlund, Louise Lynn Trudsø, Benni Winding Hansen, Simon David Herzog, Søren Laurentius Nielsen, Nikoline Garner Oturai, Dorthe Posselt, Ramasamy Praveen Kumar, Monica Hamann Sandgaard, Kristian Syberg, Henriette Selck, Gry Lyngsie. Particles as carriers of matter in the aquatic environment: Challenges and ways ahead for transdisciplinary research. Science of The Total Environment 2022, , 155831.
    24. Prasun Goswami, Gajendra Joshi, Nambali Valsalan Vinithkumar, Gopal Dharani. Plastic pollution and beyond: do microbes hold the key towards a sustainable solution to this global crisis?. 2022, 1-5.
    25. Michael S. Bank, Sophia V. Hansson. The Microplastic Cycle: An Introduction to a Complex Issue. 2022, 1-16.
    26. Suning Zhang, Tongtong Ye. Preparation of Natural Composite Microcapsules Containing Orchid Black Currant Fragrance and its Sustained-Release Properties on Hair Bundle. Journal of Polymers and the Environment 2022, 30 (1) , 136-150.
    27. Ahmed Yusuf, Ahmed Sodiq, Adewale Giwa, Joyner Eke, Oluwadamilola Pikuda, Jamiu O. Eniola, Bilkis Ajiwokewu, Nonni Soraya Sambudi, Muhammad Roil Bilad. Updated review on microplastics in water, their occurrence, detection, measurement, environmental pollution, and the need for regulatory standards. Environmental Pollution 2022, 292 , 118421.
    28. Seta Noventa, Matthew S. P. Boyles, Andreas Seifert, Simone Belluco, Aracaeli Sánchez Jiménez, Helinor J. Johnston, Lang Tran, Teresa F. Fernandes, Lapo Mughini-Gras, Massimiliano Orsini, Fabiana Corami, Kepa Castro, Franco Mutinelli, Massimo Boldrin, Victor Puntes, Mahshid Sotoudeh, Giulia Mascarello, Barbara Tiozzo, Polly McLean, Francesca Ronchi, Andy M. Booth, Albert A. Koelmans, Carmen Losasso. Paradigms to assess the human health risks of nano- and microplastics. Microplastics and Nanoplastics 2021, 1 (1)
    29. Mansi Vaid, Komal Mehra, Anshu Gupta. Microplastics as contaminants in Indian environment: a review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2021, 28 (48) , 68025-68052.
    30. Oldamur Hollóczki. Evidence for protein misfolding in the presence of nanoplastics. International Journal of Quantum Chemistry 2021, 121 (3)
    31. K.J. Collins. Environmental impact of tires used in marine construction. 2021, 275-296.
    32. Emma Fältström, Stefan Anderberg. Towards control strategies for microplastics in urban water. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2020, 27 (32) , 40421-40433.
    33. M. Narmatha Sathish, Immaculate Jeyasanta, Jamila Patterson. Microplastics in Salt of Tuticorin, Southeast Coast of India. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 2020, 79 (1) , 111-121.
    34. Frederieke J. Kroon, Kathryn L.E. Berry, Diane L. Brinkman, Rai Kookana, Frederic D.L. Leusch, Steven D. Melvin, Peta A. Neale, Andrew P. Negri, Marji Puotinen, Jeffrey J. Tsang, Jason P. van de Merwe, Mike Williams. Sources, presence and potential effects of contaminants of emerging concern in the marine environments of the Great Barrier Reef and Torres Strait, Australia. Science of The Total Environment 2020, 719 , 135140.
    35. Thomas Mani, Patricia Burkhardt-Holm. Seasonal microplastics variation in nival and pluvial stretches of the Rhine River – From the Swiss catchment towards the North Sea. Science of The Total Environment 2020, 707 , 135579.
    36. Lei Su, Simon M. Sharp, Vincent J. Pettigrove, Nicholas J. Craig, Bingxu Nan, Fangni Du, Huahong Shi. Superimposed microplastic pollution in a coastal metropolis. Water Research 2020, 168 , 115140.
    37. Lulu Lv, Junhao Qu, Zihua Yu, Daihuan Chen, Chunxia Zhou, Pengzhi Hong, Shengli Sun, Chengyong Li. A simple method for detecting and quantifying microplastics utilizing fluorescent dyes - Safranine T, fluorescein isophosphate, Nile red based on thermal expansion and contraction property. Environmental Pollution 2019, 255 , 113283.
    38. Mengting Liu, Yang Song, Shibo Lu, Rong Qiu, Jiani Hu, Xinyu Li, Moritz Bigalke, Huahong Shi, Defu He. A method for extracting soil microplastics through circulation of sodium bromide solutions. Science of The Total Environment 2019, 691 , 341-347.
    39. Thomas Mani, Stefan Frehland, Andreas Kalberer, Patricia Burkhardt-Holm. Using castor oil to separate microplastics from four different environmental matrices. Analytical Methods 2019, 11 (13) , 1788-1794.
    40. Lei Su, Hua Deng, Bowen Li, Qiqing Chen, Vincent Pettigrove, Chenxi Wu, Huahong Shi. The occurrence of microplastic in specific organs in commercially caught fishes from coast and estuary area of east China. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2019, 365 , 716-724.
    41. Thomas Mani, Pascal Blarer, Florian R. Storck, Marco Pittroff, Theo Wernicke, Patricia Burkhardt-Holm. Repeated detection of polystyrene microbeads in the Lower Rhine River. Environmental Pollution 2019, 245 , 634-641.
    42. Francoise Watteau, Marie-France Dignac, Adeline Bouchard, Agathe Revallier, Sabine Houot. Microplastic Detection in Soil Amended With Municipal Solid Waste Composts as Revealed by Transmission Electronic Microscopy and Pyrolysis/GC/MS. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 2018, 2
    43. Chandan Krishna Seth, Amritanshu Shriwastav. Contamination of Indian sea salts with microplastics and a potential prevention strategy. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2018, 25 (30) , 30122-30131.
    44. Pui Kwan Cheung, Lincoln Fok, Pui Lam Hung, Lewis T.O. Cheung. Spatio-temporal comparison of neustonic microplastic density in Hong Kong waters under the influence of the Pearl River Estuary. Science of The Total Environment 2018, 628-629 , 731-739.
    • This publication has no figures.
    • This publication has no References.

    Pair your accounts.

    Export articles to Mendeley

    Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

    Pair your accounts.

    Export articles to Mendeley

    Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

    You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

    STEP 1:
    Click to create an ACS ID

    Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

    Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

    Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

    Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect