ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
My Activity
CONTENT TYPES

Building Practical Descriptors for Defect Engineering of Electrocatalytic Materials

Cite this: ACS Catal. 2020, 10, 16, 9046–9056
Publication Date (Web):July 13, 2020
https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.0c02144
Copyright © 2020 American Chemical Society
  • Free to Read

Article Views

3579

Altmetric

-

Citations

LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
PDF (8 MB)
Supporting Info (1)»
Defect engineering has recently gained considerable interest in electrocatalysis by extending the portfolio of materials’ design strategies toward more efficient and sustainable nanocatalysts. (1) This approach is highly versatile as the term “defect” in crystallography refers to any interruption of the regular pattern defining a perfect crystal. As such, point defects (atomic vacancies, interstitial atoms, antisite defects), line defects (dislocations, disclinations), planar defects (grain boundaries, stacking faults, twinning, steps), or bulk defects (voids, pores, cracks) are a nonexhaustive list of structural parameters to be possibly tailored to meet a catalytic material’s functional specifications. In contrast to former approaches in electrocatalysis, within the defects’ engineering strategies, electrocatalytic properties are tuned locally not globally. Indeed, defects produce (simultaneous) local changes in key structural parameters relative to catalytic performance, such as site coordination, strain, or chemical composition.
Historically, density functional theory (DFT) calculations, molecular dynamics, and kinetic Monte Carlo simulations have been extensively used to connect the catalytic site local environment to its catalytic properties from computational screening over the trial-and-error approach. (2) These methods rely on the determination of catalytic site electronic structure that can be further bridged to the catalytic performance through the adsorption strength of reaction intermediates. Especially, for a given reaction mechanism, focusing on the “limiting” reaction step(s) in the frame of the Sabatier principle represents a remarkably powerful and efficient route toward the reduction of numerous system variables to a few “key” reactivity descriptors. (3) In the case of the sluggish oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) on Pt, which restricts the development of proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFC), the existence of so-called scaling relations between the *O, *OH, and *OOH intermediates’ adsorption strengths allows focusing on a single of these adsorbates. In that frame, calculations predict the optimal ORR rate is obtained by decreasing the adsorption energy of *O (or by extension *OH and *OOH) by ∼0.2 eV (or ∼ 0.1 eV) compared with Pt(111). (4) The pivotal correlation between the adsorption trends of the reaction intermediates and the electronic structure of the catalytic sites is described by the d-band model introduced by Hammer and Nørskov. (5,6) Since from this principle, the catalytic properties of a site can be determined completely by its electronic structure, descriptors of the d-band ultimately become (electronic) reactivity descriptors.
Figure 1a illustrates how the d-band theory applies to a model Pt(111) surface, where all sites are equivalent (uniform coordination, interatomic distances, and chemical environment). The surface thus features a Dirac type *OH adsorption free energy (ΔG*OH) distribution, centered on the value expected for a single Pt(111) site, and its global activity (star symbol) can thus be virtually described by that of a single catalytic site (circle symbol). In contrast, Figure 1b displays the situation when structural disorder is present at the surface (defect-engineered Pt(111) surface). Here, the coexistence of sites with various local environments results in a broad, near-continuous distribution of chemisorption properties. (7,8) Supposing the scaling relations still hold, this implies that the global catalytic activity of the surface can no longer be described by that of a single site, but rather as the average catalytic activity of each site. Consequently, whereas the ORR activity of flat Pt(111) is limited by the overall too strong affinity with *OH species (left branch of the volcano), a minority of catalytic sites with close-to-optimal structural configuration, but exponential contribution to the global activity (Butler–Volmer kinetics), ensures enhanced ORR activity for the defect-engineered Pt(111) surface.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Defect engineering approach. Schematic representation principle of the narrow vs near-continuous broad distributions of catalytic sites configurations and electrocatalytic performance for (a) ordered, model vs (b) defective Pt(111) surfaces.

However, structure-sensitive, electronic descriptors alone (such as the d-band center, εd) do not provide any clear-cut reverse structural information about the catalytic site local environment that could guide material design. Also, even if computational methods from model structures can correlate a fine local atomic motif and electronic properties (see coordination-based descriptors such as CN, (9) CNα, (10) or CNsd (11)), ensuring the successful implementation of such fine atomic motif onto practical nanocatalysts surface remains extremely difficult. That is because (i) it requires an atomic scale control of the surface structure design (other than atomically flat) and (ii) characterization techniques are limited in describing such fine structural atomic motifs on “real-life” nanocatalysts. This apparent dichotomy between extremely fine theoretical insights on well-defined systems and the extreme complexity of poorly defined practical systems is at the heart of the defect engineering current challenge. Whereas the uniformity of the catalytic sites was a convenient pillar of surface science, here each surface atom has its own configuration and should be considered individually (Figure 1). In that frame, practical descriptors able to bridge surface heterogeneous structure and catalytic performance experimentally are of primary importance.
This Viewpoint article intends to comment on the establishment of practical descriptors able to guide the defect engineering of practical nanocatalysts. We first discuss the case of the local strain and especially how an explicit bulk physical parameter can be turned to a surface structural descriptor: the surface distortion (SD). Then, we show how cyclic voltammetry experiments analyzed in light of SD can reveal electrochemical adsorption fingerprint of structural disorder, thus providing a versatile method to shortcut in-depth structural characterization. Importantly, we emphasize that, because structural or adsorption properties are averaged over the whole catalyst (i.e., the spatial resolution is lost), such descriptors do not reveal the nature of the active site but mostly provide statistical insights on their emergence from disorder. Consequently, we finally discuss the opportunities offered by emerging analytical techniques, which we anticipate will advance our understanding of defect characterization toward identification of electrocatalytically active and stable motifs. Whereas Pt-based catalysts for PEM fuel cell served as a discovery platform of the presented methods, all results (except the cyclic voltammetry techniques) apply to other types of nanocatalysts.

1. Physical and Electrochemical Assessments of Local Strain to Describe Surface Disorder

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Microstrain Line Broadening in Powder X-ray Diffraction

Many phenomena synergistically contribute to the diffractograms profile observed in powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) experiments. As PXRD (especially from laboratory sources) has become a routine technique in numerous fields of research, simple analytical softwares have been developed to extract sample structural information from PXRD data. However, extracting reliable information related to the quantification of structural disorder requires a rigorous methodology to minimize the impact of errors related to both experimental and interpretation artifacts. Numerous analytical approaches such as the Williamson-Hall method, the Warren-Averbach method, the Fourier method, or full profile refinement (Rietveld, Le Bail) methods can be used to investigate the microstructure of a powder sample from PXRD data. In the case of nanocrystals with sizes < 10 nm, extensive peak broadening and overlap makes the methods based on the analysis of few individual reflections inaccurate and full profile refinement technique of PXRD patterns extending over a large Q-range are preferred (see Figure 2a). This reason, together with the versatility offered by the full profile refinement methods in terms of the peak shape description and possible anisotropy consideration, make the Rietveld method (12) highly attractive, despite its complexity due to the large number of control parameters.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) patterns’ broadening and sources of microstrain in PtM nanoparticles (M being an early or late transition metal element). (a) Typical experimental PXRD patterns measured at the high-energy ID31 beamline of the European Synchrotron Radiation facility on structurally disordered and structurally ordered catalysts (here hollow PtNi/C and cube Pt/C nanoparticles, respectively) plotted as a function of the momentum transfer Q. (b) Possible sources of microstrain in PtM nanocatalysts (grain boundaries, inhomogeneous alloying, or (electro)chemical surface dealloying). The inset in (a) shows the influence of macrostrain, instrumental contribution, and microstrain on the position and the broadening of the PXRD reflections. Adapted from ref (13). Copyright 2018 Springer Nature.

It is generally admitted that the Bragg peak profile (shape and width) can be described as the convolution of three contributions: (i) the incident X-ray beam monochromaticity, (ii) the instrument optics (slit gaps and positions, detector pixel size, etc.), and (iii) sample-related broadening effects. The latter is the consequence of two microstructural properties of the sample investigated, namely, the finite size of the coherent domains (or grain size) and the presence of microstrain (or local strain, the parameter of interest here), which reflects the local variations of inter interplanar distances caused by some sort of stress (disorder, stacking fault, twins, grain boundaries, inhomogeneous alloying, etc.; see Figure 2b). As described in the Supporting Information, the Rietveld method can disentangle microstrain broadening from other contributions, thus providing a physical parameter that is representative of local strain originating from structural disorder.
Rietveld refinement of powder X-ray diffractograms becomes limited when the nanoparticle size is substantially smaller than the beam coherence length, (i.e., typically a few nanometers (14)) and a periodic crystal-type description of the atomic arrangement breaks down, as does the Bragg’s law. In such case, pair distribution function (PDF) analysis of total scattering data can provide quantitative information on the structural and microstructural properties of nanocatalysts. (15) Experimentally, the PDF is obtained from a PXRD pattern by realizing the Fourier transform as:
(1)
where ρ(r) is the microscopic pair density and Q = 4π·sin(θ)/λ. S(Q) is the total structure function, that is, the normalized coherent scattered intensity obtained from the PXRD pattern after subtraction of the environment and inelastic/incoherent scattering and normalization. It is worth noting that the whole diffraction pattern is used to obtain G(r), not only the Bragg peak intensities as for Rietveld refinement. Therefore, the effects of disorder, defects, and so on, which contribute to the pattern through diffuse scattering outside of the Bragg peaks, will also be included in G(r). The PDF yields the probability of finding a pair of atoms separated by a distance r. It will oscillate in a way that is characteristic of a given structure, about the average pair density that would result from a completely unordered atomic arrangement. Thus, it can be calculated from a structural model describing the distribution of atoms in a sample. The calculated PDF can be fitted to the observed one, as in a “direct space Rietveld refinement”. The fit is carried out in a given interatomic distance range, yielding accurate structural parameters relative to this range. Comparing refinements for very small or longer distances allows revealing the presence of local structural distortions with respect to an average long-range atomic arrangement. In addition, the PDF signal vanishes for distances longer than the structural coherence length (or domain size), which provides a simple way to determine the average nanoparticle size in a sample. On the other hand, the effect of microstrain will be to broaden the distribution of interatomic distances about their average values, which will result in a broadening of the corresponding peaks of the PDF. The PDF is thus sensitive to microstrain; however, its effect is combined to thermal displacement and instrumental broadening, from which it is difficult to extract. The PDF can also be used with Reverse Monte Carlo minimization of large atomic assemblies, which allows a statistical description of samples from liquids and amorphous to crystalline nanoparticles. (16)

From Bulk Microstrain to Surface Distortion

The main reason to correct microstrain values is related to the definition of microstrain itself, which links a local variation of the interplanar distance d between d–Δd and dd according to:
(2)
In practice, there is a distribution of Δd/d within and across the coherent domains. The refined ε value thus corresponds to the root-mean-square <ε> , averaged over all crystallites in the sample. Consequently, microstrain is a global and relative estimation of structural disorder, since the even perfectly ordered domains (Δd = 0) also contribute to the average value. To build a consistent structure–activity relationship in heterogeneous catalysis, a surface-specific and quantitative structural descriptor is needed. To fulfill these requirements, two complementary “corrections” of the as-measured microstrain values were proposed. (13,17) These corrections derive from experimental (electron microscopy observations (18−23)) and theoretical studies, (8,13,24) which suggest that microstrain can be decomposed into two main and independent contributions:
  • The surface microstrain mostly associated with the presence of grain boundaries and/or arising from dealloying. Despite being surface bound, such microstrain values are relative and need to be corrected from the crystallite size;

  • The microstrain of the whole crystallite volume (mostly arising from heterogeneous alloying and hereafter referred to as “chemical disorder” in what follows). Such microstrain is not representative of the surface and must be estimated and subtracted.

As detailed in the Supporting Information, for PtM bimetallic catalysts, these hypotheses allow to decompose the measured microstrain as a sum of bulk chemical disorder (f(%M), estimated experimentally or from DFT calculations) and surface defectiveness (SD), weighted by the surface-to-volume ratio (D, calculated using Montejano-Carrizales et al.’s model (25)):
(3)
Figure 3 shows how the SD descriptor can be used to unveil the “operating mode” of a library of Pt and PtNi nanocatalysts. The ORR specific activity-SD plot in Figure 3k indicates that enhanced ORR activity arises from two distinct approaches:
  • The global surface tuning approach (null and low SD values), derived from DFT calculations and single crystal studies, which aims at enhancing the ORR rate by synthetically tailoring and maximizing the density of catalytic sites that weakly chemisorb the ORR intermediates (in this category, octahedral PtNi nanoparticles feature the highest ORR activity),

  • The local surface tuning, or defect-engineering approach (high SD values), in which the ORR rate is controlled by the fraction of catalytic sites with close-to-optimal affinity to the ORR intermediates.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Using the SD descriptor to unveil the “operating mode” of a variety of ORR nanocatalysts. (a–j) TEM images of the various nanostructures investigated. The insets show higher magnification TEM or STEM/X-EDS elemental maps. (k) ORR activity measured at 0.95 V vs. RHE plotted as a function of the SD descriptor. The activity–SD plot quantitatively confirms that high ORR activity can be reached through the two approaches presented in Figure 1. Panels (a–j) are reprinted with permission from ref (26). Copyright 2020 American Chemical Society. Panel (k) is adapted with permission from ref (13). Copyright 2018 Springer Nature.

It is noteworthy that as SD values are derived from microstrain values, they are only sensitive to the local strain caused by defects and do not take into account other ORR-relevant fundamental parameters such as the average lattice contraction (global strain), the near surface chemical composition, or the site coordination (that is why multiple ORR activities can be found at low SD values). However, the fact that the ORR activities increase almost linearly with the SD values (Figure 3k) is clear evidence that (i) similar to the “classical” strain and ligand effects, surface disorder plays a key role in ORR electrocatalysis; and (ii) local strain alone is one of the most, if not the most, influential facets of disorder on catalytic performance.

Quantifying Surface Distortion from Cyclic Voltammetry

As discussed previously, the fundamental and direct consequence of structural disorder is the emergence of a wide variety of catalytic site configurations on a given electrocatalytic surface (Figure 1b). DFT calculations by Le Bacq et al. (8,13) have revealed a ±1 eV distribution width in *OH binding energy on structurally disordered Pt surfaces. Whereas a fraction of these catalytic sites is statistically close to the optimal configuration for a given catalytic reaction (∼0.1 eV weaker chemisorption of *OH in the case of the ORR), another fraction is in the optimal configuration for a different reaction. Indeed, highly aggregated/polycristalline nanocatalysts have demonstrated desirable catalytic performances for a wide range of electrochemical reactions including the ORR, (17,27−35) the CO electrooxidation, (17,36) the methanol or ethanol electrooxidation, (8,37−39) the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) and the oxygen evolution reaction (OER). (40−43) Consequently, surface disorder and catalytic polyvalence must be somehow linked, and a similar SD–activity plot should be found for almost any reaction, at least involving *OH species.
In that frame, COads stripping (here referred to COOR) can be chosen as a complementary reaction to the ORR to investigate surface catalytic polyvalence because the prerequisite for optimal COOR are different regarding *OH adsorption strength (increased *OH binding by ∼ 0.4 eV relative to Pt(111) according to Calle-Vallejo et al.). (44) Simultaneous improvement in ORR and COOR specific activity should consequently evidence catalytic polyvalence and thus surface defectiveness. The COOR activity (or CO tolerance) of a Pt-based nanocatalyst can be quantified by the average COads oxidation potential (μ1CO, or the first moment of the potential weight in the COads stripping voltammograms, see details in ref (17) and examples in Figure 4a).

Figure 4

Figure 4. Probing catalytic sites diversity and oxophilicity. (a) Background-subtracted COads stripping voltammograms recorded on Pt and PtNi nanomaterials featuring increasing SD values and their associated average potential μ1CO (dashed lines), (b) SD plotted as a function of the COOR activity (μ1CO) for a wide range of PtNi materials with different shape, size, or Ni content. (c) Background-subtracted Hads desorption curves (so-called-HUPD region) of materials featuring increasing SD values pointing an extra electrochemical process at high potential ascribed to *H displacement by *OH on extremely oxophilic sites and (d) SD plotted as a function of the ratio QCO/2QH for a wide range of PtNi materials with different shape, size, or Ni content. In (b), the numbers displayed close to the experimental points are the SD values associated to these catalysts. In both (a) and (c), the curves are normalized by the Pt surface area measured by COads stripping. Panel (d) is adapted with permission from ref (26). Copyright 2020 American Chemical Society.

As shown in Figure 4b, a drawback of using complementary reactions to probe surface catalytic polyvalence is that it is not generally applicable. If structural disorder must induce catalytic polyvalence (μ1CO generally decreases with increasing SD), the inverse is not necessarily true. Indeed, the COOR overpotential is not strictly governed only by *OH adsorption strength but by an appropriate balance between the formation of *OH species and their recombination with diffusing (45) *CO species (Langmuir–Hinshelwood mechanism). In practice, not only structural disorder but also crystallite size, surface chemical composition, and site coordination influence the *CO binding energy and thus the μ1CO values. A very good example of this was provided by Stamenkovic et al., (46) who reported a simultaneous negative shift of the COads stripping profile and tremendous ORR activity for the Pt3Ni(111)-skin surface, in agreement with results from shape-controlled nanoparticles displayed in Figure 5b, especially regarding PtNi octahedra. A method relying only on *OH bond strength is consequently needed.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Determining the nature and structure of the catalytically active sites. (a) 3D atomic displacements measured in a FePt nanoparticle using GENFIRE algorithm from AC-STEM images; (b) Atomic resolution STEM images, with atomic displacement and strain maps within two crystallographic planes, as indicated in the Pt nanoparticle; (c) APT data showing the atom map from a Ag@Pd nanoparticle; (d) Sketch of the BCDI setup, 2D slice of the strain field through the center of a reconstructed Pt nanoparticle under Ar/CO flow and associated probability density of the strain field; (e) Scheme explaining the concept of using EC-STM noise analysis to reveal the catalytic sites under reaction conditions. Panel (a) is adapted with permission from ref (22). Copyright 2017 Springer Nature. Panel (b) is adapted with permission from ref (21). Copyright 2018 Springer Nature. Panel (c) is adapted with permission from ref (63). Copyright 2011 Springer Nature. Panel (d) is adapted with permission from ref (68). Copyright 2019 American Chemical Society. Panel (e) is adapted with permission from ref (80). Copyright 2017 Springer Nature.

It is deduced from the extremely low COOR onset potential observed in the case of the highly defective sponge PtNi/C in Figure 4a (∼0.4 V vs. RHE) that *OH species are adsorbed on the surface at such low electrode potentials. The idea of concomitant adsorption of *OH and under-potentially deposited hydrogen (HUPD) has been discussed many years ago by Marichev et al., (47) Van Der Niet et al., (48) and more recently by Janik et al. (49) The results of infrared spectroscopy (IRAS) (50) and CO displacement measurements (51) on extended surfaces, as well as DFT calculations, have suggested that *H species adsorbed on extremely oxophilic sites can be displaced by *OH species, following an electrochemical reaction of the type:
(4)
The displacement process described by eq 4 creates an extra charge compared with the charge required just to desorb under-potentially deposited H atoms (QH). Consequently, an increase in QH compared to the COads stripping charge (QCO), as experimentally observed in Figure 4c, supports the presence of highly oxophilic sites on Pt-based surfaces. (26)
Most importantly, as displayed in Figure 4d, contrary to μ1CO, the QCO/2QH ratio measured on a wide range of nanocatalysts decreases almost linearly only with strictly positive values of SD, independently from other structural and chemical parameters. This suggests that such highly oxophilic sites are possibly generated only from structural disorder; that is, there are not the “simple” undercoordinated sites found at nanoparticles surface edges, steps, or kinks (otherwise, low QCO/2QH ratio would be systematically found on nanocatalysts). In other words, the QCO/2QH ratio quantitatively probes the fraction of highly oxophilic sites, which catalyze the process described by eq 4. Because such extreme *OH adsorption energies are more likely reached via the broadening of the *OH adsorption energies distribution than its simple uniform shift, the ratio indirectly quantifies the structural disorder responsible for this broadening. This hypothesis is supported by the SD-QCO/2QH plot in Figure 4d and the ORR activity-QCO/2QH plot in Figure S2 of the Supporting Information, which show that, counter-intuitively, the ORR activity increases with increasing fraction of highly oxophilic sites. This result is of primary importance since the QCO/2QH ratio can thus be used to estimate the degree of surface defectiveness of a given catalyst, just as the synchrotron X-ray based SD descriptor does, yet in a much more facile and accessible way. Besides, this method is by definition truly surface sensitive, likely incorporating the effects of coordination and/or chemical composition variations as well as local strain. The method can also be employed operando (i.e., in a PEMFC device). (26) Nevertheless, although these descriptors (SD and/or QCO/2QH) have a great advantage to provide insights on the statistical existence of active atomic motifs over the whole catalyst surface, the exact structure of these motifs and their location on the surface remain largely unknown.

2. Perspectives toward the Identification of the Active Structural Motifs

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

In the previous section, we showed how the local strain averaged over the whole catalyst surface could serve as a powerful structural descriptor to rationalize the unique electrochemical behavior of practical disordered surfaces. The SD descriptor, in addition to the QCO/2QH ratio, suggests that increasing surface disorder promotes the emergence of only a fraction of active catalytic sites, in detriment of another fraction. Further insights on the nature of these active sites (such as their location, structural environment, or which kind of defect generates them) would certainly guide the optimization of defective nanocatalysts. In the following section, we review several emerging analytical techniques that we believe will play a key role in that purpose.

Electron Microscopy Tomography

Recent advances in transmission electron microscopy (TEM) methodology regarding spherical and chromatic aberration correction and improvements of cameras, energy resolution of electron guns, and processing algorithms (52) now allow the imaging and/or 3D reconstruction of nanoparticles at the atomic scale. For example, using aberration corrected scanning transmission electron microscopy (AC-STEM) operated in annular dark field mode (STEM-ADF) tomography coupled with a generalized Fourier iterative reconstruction (GENFIRE) algorithm, Yang et al. (22) determined the coordinates of each atom composing a face-centered tetragonal (L10) PtFe nanoparticle (Figure 5a). Atomic coordinate determination represents the ultimate structural characterization one can expect, and the results showed that a nominally ordered particle was in fact composed of 8 individual grains, each featuring a different phase, including ordered L10 and L20 or disordered face-centered cubic (fcc) phases. Each surface atom coordination, local displacement compared with the perfect crystal structure and local chemical environment can be determined from such measurements. Similarly, an increasing number of studies (18−23) have successfully mapped the distribution of strain in extended surfaces or mono- and bimetallic nanoparticles. Using high-resolution scanning transmission electron microscopy (HRSTEM), Nilsson et al. (21) have reported that the bulk of Pt nanoparticles supported on alumina or ceria is (“rather”, as employed by the authors) deformation-free. Interestingly, local strain was systematically detected close to twin boundaries, at high surface curvature (convex edge sites or concavities) and at the nanoparticle–support interface (see in Figure 5b), in agreement with other TEM studies. (22,23,53,54) In addition, the “true” surface strain distribution was directly deduced from the data, which constitutes an improvement compared with SD that requires numerous hypotheses. This direct strain–defect type correlation is precious for the defect engineering approach. It also evidences that coordination and strain are strongly linked.
However, these measurements are extremely resource demanding and are usually limited to a limited number of nanoparticles, which are supposed to be representative of the whole catalyst. In addition, identical-location-aberration-corrected scanning STEM (IL-AC-STEM) measurements (23) evidenced that atomic coordinates measured under TEM vacuum conditions change upon exposure to a PEMFC-relevant electrochemical environment, which compromises the straightforward establishment of valid structure–activity relationships from ex situ TEM imaging. Moreover, while environmental in situ TEM methods are also progressing, (52) the dramatic impact of electron-irradiation on nanomaterials’ structure and chemistry in liquid cells is a major issue that cannot be neglected. (55)

Atom Probe Tomography (APT)

Kelly et al. (56) have stated that “The ideal microscope would reveal the position and identity of all atoms in a specimen for as far as the user wishes to see” and have added that “atom probes approach this ideal”. APT is based on the evaporation of a specimen atom by atom, layer by layer, from its surface by the field effect, the ions being further projected onto a position sensitive detector. The detector allows the simultaneous determination of position and the element evaporated. The position and the order of arrival of the ion impact on the detector allows one to reconstruct the original position of the atoms on the initial tip and the time-of-flight of the ions contains their elemental identity via the mass to charge ratio. The sample must be in the form of a very sharp or a needle-shape tip. This is critical because the atoms are progressively removed from the tip allowing the reconstruction of a 3D image of the sample at the atomic scale. In relation with the concerns of the present paper, the combination of highly sensitive composition measurement and three-dimensional microstructural characterization represents a useful tool for the characterization of structural defects. Indeed, APT has the unique capacity to study chemical segregation to crystalline defects such as dislocations, stacking faults, and grain boundaries. (57)
Recently, APT has met fundamental electrocatalysis. The oxidation/reduction behavior of Pt-based alloys has been studied at different temperatures to show preferential segregation effect of one metal. The oxidation of PtRhRu alloy was dynamically monitored, and it was shown that oxidation is initiated at grain boundaries and propagates to form a Ru and Rh-rich oxide. (58) APT also revealed the interplay between surface structure/composition, activity for OER, and stability of electrochemical Ir oxide. (59) At first stage of the metallic Ir oxidation by anodic polarization, the high OER activity was rationalized by the formation of nonstoichiometric Ir oxide (IrOx with x < 2) clusters composed of a very limited number of atoms (only few tens) predominantly located at grain boundaries. This structure gradually evolves toward more stable but less active IrO2. By combining isotope labeling, APT, and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, the same group has demonstrated that oxygen from the hydrated Ir oxide participates in the formation of molecular oxygen, and that this mechanism accelerates Ir dissolution. (59) Lastly, spatially resolved elemental compositions achieved by APT have also demonstrated surface compositional changes of NiP catalysts used to electrocatalyze the OER upon aging in alkaline medium. The APT results provided evidence of the complete depletion of P along with the presence of amorphous and resistive NiO at the near-surface layers of the catalyst, and these results were used to rationalize the OER activity decay. (60)
Nevertheless, APT sample preparation remains an issue to envision the use of this technique in the (electro)catalysis field. The specific geometry of the APT tip with an end-tip radius of 30–100 nm is hardly compatible with powder samples such as supported or even unsupported nanoparticles. (61) Similarly, analysis of porous materials usually designed by dealloying processes requires a specific preparation. Pores and voids have to be previously filled to avoid overlapping ion trajectories and distorted reconstructions induced by porosity. (62) Nevertheless, these recent results show that APT is a growing analytical tool in (electro)catalysis and its emergence provides hope for detailed characterization of the topmost atomic surface layers of nanostructured electrocatalysts, keeping in mind that APT overcomes the main limitations of regular TEM. For example, Tedsree et al. (63) successfully used APT to reveal the internal structure of an Ag@Pd core@shell nanoparticle (Figure 5c), where the close proximity of Ag and Pd elements in the periodic table makes the imaging contrast extremely challenging in TEM.

Advanced (Coherent) X-ray Methods

Beyond the averaged microstrain values extracted from PXRD, Bragg coherent diffraction imaging (BCDI) is an emerging technique designed specifically for resolving the 3D strain field inside individual nanocrystals using nanofocused X-rays (64) (see Figure 5d). Strain fields inside a nanocrystal create phase shifts in the diffracted beam, producing an interference pattern at the detector. A single 3D rocking curve coherent diffraction pattern can recover 3D images of the electron density and strain inside Pt nanoparticles. Complete data sets can be acquired on the order of minutes per nanocrystal. (65) Strain maps of single nanocrystals allow the structural influence of individual crystal defects to be resolved. The strain field present at the surface of the particle can be quantitatively determined, and different types of strain-inducing defect structures can be visualized (e.g., vacancies from alloy leaching vs dislocation loops). (66)
The strain and real space resolutions of BCDI have benefited from ongoing improvements in synchrotron brightness and coherent flux and now approach those of electron microscopy. The most significant advantage of X-ray based techniques is that they can be performed in situ (67,68) with much less beam damage artifacts and easier electrochemical control compared with TEM methods. The extremely small size of commercial fuel cell Pt catalyst particles (<5 nm) remains, however, below the present spatial resolution limit of BCDI, but shape-controlled model systems and other electrocatalysts are already within reach. (69) The phase sensitivity and strain resolution in BCDI vastly exceeds the real-space electron density resolution of the nanocrystal. More specifically, the presence of point defects can be detected, even when they cannot be atomically resolved, because the locally induced strain field propagates several unit cells away. The increased coherence of X-ray (nano)beams at fourth generation synchrotron sources, such as the Extremely Brilliant Source (EBS) at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF) are expectedly to rapidly advance the ease and applicability of BCDI for in situ electrocatalyst strain imaging at the single particle level, under the environment of a PEMFC device.
Complementarily, if one of the major advantages of high energy X-ray based techniques over other methods is their ability to probe practical catalysts in situ or even operando, the coherent diffraction imaging principles can be also applied to “revisit” model surfaces. The advantage over experiments on practical nanoparticle systems is that specific defects can be introduced on single crystal surfaces in a well-controlled manner, using techniques such as ion irradiation, (70) cathodic atomization, (71) and plasma or laser etching. (72) The structure of such model-defect-engineered surfaces can be resolved in situ from surface X-ray diffraction (73) and electrochemical scanning tunneling microscopy (EC-STM). (74,75) Coherent X-ray diffraction can also be used to reconstruct the local strain fields on extended surfaces. Although experimental protocols and X-ray methodology still require further development, the first steps in this direction have already been taken. (76,77)
One of the ultimate goals of nanofocused X-ray beam techniques is to study nanostructured materials in situ and operando conditions utilizing the X-ray equivalent of a TEM. The main advantage of direct, real space nanofocused beams over reciprocal space imaging techniques is the ease of use and significantly simpler data analysis, due to the lack of the diffraction phase problem. Currently, dedicated dark-field hard X-ray microscopy (DFXRM) instruments are being developed at ESRF. (78) The first imaging results are encouraging, but the instrument still lacks the necessary resolution to study catalyst particles in nanometre range. The spatial resolution ultimately depends on the quality of the imaging lens, which is the current bottleneck. However, recent developments in multilayer Laue lenses give hope that this obstacle will be soon surpassed and imaging at the few-nanometre scale can be achieved in the near future. (79)

Electrochemical Scanning Tunneling Microscopy Noise Measurements

Whereas the various methods described above shed light on the complex local structure of disordered surfaces, identification of the electrocatalytically active sites/motifs is pivotal to the further development of the defect-engineering approach. In that frame, it is worth pointing electrochemical scanning tunneling microscopy noise measurements (n-ECSTM) first introduced by Pfisterer et al. in 2017. (80) This technique is based on the energy barrier difference for electrons tunneling from a sample to a STM tip in aqueous electrolyte. The tunneling barrier is sensitive to all the molecules present along the electrons’ path, such as those adsorbed on the electrocatalytic surface (81) and those diffusing to/from the electrochemical double layer. (82,83) Local modifications of the tunneling barrier in turn allow identification of the most active sites for a given reaction (Figure 5e). The n-ECSTM technique revealed that Pt(111) terraces best electrocatalyze the ORR in alkaline media (84) and that step sites and concave sites are the most active in acidic media. (80,84) Besides ORR, this technique revealed that the edges of single MoS2 and MoSe2 flakes are more active than basal planes for the HER, but that the latter can be activated upon bombarding with He-ions. (85)

Conclusions

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

In summary, the defect engineering approach has the particularity to touch the extreme complexity of nanoscale intrinsic structural disorder. Contrary to the “classical” surface science approach, the connection between theoretical computations (and their necessary simplifying assumptions) and experimental measurements on practical systems is not yet established. Numerous theoretical descriptors have nonetheless been applied to complex surfaces. For example, the generalized coordination number (CN) theory predicts the benefits of locally concave surface curvature but without considering the local strain possibly generated by surface roughness. On the contrary, experimental observations (electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction) reveal significant local strain in the vicinity of structural defects. From this factual result, local strain alone (without considering the coordination effect) is a desirable experimental structural descriptor of surface defectiveness that is able to rationalize the electrochemical adsorption behavior of disordered nanocatalysts, whereas each surface CN remains hardly accessible in practice.
Consequently, there are currently no clear theoretical guidelines driving the “defective-by-design” engineering of catalytic materials, and computational models must be adapted to better describe experimental observations (and not the other way around). Practical descriptors, however, suggest that maximizing surface distortion is an efficient approach to boost catalytic performance, and the introduction of grain boundaries or surface dealloying was identified as an experimental lever to implement such distortion. If practical structural descriptors inherit the limitations of their characterization technique(s) (resolution, artifacts, (un)realistic sample environment, etc.), the constant technical development and fast progresses of instrumental tools predict an ongoing improvement of their descriptive power.
Finally, one could reasonably think that the ultimate goal in the defect engineering approach is to identify the structure of the most catalytically active site and to maximize its implementation on the nanocatalyst surface. This would be missing an important subtlety of this approach: the most active site is not necessarily desirable. It depends on the compromise between the resulting site activity and the number of (neighboring) sites that are “sacrificed” for this purpose. This adds an extra layer of complexity above the previously mentioned. One thing is certain: there is still a lot to uncover.

Supporting Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acscatal.0c02144.

  • Discussion on the extraction of the microstrain parameter from powder X-ray diffraction experiments with the Rietveld method; discussion on the correction of the as-measured microstrain to describe surface defectiveness; and a plot bridging the specific activity for the ORR and the QCO/2QH ratio (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Acknowledgments

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This work was performed within the framework of the Centre of Excellence of Multifunctional Architectured Materials “CEMAM” (grant number ANR-10-LABX-44-01). The authors acknowledge financial support from the French National Research Agency through the BRIDGE project (grant number ANR-19-ENER-0008-01).

References

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article references 85 other publications.

  1. 1
    Li, W.; Wang, D.; Zhang, Y.; Tao, L.; Wang, T.; Zou, Y.; Wang, Y.; Chen, R.; Wang, S. Defect Engineering for Fuel-Cell Electrocatalysts. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 1907879,  DOI: 10.1002/adma.201907879
  2. 2
    Nørskov, J. K.; Bligaard, T.; Rossmeisl, J.; Christensen, C. H. Towards the Computational Design of Solid Catalysts. Nat. Chem. 2009, 1 (1), 3746,  DOI: 10.1038/nchem.121
  3. 3
    Zhao, Z.; Liu, S.; Zha, S.; Cheng, D.; Studt, F.; Henkelman, G.; Gong, J. Theory-Guided Design of Catalytic Materials Using Scaling Relationships and Reactivity Descriptors. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2019, 4, 792804,  DOI: 10.1038/s41578-019-0152-x
  4. 4
    Nørskov, J. K.; Rossmeisl, J.; Logadottir, A.; Lindqvist, L.; Kitchin, J. R.; Bligaard, T.; Jónsson, H. Origin of the Overpotential for Oxygen Reduction at a Fuel-Cell Cathode. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108 (46), 1788617892,  DOI: 10.1021/jp047349j
  5. 5
    Hammer, B.; Norskov, J. K. Why Gold Is the Noblest of All the Metals. Nature 1995, 376, 238240,  DOI: 10.1038/376238a0
  6. 6
    Hammer, B.; Nørskov, J. K. Electronic Factors Determining the Reactivity of Metal Surfaces. Surf. Sci. 1995, 343 (3), 211220,  DOI: 10.1016/0039-6028(96)80007-0
  7. 7
    Batchelor, T. A. A.; Pedersen, J. K.; Winther, S. H.; Castelli, I. E.; Jacobsen, K. W.; Rossmeisl, J. High-Entropy Alloys as a Discovery Platform for Electrocatalysis. Joule 2019, 3 (3), 834845,  DOI: 10.1016/j.joule.2018.12.015
  8. 8
    Le Bacq, O.; Pasturel, A.; Chattot, R.; Previdello, B.; Nelayah, J.; Asset, T.; Dubau, L.; Maillard, F. Effect of Atomic Vacancies on the Structure and the Electrocatalytic Activity of Pt-Rich/C Nanoparticles: A Combined Experimental and Density Functional Theory Study. ChemCatChem 2017, 9 (12), 23242338,  DOI: 10.1002/cctc.201601672
  9. 9
    Calle-Vallejo, F.; Tymoczko, J.; Colic, V.; Vu, Q. H.; Pohl, M. D.; Morgenstern, K.; Loffreda, D.; Sautet, P.; Schuhmann, W.; Bandarenka, A. S. Finding Optimal Surface Sites on Heterogeneous Catalysts by Counting Nearest Neighbors. Science 2015, 350 (6527), 185189,  DOI: 10.1126/science.aab3501
  10. 10
    Ma, X.; Xin, H. Orbitalwise Coordination Number for Predicting Adsorption Properties of Metal Nanocatalysts. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017, 118 (3), 036101,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.036101
  11. 11
    Wu, D.; Dong, C.; Zhan, H.; Du, X. Bond-Energy-Integrated Descriptor for Oxygen Electrocatalysis of Transition Metal Oxides. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2018, 9, 33873391,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b01493
  12. 12
    Rietveld, H. M. A Profile Refinement Method for Nuclear and Magnetic Structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1969, 2 (2), 6571,  DOI: 10.1107/S0021889869006558
  13. 13
    Chattot, R.; Le Bacq, O.; Beermann, V.; Kühl, S.; Herranz, J.; Henning, S.; Kühn, L.; Asset, T.; Guétaz, L.; Renou, G.; Drnec, J.; Bordet, P.; Pasturel, A.; Eychmüller, A.; Schmidt, T. J.; Strasser, P.; Dubau, L.; Maillard, F. Surface Distortion as a Unifying Concept and Descriptor in Oxygen Reduction Reaction Electrocatalysis. Nat. Mater. 2018, 17 (9), 827833,  DOI: 10.1038/s41563-018-0133-2
  14. 14
    Billinge, S. J. L. The Rise of the X-Ray Atomic Pair Distribution Function Method: A Series of Fortunate Events. Philos. Trans. R. Soc., A 2019, 377 (2147), 20180413,  DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2018.0413
  15. 15
    Thompson, P.; Cox, D. E.; Hastings, J. B. Rietveld Refinement of Debye-Scherrer Synchrotron X-Ray Data from Al2O3. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1987, 20 (2), 7983,  DOI: 10.1107/S0021889887087090
  16. 16
    Harada, M.; Ikegami, R.; Kumara, L. S. R.; Kohara, S.; Sakata, O. Reverse Monte Carlo Modeling for Local Structures of Noble Metal Nanoparticles Using High-Energy XRD and EXAFS. RSC Adv. 2019, 9 (51), 2951129521,  DOI: 10.1039/C9RA06519A
  17. 17
    Chattot, R.; Asset, T.; Bordet, P.; Drnec, J.; Dubau, L.; Maillard, F. Beyond Strain and Ligand Effects: Microstrain-Induced Enhancement of the Oxygen Reduction Reaction Kinetics on Various PtNi/C Nanostructures. ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 398408,  DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.6b02356
  18. 18
    Sneed, B. T.; Young, A. P.; Tsung, C. K. Building up Strain in Colloidal Metal Nanoparticle Catalysts. Nanoscale 2015, 7 (29), 1224812265,  DOI: 10.1039/C5NR02529J
  19. 19
    Gan, L.; Yu, R.; Luo, J.; Cheng, Z.; Zhu, J. Lattice Strain Distributions in Individual Dealloyed Pt-Fe Catalyst Nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2012, 3 (7), 934938,  DOI: 10.1021/jz300192b
  20. 20
    Suzana, A. F.; Rochet, A.; Passos, A. R.; Castro Zerba, J. P.; Polo, C. C.; Santilli, C. V.; Pulcinelli, S. H.; Berenguer, F.; Harder, R.; Maxey, E.; Meneau, F. In Situ Three-Dimensional Imaging of Strain in Gold Nanocrystals during Catalytic Oxidation. Nanoscale Adv. 2019, 1 (8), 30093014,  DOI: 10.1039/C9NA00231F
  21. 21
    Nilsson Pingel, T.; Jørgensen, M.; Yankovich, A. B.; Grönbeck, H.; Olsson, E. Influence of Atomic Site-Specific Strain on Catalytic Activity of Supported Nanoparticles. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 2722,  DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-05055-1
  22. 22
    Yang, Y.; Chen, C. C.; Scott, M. C.; Ophus, C.; Xu, R.; Pryor, A.; Wu, L.; Sun, F.; Theis, W.; Zhou, J.; Eisenbach, M.; Kent, P. R. C.; Sabirianov, R. F.; Zeng, H.; Ercius, P.; Miao, J. Deciphering Chemical Order/Disorder and Material Properties at the Single-Atom Level. Nature 2017, 542 (7639), 7579,  DOI: 10.1038/nature21042
  23. 23
    Ruiz-Zepeda, F.; Gatalo, M.; Pavlišič, A.; Dražić, G.; Jovanovič, P.; Bele, M.; Gaberšček, M.; Hodnik, N. Atomically Resolved Anisotropic Electrochemical Shaping of Nano-Electrocatalyst. Nano Lett. 2019, 19 (8), 49194927,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b00918
  24. 24
    Stukowski, A.; Markmann, J.; Weissmüller, J.; Albe, K. Atomistic Origin of Microstrain Broadening in Diffraction Data of Nanocrystalline Solids. Acta Mater. 2009, 57 (5), 16481654,  DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2008.12.011
  25. 25
    Montejano-Carrizales, J. M.; Morán-López, J. L. Geometrical Characteristics of Compact Nanoclusters. Nanostruct. Mater. 1992, 1 (5), 397409,  DOI: 10.1016/0965-9773(92)90090-K
  26. 26
    Chattot, R.; Martens, I.; Scohy, M.; Herranz, J.; Drnec, J.; Maillard, F.; Dubau, L. Disclosing Pt-Bimetallic Alloy Nanoparticle Surface Lattice Distortion with Electrochemical Probes. ACS Energy Lett. 2020, 5 (1), 162169,  DOI: 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b02287
  27. 27
    Henning, S.; Kühn, L.; Herranz, J.; Durst, J.; Binninger, T.; Nachtegaal, M.; Werheid, M.; Liu, W.; Adam, M.; Kaskel, S.; Eychmüller, A.; Schmidt, T. J. Pt-Ni Aerogels as Unsupported Electrocatalysts for the Oxygen Reduction Reaction. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2016, 163 (9), F998F1003,  DOI: 10.1149/2.0251609jes
  28. 28
    Henning, S.; Herranz, J.; Ishikawa, H.; Kim, B. J.; Abbott, D.; Kühn, L.; Eychmüller, A.; Schmidt, T. J. Durability of Unsupported Pt-Ni Aerogels in PEFC Cathodes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2017, 164 (12), F1136F1141,  DOI: 10.1149/2.0131712jes
  29. 29
    Henning, S.; Ishikawa, H.; Kühn, L.; Herranz, J.; Müller, E.; Eychmüller, A.; Schmidt, T. J. Unsupported Pt-Ni Aerogels with Enhanced High Current Performance and Durability in Fuel Cell Cathodes. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017, 56 (36), 1070710710,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201704253
  30. 30
    Li, M.; Zhao, Z.; Cheng, T.; Fortunelli, A.; Chen, C. Y.; Yu, R.; Zhang, Q.; Gu, L.; Merinov, B. V.; Lin, Z.; Zhu, E.; Yu, T.; Jia, Q.; Guo, J.; Zhang, L.; Goddard, W. A.; Huang, Y.; Duan, X. Ultrafine Jagged Platinum Nanowires Enable Ultrahigh Mass Activity for the Oxygen Reduction Reaction. Science 2016, 354 (6318), 14141419,  DOI: 10.1126/science.aaf9050
  31. 31
    Alia, S. M.; Ngo, C.; Shulda, S.; Ha, M. A.; Dameron, A. A.; Weker, J. N.; Neyerlin, K. C.; Kocha, S. S.; Pylypenko, S.; Pivovar, B. S. Exceptional Oxygen Reduction Reaction Activity and Durability of Platinum-Nickel Nanowires through Synthesis and Post-Treatment Optimization. ACS Omega 2017, 2 (4), 14081418,  DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.7b00054
  32. 32
    Van Der Vliet, D. F.; Wang, C.; Tripkovic, D.; Strmcnik, D.; Zhang, X. F.; Debe, M. K.; Atanasoski, R. T.; Markovic, N. M.; Stamenkovic, V. R. Mesostructured Thin Films as Electrocatalysts with Tunable Composition and Surface Morphology. Nat. Mater. 2012, 11 (12), 10511058,  DOI: 10.1038/nmat3457
  33. 33
    Bae, S. J.; Yoo, S. J.; Lim, Y.; Kim, S.; Lim, Y.; Choi, J.; Nahm, K. S.; Hwang, S. J.; Lim, T. H.; Kim, S. K.; Kim, P. Facile Preparation of Carbon-Supported PtNi Hollow Nanoparticles with High Electrochemical Performance. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22 (18), 88208825,  DOI: 10.1039/c2jm16827h
  34. 34
    Snyder, J.; Fujita, T.; Chen, M. W.; Erlebacher, J. Oxygen Reduction in Nanoporous Metal-Ionic Liquid Composite Electrocatalysts. Nat. Mater. 2010, 9 (11), 904907,  DOI: 10.1038/nmat2878
  35. 35
    Luo, M.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, X.; Qin, Y.; Li, M.; Li, Y.; Li, C.; Yang, Y.; Wang, L.; Gao, P.; Lu, G.; Guo, S. Stable High-Index Faceted Pt Skin on Zigzag-Like PtFe Nanowires Enhances Oxygen Reduction Catalysis. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30 (10), 1705515,  DOI: 10.1002/adma.201705515
  36. 36
    Dubau, L.; Nelayah, J.; Moldovan, S.; Ersen, O.; Bordet, P.; Drnec, J.; Asset, T.; Chattot, R.; Maillard, F. Defects Do Catalysis: CO Monolayer Oxidation and Oxygen Reduction Reaction on Hollow PtNi/C Nanoparticles. ACS Catal. 2016, 6 (7), 46734684,  DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.6b01106
  37. 37
    Alia, S. M.; Pylypenko, S.; Neyerlin, K. C.; Kocha, S. S.; Pivovar, B. S. Nickel Nanowire Oxidation and Its Effect on Platinum Galvanic Displacement and Methanol Oxidation. ECS Trans. 2014, 64 (3), 8995,  DOI: 10.1149/06403.0089ecst
  38. 38
    Xiong, Z.; Li, S.; Xu, H.; Zhang, K.; Yan, B.; Du, Y. Newly Designed Ternary Metallic PtPdBi Hollow Catalyst with High Performance for Methanol and Ethanol Oxidation. Catalysts 2017, 7, 208,  DOI: 10.3390/catal7070208
  39. 39
    Mao, J.; Chen, W.; He, D.; Wan, J.; Pei, J.; Dong, J.; Wang, Y.; An, P.; Jin, Z.; Xing, W.; Tang, H.; Zhuang, Z.; Liang, X.; Huang, Y.; Zhou, G.; Wang, L.; Wang, D.; Li, Y. Design of Ultrathin Pt-Mo-Ni Nanowire Catalysts for Ethanol Electrooxidation. Sci. Adv. 2017, 3, e1603068  DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1603068
  40. 40
    Zhao, S.; Li, M.; Han, M.; Xu, D.; Yang, J.; Lin, Y.; Shi, N. E.; Lu, Y.; Yang, R.; Liu, B.; Dai, Z.; Bao, J. Defect-Rich Ni3FeN Nanocrystals Anchored on N-Doped Graphene for Enhanced Electrocatalytic Oxygen Evolution. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28 (18), 1706018,  DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201706018
  41. 41
    Wang, P.; Jiang, K.; Wang, G.; Yao, J.; Huang, X. Phase and Interface Engineering of Platinum-Nickel Nanowires for Efficient Electrochemical Hydrogen Evolution. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55 (41), 1285912863,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201606290
  42. 42
    Dickens, C. F.; Nørskov, J. K. A Theoretical Investigation into the Role of Surface Defects for Oxygen Evolution on RuO2. J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121 (34), 1851618524,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b03481
  43. 43
    Shi, Q.; Zhu, C.; Zhong, H.; Su, D.; Li, N.; Engelhard, M. H.; Xia, H.; Zhang, Q.; Feng, S.; Beckman, S. P.; Du, D.; Lin, Y. Nanovoid Incorporated IrxCu Metallic Aerogels for Oxygen Evolution Reaction Catalysis. ACS Energy Lett. 2018, 3 (9), 20382044,  DOI: 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b01338
  44. 44
    Calle-Vallejo, F.; Pohl, M. D.; Bandarenka, A. S. Quantitative Coordination-Activity Relations for the Design of Enhanced Pt Catalysts for CO Electro-Oxidation. ACS Catal. 2017, 7 (7), 43554359,  DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.7b01105
  45. 45
    Maillard, F.; Eikerling, M.; Cherstiouk, O. V; Schreier, S.; Savinova, E.; Stimming, U. Size Effects on Reactivity of Pt Nanoparticles in CO Monolayer Oxidation: The Role of Surface Mobility. Faraday Discuss. 2004, 125, 357377,  DOI: 10.1039/b303911k
  46. 46
    Van Der Vliet, D. F.; Wang, C.; Li, D.; Paulikas, A. P.; Greeley, J.; Rankin, R. B.; Strmcnik, D.; Tripkovic, D.; Markovic, N. M.; Stamenkovic, V. R. Unique Electrochemical Adsorption Properties of Pt-Skin Surfaces. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51 (13), 31393142,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201107668
  47. 47
    Marichev, V. A. Reversibility of Platinum Voltammograms in Aqueous Electrolytes and Ionic Product of Water. Electrochim. Acta 2008, 53 (27), 79527960,  DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2008.05.076
  48. 48
    Van Der Niet, M. J. T. C.; Garcia-Araez, N.; Hernández, J.; Feliu, J. M.; Koper, M. T. M. Water Dissociation on Well-Defined Platinum Surfaces: The Electrochemical Perspective. Catal. Today 2013, 202, 105113,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2012.04.059
  49. 49
    Janik, M. J.; McCrum, I. T.; Koper, M. T. M. On the Presence of Surface Bound Hydroxyl Species on Polycrystalline Pt Electrodes in the “Hydrogen Potential Region” (0 to 0.4 V-RHE). J. Catal. 2018, 367, 332337,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2018.09.031
  50. 50
    Tanaka, H.; Sugawara, S.; Shinohara, K.; Ueno, T.; Suzuki, S.; Hoshi, N.; Nakamura, M. Infrared Reflection Absorption Spectroscopy of OH Adsorption on the Low Index Planes of Pt. Electrocatalysis 2015, 6 (3), 295299,  DOI: 10.1007/s12678-014-0245-7
  51. 51
    Garcia-Araez, N.; Climent, V.; Feliu, J. M. Analysis of Temperature Effects on Hydrogen and OH Adsorption on Pt(111), Pt(100) and Pt(110) by Means of Gibbs Thermodynamics. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2010, 649 (1–2), 6982,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2010.01.024
  52. 52
    Zhang, C.; Firestein, K. L.; Fernando, J. F. S.; Siriwardena, D.; von Treifeldt, J. E.; Golberg, D. Recent Progress of In Situ Transmission Electron Microscopy for Energy Materials. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32 (18), 1904094,  DOI: 10.1002/adma.201904094
  53. 53
    Daio, T.; Staykov, A.; Guo, L.; Liu, J.; Tanaka, M.; Matthew Lyth, S.; Sasaki, K. Lattice Strain Mapping of Platinum Nanoparticles on Carbon and SnO2 Supports. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 13126,  DOI: 10.1038/srep13126
  54. 54
    Wang, Y.; Zhang, W. Mapping the Strain Distribution within Embedded Nanoparticles via Geometrical Phase Analysis. Micron 2019, 125, 102715,  DOI: 10.1016/j.micron.2019.102715
  55. 55
    Ahmad, N.; Le Bouar, Y.; Ricolleau, C.; Alloyeau, D. Growth of Dendritic Nanostructures by Liquid-Cell Transmission Electron Microscopy: A Reflection of the Electron-Irradiation History. Adv. Struct. Chem. Imaging 2016, 2, 9,  DOI: 10.1186/s40679-016-0023-0
  56. 56
    Kelly, T. F.; Miller, M. K. Atom Probe Tomography. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2007, 78, 031101,  DOI: 10.1063/1.2709758
  57. 57
    Gault, B.; Breen, A. J.; Chang, Y.; He, J.; Jägle, E. A.; Kontis, P.; Kürnsteiner, P.; Kwiatkowski Da Silva, A.; Makineni, S. K.; Mouton, I.; Peng, Z.; Ponge, D.; Schwarz, T.; Stephenson, L. T.; Szczepaniak, A.; Zhao, H.; Raabe, D. Interfaces and Defect Composition at the Near-Atomic Scale through Atom Probe Tomography Investigations. J. Mater. Res. 2018, 33 (23), 40184030,  DOI: 10.1557/jmr.2018.375
  58. 58
    Li, T.; Bagot, P. A. J.; Marquis, E. A.; Tsang, S. C. E.; Smith, G. D. W. Characterization of Oxidation and Reduction of Pt-Ru and Pt-Rh-Ru Alloys by Atom Probe Tomography and Comparison with Pt-Rh. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116 (33), 1763317640,  DOI: 10.1021/jp304359m
  59. 59
    Li, T.; Kasian, O.; Cherevko, S.; Zhang, S.; Geiger, S.; Scheu, C.; Felfer, P.; Raabe, D.; Gault, B.; Mayrhofer, K. J. J. Atomic-Scale Insights into Surface Species of Electrocatalysts in Three Dimensions. Nat. Catal. 2018, 1 (4), 300305,  DOI: 10.1038/s41929-018-0043-3
  60. 60
    Wilde, P.; Dieckhöfer, S.; Quast, T.; Xiang, W.; Bhatt, A.; Chen, Y. T.; Seisel, S.; Barwe, S.; Andronescu, C.; Li, T.; Schuhmann, W.; Masa, J. Insights into the Formation, Chemical Stability, and Activity of Transient NiyP@NiOx Core-Shell Heterostructures for the Oxygen Evolution Reaction. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2020, 3 (3), 23042309,  DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.9b02481
  61. 61
    Barroo, C.; Akey, A. J.; Bell, D. C. Atom Probe Tomography for Catalysis Applications: A Review. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9 (13), 2721,  DOI: 10.3390/app9132721
  62. 62
    Pfeiffer, B.; Erichsen, T.; Epler, E.; Volkert, C. A.; Trompenaars, P.; Nowak, C. Characterization of Nanoporous Materials with Atom Probe Tomography. Microsc. Microanal. 2015, 21 (3), 557563,  DOI: 10.1017/S1431927615000501
  63. 63
    Tedsree, K.; Li, T.; Jones, S.; Chan, C. W. A.; Yu, K. M. K.; Bagot, P. A. J.; Marquis, E. A.; Smith, G. D. W.; Tsang, S. C. E. Hydrogen Production from Formic Acid Decomposition at Room Temperature Using a Ag-Pd Core-Shell Nanocatalyst. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2011, 6 (5), 302307,  DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2011.42
  64. 64
    Abbey, B. From Grain Boundaries to Single Defects: A Review of Coherent Methods for Materials Imaging in the X-Ray Sciences. JOM 2013, 65 (9), 11831201,  DOI: 10.1007/s11837-013-0702-4
  65. 65
    Ulvestad, A.; Tripathi, A.; Hruszkewycz, S. O.; Cha, W.; Wild, S. M.; Stephenson, G. B.; Fuoss, P. H. Coherent Diffractive Imaging of Time-Evolving Samples with Improved Temporal Resolution. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2016, 93 (18), 184105,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.184105
  66. 66
    Carnis, J.; Gao, L.; Labat, S.; Kim, Y. Y.; Hofmann, J. P.; Leake, S. J.; Schülli, T. U.; Hensen, E. J. M.; Thomas, O.; Richard, M.-I. Towards a Quantitative Determination of Strain in Bragg Coherent X-Ray Diffraction Imaging: Artefacts and Sign Convention in Reconstructions. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 17357,  DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-53774-2
  67. 67
    Ulvestad, U.; Singer, A.; Clark, J. N.; Cho, H. M.; Kim, J. W.; Harder, R.; Maser, J.; Meng, Y. S.; Shpyrko, O. G. Topological Defect Dynamics in Operando Battery Nanoparticles. Science 2015, 348 (6241), 13441347,  DOI: 10.1126/science.aaa1313
  68. 68
    Abuin, M.; Kim, Y. Y.; Runge, H.; Kulkarni, S.; Maier, S.; Dzhigaev, D.; Lazarev, S.; Gelisio, L.; Seitz, C.; Richard, M.-I.; Zhou, T.; Vonk, V.; Keller, T. F.; Vartanyants, I. A.; Stierle, A. Coherent X-Ray Imaging of CO-Adsorption-Induced Structural Changes in Pt Nanoparticles: Implications for Catalysis. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2019, 2 (8), 48184824,  DOI: 10.1021/acsanm.9b00764
  69. 69
    Kim, D.; Chung, M.; Kim, S.; Yun, K.; Cha, W.; Harder, R.; Kim, H. Defect Dynamics at a Single Pt Nanoparticle during Catalytic Oxidation. Nano Lett. 2019, 19 (8), 50445052,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b01332
  70. 70
    Sun, Y.; Liang, Y.; Luo, M.; Lv, F.; Qin, Y.; Wang, L.; Xu, C.; Fu, E.; Guo, S. Defects and Interfaces on PtPb Nanoplates Boost Fuel Cell Electrocatalysis. Small 2018, 14 (3), 1702259,  DOI: 10.1002/smll.201702259
  71. 71
    Fichtner, J.; Watzele, S.; Garlyyev, B.; Kluge, R. M.; Haimerl, F.; El-Sayed, H. A.; Li, W. J.; Maillard, F. M.; Dubau, L.; Chattot, R.; Michalička, J.; MacAk, J. M.; Wang, W.; Wang, D.; Gigl, T.; Hugenschmidt, C.; Bandarenka, A. S. Tailoring the Oxygen Reduction Activity of Pt Nanoparticles through Surface Defects: A Simple Top-Down Approach. ACS Catal. 2020, 10 (5), 31313142,  DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.9b04974
  72. 72
    Dou, S.; Tao, L.; Wang, R.; El Hankari, S.; Chen, R.; Wang, S. Plasma-Assisted Synthesis and Surface Modification of Electrode Materials for Renewable Energy. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30 (21), 1705850,  DOI: 10.1002/adma.201705850
  73. 73
    Ruge, M.; Drnec, J.; Rahn, B.; Reikowski, F.; Harrington, D. A.; Carlà, F.; Felici, R.; Stettner, J.; Magnussen, O. M. Structural Reorganization of Pt(111) Electrodes by Electrochemical Oxidation and Reduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139 (12), 45324539,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b01039
  74. 74
    Jacobse, L.; Huang, Y. F.; Koper, M. T. M.; Rost, M. J. Correlation of Surface Site Formation to Nanoisland Growth in the Electrochemical Roughening of Pt(111). Nat. Mater. 2018, 17 (3), 277282,  DOI: 10.1038/s41563-017-0015-z
  75. 75
    Jacobse, L.; Rost, M. J.; Koper, M. T. M. Atomic-Scale Identification of the Electrochemical Roughening of Platinum. ACS Cent. Sci. 2019, 5 (12), 19201928,  DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.9b00782
  76. 76
    Livet, F.; Beutier, G.; De Boissieu, M.; Ravy, S.; Picca, F.; Le Bolloc’h, D.; Jacques, V. Coherent Scattering from Silicon Monocrystal Surface. Surf. Sci. 2011, 605, 390395,  DOI: 10.1016/j.susc.2010.11.006
  77. 77
    Nicolas, J. D.; Reusch, T.; Osterhoff, M.; Sprung, M.; Schülein, F. J. R.; Krenner, H. J.; Wixforth, A.; Salditt, T. Time-Resolved Coherent X-Ray Diffraction Imaging of Surface Acoustic Waves. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2014, 47 (5), 15961605,  DOI: 10.1107/S1600576714016896
  78. 78
    Kutsal, M.; Bernard, P.; Berruyer, G.; Cook, P. K.; Hino, R. The ESRF Dark-Field x-Ray Microscope at ID06. IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 580, 012007,  DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/580/1/012007
  79. 79
    Morgan, A. J.; Prasciolu, M.; Andrejczuk, A.; Krzywinski, J.; Meents, A.; Pennicard, D.; Graafsma, H.; Barty, A.; Bean, R. J.; Barthelmess, M.; Oberthuer, D.; Yefanov, O.; Aquila, A.; Chapman, H. N.; Bajt, S. High Numerical Aperture Multilayer Laue Lenses. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 9892,  DOI: 10.1038/srep09892
  80. 80
    Pfisterer, J. H. K.; Liang, Y.; Schneider, O.; Bandarenka, A. S. Direct Instrumental Identification of Catalytically Active Surface Sites. Nature 2017, 549 (7670), 7477,  DOI: 10.1038/nature23661
  81. 81
    Sumetskii, M.; Kornyshev, A. A.; Stimming, U. Adatom Diffusion Characteristics from STM Noise: Theory. Surf. Sci. 1994, 307–309, 2327,  DOI: 10.1016/0039-6028(94)90364-6
  82. 82
    Sumetskii, M.; Kornyshev, A. A. Noise in STM Due to Atoms Moving in the Tunneling Space. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 1993, 48 (23), 1749317506,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.48.17493
  83. 83
    Hugelmann, M.; Schindler, W. Tunnel Barrier Height Oscillations at the Solid/Liquid Interface. Surf. Sci. 2003, 541, L643L648,  DOI: 10.1016/S0039-6028(03)00923-3
  84. 84
    Liang, Y.; McLaughlin, D.; Csoklich, C.; Schneider, O.; Bandarenka, A. S. The Nature of Active Centers Catalyzing Oxygen Electro-Reduction at Platinum Surfaces in Alkaline Media. Energy Environ. Sci. 2019, 12 (1), 351357,  DOI: 10.1039/C8EE03228A
  85. 85
    Mitterreiter, E.; Liang, Y.; Golibrzuch, M.; McLaughlin, D.; Csoklich, C.; Bartl, J. D.; Holleitner, A.; Wurstbauer, U.; Bandarenka, A. S. In-Situ Visualization of Hydrogen Evolution Sites on Helium Ion Treated Molybdenum Dichalcogenides under Reaction Conditions. npj 2D Mater. Appl. 2019, 3, 25,  DOI: 10.1038/s41699-019-0107-5

Cited By

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article is cited by 27 publications.

  1. Michal Ronovsky, Lujin Pan, Malte Klingenhof, Isaac Martens, Lukas Fusek, Peter Kus, Raphael Chattot, Marta Mirolo, Fabio Dionigi, Harriet Burdett, Jonathan Sharman, Peter Strasser, Alex Martinez Bonastre, Jakub Drnec. Assessing Utilization Boundaries for Pt-Based Catalysts in an Operating Proton-Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell. ACS Applied Energy Materials 2023, 6 (17) , 8660-8665. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.3c01243
  2. Raphaël Chattot, Camille Roiron, Kavita Kumar, Vincent Martin, Carlos Augusto Campos Roldan, Marta Mirolo, Isaac Martens, Luis Castanheira, Arnaud Viola, Rémi Bacabe, Sara Cavaliere, Pierre-Yves Blanchard, Laetitia Dubau, Frédéric Maillard, Jakub Drnec. Break-In Bad: On the Conditioning of Fuel Cell Nanoalloy Catalysts. ACS Catalysis 2022, 12 (24) , 15675-15685. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.2c04495
  3. Chao Xie, Dafeng Yan, Hao Li, Shiqian Du, Wei Chen, Yanyong Wang, Yuqin Zou, Ru Chen, Shuangyin Wang. Defect Chemistry in Heterogeneous Catalysis: Recognition, Understanding, and Utilization. ACS Catalysis 2020, 10 (19) , 11082-11098. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.0c03034
  4. Pingfan Zhang, Shihuan Hong, Ning Song, Zhonghui Han, Fei Ge, Gang Dai, Hongjun Dong, Chunmei Li. Alloy as advanced catalysts for electrocatalysis: From materials design to applications. Chinese Chemical Letters 2023, 3 , 109073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2023.109073
  5. Chao-Peng Wang, Hao Sun, Gang Bian, Jia-Xi Wang, Xixi Pang, Guoqi Wang, Jian Zhu, Xian-He Bu. Electrostatically connected nanoarchitected electrocatalytic films for boosted water splitting. Nano Research 2023, 355 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-023-5917-2
  6. A.R. Kamšek, A. Meden, I. Arčon, P. Jovanovič, M. Šala, F. Ruiz-Zepeda, G. Dražić, M. Gaberšček, M. Bele, N. Hodnik. Periodic anti-phase boundaries and crystal superstructures in PtCu3 nanoparticles as fuel cell electrocatalysts. Materials Today Nano 2023, 23 , 100377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtnano.2023.100377
  7. J. Wang, X. Zhao, G. Zou, L. Zhang, S. Han, Y. Li, D. Liu, C. Fernandez, L. Li, L. Ren, Q. Peng. Crystal-defect engineering of electrode materials for energy storage and conversion. Materials Today Nano 2023, 22 , 100336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtnano.2023.100336
  8. Xianyou Luo, Heng Zheng, Wende Lai, Ping Yuan, Shengwei Li, De Li, Yong Chen. Defect Engineering of Carbons for Energy Conversion and Storage Applications. ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL MATERIALS 2023, 6 (3) https://doi.org/10.1002/eem2.12402
  9. Dantong Zhang, Qi Zhang, Chao Peng, Zhi Long, Guilin Zhuang, Denis Kramer, Sridhar Komarneni, Chunyi Zhi, Dongfeng Xue. Recent advances in developing multiscale descriptor approach for the design of oxygen redox electrocatalysts. iScience 2023, 26 (5) , 106624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.106624
  10. Gracita M. Tomboc, Sandhya Venkateshalu, Quang-Tung Ngo, Songa Choi, Bruno G. Pollet, Hangil Lee, Kwangyeol Lee. Defect-induced electronic modification and surface reconstruction of catalysts during water oxidation process. Chemical Engineering Journal 2023, 454 , 140254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.140254
  11. William Judge, Henry Chan, Subramanian Sankaranarayanan, Ross J. Harder, Jordi Cabana, Mathew J. Cherukara. Defect identification in simulated Bragg coherent diffraction imaging by automated AI. MRS Bulletin 2023, 48 (2) , 124-133. https://doi.org/10.1557/s43577-022-00342-1
  12. Tina Đukić, Luka Pavko, Primož Jovanovič, Nik Maselj, Matija Gatalo, Nejc Hodnik. Stability challenges of carbon-supported Pt-nanoalloys as fuel cell oxygen reduction reaction electrocatalysts. Chemical Communications 2022, 58 (100) , 13832-13854. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2CC05377B
  13. Bo Liu, Siming Yan, Yi He, Teng He, Xiangying Yin, Ruxia Song, Zhifei Zhang, Hongjie Li, Li Chen. Flower-like superhydrophilic and superaerophobic B-doped NiMoO4@NF as self-supported electrode for highly efficient hydrogen evolution. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 2022, 653 , 129972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.129972
  14. Rahul Majee, Sahanaz Parvin, Quazi Arif Islam, Ashwani Kumar, Bharati Debnath, Surajit Mondal, Subhajit Bhattacharjee, Satarupa Das, Arun Kumar, Sayan Bhattacharyya. The Perfect Imperfections in Electrocatalysts. The Chemical Record 2022, 22 (9) https://doi.org/10.1002/tcr.202200070
  15. Prajwal Adiga, William Nunn, Cindy Wong, Anusha K. Manjeshwar, Sreejith Nair, Bharat Jalan, Kelsey A. Stoerzinger. Breaking OER and CER scaling relations via strain and its relaxation in RuO2 (101). Materials Today Energy 2022, 28 , 101087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtener.2022.101087
  16. Yi Luo, Junzong Feng, Lukai Wang, Yonggang Jiang, Liangjun Li, Jian Feng. Highly stable nanocarbon supported Pt catalyst for fuel cell via a molten salt graphitization strategy. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47 (47) , 20494-20506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.04.162
  17. Tomáš Hrbek, Peter Kúš, Tereza Košutová, Kateřina Veltruská, Thu Ngan Dinhová, Milan Dopita, Vladimír Matolín, Iva Matolínová. Sputtered Ir–Ru based catalysts for oxygen evolution reaction: Study of iridium effect on stability. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47 (49) , 21033-21043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.04.224
  18. Tadele Hunde Wondimu, Anteneh Wodaje Bayeh, Daniel Manaye Kabtamu, Qian Xu, Puiki Leung, Akeel Abbas Shah. Recent progress on tungsten oxide-based materials for the hydrogen and oxygen evolution reactions. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47 (47) , 20378-20397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.04.226
  19. Jianhao Lu, Zilong Wang, Yang Guo, Zhaoqing Jin, Gaoping Cao, Jingyi Qiu, Fang Lian, Anbang Wang, Weikun Wang. Ultrathin nanosheets of FeOOH with oxygen vacancies as efficient polysulfide electrocatalyst for advanced lithium–sulfur batteries. Energy Storage Materials 2022, 47 , 561-568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2022.02.008
  20. Abdul Kader Mohiuddin, Mohammad Shamsuddin Ahmed, Seungwon Jeon. Palladium doped α-MnO2 nanorods on graphene as an electrochemical sensor for simultaneous determination of dopamine and paracetamol. Applied Surface Science 2022, 578 , 152090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.152090
  21. Shilong Jiao, Xianwei Fu, Hongwen Huang. Descriptors for the Evaluation of Electrocatalytic Reactions: d‐Band Theory and Beyond. Advanced Functional Materials 2022, 32 (4) https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202107651
  22. Yi Luo, Junzong Feng, Lukai Wang, Yonggang Jiang, Liangjun Li, Jian Feng. Highly Stable Nanocarbon Supported Pt Catalyst for Fuel Cell Via a Molten Salt Graphitization Strategy. SSRN Electronic Journal 2022, 164 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4006217
  23. Yi Luo, Junzong Feng, Lukai Wang, Yonggang Jiang, Liangjun Li, Jian Feng. Highly Stable Nanocarbon Supported Pt Catalyst for Fuel Cell Via a Molten Salt Graphitization Strategy. SSRN Electronic Journal 2022, 164 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4006218
  24. Yingge Zhang, Yihe Zhang, Hanfang Zhang, Liqi Bai, Lin Hao, Tianyi Ma, Hongwei Huang. Defect engineering in metal sulfides for energy conversion and storage. Coordination Chemistry Reviews 2021, 448 , 214147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2021.214147
  25. Menglong Liu, Ying Kong, Huifang Hu, Noémi Kovács, Changzhe Sun, Iván Zelocualtecatl Montiel, María de Jesús Gálvez Vázquez, Yuhui Hou, Marta Mirolo, Isaac Martens, Jakub Drnec, Soma Vesztergom, Peter Broekmann. The capping agent is the key: Structural alterations of Ag NPs during CO2 electrolysis probed in a zero-gap gas-flow configuration. Journal of Catalysis 2021, 404 , 371-382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2021.10.016
  26. Jiashi Wang, Yanzhen Liu, Na Li, Fangfang Qin, Feifei Xu, Wen Shi, Huiyu Li, Wenzhong Shen. Petal-like N, O-codoped carbon nanosheets as Mott–Schottky nanoreactors in electrodes of Zn-Air batteries and supercapacitors. Carbon 2021, 178 , 581-593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2021.03.015
  27. Leonard Jean Moriau, Armin Hrnjić, Andraž Pavlišič, Ana Rebeka Kamšek, Urša Petek, Francisco Ruiz-Zepeda, Martin Šala, Luka Pavko, Vid Simon Šelih, Marjan Bele, Primož Jovanovič, Matija Gatalo, Nejc Hodnik. Resolving the nanoparticles' structure-property relationships at the atomic level: a study of Pt-based electrocatalysts. iScience 2021, 24 (2) , 102102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2021.102102
  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Defect engineering approach. Schematic representation principle of the narrow vs near-continuous broad distributions of catalytic sites configurations and electrocatalytic performance for (a) ordered, model vs (b) defective Pt(111) surfaces.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) patterns’ broadening and sources of microstrain in PtM nanoparticles (M being an early or late transition metal element). (a) Typical experimental PXRD patterns measured at the high-energy ID31 beamline of the European Synchrotron Radiation facility on structurally disordered and structurally ordered catalysts (here hollow PtNi/C and cube Pt/C nanoparticles, respectively) plotted as a function of the momentum transfer Q. (b) Possible sources of microstrain in PtM nanocatalysts (grain boundaries, inhomogeneous alloying, or (electro)chemical surface dealloying). The inset in (a) shows the influence of macrostrain, instrumental contribution, and microstrain on the position and the broadening of the PXRD reflections. Adapted from ref (13). Copyright 2018 Springer Nature.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Using the SD descriptor to unveil the “operating mode” of a variety of ORR nanocatalysts. (a–j) TEM images of the various nanostructures investigated. The insets show higher magnification TEM or STEM/X-EDS elemental maps. (k) ORR activity measured at 0.95 V vs. RHE plotted as a function of the SD descriptor. The activity–SD plot quantitatively confirms that high ORR activity can be reached through the two approaches presented in Figure 1. Panels (a–j) are reprinted with permission from ref (26). Copyright 2020 American Chemical Society. Panel (k) is adapted with permission from ref (13). Copyright 2018 Springer Nature.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. Probing catalytic sites diversity and oxophilicity. (a) Background-subtracted COads stripping voltammograms recorded on Pt and PtNi nanomaterials featuring increasing SD values and their associated average potential μ1CO (dashed lines), (b) SD plotted as a function of the COOR activity (μ1CO) for a wide range of PtNi materials with different shape, size, or Ni content. (c) Background-subtracted Hads desorption curves (so-called-HUPD region) of materials featuring increasing SD values pointing an extra electrochemical process at high potential ascribed to *H displacement by *OH on extremely oxophilic sites and (d) SD plotted as a function of the ratio QCO/2QH for a wide range of PtNi materials with different shape, size, or Ni content. In (b), the numbers displayed close to the experimental points are the SD values associated to these catalysts. In both (a) and (c), the curves are normalized by the Pt surface area measured by COads stripping. Panel (d) is adapted with permission from ref (26). Copyright 2020 American Chemical Society.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. Determining the nature and structure of the catalytically active sites. (a) 3D atomic displacements measured in a FePt nanoparticle using GENFIRE algorithm from AC-STEM images; (b) Atomic resolution STEM images, with atomic displacement and strain maps within two crystallographic planes, as indicated in the Pt nanoparticle; (c) APT data showing the atom map from a Ag@Pd nanoparticle; (d) Sketch of the BCDI setup, 2D slice of the strain field through the center of a reconstructed Pt nanoparticle under Ar/CO flow and associated probability density of the strain field; (e) Scheme explaining the concept of using EC-STM noise analysis to reveal the catalytic sites under reaction conditions. Panel (a) is adapted with permission from ref (22). Copyright 2017 Springer Nature. Panel (b) is adapted with permission from ref (21). Copyright 2018 Springer Nature. Panel (c) is adapted with permission from ref (63). Copyright 2011 Springer Nature. Panel (d) is adapted with permission from ref (68). Copyright 2019 American Chemical Society. Panel (e) is adapted with permission from ref (80). Copyright 2017 Springer Nature.

  • References

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    This article references 85 other publications.

    1. 1
      Li, W.; Wang, D.; Zhang, Y.; Tao, L.; Wang, T.; Zou, Y.; Wang, Y.; Chen, R.; Wang, S. Defect Engineering for Fuel-Cell Electrocatalysts. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 1907879,  DOI: 10.1002/adma.201907879
    2. 2
      Nørskov, J. K.; Bligaard, T.; Rossmeisl, J.; Christensen, C. H. Towards the Computational Design of Solid Catalysts. Nat. Chem. 2009, 1 (1), 3746,  DOI: 10.1038/nchem.121
    3. 3
      Zhao, Z.; Liu, S.; Zha, S.; Cheng, D.; Studt, F.; Henkelman, G.; Gong, J. Theory-Guided Design of Catalytic Materials Using Scaling Relationships and Reactivity Descriptors. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2019, 4, 792804,  DOI: 10.1038/s41578-019-0152-x
    4. 4
      Nørskov, J. K.; Rossmeisl, J.; Logadottir, A.; Lindqvist, L.; Kitchin, J. R.; Bligaard, T.; Jónsson, H. Origin of the Overpotential for Oxygen Reduction at a Fuel-Cell Cathode. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108 (46), 1788617892,  DOI: 10.1021/jp047349j
    5. 5
      Hammer, B.; Norskov, J. K. Why Gold Is the Noblest of All the Metals. Nature 1995, 376, 238240,  DOI: 10.1038/376238a0
    6. 6
      Hammer, B.; Nørskov, J. K. Electronic Factors Determining the Reactivity of Metal Surfaces. Surf. Sci. 1995, 343 (3), 211220,  DOI: 10.1016/0039-6028(96)80007-0
    7. 7
      Batchelor, T. A. A.; Pedersen, J. K.; Winther, S. H.; Castelli, I. E.; Jacobsen, K. W.; Rossmeisl, J. High-Entropy Alloys as a Discovery Platform for Electrocatalysis. Joule 2019, 3 (3), 834845,  DOI: 10.1016/j.joule.2018.12.015
    8. 8
      Le Bacq, O.; Pasturel, A.; Chattot, R.; Previdello, B.; Nelayah, J.; Asset, T.; Dubau, L.; Maillard, F. Effect of Atomic Vacancies on the Structure and the Electrocatalytic Activity of Pt-Rich/C Nanoparticles: A Combined Experimental and Density Functional Theory Study. ChemCatChem 2017, 9 (12), 23242338,  DOI: 10.1002/cctc.201601672
    9. 9
      Calle-Vallejo, F.; Tymoczko, J.; Colic, V.; Vu, Q. H.; Pohl, M. D.; Morgenstern, K.; Loffreda, D.; Sautet, P.; Schuhmann, W.; Bandarenka, A. S. Finding Optimal Surface Sites on Heterogeneous Catalysts by Counting Nearest Neighbors. Science 2015, 350 (6527), 185189,  DOI: 10.1126/science.aab3501
    10. 10
      Ma, X.; Xin, H. Orbitalwise Coordination Number for Predicting Adsorption Properties of Metal Nanocatalysts. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017, 118 (3), 036101,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.036101
    11. 11
      Wu, D.; Dong, C.; Zhan, H.; Du, X. Bond-Energy-Integrated Descriptor for Oxygen Electrocatalysis of Transition Metal Oxides. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2018, 9, 33873391,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b01493
    12. 12
      Rietveld, H. M. A Profile Refinement Method for Nuclear and Magnetic Structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1969, 2 (2), 6571,  DOI: 10.1107/S0021889869006558
    13. 13
      Chattot, R.; Le Bacq, O.; Beermann, V.; Kühl, S.; Herranz, J.; Henning, S.; Kühn, L.; Asset, T.; Guétaz, L.; Renou, G.; Drnec, J.; Bordet, P.; Pasturel, A.; Eychmüller, A.; Schmidt, T. J.; Strasser, P.; Dubau, L.; Maillard, F. Surface Distortion as a Unifying Concept and Descriptor in Oxygen Reduction Reaction Electrocatalysis. Nat. Mater. 2018, 17 (9), 827833,  DOI: 10.1038/s41563-018-0133-2
    14. 14
      Billinge, S. J. L. The Rise of the X-Ray Atomic Pair Distribution Function Method: A Series of Fortunate Events. Philos. Trans. R. Soc., A 2019, 377 (2147), 20180413,  DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2018.0413
    15. 15
      Thompson, P.; Cox, D. E.; Hastings, J. B. Rietveld Refinement of Debye-Scherrer Synchrotron X-Ray Data from Al2O3. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1987, 20 (2), 7983,  DOI: 10.1107/S0021889887087090
    16. 16
      Harada, M.; Ikegami, R.; Kumara, L. S. R.; Kohara, S.; Sakata, O. Reverse Monte Carlo Modeling for Local Structures of Noble Metal Nanoparticles Using High-Energy XRD and EXAFS. RSC Adv. 2019, 9 (51), 2951129521,  DOI: 10.1039/C9RA06519A
    17. 17
      Chattot, R.; Asset, T.; Bordet, P.; Drnec, J.; Dubau, L.; Maillard, F. Beyond Strain and Ligand Effects: Microstrain-Induced Enhancement of the Oxygen Reduction Reaction Kinetics on Various PtNi/C Nanostructures. ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 398408,  DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.6b02356
    18. 18
      Sneed, B. T.; Young, A. P.; Tsung, C. K. Building up Strain in Colloidal Metal Nanoparticle Catalysts. Nanoscale 2015, 7 (29), 1224812265,  DOI: 10.1039/C5NR02529J
    19. 19
      Gan, L.; Yu, R.; Luo, J.; Cheng, Z.; Zhu, J. Lattice Strain Distributions in Individual Dealloyed Pt-Fe Catalyst Nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2012, 3 (7), 934938,  DOI: 10.1021/jz300192b
    20. 20
      Suzana, A. F.; Rochet, A.; Passos, A. R.; Castro Zerba, J. P.; Polo, C. C.; Santilli, C. V.; Pulcinelli, S. H.; Berenguer, F.; Harder, R.; Maxey, E.; Meneau, F. In Situ Three-Dimensional Imaging of Strain in Gold Nanocrystals during Catalytic Oxidation. Nanoscale Adv. 2019, 1 (8), 30093014,  DOI: 10.1039/C9NA00231F
    21. 21
      Nilsson Pingel, T.; Jørgensen, M.; Yankovich, A. B.; Grönbeck, H.; Olsson, E. Influence of Atomic Site-Specific Strain on Catalytic Activity of Supported Nanoparticles. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 2722,  DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-05055-1
    22. 22
      Yang, Y.; Chen, C. C.; Scott, M. C.; Ophus, C.; Xu, R.; Pryor, A.; Wu, L.; Sun, F.; Theis, W.; Zhou, J.; Eisenbach, M.; Kent, P. R. C.; Sabirianov, R. F.; Zeng, H.; Ercius, P.; Miao, J. Deciphering Chemical Order/Disorder and Material Properties at the Single-Atom Level. Nature 2017, 542 (7639), 7579,  DOI: 10.1038/nature21042
    23. 23
      Ruiz-Zepeda, F.; Gatalo, M.; Pavlišič, A.; Dražić, G.; Jovanovič, P.; Bele, M.; Gaberšček, M.; Hodnik, N. Atomically Resolved Anisotropic Electrochemical Shaping of Nano-Electrocatalyst. Nano Lett. 2019, 19 (8), 49194927,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b00918
    24. 24
      Stukowski, A.; Markmann, J.; Weissmüller, J.; Albe, K. Atomistic Origin of Microstrain Broadening in Diffraction Data of Nanocrystalline Solids. Acta Mater. 2009, 57 (5), 16481654,  DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2008.12.011
    25. 25
      Montejano-Carrizales, J. M.; Morán-López, J. L. Geometrical Characteristics of Compact Nanoclusters. Nanostruct. Mater. 1992, 1 (5), 397409,  DOI: 10.1016/0965-9773(92)90090-K
    26. 26
      Chattot, R.; Martens, I.; Scohy, M.; Herranz, J.; Drnec, J.; Maillard, F.; Dubau, L. Disclosing Pt-Bimetallic Alloy Nanoparticle Surface Lattice Distortion with Electrochemical Probes. ACS Energy Lett. 2020, 5 (1), 162169,  DOI: 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b02287
    27. 27
      Henning, S.; Kühn, L.; Herranz, J.; Durst, J.; Binninger, T.; Nachtegaal, M.; Werheid, M.; Liu, W.; Adam, M.; Kaskel, S.; Eychmüller, A.; Schmidt, T. J. Pt-Ni Aerogels as Unsupported Electrocatalysts for the Oxygen Reduction Reaction. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2016, 163 (9), F998F1003,  DOI: 10.1149/2.0251609jes
    28. 28
      Henning, S.; Herranz, J.; Ishikawa, H.; Kim, B. J.; Abbott, D.; Kühn, L.; Eychmüller, A.; Schmidt, T. J. Durability of Unsupported Pt-Ni Aerogels in PEFC Cathodes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2017, 164 (12), F1136F1141,  DOI: 10.1149/2.0131712jes
    29. 29
      Henning, S.; Ishikawa, H.; Kühn, L.; Herranz, J.; Müller, E.; Eychmüller, A.; Schmidt, T. J. Unsupported Pt-Ni Aerogels with Enhanced High Current Performance and Durability in Fuel Cell Cathodes. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017, 56 (36), 1070710710,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201704253
    30. 30
      Li, M.; Zhao, Z.; Cheng, T.; Fortunelli, A.; Chen, C. Y.; Yu, R.; Zhang, Q.; Gu, L.; Merinov, B. V.; Lin, Z.; Zhu, E.; Yu, T.; Jia, Q.; Guo, J.; Zhang, L.; Goddard, W. A.; Huang, Y.; Duan, X. Ultrafine Jagged Platinum Nanowires Enable Ultrahigh Mass Activity for the Oxygen Reduction Reaction. Science 2016, 354 (6318), 14141419,  DOI: 10.1126/science.aaf9050
    31. 31
      Alia, S. M.; Ngo, C.; Shulda, S.; Ha, M. A.; Dameron, A. A.; Weker, J. N.; Neyerlin, K. C.; Kocha, S. S.; Pylypenko, S.; Pivovar, B. S. Exceptional Oxygen Reduction Reaction Activity and Durability of Platinum-Nickel Nanowires through Synthesis and Post-Treatment Optimization. ACS Omega 2017, 2 (4), 14081418,  DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.7b00054
    32. 32
      Van Der Vliet, D. F.; Wang, C.; Tripkovic, D.; Strmcnik, D.; Zhang, X. F.; Debe, M. K.; Atanasoski, R. T.; Markovic, N. M.; Stamenkovic, V. R. Mesostructured Thin Films as Electrocatalysts with Tunable Composition and Surface Morphology. Nat. Mater. 2012, 11 (12), 10511058,  DOI: 10.1038/nmat3457
    33. 33
      Bae, S. J.; Yoo, S. J.; Lim, Y.; Kim, S.; Lim, Y.; Choi, J.; Nahm, K. S.; Hwang, S. J.; Lim, T. H.; Kim, S. K.; Kim, P. Facile Preparation of Carbon-Supported PtNi Hollow Nanoparticles with High Electrochemical Performance. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22 (18), 88208825,  DOI: 10.1039/c2jm16827h
    34. 34
      Snyder, J.; Fujita, T.; Chen, M. W.; Erlebacher, J. Oxygen Reduction in Nanoporous Metal-Ionic Liquid Composite Electrocatalysts. Nat. Mater. 2010, 9 (11), 904907,  DOI: 10.1038/nmat2878
    35. 35
      Luo, M.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, X.; Qin, Y.; Li, M.; Li, Y.; Li, C.; Yang, Y.; Wang, L.; Gao, P.; Lu, G.; Guo, S. Stable High-Index Faceted Pt Skin on Zigzag-Like PtFe Nanowires Enhances Oxygen Reduction Catalysis. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30 (10), 1705515,  DOI: 10.1002/adma.201705515
    36. 36
      Dubau, L.; Nelayah, J.; Moldovan, S.; Ersen, O.; Bordet, P.; Drnec, J.; Asset, T.; Chattot, R.; Maillard, F. Defects Do Catalysis: CO Monolayer Oxidation and Oxygen Reduction Reaction on Hollow PtNi/C Nanoparticles. ACS Catal. 2016, 6 (7), 46734684,  DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.6b01106
    37. 37
      Alia, S. M.; Pylypenko, S.; Neyerlin, K. C.; Kocha, S. S.; Pivovar, B. S. Nickel Nanowire Oxidation and Its Effect on Platinum Galvanic Displacement and Methanol Oxidation. ECS Trans. 2014, 64 (3), 8995,  DOI: 10.1149/06403.0089ecst
    38. 38
      Xiong, Z.; Li, S.; Xu, H.; Zhang, K.; Yan, B.; Du, Y. Newly Designed Ternary Metallic PtPdBi Hollow Catalyst with High Performance for Methanol and Ethanol Oxidation. Catalysts 2017, 7, 208,  DOI: 10.3390/catal7070208
    39. 39
      Mao, J.; Chen, W.; He, D.; Wan, J.; Pei, J.; Dong, J.; Wang, Y.; An, P.; Jin, Z.; Xing, W.; Tang, H.; Zhuang, Z.; Liang, X.; Huang, Y.; Zhou, G.; Wang, L.; Wang, D.; Li, Y. Design of Ultrathin Pt-Mo-Ni Nanowire Catalysts for Ethanol Electrooxidation. Sci. Adv. 2017, 3, e1603068  DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1603068
    40. 40
      Zhao, S.; Li, M.; Han, M.; Xu, D.; Yang, J.; Lin, Y.; Shi, N. E.; Lu, Y.; Yang, R.; Liu, B.; Dai, Z.; Bao, J. Defect-Rich Ni3FeN Nanocrystals Anchored on N-Doped Graphene for Enhanced Electrocatalytic Oxygen Evolution. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28 (18), 1706018,  DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201706018
    41. 41
      Wang, P.; Jiang, K.; Wang, G.; Yao, J.; Huang, X. Phase and Interface Engineering of Platinum-Nickel Nanowires for Efficient Electrochemical Hydrogen Evolution. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55 (41), 1285912863,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201606290
    42. 42
      Dickens, C. F.; Nørskov, J. K. A Theoretical Investigation into the Role of Surface Defects for Oxygen Evolution on RuO2. J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121 (34), 1851618524,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b03481
    43. 43
      Shi, Q.; Zhu, C.; Zhong, H.; Su, D.; Li, N.; Engelhard, M. H.; Xia, H.; Zhang, Q.; Feng, S.; Beckman, S. P.; Du, D.; Lin, Y. Nanovoid Incorporated IrxCu Metallic Aerogels for Oxygen Evolution Reaction Catalysis. ACS Energy Lett. 2018, 3 (9), 20382044,  DOI: 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b01338
    44. 44
      Calle-Vallejo, F.; Pohl, M. D.; Bandarenka, A. S. Quantitative Coordination-Activity Relations for the Design of Enhanced Pt Catalysts for CO Electro-Oxidation. ACS Catal. 2017, 7 (7), 43554359,  DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.7b01105
    45. 45
      Maillard, F.; Eikerling, M.; Cherstiouk, O. V; Schreier, S.; Savinova, E.; Stimming, U. Size Effects on Reactivity of Pt Nanoparticles in CO Monolayer Oxidation: The Role of Surface Mobility. Faraday Discuss. 2004, 125, 357377,  DOI: 10.1039/b303911k
    46. 46
      Van Der Vliet, D. F.; Wang, C.; Li, D.; Paulikas, A. P.; Greeley, J.; Rankin, R. B.; Strmcnik, D.; Tripkovic, D.; Markovic, N. M.; Stamenkovic, V. R. Unique Electrochemical Adsorption Properties of Pt-Skin Surfaces. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51 (13), 31393142,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201107668
    47. 47
      Marichev, V. A. Reversibility of Platinum Voltammograms in Aqueous Electrolytes and Ionic Product of Water. Electrochim. Acta 2008, 53 (27), 79527960,  DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2008.05.076
    48. 48
      Van Der Niet, M. J. T. C.; Garcia-Araez, N.; Hernández, J.; Feliu, J. M.; Koper, M. T. M. Water Dissociation on Well-Defined Platinum Surfaces: The Electrochemical Perspective. Catal. Today 2013, 202, 105113,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2012.04.059
    49. 49
      Janik, M. J.; McCrum, I. T.; Koper, M. T. M. On the Presence of Surface Bound Hydroxyl Species on Polycrystalline Pt Electrodes in the “Hydrogen Potential Region” (0 to 0.4 V-RHE). J. Catal. 2018, 367, 332337,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2018.09.031
    50. 50
      Tanaka, H.; Sugawara, S.; Shinohara, K.; Ueno, T.; Suzuki, S.; Hoshi, N.; Nakamura, M. Infrared Reflection Absorption Spectroscopy of OH Adsorption on the Low Index Planes of Pt. Electrocatalysis 2015, 6 (3), 295299,  DOI: 10.1007/s12678-014-0245-7
    51. 51
      Garcia-Araez, N.; Climent, V.; Feliu, J. M. Analysis of Temperature Effects on Hydrogen and OH Adsorption on Pt(111), Pt(100) and Pt(110) by Means of Gibbs Thermodynamics. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2010, 649 (1–2), 6982,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2010.01.024
    52. 52
      Zhang, C.; Firestein, K. L.; Fernando, J. F. S.; Siriwardena, D.; von Treifeldt, J. E.; Golberg, D. Recent Progress of In Situ Transmission Electron Microscopy for Energy Materials. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32 (18), 1904094,  DOI: 10.1002/adma.201904094
    53. 53
      Daio, T.; Staykov, A.; Guo, L.; Liu, J.; Tanaka, M.; Matthew Lyth, S.; Sasaki, K. Lattice Strain Mapping of Platinum Nanoparticles on Carbon and SnO2 Supports. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 13126,  DOI: 10.1038/srep13126
    54. 54
      Wang, Y.; Zhang, W. Mapping the Strain Distribution within Embedded Nanoparticles via Geometrical Phase Analysis. Micron 2019, 125, 102715,  DOI: 10.1016/j.micron.2019.102715
    55. 55
      Ahmad, N.; Le Bouar, Y.; Ricolleau, C.; Alloyeau, D. Growth of Dendritic Nanostructures by Liquid-Cell Transmission Electron Microscopy: A Reflection of the Electron-Irradiation History. Adv. Struct. Chem. Imaging 2016, 2, 9,  DOI: 10.1186/s40679-016-0023-0
    56. 56
      Kelly, T. F.; Miller, M. K. Atom Probe Tomography. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2007, 78, 031101,  DOI: 10.1063/1.2709758
    57. 57
      Gault, B.; Breen, A. J.; Chang, Y.; He, J.; Jägle, E. A.; Kontis, P.; Kürnsteiner, P.; Kwiatkowski Da Silva, A.; Makineni, S. K.; Mouton, I.; Peng, Z.; Ponge, D.; Schwarz, T.; Stephenson, L. T.; Szczepaniak, A.; Zhao, H.; Raabe, D. Interfaces and Defect Composition at the Near-Atomic Scale through Atom Probe Tomography Investigations. J. Mater. Res. 2018, 33 (23), 40184030,  DOI: 10.1557/jmr.2018.375
    58. 58
      Li, T.; Bagot, P. A. J.; Marquis, E. A.; Tsang, S. C. E.; Smith, G. D. W. Characterization of Oxidation and Reduction of Pt-Ru and Pt-Rh-Ru Alloys by Atom Probe Tomography and Comparison with Pt-Rh. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116 (33), 1763317640,  DOI: 10.1021/jp304359m
    59. 59
      Li, T.; Kasian, O.; Cherevko, S.; Zhang, S.; Geiger, S.; Scheu, C.; Felfer, P.; Raabe, D.; Gault, B.; Mayrhofer, K. J. J. Atomic-Scale Insights into Surface Species of Electrocatalysts in Three Dimensions. Nat. Catal. 2018, 1 (4), 300305,  DOI: 10.1038/s41929-018-0043-3
    60. 60
      Wilde, P.; Dieckhöfer, S.; Quast, T.; Xiang, W.; Bhatt, A.; Chen, Y. T.; Seisel, S.; Barwe, S.; Andronescu, C.; Li, T.; Schuhmann, W.; Masa, J. Insights into the Formation, Chemical Stability, and Activity of Transient NiyP@NiOx Core-Shell Heterostructures for the Oxygen Evolution Reaction. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2020, 3 (3), 23042309,  DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.9b02481
    61. 61
      Barroo, C.; Akey, A. J.; Bell, D. C. Atom Probe Tomography for Catalysis Applications: A Review. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9 (13), 2721,  DOI: 10.3390/app9132721
    62. 62
      Pfeiffer, B.; Erichsen, T.; Epler, E.; Volkert, C. A.; Trompenaars, P.; Nowak, C. Characterization of Nanoporous Materials with Atom Probe Tomography. Microsc. Microanal. 2015, 21 (3), 557563,  DOI: 10.1017/S1431927615000501
    63. 63
      Tedsree, K.; Li, T.; Jones, S.; Chan, C. W. A.; Yu, K. M. K.; Bagot, P. A. J.; Marquis, E. A.; Smith, G. D. W.; Tsang, S. C. E. Hydrogen Production from Formic Acid Decomposition at Room Temperature Using a Ag-Pd Core-Shell Nanocatalyst. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2011, 6 (5), 302307,  DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2011.42
    64. 64
      Abbey, B. From Grain Boundaries to Single Defects: A Review of Coherent Methods for Materials Imaging in the X-Ray Sciences. JOM 2013, 65 (9), 11831201,  DOI: 10.1007/s11837-013-0702-4
    65. 65
      Ulvestad, A.; Tripathi, A.; Hruszkewycz, S. O.; Cha, W.; Wild, S. M.; Stephenson, G. B.; Fuoss, P. H. Coherent Diffractive Imaging of Time-Evolving Samples with Improved Temporal Resolution. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2016, 93 (18), 184105,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.184105
    66. 66
      Carnis, J.; Gao, L.; Labat, S.; Kim, Y. Y.; Hofmann, J. P.; Leake, S. J.; Schülli, T. U.; Hensen, E. J. M.; Thomas, O.; Richard, M.-I. Towards a Quantitative Determination of Strain in Bragg Coherent X-Ray Diffraction Imaging: Artefacts and Sign Convention in Reconstructions. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 17357,  DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-53774-2
    67. 67
      Ulvestad, U.; Singer, A.; Clark, J. N.; Cho, H. M.; Kim, J. W.; Harder, R.; Maser, J.; Meng, Y. S.; Shpyrko, O. G. Topological Defect Dynamics in Operando Battery Nanoparticles. Science 2015, 348 (6241), 13441347,  DOI: 10.1126/science.aaa1313
    68. 68
      Abuin, M.; Kim, Y. Y.; Runge, H.; Kulkarni, S.; Maier, S.; Dzhigaev, D.; Lazarev, S.; Gelisio, L.; Seitz, C.; Richard, M.-I.; Zhou, T.; Vonk, V.; Keller, T. F.; Vartanyants, I. A.; Stierle, A. Coherent X-Ray Imaging of CO-Adsorption-Induced Structural Changes in Pt Nanoparticles: Implications for Catalysis. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2019, 2 (8), 48184824,  DOI: 10.1021/acsanm.9b00764
    69. 69
      Kim, D.; Chung, M.; Kim, S.; Yun, K.; Cha, W.; Harder, R.; Kim, H. Defect Dynamics at a Single Pt Nanoparticle during Catalytic Oxidation. Nano Lett. 2019, 19 (8), 50445052,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b01332
    70. 70
      Sun, Y.; Liang, Y.; Luo, M.; Lv, F.; Qin, Y.; Wang, L.; Xu, C.; Fu, E.; Guo, S. Defects and Interfaces on PtPb Nanoplates Boost Fuel Cell Electrocatalysis. Small 2018, 14 (3), 1702259,  DOI: 10.1002/smll.201702259
    71. 71
      Fichtner, J.; Watzele, S.; Garlyyev, B.; Kluge, R. M.; Haimerl, F.; El-Sayed, H. A.; Li, W. J.; Maillard, F. M.; Dubau, L.; Chattot, R.; Michalička, J.; MacAk, J. M.; Wang, W.; Wang, D.; Gigl, T.; Hugenschmidt, C.; Bandarenka, A. S. Tailoring the Oxygen Reduction Activity of Pt Nanoparticles through Surface Defects: A Simple Top-Down Approach. ACS Catal. 2020, 10 (5), 31313142,  DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.9b04974
    72. 72
      Dou, S.; Tao, L.; Wang, R.; El Hankari, S.; Chen, R.; Wang, S. Plasma-Assisted Synthesis and Surface Modification of Electrode Materials for Renewable Energy. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30 (21), 1705850,  DOI: 10.1002/adma.201705850
    73. 73
      Ruge, M.; Drnec, J.; Rahn, B.; Reikowski, F.; Harrington, D. A.; Carlà, F.; Felici, R.; Stettner, J.; Magnussen, O. M. Structural Reorganization of Pt(111) Electrodes by Electrochemical Oxidation and Reduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139 (12), 45324539,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b01039
    74. 74
      Jacobse, L.; Huang, Y. F.; Koper, M. T. M.; Rost, M. J. Correlation of Surface Site Formation to Nanoisland Growth in the Electrochemical Roughening of Pt(111). Nat. Mater. 2018, 17 (3), 277282,  DOI: 10.1038/s41563-017-0015-z
    75. 75
      Jacobse, L.; Rost, M. J.; Koper, M. T. M. Atomic-Scale Identification of the Electrochemical Roughening of Platinum. ACS Cent. Sci. 2019, 5 (12), 19201928,  DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.9b00782
    76. 76
      Livet, F.; Beutier, G.; De Boissieu, M.; Ravy, S.; Picca, F.; Le Bolloc’h, D.; Jacques, V. Coherent Scattering from Silicon Monocrystal Surface. Surf. Sci. 2011, 605, 390395,  DOI: 10.1016/j.susc.2010.11.006
    77. 77
      Nicolas, J. D.; Reusch, T.; Osterhoff, M.; Sprung, M.; Schülein, F. J. R.; Krenner, H. J.; Wixforth, A.; Salditt, T. Time-Resolved Coherent X-Ray Diffraction Imaging of Surface Acoustic Waves. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2014, 47 (5), 15961605,  DOI: 10.1107/S1600576714016896
    78. 78
      Kutsal, M.; Bernard, P.; Berruyer, G.; Cook, P. K.; Hino, R. The ESRF Dark-Field x-Ray Microscope at ID06. IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 580, 012007,  DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/580/1/012007
    79. 79
      Morgan, A. J.; Prasciolu, M.; Andrejczuk, A.; Krzywinski, J.; Meents, A.; Pennicard, D.; Graafsma, H.; Barty, A.; Bean, R. J.; Barthelmess, M.; Oberthuer, D.; Yefanov, O.; Aquila, A.; Chapman, H. N.; Bajt, S. High Numerical Aperture Multilayer Laue Lenses. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 9892,  DOI: 10.1038/srep09892
    80. 80
      Pfisterer, J. H. K.; Liang, Y.; Schneider, O.; Bandarenka, A. S. Direct Instrumental Identification of Catalytically Active Surface Sites. Nature 2017, 549 (7670), 7477,  DOI: 10.1038/nature23661
    81. 81
      Sumetskii, M.; Kornyshev, A. A.; Stimming, U. Adatom Diffusion Characteristics from STM Noise: Theory. Surf. Sci. 1994, 307–309, 2327,  DOI: 10.1016/0039-6028(94)90364-6
    82. 82
      Sumetskii, M.; Kornyshev, A. A. Noise in STM Due to Atoms Moving in the Tunneling Space. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 1993, 48 (23), 1749317506,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.48.17493
    83. 83
      Hugelmann, M.; Schindler, W. Tunnel Barrier Height Oscillations at the Solid/Liquid Interface. Surf. Sci. 2003, 541, L643L648,  DOI: 10.1016/S0039-6028(03)00923-3
    84. 84
      Liang, Y.; McLaughlin, D.; Csoklich, C.; Schneider, O.; Bandarenka, A. S. The Nature of Active Centers Catalyzing Oxygen Electro-Reduction at Platinum Surfaces in Alkaline Media. Energy Environ. Sci. 2019, 12 (1), 351357,  DOI: 10.1039/C8EE03228A
    85. 85
      Mitterreiter, E.; Liang, Y.; Golibrzuch, M.; McLaughlin, D.; Csoklich, C.; Bartl, J. D.; Holleitner, A.; Wurstbauer, U.; Bandarenka, A. S. In-Situ Visualization of Hydrogen Evolution Sites on Helium Ion Treated Molybdenum Dichalcogenides under Reaction Conditions. npj 2D Mater. Appl. 2019, 3, 25,  DOI: 10.1038/s41699-019-0107-5
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acscatal.0c02144.

    • Discussion on the extraction of the microstrain parameter from powder X-ray diffraction experiments with the Rietveld method; discussion on the correction of the as-measured microstrain to describe surface defectiveness; and a plot bridging the specific activity for the ORR and the QCO/2QH ratio (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect