ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Systematic Evaluation of Emerging Wastewater Nutrient Removal and Recovery Technologies to Inform Practice and Advance Resource Efficiency
My Activity
    Review

    Systematic Evaluation of Emerging Wastewater Nutrient Removal and Recovery Technologies to Inform Practice and Advance Resource Efficiency
    Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

    • Anna Kogler
      Anna Kogler
      Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, United States
      Engineering Research Center for Re-inventing the Nation’s Urban Water Infrastructure (ReNUWIt), Stanford, California 94305, United States
      More by Anna Kogler
    • McKenna Farmer
      McKenna Farmer
      Northwestern University Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Evanston, Illinois 60208, United States
    • Julia A. Simon
      Julia A. Simon
      Department of Chemical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, United States
      Codiga Resource Recovery Center, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, United States
    • Sebastien Tilmans
      Sebastien Tilmans
      Engineering Research Center for Re-inventing the Nation’s Urban Water Infrastructure (ReNUWIt), Stanford, California 94305, United States
      Codiga Resource Recovery Center, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, United States
    • George F. Wells
      George F. Wells
      Northwestern University Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Evanston, Illinois 60208, United States
    • William A. Tarpeh*
      William A. Tarpeh
      Engineering Research Center for Re-inventing the Nation’s Urban Water Infrastructure (ReNUWIt), Stanford, California 94305, United States
      Department of Chemical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, United States
      *Email: [email protected]. Address: 443 Via Ortega, Room 387, Stanford CA, 94305. Telephone: 650-497-1324.
    Other Access OptionsSupporting Information (3)

    ACS ES&T Engineering

    Cite this: ACS EST Engg. 2021, 1, 4, 662–684
    Click to copy citationCitation copied!
    https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestengg.0c00253
    Published March 15, 2021
    Copyright © 2021 American Chemical Society

    Abstract

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
    Abstract Image

    Advancing nutrient recovery from idea to implementation requires reporting practices that facilitate comparison among diverse nutrient removal and recovery (NRR) technologies and enhance the translation of academic research to practice. We reviewed 157 technologies that treat nitrogen- and/or phosphorus-laden wastewater across several underlying mechanisms, stages of development, and scales of operation. We outline a systematic reporting and analysis framework to characterize NRR technologies using quantitative performance metrics (i.e., removal and recovery efficiency, removal and recovery rate, energy consumption, cost, greenhouse gas emissions, effluent concentration) and qualitative attributes (e.g., technology readiness level). Comparing peer-reviewed literature with practitioner needs reveals limited reporting of energy consumption and cost, indicating misalignment between research and practice. By synthesizing literature and practitioner input on anticipated benefits, barriers to adoption, and knowledge gaps, we identify opportunities for expanding benefits achieved by NRR technologies and aligning research with critical barriers. We propose a research agenda addressing the most reported gaps (e.g., underlying process mechanisms, scale-up) and emphasizing rigorous investigations of systems-level impacts and product-market fit. Results from this study will facilitate interdisciplinary research on NRR technologies, guide technology development by academics and practitioners, and accelerate implementation for resource-efficient nutrient management fit for 21st century challenges.

    Copyright © 2021 American Chemical Society

    Read this article

    To access this article, please review the available access options below.

    Get instant access

    Purchase Access

    Read this article for 48 hours. Check out below using your ACS ID or as a guest.

    Recommended

    Access through Your Institution

    You may have access to this article through your institution.

    Your institution does not have access to this content. Add or change your institution or let them know you’d like them to include access.

    Supporting Information

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

    The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsestengg.0c00253.

    • Summaries of previous nutrient removal and recovery reviews; definitions of key terms used in this review; details on our literature review and analysis methodology and associated limitations; descriptions of nutrient removal and recovery process groups; more detailed information on reporting practices and available data for standard metrics; practitioner survey results; definitions of value propositions, knowledge gaps, and barriers; figures detailing reported knowledge gaps and barriers; and figures relating market size to reporting of recovered products (PDF)

    • Table S3-1, nutrient removal and recovery processes reviewed (XLSX)

    • Table S4-3, scope of studies reporting energy consumption, cost, and greenhouse gas emissions (XLSX)

    Terms & Conditions

    Electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. The American Chemical Society holds a copyright ownership interest in any copyrightable Supporting Information. Files available from the ACS website may be downloaded for personal use only. Users are not otherwise permitted to reproduce, republish, redistribute, or sell any Supporting Information from the ACS website, either in whole or in part, in either machine-readable form or any other form without permission from the American Chemical Society. For permission to reproduce, republish and redistribute this material, requesters must process their own requests via the RightsLink permission system. Information about how to use the RightsLink permission system can be found at http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

    Cited By

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

    This article is cited by 46 publications.

    1. Edward Apraku, Chloe M. Laguna, Robert M. Wood, Neha Sharma, Hang Dong, William A. Tarpeh. Enhancing Resource Recovery through Electro-Assisted Regeneration of an Ammonia-Selective Cation Exchange Resin. ACS ES&T Water 2024, 4 (10) , 4521-4532. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestwater.4c00543
    2. Anna Kogler, Meili Gong, Kindle S. Williams, William A. Tarpeh. Flexible Electrochemical Stripping for Wastewater Ammonia Recovery with On-Demand Product Tunability. Environmental Science & Technology Letters 2024, 11 (8) , 886-894. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.4c00366
    3. Zixuan Wang, Emma Thompson Brewster, Siyang Xing, Zhen He. Electrochemical Phosphorus Recovery from Anaerobically Digested Sludge: Improving Product Purity and Concentration. ACS ES&T Engineering 2024, 4 (8) , 1981-1989. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestengg.4c00172
    4. Sifat Kalam, Abhishek Dutta, Xuesong Li, Sangsuk Lee, Duong Nguyen, Anthony P. Straub, Jongho Lee. Maximizing Biochemical and Energy Recovery from Wastewater Using Vapor-Gap Membranes. ACS ES&T Engineering 2024, 4 (7) , 1540-1561. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestengg.4c00144
    5. Mst. Mahmoda Akter, Md. Anwar Hosen, Brandon H. Gilroyed, Shamima Akter Eti, Protima Sarker, Mohammad Mahbub Kabir, Mohammad Mohinuzzaman. Nutrient Recovery for Fertilizer Production and Wastewater Treatment for a Circular Economy. ACS Sustainable Resource Management 2024, 1 (4) , 787-798. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssusresmgt.4c00016
    6. Anna Kogler, Neha Sharma, Diana Tiburcio, Meili Gong, Dean M. Miller, Kindle S. Williams, Xi Chen, William A. Tarpeh. Long-Term Robustness and Failure Mechanisms of Electrochemical Stripping for Wastewater Ammonia Recovery. ACS Environmental Au 2024, 4 (2) , 89-105. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenvironau.3c00058
    7. Jianan Feng, Yalin Li, Timothy J. Strathmann, Jeremy S. Guest. Characterizing the Opportunity Space for Sustainable Hydrothermal Valorization of Wet Organic Wastes. Environmental Science & Technology 2024, 58 (5) , 2528-2541. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c07394
    8. Dean M. Miller, Kristen Abels, Jinyu Guo, Kindle S. Williams, Matthew J. Liu, William A. Tarpeh. Electrochemical Wastewater Refining: A Vision for Circular Chemical Manufacturing. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2023, 145 (36) , 19422-19439. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.3c01142
    9. William A. Tarpeh, Yan Du, Corey M. G. Carpenter, Enrique E. Rodriguez, Damian E. Helbling, Diana S. Aga, Nancy G. Love, Krista R. Wigginton. A Unit Process Approach to Nontarget Screening of Organic Contaminants during Urine Treatment. ACS ES&T Engineering 2023, 3 (4) , 590-601. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestengg.2c00366
    10. Hang Dong, Chloe Marie Laguna, Matthew J. Liu, Jinyu Guo, William A. Tarpeh. Electrified Ion Exchange Enabled by Water Dissociation in Bipolar Membranes for Nitrogen Recovery from Source-Separated Urine. Environmental Science & Technology 2022, 56 (22) , 16134-16143. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c03771
    11. Guanglong Liu, Cong Han, Minghao Kong, Wael H. M. Abdelraheem, Mallikarjuna N. Nadagouda, Dionysios D. Dionysiou. Nanoscale Zero-Valent Iron Confined in Anion Exchange Resins to Enhance Selective Adsorption of Phosphate from Wastewater. ACS ES&T Engineering 2022, 2 (8) , 1454-1464. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestengg.1c00506
    12. Xiaohan Shao, Sydney R. Johnson, William A. Tarpeh. Quantifying and Characterizing Sulfide Oxidation to Inform Operation of Electrochemical Sulfur Recovery from Wastewater. ACS ES&T Engineering 2022, 2 (5) , 807-818. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestengg.1c00376
    13. Abraham Noe-Hays, Ryan John Homeyer, Arthur P. Davis, Nancy G. Love. Advancing the Design and Operating Conditions for Block Freeze Concentration of Urine-Derived Fertilizer. ACS ES&T Engineering 2022, 2 (3) , 446-455. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestengg.1c00271
    14. Km Prottoy Shariar Piash, Noah Sprouse, Cole Hodges, Lian-Shin Lin, Oishi Sanyal. Elucidating organic and nutrient transport mechanisms in polyelectrolyte modified membranes for selective nutrient recovery. Journal of Membrane Science 2025, 715 , 123438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2024.123438
    15. Edward Apraku, McKenna Farmer, Chayse Lavallais, Danna A Soriano, Justin Notestein, Keith Tyo, Jennifer Dunn, William A Tarpeh, George F Wells. Toward a circular nitrogen bioeconomy: integrating nitrogen bioconcentration, separations, and high-value products for nitrogen recovery. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 2025, 91 , 103225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2024.103225
    16. Haidar Aldaach, Mohammed T. Zaki, Kevin D. Orner. Improving Prediction of Nutrient Recovery via Struvite Precipitation from Organic Waste Digestate. Environmental Engineering Science 2024, https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.2024.0116
    17. Jinyu Guo, Matthew J. Liu, Chloe Laguna, Dean M. Miller, Kindle S. Williams, Brandon D. Clark, Carolina Muñoz, Sarah J. Blair, Adam C. Nielander, Thomas F. Jaramillo, William A. Tarpeh. Electrodialysis and nitrate reduction (EDNR) to enable distributed ammonia manufacturing from wastewaters. Energy & Environmental Science 2024, 17 (22) , 8787-8800. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4EE03002H
    18. Ashton W. Merck, J. A. Deaver, L. Crane, E. S. Morrison, D. F. Call, T. H. Boyer, A. Marshall, K. Grieger. Stakeholder Views of Science and Technologies for Phosphorus Sustainability: A Comparative Analysis of Three Case Studies in Phosphorus Recovery in the U.S.. Society & Natural Resources 2024, 37 (11) , 1528-1545. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2024.2389806
    19. Kuppan Praveen, Sudharsanam Abinandan, Kadiyala Venkateswarlu, Mallavarapu Megharaj. Synergy of eco-innovation with on-farm practices enhances circularity beyond conventional nutrient recovery framework. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 2024, 208 , 107735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107735
    20. Allan Soo, Ho Kyong Shon. A nutrient circular economy framework for wastewater treatment plants. Desalination 2024, 44 , 118090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2024.118090
    21. Dario R Shaw, Akihiko Terada, Pascal E Saikaly. Future directions in microbial nitrogen cycling in wastewater treatment. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 2024, 88 , 103163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2024.103163
    22. Dean M. Miller, Matthew J. Liu, Kristen Abels, Anna Kogler, Kindle S. Williams, William A. Tarpeh. Engineering a molecular electrocatalytic system for energy-efficient ammonia production from wastewater nitrate. Energy & Environmental Science 2024, 17 (15) , 5691-5705. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4EE01727G
    23. Yuxian Gong, Xiaoyuan Wang, Xiaoan Bao, Ka Leung Lam. Life cycle assessment of ammonium sulfate recovery from urban wastewater. Blue-Green Systems 2024, 6 (1) , 90-99. https://doi.org/10.2166/bgs.2024.054
    24. Lin-Feng He, Shu-Jie Hu, Di Wu, Meng-Yue Zhang, Hong Liu, Yuan Liu. Comparative study on the nutrient recovery from source-separated urine using magnesium-air fuel cell in different operating modes. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 2024, 185 , 164-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2024.03.024
    25. Weikun Chen, Stefan Grimberg, Shane Rogers, Taeyoung Kim. Bipolar membrane electrodialysis for nutrient recovery from anaerobic digestion dewatering sidestream. Chemical Engineering Journal 2024, 488 , 150834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2024.150834
    26. Christian E. Alvarez Pugliese, Dayana Donneys-Victoria, Wilfredo J. Cardona-Velez, Gerardine G. Botte. Perspectives on electrochemical valorization of organic waste. Current Opinion in Electrochemistry 2024, 114 , 101508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coelec.2024.101508
    27. Seongmin Choi, Wonjun Lee, Hanwoong Kim, Gwangtaek Lee, Changsoo Lee, Dae-Yeol Cheong, Won-Keun Son, Kwiyong Kim. Ammonia concentration and recovery in an up-scaled electrochemical cell through screening of cation exchange membrane. Frontiers in Water 2024, 6 https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2024.1367315
    28. Armando Silva-Afonso, Carla Pimentel-Rodrigues. Water–Energy–Nutrients Nexus of Urban Environments. Water 2024, 16 (6) , 904. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16060904
    29. Naixin Zhang, Wenbiao Jin, Xu Zhou, Jing Sun, Mohammad Rafe Hatshan, Guangming Jiang. Nutrients recovery during sewage treatment by aquatic plants: A comprehensive evaluation. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 2024, 64 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2024.02.083
    30. Xiaohan Shao, Yixuan Huang, Robert M. Wood, William A. Tarpeh. Electrochemical sulfate production from sulfide-containing wastewaters and integration with electrochemical nitrogen recovery. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2024, 466 , 133527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.133527
    31. Changhyun Lee, Puttaswamy Madhusudan, Jong-Oh Kim. Recovery of phosphate using a zinc oxide/hydroxide and lanthanum hydroxide nanoflower adsorbent prepared via co-precipitation in water. Separation and Purification Technology 2024, 330 , 125313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2023.125313
    32. Tian Xia, Ang Chen, Yongxia Zi, Yuan Zhang, Qianzhi Xu, Yueshu Gao, Chunjie Li. Performance of fish sludge solubilization and phototrophic bioconversion by purple phototrophic bacteria for nutrient recovery in aquaponic system. Waste Management 2023, 171 , 105-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2023.08.016
    33. Chayse M. Lavallais, Jennifer B. Dunn. Developing product level indicators to advance the nitrogen circular economy. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 2023, 198 , 107167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.107167
    34. Álvaro Mayor, Sergi Vinardell, Kishore Ganesan, Carles Bacardí, Jose Luis Cortina, César Valderrama. Life-cycle assessment and techno-economic evaluation of the value chain in nutrient recovery from wastewater treatment plants for agricultural application. Science of The Total Environment 2023, 892 , 164452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164452
    35. Ashton W. Merck, Khara D. Grieger, Alison Deviney, Anna-Maria Marshall. Using a Phosphorus Flow Diagram as a Boundary Object to Inform Stakeholder Engagement. Sustainability 2023, 15 (15) , 11496. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151511496
    36. Jiayi Wu, Wei Ding, Nan Shen, Haiou Song, Yun Li, Guoxiang Wang, Yun Chen. Selective separation of volatile fatty acids and phosphorous recovery from fermented broth using flow-electrode capacitive deionization. Waste Management 2023, 165 , 12-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2023.04.021
    37. Jiaxin Du, T. David Waite, Jing Feng, Yang Lei, Wangwang Tang. Coupled electrochemical methods for nitrogen and phosphorus recovery from wastewater: a review. Environmental Chemistry Letters 2023, 21 (2) , 885-909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-023-01561-x
    38. Dominika Sobotka, Bogna Śniatała, Jacek Mąkinia. Technologies for Nutrient Recovery from Municipal Wastewater. 2023, 155-166. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18165-8_12
    39. Chengyuan Su, Xibing Zhou, Pingping Lu, Xiaoyun Dai, Zhuxin Chen, Bocai Liang, Yihao Tian, Menglin Chen. Role of coke media strategy in an adsorption-biological coupling technology for wastewater treatment performance, microbial community, and metabolic pathways features. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2023, 30 (5) , 13469-13482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23090-w
    40. Muhammad Naveed Afridi, Jong-Oh Kim. Statistical optimization of Mg-doped UiO-66-NH2 synthesis for resource recovery from wastewater using response surface methodology. Applied Surface Science 2022, 606 , 154973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.154973
    41. Mariana M. Vasquez, Kayana J. Tyson, Brian T. Hawkins, Lena Trotochaud, . Integration of silicate minerals for ammonium and phosphate removal with an on-site wastewater treatment prototype. PLOS Water 2022, 1 (9) , e0000048. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pwat.0000048
    42. Tuhin Kamilya, Rajneesh Kumar Gautam, Shobha Muthukumaran, Dimuth Navaratna, Sandip Mondal. Technical advances on current research trends and explore the future scope on nutrient recovery from waste-streams: a review and bibliometric analysis from 2000 to 2020. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2022, 29 (33) , 49632-49650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20895-7
    43. Muhammad Irfan, Sharjeel Waqas, Javed Akbar Khan, Saifur Rahman, Izabela Kruszelnicka, Dobrochna Ginter-Kramarczyk, Stanislaw Legutko, Marek Ochowiak, Sylwia Włodarczak, Krystian Czernek. Effect of Operating Parameters and Energy Expenditure on the Biological Performance of Rotating Biological Contactor for Wastewater Treatment. Energies 2022, 15 (10) , 3523. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15103523
    44. Anand V. Lalwani, Hang Dong, Linchao Mu, Kelly Woo, Hunter A. Johnson, Max A. Holliday, Jinyu Guo, Debbie G. Senesky, William A. Tarpeh. Selective aqueous ammonia sensors using electrochemical stripping and capacitive detection. AIChE Journal 2021, 67 (12) https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.17465
    45. Zhang Yan, Zongren Dai, Wenxiao Zheng, Zhenchao Lei, Jinwen Qiu, Wenjie Kuang, Weijun Huang, Chunhua Feng. Facile ammonium oxidation to nitrogen gas in acid wastewater by in situ photogenerated chlorine radicals. Water Research 2021, 205 , 117678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2021.117678
    46. Praveen Rosario, Ramya Viswash, Thamayanthi Seenivasan, Sudha Ramalingam, Katelyn L Sellgren, Sonia Grego, Lena Trotochaud. Potential Pitfalls in Wastewater Phosphorus Analysis and How to Avoid Them. Environmental Health Insights 2021, 15 https://doi.org/10.1177/11786302211019218

    ACS ES&T Engineering

    Cite this: ACS EST Engg. 2021, 1, 4, 662–684
    Click to copy citationCitation copied!
    https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestengg.0c00253
    Published March 15, 2021
    Copyright © 2021 American Chemical Society

    Article Views

    2978

    Altmetric

    -

    Citations

    Learn about these metrics

    Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

    Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

    The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.