Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect
ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Surface- and Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy in Catalysis
My Activity

Figure 1Loading Img
  • Open Access
  • Editors Choice
Perspective

Surface- and Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy in Catalysis
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

View Author Information
Faculty of Science, Debye Institute for Nanomaterials Science, Utrecht University, Universiteitsweg 99, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands
National Physical Laboratory, Hampton Road, Teddington, Middlesex TW11 0LW, U.K.
§ BIOS Lab on a Chip Group and MESA+ Institute for Nanotechnology, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands
Open PDF

The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters

Cite this: J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2016, 7, 8, 1570–1584
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00147
Published April 14, 2016

Copyright © 2016 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Surface- and tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS and TERS) techniques exhibit highly localized chemical sensitivity, making them ideal for studying chemical reactions, including processes at catalytic surfaces. Catalyst structures, adsorbates, and reaction intermediates can be observed in low quantities at hot spots where electromagnetic fields are the strongest, providing ample opportunities to elucidate reaction mechanisms. Moreover, under ideal measurement conditions, it can even be used to trigger chemical reactions. However, factors such as substrate instability and insufficient signal enhancement still limit the applicability of SERS and TERS in the field of catalysis. By the use of sophisticated colloidal synthesis methods and advanced techniques, such as shell-isolated nanoparticle-enhanced Raman spectroscopy, these challenges could be overcome.

Copyright © 2016 American Chemical Society

Catalysis is essential in the field of sustainable chemistry because it allows reactions to take place more quickly, efficiently, and safely. (1-3) To improve chemical processes it is crucial to know how catalysts operate and how, why, and when they cease to work. Understanding the mechanism of all involved surface reactions in the case of heterogeneous catalysts is the key to designing the best possible catalytic materials. For this purpose, researchers use a wide variety of techniques. They originally used methods to study catalysts before and after reaction, such as spectroscopy, (electron) microscopy, and many more. Although these methods have greatly enhanced the understanding of catalysts, knowledge of actual operating catalysts remains incomplete. Understanding working catalysts requires the use of techniques that are able to identify when and where reactions take place, ultimately linking this information to the catalytic performance of these materials.

Valuable techniques for elucidating molecular structures are vibrational spectroscopy methods, including various forms of infrared (IR) (4-6) and Raman spectroscopy. (7-10) Raman spectroscopy enables the measurement of vibrational energy levels, which provide information about the molecular composition and structure within a sample. Operative under several different conditions, this spectroscopic technique has greatly improved the knowledge of both the syntheses (7, 8) and operation (9, 10) of catalytic solids. However, Raman spectroscopy lacks sensitivity due to the small Raman scattering cross section of analyte molecules. (11) The sensitivity of Raman spectroscopy can be enhanced using specialized techniques, of which resonance Raman, (11-14) coherent anti-Stokes Raman spectroscopy (CARS), (15) and surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) are the three most popular choices. (16) All of these techniques have their own strengths and weaknesses, but compared to the others, SERS exhibits a strong feature for catalysis: highly localized sensitivity. This local sensitivity can be exploited to sense surface species and adsorbates. (17-19) Multiple techniques, such as CARS and SERS, can be combined to obtain even stronger signal intensities. (20)

However, SERS is not the only surface-sensitive vibrational spectroscopic technique used in the field of catalysis. For example, other characterization techniques to study surface adsorbates include polarization modulation infrared reflection absorption spectroscopy (PM-IRRAS) (21, 22) and sum frequency generation (SFG). (23-25) The latter approach has been pioneered by the group of Somorjai, and has been used, for example, to investigate the hydrogenation of benzene over platinum single crystals with a combined high-pressure scanning tunneling microscopy (HP-STM) and SFG instrument. (26) On the other hand, SERS enables the observation and characterization of the structure of surface species and adsorbates with greater sensitivity up to the level of detecting single molecules. When combined with scanning probe microscopy (SPM) methods, tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (TERS) can even reach nanoscale spatial resolution. (27) Furthermore, the SERS substrates can be triggered to start a reaction due to the formation of the strong electric field, hot electrons, and the involved heat generation. (28, 29) With increased control over these SERS substrates, improved Raman signals are obtained with shorter acquisition times, allowing the observation of possible reaction intermediates or even transition states. (30, 31)

A few hurdles need to be overcome before SERS and TERS can become a routine analytical tool for catalysis. In this Perspective, we briefly introduce the capabilities and challenges of SERS and TERS and present several examples of past work and future perspectives to encourage readers to start working with and expand the knowledge of these powerful analytical tools for the study of catalytic reactions. Although this Perspective is mostly aimed at heterogeneous catalysis, it is important to realize that the strengths of SERS are not necessarily limited to this field of research and can also be applied to the field of homogeneous catalysis. (32, 33) Furthermore, SERS is promising to become one of the tools of choice for monitoring the dynamics of biological macromolecules in biomedical applications and is useful for the characterization of biocatalysts, although its current main use is in diagnostics. (34, 35)

SERS. The strong Raman signal enhancement in SERS arises from the excitation of a localized surface plasmon in metallic nanostructures by an external oscillating electric field that matches the resonant frequency of the plasmon. Metallic nanoparticles are polarized by the electric field, and the induced dipole will resonate with the frequency of the incident light. This phenomenon is known as a “localized surface plasmon resonance” (LSPR) and creates a strong localized electromagnetic field, which strongly enhances the Raman signal from analyte molecules in close vicinity of the metallic nanoparticles. The strength of SERS signals dissipates by r–10 to r–12, depending on the substrate and analyte. (17-19, 36, 37) This distance dependency makes the technique an ideal surface-specific characterization technique.

SERS substrates are often fabricated from gold and silver nanoparticles. Depending on their size, shape, aggregation state, and the properties of the excitation laser, the Raman signal can be enhanced by over a factor of 106. (17-19, 31, 38) Silver nanoparticles provide stronger SERS signals than gold nanoparticles; however, gold nanoparticles are often preferred because of their higher stability. (39) Indeed, gold nanoparticles are more stable than their silver counterparts and are therefore easier to handle and store. Additionally, they are more likely to retain their SERS activity during experiments requiring elevated temperatures and/or pressures. However, because silver nanoparticles are more SERS active for laser excitation below 600 nm, they provide stronger signal enhancement since Raman scattering intensity is proportional to λ–4.

The strongest signal enhancements in SERS substrates are obtained from so-called “hot spots”, sites that have the strongest LSPR. For example, at the junction between a nanoparticle with another nanoparticle or a bulk metal surface, the surface plasmons can overlap to form gap-mode plasmons (Figure 1a,b). Depending on the distance between the particles, these gap-mode plasmons tremendously enhance the signal intensity in comparison to single particles, and it vanishes quickly when they move away from each other (Figure 1c–e). (40, 41) This knowledge of hot spots illustrates the difficulty of applying SERS to other catalysts besides silver, gold, and copper. Since the highest enhancements come from between two plasmonic particles, one of the largest challenges becomes the observation of surface species and adsorbates on other catalytic materials.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Strongest EFs arise from hot spots, which are produced by gap-mode plasmons that emerge between closely spaced plasmonic particles or tip–surface interactions where the plasmons overlap. (a) The Raman signal EF can reach theoretical values of 108 for dimer gold nanoparticles under 559 nm laser irradiance (40) and (b) 1011 for a sharp gold tip–gold surface interaction under 633 nm laser irradiance. (40) (c) The electric field is at its strongest when the particles touch and rapidly reduces to a negligible value when the particles are more than 15 nm away from each other. (d) This can be observed in the SERS spectra of adsorbed ammonium salt of pyrene on Ag@SiO2 spheres. (e) Plot of SERS EF versus distance between the particles. (41) Reprinted with permission from ref 40. Copyright 2008 Royal Society of Chemistry. Reprinted from ref 41. Copyright 2012 American Chemical Society.

Micro- and Nanostructured SERS Surfaces. Nanoparticle-based SERS offers advantages in terms of ease of preparation and control of chemistry, but has limited reproducibility due to surface inhomogeneity, varying dimer orientation, and ill-defined dimer spacing. For over a decade efforts have been made to create SERS surfaces with well-defined and homogeneously distributed hot spots using a variety of methods such as nanoimprinting, e-beam lithography, focused ion beam (FIB) milling, laser interference lithography (LIL), and template-based technologies that are much more promising. (42, 43) Of these methods, photolithography holds great promise because of its exact geometric control and availability of an extensive technological toolbox. With this technique, structures such as nanogroove, nanopyramid, and nanogap–nanowire arrays have been recently realized with tunable gap spacing and high spatially averaged analytical enhancement factors (AEF), (44) as shown in Figure 2. (45, 46) Since in the first two of these approaches LIL is used in combination with anisotropic (100) silicon etching to create nanometer pitches and spacing, no mask is needed and the method is therefore relatively cheap. However, a disadvantage of these anisotropically etched structures is that the SERS hot spots with high signal enhancement occur only at a very small percentage of the surface area because the groove width and spacing between the pyramid sidewalls vary strongly. The third structure, the nanogap–nanowire, is particularly interesting for two reasons. First, the gap size remains constant (<20 nm) as opposed to the groove and pyramid structures, while a large percentage of the surface gives high AEFs. The latter fact is due to the extremely high nanogap density of ∼1000 m·cm–2. (45) In Figure 2d it is shown that practically all of the 2500 spots measured (at 1068 cm–1) exhibit AEF values between 1 × 107 and 2 × 107 with an average value of 1.5 × 107. (45) The second advantage of the nanowire–nanogap structure is that it offers the opportunity of combining electrochemical reactions with in situ SERS analysis. Such a spectro-electrochemical technique gives the opportunity to study redox reactions and electron-driven processes in situ and has great importance for the study of catalytic reactions. It has also been shown to be of great value for studying and analyzing adsorbates, chemisorbed species, and reaction intermediates. (47) The nanowires can be contacted electrically in an interdigitated way under potentiostatic control, and finally the nanostructured surface can be integrated in a microfluidic system. For example, such a setup can be utilized to measure the spectral shift of iron bands upon using a Ag/AgCl reference electrode and a platinum counter electrode. It was found that when the redox state of the hemin group of the mercaptopyridine (MPy)/hemin modified gold nanowires was changed by shuttling the voltage between −0.2 V (Figure 2e) and −0.5 V (Figure 2f) versus Ag/AgCl, a corresponding change in the SERS spectra was observed. (48) This demonstrates that a combination of orthogonal analytical techniques combined with dynamic control of environmental conditions using microfluidics clearly holds great promise for in situ study of catalytic reactions.

Figure 2

Figure 2. (a) Nano v-grooves, (46) (b) artist’s impression of nanopyramids, (46) (c) nanowires and nanogaps with cross section in inset, (45) (d) histogram of analytical enhancement factor (AEF) on a nanowire–nanogap substrate, (45) (e) −0.2 V and (f) −0.5 V spectro-electrogram of MPY/hemin modified gold nanowire electrodes with the Fe2+ and Fe3+ bands indicated. (48) Reprinted from refs 45, 46, and 48. Copyright 2013, 2010, and 2015, respectively, American Chemical Society.

Combining SERS and Catalysis. Gold and silver metal nanoparticles show catalytic behavior in a variety of reactions, implying that they can simultaneously act as sensor as well as catalyst. (49, 50) Gold and silver catalysts can generally be used in three different types of surface reactions: heterogeneous catalysis, (51) electrochemical reactions, (47) and photocatalytic (plasmon-driven) reactions. (52-54)

Valuable industrial reactions, such as NOx reduction, (55) epoxidation reactions, (50, 56) and methanol synthesis (57) can be carried out over copper and silver metals. However, because of their lower stability in air, they are less implemented in SERS in comparison to gold nanoparticles. Alloys made from silver/gold or copper/gold often have higher stability than pure materials. Gold–silver alloys can be fabricated for example by a simple coreduction of HAuCl4 and AgNO3 using trisodium citrate. (58) Star-shaped copper/gold alloys have been prepared as well by a coreduction using glucose as reductant. (59) The introduction of other metals during the synthesis to prepare alloyed nanoparticles not only is interesting to increase the stability, but also will affect the position of the LSPR as well as catalytic activity. (60)

A recent study by Marimuthu et al. showed that the oxidation state of surface atoms in copper nanoparticles can be tuned by light during the epoxidation of propylene. (56) When the LSPR of the metallic core of the particles is excited, the subsequent increased electric field or hot electrons can reduce the copper oxide shell. The threshold light intensity to reduce the copper oxide surface was found to be 550 mW/cm2, meaning that Raman lasers can easily be used to reduce the oxide surface. A plasmonic material that can reduce its oxidized surface by using Raman lasers sounds like the ideal SERS substrate. However, although the threshold intensity is far below the laser intensity used in SERS, we are skeptical whether this can be applied for SERS experiments because this mechanism has not been mentioned anywhere else in the literature.

When SERS activity and catalytic activity do not go hand in hand, innovative materials have to be applied. For example, gold nanoparticles become most catalytically active for sizes of approximately 5 nm, (61, 62) whereas particles smaller than roughly 20 nm do not give a significant Raman signal enhancement. (63) Several research groups have devised methods to combine the catalytic activity of small gold nanoparticles with bigger SERS particles. By varying the synthesis conditions of a seeded growth method slightly, 125 nm gold particles were prepared with porous surfaces. These porous surfaces behaved in a similar fashion as sub-5 nm gold nanoparticles, whereas the overall particle provided the plasmonic enhancement for SERS. (64) Other methods describe the use of particles with different exposed facets, (65) adsorbing small gold nanoparticles to gelatin-covered SERS particles, (66) or by adsorption of smaller gold particles to an oxide-coated plasmonic particle. (67)

Model Reactions. One of the most investigated reactions in recent SERS studies is the reduction of 4-nitrothiophenol (4-NTP) to 4-aminothiophenol (4-ATP). (68) Thiol-functionalized molecules, such as 4-NTP and 4-ATP, exhibit high affinity for metal surfaces, guaranteeing their close contact with the SERS substrate. Additionally, the Raman scattering cross section of molecules containing nitro- and amino-functionalized groups in combination with aromatic rings is relatively large, and at certain excitation wavelengths this can lead to resonance Raman scattering. Furthermore, the use of thiols in catalysis gives the possibility of studying the kinetics of surface reactions with only minor interference of diffusion, adsorption, and desorption mechanisms because they are fixed on the surface. The combination of these properties makes 4-ATP and 4-NTP ideal model molecules for SERS experiments.

The reduction of 4-NTP by NaBH4 requires the presence of a metal catalyst and can be performed at ambient conditions. Consequently, gold and silver nanoparticles meet the requirements for both catalysis and SERS substrate. Various papers and reviews have already been published concerning the reactions of 4-ATP and 4-NTP. (54, 68-73) Model studies using 4-ATP and 4-NTP molecules can be used to increase our understanding of SERS in catalysis and to gain more insight into the interpretation of SERS spectra. Herein, we present several recent examples to demonstrate the possibilities and also the difficulties of interpreting SERS results.

By preparing well-defined particles with different morphologies, it is possible to link structure of a catalyst to its performance. However, it should be kept in mind that SERS activity is strongly dependent on a particle’s size and shape. Since the electric field enhancement is highly local, it is inherent that the probing area of SERS measures only a fraction of the catalytically active surface. For example, Zhang and Wang used gold nanoparticles with different geometries to study their facet-dependent catalytic activity for the reduction of 4-ATP to 4-NTP with SERS. (65) As expected, high-index faceted particles were the most active according to the data obtained by SERS. However, the more anisotropic particles required a much shorter acquisition time for sufficient SERS signal in order to observe clear bands in the spectra, indicating that these particles exhibit intrinsic hot spots. Drawing conclusions about the overall catalytic activity of a particle is therefore difficult with SERS because the Raman signal intensity at hot spots is several orders of magnitude stronger than over the rest of the particle and therefore dominates the overall spectrum. Additional studies, such as ultraviolet–visible (UV–vis) measurements, should then be performed for comparison.

Plasmon-Driven Reactions. SERS cannot simply be used as a noninvasive characterization technique; the plasmonic nanoparticles can interfere with the reaction of interest in multiple ways. (28, 52, 69, 74-76) First, the massive electromagnetic field near the surface can weaken certain bonds in the analyte, initiating reactions. (28) Second, the heat generated as a result of the absorbed light will change the reaction conditions, affecting both temperature (77) and subsequently analyte concentrations. (73-78) Third, the plasmonic particles can generate new and alternative reaction pathways by the formation and injection of hot electrons (Figure 3).

Figure 3

Figure 3. (a) Schematic diagram of the formation of hot electrons and holes in silver nanoparticles, which are able to catalyze both oxidative and reductive reactions. (79) (b) Possible reactions occurring during the chemical reduction of 4-NTP by NaBH4 over gold nanoparticles. (c) NMF-calculated SERS spectra of the three pure components including their assignment to the three molecular species 4-NTP (blue), 4,4′-DMAB (green), and 4-ATP (red). (98) (d) Raw SERS spectra of the reduction of 4-NTP to 4-ATP over Au/Pt/Au catalysts, including DMAB-associated peaks for intermediate volumes of NaBH4 added, corresponding to the calculated spectra from panel c. (98) Reprinted with permission from ref 79. Copyright 2012 Royal Society of Chemistry. Reprinted from ref 98. Copyright 2011 American Chemical Society.

Hot electrons can be generated at hot spots, where electrons are excited from below the Fermi level to an occupied state below the vacuum level. When an electron-acceptor is close to the surface, these “hot electrons” can be injected into the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) of this molecule. Simultaneously, the hole can also accept electrons from the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) of a nearby molecule (Figure 3a). (79)

The three alternative pathways can take place simultaneously and can affect each other. These side effects do not mean that SERS is useless for catalysis; however, it does mean that one has to make sure that what is measured is definitely the reaction of interest, and not a SERS artifact. Additionally, the three side effects can be advantageously used to initiate reactions, for example by extreme heating of the sample by applying pulsed lasers.

One has to make sure that what is measured is definitely the reaction of interest and not a SERS artifact.

The use of plasmonic materials as catalysts has recently become a growing field within photocatalysis because it can produce chemicals with alternative pathways at ambient temperatures. Because both the reaction and the SERS signal are the strongest at hot spots, SERS seems to be an ideal method to study plasmon-driven reactions. (71) Photocatalysts are useful as wastewater treatment and as a sustainable energy-supplier for the future, (80) and plasmon-driven catalysis is an exciting field in its own right. Interested readers are therefore directed to the recent literature. (28, 54, 69, 76)

To study conventional catalysts, one has to make sure that the characterization technique does not interfere with the reaction of interest. Decreasing laser energy and power and changing the polarization are known to affect the catalytic power of the plasmons, although the signal-enhancing effects of the plasmonic particles are thereby sacrificed. (29, 72, 81)

Borrowing SERS Activity. Because SERS is limited to a few materials, (82-84) SERS activity has to be “borrowed” from existing substrates when the catalyst itself is not SERS active. (85) Catalytically active nanoparticles can be directly assembled on a SERS substrate. Joseph et al., for example, reported a novel method to study the reduction of 4-NTP to 4-ATP over platinum catalysts. (33) The SERS signal of 4-NTP was used to obtain kinetic data of the reaction in solution. The 2 nm platinum particles were either randomly deposited over a SERS substrate consisting of gold nanoparticles or were used in colloidal solution. Since the reaction data of immobilized particles was not significantly different from the colloidal catalyst, the reaction mechanism is thought to be the same; thus, this method of immobilizing catalyst nanoparticles can possibly be applied to other chemical reactions as well. (33) However, this method does not give information exclusive to the platinum-catalyzed reaction because the gold particles are not entirely inert nor are they isolated.

Postsynthesis mixing of separately prepared Au and Pt NPs can result in a heterogeneous distribution of different particles throughout the sample. To guarantee close contact between sensor and catalyst, thin overlayers of catalytically active metal can be sputtered over existing SERS substrates. For example, Heck et al. (86) prepared gold nanoshells with submonolayer coverages of palladium and observed improved activity for the aqueous-phase hydrodechlorination of dichloroethylene (DCE). These nanostructures allowed for the detection of the dechlorination of 1,1-DCE to ethane. Although the signal intensity of the probe molecule 4-ATP was reduced after palladium was grown on the gold nanoshells, the signal intensities of adsorbed 1,1-DCE increased, indicating the stronger interaction of 1,1-DCE to Pd. The dechlorination at the surface was observed by the appearance of peaks associated with Cl–M and C–M bonds. Additionally, a range of intermediate structures from 1,1-DCE to ethane were detected. (86)

Core–shell nanoparticles can be fabricated by colloidal synthesis as well. (85) Using this method, any direct interaction with the plasmonic particle can be prevented when a uniform coating is applied. A crucial side effect can take place when thin metal layers are deposited over other metals. Due to the formation of alloys or by electron transfer from the core to the shell, the electronic structure of the catalyst may change, influencing its activity. (87) It has been reported that it is necessary to keep the metal coatings at least 5 monolayers thick so that it behaves as a “pure” material. (88) Attard et al. have used a colloidal method to produce platinum-coated SERS particles for studying the effect of surface poisoning on the alkyne adsorption on platinum catalysts. (89)

Because SERS substrates are heterogeneous by definition, the materials will have to be cleverly designed for homogeneous catalysis depending on the desired results. To increase the signal of low concentrated catalysts, reactants, and products, the materials can be simply mixed in solution. (33) However, when these materials show a negative affinity to the SERS substrates, insufficient signal will be obtained and no conclusive spectrum can be formed. Additionally, some molecules in the solution might have a higher affinity to gold or silver (also depending on the facets), increasing the chance to observe them and simultaneously decreasing the chance to observe other molecules. Similar to heterogeneous catalysis, the catalysts are preferred to be fixed to the surface of a well-defined SERS substrate so that we know what we are looking at. Other methods are to fix the catalysts to a self-assembled monolayer (SAM) on a gold substrate or to induce aggregation between the nanoparticles by introducing the catalyst. (34, 35, 90)

SHINERS, for Stable and Noninvasive Characterization. A promising method to minimize plasmonic side-reactions is isolating the noble metal nanoparticles using thin dielectric oxide coatings. Coatings of <10 nm thick silica have been proposed to make plasmonic particles inert. (91) The technique, quite aptly named “shell-isolated nanoparticle-enhanced Raman spectroscopy” (SHINERS), has been successfully applied, among others, to study catalysts. (67, 91-93) Coating of nanoparticles with oxides enhances their stability in demanding conditions and increases their shelf life. Al2O3 shells of less than 1 nm thick can enhance the stability of the nanoparticles to withstand temperatures of up to 500 °C under nitrogen for a few hours (Figure 4d,e). (94) The improved stability makes SHINERS a highly promising technique to study a wide variety of heterogeneous catalysts. Shell-isolated nanoparticles (SHINs) can be used for expanding the SERS activity to other materials because the oxide coating reduces plasmon-driven reactions (Figure 4a) and increases the stability of the plasmonic particle (Figure 4c,d).

Figure 4

Figure 4. Advantages of SHINs over bare gold nanoparticles. (a) SHINs prevent plasmon-driven reactions. SERS spectra collected from 4-ATP adsorbed on 80 nm gold particles, 80 nm gold nanoparticles covered with 5 nm gold particles, and 80 nm SHINs covered with 5 nm gold particles. DMAB is not observed when SHINs are implemented. (67) Adapted from ref 67. Copyright 2013 American Chemical Society. (b) SERS EF calculated for a variety of silver nanocubes: bare (I, red) and SiO2-coated cubes using different methods (II–V, blue). All SiO2-coated nanocubes show increased EFs compared to bare silver nanocubes. (99) Adapted with permission from ref 99. Copyright 2015 Royal Society of Chemistry. (c) UV–vis absorption spectra of gold nanoparticles at elevated temperatures indicate that their LSPR shifts above temperatures of 100 °C. (94) (d) UV–vis absorption spectra of gold nanoparticles coated with 1 nm alumina at elevated temperatures indicate that stability is maintained up to 400 °C. (94) Adapted from ref 94. Copyright 2007 American Chemical Society. (e) SHINs (green) could potentially serve as a support for many other catalysts (purple spheres). Because the electric field is stronger (red) at the surface of the SHIN, it is expected that the catalyst–support interface can be characterized.

An effective method to implement SHINERS in catalysis is to prepare a physical mixture of bulk catalyst material with SHINs. Such a strategy was used by Li et al. to study nickel-based solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) anodes. Spherical silver nanoparticles were coated with 10 nm thick silica layers to increase their thermal stability, enabling them to withstand temperatures of up to 500 °C. However, due to the thickness of the coating the Raman signal was enhanced only by a factor of 150. Even with this low EF, the authors were able to observe surface species in ceria (CeO2) at elevated temperatures and detect small quantities of coke that lay beneath the sensitivity limit of conventional Raman spectroscopy. Li et al. state that this technique can be readily applied to other catalytic and electrochemical systems, and we feel similarly. This method is highly suitable for the detection of surface species and adsorbates and could show even greater potential when more stable and/or thinner coatings can be produced. (92, 93)

The oxide layer can furthermore serve as a support material for nanoparticles (Figure 4e), facilitating close contact between the SERS-active particle and the catalyst. (67, 96, 97) Similarly to other studies concerning the reduction of 4-NTP to 4-ATP, (64, 65, 98) Xie et al. observed DMAB as intermediate when the large plasmonic particles were not coated with silica. (67) However, when the large particle was isolated by an ultrathin (∼1.5 nm) but nonporous silica coating, the bands associated with DMAB were no longer observed and only the reduction of 4-NTP to 4-ATP was detected (Figure 4a). Gold catalysts of 5 and 10 nm deposited on the silica layer were used to show that smaller particles were indeed more effective catalysts.

A similar approach was applied by Attard et al. where they used silica-coated gold nanoparticles on single-crystal platinum surfaces to observe adsorbates with SHINERS, and more recently during the hydrogenation of ethyl pyruvate (EP) to (R)-ethyl lactate (EL) over modified and unmodified Pt{hkl} electrodes. (89, 95) SHINs deposited on different platinum surfaces proved to noninvasively enhance the signal of EP adsorbed to the surface. An intermediate structure of the ethyl pyruvate, more specifically a half-hydrogenation state (HHS), was formed by addition of a hydrogen atom to the keto carbonyl group; in addition, a new species was identified as intact chemisorbed EP bound in a μ2(C,O) configuration, as illustrated in Figure 5 with a series of SHINERS spectra, as well as for the calculated structures of Pt-chemisorbed EP and HHS. (95) The relative ratio of both species was sensitive to the Pt surface structure. More specifically, the μ2(C,O) EP surface species was dominant at pristine Pt{111} and Pt{100} surfaces, whereas the HHS was observed only at surfaces with defects and kinks, such as Pt{110} and roughened Pt electrodes.

Figure 5

Figure 5. (a, b) SHINERS spectra of Pt{hkl} single crystals immersed in 0.1 M EP/0.1 M HClO4 recorded under hydrogen evolution conditions (−0.1 V). (c) Schematic depiction of the half-hydrogenated state (HHS) intermediate. (d) Calculated structure of EP adsorbed in the μ2(C,O) configuration. (e) Calculated structure of HHS at a Pt{221} surface. Reprinted from ref 95. Copyright 2016 American Chemical Society.

In our lab, the dimerization of 4-ATP over pinhole-free SHINs was observed, contradicting the previously mentioned experiments. (70) This indicates that in the research conducted by Xie et al. the rate of plasmon-driven reactions is most likely slowed significantly by the SiO2 coating in comparison to the reduction by NaBH4, making the observation of DMAB impossible. (67) In many publications, side effects are reported to be caused by hot electrons injected into nearby molecules, but we believe that the extremely strong electric field facilitates photosensitive reactions as well. (28) Although SERS intensity can increase for some coated particles (Figure 4b), (99) increasing thickness of oxide coatings will result in a decrease of the signal-enhancing effect and prevent side reactions caused by hot electrons or a strong electric field.

Any catalyst can potentially be assembled on the surface of SHINs, allowing the observation of Raman active surface species on these catalysts. These particles can then be tuned in size, shape, and structure to characterize the effect on the reaction, similar to the method described by Xie et al. (67) One could also make use of different oxide (91, 100, 101) or carbon (102) coatings to mimic the support material, although some combinations of materials are effective photocatalysts, such as titania-coated gold nanoparticles. (74, 100) A coating of several nanometers separates the catalyst particle and the plasmonic particle, meaning that for increasing catalyst size, the signal intensity decreases dramatically for the far side of the particle (Figure 4e). The strongest signals are produced at the metal–support interface in comparison to the far side of the particle. This effect can be exploited by attaching larger catalysts to the surface, making it more likely to observe reactions or catalyst structures at the support–catalyst interface. (103)

Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. To directly relate catalytic activity with the morphology of catalysts, we need to map and monitor catalytic activity on a single catalytic particle. Instruments with high sensitivity and above all nanoscale spatial resolution are required to reach this goal. (104) Therefore, a more direct method to correlate catalyst structure to activity is by combining high chemical sensitivity of SERS with nanoscale spatial resolution of scanning probe microscopy. To showcase the possibilities of the AFM–Raman methodology, the catalytic activity of silver nanocubes in rhodamine 6G degradation was linked to their distribution. (105) However, the diffraction-limited spatial resolution of Raman spectroscopy (typically 200–300 nm) is not overcome by combining SERS and AFM.

The spatial resolution can be significantly improved when a metal-coated tip is implemented; this technique is referred to as TERS. (106) Compared to SERS where hot spots are randomly distributed over the substrate, the electromagnetic enhancement in TERS occurs only at a single point of the TERS tip-apex, which can be scanned over a surface using sensitive SPM feedback to make a nanoscale map of surface chemistry and catalytic activity simultaneously with the topography. TERS improves the diffraction-limited spatial resolution of confocal Raman spectroscopy to the nanoscale, with a recent breakthrough reaching the subnanometer regime with STM-based TERS demonstrating the capability of TERS to map even single molecules. (27)

The potential of TERS for in situ catalysis research was first demonstrated by Domke and Pettinger (107) who studied the organometallic catalyst cobalt meso-tetraphenylporphyrin (CoTPP) on Au(111) substrate using STM-TERS with a Au tip. With TERS, the authors could spectroscopically discriminate between axially complexed and ligand-free CoTPP regions on the Ag substrate and identify chemical species complexed with CoTPP. TERS spectra from well-ordered CoTPP regions identified in the STM topography images showed vibrational bands characteristic of linker-modified CoTPP sandwiched between two Au layers, whereas TERS spectra from the disordered region showed vibrational features of CoTPP axially complexed with CO and NO formed by catalytic reduction of CO2 and NO2 from ambient air. This study demonstrates that TERS can be successfully used to correlate structure with catalytic activity in heterogeneous catalysis, while the observation of such complexes indicates possible applications in homogeneous catalysis.

Studying Light-Triggered Reactions with TERS. TERS studies of the plasmon-driven photocatalytic reaction (4-NTP to DMAB) was carried out for the first time in a collaborative effort by Weckhuysen and Deckert et al. (29) The reaction was triggered using a 532 nm laser and was unobtrusively monitored using a 633 nm laser. It was found that a complete self-assembled monolayer (SAM) is necessary to obtain a stable starting signal as the molecules in an incomplete monolayer can change their orientation or move in and out of the sampling area more easily. (29) Because TERS measures only a small number of molecules and spectra are not averaged over an ensemble, signal intensities are highly influenced by small fluctuations of analyte molecules in the measured area. (108) Time-series Raman spectra measured before and after the reaction at the tip-apex clearly showed the Raman bands associated with 4-NTP decrease and DMAB increase in intensity over time. This demonstrates the potential of TERS to monitor reactions on single catalytic particles over time. (29) Almost simultaneously, Zhang, Xu, and co-workers (109) performed a similar experiment using high-vacuum (HV) STM-TERS to demonstrate that this photocatalytic reaction is driven by hot electrons produced during surface plasmon resonance. The authors showed that the reaction can be controlled by plasmon intensity, which depends on laser power or the tip–substrate distance. In an additional report it was shown using HV STM-TERS that the reaction was indeed the result of the plasmon resonance in the nanogap between a Au tip and a Ag substrate and any thermal effects could be neglected. (110)

Very recently, the potential of TERS to actually relate catalyst structure to activity was realized by Kumar et al. with AFM-based TERS. (111) The activity of silver nanoparticles was studied using the plasmon-driven photocatalytic dimerization of 4-ATP to DMAB. The authors first mapped the reaction at a single point of contact of the Ag-coated TERS tip with a reactant substrate. Since both the silver particles and the silver-coated tip were catalytically active in the reaction 4-ATP to DMAB, the tip was made inert by applying a 3–5 nm thick Al2O3 coating while preserving its plasmonic enhancement. Using such an alumina-protected TERS tip, the authors were able to map catalytically active sites on the Ag substrate with 20 nm spatial resolution, as shown in Figure 6. (111)

Figure 6

Figure 6. (a) AFM topography image of the Ag catalyst substrate. (b) TERS map of the area marked by the dashed rectangle in panel a showing signal intensities of a DMAB-associated band at 1142 cm–1. (c) Near-field spectra measured at the positions marked in panel b. (d) Intensity profile along the dotted line marked in panel b showing the spatial resolution of the TERS map using a fitted Gaussian curve (red) to be 20 nm. (111) Reprinted with permission from ref 111. Copyright 2015 Royal Society of Chemistry.

We believe that dielectric coating of TERS tips is a good strategy for obtaining reliable and stable data during measurements, similarly to the application of SHINERS. It is known that the tips can be contaminated by surface species, causing additional bands in the spectrum or worse, the loss of their signal-enhancing properties. (112) Dielectric coatings such as oxides can prevent adsorption of contaminants or irreversible tip damage from oxidative reactions, thereby enhancing their stability. However, because the decay length of TERS near-field is only a few nanometers, (113) a thick dielectric coating may significantly decrease the plasmonic enhancement of the TERS tip. (37) Therefore, the thickness of the protective dielectric coating should not be more than a few nanometers (ideally 1–2 nm) and should be pinhole-free for TERS tips to provide Raman signal enhancements. Alternatively, aluminum-coated tips have been used in TERS in combination with a 363.8 nm ultraviolet laser. (114) Because aluminum is known to form a thin native oxide layer of approximately 3 nm, such tips are expected to be chemically more stable, although higher-energy lasers are required that may cause degradation of chemical species. (82)

The sensitivity of TERS measurements can be significantly enhanced by utilizing the plasmonic coupling of a metal or metal-coated tip with a metal substrate. Using this so-called “gap-mode” TERS, extremely high EFs can be reached. For example, gold-coated tips close to metallic substrates can produce Raman signals that are a factor of 103 stronger than those of tips close to dielectric substrates, such as SiO2. (115) However, care must be taken to ensure that the metal used for the tip or substrate is not catalytically active for the reaction under study. So far, TERS has been mainly used for the study of plasmon-driven photocatalytic reactions in which the reactants and products have a rather large Raman cross section. However, the reactants and products employed in more industrially relevant catalytic reactions usually have a much lower Raman cross section. Furthermore, such reactions are carried out at temperatures and pressures much higher than ambient conditions. Therefore, TERS probes with high plasmonic enhancement, stability, and lifetime are required to make TERS a powerful tool for the study of catalytic reactions under operating conditions.

Toward the Observation of Single Molecules. Spectral fluctuations that arise in TERS and SERS experiments do not have to be an undesired result but can be a topic of interest as well. Shifts in the band position can give clues to the mechanism of a reaction. Not only do orientational effects become more visible when homogeneous broadening is reduced by measuring smaller ensembles, but also other interesting events can be observed as well. For example, one can distinguish between isotopes because vibrational energy levels are related to the reduced mass of the participating atoms. (116)

Isotopes can be useful for the study of catalytic reactions and have been implemented to reveal a variety of reaction mechanisms using techniques such as steady-state isotopic transient kinetic analysis (SSITKA). (117) However, this technique observes only the product and is not able to detect the surface species and adsorbates. Combining SERS with SSITKA could enable the characterization of surface species and possibly track the changes in the spectrum of the adsorbed molecules when it reacts with the isotopes. We believe this can provide crucial information about the specific reaction mechanisms.

Time-resolved Raman spectroscopy should be combined with TERS to give a spatial resolution in the nanometer scale and a temporal resolution in the picosecond scale.

Additionally, the chance to find short-lived species such as intermediates should increase when approaching single-molecule experiments. Knowing which and how many intermediates are present during the reaction is crucial to optimally tune the catalyst as it will tell us the amount of rate-limiting steps and how to possibly improve the reaction kinetics. Combining single-particle and single-molecule kinetic studies have been performed in fluorescence microscopy experiments, revealing intermediates and interparticle heterogeneities such as size-dependent activity. (118) However, fluorescence microscopy experiments do not enable the observation of structures of the reactants and requires the use of fluorescent reactants or products, thereby limiting its use. SERS, on the other hand, can supply us with structural information on both the reactant and catalyst and can be applied to a wider range of molecules, allowing a larger versatility.

To approach single-molecule experiments, the analytes can be diluted. However, dilution of the reactants cannot always be applied to obtain reaction mechanisms. Reaction conditions will often change upon dilution, and this can lead to different reaction pathways. For example, the dimerization of 4-NTP cannot proceed for single molecules, and it was expected that the reaction would therefore be inhibited. Zhang et al. found that a plasmon-driven reaction of highly diluted 4-NTP still takes place, although the diazo-product is not formed. (75) When there is no second molecule nearby, the nitro-group is split from the substrate and thiophene (TP) is obtained as the product. Hot electrons generated at the hot spots were proposed to have sufficient energy to excite 4-NTP to a transient negative ion. The negative ion “travels” to the excited state of TP and returns to the ground state of TP, returning the electron to the gold surface. (75)

Single or several molecules at hot spots can dominate the spectrum over larger ensembles because the electric field is significantly stronger than for molecules positioned at other structures. If a reaction takes place while the molecule is situated at the hot spot, we should be able to observe the reaction. Plasmonic catalysts therefore prove to be an ideal substrate for SERS experiments, because both the high signal enhancement and catalytic activity originate from the hot spot. (28, 54) Previous research performed in our group utilized this principle to study the dimerization of 4-NTP to DMAB. (29, 30, 119) Chemometric methods were applied to obtain a clearer image of the kinetics during the reaction, demonstrated in Figure 7. (30) First, a one-component principal-component analysis (PCA) removed the spectral blinking from the data and already resulted in a lower signal-to-noise ratio (Figure 7 left panel vs middle panel). After removal of the spectral blinking, the reaction spectra were taken through a two-component multivariate curve resolution (MCR) that described the reactant and the product. This resulted in a better understanding of the reaction data with a lower signal-to-noise ratio. The spectra that were removed from the kinetic data were subsequently analyzed with a four-component MCR analysis (Figure 7, right side). Two of the components were similar to the two main components in the kinetic data, apart from some slight variations in peak intensities that were caused by differences in orientation. The third and fourth components were low in intensity over the measured time, apart from two single instances for each component. The third component resembled much of DMAB, but the fourth component is a completely unknown structure and is a potential reaction intermediate. (30)

Figure 7

Figure 7. PCA used to obtain kinetic data with reduced noise in SERS experiments. (Left) The conventional method to obtain kinetic data is to plot a peak area over time. (Middle) Spectral fluctuations can be removed from the spectrum with a PCA time filter, after which a two-component MCR can further clear up the kinetic data. The kinetic data is now analyzed over full spectra instead of over single peaks, making it less prone to shifts in band positions. (Right) The discarded data after the PCA time filter can be analyzed with MCR to find possible intermediate structures. (30) Adapted with permission from ref 30. Copyright 2015 Wiley-VCH.

Ultrafast Raman Spectroscopy, Watching a Molecule Breathe. Most Raman spectrometers require spectral integration times of at least a second and are therefore not fit to observe short-lived species such as intermediates. Recent progress made in the field of ultrafast Raman spectroscopy allows acquisition times in the order of picoseconds with Raman line widths of tens of reciprocal centimeters. (31) Such fast acquisition times enable the elucidation of a great deal of reaction steps and dynamics, such as bond forming and breaking. To extend the potential of time-resolved Raman spectroscopy, it can be combined with other techniques such as CARS, to improve the signal intensity, and SERS, to increase the signal intensity even further to detect surface species. (120) (121)

Because the technique generates extremely large electric fields that can potentially damage the sample and the SERS antennae, the experiments need to be performed in a highly controlled environment. Yampolsky et al. managed to reduce the damage to SERS-antennae by encapsulating gold dimers and adsorbed trans-1,2-bis(4-pyridyl) ethylene (BPE) in a thick porous silica shell of about 70–80 nm. (120) The hot spots between the dimer in combination with CARS provided excellent signal enhancement for the observation of BPE near the single-molecule level. By applying a femtosecond laser scanning CARS microscope and by tuning the frequencies of the pump and the Stokes pulses, the authors were able to observe an oscillating signal that was associated with the quantum beating of the closely spaced excited vibrational modes of BPE. It is important to note that a single time trace was not obtained instantly, but the result was obtained after averaging the signal over an hour. (120)

Ultrafast Raman spectroscopy can lead to promising results where one could actually follow bond formation and breaking. However, the technique suffers from the possibility of sample damage and requires highly controlled environments and thus does not seem fit for the characterization of catalysts in their operating conditions yet. Ultimately, time-resolved Raman spectroscopy should be combined with TERS to give a spatial resolution in the nanometer scale and a temporal resolution in the picosecond scale. However, such experiments have to be performed on fixed analytes under ultrahigh vacuum to prevent signal blinking and signal degradation.

Challenges and Future Prospects. Based on the above considerations it should be clear that SERS and TERS can make the difference in three specific fields. The first field concerns the monitoring of chemical reactions at the molecular level, including the potential to identify reaction intermediates and even transition states. Second, the use of SERS in combination with its plasmonic platform opens up ample opportunities to conduct a wealth of chemical reactions at the surface of gold and silver, which are known to be catalytically active. The third field is associated with the heat developed by the plasmonic materials upon illumination providing new opportunities to locally create the proper experimental conditions to trigger a catalytic reaction.

The heat developed by the plasmonic materials upon illumination provides new opportunities to locally create the proper experimental conditions to trigger a catalytic reaction.

It is important to realize that SERS and TERS have made tremendous progress over recent years and are becoming mature spectroscopic techniques. Improvements in substrate preparation have made SERS more robust and sensitive, opening the path for the detection of surface species with low Raman scattering cross sections in a wide range of reaction conditions. We believe that, following the highlighted examples in this perspective article, SERS can become an attractive and versatile characterization method for a wide variety of catalytic materials. However, this will not be a simple task and requires highly interdisciplinary research for developing stable and inert SERS substrates, without losing plasmonic enhancement. Simple spherical plasmonic nanoparticles often do not suffice for heterogeneous catalysis research because their enhancement signal is negligible when they are not in an aggregated state. (122) Dimers or other structures, such as nanorods, are expected to give better results with respect to signal enhancement, but they are currently less stable. It is believed that SERS substrates prepared by photolithography can yield more robust and homogeneous signal intensities. Similarly, TERS tips, especially with Ag-coating, are known to degrade at a fast rate and require development of robust methods of thin, pinhole free protective dielectric coatings for prolonged measurements in ambient and especially at operating conditions of catalysts.

Creating stronger LSPRs will result in more intense Raman signal intensities but can also lead to undesired effects, such as substrate damage and unwanted side-reactions. More research effort is needed to study the role of the strong localized electromagnetic field and local heating and if ultrathin oxide layers are really able to prevent plasmonic side-reactions.

We believe that SHINERS and its TERS counterpart can play significant roles in the study of heterogeneous catalysis. SHINs have been proven to be more inert and stable than bare particles and can even act as a support material, guaranteeing close contact between catalyst and sensor for heterogeneous catalysis (Table 1). Additionally, alumina-protected TERS tips have proven to be a useful, stable, and noninvasive technique for mapping catalytic activity of silver photocatalysts. Combining the current developments in SERS and TERS with other developments in Raman, such as CARS and ultrafast spectroscopy, will most likely lead to useful mechanistic information regarding catalytic solids.

Table 1. Overview of Different SERS Substrates Including Their Advantages and Disadvantages

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Author
    • Bert M. Weckhuysen - Faculty of Science, Debye Institute for Nanomaterials Science, Utrecht University, Universiteitsweg 99, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands Email: [email protected]
  • Authors
    • Thomas Hartman - Faculty of Science, Debye Institute for Nanomaterials Science, Utrecht University, Universiteitsweg 99, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands
    • Caterina S. Wondergem - Faculty of Science, Debye Institute for Nanomaterials Science, Utrecht University, Universiteitsweg 99, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands
    • Naresh Kumar - Faculty of Science, Debye Institute for Nanomaterials Science, Utrecht University, Universiteitsweg 99, 3584 CG Utrecht, The NetherlandsNational Physical Laboratory, Hampton Road, Teddington, Middlesex TW11 0LW, U.K.
    • Albert van den Berg - BIOS Lab on a Chip Group and MESA+ Institute for Nanotechnology, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands
  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Biographies

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Thomas Hartman obtained his M.Sc. degree in Nanomaterials: Chemistry and Physics from Utrecht University in 2014. He is now working under the guidance of Prof. Bert Weckhuysen as a Ph.D. student to increase the understanding of operating catalysts with SERS by implementing oxide-coated plasmonic nanoparticles as catalyst support material and SERS substrates.

Caterina S. Wondergem obtained her M.Sc. degree in Nanomaterials: Chemistry and Physics from Utrecht University. She graduated cum laude in 2014 with a thesis entitled “The Effect of Water on Methanol-to-Olefins Reactions Studied by Advanced In-situ Microspectroscopy”. Later that year she started her Ph.D. research “Unravelling the Mysteries of Solar Steam Nanobubbles” under the supervision of Prof. Bert Weckhuysen.

Naresh Kumar obtained his B.Tech. from the Indian Institute of Technology Delhi. He received his Master Degree in Physics from King’s College London, where he worked on the nanoscale chemical imaging of polymer-blend thin films using TERS. Naresh has now set up an AFM-TERS system and has applied it to solve various problems at National Physical Laboratory. He started his Ph.D. research in 2015 under the supervision of Prof. Bert Weckhuysen.

Albert van den Berg was appointed as full professor on Miniaturized Systems for (Bio)Chemical Analysis at the University of Twente in 2000. His current research interests focus on microanalysis systems and nanosensors; nanofluidics; and single cells, tissues, and organs on chips, especially with applications in personalized health care, drug development, and development of sustainable (nano-)technologies.

Bert M. Weckhuysen has been a full professor in Inorganic Chemistry and Catalysis at Utrecht University since 2000. His research interests are in the development of spectroscopy and microscopy techniques for elucidating the working and deactivation principles of catalytic solids, mostly applied under true reaction conditions.

Acknowledgment

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

B.M.W. acknowledges financial support from The Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) Gravitation Program (Netherlands Center for Multiscale Catalytic Energy Conversion, MCEC) and a European Research Council (ERC) Advanced Grant (321140). N.K. acknowledges funding from the ‘NanoSpec’ project in the Strategic Capability programme of the National Measurements System of the U.K. Department of Business, Innovation and Skills.

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 122 other publications.

  1. 1
    Handbook of Heterogeneous Catalysis, 2nd ed.; Ertl, G., Knözinger, H., Schüth, F., Weitkamp, J., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2008.
  2. 2
    Hagen, J. Industrial Catalysis: A Practical Approach, 3rd ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2015.
  3. 3
    Somorjai, G. A.; Li, Y. Introduction to Surface Chemistry and Catalysis, 2nd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 2010.
  4. 4
    Zaera, F. New Advances in the Use of Infrared Absorption Spectroscopy for the Characterization of Heterogeneous Catalytic Reactions Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 7624 7663 DOI: 10.1039/C3CS60374A
  5. 5
    Savara, A.; Weitz, E. Elucidation of Intermediates and Mechanisms in Heterogeneous Catalysis Using Infrared Spectroscopy Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2014, 65, 249 273 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-physchem-040513-103647
  6. 6
    Stavitski, E.; Weckhuysen, B. M. Infrared and Raman Imaging of Heterogeneous Catalysts Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 4615 4625 DOI: 10.1039/c0cs00064g
  7. 7
    Fan, F.; Feng, Z.; Li, G.; Sun, K.; Ying, P.; Li, C. In Situ UV Raman Spectroscopic Studies on the Synthesis Mechanism of Zeolite X Chem. - Eur. J. 2008, 14, 5125 5129 DOI: 10.1002/chem.200800560
  8. 8
    Dufresne, P.; Payen, E.; Grimblot, J.; Bonnelle, J. P. Study of Ni-Mo-γ-Al2O3 Catalysts by X-Ray Photoelectron and Raman Spectroscopy. Comparison with Co-Mo-γ-Al2O3 Catalysts J. Phys. Chem. 1981, 85, 2344 2351 DOI: 10.1021/j150616a010
  9. 9
    Li, C.; Stair, P. C. Ultraviolet Raman Spectroscopy Characterization of Coke Formation in Zeolites Catal. Today 1997, 33, 353 360 DOI: 10.1016/S0920-5861(96)00120-4
  10. 10
    Knözinger, H. In Situ Raman Spectroscopy. A Powerful Tool for Studies in Selective Catalytic Oxidation Catal. Today 1996, 32, 71 80 DOI: 10.1016/S0920-5861(96)00074-0
  11. 11
    Kim, H.; Kosuda, K. M.; Van Duyne, R. P.; Stair, P. C. Resonance Raman and Surface- and Tip-enhanced Raman Spectroscopy to Study Solid Catalysts and Heterogeneous Catalytic Reactions Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 4820 4844 DOI: 10.1039/c0cs00044b
  12. 12
    Wachs, I. E. Raman and IR Studies of Surface Metal Oxide Species on Oxide Supports: Supported Metal Oxide Catalysts Catal. Today 1996, 27, 437 455 DOI: 10.1016/0920-5861(95)00203-0
  13. 13
    Wachs, I. E.; Roberts, C. A. Monitoring Surface Metal Oxide Catalytic Active Sites with Raman Spectroscopy Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 5002 5017 DOI: 10.1039/c0cs00145g
  14. 14
    Bañares, M. A.; Mestl, G. Structural Characterization of Operating Catalysts by Raman Spectroscopy Adv. Catal. 2009, 52, 43 128 DOI: 10.1016/S0360-0564(08)00002-3
  15. 15
    Cheng, J.-X.; Xie, X. S. Coherent Anti-Stokes Raman Scattering Microscopy: Instrumentations, Theory and Applications J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 827 840 DOI: 10.1021/jp035693v
  16. 16
    Smith, E.; Dent, G. Modern Raman Spectroscopy—A Practical Approach, 1st ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd: Chichester, England, 2005.
  17. 17
    Schlücker, S. Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy: Concepts and Chemical Applications Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 4756 4795 DOI: 10.1002/anie.201205748
  18. 18
    Tian, Z. Q.; Ren, B.; Wu, D. Y. Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering: From Nobel to Transition Metals and From Rough Surfaces to Ordered Nanostructures J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 9463 9483 DOI: 10.1021/jp0257449
  19. 19
    Xie, W.; Schlücker, S. Rationally Designed Multifunctional Plasmonic Nanostructures for Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy: A Review Rep. Prog. Phys. 2014, 77, 116502 DOI: 10.1088/0034-4885/77/11/116502
  20. 20
    Zhang, Y.; Zhen, Y.-R.; Neumann, O.; Day, J. K.; Nordlander, P.; Halas, N. J. Coherent Anti-Stokes Raman Scattering with Single-Molecule Sensitivity Using a Plasmonic Fano Resonance Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 4424 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms5424
  21. 21
    Hoffmann, F. M. Infrared Reflection-Absorption Spectroscopy of Adsorbed Molecules Surf. Sci. Rep. 1983, 3, 107 192 DOI: 10.1016/0167-5729(83)90001-8
  22. 22
    Rupprechter, G. Sum Frequency Generation and Polarization-Modulation Infared Reflection Absorption Spectrosocpy of Functioning Model Catalysts from Ultrahigh Vacuum to Ambient Pressure Adv. Catal. 2007, 51, 133 263 DOI: 10.1016/S0360-0564(06)51004-1
  23. 23
    Shen, Y. R. Surface Properties Probed by Second-Harmonic and Sum-Frequency Generation Nature 1989, 337, 519 525 DOI: 10.1038/337519a0
  24. 24
    Han, H. L.; Melaet, G.; Alayoglu, S.; Somorjai, G. A. In-situ Microscopy and Spectroscopy Applied to Surfaces at Work ChemCatChem 2015, 7, 3625 3628 DOI: 10.1002/cctc.201500642
  25. 25
    Somorjai, G. A.; Frei, H.; Park, J. Y. Advancing the Frontiers in Nanocatalysis, Biointerfaces and Renewable Energy Conversion by Innovations of Surface Techniques J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 16589 16605 DOI: 10.1021/ja9061954
  26. 26
    Bratlie, K. M.; Montano, M. O.; Flores, L. D.; Paajanen, M.; Somorjai, G. A. Sum Frequency Generation Vibrational Spectroscopic and High-Pressure Scanning Tunneling Microscopic Studies of Benzene Hydrogenation on Pt(111) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 12810 12816 DOI: 10.1021/ja0626032
  27. 27
    Zhang, R.; Zhang, Y.; Dong, Z. C.; Jiang, S.; Zhang, C.; Chen, L. G.; Zhang, L.; Liao, Y.; Aizpurua, J.; Luo, Y. Chemical Mapping of a Single Molecule by Plasmon-Enhanced Raman Scattering Nature 2013, 498, 82 86 DOI: 10.1038/nature12151
  28. 28
    Long, R.; Li, Y.; Song, L.; Xiong, Y. Coupling Solar Energy into Reactions: Materials Design for Surface Plasmon-Mediated Catalysis Small 2015, 11, 3873 3889 DOI: 10.1002/smll.201403777
  29. 29
    van Schrojenstein Lantman, E. M.; Deckert-Gaudig, T.; Mank, A. J. G.; Deckert, V.; Weckhuysen, B. M. Catalytic Processes Monitored at the Nanoscale with Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy Nat. Nanotechnol. 2012, 7, 583 586 DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2012.131
  30. 30
    van Schrojenstein Lantman, E. M.; de Peinder, P.; Mank, A. J. G.; Weckhuysen, B. M. Separation of Time-Resolved Phenomena in Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering of the Photocatalytic Reduction of p-Nitrothiophenol ChemPhysChem 2015, 16, 547 554 DOI: 10.1002/cphc.201402709
  31. 31
    Keller, E. L.; Brandt, N. C.; Cassabaum, A. A.; Frontiera, R. R. Ultrafast Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy Analyst 2015, 140, 4922 4931 DOI: 10.1039/C5AN00869G
  32. 32
    Hu, K.; Li, D.; Cui, J.; Cao, Y.; Long, Y. In Situ Monitoring of Palladacycle-Mediated Carbonylation by Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 97734 97737 DOI: 10.1039/C5RA20292B
  33. 33
    Joseph, V.; Engelbrekt, C.; Zhang, J.; Gernert, U.; Ulstrup, J.; Kneipp, J. Characterizing the Kinetics of Nanoparticle-Catalyzed Reactions by Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 7592 7596 DOI: 10.1002/anie.201203526
  34. 34
    Cialla, D.; Pollok, S.; Steinbrücker, C.; Weber, K.; Popp, J. SERS-Based Detection of Biomolecules Nanophotonics 2014, 3, 383 411 DOI: 10.1515/nanoph-2013-0024
  35. 35
    Peng, F.; Su, Y. Y.; Zhong, Y. L.; Fan, C. H.; Lee, S. T.; He, Y. Silicon Nanomaterials Platform for Bioimaging, Biosensing, and Cancer Therapy Acc. Chem. Res. 2014, 47, 612 623 DOI: 10.1021/ar400221g
  36. 36
    Pettinger, B. Single-Molecule Surface- and Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy Mol. Phys. 2010, 108, 2039 2059 DOI: 10.1080/00268976.2010.506891
  37. 37
    Dieringer, J. A.; Mcfarland, A. D.; Shah, N. C.; Stuart, D. A.; Whitney, A. V.; Yonzon, C. R.; Young, M. A.; Zhang, X.; Van Duyne, R. P. Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy: New Materials, Concepts, Characterization Tools, and Applications Faraday Discuss. 2006, 132, 9 26 DOI: 10.1039/B513431P
  38. 38
    Moskovits, M. Persistent Misconceptions Regarding SERS Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013, 15, 5301 5311 DOI: 10.1039/c2cp44030j
  39. 39
    Etchegoin, P. G.; Le Ru, E. C. Basic Electromagnetic Theory of SERS. In Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy: Analytical, Biophysical and Life Science Applications; Schlücker, S., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2010; pp 1 37.
  40. 40
    Etchegoin, P. G.; Le Ru, E. C. A Perspective on Single Molecule SERS: Current Status and Future Challenges Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2008, 10, 6079 6089 DOI: 10.1039/b809196j
  41. 41
    Shanthil, M.; Thomas, R.; Swathi, R. S.; Thomas, K. G. Ag@SiO2 Core–Shell Nanostructures: Distance-Dependent Plasmon Coupling and SERS Investigation J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2012, 3, 1459 1464 DOI: 10.1021/jz3004014
  42. 42
    Stewart, M. E.; Anderton, C. R.; Thompson, L. B.; Maria, J.; Gray, S. K.; Rogers, J. A.; Nuzzo, R. G. Nanostructured Plasmonic Sensors Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 494 521 DOI: 10.1021/cr068126n
  43. 43
    Fan, M.; Andrade, G. F. S.; Brolo, A. G. A Review on the Fabrication of Substrates for Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy and Their Applications in Analytical Chemistry Anal. Chim. Acta 2011, 693, 7 25 DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2011.03.002
  44. 44

    The magnitude of the SERS enhancement is often described by the term “enhancement factor” (EF). It is a theoretical number that can be calculated with multiple methods. Each gives certain advantages over the others. Two examples of the methods to calculate EFs are the substrate EF (EF) and the analytical AEF (AEF), which are calculated as

    EF=ISERS/NSurIRS/NVol
    where ISERS is the intensity of the signal under SERS conditions, Nsur the amount of molecules adsorbed on the substrates surface in the spot size of the incident laser, IRS the average intensity of the signal during normal Raman spectroscopy, and Nvol the average number of molecules in the volume probed by normal Raman spectroscopy.
    AEF=ISERS/cSERSIRS/cRS
    where cSERS is the concentration of analyte under SERS conditions. For details, we refer to the pioneering work of Felidj and co-workers:

    Felidj, N.; Aubard, J.; Levi, G.; Krenn, J. R.; Salerno, M.; Schider, G.; Lamprecht, P.; Leitner, A.; Aussenegg, F. R. Controlling the Optical Response of Regular Arrays of Gold Particles for Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2002, 65, 075419 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.075419
  45. 45
    Ngoc, L. L. T.; Jin, M.; Wiedemair, J.; van den Berg, A.; Carlen, E. T. Large Area Metal Nanowire Arrays with Tunable Sub-20 Nm Nanogaps ACS Nano 2013, 7, 5223 5234 DOI: 10.1021/nn4009559
  46. 46
    Jin, M.; Pully, V.; Otto, C.; van den Berg, A.; Carlen, E. T. High-Density Periodic Arrays of Self-Aligned Subwavelength Nanopyramids for Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 21953 21959 DOI: 10.1021/jp106245a
  47. 47
    Wu, D.-Y.; Li, J.-F.; Ren, B.; Tian, Z.-Q. Electrochemical Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy of Nanostructures Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 1025 1041 DOI: 10.1039/b707872m
  48. 48
    Yuan, T.; Ngoc, L. L. T.; van Nieuwkasteele, J.; Odijk, M.; van den Berg, A.; Permentier, H.; Bischoff, R.; Carlen, E. T. In Situ Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroelectrochemical Analysis System with a Hemin Modified Nanostructured Gold Surface Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 2588 2592 DOI: 10.1021/ac504136j
  49. 49
    McBreen, P. H.; Moskovits, M. A Surface-Enhanced Interacting Raman Study of Ethylene and Oxygen with Supported Silver Catalysts J. Catal. 1987, 103, 188 199 DOI: 10.1016/0021-9517(87)90105-9
  50. 50
    Boghosian, S.; Bebelis, S.; Vayenas, C. G.; Papatheodorou, G. N. In Situ High Temperature SERS Study of Ag Catalysts Electrodes during Ethylene Epoxidation J. Catal. 1989, 117, 561 565 DOI: 10.1016/0021-9517(89)90366-7
  51. 51
    Mikami, Y.; Dhakshinamoorthy, A.; Alvaro, M.; García, H. Catalytic Activity of Unsupported Gold Nanoparticles Catal. Sci. Technol. 2013, 3, 58 69 DOI: 10.1039/C2CY20068F
  52. 52
    Christopher, P.; Xin, H.; Linic, S. Visible-Light-Enhanced Catalytic Oxidation Reactions on Plasmonic Silver Nanostructures Nat. Chem. 2011, 3, 467 472 DOI: 10.1038/nchem.1032
  53. 53
    Dorain, P. B.; Von Raben, K. U.; Chang, R. K.; Laube, B. L. Catalytic Formation of SO32- and SO42- from SO2 on Silver Observed by Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering Chem. Phys. Lett. 1981, 84, 405 409 DOI: 10.1016/0009-2614(81)80373-9
  54. 54
    Zhang, Z.; Deckert-Gaudig, T.; Deckert, V. Label-Free Monitoring of Plasmonic Catalysis at the Nanoscale Analyst 2015, 140, 4325 4335 DOI: 10.1039/C5AN00630A
  55. 55
    Bethke, K. A.; Kung, H. H. Supported Ag Catalysts for the Lean Reduction of NO with C3H6 J. Catal. 1997, 172, 93 102 DOI: 10.1006/jcat.1997.1794
  56. 56
    Marimuthu, A.; Zhang, J.; Linic, S. Tuning Selectivity in Propylene Epoxidation by Plasmon Mediated Photo-Switching of Cu Oxidation State Science 2013, 339, 1590 1593 DOI: 10.1126/science.1231631
  57. 57
    Karelovic, A.; Ruiz, P. The Role of Copper Particle Size in Low Pressure Methanol Synthesis via CO2 Hydrogenation over Cu/ZnO Catalysts Catal. Sci. Technol. 2015, 5, 869 881 DOI: 10.1039/C4CY00848K
  58. 58
    Wang, J. L.; Ando, R. A.; Camargo, P. H. C. Investigating the Plasmon-Mediated Catalytic Activity of AgAu Nanoparticles as a Function of Composition: Are Two Metals Better than One? ACS Catal. 2014, 4, 3815 3819 DOI: 10.1021/cs501189m
  59. 59
    He, R.; Wang, Y.; Wang, X.; Wang, Z.; Liu, G.; Zhou, W.; Wen, L.; Li, Q.; Wang, X.; Chen, X.; Zeng, J.; Hou, J. G. Facile Synthesis of Pentacle Gold-Copper Alloy Nanocrystals and Their Plasmonic and Catalytic Properties Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 4327 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms5327
  60. 60
    Santos Costa, J. C.; Corio, P.; Marcia Rossi, L. Catalytic Oxidation of Cinnamyl Alcohol Using Au – Ag Nanotubes Investigated by Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy Nanoscale 2015, 7, 8536 8543 DOI: 10.1039/C5NR01064K
  61. 61
    Kiyonaga, T.; Jin, Q.; Kobayashi, H.; Tada, H. Size-Dependence of Catalytic Activity of Gold Nanoparticles Loaded on Titanium (IV) Dioxide for Hydrogen Peroxide Decomposition ChemPhysChem 2009, 10, 2935 2938 DOI: 10.1002/cphc.200900596
  62. 62
    Laoufi, I.; Saint-Lager, M. C.; Lazzari, R.; Jupille, J.; Robach, O.; Garaudée, S.; Cabailh, G.; Dolle, P.; Cruguel, H.; Bailly, A. Size and Catalytic Activity of Supported Gold Nanoparticles: An in Operando Study during CO Oxidation J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 4673 4679 DOI: 10.1021/jp1110554
  63. 63
    Bell, S. E. J.; McCourt, M. R. SERS Enhancement by Aggregated Au Colloids: Effect of Particle Size Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2009, 11, 7455 7462 DOI: 10.1039/b906049a
  64. 64
    Zhang, Q.; Blom, D. A.; Wang, H. Nanoporosity-Enhanced Catalysis on Subwavelength Au Nanoparticles: A Plasmon-Enhanced Spectroscopic Study Chem. Mater. 2014, 26, 5131 5142 DOI: 10.1021/cm502508d
  65. 65
    Zhang, Q.; Wang, H. Facet-Dependent Catalytic Activities of Au Nanoparticles Enclosed by High-Index Facets ACS Catal. 2014, 4, 4027 4033 DOI: 10.1021/cs501445h
  66. 66
    Cui, Q.; Yashchenok, A.; Zhang, L.; Li, L.; Masic, A.; Wienskol, G.; Möhwald, H.; Bargheer, M. Fabrication of Bifunctional Gold/gelatin Hybrid Nanocomposites and Their Application ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 1999 2002 DOI: 10.1021/am5000068
  67. 67
    Xie, W.; Walkenfort, B.; Schlücker, S. Label-Free SERS Monitoring of Chemical Reactions Catalyzed by Small Gold Nanoparticles Using 3D Plasmonic Superstructures J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 1657 1660 DOI: 10.1021/ja309074a
  68. 68
    van Schrojenstein Lantman, E. M. Raman Nanospectroscopy of a Photo-Catalytic Reaction. Ph.D. Thesis, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2014.
  69. 69
    Sun, M.; Xu, H. A Novel Application of Plasmonics: Plasmon-Driven Surface-Catalyzed Reactions Small 2012, 8, 2777 2786 DOI: 10.1002/smll.201200572
  70. 70
    Harvey, C. E.; Weckhuysen, B. M. Surface- and Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy as Operando Probes for Monitoring and Understanding Heterogeneous Catalysis Catal. Lett. 2015, 145, 40 57 DOI: 10.1007/s10562-014-1420-4
  71. 71
    Chen, X.-J.; Cabello, G.; Wu, D.-Y.; Tian, Z.-Q. Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy toward Application in Plasmonic Photocatalysis on Metal Nanostructures J. Photochem. Photobiol., C 2014, 21, 54 80 DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2014.10.003
  72. 72
    Pashaee, F.; Hou, R.; Gobbo, P.; Workentin, M. S.; Lagugné-Labarthet, F. Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy of Self-Assembled Thiolated Monolayers on Flat Gold Nanoplates Using Gaussian-Transverse and Radially Polarized Excitations J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 15639 15646 DOI: 10.1021/jp403157v
  73. 73
    Tabatabaei, M.; Sangar, A.; Kazemi-zanjani, N.; Torchio, P.; Merlen, A.; Lagugné-Labarthet, F. Optical Properties of Silver and Gold Tetrahedral Nanopyramid Arrays Prepared by Nanosphere Lithography J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 14778 14786 DOI: 10.1021/jp405125c
  74. 74
    Liu, W.-L.; Lin, F.-C.; Yang, Y.-C.; Huang, C.-H.; Gwo, S.; Huang, M. H.; Huang, J.-S. The Influence of Shell Thickness of Au@TiO2 Core-Shell Nanoparticles on the Plasmonic Enhancement Effect in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells Nanoscale 2013, 5, 7953 7962 DOI: 10.1039/c3nr02800c
  75. 75
    Zhang, Z.; Deckert-Gaudig, T.; Singh, P.; Deckert, V. Single Molecule Level Plasmonic Catalysis – a Dilution Study of p-Nitrothiophenol on Gold Dimers Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 3069 3072 DOI: 10.1039/C4CC09008J
  76. 76
    Wang, P.; Huang, B.; Dai, Y.; Whangbo, M.-H. Plasmonic Photocatalysts: Harvesting Visible Light with Noble Metal Nanoparticles Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012, 14, 9813 9825 DOI: 10.1039/c2cp40823f
  77. 77
    Rycenga, M.; Wang, Z.; Gordon, E.; Cobley, C. M.; Schwartz, A. G.; Lo, C. S.; Xia, Y. Probing the Photothermal Effect of Gold-Based Nanocages with Surface Enhanced Raman Scattering (SERS) Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 9924 9927 DOI: 10.1002/anie.200904382
  78. 78
    Kang, T.; Hong, S.; Choi, Y.; Lee, L. P. The Effect of Thermal Gradients in SERS Spectroscopy Small 2010, 6, 2649 2652 DOI: 10.1002/smll.201000996
  79. 79
    Zhao, L.-B.; Huang, Y.-F.; Liu, X.-M.; Anema, J. R.; Wu, D.-Y.; Ren, B.; Tian, Z.-Q. A DFT Study on Photoinduced Surface Catalytic Coupling Reactions on Nanostructured Silver: Selective Formation of Azobenzene Derivatives from Para-Substituted Nitrobenzene and Aniline Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012, 14, 12919 12929 DOI: 10.1039/c2cp41502j
  80. 80
    Pelaez, M.; Nolan, N. T.; Pillai, S. C.; Seery, M. K.; Falaras, P.; Kontos, A. G.; Dunlop, P. S. M.; Hamilton, J. W. J.; Byrne, J. A.; Shea, K. O. A Review on the Visible Light Active Titanium Dioxide Photocatalysts for Environmental Applications Appl. Catal., B 2012, 125, 331 349 DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.05.036
  81. 81
    Huang, W.; Jing, Q.; Du, Y.; Zhang, B.; Meng, X.; Sun, M.; Schanze, K. S.; Gao, H.; Xu, P. An in Situ SERS Study of Substrate-Dependent Surface Plasmon Induced Aromatic Nitration J. Mater. Chem. C 2015, 3, 5285 5291 DOI: 10.1039/C5TC00835B
  82. 82
    Knight, M. W.; King, N. S.; Liu, L.; Everitt, H. O.; Nordlander, P.; Halas, N. J. Aluminium for Plasmonics ACS Nano 2014, 8, 834 840 DOI: 10.1021/nn405495q
  83. 83
    McMahon, J. M.; Gray, S. K.; Schatz, G. C. Ultraviolet Plasmonics: The Poor Metals Al, Ga, In, Sn, Tl, Pb, and Bi Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013, 15, 5415 5423 DOI: 10.1039/C3CP43856B
  84. 84
    Yin, P.-G.; Jiang, L.; You, T.-T.; Zhou, W.; Li, L.; Guo, L.; Yang, S. Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy with Self-Assembled Cobalt Nanoparticle Chains: Comparison of Theory and Experiment Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2010, 12, 10781 10785 DOI: 10.1039/c002662j
  85. 85
    Tian, Z.-Q.; Ren, B.; Li, J.-F.; Yang, Z.-L. Expanding Generality of Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy with Borrowing SERS Activity Strategy Chem. Commun. 2007, 34, 3514 3534 DOI: 10.1039/b616986d
  86. 86
    Heck, K. N.; Janesko, B. G.; Scuseria, G. E.; Halas, N. J.; Wong, M. S. Observing Metal-Catalyzed Chemical Reactions in Situ Using Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy on Pd-Au Nanoshells J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 16592 16600 DOI: 10.1021/ja803556k
  87. 87
    Mahmoud, M. A.; Garlyyev, B.; El-sayed, M. A. Controlling the Catalytic Efficiency on the Surface of Hollow Gold Nanoparticles by Introducing an Inner Thin Layer of Platinum or Palladium J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2014, 5, 4088 4094 DOI: 10.1021/jz502071v
  88. 88
    El-Aziz, A. M.; Kibler, L. A.; Kolb, D. M. The Potentials of Zero Charge of Pd(111) and Thin Pd Overlayers on Au(111) Electrochem. Commun. 2002, 4, 535 539 DOI: 10.1016/S1388-2481(02)00362-4
  89. 89
    Attard, G. A.; Bennett, J. A.; Mikheenko, I.; Jenkins, P.; Guan, S.; Macaskie, L. E.; Wood, J.; Wain, A. J. Semi-Hydrogenation of Alkynes at Single Crystal, Nanoparticle and Biogenic Nanoparticle Surfaces: The Role of Defects in Lindlar-Type Catalysts and the Origin of Their Selectivity Faraday Discuss. 2013, 162, 57 75 DOI: 10.1039/c3fd00007a
  90. 90
    Porter, M. D.; Lipert, R. J.; Siperko, L. M.; Wang, G.; Narayanan, R. SERS as a Bioassay Platform: Fundamentals, Design, and Applications Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 1001 1011 DOI: 10.1039/b708461g
  91. 91
    Li, J. F.; Huang, Y. F.; Ding, Y.; Yang, Z. L.; Li, S. B.; Zhou, X. S.; Fan, F. R.; Zhang, W.; Zhou, Z. Y.; Wu, D. Y.; Ren, B.; Wang, Z. L.; Tian, Z. Q. Shell-Isolated Nanoparticle-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy Nature 2010, 464, 392 395 DOI: 10.1038/nature08907
  92. 92
    Li, X.; Liu, M.; Lee, J.; Ding, D.; Bottomley, L. A.; Park, S.; Liu, M. An Operando Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy (SERS) Study of Carbon Deposition on SOFC Anodes Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 21112 21119 DOI: 10.1039/C4CP05176A
  93. 93
    Li, X.; Lee, J.-P.; Blinn, K. S.; Chen, D.; Yoo, S.; Kang, B.; Bottomley, L. A.; El-Sayed, M. A.; Park, S.; Liu, M. High-Temperature Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy for in Situ Study of Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Materials Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 306 310 DOI: 10.1039/C3EE42462F
  94. 94
    Whitney, A. V.; Elam, J. W.; Stair, P. C.; Van Duyne, R. P. Toward a Thermally Robust Operando Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy Substrate J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 16827 16832 DOI: 10.1021/jp074462b
  95. 95
    Guan, S.; Donovan-sheppard, O.; Reece, C.; Willock, D. J.; Wain, A. J.; Attard, G. A. Structure Sensitivity in Catalytic Hydrogenation at Platinum Surfaces Measured by Shell-Isolated Nanoparticle Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy (SHINERS) ACS Catal. 2016, 6, 1822 DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.5b02872
  96. 96
    Rong, Z.; Xiao, R.; Wang, C.; Wang, D.; Wang, S. Plasmonic Ag Core–Satellite Nanostructures with a Tunable Silica- Spaced Nanogap for Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering Langmuir 2015, 31, 8129 8137 DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b01713
  97. 97
    Xie, W.; Schlücker, S. Hot Electron-Induced Reduction of Small Molecules on Photorecycling Metal Surfaces Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 7570 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms8570
  98. 98
    Xie, W.; Herrmann, C.; Kömpe, K.; Haase, M.; Schlücker, S. Synthesis of Bifunctional Au/Pt/Au Core/shell Nanoraspberries for in Situ SERS Monitoring of Platinum-Catalyzed Reactions J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 19302 19305 DOI: 10.1021/ja208298q
  99. 99
    Kha, N. M.; Chen, C.-H.; Su, W.-N.; Rick, J.; Hwang, B.-J. Improved Raman and Photoluminescence Sensitivity Achieved Using Bifunctional Ag@SiO2 Nanocubes Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 21226 21235 DOI: 10.1039/C4CP05217J
  100. 100
    Seh, Z. W.; Liu, S.; Zhang, S. Y.; Bharathi, M. S.; Ramanarayan, H.; Low, M.; Shah, K. W.; Zhang, Y. W.; Han, M. Y. Anisotropic Growth of Titania onto Various Gold Nanostructures: Synthesis, Theoretical Understanding, and Optimization for Catalysis Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 10140 10143 DOI: 10.1002/anie.201104943
  101. 101
    Lin, X. D.; Uzayisenga, V.; Li, J. F.; Fang, P. P.; Wu, D. Y.; Ren, B.; Tian, Z. Q. Synthesis of Ultrathin and Compact Au@MnO2 Nanoparticles for Shell-Isolated Nanoparticle-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy (SHINERS) J. Raman Spectrosc. 2012, 43, 40 45 DOI: 10.1002/jrs.3007
  102. 102
    Sun, X.; Li, Y. Ag@C Core/Shell Structured Nanoparticles: Controlled Synthesis, Characterization, and Assembly Langmuir 2005, 21, 6019 6024 DOI: 10.1021/la050193+
  103. 103
    Formo, E. V.; Wu, Z.; Mahurin, S. M.; Dai, S. In Situ High Temperature Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy for the Study of Interface Phenomena: Probing a Solid Acid on Alumina J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 9068 9073 DOI: 10.1021/jp1119525
  104. 104
    Buurmans, I. L. C.; Weckhuysen, B. M. Heterogeneities of Individual Catalyst Particles in Space and Time as Monitored by Spectroscopy Nat. Chem. 2012, 4, 873 886 DOI: 10.1038/nchem.1478
  105. 105
    Harvey, C. E.; van Schrojenstein Lantman, E. M.; Mank, A. J. G.; Weckhuysen, B. M. An Integrated AFM-Raman Instrument for Studying Heterogeneous Catalytic Systems: A First Showcase Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 1742 1744 DOI: 10.1039/c2cc15939b
  106. 106
    Kumar, N.; Mignuzzi, S.; Su, W.; Roy, D. Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy: Principles and Applications EPJ. Technol. Instrum. 2015, 2, 1 23 DOI: 10.1140/epjti/s40485-015-0019-5
  107. 107
    Domke, K. F.; Pettinger, B. In Situ Discrimination between Axially Complexed and Ligand-Free Co Porphyrin on Au (111) with Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy ChemPhysChem 2009, 10, 1794 1798 DOI: 10.1002/cphc.200900182
  108. 108
    Singh, P.; Deckert-Gaudig, T.; Schneidewind, H.; Kirsch, K.; van Schrojenstein Lantman, E. M.; Weckhuysen, B. M.; Deckert, V. Differences in Single and Aggregated Nanoparticle Plasmon Spectroscopy Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 2991 2995 DOI: 10.1039/C4CP04850D
  109. 109
    Sun, M.; Zhang, Z.; Zheng, H.; Xu, H. In-Situ Plasmon-Driven Chemical Reactions Revealed by High Vacuum Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy Sci. Rep. 2012, 2, 1 4 DOI: 10.1038/srep00647
  110. 110
    Zhang, Z.; Chen, L.; Sun, M.; Ruan, P.; Zheng, H.; Xu, H. Insights into the Nature of Plasmon-Driven Catalytic Reactions Revealed by HV-TERS Nanoscale 2013, 5, 3249 3252 DOI: 10.1039/c3nr00352c
  111. 111
    Kumar, N.; Stephanidis, B.; Zenobi, R.; Wain, A. J.; Roy, D. Nanoscale Mapping of Catalytic Activity Using Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy Nanoscale 2015, 7, 7133 7137 DOI: 10.1039/C4NR07441F
  112. 112
    Chaigneau, M.; Picardi, G.; Ossikovski, R. Surface Science Tip Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy Evidence for Amorphous Carbon Contamination on Gold Surfaces Surf. Sci. 2010, 604, 701 705 DOI: 10.1016/j.susc.2010.01.018
  113. 113
    Ichimura, T.; Fujii, S.; Verma, P.; Yano, T.; Inouye, Y.; Kawata, S. Subnanometric Near-Field Raman Investigation in the Vicinity of a Metallic Nanostructure Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 102, 186101 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.186101
  114. 114
    Poborchii, V.; Tada, T.; Kanayama, T.; Geshev, P. Optimization of Tip Material and Shape for near-UV TERS in Si Structures J. Raman Spectrosc. 2009, 40, 1377 1385 DOI: 10.1002/jrs.2417
  115. 115
    Yang, Z.; Aizpurua, J.; Xu, H. Electromagnetic Field Enhancement in TERS Configurations J. Raman Spectrosc. 2009, 40, 1343 1348 DOI: 10.1002/jrs.2429
  116. 116
    Etchegoin, P. G.; Le Ru, E. C.; Meyer, M. Evidence of Natural Isotopic Distribution from Single-Molecule SERS J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 2713 2716 DOI: 10.1021/ja808934d
  117. 117
    Ledesma, C.; Yang, J.; Chen, D.; Holmen, A. Recent Approaches in Mechanistic and Kinetic Studies of Catalytic Reactions Using SSITKA Technique ACS Catal. 2014, 4, 4527 4547 DOI: 10.1021/cs501264f
  118. 118
    Shen, H.; Zhou, X.; Zou, N.; Chen, P. Single-Molecule Kinetics Reveals a Hidden Surface Reaction Intermediate in Single-Nanoparticle Catalysis J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 26902 26911 DOI: 10.1021/jp509507u
  119. 119
    van Schrojenstein Lantman, E. M.; Gijzeman, O. L. J.; Mank, A. J. G.; Weckhuysen, B. M. Investigation of the Kinetics of a Surface Photocatalytic Reaction in Two Dimensions with Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering ChemCatChem 2014, 6, 3342 3346 DOI: 10.1002/cctc.201402647
  120. 120
    Yampolsky, S.; Fishman, D. A.; Dey, S.; Hulkko, E.; Banik, M.; Potma, E. O.; Apkarian, V. A. Seeing a Single Molecule Vibrate through Time-Resolved Coherent Anti-Stokes Raman Scattering Nat. Photonics 2014, 8, 650 656 DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2014.143
  121. 121
    Pozzi, E. A.; Sonntag, M. D.; Jiang, N.; Chiang, N.; Seideman, T.; Hersam, M. C.; Van Duyne, R. P. Ultrahigh Vacuum Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy with Picosecond Excitation J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2014, 5, 2657 2661 DOI: 10.1021/jz501239z
  122. 122
    Zhang, Y.; Walkenfort, B.; Yoon, J. H.; Schlücker, S.; Xie, W. Gold and Silver Nanoparticle Monomers Are Non-SERS-Active: A Negative Experimental Study with Silica-Encapsulated Raman-Reporter-Coated Metal Colloids Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 21120 21126 DOI: 10.1039/C4CP05073H

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article is cited by 153 publications.

  1. Jorge Benavides-Hernández, Franck Dumeignil. From Characterization to Discovery: Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning and High-Throughput Experiments for Heterogeneous Catalyst Design. ACS Catalysis 2024, 14 (15) , 11749-11779. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.3c06293
  2. Manuel Grumet, Clara von Scarpatetti, Tomáš Bučko, David A. Egger. Delta Machine Learning for Predicting Dielectric Properties and Raman Spectra. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2024, 128 (15) , 6464-6470. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.4c00886
  3. Björn Altenburger, Carl Andersson, Sune Levin, Fredrik Westerlund, Joachim Fritzsche, Christoph Langhammer. Label-Free Imaging of Catalytic H2O2 Decomposition on Single Colloidal Pt Nanoparticles Using Nanofluidic Scattering Microscopy. ACS Nano 2023, 17 (21) , 21030-21043. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.3c03977
  4. Lihi Rikanati, Hadar Shema, Tzipora Ben-Tzvi, Elad Gross. Nanoimaging of Facet-Dependent Adsorption, Diffusion, and Reactivity of Surface Ligands on Au Nanocrystals. Nano Letters 2023, 23 (12) , 5437-5444. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c00250
  5. Shahar Dery, Barak Friedman, Hadar Shema, Elad Gross. Mechanistic Insights Gained by High Spatial Resolution Reactivity Mapping of Homogeneous and Heterogeneous (Electro)Catalysts. Chemical Reviews 2023, 123 (9) , 6003-6038. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00867
  6. Dušan Mrđenović, Zi-Xi Tang, Yashashwa Pandey, Weitao Su, Yao Zhang, Naresh Kumar, Renato Zenobi. Regioselective Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy of Lipid Membranes with Sub-Nanometer Axial Resolution. Nano Letters 2023, 23 (9) , 3939-3946. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c00689
  7. Tiancheng Pu, Jih-Mirn Jehng, Adhika Setiawan, Bar Mosevitzky Lis, Michael E. Ford, Srinivas Rangarajan, Israel E. Wachs. Resolving the Oxygen Species on Ozone Activated AgAu Alloy Catalysts for Oxidative Methanol Coupling. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2022, 126 (51) , 21568-21575. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c03769
  8. Douglas dos Santos Lopes, Dieric dos Santos Abreu, Rômulo Augusto Ando, Paola Corio. Regioselective Plasmon-Driven Decarboxylation of Mercaptobenzoic Acids Triggered by Distinct Reactive Oxygen Species. ACS Catalysis 2022, 12 (23) , 14619-14628. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.2c04058
  9. Demelza Wright, Sara Sangtarash, Niclas S. Mueller, Qianqi Lin, Hatef Sadeghi, Jeremy J. Baumberg. Vibrational Stark Effects: Ionic Influence on Local Fields. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2022, 13 (22) , 4905-4911. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c01048
  10. Yao Yang, Cheyenne R. Peltier, Rui Zeng, Roberto Schimmenti, Qihao Li, Xin Huang, Zhifei Yan, Georgia Potsi, Ryan Selhorst, Xinyao Lu, Weixuan Xu, Mariel Tader, Alexander V. Soudackov, Hanguang Zhang, Mihail Krumov, Ellen Murray, Pengtao Xu, Jeremy Hitt, Linxi Xu, Hsin-Yu Ko, Brian G. Ernst, Colin Bundschu, Aileen Luo, Danielle Markovich, Meixue Hu, Cheng He, Hongsen Wang, Jiye Fang, Robert A. DiStasio, Jr., Lena F. Kourkoutis, Andrej Singer, Kevin J. T. Noonan, Li Xiao, Lin Zhuang, Bryan S. Pivovar, Piotr Zelenay, Enrique Herrero, Juan M. Feliu, Jin Suntivich, Emmanuel P. Giannelis, Sharon Hammes-Schiffer, Tomás Arias, Manos Mavrikakis, Thomas E. Mallouk, Joel D. Brock, David A. Muller, Francis J. DiSalvo, Geoffrey W. Coates, Héctor D. Abruña. Electrocatalysis in Alkaline Media and Alkaline Membrane-Based Energy Technologies. Chemical Reviews 2022, 122 (6) , 6117-6321. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00331
  11. Zhen-Feng Cai, Juan Pedro Merino, Wei Fang, Naresh Kumar, Jeremy O. Richardson, Steven De Feyter, Renato Zenobi. Molecular-Level Insights on Reactive Arrangement in On-Surface Photocatalytic Coupling Reactions Using Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2022, 144 (1) , 538-546. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c11263
  12. Petar M. Radjenovic, Ru-Yu Zhou, Jin-Chao Dong, Jian-Feng Li. Watching Reactions at Solid–Liquid Interfaces with in Situ Raman Spectroscopy. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2021, 125 (48) , 26285-26295. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c08640
  13. Shahar Dery Elad Gross . IR Nanospectroscopy in Catalysis Research. , 147-173. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2021-1396.ch007
  14. Zhandong Li, Dmitry Kurouski. Plasmon-Driven Chemistry on Mono- and Bimetallic Nanostructures. Accounts of Chemical Research 2021, 54 (10) , 2477-2487. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.1c00093
  15. Rui-Pu Wang, Ben Yang, Qiang Fu, Yao Zhang, Rui Zhu, Xiao-Ru Dong, Yang Zhang, Bing Wang, Jin-Long Yang, Yi Luo, Zhen-Chao Dong, J. G. Hou. Raman Detection of Bond Breaking and Making of a Chemisorbed Up-Standing Single Molecule at Single-Bond Level. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2021, 12 (7) , 1961-1968. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c00074
  16. Emmett D. Goodman, Chengshuang Zhou, Matteo Cargnello. Design of Organic/Inorganic Hybrid Catalysts for Energy and Environmental Applications. ACS Central Science 2020, 6 (11) , 1916-1937. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.0c01046
  17. Sandip Kumar De, Sourabh Kumar, Sarmistha Ray, Subrata Mondal, Abhijit Roy, Gourab Bhattacharjee, Arpita Nandy, Anuradha Roy, Biswarup Pathak, Dulal Senapati. Au-Seeded Ag-Nanorod Networks for Electrocatalytic Sensing. ACS Applied Nano Materials 2020, 3 (10) , 9969-9983. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.0c01976
  18. Tej B. Limbu, Basant Chitara, Martha Y. Garcia Cervantes, Yu Zhou, Shengxi Huang, Yongan Tang, Fei Yan. Unravelling the Thickness Dependence and Mechanism of Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering on Ti3C2TX MXene Nanosheets. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2020, 124 (32) , 17772-17782. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c05143
  19. Joëlle Thuriot-Roukos, Romaissa Khadraoui, Sébastien Paul, Robert Wojcieszak. Raman Spectroscopy Applied to Monitor Furfural Liquid-Phase Oxidation Catalyzed by Supported Gold Nanoparticles. ACS Omega 2020, 5 (24) , 14283-14290. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c00091
  20. Hua Zhang, Sai Duan, Petar M. Radjenovic, Zhong-Qun Tian, Jian-Feng Li. Core–Shell Nanostructure-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy for Surface Catalysis. Accounts of Chemical Research 2020, 53 (4) , 729-739. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00545
  21. Jacek Szczerbiński, Hao Yin, Yue-Jiao Zhang, Fan-Li Zhang, Jian-Feng Li, Renato Zenobi. Preserving Plasmonic Nanostructures from Laser-Induced Deactivation by a Protective Dielectric Shell. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2020, 124 (11) , 6385-6394. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b11183
  22. Judith Langer, Dorleta Jimenez de Aberasturi, Javier Aizpurua, Ramon A. Alvarez-Puebla, Baptiste Auguié, Jeremy J. Baumberg, Guillermo C. Bazan, Steven E. J. Bell, Anja Boisen, Alexandre G. Brolo, Jaebum Choo, Dana Cialla-May, Volker Deckert, Laura Fabris, Karen Faulds, F. Javier García de Abajo, Royston Goodacre, Duncan Graham, Amanda J. Haes, Christy L. Haynes, Christian Huck, Tamitake Itoh, Mikael Käll, Janina Kneipp, Nicholas A. Kotov, Hua Kuang, Eric C. Le Ru, Hiang Kwee Lee, Jian-Feng Li, Xing Yi Ling, Stefan A. Maier, Thomas Mayerhöfer, Martin Moskovits, Kei Murakoshi, Jwa-Min Nam, Shuming Nie, Yukihiro Ozaki, Isabel Pastoriza-Santos, Jorge Perez-Juste, Juergen Popp, Annemarie Pucci, Stephanie Reich, Bin Ren, George C. Schatz, Timur Shegai, Sebastian Schlücker, Li-Lin Tay, K. George Thomas, Zhong-Qun Tian, Richard P. Van Duyne, Tuan Vo-Dinh, Yue Wang, Katherine A. Willets, Chuanlai Xu, Hongxing Xu, Yikai Xu, Yuko S. Yamamoto, Bing Zhao, Luis M. Liz-Marzán. Present and Future of Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering. ACS Nano 2020, 14 (1) , 28-117. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.9b04224
  23. Alexandra Gellé, Tony Jin, Luis de la Garza, Gareth D. Price, Lucas V. Besteiro, Audrey Moores. Applications of Plasmon-Enhanced Nanocatalysis to Organic Transformations. Chemical Reviews 2020, 120 (2) , 986-1041. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00187
  24. Hai-Sheng Su, Hui-Shu Feng, Qing-Qing Zhao, Xia-Guang Zhang, Juan-Juan Sun, Yuhan He, Sheng-Chao Huang, Teng-Xiang Huang, Jin-Hui Zhong, De-Yin Wu, Bin Ren. Probing the Local Generation and Diffusion of Active Oxygen Species on a Pd/Au Bimetallic Surface by Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2020, 142 (3) , 1341-1347. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b10512
  25. Caterina S. Wondergem, Thomas Hartman, Bert M. Weckhuysen. In Situ Shell-Isolated Nanoparticle-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy to Unravel Sequential Hydrogenation of Phenylacetylene over Platinum Nanoparticles. ACS Catalysis 2019, 9 (12) , 10794-10802. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.9b03010
  26. Tiancheng Pu, Huijie Tian, Michael E. Ford, Srinivas Rangarajan, Israel E. Wachs. Overview of Selective Oxidation of Ethylene to Ethylene Oxide by Ag Catalysts. ACS Catalysis 2019, 9 (12) , 10727-10750. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.9b03443
  27. Chase Z. Cunniff, Sarah E. Specht, Alyssa M. Love, Pajean Uchupalanun, Juan M. Venegas, Catherine E. Kruszynski, Ive Hermans. Investigation of Supported Metal Oxide Species with Shell-Isolated Nanoparticle-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2019, 123 (41) , 25220-25227. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b07019
  28. Zhu Chen, Song Jiang, Gyeongwon Kang, Duc Nguyen, George C. Schatz, Richard P. Van Duyne. Operando Characterization of Iron Phthalocyanine Deactivation during Oxygen Reduction Reaction Using Electrochemical Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2019, 141 (39) , 15684-15692. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b07979
  29. Nina Heidary, Khoa H. Ly, Nikolay Kornienko. Probing CO2 Conversion Chemistry on Nanostructured Surfaces with Operando Vibrational Spectroscopy. Nano Letters 2019, 19 (8) , 4817-4826. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b01582
  30. Svetlana Alekseeva, Ievgen I. Nedrygailov, Christoph Langhammer. Single Particle Plasmonics for Materials Science and Single Particle Catalysis. ACS Photonics 2019, 6 (6) , 1319-1330. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.9b00339
  31. Robin Schürmann, Kenny Ebel, Christophe Nicolas, Aleksandar R. Milosavljević, Ilko Bald. Role of Valence Band States and Plasmonic Enhancement in Electron-Transfer-Induced Transformation of Nitrothiophenol. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2019, 10 (11) , 3153-3158. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b00848
  32. Su Liu, Arturo Susarrey Arce, Sara Nilsson, David Albinsson, Lars Hellberg, Svetlana Alekseeva, Christoph Langhammer. In Situ Plasmonic Nanospectroscopy of the CO Oxidation Reaction over Single Pt Nanoparticles. ACS Nano 2019, 13 (5) , 6090-6100. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.9b02876
  33. Naresh Kumar, Caterina S. Wondergem, Andrew J. Wain, Bert M. Weckhuysen. In Situ Nanoscale Investigation of Catalytic Reactions in the Liquid Phase Using Zirconia-Protected Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy Probes. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2019, 10 (8) , 1669-1675. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b02496
  34. Yao-Hui Wang, Jie Wei, Petar Radjenovic, Zhong-Qun Tian, Jian-Feng Li. In Situ Analysis of Surface Catalytic Reactions Using Shell-Isolated Nanoparticle-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. Analytical Chemistry 2019, 91 (3) , 1675-1685. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.8b05499
  35. Jacek Szczerbiński, Luzia Gyr, Jérôme Kaeslin, Renato Zenobi. Plasmon-Driven Photocatalysis Leads to Products Known from E-beam and X-ray-Induced Surface Chemistry. Nano Letters 2018, 18 (11) , 6740-6749. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b02426
  36. Pengcheng Hu, Xu Li, Bolin Li, Xiaofeng Han, Furong Zhang, Keng C. Chou, Zhan Chen, Xiaolin Lu. Molecular Coupling between Organic Molecules and Metal. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2018, 9 (17) , 5167-5172. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b01765
  37. Gayatri Kumari, Xueqiang Zhang, Dinumol Devasia, Jaeyoung Heo, Prashant K. Jain. Watching Visible Light-Driven CO2 Reduction on a Plasmonic Nanoparticle Catalyst. ACS Nano 2018, 12 (8) , 8330-8340. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.8b03617
  38. Nicolò Bontempi, Irene Vassalini, Stefano Danesi, Matteo Ferroni, Maurizio Donarelli, Paolo Colombi, Ivano Alessandri. Non-Plasmonic SERS with Silicon: Is It Really Safe? New Insights into the Optothermal Properties of Core/Shell Microbeads. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2018, 9 (9) , 2127-2132. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b00662
  39. Andrew J. Wilson, Prashant K. Jain. Structural Dynamics of the Oxygen-Evolving Complex of Photosystem II in Water-Splitting Action. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2018, 140 (17) , 5853-5859. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.8b02620
  40. Ferenc Liebig, Radwan M. Sarhan, Claudia Prietzel, Clemens N. Z. Schmitt, Matias Bargheer, Joachim Koetz. Tuned Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering Performance of Undulated Au@Ag Triangles. ACS Applied Nano Materials 2018, 1 (4) , 1995-2003. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.8b00570
  41. Nilam C. Shah Ian Murphy Alexandra Widmer . Exploring the Figures of Merit of Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. 2018, 153-163. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2018-1305.ch009
  42. Weihua Lin, Yaqian Cao, Peijie Wang, and Mengtao Sun . Unified Treatment for Plasmon–Exciton Co-driven Reduction and Oxidation Reactions. Langmuir 2017, 33 (43) , 12102-12107. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b03144
  43. Alyssa B. Zrimsek, Naihao Chiang, Michael Mattei, Stephanie Zaleski, Michael O. McAnally, Craig T. Chapman, Anne-Isabelle Henry, George C. Schatz, and Richard P. Van Duyne . Single-Molecule Chemistry with Surface- and Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. Chemical Reviews 2017, 117 (11) , 7583-7613. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00552
  44. Prabhat Verma . Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy: Technique and Recent Advances. Chemical Reviews 2017, 117 (9) , 6447-6466. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00821
  45. Guang Yang, Jagjit Nanda, Boya Wang, Gang Chen, and Daniel T. Hallinan, Jr. . Self-Assembly of Large Gold Nanoparticles for Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2017, 9 (15) , 13457-13470. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b01121
  46. Jian-Feng Li, Yue-Jiao Zhang, Song-Yuan Ding, Rajapandiyan Panneerselvam, and Zhong-Qun Tian . Core–Shell Nanoparticle-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. Chemical Reviews 2017, 117 (7) , 5002-5069. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00596
  47. Qianqian Ding, Maodu Chen, Yurui Fang, Zhenglong Zhang, and Mengtao Sun . Plasmon-Driven Diazo Coupling Reactions of p-Nitroaniline via −NH2 or −NO2 in Atmosphere Environment. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2017, 121 (9) , 5225-5231. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b12589
  48. Zhenglong Zhang, Shaoxiang Sheng, Rongming Wang, and Mengtao Sun . Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. Analytical Chemistry 2016, 88 (19) , 9328-9346. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.6b02093
  49. Gregory Q. Wallace, Mohammadali Tabatabaei, Renjie Hou, Matthew J. Coady, Peter R. Norton, Todd S. Simpson, Scott M. Rosendahl, Alexandre Merlen, François Lagugné-Labarthet. Superimposed Arrays of Nanoprisms for Multispectral Molecular Plasmonics. ACS Photonics 2016, 3 (9) , 1723-1732. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.6b00388
  50. Gregory D. Scholes . Most Accessed Papers: An Interesting Mix. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2016, 7 (11) , 2085-2086. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b01092
  51. Tao Yang, Jianping Zhou, Yongkang Wang, Ben Fan, Jing Qiao, Lixiang Chen, Xiaoyu Wang, Lingxiang Guo, Hong Yang, Quan Li. Magnetic Micromotors with Spiky Gold Nanoshells as SERS Sensors for Thiram and Bacteria Detection. Small 2024, 34 https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202405193
  52. Pratikkumar Lakhani, Dhavalkumar Bhanderi, Chetan K. Modi. Nanocatalysis: recent progress, mechanistic insights, and diverse applications. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 2024, 26 (7) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-024-06053-9
  53. Jun‐Lei Yang, Yue‐Wen Zhou, Ming‐Yang Jia, Qinlei Liu, Zhen‐Feng Cai. Insights into Heterogeneous Catalysis by Tip‐Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. ChemCatChem 2024, 11 https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.202400370
  54. Ketki Srivastava, Thimo S. Jacobs, Stefan Ostendorp, Dirk Jonker, Floor A. Brzesowsky, Arturo Susarrey-Arce, Han Gardeniers, Gerhard Wilde, Bert M. Weckhuysen, Albert van den Berg, Ward van der Stam, Mathieu Odijk. Alternative nano-lithographic tools for shell-isolated nanoparticle enhanced Raman spectroscopy substrates. Nanoscale 2024, 16 (15) , 7582-7593. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4NR00428K
  55. Yi-Fan Bao, Meng-Yuan Zhu, Xiao-Jiao Zhao, Hong-Xuan Chen, Xiang Wang, Bin Ren. Nanoscale chemical characterization of materials and interfaces by tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Chemical Society Reviews 2024, 4 https://doi.org/10.1039/D4CS00588K
  56. Bingzhi Li, Sijie Liu, Lunjie Huang, Maojun Jin, Jianlong Wang. Nanohybrid SERS substrates intended for food supply chain safety. Coordination Chemistry Reviews 2023, 494 , 215349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2023.215349
  57. Tabitha Jones. Fabrication of nanostructured electrodes for electrochemical surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (E-SERS): A review. Materials Science and Technology 2023, 39 (16) , 2287-2301. https://doi.org/10.1080/02670836.2023.2197729
  58. Xia Zhou, Haiqiu Huang, Yingqi Yang, Hanlin Zhou, Ruiyu Liang, Yijing Zhao, Qingya Cui, Yuhai Tang, Siyu Chen, Pan Li, Huaihong Cai, Pinghua Sun, Weiping Xu, Wanyong Yang, Haibo Zhou. Dendritic alloy shell Au@AgPt yolk sensor with excellent dual SERS enhancement and catalytic performance for in-situ SERS monitoring reaction. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 2023, 394 , 134385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2023.134385
  59. Ruchika Thayil, Sudhir Cherukulappurath. SERS-based detection of efficient removal of organic dyes using molybdenum dichalcogenide nanostructures. Nano Express 2023, 4 (3) , 035005. https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-959X/acef43
  60. Xi Hu, Wanying Zheng, Mengcheng Wu, Lingyun Chen, Shaowei Chen. Composites of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) and LDHs for energy storage and environmental applications: Fundamentals, progress, and perspectives. Sustainable Materials and Technologies 2023, 37 , e00691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susmat.2023.e00691
  61. Douglas S. Lopes, Ester V. Miranda, Rômulo A. Ando, Paola Corio. SERS-based detection of an organochlorine pesticide through surface plasmon-induced C–C coupling. Environmental Science: Nano 2023, 10 (7) , 1920-1931. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3EN00123G
  62. Soumik Siddhanta, Andrey N. Kuzmin, Artem Pliss, Alexander S. Baev, Sunil K. Khare, Pramit K. Chowdhury, Ashok K. Ganguli, Paras N. Prasad. Advances in Raman spectroscopy and imaging for biomedical research. Advances in Optics and Photonics 2023, 15 (2) , 318. https://doi.org/10.1364/AOP.479884
  63. Zhichao Lou, Yao Zhang, Yanjun Li, Lei Xu. Study on microscopic physical and chemical properties of biomass materials by AFM. Journal of Materials Research and Technology 2023, 24 , 10005-10026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.05.176
  64. Sharad Ambardar, Zachary H. Withers, Jiru Liu, Xiaoyi Lai, Abdullah Albagami, Alina Zhukova, Pedro Fabris Capelli, Prasana K. Sahoo, Dmitri V. Voronine. Quantum plasmonic two-dimensional WS 2 –MoS 2 heterojunction. Nanoscale 2023, 15 (16) , 7318-7328. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3NR00861D
  65. Ruchi Singh, Vikas Yadav, Soumik Siddhanta. Probing plasmon-induced surface reactions using two-dimensional correlation vibrational spectroscopy. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 2023, 25 (8) , 6032-6043. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2CP05705K
  66. Jing Guo, Govinda Ghimire, Jianghao Zhou, Lei Yu, Zhiye Wang, Shuai Chang, Jin He. Potential controlled redox cycling of 4-aminothiophenol by coupling plasmon mediated chemical reaction with electrochemical reaction. Journal of Catalysis 2023, 418 , 256-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2023.01.018
  67. Chunxia Mu, Chongyang Lv, Xiangchao Meng, Jianhua Sun, Zhangfa Tong, Kelei Huang. In Situ Characterization Techniques Applied in Photocatalysis: A Review. Advanced Materials Interfaces 2023, 10 (3) https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.202201842
  68. Jisue Moon, Meijun Li, Anibal J. Ramirez-Cuesta, Zili Wu. Raman Spectroscopy. 2023, 75-110. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07125-6_4
  69. Ragamaye Tigiripalli, Vishal Agarwal, Goutam Deo. Case Studies: Raman Spectroscopy. 2023, 111-129. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07125-6_5
  70. Tanja Deckert-Gaudig, Marie Richard-Lacroix, Volker Deckert. Nanoscale Raman Spectroscopy. 2023, 169-188. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07125-6_8
  71. Rui Wang, Zhe He, Dmitry Kurouski. Near-field and photocatalytic properties of mono- and bimetallic nanostructures monitored by nanocavity surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Nano Research 2023, 16 (1) , 1545-1551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-022-4736-1
  72. Christophe Copéret, Maciej Damian Korzyński. Surface organometallic and coordination chemistry approach to formation of single site heterogeneous catalysts. 2023, 67-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-823144-9.00003-0
  73. Dušan Mrđenović, Wenjie Ge, Naresh Kumar, Renato Zenobi. Nanoscale Chemical Imaging of Human Cell Membranes Using Tip‐Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. Angewandte Chemie 2022, 134 (43) https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.202210288
  74. Dušan Mrđenović, Wenjie Ge, Naresh Kumar, Renato Zenobi. Nanoscale Chemical Imaging of Human Cell Membranes Using Tip‐Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2022, 61 (43) https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202210288
  75. Jessi E.S. van der Hoeven, Harith Gurunarayanan, Maarten Bransen, D.A. Matthijs de Winter, Petra E. de Jongh, Alfons van Blaaderen. Silica‐Coated Gold Nanorod Supraparticles: A Tunable Platform for Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. Advanced Functional Materials 2022, 32 (27) https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202200148
  76. Jing Shang, Jinsong Fan, Weiwei Qin, Kun Li. Single-Particle Measurements of Nanocatalysis with Dark-Field Microscopy. Catalysts 2022, 12 (7) , 764. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12070764
  77. Kankana Seal, Hirok Chaudhuri. A novel understanding of morphological anisotropy features of nanorod units in brookite dominated triphase mesoporous TiO2 and its excellent photocatalytic activity in phenol decomposition: The role of synthesis pH and surface hydroxylation. Surfaces and Interfaces 2022, 29 , 101715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfin.2021.101715
  78. Charlotte Vogt, Bert M. Weckhuysen. The concept of active site in heterogeneous catalysis. Nature Reviews Chemistry 2022, 6 (2) , 89-111. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41570-021-00340-y
  79. Priyanka Verma, Yasutaka Kuwahara, Kohsuke Mori, Robert Raja, Hiromi Yamashita. New insights in establishing the structure-property relations of novel plasmonic nanostructures for clean energy applications. EnergyChem 2022, 4 (1) , 100070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enchem.2022.100070
  80. Muhammad Saqib, Yunshan Fan, Rui Hao, Bo Zhang. Optical imaging of nanoscale electrochemical interfaces in energy applications. Nano Energy 2021, 90 , 106539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106539
  81. Fengyan Wang, Daxue Du, Shan Liu, Linna Wang, Tifeng Jiao, Zhaopeng Xu, Haiyan Wang. Revealing the Hemispherical Shielding Effect of SiO2@Ag Composite Nanospheres to Improve the Surface Enhanced Raman Scattering Performance. Nanomaterials 2021, 11 (9) , 2209. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11092209
  82. Jan P. Hofmann. In Situ Spectroscopy for Mechanistic Studies in Semiconductor Photocatalysis. 2021, 51-75. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527815296.ch3
  83. Hai-Sheng Su, Hui-Shu Feng, Xiang Wu, Juan-Juan Sun, Bin Ren. Recent advances in plasmon-enhanced Raman spectroscopy for catalytic reactions on bifunctional metallic nanostructures. Nanoscale 2021, 13 (33) , 13962-13975. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1NR04009J
  84. Stéphane Loridant. Raman spectroscopy as a powerful tool to characterize ceria-based catalysts. Catalysis Today 2021, 373 , 98-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2020.03.044
  85. Hongyu An, Longfei Wu, Laurens D. B. Mandemaker, Shuang Yang, Jim de Ruiter, Jochem H. J. Wijten, Joris C. L. Janssens, Thomas Hartman, Ward van der Stam, Bert M. Weckhuysen. Sub‐Second Time‐Resolved Surface‐Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy Reveals Dynamic CO Intermediates during Electrochemical CO 2 Reduction on Copper. Angewandte Chemie 2021, 133 (30) , 16712-16720. https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.202104114
  86. Hongyu An, Longfei Wu, Laurens D. B. Mandemaker, Shuang Yang, Jim de Ruiter, Jochem H. J. Wijten, Joris C. L. Janssens, Thomas Hartman, Ward van der Stam, Bert M. Weckhuysen. Sub‐Second Time‐Resolved Surface‐Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy Reveals Dynamic CO Intermediates during Electrochemical CO 2 Reduction on Copper. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2021, 60 (30) , 16576-16584. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202104114
  87. Iris C. ten Have, Bert M. Weckhuysen. The active phase in cobalt-based Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. Chem Catalysis 2021, 1 (2) , 339-363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.checat.2021.05.011
  88. Bin Dong, Nourhan Mansour, Teng-Xiang Huang, Wenyu Huang, Ning Fang. Single molecule fluorescence imaging of nanoconfinement in porous materials. Chemical Society Reviews 2021, 50 (11) , 6483-6506. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CS01568G
  89. Haifeng Feng, Xun Xu, Yi Du, Shi Xue Dou. Application of Scanning Tunneling Microscopy in Electrocatalysis and Electrochemistry. Electrochemical Energy Reviews 2021, 4 (2) , 249-268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41918-020-00074-3
  90. Roberto Pilot, Michele Massari. Silver nanoparticle aggregates: Wavelength dependence of their SERS properties in the first transparency window of biological tissues. Chemical Physics Impact 2021, 2 , 100014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chphi.2021.100014
  91. Paul Sprenger, Matthias Stehle, Abhijeet Gaur, Jana Weiß, Dennis Brueckner, Yi Zhang, Jan Garrevoet, Jussi‐Petteri Suuronen, Michael Thomann, Achim Fischer, Jan‐Dierk Grunwaldt, Thomas L. Sheppard. Chemical Imaging of Mixed Metal Oxide Catalysts for Propylene Oxidation: From Model Binary Systems to Complex Multicomponent Systems. ChemCatChem 2021, 13 (10) , 2483-2493. https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.202100054
  92. Zhandong Li, Dmitry Kurouski. Nanoscale structural characterization of plasmon-driven reactions. Nanophotonics 2021, 10 (6) , 1657-1673. https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2020-0647
  93. Sampreetha Thampy, Nickolas Ashburn, Kyeongjae Cho, Julia W. P Hsu. Earth‐Abundant Transition Metal‐Based Mullite‐Type Oxide Catalysts for Heterogeneous Oxidation Reactions. Advanced Energy and Sustainability Research 2021, 2 (4) https://doi.org/10.1002/aesr.202000075
  94. Christian Hess. New advances in using Raman spectroscopy for the characterization of catalysts and catalytic reactions. Chemical Society Reviews 2021, 50 (5) , 3519-3564. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CS01059F
  95. Mario D’Acunto. Plasmonics, Vibrational Nanospectroscopy and Polymers. 2021, 293-310. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73010-9_8
  96. Ruben F. Hamans, Rifat Kamarudheen, Andrea Baldi. Single Particle Approaches to Plasmon-Driven Catalysis. Nanomaterials 2020, 10 (12) , 2377. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10122377
  97. Hui-Shu Feng, Fan Dong, Hai-Sheng Su, Matthew M. Sartin, Bin Ren. In situ investigation of hot-electron-induced Suzuki−Miyaura reaction by surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Journal of Applied Physics 2020, 128 (17) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0023623
  98. L. Avakyan, V. Durimanov, D. Nemesh, V. Srabionyan, J. Ihlemann, L. Bugaev. Theoretical approach for calculation of dielectric functions of plasmonic nanoparticles of noble metals, magnesium and their alloys. Optical Materials 2020, 109 , 110264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2020.110264
  99. Miguel Rivera-Torrente, Laurens D. B. Mandemaker, Matthias Filez, Guusje Delen, Beatriz Seoane, Florian Meirer, Bert M. Weckhuysen. Spectroscopy, microscopy, diffraction and scattering of archetypal MOFs: formation, metal sites in catalysis and thin films. Chemical Society Reviews 2020, 49 (18) , 6694-6732. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CS00635A
  100. Dmitry Kurouski, Alexandre Dazzi, Renato Zenobi, Andrea Centrone. Infrared and Raman chemical imaging and spectroscopy at the nanoscale. Chemical Society Reviews 2020, 49 (11) , 3315-3347. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8CS00916C
Load all citations
Open PDF

The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters

Cite this: J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2016, 7, 8, 1570–1584
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00147
Published April 14, 2016

Copyright © 2016 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

Article Views

10k

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Strongest EFs arise from hot spots, which are produced by gap-mode plasmons that emerge between closely spaced plasmonic particles or tip–surface interactions where the plasmons overlap. (a) The Raman signal EF can reach theoretical values of 108 for dimer gold nanoparticles under 559 nm laser irradiance (40) and (b) 1011 for a sharp gold tip–gold surface interaction under 633 nm laser irradiance. (40) (c) The electric field is at its strongest when the particles touch and rapidly reduces to a negligible value when the particles are more than 15 nm away from each other. (d) This can be observed in the SERS spectra of adsorbed ammonium salt of pyrene on Ag@SiO2 spheres. (e) Plot of SERS EF versus distance between the particles. (41) Reprinted with permission from ref 40. Copyright 2008 Royal Society of Chemistry. Reprinted from ref 41. Copyright 2012 American Chemical Society.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. (a) Nano v-grooves, (46) (b) artist’s impression of nanopyramids, (46) (c) nanowires and nanogaps with cross section in inset, (45) (d) histogram of analytical enhancement factor (AEF) on a nanowire–nanogap substrate, (45) (e) −0.2 V and (f) −0.5 V spectro-electrogram of MPY/hemin modified gold nanowire electrodes with the Fe2+ and Fe3+ bands indicated. (48) Reprinted from refs 45, 46, and 48. Copyright 2013, 2010, and 2015, respectively, American Chemical Society.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. (a) Schematic diagram of the formation of hot electrons and holes in silver nanoparticles, which are able to catalyze both oxidative and reductive reactions. (79) (b) Possible reactions occurring during the chemical reduction of 4-NTP by NaBH4 over gold nanoparticles. (c) NMF-calculated SERS spectra of the three pure components including their assignment to the three molecular species 4-NTP (blue), 4,4′-DMAB (green), and 4-ATP (red). (98) (d) Raw SERS spectra of the reduction of 4-NTP to 4-ATP over Au/Pt/Au catalysts, including DMAB-associated peaks for intermediate volumes of NaBH4 added, corresponding to the calculated spectra from panel c. (98) Reprinted with permission from ref 79. Copyright 2012 Royal Society of Chemistry. Reprinted from ref 98. Copyright 2011 American Chemical Society.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. Advantages of SHINs over bare gold nanoparticles. (a) SHINs prevent plasmon-driven reactions. SERS spectra collected from 4-ATP adsorbed on 80 nm gold particles, 80 nm gold nanoparticles covered with 5 nm gold particles, and 80 nm SHINs covered with 5 nm gold particles. DMAB is not observed when SHINs are implemented. (67) Adapted from ref 67. Copyright 2013 American Chemical Society. (b) SERS EF calculated for a variety of silver nanocubes: bare (I, red) and SiO2-coated cubes using different methods (II–V, blue). All SiO2-coated nanocubes show increased EFs compared to bare silver nanocubes. (99) Adapted with permission from ref 99. Copyright 2015 Royal Society of Chemistry. (c) UV–vis absorption spectra of gold nanoparticles at elevated temperatures indicate that their LSPR shifts above temperatures of 100 °C. (94) (d) UV–vis absorption spectra of gold nanoparticles coated with 1 nm alumina at elevated temperatures indicate that stability is maintained up to 400 °C. (94) Adapted from ref 94. Copyright 2007 American Chemical Society. (e) SHINs (green) could potentially serve as a support for many other catalysts (purple spheres). Because the electric field is stronger (red) at the surface of the SHIN, it is expected that the catalyst–support interface can be characterized.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. (a, b) SHINERS spectra of Pt{hkl} single crystals immersed in 0.1 M EP/0.1 M HClO4 recorded under hydrogen evolution conditions (−0.1 V). (c) Schematic depiction of the half-hydrogenated state (HHS) intermediate. (d) Calculated structure of EP adsorbed in the μ2(C,O) configuration. (e) Calculated structure of HHS at a Pt{221} surface. Reprinted from ref 95. Copyright 2016 American Chemical Society.

    Figure 6

    Figure 6. (a) AFM topography image of the Ag catalyst substrate. (b) TERS map of the area marked by the dashed rectangle in panel a showing signal intensities of a DMAB-associated band at 1142 cm–1. (c) Near-field spectra measured at the positions marked in panel b. (d) Intensity profile along the dotted line marked in panel b showing the spatial resolution of the TERS map using a fitted Gaussian curve (red) to be 20 nm. (111) Reprinted with permission from ref 111. Copyright 2015 Royal Society of Chemistry.

    Figure 7

    Figure 7. PCA used to obtain kinetic data with reduced noise in SERS experiments. (Left) The conventional method to obtain kinetic data is to plot a peak area over time. (Middle) Spectral fluctuations can be removed from the spectrum with a PCA time filter, after which a two-component MCR can further clear up the kinetic data. The kinetic data is now analyzed over full spectra instead of over single peaks, making it less prone to shifts in band positions. (Right) The discarded data after the PCA time filter can be analyzed with MCR to find possible intermediate structures. (30) Adapted with permission from ref 30. Copyright 2015 Wiley-VCH.

  • References


    This article references 122 other publications.

    1. 1
      Handbook of Heterogeneous Catalysis, 2nd ed.; Ertl, G., Knözinger, H., Schüth, F., Weitkamp, J., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2008.
    2. 2
      Hagen, J. Industrial Catalysis: A Practical Approach, 3rd ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2015.
    3. 3
      Somorjai, G. A.; Li, Y. Introduction to Surface Chemistry and Catalysis, 2nd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 2010.
    4. 4
      Zaera, F. New Advances in the Use of Infrared Absorption Spectroscopy for the Characterization of Heterogeneous Catalytic Reactions Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 7624 7663 DOI: 10.1039/C3CS60374A
    5. 5
      Savara, A.; Weitz, E. Elucidation of Intermediates and Mechanisms in Heterogeneous Catalysis Using Infrared Spectroscopy Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2014, 65, 249 273 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-physchem-040513-103647
    6. 6
      Stavitski, E.; Weckhuysen, B. M. Infrared and Raman Imaging of Heterogeneous Catalysts Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 4615 4625 DOI: 10.1039/c0cs00064g
    7. 7
      Fan, F.; Feng, Z.; Li, G.; Sun, K.; Ying, P.; Li, C. In Situ UV Raman Spectroscopic Studies on the Synthesis Mechanism of Zeolite X Chem. - Eur. J. 2008, 14, 5125 5129 DOI: 10.1002/chem.200800560
    8. 8
      Dufresne, P.; Payen, E.; Grimblot, J.; Bonnelle, J. P. Study of Ni-Mo-γ-Al2O3 Catalysts by X-Ray Photoelectron and Raman Spectroscopy. Comparison with Co-Mo-γ-Al2O3 Catalysts J. Phys. Chem. 1981, 85, 2344 2351 DOI: 10.1021/j150616a010
    9. 9
      Li, C.; Stair, P. C. Ultraviolet Raman Spectroscopy Characterization of Coke Formation in Zeolites Catal. Today 1997, 33, 353 360 DOI: 10.1016/S0920-5861(96)00120-4
    10. 10
      Knözinger, H. In Situ Raman Spectroscopy. A Powerful Tool for Studies in Selective Catalytic Oxidation Catal. Today 1996, 32, 71 80 DOI: 10.1016/S0920-5861(96)00074-0
    11. 11
      Kim, H.; Kosuda, K. M.; Van Duyne, R. P.; Stair, P. C. Resonance Raman and Surface- and Tip-enhanced Raman Spectroscopy to Study Solid Catalysts and Heterogeneous Catalytic Reactions Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 4820 4844 DOI: 10.1039/c0cs00044b
    12. 12
      Wachs, I. E. Raman and IR Studies of Surface Metal Oxide Species on Oxide Supports: Supported Metal Oxide Catalysts Catal. Today 1996, 27, 437 455 DOI: 10.1016/0920-5861(95)00203-0
    13. 13
      Wachs, I. E.; Roberts, C. A. Monitoring Surface Metal Oxide Catalytic Active Sites with Raman Spectroscopy Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 5002 5017 DOI: 10.1039/c0cs00145g
    14. 14
      Bañares, M. A.; Mestl, G. Structural Characterization of Operating Catalysts by Raman Spectroscopy Adv. Catal. 2009, 52, 43 128 DOI: 10.1016/S0360-0564(08)00002-3
    15. 15
      Cheng, J.-X.; Xie, X. S. Coherent Anti-Stokes Raman Scattering Microscopy: Instrumentations, Theory and Applications J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 827 840 DOI: 10.1021/jp035693v
    16. 16
      Smith, E.; Dent, G. Modern Raman Spectroscopy—A Practical Approach, 1st ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd: Chichester, England, 2005.
    17. 17
      Schlücker, S. Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy: Concepts and Chemical Applications Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 4756 4795 DOI: 10.1002/anie.201205748
    18. 18
      Tian, Z. Q.; Ren, B.; Wu, D. Y. Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering: From Nobel to Transition Metals and From Rough Surfaces to Ordered Nanostructures J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 9463 9483 DOI: 10.1021/jp0257449
    19. 19
      Xie, W.; Schlücker, S. Rationally Designed Multifunctional Plasmonic Nanostructures for Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy: A Review Rep. Prog. Phys. 2014, 77, 116502 DOI: 10.1088/0034-4885/77/11/116502
    20. 20
      Zhang, Y.; Zhen, Y.-R.; Neumann, O.; Day, J. K.; Nordlander, P.; Halas, N. J. Coherent Anti-Stokes Raman Scattering with Single-Molecule Sensitivity Using a Plasmonic Fano Resonance Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 4424 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms5424
    21. 21
      Hoffmann, F. M. Infrared Reflection-Absorption Spectroscopy of Adsorbed Molecules Surf. Sci. Rep. 1983, 3, 107 192 DOI: 10.1016/0167-5729(83)90001-8
    22. 22
      Rupprechter, G. Sum Frequency Generation and Polarization-Modulation Infared Reflection Absorption Spectrosocpy of Functioning Model Catalysts from Ultrahigh Vacuum to Ambient Pressure Adv. Catal. 2007, 51, 133 263 DOI: 10.1016/S0360-0564(06)51004-1
    23. 23
      Shen, Y. R. Surface Properties Probed by Second-Harmonic and Sum-Frequency Generation Nature 1989, 337, 519 525 DOI: 10.1038/337519a0
    24. 24
      Han, H. L.; Melaet, G.; Alayoglu, S.; Somorjai, G. A. In-situ Microscopy and Spectroscopy Applied to Surfaces at Work ChemCatChem 2015, 7, 3625 3628 DOI: 10.1002/cctc.201500642
    25. 25
      Somorjai, G. A.; Frei, H.; Park, J. Y. Advancing the Frontiers in Nanocatalysis, Biointerfaces and Renewable Energy Conversion by Innovations of Surface Techniques J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 16589 16605 DOI: 10.1021/ja9061954
    26. 26
      Bratlie, K. M.; Montano, M. O.; Flores, L. D.; Paajanen, M.; Somorjai, G. A. Sum Frequency Generation Vibrational Spectroscopic and High-Pressure Scanning Tunneling Microscopic Studies of Benzene Hydrogenation on Pt(111) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 12810 12816 DOI: 10.1021/ja0626032
    27. 27
      Zhang, R.; Zhang, Y.; Dong, Z. C.; Jiang, S.; Zhang, C.; Chen, L. G.; Zhang, L.; Liao, Y.; Aizpurua, J.; Luo, Y. Chemical Mapping of a Single Molecule by Plasmon-Enhanced Raman Scattering Nature 2013, 498, 82 86 DOI: 10.1038/nature12151
    28. 28
      Long, R.; Li, Y.; Song, L.; Xiong, Y. Coupling Solar Energy into Reactions: Materials Design for Surface Plasmon-Mediated Catalysis Small 2015, 11, 3873 3889 DOI: 10.1002/smll.201403777
    29. 29
      van Schrojenstein Lantman, E. M.; Deckert-Gaudig, T.; Mank, A. J. G.; Deckert, V.; Weckhuysen, B. M. Catalytic Processes Monitored at the Nanoscale with Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy Nat. Nanotechnol. 2012, 7, 583 586 DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2012.131
    30. 30
      van Schrojenstein Lantman, E. M.; de Peinder, P.; Mank, A. J. G.; Weckhuysen, B. M. Separation of Time-Resolved Phenomena in Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering of the Photocatalytic Reduction of p-Nitrothiophenol ChemPhysChem 2015, 16, 547 554 DOI: 10.1002/cphc.201402709
    31. 31
      Keller, E. L.; Brandt, N. C.; Cassabaum, A. A.; Frontiera, R. R. Ultrafast Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy Analyst 2015, 140, 4922 4931 DOI: 10.1039/C5AN00869G
    32. 32
      Hu, K.; Li, D.; Cui, J.; Cao, Y.; Long, Y. In Situ Monitoring of Palladacycle-Mediated Carbonylation by Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 97734 97737 DOI: 10.1039/C5RA20292B
    33. 33
      Joseph, V.; Engelbrekt, C.; Zhang, J.; Gernert, U.; Ulstrup, J.; Kneipp, J. Characterizing the Kinetics of Nanoparticle-Catalyzed Reactions by Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 7592 7596 DOI: 10.1002/anie.201203526
    34. 34
      Cialla, D.; Pollok, S.; Steinbrücker, C.; Weber, K.; Popp, J. SERS-Based Detection of Biomolecules Nanophotonics 2014, 3, 383 411 DOI: 10.1515/nanoph-2013-0024
    35. 35
      Peng, F.; Su, Y. Y.; Zhong, Y. L.; Fan, C. H.; Lee, S. T.; He, Y. Silicon Nanomaterials Platform for Bioimaging, Biosensing, and Cancer Therapy Acc. Chem. Res. 2014, 47, 612 623 DOI: 10.1021/ar400221g
    36. 36
      Pettinger, B. Single-Molecule Surface- and Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy Mol. Phys. 2010, 108, 2039 2059 DOI: 10.1080/00268976.2010.506891
    37. 37
      Dieringer, J. A.; Mcfarland, A. D.; Shah, N. C.; Stuart, D. A.; Whitney, A. V.; Yonzon, C. R.; Young, M. A.; Zhang, X.; Van Duyne, R. P. Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy: New Materials, Concepts, Characterization Tools, and Applications Faraday Discuss. 2006, 132, 9 26 DOI: 10.1039/B513431P
    38. 38
      Moskovits, M. Persistent Misconceptions Regarding SERS Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013, 15, 5301 5311 DOI: 10.1039/c2cp44030j
    39. 39
      Etchegoin, P. G.; Le Ru, E. C. Basic Electromagnetic Theory of SERS. In Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy: Analytical, Biophysical and Life Science Applications; Schlücker, S., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2010; pp 1 37.
    40. 40
      Etchegoin, P. G.; Le Ru, E. C. A Perspective on Single Molecule SERS: Current Status and Future Challenges Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2008, 10, 6079 6089 DOI: 10.1039/b809196j
    41. 41
      Shanthil, M.; Thomas, R.; Swathi, R. S.; Thomas, K. G. Ag@SiO2 Core–Shell Nanostructures: Distance-Dependent Plasmon Coupling and SERS Investigation J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2012, 3, 1459 1464 DOI: 10.1021/jz3004014
    42. 42
      Stewart, M. E.; Anderton, C. R.; Thompson, L. B.; Maria, J.; Gray, S. K.; Rogers, J. A.; Nuzzo, R. G. Nanostructured Plasmonic Sensors Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 494 521 DOI: 10.1021/cr068126n
    43. 43
      Fan, M.; Andrade, G. F. S.; Brolo, A. G. A Review on the Fabrication of Substrates for Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy and Their Applications in Analytical Chemistry Anal. Chim. Acta 2011, 693, 7 25 DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2011.03.002
    44. 44

      The magnitude of the SERS enhancement is often described by the term “enhancement factor” (EF). It is a theoretical number that can be calculated with multiple methods. Each gives certain advantages over the others. Two examples of the methods to calculate EFs are the substrate EF (EF) and the analytical AEF (AEF), which are calculated as

      EF=ISERS/NSurIRS/NVol
      where ISERS is the intensity of the signal under SERS conditions, Nsur the amount of molecules adsorbed on the substrates surface in the spot size of the incident laser, IRS the average intensity of the signal during normal Raman spectroscopy, and Nvol the average number of molecules in the volume probed by normal Raman spectroscopy.
      AEF=ISERS/cSERSIRS/cRS
      where cSERS is the concentration of analyte under SERS conditions. For details, we refer to the pioneering work of Felidj and co-workers:

      Felidj, N.; Aubard, J.; Levi, G.; Krenn, J. R.; Salerno, M.; Schider, G.; Lamprecht, P.; Leitner, A.; Aussenegg, F. R. Controlling the Optical Response of Regular Arrays of Gold Particles for Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2002, 65, 075419 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.075419
    45. 45
      Ngoc, L. L. T.; Jin, M.; Wiedemair, J.; van den Berg, A.; Carlen, E. T. Large Area Metal Nanowire Arrays with Tunable Sub-20 Nm Nanogaps ACS Nano 2013, 7, 5223 5234 DOI: 10.1021/nn4009559
    46. 46
      Jin, M.; Pully, V.; Otto, C.; van den Berg, A.; Carlen, E. T. High-Density Periodic Arrays of Self-Aligned Subwavelength Nanopyramids for Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 21953 21959 DOI: 10.1021/jp106245a
    47. 47
      Wu, D.-Y.; Li, J.-F.; Ren, B.; Tian, Z.-Q. Electrochemical Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy of Nanostructures Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 1025 1041 DOI: 10.1039/b707872m
    48. 48
      Yuan, T.; Ngoc, L. L. T.; van Nieuwkasteele, J.; Odijk, M.; van den Berg, A.; Permentier, H.; Bischoff, R.; Carlen, E. T. In Situ Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroelectrochemical Analysis System with a Hemin Modified Nanostructured Gold Surface Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 2588 2592 DOI: 10.1021/ac504136j
    49. 49
      McBreen, P. H.; Moskovits, M. A Surface-Enhanced Interacting Raman Study of Ethylene and Oxygen with Supported Silver Catalysts J. Catal. 1987, 103, 188 199 DOI: 10.1016/0021-9517(87)90105-9
    50. 50
      Boghosian, S.; Bebelis, S.; Vayenas, C. G.; Papatheodorou, G. N. In Situ High Temperature SERS Study of Ag Catalysts Electrodes during Ethylene Epoxidation J. Catal. 1989, 117, 561 565 DOI: 10.1016/0021-9517(89)90366-7
    51. 51
      Mikami, Y.; Dhakshinamoorthy, A.; Alvaro, M.; García, H. Catalytic Activity of Unsupported Gold Nanoparticles Catal. Sci. Technol. 2013, 3, 58 69 DOI: 10.1039/C2CY20068F
    52. 52
      Christopher, P.; Xin, H.; Linic, S. Visible-Light-Enhanced Catalytic Oxidation Reactions on Plasmonic Silver Nanostructures Nat. Chem. 2011, 3, 467 472 DOI: 10.1038/nchem.1032
    53. 53
      Dorain, P. B.; Von Raben, K. U.; Chang, R. K.; Laube, B. L. Catalytic Formation of SO32- and SO42- from SO2 on Silver Observed by Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering Chem. Phys. Lett. 1981, 84, 405 409 DOI: 10.1016/0009-2614(81)80373-9
    54. 54
      Zhang, Z.; Deckert-Gaudig, T.; Deckert, V. Label-Free Monitoring of Plasmonic Catalysis at the Nanoscale Analyst 2015, 140, 4325 4335 DOI: 10.1039/C5AN00630A
    55. 55
      Bethke, K. A.; Kung, H. H. Supported Ag Catalysts for the Lean Reduction of NO with C3H6 J. Catal. 1997, 172, 93 102 DOI: 10.1006/jcat.1997.1794
    56. 56
      Marimuthu, A.; Zhang, J.; Linic, S. Tuning Selectivity in Propylene Epoxidation by Plasmon Mediated Photo-Switching of Cu Oxidation State Science 2013, 339, 1590 1593 DOI: 10.1126/science.1231631
    57. 57
      Karelovic, A.; Ruiz, P. The Role of Copper Particle Size in Low Pressure Methanol Synthesis via CO2 Hydrogenation over Cu/ZnO Catalysts Catal. Sci. Technol. 2015, 5, 869 881 DOI: 10.1039/C4CY00848K
    58. 58
      Wang, J. L.; Ando, R. A.; Camargo, P. H. C. Investigating the Plasmon-Mediated Catalytic Activity of AgAu Nanoparticles as a Function of Composition: Are Two Metals Better than One? ACS Catal. 2014, 4, 3815 3819 DOI: 10.1021/cs501189m
    59. 59
      He, R.; Wang, Y.; Wang, X.; Wang, Z.; Liu, G.; Zhou, W.; Wen, L.; Li, Q.; Wang, X.; Chen, X.; Zeng, J.; Hou, J. G. Facile Synthesis of Pentacle Gold-Copper Alloy Nanocrystals and Their Plasmonic and Catalytic Properties Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 4327 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms5327
    60. 60
      Santos Costa, J. C.; Corio, P.; Marcia Rossi, L. Catalytic Oxidation of Cinnamyl Alcohol Using Au – Ag Nanotubes Investigated by Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy Nanoscale 2015, 7, 8536 8543 DOI: 10.1039/C5NR01064K
    61. 61
      Kiyonaga, T.; Jin, Q.; Kobayashi, H.; Tada, H. Size-Dependence of Catalytic Activity of Gold Nanoparticles Loaded on Titanium (IV) Dioxide for Hydrogen Peroxide Decomposition ChemPhysChem 2009, 10, 2935 2938 DOI: 10.1002/cphc.200900596
    62. 62
      Laoufi, I.; Saint-Lager, M. C.; Lazzari, R.; Jupille, J.; Robach, O.; Garaudée, S.; Cabailh, G.; Dolle, P.; Cruguel, H.; Bailly, A. Size and Catalytic Activity of Supported Gold Nanoparticles: An in Operando Study during CO Oxidation J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 4673 4679 DOI: 10.1021/jp1110554
    63. 63
      Bell, S. E. J.; McCourt, M. R. SERS Enhancement by Aggregated Au Colloids: Effect of Particle Size Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2009, 11, 7455 7462 DOI: 10.1039/b906049a
    64. 64
      Zhang, Q.; Blom, D. A.; Wang, H. Nanoporosity-Enhanced Catalysis on Subwavelength Au Nanoparticles: A Plasmon-Enhanced Spectroscopic Study Chem. Mater. 2014, 26, 5131 5142 DOI: 10.1021/cm502508d
    65. 65
      Zhang, Q.; Wang, H. Facet-Dependent Catalytic Activities of Au Nanoparticles Enclosed by High-Index Facets ACS Catal. 2014, 4, 4027 4033 DOI: 10.1021/cs501445h
    66. 66
      Cui, Q.; Yashchenok, A.; Zhang, L.; Li, L.; Masic, A.; Wienskol, G.; Möhwald, H.; Bargheer, M. Fabrication of Bifunctional Gold/gelatin Hybrid Nanocomposites and Their Application ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 1999 2002 DOI: 10.1021/am5000068
    67. 67
      Xie, W.; Walkenfort, B.; Schlücker, S. Label-Free SERS Monitoring of Chemical Reactions Catalyzed by Small Gold Nanoparticles Using 3D Plasmonic Superstructures J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 1657 1660 DOI: 10.1021/ja309074a
    68. 68
      van Schrojenstein Lantman, E. M. Raman Nanospectroscopy of a Photo-Catalytic Reaction. Ph.D. Thesis, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2014.
    69. 69
      Sun, M.; Xu, H. A Novel Application of Plasmonics: Plasmon-Driven Surface-Catalyzed Reactions Small 2012, 8, 2777 2786 DOI: 10.1002/smll.201200572
    70. 70
      Harvey, C. E.; Weckhuysen, B. M. Surface- and Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy as Operando Probes for Monitoring and Understanding Heterogeneous Catalysis Catal. Lett. 2015, 145, 40 57 DOI: 10.1007/s10562-014-1420-4
    71. 71
      Chen, X.-J.; Cabello, G.; Wu, D.-Y.; Tian, Z.-Q. Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy toward Application in Plasmonic Photocatalysis on Metal Nanostructures J. Photochem. Photobiol., C 2014, 21, 54 80 DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2014.10.003
    72. 72
      Pashaee, F.; Hou, R.; Gobbo, P.; Workentin, M. S.; Lagugné-Labarthet, F. Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy of Self-Assembled Thiolated Monolayers on Flat Gold Nanoplates Using Gaussian-Transverse and Radially Polarized Excitations J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 15639 15646 DOI: 10.1021/jp403157v
    73. 73
      Tabatabaei, M.; Sangar, A.; Kazemi-zanjani, N.; Torchio, P.; Merlen, A.; Lagugné-Labarthet, F. Optical Properties of Silver and Gold Tetrahedral Nanopyramid Arrays Prepared by Nanosphere Lithography J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 14778 14786 DOI: 10.1021/jp405125c
    74. 74
      Liu, W.-L.; Lin, F.-C.; Yang, Y.-C.; Huang, C.-H.; Gwo, S.; Huang, M. H.; Huang, J.-S. The Influence of Shell Thickness of Au@TiO2 Core-Shell Nanoparticles on the Plasmonic Enhancement Effect in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells Nanoscale 2013, 5, 7953 7962 DOI: 10.1039/c3nr02800c
    75. 75
      Zhang, Z.; Deckert-Gaudig, T.; Singh, P.; Deckert, V. Single Molecule Level Plasmonic Catalysis – a Dilution Study of p-Nitrothiophenol on Gold Dimers Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 3069 3072 DOI: 10.1039/C4CC09008J
    76. 76
      Wang, P.; Huang, B.; Dai, Y.; Whangbo, M.-H. Plasmonic Photocatalysts: Harvesting Visible Light with Noble Metal Nanoparticles Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012, 14, 9813 9825 DOI: 10.1039/c2cp40823f
    77. 77
      Rycenga, M.; Wang, Z.; Gordon, E.; Cobley, C. M.; Schwartz, A. G.; Lo, C. S.; Xia, Y. Probing the Photothermal Effect of Gold-Based Nanocages with Surface Enhanced Raman Scattering (SERS) Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 9924 9927 DOI: 10.1002/anie.200904382
    78. 78
      Kang, T.; Hong, S.; Choi, Y.; Lee, L. P. The Effect of Thermal Gradients in SERS Spectroscopy Small 2010, 6, 2649 2652 DOI: 10.1002/smll.201000996
    79. 79
      Zhao, L.-B.; Huang, Y.-F.; Liu, X.-M.; Anema, J. R.; Wu, D.-Y.; Ren, B.; Tian, Z.-Q. A DFT Study on Photoinduced Surface Catalytic Coupling Reactions on Nanostructured Silver: Selective Formation of Azobenzene Derivatives from Para-Substituted Nitrobenzene and Aniline Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012, 14, 12919 12929 DOI: 10.1039/c2cp41502j
    80. 80
      Pelaez, M.; Nolan, N. T.; Pillai, S. C.; Seery, M. K.; Falaras, P.; Kontos, A. G.; Dunlop, P. S. M.; Hamilton, J. W. J.; Byrne, J. A.; Shea, K. O. A Review on the Visible Light Active Titanium Dioxide Photocatalysts for Environmental Applications Appl. Catal., B 2012, 125, 331 349 DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.05.036
    81. 81
      Huang, W.; Jing, Q.; Du, Y.; Zhang, B.; Meng, X.; Sun, M.; Schanze, K. S.; Gao, H.; Xu, P. An in Situ SERS Study of Substrate-Dependent Surface Plasmon Induced Aromatic Nitration J. Mater. Chem. C 2015, 3, 5285 5291 DOI: 10.1039/C5TC00835B
    82. 82
      Knight, M. W.; King, N. S.; Liu, L.; Everitt, H. O.; Nordlander, P.; Halas, N. J. Aluminium for Plasmonics ACS Nano 2014, 8, 834 840 DOI: 10.1021/nn405495q
    83. 83
      McMahon, J. M.; Gray, S. K.; Schatz, G. C. Ultraviolet Plasmonics: The Poor Metals Al, Ga, In, Sn, Tl, Pb, and Bi Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013, 15, 5415 5423 DOI: 10.1039/C3CP43856B
    84. 84
      Yin, P.-G.; Jiang, L.; You, T.-T.; Zhou, W.; Li, L.; Guo, L.; Yang, S. Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy with Self-Assembled Cobalt Nanoparticle Chains: Comparison of Theory and Experiment Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2010, 12, 10781 10785 DOI: 10.1039/c002662j
    85. 85
      Tian, Z.-Q.; Ren, B.; Li, J.-F.; Yang, Z.-L. Expanding Generality of Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy with Borrowing SERS Activity Strategy Chem. Commun. 2007, 34, 3514 3534 DOI: 10.1039/b616986d
    86. 86
      Heck, K. N.; Janesko, B. G.; Scuseria, G. E.; Halas, N. J.; Wong, M. S. Observing Metal-Catalyzed Chemical Reactions in Situ Using Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy on Pd-Au Nanoshells J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 16592 16600 DOI: 10.1021/ja803556k
    87. 87
      Mahmoud, M. A.; Garlyyev, B.; El-sayed, M. A. Controlling the Catalytic Efficiency on the Surface of Hollow Gold Nanoparticles by Introducing an Inner Thin Layer of Platinum or Palladium J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2014, 5, 4088 4094 DOI: 10.1021/jz502071v
    88. 88
      El-Aziz, A. M.; Kibler, L. A.; Kolb, D. M. The Potentials of Zero Charge of Pd(111) and Thin Pd Overlayers on Au(111) Electrochem. Commun. 2002, 4, 535 539 DOI: 10.1016/S1388-2481(02)00362-4
    89. 89
      Attard, G. A.; Bennett, J. A.; Mikheenko, I.; Jenkins, P.; Guan, S.; Macaskie, L. E.; Wood, J.; Wain, A. J. Semi-Hydrogenation of Alkynes at Single Crystal, Nanoparticle and Biogenic Nanoparticle Surfaces: The Role of Defects in Lindlar-Type Catalysts and the Origin of Their Selectivity Faraday Discuss. 2013, 162, 57 75 DOI: 10.1039/c3fd00007a
    90. 90
      Porter, M. D.; Lipert, R. J.; Siperko, L. M.; Wang, G.; Narayanan, R. SERS as a Bioassay Platform: Fundamentals, Design, and Applications Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 1001 1011 DOI: 10.1039/b708461g
    91. 91
      Li, J. F.; Huang, Y. F.; Ding, Y.; Yang, Z. L.; Li, S. B.; Zhou, X. S.; Fan, F. R.; Zhang, W.; Zhou, Z. Y.; Wu, D. Y.; Ren, B.; Wang, Z. L.; Tian, Z. Q. Shell-Isolated Nanoparticle-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy Nature 2010, 464, 392 395 DOI: 10.1038/nature08907
    92. 92
      Li, X.; Liu, M.; Lee, J.; Ding, D.; Bottomley, L. A.; Park, S.; Liu, M. An Operando Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy (SERS) Study of Carbon Deposition on SOFC Anodes Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 21112 21119 DOI: 10.1039/C4CP05176A
    93. 93
      Li, X.; Lee, J.-P.; Blinn, K. S.; Chen, D.; Yoo, S.; Kang, B.; Bottomley, L. A.; El-Sayed, M. A.; Park, S.; Liu, M.