logo
CONTENT TYPES

Figure 1Loading Img

A Co-Crystal between Acetylene and Butane: A Potentially Ubiquitous Molecular Mineral on Titan

  • Morgan L. Cable*
    Morgan L. Cable
    NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91109, United States
    *E-mail: [email protected].
  • Tuan H. Vu
    Tuan H. Vu
    NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91109, United States
    More by Tuan H. Vu
  • Michael J. Malaska
    Michael J. Malaska
    NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91109, United States
  • Helen E. Maynard-Casely
    Helen E. Maynard-Casely
    Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, Kirrawee DC, New South Wales 2232, Australia
  • Mathieu Choukroun
    Mathieu Choukroun
    NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91109, United States
  • Robert Hodyss
    Robert Hodyss
    NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91109, United States
Cite this: ACS Earth Space Chem. 2019, 3, 12, 2808-2815
Publication Date (Web):November 15, 2019
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.9b00275
Copyright © 2019 American Chemical Society
Editors ChoiceACS Editors' Choice
Article Views
1564
Altmetric
-
Citations
-
LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

PDF (2 MB)
Supporting Info (1)»

Abstract

Titan hosts a complex chemical engine producing a rich inventory of organic molecules in its thick atmosphere and on its surface. Some of these organics may be deposited in the liquid hydrocarbon lakes in the polar regions and form evaporite features when the lakes dry out as part of Titan’s methane/ethane cycle that is analogous to Earth’s hydrologic cycle. Modeling suggests that acetylene and butane would be the main components of such evaporite deposits. We have previously demonstrated that some organic molecules (such as benzene and ethane) readily form co-crystals in Titan-relevant conditions. We report here Raman spectroscopic evidence for a new co-crystal between acetylene and butane, which could be the most common organic co-crystal discovered so far of direct relevance to Titan’s surface. Intermolecular interactions such as those in the acetylene-butane co-crystal could modify the kinetics and equilibria of various processes (dissolution, reprecipitation, etc.) and therefore may play a key role in the formation mechanisms and timescales of landscape evolution on Titan.

Introduction

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Titan, the largest satellite of Saturn, contains a wide distribution of organic molecules and is considered a prebiotic chemical laboratory on a planetary scale. Photochemistry in the atmosphere induced by solar radiation and energy from Saturn’s magnetosphere causes a chemical cascade as N2 and CH4 dissociate and generate organic molecules ranging from simple (ethane, acetylene, and HCN) to complex (>10,000 Da). These molecules continue to combine and react as they move through Titan’s atmosphere, forming aerosol haze layers and ultimately depositing on the surface.(1)
Some of these organic compounds are transported via fluvial (rivers and streams) or pluvial (rain) processes into the hydrocarbon lakes in Titan’s polar regions, comprised mostly of methane, ethane, dissolved molecular nitrogen, propane, and possibly 1-butene (C4H8).(2−4) Molecules that dissolve in these nonpolar liquids may precipitate via evaporation or other mechanisms (i.e., if the liquid recedes into a subsurface reservoir) and could be responsible for the 5 μm bright features observed by Cassini’s Visual and Infrared Mapping Spectrometer (VIMS), and the high-backscatter regions observed by Cassini’s Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR), around some of the lakes and in dry lakebeds in the north pole(5,6) and in other regions of Titan’s surface where liquid was present in the past.(7)
Acetylene (C2H2) is the primary solid photochemical product generated in Titan’s atmosphere.(8−12) It is believed to form via a multistep process starting with the photolysis of methane and leading to the photolysis of ethylene (Table 1).(8,10) Acetylene was first identified in the upper atmosphere of Titan by Voyager 1 and ground-based observations(13) and was later confirmed by the Composite Infrared Spectrometer(14) and Ion and Neutral Mass Spectrometer(15) instruments aboard Cassini. Acetylene was also detected on the surface by the gas chromatograph mass spectrometer of the Huygens probe upon landing(16) and has been tentatively identified in the equatorial region by Cassini’s VIMS.(17) Acetylene can be present in the solid form as one of two phases below the melting point (193 K) depending on the temperature: cubic (133–193 K) and orthorhombic (<133 K).(18−20) It is likely present in the low-temperature orthorhombic phase on Titan’s surface at 90 K.
Table 1. Primary Formation Mechanisms of Acetylene and n-Butane in the Atmosphere of Titan, Predicted Precipitation Rates onto the Surface, and Calculated Solubilities in Titan Lakes
speciesformation reaction(s)aprecipitation rate (molecules·m–2·s–1)bsolubility (mole frac)c
acetyleneC2H4 + hν → C2H2 + 2H/H25.1 × 1075.40 × 10–2
butaneCH3 + C3H7 + M → C4H10 + M5.4 × 1071.22 × 10–1
2C2H5 + M → C4H10 + M
a

M is a third neutral molecule (most likely N2) required for energy balance in the termolecular reactions.

b

Refs (10) and (27).

c

Ref (27). Calculated ideal mole fractions at saturation (assumes all activity coefficients are 1) for a solution of 89% ethane, 10% methane, and 1% nitrogen at 90 K.

Butane is expected to be abundant on Titan, though it is difficult to detect via remote sensing techniques. Propane is the largest saturated hydrocarbon detected in Titan’s atmosphere to date,(21) but n-butane (C4H10) and higher hydrocarbons are predicted by photochemical models(8−10) and laboratory experiments.(22,23)n-Butane is likely generated in the Titan atmosphere by the collisional addition of one methyl and one propyl radical or two ethyl radicals (Table 1); these radicals are produced via the photodissociation of hydrocarbons, such as methane and 1-butene, and/or abstraction reactions of propane with hydrogen and acetylene with ethane.(8,10,24) Butane detection on Titan via remote observation is difficult as the absorption bands overlap with other saturated hydrocarbons (propane, etc.), although data from the Infrared Space Observatory suggests that mole fractions of hydrocarbons in the atmosphere of Titan follow a power-law up to C6 compounds.(25)n-Butane is known to have three solid forms below the melting point (133 K), all with a monoclinic symmetry, due to internal rotation about the central C–C single bond, though we note that these have been determined from deuterated butane.(26) Above 108 K, butane is a disordered structure, and below this (and therefore at Titan surface conditions), it can be present in two forms, both trans configurations, with one being metastable compared to the other.
The estimated precipitation rates for n-butane and acetylene on Titan are on the same order,(10,27) and their solubilities in liquid methane and ethane (Table 1) are relatively high compared to other solid organics on Titan.(28−31) Each of these compounds is estimated to comprise approximately 1% of the lake composition, with the other lake constituents being ethane (∼76–79%), propane (∼7–8%), methane (∼5–10%), hydrogen cyanide (∼2–3%), and butene (∼1%).(3) However, recent work suggests that the ethane content in the lakes and seas can vary significantly; the southern lakes and most equatorward of the north polar seas may be ethane-dominated(32) and could contain significant solutes and/or suspended materials, while the loss tangent of the northernmost seas suggests a composition of almost pure methane and dissolved molecular nitrogen(33) as supported by Cassini’s SAR measurements.(4)
Modeling suggests that precipitation from any Titan lake would result in an evaporite layer enriched in n-butane (C4H10) and acetylene (C2H2), regardless of whether the solvent is methane- or ethane-rich.(27,34) Previous studies(35−37) have shown that some organic molecules readily form co-crystals in Titan-relevant conditions, including acetylene.(38,39) These molecular minerals represent an exciting new class of compounds for Titan’s surface, which are in the initial stages of being catalogued.(40) We report here evidence for a new co-crystal between acetylene and n-butane that may be the most ubiquitous organic co-crystalline molecular mineral on Titan discovered thus far.

Experimental Methods

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Acetylene (Airgas, industrial grade, dissolved in acetone) and n-butane (Sigma-Aldrich, 99% purity) were either condensed sequentially or co-deposited from the gas phase into a liquid nitrogen-cooled cryostage (LTS 350, Linkam Scientific Instruments, Ltd.) maintained at 90 ± 0.1 K under an atmosphere of N2 (1 bar). The acetylene was passed through a purifier (Micro Torr MC400-404F, SAES Pure Gas, Inc.) to remove organic impurities to <1 pptV and particles <0.003 μm prior to condensation in the cryostage (absence of features at 787, 1710, and 2922 cm–1 in the Raman spectrum verified removal of acetone, a stabilizer added to acetylene to prevent self-polymerization). Another method implemented to improve the ratio of co-crystal to pure components was to condense n-butane and acetylene sequentially into a plastic pipette bulb (volume, ∼4 mL) immersed in an n-butane bath (130 K) in a custom-built cryostat under an atmosphere of N2 (1 bar). After 30 min of equilibration, this mixture was transferred under N2 atmosphere to the cryostage maintained at 90 K.
The optical cryostage was mounted onto an XYZ motorized translation stage underneath the Olympus BXFM objective turret of a high-resolution confocal dispersive micro-Raman spectrometer (Horiba Jobin-Yvon LabRam HR). The sample was observed continuously under various levels of magnification during the experiment. Raman spectra were obtained at 0.4 cm–1/px resolution using an 1800 grooves/mm grating. All samples were excited by an external frequency-doubled Nd:YAG 532 nm laser with an output power of 50 mW. The silicon 520.7 cm–1 peak was used for frequency calibration. Spectra were accumulated in duplicate or greater to improve the signal-to-noise ratio. Thermal stability studies were performed by warming in 5 K increments and obtaining Raman spectra following a 5 min equilibration time at each temperature point.
In an additional experiment designed to simulate an ethane pluvial (rain) event, acetylene and n-butane were condensed sequentially in the cryostage at 130 K. The cryostage was cooled to Titan surface temperature (90 K), and an aliquot of liquid ethane (Matheson Tri-Gas, ultrahigh purity grade (99.95%)) was then condensed onto the acetylene-butane deposit. The evolution of this ethane-wetted sample with time was monitored both with microscopic observations and collection of Raman spectra.

Results

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Formation of the Co-Crystal

Raman spectroscopy is an instructive tool in identification of organic co-crystals and their properties as it is sensitive to the chemical environments of the molecules probed. Co-crystal formation typically results in frequency shifts and sharpening of peaks as compared to the Raman spectra of pure compounds, enabling identification. Here, we compare the frequency shifts observed in the acetylene-butane co-crystal to the pure compounds and to acetylene clathrate hydrate. Acetylene clathrate hydrate is included for comparison due to its ease of formation under our experimental conditions(41) and the possibility of adventitious water in the sample.
Upon sequential deposition or co-deposition of acetylene and n-butane at 130 K, blue shifts of the ν2 C≡C stretch (12 cm–1) and ν1 C–H symmetric stretch (20 cm–1) of acetylene are observed, suggesting a distinctly different chemical environment for C2H2 compared to its solid phase (Figure 1). Shifts of similar magnitude have been observed in the vibrational spectra of other Titan-relevant co-crystals(35,38) and clathrate hydrates.(42) The blue shift of the acetylene ν2 C≡C stretch, from 1955 cm–1 in pure solid acetylene to 1967 cm–1 in the presence of butane, is very similar to (but resolvable and distinct from) the acetylene clathrate hydrate(41) and a co-crystal of acetylene and CO2 with a fixed 2:1 stoichiometry,(43) which exhibit features at 1966 and 1964 cm–1, respectively, in the Raman and IR. The acetylene clathrate spectrum also features a broad absorption in the O–H region around 3100 cm–1, which is absent in the co-crystal spectra (Figure 1 and Supporting Information, Figures S2 and S3). Therefore, we assign the observed spectral shifts to the formation of a co-crystal between acetylene and butane. This is additionally supported by a change in morphology upon the formation of the co-crystalline structure (see Supporting Information, Figure S1), similar to the recrystallization observed on the formation of the ethane-benzene co-crystal.(35)

Figure 1

Figure 1. (A–C) High-resolution Raman spectra of solid acetylene (blue), liquid butane (gray), the acetylene-butane co-crystal (orange), and the acetylene clathrate hydrate (yellow). Single-component spectra were collected at 130 K, and the co-crystal spectrum was collected at 150 K due to stability of the respective species within the experimental setup. The acetylene clathrate spectrum is from Vu et al.(35) and was collected at 200 K. Spectra are vertically offset for clarity. The clearest indications of co-crystal formation are the blue shifts in the C≡C stretch from 1955 to 1967 cm–1 (inset B, orange spectrum multiplied by 20 for visibility) and the C–H stretch from 3333 to 3355 cm–1 (inset C); these are distinct from the clathrate spectrum, which also exhibits a strong OH stretching vibration at ∼3120 cm–1.

Both solid phases of pure acetylene (cubic ≥133 K (Figure 1) and orthorhombic <133 K (Figure S4)) exhibit splitting in the ν2 C≡C stretch and ν1 C–H stretch due to crystal field effects.(44,45) These unique splittings indicate differences in the crystal structure and intermolecular interaction (primarily the C···H interaction) between the two acetylene solid phases. In the low-temperature orthorhombic phase, this splitting is also affected by the presence of a weak hydrogen bond between the C–H and the π-electrons.(44,46) Pressure studies of the orthorhombic acetylene phase show that splitting in the ν2 C≡C stretch increases as the hydrogen-bonding interaction strengthens.(47) Crystal field splitting in the acetylene-butane co-crystal is expected to be suppressed because of the different crystal structures; this is consistent with the observed Raman spectra, where single peaks are observed at 1967.3 and 3355.2 cm–1 for the ν2 C≡C stretch and ν1 C–H stretch, respectively (Figure 1 and Table 2).
Table 2. List of Selected Experimental Raman Shifts upon Co-Crystal Formation at 150 K, Compared to Reported Raman Values for Pure Components and the Acetylene Clathrate at a Similar Temperature
  Raman shift (cm–1)
  pure componentco-crystalclathrateΔν between pure component and co-crystal
moleculevibrational modethis workareportedbthis workreportedcthis workd
acetylene13C≡C stretch1928.81929.51935.81935.27.0
ν2 (C≡C stretch)1955.119591967.31966.012.2
1960.71961.5   
ν1 (C–H stretch)3327.13329.5   
3333.233353355.23352.622.0
butaneν8 CH3 rock, C–C stretch1150.811501150.3 –0.5
a

Pure component spectra collected at 130 K.

b

Cubic C2H2 at 150 K;(45) liquid n-butane at 146 K.(48)

c

sI clathrate hydrate, large cage, collected at 200 K.(41)

d

A positive value of Δν indicates a blue shift; a negative value indicates a red shift.

Interestingly, the acetylene-ammonia co-crystal displays not a blue shift but a 7 cm–1 red shift of the acetylene ν2 C≡C stretch with respect to solid acetylene, to 1944 cm–1.(38) This pattern is also present in the symmetric C–H stretching bands and may serve to highlight the differences in how the acetylene molecule is confined in the acetylene-butane co-crystalline structure compared to the acetylene-ammonia structure. As ammonia is capable of forming strong hydrogen bonds in the solid phase, its interaction with acetylene can be expected to be significantly different from that of the nonpolar n-butane molecules. In particular, the ammonia-acetylene co-crystal is governed by a network of specific C–H···N interactions,(39) giving rise to large red shifts in both the C≡C and C–H stretches of acetylene. The n-butane matrix, on the other hand, is bound together by weak hydrophobic interactions, implying that no specific bonding motif is likely involved in the formation of the co-crystal. Given the similarity between the shifts observed for acetylene confined in the co-crystal and those trapped in clathrate hydrates,(41) it is probable that the co-crystal exhibits a clathrate-like environment where acetylene molecules are loosely held in the butane structure. Such a configuration is also consistent with the fact that no significant shifts were observed in the low-frequency regions of lattice vibrations and C–H bending modes for the acetylene-butane co-crystal; in contrast, shifts on the order of 42–66 cm–1 were observed in the acetylene-ammonia co-crystal.(38) Further crystallographic work is warranted in order to definitively correlate vibrational frequency shifts with co-crystal structures, although it does seem clear that not all co-crystals behave the same spectroscopically. All observed frequency shifts for the acetylene-butane co-crystal are reported in Table 2 (for shifts at 90 K, see Supporting Information, Table S1).

Thermal Stability

The co-crystal forms within minutes at 130 K and is stable when cooled to Titan surface temperatures (90 K) (see Supporting Information, Figure S2). This co-crystal remains intact up to 190 K (Figure 2), approximately 40° higher than the point at which acetylene sublimates in our experimental setup. This enhanced thermal stability is similar to that seen in the benzene-ethane co-crystal, which persisted up to 160 K, 15° higher than the temperature where we observed pure liquid ethane to boil off in the same experimental setup.(36) It is also distinct from the acetylene clathrate hydrate, which is stable up to 233 K.(41)

Figure 2

Figure 2. Thermal stability study of the acetylene-butane co-crystal. The C≡C stretch at 1967 cm–1 persists up to 190 K, above which temperature it is no longer 3σ above the noise. Spectra are scaled on the left and are vertically offset for clarity. The 1974 cm–1 feature (dashed line) is acetylene in the gas phase, which increases with temperature relative to the co-crystal features as sublimated acetylene fills the headspace.

Influence of Solid-Phase Acetylene or Butane on Co-Crystal Stability

As described above, acetylene can be present in the solid form either in the cubic phase (≥133 K) or orthorhombic phase (<133 K).(18,19) The formation of the acetylene-butane co-crystal appears to be independent of the acetylene phase; the 1967 cm–1 feature is present above and below the phase transition temperature of 133 K (see Supporting Information, Figure S4).(49) This phase transition from orthorhombic to cubic results in a blue shift in the C≡C region from 1951.9 to 1955.1 cm–1 and the ν1 C–H stretching modes from 3317.0 and 3325.4 cm–1 to 3327.1 and 3333.2 cm–1, respectively. While these shifts due to the phase transition of pure acetylene are still observed in the sample (containing both co-crystal and pure acetylene, see Table 2), the co-crystal features are unaffected.
n-Butane has multiple phases at a low temperature, including one liquid (>133 K), one disordered solid (108–133 K), and two ordered solid (≤108) phases. Stability of the acetylene-butane co-crystal appears to be independent of n-butane phase; the 1967 cm–1 feature is present above and below the freezing point of n-butane and at temperatures where solid butane is in the ordered or disordered phase (see Supporting Information, Figures S5 and S6). It should be noted, however, that attempts to form the co-crystal from solid–solid contact of n-butane and acetylene at Titan surface temperature (90 K) were not successful over timescales achievable with our laboratory setup. The co-crystal forms rapidly (< 5 min) at 130 K when n-butane is liquid and remains stable when cooled to 90 K. This is unsurprising given the greater mobility of liquid butane. Further experiments on the kinetics of co-crystal formation may provide better constraints on the timescale required for its formation at Titan surface temperature.

Co-Crystal Stability after Exposure to Liquid Ethane

The stability of the co-crystal was investigated in the presence of liquid ethane to simulate exposure to hydrocarbon liquids. Ethane was selected over methane due to the greater solubilities of acetylene and butane in this solvent, and hence we expect any impact on co-crystal stability due to a fluvial or pluvial event to be more pronounced with ethane. After co-crystal formation was observed, the cryostage was cooled to Titan surface temperature, and ethane was condensed over the co-crystal. As shown in Figure 3, the co-crystal is still observed in the presence of liquid ethane after a brief (∼20 min) equilibration period. Subsequent warming in 5 K increments up to 135 K in the presence of liquid ethane showed a dramatic decrease in the ratio of co-crystal to pure acetylene when the temperature reached 120 K (Figure 4A); this was not coincident with the phase change of acetylene, which occurs at 130 K. It was, however, coincident with the phase change of n-butane to liquid (Figure 4B), which occurred at a lower temperature than the typical melting point of n-butane (133 K) perhaps due to freezing point depression. It is possible that, once the excess butane melted and dissolved in the liquid ethane, the butane in the co-crystal was able to more easily dissolve in the mixed solvent. The loss of the co-crystal with the change in phase of n-butane suggests that, above this temperature (120 K), the co-crystal is not stable in the presence of liquid hydrocarbons. Detailed kinetics studies of dissociation may further elucidate the stability of the acetylene-butane co-crystal in the presence of liquid hydrocarbons at Titan surface temperature (90–95 K). This may have important implications for geological resistance under Titan surface conditions.(50)

Figure 3

Figure 3. (A) High-resolution Raman spectra of solid acetylene (black), liquid butane (gray), liquid ethane (green), and the acetylene-butane co-crystal exposed to liquid ethane (red). (B) Co-crystal feature at 1967 cm–1 is still clearly visible in the red spectrum (arrow) when liquid ethane is present. The feature at 1974 cm–1 is acetylene in the gas phase. All spectra collected at 90 K except for the ethane control (105 K). Spectra are vertically offset for clarity.

Figure 4

Figure 4. High-resolution Raman spectra of the acetylene-butane co-crystal exposed to liquid ethane and warmed from 90 to 135 K. (A) At 120 K (green spectrum), the intensity of the co-crystal feature at 1967 cm–1 (arrow) decreases substantially. (B) This coincides with butane features in the fingerprint region, which show a transition from solid to liquid butane at 120 K (also indicative of freezing point depression, as typically butane melts at 133 K). The phase transition of pure acetylene is also visible in (A) in the blue shift of the C≡C stretch from 1952.3 to 1955.1 cm–1 at 130 K. The feature at 1974 cm–1 is acetylene in the gas phase. Spectra are vertically offset for clarity.

While the co-crystal is stable following exposure to liquid ethane below the depressed butane freezing point (120 K), attempts to form the co-crystal via dissolution of acetylene and butane in liquid ethane followed by evaporation to form a precipitate were not successful. This may be due to the limitations of the experimental setup as subsequent Raman analyses revealed that significant amounts of butane had dissolved in the ethane solvent over the ∼3 h equilibration period (in a custom cryostat maintained at 110 K with stirring), but very little if any acetylene was dissolved. This is consistent with the higher solubility of butane compared to acetylene in liquid hydrocarbons (Table 1).(27) It may not be possible to fully replicate the conditions of Titan in this respect, where acetylene would be expected to have sufficient time to fully equilibrate in a liquid methane/ethane lake over seasonal or geologic timescales.

Discussion

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The acetylene-butane co-crystal has been successfully formed via sequential deposition and co-deposition at 130 K. While many co-crystals have previously been reported with acetylene,(51) this is, to the best of our knowledge, the first report of a co-crystal between acetylene and butane. This is also the third organic co-crystal observed to be stable under simulated Titan surface conditions in addition to the benzene-ethane and acetylene-ammonia co-crystals.
The acetylene-butane co-crystal forms rapidly at 130 K and is stable at Titan surface temperatures (90 K). Given that butane and acetylene are predicted to be the most abundant evaporite materials around Titan lakes, the acetylene-butane co-crystal may be ubiquitous in these regions of Titan’s surface. Further, as this co-crystal may not be stable under constant or extensive fluvial/pluvial exposure to methane or ethane, the presence of this co-crystal on the surface of Titan may be an indicator of a dry lakebed with little to no liquid weathering (hydrocarbon rain or flooding events).
Co-crystals may influence Titan surface material characteristics such as particle size, dissolution rate, structural hardness, and resistance to erosion. Given that this is the second co-crystal discovered with an alkane (the first being the benzene-ethane co-crystal), it seems likely that lake edges and evaporite basins could serve as selective hydrocarbon reservoirs, possibly enriching these materials in ethane and butane over more unlikely co-crystal formers (to date) such as methane and propane.
Many of the smaller circular closed depressions in Titan’s polar regions are thought to have been formed from karstic dissolution or other phase change processes.(52) Most of these studies and modeling efforts have been via examination of one pure solid or mixture of solids, which behave as individual components.(30) If intimately associated molecules, as demonstrated in these laboratory experiments, exist on Titan’s surface, then intermolecular interactions could change dissolution and reprecipitation kinetics and equilibria, thus affecting the chemical erosion, transport, and deposition of molecules on Titan’s surface. Furthermore, if geologically significant quantities of these co-crystals exist, then they could play a key role in the formation mechanisms and timescales of landscape evolution, particularly in karstic or other phase change processes. For example, karstic dissolution and other phase change processes have been invoked in the formation of Titan’s uplifted plateau, referred to as labyrinth terrains.(53)
Recent investigations have identified enigmatic raised ramparts surrounding some of the northern Titan lakes.(54) These are positively expressed features up to 100 m and extending outward up to 10 km from the lakes. The near-infrared reflectance spectra of these features are similar to evaporitic materials found in some of the empty lake basins. One of the leading hypotheses for their formation is a “karstic hardening” due to dissolution/reprecipitation of dissolved materials and/or the surrounding geological substrate. Following landscape deflation from regional erosion, more resistant structures would be positively expressed. Thus, if co-crystal formation occurred during precipitation and percolation into the surrounding substrate, and if these materials were more resistant and durable than surrounding terrains comprised more “pure” molecular materials, they could explain the formation of this terrain. The exact formation mechanism of the ramparts, and other enigmatic features such as the high-walled lake rims, both could in part be affected by differential erosion rates of varied materials on Titan.(55) Understanding the complex chemical associations and chemical properties of Titan surface candidate materials could therefore have important implications for geological processes and features occurring on Titan.(40)
Differences in physical or mechanical properties may also lead to chemical gradients on Titan, which life could potentially exploit.(40) On Earth, in deepwater marine and freshwater environments, the obligate anaerobe Pelobacter acetylenicus is able to hydrolyze acetylene to acetaldehyde and use acetylene as both an energy source and its sole carbon source.(56−58) This bacterium uses a unique metalloenzyme, acetylene hydratase, that is able to perform this conversion.(59) The catalytic hydrogenation of acetylene to ethane has also been proposed as a possible energy-yielding reaction for metabolism.(60−62) It is possible that acetylene-based co-crystals might be a mechanism for storing acetylene, in a manner similar to how carbon dioxide is stored in carbonate deposits on Earth, where it might be more readily accessible to a putative microbial community either at the surface or in the deeper subsurface.
In conclusion, we have demonstrated the formation of a new co-crystal between acetylene and n-butane at Titan-relevant temperatures. This co-crystal may have implications in understanding some of the chemical and geological processes leading to surface features observed on this moon, as well as possibly sequestering nutrients for putative life. A future in situ Titan mission, such as the recently selected Dragonfly mission under the NASA New Frontiers program, may help to shed light on such tantalizing possibilities.

Supporting Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.9b00275.

  • Raman microscopy images, a table of experimental Raman shifts upon co-crystal formation at 90 K, and high-resolution Raman spectra of the acetylene-butane co-crystal (PDF)

Author Contributions

The manuscript was written through contributions of all authors. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.

The NASA Solar Systems Working (SSW) Program.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Terms & Conditions

Electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. The American Chemical Society holds a copyright ownership interest in any copyrightable Supporting Information. Files available from the ACS website may be downloaded for personal use only. Users are not otherwise permitted to reproduce, republish, redistribute, or sell any Supporting Information from the ACS website, either in whole or in part, in either machine-readable form or any other form without permission from the American Chemical Society. For permission to reproduce, republish and redistribute this material, requesters must process their own requests via the RightsLink permission system. Information about how to use the RightsLink permission system can be found at http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Acknowledgments

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The authors gratefully acknowledge funding from the Solar System Workings Program. The authors also thank Jason Barnes and another anonymous reviewer for comments that helped improve this manuscript. This work was conducted at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with NASA.

ABBREVIATIONS
HCN

hydrogen cyanide

SAR

Synthetic Aperture Radar

VIMS

Visual and Infrared Mapping Spectrometer

References

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article references 62 other publications.

  1. 1
    Cable, M. L.; Hörst, S. M.; Hodyss, R.; Beauchamp, P. M.; Smith, M. A.; Willis, P. A. Titan Tholins: Simulating Titan Organic Chemistry in the Cassini-Huygens Era. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 18821909,
  2. 2
    Brown, R. H.; Soderblom, L. A.; Soderblom, J. M.; Clark, R. N.; Jaumann, R.; Barnes, J. W.; Sotin, C.; Buratti, B.; Baines, K. H.; Nicholson, P. D. The identification of liquid ethane in Titan’s Ontario Lacus. Nature 2008, 454, 607610,
  3. 3
    Cordier, D.; Mousis, O.; Lunine, J. I.; Lavvas, P.; Vuitton, V. An Estimate of the Chemical Composition of Titan’s Lakes. Astrophys. J. 2009, 707, L128L131,
  4. 4
    Mastrogiuseppe, M.; Poggiali, V.; Hayes, A. G.; Lunine, J. I.; Seu, R.; Mitri, G.; Lorenz, R. D. Deep and methane-rich lakes on Titan. Nat. Astron. 2019, 535,
  5. 5
    Barnes, J. W.; Bow, J.; Schwartz, J.; Brown, R. H.; Soderblom, J. M.; Hayes, A. G.; Vixie, G.; Le Mouélic, S.; Rodriguez, S.; Sotin, C.; Jaumann, R.; Stephan, K.; Soderblom, L. A.; Clark, R. N.; Buratti, B. J.; Baines, K. H.; Nicholson, P. D. Organic sedimentary deposits in Titan’s dry lakebeds: Probable evaporite. Icarus 2011, 216, 136140,
  6. 6
    Barnes, J. W.; Brown, R. H.; Soderblom, J. M.; Soderblom, L. A.; Jaumann, R.; Jackson, B.; Le Mouélic, S.; Sotin, C.; Buratti, B. J.; Pitman, K. M.; Baines, K. H.; Clark, R. N.; Nicholson, P. D.; Turtle, E. P.; Perry, J. Shoreline features of Titan’s Ontario Lacus from Cassini/VIMS observations. Icarus 2009, 201, 217225,
  7. 7
    MacKenzie, S. M.; Barnes, J. W.; Sotin, C.; Soderblom, J. M.; Le Mouélic, S.; Rodriquez, S.; Baines, K. H.; Buratti, B. J.; Clark, R. N.; Nicholson, P. D.; McCord, T. B. Evidence of Titan’s climate history from evaporite distribution. Icarus 2014, 243, 191207,
  8. 8
    Lara, L. M.; Lellouch, E.; López-Moreno, J. J.; Rodrigo, R. Vertical distribution of Titan’s atmospheric neutral constituents. J. Geophys. Res. 1996, 101, 2326123283,
  9. 9
    Lavvas, P. P.; Coustenis, A.; Vardavas, I. M. Coupling photochemistry with haze formation in Titan’s atmosphere, Part II: Results and validation with Cassini/Huygens data. Planet. Space Sci. 2008, 56, 6799,
  10. 10
    Lavvas, P. P.; Coustenis, A.; Vardavas, I. M. Coupling photochemistry with haze formation in Titan’s atmosphere, Part I: Model description. Planet. Space Sci. 2008, 56, 2766,
  11. 11
    Krasnopolsky, V. A. A photochemical model of Titan’s atmosphere and ionosphere. Icarus 2009, 201, 226256,
  12. 12
    Krasnopolsky, V. A. Chemical composition of Titan’s atmosphere and ionosphere: Observations and the photochemical model. Icarus 2014, 236, 8391,
  13. 13
    Gupta, S.; Ochiai, E.; Ponnamperuma, C. Organic synthesis in the atmosphere of Titan. Nature 1981, 293, 725727,
  14. 14
    Coustenis, A.; Achterberg, R. K.; Conrath, B. J.; Jennings, D. E.; Marten, A.; Gautier, D.; Nixon, C. A.; Flasar, F. M.; Teanby, N. A.; Bézard, B.; Samuelson, R. E.; Carlson, R. C.; Lellouch, E.; Bjoraker, G. L.; Romani, P. N.; Taylor, F. W.; Irwin, P. G. J.; Fouchet, T.; Hubert, A.; Orton, G. S.; Kunde, V. G.; Vinatier, S.; Mondellini, J.; Abbas, M. M.; Courtin, R. The composition of Titan’s stratosphere from Cassini/CIRS mid-infrared spectra. Icarus 2007, 189, 3562,
  15. 15
    Waite, J. H., Jr.; Niemann, H.; Yelle, R. V.; Kasprzak, W. T.; Cravens, T. E.; Luhmann, J. G.; McNutt, R. L.; Ip, W.-H.; Gell, D.; De La Haye, V.; Müller-Wordag, I.; Magee, B.; Borggren, N.; Ledvina, S.; Fletcher, G.; Walter, E.; Miller, R.; Scherer, S.; Thorpe, R.; Xu, J.; Block, B.; Arnett, K. Ion neutral mass spectrometer results from the first flyby of Titan. Science 2005, 308, 982986,
  16. 16
    Niemann, H. B.; Atreya, S. K.; Demick, J. E.; Gautier, D.; Haberman, J. A.; Harpold, D. N.; Kasprzak, W. T.; Lunine, J. I.; Owen, T. C.; Raulin, F. Composition of Titan’s lower atmosphere and simple surface volatiles as measured by the Cassini-Huygens probe gas chromatograph mass spectrometer experiment. J. Geophys. Res. 2010, 115, E12006,
  17. 17
    Singh, S.; McCord, T. B.; Combe, J.-P.; Rodriguez, S.; Cornet, T.; Le Mouélic, S.; Clark, R. N.; Maltagliati, L.; Chevrier, V. F. Acetylene on Titan’s Surface. Astrophys. J. 2016, 828, 18,
  18. 18
    Bottger, G. L.; Eggers, D. F., Jr. Infrared spectra of crystalline C2H2, C2HD, and C2D2. J. Chem. Phys. 1964, 40, 20102017,
  19. 19
    van Nes, G. J. H.; van Bolhuis, F. Single-crystal structures and electron density distributions of ethane, ethylene and acetylene. II. Single-crystal X-ray structure determination of acetylene at 141 K. Acta Cryst. 1979, 35, 25802593,
  20. 20
    Sugawara, T.; Kanda, E. The Crystal Structure of Acetylene. I. Ser. A, Phys. Chem. Metall. 1952, 4, 607614
  21. 21
    Nixon, C. A.; Jennings, D. E.; Flaud, J.-M.; Bézard, B.; Teanby, N. A.; Irwin, P. G. J.; Ansty, T. M.; Coustenis, A.; Vinatier, S.; Flasar, F. M. Titan’s prolific propane: The Cassini CIRS perspective. Planet. Space Sci. 2009, 57, 15731585,
  22. 22
    Coll, P.; Coscia, D.; Smith, N.; Gazeau, M.-C.; Ramïrez, S. I.; Cernogora, G.; Israël, G.; Raulin, F. Experimental laboratory simulation of Titan’s atmosphere: Aerosols and gas phase. Planet. Space Sci. 1999, 47, 13311340,
  23. 23
    Tran, B. N.; Joseph, J. C.; Force, M.; Briggs, R. G.; Vuitton, V.; Ferris, J. P. Photochemical processes on Titan: Irradiation of mixtures of gases that simulate Titan’s atmosphere. Icarus 2005, 177, 106115,
  24. 24
    Laufer, A. H.; Gardner, E. P.; Kwok, T. L.; Yung, Y. L. Computations and estimates of rate coefficients for hydrocarbon reactions of interest to the atmospheres of the outer solar system. Icarus 1983, 56, 560567,
  25. 25
    Dobrijevic, M.; Dutour, I. The distribution of hydrocarbons in Titan’s atmosphere: An evolutionary algorithm-based model. Planet. Space Sci. 2007, 55, 21282136,
  26. 26
    Refson, K.; Pawley, G. S. The structure and orientational disorder in solid n-butane by neutron powder diffraction. Acta Cryst. B 1986, 42, 402410,
  27. 27
    Cordier, D.; Barnes, J. W.; Ferreira, A. G. On the chemical composition of Titan’s dry lakebed evaporites. Icarus 2013, 226, 14311437,
  28. 28
    Raulin, F. Organic Chemistry in the Oceans of Titan. Adv. Space Res. 1987, 7, 7181,
  29. 29
    Glein, C. R.; Shock, E. L. A geochemical model of non-ideal solutions in the methane-ethane-propane-nitrogen-acetylene system on Titan. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2013, 115, 217240,
  30. 30
    Cornet, T.; Cordier, D.; Le Bahers, T.; Bourgeois, O.; Fleurant, C.; Le Mouélic, S.; Altobelli, N. Dissolution on Titan and on Earth: Toward the age of Titan’s karstic landscapes. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 2015, 120, 10441074,
  31. 31
    Singh, S.; Combe, J.-P.; Cordier, D.; Wagner, A.; Chevrier, V. F.; McMahon, Z. Experimental determination of acetylene and ethylene solubility in liquid methane and ethane: Implications to Titan’s surface. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2017, 208, 86101,
  32. 32
    Lorenz, R. D. The flushing of Ligeia: Composition variations across Titan’s seas in a simple hydrological model. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2014, 41, 57645770,
  33. 33
    Mitchell, K. L.; Barmatz, M. B.; Jamieson, C. S.; Lorenz, R. D.; Lunine, J. I. Laboratory measurements of cryogenic liquid alkane microwave absorptivity and implications for the composition of Ligeia Mare, Titan. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2015, 42, 13401345,
  34. 34
    Cordier, D.; Cornet, T.; Barnes, J. W.; MacKenzie, S. M.; Le Bahers, T.; Nna-Mvondo, D.; Rannou, P.; Ferreira, A. G. Structure of Titan’s evaporites. Icarus 2016, 270, 4156,
  35. 35
    Vu, T. H.; Cable, M. L.; Choukroun, M.; Hodyss, R.; Beauchamp, P. Formation of a new benzene-ethane co-crystalline structure under cryogenic conditions. J. Phys. Chem. A 2014, 118, 40874094,
  36. 36
    Cable, M. L.; Vu, T. H.; Hodyss, R.; Choukroun, M.; Malaska, M. J.; Beauchamp, P. Experimental determination of the kinetics of formation of the benzene-ethane co-crystal and implications for Titan. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2014, 41, 53965401,
  37. 37
    Maynard-Casely, H. E.; Hodyss, R.; Cable, M. L.; Vu, T. H.; Rahm, M. A co-crystal between benzene and ethane: A potential evaporite material for Saturn’s moon Titan. Int. Union Cryst. J. 2016, 3, 192199,
  38. 38
    Cable, M. L.; Vu, T. H.; Maynard-Casely, H. E.; Choukroun, M.; Hodyss, R. The Acetylene-Ammonia Co-crystal on Titan. ACS Earth Space Chem. 2018, 2, 366375,
  39. 39
    Boese, R.; Bläser, D.; Jansen, G. Synthesis and theoretical characterization of an acetylene-ammonia cocrystal. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 21042106,
  40. 40
    Maynard-Casely, H. E.; Cable, M. L.; Malaska, M. J.; Vu, T. H.; Choukroun, M.; Hodyss, R. Prospects for Mineralogy on Titan. Am. Mineral. 2018, 103, 343349,
  41. 41
    Vu, T. H.; Hodyss, R.; Cable, M. L.; Choukroun, M. Raman signatures and thermal expansivity of acetylene clathrate hydrate. J. Phys. Chem. A 2019, 123, 70517056,
  42. 42
    Subramanian, S.; Sloan, E. D. Trends in vibrational frequencies of guests trapped in clathrate hydrate cages. J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 43484355,
  43. 43
    Gough, T. E.; Wang, T. Vibrational spectroscopy of cocrystallized carbon dioxide and acetylene. J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 102, 3932,
  44. 44
    Ito, M.; Yokoyama, T.; Suzuki, M. Raman spectra of acetylene crystals I and II. Spectrochim. Acta, Part A 1970, 26, 695705,
  45. 45
    Anderson, A.; Andrews, B.; Torrie, B. H. Raman and Far Infrared Spectra of Crystalline Acetylene, C2H2 and C2D2. J. Raman Spectrosc. 1985, 16, 202207,
  46. 46
    Marchi, M.; Righini, R. Intermolecular potential and lattice dynamics of orthorhombic acetylene. Chem. Phys. 1985, 94, 465,
  47. 47
    Aoki, K.; Kakudate, Y.; Usuba, S.; Yoshida, M.; Tanaka, K.; Fujiwara, S. High-pressure Raman study of liquid and crystalline C2H2. J. Chem. Phys. 1988, 88, 45654568,
  48. 48
    Kint, S.; Scherer, J. R.; Snyder, R. G. Raman spectra of liquid n-alkanes. III. Energy difference between trans and gauche n-butane. J. Chem. Phys. 1980, 73, 25992602,
  49. 49
    Schwartz, Y. A.; Ron, A.; Kimel, S. Far-infrared spectrum and phase transition of acetylene. J. Chem. Phys. 1969, 51, 16661667,
  50. 50
    Malaska, M. J.; Hodyss, R. Dissolution of benzene, naphthalene, and biphenyl in a simulated Titan lake. Icarus 2014, 242, 7481,
  51. 51
    Kirchner, M. T.; Bläser, D.; Boese, R. Co-crystals with acetylene: Small is not simple!. Chem. – Eur. J. 2010, 16, 21312146,
  52. 52
    Hayes, A. G.; Birch, S. P. D.; Dietrich, W. E.; Howard, A. D.; Kirk, R. L.; Poggiali, V.; Mastroguiseppe, M.; Michaelides, R. J.; Corlies, P. M.; Moore, J. M.; Malaska, M. J.; Mitchell, K. L.; Lorenz, R. D.; Wood, C. A. Topographic constraints on the evolution and connectivity of Titan’s lacustrine basins. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2017, 44, 11745,
  53. 53
    Malaska, M. J.; Radebaugh, J.; Lopes, R. M. C.; Mitchell, K. L.; Verlander, T.; Schoenfeld, A. M.; Florence, M. M.; Le Gall, A.; Solomonidou, A.; Hayes, A. G.; Birch, S. P. D.; Janssen, M. A.; Shurmeier, L.; Cornet, T.; Ahrens, C.; Farr, T. G.; Cassini RADAR Team. Labyrinth Terrain on Titan. Submitted to Icarus.
  54. 54
    Solomonidou, A.; Le Gall, A.; Malaska, M.; Wall, S.; Lopes, R. M. C.; Coustenis, A.; Rodriguez, S.; Elachi, C.; Drossart, P.; Nasr, M.; Matsoukas, M.; Soderblom, J.; Janssen, M.; Lawrence, K.; Altobelli, N.; Witasse, O.; Radebaugh, J.; Schoenfeld, A.; Cassini RADAR Team Spectral and emissivity analysis of the raised ramparts around Titan’s northern lakes. Icarus 2019,
  55. 55
    Birch, S. P. D.; Hayes, A. G.; Poggiali, V.; Hofgartner, J. D.; Lunine, J. I.; Malaska, M. J.; Wall, S.; Lopes, R. M. C.; White, O. Raised rims around Titan’s sharp-edged depressions. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2018, 45, 19,
  56. 56
    Schink, B. Fermentation of acetylene by an obligate anaerobe,Pelobacter acetylenicus sp. nov.. Arch. Microbiol. 1985, 142, 295301,
  57. 57
    Oremland, R. S.; Voytek, M. A. Acetylene as fast food: Implications for development of life on anoxic primordial Earth and in the Outer Solar System. Astrobiology 2008, 8, 4558,
  58. 58
    ten Brink, F. Living on Acetylene. A Primordial Energy Source. In The Metal-Driven Biogeochemistry of Gaseous Compounds in the Environment, Metal Ions in Life Sciences; Springer: Netherlands, 2014, Chapter 14. .
  59. 59
    Seiffert, G. B.; Ullmann, G. M.; Messerschmidt, A.; Schink, B.; Kroneck, P. M. H.; Einsle, O. Structure of the non-redox-active tungsten/[4Fe:4S] enzyme acetylene hydratase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2007, 104, 30733077,
  60. 60
    Schulze-Makuch, D.; Grinspoon, D. H. Biologically enhanced energy and carbon cycling on Titan?. Astrobiology 2005, 5, 560567,
  61. 61
    McKay, C. P.; Smith, H. D. Possibilities for methanogenic life in liquid methane on the surface of Titan. Icarus 2005, 178, 274276,
  62. 62
    Tokano, T. Limnological structure of Titan’s hydrocarbon lakes and its astrobiological implication. Astrobiology 2009, 9, 147164,

Cited By


This article has not yet been cited by other publications.

    • Abstract

      Figure 1

      Figure 1. (A–C) High-resolution Raman spectra of solid acetylene (blue), liquid butane (gray), the acetylene-butane co-crystal (orange), and the acetylene clathrate hydrate (yellow). Single-component spectra were collected at 130 K, and the co-crystal spectrum was collected at 150 K due to stability of the respective species within the experimental setup. The acetylene clathrate spectrum is from Vu et al.(35) and was collected at 200 K. Spectra are vertically offset for clarity. The clearest indications of co-crystal formation are the blue shifts in the C≡C stretch from 1955 to 1967 cm–1 (inset B, orange spectrum multiplied by 20 for visibility) and the C–H stretch from 3333 to 3355 cm–1 (inset C); these are distinct from the clathrate spectrum, which also exhibits a strong OH stretching vibration at ∼3120 cm–1.

      Figure 2

      Figure 2. Thermal stability study of the acetylene-butane co-crystal. The C≡C stretch at 1967 cm–1 persists up to 190 K, above which temperature it is no longer 3σ above the noise. Spectra are scaled on the left and are vertically offset for clarity. The 1974 cm–1 feature (dashed line) is acetylene in the gas phase, which increases with temperature relative to the co-crystal features as sublimated acetylene fills the headspace.

      Figure 3

      Figure 3. (A) High-resolution Raman spectra of solid acetylene (black), liquid butane (gray), liquid ethane (green), and the acetylene-butane co-crystal exposed to liquid ethane (red). (B) Co-crystal feature at 1967 cm–1 is still clearly visible in the red spectrum (arrow) when liquid ethane is present. The feature at 1974 cm–1 is acetylene in the gas phase. All spectra collected at 90 K except for the ethane control (105 K). Spectra are vertically offset for clarity.

      Figure 4

      Figure 4. High-resolution Raman spectra of the acetylene-butane co-crystal exposed to liquid ethane and warmed from 90 to 135 K. (A) At 120 K (green spectrum), the intensity of the co-crystal feature at 1967 cm–1 (arrow) decreases substantially. (B) This coincides with butane features in the fingerprint region, which show a transition from solid to liquid butane at 120 K (also indicative of freezing point depression, as typically butane melts at 133 K). The phase transition of pure acetylene is also visible in (A) in the blue shift of the C≡C stretch from 1952.3 to 1955.1 cm–1 at 130 K. The feature at 1974 cm–1 is acetylene in the gas phase. Spectra are vertically offset for clarity.

    • References

      ARTICLE SECTIONS
      Jump To

      This article references 62 other publications.

      1. 1
        Cable, M. L.; Hörst, S. M.; Hodyss, R.; Beauchamp, P. M.; Smith, M. A.; Willis, P. A. Titan Tholins: Simulating Titan Organic Chemistry in the Cassini-Huygens Era. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 18821909,
      2. 2
        Brown, R. H.; Soderblom, L. A.; Soderblom, J. M.; Clark, R. N.; Jaumann, R.; Barnes, J. W.; Sotin, C.; Buratti, B.; Baines, K. H.; Nicholson, P. D. The identification of liquid ethane in Titan’s Ontario Lacus. Nature 2008, 454, 607610,
      3. 3
        Cordier, D.; Mousis, O.; Lunine, J. I.; Lavvas, P.; Vuitton, V. An Estimate of the Chemical Composition of Titan’s Lakes. Astrophys. J. 2009, 707, L128L131,
      4. 4
        Mastrogiuseppe, M.; Poggiali, V.; Hayes, A. G.; Lunine, J. I.; Seu, R.; Mitri, G.; Lorenz, R. D. Deep and methane-rich lakes on Titan. Nat. Astron. 2019, 535,
      5. 5
        Barnes, J. W.; Bow, J.; Schwartz, J.; Brown, R. H.; Soderblom, J. M.; Hayes, A. G.; Vixie, G.; Le Mouélic, S.; Rodriguez, S.; Sotin, C.; Jaumann, R.; Stephan, K.; Soderblom, L. A.; Clark, R. N.; Buratti, B. J.; Baines, K. H.; Nicholson, P. D. Organic sedimentary deposits in Titan’s dry lakebeds: Probable evaporite. Icarus 2011, 216, 136140,
      6. 6
        Barnes, J. W.; Brown, R. H.; Soderblom, J. M.; Soderblom, L. A.; Jaumann, R.; Jackson, B.; Le Mouélic, S.; Sotin, C.; Buratti, B. J.; Pitman, K. M.; Baines, K. H.; Clark, R. N.; Nicholson, P. D.; Turtle, E. P.; Perry, J. Shoreline features of Titan’s Ontario Lacus from Cassini/VIMS observations. Icarus 2009, 201, 217225,
      7. 7
        MacKenzie, S. M.; Barnes, J. W.; Sotin, C.; Soderblom, J. M.; Le Mouélic, S.; Rodriquez, S.; Baines, K. H.; Buratti, B. J.; Clark, R. N.; Nicholson, P. D.; McCord, T. B. Evidence of Titan’s climate history from evaporite distribution. Icarus 2014, 243, 191207,
      8. 8
        Lara, L. M.; Lellouch, E.; López-Moreno, J. J.; Rodrigo, R. Vertical distribution of Titan’s atmospheric neutral constituents. J. Geophys. Res. 1996, 101, 2326123283,
      9. 9
        Lavvas, P. P.; Coustenis, A.; Vardavas, I. M. Coupling photochemistry with haze formation in Titan’s atmosphere, Part II: Results and validation with Cassini/Huygens data. Planet. Space Sci. 2008, 56, 6799,
      10. 10
        Lavvas, P. P.; Coustenis, A.; Vardavas, I. M. Coupling photochemistry with haze formation in Titan’s atmosphere, Part I: Model description. Planet. Space Sci. 2008, 56, 2766,
      11. 11
        Krasnopolsky, V. A. A photochemical model of Titan’s atmosphere and ionosphere. Icarus 2009, 201, 226256,
      12. 12
        Krasnopolsky, V. A. Chemical composition of Titan’s atmosphere and ionosphere: Observations and the photochemical model. Icarus 2014, 236, 8391,
      13. 13
        Gupta, S.; Ochiai, E.; Ponnamperuma, C. Organic synthesis in the atmosphere of Titan. Nature 1981, 293, 725727,
      14. 14
        Coustenis, A.; Achterberg, R. K.; Conrath, B. J.; Jennings, D. E.; Marten, A.; Gautier, D.; Nixon, C. A.; Flasar, F. M.; Teanby, N. A.; Bézard, B.; Samuelson, R. E.; Carlson, R. C.; Lellouch, E.; Bjoraker, G. L.; Romani, P. N.; Taylor, F. W.; Irwin, P. G. J.; Fouchet, T.; Hubert, A.; Orton, G. S.; Kunde, V. G.; Vinatier, S.; Mondellini, J.; Abbas, M. M.; Courtin, R. The composition of Titan’s stratosphere from Cassini/CIRS mid-infrared spectra. Icarus 2007, 189, 3562,
      15. 15
        Waite, J. H., Jr.; Niemann, H.; Yelle, R. V.; Kasprzak, W. T.; Cravens, T. E.; Luhmann, J. G.; McNutt, R. L.; Ip, W.-H.; Gell, D.; De La Haye, V.; Müller-Wordag, I.; Magee, B.; Borggren, N.; Ledvina, S.; Fletcher, G.; Walter, E.; Miller, R.; Scherer, S.; Thorpe, R.; Xu, J.; Block, B.; Arnett, K. Ion neutral mass spectrometer results from the first flyby of Titan. Science 2005, 308, 982986,
      16. 16
        Niemann, H. B.; Atreya, S. K.; Demick, J. E.; Gautier, D.; Haberman, J. A.; Harpold, D. N.; Kasprzak, W. T.; Lunine, J. I.; Owen, T. C.; Raulin, F. Composition of Titan’s lower atmosphere and simple surface volatiles as measured by the Cassini-Huygens probe gas chromatograph mass spectrometer experiment. J. Geophys. Res. 2010, 115, E12006,
      17. 17
        Singh, S.; McCord, T. B.; Combe, J.-P.; Rodriguez, S.; Cornet, T.; Le Mouélic, S.; Clark, R. N.; Maltagliati, L.; Chevrier, V. F. Acetylene on Titan’s Surface. Astrophys. J. 2016, 828, 18,
      18. 18
        Bottger, G. L.; Eggers, D. F., Jr. Infrared spectra of crystalline C2H2, C2HD, and C2D2. J. Chem. Phys. 1964, 40, 20102017,
      19. 19
        van Nes, G. J. H.; van Bolhuis, F. Single-crystal structures and electron density distributions of ethane, ethylene and acetylene. II. Single-crystal X-ray structure determination of acetylene at 141 K. Acta Cryst. 1979, 35, 25802593,
      20. 20
        Sugawara, T.; Kanda, E. The Crystal Structure of Acetylene. I. Ser. A, Phys. Chem. Metall. 1952, 4, 607614
      21. 21
        Nixon, C. A.; Jennings, D. E.; Flaud, J.-M.; Bézard, B.; Teanby, N. A.; Irwin, P. G. J.; Ansty, T. M.; Coustenis, A.; Vinatier, S.; Flasar, F. M. Titan’s prolific propane: The Cassini CIRS perspective. Planet. Space Sci. 2009, 57, 15731585,
      22. 22
        Coll, P.; Coscia, D.; Smith, N.; Gazeau, M.-C.; Ramïrez, S. I.; Cernogora, G.; Israël, G.; Raulin, F. Experimental laboratory simulation of Titan’s atmosphere: Aerosols and gas phase. Planet. Space Sci. 1999, 47, 13311340,
      23. 23
        Tran, B. N.; Joseph, J. C.; Force, M.; Briggs, R. G.; Vuitton, V.; Ferris, J. P. Photochemical processes on Titan: Irradiation of mixtures of gases that simulate Titan’s atmosphere. Icarus 2005, 177, 106115,
      24. 24
        Laufer, A. H.; Gardner, E. P.; Kwok, T. L.; Yung, Y. L. Computations and estimates of rate coefficients for hydrocarbon reactions of interest to the atmospheres of the outer solar system. Icarus 1983, 56, 560567,
      25. 25
        Dobrijevic, M.; Dutour, I. The distribution of hydrocarbons in Titan’s atmosphere: An evolutionary algorithm-based model. Planet. Space Sci. 2007, 55, 21282136,
      26. 26
        Refson, K.; Pawley, G. S. The structure and orientational disorder in solid n-butane by neutron powder diffraction. Acta Cryst. B 1986, 42, 402410,
      27. 27
        Cordier, D.; Barnes, J. W.; Ferreira, A. G. On the chemical composition of Titan’s dry lakebed evaporites. Icarus 2013, 226, 14311437,
      28. 28
        Raulin, F. Organic Chemistry in the Oceans of Titan. Adv. Space Res. 1987, 7, 7181,
      29. 29
        Glein, C. R.; Shock, E. L. A geochemical model of non-ideal solutions in the methane-ethane-propane-nitrogen-acetylene system on Titan. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2013, 115, 217240,
      30. 30
        Cornet, T.; Cordier, D.; Le Bahers, T.; Bourgeois, O.; Fleurant, C.; Le Mouélic, S.; Altobelli, N. Dissolution on Titan and on Earth: Toward the age of Titan’s karstic landscapes. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 2015, 120, 10441074,
      31. 31
        Singh, S.; Combe, J.-P.; Cordier, D.; Wagner, A.; Chevrier, V. F.; McMahon, Z. Experimental determination of acetylene and ethylene solubility in liquid methane and ethane: Implications to Titan’s surface. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2017, 208, 86101,
      32. 32
        Lorenz, R. D. The flushing of Ligeia: Composition variations across Titan’s seas in a simple hydrological model. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2014, 41, 57645770,
      33. 33
        Mitchell, K. L.; Barmatz, M. B.; Jamieson, C. S.; Lorenz, R. D.; Lunine, J. I. Laboratory measurements of cryogenic liquid alkane microwave absorptivity and implications for the composition of Ligeia Mare, Titan. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2015, 42, 13401345,
      34. 34
        Cordier, D.; Cornet, T.; Barnes, J. W.; MacKenzie, S. M.; Le Bahers, T.; Nna-Mvondo, D.; Rannou, P.; Ferreira, A. G. Structure of Titan’s evaporites. Icarus 2016, 270, 4156,
      35. 35
        Vu, T. H.; Cable, M. L.; Choukroun, M.; Hodyss, R.; Beauchamp, P. Formation of a new benzene-ethane co-crystalline structure under cryogenic conditions. J. Phys. Chem. A 2014, 118, 40874094,
      36. 36
        Cable, M. L.; Vu, T. H.; Hodyss, R.; Choukroun, M.; Malaska, M. J.; Beauchamp, P. Experimental determination of the kinetics of formation of the benzene-ethane co-crystal and implications for Titan. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2014, 41, 53965401,
      37. 37
        Maynard-Casely, H. E.; Hodyss, R.; Cable, M. L.; Vu, T. H.; Rahm, M. A co-crystal between benzene and ethane: A potential evaporite material for Saturn’s moon Titan. Int. Union Cryst. J. 2016, 3, 192199,
      38. 38
        Cable, M. L.; Vu, T. H.; Maynard-Casely, H. E.; Choukroun, M.; Hodyss, R. The Acetylene-Ammonia Co-crystal on Titan. ACS Earth Space Chem. 2018, 2, 366375,
      39. 39
        Boese, R.; Bläser, D.; Jansen, G. Synthesis and theoretical characterization of an acetylene-ammonia cocrystal. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 21042106,
      40. 40
        Maynard-Casely, H. E.; Cable, M. L.; Malaska, M. J.; Vu, T. H.; Choukroun, M.; Hodyss, R. Prospects for Mineralogy on Titan. Am. Mineral. 2018, 103, 343349,
      41. 41
        Vu, T. H.; Hodyss, R.; Cable, M. L.; Choukroun, M. Raman signatures and thermal expansivity of acetylene clathrate hydrate. J. Phys. Chem. A 2019, 123, 70517056,
      42. 42
        Subramanian, S.; Sloan, E. D. Trends in vibrational frequencies of guests trapped in clathrate hydrate cages. J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 43484355,
      43. 43
        Gough, T. E.; Wang, T. Vibrational spectroscopy of cocrystallized carbon dioxide and acetylene. J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 102, 3932,
      44. 44
        Ito, M.; Yokoyama, T.; Suzuki, M. Raman spectra of acetylene crystals I and II. Spectrochim. Acta, Part A 1970, 26, 695705,
      45. 45
        Anderson, A.; Andrews, B.; Torrie, B. H. Raman and Far Infrared Spectra of Crystalline Acetylene, C2H2 and C2D2. J. Raman Spectrosc. 1985, 16, 202207,
      46. 46
        Marchi, M.; Righini, R. Intermolecular potential and lattice dynamics of orthorhombic acetylene. Chem. Phys. 1985, 94, 465,
      47. 47
        Aoki, K.; Kakudate, Y.; Usuba, S.; Yoshida, M.; Tanaka, K.; Fujiwara, S. High-pressure Raman study of liquid and crystalline C2H2. J. Chem. Phys. 1988, 88, 45654568,
      48. 48
        Kint, S.; Scherer, J. R.; Snyder, R. G. Raman spectra of liquid n-alkanes. III. Energy difference between trans and gauche n-butane. J. Chem. Phys. 1980, 73, 25992602,
      49. 49
        Schwartz, Y. A.; Ron, A.; Kimel, S. Far-infrared spectrum and phase transition of acetylene. J. Chem. Phys. 1969, 51, 16661667,
      50. 50
        Malaska, M. J.; Hodyss, R. Dissolution of benzene, naphthalene, and biphenyl in a simulated Titan lake. Icarus 2014, 242, 7481,
      51. 51
        Kirchner, M. T.; Bläser, D.; Boese, R. Co-crystals with acetylene: Small is not simple!. Chem. – Eur. J. 2010, 16, 21312146,
      52. 52
        Hayes, A. G.; Birch, S. P. D.; Dietrich, W. E.; Howard, A. D.; Kirk, R. L.; Poggiali, V.; Mastroguiseppe, M.; Michaelides, R. J.; Corlies, P. M.; Moore, J. M.; Malaska, M. J.; Mitchell, K. L.; Lorenz, R. D.; Wood, C. A. Topographic constraints on the evolution and connectivity of Titan’s lacustrine basins. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2017, 44, 11745,
      53. 53
        Malaska, M. J.; Radebaugh, J.; Lopes, R. M. C.; Mitchell, K. L.; Verlander, T.; Schoenfeld, A. M.; Florence, M. M.; Le Gall, A.; Solomonidou, A.; Hayes, A. G.; Birch, S. P. D.; Janssen, M. A.; Shurmeier, L.; Cornet, T.; Ahrens, C.; Farr, T. G.; Cassini RADAR Team. Labyrinth Terrain on Titan. Submitted to Icarus.
      54. 54
        Solomonidou, A.; Le Gall, A.; Malaska, M.; Wall, S.; Lopes, R. M. C.; Coustenis, A.; Rodriguez, S.; Elachi, C.; Drossart, P.; Nasr, M.; Matsoukas, M.; Soderblom, J.; Janssen, M.; Lawrence, K.; Altobelli, N.; Witasse, O.; Radebaugh, J.; Schoenfeld, A.; Cassini RADAR Team Spectral and emissivity analysis of the raised ramparts around Titan’s northern lakes. Icarus 2019,
      55. 55
        Birch, S. P. D.; Hayes, A. G.; Poggiali, V.; Hofgartner, J. D.; Lunine, J. I.; Malaska, M. J.; Wall, S.; Lopes, R. M. C.; White, O. Raised rims around Titan’s sharp-edged depressions. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2018, 45, 19,
      56. 56
        Schink, B. Fermentation of acetylene by an obligate anaerobe,Pelobacter acetylenicus sp. nov.. Arch. Microbiol. 1985, 142, 295301,
      57. 57
        Oremland, R. S.; Voytek, M. A. Acetylene as fast food: Implications for development of life on anoxic primordial Earth and in the Outer Solar System. Astrobiology 2008, 8, 4558,
      58. 58
        ten Brink, F. Living on Acetylene. A Primordial Energy Source. In The Metal-Driven Biogeochemistry of Gaseous Compounds in the Environment, Metal Ions in Life Sciences; Springer: Netherlands, 2014, Chapter 14. .
      59. 59
        Seiffert, G. B.; Ullmann, G. M.; Messerschmidt, A.; Schink, B.; Kroneck, P. M. H.; Einsle, O. Structure of the non-redox-active tungsten/[4Fe:4S] enzyme acetylene hydratase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2007, 104, 30733077,
      60. 60
        Schulze-Makuch, D.; Grinspoon, D. H. Biologically enhanced energy and carbon cycling on Titan?. Astrobiology 2005, 5, 560567,
      61. 61
        McKay, C. P.; Smith, H. D. Possibilities for methanogenic life in liquid methane on the surface of Titan. Icarus 2005, 178, 274276,
      62. 62
        Tokano, T. Limnological structure of Titan’s hydrocarbon lakes and its astrobiological implication. Astrobiology 2009, 9, 147164,
    • Supporting Information

      Supporting Information

      ARTICLE SECTIONS
      Jump To

      The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.9b00275.

      • Raman microscopy images, a table of experimental Raman shifts upon co-crystal formation at 90 K, and high-resolution Raman spectra of the acetylene-butane co-crystal (PDF)

      Terms & Conditions

      Electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. The American Chemical Society holds a copyright ownership interest in any copyrightable Supporting Information. Files available from the ACS website may be downloaded for personal use only. Users are not otherwise permitted to reproduce, republish, redistribute, or sell any Supporting Information from the ACS website, either in whole or in part, in either machine-readable form or any other form without permission from the American Chemical Society. For permission to reproduce, republish and redistribute this material, requesters must process their own requests via the RightsLink permission system. Information about how to use the RightsLink permission system can be found at http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

    Pair your accounts.

    Export articles to Mendeley

    Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

    Pair your accounts.

    Export articles to Mendeley

    Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

    You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

    STEP 1:
    Click to create an ACS ID

    Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

    Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

    Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

    OOPS

    You have to login with your ACS ID befor you can login with your Mendeley account.

    MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
    Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect

    This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By continuing to use the site, you are accepting our use of cookies. Read the ACS privacy policy.

    CONTINUE