logo
CONTENT TYPES

Synthesis of Fluorosugar Reagents for the Construction of Well-Defined Fluoroglycoproteins

View Author Information
Departament de Química Analítica i Química Orgànica, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, C/Marcel·lí Domingo s/n, 43007 Tarragona, Spain
Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, CB2 1EW Cambridge, U.K.
§ Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Prof. Egas Moniz, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal
Cite this: Org. Lett. 2015, 17, 11, 2836-2839
Publication Date (Web):May 22, 2015
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.orglett.5b01259
Copyright © 2015 American Chemical Society
Authors ChoiceACS AuthorChoice
with CC-BY license
Article Views
1648
Altmetric
-
Citations
LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

PDF (898 KB)
Supporting Info (1)»

Abstract

2-Deoxy-2-fluoroglycosyl iodides are privileged glycosyl donors for the stereoselective preparation of 1-Nu-β-fluorosugars, which are useful reagents for chemical site-selective protein glycosylation. Ready access to such β-fluorosugars enables the mild and efficient construction of well-defined fluoroglycoproteins.

F-glycopeptides(1-9) and the more recently disclosed F-glycoproteins(10-19) are promising candidates for the preparation of synthetic carbohydrate vaccines(20) and hold great potential as a new generation of [18F]-(glyco)radiopharmaceuticals(21, 22) and tracers for the noninvasive imaging techniques positron emission tomography (18F-PET)(23, 24) and magnetic resonance/magnetic resonance imaging (19F-MR/MRI).(25) In addition to the development of more efficient methods for protein/peptide modification,(26) it is also pivotal to access pure F-sugar reagents and building blocks for such transformations. These glycosyl units typically include in their structure reactive handles such as azides (for copper(I)-catalyzed azide–alkyne cycloaddition–CuAAC and Staudinger ligations)(17) or chalcogens in the form of sulfhydryl groups or diselenide moieties (for exchange reactions with Cys or additions to dehydroalanine),(14, 15) which upon reaction generate a new carbohydrate–protein conjugate. Retrosynthetic analysis revealed that 2-F-glycosyl halides are suitable glycosyl donors for the preparation of such reagents via biphasic glycosylations/phase-transfer catalyzed reactions (PTC). These moieties enable exquisite control of β-anomeric selectivity (via SN2-like mechanism) during the introduction of the reactive handle, which is typically a “soft” nucleophilic moiety.(27) There are two general strategies (one-pot from glycals vs two-step from 2-F-pyranoses) for the preparation of 1-β-“soft Nu”-2-deoxy-2-fluoroglycosides using electrophilic F+ reagents (Scheme 1).(28) While the one-pot strategy works well for certain configurations (e.g., Gal), the two-step approach is more general and thus preferred for the preparation of pure F-sugar reagents in a more efficient and homogeneous manner (giving a better overall yield and controlled Fax/eq diastereoselectivity).

Scheme 1

Scheme 1. General Strategies for the Preparation of 1-β-“Soft Nu”-2-deoxy-2-fluoroglycosides Using F+

Among glycosyl halides, iodides(29) have been recently utilized in several glycosylation strategies and provide a robust platform for PTC reactions, perhaps leading to higher yields compared to chlorides or bromides due to their superior leaving group properties under SN2-like reaction conditions. There are very few examples of 2-F- and 2,2-diF-glycosyl iodides. This rare class of glycosyl donors include some isolated examples of 2-F- and 2,2-diF-pyranosides(30-32) and our 2-F-galactopyranosyl iodide prepared via a “one-pot” strategy, as revealed by VT-NMR experiments (see Supporting Information),(33) and more recently 2,2-diF-furanosides.(34) Despite their great potential, low preparative yields in the pyranose series and inseparable α/β mixtures in the case of furanoses has so far hampered their wide utilization as β-selective glycosyl donors in PTC protocols.

In this work, we envisioned a “two-step” strategy for the preparation of 2-F-glycosyl iodides from ready available 2-F-glycosyl-1-O-Ac derivatives that might overcome such limitations enabling a more efficient preparation of this class of highly reactive glycosyl donors. We then sought to explore their reactivity for the preparation of fluorosugar reagents that would serve as useful moieties to achieve site-selective chemical glycosylation of proteins. We first evaluated the reaction conditions using 2-F-α/β-galactopyranose 1 (Table 1). Initial experiments revealed TMSI(35) to be an effective promoter for the preparation of glycosyl iodide 2a, although the reaction only proceeded in 57% yield after two consecutive reaction cycles (entry 1). We found that addition of MgO(36) that acts as a scavenger for the in situ generated TMSOAc avoids the reversible formation of starting 1, while increasing the yields up to 78% (entry 2). Good yields (up to 85% in a single reaction cycle) were finally obtained by increasing the amount of both TMSI (2.2 equiv) and MgO (4 equiv) as well as reducing the reaction temperature (from reflux to rt) in order to avoid detrimental side reactions (entry 3). Other promoters were also evaluated (entries 4–7). While the use of HMDS/I2 proved ineffective and complex mixtures of products were observed (entry 7),(37) the in situ formation of highly reactive HI by refluxing AcSH and I2 allowed the formation of the desired iodide 2a, albeit in lower yields compared to TMSI (up to 54%) (entries 4–6).(38) Interestingly, the use of MgO was found to be costly (24%) when using AcSH and I2 probably due to its incompatibility with AcSH and/or HI (entry 4). 2-F-galactosyl bromide 2b was also prepared following a reported procedure in 95% yield (Table 1, entry 8).(39) With the optimized conditions in hand we set out to evaluate the scope of the iodination with other configurations (Table 2). Conditions A (with TMSI) were utilized with 2-F-α/β-pyranoses of Glc3 and Man4 configuration affording desired glycosyl iodides 5a and 6a in moderate yields (entries 1 and 4). To our delight, conditions B (with AcSH and I2) improved the yield to 82% for 5a and 75% for 6a (entries 2 and 5). 2-F-glycosyl bromides 5b and 6b were also prepared in excellent yields (up to 98%) using the standard conditions (entries 3 and 6). Practical yields of the corresponding α-glycosyl iodides as sole anomers (e.g., 1JC1–H1 = 187.6 Hz, 3J1,2 = 4.7 Hz, and 3J3,4 = 10.2 Hz in 5a, 4C1 conformation)(40) were obtained regardless of the pyranoside configuration (Gal, Glc, and Man).

Table 1. Optimization of Reaction Conditions for the Halogenation of 1a
entryconditions (equiv)productyield (%)
1TMSI (1), rt, 8 h2a57b
2TMSI (1.1), MgO (2), reflux, 12 h2a78b
3TMSI (2.2), MgO (4), rt, 24 h2a85
4AcSH (1.7), I2 (0.8), MgO (2), reflux, 30 h2a24b
5AcSH (4.4), I2 (2), reflux, 12 h2a34b
6AcSH (2.2), I2 (1), reflux, 12 h2a54b
7HMDS (0.6), I2 (0.6), rt, 24 h2amixture
833% HBr in AcOH, rt, 8 h2b95
a

General conditions: 2-F-α/β-galactopyranose 1 (2:1 α/β) (1 equiv) in dry CH2Cl2 (0.1 M) unless otherwise indicated.

b

Isolated yield after two consecutive reaction cycles. TMS = trimethylsilyl, HMDS = hexamethyldisilazane.

Table 2. Scope of Halogenationa
entry2-F-pyranoseconditionsproductyield (%)
13A5a38b
23B5a82b
33C5b98
44A6a50b
54B6a75b
64C6b94
a

General conditions: 2-F-α/β-pyranose (1:0–1:3 α/β) (1 equiv) in dry CH2Cl2 (0.1 M) unless otherwise indicated.

b

Isolated yield after two consecutive reaction cycles. Conditions A: TMSI (2.2 equiv), MgO (4 equiv), rt, 30 h. Conditions B: AcSH (2.2), I2 (1), reflux, 5 h. Conditions C: 33% HBr in AcOH, rt, 3–8 h. TMS = trimethylsilyl.

2-F-glycosyl iodides proved stable and were purified by SiO2 flash column chromatography with no decomposition observed. They are also UV visible (at 254 nm) providing an easy experimental follow-up. Similar to other protocols that use strong acid activators (e.g., HBr), base sensitive acetyl groups are the more appropriate protecting groups for the overall synthetic route (Selectfluor–halogenation–PTC–deprotection). Acetyl protecting groups are easily introduced, prove stable under the sequence of transformations, and are easily removed under Zemplén conditions to afford the final unprotected and ready-to-conjugate fluorosugar reagents. Other acid sensitive groups such as tert-butyldiphenylsilyl (TBDPSi) were not tolerated under the optimized acid–based reaction conditions, and extensive deprotection was observed.

Next, the synthesis of 1-β-“soft Nu”-2-deoxy-2-fluoroglycosides was attempted using 2-F-glycosyl halides 2a,b and 56a,b (Scheme 2). A wide range of N-, S-, and Se-nucleophiles led to β-fluorosugar reagents 710, useful for chemical protein glycosylation strategies,(14, 15, 17) even including those with the challenging 1-β-cis-Man(41) disposition 9ac. Excellent yields (up to 98%) and pure β-selectivity (e.g., 1JC1–H1 = 162.7 Hz, 3J1,2 = 10.6 Hz, and 3J3,4 = 9.5 Hz in 8c, 4C1 conformation)(40) were always obtained. Iodides proved slightly better in terms of yield (ca. 10–15%) over their bromide counterparts using a better Nu in a “match” scenario of reactivity. We believe the low reactivity of mannosyl-1-halides is probably due to unfavorable dipolar interactions between the donor and the incoming Nu and/or conformational issues that reduce the reaction rate. This made competitive otherwise negligible side reactions that reduce the overall yield.(42) A weaker Nu such as sodium benzenethiosulfonate (NaPTS)(43) necessitated the use of more reactive iodides and afforded moderate-to-good yields (88% for I vs 45% for Br in 10a). Our data indicate that 2-F-glycosyl iodides are needed when using weaker nucleophiles. The reported 2-F-glycosyl iodides may also find broader utility for example in the preparation of advanced fluorinated building blocks such as O-linked natural product mimetics(44)11a and covalent inhibitors(45, 46) of carbohydrate processing enzymes 11b and 12 where the use of “soft” nucleophilic acceptors are required. Finally, to illustrate the application of such reagents and further complement our previous reports on the preparation of a variety of well-defined triazole,(17) thioether,(15, 18) and SeS-linked(14, 18) fluorinated glycoproteins including their [18F]-counterparts, we examined the reaction between Cys-specific Ac3GlcF(9) and Ac3GalF-1-PTS reagents 10a,b with Annexin V 13. This protein displays a unique naturally occurring surface exposed Cys and is widely utilized as a marker of apoptosis (Scheme 3).(47) Indeed, reaction of 10a or 10b with Annexin V 13 in 20 mM Tris HCl buffer pH 8 and 10% CH3CN, which was used to ensure reagent solubility, gave the expected homogeneous disulfide-linked F-glycoproteins 14a,b in >95% conversion after 1 h at rt. This is demonstrative of the utility of the reagents that can now be easily prepared from the 2-F-glycosyl iodide reagents we have reported in this work. Moreover, this methodology is amenable to utilization in 18F-PET imaging using the corresponding [18F]-glyco-1-PTS reagents.(9)

Scheme 2

Scheme 2. Phase-Transfer Catalyzed Reactions (PTC) for the Preparation of 712a

aGeneral conditions: 2-F-α-pyranosyl halide (1 equiv), Nu (2 equiv), TBAHS (2 equiv) in 5:1 EtOAc–1 M Na2CO3 aq (0.04 M), rt, from 1 h up to 7 days unless otherwise indicated.

Determined by 19F NMR of the crude reaction mixture.

2-F-α-galactosyl bromide 2b (1 equiv), Nu (2 equiv), TBAB (2 equiv) in 3:2 CH2Cl2–5% NaOH aq (0.02 M), rt, 14–22 h.

2-F-α-galactosyl bromide 2b (2 equiv), estrone (1 equiv), 60% NaH in mineral oil (1.5 equiv) in dry 1,4-dioxane (0.08 M), rt, 24 h. Nu = nucleophile. TBAHS = tetrabutylammonium hydrogen sulfate. TBAB = tetrabutylammonium bromide.

Scheme 3

Scheme 3. Selective Chemical Protein Modification of Annexin V 13a

aGeneral conditions: Annexin V 13 (1 mg mL–1) (1 equiv), 2-F-sugar reagent 10a,b (250 equiv) in 20 mM Tris HCl buffer (pH 8.0) and 10% CH3CN, rt, 1 h.

In summary, we have disclosed a general strategy for accessing a wide range of 1-Nu-2-fluorosugars that are useful reagents for chemical-site-selective protein glycosylation. The glycosyl iodide intermediates prepared here possess a seemly balance between stability and reactivity that facilitates their preparation, purification, and storage. Importantly, these intermediates also ensure product homogeneity by their exquisite β-control during stereoselective glycosylation with a “soft” Nu (via SN2-like reactions). The reported F-sugar reagents will find broad utility for building not only homogeneous 19F- but also [18F]-glycoprobes that are valuable tools in the fields of chemical biology and biomedical imaging.

Supporting Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Experimental details, VT-NMR experiments, characterization data, and copies of 1H, 13C, and 19F NMR spectra for all new compounds. The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.orglett.5b01259.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Terms & Conditions

Electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. The American Chemical Society holds a copyright ownership interest in any copyrightable Supporting Information. Files available from the ACS website may be downloaded for personal use only. Users are not otherwise permitted to reproduce, republish, redistribute, or sell any Supporting Information from the ACS website, either in whole or in part, in either machine-readable form or any other form without permission from the American Chemical Society. For permission to reproduce, republish and redistribute this material, requesters must process their own requests via the RightsLink permission system. Information about how to use the RightsLink permission system can be found at http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Acknowledgment

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

We thank the European Commission (Marie Curie CIG, O.B. and G.J.L.B.), MICINN, Spain (Juan de la Cierva Fellowship, O.B.), MINECO, Spain (CTQ2011-22872BQU), and Generalitat de Catalunya (M.S.) for generous financial support. We also thank Mr. Adrià Cardona-Benages (URV) for technical assistance. G.J.L.B. thanks the Royal Society (University Research Fellowship), Fundação para a Ciência a Tecnologia, Portugal (FCT Investigator), and the EPSRC for funding.

References

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article references 47 other publications.

  1. 1
    Johannes, M.; Reindl, M.; Gerlitzki, B.; Schmitt, E.; Hoffmann-Röder, A. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2015, 11, 155 161
  2. 2
    Lamandé-Langle, S.; Collet, C.; Hensienne, R.; Vala, C.; Chrétien, F.; Chapleur, Y.; Mohamadi, A.; Lacolley, P.; Regnault, V. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2014, 22, 6672 6683
  3. 3
    Dall’Angelo, S.; Zhang, Q.; Fleming, I. N.; Piras, M.; Schweiger, L. F.; O’Hagan, D.; Zanda, M. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2013, 11, 4551 4558
  4. 4
    Lang, C.; Maschauer, S.; Hübner, H.; Gmeiner, P.; Prante, O. J. Med. Chem. 2013, 56, 9361 9365
  5. 5
    Li, X.-G.; Dall’Angelo, S.; Schweiger, L. F.; Zanda, M.; O’Hagan, D. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 5247 5249
  6. 6
    Maschauer, S.; Einsiedel, J.; Haubner, R.; Hocke, C.; Ocker, M.; Hübner, H.; Kuwert, T.; Gmeiner, P.; Prante, O. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 976 979
  7. 7
    Hoffmann-Röder, A.; Kaiser, A.; Wagner, S.; Gaidzik, N.; Kowalczyk, D.; Westerlind, U.; Gerlitzki, B.; Schmitt, E.; Kunz, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 8498 8503
  8. 8
    Wuest, F.; Hultsch, C.; Berndt, M.; Bergmann, R. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2009, 19, 5426 5428
  9. 9
    Prante, O.; Einsiedel, J.; Haubner, R.; Gmeiner, P.; Wester, H.-J.; Kuwert, T.; Maschauer, S. Bioconjugate Chem. 2007, 18, 254 262
  10. 10
    Huo, C.-X.; Zheng, X.-J.; Xiao, A.; Liu, C.-C.; Sun, S.; Lv, Z.; Ye, X.-S. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2015, 13, 3677 3690
  11. 11
    Lee, H.-Y.; Chen, C.-Y.; Tsai, T.-I.; Li, S.-T.; Lin, K.-H.; Cheng, Y.-Y.; Ren, C.-T.; Cheng, T.-J. R.; Wu, C.-Y.; Wong, C.-H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 16844 16853
  12. 12
    Orwenyo, J.; Huang, W.; Wang, L. X. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2013, 21, 4768 4777
  13. 13
    Fröhlich, R. F. G.; Schrank, E.; Zangger, K. Carbohydr. Res. 2012, 361, 100 104
  14. 14
    Boutureira, O.; Bernardes, G. J. L.; Fernández-González, M.; Anthony, D. C.; Davis, B. G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 1432 1436
  15. 15
    Boutureira, O.; Bernardes, G. J. L.; D’Hooge, F.; Davis, B. G. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 10010 10012
  16. 16
    Yang, F.; Zheng, X.-J.; Huo, C.-X.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Ye, X.-S. ACS Chem. Biol. 2011, 6, 252 259
  17. 17
    Boutureira, O.; D’Hooge, F.; Fernández-González, M.; Bernardes, G. J. L.; Sánchez-Navarro, M.; Koeppe, J. R.; Davis, B. G. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 8142 8144
  18. 18
    Fernández-González, M.; Boutureira, O.; Bernardes, G. J. L.; Chalker, J. M.; Young, M. A.; Errey, J. C.; Davis, B. G. Chem. Sci. 2010, 1, 709 715
  19. 19
    Wuest, F.; Berndt, M.; Bergmann, R.; van den Hoff, J.; Pietzsch, J. Bioconjugate Chem. 2008, 19, 1202 1210
  20. 20
    Adamo, R.; Nilo, A.; Castagner, B.; Boutureira, O.; Berti, F.; Bernardes, G. J. L. Chem. Sci. 2013, 4, 2995 3008
  21. 21
    Maschauer, S.; Prante, O. Biomed Res. Int. 2014, 2014,

    Article ID 214748

    .
  22. 22
    Ribeiro Morais, G.; Falconer, R. A.; Santos, I. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 1401 1414
  23. 23
    Jacobson, O.; Kiesewetter, D. O.; Chen, X. Bioconjugate Chem. 2015, 26, 1 18
  24. 24
    Ametamey, S. M.; Honer, M.; Schubiger, P. A. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 1501 1516
  25. 25
    Tirotta, I.; Dichiarante, V.; Pigliacelli, C.; Cavallo, G.; Terraneo, G.; Bombelli, F. B.; Metrangolo, P.; Resnati, G. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 1106 1129
  26. 26
    Boutureira, O.; Bernardes, G. J. L. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 2174 2195
  27. 27
    Carrière, D.; Meunier, S. J.; Tropper, F. D.; Cao, S.; Roy, R. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2000, 154, 9 22
  28. 28
    Dax, K.; Albert, M.; Ortner, J.; Paul, B. J. Carbohydr. Res. 2000, 327, 47 86
  29. 29
    Meloncelli, P. J.; Martin, A. D.; Lowary, T. L. Carbohydr. Res. 2009, 344, 1110 1122
  30. 30
    Nakai, K.; Takagi, Y.; Tsuchiya, T. Carbohydr. Res. 1999, 316, 47 57
  31. 31
    Premchandran, R. H.; Ogletree, M. L.; Fried, J. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 5724 5731
  32. 32
    Tsuchiya, T.; Takahashi, Y.; Endo, M.; Umezawa, S.; Umezawa, H. J. Carbohydr. Chem. 1985, 4, 587 611
  33. 33
    Boutureira, O.; Díaz, Y.; Matheu, M. I.; Castillón, S. Synthesis and reactivity of 2-deoxy-2-fluoroglycosyl iodides. Part of this work has been presented as a poster at the 23rd International Carbohydrate Symposium, Whistler, Canada, July 23–28, 2006; TUE-PS.6.
  34. 34
    Chu, C.-Y.; Lee, W.-D.; Li, W.; Hwang, C. K. PCT Int. Appl. WO 2009061894A1 20090514, 2009.
  35. 35
    Thiem, J.; Meyer, B. Chem. Ber. 1980, 113, 3075 3085
  36. 36
    Dabideen, D. R.; Gervay-Hague, J. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 973 975
  37. 37
    Mukhopadhyay, B.; Kartha, K. P. R.; Russell, D. A.; Field, R. A. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 7758 7760
  38. 38
    Chervin, S. M.; Abada, P.; Koreeda, M. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 369 372
  39. 39
    Kováč, P.; Yeh, H. J. C.; Glaudemans, C. P. J. Carbohydr. Res. 1987, 169, 23 34
  40. 40
    Michalik, M.; Hein, M.; Frank, M. Carbohydr. Res. 2000, 327, 185 218
  41. 41
    Abronina, P. I.; Kachala, V. V.; Kononov, L. O. Carbohydr. Res. 2009, 344, 240 244
  42. 42
    Hale, K. J.; Hough, L.; Manaviazar, S.; Calabrese, A. Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 4838 4841
  43. 43
    Gamblin, D. P.; Garnier, P.; Ward, S. J.; Oldham, N. J.; Fairbanks, A. J.; Davis, B. G. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2003, 1, 3642 3644
  44. 44
    Černý, I.; Novotný, P.; Drašar, P.; Havel, M.; Pacák, J. Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. 1989, 54, 2775 2783
  45. 45
    Rempel, B. P.; Withers, S. G. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2014, 12, 2592 2595
  46. 46
    Rempel, B. P.; Tropak, M. B.; Mahuran, D. J.; Withers, S. G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 10381 10383
  47. 47
    Logue, S. E.; Elgendy, M.; Martin, S. J. Nat. Protoc. 2009, 4, 1383 1395

Cited By


This article is cited by 7 publications.

  1. Annabel Kitowski, Ester Jiménez-Moreno, Míriam Salvadó, Jordi Mestre, Sergio Castillón, Gonzalo Jiménez-Osés, Omar Boutureira, and Gonçalo J. L. Bernardes . Oxidative Activation of C–S Bonds with an Electropositive Nitrogen Promoter Enables Orthogonal Glycosylation of Alkyl over Phenyl Thioglycosides. Organic Letters 2017, 19 (19) , 5490-5493. DOI: 10.1021/acs.orglett.7b02886.
  2. Jian-She Zhu, Nicole E. McCormick, Shannon C. Timmons, and David L. Jakeman . Synthesis of α-Deoxymono and Difluorohexopyranosyl 1-Phosphates and Kinetic Evaluation with Thymidylyl- and Guanidylyltransferases. The Journal of Organic Chemistry 2016, 81 (19) , 8816-8825. DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.6b01485.
  3. P. Mampuys, C. R. McElroy, J. H. Clark, R. V. A. Orru, B. U. W. Maes. Thiosulfonates as Emerging Reactants: Synthesis and Applications. Advanced Synthesis & Catalysis 2020, 362 (1) , 3-64. DOI: 10.1002/adsc.201900864.
  4. Chunlai Feng, Jin Wang, Qiujie Tang, Zijian Zhong, Shusen Qiao, Xingyu Liu, Can Chen, Aihua Zhou. One-pot synthesis of glycosyl phenylthiosulfonates from sulfinate, S and glycosyl bromides. Carbohydrate Research 2019, 471, 1-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.carres.2018.10.005.
  5. Raju Jannapu Reddy, Md. Waheed, Jangam Jagadesh Kumar. A straightforward and convenient synthesis of functionalized allyl thiosulfonates and allyl disulfanes. RSC Advances 2018, 8 (70) , 40446-40453. DOI: 10.1039/C8RA06938G.
  6. Nan Yan, Zhi-Wei Lei, Jia-Kun Su, Wei-Lin Liao, Xiang-Guo Hu. Ring opening of sugar-derived epoxides by TBAF/KHF 2 : An attractive alternative for the introduction of fluorine into the carbohydrate scaffold. Chinese Chemical Letters 2017, 28 (2) , 467-470. DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2016.10.006.
  7. Yong Zheng, Feng-Ling Qing, Yangen Huang, Xiu-Hua Xu. Tunable and Practical Synthesis of Thiosulfonates and Disulfides from Sulfonyl Chlorides in the Presence of Tetrabutylammonium Iodide. Advanced Synthesis & Catalysis 2016, 358 (21) , 3477-3481. DOI: 10.1002/adsc.201600633.
  • Abstract

    Scheme 1

    Scheme 1. General Strategies for the Preparation of 1-β-“Soft Nu”-2-deoxy-2-fluoroglycosides Using F+

    Scheme 2

    Scheme 2. Phase-Transfer Catalyzed Reactions (PTC) for the Preparation of 712a

    aGeneral conditions: 2-F-α-pyranosyl halide (1 equiv), Nu (2 equiv), TBAHS (2 equiv) in 5:1 EtOAc–1 M Na2CO3 aq (0.04 M), rt, from 1 h up to 7 days unless otherwise indicated.

    Determined by 19F NMR of the crude reaction mixture.

    2-F-α-galactosyl bromide 2b (1 equiv), Nu (2 equiv), TBAB (2 equiv) in 3:2 CH2Cl2–5% NaOH aq (0.02 M), rt, 14–22 h.

    2-F-α-galactosyl bromide 2b (2 equiv), estrone (1 equiv), 60% NaH in mineral oil (1.5 equiv) in dry 1,4-dioxane (0.08 M), rt, 24 h. Nu = nucleophile. TBAHS = tetrabutylammonium hydrogen sulfate. TBAB = tetrabutylammonium bromide.

    Scheme 3

    Scheme 3. Selective Chemical Protein Modification of Annexin V 13a

    aGeneral conditions: Annexin V 13 (1 mg mL–1) (1 equiv), 2-F-sugar reagent 10a,b (250 equiv) in 20 mM Tris HCl buffer (pH 8.0) and 10% CH3CN, rt, 1 h.

  • References

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    This article references 47 other publications.

    1. 1
      Johannes, M.; Reindl, M.; Gerlitzki, B.; Schmitt, E.; Hoffmann-Röder, A. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2015, 11, 155 161
    2. 2
      Lamandé-Langle, S.; Collet, C.; Hensienne, R.; Vala, C.; Chrétien, F.; Chapleur, Y.; Mohamadi, A.; Lacolley, P.; Regnault, V. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2014, 22, 6672 6683
    3. 3
      Dall’Angelo, S.; Zhang, Q.; Fleming, I. N.; Piras, M.; Schweiger, L. F.; O’Hagan, D.; Zanda, M. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2013, 11, 4551 4558
    4. 4
      Lang, C.; Maschauer, S.; Hübner, H.; Gmeiner, P.; Prante, O. J. Med. Chem. 2013, 56, 9361 9365
    5. 5
      Li, X.-G.; Dall’Angelo, S.; Schweiger, L. F.; Zanda, M.; O’Hagan, D. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 5247 5249
    6. 6
      Maschauer, S.; Einsiedel, J.; Haubner, R.; Hocke, C.; Ocker, M.; Hübner, H.; Kuwert, T.; Gmeiner, P.; Prante, O. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 976 979
    7. 7
      Hoffmann-Röder, A.; Kaiser, A.; Wagner, S.; Gaidzik, N.; Kowalczyk, D.; Westerlind, U.; Gerlitzki, B.; Schmitt, E.; Kunz, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 8498 8503
    8. 8
      Wuest, F.; Hultsch, C.; Berndt, M.; Bergmann, R. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2009, 19, 5426 5428
    9. 9
      Prante, O.; Einsiedel, J.; Haubner, R.; Gmeiner, P.; Wester, H.-J.; Kuwert, T.; Maschauer, S. Bioconjugate Chem. 2007, 18, 254 262
    10. 10
      Huo, C.-X.; Zheng, X.-J.; Xiao, A.; Liu, C.-C.; Sun, S.; Lv, Z.; Ye, X.-S. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2015, 13, 3677 3690
    11. 11
      Lee, H.-Y.; Chen, C.-Y.; Tsai, T.-I.; Li, S.-T.; Lin, K.-H.; Cheng, Y.-Y.; Ren, C.-T.; Cheng, T.-J. R.; Wu, C.-Y.; Wong, C.-H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 16844 16853
    12. 12
      Orwenyo, J.; Huang, W.; Wang, L. X. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2013, 21, 4768 4777
    13. 13
      Fröhlich, R. F. G.; Schrank, E.; Zangger, K. Carbohydr. Res. 2012, 361, 100 104
    14. 14
      Boutureira, O.; Bernardes, G. J. L.; Fernández-González, M.; Anthony, D. C.; Davis, B. G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 1432 1436
    15. 15
      Boutureira, O.; Bernardes, G. J. L.; D’Hooge, F.; Davis, B. G. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 10010 10012
    16. 16
      Yang, F.; Zheng, X.-J.; Huo, C.-X.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Ye, X.-S. ACS Chem. Biol. 2011, 6, 252 259
    17. 17
      Boutureira, O.; D’Hooge, F.; Fernández-González, M.; Bernardes, G. J. L.; Sánchez-Navarro, M.; Koeppe, J. R.; Davis, B. G. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 8142 8144
    18. 18
      Fernández-González, M.; Boutureira, O.; Bernardes, G. J. L.; Chalker, J. M.; Young, M. A.; Errey, J. C.; Davis, B. G. Chem. Sci. 2010, 1, 709 715
    19. 19
      Wuest, F.; Berndt, M.; Bergmann, R.; van den Hoff, J.; Pietzsch, J. Bioconjugate Chem. 2008, 19, 1202 1210
    20. 20
      Adamo, R.; Nilo, A.; Castagner, B.; Boutureira, O.; Berti, F.; Bernardes, G. J. L. Chem. Sci. 2013, 4, 2995 3008
    21. 21
      Maschauer, S.; Prante, O. Biomed Res. Int. 2014, 2014,

      Article ID 214748

      .
    22. 22
      Ribeiro Morais, G.; Falconer, R. A.; Santos, I. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 1401 1414
    23. 23
      Jacobson, O.; Kiesewetter, D. O.; Chen, X. Bioconjugate Chem. 2015, 26, 1 18
    24. 24
      Ametamey, S. M.; Honer, M.; Schubiger, P. A. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 1501 1516
    25. 25
      Tirotta, I.; Dichiarante, V.; Pigliacelli, C.; Cavallo, G.; Terraneo, G.; Bombelli, F. B.; Metrangolo, P.; Resnati, G. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 1106 1129
    26. 26
      Boutureira, O.; Bernardes, G. J. L. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 2174 2195
    27. 27
      Carrière, D.; Meunier, S. J.; Tropper, F. D.; Cao, S.; Roy, R. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2000, 154, 9 22
    28. 28
      Dax, K.; Albert, M.; Ortner, J.; Paul, B. J. Carbohydr. Res. 2000, 327, 47 86
    29. 29
      Meloncelli, P. J.; Martin, A. D.; Lowary, T. L. Carbohydr. Res. 2009, 344, 1110 1122
    30. 30
      Nakai, K.; Takagi, Y.; Tsuchiya, T. Carbohydr. Res. 1999, 316, 47 57
    31. 31
      Premchandran, R. H.; Ogletree, M. L.; Fried, J. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 5724 5731
    32. 32
      Tsuchiya, T.; Takahashi, Y.; Endo, M.; Umezawa, S.; Umezawa, H. J. Carbohydr. Chem. 1985, 4, 587 611
    33. 33
      Boutureira, O.; Díaz, Y.; Matheu, M. I.; Castillón, S. Synthesis and reactivity of 2-deoxy-2-fluoroglycosyl iodides. Part of this work has been presented as a poster at the 23rd International Carbohydrate Symposium, Whistler, Canada, July 23–28, 2006; TUE-PS.6.
    34. 34
      Chu, C.-Y.; Lee, W.-D.; Li, W.; Hwang, C. K. PCT Int. Appl. WO 2009061894A1 20090514, 2009.
    35. 35
      Thiem, J.; Meyer, B. Chem. Ber. 1980, 113, 3075 3085
    36. 36
      Dabideen, D. R.; Gervay-Hague, J. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 973 975
    37. 37
      Mukhopadhyay, B.; Kartha, K. P. R.; Russell, D. A.; Field, R. A. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 7758 7760
    38. 38
      Chervin, S. M.; Abada, P.; Koreeda, M. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 369 372
    39. 39
      Kováč, P.; Yeh, H. J. C.; Glaudemans, C. P. J. Carbohydr. Res. 1987, 169, 23 34
    40. 40
      Michalik, M.; Hein, M.; Frank, M. Carbohydr. Res. 2000, 327, 185 218
    41. 41
      Abronina, P. I.; Kachala, V. V.; Kononov, L. O. Carbohydr. Res. 2009, 344, 240 244
    42. 42
      Hale, K. J.; Hough, L.; Manaviazar, S.; Calabrese, A. Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 4838 4841
    43. 43
      Gamblin, D. P.; Garnier, P.; Ward, S. J.; Oldham, N. J.; Fairbanks, A. J.; Davis, B. G. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2003, 1, 3642 3644
    44. 44
      Černý, I.; Novotný, P.; Drašar, P.; Havel, M.; Pacák, J. Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. 1989, 54, 2775 2783
    45. 45
      Rempel, B. P.; Withers, S. G. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2014, 12, 2592 2595
    46. 46
      Rempel, B. P.; Tropak, M. B.; Mahuran, D. J.; Withers, S. G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 10381 10383
    47. 47
      Logue, S. E.; Elgendy, M.; Martin, S. J. Nat. Protoc. 2009, 4, 1383 1395
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    Experimental details, VT-NMR experiments, characterization data, and copies of 1H, 13C, and 19F NMR spectra for all new compounds. The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.orglett.5b01259.

    Terms & Conditions

    Electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. The American Chemical Society holds a copyright ownership interest in any copyrightable Supporting Information. Files available from the ACS website may be downloaded for personal use only. Users are not otherwise permitted to reproduce, republish, redistribute, or sell any Supporting Information from the ACS website, either in whole or in part, in either machine-readable form or any other form without permission from the American Chemical Society. For permission to reproduce, republish and redistribute this material, requesters must process their own requests via the RightsLink permission system. Information about how to use the RightsLink permission system can be found at http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

OOPS

You have to login with your ACS ID befor you can login with your Mendeley account.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect

This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By continuing to use the site, you are accepting our use of cookies. Read the ACS privacy policy.

CONTINUE