ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Modification at the 2′-Position of the 4,5-Series of 2-Deoxystreptamine Aminoglycoside Antibiotics To Resist Aminoglycoside Modifying Enzymes and Increase Ribosomal Target Selectivity
My Activity

Figure 1Loading Img
  • Open Access
  • Editors Choice
Article

Modification at the 2′-Position of the 4,5-Series of 2-Deoxystreptamine Aminoglycoside Antibiotics To Resist Aminoglycoside Modifying Enzymes and Increase Ribosomal Target Selectivity
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

  • Girish C. Sati
    Girish C. Sati
    Department of Chemistry, Wayne State University, 5101 Cass Avenue, Detroit, Michigan 48202, United States
  • Vikram A. Sarpe
    Vikram A. Sarpe
    Department of Chemistry, Wayne State University, 5101 Cass Avenue, Detroit, Michigan 48202, United States
  • Takayuki Furukawa
    Takayuki Furukawa
    Department of Chemistry, Wayne State University, 5101 Cass Avenue, Detroit, Michigan 48202, United States
  • Sujit Mondal
    Sujit Mondal
    Department of Chemistry, Wayne State University, 5101 Cass Avenue, Detroit, Michigan 48202, United States
    More by Sujit Mondal
  • Matilde Mantovani
    Matilde Mantovani
    Institute of Medical Microbiology, University of Zurich, 28 Gloriastrasse, 8006 Zürich, Switzerland
  • Sven N. Hobbie
    Sven N. Hobbie
    Institute of Medical Microbiology, University of Zurich, 28 Gloriastrasse, 8006 Zürich, Switzerland
  • Andrea Vasella
    Andrea Vasella
    Organic Chemistry Laboratory, ETH Zürich, Vladimir-Prelog-Weg 1-5/10, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland
  • Erik C. Böttger
    Erik C. Böttger
    Institute of Medical Microbiology, University of Zurich, 28 Gloriastrasse, 8006 Zürich, Switzerland
  • David Crich*
    David Crich
    Department of Chemistry, Wayne State University, 5101 Cass Avenue, Detroit, Michigan 48202, United States
    *E-mail: [email protected]
    More by David Crich
Open PDFSupporting Information (2)

ACS Infectious Diseases

Cite this: ACS Infect. Dis. 2019, 5, 10, 1718–1730
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsinfecdis.9b00128
Published August 22, 2019

Copyright © 2019 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

A series of derivatives of the 4,5-disubstituted class of 2-deoxystreptamine aminoglycoside antibiotics neomycin, paromomycin, and ribostamycin was prepared and assayed for (i) their ability to inhibit protein synthesis by bacterial ribosomes and by engineered bacterial ribosomes carrying eukaryotic decoding A sites, (ii) antibacterial activity against wild type Gram negative and positive pathogens, and (iii) overcoming resistance due to the presence of aminoacyl transferases acting at the 2′-position. The presence of five suitably positioned residual basic amino groups was found to be necessary for activity to be retained upon removal or alkylation of the 2′-position amine. As alkylation of the 2′-amino group overcomes the action of resistance determinants acting at that position and in addition results in increased selectivity for the prokaryotic over eukaryotic ribosomes, it constitutes an attractive modification for introduction into next generation aminoglycosides. In the neomycin series, the installation of small (formamide) or basic (glycinamide) amido groups on the 2′-amino group is tolerated.

Copyright © 2019 American Chemical Society
The increasing threat of multidrug-resistant infectious diseases demands continued development of new and improved anti-infective agents. (1−6) In this regard, aminoglycosides (AGAs) (7−11) are strong candidates for further development because of their widespread availability, innate potency, and the extensive knowledge base covering their mechanism of action (10,12,13) and chemistry. (7,14−16) Together with the deep understanding of the mechanism of resistance, this knowledge base has long informed the structure-based design of new generations of AGAs, (17−24) as exemplified by the recent introduction of the semisynthetic AGA plazomicin 1 into clinical practice. (25,26) In addition to many aminoglycoside modifying enzymes (AMEs), (27−30) a second important and growing mechanism of AGA resistance is the modification of G1405 in the drug binding pocket in the decoding A site of the bacterial ribosome by the ribosomal methyl transferases (RMTs). (31) The action of the G1405 RMTs greatly diminishes the activity of all members of the 4,6-disubstituted 2-deoxystreptamine (DOS) class of AGAs, that is, all AGAs in current clinical use including plazomicin, (25,26,32) and is especially problematic when the responsible genes are encoded on the same plasmid as those for a metallocarbapenemase. (31,33−35) Fortunately, DOS-type AGAs lacking a ring substitution at the 6-position do not make direct contact with G1405 and are not susceptible to the action of RMTs. (36) Such AGAs include the 4,5-disubstituted DOS class such as paromomycin 2 and neomycin 3, and the unusual monosubstituted DOS AGA apramycin 4, (37−41) currently a clinical candidate for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections. (42)
Accordingly, we have focused our efforts on the design and development of semisynthetic AGAs in the 4,5-DOS class with emphasis on modification at the 4′- and 6′-positions of paromomycin, (43−46) as exemplified by propylamycin 5 (4′-deoxy-4′-propylparomomycin). (47) In addition to thwarting the action of several AMEs, we discovered that the introduction of appropriate substituents to the 4′-position of paromomycin disproportionately reduces affinity for the drug binding site in the eukaryotic ribosomes, cytoplasmic and mitochondrial, thereby increasing target selectivity and reducing ototoxicity, an important side effect of AGA therapy, (48−50) as borne out by in vivo studies with guinea pigs. (44,47) Stimulated by early observations in the literature on the derivatization of the 2′-position of paromomycin and neomycin directed at circumventing the action of the AAC(2′) class of aminoglycoside acetyl transferase AMEs, (51−53) we now turn our attention to and report here on the possibility of circumventing AME action in conjunction with improvements in target selectivity by modification at the 2′-position of paromomycin 2, neomycin 3, and ribostamycin 6 (Figure 1).

Results

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Chemical Synthesis

By adapting a literature procedure for the regioselective tetra-N-acetylation of paromomycin, (51) treatment of a solution of paromomycin 2 and neomycin B 3 free bases in methanol containing 1N aqueous HCl with acetic anhydride gave 1,3,2′′′,6′′′-tetra-N-acetyl paromomycin 7 and 1,3,6′,2′′′,6′′′-penta-N-acetyl neomycin 8 as the major products in 41 and 39% isolated yields, respectively. Reductive amination of both 7 and 8 with benzaldehyde, followed by a second reductive amination with formaldehyde, and, in the case of the neomycin derivative by peracetylation, afforded the 2′-N-benzyl-2′-N-methyl paromomycin and neomycin derivatives 9 and 10 in 48 and 62% yield, respectively (Scheme 1). Reductive amination of 7 with acetaldehyde and propionaldehyde gave 11 and 12, whereas treatment of 8 with acetaldehyde and sodium cyanoborohydride gave 13, all in moderate to good yield. Hydrogenolysis of 9 and 10 over palladium hydroxide in methanol followed by heating to reflux with either aqueous sodium hydroxide or barium hydroxide and then Sephadex chromatography gave the 2′-N-methyl derivatives 14 and 15 of paromomycin and neomycin, respectively. Simple heating of 1113 with aqueous sodium or barium hydroxide followed by Sephadex chromatography afforded the known (51) 2′-N-ethyl paromomycin derivative 16, the corresponding neomycin derivative 18, and the 2′-N-propyl paromomycin derivative 17. All compounds in this and subsequent schemes were isolated as their peracetate salts following lyophilization from aqueous acetic acid.

Scheme 1

Scheme 1. Synthesis of 2′-N-Alkyl Derivatives of Paromomycin and Neomycin
Following the Farmitalia protocol, (52) installation of a benzyl carbamate on the amino group of 7 followed by peracetylation gave 19 in 57% yield. Hydrogenolysis of 19 followed by diazotization in aqueous acetic acid gave the known (52) pseudotrisaccharide 20 in 52% yield. Glycosylation of acceptor 20 with donors 21 and 22, prepared as described in the literature, (54,55) with activation by N-iodosuccinimide and trimethylsilyl triflate in a mixture of dichloromethane and dimethylformamide, so as to obtain the axial glycosides selectively, (56) gave 23 and 24 in 46 and 29% yield, respectively. Hydrogenolysis, heating to reflux in aqueous sodium hydroxide, and Sephadex chromatography then gave the 2′-desamino-2′-hydroxy paromomycin and neomycin derivatives 25 and 26, respectively (Scheme 2). Glycosylation with donor 21 leading directly to the glycoside 23 was considered preferable to the more elaborate sequence employed previously in the preparation of 25 from 20 by the Farmitalia group who nevertheless favored the use of DMF as solvent in their glycosylation reaction. (52) The cleavage of ring I from 19 by the nitrosylation protocol confirms the regioselectivity of the initial partial acetylation of 2 giving 7 (Scheme 1) and of all subsequent derivatives of it.

Scheme 2

Scheme 2. Synthesis of 2′-Desamino-2′-hydroxy Paromomycin and Neomycin Derivatives
Formylation of 8 with formic acetic anhydride followed by acetylation gave the 2′-N-formyl neomycin derivative 27. This was converted by reaction with phosphorus oxychloride and triethylamine to the corresponding isocyanate, which without characterization was subject to the Barton deamination reaction (57−59) using tris(trimethylsilyl)silane (60) in place of the original tributyltin hydride, to afford the 2′-desamino derivative 28 in 44% yield for the two steps. Hydrolysis with hot barium hydroxide then afforded 29 in the standard manner (Scheme 3). No attempt was made to prepare the corresponding 2′-desamino paromomycin derivative in view of the modest antibacterial activity of the 2′-desamino-2′-hydroxy paromomycin derivative 25.

Scheme 3

Scheme 3. Synthesis of 2′-Desamino Neomycin
Turning to the preparation of 2′-N-acyl derivatives, neomycin B 3 was treated with acetic anhydride in the presence of HCl to give crude 8, which was subjected to reaction with imidazole sulfonyl azide (61−64) and potassium carbonate in the presence of copper sulfate to give the corresponding 2′-azido derivative. Without isolation, and adopting the Grieco protocol for acetamide cleavage, (65) this compound was heated to reflux in tetrahydrofuran with Boc2O and DMAP, followed by acetylation with acetic anhydride in pyridine to give 30 in 13% overall yield for the four steps from 3 (Scheme 4). Treatment with sodium methoxide in methanol followed by Staudinger reduction of the azide with trimethylphosphine (66) then afforded a 2′-amine 31 suitable for installation of various amides. Treatment of 31 with formic acetic anhydride or acetic anhydride in pyridine followed by aqueous methanolic sodium carbonate then gave amides 32 and 33 in 78 and 88% yield, respectively. Coupling of 31 with azidoacetic acid (67) by means of EDC and HOBt gave the azido acetamide 34 in 68% yield. Finally, stirring of 32 and 33 with wet trifluoroacetic acid in the presence of anisole, followed by sephadex chromatography and lyophilization from acetic acid gave the 2′-N-formamide 35, and an authentic sample of the acetamide 36 in 42, and 81% yields, respectively. In the case of the glycinamide 37, isolated in 48% yield, the removal of the carbamate groups was preceded by reduction of the azide (Scheme 4). It is of interest, although not inconsistent with the literature, (68−70) that the formamide 35 exists in D2O solution as an unassigned 7:3 mixture of rotamers.

Scheme 4

Scheme 4. Synthesis of Neomycin 2′-Amides
In the ribostamycin series, the parent 6 was regioselectively protected as the 1,3,6′-tris(benzyloxycarbamate) 38 by treatment with N-(benzyloxycarbonyloxy)-5-norborene-endo-2,3-dicarboximide (NBD) (71) in the presence of sodium carbonate in 36% yield. Sequential reductive amination with benzaldehyde and then with formaldehyde gave the 2′-N-benzyl-2′-N-methyl derivative 39 in 24% yield, while parallel treatment with acetaldehyde and sodium cyanoborohydride gave the 2′-N-ethyl derivative 40 in 44% yield. Hydrogenolysis of 39 and 40 over palladium hydroxide then afforded 2′-N-methyl and 2′-N-ethyl ribostamycin, 41 and 42, in 26 and 23% yield, respectively (Scheme 5). Reaction of 38 with formic acetic anhydride and pyridine provided the 2′-formamide 43 in 59%, which was converted to the peracetate 44 in 75% yield in the standard manner. Dehydration of 44 with phosphorusoxy chloride and triethylamine afforded the corresponding 2′-isonitrile, which was subjected to tris(trimethylsilyl)silane and AIBN in hot toluene to give the 2′-desamino derivative 45 in 66% yield for the two steps. Deprotection with sodium methoxide in methanol followed by hydrogenloysis then afforded 2′-desamino ribostamycin 46 in 61% yield.

Scheme 5

Scheme 5. Synthesis of Ribostamycin Derivatives 41, 42, and 46
To prepare 2′-desamino-2′-hydroxy ribostamycin derivatives, we again took an approach based on glycosylation of a 2-deoxystreptamine derivative. Thus, adapting Hanessian’s protocol for the degradation of rings I and IV, (72) the perazido paromomycin derivative 47 (73) was treated with periodic acid followed by triethylamine to afford the 5-O-ribosyl-2-deoxystreptamine derivative 48 in 23% yield (Scheme 6). Installation of a trityl group on the primary alcohol to give 49 in 52% was followed by conversion of the cis-diol to the corresponding acetonide 50 in 95% yield with 2,2-dimethoxypropane under catalysis by camphor-10-sufonic acid. Treatment of 50 with tert-butyldimethylsilyl triflate in the presence of 2,6-lutidine gave a single monosilyl ether 51 in 82% yield. Notwithstanding the literature precedent for the regioselective monofunctionalization of 50-like diols at the 6-position, (74)51 was converted to the crystalline derivative 52 in 60% yield by Staudinger reduction of the azides followed by amide formation, whose structures were confirmed by X-ray crystallography (Supporting Information, Figure S1, CCDC 1908319). The glycosyl acceptor 51 was converted to the α-glycoside 55 in 47% yield by means of reaction with sulfoxide 53 (Supporting Information) on activation with triflic anhydride. Similarly, glycosylation of 51 with sulfoxide 54 (Supporting Information) gave the α-glycoside 56 in 65% yield. Treatment of 55 and 56 with tetrabutylammonium fluoride and then acetic acid affording the triols 57 and 58, both in 44% yield, was followed by Staudinger reaction and hydrogenolysis to give 2′-desamino-2′-hydroxy ribostamycin 59 and the ribostamycin regioisomer 60 in 51 and 40% yields, respectively (Scheme 6).

Figure 1

Figure 1. Some natural and semisynthetic aminoglycoside antibiotics.

Scheme 6

Scheme 6. Synthesis of Ribostamycin Derivatives 59 and 60

Activity and Selectivity at the Target Level

All compounds were studied for their ability to inhibit protein synthesis in a series of cell-free translation assays as described previously. (43) These assays employed wild-type bacterial Mycobacterium smegmatis ribosomes and humanized hybrid M. smegmatis ribosomes carrying complete eukaryotic decoding A sites, that is, the crystallographically characterized drug binding pocket (Figure 3), (36,75) from human mitochondrial ribosomes (Mit 13), A1555G mutant mitochondrial ribosomes (A1555), and human cytoplasmic ribosomes (Cyt 14) (Figure 2 and Table 1). (76) This model system, developed in our laboratories, was previously employed to identify the mitoribosome as target in aminoglycoside ototoxicity, (77) to study the mechanisms of mutant rRNA-associated deafness, (78) and to rationalize aminoglycoside activity against protozoa. (79) In the series of experiments reported in Table 1, inhibition of the mitochondrial ribosome, together with slow clearance from the inner ear, is thought to be the root cause of AGA-induced ototoxicity; the hypersusceptibility to AGA-induced ototoxicity found in a subset of the population arises from the presence of the A1555G mutation in the mitochondrial decoding A site. (77,78,80,81) Inhibition of the human cytoplasmic ribosome on the other hand is expected to result in more systemic toxicity.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Decoding A sites of prokaryotic and eukaryotic ribosomes. The bacterial AGA binding pocket is boxed. The bacterial numbering scheme is illustrated for the AGA binding pocket. Changes from the bacterial ribosome binding pocket are colored green. The A1555G mutant conferring hypersusceptibility to AGA ototoxicity is colored red.

Table 1. Antiribosomal Activities (IC50,μM) and Selectivitiesa
 substituent IC50, μMselectivity
compound6′2′basic amino groupsbacterialMit13A1555GCyt14Mit13A1555GCyt14
Neomycin Series
3NH2NH260.044.30.43610810900
15NH2NHMe60.014.71.1374701103700
18NH2NHEt60.02111.643550802150
26NH2OH50.03362.91081200973600
29NH2H50.03220.985773302833
35NH2NHCHO50.1254131274501081058
36NH2NHAc55.39328147185.328
37NH2NHglycyl50.16111.225698156
Paromomycin Series
2OHNH250.0414212313550300775
14OHNHMe40.051505460300010801200
16OHNHEt50.05220844344001680860
17OHNHPr50.0722358323186829457
25OHOH42.2662313446301142203
Ribostamycin Series
6NH2NH240.10      
41NH2NHMe41.13      
42NH2NHEt 1.93      
59NH2OH32.66      
46NH2H39.93      
60bNH2OH4>20      
a

Selectivities are obtained by dividing the eukaryotic by the bacterial values.

b

Compound 60 is additionally modified at the 3′-position by replacement of the hydroxyl group by an amino group.

As shown in Table 1, 2′-N-methylation and ethylation have little to no effect on the ability of paromomycin or neomycin to inhibit translation by the bacterial ribosome. Even 2′-N-propylation has a minimal effect as demonstrated with the paromomycin derivative 17. The effects of these 2′-N-alkylations on translation by the mitochondrial and cytoplasmic hybrid ribosomes are minimal for paromomycin but result in significant increases in selectivity for neomycin. In addition, these modifications have a marked effect on A1555G mutant mitochondrial ribosomes resulting in increases in selectivity of between 3- and 10-fold. The minimal loss of inhibitory activity of 2′-N-ethyl paromomycin for the bacterial ribosome is consistent with the limited reduction in antibacterial activity observed previously for this modification. (51) In contrast to the minimal influence of 2′-N-alkylation in the paromomycin and neomycin series, the comparable 2′-N-alkylated ribostamycin derivatives 41 and 42 were found to be 10-fold less active than the parent against the bacterial ribosome. In view of the low antibacterioribosomal activity of 41 and 42 and all subsequent ribostamycin derivatives, the activity of ribostamycin compounds against the eukaryotic ribosomes was not investigated.
Substitution of a hydroxyl group for an amino group at the 2′-position has minimal influence on antiribosomal activity in the neomycin series (analogue 26), consistent with the antibacterial activity reported for this compound previously. (52) Notably, a significant increase in selectivity for all eukaryotic decoding sites (mitochondrial, A1555G, and cytosolic) is achieved by the 2′-hydroxyl modification. However, the identical substitution is detrimental for both paromomycin and ribostamycin as evidenced by the corresponding paromomycin and ribostamycin analogues 25 and 59. The high activity of 26 suggested that further such modifications would be tolerated in the neomycin series, as was borne out by the 2′-desamino neomycin derivative 29, which again displays increased across the board selectivity compared to the parent. The substantially reduced activity of 2′-desamino-2′-hydroxy paromomycin 25 and of 2′-desaminoribostamycin 46 discouraged us from making any further modifications to the 2′-position of paromomycin and ribostamycin that result in loss of the basic amine. In an attempt to remove the 2′-amino group without a change in the number of basic amines present, ribostamycin was converted to the regioisomer 60 in which the 2′-amino group has been substituted by an hydroxyl group, while the inverse modification was affected at the 3′-position. Unfortunately, this modification was associated with a substantial loss of activity.
Turning to the installation of amides at the 2′-position, and restricting ourselves to the neomycin series, formylation giving the neomycin derivative 35 resulted in little loss of activity against the bacterial ribosome coupled with a substantial increase in selectivity for the mitochondrial and mutant mitochondrial ribosomes. This is in contrast to 2′-N-acetylation, the modification introduced by the AAC(2′) family of AMEs, which led to a greater than 100-fold loss in activity in derivative 36. The negative influence of the 2′-N-acetyl modification on activity can be largely overcome by its coupling with the reinstallation of a basic amine as in the 2′-N-glycyl neomycin derivative 37, which shows only a 4-fold loss of activity against the bacterial ribosome compared to the parent. However, this modification comes with a substantial loss in selectivity with regard to the cytoplasmic ribosome. These observations on the influence of amide formation at the 2′-position are consistent with the prior literature describing other 2′-amides. Thus, it has been reported that the 2′-N-glycinamide derivatives of simple aminoalkyl 2,6-diamino-α-d-glucopyranosides, and of fortimicin B, retain antibacterial activity as does 2′-formamido sisomicin. (82−84)

Antibacterial Activity in the Absence and Presence of Aminoglycoside Modifying Enzymes

The antibacterial activities displayed by the various paromomycin, neomycin, and ribostamycin derivatives against clinical strains of the Gram-positive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and the Gram-negative Escherichia coli (Table 2) were consistent with their ability to inhibit bacterial protein synthesis in the translation assays (Table 1). The more potent compounds were also screened for activity against a single wild-type clinical strain each of the ESKAPE pathogens, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter cloacae, and Acinetobacter baumannii, with MICs determined to be ≤4 μg/mL (Table 2).
Table 2. Antibacterial Activities (MIC, μg/mL)a
 substituentMRSAE. coliK. pneuE. cloaA. baum
compound6′2′AG038AG001AG003AG215AG290AG225
Neomycin Series
3NH2NH20.5110.25–0.511–2
15NH2NHMe0.5210.50.5–11
18NH2NHEt0.51–210.50.5–11
26NH2OH22–42–40.511
29NH2H121–20.511
35NH2NHCHO2–44–84–81–222
36NH2NHAc>128>128>128   
37NH2NHglycyl41632   
Paromomycin Series
2OHNH242–44–8122
16OHNHEt81616   
14OHNHMe8816   
17OHNHPr8–161616   
25OHOH64–128>128>128   
Ribostamycin Series
6NH2NH244–84–8244
41NH2NHMe64–12864–12864   
42NH2NHEt>128128128   
59NH2OH>128>128>128   
46NH2H≥256     
60bNH2OH>128>128>128   
a

All values were determined in duplicate using 2-fold dilution series.

b

Compound 60 is additionally modified at the 3′-position by replacement of the hydroxyl group by an amino group.

As the 2′-amino group is the target for acetylation by the AAC(2′) class of AMEs, the more active compounds were screened for activity against two clinical strains of E. coli carrying different isoforms of AAC(2′) (Table 3). The presence of either of these AAC(2′) isoforms greatly abrogates the activity of both paromomycin and neomycin, consistent with the minimal activity of authentic 2′-N-acetyl neomycin 36. In contrast, 2′-N-methylation, ethylation, and propylation, compounds 1418, maintains activity in the presence of AAC(2′). Similarly, the 2′-desamino-2′-hydroxy and 2′-desamino modifications in the neomycin series, compounds 26 and 29, resist the AAC(2′) class of AMEs in E. coli, as does the 2′-N-formyl modification displayed in compound 35. Plazomicin, obtained by an improved synthesis, (32) and amikacin, one carrying a 2′-amino group and the other a 2′-hydroxy group, served as controls for the AAC(2′) AMEs in E. coli.
Table 3. Antibacterial Activities Against E. coli Strains with Acquired AAC(2′) Resistance and Mycobacteria with Intrinsic AAC(2′) Resistance (MIC, μg/mL)a
 substituentE. coli AG001E. coli AG106E. coli pH434M. abscessus ATCC 19977 (AAC2′)ratio M. abscessus wt/E. coli wt
compound6′2′wtAAC(2′)-1aAAC(2′)-1bwt 
Neomycin Series
3NH2NH2116>641616
15NH2NHMe22.02–40.250.125
18NH2NHEt1–2120.250.125–0.25
26NH2OH2–42420.5–1.0
29NH2H22421
35NH2NHCHO4–888–16  
37NH2NHglycyl1616–32   
Paromomycin Series
2OHNH22–4>64>6482–4
14OHNHMe888162
16OHNHEt16 8322
17OHNHPr16 8322
Ribostamycin Series
6NH2NH24–8128>128  
plazomicin  0.5–18–168  
amikacin (2′OH)  222  
a

All values were determined in duplicate using 2-fold dilution series.

Mycobacterium abscessus is a growing threat in hospitalized patients with chronic pulmonary disease or cystic fibrosis. (85) The innate AGA susceptibility of M. abscessus is determined by the presence of a functional AAC(2′) AME, (86) prompting us to test the more active compounds against the M. abscessus reference strain ATCC 19977. To illustrate the effect of the mycobacterial AAC2′ on compound activity, we also calculated the ratio of M. abscessus wt (AAC2′ present) versus E. coli wt (no AAC2′ present). Inherently, the mycobacterial AAC2′ shows little activity toward paromomycin but significantly reduces the antimycobacterial activity of neomycin. In line with expectation, the 2′-N-alkyl derivatives of paromomycin 14, 16, and 17 did not show any difference compared to the parent; however, the same modifications in the neomycin series, as in compounds 15 and 18, were highly efficacious resulting in a 64-fold reduction in MIC values (Table 3). The 2′-desamino-2′-hydroxy and 2′-desamino derivatives 26 and 29 of neomycin also showed much greater activity against M. abscessus than the parent.
Finally, selected compounds were screened for activity in the presence of AAC(3), AAC(6′), ANT(4′,4′′), and APH(3′). As expected, none of the modifications investigated was effective at suppressing the activity of these AMEs.

Discussion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Classically, the activity of AGAs is considered to be correlated to the number of basic amino groups (87) and so, following protonation at physiological pH, to the degree of electrostatic attraction with the negatively charged drug binding pocket. (88,89) The electrostatic component of the binding energy is supplemented by a number of direct and water-mediated hydrogen bonding contacts and other directional intermolecular noncovalent interactions between the drug and the binding pocket (Figure 3). (27,75,87,90−92) The partitioning of the contribution of an individual protonated amine to the binding energy between electrostatic and directed components necessarily varies with the location of the amine in the AGA. Thus, while the amines of rings I and II of the 4,5-AGAs are involved in multiple H-bonding interactions with the drug-binding pocket, those of ring IV do so to a lesser extent (Figure 3). Indeed, it has been suggested that ring IV serves simply as a concentration of positive charge that makes a strong electrostatic contribution to the binding energy. (93) Finally, intramolecular conformation-restricting noncovalent interactions within the body of the drug itself have also been suggested to be an important component of the binding energy. (94) Among the hydrogen bonding interactions between rings I and III of the 4,5-AGAs, specifically those between the protonated 2′-amino group and O4′′ or O5′′ of the ribofuranosyl moiety (Figure 3) (75,95) are featured prominently. On the basis of these interactions, Hermann and co-workers prepared the conformationally restricted paromomycin and neomycin analogues 61 and 62 and studied their binding to the bacterial decoding A site. (96,97) Contemporaneously, and with a view to exploiting the differing conformations of AGAs bound to the decoding A site and that of the ANT(4′,4′′) AMEs, Asensio and co-workers prepared 62 and the higher homologue 63. (98,99) Other workers have prepared complex aminoglycosides by ribofuranosylation of the 5-OH in the 4,6-AGAs to take advantage of this intramolecular interaction and other contacts. (100,101) Unfortunately, each of 6163 showed reduced affinity for decoding A site models and reduced antibacterial activity, the latter in common with an earlier conformationally restricted analogue 64 of the ribostamycin isomer xylostacin. (102)

Figure 3

Figure 3. Schematic of the crystallographically determined interactions of neomycin 3 (X = NH2+) and paromomycin 2 (X = O) with the AGA binding pocket. Ribostamycin 6 (X = NH2+) binds identically but lacks ring IV.

The pattern of antibacterioribosomal activity (Table 1) and antibacterial activity (Table 2) of the present series of compounds, together with the reduced activity of 6163, provides the opportunity to examine the interplay between electrostatic and hydrogen bonding interactions in greater detail. The parity in the ability of neomycin and its analogues 26 and 29 lacking the 2′-amino group to inhibit the function of the bacterial ribosome (Table 1) and the growth of wild-type Gram-negative pathogens (Table 2) indicates that the presence of five appropriately located protonated amino groups provides sufficient electrostatic attraction with the negatively charged ribosome to overcome the absence of the 2′-amino group for this scaffold. For paramomycin and ribostamycin on the other hand, with only five and four such basic amino groups, respectively, the reduction in the electrostatic component conferred by removal of the 2′-amino group is critical, as borne out by the reduced activity of 2′-desamino-2′-hydroxy paromomycin 25 with its four protonated amino groups and by the ribostamycin analogues 46 and 59, both with only three protonated amino groups (Tables 1 and 2). Compensating for the loss of C(2′)NH2 in 59 by reintroducing an amino group at the 3′ position, resulting in compound 60, did not restore activity. This indicates that in the ribostamycin series, with only four basic amino groups, electrostatic attraction alone is not sufficient for activity but must be complemented by location of one of these groups at the 2′-position.
Alkylation of N2′ is tolerated when the molecule possesses five or more suitably placed basic amines as is clear from the activity of the neomycin and paromomycin analogs 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18 (Tables 1 and 3). The loss of activity observed for the 2′-N-alkylated ribostamycin analogues 41 and 42 on the other hand indicates that even the correct placement of four basic amino groups is insufficient to compensate for the destabilizing effect of the alkyl groups. The retention of activity of 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18 contrasts with the reduced activity of the cyclic (2′-N-alkylated) neomycin and paromomycin derivatives 6163. Cyclization of the 2′-amine onto the 5′′-position was reported to result in a reduction in basicity of the 2′-amine in 61 and 62 by ∼1.5 pKa units. This reduction in pKa is most likely due to the inductively electron-withdrawing O4′′ ribosyl ring oxygen, which is β- to N2′ in 61 and 62, (103) albeit the authors suggested steric inhibition of solvation of the protonated amino group as the cause. (96,97,104) Whatever the underlying reason for the reduction in basicity, affinity for the ribosome was restored under more acidic conditions, illustrating the importance of protonation of N2′ in overcoming the negative effect of the cyclic modification. Simple alkylation, as in 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18, on the other hand is expected to increase the basicity of N2′ consistent with their high levels of activity. (103) The homologue 63 of 62 lacks the basicity-reducing vicinal relationship between N2′ and O4′′ present in 61 and 62 but also shows a significant reduction in antibacterial activity and affinity for a decoding A site model. (99) This suggests that the diminished activity of 6163 is at least in part due to other factors such as the loss of a crystallographically observed (Figure 3) (75) hydrogen bond from 5′′–OH in the parent to N7 of G1491 at the bottom of the binding site. (96−99) Overall, in the absence of cyclic constraints, the presence of a basic amino group at the 2′-position of the 4,5-AGAs is not necessary provided five other appropriately located basic amino groups are present in the molecule. When a 4,5-series AGA contains only four basic amino groups, one of them must be at the 2′-position. Alkylation of the 2′-amino group is tolerated in the absence of cyclic constraints provided there are a minimum of five basic amino groups in the molecule.
With regard to the 2′-N-acyl derivatives of neomycin, the loss of activity observed with the acetamide 36 was anticipated in view of the well-known ability of the AAC(2′) AMEs to significantly reduce the activity of AGAs (Table 2). In view of the high levels of activity retained by neomycin derivatives 26 and 29, both of which lack a basic nitrogen at the 2′-position, the loss of activity due to 2′-acetamide formation cannot result from a reduction in electrostatic binding energy in neomycin. The loss of activity on acetamide formation can also not be due to the inclusion of a hydrophobic methyl group, as simple 2′-N-alkylation is well tolerated in both paromomycin and neomycin. By a process of elimination, the detrimental effect of the 2′-acetamido group in the neomycin series must arise either from a steric interaction or an unfavorable electrostatic interaction involving the amide carbonyl group. The steric component of this interaction is more important for the 2′-acetamide than for the 2′-N-alkyl derivatives because of the rigid nature of the amide function and its well-known orientation with respect to the pyranose ring in all 2-deoxy-2-acetamido glucopyranose derivatives. (69) Further, it results mainly from the presence of the acetamide methyl group as the corresponding formamide 36 is considerably more active. In addition to its smaller size, the formamide 36 is also capable of avoiding any unfavorable electrostatic interaction by population of the cis- rather than the trans-rotamer. (70) Finally, the unfavorable interaction in the acetamide is not so large as to prevent docking of the drug into the binding site, as it can be partially overcome by the introduction of a further basic amino group as in the glycinamide 37.

Conclusion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Extensive structure activity relationships (SAR) have been provided, resulting from modification of the 2′-position by deletion, replacement by a hydroxy group, alkylation, and in part acylation of the AGAs neomycin, paromomycin, and ribostamycin. This SAR leads to a series of conclusions on the influence of modification at this position on ribosomal affinity and antibacterial activity. Thus, the presence of a basic amino group at the 2′-position of the 4,5-AGAs is not essential for activity provided five other suitably placed basic amines are present in the molecule. In contrast, a basic amino group is required at the 2′-position when a 4,5-series AGA contains only four such basic amines. With five correctly placed basic amino groups present, alkylation of the 2′-amine is tolerated. Most notably, in paromomycin and in particular neomycin modification of the 2′-amino group also results in a gain in selectivity for the bacterial over the eukaryotic ribosomes, thereby providing an attractive means of both overcoming resistance due to the presence of AAC(2′)-type resistance determinants and increasing ribosomal target selectivity by a single modification.
Finally, the changes in selectivity between the prokaryotic and the different eukaryotic ribosomes occasioned by the various modifications introduced at the 2′-position (Table 1) presumably arise by indirect effects as the 2′-amine makes no direct contact with the drug binding pocket (Figure 3). These differential effects likely arise from interactions of the AGAs with the ribosomal base 1491, which is G in the bacterial ribosomes and A or C in the humanized ribosomes (Figure 2). Thus, modification of the 2′-substituent necessarily affects the CH−π interaction of the 4′–C–H bond with the base 1491 and, because of the H-bond network, the H-bond of the 5′′-hydroxyl group with the same base (Figure 3), both in a base-dependent manner.

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.9b00128.

  • Full experimental details and copies of 1H and 13C NMR spectra for all new AGAs (PDF)

  • Crystallographic data (CIF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Author
    • David Crich - Department of Chemistry, Wayne State University, 5101 Cass Avenue, Detroit, Michigan 48202, United StatesPresent Address: D.C.: Departments of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Sciences, and Chemistry, and Complex Carbohydrate Research Center, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, United StatesOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-2400-0083 Email: [email protected]
  • Authors
    • Girish C. Sati - Department of Chemistry, Wayne State University, 5101 Cass Avenue, Detroit, Michigan 48202, United States
    • Vikram A. Sarpe - Department of Chemistry, Wayne State University, 5101 Cass Avenue, Detroit, Michigan 48202, United StatesPresent Address: V.A.S.: Department of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Sciences, and Complex Carbohydrate Research Center, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, United StatesOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0001-9855-8923
    • Takayuki Furukawa - Department of Chemistry, Wayne State University, 5101 Cass Avenue, Detroit, Michigan 48202, United States
    • Sujit Mondal - Department of Chemistry, Wayne State University, 5101 Cass Avenue, Detroit, Michigan 48202, United States
    • Matilde Mantovani - Institute of Medical Microbiology, University of Zurich, 28 Gloriastrasse, 8006 Zürich, Switzerland
    • Sven N. Hobbie - Institute of Medical Microbiology, University of Zurich, 28 Gloriastrasse, 8006 Zürich, Switzerland
    • Andrea Vasella - Organic Chemistry Laboratory, ETH Zürich, Vladimir-Prelog-Weg 1-5/10, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland
    • Erik C. Böttger - Institute of Medical Microbiology, University of Zurich, 28 Gloriastrasse, 8006 Zürich, Switzerland
  • Notes
    The authors declare the following competing financial interest(s): D.C., A.V., S.N.H., and E.C.B. are cofounders of and have an equity interest in Juvabis AG, a biotech startup operating in the field of aminoglycoside antibiotics.

Acknowledgments

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

We thank the NIH (AI123352) for support and Dr. Philip Martin, WSU, for the X-ray structure. E.C.B. thanks the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF No. 407240_166998) and JPIAMR “RIBOTARGET” (SNF No. 40AR40_185777) for partial support of the work in Zurich.

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 104 other publications.

  1. 1
    Chang, H.-H., Cohen, T., Grad, Y. H., Hanage, W. P., O’Brien, T. F., and Lipsitch, M. (2015) Origin and Proliferation of Multiple-Drug Resistance in Bacterial Pathogens. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 79, 101116,  DOI: 10.1128/MMBR.00039-14
  2. 2
    Fisher, J. F. and Mobashery, S. (2016) Endless Resistance. Endless Antibiotics?. MedChemComm 7, 3749,  DOI: 10.1039/C5MD00394F
  3. 3
    Pendleton, J. N., Gorman, S. P., and Gilmore, B. F. (2013) Clinical Relevance of ESKAPE Pathogens. Expert Rev. Anti-Infect. Ther. 11, 297308,  DOI: 10.1586/eri.13.12
  4. 4
    O'Connell, K. M. G., Hodgkinson, J. T., Sore, H. F., Welch, M., Salmond, G. P. C., and Spring, D. R. (2013) Combating Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria: Current Strategies for the Discovery of Novel Antibacterials. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 52, 1070610733,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201209979
  5. 5
    Wright, G. D. (2015) Solving the Antibiotic Crisis. ACS Infect. Dis. 1, 8084,  DOI: 10.1021/id500052s
  6. 6
    Wright, P. M., Seiple, I. B., and Myers, A. G. (2014) The Evolving Role of Chemical Synthesis in Antibacterial Drug Discovery. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 53, 88408863,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201310843
  7. 7
    Umezawa, S. (1974) Structures and Syntheses of Aminoglycoside Antibiotics. Adv. Carbohydr. Chem. Biochem. 30, 111182,  DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2318(08)60264-4
  8. 8
    Haddad, J., Kotra, L. P., and Mobashery, S. (2001) in Glycochemsitry: Principles, Synthesis, and Applications (Wang, P. G., and Bertozzi, C. R., Eds.) pp 307351, Dekker, New York.
  9. 9
    Vakulenko, S. B. and Mobashery, S. (2003) Versatility of Aminoglycosides and Prospects for Their Future. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 16, 430450,  DOI: 10.1128/CMR.16.3.430-450.2003
  10. 10
    (2007) Aminoglycoside Antibiotics: From Chemical Biology to Drug Discovery (Arya, D. P., Ed.) Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
  11. 11
    Jackson, J., Chen, C., and Buising, K. (2013) Aminoglycosides: How Should We Use Them in the 21st Century?. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 26, 516525,  DOI: 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000012
  12. 12
    Vicens, Q. and Westhof, E. (2003) RNA as a Drug Target: The Case of Aminoglycosides. ChemBioChem 4, 10181023,  DOI: 10.1002/cbic.200300684
  13. 13
    Kondo, J., and Westhof, E. (2014) in Antibioitcs: Targets, Mechanisms and Resistance (Gualerzi, C. O., Brandi, L., Fabbretti, A., and Pon, C. L., Eds.) pp 453470, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim.
  14. 14
    Haddad, J., Liu, M.-Z., and Mobashery, S. (2001) in Glycochemistry: Principles, Synthesis, and Applications (Wang, P. G., and Bertozzi, C. R., Eds.) pp 353424, Dekker, New York.
  15. 15
    Wang, J., and Chang, C.-W. T. (2007) in Aminoglycoside Antibiotics (Arya, D. P., Ed.) pp 141180, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
  16. 16
    Berkov-Zrihen, Y., and Fridman, M. (2014) in Modern Synthetic Methods in Carbohydrate Chemistry; From Monosaccharides to Complex Glycoconjugates (Werz, D. B., and Vidal, S., Eds.) pp 161190, Wiley, Weinheim.
  17. 17
    Price, K. E., Godfrey, J. C., and Kawaguchi, H. (1974) Effect of Structural Modifications on the Biological Properties of Aminoglycoside Antibiotics Containing 2-Deoxystreptamine. Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 18, 191307,  DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2164(08)70572-0
  18. 18
    Becker, B. and Cooper, M. A. (2013) Aminoglycoside Antibiotics in the 21st Century. ACS Chem. Biol. 8, 105115,  DOI: 10.1021/cb3005116
  19. 19
    Yang, L. and Ye, X. S. (2010) Development of Aminoglycoside Antibiotics Effective Against Resistant Bacterial Strains. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 10, 18981926,  DOI: 10.2174/156802610793176684
  20. 20
    Armstrong, E. S., Kostrub, C. F., Cass, R. T., Moser, H. E., Serio, A. W., and Miller, G. H. (2012) in Antibiotic Discovery and Development (Dougherty, T. J., and Pucci, M. J., Eds.) pp 229269, Springer Science+Business Media, New York.
  21. 21
    Chandrika, N. T. and Garneau-Tsodikova, S. (2016) A Review of Patents (2011–2015) Towards Combating Resistance to and Toxicity of Aminoglycosides. MedChemComm 7, 5068,  DOI: 10.1039/C5MD00453E
  22. 22
    Thamban Chandrika, N. and Garneau-Tsodikova, S. (2018) Comprehensive Review of Chemical Strategies for the Preparation of New Aminoglycosides and their Biological Activities. Chem. Soc. Rev. 47, 11891249,  DOI: 10.1039/C7CS00407A
  23. 23
    Zárate, S. G., De la Cruz Claure, M. L., Benito-Arenas, R., Revuelta, R., Santana, A. G., and Bastida, A. (2018) Overcoming Aminoglycoside Enzymatic Resistance: Design of Novel Antibiotics and Inhibitors. Molecules 23, 284,  DOI: 10.3390/molecules23020284
  24. 24
    Takahashi, Y. and Igarashi, M. (2018) Destination of Aminoglycoside Antibiotics in the ‘Post-Antibiotic Era’. J. Antibiot. 71, 414,  DOI: 10.1038/ja.2017.117
  25. 25
    Aggen, J. B., Armstrong, E. S., Goldblum, A. A., Dozzo, P., Linsell, M. S., Gliedt, M. J., Hildebrandt, D. J., Feeney, L. A., Kubo, A., Matias, R. D., Lopez, S., Gomez, M., Wlasichuk, K. B., Diokno, R., Miller, G. H., and Moser, H. E. (2010) Synthesis and Spectrum of the Neoglycoside ACHN-490. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 54, 46364642,  DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00572-10
  26. 26
    Cox, G., Ejim, L., Stogios, P. J., Koteva, K., Bordeleau, E., Evdokimova, E., Sieron, A. O., Savchenko, A., Serio, A. W., Krause, K. M., and Wright, G. D. (2018) Plazomicin Retains Antibiotic Activity against Most Aminoglycoside Modifying Enzymes. ACS Infect. Dis. 4, 980987,  DOI: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.8b00001
  27. 27
    Magnet, S. and Blanchard, J. S. (2005) Molecular Insights into Aminoglycoside Action and Resistance. Chem. Rev. 105, 477497,  DOI: 10.1021/cr0301088
  28. 28
    Ramirez, M. S. and Tolmasky, M. E. (2010) Aminoglycoside Modifiying Enzymes. Drug Resist. Updates 13, 151171,  DOI: 10.1016/j.drup.2010.08.003
  29. 29
    Garneau-Tsodikova, S. and Labby, K. J. (2016) Mechanisms of Resistance to Aminoglycoside Antibiotics: Overview and Perspectives. MedChemComm 7, 1127,  DOI: 10.1039/C5MD00344J
  30. 30
    Bacot-Davis, V. R., Bassenden, A. V., and Berghuis, A. M. (2016) Drug-target Networks in Aminoglycoside Resistance: Hierarchy of Priority in Structural Drug Design. MedChemComm 7, 103113,  DOI: 10.1039/C5MD00384A
  31. 31
    Doi, Y., Wachino, J. I., and Arakawa, Y. (2016) Aminoglycoside Resistance: The Emergence of Acquired 16S Ribosomal RNA Methyltransferases. Infect. Dis. Clin. North Am. 30, 523537,  DOI: 10.1016/j.idc.2016.02.011
  32. 32
    Sonousi, A., Sarpe, V. A., Brilkova, M., Schacht, J., Vasella, A., Böttger, E. C., and Crich, D. (2018) Effects of the 1-N-(4-Amino-2S-hydroxybutyryl) and 6′-N-(2-Hydroxyethyl) Substituents on Ribosomal Selectivity, Cochleotoxicity and Antibacterial Activity in the Sisomicin Class of Aminoglycoside Antibiotics. ACS Infect. Dis. 4, 11141120,  DOI: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.8b00052
  33. 33
    Livermore, D. M., Mushtaq, S., Warner, M., Zhang, J.-C., Maharjan, S., Doumith, M., and Woodford, N. (2011) Activity of Aminoglycosides, Including ACHN-490, Against Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae Isolates. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 66, 4853,  DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkq408
  34. 34
    Taylor, E., Sriskandan, S., Woodford, N., and Hopkins, K. L. (2018) High Prevalence of 16S rRNA Methyltransferases Among Carbapenenase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in the UK and Ireland. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 52, 278282,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2018.03.016
  35. 35
    Piekarska, K., Zacharczuk, K., Wołkowicz, T., Rzeczkowska, M., Bareja, E., Olak, M., and Gierczyński, R. (2016) Distribution of 16S rRNA Methylases Among Different Species of Aminoglycoside-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Poland. Adv. Clin. Exp. Med. 25, 539544,  DOI: 10.17219/acem/34150
  36. 36
    Vicens, Q. and Westhof, E. (2003) Molecular Recognition of Aminoglycoside Antibiotics by Ribosomal RNA and Resistance Enzymes: An Analysis of X-Ray Crystal Structures. Biopolymers 70, 4257,  DOI: 10.1002/bip.10414
  37. 37
    O’Connor, S., Lam, L. K. T., Jones, N. D., and Chaney, M. O. (1976) Apramycin, a Unique Aminocyclitol Antibiotic. J. Org. Chem. 41, 20872092,  DOI: 10.1021/jo00874a003
  38. 38
    Smith, K. P. and Kirby, J. E. (2016) Evaluation of Apramycin Activity Against Carbapenem-Resistant and -Susceptible Strains of Enterobacteriaceae. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 86, 439441,  DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2016.09.002
  39. 39
    Hu, Y., Liu, L., Zhang, X., Feng, Y., and Zong, Z. (2017) In Vitro Activity of Neomycin, Streptomycin, Paromomycin and Apramycin Against Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae Clinical Strains. Front. Microbiol. 8, 2275,  DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02275
  40. 40
    Kang, A. D., Smith, K. P., Eliopoulos, G. M., Berg, A. H., McCoy, C., and Kirby, J. E. (2017) In vitro Apramycin Activity Against Multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 88, 188191,  DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.03.006
  41. 41
    Juhas, M., Widlake, E., Teo, J., Huseby, D. L., Tyrrell, J. M., Polikanov, Y., Ercan, O., Petersson, A., Cao, S., Aboklaish, A. F., Rominski, A., Crich, D., Böttger, E. C., Walsh, T. R., Hughes, D. E., and Hobbie, S. N. (2019) In-vitro Activity of Apramycin Against Multidrug-, Carbapenem-, and Aminoglycoside-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae and Acinetobacter baumannii. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 74, 944952,  DOI: 10.1093/jac/dky546
  42. 42
    (2018) Tackling Antimicrobial Resistance: ENABLE Selects First Clinical Candidate, Innovative Medicines Initiative. https://www.imi.europa.eu/projects-results/project-factsheets/enable (accessed Feb 12, 2019).
  43. 43
    Perez-Fernandez, D., Shcherbakov, D., Matt, T., Leong, N. C., Kudyba, I., Duscha, S., Boukari, H., Patak, R., Dubbaka, S. R., Lang, K., Meyer, M., Akbergenov, R., Freihofer, P., Vaddi, S., Thommes, P., Ramakrishnan, V., Vasella, A., and Böttger, E. C. (2014) 4′-O-Substitutions Determine Aminoglycoside Selectivity at the Drug Target Level. Nat. Commun. 5, 3112,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4112
  44. 44
    Duscha, S., Boukari, H., Shcherbakov, D., Salian, S., Silva, S., Kendall, A., Kato, T., Akbergenov, R., Perez-Fernandez, D., Bernet, B., Vaddi, S., Thommes, P., Schacht, J., Crich, D., Vasella, A., and Böttger, E. C. (2014) Identification and Evaluation of Improved 4′-O-(Alkyl) 4,5-Disubstituted 2-Deoxystreptamines as Next Generation Aminoglycoside Antibiotics. mBio 5, e0182714,  DOI: 10.1128/mBio.01827-14
  45. 45
    Matsushita, T., Chen, W., Juskeviciene, R., Teo, Y., Shcherbakov, D., Vasella, A., Böttger, E. C., and Crich, D. (2015) Influence of 4′-O-Glycoside Constitution and Configuration on Ribosomal Selectivity of Paromomycin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 77067717,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.5b02248
  46. 46
    Sati, G. C., Shcherbakov, D., Hobbie, S., Vasella, A., Böttger, E. C., and Crich, D. (2017) N6′, N6‴, and O4′-Modifications to Neomycin Affect Ribosomal Selectivity Without Compromising Antibacterial Activity. ACS Infect. Dis. 3, 368376,  DOI: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.6b00214
  47. 47
    Matsushita, T., Sati, G. C., Kondasinghe, N., Pirrone, M. G., Kato, T., Waduge, P., Kumar, H. S., Cortes Sanchon, A., Dobosz-Bartoszek, M., Shcherbakov, D., Juhas, M., Hobbie, S. N., Schrepfer, T., Chow, C. S., Polikanov, Y. S., Schacht, J., Vasella, A., Böttger, E. C., and Crich, D. (2019) Design, Multigram Synthesis, and in Vitro and in Vivo Evaluation of Propylamycin: A Semisynthetic 4,5-Deoxystreptamine Class Aminoglycoside for the Treatment of Drug-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae and Other Gram-Negative Pathogens. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 50515061,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b01693
  48. 48
    Böttger, E. C. and Schacht, J. (2013) The Mitochondrion: A Perpetrator of Acquired Hearing Loss. Hear. Res. 303, 1219,  DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.01.006
  49. 49
    Huth, M. E., Ricci, A. J., and Cheng, A. G. (2011) Mechanisms of Aminoglycoside Ototoxicity and Targets of Hair Cell Protection. Int. J. Otolaryngol. 2011, 937861,  DOI: 10.1155/2011/937861
  50. 50
    Jiang, M., Karasawa, T., and Steyger, P. S. (2017) Aminoglycoside-Induced Cochleotoxicity: A Review. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 11, 308,  DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2017.00308
  51. 51
    Cassinelli, G., Franceschi, G., Di Colo, G., and Arcamone, F. (1978) Semisynthetic Aminoglycoside Antibiotics 1. New Reactions of Paromomycin and Synthesis of its 2′-N-Ethyl Derivative. J. Antibiot. 31, 378381,  DOI: 10.7164/antibiotics.31.379
  52. 52
    Cassinelli, G., Julita, P., and Arcamone, F. (1978) Semisynthetic Aminoglycoside Antibiotics II. Synthesis of Analogues of Paromomycin Modified in the Glucosamine Moiety. J. Antibiot. 31, 382384,  DOI: 10.7164/antibiotics.31.382
  53. 53
    Roestamadji, J., Graspsas, I., and Mobashery, S. (1995) Loss of Individual Electrostatic Interactions between Aminoglycoside Antibiotics and Resistance Enzymes as an Effective Means to Overcoming Bacterial Drug Resistance. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117, 1106011069,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00150a004
  54. 54
    Ferrier, R. J., Hay, R. W., and Vethaviyasar, N. (1973) A Potentially Versatile Synthesis of Glycosides. Carbohydr. Res. 27, 5561,  DOI: 10.1016/S0008-6215(00)82424-6
  55. 55
    Greenberg, W. A., Priestley, E. S., Sears, P. S., Alper, P. B., Rosenbohm, C., Hendrix, M., Hung, S.-C., and Wong, C.-H. (1999) Design and Synthesis of New Aminoglycoside Antibiotics Containing Neamine as an Optimal Core Structure: Correlation of Antibiotic Activity with in Vitro Inhibition of Translation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121, 65276541,  DOI: 10.1021/ja9910356
  56. 56
    Lu, S.-R., Lai, Y. H., Chen, J.-H., Liu, C.-Y., and Mong, K.-K. T. (2011) Dimethylformamide: An Unusual Glycosylation Modulator. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 50, 73157320,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201100076
  57. 57
    Saegusa, T., Kobayashi, S., Ito, Y., and Yasuda, N. (1968) Radical Reaction of Isocyanide with Organotin Hydride. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 90, 41824182,  DOI: 10.1021/ja01017a061
  58. 58
    Barton, D. H. R., Bringmann, G., Lamotte, G., Motherwell, W. B., Hay Motherwell, R. S., and Porter, A. E. A. (1980) Reactions of Relevance to the Chemistry of the Aminoglycoside Antibiotics. Part 14. A Useful Radical-Deamination Reaction. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1, 26572664,  DOI: 10.1039/p19800002657
  59. 59
    Barton, D. H. R., Bringmann, G., and Motherwell, W. B. (1980) Reactions of Relevance to the Aminoglycoside Antibiotics. Part 15. The Selective Modification of Neamine by Radical-Induced Deamination. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1, 26652669,  DOI: 10.1039/p19800002665
  60. 60
    Ballestri, M., Chatgilialoglu, C., Clark, K. B., Griller, D., Giese, B., and Kopping, B. (1991) Tris(trimethylsily1)silane as a Radical-Based Reducing Agent in Synthesis. J. Org. Chem. 56, 678683,  DOI: 10.1021/jo00002a035
  61. 61
    Goddard-Borger, E. D. and Stick, R. V. (2007) An Efficient, Inexpensive, and Shelf-Stable Diazotransfer Reagent: Imidazole-1-sulfonyl Azide Hydrochloride. Org. Lett. 9, 37973800,  DOI: 10.1021/ol701581g
  62. 62
    Ye, H., Liu, R., Li, D., Liu, Y., Yuan, H., Guo, W., Zhou, L., Cao, X., Tian, H., Shen, J., and Wang, P. G. (2013) A Safe and Facile Route to Imidazole-1-sulfonyl Azide as a Diazotransfer Reagent. Org. Lett. 15, 1821,  DOI: 10.1021/ol3028708
  63. 63
    Fischer, N., Goddard-Borger, E. D., Greiner, R., Klapotke, T. M., Skelton, B. W., and Stierstorfer, J. (2012) Senstivities of Some Imidazole-1-sulfonyl Azide Salts. J. Org. Chem. 77, 17601764,  DOI: 10.1021/jo202264r
  64. 64
    Potter, G. T., Jayson, G. C., Miller, G. J., and Gardiner, J. M. (2016) An Updated Synthesis of the Diazo-Transfer Reagent Imidazole-1-sulfonyl Azide Hydrogen Sulfate. J. Org. Chem. 81, 34433446,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.6b00177
  65. 65
    Flynn, D. L., Zelle, R. E., and Grieco, P. A. (1983) A Mild Two-Step Method for the Hydolysis/Methanolysis of Secondary Amides and Lactams. J. Org. Chem. 48, 24242426,  DOI: 10.1021/jo00162a028
  66. 66
    Pathak, R., Perez-Fernandez, D., Nandurdikar, R., Kalapala, S. K., Böttger, E. C., and Vasella, A. (2008) Synthesis and Evaluation of Paromomycin Derivatives Modified at C(4′). Helv. Chim. Acta 91, 15331552,  DOI: 10.1002/hlca.200890167
  67. 67
    Schmitz, J., Li, T., Bartz, U., and Gütschow, M. (2016) Cathepsin B Inhibitors: Combining Dipeptide Nitriles with an Occluding Loop Recognition Element by Click Chemistry. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 7, 211216,  DOI: 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.5b00474
  68. 68
    LaPlanche, L. A. and Rogers, M. T. (1964) cis and trans Configurations of the Peptide Bond in N-Monosubstituted Amides by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 86, 337341,  DOI: 10.1021/ja01057a007
  69. 69
    Fowler, P., Bernet, B., and Vasella, A. (1996) A 1H-NMR Spectroscopic Investigation of the Conformation of the Acetamido Group in Some Derivatives of N-Acetyl-D-allosamine and D-Glucosamine. Helv. Chim. Acta 79, 269287,  DOI: 10.1002/hlca.19960790127
  70. 70
    Hu, X., Zhang, W., Carmichael, I., and Serianni, A. S. (2010) Amide Cis-Trans Isomerization in Aqueous Solutions of Methyl N-Formyl-D-glucosaminides and Methyl N-Acetyl-D-glucosaminides: Chemical Equilibria and Exchange Kinetics. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 46414652,  DOI: 10.1021/ja9086787
  71. 71
    Naito, T., Nakagawa, S., Narita, Y., and Kawaguchi, H. (1976) Chemical Modification of Sorbistin. N-Acyl Analogs of Sorbistin. J. Antibiot. 29, 12861296,  DOI: 10.7164/antibiotics.29.1286
  72. 72
    Hanessian, S., Takamoto, T., and Masse, R. (1975) Oxidative Degradations Leading to Novel Biochemical Probes and Synthetic Intermediates. J. Antibiot. 28, 835836,  DOI: 10.7164/antibiotics.28.835
  73. 73
    Pathak, R., Böttger, E. C., and Vasella, A. (2005) Design and Synthesis of Aminoglycoside Antibiotics to Selectively Target 16S Ribosomal RNA Position 1408. Helv. Chim. Acta 88, 29672984,  DOI: 10.1002/hlca.200590240
  74. 74
    Fukami, H., Ikeda, S., Kitahara, K., and Nakajima, M. (1977) Total Synthesis of Ribostamycin. Agric. Biol. Chem. 41, 16891694,  DOI: 10.1271/bbb1961.41.1689
  75. 75
    Carter, A. P., Clemons, W. M., Brodersen, D. E., Morgan-Warren, R. J., Wimberly, B. T., and Ramakrishnan, V. (2000) Functional Insights from the Structure of the 30S Ribosomal Subunit and its Interactions with Antibiotics. Nature 407, 340348,  DOI: 10.1038/35030019
  76. 76
    Hobbie, S. N., Kalapala, S. K., Akshay, S., Bruell, C., Schmidt, S., Dabow, S., Vasella, A., Sander, P., and Böttger, E. C. (2007) Engineering the rRNA Decoding Site of Eukaryotic Cytosolic Ribosomes in Bacteria. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, 60866093,  DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkm658
  77. 77
    Hobbie, S. N., Akshay, S., Kalapala, S. K., Bruell, C., Shcherbakov, D., and Böttger, E. C. (2008) Genetic Analysis of Interactions with Eukaryotic rRNA Identify the Mitoribosome as Target in Aminoglycoside Ototoxicity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105, 2088820893,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0811258106
  78. 78
    Hobbie, S. N., Bruell, C. M., Akshay, S., Kalapala, S. K., Shcherbakov, D., and Böttger, E. C. (2008) Mitochondrial Deafness Alleles Confer Misreading of the Genetic Code. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105, 32443249,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0707265105
  79. 79
    Hobbie, S. N., Kaiser, M., Schmidt, S., Shcherbakov, D., Janusic, T., Brun, R., and Böttger, E. C. (2011) Genetic Reconstruction of Protozoan rRNA Decoding Sites Provides a Rationale for Paromomycin Activity against Leishmania and Trypanosoma. PLoS Neglected Trop. Dis. 5, e1161  DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001161
  80. 80
    Qian, Y. and Guan, M.-X. (2009) Interaction of Aminoglycosides with Human Mitochondrial 12S rRNA Carrying the Deafness-Associated Mutation. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53, 46124618,  DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00965-08
  81. 81
    Prezant, T. R., Agapian, J. V., Bohlman, M. C., Bu, X., Öztas, S., Qiu, W.-Q., Arnos, K. S., Cortopassi, G. A., Jaber, L., Rotter, J. I., Shohat, M., and Fischel-Ghodsian, N. (1993) Mitochondrial Ribosomal RNA Mutation Associated with Both Antibiotic-Induced and Non-Syndromic Deafness. Nat. Genet. 4, 289294,  DOI: 10.1038/ng0793-289
  82. 82
    Tadanier, J., Martin, J. R., Johnson, P., Goldstein, A. W., and Hallas, R. (1980) 2′-N-Acylfortimicins and 2′-N-Alkylfortimicins via the Isofortimicin Rearrangement. Carbohydr. Res. 85, 6171,  DOI: 10.1016/S0008-6215(00)84564-4
  83. 83
    Satoi, S., Awata, M., Muto, N., Hayashi, M., Sagai, H., and Otani, M. (1983) A New Aminoglycoside Antibiotic G-367 S1, 2′-N-Formylsisomicin. Fermentation, Isolation and Characterization. J. Antibiot. 36, 15,  DOI: 10.7164/antibiotics.36.1
  84. 84
    Wong, C.-H., Hendrix, M., Manning, D. D., Rosenbohm, C., and Greenberg, A. A. (1998) A Library Approach to the Discovery of Small Molecules That Recognize RNA: Use of a 1,3-Hydroxyamine Motif as Core. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120, 83198327,  DOI: 10.1021/ja980826p
  85. 85
    Nessar, R., Cambau, E., Reyrat, J. M., Murray, A., and Gicquel, B. (2012) Mycobacterium abscessus: A New Antibiotic Nightmare. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 67, 810818,  DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkr578
  86. 86
    Maurer, F. P., Bruderer, V. L., Castelberg, C., Ritter, C., Scherbakov, D., Bloemberg, G. V., and Böttger, E. C. (2015) Aminoglycoside-modifying Enzymes Determine the Innate Susceptibility to Aminoglycoside Antibiotics in Rapidly Growing Mycobacteria. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 70, 14121419,  DOI: 10.1093/jac/dku550
  87. 87
    François, B., Russell, R. J. M., Murray, J. B., Aboul-Ela, F., Masquid, B., Vicens, Q., and Westhof, E. (2005) Crystal Structures of Complexes Between Aminoglycosides and Decoding A Site Oligonucleotides: Role of the Number of Rings and Positive Charges in the Specific Binding Leading to Miscoding. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, 56775690,  DOI: 10.1093/nar/gki862
  88. 88
    Kaul, M. and Pilch, D. S. (2002) Thermodynamics of Aminoglycoside-rRNA Recognition: The Binding of Neomycin-Class Aminoglycosides to the A Site of 16S rRNA. Biochemistry 41, 76957706,  DOI: 10.1021/bi020130f
  89. 89
    Kaul, M., Barbieri, C. M., Kerrigan, J. E., and Pilch, D. S. (2003) Coupling of Drug Protonation to the Specific Binding of Aminoglycosides to the A Site of 16 S rRNA: Elucidation of the Number of Drug Amino Groups Involved and their Identities. J. Mol. Biol. 326, 13731387,  DOI: 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)01452-3
  90. 90
    Wasserman, M. R., Pulk, A., Zhou, Z., Altman, R. B., Zinder, J. C., Green, K. D., Garneau-Tsodikova, S., Doudna Cate, J. H., and Blanchard, S. C. (2015) Chemically Related 4,5-Linked Aminoglycoside Antibiotics Drive Subunit Rotation in Opposite Directions. Nat. Commun. 6, 7896,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms8896
  91. 91
    Vacas, T., Corzana, F., Jiménez-Osés, G., González, C., Gómez, A. M., Bastida, A., Revuelta, J., and Asensio, J. L. (2010) Role of Aromatic Rings in the Molecular Recognition of Aminoglycoside Antibiotics: Implications for Drug Design. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 1207412090,  DOI: 10.1021/ja1046439
  92. 92
    Hanessian, S., Saavedra, O. M., Vilchis-Reyes, M. A., Maianti, J. P., Kanazawa, H., Dozzo, P., Matias, R. D., Serio, A., and Kondo, J. (2014) Synthesis, Broad Spectrum Antibacterial Activity, and X-ray Co-crystal Structure of the Decoding Bacterial Ribosomal A-Site with 4′-Deoxy-4′-Fluoro Neomycin Analogs. Chem. Sci. 5, 46214632,  DOI: 10.1039/C4SC01626B
  93. 93
    Hermann, T. and Westhof, E. (1999) Docking of Cationic Antibiotics to Negatively Charged Pockets in RNA Folds. J. Med. Chem. 42, 12501261,  DOI: 10.1021/jm981108g
  94. 94
    Corzana, F., Cuesta, I., Freire, F., Revuelta, J., Torrado, M., Bastida, A., Jiménez-Barbero, J., and Asensio, J. L. (2007) The Pattern of Distribution of Amino Groups Modulates the Structure and Dynamics of Natural Aminoglycosides: Implications for RNA Recognition. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 28492865,  DOI: 10.1021/ja066348x
  95. 95
    Fourmy, D., Recht, M. I., Blanchard, S. C., and Puglisi, J. D. (1996) Structure of the A Site of Escherichia coli 16S Ribosomal RNA Complexed with an Aminoglycoside Antibiotic. Science 274, 13671371,  DOI: 10.1126/science.274.5291.1367
  96. 96
    Zhao, F., Zhao, Q., Blount, K. F., Han, Q., Tor, Y., and Hermann, T. (2005) Moelcular Recognition of RNA by Neomycin and a Restricted Neomycin Derivative. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 44, 53295334,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.200500903
  97. 97
    Blount, K. F., Zhao, F., Hermann, T., and Tor, Y. (2005) Conformational Constraint as a Means for Understanding RNA-Aminoglycoside Specificity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 98189829,  DOI: 10.1021/ja050918w
  98. 98
    Asensio, J. L., Hidalgo, A., Bastida, A., Torrado, M., Corzana, F., Chiara, J. L., Garcia-Junceda, E., Cañada, J., and Jiménez-Barbero, J. (2005) A Simple Structural-Based Approach to Prevent Aminoglycoside Inactivation by Bacterial Defense Proteins. Conformational Restriction Provides Effective Protection against Neomycin-B Nucleotidylation by ANT. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 82788279,  DOI: 10.1021/ja051722z
  99. 99
    Bastida, A., Hidalgo, A., Chiara, J. L., Torrado, M., Corzana, F., Pérez-Cañadillas, J. M., Groves, P., Garcia-Junceda, E., Gonzalez, C., Jimenez-Barbero, J., and Asensio, J. L. (2006) Exploring the Use of Conformationally Locked Aminoglycosides as a New Strategy to Overcome Bacterial Resistance. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 100116,  DOI: 10.1021/ja0543144
  100. 100
    Revuelta, J., Vacas, T., Bastida, A., and Asensio, J. L. (2010) Structure-Based Design of Highly Crowded Ribostamycin/Kananmycin Hybrids as a New Family of Antibiotics. Chem. - Eur. J. 16, 29862991,  DOI: 10.1002/chem.200903003
  101. 101
    Herzog, I. M., Louzoun Zada, S., and Fridman, M. (2016) Effects of 5-O-Ribosylation of Aminoglycosides on Antimicrobial Activity and Selective Perturbation of Bacterial Translation. J. Med. Chem. 59, 80088018,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b00793
  102. 102
    Asako, T., Yoshioka, K., Mabuchi, H., and Hiraga, K. (1978) Chemical Transformation of 3′-Chloro-3′-deoxyaminoglycosides into New Cyclic Pseudo-trisaccharides. Heterocycles 11, 1972002,  DOI: 10.3987/S(N)-1978-01-0197
  103. 103
    Morgenthaler, M., Schweizer, E., Hoffmann-Roder, A., Benini, F., Martin, R. E., Jaeschke, G., Wagner, B., Fischer, H., Bendels, S., Zimmerli, D., Schneider, J., Diederich, F., Kansy, M., and Muller, K. (2007) Predicting and Tuning Physicochemical Properties in Lead Optimization: Amine Basicities. ChemMedChem 2, 11001115,  DOI: 10.1002/cmdc.200700059
  104. 104
    Barbieri, C. M., Kaul, M., Bozza-Hingos, M., Zhao, F., Tor, Y., Hermann, T., and Pilch, D. S. (2007) Defining the Molecular Forces That Determine the Impact of Neomycin on Bacterial Protein Synthesis: Importance of the 2-Amino Functionality. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51, 17601769,  DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01267-06

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
Citation Statements
Explore this article's citation statements on scite.ai

This article is cited by 28 publications.

  1. Christian Hobson, Andrew N. Chan, Gerard D. Wright. The Antibiotic Resistome: A Guide for the Discovery of Natural Products as Antimicrobial Agents. Chemical Reviews 2021, 121 (6) , 3464-3494. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01214
  2. Amr Sonousi, Andrea Vasella, David Crich. Synthesis of a Pseudodisaccharide Suitable for Synthesis of Ring I Modified 4,5-2-Deoxystreptamine Type Aminoglycoside Antibiotics. The Journal of Organic Chemistry 2020, 85 (11) , 7583-7587. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.0c00743
  3. Parasuraman Rajasekaran, David Crich. Synthesis of Gentamicin Minor Components: Gentamicin B1 and Gentamicin X2. Organic Letters 2020, 22 (10) , 3850-3854. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.orglett.0c01107
  4. Mahnaz Sabeti Azad, Maho Okuda, Mélina Cyrenne, Mickael Bourge, Marie-Pierre Heck, Satoko Yoshizawa, Dominique Fourmy. Fluorescent Aminoglycoside Antibiotics and Methods for Accurately Monitoring Uptake by Bacteria. ACS Infectious Diseases 2020, 6 (5) , 1008-1017. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsinfecdis.9b00421
  5. Abd Al-Aziz A. Abu-Saleh, Sweta Sharma, Arpita Yadav, Raymond A. Poirier. Role of Asp190 in the Phosphorylation of the Antibiotic Kanamycin Catalyzed by the Aminoglycoside Phosphotransferase Enzyme: A Combined QM:QM and MD Study. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2020, 124 (17) , 3494-3504. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c01604
  6. Erik C. Böttger, David Crich. Aminoglycosides: Time for the Resurrection of a Neglected Class of Antibacterials?. ACS Infectious Diseases 2020, 6 (2) , 168-172. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsinfecdis.9b00441
  7. Jonathan C. K. Quirke, Parasuraman Rajasekaran, Vikram A. Sarpe, Amr Sonousi, Ivan Osinnii, Marina Gysin, Klara Haldimann, Qiao-Jun Fang, Dimitri Shcherbakov, Sven N. Hobbie, Su-Hua Sha, Jochen Schacht, Andrea Vasella, Erik C. Böttger, David Crich. Apralogs: Apramycin 5-O-Glycosides and Ethers with Improved Antibacterial Activity and Ribosomal Selectivity and Reduced Susceptibility to the Aminoacyltransferase (3)-IV Resistance Determinant. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2020, 142 (1) , 530-544. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b11601
  8. Shiqing Luo, Xiaojie Sun, Lifang Zhang, Yanming Miao, Guiqin Yan. Mn-doped ZnS quantum dots@dendritic mesoporous silica phosphorescent nanocomposites for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 2025, 435 , 137664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2025.137664
  9. Michel Plattner, Maurizio Catelani, Sarah-Lisa Gmür, Maximilian Hartmann, Fatmanur Kiliç, Klara Haldimann, David Crich, Sven N. Hobbie. Phenotypic Differentiation Within the aac(6′) Aminoglycoside Resistance Gene Family Suggests a Novel Subtype IV of Contemporary Clinical Relevance. Antibiotics 2024, 13 (12) , 1196. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13121196
  10. Siran Zhao, Tianji Zhang, Ying Kan, Hongmei Li, Jin-ping Li. Overview of the current procedures in synthesis of heparin saccharides. Carbohydrate Polymers 2024, 339 , 122220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2024.122220
  11. Marharyta Hancharova, Kinga Halicka-Stępień, Aleksandra Dupla, Anna Lesiak, Jadwiga Sołoducho, Joanna Cabaj. Antimicrobial activity of metal-based nanoparticles: a mini-review. BioMetals 2024, 37 (4) , 773-801. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10534-023-00573-y
  12. Nittert Marinus, Niels R. M. Reintjens, Klara Haldimann, Marc L. M. C. Mouthaan, Sven N. Hobbie, Martin D. Witte, Adriaan J. Minnaard. Site‐Selective Palladium‐catalyzed Oxidation of Unprotected Aminoglycosides and Sugar Phosphates. Chemistry – A European Journal 2024, 30 (19) https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.202400017
  13. Tushar Tiwari, Divya Pratap Nain, Nisha Gaur, Eti Sharma. Countering Aminoglycoside Modifying Enzymes. 2024, 119-147. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-1540-8.ch005
  14. Emily Bordeleau, Peter J. Stogios, Elena Evdokimova, Kalinka Koteva, Alexei Savchenko, Gerard D. Wright. Mechanistic plasticity in ApmA enables aminoglycoside promiscuity for resistance. Nature Chemical Biology 2024, 20 (2) , 234-242. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41589-023-01483-3
  15. Hadi Jabbari. Synthesis of New Glycosylamine Derivatives based on Carbohydrates. Current Bioactive Compounds 2024, 20 (2) https://doi.org/10.2174/1573407219666230810094657
  16. Ayan Mukherjee, Danyel Ramirez, Rajat Arora, Gilbert Arthur, Frank Schweizer. Amphiphilic tribasic galactosamines potentiate rifampicin in Gram-negative bacteria at low Mg++/Ca++concentrations. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters 2024, 97 , 129371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2023.129371
  17. Mnaza Noreen, Muhammad Bilal, Muhammad Usman Qamar, Nasir Rasool, Abid Mahmood, Sobia Umar Din, Tawaf Ali Shah, Yousef Bin Jardan, Mohammed Bourhia, Lahcen Ouahmane. Facile Synthesis of 5-Bromo-N-Alkylthiophene-2-Sulfonamides and Its Activities Against Clinically Isolated New Delhi Metallo-β-Lactamase Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae ST147. Infection and Drug Resistance 2024, Volume 17 , 2943-2955. https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S455979
  18. Conor J. Crawford, Peter H. Seeberger. Advances in glycoside and oligosaccharide synthesis. Chemical Society Reviews 2023, 52 (22) , 7773-7801. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3CS00321C
  19. Xiaohan Zhai, Guoyu Wu, Xufeng Tao, Shilei Yang, Linlin Lv, Yanna Zhu, Deshi Dong, Hong Xiang. Success stories of natural product-derived compounds from plants as multidrug resistance modulators in microorganisms. RSC Advances 2023, 13 (12) , 7798-7817. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3RA00184A
  20. Michael G. Pirrone, Chennaiah Ande, Klara Haldimann, Sven N. Hobbie, Andrea Vasella, Erik C. Böttger, David Crich. Importance of Co‐operative Hydrogen Bonding in the Apramycin‐Ribosomal Decoding A‐Site Interaction. ChemMedChem 2023, 18 (1) https://doi.org/10.1002/cmdc.202200486
  21. Ribai Yan, Xiaonan Li, Yuheng Liu, Xinshan Ye. Design, Synthesis, and Bioassay of 2′-Modified Kanamycin A. Molecules 2022, 27 (21) , 7482. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27217482
  22. J. Obszynski, H. Loidon, A. Blanc, J.-M. Weibel, P. Pale. Targeted modifications of neomycin and paromomycin: Towards resistance-free antibiotics?. Bioorganic Chemistry 2022, 126 , 105824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioorg.2022.105824
  23. Yan Li, Ting-Biao Wan, Bin Guo, Xiao-Wen Qi, Chifan Zhu, Mei-Hua Shen, Hua-Dong Xu. Quaternization of azido-N-heteroarenes with Meerwein reagent: A straightforward synthesis of 2-azido(benzo)imidazolium and related azido-N-heteroarenium tetrafluoroborates. Tetrahedron Letters 2022, 106 , 154063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tetlet.2022.154063
  24. Jonathan C. K. Quirke, Girish C. Sati, Amr Sonousi, Marina Gysin, Klara Haldimann, Erik C. Böttger, Andrea Vasella, Sven N. Hobbie, David Crich. Structure‐Activity Relationships for 5′′ Modifications of 4,5‐Aminoglycoside Antibiotics. ChemMedChem 2022, 17 (13) https://doi.org/10.1002/cmdc.202200120
  25. Tolou Golkar, Angelia V. Bassenden, Krishnagopal Maiti, Dev P. Arya, T. Martin Schmeing, Albert M. Berghuis. Structural basis for plazomicin antibiotic action and resistance. Communications Biology 2021, 4 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-021-02261-4
  26. Laiying Zhang, Jun He, Lang Bai, Shihua Ruan, Tao Yang, Youfu Luo. Ribosome‐targeting antibacterial agents: Advances, challenges, and opportunities. Medicinal Research Reviews 2021, 41 (4) , 1855-1889. https://doi.org/10.1002/med.21780
  27. Zoe L Watson, Fred R Ward, Raphaël Méheust, Omer Ad, Alanna Schepartz, Jillian F Banfield, Jamie HD Cate. Structure of the bacterial ribosome at 2 Å resolution. eLife 2020, 9 https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.60482
  28. Ji Zhang, Liubov Yakovlieva, Bart J. de Haan, Paul de Vos, Adriaan J. Minnaard, Martin D. Witte, Marthe T. C. Walvoort. Selective Modification of Streptozotocin at the C3 Position to Improve Its Bioactivity as Antibiotic and Reduce Its Cytotoxicity towards Insulin-Producing β Cells. Antibiotics 2020, 9 (4) , 182. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9040182

ACS Infectious Diseases

Cite this: ACS Infect. Dis. 2019, 5, 10, 1718–1730
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsinfecdis.9b00128
Published August 22, 2019

Copyright © 2019 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

Article Views

4085

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Scheme 1

    Scheme 1. Synthesis of 2′-N-Alkyl Derivatives of Paromomycin and Neomycin

    Scheme 2

    Scheme 2. Synthesis of 2′-Desamino-2′-hydroxy Paromomycin and Neomycin Derivatives

    Scheme 3

    Scheme 3. Synthesis of 2′-Desamino Neomycin

    Scheme 4

    Scheme 4. Synthesis of Neomycin 2′-Amides

    Scheme 5

    Scheme 5. Synthesis of Ribostamycin Derivatives 41, 42, and 46

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Some natural and semisynthetic aminoglycoside antibiotics.

    Scheme 6

    Scheme 6. Synthesis of Ribostamycin Derivatives 59 and 60

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Decoding A sites of prokaryotic and eukaryotic ribosomes. The bacterial AGA binding pocket is boxed. The bacterial numbering scheme is illustrated for the AGA binding pocket. Changes from the bacterial ribosome binding pocket are colored green. The A1555G mutant conferring hypersusceptibility to AGA ototoxicity is colored red.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Schematic of the crystallographically determined interactions of neomycin 3 (X = NH2+) and paromomycin 2 (X = O) with the AGA binding pocket. Ribostamycin 6 (X = NH2+) binds identically but lacks ring IV.

  • References


    This article references 104 other publications.

    1. 1
      Chang, H.-H., Cohen, T., Grad, Y. H., Hanage, W. P., O’Brien, T. F., and Lipsitch, M. (2015) Origin and Proliferation of Multiple-Drug Resistance in Bacterial Pathogens. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 79, 101116,  DOI: 10.1128/MMBR.00039-14
    2. 2
      Fisher, J. F. and Mobashery, S. (2016) Endless Resistance. Endless Antibiotics?. MedChemComm 7, 3749,  DOI: 10.1039/C5MD00394F
    3. 3
      Pendleton, J. N., Gorman, S. P., and Gilmore, B. F. (2013) Clinical Relevance of ESKAPE Pathogens. Expert Rev. Anti-Infect. Ther. 11, 297308,  DOI: 10.1586/eri.13.12
    4. 4
      O'Connell, K. M. G., Hodgkinson, J. T., Sore, H. F., Welch, M., Salmond, G. P. C., and Spring, D. R. (2013) Combating Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria: Current Strategies for the Discovery of Novel Antibacterials. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 52, 1070610733,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201209979
    5. 5
      Wright, G. D. (2015) Solving the Antibiotic Crisis. ACS Infect. Dis. 1, 8084,  DOI: 10.1021/id500052s
    6. 6
      Wright, P. M., Seiple, I. B., and Myers, A. G. (2014) The Evolving Role of Chemical Synthesis in Antibacterial Drug Discovery. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 53, 88408863,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201310843
    7. 7
      Umezawa, S. (1974) Structures and Syntheses of Aminoglycoside Antibiotics. Adv. Carbohydr. Chem. Biochem. 30, 111182,  DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2318(08)60264-4
    8. 8
      Haddad, J., Kotra, L. P., and Mobashery, S. (2001) in Glycochemsitry: Principles, Synthesis, and Applications (Wang, P. G., and Bertozzi, C. R., Eds.) pp 307351, Dekker, New York.
    9. 9
      Vakulenko, S. B. and Mobashery, S. (2003) Versatility of Aminoglycosides and Prospects for Their Future. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 16, 430450,  DOI: 10.1128/CMR.16.3.430-450.2003
    10. 10
      (2007) Aminoglycoside Antibiotics: From Chemical Biology to Drug Discovery (Arya, D. P., Ed.) Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
    11. 11
      Jackson, J., Chen, C., and Buising, K. (2013) Aminoglycosides: How Should We Use Them in the 21st Century?. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 26, 516525,  DOI: 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000012
    12. 12
      Vicens, Q. and Westhof, E. (2003) RNA as a Drug Target: The Case of Aminoglycosides. ChemBioChem 4, 10181023,  DOI: 10.1002/cbic.200300684
    13. 13
      Kondo, J., and Westhof, E. (2014) in Antibioitcs: Targets, Mechanisms and Resistance (Gualerzi, C. O., Brandi, L., Fabbretti, A., and Pon, C. L., Eds.) pp 453470, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim.
    14. 14
      Haddad, J., Liu, M.-Z., and Mobashery, S. (2001) in Glycochemistry: Principles, Synthesis, and Applications (Wang, P. G., and Bertozzi, C. R., Eds.) pp 353424, Dekker, New York.
    15. 15
      Wang, J., and Chang, C.-W. T. (2007) in Aminoglycoside Antibiotics (Arya, D. P., Ed.) pp 141180, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
    16. 16
      Berkov-Zrihen, Y., and Fridman, M. (2014) in Modern Synthetic Methods in Carbohydrate Chemistry; From Monosaccharides to Complex Glycoconjugates (Werz, D. B., and Vidal, S., Eds.) pp 161190, Wiley, Weinheim.
    17. 17
      Price, K. E., Godfrey, J. C., and Kawaguchi, H. (1974) Effect of Structural Modifications on the Biological Properties of Aminoglycoside Antibiotics Containing 2-Deoxystreptamine. Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 18, 191307,  DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2164(08)70572-0
    18. 18
      Becker, B. and Cooper, M. A. (2013) Aminoglycoside Antibiotics in the 21st Century. ACS Chem. Biol. 8, 105115,  DOI: 10.1021/cb3005116
    19. 19
      Yang, L. and Ye, X. S. (2010) Development of Aminoglycoside Antibiotics Effective Against Resistant Bacterial Strains. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 10, 18981926,  DOI: 10.2174/156802610793176684
    20. 20
      Armstrong, E. S., Kostrub, C. F., Cass, R. T., Moser, H. E., Serio, A. W., and Miller, G. H. (2012) in Antibiotic Discovery and Development (Dougherty, T. J., and Pucci, M. J., Eds.) pp 229269, Springer Science+Business Media, New York.
    21. 21
      Chandrika, N. T. and Garneau-Tsodikova, S. (2016) A Review of Patents (2011–2015) Towards Combating Resistance to and Toxicity of Aminoglycosides. MedChemComm 7, 5068,  DOI: 10.1039/C5MD00453E
    22. 22
      Thamban Chandrika, N. and Garneau-Tsodikova, S. (2018) Comprehensive Review of Chemical Strategies for the Preparation of New Aminoglycosides and their Biological Activities. Chem. Soc. Rev. 47, 11891249,  DOI: 10.1039/C7CS00407A
    23. 23
      Zárate, S. G., De la Cruz Claure, M. L., Benito-Arenas, R., Revuelta, R., Santana, A. G., and Bastida, A. (2018) Overcoming Aminoglycoside Enzymatic Resistance: Design of Novel Antibiotics and Inhibitors. Molecules 23, 284,  DOI: 10.3390/molecules23020284
    24. 24
      Takahashi, Y. and Igarashi, M. (2018) Destination of Aminoglycoside Antibiotics in the ‘Post-Antibiotic Era’. J. Antibiot. 71, 414,  DOI: 10.1038/ja.2017.117
    25. 25
      Aggen, J. B., Armstrong, E. S., Goldblum, A. A., Dozzo, P., Linsell, M. S., Gliedt, M. J., Hildebrandt, D. J., Feeney, L. A., Kubo, A., Matias, R. D., Lopez, S., Gomez, M., Wlasichuk, K. B., Diokno, R., Miller, G. H., and Moser, H. E. (2010) Synthesis and Spectrum of the Neoglycoside ACHN-490. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 54, 46364642,  DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00572-10
    26. 26
      Cox, G., Ejim, L., Stogios, P. J., Koteva, K., Bordeleau, E., Evdokimova, E., Sieron, A. O., Savchenko, A., Serio, A. W., Krause, K. M., and Wright, G. D. (2018) Plazomicin Retains Antibiotic Activity against Most Aminoglycoside Modifying Enzymes. ACS Infect. Dis. 4, 980987,  DOI: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.8b00001
    27. 27
      Magnet, S. and Blanchard, J. S. (2005) Molecular Insights into Aminoglycoside Action and Resistance. Chem. Rev. 105, 477497,  DOI: 10.1021/cr0301088
    28. 28
      Ramirez, M. S. and Tolmasky, M. E. (2010) Aminoglycoside Modifiying Enzymes. Drug Resist. Updates 13, 151171,  DOI: 10.1016/j.drup.2010.08.003
    29. 29
      Garneau-Tsodikova, S. and Labby, K. J. (2016) Mechanisms of Resistance to Aminoglycoside Antibiotics: Overview and Perspectives. MedChemComm 7, 1127,  DOI: 10.1039/C5MD00344J
    30. 30
      Bacot-Davis, V. R., Bassenden, A. V., and Berghuis, A. M. (2016) Drug-target Networks in Aminoglycoside Resistance: Hierarchy of Priority in Structural Drug Design. MedChemComm 7, 103113,  DOI: 10.1039/C5MD00384A
    31. 31
      Doi, Y., Wachino, J. I., and Arakawa, Y. (2016) Aminoglycoside Resistance: The Emergence of Acquired 16S Ribosomal RNA Methyltransferases. Infect. Dis. Clin. North Am. 30, 523537,  DOI: 10.1016/j.idc.2016.02.011
    32. 32
      Sonousi, A., Sarpe, V. A., Brilkova, M., Schacht, J., Vasella, A., Böttger, E. C., and Crich, D. (2018) Effects of the 1-N-(4-Amino-2S-hydroxybutyryl) and 6′-N-(2-Hydroxyethyl) Substituents on Ribosomal Selectivity, Cochleotoxicity and Antibacterial Activity in the Sisomicin Class of Aminoglycoside Antibiotics. ACS Infect. Dis. 4, 11141120,  DOI: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.8b00052
    33. 33
      Livermore, D. M., Mushtaq, S., Warner, M., Zhang, J.-C., Maharjan, S., Doumith, M., and Woodford, N. (2011) Activity of Aminoglycosides, Including ACHN-490, Against Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae Isolates. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 66, 4853,  DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkq408
    34. 34
      Taylor, E., Sriskandan, S., Woodford, N., and Hopkins, K. L. (2018) High Prevalence of 16S rRNA Methyltransferases Among Carbapenenase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in the UK and Ireland. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 52, 278282,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2018.03.016
    35. 35
      Piekarska, K., Zacharczuk, K., Wołkowicz, T., Rzeczkowska, M., Bareja, E., Olak, M., and Gierczyński, R. (2016) Distribution of 16S rRNA Methylases Among Different Species of Aminoglycoside-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Poland. Adv. Clin. Exp. Med. 25, 539544,  DOI: 10.17219/acem/34150
    36. 36
      Vicens, Q. and Westhof, E. (2003) Molecular Recognition of Aminoglycoside Antibiotics by Ribosomal RNA and Resistance Enzymes: An Analysis of X-Ray Crystal Structures. Biopolymers 70, 4257,  DOI: 10.1002/bip.10414
    37. 37
      O’Connor, S., Lam, L. K. T., Jones, N. D., and Chaney, M. O. (1976) Apramycin, a Unique Aminocyclitol Antibiotic. J. Org. Chem. 41, 20872092,  DOI: 10.1021/jo00874a003
    38. 38
      Smith, K. P. and Kirby, J. E. (2016) Evaluation of Apramycin Activity Against Carbapenem-Resistant and -Susceptible Strains of Enterobacteriaceae. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 86, 439441,  DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2016.09.002
    39. 39
      Hu, Y., Liu, L., Zhang, X., Feng, Y., and Zong, Z. (2017) In Vitro Activity of Neomycin, Streptomycin, Paromomycin and Apramycin Against Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae Clinical Strains. Front. Microbiol. 8, 2275,  DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02275
    40. 40
      Kang, A. D., Smith, K. P., Eliopoulos, G. M., Berg, A. H., McCoy, C., and Kirby, J. E. (2017) In vitro Apramycin Activity Against Multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 88, 188191,  DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.03.006
    41. 41
      Juhas, M., Widlake, E., Teo, J., Huseby, D. L., Tyrrell, J. M., Polikanov, Y., Ercan, O., Petersson, A., Cao, S., Aboklaish, A. F., Rominski, A., Crich, D., Böttger, E. C., Walsh, T. R., Hughes, D. E., and Hobbie, S. N. (2019) In-vitro Activity of Apramycin Against Multidrug-, Carbapenem-, and Aminoglycoside-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae and Acinetobacter baumannii. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 74, 944952,  DOI: 10.1093/jac/dky546
    42. 42
      (2018) Tackling Antimicrobial Resistance: ENABLE Selects First Clinical Candidate, Innovative Medicines Initiative. https://www.imi.europa.eu/projects-results/project-factsheets/enable (accessed Feb 12, 2019).
    43. 43
      Perez-Fernandez, D., Shcherbakov, D., Matt, T., Leong, N. C., Kudyba, I., Duscha, S., Boukari, H., Patak, R., Dubbaka, S. R., Lang, K., Meyer, M., Akbergenov, R., Freihofer, P., Vaddi, S., Thommes, P., Ramakrishnan, V., Vasella, A., and Böttger, E. C. (2014) 4′-O-Substitutions Determine Aminoglycoside Selectivity at the Drug Target Level. Nat. Commun. 5, 3112,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4112
    44. 44
      Duscha, S., Boukari, H., Shcherbakov, D., Salian, S., Silva, S., Kendall, A., Kato, T., Akbergenov, R., Perez-Fernandez, D., Bernet, B., Vaddi, S., Thommes, P., Schacht, J., Crich, D., Vasella, A., and Böttger, E. C. (2014) Identification and Evaluation of Improved 4′-O-(Alkyl) 4,5-Disubstituted 2-Deoxystreptamines as Next Generation Aminoglycoside Antibiotics. mBio 5, e0182714,  DOI: 10.1128/mBio.01827-14
    45. 45
      Matsushita, T., Chen, W., Juskeviciene, R., Teo, Y., Shcherbakov, D., Vasella, A., Böttger, E. C., and Crich, D. (2015) Influence of 4′-O-Glycoside Constitution and Configuration on Ribosomal Selectivity of Paromomycin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 77067717,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.5b02248
    46. 46
      Sati, G. C., Shcherbakov, D., Hobbie, S., Vasella, A., Böttger, E. C., and Crich, D. (2017) N6′, N6‴, and O4′-Modifications to Neomycin Affect Ribosomal Selectivity Without Compromising Antibacterial Activity. ACS Infect. Dis. 3, 368376,  DOI: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.6b00214
    47. 47
      Matsushita, T., Sati, G. C., Kondasinghe, N., Pirrone, M. G., Kato, T., Waduge, P., Kumar, H. S., Cortes Sanchon, A., Dobosz-Bartoszek, M., Shcherbakov, D., Juhas, M., Hobbie, S. N., Schrepfer, T., Chow, C. S., Polikanov, Y. S., Schacht, J., Vasella, A., Böttger, E. C., and Crich, D. (2019) Design, Multigram Synthesis, and in Vitro and in Vivo Evaluation of Propylamycin: A Semisynthetic 4,5-Deoxystreptamine Class Aminoglycoside for the Treatment of Drug-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae and Other Gram-Negative Pathogens. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 50515061,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b01693
    48. 48
      Böttger, E. C. and Schacht, J. (2013) The Mitochondrion: A Perpetrator of Acquired Hearing Loss. Hear. Res. 303, 1219,  DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.01.006
    49. 49
      Huth, M. E., Ricci, A. J., and Cheng, A. G. (2011) Mechanisms of Aminoglycoside Ototoxicity and Targets of Hair Cell Protection. Int. J. Otolaryngol. 2011, 937861,  DOI: 10.1155/2011/937861
    50. 50
      Jiang, M., Karasawa, T., and Steyger, P. S. (2017) Aminoglycoside-Induced Cochleotoxicity: A Review. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 11, 308,  DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2017.00308
    51. 51
      Cassinelli, G., Franceschi, G., Di Colo, G., and Arcamone, F. (1978) Semisynthetic Aminoglycoside Antibiotics 1. New Reactions of Paromomycin and Synthesis of its 2′-N-Ethyl Derivative. J. Antibiot. 31, 378381,  DOI: 10.7164/antibiotics.31.379
    52. 52
      Cassinelli, G., Julita, P., and Arcamone, F. (1978) Semisynthetic Aminoglycoside Antibiotics II. Synthesis of Analogues of Paromomycin Modified in the Glucosamine Moiety. J. Antibiot. 31, 382384,  DOI: 10.7164/antibiotics.31.382
    53. 53
      Roestamadji, J., Graspsas, I., and Mobashery, S. (1995) Loss of Individual Electrostatic Interactions between Aminoglycoside Antibiotics and Resistance Enzymes as an Effective Means to Overcoming Bacterial Drug Resistance. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117, 1106011069,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00150a004
    54. 54
      Ferrier, R. J., Hay, R. W., and Vethaviyasar, N. (1973) A Potentially Versatile Synthesis of Glycosides. Carbohydr. Res. 27, 5561,  DOI: 10.1016/S0008-6215(00)82424-6
    55. 55
      Greenberg, W. A., Priestley, E. S., Sears, P. S., Alper, P. B., Rosenbohm, C., Hendrix, M., Hung, S.-C., and Wong, C.-H. (1999) Design and Synthesis of New Aminoglycoside Antibiotics Containing Neamine as an Optimal Core Structure: Correlation of Antibiotic Activity with in Vitro Inhibition of Translation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121, 65276541,  DOI: 10.1021/ja9910356
    56. 56
      Lu, S.-R., Lai, Y. H., Chen, J.-H., Liu, C.-Y., and Mong, K.-K. T. (2011) Dimethylformamide: An Unusual Glycosylation Modulator. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 50, 73157320,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201100076
    57. 57
      Saegusa, T., Kobayashi, S., Ito, Y., and Yasuda, N. (1968) Radical Reaction of Isocyanide with Organotin Hydride. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 90, 41824182,  DOI: 10.1021/ja01017a061
    58. 58
      Barton, D. H. R., Bringmann, G., Lamotte, G., Motherwell, W. B., Hay Motherwell, R. S., and Porter, A. E. A. (1980) Reactions of Relevance to the Chemistry of the Aminoglycoside Antibiotics. Part 14. A Useful Radical-Deamination Reaction. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1, 26572664,  DOI: 10.1039/p19800002657
    59. 59
      Barton, D. H. R., Bringmann, G., and Motherwell, W. B. (1980) Reactions of Relevance to the Aminoglycoside Antibiotics. Part 15. The Selective Modification of Neamine by Radical-Induced Deamination. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1, 26652669,  DOI: 10.1039/p19800002665
    60. 60
      Ballestri, M., Chatgilialoglu, C., Clark, K. B., Griller, D., Giese, B., and Kopping, B. (1991) Tris(trimethylsily1)silane as a Radical-Based Reducing Agent in Synthesis. J. Org. Chem. 56, 678683,  DOI: 10.1021/jo00002a035
    61. 61
      Goddard-Borger, E. D. and Stick, R. V. (2007) An Efficient, Inexpensive, and Shelf-Stable Diazotransfer Reagent: Imidazole-1-sulfonyl Azide Hydrochloride. Org. Lett. 9, 37973800,  DOI: 10.1021/ol701581g
    62. 62
      Ye, H., Liu, R., Li, D., Liu, Y., Yuan, H., Guo, W., Zhou, L., Cao, X., Tian, H., Shen, J., and Wang, P. G. (2013) A Safe and Facile Route to Imidazole-1-sulfonyl Azide as a Diazotransfer Reagent. Org. Lett. 15, 1821,  DOI: 10.1021/ol3028708
    63. 63
      Fischer, N., Goddard-Borger, E. D., Greiner, R., Klapotke, T. M., Skelton, B. W., and Stierstorfer, J. (2012) Senstivities of Some Imidazole-1-sulfonyl Azide Salts. J. Org. Chem. 77, 17601764,  DOI: 10.1021/jo202264r
    64. 64
      Potter, G. T., Jayson, G. C., Miller, G. J., and Gardiner, J. M. (2016) An Updated Synthesis of the Diazo-Transfer Reagent Imidazole-1-sulfonyl Azide Hydrogen Sulfate. J. Org. Chem. 81, 34433446,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.6b00177
    65. 65
      Flynn, D. L., Zelle, R. E., and Grieco, P. A. (1983) A Mild Two-Step Method for the Hydolysis/Methanolysis of Secondary Amides and Lactams. J. Org. Chem. 48, 24242426,  DOI: 10.1021/jo00162a028
    66. 66
      Pathak, R., Perez-Fernandez, D., Nandurdikar, R., Kalapala, S. K., Böttger, E. C., and Vasella, A. (2008) Synthesis and Evaluation of Paromomycin Derivatives Modified at C(4′). Helv. Chim. Acta 91, 15331552,  DOI: 10.1002/hlca.200890167
    67. 67
      Schmitz, J., Li, T., Bartz, U., and Gütschow, M. (2016) Cathepsin B Inhibitors: Combining Dipeptide Nitriles with an Occluding Loop Recognition Element by Click Chemistry. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 7, 211216,  DOI: 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.5b00474
    68. 68
      LaPlanche, L. A. and Rogers, M. T. (1964) cis and trans Configurations of the Peptide Bond in N-Monosubstituted Amides by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 86, 337341,  DOI: 10.1021/ja01057a007
    69. 69
      Fowler, P., Bernet, B., and Vasella, A. (1996) A 1H-NMR Spectroscopic Investigation of the Conformation of the Acetamido Group in Some Derivatives of N-Acetyl-D-allosamine and D-Glucosamine. Helv. Chim. Acta 79, 269287,  DOI: 10.1002/hlca.19960790127
    70. 70
      Hu, X., Zhang, W., Carmichael, I., and Serianni, A. S. (2010) Amide Cis-Trans Isomerization in Aqueous Solutions of Methyl N-Formyl-D-glucosaminides and Methyl N-Acetyl-D-glucosaminides: Chemical Equilibria and Exchange Kinetics. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 46414652,  DOI: 10.1021/ja9086787
    71. 71
      Naito, T., Nakagawa, S., Narita, Y., and Kawaguchi, H. (1976) Chemical Modification of Sorbistin. N-Acyl Analogs of Sorbistin. J. Antibiot. 29, 12861296,  DOI: 10.7164/antibiotics.29.1286
    72. 72
      Hanessian, S., Takamoto, T., and Masse, R. (1975) Oxidative Degradations Leading to Novel Biochemical Probes and Synthetic Intermediates. J. Antibiot. 28, 835836,  DOI: 10.7164/antibiotics.28.835
    73. 73
      Pathak, R., Böttger, E. C., and Vasella, A. (2005) Design and Synthesis of Aminoglycoside Antibiotics to Selectively Target 16S Ribosomal RNA Position 1408. Helv. Chim. Acta 88, 29672984,  DOI: 10.1002/hlca.200590240
    74. 74
      Fukami, H., Ikeda, S., Kitahara, K., and Nakajima, M. (1977) Total Synthesis of Ribostamycin. Agric. Biol. Chem. 41, 16891694,  DOI: 10.1271/bbb1961.41.1689
    75. 75
      Carter, A. P., Clemons, W. M., Brodersen, D. E., Morgan-Warren, R. J., Wimberly, B. T., and Ramakrishnan, V. (2000) Functional Insights from the Structure of the 30S Ribosomal Subunit and its Interactions with Antibiotics. Nature 407, 340348,  DOI: 10.1038/35030019
    76. 76
      Hobbie, S. N., Kalapala, S. K., Akshay, S., Bruell, C., Schmidt, S., Dabow, S., Vasella, A., Sander, P., and Böttger, E. C. (2007) Engineering the rRNA Decoding Site of Eukaryotic Cytosolic Ribosomes in Bacteria. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, 60866093,  DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkm658
    77. 77
      Hobbie, S. N., Akshay, S., Kalapala, S. K., Bruell, C., Shcherbakov, D., and Böttger, E. C. (2008) Genetic Analysis of Interactions with Eukaryotic rRNA Identify the Mitoribosome as Target in Aminoglycoside Ototoxicity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105, 2088820893,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0811258106
    78. 78
      Hobbie, S. N., Bruell, C. M., Akshay, S., Kalapala, S. K., Shcherbakov, D., and Böttger, E. C. (2008) Mitochondrial Deafness Alleles Confer Misreading of the Genetic Code. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105, 32443249,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0707265105
    79. 79
      Hobbie, S. N., Kaiser, M., Schmidt, S., Shcherbakov, D., Janusic, T., Brun, R., and Böttger, E. C. (2011) Genetic Reconstruction of Protozoan rRNA Decoding Sites Provides a Rationale for Paromomycin Activity against Leishmania and Trypanosoma. PLoS Neglected Trop. Dis. 5, e1161  DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001161
    80. 80
      Qian, Y. and Guan, M.-X. (2009) Interaction of Aminoglycosides with Human Mitochondrial 12S rRNA Carrying the Deafness-Associated Mutation. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53, 46124618,  DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00965-08
    81. 81
      Prezant, T. R., Agapian, J. V., Bohlman, M. C., Bu, X., Öztas, S., Qiu, W.-Q., Arnos, K. S., Cortopassi, G. A., Jaber, L., Rotter, J. I., Shohat, M., and Fischel-Ghodsian, N. (1993) Mitochondrial Ribosomal RNA Mutation Associated with Both Antibiotic-Induced and Non-Syndromic Deafness. Nat. Genet. 4, 289294,  DOI: 10.1038/ng0793-289
    82. 82
      Tadanier, J., Martin, J. R., Johnson, P., Goldstein, A. W., and Hallas, R. (1980) 2′-N-Acylfortimicins and 2′-N-Alkylfortimicins via the Isofortimicin Rearrangement. Carbohydr. Res. 85, 6171,  DOI: 10.1016/S0008-6215(00)84564-4
    83. 83
      Satoi, S., Awata, M., Muto, N., Hayashi, M., Sagai, H., and Otani, M. (1983) A New Aminoglycoside Antibiotic G-367 S1, 2′-N-Formylsisomicin. Fermentation, Isolation and Characterization. J. Antibiot. 36, 15,  DOI: 10.7164/antibiotics.36.1
    84. 84
      Wong, C.-H., Hendrix, M., Manning, D. D., Rosenbohm, C., and Greenberg, A. A. (1998) A Library Approach to the Discovery of Small Molecules That Recognize RNA: Use of a 1,3-Hydroxyamine Motif as Core. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120, 83198327,  DOI: 10.1021/ja980826p
    85. 85
      Nessar, R., Cambau, E., Reyrat, J. M., Murray, A., and Gicquel, B. (2012) Mycobacterium abscessus: A New Antibiotic Nightmare. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 67, 810818,  DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkr578
    86. 86
      Maurer, F. P., Bruderer, V. L., Castelberg, C., Ritter, C., Scherbakov, D., Bloemberg, G. V., and Böttger, E. C. (2015) Aminoglycoside-modifying Enzymes Determine the Innate Susceptibility to Aminoglycoside Antibiotics in Rapidly Growing Mycobacteria. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 70, 14121419,  DOI: 10.1093/jac/dku550
    87. 87
      François, B., Russell, R. J. M., Murray, J. B., Aboul-Ela, F., Masquid, B., Vicens, Q., and Westhof, E. (2005) Crystal Structures of Complexes Between Aminoglycosides and Decoding A Site Oligonucleotides: Role of the Number of Rings and Positive Charges in the Specific Binding Leading to Miscoding. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, 56775690,  DOI: 10.1093/nar/gki862
    88. 88
      Kaul, M. and Pilch, D. S. (2002) Thermodynamics of Aminoglycoside-rRNA Recognition: The Binding of Neomycin-Class Aminoglycosides to the A Site of 16S rRNA. Biochemistry 41, 76957706,  DOI: 10.1021/bi020130f
    89. 89
      Kaul, M., Barbieri, C. M., Kerrigan, J. E., and Pilch, D. S. (2003) Coupling of Drug Protonation to the Specific Binding of Aminoglycosides to the A Site of 16 S rRNA: Elucidation of the Number of Drug Amino Groups Involved and their Identities. J. Mol. Biol. 326, 13731387,  DOI: 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)01452-3
    90. 90
      Wasserman, M. R., Pulk, A., Zhou, Z., Altman, R. B., Zinder, J. C., Green, K. D., Garneau-Tsodikova, S., Doudna Cate, J. H., and Blanchard, S. C. (2015) Chemically Related 4,5-Linked Aminoglycoside Antibiotics Drive Subunit Rotation in Opposite Directions. Nat. Commun. 6, 7896,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms8896
    91. 91
      Vacas, T., Corzana, F., Jiménez-Osés, G., González, C., Gómez, A. M., Bastida, A., Revuelta, J., and Asensio, J. L. (2010) Role of Aromatic Rings in the Molecular Recognition of Aminoglycoside Antibiotics: Implications for Drug Design. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 1207412090,  DOI: 10.1021/ja1046439
    92. 92
      Hanessian, S., Saavedra, O. M., Vilchis-Reyes, M. A., Maianti, J. P., Kanazawa, H., Dozzo, P., Matias, R. D., Serio, A., and Kondo, J. (2014) Synthesis, Broad Spectrum Antibacterial Activity, and X-ray Co-crystal Structure of the Decoding Bacterial Ribosomal A-Site with 4′-Deoxy-4′-Fluoro Neomycin Analogs. Chem. Sci. 5, 46214632,  DOI: 10.1039/C4SC01626B
    93. 93
      Hermann, T. and Westhof, E. (1999) Docking of Cationic Antibiotics to Negatively Charged Pockets in RNA Folds. J. Med. Chem. 42, 12501261,  DOI: 10.1021/jm981108g
    94. 94
      Corzana, F., Cuesta, I., Freire, F., Revuelta, J., Torrado, M., Bastida, A., Jiménez-Barbero, J., and Asensio, J. L. (2007) The Pattern of Distribution of Amino Groups Modulates the Structure and Dynamics of Natural Aminoglycosides: Implications for RNA Recognition. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 28492865,  DOI: 10.1021/ja066348x
    95. 95
      Fourmy, D., Recht, M. I., Blanchard, S. C., and Puglisi, J. D. (1996) Structure of the A Site of Escherichia coli 16S Ribosomal RNA Complexed with an Aminoglycoside Antibiotic. Science 274, 13671371,  DOI: 10.1126/science.274.5291.1367
    96. 96
      Zhao, F., Zhao, Q., Blount, K. F., Han, Q., Tor, Y., and Hermann, T. (2005) Moelcular Recognition of RNA by Neomycin and a Restricted Neomycin Derivative. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 44, 53295334,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.200500903
    97. 97
      Blount, K. F., Zhao, F., Hermann, T., and Tor, Y. (2005) Conformational Constraint as a Means for Understanding RNA-Aminoglycoside Specificity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 98189829,  DOI: 10.1021/ja050918w
    98. 98
      Asensio, J. L., Hidalgo, A., Bastida, A., Torrado, M., Corzana, F., Chiara, J. L., Garcia-Junceda, E., Cañada, J., and Jiménez-Barbero, J. (2005) A Simple Structural-Based Approach to Prevent Aminoglycoside Inactivation by Bacterial Defense Proteins. Conformational Restriction Provides Effective Protection against Neomycin-B Nucleotidylation by ANT. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 82788279,  DOI: 10.1021/ja051722z
    99. 99
      Bastida, A., Hidalgo, A., Chiara, J. L., Torrado, M., Corzana, F., Pérez-Cañadillas, J. M., Groves, P., Garcia-Junceda, E., Gonzalez, C., Jimenez-Barbero, J., and Asensio, J. L. (2006) Exploring the Use of Conformationally Locked Aminoglycosides as a New Strategy to Overcome Bacterial Resistance. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 100116,  DOI: 10.1021/ja0543144
    100. 100
      Revuelta, J., Vacas, T., Bastida, A., and Asensio, J. L. (2010) Structure-Based Design of Highly Crowded Ribostamycin/Kananmycin Hybrids as a New Family of Antibiotics. Chem. - Eur. J. 16, 29862991,  DOI: 10.1002/chem.200903003
    101. 101
      Herzog, I. M., Louzoun Zada, S., and Fridman, M. (2016) Effects of 5-O-Ribosylation of Aminoglycosides on Antimicrobial Activity and Selective Perturbation of Bacterial Translation. J. Med. Chem. 59, 80088018,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b00793
    102. 102
      Asako, T., Yoshioka, K., Mabuchi, H., and Hiraga, K. (1978) Chemical Transformation of 3′-Chloro-3′-deoxyaminoglycosides into New Cyclic Pseudo-trisaccharides. Heterocycles 11, 1972002,  DOI: 10.3987/S(N)-1978-01-0197
    103. 103
      Morgenthaler, M., Schweizer, E., Hoffmann-Roder, A., Benini, F., Martin, R. E., Jaeschke, G., Wagner, B., Fischer, H., Bendels, S., Zimmerli, D., Schneider, J., Diederich, F., Kansy, M., and Muller, K. (2007) Predicting and Tuning Physicochemical Properties in Lead Optimization: Amine Basicities. ChemMedChem 2, 11001115,  DOI: 10.1002/cmdc.200700059
    104. 104
      Barbieri, C. M., Kaul, M., Bozza-Hingos, M., Zhao, F., Tor, Y., Hermann, T., and Pilch, D. S. (2007) Defining the Molecular Forces That Determine the Impact of Neomycin on Bacterial Protein Synthesis: Importance of the 2-Amino Functionality. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51, 17601769,  DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01267-06
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.9b00128.

    • Full experimental details and copies of 1H and 13C NMR spectra for all new AGAs (PDF)

    • Crystallographic data (CIF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.