ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Nanophase-Separated Block-co-Polymers Based on Phosphonated Pentafluorostyrene and Octylstyrene for Proton-Exchange Membranes
My Activity

Figure 1Loading Img
  • Open Access
Letter

Nanophase-Separated Block-co-Polymers Based on Phosphonated Pentafluorostyrene and Octylstyrene for Proton-Exchange Membranes
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

  • Sebastian Auffarth*
    Sebastian Auffarth
    Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Helmholtz Institute Erlangen-Nürnberg for Renewable Energy (IEK 11), Cauerstr. 1, 91058 Erlangen, Germany
    Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Egerlandstr. 3, 91058 Erlangen, Germany
    * Email: [email protected]
  • Maximilian Wagner
    Maximilian Wagner
    Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Helmholtz Institute Erlangen-Nürnberg for Renewable Energy (IEK 11), Cauerstr. 1, 91058 Erlangen, Germany
  • Anja Krieger
    Anja Krieger
    Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Helmholtz Institute Erlangen-Nürnberg for Renewable Energy (IEK 11), Cauerstr. 1, 91058 Erlangen, Germany
    More by Anja Krieger
  • Birk Fritsch
    Birk Fritsch
    Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Helmholtz Institute Erlangen-Nürnberg for Renewable Energy (IEK 11), Cauerstr. 1, 91058 Erlangen, Germany
    More by Birk Fritsch
  • Linus Hager
    Linus Hager
    Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Helmholtz Institute Erlangen-Nürnberg for Renewable Energy (IEK 11), Cauerstr. 1, 91058 Erlangen, Germany
    Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Egerlandstr. 3, 91058 Erlangen, Germany
    More by Linus Hager
  • Andreas Hutzler
    Andreas Hutzler
    Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Helmholtz Institute Erlangen-Nürnberg for Renewable Energy (IEK 11), Cauerstr. 1, 91058 Erlangen, Germany
  • Thomas Böhm
    Thomas Böhm
    Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Helmholtz Institute Erlangen-Nürnberg for Renewable Energy (IEK 11), Cauerstr. 1, 91058 Erlangen, Germany
    More by Thomas Böhm
  • Simon Thiele
    Simon Thiele
    Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Helmholtz Institute Erlangen-Nürnberg for Renewable Energy (IEK 11), Cauerstr. 1, 91058 Erlangen, Germany
    Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Egerlandstr. 3, 91058 Erlangen, Germany
    More by Simon Thiele
  • Jochen Kerres*
    Jochen Kerres
    Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Helmholtz Institute Erlangen-Nürnberg for Renewable Energy (IEK 11), Cauerstr. 1, 91058 Erlangen, Germany
    Chemical Resource Beneficiation Faculty of Natural Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom 2520, South Africa
    *Email: [email protected]
Open PDFSupporting Information (1)

ACS Materials Letters

Cite this: ACS Materials Lett. 2023, 5, 8, 2039–2046
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmaterialslett.3c00569
Published June 29, 2023

Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0 .

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Nanophase separation into hydrophobic and hydrophilic domains in commercial perfluorosulfonic acid polymers promotes high conductivity by forming proton-conductive channels within a matrix. To transfer this beneficial phase separation to phosphonic acid functionalized ionomers, we combine phosphonated polypentafluorostyrene and flexible polyoctylstyrene in a di-block-co-polymer. We introduce a stepwise approach, including mesophase simulations, synthesis, and spectroscopic imaging. After the required block lengths were calculated, controlled radical polymerization led to a narrowly distributed block-co-polymer. The respective block-co-polymer membrane outperforms a phosphonated pentafluorostyrene blend concerning conductivity and water uptake. Stained membrane cross-sections revealed bicontinuous nanophase separation in the 13 to 25 nm range in transmission electron microscopy. The ion-conducting phosphonated polymer block assembled into an isotropic, three-dimensional gyroidal network across the membrane. Our stepwise approach is transferable toward other block-co-polymer systems featuring different monomers or functional groups. Applying the proposed principles allows for the prediction of structure-related phase separation while reducing the amount of synthesis work.

This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0 .
  • cc licence
  • by licence
Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society
Ion-conducting polymers (ionomers) are part of a wide range of electrolyzers, batteries, and fuel cells, facilitating ion transport between anode and cathode reactions. (1−3) In those applications, their high ion conductivity can be utilized in membranes and electrodes. (4,5) Application-relevant ionomer properties include
  • high conductivity at application temperature

  • high chemical stability against the reactants/products, radicals, humidity and temperature(-changes)

  • high durability against dimensional changes related to swelling, start/shut-down cycles, and pressure deviations in reactant/product feeds

If an ionomer is used as a membrane material, the electric insulation of the anode and cathode, the separation of the reactants and the selective transport of different ionic species are essential. (6−8) Ionomer membranes can be specifically tailored for their respective applications, because of the broad range of possible material modifications.
Nafion and its derivates have emerged as standard materials for hydrogen fuel cells and electrolyzers featuring a fluorinated, aliphatic polymer backbone and sulfonic acid group side chains. (9−11) In particular, Nafion excels in achieving high proton conductivities despite a comparably low ion-exchange capacity (IEC) of under one mmol H+ per gram of polymer. This characteristic relates to a pronounced phase separation in the nanometer range, promoting channels with high local concentrations of water and sulfonic acid. (12,13) Compared to randomly sulfonated copolymers, phase separation of block-co-polymers enhances the conductivity, water uptake, and cell performance. (14,15) Recently, the thiolation of block-co-polymers from polypentafluorostyrene (PPFS) and butylacrylate enabled the preparation of thin films and membranes with distinct nanophase separation between 30 and 96 nm. (16,17) Extensive swelling of the mercaptopropane sulfonate functionalized ionomer was observed in water, but ionic and covalent cross-linking stabilized the membranes. (17)
In general, the presence of water around acidic groups enables high proton conductivity due to distinct hopping and vehicular transport mechanisms. (18) Above 100 °C at ambient pressure, the evaporation of water limits the sufficient humidification of sulfonated polymers required for high conductivities.
Consequently, high-temperature applications above 100 °C often rely on phosphoric acid-doped membranes. (19) The respective ionomers contain a positive or protonated group, which coordinates phosphoric acid and phosphonates. (20,21) General obstacles of phosphonic acid-doped materials include catalyst poisoning by phosphonate anions and acid loss over time. (22,23) The loss of the ion-conducting acid can occur during operation by evaporation above 160 °C or via an exponential water replacement mechanism. (24) Phosphonic acid groups can also be directly attached to a polymer to avoid acid loss over time. In phosphonated polypentafluorostyrene (PWN), the electron-deficient aromatic ring enhances the acidity of the ion-conducting group by stabilizing the corresponding negative charge. (25) Applying atom-transfer radical polymerization, first graft and block-co-polymers of PWN have been reported based on polymer backbones with high molecular weight dispersity and glass transition temperature. (26−28) Unfortunately, PWN, in its dry state, is also very brittle due to its high glass-transition temperature. (29) The mechanical properties can be enhanced by blending them with polybenzimidazole. While the additional acid–base cross-links further stabilize the membrane, the basic benzimidazole groups reduce the number of accessible acid groups for proton transport.
In this publication, we present the mesophase structure simulation-supported, controlled synthesis of a block-co-polymer based on brittle PWN and viscous polyoctylstyrene (POS). After preparation of a diblock-polymer membrane, the conductivity and water uptake were determined. The nanostructure of the membrane was analyzed by scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDXS).
Various solubility parameters can describe the interactions between two blocks within a di-block-co-polymer. In this publication, solubility parameters and molar densities were calculated by forcite calculations (see SI-1). Table 1 shows the respective densities and solubility parameters of different repeating units calculated from an energy minimization of 100 monomers each. We decided to reduce the phosphonation degree to two-thirds in the simulation since fully phosphonated PWN-100 is water-soluble. (25) Figure 1 depicts the nanophase separation from mesostructured simulations of di-block-co-polymers with various lengths based on partly phosphonated PWN and POS in 64·64·64 nm3 cubes. The number of simulated polymer chains is related to the block lengths and their molar volume (see SI-1). Typical for di-block-co-polymers, the ratio between the block lengths of partly phosphonated PWN and POS plays a significant role in the nanostructure. A continuous nanophase of functional groups is required to ensure sufficient conductivity of charges within ion exchange membranes.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Mesostructure simulations of nanophase separation of POS-b-PWN-66 with block lengths of 100:20 (a), 50:50 (b), and 20:100 (c). The simulated cubes consist of 5543 (a), 7763 (b), 7769 (c) distinct POS-b-PWN-66 chains.

Table 1. Calculated Parameters for Mesostructure Simulations by Forcite Energy Minimization
polymersolubility parameter [(J cm–3)0.5]density [g cm–3]molar mass [g mol–1]molar volume [cm3 mol–1]
phosphonated PFS24.01.6256160
pentafluorostyrene18.61.42194137
octylstyrene17.20.85216254
PWN-6622.21.54235152
PWN-66-POS5.0  203
For proton-exchange membranes, a continuous domain of phosphonic acid groups presents a direct pathway for protons to move through the membrane. Therefore, materials with nanophase separations, as depicted in Figure 1b and c, promise sufficient conductivity. A bicontinuous system, like in Figure 1b, offers adequate conductivity while reducing the amount of brittle PWN. The length adjustment of the polymer blocks allows fine-tuning of the nanophase. Thus, the simulations of this relationship are utilized in the following polymer synthesis.
The mesostructure simulations of the POS-b-PWN-66 derivatives rely on distinct block lengths with a unique molecular weight. Therefore, we aimed to synthesize polymers with a narrow polymer weight distribution to minimize a potential impact on the nanophase separation. The stepwise polymerization of the di-block-co-polymer was realized by a controlled radical polymerization utilizing a reversible addition-fragmentation chain-transfer (RAFT) reagent. Figure 2 shows the synthesis of the block-co-polymer POS-PPFS and the subsequent phosphonation of X% pentafluorostyrene units to POS-PWN-X. End-group and backbone analyses by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy (see SI-2) and size-exclusion chromatography (GPC) were used to calculate the block lengths within the di-block-co-polymer POS-PPFS (Table 2).

Figure 2

Figure 2. Stepwise synthesis of POS-PPFS by RAFT-polymerization and partial phosphonation.

Table 2. Block Lengths from GPC/NMR Analysis and Glass Transition Temperatures of Block-co-polymer POS-b-PPFS
polymer-blockMn/Mw [kg mol–1]dispersity Đblock length GPC-Mwblock length 1H-NMRTg [°C]
polyoctylstyrene (POS)12.8/13.31.0376250 
polypentafluorostyrene (PPFS)  5554 
POS-b-PPFS21.1/24.01.137  –19/101
While only the synthesis of the first block POS required an additional RAFT reagent, azobis(isobutyronitrile) (AIBN) initiated the polymerizations of both polymer blocks. The RAFT-terminated POS was isolated as a yellow, sticky oil since the alkyl chains in the para-position disturb POS’s crystallization, lowering the glass transition temperature. (30) For calculation of the block lengths, the degree of polymerization (DP, average number of monomer units per polymer) was determined. The terminal CH3-group of the RAFT reagent was used as a reference for calculating the block length by 1H-NMR analysis (see SI-2). Compared to the block length by end-group analysis, GPC’s mass average corresponds to a slightly higher number of octylstyrene units. Next to minor chain termination by recombination, this finding relates to GPC’s polystyrene standard calibration and the increased hydrodynamic diameter of POS.
Nevertheless, the low dispersity of under 1.04 underlines the narrow weight distribution of the controlled radical polymerization. For the second block of PPFS, the POS block was utilized as a macro-RAFT-reagent. By comparing backbone integrals, NMR analysis proves the successful synthesis of the di-block-co-polymer POS-b-PPFS with equal block sizes (see SI-2). Deriving the difference in mass average from GPC, the block lengths for the PPFS block are similar regardless of the analysis technique. While the dispersity of POS-b-PPFS increased slightly, the diblock exhibits the expected glass transition temperatures of around −20 and 100 °C (see SI-4). (31,32)
The PPFS part of the diblock-polymer was phosphonated by para-fluor substitution with tris(trimethylsilyl)-phosphite (TSP). The stoichiometric equivalents of the TSP influence the phosphonation degree X, as described in the literature for the phosphonation of pure PPFS. (33) Additional factors that impact the phosphonation degree include influences of additional solvent and water/oxygen impurities, which quench the TSP during or before the reaction. To monitor the phosphonation degree X against time, we traced the reaction by 19F-NMR (see SI-3). Since TSP substitutes the para-fluorine atom, the degree of phosphonation can be calculated from the integrals of the respective peaks. The solvent DMAc seemed to limit the phosphonation degrees to around 60% despite 1.2 equiv of TSP. During the subsequent workup, the protecting groups were hydrolyzed. For higher phosphonation degrees, pure TSP was used both as a reactant and as a solvent for POS-b-PPFS. The excess of TSP leads to shorter reaction times of a few hours (see SI-3). However, (nearly) complete phosphonation of PWN-homopolymers causes water solubility, preventing their application in aqueous conditions. A fully phosphonated POS-b-PWN-100 derivate showed good film-forming properties but disintegrated into a turbid dispersion due to the excessive water uptake of the PWN-100 block.
The block-co-polymer POS-b-PWN-60 forms a clear, viscous gel in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO). By the addition of tetrahydrofuran (THF), the viscosity of the polymer solution decreases drastically to allow membrane manufacturing by solution casting. This observation relates to the different solubilities of the hydrophobic and hydrophilic blocks. Unlike pristine PWN, the POS-b-PWN-60 membrane features two glass transition temperatures at −20 and 265 °C (see SI-4). The membrane POS50-b-PWN-6054 is relatively sticky to various surfaces, such as a polyethylene storage bag. When the POS ratio in the presented block-co-polymer is increased, the stickiness is expected to increase until the membrane becomes a viscous oil. When the PPFS block is enlarged to around 185 units, the water uptake of the PWN part, which is responsible for membrane disintegration, needs to be contradicted. The phosphonation degree was reduced to 42%. While the decreased proportion of POS reduced the stickiness of POS50-b-PWN-42185, the general mechanical handling of the membrane was similar to POS50-b-PWN-6054. The material’s brittleness corresponds to Young’s modulus, which was analyzed by dynamic mechanical analysis (see SI-5). As expected, pure PWN-75 has a higher Young’s modulus of 275 ± 42 MPa than the POS-b-PWN-60 with 70 ± 7 MPa at 0% relative humidity. With its −20 °C glass transition temperature, the POS block softens the respective membrane, resulting in a lower overall brittleness/Young’s modulus. At high relative humidities of around 90% (maximum of our testing device), the Young’s moduli of PWN-75 and POS-b-PWN-60 are very close within the same order of magnitude and decrease by 98.6% and 89.3%, respectively. Since their high phosphonation degree, PWN-75 and POS-b-PWN-60 absorb water, significantly lowering the brittleness. However, the absolute change is lower for POS-b-PWN-60 because the POS block causes a general softening regardless of the precise relative humidity. While these results prove the softening effect of the flexible POS on the brittle PWN, additional cross-linking of the polymer chains may be incorporated in the future to achieve elastomeric properties of the block-co-polymer.
Table 3 compares the POS-b-PWN-60 membrane’s properties (see experimental details in SI-6) to Nafion and a blend of PWN-75 and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF). The through-plane membrane conductivities at room temperature of POS-b-PWN-60 and the PVDF-PWN-75-blend are lower than for the commercial Nafion 211 reference. This finding is expected and relates to the lower acidity of phosphonic acid groups compared with the sulfonic acids found in Nafion. Like phosphoric acid, phosphonated ionomers can simultaneously act as a proton acceptor and donor, reducing reliance on water to ensure proton conductivity. (34,35) The phosphonated PWN also features higher thermal stability than the sulfonated equivalent (Tdegradation: 391 °C for PWN/351 °C for sulfonated PPFS). (36) Phosphonated ionomers are therefore used in low humidity applications, especially. (37) A higher number of acidic groups generally increase the number of charge carriers in proton-exchange membranes, thereby enhancing conductivity. The ratio of the PVDF and PWN-75 was set to mimic the number of charge carriers (IECdirect) of POS-PWN-60 to allow a direct comparison of conductivity and swelling. Despite their same IECdirect (see experimental details in SI-6), POS-b-PWN-60 has a 50% higher conductivity than the PVDF-PWN-75. As for Nafion, distinct nanophase separation produces pathways for proton transport by locally increasing the concentration of acidic groups. The PVDF-PWN-75-membrane has a far higher water uptake of 123 wt % at 85 °C, whereas the uptake of Nafion and POS-b-PWN-60 is around 40 wt % and 70 wt % (see Table 3). While the water uptake is higher than for commercial Nafion membranes, the nonpolar POS block reduces the water uptake of POS-b-PWN-60 significantly compared to PVDF-PWN-75.
Table 3. Membrane Properties of POS-b-PWN-60, PVDF-PWN-75, and Nafion 211
membraneconductivity [mS cm–1]water uptake (wt %) at 25/60/85 °CIECdirect [mmol g–1]
POS-b-PWN-6033 ± 227/44/711.22
PVDF-PWN-7521 ± 144/69/1231.25
N21155 ± 415/36/410.91*
*

Calculated from the equivalent weight.

In general, high water absorption directly correlates with dimensional swelling and wider proton conductive channels. Despite the lower water uptake of POS-b-PWN-60, the additional nanostructure increases the local density of the proton conducting groups. This effect seems to overcompensate for the influence of the reduced water absorption on the conductivity. In literature, the impact of the copolymer architecture on the conductivity in regard to hydration has been demonstrated for different sulfonated membranes before. (38,39) A sulfonated block copolymer from styrene and isobutylene polymer (48% sulfonation degree, IECdirect 1.28 mmol g–1) featured a conductivity at room temperature of around 25 mS cm–1 and a water uptake of 75 wt % (Nafion 117: 27 mS cm–1, 25 wt %). (14) Utilizing an in-plane conductivity procedure, a copolymer consisting of PVDF/hexafluoropropylene and partially sulfonated styrene blocks with an IECdirect of 1.18 mmol g–1 had a conductivity of 80 mS cm–1 and a water-uptake of around 90 wt % (Nafion 117: 72 mS cm–1, 29 wt %). (40) While the conductivities of sulfonated, phase-separated membranes equal that of their respective Nafion references, the water uptake at room temperature was significantly higher than that for POS-b-PWN-60. Compared to the phosphonated PVDF-PWN-75 blend, the block-co-polymer membrane features a conductivity increase of 50% despite a 40% decrease in swelling. These results clearly show the potential of our block-co-polymer approach toward high-performance membrane alternatives. The sulfonation of the block-co-polymer is currently being investigated in our laboratories to provide nanostructure-enhanced membranes for low-temperature applications.
To prove the formation of distinct nanophases, the POS-b-PWN-60 membrane was stained with Pb2+-ions and an ultramicrotomy cross-section was analyzed by high-angle annular dark field (HAADF) STEM imaging. Pb2+-staining increases the Z-contrast in HAADF-STEM due to the Rutherford-like scattering. The HAADF-STEM micrographs in Figure 3 depict a clear nanophase separation of a bright, continuous, honeycomb-like structure within a darker phase. Nanophases with highly polar constituents, like the polar PWN-60 block, accumulate the charged Pb2+-ions while they are excluded from the nonpolar POS block. As the scattering at the Pb2+-ions creates a bright image contrast, the darker domains correspond to the POS block.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Nanophase separation in POS-b-PWN-60. (a) HAADF-STEM images of the Pb2+ stained membrane cross-section and diffractogram for nanostructure size determination. (b) Mean atomic-bond lengths from SAED. (c) Chemical structure of the polymer from synthesis. (d) Nanophase simulation of POS50-b-PWN-6650 with the same parameters as those in Figure 1. Similar to (a), the dark parts correspond to the nonpolar POS-rich phase. (e) Structure domains highlighted in HAADF image and corresponding EDXS images for fluorine, lead, phosphorus, and carbon.

As mentioned, the dark and bright domains consist of nonpolar and polar blocks, respectively. The different shades within the TEM images (e.g., visible in Figure 3a) can be explained by the section thickness of the sample, with a nominal thickness of 75 nm. Consequently, the transmission images contain overlaps between polar and nonpolar domains. The interconnection of bright domains between dark, nonpolar domains forms a gyroidal, three-dimensional network. Since this network consists of the polar PWN-60 block, isotropic proton transport occurs through the phosphonic groups. In contrast, lamellar or similar nanophases often align parallel to the fabrication direction (here, membrane casting), negatively affecting the perpendicular through-plane conductivity. (41)
At high magnification, the bright intensity at the interphase between the nonpolar and polar domains only decays gradually. This observation may be explained by staining artifacts and ultimately hinders the direct measurement of domain sizes from STEM images. Therefore, the average sizes of the domains were extracted from the diffractograms (see inset in Figure 3a) of the HAADF-STEM images. The nonpolar regions have an average size of 24.7 ± 9.5 nm, whereas polar domains are slightly smaller with an average size of 12.7 ± 2.5 nm (marked as np/p in Figure 3e, respectively). In addition, a nanostructure size of 2.3 ± 1.3 nm (visible in Figure 3a at higher magnification) was extracted, which might relate to agglomerations of octylstyrene repeating units or the congregation of multiple phosphonic acid groups within the polar region. Additional selected area electron diffraction (SAED) was performed to obtain information about potential smaller structure sizes. The corresponding selected area bright field TEM micrograph is depicted in SI-7. By least-squares fitting of background-corrected, polar-integrated radial intensity profiles, (42) structure sizes in the range of various inter-/intramolecular bond lengths were identified (see Figure 3b).
Compared to the simulation of an ideal 50–50 co-block-polymer (Figure 3d), the cross-section of the actual polymer POS-b-PWN-60 (chemical structure depicted in Figure 3c) appears to have slightly larger domain sizes. Although still on the same order of magnitude, the deviation in the transmission images also relates to the domain’s random orientation within the sample section and blurred domain edges (see SI-8). Slight deviations from a broader polymer weight distribution and lower phosphonation might also influence the precise form of the nanophases in the STEM micrographs. The observed honeycomb structure of the polar domains could relate to other interactions within the distinct nanophases, which were not considered in the simulation. Nevertheless, our mesophase simulations of diblock polymers accurately predicted the bicontinuous, phase-separated structure and successfully guided our polymer synthesis.
Additional EDXS imaging in Figure 3e confirms the assignment of POS and PWN-60 domains. The intensities of fluorine and phosphorus, only present in the PWN-60 block, correlate with the bright regions of the micrographs. As expected, the intensity of the lead emerges in the same regions, highlighting the polarity of the phases. In contrast, differences in carbon intensity, present in both parts of the block-co-polymer, are minor. The higher fraction of carbon in the POS block (89 wt % C) compared to the PWN-60 block (42 wt % C without lead staining) results in slightly higher intensity in the nonpolar domains.
To conclude, we present the combination of simulation, synthesis, and (spectroscopic) imaging of a block-co-polymer for application as a proton-exchange membrane. After calculating the solubility parameters for mesostructure analysis, we estimated the required block sizes for a bicontinuous polymer nanophase. Controlled RAFT-polymerization allowed us to realize the proposed diblock backbone structure with two distinct glass transition temperatures. After partial phosphonation, membranes were manufactured by solution casting. Compared with a PWN75-PVDF blend, the diblock-polymer exhibited improved conductivity and water uptake. The proposed nanostructure of a cross-section was verified by HAADF-STEM imaging and EDXS, where a gyroidal network of ion-conducting domains was found. The isotropic distribution of these domains enables a high ion conductivity. In the future, our simulation-guided synthesis approach may help in the manufacture of membranes from ionomers suffering from high brittleness. We look forward to expanding our block-co-polymer systems to other nonpolar polymer blocks and further ion-conducting functional groups.

Experimental Methods

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Octylstyrene was destabilized by an alumina oxide column. All of the other chemicals were used without further purification.

Synthesis of the Block-co-polymer POS-PPFS

DDMAT (97.0 mg, 0.26 mmol, 1 equiv) and AIBN (8.7 mg, 0.05 mmol, 0.2 equiv) were dissolved in a mixture of DMF (3 mL) and 4-n-octylstyrene (4.5 g, 5.4 mL, 0.02 mol, 80 equiv), and the reaction mixture was degassed by three freeze–pump–thaw cycles to remove oxygen residuals. The reaction mixture was stirred at 85 °C for three days. The viscous yellow raw product was dissolved in ethyl acetate (10 mL) and precipitated in methanol twice. The viscous oil was separated, and volatile residual solvents/monomer were removed at 80 °C under high vacuum. The poly(4-octylstyrene) (POS, macro-chain-transfer-reagent, 2.2 g, 0.18 mmol, 1 equiv) was dissolved in destabilized THF and was added to 1,2,3,4,5-pentafluorostyrene (2.1 g, 1.5 mL, 0.01 mol, 60 equiv) and AIBN (6.0 mg, 0.04 mmol, 0.2 eq). The reaction mixture was stirred at 85 °C for 35 h. The viscous solution was diluted in THF (5 mL) and precipitated in isopropanol twice. The yellowish powder POS-PPFS (2.1 g) was filtered off and dried overnight at 60 °C in a vacuum oven.

Phosphonation of the Block-co-polymer POS-PPFS

For partial phosphonation, POS-PPFS (2.0 g, 5.19 mmol PFS-units, 1 equiv) was dissolved in DMAc, and the phosphonation reagent TSP (2.0 g, 2.3 mL, 0.07 mmol, 1.26 equiv) was added portion-wise. Under an argon atmosphere, the reaction mixture was heated to 170 °C for 48 h. For full phosphonation, POS-PPFS (1 equiv) can be dissolved in the phosphonation reagent TSP (6 eq). Under an argon atmosphere, the reaction mixture was heated up to 170 °C for 20 h. In both cases, the crude product was cooled to room temperature and precipitated in acetonitrile. The polymer was filtered off and consecutively hydrolyzed in water (100 °C) and aqueous HCl (1 M, 60 °C) for one day each. The polymer suspension was precipitated once in acetonitrile and washed with water until a neutral pH. The phosphonated polymer POS-PWN-60 was dried at 95 °C for 18 h and at 60 °C for 2 h in a vacuum oven to yield a yellow solid (1.3 g).

Membrane Casting

After dissolving the di-block-co-polymer in DMSO (5 wt % solution), THF (20 wt %) was added to the solution to decrease the viscosity for doctor blade casting. After adding THF to the viscous polymer solution in DMSO (5 wt %), the final polymer concentration is around 4.2 wt %. The casted thin film was predried sequentially at 45 and 65 °C for 45 min each to evaporate the THF slowly. After, the thin film was dried at 85 °C for 2 h. To ensure complete evaporation of the solvent, the membrane was further dried at 110 °C overnight. A gap height of 900 μm resulted in a 32 μm thick membrane after detachment in water. The PVDF-PWN-75 blend membranes were prepared by mixing PVDF (10 wt %) and PWN-75 (5 wt %) solutions in DMAc. The PWN-75 was synthesized according to the literature. (25) The ratio of PVDF and PWN-75 was calculated according to the measured IECdirect of the membrane POS-PWN-60.

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsmaterialslett.3c00569.

  • Simulation of POS-PWN-66 nanophase; NMRs of the block-co-polymers; DSC curves of POS-PPFS and POS-PWN60; DMA measurements of POS-b-PWN-60 and PWN-75; experimental details of membrane characterization; experimental details of nanophase imaging; analysis of STEM and simulation images of POS-PWN; NMR and GPC methods (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Authors
    • Sebastian Auffarth - Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Helmholtz Institute Erlangen-Nürnberg for Renewable Energy (IEK 11), Cauerstr. 1, 91058 Erlangen, GermanyDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Egerlandstr. 3, 91058 Erlangen, GermanyOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6784-9135 Email: [email protected]
    • Jochen Kerres - Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Helmholtz Institute Erlangen-Nürnberg for Renewable Energy (IEK 11), Cauerstr. 1, 91058 Erlangen, GermanyChemical Resource Beneficiation Faculty of Natural Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom 2520, South Africa Email: [email protected]
  • Authors
    • Maximilian Wagner - Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Helmholtz Institute Erlangen-Nürnberg for Renewable Energy (IEK 11), Cauerstr. 1, 91058 Erlangen, Germany
    • Anja Krieger - Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Helmholtz Institute Erlangen-Nürnberg for Renewable Energy (IEK 11), Cauerstr. 1, 91058 Erlangen, Germany
    • Birk Fritsch - Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Helmholtz Institute Erlangen-Nürnberg for Renewable Energy (IEK 11), Cauerstr. 1, 91058 Erlangen, GermanyOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7935-2188
    • Linus Hager - Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Helmholtz Institute Erlangen-Nürnberg for Renewable Energy (IEK 11), Cauerstr. 1, 91058 Erlangen, GermanyDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Egerlandstr. 3, 91058 Erlangen, Germany
    • Andreas Hutzler - Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Helmholtz Institute Erlangen-Nürnberg for Renewable Energy (IEK 11), Cauerstr. 1, 91058 Erlangen, GermanyOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5484-707X
    • Thomas Böhm - Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Helmholtz Institute Erlangen-Nürnberg for Renewable Energy (IEK 11), Cauerstr. 1, 91058 Erlangen, GermanyOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2036-2159
    • Simon Thiele - Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Helmholtz Institute Erlangen-Nürnberg for Renewable Energy (IEK 11), Cauerstr. 1, 91058 Erlangen, GermanyDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Egerlandstr. 3, 91058 Erlangen, GermanyOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4248-2752
  • Author Contributions

    All authors have approved the final version of the manuscript. CRediT: Sebastian Auffarth conceptualization, methodology, investigation, data curation, writing - original draft, visualization; Maximilian Wagner methodology, software, writing - review & editing; Anja Krieger investigation, visualization, writing - review & editing; Birk Fritsch investigation, visualization, writing - review & editing; Linus Hager conceptualization, writing - review & editing; Andreas Hutzler investigation, visualization, writing - review & editing; Thomas Böhm investigation, writing - review & editing; Simon Thiele funding acquisition, supervision, writing - review & editing; Jochen Kerres conceptualization, supervision, writing - review & editing

  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The authors acknowledge financial support from the Bavarian Ministry of Economic Affairs, Regional Development and Energy.

Abbreviations

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

IEC

ion-exchange capacity

PPFS

polypentafluorostyrene

PWN-X

X% phosphonated polypentafluorostyrene

POS

polyoctylstyrene

STEM

scanning transmission electron microscope

EDXS

energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy

RAFT

reversible addition–fragmentation chain-transfer

NMR

nuclear magnetic resonance

GPC

gel permeation chromatograph

AIBN

azobisisobutyronitrile

DP

degree of polymerization

DDMAT

2-(dodecylthiocarbonothioylthio)-2-methylpropanoic acid

DMSO

dimethylsulfoxide

THF

tetrahydrofuran

TSP

tris(trimethylsilyl)phosphite

HAADF

high-angle annular dark-field imaging

DMF

dimethylformamide

DMAc

dimethylacetamide

DSC

differential scanning calorimetry

SAED

selected area electron diffraction

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 42 other publications.

  1. 1
    Kerres, J. A. Design Concepts for Aromatic Ionomers and Ionomer Membranes to be Applied to Fuel Cells and Electrolysis. Polymer Reviews 2015, 55, 273306,  DOI: 10.1080/15583724.2015.1011754
  2. 2
    Chromik, A.; dos Santos, A. R.; Turek, T.; Kunz, U.; Häring, T.; Kerres, J. Stability of acid-excess acid–base blend membranes in all-vanadium redox-flow batteries. J. Membr. Sci. 2015, 476, 148155,  DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.11.036
  3. 3
    Park, J. E.; Kim, J.; Han, J.; Kim, K.; Park, S.; Kim, S.; Park, H. S.; Cho, Y.-H.; Lee, J.-C.; Sung, Y.-E. High-performance proton-exchange membrane water electrolysis using a sulfonated poly(arylene ether sulfone) membrane and ionomer. J. Membr. Sci. 2021, 620, 118871,  DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118871
  4. 4
    Bernt, M.; Gasteiger, H. A. Influence of Ionomer Content in IrO2/TiO2 Electrodes on PEM Water Electrolyzer Performance. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2016, 163, F3179F3189,  DOI: 10.1149/2.0231611jes
  5. 5
    Kerres, J. A. Development of ionomer membranes for fuel cells. J. Membr. Sci. 2001, 185, 327,  DOI: 10.1016/S0376-7388(00)00631-1
  6. 6
    Inaba, M.; Kinumoto, T.; Kiriake, M.; Umebayashi, R.; Tasaka, A.; Ogumi, Z. Gas crossover and membrane degradation in polymer electrolyte fuel cells. Electrochim. Acta 2006, 51, 57465753,  DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2006.03.008
  7. 7
    Auffarth, S.; Dafinger, W.; Mehler, J.; Ardizzon, V.; Preuster, P.; Wasserscheid, P.; Thiele, S.; Kerres, J. Cross-linked proton-exchange membranes with strongly reduced fuel crossover and increased chemical stability for direct-isopropanol fuel cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 2022, 10, 1720817216,  DOI: 10.1039/D2TA03832C
  8. 8
    Kreuer, K.-D.; Münchinger, A. Fast and Selective Ionic Transport: From Ion-Conducting Channels to Ion Exchange Membranes for Flow Batteries. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 2021, 51, 2146,  DOI: 10.1146/annurev-matsci-080619-010139
  9. 9
    Banerjee, S.; Curtin, D. E. Nafion® perfluorinated membranes in fuel cells. Journal of Fluorine Chemistry 2004, 125, 12111216,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jfluchem.2004.05.018
  10. 10
    Mališ, J.; Mazúr, P.; Paidar, M.; Bystron, T.; Bouzek, K. Nafion 117 stability under conditions of PEM water electrolysis at elevated temperature and pressure. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2016, 41, 21772188,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.11.102
  11. 11
    Brodt, M.; Müller, K.; Kerres, J.; Katsounaros, I.; Mayrhofer, K.; Preuster, P.; Wasserscheid, P.; Thiele, S. The 2-Propanol Fuel Cell: A Review from the Perspective of a Hydrogen Energy Economy. Energy Tech 2021, 9, 2100164,  DOI: 10.1002/ente.202100164
  12. 12
    Mauritz, K. A.; Moore, R. B. State of understanding of nafion. Chemical Reviews 2004, 104, 45354585,  DOI: 10.1021/cr0207123
  13. 13
    Roche, E. J.; Pineri, M.; Duplessix, R.; Levelut, A. M. Small-angle scattering studies of nafion membranes. J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Phys. Ed. 1981, 19, 111,  DOI: 10.1002/pol.1981.180190101
  14. 14
    Elabd, Y. A.; Napadensky, E.; Walker, C. W.; Winey, K. I. Transport Properties of Sulfonated Poly(styrene-b-isobutylene-b-styrene) Triblock Copolymers at High Ion-Exchange Capacities. Macromolecules 2006, 39, 399407,  DOI: 10.1021/ma051958n
  15. 15
    Einsla, M. L.; Kim, Y. S.; Hawley, M.; Lee, H.-S.; McGrath, J. E.; Liu, B.; Guiver, M. D.; Pivovar, B. S. Toward Improved Conductivity of Sulfonated Aromatic Proton Exchange Membranes at Low Relative Humidity. Chem. Mater. 2008, 20, 56365642,  DOI: 10.1021/cm801198d
  16. 16
    Bosson, K.; Marcasuzaa, P.; Bousquet, A.; Tovar, G. E.; Atanasov, V.; Billon, L. PentaFluoroStyrene-based block copolymers controlled self-assembly pattern: A platform paving the way to functional block copolymers. Eur. Polym. J. 2022, 179, 111560,  DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2022.111560
  17. 17
    Bosson, K.; Marcasuzaa, P.; Bousquet, A.; Tovar, G. E.; Atanasov, V.; Billon, L. para fluoro-thiol clicked diblock-copolymer self-assembly: Towards a new paradigm for highly proton-conductive membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2022, 659, 120796,  DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2022.120796
  18. 18
    Feng, S.; Voth, G. A. Proton solvation and transport in hydrated nafion. The journal of physical chemistry. B 2011, 115, 59035912,  DOI: 10.1021/jp2002194
  19. 19
    Lim, K. H.; Lee, A. S.; Atanasov, V.; Kerres, J.; Park, E. J.; Adhikari, S.; Maurya, S.; Manriquez, L. D.; Jung, J.; Fujimoto, C.; Matanovic, I.; Jankovic, J.; Hu, Z.; Jia, H.; Kim, Y. S. Protonated phosphonic acid electrodes for high power heavy-duty vehicle fuel cells. Nat Energy 2022, 7, 248259,  DOI: 10.1038/s41560-021-00971-x
  20. 20
    Arslan, F.; Chuluunbandi, K.; Freiberg, A. T. S.; Kormanyos, A.; Sit, F.; Cherevko, S.; Kerres, J.; Thiele, S.; Böhm, T. Performance of Quaternized Polybenzimidazole-Cross-Linked Poly(vinylbenzyl chloride) Membranes in HT-PEMFCs. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2021, 13, 5658456596,  DOI: 10.1021/acsami.1c17154
  21. 21
    Pingitore, A. T.; Huang, F.; Qian, G.; Benicewicz, B. C. Durable High Polymer Content m/p -Polybenzimidazole Membranes for Extended Lifetime Electrochemical Devices. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2019, 2, 17201726,  DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.8b01820
  22. 22
    Kaserer, S.; Caldwell, K. M.; Ramaker, D. E.; Roth, C. Analyzing the Influence of H3PO4 as Catalyst Poison in High Temperature PEM Fuel Cells Using in-operando X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 62106217,  DOI: 10.1021/jp311924q
  23. 23
    Tang, H.; Gao, J.; Wang, Y.; Li, N.; Geng, K. Phosphoric-Acid Retention in High-Temperature Proton-Exchange Membranes. Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) 2022, 28, e202202064,  DOI: 10.1002/chem.202202064
  24. 24
    Lim, K. H.; Matanovic, I.; Maurya, S.; Kim, Y.; Castro, E. S. de; Jang, J.-H.; Park, H.; Kim, Y. S. High Temperature Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cells with High Phosphoric Acid Retention. ACS Energy Lett. 2023, 8, 529536,  DOI: 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c02367
  25. 25
    Atanasov, V.; Kerres, J. Highly Phosphonated Polypentafluorostyrene. Macromolecules 2011, 44, 64166423,  DOI: 10.1021/ma2011574
  26. 26
    Nederstedt, H.; Jannasch, P. Poly(p-terphenyl alkylene)s grafted with highly acidic sulfonated polypentafluorostyrene side chains for proton exchange membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2022, 647, 120270,  DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2022.120270
  27. 27
    Shao, Z.; Sannigrahi, A.; Jannasch, P. Poly(tetrafluorostyrenephosphonic acid)-polysulfone block copolymers and membranes. J. Polym. Sci. A Polym. Chem. 2013, 51, 46574666,  DOI: 10.1002/pola.26887
  28. 28
    Yu, L.; Yue, B.; Yan, L.; Zhao, H.; Zhang, J. Proton conducting composite membranes based on sulfonated polysulfone and polysulfone-g-(phosphonated polystyrene) via controlled atom-transfer radical polymerization for fuel cell applications. Solid State Ionics 2019, 338, 103112,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ssi.2019.05.012
  29. 29
    Atanasov, V.; Gudat, D.; Ruffmann, B.; Kerres, J. Highly phosphonated polypentafluorostyrene: Characterization and blends with polybenzimidazole. Eur. Polym. J. 2013, 49, 39773985,  DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2013.09.002
  30. 30
    Matsushima, S.; Takano, A.; Takahashi, Y.; Matsushita, Y. Precise synthesis of a series of poly(4-n-alkylstyrene)s and their glass transition temperatures. J. Polym. Sci. Part B: Polym. Phys. 2017, 55, 757763,  DOI: 10.1002/polb.24326
  31. 31
    Funk, L.; Brehmer, M.; Zentel, R.; Kang, H.; Char, K. Novel Amphiphilic Styrene-Based Block Copolymers for Induced Surface Reconstruction. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2008, 209, 5263,  DOI: 10.1002/macp.200700312
  32. 32
    Jankova, K.; Hvilsted, S. Preparation of Poly(2,3,4,5,6-pentafluorostyrene) and Block Copolymers with Styrene by ATRP. Macromolecules 2003, 36, 17531758,  DOI: 10.1021/ma021039m
  33. 33
    Atanasov, V.; Oleynikov, A.; Xia, J.; Lyonnard, S.; Kerres, J. Phosphonic acid functionalized poly(pentafluorostyrene) as polyelectrolyte membrane for fuel cell application. Journal of Power Sources 2017, 343, 364372,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.01.085
  34. 34
    Sun, X.; Guan, J.; Wang, X.; Li, X.; Zheng, J.; Li, S.; Zhang, S. Phosphonated Ionomers of Intrinsic Microporosity with Partially Ordered Structure for High-Temperature Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells. ACS Central Science 2023, 9, 733741,  DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.3c00146
  35. 35
    Vilčiauskas, L.; Tuckerman, M. E.; Bester, G.; Paddison, S. J.; Kreuer, K.-D. The mechanism of proton conduction in phosphoric acid. Nature Chem 2012, 4, 461466,  DOI: 10.1038/nchem.1329
  36. 36
    Atanasov, V.; Bürger, M.; Lyonnard, S.; Porcar, L.; Kerres, J. Sulfonated poly(pentafluorostyrene): Synthesis & characterization. Solid State Ionics 2013, 252, 7583,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ssi.2013.06.010
  37. 37
    Atanasov, V.; Lee, A. S.; Park, E. J.; Maurya, S.; Baca, E. D.; Fujimoto, C.; Hibbs, M.; Matanovic, I.; Kerres, J.; Kim, Y. S. Synergistically integrated phosphonated poly(pentafluorostyrene) for fuel cells. Nat. Mater. 2021, 20, 370377,  DOI: 10.1038/s41563-020-00841-z
  38. 38
    Elabd, Y. A.; Hickner, M. A. Block Copolymers for Fuel Cells. Macromolecules 2011, 44, 111,  DOI: 10.1021/ma101247c
  39. 39
    Bae, B.; Miyatake, K.; Watanabe, M. Synthesis and properties of sulfonated block copolymers having fluorenyl groups for fuel-cell applications. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2009, 1, 12791286,  DOI: 10.1021/am900165w
  40. 40
    Shi, Z.; Holdcroft, S. Synthesis and Proton Conductivity of Partially Sulfonated Poly([vinylidene difluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene]-b-styrene) Block Copolymers. Macromolecules 2005, 38, 41934201,  DOI: 10.1021/ma0477549
  41. 41
    Tsang, E. M. W.; Zhang, Z.; Shi, Z.; Soboleva, T.; Holdcroft, S. Considerations of macromolecular structure in the design of proton conducting polymer membranes: graft versus diblock polyelectrolytes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 1510615107,  DOI: 10.1021/ja074765j
  42. 42
    Fritsch, B.; Wu, M.; Hutzler, A.; Zhou, D.; Spruit, R.; Vogl, L.; Will, J.; Hugo Pérez Garza, H.; März, M.; Jank, M. P. M.; Spiecker, E. Sub-Kelvin thermometry for evaluating the local temperature stability within in situ TEM gas cells. Ultramicroscopy 2022, 235, 113494,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2022.113494

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article is cited by 1 publications.

  1. Xiang-Tian Bai, Li-Hui Cao, Fang Zhao, Shu-Hui Li. Arylsulfonate Ionic Hydrogen-Bonded Organic Frameworks Enable Highly Stable and Superprotonic Conductivity for Enhancing Direct Methanol Fuel Cells. ACS Materials Letters 2024, 6 (8) , 3351-3357. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmaterialslett.4c00953

ACS Materials Letters

Cite this: ACS Materials Lett. 2023, 5, 8, 2039–2046
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmaterialslett.3c00569
Published June 29, 2023

Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0 .

Article Views

2007

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Mesostructure simulations of nanophase separation of POS-b-PWN-66 with block lengths of 100:20 (a), 50:50 (b), and 20:100 (c). The simulated cubes consist of 5543 (a), 7763 (b), 7769 (c) distinct POS-b-PWN-66 chains.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Stepwise synthesis of POS-PPFS by RAFT-polymerization and partial phosphonation.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Nanophase separation in POS-b-PWN-60. (a) HAADF-STEM images of the Pb2+ stained membrane cross-section and diffractogram for nanostructure size determination. (b) Mean atomic-bond lengths from SAED. (c) Chemical structure of the polymer from synthesis. (d) Nanophase simulation of POS50-b-PWN-6650 with the same parameters as those in Figure 1. Similar to (a), the dark parts correspond to the nonpolar POS-rich phase. (e) Structure domains highlighted in HAADF image and corresponding EDXS images for fluorine, lead, phosphorus, and carbon.

  • References


    This article references 42 other publications.

    1. 1
      Kerres, J. A. Design Concepts for Aromatic Ionomers and Ionomer Membranes to be Applied to Fuel Cells and Electrolysis. Polymer Reviews 2015, 55, 273306,  DOI: 10.1080/15583724.2015.1011754
    2. 2
      Chromik, A.; dos Santos, A. R.; Turek, T.; Kunz, U.; Häring, T.; Kerres, J. Stability of acid-excess acid–base blend membranes in all-vanadium redox-flow batteries. J. Membr. Sci. 2015, 476, 148155,  DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.11.036
    3. 3
      Park, J. E.; Kim, J.; Han, J.; Kim, K.; Park, S.; Kim, S.; Park, H. S.; Cho, Y.-H.; Lee, J.-C.; Sung, Y.-E. High-performance proton-exchange membrane water electrolysis using a sulfonated poly(arylene ether sulfone) membrane and ionomer. J. Membr. Sci. 2021, 620, 118871,  DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118871
    4. 4
      Bernt, M.; Gasteiger, H. A. Influence of Ionomer Content in IrO2/TiO2 Electrodes on PEM Water Electrolyzer Performance. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2016, 163, F3179F3189,  DOI: 10.1149/2.0231611jes
    5. 5
      Kerres, J. A. Development of ionomer membranes for fuel cells. J. Membr. Sci. 2001, 185, 327,  DOI: 10.1016/S0376-7388(00)00631-1
    6. 6
      Inaba, M.; Kinumoto, T.; Kiriake, M.; Umebayashi, R.; Tasaka, A.; Ogumi, Z. Gas crossover and membrane degradation in polymer electrolyte fuel cells. Electrochim. Acta 2006, 51, 57465753,  DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2006.03.008
    7. 7
      Auffarth, S.; Dafinger, W.; Mehler, J.; Ardizzon, V.; Preuster, P.; Wasserscheid, P.; Thiele, S.; Kerres, J. Cross-linked proton-exchange membranes with strongly reduced fuel crossover and increased chemical stability for direct-isopropanol fuel cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 2022, 10, 1720817216,  DOI: 10.1039/D2TA03832C
    8. 8
      Kreuer, K.-D.; Münchinger, A. Fast and Selective Ionic Transport: From Ion-Conducting Channels to Ion Exchange Membranes for Flow Batteries. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 2021, 51, 2146,  DOI: 10.1146/annurev-matsci-080619-010139
    9. 9
      Banerjee, S.; Curtin, D. E. Nafion® perfluorinated membranes in fuel cells. Journal of Fluorine Chemistry 2004, 125, 12111216,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jfluchem.2004.05.018
    10. 10
      Mališ, J.; Mazúr, P.; Paidar, M.; Bystron, T.; Bouzek, K. Nafion 117 stability under conditions of PEM water electrolysis at elevated temperature and pressure. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2016, 41, 21772188,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.11.102
    11. 11
      Brodt, M.; Müller, K.; Kerres, J.; Katsounaros, I.; Mayrhofer, K.; Preuster, P.; Wasserscheid, P.; Thiele, S. The 2-Propanol Fuel Cell: A Review from the Perspective of a Hydrogen Energy Economy. Energy Tech 2021, 9, 2100164,  DOI: 10.1002/ente.202100164
    12. 12
      Mauritz, K. A.; Moore, R. B. State of understanding of nafion. Chemical Reviews 2004, 104, 45354585,  DOI: 10.1021/cr0207123
    13. 13
      Roche, E. J.; Pineri, M.; Duplessix, R.; Levelut, A. M. Small-angle scattering studies of nafion membranes. J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Phys. Ed. 1981, 19, 111,  DOI: 10.1002/pol.1981.180190101
    14. 14
      Elabd, Y. A.; Napadensky, E.; Walker, C. W.; Winey, K. I. Transport Properties of Sulfonated Poly(styrene-b-isobutylene-b-styrene) Triblock Copolymers at High Ion-Exchange Capacities. Macromolecules 2006, 39, 399407,  DOI: 10.1021/ma051958n
    15. 15
      Einsla, M. L.; Kim, Y. S.; Hawley, M.; Lee, H.-S.; McGrath, J. E.; Liu, B.; Guiver, M. D.; Pivovar, B. S. Toward Improved Conductivity of Sulfonated Aromatic Proton Exchange Membranes at Low Relative Humidity. Chem. Mater. 2008, 20, 56365642,  DOI: 10.1021/cm801198d
    16. 16
      Bosson, K.; Marcasuzaa, P.; Bousquet, A.; Tovar, G. E.; Atanasov, V.; Billon, L. PentaFluoroStyrene-based block copolymers controlled self-assembly pattern: A platform paving the way to functional block copolymers. Eur. Polym. J. 2022, 179, 111560,  DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2022.111560
    17. 17
      Bosson, K.; Marcasuzaa, P.; Bousquet, A.; Tovar, G. E.; Atanasov, V.; Billon, L. para fluoro-thiol clicked diblock-copolymer self-assembly: Towards a new paradigm for highly proton-conductive membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2022, 659, 120796,  DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2022.120796
    18. 18
      Feng, S.; Voth, G. A. Proton solvation and transport in hydrated nafion. The journal of physical chemistry. B 2011, 115, 59035912,  DOI: 10.1021/jp2002194
    19. 19
      Lim, K. H.; Lee, A. S.; Atanasov, V.; Kerres, J.; Park, E. J.; Adhikari, S.; Maurya, S.; Manriquez, L. D.; Jung, J.; Fujimoto, C.; Matanovic, I.; Jankovic, J.; Hu, Z.; Jia, H.; Kim, Y. S. Protonated phosphonic acid electrodes for high power heavy-duty vehicle fuel cells. Nat Energy 2022, 7, 248259,  DOI: 10.1038/s41560-021-00971-x
    20. 20
      Arslan, F.; Chuluunbandi, K.; Freiberg, A. T. S.; Kormanyos, A.; Sit, F.; Cherevko, S.; Kerres, J.; Thiele, S.; Böhm, T. Performance of Quaternized Polybenzimidazole-Cross-Linked Poly(vinylbenzyl chloride) Membranes in HT-PEMFCs. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2021, 13, 5658456596,  DOI: 10.1021/acsami.1c17154
    21. 21
      Pingitore, A. T.; Huang, F.; Qian, G.; Benicewicz, B. C. Durable High Polymer Content m/p -Polybenzimidazole Membranes for Extended Lifetime Electrochemical Devices. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2019, 2, 17201726,  DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.8b01820
    22. 22
      Kaserer, S.; Caldwell, K. M.; Ramaker, D. E.; Roth, C. Analyzing the Influence of H3PO4 as Catalyst Poison in High Temperature PEM Fuel Cells Using in-operando X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 62106217,  DOI: 10.1021/jp311924q
    23. 23
      Tang, H.; Gao, J.; Wang, Y.; Li, N.; Geng, K. Phosphoric-Acid Retention in High-Temperature Proton-Exchange Membranes. Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) 2022, 28, e202202064,  DOI: 10.1002/chem.202202064
    24. 24
      Lim, K. H.; Matanovic, I.; Maurya, S.; Kim, Y.; Castro, E. S. de; Jang, J.-H.; Park, H.; Kim, Y. S. High Temperature Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cells with High Phosphoric Acid Retention. ACS Energy Lett. 2023, 8, 529536,  DOI: 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c02367
    25. 25
      Atanasov, V.; Kerres, J. Highly Phosphonated Polypentafluorostyrene. Macromolecules 2011, 44, 64166423,  DOI: 10.1021/ma2011574
    26. 26
      Nederstedt, H.; Jannasch, P. Poly(p-terphenyl alkylene)s grafted with highly acidic sulfonated polypentafluorostyrene side chains for proton exchange membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2022, 647, 120270,  DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2022.120270
    27. 27
      Shao, Z.; Sannigrahi, A.; Jannasch, P. Poly(tetrafluorostyrenephosphonic acid)-polysulfone block copolymers and membranes. J. Polym. Sci. A Polym. Chem. 2013, 51, 46574666,  DOI: 10.1002/pola.26887
    28. 28
      Yu, L.; Yue, B.; Yan, L.; Zhao, H.; Zhang, J. Proton conducting composite membranes based on sulfonated polysulfone and polysulfone-g-(phosphonated polystyrene) via controlled atom-transfer radical polymerization for fuel cell applications. Solid State Ionics 2019, 338, 103112,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ssi.2019.05.012
    29. 29
      Atanasov, V.; Gudat, D.; Ruffmann, B.; Kerres, J. Highly phosphonated polypentafluorostyrene: Characterization and blends with polybenzimidazole. Eur. Polym. J. 2013, 49, 39773985,  DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2013.09.002
    30. 30
      Matsushima, S.; Takano, A.; Takahashi, Y.; Matsushita, Y. Precise synthesis of a series of poly(4-n-alkylstyrene)s and their glass transition temperatures. J. Polym. Sci. Part B: Polym. Phys. 2017, 55, 757763,  DOI: 10.1002/polb.24326
    31. 31
      Funk, L.; Brehmer, M.; Zentel, R.; Kang, H.; Char, K. Novel Amphiphilic Styrene-Based Block Copolymers for Induced Surface Reconstruction. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2008, 209, 5263,  DOI: 10.1002/macp.200700312
    32. 32
      Jankova, K.; Hvilsted, S. Preparation of Poly(2,3,4,5,6-pentafluorostyrene) and Block Copolymers with Styrene by ATRP. Macromolecules 2003, 36, 17531758,  DOI: 10.1021/ma021039m
    33. 33
      Atanasov, V.; Oleynikov, A.; Xia, J.; Lyonnard, S.; Kerres, J. Phosphonic acid functionalized poly(pentafluorostyrene) as polyelectrolyte membrane for fuel cell application. Journal of Power Sources 2017, 343, 364372,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.01.085
    34. 34
      Sun, X.; Guan, J.; Wang, X.; Li, X.; Zheng, J.; Li, S.; Zhang, S. Phosphonated Ionomers of Intrinsic Microporosity with Partially Ordered Structure for High-Temperature Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells. ACS Central Science 2023, 9, 733741,  DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.3c00146
    35. 35
      Vilčiauskas, L.; Tuckerman, M. E.; Bester, G.; Paddison, S. J.; Kreuer, K.-D. The mechanism of proton conduction in phosphoric acid. Nature Chem 2012, 4, 461466,  DOI: 10.1038/nchem.1329
    36. 36
      Atanasov, V.; Bürger, M.; Lyonnard, S.; Porcar, L.; Kerres, J. Sulfonated poly(pentafluorostyrene): Synthesis & characterization. Solid State Ionics 2013, 252, 7583,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ssi.2013.06.010
    37. 37
      Atanasov, V.; Lee, A. S.; Park, E. J.; Maurya, S.; Baca, E. D.; Fujimoto, C.; Hibbs, M.; Matanovic, I.; Kerres, J.; Kim, Y. S. Synergistically integrated phosphonated poly(pentafluorostyrene) for fuel cells. Nat. Mater. 2021, 20, 370377,  DOI: 10.1038/s41563-020-00841-z
    38. 38
      Elabd, Y. A.; Hickner, M. A. Block Copolymers for Fuel Cells. Macromolecules 2011, 44, 111,  DOI: 10.1021/ma101247c
    39. 39
      Bae, B.; Miyatake, K.; Watanabe, M. Synthesis and properties of sulfonated block copolymers having fluorenyl groups for fuel-cell applications. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2009, 1, 12791286,  DOI: 10.1021/am900165w
    40. 40
      Shi, Z.; Holdcroft, S. Synthesis and Proton Conductivity of Partially Sulfonated Poly([vinylidene difluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene]-b-styrene) Block Copolymers. Macromolecules 2005, 38, 41934201,  DOI: 10.1021/ma0477549
    41. 41
      Tsang, E. M. W.; Zhang, Z.; Shi, Z.; Soboleva, T.; Holdcroft, S. Considerations of macromolecular structure in the design of proton conducting polymer membranes: graft versus diblock polyelectrolytes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 1510615107,  DOI: 10.1021/ja074765j
    42. 42
      Fritsch, B.; Wu, M.; Hutzler, A.; Zhou, D.; Spruit, R.; Vogl, L.; Will, J.; Hugo Pérez Garza, H.; März, M.; Jank, M. P. M.; Spiecker, E. Sub-Kelvin thermometry for evaluating the local temperature stability within in situ TEM gas cells. Ultramicroscopy 2022, 235, 113494,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2022.113494
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsmaterialslett.3c00569.

    • Simulation of POS-PWN-66 nanophase; NMRs of the block-co-polymers; DSC curves of POS-PPFS and POS-PWN60; DMA measurements of POS-b-PWN-60 and PWN-75; experimental details of membrane characterization; experimental details of nanophase imaging; analysis of STEM and simulation images of POS-PWN; NMR and GPC methods (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.