ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Photoredox-Catalyzed Dehydrogenative Csp3–Csp2 Cross-Coupling of Alkylarenes to Aldehydes in Flow
My Activity

Figure 1Loading Img
  • Open Access
Article

Photoredox-Catalyzed Dehydrogenative Csp3–Csp2 Cross-Coupling of Alkylarenes to Aldehydes in Flow
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

  • Oliver M. Griffiths
    Oliver M. Griffiths
    Yusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, CB2 1EW Cambridge, U.K.
  • Henrique A. Esteves
    Henrique A. Esteves
    Yusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, CB2 1EW Cambridge, U.K.
  • Yiding Chen
    Yiding Chen
    Yusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, CB2 1EW Cambridge, U.K.
    More by Yiding Chen
  • Karin Sowa
    Karin Sowa
    Yusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, CB2 1EW Cambridge, U.K.
    Department of Chemistry, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany
    More by Karin Sowa
  • Oliver S. May
    Oliver S. May
    Yusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, CB2 1EW Cambridge, U.K.
  • Peter Morse
    Peter Morse
    Medicine Design, Pfizer, Inc., Groton, Connecticut 06340, United States
    More by Peter Morse
  • David C. Blakemore
    David C. Blakemore
    Medicine Design, Pfizer, Inc., Groton, Connecticut 06340, United States
  • Steven V. Ley*
    Steven V. Ley
    Yusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, CB2 1EW Cambridge, U.K.
    *Email: [email protected]
Open PDFSupporting Information (1)

The Journal of Organic Chemistry

Cite this: J. Org. Chem. 2021, 86, 19, 13559–13571
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.1c01621
Published September 15, 2021

Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0 .

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Executing photoredox reactions in flow offers solutions to frequently encountered issues regarding reproducibility, reaction time, and scale-up. Here, we report the transfer of a photoredox-catalyzed benzylic coupling of alkylarenes to aldehydes to a flow chemistry setting leading to improvements in terms of higher concentration, shorter residence times, better yields, ease of catalyst preparation, and enhanced substrate scope. Its applicability has been demonstrated by a multi-gram-scale reaction using high-power light-emitting diodes (LEDs), late-stage functionalization of selected active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), and also a photocatalyst recycling method.

This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0 .
  • cc licence
  • by licence
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society

Introduction

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Constructing new Csp2–Csp3 bonds constitutes a significant process in the molecular assembly and late-stage functionalization of biologically relevant molecules. Consequently, the development of straightforward methods to quickly forge these bonds has been a focus of attention for synthetic chemists in recent years. Noteworthy in this context, photoredox catalysis has arisen as a valuable tool that enables the construction of complex molecular architectures in a modular manner under mild conditions via the intermediacy of highly reactive species generated by various light sources. (1)
This strategy has enabled the direct activation of unfunctionalized C–H bonds for cross-coupling using a synergistic combination of photoredox and transition-metal catalysis. (2) The opportunities to explore cross-dehydrogenative coupling reactions using this strategy are particularly attractive since no prefunctionalization is required in either coupling partner, resulting in high atom economies and access to a large array of late-stage functionalization opportunities, employing cheap and abundant chemical feedstocks. (3)
Recently, Murakami et al. reported a dehydrogenative photocatalytic C(sp2)–C(sp3) coupling reaction between alkylarenes and aldehydes in the presence of an iridium photocatalyst and a nickel co-catalyst. This method facilitates the introduction of acyl groups to aromatic side chains to afford α-aryl ketones, (4) versatile building blocks, and key intermediates toward the preparation of many active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) such as amphetamines and opiates. (5) Despite the potential utility of this and related transformations, there are significant challenges hampering the widespread adoption of photochemical reactions more generally in chemical synthesis, particularly in terms of scalability. (6) Although photochemical reactions are attractive in terms of product outcome, their efficiency is dependent on the incident photon flux on the reaction mixture. This adds to existing concerns relating to poorer reproducibility, difficulties of optimization, photodegradation, and unwanted side reactions. (7) Scale-up issues associated with irradiating reactions are governed by the Beer–Lambert–Bouguer law, which describes exponentially decreasing photon flux penetration through solutions of high molar absorptive molecules, such as photocatalysts. (6) Consequently, visible light-mediated reactions only take place on the periphery regions of a batch reaction vessel. (8)
To address these issues, many researchers have shown that transferring photochemical reactions to a continuous flow regime using high-power light-emitting diodes (LEDs) can improve reproducibility, scalability, reaction outcome, and reaction times. (9) Many of these benefits arise from superior heat distribution, mixing, and photon flux as a result of the small cross section of tubing found in flow reactor platforms.

Results and Discussion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Inspired by the work of Murakami, we set out to investigate conditions applicable for scale-up of this dehydrogenative C(sp2)–C(sp3) cross-coupling reaction by exploiting flow chemistry techniques.
Establishing 4-methylanisole (1a) and hexanal (2a) as model substrates, we found initial conditions to execute the reaction (Scheme 1). We then commenced a reaction optimization campaign using a commercial flow reactor. The results are summarized in Table 1.

Scheme 1

Scheme 1. Initial Conditions Found
Table 1. Reaction Optimizationa
entrydeviation from standard conditionsyielda (%)
1none96 (86)b
2no photocatalyst0c
3no ligand added59c
4no NiBr2(dme) and ligand (0.5 equiv TBAB added)17c
5NiCl2(dme) instead of NiBr2(dme)55
6NiCl2(dme) instead of NiBr2(dme) (0.5 equiv TBAB added)71
7under N2, reaction mixture degassed91
8tR = 80 min77c
9tR = 80 min, 45 W 420 nm LED28c
10EtOAc solvent77
110.2 M66
a

Reaction conditions: 0.2 mmol, 1.0 equiv of hexanal, 5.0 equiv of 4-methylanisole, 2 mol % (Ir[dF(CF3)ppy]2(dtbpy))PF6, 5 mol % NiBr2(dme), 5 mol % dtbpy, 2 mL of acetone. NMR conversion to the product with 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene as an internal standard.

b

Isolated yield.

c

Unreacted hexanal detected by 1H NMR.

We found that while the photocatalyst was essential (entry 2), to obtain a high yield of product, small quantities of product were observed in the absence of ligand or nickel co-catalyst, provided a bromide source such as tetra-butylammonium bromide (TBAB) was added to the reaction mixture (entries 3 and 4). The presence of Br is important as Br is likely the radical abstractor for this reaction. (4) Using nickel chloride as an alternative catalyst also gave reasonable conversion to the product (entry 5), although the addition of TBAB increased the conversion considerably (entry 6) and is in line with their respective oxidation potentials. (10) We were also pleased to find that the reaction could be carried out under aerobic conditions with no significant depreciation in product yield (entry 7). Stock solutions of the iridium photocatalyst, nickel co-catalyst, and ligand could be prepared and stored under air for 2 months then used directly with no observed deleterious effects on the reaction. Optimization of the flow reactor parameters showed that only 120 min residence time was required for full conversion of the aldehyde component (entry 8) and a 365 nm LED light source was preferred over 420 nm LEDs (entry 9). Finally, acetone was also preferable to previously used ethyl acetate (entry 10) (4) and the concentration was found to be optimal at 0.1 M (entry 11).
Upon defining a suitable set of conditions, a range of alkylarenes were then evaluated (Table 2). Electron-rich methylarenes (1af) were found to work well and were acylated in good to excellent yields. While the absence of an electron-donating group, such as in toluene, led to decreased yield (3g), the presence of secondary benzylic sites appeared to be beneficial (3hk), enabling good reactivity with electron-deficient aromatic rings (3k). An extended aromatic system was also tolerated (3l). Aryl halides were also amenable to this transformation (3m), providing a handle for further functionalization via orthogonal cross-coupling chemistry. Pleasingly, protected aniline derivatives were also reasonable substrates, giving 3n and 3o in 52 and 38%, respectively. Finally, we examined a range of heterocyclic methylarenes and found that indoles, furans, and thiophenes were competent substrates in this reaction (3px); however, basic N-heterocyclic substrates such as methyl-pyridines or methyl-imidazole failed to deliver the expected ketones (see Supporting Information, SI).
Table 2. Alkylarene Scope
a

Reaction conditions: 1 (2.0 mmol), aldehyde (0.4 mmol), (Ir[dF(CF3)ppy]2(dtbpy))PF6 (2 mol %), NiBr2(dme) (5 mol %), dtbpy (5 mol %), and acetone (4.0 mL). tR = 180 min.

b

tR = 300 min.

Next, we turned our attention to the aldehyde component in this coupling reaction (Table 3). A variety of aliphatic aldehydes with a range of chain lengths, as well as substrates bearing α-alkyl groups, were found to give good to excellent yields of the corresponding products (3vaf). Alcohols and aromatic rings were well tolerated (3agaj), although significant decomposition via aldehyde decarbonylation was observed with phenylacetaldehyde (3ah) (see the SI). Aldehydes bearing Boc-protected amines also delivered the desired ketone products in moderate to good yields (3akan), while a substrate containing a terminal alkene was less well suited (3ao), exhibiting product photodegradation.
Table 3. Aldehyde Scope
a

Reaction conditions: 1 (2.0 mmol), aldehyde (0.4 mmol), (Ir[dF(CF3)ppy]2(dtbpy))PF6 (2 mol %), NiBr2(dme) (5 mol %), dtbpy (5 mol %), and acetone (4.0 mL). tR = 180 min.

Key to our interests in this reaction was the potential applicability toward late-stage functionalization of APIs in flow. Methyl-substituted aromatic rings are frequently found among APIs, agrochemicals, and natural products and are, therefore, highly desirable targets for selective modification. The opportunity to acylate APIs directly to α-aryl ketones is particularly attractive due to the versatility of ketones to be transformed to a plethora of other desirable functional groups, therefore opening up a wider range of chemical space to be explored for biological activity. We were pleased to find therefore that a selection of molecules could be derivatized in moderate to excellent yields (Table 4). Gemfibrozil was acylated in 95% yield, with 5.7:1 regioselectivity for the ortho-methyl group over the meta-methyl position (3ap). Anti-inflammatory drug celecoxib gave ketone 3aq in 41% yield, demonstrating the ability to incorporate N-containing aromatic heterocycles in the substrate scope, provided they are deactivated as bases. Muscle relaxant metaxalone was acylated in 62% yield and isolated as 1:1 mixture of diastereoisomers (3ar). N-Boc-protected Mexiletine was functionalized to give ketone 3as in 77% yield. N-Boc-protected Atomoxetine was also derivatized in 50% yield (3at).
Table 4. Late-Stage Functionalization of APIs and Analoguesa
a

Reaction conditions: 1 (2.0 mmol), 7-hydroxycitronellal (0.4 mmol), (Ir[dF(CF3)ppy]2(dtbpy))PF6 (2 mol %), NiBr2(dme) (5 mol %), dtbpy (5 mol %), and acetone (4.0 mL).

Solutions to scalability issues faced with photochemical reactions, such as the above process, have been investigated previously by the group and so we set out to address this aspect of the procedure. (9f,11) First, using the original reactor with a 61 W 365 nm LED as the light source (Figure 1) and 7-hydroxycitronellal (2g) selected as the aldehyde component for this scaled reaction, 5.0 mmol of ketone 3ag was synthesized continuously in 82% yield at a throughput of 2.56 g day–1. However, to increase the value of the new procedure, we felt it important to recover the expensive photocatalyst from the reaction with the aim of recycling it. We were able to show that the photocatalyst and co-catalyst were readily removed from the reaction mixture by simply passing the product solution through a silica gel plug acting as a scavenger. Elution with the reaction solvent (acetone) removed all organic components of the product mixture while subsequent washing with methanol selectively eluted the photocatalyst (90% recovery), which could then be successfully reused (x2) with only slightly diminished conversion to the final product (Figure 1).

Figure 1

Figure 1. Scale-up and catalyst recycling.

Encouraged by this result, we then set about scaling up the reaction further using a higher-power flow photoreactor (Figure 2). This setup utilized a 20 mL reactor coil (ID = 1.0 mm) and a more powerful LED (365 nm LEDs, 700 W) system. Initial experiments with this platform revealed the optimum throughput was obtained with a 40 min residence time (see the SI). With our aim to perform a multi-gram-scale reaction over 24 h, optimized for throughput rather than yield, we acknowledged that a continuous reaction for this length of time would require 1.62 g of the [Ir] photocatalyst. With this in mind, we employed our photocatalyst recycling strategy to reduce the amount required and the scale-up was carried out in 3 consecutive continuous 8 h average segments. After each run, the photocatalyst was recovered and then reused immediately in the subsequent reaction (Figure 2). The combined crude products yielded 10.5 g of ketone 3ag after purification in 50% overall yield. Crucially, a total of only 640 mg of [Ir] photocatalyst was required as a result of the recycling methodology.

Figure 2

Figure 2. PhotoSyn reactor scale-up.

In summary, we have enhanced the dehydrogenative cross-coupling reaction between aromatic alkyl side chains and aldehydes in terms of shorter reaction times, improved yields, in situ reagent preparation and catalyst preparation, and higher reaction concentrations using flow chemistry techniques as an enabling tool. Furthermore, we have shown the reaction is amenable toward the late-stage functionalization of a range of APIs. Finally, we have demonstrated that this transformation can be executed continuously on a multigram scale using high-power LEDs, while also recovering and reusing the iridium photocatalyst.

Experimental Section

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

General Methods

All procedures below were conducted under inert nitrogen atmosphere unless stated otherwise. Reagents were supplied by Sigma-Aldrich, Alfa Aesar, Acros Organics, TCI, and Fluorochem and were used as received with the exception of aldehydes that were distilled fresh prior to use. Acetone UPLC grade was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and used for all dehydrogenative cross-coupling reactions. All substrates were synthesized using a commercially available Vapourtec E series comprising three peristaltic pumps and a photoreactor. The light source used was a commercially available 61 W radiant power 365 nm (peak intensity) LED from Vapourtec with an irradiation band ranging 350–400 nm. The reactor coil constituted 10 mL total volume FEP tubing (ID = 1.0 mm). Work-up solvents were obtained from commercial sources and distilled prior to use. Petroleum ether (PE) refers to the fractions of petrol collected between 40 and 60 °C bp Flash column chromatography was conducted using a Biotage SPX system with single-use disposable silica columns of the appropriate size (SiliaSep Flash Cartridges 12 or 25 g 40–60 μm ISO04/012). Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) analysis was carried out using silica gel 60 F254 precoated glass-backed plates and visualized under UV light (254 nm) or with permanganate or vanillin stains. 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and 19F NMR were obtained using a 700 MHz Bruker TXO Spectrometer or a Bruker AV400 (Avance 400 MHz) spectrometer. Chemical shifts (δ) are referenced to residual CDCl3 in the unit of parts per million (ppm). Coupling constants J are quoted in the unit of hertz (Hz). Proton and carbon multiplicity is recorded as singlet (s), doublet (d), double of doublets (dd), triplet (t), quartet (q), pentet/quintet (p), heptet (hept.) multiplet (m) and broad (br), or combinations thereof. All compounds examined were dried in vacuo to remove residual solvents. 1H NMR signals are reported to two decimal places and 13C signals to one decimal place. High-resolution mass spectra (HRMS) were obtained on a Waters Xevo G2-S bench-top quadrupole time of flight (QTOF) spectrometer. Infrared spectra were recorded neat on a PerkinElmer Spectrum One Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometer with a universal attenuated total reflection (ATR) sampling accessory, and selected peaks are reported.

General Procedure A: Preparation of N-Boc-Protected APIs 1asat

To an oven-dried round-bottom flask were added the corresponding amine hydrochloride salt (1.0 equiv), 4-(N,N-dimethylamino)pyridine (5 mol %), triethylamine (2.1 equiv), and dichloromethane (DCM) (0.5 M) at room temperature. Di-tert-butyl dicarbonate (1.1 equiv) was then added dropwise at 0 °C, and the reaction was stirred at room temperature for 16 h. Distilled water was then added, and the mixture was extracted three times with EtOAc. The organic phases were combined, dried over MgSO4, filtered, and evaporated in vacuo. The residue was purified by flash column chromatography to give the corresponding N-Boc-protected product.

tert-Butyl (1-(2,6-Dimethylphenoxy)propan-2-yl)carbamate (1as)

Mexiletine hydrochloride (4.31 g, 20 mmol, 1 equiv), 4-(N,N-dimethylamino)pyridine (128 mg, 1.0 mmol, 5 mol %), triethylamine (5.9 mL, 42 mmol, 2.1 equiv), di-tert-butyl dicarbonate (5.1 mL, 22 mmol, 1.1 equiv), and DCM (20 mL) were subjected to General Procedure A (chromatography eluent: 40% Et2O in PE) to give compound 1as (2.72 g, 49%) as a white solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.00 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 6.95–6.89 (m, 1H), 4.88 (br. s, 1H), 3.99 (br s, 1H), 3.78 (br s, 1H), 3.69 (dd, J = 9.0, 3.6 Hz, 1H), 2.27 (s, 6H), 1.46 (s, 9H), 1.38 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz) δ 155.4, 155.1, 130.8, 128.9, 124.0, 79.2, 74.1, 46.8, 28.4, 17.9, 16.2; mp: 58–61 °C; IR: νmax 3347, 2979, 1683, 1530 cm–1; HRMS: calculated for C16H25NO3Na+, 302.1732 [M + Na]+. Found m/z 302.1735, Δ = 1.0 ppm.

tert-Butyl (R)-Methyl(3-phenyl-3-(o-tolyloxy)propyl)carbamate (1at)

Atomoxetine hydrochloride (1.08 g, 3.70 mmol, 1.0 equiv) 4-(N,N-dimethylamino)pyridine (24 mg, 0.19 mmol, 5 mol %), triethylamine (1.1 mL, 7.8 mmol, 2.1 equiv), di-tert-butyl dicarbonate (935 μL, 4.07 mmol, 1.1 equiv), and DCM (4 mL) were subjected to General Procedure A (chromatography eluent: 40% Et2O in PE) to give compound 1at (1.22 g, 93%) as a colorless oil and a mixture of rotamers. 1H NMR (700 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.43–7.32 (m, 4H). 7.30–7.24 (m, 1H), 7.16 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 6.98 (t, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 6.81 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 6.63 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 5.20 (s, 1H), 3.61–3.36 (m, 2H), 2.88 (s, 3H), 2.39 (s, 3H), 2.32–2.08 (m, 2H), 1.55–1.37 (m, 9H); 13C{1H} NMR (176 MHz) δ 155.8, 155.7, 141.8, 130.6, 128.7, 127.5, 126.8, 126.6, 125.6, 120.3, 112.6, 79.3, 76.8, 46.0, 37.3, 34.4, 28.4, 16.6; IR: νmax 2975, 2922, 1690, 1491 cm–1; HRMS: calculated for C22H29NO3Na+, 378.2045 [M + Na]+. Found m/z 378.2037, Δ = −2.1 ppm.

General Procedure B: Dehydrogenative Cross-Coupling Reaction between Alkylarenes and Aldehydes to Ketones 3aat

To a 10 mL microwave vial were added under air the corresponding methylarene (2.0 mmol, 5.0 equiv), catalyst stock solution* (4 mL), and the corresponding aldehyde (0.4 mmol, 1.0 equiv). The reaction mixture was pumped at a flow rate of 0.083 mL min–1 using a Vapourtec E-series flow reactor into a UV-150 photochemical reactor (10 mL reactor volume, FEP tubing) and irradiated by a 365 nm LED lamp (61 W output power). The temperature of the reactor was kept at 30–50 °C, and the product formation was monitored using a Mettler Toledo FlowIR device (DiComp head, 1750–1500 cm–1). The reactor output was collected and evaporated under reduced pressure.** The crude mixture was then purified via flash column chromatography as indicated to give the corresponding ketone product.
*The stock solution was prepared by adding to a 250 mL flask (Ir[dF(CF3)ppy]2(dtbpy))PF6 (224 mg, 0.20 mmol), nickel(II) bromide ethylene glycol dimethyl ether complex (154 mg, 0.50 mmol), 4,4′-di-tert-butyl-2,2′-dipyridyl (134 mg, 0.50 mmol), and acetone (100 mL). The resulting mixture was stirred for 10 min and then stored under air at 5 °C for up to 2 months.
**If traces of unreacted aldehyde were detected in the crude 1H NMR spectrum, the product was dissolved in DCM (5 mL) and 4 mL of (0.1 M) aqueous sodium bisulfite solution was added. After vigorous stirring for 30 min, the layers were separated, the aqueous layer was washed with DCM (5 mL), and the combined organic layers were then washed with brine and evaporated under reduced pressure. (12)

Procedure for the Scaled-Up Reaction

To a 250 mL Erlenmeyer flask equipped with a magnetic stir bar were added (Ir[dF(CF3)ppy]2(dtbpy))PF6 (539 mg, 0.480 mmol, 2 mol %), nickel(II) bromide ethylene glycol dimethyl ether complex (370 mg, 1.20 mmol, 5 mol %), 4,4′-di-tert-butyl-2,2′-dipyridyl (322 mg, 1.20 mmol, 5 mol %), followed by acetone (240 mL), 4-methylanisole (15.1 mL, 120 mmol, 5.0 equiv), and 7-hydroxycitronellal (4.5 mL, 24 mmol, 1.0 equiv). The resulting mixture was stirred for 10 min and then pumped into a 20 mL Uniqsis PhotoSyn reactor cooled by a CRD Polar Bear Plus Flow cooling unit using a peristaltic pump (Vapourtec SF-10 series) at a flow rate of 500 μL·min–1. After 8 h, the reactor output was collected, concentrated under reduced pressure, and the residue was loaded onto a 120 g silica column (SiliCycle, Inc.), which was then flushed with 300 mL of acetone followed by 300 mL of MeOH. The methanolic fraction was evaporated, resuspended in DCM (50 mL), filtered, and evaporated under reduced pressure, resulting in a yellow-green solid (recovered (Ir[dF(CF3)ppy]2(dtbpy))PF6, 489 mg) that was reused in the next 8 h experiment after the addition of 50 mg of fresh (Ir[dF(CF3)ppy]2(dtbpy))PF6. The procedure was repeated three times (24 h in total), resulting in three acetone fractions that were combined and evaporated. The resulting oil was purified via flash column chromatography (chromatography eluent: 20–70% Et2O in PE), resulting in 10.5 g of ketone 3ag.

Characterization of Products 3aat

1-(4-Methoxyphenyl)heptan-2-one (3a)

4-Methylanisole (252 μL, 2.00 mmol, 5.0 equiv) and hexanal (49 μL, 0.4 mmol, 1.0 equiv) were subjected to General Procedure B (chromatography eluent: 0–20% Et2O in PE) to give ketone 3a (76 mg, 86%) as a colorless oil. 1H NMR (700 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.11 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 6.86 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 3.80 (s, 3H), 3.61 (s, 2H), 2.42 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 1.54 (p, J = 8.3, 7.4 Hz, 2H), 1.30–1.18 (m, 4H), 0.86 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (176 MHz) δ 209.2, 158.7, 130.5, 126.6, 114.2, 55.4, 49.3, 41.9, 31.4, 23.6, 22.5, 14.0. Spectroscopic data are consistent with those previously reported. (13)

1-(4-Methoxy-3,5-dimethylphenyl)heptan-2-one and 1-(2-Methoxy-3,5-dimethylphenyl)heptan-2-one Mixture (3b)

2,4,6-Trimethylanisole (315 μL, 2.00 mmol, 5.0 equiv) and hexanal (49 μL, 0.4 mmol, 1.0 equiv) were subjected to General Procedure B (chromatography eluent: 0–20% Et2O in PE) to give ketone 3b (88 mg, 88%) as a 1:1 mixture of inseparable regioisomers presented as a colorless oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ [6.91 (s) + 6.84 (s) + 6.78 (s), 2H], [3.71 (s), 3.56 (s), 2H], 3.66 (s, 3H), 2.48–2.40 (m, 2H), [2.27 (s), 2.25 (s), 6H], 1.64–1.50 (m, 2H), 1.35–1.19 (m, 4H), 0.91–0.83 (m, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz) δ 209.2, 156.1, 154.7, 133.5, 131.3, 131.1, 130.8, 129.9, 129.7, 129.5, 127.7, 60.3, 59.8, 49.5, 44.7, 42.1, 42.0, 31.5, 31.4, 23.7, 23.6, 22.6, 22.5, 20.8, 16.3, 16.1, 14.0, 14.0; IR: νmax 2928, 2860, 1711, 1601, 1483 cm–1; HRMS: calculated for C16H25O2+, 249.1855 [M + H]+. Found m/z 249.1864, Δ = 3.6 ppm.

1-(3,5-Dimethylphenyl)heptan-2-one (3c)

Mesitylene (278 μL, 2.00 mmol, 5.0 equiv) and hexanal (49 μL, 0.4 mmol, 1.0 equiv) were subjected to General Procedure B (chromatography eluent: 0–20% EtOAc in PE) to give ketone 3c (66 mg, 76%) as a colorless oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 6.89 (s, 1H), 6.81 (s, 2H), 3.59 (s, 2H), 2.43 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 2.30 (s, 6H), 1.56 (p, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.32–1.15 (m, 4H), 0.86 (t, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz) δ 209.1, 138.4, 134.4, 128.7, 127.3, 50.2, 42.0, 31.5, 23.6, 22.6, 21.4, 14.0; IR: νmax 2954, 2926, 2871, 1710, 1605, 1460 cm–1; HRMS: calculated for C15H23O+, 219.1743 [M + H]+. Found m/z 219.1749, Δ = 2.7 ppm.

1-(p-Tolyl)heptan-2-one (3d)

p-Xylene (247 μL, 2.00 mmol, 5.0 equiv) and hexanal (49 μL, 0.4 mmol, 1.0 equiv) were subjected to General Procedure B (chromatography eluent: 0–20% Et2O in PE) to give ketone 3d (63 mg, 76%) as a colorless oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.14 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.09 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 3.64 (s, 2H), 2.43 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 2.34 (s, 3H), 1.56 (p, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 1.35–1.13 (m, 4H), 0.87 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz) δ 209.0, 136.6, 131.5, 129.5, 129.4, 49.9, 42.0, 31.4, 23.6, 22.5, 21.2, 14.0. Spectroscopic data are consistent with those previously reported. (14)

1-(2-Methoxyphenyl)heptan-2-one (3e)

2-Methylanisole (248 μL, 2.00 mmol, 5.0 equiv) and hexanal (49 μL, 0.4 mmol, 1.0 equiv) were subjected to General Procedure B (chromatography eluent: 0–20% Et2O in PE) to give ketone 3e (74 mg, 84%) as a colorless oil. 1H NMR (700 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.27–7.11 (m, 1H), 7.12 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 6.92 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 6.87 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 3.80 (s, 3 H), 3.66 (s, 2H), 2.41 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 1.60–1.53 (m, 2H), 1.32–1.20 (m, 4H), 0.87 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (176 MHz) δ 209.3, 157.5, 131.3, 128.5, 123.9, 120.8, 110.6, 55.4, 44.8, 42.0, 31.5, 23.6, 22.6, 14.1; IR: νmax 2929, 2859, 1712, 1601, 1589, 1494 cm–1; HRMS: calculated for C14H21O2+, 221.1536 [M + H]+. Found m/z 221.1542, Δ = 1.8 ppm.

1-(2-Methoxy-3-methylphenyl)heptan-2-one (3f)

2,6-Dimethylanisole (283 μL, 2.00 mmol, 5.0 equiv) and hexanal (49 μL, 0.4 mmol, 1.0 equiv) were subjected to General Procedure B (chromatography eluent: 0–20% Et2O in PE) to give ketone 3f (59 mg, 63%) as a colorless oil. 1H NMR (700 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.12–7.07 (m, 1H), 6.98 (d, J = 6.98 Hz, 2H), 3.69 (s, 2H), 3.68 (s, 3H), 2.44 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 2.31 (s, 3H), 1.61–1.53 (m, 2H), 1.32–1.20 (m, 4H), 0.87 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (176 MHz) δ 209.1, 157.0, 131.3, 130.7, 129.0, 128.2, 124.2, 60.3, 44.8, 42.1, 31.5, 23.7, 22.6, 16.4, 14.0; IR: νmax 2929, 2871, 1712, 1591, 1468 cm–1; HRMS: calculated for C15H23O2+, 235.1698 [M + H]+. Found m/z 235.1707, Δ = 3.8 ppm.

1-Phenylheptan-2-one (3g)

Toluene (213 μL, 2.00 mmol, 5.0 equiv) and hexanal (49 μL, 0.4 mmol, 1.0 equiv) were subjected to General Procedure B (chromatography eluent: 0–20% Et2O in PE) to give ketone 3g (27 mg, 35%) as a colorless oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.35 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.29 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 7.23 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H), 3.70 (s, 2H), 2.46 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 1.64–1.52 (m, 2H), 1.34–1.19 (m, 4H), 0.89 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz) δ 208.7, 134.5, 129.5, 128.8, 127.1, 50.3, 42.1, 31.4, 23.6, 22.5, 14.0. Spectroscopic data are consistent with those previously reported. (15)

9-Hydroxy-5,9-dimethyl-2-phenyldecan-3-one (3h)

Ethylbenzene (245 μL, 2.0 mmol, 5.0 equiv) and 7-hydroxycitronellal (75 μL, 0.4 mmol, 1.0 equiv) were subjected to General Procedure B (chromatography eluent: 20–50% Et2O in PE) to give ketone 3h (66 mg, 60%) as a colorless oil and a mixture of diastereomers. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.37–7.29 (m, 2H), 7.29–7.18 (m, 3H), 3.79–3.67 (m, 1H), 2.40–2.27 (m, 1H), 2.25–2.11 (m, 1H), 2.05–1.90 (m, 1H), 1.54 (br. s, 1H), [1.43–0.93 (m), 1.39 (d, J = 7.1 Hz), 1.18 (d, J = 9.2 Hz), 15H], [0.84 (d, J = 6.6 Hz), 0.73 (d, J = 6.5 Hz), 3H]; 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz) δ 210.7, 210.6, 140.6, 128.9, 128.0, 127.2, 70.9, 53.6, 53.2, 48.5, 48.5, 43.9, 37.4, 37.0, 29.4, 29.3, 29.2, 29.2, 29.0, 28.9, 21.7, 21.5, 19.9, 19.7, 17.5, 17.5; IR: νmax 3423, 2967, 2932, 1708, 1600 cm–1; HRMS: calculated for C18H29O2+, 277.2168 [M + H]+. Found m/z 277.2180, Δ = 4.3 ppm.

9-Hydroxy-2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-5,9-dimethyldecan-3-one (3i)

4-Ethylanisole (284 μL, 2.00 mmol, 5.0 equiv) and 7-hydroxycitronellal (75 μL, 0.4 mmol, 1.0 equiv) were subjected to General Procedure B (chromatography eluent: 20–50% Et2O in PE) to give ketone 3i (72 mg, 59%) as a colorless oil and a mixture of diastereomers. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.10 (d. J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 6.84 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 3.77 (s. 3H), 3.70–3.60 (m, 1H), 2.36–2.33 (m, 1H), 2.20–2.08 (m, 1H), 2.02–1.88 (m, 1H), [1.43–0.97 (m), 1.33 (d, J = 7.2 Hz), 1.15 (d, J = 7.2 Hz), 16H], [0.81 (d, J = 6.7 Hz), 0.71 (d, J = 6.7 Hz), 3H]; 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz) δ 211.1, 211.0, 158.8, 132.7, 132.7, 129.1, 114.4, 71.1, 71.0, 55.4, 52.8, 52.4, 48.5, 48.4, 44.0, 44.0, 37.4, 37.1, 29.4, 29.4, 29.3, 29.3, 29.1, 29.0, 21.8, 21.5, 20.0, 19.8, 17.6, 17.6; IR: νmax 3452, 2964, 2934, 1707, 1610, 1510 cm–1; HRMS: calculated for C19H30O3Na+, 329.2086 [M + H]+. Found m/z 329.2093, Δ = 2.1 ppm.

3-Phenylnonan-4-one (3j)

Propylbenzene (279 μL, 2.00 mmol, 5.0 equiv) and hexanal (49 μL, 0.4 mmol, 1.0 equiv) were subjected to General Procedure B (chromatography eluent: 0–5% Et2O in PE) to give ketone 3j (48 mg, 55%) as a colorless oil. 1H NMR (700 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.31 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 7.24 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 7.20 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 3.52 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 2.38–2.29 (m, 2H), 2.06 (dp, J = 14.7, 7.5 Hz, 1H), 1.70 (dp, J = 14.7, 7.5 Hz, 1H), 1.54–1.41 (m, 2H), 1.24–1.18 (m, 2H), 1.16–1.08 (m, 2H), 0.82 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 6H); 13C{1H} NMR (176 MHz) δ 211.0, 139.3, 128.9, 128.4, 127.2, 60.9, 42.1, 31.4, 25.4, 23.6, 22.5, 14.0, 12.3. Spectroscopic data are consistent with those previously reported. (16)

2-(4-Chlorophenyl)-9-hydroxy-5,9-dimethyldecan-3-one (3k)

1-Chloro-ethylbenzene (269 μL, 2.0 mmol, 5.0 equiv) and 7-hydroxycitronellal (75 μL, 0.4 mmol, 1.0 equiv) were subjected to General Procedure B (chromatography eluent: 20–50% Et2O in PE) to give ketone 3k (70 mg, 56%) as a colorless oil and a mixture of diastereomers. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.30–7.24 (m, 2H), 7.15–7.11 (m, 2H), 3.73–3.65 (m, 1H), 2.36–2.26 (m, 1H), 2.20–2.11 (m, 1H), 2.00–1.91 (m, 1H), 1.73 (br s, 1H), 1.43–1.18 (m, 8H), [1.17 (s) + 1.15 (s), 6H], 1.12–0.93 (m, 1H), [0.81 (d, J = 6.6 Hz) + 0.71 (d, J = 6.6 Hz), 3H]; 13C{1H} NMR (176 MHz) δ 210.3, 210.1, 139.1, 139.1, 133.1, 129.4, 129.1, 71.0, 71.0, 52.9, 52.5, 48.7, 48.7, 43.9, 37.3, 37.0, 29.4, 29.4, 29.3, 29.0, 28.9, 21.8, 21.5, 19.9, 19.7, 17.6, 17.5; IR: νmax 3448, 2967, 2933, 1710, 1491 cm–1; HRMS: calculated for C18H27O2ClNa+, 333.1597 [M + Na]+. Found m/z 333.1611, Δ = 4.2 ppm.

1-([1,1′-Biphenyl]-4-yl)heptan-2-one (3l)

4-Phenyltoluene (336 mg, 2.00 mmol, 5.0 equiv) and hexanal (49 μL, 0.4 mmol, 1.0 equiv) were subjected to General Procedure B (chromatography eluent: 5–20% Et2O in PE) to give ketone 3l (76 mg, 71%) as a white crystalline solid. 1H NMR (700 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.58 (dd, J = 8.4, 1.2 Hz, 2H), 7.56 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.44 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.34 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.28 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 3.72 (s, 2H), 2.48 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.58 (p, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.32–1.19 (m, 4H), 0.87 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (176 MHz) δ 208.6, 140.9, 140.0, 133.5, 129.9, 128.9, 127.5, 127.4, 127.2, 49.8, 42.2, 31.4, 23.6, 22.5, 14.0; mp: 51–53 °C; IR: νmax 2970, 2927, 2873, 1706, 1604 cm–1; HRMS: calculated for C19H23O+, 267.1749 [M + H]+. Found m/z 267.1743, Δ = −2.2 ppm.

1-(4-Bromo-3,5-dimethylphenyl)heptan-2-one and 1-(2-Bromo-3,5-dimethylphenyl)heptan-2-one (3m)

2-Bromomesitylene (306 μL, 2.00 mmol, 5.0 equiv) and hexanal (49 μL, 0.4 mmol, 1.0 equiv) were subjected to General Procedure B (chromatography eluent: 0–5% EtOAc in PE) to give ketone 3m (49 mg, 41%) as a 1:1 mixture of inseparable diastereomers presented as a colorless oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ [6.97 (s), 6.90 (s), 6.85 (s), 2H], [3.83 (s), 3.57 (s), 2H], 2.52–2.40 (m, 2H), [2.39 (s), 2.38 (s), 2.26 (s), 6H], 1.65–1.50 (m, 2H), 1.35–1.17 (m, 4H), 0.92–0.82 (m, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz) δ 208.4, 207.9, 138.7, 138.6, 136.9, 135.1, 132.9, 130.7, 130.1, 129.4, 126.3, 124.4, 50.9, 49.4, 42.6, 42.2, 31.5, 31.4, 23.9, 23.9, 23.6, 23.6, 22.6, 22.6, 20.8, 14.1, 14.0; IR: νmax 2954, 2927, 2858, 1713, 1583, 1464 cm–1; HRMS: calculated for C15H22OBr+, 297.0854 [M + H]+. Found m/z 297.0846, Δ = −2.7 ppm.

4-Methyl-N-(4-(2-oxoheptyl)phenyl)benzenesulfonamide (3n)

4-Methyl-N-(p-tolyl)benzenesulfonamide (17) (523 mg, 2.00 mmol, 5.0 equiv) and hexanal (49 μL, 0.4 mmol, 1.0 equiv) were subjected to General Procedure B with a flow rate of 0.056 mL min–1 (tR = 180 min) (chromatography eluent: 5–20% Et2O in PE) to give ketone 3n (75 mg, 52%) as an off-white crystalline solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.66 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H), 7.21 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H), 7.09–6.99 (m, 4H), 3.59 (s, 2H), 2.43–2.36 (m, 2H), 2.37 (s, 3H), 1.52 (p, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.31–1.13 (m, 4H), 0.85 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (176 MHz) δ 208.8, 143.9, 136.2, 135.6, 131.3, 130.4, 129.7, 127.3, 121.8, 49.3, 42.2, 31.3, 23.5, 22.5, 21.6, 14.0; IR: νmax 3263, 2936, 1716, 1597, 1508 cm–1; HRMS: calculated for C20H26NO3S+, 360.1633 [M + H]+. Found m/z 360.1623, Δ = −2.8 ppm.

tert-Butyl (4-(2-Oxoheptyl)phenyl)carbamate (3o)

tert-Butyl-p-tolylcarbamate (18) (414 mg, 2.00 mmol, 5.0 equiv) and hexanal (49 μL, 0.4 mmol, 1.0 equiv) were subjected to General Procedure B with a flow rate of 0.033 mL min–1 (tR = 300 min) (chromatography eluent: 5–20% EtOAc in PE) to give ketone 3o (46 mg, 38%) as an orange solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.31 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.12 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 6.45 (s, 1H), 3.61 (s, 2H), 2.41 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.58–1.49 (m, 2H), 1.51 (s, 9H), 1.30–1.14 (m, 4H), 0.85 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (176 MHz) δ 209.0, 152.9, 137.4, 130.0, 129.1, 118.9, 80.7, 49.6, 41.9, 31.4, 28.5, 23.5, 22.5, 14.0; mp: 124–125 °C; IR: νmax 3308, 2956, 1712, 1696, 1594, 1528 cm–1; HRMS: calculated for C18H27O3NNa+, 328.1883 [M + Na]+. Found m/z 328.1889, Δ = 2.4 ppm.

tert-Butyl 5-(2-Oxoheptyl)-1H-indole-1-carboxylate (3p)

tert-Butyl 5-methyl-1H-indole-1-carboxylate (19) (463 mg, 2.00 mmol, 5.0 equiv) and hexanal (49 μL, 0.4 mmol, 1.0 equiv) were subjected to General Procedure B but with a flow rate of 0.056 mL min–1 (tR = 180 min) (chromatography eluent: 5–20% Et2O in PE) to give ketone 3p (59 mg, 45%) as a colorless oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.09 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.58 (s, 1H), 7.39 (s, 1H), 7.14 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 6.53 (d, J = 4.3 Hz, 1H), 3.75 (s, 2H), 2.43 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 1.67 (s, 9H), 1.60–1.48 (m, 2H), 1.32–1.43 (m, 4H), 0.85 (t, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz) δ 209.2, 149.8, 134.4, 131.1, 128.9, 126.5, 125.7, 121.7, 115.4, 107.2, 83.8, 50.2, 41.9, 31.4, 28.3, 23.6, 22.5, 14.0; IR: νmax 2957, 2930, 2872, 1731, 1468 cm–1; HRMS: calculated for C20H27NO3Na+, 352.1889 [M + H]+. Found m/z 352.1886, Δ = −0.9 ppm.

tert-Butyl 3-(2-Oxoheptyl)-1H-indole-1-carboxylate (3q)

tert-Butyl 3-methyl-1H-indole-1-carboxylate (20) (463 mg, 2.00 mmol, 5.0 equiv) and hexanal (49 μL, 0.4 mmol, 1.0 equiv) were subjected to General Procedure B with a flow rate of 0.056 mL min–1 (tR = 180 min) (chromatography eluent: 5–20% Et2O in PE) to give ketone 3q (73 mg, 56%) as a colorless oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.15 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.54 (s, 1H), 7.46 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.33 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.27–7.20 (m, 1H), 3.75 (s, 2H), 2.50 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 1.68 (s, 9H), 1.63–1.53 (m, 2H), 1.33–1.17 (m, 4H), 0.86 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz) δ 208.2, 149.7, 135.6, 130.4, 124.7, 124.5, 122.8, 119.1, 115.4, 113.7, 83.8, 41.9, 39.7, 31.4, 28.3, 23.6, 22.5, 14.0; IR: νmax 2956, 2931, 2870, 1728, 1609, 1451 cm–1; HRMS: calculated for C20H27NO3Na+, 352.1889 [M + H]+. Found m/z 352.1906, Δ = 4.8 ppm.

1-(Furan-2-yl)undecan-2-one (3r)

2-Methylfuran (180 μL, 2.00 mmol, 5.0 equiv) and decanal (75 μL, 0.4 mmol, 1.0 equiv) were subjected to General Procedure B (chromatography eluent: 5–20% Et2O in PE) to give ketone 3r (38 mg, 43%) as a colorless oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.36 (s, 1H), 6.34 (s, 1H), 6.18 (s, 1H), 3.70 (s, 2H), 2.44 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 1.62–1.48 (m, 2H), 1.30–1.20 (m, 12H), 0.87 (t, J = 6.3 Hz, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz) δ 206.6, 148.6, 142.2, 110.8, 108.3, 42.6, 42.1, 32.0, 29.5, 29.5, 29.4, 29.2, 23.8, 22.8, 14.2. Spectroscopic data are consistent with those previously reported. (21)

1-(Thiophen-2-yl)heptan-2-one (3s)

2-Methylthiophene (194 μL, 2.00 mmol, 5.0 equiv) and hexanal (49 μL, 0.4 mmol, 1.0 equiv) were subjected to General Procedure B (chromatography eluent: 5–20% Et2O in PE) to give ketone 3s (51 mg, 65%) as a yellow oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.21 (d, J = 5.1 Hz, 1H), 6.97 (t, J = 4.1 Hz, 1H), 6.90–6.86 (m, 1H), 3.88 (s, 2H), 2.49 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 1.58 (p, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 1.35–1.18 (m, 4H), 0.87 (t, J = 6.7 Hz, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz) δ 207.1, 135.6, 127.1, 126.8, 125.1, 43.7, 41.9, 31.4, 23.6, 22.5, 14.0; IR: νmax 2956, 2928, 2860, 1692, 1583 cm–1; HRMS: calculated for C11H17OS+, 197.1000 [M + H]+. Found m/z 197.0996, Δ = −2.0 ppm.

3-Methyl-1-(thiophen-2-yl)pentan-2-one (3t)

2-Methylthiophene (194 μL, 2.00 mmol, 5.0 equiv) and 2-methylbutyraldehyde (43 μL, 0.4 mmol, 1.0 equiv) were subjected to General Procedure B (chromatography eluent: 5–20% Et2O in PE) to give ketone 3t (43 mg, 59%) as a yellow oil.1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.21 (d, J = 5.1 Hz, 1H), 6.97 (t, J = 4.3 Hz, 1H), 6.88 (d, J = 3.0, 1H), 3.93 (s, 2H), 2.62 (h, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 1.72 (dp, J = 14.5, 7.3 Hz, 1H), 1.42 (dp, J = 14.5, 7.3 Hz, 1H), 1.10 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H), 0.86 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz) δ 210.3, 135.6, 127.0, 126.8, 125.1, 47.1, 42.2, 26.1, 16.1, 11.7; IR: νmax 2967, 2931, 2876, 1708, 1673, 1580 cm–1; HRMS: calculated for C10H15OS+, 183.0844 [M + H]+. Found m/z 183.0836, Δ = −4.4 ppm.

1-(Benzo[b]thiophen-2-yl)heptan-2-one (3u)

2-Methylthianaphthene (296 mg, 2.00 mmol, 5.0 equiv) and hexanal (49 μL, 0.4 mmol, 1.0 equiv) were subjected to General Procedure B (chromatography eluent: 0–15% Et2O in PE) to give ketone 3u (36 mg, 37%) as a colorless oil. 1H NMR (700 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.87 (d, J = 7.9, 1H), 7.69 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.40 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.36 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.30 (s, 1H), 3.91 (s, 2H), 2.46 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 1.59–1.53 (m, 2H), 1.29–1.17 (m, 4H), 0.85 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (146 MHz) δ 207.9, 140.4, 138.8, 129.0, 124.6, 124.6, 124.4, 123.0, 121.9, 43.3, 41.8, 31.4, 23.6, 22.5, 14.0; IR: νmax 2954, 2927, 2856, 1710 cm–1; HRMS: calculated for C15H19OS+, 247.1157 [M + H]+. Found m/z 247.1150, Δ = −2.8 ppm.

1-(4-Methoxyphenyl)undecan-2-one (3v)

4-Methylanisole (252 μL, 2.00 mmol, 5.0 equiv) and decanal (75 μL, 0.4 mmol, 1.0 equiv) were subjected to General Procedure B (chromatography eluent: 5–20% Et2O in PE) to give ketone 3v (77 mg, 70%) as a white crystalline solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.11 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 6.86 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 3.79 (s, 3H), 3.61 (s, 2H), 2.42 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 1.58–1.47 (m, 2H), 1.32–1.17 (m, 12H), 0.87 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz) δ 209.1, 158.7, 130.5, 126.6, 114.2, 55.3, 49.3, 41.9, 32.0, 29.5, 29.5, 29.4, 29.2, 23.9, 22.8, 14.2; mp: 40–42 °C; IR: νmax 2972, 2924, 1708, 1614, 1513 cm–1; HRMS: calculated for C18H29O2+, 277.2168 [M + H]+. Found m/z 277.2156, Δ = −4.3 ppm.

1-(4-Methoxyphenyl)decan-2-one (3w)

4-Methylanisole (252 μL, 2.00 mmol, 5.0 equiv) and nonanal (69 μL, 0.4 mmol, 1.0 equiv) were subjected to General Procedure B (chromatography eluent: 5–20% Et2O in PE) to give ketone 3w (81 mg, 77%) as a yellow solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.11 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 6.86 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 3.80 (s, 3H), 3.61 (s, 2H), 2.42 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 1.60–1.46 (m, 2H), 1.34–1.15 (m, 10H), 0.87 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz) δ 209.2. 158.8, 130.5, 126.6, 114.3, 55.4, 49.4, 42.0, 31.9, 29.5, 29.3, 29.3, 23.9, 22.8, 14.2; mp: 36–37 °C; IR: νmax 2922, 2848, 1708, 1614, 1512 cm–1; HRMS: calculated for C17H27O2+, 263.2011 [M + H]+. Found m/z 263.1998, Δ = −4.9 ppm.

1-(4-Methoxyphenyl)nonan-2-one (3x)

4-Methylanisole (252 μL, 2.00 mmol, 5.0 equiv) and octanal (63 μL, 0.4 mmol, 1.0 equiv) were subjected to General Procedure B (chromatography eluent: 5–20% Et2O in PE) to give ketone 3x (81 mg, 82%) as a colorless oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.11 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 6.86 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 3.79 (s, 3H), 3.61 (s, 2H), 2.42 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 1.58–1.47 (m, 2H), 1.32–1.15 (m, 8H), 0.86 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz) δ 209.2, 158.8, 130.5, 126.6, 114.3, 55.4, 49.4, 42.0, 31.8, 29.2, 29.1, 23.9, 22.7, 14.2; IR: νmax 2925, 2855, 1707, 1601, 1511 cm–1; HRMS: calculated for C16H25O2+, 249.1855 [M + H]+. Found m/z 249.1862, Δ = 2.8 ppm.

1-(4-Methoxyphenyl)propan-2-one (3y)

4-Methylanisole (252 μL, 2.00 mmol, 5.0 equiv) and acetaldehyde (22 μL, 0.4 mmol, 1.0 equiv) were subjected to General Procedure B (chromatography eluent: 5–20% Et2O in PE) to give ketone 3y (39 mg, 60%) as a colorless oil. 1H NMR (700 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.12 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 6.87 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 3.80 (s, 3H), 3.63 (s, 2H), 2.14 (s, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (176 MHz) δ 207.0, 158.8, 130.5, 126.5, 114.3, 55.4, 50.3, 29.3. Spectroscopic data are consistent with those previously reported. (22)

1-(4-Methoxyphenyl)-4-methylpentan-2-one (3z)

4-Methylanisole (252 μL, 2.00 mmol, 5.0 equiv) and isovaleraldehyde (43 μL, 0.4 mmol, 1.0 equiv) were subjected to General Procedure B (chromatography eluent: 5–20% Et2O in PE) to give ketone 3z (63 mg, 76%) as a colorless oil.1H NMR (700 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.11 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 6.86 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 3.80 (s, 3H), 3.59 (s, 2H), 2.31 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 2H), 2.13 (hept., J = 6.5 Hz, 1H), 0.87 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 6H); 13C{1H} NMR (176 MHz) δ 208.7, 158.8, 130.6, 126.5, 114.3, 55.4, 50.9, 49.9, 24.6, 22.7; IR: νmax 2957, 2872, 2837, 1707, 1610, 1510 cm–1; HRMS: calculated for C13H19O2+, 207.1380 [M + H]+. Found m/z 207.1385, Δ = 2.9 ppm.

1-(4-Methoxyphenyl)-4,4-dimethylpentan-2-one (3aa)

4-Methoxylanisole (252 μL, 2.00 mmol, 5.0 equiv) and 3,3-dimethylbutyraldehyde (50 μL, 0.4 mmol, 1.0 equiv) were subjected to General Procedure B (chromatography eluent: 5–20% Et2O in PE) to give ketone 3aa (65 mg, 74%) as a colorless oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.09 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 6.86 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 3.79 (s, 3H), 3.59 (s, 2H), 2.34 (s, 2H), 1.00 (s, 9H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz) δ 208.4, 158.7, 130.6, 126.5, 114.2, 55.4, 54.0, 51.3, 31.2, 29.8; IR: νmax 2952, 2907, 2870, 1710, 1610, 1510 cm–1; HRMS: calculated for C14H21O2+, 221.1536 [M + H]+. Found m/z 221.1542, Δ = −5.0 ppm.

1-(4-Methoxyphenyl)-3-methylpentan-2-one (3ab)

4-Methylanisole (252 μL, 2.00 mmol, 5.0 equiv) and 2-methylbutyraldehyde (43 μL, 0.4 mmol, 1.0 equiv) were subjected to General Procedure B (chromatography eluent: 5–20% Et2O in PE) to give ketone 3ab (64 mg, 77%) as a colorless oil. 1H NMR (700 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.11 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 6.86 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 3.79 (s, 3H), 3.66 (s, 2H), 2.57 (q, J = 6.9 Hz, 1H), 1.72–1.64 (m, 1H), 1.42–1.34 (m, 1H), 1.05 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H), 0.82 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (176 MHz) δ 212.4, 158.7, 130.6, 126.5, 114.2, 55.4, 47.8, 47.0, 26.1, 16.2, 11.8; IR: νmax 2967, 2935, 1705, 1610, 1510 cm–1; HRMS: calculated for C13H19O2+, 207.1385 [M + H]+. Found m/z 207.1393, Δ = 3.9 ppm.

1-(4-Methoxyphenyl)-3-methylhexan-2-one (3ac)

4-Methylanisole (252 μL, 2.00 mmol, 5.0 equiv) and 2-methylpentanal (50 μL, 0.4 mmol, 1.0 equiv) were subjected to General Procedure B (chromatography eluent: 5–20% Et2O in PE) to give ketone 3ac (63 mg, 72%) as a colorless oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.11 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 6.86 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 3.79 (s, 3H), 3.66 (s, 2H), 2.65 (h, J = 6.9 Hz, 1H), 1.69–1.58 (m, 1H), 1.34–1.16 (m, 3H), 1.05 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H), 0.85 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz) δ 212.4, 158.7, 130.6, 126.5, 114.2, 55.4, 47.7, 45.2, 35.3, 20.5, 16.6, 14.2; IR: νmax 2957, 2932, 1707, 1611, 1511 cm–1; HRMS: calculated for C14H21O2+, 221.1542 [M + H]+. Found m/z 221.1537, Δ = −2.3 ppm.

3-Ethyl-1-(4-methoxyphenyl)heptan-2-one (3ad)

4-Methylanisole (252 μL, 2.00 mmol, 5.0 equiv) and 2-ethylhexanal (63 μL, 0.4 mmol, 1.0 equiv) were subjected to General Procedure B (chromatography eluent: 5–20% Et2O in PE) to give ketone 3ad (98 mg, 99%) as a colorless oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.11 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 6.86 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 3.79, (s, 3H), 3.63 (s, 2H), 2.51 (p, J = 6.5 Hz, 1H), 1.69–1.53 (m, 2H), 1.50–1.32 (m, 2H), 1.30–1.18 (m, 2H), 1.18–1.08 (m, 2H), 0.84 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H), 0.80 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz) δ 212.2, 158.7, 130.7, 126.3, 114.1, 55.4, 52.9, 48.8, 31.1, 29.7, 24.8, 22.9, 14.0, 11.9. Spectroscopic data are consistent with those previously reported. (4)

1-Cyclopentyl-2-(4-methoxyphenyl)ethan-1-one (3ae)

4-Methylanisole (252 μL, 2.00 mmol, 5.0 equiv) and cyclopentanecarboxaldehyde (43 μL, 0.4 mmol, 1.0 equiv) were subjected to General Procedure B (chromatography eluent: 5–20% Et2O in PE) to give ketone 3ae (71 mg, 81%) as a colorless oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.11 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H), 6.85 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H), 3.78 (s, 3H), 3.67 (s, 2H), 2.96 (p, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 1.80–1.50 (m, 8H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz) δ 211.0, 158.6, 130.5, 126.7, 114.1, 55.3, 50.5, 48.4, 29.2, 26.1. Spectroscopic data are consistent with those previously reported. (20)

1-Cyclohexyl-2-(4-methoxyphenyl)ethan-1-one (3af)

4-Methylanisole (252 μL, 2.00 mmol, 5.0 equiv) and cyclohexanecarboxaldehyde (48 μL, 0.4 mmol, 1.0 equiv) were subjected to General Procedure B (chromatography eluent: 5–20% Et2O in PE) to give ketone 3af (78 mg, 84%) as a white crystalline solid. 1H NMR (700 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.10 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 6.85 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 3.79 (s, 3H), 3.66 (s, 2H), 2.45 (tt, J = 11.5, 3.4 Hz, 1H), 1.83–1.78 (m, 2H), 1.78–1.73 (m, 2H), 1.67–1.62 (m, 1H), 1.39–1.31 (m, 2H), 1.28–1.16 (m, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (176 MHz) δ 211.7, 158.6, 130.6, 126.6, 114.2, 55.4, 50.1, 47.1, 28.7, 25.9, 25.8. Spectroscopic data are consistent with those previously reported. (4)

8-Hydroxy-1-(4-methoxyphenyl)-4,8-dimethylnonan-2-one (3ag)

4-Methylanisole (252 μL, 2.00 mmol, 5.0 equiv) and 7-hydroxycitronellal (75 μL, 0.4 mmol, 1.0 equiv) were subjected to General Procedure B (chromatography eluent: 20–50% Et2O in PE) to give ketone 3ag (102 mg, 88%) as a white solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.10 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 6.85 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 3.78 (s, 3H), 3.58 (s, 2H), 2.41 (dd, J = 16.4, 5.8 Hz, 1H), 2.24 (dd, J = 16.1, 7.8 Hz, 1H), 2.06–1.92 (m, 1H), 1.45–1.19 (m, 6H), 1.17 (s, 6H), 1.15–1.04 (m, 1H) 0.84 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz) δ 208.7, 158.7, 130.5, 126.4, 114.2, 71.0, 55.3, 49.8, 49.3, 44.0, 37.3, 29.4, 29.3, 29.1, 21.7, 19.9; mp: 36–37 °C. Spectroscopic data are consistent with those previously reported. (4)

1-(4-Methoxyphenyl)-3-phenylpropan-2-one (3ah)

4-Methylanisole (252 μL, 2.00 mmol, 5.0 equiv) and phenylacetaldehyde (45 μL, 0.4 mmol, 1.0 equiv) were subjected to General Procedure B (chromatography eluent: 5–20% Et2O in PE) to give ketone 3ah (32 mg, 33%) as a colorless oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.36–7.29 (m, 2H), 7.29–7.25 (m, 1H), 7.18–7.13 (m, 2H), 7.07 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 6.86 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 3.80 (s, 3H), 3.71 (s, 2H), 3.66 (s, 2H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz) δ 206.2, 158.8, 134.2, 130.6, 129.6, 128.8, 127.2, 126.1, 114.3, 55.4, 49.1, 48.4. Spectroscopic data are consistent with those previously reported. (23)

1-(4-Methoxyphenyl)-4-phenylbutan-2-one (3ai)

4-Methylanisole (252 μL, 2.00 mmol, 5.0 equiv) and hydrocinnamaldehyde (53 μL, 0.4 mmol, 1.0 equiv) were subjected to General Procedure B (chromatography eluent: 5–20% Et2O in PE) to give ketone 3ai (73 mg, 72%) as a white solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.26 (t, J = 7.3, 2H), 7.18 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 7.13 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.08 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 6.85 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 3.80 (s, 3H), 3.60 (s, 2H), 2.87 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 2.75 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz) δ 208.0, 158.8, 141.1, 130.5, 128.6, 128.5, 126.3, 126.2, 114.3, 55.4, 49.6, 43.4, 30.0; mp: 60–62 °C (lit. (24) 66–67 °C). Spectroscopic data are consistent with those previously reported. (4)

1-(4-Methoxyphenyl)-4-phenylpentan-2-one (3aj)

4-Methylanisole (252 μL, 2.00 mmol, 5.0 equiv) and 3-phenylbutyraldehyde (59 μL, 0.4 mmol, 1.0 equiv) were subjected to General Procedure B (chromatography eluent: 0–10% Et2O in PE) to give ketone 3aj (85 mg, 79%) as a colorless oil. 1H NMR (700 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.33–7.28 (m, 2H), 7.23–7.20 (m, 1H), 7.19 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.04 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 6.86 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 3.82 (s, 3H), 3.53 (s, 2H), 3.33 (h, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H), 2.79 (dd, J = 16.3, 6.6 Hz, 1H), 2.68 (dd, J = 16.3, 7.7 Hz, 1H), 1.25 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (176 MHz) δ 207.7, 158.8, 146.3, 130.5, 128.6, 126.9, 126.4, 126.1, 114.3, 55.4, 50.2, 50.0, 35.6, 22.0; IR: νmax 3029, 2964, 2836 1709, 1603, 1510 cm–1; HRMS: calculated for C18H21O2+, 269.1542 [M + H]+. Found m/z 269.1547, Δ = 1.9 ppm.

tert-Butyl 3-(2-(4-Methoxyphenyl)acetyl)piperidine-1-carboxylate (3ak)

4-Methylanisole (252 μL, 2.00 mmol, 5.0 equiv) and tert-butyl-3-formylpiperidine-1-carboxylate (85 mg, 0.4 mmol, 1.0 equiv) were subjected to General Procedure B with a flow rate of 0.056 mL min–1 (tR = 180 min) (chromatography eluent: 5–25% EtOAc in PE) to give ketone 3ak (59 mg, 44%) as a pale yellow oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.10 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 6.85 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 4.10–3.97 (m, 1H), 3.95–3.85 (m, 1H), 3.78 (s, 3H), 3.69 (s, 2H), 2.91 (dd, J = 13.4, 10.3 Hz, 1H), 2.75 (t, J = 10.6 Hz, 1H), 2.65–2.55 (m, 1H), 1.93–1.83 (m, 1H), 1.68 (dt, J = 13.4, 3.5 Hz, 1H), 1.60–1.47 (m, 1H), 1.46–1.35 (m, 1H), 1.44 (s, 9H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz) δ 209.3, 158.8, 154.8, 130.6, 125.8, 114.3, 79.8, 55.4, 47.7, 45.7, 44.1, 28.5, 27.2, 24.4; IR: νmax 2937, 1684, 1611, 1511 cm–1; HRMS: calculated for C19H27O4NNa+, 356.1838 [M + H]+. Found m/z 356.1852, Δ = 3.9 ppm.

tert-Butyl 4-(2-(4-Methoxyphenyl)acetyl)piperidine-1-carboxylate (3al)

4-Methylanisole (252 μL, 2.00 mmol, 5.0 equiv) and tert-butyl 4-formylpiperidine-1-carboxylate (85 mg, 0.4 mmol, 1.0 equiv) were subjected to General Procedure B but with a flow rate of 0.056 mL min–1 (tR = 180 min) (chromatography eluent: 5–25% EtOAc in PE) to give ketone 3al (81 mg, 61%) as a pale yellow oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.09 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 6.85 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 4.06 (br. s, 2H), 3.78 (s, 3H), 3.67 (s, 2H), 2.72 (t, J = 12.8 Hz, 2H), 2.62–2.49 (m, 1H), 1.85–1.65 (m, 2H), 1.61–1.48 (m, 2H), 1.43 (s, 9H),; 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz) δ 209.9, 158.8, 154.7, 130.5, 126.0, 114.3, 79.7, 55.3, 47.7, 47.1, 43.3, 28.5, 27.7; IR: νmax 2931, 1684, 1611, 1511 cm–1; HRMS: calculated for C19H27O4NNa+, 356.1832 [M + Na]+. Found m/z 356.1838, Δ = 2.8 ppm.

tert-Butyl 4-(3-(4-Methoxyphenyl)-2-oxopropyl)piperidine-1-carboxylate (3am)

4-Methylanisole (252 μL, 2.00 mmol, 5.0 equiv) and tert-butyl-4-(2-oxoethyl)piperidine-1-carboxylate (91 mg, 0.4 mmol, 1.0 equiv) were subjected to General Procedure B but with a flow rate of 0.056 mL min–1 (tR = 180 min) (chromatography eluent: 5–20% EtOAc in PE) to give ketone 3am (101 mg, 73%) as a pale yellow oil. 1H NMR (700 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.08 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 6.85 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 4.15–3.85 (m, 2H), 3.78 (s, 3H), 3.57 (s, 2H), 2.75–2.60 (m, 2H), 2.34 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 2H), 1.98–1.90 (m, 1H), 1.56 (d, J = 14.4 Hz, 2H), 1.42 (s, 9H), 1.05–0.94 (m, 2H); 13C{1H} NMR (176 MHz) δ 207.7, 158.8, 154.9, 130.4, 126.1, 114.3, 79.3, 55.3, 50.0, 48.1, 43.6, 31.9, 31.8, 28.5; IR: νmax 2975, 2929, 2849, 1683, 1611, 1511 cm–1; HRMS: calculated for C20H29O4NNa+, 370.1994 [M + Na]+. Found m/z 370.1995, Δ = 0.3 ppm.

tert-Butyl 3-(2-(4-Methoxyphenyl)acetyl)azetidine-1-carboxylate (3an)

4-Methylanisole (252 μL, 2.00 mmol, 5.0 equiv) and tert-butyl-3-formylazetidine-1-carboxylate (74 mg, 0.4 mmol, 1.0 equiv) were subjected to General Procedure B (chromatography eluent: 5–40% EtOAc in PE) to give ketone 3an (55 mg, 45%) as a pale yellow oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.09 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 6.86 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 4.05–3.93 (m, 2H), 3.88 (t, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 3.79 (s, 3H), 3.64 (s, 2H), 3.53–3.44 (m, 1H), 1.41 (s, 9H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz) δ 206.2, 159.0, 156.3, 130.6, 125.2, 114.5, 79.9, 55.4, 50.7, 47.9, 37.9, 28.5; IR: νmax 2973, 2889, 1694, 1611, 1511 cm–1; HRMS: calculated for C17H23O4NNa+, 328.1525 [M + Na]+. Found m/z 328.1523, Δ = −0.6 ppm.

1-(4-Methoxyphenyl)dodec-11-en-2-one (3ao)

4-Methylanisole (252 μL, 2.00 mmol, 5.0 equiv) and 10-undecenal (80 μL, 0.4 mmol, 1.0 equiv) were subjected to General Procedure B (chromatography eluent: 0–20% Et2O in PE) to give ketone 3ao (23 mg, 20%) as a colorless oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.11 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 6.86 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 5.90–5.70 (m, 1H), 5.50–5.29 (m, 1H), 4.98 (d, J = 17.1 Hz, 1H), 4.92 (d, J = 10.1 Hz, 1H), 3.80 (s, 3H), 3.60 (s, 2H), 2.41 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 2.08–1.90 (m, 2H), 1.60–1.45 (m, 2H), 1.40–1.16 (m, 10H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz) δ 209.1, 158.8, 139.3, 130.5, 126.6, 114.3, 55.4, 49.4, 42.0, 33.9, 29.4, 29.4, 29.2, 29.2, 29.0, 23.9; IR: νmax 2923, 2849, 1709, 1614, 1512 cm–1; HRMS: calculated for C19H29O2+, 289.2168 [M + H]+. Found m/z 289.2162, Δ = −2.1 ppm.

5-(2-(8-Hydroxy-4,8-dimethyl-2-oxononyl)-5-methylphenoxy)-2,2-dimethylpentanoic Acid and 5-(5-(8-Hydroxy-4,8-dimethyl-2-oxononyl)-2-methylphenoxy)-2,2-dimethylpentanoic Acid (3ap)

Gemfibrozil (501 mg, 2.0 mmol, 5.0 equiv) and 7-hydroxycitronellal (75 μL, 0.4 mmol, 1.0 equiv) were subjected to General Procedure B (chromatography eluent: 20–50% EtOAc in PE) to give ketone 3ap (159 mg, 95%) as a 5.7:1 mixture of separable regioisomers (both presented as pale yellow oils). Major regioisomer: 1H NMR (700 MHz, CDCl3) δ 6.98 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 6.71 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 6.65 (s, 1H), 3.91 (t, J = 6.2 Hz, 2H), 3.60 (s, 2H), 2.44 (dd, J = 16.0, 5.5 Hz, 1H), 2.32 (s, 3H), 2.21 (dd, J = 16.0, 8.1 Hz, 1H), 2.05–1.98 (m, 1H). 1.79–1.72 (m, 2H), 1.70–1.64 (m, 2H), 1.45–1.08 (m, 19H), 0.86 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (176 MHz) δ 209.2, 182.4, 156.6, 138.4, 131.0, 121.2, 120.6, 112.2, 71.7, 68.1, 49.2, 44.9, 43.7, 41.9, 37.4, 37.0, 29.3, 29.1, 29.1, 25.2, 25.2, 25.1, 21.7, 21.6, 20.0; IR: νmax 2937, 1699, 1612, 1508 cm–1; HRMS: calculated for C25H40O5Na+, 443.2773 [M + Na]+. Found m/z 443.2771, Δ = −0.5 ppm; Minor regioisomer: 1H NMR (700 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.06 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.67 (dd, J = 7.6, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 6.61 (d, J = 1.8 Hz, 1H), 3.94 (t, J = 6.1 Hz, 2H), 3.59 (s, 2H), 2.43 (dd, J = 16.3, 6.0 Hz, 1H), 2.24 (dd, J = 16.3, 7.6 Hz, 1H), 2.18 (s, 3H), 2.07–1.93 (m, 1H), 1.85–1.67 (m, 4H), 1.42–1.04 (m, 19H), 0.85 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (176 MHz) δ 209.0, 182.3, 157.3, 132.9, 130.9, 125.8, 121.4, 112.1, 71.4, 68.1, 50.9, 49.2, 43.9, 37.3, 37.0, 29.4, 29.2, 29.1, 25.2, 25.2, 25.2, 21.7, 20.0, 16.0; IR: νmax 3436, 2926, 1701, 1611, 1508 cm–1; HRMS: calculated for C25H40O5Na+, 443.2773 [M + Na]+. Found m/z 443.2766, Δ = −1.6 ppm.

4-(5-(4-(8-Hydroxy-4,8-dimethyl-2-oxononyl)phenyl)-3-(trifluoromethyl)-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)benzenesulfonamide (3aq)

Celecoxib (763 mg, 2.00 mmol, 5.0 equiv) and 7-hydroxycitronellal (75 μL, 0.4 mmol, 1.0 equiv) were subjected to General Procedure B (chromatography eluent: 25–50% EtOAc in PE) to give ketone 3aq (90 mg, 41%) as a yellow solid. 1H NMR (700 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.87 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 7.43 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 7.22–7.15 (m, 4H), 6.75 (s, 1H), 5.44 (br. s, 2H), 3.69 (s, 2H), 2.46 (dd, J = 16.3, 5.9 Hz, 1H), 2.30 (dd, J = 16.3, 7.7 Hz, 1H). 2.05–1.95 (m, 1H), 1.59 (br. s, 1H), 1.45–1.08 (m, 6H), 1.17 (s, 6H), 0.85 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 3H).; 13C{1H} NMR (176 MHz) δ 207.7, 144.9, 144.2 (q, 2J = 38.5 Hz), 142.4, 141.9, 135.9, 130.4, 129.2, 127.6, 127.5, 125.5, 121.1 (q, 1J = 269.2 Hz), 106.7, 71.3, 50.1, 49.9, 43.8, 37.3, 29.4, 29.3, 29.1, 21.7, 19.9; 19F (376 MHz, CDCl3) δ −62.4 (s, 3F); mp: 63–65 °C; IR: νmax 3313, 2970, 2936, 1709, 1597, 1471 cm–1; HRMS: calculated for C27H33N3O4SF3+, 552.2144 [M + H]+. Found m/z 552.2148, Δ = 0.7 ppm.

5-((3-(8-Hydroxy-4,8-dimethyl-2-oxononyl)-5-methylphenoxy)methyl)oxazolidin-2-one (3ar)

Metaxalone (443 mg, 2.00 mmol, 5.0 equiv) and 7-hydroxycitronellal (75 μL, 0.4 mmol, 1.0 equiv) were subjected to General Procedure B (chromatography eluent: 10–40% MeCN in toluene) to give ketone 3ar (97 mg, 62%) as a colorless oil and a 1:1 mixture of inseparable diastereomers. 1H NMR (700 MHz, CDCl3) δ 6.62 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 2H), 6.54 (s, 1H), 6.10 (s, 1H), 4.95–4.89 (m, 1H), 4.11 (d, J = 4.8 Hz, 2H), 3.74 (t, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 3.60–3.54 (m, 3H), 2.42 (dd, J = 16.3, 5.9 Hz, 1H), 2.29 (s, 3H), 2.25 (dd, J = 16.3, 7.7, 1H), 2.05–1.95 (m, 1H), 1.59 (br s, 1H), 1.44–1.18 (m, 5H), 1.17 (s, 6H), 1.14–1.06 (m, 1H), 0.85 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (176 MHz) δ 208.3, 159.7, 158.5, 140.1, 135.7, 123.7, 114.1, 114.1, 112.9, 112.9, 74.3, 74.3, 71.0, 68.1, 68.1, 50.6, 50.6, 49.5, 44.0, 42.8, 42.8, 37.3, 29.4, 29.4, 29.3, 29.3, 29.1, 21.7, 21.5, 19.9; IR: νmax 3318, 2964, 2932, 1745, 1594 cm–1; HRMS: calculated for C22H33O5NNa+, 414.2256 [M + Na]+. Found m/z 414.2254, Δ = −0.5 ppm.

tert-Butyl-(1-(2-(8-hydroxy-4,8-dimethyl-2-oxononyl)-6-methylphenoxy)propan-2-yl)carbamate (3as)

tert-Butyl (1-(2,6-dimethylphenoxy)propan-2-yl)carbamate (1as) (559 mg, 2.00 mmol, 5.0 equiv) and 7-hydroxycitronellal (75 μL, 0.4 mmol, 1.0 equiv) were subjected to General Procedure B (chromatography eluent: 10–40% EtOAc in PE) to give ketone 3as (138 mg, 77%) as a yellow oil. 1H NMR (700 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.11–7.04 (m, 1H), 7.02–6.93 (m, 2H), 5.22–5.05 (m, 1H), 3.96 (br s, 1H), 3.75–3.59 (m, 4H), 2.41 (dd, J = 16.4, 5.9 Hz, 1H), 2.26 (s, 3H), 2.25–2.15 (m, 1H), 2.00 (br s, 1H), 1.69–1.49 (m, 1H), 1.44 (s, 9H), 1.40–1.06 (m, 15H), 0.91–0.80 (m, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (176 MHz) δ 208.6, 208.5, 155.4, 155.2, 131.3, 131.3, 130.7, 129.1, 127.9, 127.9, 124.4, 79.3, 75.0, 70.8, 49.0, 48.9, 46.6, 45.4, 45.3, 43.9, 43.9, 37.2, 37.2, 29.3, 29.3, 29.2, 29.0, 28.9, 28.5, 21.6, 21.6, 19.9, 17.8, 16.4, 16.4; IR: νmax 3355, 2969, 2933, 1694, 1519 cm–1; HRMS: calculated for C26H43O5NNa+, 472.3039 [M + Na]+. Found m/z 472.3025, Δ = −3.0 ppm.

tert-Butyl-((3R)-3-(2-(8-hydroxy-4,8-dimethyl-2-oxononyl)phenoxy)-3-phenylpropyl)(methyl)carbamate (3at)

tert-Butyl (R)-methyl(3-phenyl-3-(o-tolyloxy)propyl)carbamate (1at) (711 mg, 2.00 mmol, 5.0 equiv) and 7-hydroxycitronellal (75 μL, 0.4 mmol, 1.0 equiv) were subjected to General Procedure B (chromatography eluent: 30–50% EtOAc in PE) to give ketone 3at (105 mg, 50%) as a colorless oil. 1H NMR (700 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.37–7.20 (m, 5H), 7.10 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.04 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 6.83 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 6.62 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 5.15 (br s, 1H), 3.86–3.75 (m, 1H), 3.71–3.63 (m, 1H), 3.47–3.22 (m, 2H), 2.83 (s, 3H), 2.54–2.43 (m, 1H), 2.37–2.26 (m, 1H), 2.20–2.01 (m, 3H), 1.50–1.10 (m, 22H), 0.91 (t, J = 5.8 Hz, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (176 MHz) δ 208.3, 155.8, 155.6, 141.3, 131.5, 128.9, 128.4, 127.8, 125.8, 123.9, 120.7, 112.9, 79.6, 71.0, 71.0, 49.6, 46.0, 45.9, 44.1, 44.1, 37.5, 37.3, 34.7, 29.8, 29.5, 29.3, 29.3, 29.2, 28.5, 21.8, 20.0, 20.0; IR: νmax 3436, 2968, 2932, 1693, 1602, 1490 cm–1; HRMS: calculated for C32H47O5NNa+, 548.3352 [M + H]+. Found m/z 548.3339, Δ = −2.4 ppm.

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.joc.1c01621.

  • Details of the experimental setup, control experiments, and NMR spectra (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Author
    • Steven V. Ley - Yusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, CB2 1EW Cambridge, U.K. Email: [email protected]
  • Authors
    • Oliver M. Griffiths - Yusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, CB2 1EW Cambridge, U.K.Orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3954-9343
    • Henrique A. Esteves - Yusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, CB2 1EW Cambridge, U.K.
    • Yiding Chen - Yusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, CB2 1EW Cambridge, U.K.
    • Karin Sowa - Yusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, CB2 1EW Cambridge, U.K.Department of Chemistry, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany
    • Oliver S. May - Yusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, CB2 1EW Cambridge, U.K.
    • Peter Morse - Medicine Design, Pfizer, Inc., Groton, Connecticut 06340, United States
    • David C. Blakemore - Medicine Design, Pfizer, Inc., Groton, Connecticut 06340, United States
  • Author Contributions

    All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.

  • Notes
    The authors declare the following competing financial interest(s): David C. Blakemore is an employee and stockholder of Pfizer Inc.

Acknowledgments

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

O.M.G. acknowledges support from the EPSRC (EP/S024220/1) SynTech Automated Centre for Chemical Synthesis, Centre for Doctoral Training in Cambridge, U.K. H.A.E. and Y.C. thank Pfizer Inc. for funding the postdoctoral fellowship. S.V.L. thanks the American Chemical Society for support through receipt of the Arthur C. Cope Award.

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 24 other publications.

  1. 1

    For reviews, see

    (a) Prier, C. K.; Rankic, D. A.; MacMillan, D. W. C. Visible light photoredox catalysis with transition metal complexes: applications in organic synthesis. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 53225363,  DOI: 10.1021/cr300503r
    (b) Shaw, M.; Twilton, J.; MacMillan, D. W. C. Photoredox catalysis in organic chemistry. J. Org. Chem. 2016, 81, 68986926,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.6b01449
    (c) Twilton, J.; Le, C.; Zhang, P.; Shaw, M. H.; Evans, R. W.; MacMillan, D. W. C. The merger of transition metal and photocatalysis. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2017, 1, 0052,  DOI: 10.1038/s41570-017-0052

    For selected photoredox catalyzed C(sp2)–C(sp3) bond formations see

    (d) Tellis, J. C.; Kelly, C. B.; Primer, D. N.; Jouffroy, M.; Patel, N. R.; Molander, G. A. Single-electron transmetalation via Photoredox/Nickel dual catalysis: unlocking a new paradigm for sp3-sp2 cross- coupling. Acc. Chem. Res. 2016, 49, 14291439,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00214
    (e) Joe, C. L.; Doyle, A. G. Direct Acylation of C(sp3)-H Bonds Enabled by Nickel and Photoredox Catalysis. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 40404043,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201511438
    (f) Deng, H. P.; Fan, X. Z.; Chen, Z. H.; Xu, Q. H.; Wu, J. Photoinduced Nickel-Catalyzed Chemo- and Regioselective Hydroalkylation of Internal Alkynes with Ether and Amide α-Hetero C(sp3)-H Bonds. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 1357913584,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b08158
    (g) Shaw, M. H.; Shurtleff, V. W.; Terrett, J. A.; Cuthbertson, J. D.; MacMillan, D. W. C. Native functionality in triple catalytic cross-coupling: sp3 C-H bonds as latent nucleophiles. Science 2016, 352, 13041308,  DOI: 10.1126/science.aaf6635
    (h) Heitz, D. R.; Tellis, J. C.; Molander, G. A. Photochemical Nickel Catalyzed C-H Arylation: Synthetic Scope and Mechanistic Investigations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 1271512718,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.6b04789
    (i) Sakai, H. A.; Liu, W.; Le, C.; MacMillan, D. W. C. Cross-Electrophile Coupling of Unactivated Alkyl Chlorides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 1169111697,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.0c04812
    (j) Dewanji, A.; Krach, P. E.; Rueping, M. The Dual Role of Benzophenone in Visible-Light/Nickel Photoredox-Catalyzed C–H Arylations: Hydrogen-Atom Transfer and Energy Transfer. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 35663570,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201901327
  2. 2
    (a) Heitz, D. R.; Tellis, J. C.; Molander, G. A. Photochemical nickel-catalyzed C-H arylation: synthetic scope and mechanistic investigations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 1271512718,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.6b04789
    (b) Shields, B. J.; Doyle, A. G. Direct C(sp3)-H cross coupling enabled by catalytic generation of chlorine radicals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 1271912722,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.6b08397
    (c) Ishida, N.; Masuda, Y.; Ishikawa, N.; Murakami, M. Cooperation of a nickel-bipyridine complex with light for benzylic C-H arylation of toluene derivatives. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2017, 6, 669672,  DOI: 10.1002/ajoc.201700115
    (d) Dewanji, A.; Krach, P. E.; Rueping, M. The dual role of benzophenone in visible-light/nickel photoredox-catalysed C-H arylations: hydrogen-atom transfer and energy transfer. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 35663570,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201901327
    (e) Cheng, X.; Lu, H.; Lu, Z. Enantioselective benzylic C-H arylation via photoredox and nickel dual catalysis. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 3549  DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-11392-6
    (f) Ackerman, L. K. G.; Martinez Alvarado, J. I.; Doyle, A. G. Direct C-C bond formation from alkanes using Ni-photoredox catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 1405914063,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.8b09191
    (g) Lee, G. S.; Hong, S. H. Formal Giese addition of C(sp3)-H nucleophiles enabled by visible light mediated Ni catalysis of triplet enone diradicals. Chem. Sci. 2018, 9, 58105815,  DOI: 10.1039/C8SC01827H
    (h) Ishida, N.; Masuda, Y.; Imamura, Y.; Yamazaki, K.; Murakami, M. Carboxylation of benzylic and aliphatic C-H bonds with CO2 induced by light/ketone/nickel. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 1961119615,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b12529
    (i) Rohe, S.; Morris, A. O.; McCallum, T.; Barriault, L. Hydrogen Atom Transfer Reactions via Photoredox Catalyzed Chlorine Atom Generation. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 1566415669,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201810187
  3. 3
    Huang, C.-Y.; Kang, H.; Li, J.; Li, C.-J. En route to intermolecular cross-dehydrogenative coupling reactions. J. Org. Chem. 2019, 84, 1270512721,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.9b01704
  4. 4
    Kawasaki, T.; Ishida, N.; Murakami, M. Dehydrogenative Coupling of Benzylic and Aldehydic C–H Bonds. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 33663370,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b13920
  5. 5
    Soine, W. H. Clandestine drug synthesis. Med. Res. Rev. 1986, 6, 4174,  DOI: 10.1002/med.2610060103
  6. 6
    (a) Beeler, A. B.; Corning, S. R. Photochemistry in Flow. Photochemistry 2016, 43, 173190
    (b) Knowles, J. P.; Elliott, L. D.; Booker-Milburn, K. I. Flow photochemistry: Old light through new windows. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2012, 8, 20252052,  DOI: 10.3762/bjoc.8.229
    (c) Gilmore, K.; Seeberger, P. H. Continuous flow photochemistry. Chem. Rec. 2014, 14, 410418,  DOI: 10.1002/tcr.201402035
  7. 7
    Telmasani, R.; Sun, A. C.; Beeler, A. B.; Stephenson, C. R. J. Flow Chemistry in Organic Synthesis, 1st ed.; Jamison, T. F.; Koch, G., Eds.; Thieme: Germany, 2019; pp 103145.
  8. 8
    (a) Shvydkiv, O.; Gallagher, S.; Nolan, K.; Oelgemöller, M. From conventional to microphotochemistry: photodecarboxylation reactions involving phthalimides. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 51705173,  DOI: 10.1021/ol102184u
    (b) Cambié, D.; Bottecchia, C.; Straathof, N. J. W.; Hessel, V.; Noël, T. Applications of continuous-flow photochemistry in organic synthesis, material science, and water treatment. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 1027610341,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00707
  9. 9
    (a) Tucker, J. W.; Zhang, Y.; Jamison, T. F.; Stephenson, R. R. J. Visible-light photoredox catalysis in flow. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 124, 42204223,  DOI: 10.1002/ange.201200961
    (b) Nguyen, J. D.; Reiß, B.; Dai, C.; Stephenson, C. R. J. Batch to flow deoxygenation using visible light photoredox catalysis. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 43524354,  DOI: 10.1039/C2CC37206A
    (c) Elliott, L. D.; Knowles, J. P.; Koovits, P. J.; Maskill, K. G.; Ralph, M. J.; Lejeune, G.; Edwards, L. J.; Robinson, R. I.; Clemens, I. R.; Cox, B.; Pascoe, D. D.; Koch, G.; Eberle, M.; Berry, M. B.; Booker-Milburn, K. Batch versus flow photochemistry: a revealing comparison of yield and productivity. Chem. - Eur. J. 2014, 20, 1522615232,  DOI: 10.1002/chem.201404347
    (d) Plutschack, M. B.; Pieber, B.; Gilmore, K.; Seeberger, P. H. The hitchhiker’s guide to flow chemistry. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 1179611893,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00183
    (e) Lima, F.; Grunenberg, L.; Rahman, H. B. A.; Labes, R.; Ley, S. V. Organic photocatalysis for the radical couplings of boronic acid derivatives in batch and flow. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 56065609,  DOI: 10.1039/C8CC02169D
    (f) Chen, Y.; May, O.; Blakemore, D. C.; Ley, S. V. A photoredox coupling reaction of benzylboronic esters and carbonyl compounds in batch and flow. Org. Lett. 2019, 21, 61406144,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.orglett.9b02307
  10. 10
    (a) Isse, A. A.; Lin, C. Y.; Coote, M. L.; Gennaro, A. Estimation of Standard Reduction Potentials of Halogen Atoms and Alkyl Halides. J. Phys. Chem. B 2011, 115, 678684,  DOI: 10.1021/jp109613t
    (b) Wehlin, S. A. M.; Troian-Gautier, L.; Li, G.; Meyer, G. J. Chloride Oxidation by Ruthenium Excited-States in Solution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 1290312906,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b06762
  11. 11
    (a) Dingwall, P.; Greb, A.; Crespin, L. N. S.; Labes, R.; Musio, B.; Poh, J. S.; Pasau, P.; Blakemore, D. C.; Ley, S. V. C-H functionalisation of aldehydes using light generated, non-stabilised diazo compounds in flow. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 1168511688,  DOI: 10.1039/C8CC06202A
    (b) Lima, F.; Grunenberg, L.; Rahman, H. B. A.; Labes, R.; Sedelmeier, J.; Ley, S. V. Organic photocatalysis for the radical couplings of boronic acid derivatives in batch and flow. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 56065609,  DOI: 10.1039/C8CC02169D
    (c) Greb, A.; Poh, J. S.; Greed, S.; Battilocchio, C.; Pasau, P.; Blakemore, D. C.; Ley, S. V. A Versatile Route to Unstable Diazo Compounds via Oxadiazolines and their Use in Aryl-Alkyl Cross-Coupling Reactions. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 1660216605,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201710445
    (d) Lima, F.; Kabeshov, M. A.; Tran, D. N.; Battilocchio, C.; Sedelmeier, J.; Sedelmeier, G.; Schenkel, B.; Ley, S. V. Visible light activation of boronic esters enables efficient photoredox C(sp2)-C(sp3) cross-couplings in flow. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 1408514089,  DOI: 10.1002/ange.201605548
  12. 12
    Bourne, S. L.; Ley, S. V. A Continuous Flow Solution to Achieving Efficient Aerobic Anti-Markovnikov Wacker Oxidation. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2013, 355, 19051910,  DOI: 10.1002/adsc.201300278
  13. 13
    Alsabeh, P. G.; Stradiotto, M. Addressing Challenges in Palladium-Catalyzed Cross-Couplings of Aryl Mesylates: Monoarylation of Ketones and Primary Alkyl Amines. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 72427246,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201303305
  14. 14
    Nie, X.-X.; Huang, Y.-H.; Wang, P. Thianthrenation-Enabled α-Arylation of Carbonyl Compounds with Arenes. Org. Lett. 2020, 22, 77167720,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.orglett.0c02913
  15. 15
    Zhang, G.; Hu, X.; Chiang, C.-W.; Yi, H.; Pei, P.; Singh, A. K.; Lei, A. Anti-Markovnikov Oxidation of β-Alkyl Styrenes with H2O as the Terminal Oxidant. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 1203712040,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.6b07411
  16. 16
    Kim, J.; Yi, C. S. Intermolecular Markovnikov-Selective Hydroacylation of Olefins Catalyzed by a Cationic Ruthenium–Hydride Complex. ACS Catal. 2016, 6, 33363339,  DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.6b00856
  17. 17

    Methyl arene 1n was synthesized following a known literature procedure

    Alp, C.; Özsoy, S.; Alp, N.; Erdem, D.; Gültekin, M.; Küfrevioğlu, Ö.; Şentürk, M.; Supuran, C. Sulfapyridine-like benzenesulfonamide derivatives as inhibitors of carbonic anhydrase isoenzymes I, II and VI. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2012, 27, 818824,  DOI: 10.3109/14756366.2011.617745
  18. 18

    Methyl arene 1o was synthesized following a known literature procedure

    Lavrard, H.; Popowycz, F. Harnessing Cascade Suzuki-Cyclization Reactions of Pyrazolo[3,4-b]pyridine for the Synthesis of Tetracyclic Fused Heteroaromatics. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2017, 2017, 600608,  DOI: 10.1002/ejoc.201601242
  19. 19

    Methyl arene 1p was synthesized following a known literature procedure

    Kanamori, T.; Masaki, Y.; Mizuta, M.; Tsunoda, H.; Ohkubo, A.; Sekine, M.; Seio, K. DNA duplexes and triplex-forming oligodeoxynucleotides incorporating modified nucleosides which can form stable and selective triplexes. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2012, 10, 10071013,  DOI: 10.1039/C1OB06411H
  20. 20

    Methyl arene 1q was synthesized following a known literature procedure

    Kuwano, R.; Kashiwabara, M. Ruthenium-Catalyzed Asymmetric Hydrogenation of N-Boc-Indoles. Org. Lett. 2006, 12, 26532655,  DOI: 10.1021/ol061039x
  21. 21
    Zhai, R. L.; Xue, Y. S.; Liang, T.; Mi, J. J.; Xu, Z. Regioselective Arene and Heteroarene Functionalization: N-Alkenoxypyridinium Salts as Electrophilic Alkylating Agents for the Synthesis of α-Aryl/α-Heteroaryl Ketones. J. Org. Chem. 2018, 83, 1005110059,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.8b01388
  22. 22
    Pulikottil, F. T.; Pilli, R.; Suku, R. V.; Rasappan, R. Nickel-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling of Alkyl Carboxylic Acid Derivatives with Pyridinium Salts via C–N Bond Cleavage. Org. Lett. 2020, 22, 29022907,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.orglett.0c00554
  23. 23
    Ackermann, L.; Mehta, V. P. Palladium-Catalyzed Mono-α-Arylation of Acetone with Aryl Imidazolylsulfonates. Chem. - Eur. J. 2012, 18, 1023010233,  DOI: 10.1002/chem.201201394
  24. 24
    Mamidala, R.; Samser, S.; Sharma, N.; Lourderaj, U.; Venkatasubbaiah, K. Isolation and Characterization of Regioisomers of Pyrazole-Based Palladacycles and Their Use in α-Alkylation of Ketones Using Alcohols. Organometallics 2017, 36, 33433351,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.organomet.7b00478

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
Citation Statements
Explore this article's citation statements on scite.ai

This article is cited by 13 publications.

  1. Davin Cronly, Megan Smyth, Thomas S. Moody, Scott Wharry, Julia Bruno-Colmenarez, Brendan Twamley, Marcus Baumann. Structurally Diverse Nitrogen-Rich Scaffolds via Continuous Photo-Click Reactions. Organic Letters 2024, 26 (49) , 10559-10563. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.orglett.4c03953
  2. Peter Bellotti, Huan-Ming Huang, Teresa Faber, Frank Glorius. Photocatalytic Late-Stage C–H Functionalization. Chemical Reviews 2023, 123 (8) , 4237-4352. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00478
  3. Oliver M. Griffiths, Steven V. Ley. Multicomponent Direct Assembly of N-Heterospirocycles Facilitated by Visible-Light-Driven Photocatalysis. The Journal of Organic Chemistry 2022, 87 (19) , 13204-13223. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.2c01684
  4. Anna V. Bay, Emelia J. Farnam, Karl A. Scheidt. Synthesis of Cyclohexanones by a Tandem Photocatalyzed Annulation. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2022, 144 (16) , 7030-7037. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c13105
  5. Xiaoqin Wang, Sheng Xu, Yuanyuan Ping, Wangqing Kong. Selective Functionalization of C(sp 3 )—H Bonds via Photoredox/ Nickel Dual Catalysis. Chinese Journal of Organic Chemistry 2025, 45 (2) , 383. https://doi.org/10.6023/cjoc202406036
  6. Bholanath Maity, Sayan Dutta, Luigi Cavallo. The mechanism of visible light-induced C–C cross-coupling by C sp 3 –H bond activation. Chemical Society Reviews 2023, 52 (16) , 5373-5387. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2CS00960A
  7. G. M. Martins, R. C. Silva, G. C. Zimmer, T. J. Brocksom, K. T. de Oliveira. 13 C—C Bond Formation in Flow Systems Through Cross-Dehydrogenative Coupling. 2023https://doi.org/10.1055/sos-SD-240-00064
  8. Tingting Wang, Changmeng Liu, Dong Xu, Jiaxi Xu, Zhanhui Yang. Iridium-Catalyzed and pH-Dependent Reductions of Nitroalkenes to Ketones. Molecules 2022, 27 (22) , 7822. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27227822
  9. Qiao-Lin Wang, Huawen Huang, Guojiang Mao, Guo-Jun Deng. Bromine radical-enhanced HAT activity leading to stoichiometric couplings of methylarenes with acid chlorides. Green Chemistry 2022, 24 (21) , 8324-8329. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2GC02972C
  10. Stefano Bonciolini, Timothy Noël, Luca Capaldo. Synthetic Applications of Photocatalyzed Halogen‐Radical Mediated Hydrogen Atom Transfer for C−H Bond Functionalization. European Journal of Organic Chemistry 2022, 2022 (34) https://doi.org/10.1002/ejoc.202200417
  11. Chuan-Hua Qu, Run Huang, Yuan Liu, Tong Liu, Gui-Ting Song. Bromine-radical-induced C sp 2 –H difluoroalkylation of quinoxalinones and hydrazones through visible-light-promoted C sp 3 –Br bond homolysis. Organic Chemistry Frontiers 2022, 9 (15) , 4135-4145. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2QO00710J
  12. Joshua W. M. MacMillan, Ryan T. McGuire, Mark Stradiotto. Organic Base Enabled Nickel‐Catalyzed Mono‐α‐Arylation of Feedstock Solvents. Chemistry – A European Journal 2022, 28 (28) https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.202200764
  13. . Flow Reaction of Cross-Coupling Reaction Between Alkylarenes and Aldehydes. Synfacts 2021, 1414. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1720000

The Journal of Organic Chemistry

Cite this: J. Org. Chem. 2021, 86, 19, 13559–13571
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.1c01621
Published September 15, 2021

Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0 .

Article Views

6395

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Scheme 1

    Scheme 1. Initial Conditions Found

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Scale-up and catalyst recycling.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. PhotoSyn reactor scale-up.

  • References


    This article references 24 other publications.

    1. 1

      For reviews, see

      (a) Prier, C. K.; Rankic, D. A.; MacMillan, D. W. C. Visible light photoredox catalysis with transition metal complexes: applications in organic synthesis. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 53225363,  DOI: 10.1021/cr300503r
      (b) Shaw, M.; Twilton, J.; MacMillan, D. W. C. Photoredox catalysis in organic chemistry. J. Org. Chem. 2016, 81, 68986926,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.6b01449
      (c) Twilton, J.; Le, C.; Zhang, P.; Shaw, M. H.; Evans, R. W.; MacMillan, D. W. C. The merger of transition metal and photocatalysis. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2017, 1, 0052,  DOI: 10.1038/s41570-017-0052

      For selected photoredox catalyzed C(sp2)–C(sp3) bond formations see

      (d) Tellis, J. C.; Kelly, C. B.; Primer, D. N.; Jouffroy, M.; Patel, N. R.; Molander, G. A. Single-electron transmetalation via Photoredox/Nickel dual catalysis: unlocking a new paradigm for sp3-sp2 cross- coupling. Acc. Chem. Res. 2016, 49, 14291439,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00214
      (e) Joe, C. L.; Doyle, A. G. Direct Acylation of C(sp3)-H Bonds Enabled by Nickel and Photoredox Catalysis. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 40404043,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201511438
      (f) Deng, H. P.; Fan, X. Z.; Chen, Z. H.; Xu, Q. H.; Wu, J. Photoinduced Nickel-Catalyzed Chemo- and Regioselective Hydroalkylation of Internal Alkynes with Ether and Amide α-Hetero C(sp3)-H Bonds. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 1357913584,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b08158
      (g) Shaw, M. H.; Shurtleff, V. W.; Terrett, J. A.; Cuthbertson, J. D.; MacMillan, D. W. C. Native functionality in triple catalytic cross-coupling: sp3 C-H bonds as latent nucleophiles. Science 2016, 352, 13041308,  DOI: 10.1126/science.aaf6635
      (h) Heitz, D. R.; Tellis, J. C.; Molander, G. A. Photochemical Nickel Catalyzed C-H Arylation: Synthetic Scope and Mechanistic Investigations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 1271512718,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.6b04789
      (i) Sakai, H. A.; Liu, W.; Le, C.; MacMillan, D. W. C. Cross-Electrophile Coupling of Unactivated Alkyl Chlorides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 1169111697,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.0c04812
      (j) Dewanji, A.; Krach, P. E.; Rueping, M. The Dual Role of Benzophenone in Visible-Light/Nickel Photoredox-Catalyzed C–H Arylations: Hydrogen-Atom Transfer and Energy Transfer. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 35663570,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201901327
    2. 2
      (a) Heitz, D. R.; Tellis, J. C.; Molander, G. A. Photochemical nickel-catalyzed C-H arylation: synthetic scope and mechanistic investigations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 1271512718,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.6b04789
      (b) Shields, B. J.; Doyle, A. G. Direct C(sp3)-H cross coupling enabled by catalytic generation of chlorine radicals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 1271912722,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.6b08397
      (c) Ishida, N.; Masuda, Y.; Ishikawa, N.; Murakami, M. Cooperation of a nickel-bipyridine complex with light for benzylic C-H arylation of toluene derivatives. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2017, 6, 669672,  DOI: 10.1002/ajoc.201700115
      (d) Dewanji, A.; Krach, P. E.; Rueping, M. The dual role of benzophenone in visible-light/nickel photoredox-catalysed C-H arylations: hydrogen-atom transfer and energy transfer. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 35663570,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201901327
      (e) Cheng, X.; Lu, H.; Lu, Z. Enantioselective benzylic C-H arylation via photoredox and nickel dual catalysis. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 3549  DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-11392-6
      (f) Ackerman, L. K. G.; Martinez Alvarado, J. I.; Doyle, A. G. Direct C-C bond formation from alkanes using Ni-photoredox catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 1405914063,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.8b09191
      (g) Lee, G. S.; Hong, S. H. Formal Giese addition of C(sp3)-H nucleophiles enabled by visible light mediated Ni catalysis of triplet enone diradicals. Chem. Sci. 2018, 9, 58105815,  DOI: 10.1039/C8SC01827H
      (h) Ishida, N.; Masuda, Y.; Imamura, Y.; Yamazaki, K.; Murakami, M. Carboxylation of benzylic and aliphatic C-H bonds with CO2 induced by light/ketone/nickel. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 1961119615,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b12529
      (i) Rohe, S.; Morris, A. O.; McCallum, T.; Barriault, L. Hydrogen Atom Transfer Reactions via Photoredox Catalyzed Chlorine Atom Generation. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 1566415669,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201810187
    3. 3
      Huang, C.-Y.; Kang, H.; Li, J.; Li, C.-J. En route to intermolecular cross-dehydrogenative coupling reactions. J. Org. Chem. 2019, 84, 1270512721,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.9b01704
    4. 4
      Kawasaki, T.; Ishida, N.; Murakami, M. Dehydrogenative Coupling of Benzylic and Aldehydic C–H Bonds. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 33663370,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b13920
    5. 5
      Soine, W. H. Clandestine drug synthesis. Med. Res. Rev. 1986, 6, 4174,  DOI: 10.1002/med.2610060103
    6. 6
      (a) Beeler, A. B.; Corning, S. R. Photochemistry in Flow. Photochemistry 2016, 43, 173190
      (b) Knowles, J. P.; Elliott, L. D.; Booker-Milburn, K. I. Flow photochemistry: Old light through new windows. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2012, 8, 20252052,  DOI: 10.3762/bjoc.8.229
      (c) Gilmore, K.; Seeberger, P. H. Continuous flow photochemistry. Chem. Rec. 2014, 14, 410418,  DOI: 10.1002/tcr.201402035
    7. 7
      Telmasani, R.; Sun, A. C.; Beeler, A. B.; Stephenson, C. R. J. Flow Chemistry in Organic Synthesis, 1st ed.; Jamison, T. F.; Koch, G., Eds.; Thieme: Germany, 2019; pp 103145.
    8. 8
      (a) Shvydkiv, O.; Gallagher, S.; Nolan, K.; Oelgemöller, M. From conventional to microphotochemistry: photodecarboxylation reactions involving phthalimides. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 51705173,  DOI: 10.1021/ol102184u
      (b) Cambié, D.; Bottecchia, C.; Straathof, N. J. W.; Hessel, V.; Noël, T. Applications of continuous-flow photochemistry in organic synthesis, material science, and water treatment. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 1027610341,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00707
    9. 9
      (a) Tucker, J. W.; Zhang, Y.; Jamison, T. F.; Stephenson, R. R. J. Visible-light photoredox catalysis in flow. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 124, 42204223,  DOI: 10.1002/ange.201200961
      (b) Nguyen, J. D.; Reiß, B.; Dai, C.; Stephenson, C. R. J. Batch to flow deoxygenation using visible light photoredox catalysis. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 43524354,  DOI: 10.1039/C2CC37206A
      (c) Elliott, L. D.; Knowles, J. P.; Koovits, P. J.; Maskill, K. G.; Ralph, M. J.; Lejeune, G.; Edwards, L. J.; Robinson, R. I.; Clemens, I. R.; Cox, B.; Pascoe, D. D.; Koch, G.; Eberle, M.; Berry, M. B.; Booker-Milburn, K. Batch versus flow photochemistry: a revealing comparison of yield and productivity. Chem. - Eur. J. 2014, 20, 1522615232,  DOI: 10.1002/chem.201404347
      (d) Plutschack, M. B.; Pieber, B.; Gilmore, K.; Seeberger, P. H. The hitchhiker’s guide to flow chemistry. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 1179611893,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00183
      (e) Lima, F.; Grunenberg, L.; Rahman, H. B. A.; Labes, R.; Ley, S. V. Organic photocatalysis for the radical couplings of boronic acid derivatives in batch and flow. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 56065609,  DOI: 10.1039/C8CC02169D
      (f) Chen, Y.; May, O.; Blakemore, D. C.; Ley, S. V. A photoredox coupling reaction of benzylboronic esters and carbonyl compounds in batch and flow. Org. Lett. 2019, 21, 61406144,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.orglett.9b02307
    10. 10
      (a) Isse, A. A.; Lin, C. Y.; Coote, M. L.; Gennaro, A. Estimation of Standard Reduction Potentials of Halogen Atoms and Alkyl Halides. J. Phys. Chem. B 2011, 115, 678684,  DOI: 10.1021/jp109613t
      (b) Wehlin, S. A. M.; Troian-Gautier, L.; Li, G.; Meyer, G. J. Chloride Oxidation by Ruthenium Excited-States in Solution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 1290312906,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b06762
    11. 11
      (a) Dingwall, P.; Greb, A.; Crespin, L. N. S.; Labes, R.; Musio, B.; Poh, J. S.; Pasau, P.; Blakemore, D. C.; Ley, S. V. C-H functionalisation of aldehydes using light generated, non-stabilised diazo compounds in flow. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 1168511688,  DOI: 10.1039/C8CC06202A
      (b) Lima, F.; Grunenberg, L.; Rahman, H. B. A.; Labes, R.; Sedelmeier, J.; Ley, S. V. Organic photocatalysis for the radical couplings of boronic acid derivatives in batch and flow. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 56065609,  DOI: 10.1039/C8CC02169D
      (c) Greb, A.; Poh, J. S.; Greed, S.; Battilocchio, C.; Pasau, P.; Blakemore, D. C.; Ley, S. V. A Versatile Route to Unstable Diazo Compounds via Oxadiazolines and their Use in Aryl-Alkyl Cross-Coupling Reactions. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 1660216605,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201710445
      (d) Lima, F.; Kabeshov, M. A.; Tran, D. N.; Battilocchio, C.; Sedelmeier, J.; Sedelmeier, G.; Schenkel, B.; Ley, S. V. Visible light activation of boronic esters enables efficient photoredox C(sp2)-C(sp3) cross-couplings in flow. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 1408514089,  DOI: 10.1002/ange.201605548
    12. 12
      Bourne, S. L.; Ley, S. V. A Continuous Flow Solution to Achieving Efficient Aerobic Anti-Markovnikov Wacker Oxidation. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2013, 355, 19051910,  DOI: 10.1002/adsc.201300278
    13. 13
      Alsabeh, P. G.; Stradiotto, M. Addressing Challenges in Palladium-Catalyzed Cross-Couplings of Aryl Mesylates: Monoarylation of Ketones and Primary Alkyl Amines. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 72427246,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201303305
    14. 14
      Nie, X.-X.; Huang, Y.-H.; Wang, P. Thianthrenation-Enabled α-Arylation of Carbonyl Compounds with Arenes. Org. Lett. 2020, 22, 77167720,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.orglett.0c02913
    15. 15
      Zhang, G.; Hu, X.; Chiang, C.-W.; Yi, H.; Pei, P.; Singh, A. K.; Lei, A. Anti-Markovnikov Oxidation of β-Alkyl Styrenes with H2O as the Terminal Oxidant. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 1203712040,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.6b07411
    16. 16
      Kim, J.; Yi, C. S. Intermolecular Markovnikov-Selective Hydroacylation of Olefins Catalyzed by a Cationic Ruthenium–Hydride Complex. ACS Catal. 2016, 6, 33363339,  DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.6b00856
    17. 17

      Methyl arene 1n was synthesized following a known literature procedure

      Alp, C.; Özsoy, S.; Alp, N.; Erdem, D.; Gültekin, M.; Küfrevioğlu, Ö.; Şentürk, M.; Supuran, C. Sulfapyridine-like benzenesulfonamide derivatives as inhibitors of carbonic anhydrase isoenzymes I, II and VI. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2012, 27, 818824,  DOI: 10.3109/14756366.2011.617745
    18. 18

      Methyl arene 1o was synthesized following a known literature procedure

      Lavrard, H.; Popowycz, F. Harnessing Cascade Suzuki-Cyclization Reactions of Pyrazolo[3,4-b]pyridine for the Synthesis of Tetracyclic Fused Heteroaromatics. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2017, 2017, 600608,  DOI: 10.1002/ejoc.201601242
    19. 19

      Methyl arene 1p was synthesized following a known literature procedure

      Kanamori, T.; Masaki, Y.; Mizuta, M.; Tsunoda, H.; Ohkubo, A.; Sekine, M.; Seio, K. DNA duplexes and triplex-forming oligodeoxynucleotides incorporating modified nucleosides which can form stable and selective triplexes. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2012, 10, 10071013,  DOI: 10.1039/C1OB06411H
    20. 20

      Methyl arene 1q was synthesized following a known literature procedure

      Kuwano, R.; Kashiwabara, M. Ruthenium-Catalyzed Asymmetric Hydrogenation of N-Boc-Indoles. Org. Lett. 2006, 12, 26532655,  DOI: 10.1021/ol061039x
    21. 21
      Zhai, R. L.; Xue, Y. S.; Liang, T.; Mi, J. J.; Xu, Z. Regioselective Arene and Heteroarene Functionalization: N-Alkenoxypyridinium Salts as Electrophilic Alkylating Agents for the Synthesis of α-Aryl/α-Heteroaryl Ketones. J. Org. Chem. 2018, 83, 1005110059,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.8b01388
    22. 22
      Pulikottil, F. T.; Pilli, R.; Suku, R. V.; Rasappan, R. Nickel-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling of Alkyl Carboxylic Acid Derivatives with Pyridinium Salts via C–N Bond Cleavage. Org. Lett. 2020, 22, 29022907,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.orglett.0c00554
    23. 23
      Ackermann, L.; Mehta, V. P. Palladium-Catalyzed Mono-α-Arylation of Acetone with Aryl Imidazolylsulfonates. Chem. - Eur. J. 2012, 18, 1023010233,  DOI: 10.1002/chem.201201394
    24. 24
      Mamidala, R.; Samser, S.; Sharma, N.; Lourderaj, U.; Venkatasubbaiah, K. Isolation and Characterization of Regioisomers of Pyrazole-Based Palladacycles and Their Use in α-Alkylation of Ketones Using Alcohols. Organometallics 2017, 36, 33433351,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.organomet.7b00478
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.joc.1c01621.

    • Details of the experimental setup, control experiments, and NMR spectra (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.