Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect
ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Thermodynamic, Computational Solubility Parameters in Organic Solvents and In Silico GastroPlus Based Prediction of Ketoconazole
My Activity
  • Open Access
Article

Thermodynamic, Computational Solubility Parameters in Organic Solvents and In Silico GastroPlus Based Prediction of Ketoconazole
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

  • Sultan Alshehri*
    Sultan Alshehri
    Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2457, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
    *Email:[email protected]. Mobile: +966114678042.
  • Afzal Hussain*
    Afzal Hussain
    Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2457, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
    *Email: [email protected]; [email protected]. Mobile: 0564591584.
  • Mohd Neyaz Ahsan
    Mohd Neyaz Ahsan
    Department of Medical Laboratory Technology University Polytechnic, Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, Ranchi 835215, Jharkhand, India
  • Raisuddin Ali
    Raisuddin Ali
    Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2457, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
  • Mohd Usman Mohd Siddique
    Mohd Usman Mohd Siddique
    Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Shri Vile Parley Kelavani Mandal’s Institute of Pharmacy, Dhule 424001, Maharastra, India
Open PDF

ACS Omega

Cite this: ACS Omega 2021, 6, 7, 5033–5045
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c06234
Published February 11, 2021

Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 .

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The study aimed to select a suitable solvent capable to solubilize ketoconazole (KETO) and serve as a permeation enhancer across the skin. Experimental solubility and Hansen solubility parameters were obtained in ethanol, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), ethylene glycol, oleic acid, span 80, limonene, eugenol, transcutol (THP), labrasol, and propylene glycol. Thermodynamic functional parameters and computational models (vanʼt Hoff and Apelblat) validated the determined solubility in various solvents at T = 298.2 K to 318.2 K and P = 0.1 MPa. The HSPiP software estimated the solubility parameters in the solvents. The maximum mole fractional solubility values of KETO were found to be in an order as oleic acid (8.5 × 10–3) > limonene (7.3 × 10–3) > span 80 (6.9 × 10–2) > THP (4.9 × 10–2) > eugenol (4.5 × 10–3) at T = 318.2 K. The results of the apparent thermodynamic analysis confirmed that the dissolution rate was endothermic and entropy driven. The GastroPlus program predicted significantly high permeation of KETO (79.1%) in human skin from the KETO-THP construct as compared to drug solution (38%) and excellent immediate release from THP-solubilized construct (90% < 1 h). Hence, THP could be a better option for topical, transdermal, and oral formulation.

This publication is licensed under

CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 .
  • cc licence
  • by licence
  • nc licence
  • nd licence
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society

Introduction

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The incidence of fungal infections occurred about 40 million in developing and under developing nations as per global estimates. (1) Chemically, ketoconazole (KETO) is an azole type (±) (cis-1-acetyl-4-[4-[2-(2,4-dichlorophenyl-2-(1H-imidazol-1ylmethyl)-1,3-dioxalon-4-yl]methoxy]phenyl]piperazine) antifungal drug for local and systemic treatments. (2) The empirical molecular formula and molecular weight of KETO are C26H28Cl2N4O4 (Figure 1A) and 531.43 g mol–1, respectively. (3) Azole molecules are the first choice option to treat cutaneous and systemic fungal infections. However, the drug possesses poor aqueous solubility (0.04 mg/mL at 25 °C), high partition coefficient (logP = 4.31), and limited oral bioavailability. (3) The drug is reported to treat several cutaneous fungal infections such as (a) onychomychosis (nail fungal infection), (b) psoriasis, (c) dermatitis, and (d) fungal infections (Candida species and Cryptococcus neoformans) associated with other diseases (human immunodeficiency virus). (4) The poor aqueous solubility challenged the drug for parenteral, oral, and topical delivery to treat these fungal infections. A high oral dose owing to limited aqueous solubility results in dose-related toxic side effects. Therefore, topical and transdermal delivery could be a suitable alternative using a suitable permeation enhancer. Hossin et al. investigated the nail–drug interaction (affinity) using Hansen solubility parameters, which can assist formulation scientists to design a suitable carrier or solvent selection (DMSO, N-methyl pyrrolidone, ethanol, and ethylene glycol) for topical application with improved efficacy. (5) Hashemzadeh and Jouyban studied the binary system of ethanol + water mixture for improved solubility of KETO at various temperatures using a Jouyban–Acree model of co-solvency. (2) Moreover, authors reported that KETO exhibited the maximum mole fractional solubility (0.117) at 308.2 K when the mass fraction of ethanol in water was 0.8. (2) They also reported KETO molar solubilities of 1.40 × 10–5 and 2.90 × 10–5 at 293.2 and 308.2 K in water, respectively. (2) Jouyban et al. explored the solubility of KETO in various polyethylene glycol-200 + water binary systems at various temperature range (298.2–318.32 K) wherein the computational models (Jouyban–Acree and vanʼt Hoff models) were the best fit to the experimental solubility data within acceptable range of mean relative deviation (MRD) values. (6) In further development, polyethylene glycols (of various molecular weights such as 200, 400, and 600) were used for the solubility study of KETO as binary as well as ternary with ethanol or water at 298.2 K. Soltanpour and Nazemi investigated that the binary mixture of ethanol + water showed relatively less molar solubility (0.041–3.071) over explored mass fractions (0.1–0.9), whereas the binary mixture of the PEG + water system exhibited higher molar solubility (0.065–3.86 for PEG200, 0.04–9.87 for PEG400, and 0.145–10.71 for PEG600) at the same mass fraction and experimental temperature (298.2 K). (7) They also studied that the binary system of ethanol + PEG revealed increased solubility with increase in the PEG molecular weight (PEG600 > PEG400 > PEG200). (7) Considering these, there are several safe and biocompatible permeation enhancers, which may be explored for solubilizing KETO, which can assist enhanced permeation across the stratum corneum (SC) after topical or transdermal application. These are ethanol, propylene glycol, labrasol, transcutol, eugenol, limonene, span 80, oleic acid, ethylene glycol, and DMSO (dimethyl sulfoxide). (8) KETO (bearing two pKa values such as 2.94 and 6.51) solubility in acetate buffer (pH = 5.0) was reported to be 0.3 mg/mL, and the solubility was increased to 4.6 mg/mL by fabricating as KETO succinate co-crystals. KETO is a weakly basic molecule. (9)

Figure 1

Figure 1. (A) Chemical structure of ketoconazole, (B) DSC thermogram of pure and equilibrated ketoconazole (recovered from methanol), and (C) chromatogram of pure ketoconazole with a retention time of 6.789 min from method validation (Empower 2 software)

No studies have been conducted for Hansen solubility, thermodynamic parameters, computational validation, and the GastroPlus-based in silico prediction of ketoconazole for topical or transdermal delivery employing these permeation enhancers. Based on experimental solubility values, the GastroPlus software can be applied to predict in vivo performance of the drug solution in a particular solvent (permeation enhancer) responsible for maximized solubility depending on the experimental solubility, Hansen solubility (HSPiP software), and thermodynamic parameters. (10) Moreover, the software can predict the effect of physicochemical properties of the drug for improved permeation across the human skin. Thus, the solubility of KETO in these permeation enhancers and their validation parameters (thermodynamic and computational models) are required in pre-formulation study.
In this study, HSPiP assisted to select the most relevant organic solvent (permeation enhancers) based on three solubility parameters (three-dimensional Hansen solubility and space parameters), which are designated as δd as the dispersion parameter, δp as the polarity parameter, and δh as the hydrogen parameter. The solubility study was conducted over various temperature range (T = 298.2 to 318.2 K) and fixed pressure (P = 0.1 MPa). The study was performed at a temperature below its melting point (146.7 °C) (Figure 1B). These parameters were modeled to correlate the experimental solubility data. Furthermore, the apparent thermodynamic analysis and computational models regressed the experimental data and validated the studied solubility models, respectively. Molecular interaction between the drug and solvents was also studied. Finally, the GastroPlus simulation and prediction modules investigated major factors affecting the solubility of the drug and pharmacokinetic parameters when formulated for oral or topical delivery in the best solvent.

Results and Discussion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Characterization of KETO in the Solid Phase

KETO is a highly crystalline compound with poor aqueous solubility. The pure drug and equilibrated KETO (with methanol) were characterized for solid phases using a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC), and the result (thermogram) is illustrated in Figure 1B. A characteristic endothermic peak indicated a fusion temperature (Tfus) along with the marked value of the fusion enthalpy (ΔHfus). The observed values of Tfus and ΔHfus were 146.84 °C and 107.8 J/g, respectively, as indicated in the characteristic endothermic peak of the thermogram (Figure 1B). Moreover, these values (Tfus and ΔHfus) were observed to be 146.92 °C and 107.62 J/g (Figure 1B), respectively, for equilibrated KETO obtained from well-resolved sharp peaks. It is obvious from the thermogram that both of them (pure KETO and equilibrated) are stable and remained in a crystalline solid state. There were no visible changes in solid-state characteristic thermal parameters (Tfus and ΔHfus) during solubility assessment. The reported value of Tfus of KETO was 146.0 °C, and there is no observed degradation beyond the melting point of KETO during thermal analysis. (11) The finding is in close agreement with the experimental value (146.8 °C).

Experimental Solubility Data

The results of experimental solubility in various organic permeation enhancers are presented in Table 1. These are biocompatible and well-established skin permeation enhancers already explored in various topical and transdermal drug delivery. Moreover, several organic solvents (2-propanol, ethanol, PEG200, PEG400, and PEG600) have been investigated for improved solubility of KETO intended for pharmaceutical application. (2,12) Improved solubility in the explored permeation enhancer could be an ideal component for topical or transdermal delivery in the treatment of various dermal fungal infections. Therefore, the solubility of KETO in these permeation enhancers were envisaged and investigated for quantitative analysis followed by validation using thermodynamic and computational models. The software HSPiP assisted to screen the most suitable permeation enhancer based on the solubility parameters (dispersion, polarity, and hydrogen bond) and chemical structure of the drug (Figure 1A and Table 2).
Table 1. Mole Fractional Experimental Solubility (xe) of Ketoconazole at Varied Temperatures T = 298.2–318.2 K and Pressure = 0.1 MPaa
 temperature (K)
solvent298.2 K303.2 K308.2 K313.2 K318.2 K
ethanol2.1× 10–42.8× 10–43.7× 10–44.9× 10–45.6× 10–4
DMSO2.5× 10–42.9× 10–43.4× 10–44.2× 10–44.9× 10–4
ethylene glycol0.2× 10–40.3× 10–41.0× 10–41.3× 10–41.7× 10–4
oleic acid5.8× 10–36.3× 10–36.9× 10–37.5× 10–38.5× 10–3
span 804.7× 10–35.1× 10–35.7× 10–36.2× 10–36.9× 10–3
limonene5.1× 10–35.5× 10–36.1× 10–36.8× 10–37.3× 10–3
eugenol3.5× 10–33.7× 10–34.1× 10–34.2× 10–34.5× 10–3
THP3.2× 10–33.4× 10–33.9× 10–34.3× 10–34.9× 10–3
labrasol2.8× 10–33.1× 10–33.5× 10–33.9× 10–34.4× 10–3
propylene glycol0.1× 10–41.2× 10–41.6× 10–42.3× 10–42.8× 10–4
xidl0.38 × 10–30.53 × 10–30.74 × 10–31.01 × 10–31.37 × 10–3
a

DMSO = Dimethyl sulfoxide; THP = transcutol HP. The standard uncertainties u are u(T) = 0.10 K, u(P) = 0.004 MPa and u(xe) = 1.5%.

Table 2. Various Hansen Solubility (xe) Parameters of KTZ in Various Permeation Enhancers (Solvents)a
 Hansen solubility parameters (MPa1/2)
solventδdδpδhδRaΔδΔδ*
ketoconazole21.611.96.225.4   
ethanol15.38.919.125.115.92.2016.64
DMSO10.216.810.224.811.04.4716.89
ethylene glycol17.211.126.435.822.60.1825.67
oleic acid16.17.35.817.26.62.6117.33
span 8016.26.57.119.76.722.917.16
limonene17.22.14.318.95.922.9110.41
eugenol19.47.212.922.95.140.4112.65
THP16.37.110.221.84.132.512.93
labrasol15.84.18.720.19.323.9610.00
propylene glycol17.110.121.828.118.000.4225.50
a

IPA = isopropyl alcohol; IPM = isopropyl myristate; THP = transcutol HP; EA = ethyl acetate.

Table 1 summarizes the experimental values (xe) of KETO in the organic solvents at an explored temperature range (Table 1) wherein the values of xe were found to be constantly increasing with temperature (p < 0.05). The maximum xe solubility values of KETO were obtained in oleic acid (8.5× 10–3) and limonene (7.3× 10–3) at T = 318.2 K. The values of experimental solubility in all solvents can be ordered as oleic acid > limonene > span 80 (6.9× 10–3) > THP (4.9× 10–3) > eugenol (4.5× 10–3) > labrasol (4.4× 10–3) > DMSO (4.9× 10–4) > ethanol (5.6 × 10–4) > propylene glycol (2.8× 10–4) > ethylene glycol (1.7× 10–4) performed at a temperature of 318.2 K. The xe values followed the same trend at temperatures of T = 298.2 K, T = 303.2 K, T = 308.2 K, and T = 313.2 K. It is noticeable that the xe values were significant (p < 0.05) in oleic acid, limonene, and span 80 compared to others. This can be explained based on the correlation of the HSPs values of oleic acid, limonene, and span 80 with that of the HSPs values of pure KETO. The values of δd, δp, and δh of KETO are 21.6, 11.9, and 6.2, whereas these values for oleic acid were predicted to be 16.1, 7.3, and 5.8, respectively. The polarity parameter values of oleic acid, eugenol, span80, and THP are comparable and much lower than the hydrophilic solvents (labrasol and ethanol). KETO molar solubility values in ethanol were found to be 2.1 × 10–4, 2.8 × 10–4, 3.7 × 10–4, 4.9 × 10–4, and 5.6 × 10–4 at T = 298.2 K, T = 303.2 K, T = 308.2 K, T = 313.2 K, and T = 313.2 K, respectively. Recently, the drug molar solubility values in ethanol were reported to be 2.2 × 10–5, 2.6 × 10–5, and 2.9 × 10–5 at T = 298.2 K, T = 303.2 K, and T = 308.2 K, respectively. (2) The slight differences at the corresponding temperatures may be due to differences in pressure (0.1 MPa). However, the differences in the molar solubility with the increase in temperature were not significant, which are in accordance with the reported pattern. Moreover, Hashemzadeh and Jouyban did not investigate the molar solubility in ethanol at 298.2 and 318.2 K. (2) The drug is poorly water soluble being crystalline in nature. Therefore, the increased drug solubility may be correlated with the lipophilic–lipophilic-enabled (solute–solvent) interaction (like dissolves like). On the other hand, labrasol, ethanol, propylene glycol, and ethylene glycol exhibited quite lower values of xe, which are due to the high polarity δp value of HSPs (Tables 1 and 2) at T = 318.2 K. Oleic acid and span 80 showed about similar values of HSPs parameters, which may be a reason for closeness in experimental solubility (xe), space parameter (Ra), and total solubility (Δδ) values as shown in Table 2. (14) The mole fractional experimental solubility values of KETO in ethylene glycol and propylene glycol are 1.7 × 10–4 and 2.8 × 10–4, respectively, which may be due to higher values of δh (26.4 for ethylene glycol and 21.8 for propylene glycol) compared to KETO (6.2). This may have led to limited interaction (hydrogen bonding interaction) between the drug and solvent resulting least solubility (Tables 1 and 2). Ethylene glycol showed an approximate value of the δp (11.1), which was close to that of the drug (11.9). However, the drug was found to be the least soluble, which may be due to weak dispersion in the solvent (δp = 17.2). In this context, the drug was found maximally solubilized in oleic acid due to poor polarity of the solvent and hydrophobic–hydrophobic facilitated interaction. Thus, the solvents such as oleic acid, THP, span 80, and limonene can be proposed as suitable solvents for developing formulation intended for transdermal or topical delivery of rifampicin working as a carrier as well as permeation enhancer if laden with the drug.

Solubility Parameters of KETO and Studied Solvents using Various Models

We used all of the HSP parameters for the drug and solvents as shown in Table 2. The value of δ of KETO was predicted to be 25.4 MPa1/2 and polarity parameter was estimated to be 11.9 MPa1/2 suggesting weak interaction with hydrophilic/polar solvents. Therefore, the drug was found to have maximum xe data in a permeation enhancer with high hydrophobicity and low polarity (δp) (oleic acid, THP, span 80, and limonene). It is noteworthy that calculated values of Ra for oleic acid (6.6), span 80 (6.7), limonene (5.92), eugenol (5.14), and THP (4.13) were <10.0 MPa1/2, suggesting augmented miscibility of the drug in these solvents. In general, the value of Ra of <5.6 MPa1/2 is considered as “good soluble” or “miscible of solute”. (13,14) However, there are contradictory findings among the literature values. Few authors correlated this value as soluble (around 10 MPa1/2). (14) In the our case, the values of Ra for limonene, eugenol, THP, span 80, and oleic acid are in the range of 5.6–8.0 MPa1/2 and these could be considered as the most suitable permeation enhancers for topical or transdermal delivery. There are few reports where authors could not find any values of the Ra value close to 5.6 MPa1/2 in all explored solvents. However, they agreed and defined the solubility of the solute as soluble considering the Ra value of 8.0 close to 5.6 MPa1/2. (15) Thus, THP, limonene, span 80, oleic acid, and eugenol can be considered as a first series of solvents for good solubility/miscibility of KETO among them. Furthermore, the values of other parameters such as Δδ* and Δδ were estimated in the solvents. The values of Δδ ranged from 0.18 to 4.74 MPa1/2 for the studied solvents, which indicated within the acceptable range (<10.0 MPa1/2). This parameter (Δδ) was minimum for ethylene glycol (0.18 MPa1/2), propylene glycol (0.42 MPa1/2), and eugenol (0.41 MPa1/2), as shown in Table 2. As per the literature, the value of Δδ of <7.0 MPa1/2 was considered as the most soluble or miscible of a solute in a given solvent. (16) Considering the values of Ra and Δδ, limonene, eugenol, and THP are the most preferred solvents being capable of solubilizing hydrophobic KETO. In the case of propylene glycol and ethylene glycol, the values of Δδ, are the least but the Ra values are quite high. This might be due to the fact that the dispersion ability of the drug as observed in the δd, of the Hansen solubility parameter for eugenol (δd = 19.0) is the closest value to KETO (21.6). Similarly, the Δδ* values of KETO were determined using van Krevelen and Hoftyzer equations. However, the value of Δδ of <5.0 MPa1/2 is good for improved solubility or miscibility. (15,16) The values of Δδ* are found to be ≥10.0 MPa1/2 in all explored permeation enhancers except THP (2.93 MPa1/2) as shown in Table 2. A solvent is selected with the lowest value of Δδ* of the Hansen solubility parameter. The estimated values of Δδ* were observed to be 2.93, 10.0, and 10.41 MPa1/2 for THP, labrasol, and limonene, respectively, wherein the THP exhibited the minimum value. Thus, these Hansen solubility parameters (Ra, Δδ*, and Δδ) are in an acceptable range as compared to other solvents, which showed good solubility of KETO in THP. Thus, THP could be considered as the most suitable solvent (permeation enhancer), whereas ethylene glycol is the solvent with poor solubility of KETO. There is a correlation that exists between the solubility of a solute in a solvent and their solubility parameters. In addition, several factors are responsible for KETO solubility in the solvent and these are the molar mass volume and molecular interaction (inter and intra). (15) The objective of the study was to select a permeation enhancer with dual functionality (permeation enhancer and carrier) in developing topical or transdermal formulation. Therefore, considering Hansen solubility parameters and space parameter (Ra), THP could be the best permeation enhancer and suitable solvent when fabricated in a nanocarrier system intended for topical or transdermal delivery.

Estimation of Ideal Solubility (xidl) and Activity Coefficient (Υi)

These values were estimated to identify the most suitable solvent responsible for maximum solubility of KETO and serving as the potential permeation enhancer. Moreover, the estimated value of Υi assists to find a molecular interaction between the solute and the solvent. Initially, the xidl of KETO was estimated to calculate the value of the activity coefficient. Tables 1 and 3 summarize the values of xidl and Υi of KETO in various permeation enhancers, respectively. The ideal solubility values (xidl) of KETO were found to be 0.38 × 10–3 to 1.37 × 10–3 at T = 298.2 to 318.2 K (Table 1). The experimental solubility xe of KETO in oleic acid was found to be significantly (p < 0.05) higher than the ideal solubility (xidl) values at T = 298.2 and 303.2 K, whereas this pattern decreases beyond the temperature of 303.2 K (Table 1). Ethanol, DMSO, ethylene glycol, and propylene glycol showed experimental solubility values of KETO lower than the ideal solubility as shown in Table 1. Similarly, oleic acid, span 80, limonene, eugenol, and THP exhibited significantly (p < 0.05) higher values of xe as compared to xidl over all studied temperature points, which could be basis for considering these solvents suitable for KETO solubilization.
Table 3. Activity Coefficient (Υi) of Ketoconazole at Varied Temperatures (T = 298.2–318.2 K)a
 Υi
solvent298.2 K303.2 K308.2 K313.2 K318.2 K
ethanol1.811.891.982.052.44
DMSO1.521.832.162.412.79
ethylene glycol1.933.657.357.758.06
oleic acid1.651.841.761.842.61
span 800.801.041.281.622.21
limonene0.740.961.201.481.87
eugenol1.001.431.691.851.98
THP0.110.560.881.031.18
labrasol1.351.712.102.583.11
propylene glycol3.804.434.594.834.98
a

DMSO = dimethyl sulfoxide; THP = transcutol HP.

The estimated values of activity coefficient (Υi) of KETO in 10 permeation enhancers at the temperature range of T = 298.2–318.2 K are tabulated in Table 3. The values were in the range of 0.75–1.87, 1.0–1.98, and 0.11–1.18 in limonene, eugenol, and THP, respectively. Moreover, the Υi values were relatively higher in DMSO, ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, labrasol, and ethanol as compared to THP, limonene, and eugenol estimated at T = 298.2 K, 303.2, 308.2, 313.2, and 318.2 K. That may rationalize that these three solvents might have maximized the solute–solvent molecular interaction, which can be ordered as “KETO-THP > KETO-limonene > KETO-Eugenol” combination. Improved solubilization in THP may be attributed to formation of intermolecular hydrogen bonding between the hydroxyl group of THP and the imidazole nitrogen atom. (18,19) Conclusively, THP, limonene, and eugenol may be the most preferred solvents to solubilize KETO.

Computational Validation

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The objective of the study was to investigate a suitable permeation enhancer working as a solvent to solubilize KETO and a potential skin permeation when formulated as topical or transdermal formulation. Therefore, experimental solubility data were generated at various temperatures (selected based on Hansen solubility parameters). The data needed to be validated using two known validation computational models such as the Apelblat model and vanʼt Hoff model. Using both of them, a graphical correlation was established between the lnxe and lnxapl of KETO as a function of 1/T (Figure 2). The computational validation results are presented in Table 4, which corroborated a good correlation between lnxe and lnxapl (Figure 2). Moreover, the estimated values of the percent relative mean square deviation (%RMSD) and overall %RMSD of the drug in all studied solvents were 0.011–0.848 and 0.136, respectively (Table 4). In Table 4, the values of A, B, and C represent the Apelblat solubility parameters, which were estimated using the Apelblat equation. To analyze this model for each solvent, the value of r2 (regression coefficient) was found to be ≥0.99, vindicating a good correlation of lnxe of KETO in all studied solvents.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Correlation of lnxe values of ketoconazole with the Apelblat model in various organic solvents as a function of 1/T.

Table 4. Apelblat Equation Parameters for Various Permeation Enhancers (Solvent)a
 parameters
solventABCr2RMSD (%)overall RMSD
ethanol–317.004–6.12955.9880.99890.037 
DMSO–211.412–7.13737.5200.99970.039 
ethylene glycol–139.297–7.16124.4690.99930.345 
oleic acid–225.371–8.15140.5530.99780.018 
span 80–188.187–9.14233.8410.99950.0130.136
limonene–194.879–7.13135.0850.99980.012 
eugenol–183.983–7.12615.3570.99760.026 
THP–140.569–6.13525.2170.99990.011 
labrasol–137.419–8.14729.6060.99970.016 
propylene glycol–227.878–7.14240.0480.99320.848 
a

DMSO = dimethyl sulfoxide; THP = transcutol HP; RMSD = root mean square deviation.

Similar experimental analysis was carried out using the vanʼt Hoff model wherein a graphical correlation between lnxe and lnxvant as a function of 1/T was demonstrated, suggesting a good correlation (Figure 3). Likewise, the estimated values of the %RMSD, overall %RMSD, model parameters (a and b), and regression coefficient are presented in Table 5. The estimated values of %RMSD and overall %RMSD were found to be 0.011–0.178 and 0.0478, respectively (Table 5) for all studied solvents. The estimated values of r2in each solvent were found to be ≥0.09. Thus, both models validated the experimental solubility data studied in various solvents at varied temperatures by establishing a good graphical correlation and estimating model parameters.

Figure 3

Figure 3. van’t Hoff plot for ketoconazole plotted between lnxe and (1/T – 1/Thm) for the drug in various organic solvents.

Table 5. Vanʼt Hoff Model and Parametersa
 parameters
solventabr2RMSDoverall RMSD
ethanol58.84–17256.20.98880.041 
DMSO41.062–11546.00.99980.042 
ethylene glycol52.119–14865.80.99890.076 
oleic acid47.545–12489.50.99730.178 
span 8048.508–13094.30.99980.0230.0478
limonene41.238–10805.40.99750.013 
eugenol19.403–4744.860.99390.013 
THP29.123–7763.60.99990.010 
labrasol28.137–7577.060.99980.017 
propylene glycol26.376–7589.080.97760.065 
a

DMSO = dimethyl sulfoxide; THP = transcutol HP.

Thermodynamic Parameters

Thermodynamic functional parameters are required to explain the mechanistic view of KETO solubility in individual solvent at various temperatures. These function parameters are based on physical changes (events) and represented as ΔsolΔG°, ΔsolΔH° and ΔsolΔS° in a mathematical equation. We rationalized the process of KETO solubility in studied solvents by thermodynamic analysis and using three thermodynamic solubility function parameters. (20) These functional parameters were estimated for KETO in various solvents and are presented in Table 6. The calculated values of ΔsolΔG°, ΔsolΔH° and ΔsolΔS° were found in the range of 1195.7–10820.7, 13071.9–22501.2, and 28.4–56.92 kJ mol–1, respectively, in the investigated solvents. It is apparently clear from the result that oleic acid, span 80, limonene, eugenol, and THP showed relatively low values of the free energy (ΔsolΔG°) of dissolution as compared to other solvents. Similarly, limonene, eugenol, and THP showed the values of ΔsolΔS° to be 27.07, 22.34, 20.2 kJ mol–1, respectively, which were the minimum values among them. These solvents can be ordered for ΔsolΔS° as limonene > eugenol > THP, suggesting THP as the most suitable solvent for KETO. The estimated values of ΔsolΔS° were the maximum in ethanol, DMSO, ethylene glycol, and propylene glycol, which indicated that these solvents could be considered as solvents for poor solubility of KETO due to hydrophilicity and high polarity solvent resulting in weak solute–solvent molecular interaction (Table 6). As per the concept of thermodynamics, a reaction or a process is said to be spontaneous (negative free energy) when the change in free energy ΔsolΔG° decreases. Thus, KETO solubilization in limonene, THP, and eugenol was a spontaneous process resulting in a significant change in ΔsolΔG°, providing a suitable thermodynamic environment for increased solubility. (20) In addition, the lower values of ΔsolΔS° for THP, limonene, and eugenol further supported a reasonable explanation for the increased solubility of KETO in these permeation enhancers. It is quite interesting to note that the negative enthalpy values of dissolution in limonene, eugenol, and THP may be due to the possible hydrophobic interaction with the non-polar functional groups (methyl, methylene, and aromatic rings) of KETO as shown in Figure 1A. (21) Apart from these, there are several factors responsible for the solubility of KETO in these solvents or permeation enhancers. These are physicochemical behavior of the solute and solvent, hydrogen bond formation with non-polar groups of the drug, solute–solvent interaction, and co-solvency using a binary mixture of organic solvent with water. Very recently, it was reported that ethanol used as co-solvent with water increased the solubility of KETO due to breaking the ordered structure of water stabilized with hydrogen bonding around the non-polar groups of KETO, which caused increased values of enthalpy and entropy of the system. (21)
Table 6. Summary of Thermodynamic Functional Parameters for Validationa
 parameters
solventΔsol ΔH° (kJ mol–1)Δsol ΔG° (kJ mol–1)Δsol ΔS° (kJ mol–1)r2
ethanol–4773.9–20115.7651.330.9767
DMSO–3254.3–20461.356.410.9948
ethylene glycol–10820.0–19373.258.040.9357
oleic acid–1778.8–14273.3430.960.9987
span 80–1826.8–13267.237.510.9975
limonene–1763.6–13071.8927.070.9947
eugenol–1195.7–14109.022.340.9753
THP–1982.3–14243.4220.200.9998
labrasol–2150.0–14519.840.550.9982
propylene glycol–5138.1–22501.256.920.9865
a

DMSO = dimethyl sulfoxide; THP = transcutol HP.

GastroPlus Prediction Studies

The software program is basically to simulate in vitro data and prediction of in vivo performance based on the input parameters (Table 7). We added the values of in vitro drug release in in vitro data tab for pure KETO and THP-solubilized drug. Neat KETO (suspension) exhibited % drug releases of 8.4, 12.0, 25.1, 31.6, and 39.9% at the time points of 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 h, respectively, in phosphate buffer solution (pH 7.4). Similarly, THP-solubilized KETO exhibited % drug releases of 25.7, 56.9, 67.3, 75.2, and 87.7% at the same time points. The release data was also modeled for the Weibull release distribution pattern using the GastroPlus simulation. The results are illustrated in Figure 4A,B. Figure 4A and Figure 4B shows the in vitro release pattern of the neat KETO suspension and THP-solubilized drug (10 mg/mL), respectively. The neat KETO suspension and THP-solubilized drug revealed maximum drug releases of 39.9 and 87.7% at the end of 8 h, respectively. The Weibull-modeled graph (single Weibull) showed that the release distribution followed a sigmoidal pattern as evidenced with shape factors (b shape values) of 1.47 and 1.57, for suspension and THP-solubilized KETO (blue solid lines of Figure 4A,B). It is obvious from the release graphs that this model may not be the only prefect release model to confirm immediate and controlled release behavior of the drug. However, all of the other parameters affecting the drug release (such as pH, amount, pKa, polarity, logP, density, and temperature) should be figured out and controlled. (22,23)

Figure 4

Figure 4. GastroPlus-based simulation and prediction study: (A) In vitro drug release behavior and Weibull model distribution of neat ketoconazole suspension (blue line for sigmoidal release pattern), (B) in vitro drug release behavior and Weibull model distribution of THP solubilized ketoconazole (blue line for sigmoidal release pattern) in buffer solution (pH 7.4), (C) skin absorption of neat ketoconazole from suspension, and (D) skin absorption of THP-solubilized ketoconazole.

Table 7. Summary of the Input Parameters of Ketoconazole for the GastroPlus-Based Prediction Study
input parametersvalue
empirical formulaC26H28Cl2N4O4
molecular weight (g/mole)531.04
melting point (°C)146
log P value4.35
pKa3.96 (amine) and 6.74 (imine)
aqueous solubility (mg/ml at 25 °C)0.24
apparent permeability (×10–4 cm/s)0.75
dosing volume (mL)1.0
dose (mg)2.0
body weight (Kg)60.0
total clearance (L/h)8.66
elimination half-life (h)8.0
volume of distribution (L/Kg)0.36 (25.41 L)
protein binding capacity (%)84
simulation time (h)12
Furthermore, the software PBPK model predicted the amount of the drug permeated across human skin (70 Kg) when applied to the skin (arm). The predicted values of KETO cream (considering pure drug = 0.2 mg) and THP-solubilized KETO (0.2 mg as solution) are illustrated in Figure 4C and 4D, respectively where the neat drug cream and THP-solubilized KETO showed 38.0% and 79.1%, respectively. This may be correlated with improved solubilisation and permeation potential of THP explored for several poor soluble drugs. This skin penetration and permeation may be attributed to the facilitated drug portioning and diffusion. The THP is reported as the most suitable skin permeation enhancer possibly due to capable of increasing flux (21 times higher) and diffusion coefficient (17 times) higher than the hydrated skin. (23)
The neat KETO is a hydrophobic and weak water soluble molecule. However, THP-solubilized KETO was anticipated to have high permeation across human skin on topical application and enhanced absorption through intestinal membrane when administered oral. Therefore, the software based prediction study suggested that the dissolution rate (0.1 mg as input parameter of topical dose) of the drug and skin absorption (at pH 5.6 as simulated pH of human skin) was within 1 h as shown in Figure 5. The inset graph of Figure 5 depicted the immediate absorption (in vivo) profile of THP-solubilized KETO when administered orally. This could be possible due to improved drug solubility and enhanced permeation attributed to the solvent (THP). (23) However, the preclinical study using a suitable animal requires generating a complete proof of concept for topical/transdermal/oral formulation of KETO using THP as a solvent and permeation enhancer.

Figure 5

Figure 5. GastroPlus-based prediction of a relationship between dissolution and skin permeation of ketoconazole dissolved in THP. The inset of the figure predicted the plasma concentration time profile of THP solubilized ketoconazole when administeresd orally (0.1 mg).

Significance of the Explored Permeation Enhancers

In this study, the term “solvent” was used collective for the organic solvent, lipid, and surfactants responsible for improved solubilization and skin permeation if laden with the drug. KETO is a choice drug for several topical fungal diseases, which need to be addressed with new excipients exhibiting dual functionality such as solubilization as well as skin permeation. Based on the Hansen solubility parameter, 10 solvents were predicted for KETO solubility and possible interaction. The solubility experimental data were validated using thermodynamic functional terms and computational models. Thus, the result of this study would assist formulation scientists (transdermal and topical) during the preliminary study for the selection of the organic phase considering the solubility and skin permeation enhancer. We found limonene (terpene), eugenol, and THP as the most suitable solvents (permeation enhancer) intended for topical and transdermal formulation. In several literature studies, these excipients are well established for the skin permeation potential of poor soluble drugs. There is scarcity of in vivo data in human to establish a direct correlation with in vitro findings. However, we predicted in vitro release kinetics, the drug absorption across human skin (left arm), and compared between the neat drug and THP-solubilized KETO using the GastroPlus predictive modules.

Conclusions

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

KETO is extremely poorly soluble in water and a well-established antifungal candidate to control cutaneous fungal infections. Data of experimental and Hansen solubility parameters suggested that several permeation enhancers can be a suitable option for the drug solubilization and skin permeation enhancing effect. The thermodynamic functional parameters and computational models validated the experimental solubility carried out at varied temperature. No transformation occurred in KETO extracted from methanol as evidenced by the DSC result. Two models such as the vanʼt Hoff and Apelblat were employed to validate the results of experimental solubility. All of the solvents exhibited a significant (p < 0.05) proportional relationship of the experimental solubility values with temperature. This may be rationalized that these three solvents were found to have maximum solute–solvent molecular interaction, which can be ordered as KETO-THP > KETO-limonene > KETO-Eugenol combination at T = 318.2 K as compared to other combinations. The GastroPlus program software predicted a maximized drug content permeated (THP solubilized) in human skin as compared to the drug solution. Moreover, there was a good correlation between in vitro drug dissolution and permeation (absorption across the skin) when predicted for THP-solubilized construct (immediate release pattern < 1 h). The software predicted an immediate release type of oral absorption for THP-solubilized KETO. The findings suggested that transcutol may also be an ideal alternative as solvent and skin permeation enhancer for topical delivery of KETO to control fungal infection.

Experimental Methods

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Materials

KETO was procured from Sigma-Aldrich, (India). Transcutol HP and labrasol were obtained as ex gratia from Gatteffosse (36 chem de Genas-BP 603-F-69804 Saint Priest Cedex France). Span 80, ethanol, ethylene glycol, oleic acid, eugenol, limonene, DMSO, and ethanol were purchased from Merck Chemicals Mumbai, India. All of the reagents were of analytical grade.

Analytical Methodology

The drug was assayed using a validated HPLC (high-performance liquid chromatography, Waters, Empower 2 software, USA), and the procedure was adopted as per the reported method. (24) Analysis was performed using a reverse phase C18 column (150 mm × 46 mm, 5 μm), at a flow rate of 1 mL/min and UV detector at 254 nm. The mobile phase was composed of acetonitrile, water, and diethylamine (70:30:0.05, v/v). The mobile phase was filtered, sonicated, and then used in the system using 10 μL as the injection volume (sample). The set run time was 10 min with a constant operating temperature of 20 ± 1 °C (Figure 1C). The sensitivity of the analysis was 0.005 to 0.010 μg/mL with a regression coefficient (r2) of 0.9999. The final pH of the mobile phase was adjusted to 9.0 using a 0.01 N NaOH solution. (25)

Differential Scanning Calorimeter: Thermal Analysis

In order to observe any possible transition in analytical solvent, pure KETO was completely recovered from the equilibrated KETO in methanol (slow evaporation method) and assessed for thermal parameters (fusion temperature and enthalpy) using a DSC method (DSC-50, Shimadzu, Japan). This analysis was conducted to find probable chances of transition in the explored organic solvents, possible impurities, and drug degradation over the studied temperature range. An accurately weighed amount (4.0 mg) of both samples (pure and recovered) were transferred into an aluminum pan, sealed (hermatically), and then kept in the furnace chamber (sample holder). The samples were heated at the heating rate of 10 °C/min till 200 °C followed by cooling after completion of heating (nitrogen flow of 20.0 mL/min) for the next sample. The result of DSC was presented in DSC spectral peaks containing the values of endothermic peaks and fusion enthalpy (ΔHfusion J/g). The DSC cell was calibrated using indium (melting point of 156.8 °C and ΔHfusion of 28.71 J/g).

Solubility Assessment

The experimental solubility (xe) of KETO was studied in PG (propylene glycol), labrasol, THP (transcutol HP), eugenol, limonene, span 80, oleic acid, ethylene glycol, DMSO, and ethanol, which are of GRAS (generally regarded as safe) organic solvents and major skin permeation enhancer in topical formulations. The study was performed at five temperature points (T = 298.2, 303.3, 308.2, 313.2, and 318.2 K) and constant pressure (0.1 MPa) following the reported method. (7) In brief, the weighed amount of KETO was added to 5 mL of each organic solvent separately followed by shaking in a water bath shaker for 12 h (Remi Equipment Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, India). The study was continued till equilibrium was attained between the dissolved and undissolved KETO. The dissolved content (μg g–1) was estimated using validated HPLC at a λmax of 254 nm. Analysis was carried out in triplicate (n = 3) for mean and ± SD values.
(1)
where m1 and M1 are the mass and the molar mass of KETO, respectively. Similarly, m2 and M2 represent the mass and the molar mass of the solvent, respectively.

Solubility Parameters

Hildebrand and Scott introduced the idea of the solubility parameters based on the solubility behavior of the solute in a specific solvent. (26) Hildebrand and Scott considered that the inherent cohesive energy (criterion of attractiveness) of any solute is a necessary factor to separate molecules or ions or atoms from the parent compound and is related to the solubility parameters. (27) It is noticeable that the solubility of any solute is maximum when the difference between the polarity parameter of the solute (δps) and the solvent is approximately zero [Δ(δps – δpv) = 0]. (10) The Hildebrand principle could be applied to the simple liquid mixture being used in pharmaceutical manufacturing such as oral solution, parenteral product, and topical formulation (solution). However, this concept does not fit for the complex pharmaceutical mixture based products. For this, the principle was further extended by establishing new approach named as the Hansen approach to understand the complex mixture and associated interactions between the solute and the solvent. Theoretically, the Hansen theory depends upon the divided individual component of the total cohesive energy (δt) arising from the dispersion force (δd), molecular dipole–dipole interactions (δp) and the hydrogen bond (δh). (28)
(2)
In a new approach, the three-dimensional Hansen solubility parameter (3D-HSP, δ) was obtained by the sum of the square of the individual parameters:
(3)
Thus, 3D-HSP (δ) of KETO and individual solvent was calculated using HSPiP software (version 5.0.1, Louisville, KY, USA) using eq 3. The individual parameters such as dispersion, polarity, and hydrogen bonding are indicated as δd, δp, and δh, respectively, which are three prime Hansen solubility parameters responsible for main interactions between the solute and organic solvent.
During product development and generation proof of concept, researchers and formulation scientists need to understand the basic fundamental working in the solubility and the molecular interactions. These interactions exist between the solute–solvent, solvent–polymer, and solute–solvent. Thus, there are various established approaches based on the concept of solubility parameters or the “like dissolves like” theory. Van-Krevelen and co-workers presented a modified solubility parameter Δδ for explaining the mixing mechanism of two substances by eq 4. (16,17)
(4)
In order to describe the maximum probable miscibility of the solute in the solvent or between the two components, a threshold reported to be Δδ ≤ 5.0 MPa1/2, wherein the Δδ value could be considered less miscible or higher than 10, is regarded as immiscible. In this context, the term “miscibility” refers to a solution comprising of a solute (of certain molar concentration) in a particular solvent at a certain temperature.
In addition, Bagley presented a conceptual thermodynamic relationship between two solubility parameters (δd and δp). This is known as a combined solubility parameters (δv) as given in eq 5:
(5)
Equation 5 can be applied to project the 3D solubility parameter space (Ra) into a 2D plot. This plot was drawn between δv and δh, known as Bagley plot. This Ra was used to estimate a level miscibility or solubilization between two components or substances. The solubility parameter space (Ra) is a distance in the Bagley plot, which represents the solubility of any solute in a particular solvent. Mathematically, the value of Ra can be determined using eq 6:
(6)
Notably, this equation (Bagley plot) was the best fit model to estimate the solubility/miscibility of a polymer or an active drug or solute in a particular solvent/excipient. Furthermore, Greenhalgh established a new model for the miscibility of two substances, which was based on the differences of Δδt (the total solubility parameters). This can be calculated using eq 7:
(7)
In this model, it was established that two substances or compounds are said to be completely miscible when Δδt ≤ 7.0 MPa1/2 and immiscible when Δδt ≥ 10.0 MPa1/2. It is crucial to divide Δδt into its components (δd, δp, and δh), and the major limitation of this approach is the estimation of partial solubility.
Ideal solubility (xideal) and activity coefficient (Υi)
Fundamentally, a compound or substance or solute is considered in an equilibrium state of an ideal solution. Moreover, the free energy (G) or partial molar G of any compound or substance (crystalline solute) must be equal to the saturated solution of the same solute, which can be expressed as eq 8:
(8)
In the case of an irreversible process, the total energy of such process is the sum of all involved reversible processes between the same points (Kirchoffʼs law). That is why the irreversible enthalpy (at temperature T as melting point of the solute) represents the sum of all reversible enthalpies. The xideal of any solute in a particular organic solvent or permeation enhancer can be presented as eq 9
(9)
where ΔHm, ΔCpm and Tm are the enthalpy of melting, the difference of the molar heat capacity of the solid state with that of the liquid state, and the fusion temperature of the solute, respectively. (29)
Mathematically, the value of ΔCpm can be estimated using eq 10
(10)
where the values of Tm and ΔHm were estimated to be 419.0 K and 57.28 kJ mol–1, respectively (Figure 1B) by DSC analysis. Thus, the calculated value of ΔCpm for pure KETO was 43.79 J mol–1 K–1 using eq 10. Notably, it is obvious from eq 9 that an ideal solubility or the crystal–liquid solubility ratio is dependent upon the melting point of the solute only and the solvent has no effect. (30) The values of xideal and activity coefficient (Υi) of KETO were estimated in various solvents using eqs 9 and 11, respectively:
(11)

Computational Validation

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

In the present study, the experimental solubility was estimated in various organic solvents (permeation enhancers), which need to be validated using computational validation models. These models (Apelblat model and vanʼt Hoff model) are based on a thermodynamic concept. (31,32) The apelblat solubility (xapl) of KETO was calculated using eq 12:
(12)
where A, B, and C are the Apelblat solubility parameters estimated from the experimental solubility data (Table 1) using the nonlinear multivariate regression analysis method. The xe values of KETO in various solvents were modeled with the xapl data using relative means square deviation (% RMSD) and regression r2 values (Figure 2). The % RMSD values can be estimated using eq 13
(13)
where N is the number experimental data points in the current study. Similarly, the vanʼt Hoff model solubility was estimated using eq 14
(14)
where a and b are the vanʼt Hoff solubility parameters at temperature T and estimated by plotting the ln(xe) value of KETO as function of 1/T (K).

Thermodynamic Parameter Assessment

It was required to assess the thermodynamic terms (Gibbs free energy, enthalpy, and entropy) for KETO in each solvent at the studied temperature. Generally, up to now, explanation of thermodynamic function parameters (terms) for the noted molecule was lacking in the literature. Therefore, these functional parameters as validation tools for the experimental solubility have been taken into consideration and there are the scarcity of quantitative thermodynamics data for the drug in previous reports. In this study, an attempt has been made to fill this gap for the assessment of the solubility parameters. Fundamentally, a solution is said to be an ideal solution when the change of entropy, volume, and energy on mixing is null. Therefore, thermodynamic functional parameters of the solubilized KETO in a particular solvent forming a non-ideal solution can be used to characterize them, which are apparent standard dissolution enthalpy (ΔsolH°), apparent standard dissolution entropy (ΔsolS°), and apparent standard Gibb free energy (ΔsolG°). These parameters were estimated through the apparent thermodynamic analysis method for KETO in a particular organic solvent over the explored temperature range. Moreover, the values of these parameters (ΔsolH°, ΔsolG°, and ΔsolS°) were determined using the vanʼt Hoff and Krug models. (33) It was required to estimate the value of ΔsolH° for KETO in an individual solvent at mean harmonic temperature (Thm = 305.0 K) using the vanʼt Hoff analysis model (eq 15). (29)
(15)
where R and Thm are the gas constant (8.314 J K–1 mol–1) and the mean harmonic temperature, respectively. The enthalpy of dissolution (ΔsolH°) was calculated using the vanʼt Hoff plot. Moreover, the value of ΔsolG° for KETO was calculated using the Krug et al. (33) analysis model (eq 16) in each organic solvent at Thm:
(16)
The intercept value was estimated from the vanʼt Hoff plot in each solvent (Figure 3).
Similarly, the ΔsolS° value of KETO was calculated using eq 17. (33)
(17)

GastroPlus Prediction Software: In Silico Study

The GastroPlus software (version 9.7, Simulation Plus, Inc., Lancaster, USA) simulates in vitro data to in vivo performance using the ACAT (advanced compartmental absorption and transit) model based on physiological-based oral absorption model comprising nine compartmental segments of gastrointestinal tract (GIT). The software estimates and predicts pharmacokinetic parameters using PKPlus modules based on the input parameters. The program provides three tabs (compound, physiological, and pharmacokinetics tabs) for data input before analysis. There are several by-default parameters, literature-based input values, and experimental data, which are processed for simulation and prediction. The PSA module (parameter sensitivity analysis) predicts the effect of physiochemical properties (solubility, particle size, shape, density, pH, pKa, logP, etc.) of the compound, the effect of the physiological condition (intestinal transit time, volume, fast and fed condition), and effect of formulation (nanoeffect, particle size, permeability coefficient) on PK parameters.
In this study, a prediction study was carried out using experimental data, ADMET predictor module-based suggested values, and literature data. The permeation enhancer or solvent exhibiting maximum solubility of KETO was used as a new construct and compared to pure KETO for oral as well as transdermal delivery. The input parameters of the drug are presented in Table 5 obtained from various literature sources. For prediction of transdermal performance, a new additional route module was used.

Statistical Analysis

All of the experiments were repeated to get mean and standard deviation values. Data were statistically analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis analysis and Dennʼs test. MINITAB (version 15.0, free trial version) was employed to run nonlinear regression analysis using experimental values. The HSPiP software (version 5.2.06) estimated the Hansen solubility parameters of KETO and organic solvents. The value was considered significant at p < 0.05 in the study.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Authors
  • Authors
    • Mohd Neyaz Ahsan - Department of Medical Laboratory Technology University Polytechnic, Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, Ranchi 835215, Jharkhand, India
    • Raisuddin Ali - Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2457, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
    • Mohd Usman Mohd Siddique - Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Shri Vile Parley Kelavani Mandal’s Institute of Pharmacy, Dhule 424001, Maharastra, India
  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This research was funded by the Researchers Supporting Project (RSP-2020/146) at King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Abbreviation

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

KETO

ketoconazole

BCS

biopharmaceutical classification system

DSC

differential scanning calorimeter

THP

transcutol HP

RMSD

root-mean-square deviation

HPLC

high-performance liquid chromatography

DMSO

dimethyl sufoxide

PK

pharmacokinetics

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 33 other publications.

  1. 1
    Bongomin, F.; Gago, S.; Oladele, R.; Denning, D. Global and multi-national pre-valence of fungal diseases—estimate precision. J. Fungi 2017, 3, 57,  DOI: 10.3390/jof3040057
  2. 2
    Hashemzadeh, N.; Jouyban, A. Solubility of Ketoconazole in Ethanol + Water Mixtures at Various Temperatures. Chem. Eng. Commun. 2015, 202, 12111215,  DOI: 10.1080/00986445.2014.912636
  3. 3
    Jacobs, G. A.; Gerber, M.; Malan, M. M.; du Preez, J. L.; Fox, L. T.; du Plessis, J. Topical delivery of acyclovir and ketoconazole. Drug Delivery 2016, 23, 631641,  DOI: 10.3109/10717544.2014.933283
  4. 4
    Durden, F. M.; Elewski, B. Fungal infections in HIV-infected patients. Semin. Cutaneous Med. Surg. 1997, 16, 200212,  DOI: 10.1016/S1085-5629(97)80043-0
  5. 5
    Hossin, B.; Rizi, K.; Murdan, S. Application of Hansen Solubility Parameters to predict drug–nail interactions, which can assist the design of nail medicines. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2016, 102, 3240,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2016.02.009
  6. 6
    Jouyban, A.; Soleymani, J.; Soltanpour, S. Solubility of Ketoconazole in Polyethylene Glycol 200 + Water Mixtures at 298.2–318.2 K. J. Solution Chem. 2014, 43, 950958,  DOI: 10.1007/s10953-014-0171-6
  7. 7
    Soltanpour, S.; Nazemi, V. Solubility of Ketoconazole in Binary and Ternary Solvents of Polyethylene Glycols 200, 400 or 600 with Ethanol and Water at 298.2 K. Data Report and Analysis. J. Solution Chem. 2018, 47, 6579,  DOI: 10.1007/s10953-017-0708-6
  8. 8
    Lane, M. E. Skin penetration enhancers. Int. J. Pharm. 2013, 447, 1221,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.02.040
  9. 9
    Vasoya, J. M.; Shah, A. V.; Serajuddin, A. T. M. Investigation of possible solubility and dissolution advantages of cocrystals, I: Aqueous solubility and dissolution rates of ketoconazole and its cocrystals as functions of Ph. ADMET & DMPK. 2019, 7, 106130,  DOI: 10.5599/admet.661
  10. 10
    Kitak, T.; Dumičić, A.; Planinšek, O.; Šibanc, R.; Srčič, S. Determination of solubility parameters of ibuprofen and ibuprofen lysinate. Molecules 2015, 20, 2154921568,  DOI: 10.3390/molecules201219777
  11. 11
    Souto, E. B.; Müller, R. H. SLN and NLC for topical delivery of ketoconazole. J. Microencapsulation 2005, 22, 501510,  DOI: 10.1080/02652040500162436
  12. 12
    Zadaliasghar, S.; Jouyban, A.; Martinez, F.; Barzegar-Jalali, M.; Rahimpour, E. Solubility of ketoconazole in the binary mixtures of 2-propanol and water at different temperatures. J. Mol. Liq. 2020, 300, 112259,  DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2019.112259
  13. 13
    Mohammad, M. A.; Alhalaweh, A.; Velaga, S. P. Hansen solubility parameter as a tool to predict cocrystal formation. Int. J. Pharm. 2011, 407, 6371,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.01.030
  14. 14
    Kalam, M. A.; Khan, A. A.; Alshamsan, A.; Haque, A.; Shakeel, F. Solubility of a poorly soluble immunosuppressant in different pure solvents: measurement, correlation, thermodynamics and molecular interactions. J. Mol. Liq. 2018, 249, 5360,  DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2017.11.028
  15. 15
    Alanazi, A.; Alshehri, S.; Altamimi, M.; Shakeel, F. Solubility determination and three dimensional Hansen solubility parameters of gefitinib in different organic solvents: Experimental and computational approaches. J. Mol. Liq. 2020, 299, 112211,  DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2019.112211
  16. 16
    van-Krevelen, D.W.; te Nijenhuis, K. Properties of polymers: their correlation with chemical structure; their numerical estimation and prediction from additive group contributions; 4th edi.; Elsevier Science.: Amsterdam, The Netherland; Tokyo, Japan, 2009; pp. 2231031.
  17. 17
    Hancock, B. C.; York, P.; Rowe, R. C. The use of solubility parameters in pharmaceutical dosage form design. Int. J. Pharm. 1997, 148, 121,  DOI: 10.1016/S0378-5173(96)04828-4
  18. 18
    Grepioni, F.; Braga, D.; Chelazzi, L.; Shemchuk, O.; Maffei, P.; Sforzini, A.; Viscomi, G. C. Improving solubility and storage stability of rifaximin via solid-state solvation with Transcutol®. CrystEngComm 2019, 21, 52785283,  DOI: 10.1039/C9CE00567F
  19. 19
    Surov, A. O.; Voronin, A. P.; Manin, A. N.; Manin, N. G.; Kuzmina, L. G.; Churakov, A. V.; Perlovich, G. L. Pharmaceutical cocrystals of diflunisal and diclofenac with theophylline. Mol. Pharmaceutics 2014, 11, 37073715,  DOI: 10.1021/mp5004652
  20. 20
    Etman, M. A.; Naggar, V. F. Thermodynamics of paracetamol solubility in sugar-water cosolvent systems. Int. J. Pharm. 1999, 58, 177184,  DOI: 10.1016/0378-5173(90)90193-8
  21. 21
    Jouyban, A.; Acree, W. E., Jr.; Martínez, F. Dissolution thermodynamics and preferential solvation of ketoconazole in some {ethanol (1) + water (2)} mixtures. J. Mol. Liq. 2020, 313, 113579,  DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2020.113579
  22. 22
    Jahromi, R.; Mogharab, V.; Jahromi, H.; Avazpour, A. Synergistic effects of anionic surfactants on coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) virucidal efficiency of sanitizing fluids to fight COVID-19. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2020, 145, 111702,  DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2020.111702
  23. 23
    Osborne, D. W.; Musakhanian, J. Skin Penetration and Permeation Properties of Transcutol®-Neat or Diluted Mixtures. AAPS PharmSciTech 2018, 19, 35123533,  DOI: 10.1208/s12249-018-1196-8
  24. 24
    Roy, C.; Charkrabarty, J. Stability indicating validated novel RP-HPLC method for simulataneous estimation of methylparaben, ketoconazole and mometasone furoate in topical pharmaceutical dosage formulation. ISRN Anal. Chem. 2013, 1,  DOI: 10.1155/2013/342794
  25. 25
    Harris, R.; Jones, H. E.; Artis, W. M. Orally Administered Ketoconazole: Route of Delivery to the Human Stratum Corneum. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1983, 876882,  DOI: 10.1128/AAC.24.6.876
  26. 26
    Hildebrand, J. H.; Scott, R. L. Regular solutions; Prentice-Hall: Saddle River, NJ, USA, 1962; pp. 202.
  27. 27
    Hildebrand, J. H.; Scott, R. L. The solubility of nonelectrolytes; Reinhold Pub. Corp.: New York, NY, USA, 1950; pp. 514.
  28. 28
    Hansen, C. M. Hansen solubility parameters: A User’s Handbook; 2nd ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2007; pp. 544.
  29. 29
    Ruidiaz, M. A.; Delgado, D. R.; Martínez, F.; Marcus, Y. Solubility and preferential solvation of indomethacin in 1,4-dioxane + water solvent mixtures. Fluid Phase Equilib. 2010, 299, 259265,  DOI: 10.1016/j.fluid.2010.09.027
  30. 30
    Williams, R. O. B. Solubility and Solubilization in Aqueous Media By Samuel H. Yalkowsky (University of Arizona). Oxford University Press: New York. 1999. xvi + 464 pp. $165. ISBN 0-8412-3576-7. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 9882,  DOI: 10.1021/ja0047424
  31. 31
    Apelblat, A.; Manzurola, E. Solubilities ofo-acetylsalicylic, 4-aminosalicylic, 3,5-dinitrosalicylic andp-toluic acid and magnesium-DL-aspartate in water from T = 20 (278–348) K. J. Chem. Thermodyn. 1999, 31, 8591,  DOI: 10.1006/jcht.1998.0424
  32. 32
    Manzurola, E.; Apelblat, A. Solubilities of L-glutamic acid, 3-nitrobenzoic acid, acetylsalicylic, p-toluic acid, calcium-L-lactate, calcium gluconate, magnesium-DL- aspartate, and magnesium-L-lactate in water. J. Chem. Thermodyn. 2002, 34, 11271136,  DOI: 10.1006/jcht.2002.0975
  33. 33
    Krug, R. R.; Hunter, W. G.; Grieger, R. A. Enthalpy-entropy compensation. 2. Separation of the chemical from the statistic effect. J. Phys. Chem. 1976, 80, 23412351,  DOI: 10.1021/j100562a007

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article is cited by 16 publications.

  1. Liying Hao, Jikui Sun, Qingyin Wang, Haijiao Xie, Xiangui Yang, Qiang Wei. Application of Mesoporous Carbon-Based Highly Dispersed K–O2 Strong Lewis Base in the Efficient Catalysis of Methanol and Ethylene Carbonate. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2024, 16 (32) , 42080-42092. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.4c05587
  2. Jianfang Liu, Ting Liu, Rongrong Zhang, Sicheng Yang, Yaoyun Zhang, Chenglingzi Yi, Shuai Peng, Qing Yang. Thermodynamic Analysis of Eplerenone in 13 Pure Solvents at Temperatures from 283.15 to 323.15 K. ACS Omega 2024, 9 (19) , 21333-21345. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.4c01550
  3. Ravibhai Bhola, Rizwan Ghumara, Chirag Patel, Vyomesh Parsana, Keyur Bhatt, Dinesh Kundariya, Hasit Vaghani. Solubility and Thermodynamics Profile of Benzethonium Chloride in Pure and Binary Solvents at Different Temperatures. ACS Omega 2023, 8 (16) , 14430-14439. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c07877
  4. Zhenxing Cai, Hui Zhao, Pingxin Li, Xiaobo Chen, Chaohe Yang. Process Optimization of Para-xylene Crystallization Separation Process via Morphology Approach, Multi-dimensional Population Balance Equation, and Equation-Oriented Models. ACS Omega 2023, 8 (14) , 12899-12910. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c00069
  5. Afzal Hussain, Obaid Afzal, Mohammad A. Altamimi, Abdulmalik Saleh Alfawaz Altamimi, Mohhammad Ramzan, Mohd. Zaheen Hassan, Wael A. Mahdi, Thomas J. Webster. Improved Subcutaneous Delivery of Ketoconazole Using EpiDerm and HSPiP Software-Based Simulations as Assessed by Cell Viability, Cellular Uptake, Permeation, and Hemolysis In Vitro Studies. ACS Omega 2022, 7 (46) , 42593-42606. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c06001
  6. Shaya Jubran Aljurbui, Afzal Hussain, Mohammad Yusuf, Mohhammad Ramzan, Obaid Afzal, Basmah Almohaywi, Sabina Yasmin, Abdulmalik Saleh Alfawaz Altamimi. Impact of Composition and Morphology of Ketoconazole-Loaded Solid Lipid Nanoparticles on Intestinal Permeation and Gastroplus-Based Prediction Studies. ACS Omega 2022, 7 (26) , 22406-22420. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c01272
  7. Afzal Hussain, Mohammad A. Altamimi, Obaid Afzal, Abdulmalik S. A. Altamimi, Abuzer Ali, Amena Ali, Fleming Martinez, Mohd Usman Mohd Siddique, William E. Acree, Jr., Abolghasem Jouyban. Preferential Solvation Study of the Synthesized Aldose Reductase Inhibitor (SE415) in the {PEG 400 (1) + Water (2)} Cosolvent Mixture and GastroPlus-Based Prediction. ACS Omega 2022, 7 (1) , 1197-1210. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c05788
  8. Pavel Komarov, Maxim Malyshev, Pavel Baburkin, Daria Guseva. Effect of Volume Fraction of Carbon Nanotubes on Structure Formation in Polyacrylonitrile Nascent Fibers: Mesoscale Simulations. ChemEngineering 2024, 8 (5) , 97. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemengineering8050097
  9. Seyed-Mostafa Fazel-Hoseini, Amir Azadi, Parisa Ghasemiyeh, Soliman Mohammadi-Samani. Modeling of drug solubility with extended hildebrand solubility approach and jouyban-acree equations in binary and ternary solvent mixtures. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology 2024, 95 , 105634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2024.105634
  10. Elaheh Rahimpour, Milad Moradi, Atefeh Sheikhi-Sovari, Homa Rezaei, Hadis Rezaei, Vahid Jouyban-Gharamaleki, Martin Kuentz, Abolghasem Jouyban. Comparative Drug Solubility Studies Using Shake-Flask Versus a Laser-Based Robotic Method. AAPS PharmSciTech 2023, 24 (7) https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-023-02667-9
  11. Pavel Komarov, Maxim Malyshev, Pavel Baburkin, Daria Guseva. Mesoscale Simulations of Structure Formation in Polyacrylonitrile Nascent Fibers Induced by Binary Solvent Mixture. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2023, 24 (11) , 9312. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24119312
  12. Mohhammad Ramzan, Samuel Gourion-Arsiquaud, Afzal Hussain, Jaspreet Singh Gulati, Qihong Zhang, Sonia Trehan, Vinam Puri, Bozena Michniak-Kohn, Indu Pal Kaur. In vitro release, ex vivo penetration, and in vivo dermatokinetics of ketoconazole-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles for topical delivery. Drug Delivery and Translational Research 2022, 12 (7) , 1659-1683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13346-021-01058-6
  13. Afzal Hussain, Obaid Afzal, Abdulmalik S.A. Altamimi, Abuzer Ali, Amena Ali, Fleming Martinez, Mohd Usman Mohd Siddique, William E. Acree, Naushad Ali. Preferential solvation study of (Z)-N-benzyl-2-{5-(4-hydroxybenzylidene)-2,4-dioxothiazolidin-3-yl)acetamide (3) in {NMP  + Water } co-solvent mixture and GastroPlus software based in vitro simulation. Journal of Molecular Liquids 2022, 349 , 118491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2022.118491
  14. Renren Sun, Haixia He, Lei Yuan, Jiao Sha, Liyuan Li, Zidan Cao, Gaoliang Jiang, Yu Li, Tao Li, Baozeng Ren. dl-isoprenaline hydrochloride solubility in four binary solvents at saturation: Thermodynamic analysis, Hansen solubility parameters and molecular simulation. Journal of Molecular Liquids 2022, 347 , 118066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2021.118066
  15. Afzal Hussain, Sultan Alshehri, Mohhammad Ramzan, Obaid Afzal, Abdulmalik S.A. Altamimi, Manal A. Alossaimi. Biocompatible solvent selection based on thermodynamic and computational solubility models, in-silico GastroPlus prediction, and cellular studies of ketoconazole for subcutaneous delivery. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology 2021, 65 , 102699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2021.102699
  16. Mohhammad Ramzan, Gurpreet Kaur, Sonia Trehan, Javed N. Agrewala, Bozena B. Michniak-Kohn, Afzal Hussain, Wael A. Mahdi, Jaspreet Singh Gulati, Indu Pal Kaur. Mechanistic evaluations of ketoconazole lipidic nanoparticles for improved efficacy, enhanced topical penetration, cellular uptake (L929 and J774A.1), and safety assessment: In vitro and in vivo studies. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology 2021, 65 , 102743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2021.102743
Open PDF

ACS Omega

Cite this: ACS Omega 2021, 6, 7, 5033–5045
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c06234
Published February 11, 2021

Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 .

Article Views

2328

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. (A) Chemical structure of ketoconazole, (B) DSC thermogram of pure and equilibrated ketoconazole (recovered from methanol), and (C) chromatogram of pure ketoconazole with a retention time of 6.789 min from method validation (Empower 2 software)

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Correlation of lnxe values of ketoconazole with the Apelblat model in various organic solvents as a function of 1/T.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. van’t Hoff plot for ketoconazole plotted between lnxe and (1/T – 1/Thm) for the drug in various organic solvents.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. GastroPlus-based simulation and prediction study: (A) In vitro drug release behavior and Weibull model distribution of neat ketoconazole suspension (blue line for sigmoidal release pattern), (B) in vitro drug release behavior and Weibull model distribution of THP solubilized ketoconazole (blue line for sigmoidal release pattern) in buffer solution (pH 7.4), (C) skin absorption of neat ketoconazole from suspension, and (D) skin absorption of THP-solubilized ketoconazole.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. GastroPlus-based prediction of a relationship between dissolution and skin permeation of ketoconazole dissolved in THP. The inset of the figure predicted the plasma concentration time profile of THP solubilized ketoconazole when administeresd orally (0.1 mg).

  • References


    This article references 33 other publications.

    1. 1
      Bongomin, F.; Gago, S.; Oladele, R.; Denning, D. Global and multi-national pre-valence of fungal diseases—estimate precision. J. Fungi 2017, 3, 57,  DOI: 10.3390/jof3040057
    2. 2
      Hashemzadeh, N.; Jouyban, A. Solubility of Ketoconazole in Ethanol + Water Mixtures at Various Temperatures. Chem. Eng. Commun. 2015, 202, 12111215,  DOI: 10.1080/00986445.2014.912636
    3. 3
      Jacobs, G. A.; Gerber, M.; Malan, M. M.; du Preez, J. L.; Fox, L. T.; du Plessis, J. Topical delivery of acyclovir and ketoconazole. Drug Delivery 2016, 23, 631641,  DOI: 10.3109/10717544.2014.933283
    4. 4
      Durden, F. M.; Elewski, B. Fungal infections in HIV-infected patients. Semin. Cutaneous Med. Surg. 1997, 16, 200212,  DOI: 10.1016/S1085-5629(97)80043-0
    5. 5
      Hossin, B.; Rizi, K.; Murdan, S. Application of Hansen Solubility Parameters to predict drug–nail interactions, which can assist the design of nail medicines. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2016, 102, 3240,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2016.02.009
    6. 6
      Jouyban, A.; Soleymani, J.; Soltanpour, S. Solubility of Ketoconazole in Polyethylene Glycol 200 + Water Mixtures at 298.2–318.2 K. J. Solution Chem. 2014, 43, 950958,  DOI: 10.1007/s10953-014-0171-6
    7. 7
      Soltanpour, S.; Nazemi, V. Solubility of Ketoconazole in Binary and Ternary Solvents of Polyethylene Glycols 200, 400 or 600 with Ethanol and Water at 298.2 K. Data Report and Analysis. J. Solution Chem. 2018, 47, 6579,  DOI: 10.1007/s10953-017-0708-6
    8. 8
      Lane, M. E. Skin penetration enhancers. Int. J. Pharm. 2013, 447, 1221,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.02.040
    9. 9
      Vasoya, J. M.; Shah, A. V.; Serajuddin, A. T. M. Investigation of possible solubility and dissolution advantages of cocrystals, I: Aqueous solubility and dissolution rates of ketoconazole and its cocrystals as functions of Ph. ADMET & DMPK. 2019, 7, 106130,  DOI: 10.5599/admet.661
    10. 10
      Kitak, T.; Dumičić, A.; Planinšek, O.; Šibanc, R.; Srčič, S. Determination of solubility parameters of ibuprofen and ibuprofen lysinate. Molecules 2015, 20, 2154921568,  DOI: 10.3390/molecules201219777
    11. 11
      Souto, E. B.; Müller, R. H. SLN and NLC for topical delivery of ketoconazole. J. Microencapsulation 2005, 22, 501510,  DOI: 10.1080/02652040500162436
    12. 12
      Zadaliasghar, S.; Jouyban, A.; Martinez, F.; Barzegar-Jalali, M.; Rahimpour, E. Solubility of ketoconazole in the binary mixtures of 2-propanol and water at different temperatures. J. Mol. Liq. 2020, 300, 112259,  DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2019.112259
    13. 13
      Mohammad, M. A.; Alhalaweh, A.; Velaga, S. P. Hansen solubility parameter as a tool to predict cocrystal formation. Int. J. Pharm. 2011, 407, 6371,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.01.030
    14. 14
      Kalam, M. A.; Khan, A. A.; Alshamsan, A.; Haque, A.; Shakeel, F. Solubility of a poorly soluble immunosuppressant in different pure solvents: measurement, correlation, thermodynamics and molecular interactions. J. Mol. Liq. 2018, 249, 5360,  DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2017.11.028
    15. 15
      Alanazi, A.; Alshehri, S.; Altamimi, M.; Shakeel, F. Solubility determination and three dimensional Hansen solubility parameters of gefitinib in different organic solvents: Experimental and computational approaches. J. Mol. Liq. 2020, 299, 112211,  DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2019.112211
    16. 16
      van-Krevelen, D.W.; te Nijenhuis, K. Properties of polymers: their correlation with chemical structure; their numerical estimation and prediction from additive group contributions; 4th edi.; Elsevier Science.: Amsterdam, The Netherland; Tokyo, Japan, 2009; pp. 2231031.
    17. 17
      Hancock, B. C.; York, P.; Rowe, R. C. The use of solubility parameters in pharmaceutical dosage form design. Int. J. Pharm. 1997, 148, 121,  DOI: 10.1016/S0378-5173(96)04828-4
    18. 18
      Grepioni, F.; Braga, D.; Chelazzi, L.; Shemchuk, O.; Maffei, P.; Sforzini, A.; Viscomi, G. C. Improving solubility and storage stability of rifaximin via solid-state solvation with Transcutol®. CrystEngComm 2019, 21, 52785283,  DOI: 10.1039/C9CE00567F
    19. 19
      Surov, A. O.; Voronin, A. P.; Manin, A. N.; Manin, N. G.; Kuzmina, L. G.; Churakov, A. V.; Perlovich, G. L. Pharmaceutical cocrystals of diflunisal and diclofenac with theophylline. Mol. Pharmaceutics 2014, 11, 37073715,  DOI: 10.1021/mp5004652
    20. 20
      Etman, M. A.; Naggar, V. F. Thermodynamics of paracetamol solubility in sugar-water cosolvent systems. Int. J. Pharm. 1999, 58, 177184,  DOI: 10.1016/0378-5173(90)90193-8
    21. 21
      Jouyban, A.; Acree, W. E., Jr.; Martínez, F. Dissolution thermodynamics and preferential solvation of ketoconazole in some {ethanol (1) + water (2)} mixtures. J. Mol. Liq. 2020, 313, 113579,  DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2020.113579
    22. 22
      Jahromi, R.; Mogharab, V.; Jahromi, H.; Avazpour, A. Synergistic effects of anionic surfactants on coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) virucidal efficiency of sanitizing fluids to fight COVID-19. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2020, 145, 111702,  DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2020.111702
    23. 23
      Osborne, D. W.; Musakhanian, J. Skin Penetration and Permeation Properties of Transcutol®-Neat or Diluted Mixtures. AAPS PharmSciTech 2018, 19, 35123533,  DOI: 10.1208/s12249-018-1196-8
    24. 24
      Roy, C.; Charkrabarty, J. Stability indicating validated novel RP-HPLC method for simulataneous estimation of methylparaben, ketoconazole and mometasone furoate in topical pharmaceutical dosage formulation. ISRN Anal. Chem. 2013, 1,  DOI: 10.1155/2013/342794
    25. 25
      Harris, R.; Jones, H. E.; Artis, W. M. Orally Administered Ketoconazole: Route of Delivery to the Human Stratum Corneum. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1983, 876882,  DOI: 10.1128/AAC.24.6.876
    26. 26
      Hildebrand, J. H.; Scott, R. L. Regular solutions; Prentice-Hall: Saddle River, NJ, USA, 1962; pp. 202.
    27. 27
      Hildebrand, J. H.; Scott, R. L. The solubility of nonelectrolytes; Reinhold Pub. Corp.: New York, NY, USA, 1950; pp. 514.
    28. 28
      Hansen, C. M. Hansen solubility parameters: A User’s Handbook; 2nd ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2007; pp. 544.
    29. 29
      Ruidiaz, M. A.; Delgado, D. R.; Martínez, F.; Marcus, Y. Solubility and preferential solvation of indomethacin in 1,4-dioxane + water solvent mixtures. Fluid Phase Equilib. 2010, 299, 259265,  DOI: 10.1016/j.fluid.2010.09.027
    30. 30
      Williams, R. O. B. Solubility and Solubilization in Aqueous Media By Samuel H. Yalkowsky (University of Arizona). Oxford University Press: New York. 1999. xvi + 464 pp. $165. ISBN 0-8412-3576-7. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 9882,  DOI: 10.1021/ja0047424
    31. 31
      Apelblat, A.; Manzurola, E. Solubilities ofo-acetylsalicylic, 4-aminosalicylic, 3,5-dinitrosalicylic andp-toluic acid and magnesium-DL-aspartate in water from T = 20 (278–348) K. J. Chem. Thermodyn. 1999, 31, 8591,  DOI: 10.1006/jcht.1998.0424
    32. 32
      Manzurola, E.; Apelblat, A. Solubilities of L-glutamic acid, 3-nitrobenzoic acid, acetylsalicylic, p-toluic acid, calcium-L-lactate, calcium gluconate, magnesium-DL- aspartate, and magnesium-L-lactate in water. J. Chem. Thermodyn. 2002, 34, 11271136,  DOI: 10.1006/jcht.2002.0975
    33. 33
      Krug, R. R.; Hunter, W. G.; Grieger, R. A. Enthalpy-entropy compensation. 2. Separation of the chemical from the statistic effect. J. Phys. Chem. 1976, 80, 23412351,  DOI: 10.1021/j100562a007