ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Electroformation of Giant Unilamellar Vesicles on Stainless Steel Electrodes
My Activity
  • Open Access
Article

Electroformation of Giant Unilamellar Vesicles on Stainless Steel Electrodes
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

View Author Information
Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7DQ, U.K.
Mechatronics and Bioengineering Science Research Groups, Faculty of Engineering and the Environment, University of Southampton, SO17 1BJ Southampton, U.K.
§ Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, MRC Human Immunology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DS, U.K.
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Central Laser Facility, Science and Technology Facilities Council, Research Complex at Harwell, Harwell-Oxford, Didcot OX11 0FA, U.K.
*E-mail: [email protected]. Phone: +44 (0)1865 617747.
Open PDFSupporting Information (2)

ACS Omega

Cite this: ACS Omega 2017, 2, 3, 994–1002
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.6b00395
Published March 16, 2017

Copyright © 2017 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under CC-BY.

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Giant unilamellar vesicles (GUVs) are well-established model systems for studying membrane structure and dynamics. Electroformation, also referred to as electroswelling, is one of the most prevalent methods for producing GUVs, as it enables modulation of the lipid hydration process to form relatively monodisperse, defect-free vesicles. Currently, however, it is expensive and time-consuming compared with other methods. In this study, we demonstrate that 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphatidylcholine GUVs can be prepared readily at a fraction of the cost on stainless steel electrodes, such as commercially available syringe needles, without any evidence of lipid oxidation or hydrolysis.

Copyright © 2017 American Chemical Society

Introduction

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Giant unilamellar vesicles (GUVs), often referred to as giant liposomes, are fluid-filled membranes that offer a useful basic model of a biological cell. GUVs have been widely used as models to study the fluid–fluid and gel–fluid phase coexistence of membrane lipids, (1-6) membrane transport phenomena, (7-12) the behavior of native membranes, (13-16) the structure of early cells and protocells, (17) and more recently, cells’ biological activity. (10) In its simplest form, a GUV consists of a single amphiphilic lipid bilayer that encloses an aqueous solution.
Among the multitude of production methods developed over several decades, (18-20) lipid-film hydration, (21) electroformation, (22) lipid emulsification, (23, 24) and microfluidic-based methods, such as fluid jetting (25) and hydrodynamic flow focusing, (26) are the most widely used. While the literature on vesicle formation is rich with established formation protocols, each technique has its own inherent drawbacks and trade-offs according to the application. The factors affecting the choice of a specific protocol are technical expertise, the need for specialist equipment, and the degree to which vesicle characteristics need to be tuned. Of the methods mentioned above, electroformation is one of the most widespread. (18)

Figure 1

Figure 1. Schematic of vesicle electroformation from a dry lipid bilayer deposited on a substrate. Vesicles are formed upon hydration and the application of an alternating electric field, (not to scale).

Electroformation of GUVs was pioneered by Angelova and Dimitrov in 1986. (22) It involves modulating the spontaneous swelling of lipids within an aqueous solution using an externally applied electric field (Figure 1). Typically, a solution of lipids dissolved in an organic solvent is deposited on two electrodes of indium tin oxide (ITO)-coated glass or platinum. Following solvent evaporation, the electrodes are placed in contact with an aqueous solution. Subsequently, an alternating potential difference is applied across the electrodes, stimulating the swelling process of the hydrated lipid layer. The main advantages of electroformation are that it requires comparatively little technical expertise to implement and that it yields spherical, relatively monodisperse and unilamellar lipid vesicles. Set against this, however, is the cost of the electrodes, which limits the scalability of the technique.
In this article, we present and validate a simple electrode modification in the standard electroformation protocol that reduces the cost and time of chamber preparation while improving scalability. 1,2-Dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphatidylcholine (DOPC) was chosen as a representative unsaturated phospholipid, which is more prone to oxidation than saturated phospholipids, such as 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DSPC), 1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DPPC), and 1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DMPC), to prove that stainless steel does not affect its structural integrity.
Stainless steel electrodes, such as injection needles, provide a significantly lower-cost alternative to platinum and ITO electrodes, which are the established electrode materials reported in the electroformation literature. Other studies have also reported electroformation of vesicles on interdigitated and nonconductive substrates, (27) albeit with limited adoption rates.
Stainless steel electrodes provide numerous advantages. First, the rigidity of stainless steel compared to that of platinum reduces the risk of bending, improving control over the electrode-separation distance, thus leading to a more uniform electric field. In addition, disposable needles do not require cleaning in an ultrasound bath, (28) are readily available, and do not require the modification of current chambers.
The wide cost disparity between stainless steel and platinum enables two secondary modifications to the electroformation protocol: the use of longer electrodes and chamber parallelization. (29) These lead, in turn, to an increase in the overall vesicle production, concurrent electroformation, and multiparametric testing at high throughput.
While a direct comparison between electroformation methods is complex, Table 1 provides an overview of the merits and drawbacks of different electrode materials used in the electroformation of vesicles. To populate the table, the electrode surface area was fixed across all methods. The cost comparison was carried out on the face value of the electrodes, without taking into account the cost of the purpose-built polyoxymethylene electroformation chamber. A full cost breakdown of the electroformation chamber is provided in Table S1. It is noteworthy that, if the stainless steel electrodes were disposed of after every electroformation experiment, it would take approximately 292 experiments to match the cost of the platinum electrodes—ignoring overheads, such as the time and cost of cleaning.
Table 1. Comparison of Costs, Advantages, and Disadvantages of Using Stainless Steel Electrodes and Platinum Electrodes during Electroformationa
 costbdisposablescalablemachinablecleaning requiredconsistent electrode separation
platinum∼£584expensiveexpensiveyesyesdifficult
stainless steel∼£2.00yesyesyesonly if reusedyes
ITO-coated glass∼£27.00yesyesnoyesyes
a

A detailed cost breakdown of the electroformation chamber is provided in the Supporting Information.

b

Calculated for five pairs of 40 mm cylindrical electrodes with a diameter of 0.8 mm or an ITO surface of equivalent area (10 cm2).

In the experiments reported here, these features are exploited using a purpose-built electroformation device, which consists of a polyoxymethylene base containing five electroformation chambers and a lid to hold the electrodes in position.
To validate the proposed technique, vesicles were characterized in terms of their size distribution, lipid packing and unilamellarity of their membranes. In addition, the constituents of the aqueous electroformation solution were analyzed using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) to test whether any ions are released from the electrodes during electroformation. Lipid degradation was assessed by NMR.

Results and Discussion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

GUV Production and Imaging

Electroformation visualization chambers have been used to monitor and verify the effective production of vesicles. (30) To assess the formation of vesicles on stainless steel electrodes, swelling was visualized in situ (Figure 2a) using a second specially designed electroformation chamber with optical access using the protocol described in the Materials and Methods section. Vesicle formation was observed across most of the electrode surface, even before the application of the electric field (Figure 2a). Upon switching on the signal generator, the swelling was accelerated, and the vesicles reached a moderate size (see video in the Supporting Information). Swelling and detachment of DOPC vesicles from an electrode were also observed (Figure 2b,c).

Figure 2

Figure 2. Vesicles swelling from electroformation electrodes: (a) hydrated lipid layer commencing the swelling process, (b) DiI-labeled single-vesicle swelling while attached to the electroformation electrodes, and (c) vesicles forming, swelling, and detaching along the electrode.

Following the visualization, vesicles were produced inside the device depicted in Figure 2a using the electroformation protocol described in the Materials and Methods section. The electrode material did not produce significant differences in the size distributions of the vesicles (Figure 3) which were within the ranges reported in the literature (10–30 μm for DOPC vesicles). (27, 31, 32)

Figure 3

Figure 3. (a) Size distribution of DOPC vesicles as a function of electrode material. The white bars represent vesicles formed using platinum wires as electrodes, whereas the gray bars represent vesicles formed using stainless steel electrodes. (b) Comparison of average vesicle diameters (±standard deviation) of platinum and stainless steel electrodes. Three independent experiments were conducted, and over 1500 vesicles were analyzed for each electrode material.

The yield of a single electroformation chamber was estimated by suspending 100 μL of a GUV-rich solution in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and counting the number of vesicles at the bottom of a visualization plate after sedimentation. The vesicles were counted using a purpose-built algorithm for both electrode materials. On average, electroformation of the stainless steel electrode yielded 2256 vesicles (22 560 vesicles/mL) against the 3114 (31 140 vesicles/mL) yielded by the platinum wire electrodes. The difference, however, was not statistically significant.
It should be noted, however, that a comparison between GUV studies is problematic because of the differences in experimental parameters, such as osmotic pressure, electrode size and separation, electroformation solution, lipid species, electric field strength, imaging plane, and vesicle manipulation technique.

Lipid Order and Size of Vesicles Composed of Binary Lipid Mixtures

To test the parallelization potential, vesicles with different compositions were produced simultaneously by varying the DOPC/cholesterol (DOPC/Chol) molar ratio in the multichamber device (Figure 4).

Figure 4

Figure 4. Simultaneous electroformation of vesicles with dissimilar membrane properties. (a) Generalized polarization (GP) of the vesicles as a function of initial lipid-film formulation. (b) Representative GP false-colored images of four vesicles with different GP values.

The results depicted in Figure 5 were obtained by performing four concurrent electroformation experiments, coating the wires in each chamber with a different lipid composition. Figure 5a displays the average GPs and the standard deviations of the vesicles for each initial lipid composition. The packing of the membrane increases with increasing cholesterol volume fraction, as cholesterol intercalates between the DOPC lipids. (33-35) The electroformation cycle lasted 2.5 h, required limited setup time, and was performed using four pairs of new injection needles (SS304), at a total electrode cost of approximately £2.00. The equivalent cost of Pt wire electrodes would have been approximately £584 and would have required electrode cleaning and straightening.

Figure 5

Figure 5. (a) Vesicle diameters as a function of lipid composition (b) Lipid packing of DOPC vesicles as a function of electrode material.

The consistency in vesicle diameter was determined as a function of lipid composition. The vesicle size was not affected significantly by the molar fraction of cholesterol compared with the 1:0 DOPC/Chol composition (Figure 6a). The electrode material did not have an effect on the lipid packing of GUV electrodes (Figure 6b). A higher osmolarity of the extravesicular environment yields vesicles with a higher membrane order and thus a higher degree of lipid packing. (36)

Figure 6

Figure 6. 1H NMR spectra of lipids extracted from electroformed GUVs (top trace) and large multilamellar vesicles (LMVs) (bottom trace). The residual solvent peaks of chloroform (7.26 ppm) and methanol (3.49 ppm) were removed for clarity. The inset shows a magnified view of the olefinic and head group protons.

Leaching of Metals from the Electrodes

Leaching of transition metals from the electrodes can be a concern in the electroformation of GUVs. Metal ions can bind to membranes (37) and alter their bilayer structure, (38) phase behavior, (39) and stability against vesicle fusion. (40) Unwanted chemical reactions can also be catalyzed by trace metals: chromium, iron, and nickel can initiate and, in some cases, propagate lipid peroxidation. (41)
The possibility of leaching of metals from stainless steel electrodes under electroformation conditions was assessed by comparing the concentrations of their constituents (Fe, Cr, Ni, and Mn) in GUV samples (Table 2) prepared using stainless steel and platinum electrodes. No increase in metal concentration compared to that of platinum electrodes was detected by ICP-OES. While no evidence of ion leaching was detected when the electroformation was carried out in 200 mM sucrose, this may not be the case in conductive electroformation solutions. On the contrary, platinum electrodes are routinely used to electroform vesicles in solutions of physiological ionic strength. A similar argument holds true for temperature, as the electroformation of vesicles with higher transition temperatures requires a heated chamber.
Table 2. Concentrations of Alloy Constituents Inside the Electroformation Chambera
element% fraction in SS304concentration with Pt electrodes (ppm)concentration with SS304 electrodes (ppm)
iron65–71<0.1<0.1
chromium18–20<0.1<0.1
nickel8–12<0.1<0.1
manganese2<0.1<0.1
a

The concentrations of both platinum and stainless steel electrodes are shown.

Lipid Oxidation and Hydrolysis

The products of lipid oxidation and hydrolysis, which can be generated at the electrode during the electroformation process, (42) are also known to affect the physical properties of phospholipid membranes. Even small amounts of the degradation products can cause structural and dynamic changes, such as the formation of lipid rafts (42) or changes in permeability (43) and mechanical stability. (44)1H NMR and 31P NMR spectroscopies are among the fastest and most informative analytical methods that have been used to characterize the chemical structure of phospholipids extracted from biological membranes and their degradation products. (45-48) The structural integrity of electroformed GUVs was assessed by comparing the NMR spectra of the combined lipid extracts from nine electroformed GUV samples with a control obtained from LMVs prepared by lipid hydration. The 1H NMR spectra of lipids extracted from electroformed GUVs and LMVs are compared in Figure 6. The spectra were identical and consistent with pure DOPC. No degradation products were detected within a limit of detection of 1 mol %. Although trace impurities can be seen in the electroformed sample, the same impurities are found in the control. Their concentration remains constant when the concentration of DOPC in the control sample is increased from 0.34 to 3.4 mM, suggesting that they could be due to trace contamination rather than lipid degradation.
The absence of hydrolysis products was confirmed by the 31P NMR spectrum, which shows only one signal in both samples. All isomers of lyso-PC would resonate downfield, where no signal was detected.

Unilamellarity of Electroformed Vesicles

Vesicle unilamellarity was tested using a fluorescence quenching assay on the basis of the measurement of the ratio of inner to outer layers of fluorescently labeled GUVs. (49, 50) DOPC vesicles symmetrically labeled with the fluorescent lipid, N-(7-nitrobenz-2-oxa-1,3-diazol-4-yl)-1,2-dihexadecanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine, triethylammonium salt (NBD-PE), were electroformed, and a time course of their fluorescence was measured in a plate reader. Sodium dithionite, a membrane-impermeable quencher, was added to the sample to quench the fluorophores on the outer layer of the vesicles. The vesicles were then lysed by addition of Triton X-100, to expose all lipids to the quencher. The ratio of the emission drop caused by the addition of detergent (Iinterior) to the total emission drop (Itotal = Iinterior + Iexterior) is used as a measure of the fraction of leaflets that are not exposed to the solvent (unilamellarity index) (Figure 7). We measured a ratio of 51 ± 2.8%, which is consistent with unilamellarity. The measurements for all three samples are provided in the Supporting Information.

Figure 7

Figure 7. Fluorescence intensity measurements of DOPC/NBD-PE vesicles. The fluorescence of intact vesicles is represented from time = 0 to arrow 1. At arrow 1, the quencher is added to the suspension, and the intensity is recorded until a stable value is reached. The emission drop is a measure of the number of fluorophores in outer leaflets. At arrow 2, Triton X-100 is added to lyse the vesicles, and fluorescence is recorded until a new stable value is reached. The corresponding emission drop is a measure of the number of fluorophores in inner leaflets. After each addition, the plate was removed from the plate reader and shaken for several minutes (the time axis is correspondingly cut for clarity).

Conclusions

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

In summary, in this article, giant vesicle electroformation using an alternative electrode material was proposed and validated. We demonstrate that electroswelling of unilamellar vesicles occurs efficiently on stainless steel electrodes without any significant difference in vesicle size distribution, lipid degradation, or leaching of metals in the electroformation chamber from those of platinum electrodes. By using readily available stainless steel electrodes, we show that rapid, low-cost, and scalable electroformation can be achieved. We believe this platform will find application in biophysical investigations of the membrane, particularly in studies where multiplexing is crucial, such as large-scale screening of bioactive compounds.

Materials and Methods

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Electroformation Chamber

The electroformation chamber (Figure 8a) is composed of two parts: the electroformation base and the chamber lid. The electroformation base (150 mm × 40 mm × 50 mm) was designed to accommodate five equidistant electroformation chambers with a length of 50 mm and a diameter of 10 mm. The extremities of the chambers were tapered to increase vesicle concentration and facilitate the collection of the produced GUVs. The electroformation lid (150 mm × 40 mm × 5 mm) consists of five pairs of through holes (⌀ 1 mm), each aligned with an electroformation chamber, that are used to host the electrodes. On the side of the lid, 3 mm brass screws were positioned in correspondence to each electroformation chamber, to hold the electrodes in place once fully screwed. A copper bar (165 mm × 10 mm) ensures an electrical connection between corresponding electrodes. The chamber base and the lid were held together with four 4 mm screws at each corner of the device. The cost of the electroformation device with five electroformation chambers was calculated to be ∼£14.00. The full cost breakdown is provided in the Supporting Information.

Figure 8

Figure 8. Vesicle electroformation devices for high-yield production and formation visualization. (a) Scalable device with five electroformation chambers and needles held by brass screws. (b) Monitoring device with six chambers, brass screws, and stainless steel sheets for electrical connection between common electrodes.

A similar device (Figure 8b) was designed with the aim of visualizing the vesicle electroswelling process. The device was designed to be dimensionally compatible with a microscope stage and the working distance of a 40× objective. In this device, the electroformation electrodes were placed horizontally to allow imaging of the entire electrode surface area. A 170 μm thick glass slide was coupled with the bottom of the chamber with silicone gel. The electrodes were connected using two sheets of stainless steel, to provide a common electrical connection.
The electroformation chamber was cut from a solid piece of polyoxymethylene purchased from RS Components, U.K., brass screws were also supplied by RS Components, and 0.8 mm 21G 50 mm needles were purchased from Becton, Dickinson and Company. DOPC was sourced from Avanti Polar Lipids, Inc.. Cholesterol, sucrose, 2-[4-(2-hydroxyethyl)piperazin-1-yl]ethanesulfonic acid (HEPES), and bovine serum albumin (BSA) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. NBD-PE was purchased from ThermoFisher, U.K. All reagents were used as received without further purification. The electrodes were connected to an Agilent 33220A signal generator set to high-impedance load. GUVs were imaged in a μ-Slide eight-well multiwell plate purchased from ibidi GmbH, Germany. Ultrapure water (MilliQ) from a Millipore filtration system (resistivity, >18.2 MΩ cm) was used throughout all experiments.

Electroformation Protocol

The electroformation protocol consisted in preparing solutions of DOPC (1 mg/mL in chloroform) and cholesterol (10 mg/mL in chloroform) at varying molar ratios (1:0–1:3). The electrodes were rinsed in toluene and wiped using Kimwipes (Kimberly-Clark Professional) to remove any traces of silicon lubricant. The desired solution was then pipetted vertically onto the electrodes (50 μL per electrode pair) using a glass syringe, carefully coating the entire surface. After a drying phase of approximately 1 h, the electroformation chamber was filled with a sucrose solution (∼3 mL, 200 mM sucrose in deionized (DI) water at room temperature), the electrodes were submerged, and the signal generator was connected via the brass screws on the sides of the chamber.
A 5 Vpp, 10 Hz sinusoidal excitation was applied for 2 h to induce repetitive stress on the hydrated lipid bilayer, leading to vesicle swelling. The effective voltage on the electroformation chamber was recorded using a high-voltage probe and oscilloscope as 4.87 Vpp, indicating a 0.13 V voltage difference due to an unmatched load of the signal generator. Subsequently, the frequency of the excitation was lowered to 5 Hz for 30 min to facilitate vesicle detachment. The electroformation parameters used in the protocol are summarized in Table 3. At the end of the electroformation process, the lid of the chamber was removed and the vesicles were slowly pipetted into a visualization well using a 100–1000 μL pipette tip. To minimize the shear stress at the orifice, the end of the pipette tip was cut by 2 mm using a pair of scissors. The same protocol was used for both SS304 and platinum electrodes.
Table 3. Electroformation Signal Generator Parameters for GUV Formation
 parameters 
electroformation phasevoltage (V)frequency (Hz)time (min)
I510120
II5530

GUV Detection and Sizing

The GUVs were imaged by phase-contrast microscopy using a Nikon ECLIPSE Ti inverted microscope (Nikon Corporation, Japan), and the images were then processed using a purpose-built MATLAB routine. The algorithm detects the GUVs on the basis of the imfindcircles built-in MATLAB function, calculates their diameter, and plots a vesicle-size histogram for all of the vesicles detected.
To quantify the concentration of DOPC GUVs, a finite volume (100 μL) of the electroformation solution was placed in an 8-well imaging dish (ibidi, U.K.) with 400 μL of PBS. The dish was coated with BSA by letting a 1 mg/mL BSA solution in DI water stand for 2 h. The BSA solution was then rinsed gently with DI water. After allowing the GUVs to sediment for an additional 2 h, the glass surface of the dish was imaged to cover the full area of the dish. A bounding grid that consisted of 39 × 45 tiles with 10% overlap was used for stitching.

Lipid Order Measurements

The lateral organization of the membrane lipids, also referred to as lipid packing, was quantified using a microscope-based spectral imaging technique. (33, 51) For this purpose, an aliquot (100 μL) of GUV-rich solution was placed in an imaging well. The vesicles were then fluorescently labeled with a final concentration of 400 nM c-Laurdan, an environment-sensitive molecular probe. The solution was then diluted with 100 μL of PBS. In the case of the experiment relating lipid packing to electrode material, 400 μL of PBS was added to the solution.
The emission spectrum of c-Laurdan shifts as a function of the dipolar water relaxation and thus the level of hydration within its surrounding microenvironment, indicating lipid packing in membranes. GP (52) was employed as a relative measure of lipid packing on a scale of −1 to 1, where −1 represents the least-packed membrane and 1 represents the most-packed membrane. Equation 1 describes the GP relative to the intensities at two specific wavelengths: 440 (I440) and 490 nm (I490).(1)Spectral imaging was performed using a Zeiss LSM780 confocal microscope equipped with a 32-channel GaAsP detector array. The vesicles were excited at 405 nm, and the spectral intensity of the signal was recorded in the 415–691 nm range.

ICP-OES Experiments

The concentration of metal ions in the electroformed samples was measured by ICP-OES with a Varian Vista-MPX spectrometer, for both electrode materials.

Lipid Extraction and NMR Experiments

The samples for NMR analysis were prepared from nine simultaneous electroformation experiments. The content of each electroformation chamber (3 mL) was diluted with an equal volume of PBS in a 50 mL Falcon tube, which was then left to stand overnight at room temperature. The GUV-enriched layers (500 μL each) were then withdrawn from the bottom of each Falcon tube, combined, and freeze-dried. The lipids were then extracted from the dried GUV samples by the Bligh and Dyer method. (53) Briefly, the sample was dispersed in water (0.8 mL), and then methanol (2 mL) and chloroform (1 mL) were added with mixing after each addition. The sample was vortexed at 2500 rpm for 15 s and allowed to stand for 30 min. Chloroform (1 mL) and water (1 mL) were added, and the sample was centrifuged at 1000g for 5 min to achieve a complete phase separation. The bottom organic layer was withdrawn using a glass syringe, dried under a nitrogen stream, and redissolved in CDCl3 (600 μL) for analysis.
LMV control samples with different lipid concentrations were prepared using the lipid hydration method. A solution of DOPC in chloroform was added to a glass vial and dried under a nitrogen stream. The lipid film was then hydrated by adding the same sucrose solution used for electroformation and vortexed for 2 min at 2500 rpm. After adding an equal volume of PBS, the sample was left to stand at room temperature for 18 h. The lipids were then extracted with the same protocol used for the electroformed sample.
1H NMR spectra were acquired on a Bruker Ascend 400 spectrometer (at 400 MHz for 1H and at 162 MHz for 31P) with 30° pulses (Bruker zg30 sequence) and a 3 s relaxation delay on a spectral width of 8000 Hz, whereas 31P NMR spectra were acquired with proton decoupling and a 3 s relaxation delay on a spectral width of 64 103 Hz. The spectra were apodized by multiplication with an exponential decay equivalent to 0.5 Hz line broadening and a Gaussian function equivalent to 1 Hz line broadening. 1H NMR spectra were referenced to residual nondeuterated chloroform, whereas 31P NMR spectra were externally referenced to triphenylphosphine oxide.

Vesicle Unilamellarity

Three independent suspensions of fluorescently labeled vesicles were prepared using the electroformation protocol outlined previously, by depositing a mixture of DOPC and NBD-PE (1 mol %) in chloroform on the electrodes. The GUV suspension (2.7 mL) was then mixed with 300 μL of a HEPES buffer at pH 7 (0.1 M HEPES and 1 M NaCl) to obtain final concentrations of 10 mM HEPES and 100 mM NaCl. Three wells of a 96-well plate were filled with 200 μL of the buffered GUV suspension. Stable values of fluorescence intensity were measured at 520 nm on a FLUOstar Omega plate reader (BMG Labtech) before and after adding 4 μL of a freshly prepared solution of 1 M Na2S2O4 in 1 M Tris buffer at pH 10, with excitation at 485 nm. Subsequently, 20 μL of a 10% v/v solution of Triton X-100 was added to the solution to cause vesicle lysis and expose all lipid structures to the quencher. A final stable value of fluorescence was recorded after the addition of the detergent. The unilamellarity index, defined as the fraction of leaflets that are not exposed to the solvent, was calculated as the ratio of the emission drop caused by the addition of detergent (Iinterior) to the total emission drop (Itotal = Iinterior + Iexterior).

Statistical Analyses

Statistical testing was performed using one-way analysis of variance for multiple comparison analyses, whereas a Student’s t-test was employed for direct comparison between two data sets. All data were expressed in terms of mean ± standard deviation, and the number of independent replicates was expressed in the figure captions. The following conventions for statistical significance are used throughout the paper: ns, p > 0.05; *, p ≤ 0.05, **, p ≤ 0.01; ***, p ≤ 0.001; ****, p ≤ 0.0001.

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.6b00395.

  • Cost breakdown of the electroformation chamber, limit of detection in NMR experiments, and unilamellarity experimental data; photograph of electroformation chamber (PDF)

  • Video of the formation of vesicles on an SS304 electrode upon the application of an external electric field at t = 3 s (scale bar = 20 μm) (AVI)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Author
  • Authors
    • Valerio Pereno - Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7DQ, U.K.
    • Dario Carugo - Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7DQ, U.K.Mechatronics and Bioengineering Science Research Groups, Faculty of Engineering and the Environment, University of Southampton, SO17 1BJ Southampton, U.K.
    • Luca Bau - Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7DQ, U.K.
    • Erdinc Sezgin - Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, MRC Human Immunology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DS, U.K.
    • Jorge Bernardino de la Serna - Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Central Laser Facility, Science and Technology Facilities Council, Research Complex at Harwell, Harwell-Oxford, Didcot OX11 0FA, U.K.Orcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-1396-3338
    • Christian Eggeling - Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, MRC Human Immunology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DS, U.K.
  • Author Contributions

    The article was written through contributions of all authors. All authors have given approval to the final version of the article.

  • Funding

    This work was supported by EPSRC Grant EP/I021795/1. E. Sezgin and C. Eggeling thank Wolfson Foundation, the Medical Research Council (MRC, grant number MC_UU_12010/unit programmes G0902418 and MC_UU_12025), MRC/BBSRC/ESPRC (grant number MR/K01577X/1), and the Wellcome Trust (grant ref 104924/14/Z/14). E. Sezgin was supported by EMBO Long-Term and Marie Curie Intra-European Fellowships (MEMBRANE DYNAMICS). J. Bernardino de la Serna acknowledges support from the Marie Curie Career Integration Grant.

  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

    Raw data are available through the University of Oxford ORA data repository doi: 10.5287/bodleian:9ed9ON5wZ.

Acknowledgment

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The authors extend their gratitude to James Fisk and David Salisbury for the fabrication of the electroformation chambers, Graham Brown for helpful discussions on microscopic techniques, and Fabio Bianchi for the helpful technical discussions.

Abbreviations

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

GUV

giant unilamellar vesicle

LMV

large multilamellar vesicle

E

electric field

DOPC

1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphatidylcholine

DSPC

1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine

DPPC

1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine

DMPC

1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine

ITO

indium tin oxide

1H NMR

proton nuclear magnetic resonance

ICP-OES

inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry

PBS

phosphate-buffered saline

Vpp

peak-to-peak voltage

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 53 other publications.

  1. 1
    Lingwood, D.; Simons, K. Lipid Rafts as a Membrane-Organizing Principle Science 2010, 327, 46 50 DOI: 10.1126/science.1174621
  2. 2
    Bagatolli, L. A.; Gratton, E. A Correlation between Lipid Domain Shape and Binary Phospholipid Mixture Composition in Free Standing Bilayers: A Two-Photon Fluorescence Microscopy Study Biophys. J. 2000, 79, 434 447 DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76305-3
  3. 3
    Dietrich, C.; Bagatolli, L. A.; Volovyk, Z. N.; Thompson, N. L.; Levi, M.; Jacobson, K.; Gratton, E. Lipid Rafts Reconstituted in Model Membranes Biophys. J. 2001, 80, 1417 1428 DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(01)76114-0
  4. 4
    Korlach, J.; Schwille, P.; Webb, W. W.; Feigenson, G. W. Characterization of Lipid Bilayer Phases by Confocal Microscopy and Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1999, 96, 8461 8466 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.96.15.8461
  5. 5
    Feigenson, G. W.; Buboltz, J. T. Ternary Phase Diagram of Dipalmitoyl-PC/Dilauroyl-PC/Cholesterol: Nanoscopic Domain Formation Driven by Cholesterol Biophys. J. 2001, 80, 2775 2788 DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(01)76245-5
  6. 6
    Veatch, S. L.; Keller, S. L. Separation of Liquid Phases in Giant Vesicles of Ternary Mixtures of Phospholipids and Cholesterol Biophys. J. 2003, 85, 3074 3083 DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74726-2
  7. 7
    Sun, T.-L.; Sun, Y.; Lee, C.-C.; Huang, H. W. Membrane Permeability of Hydrocarbon-Cross-Linked Peptides Biophys. J. 2013, 104, 1923 1932 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.03.039
  8. 8
    Nishimura, K.; Matsuura, T.; Sunami, T.; Fujii, S.; Nishimura, K.; Suzuki, H.; Yomo, T. Identification of Giant Unilamellar Vesicles with Permeability to Small Charged Molecules RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 35224 DOI: 10.1039/C4RA05332J
  9. 9
    Staykova, M.; Lipowsky, R.; Dimova, R. Membrane Flow Patterns in Multicomponent Giant Vesicles Induced by Alternating Electric Fields Soft Matter 2008, 4, 2168 DOI: 10.1039/b811876k
  10. 10
    Fenz, S. F.; Sengupta, K. Giant Vesicles as Cell Models Integr. Biol. 2012, 4, 982 DOI: 10.1039/c2ib00188h
  11. 11
    Nappini, S.; Al Kayal, T.; Berti, D.; Nordèn, B.; Baglioni, P. Magnetically Triggered Release From Giant Unilamellar Vesicles: Visualization By Means Of Confocal Microscopy J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2011, 2, 713 718 DOI: 10.1021/jz2000936
  12. 12
    Dubavik, A.; Sezgin, E.; Lesnyak, V.; Gaponik, N.; Schwille, P.; Eychmüller, A. Penetration of Amphiphilic Quantum Dots through Model and Cellular Plasma Membranes ACS Nano 2012, 6, 2150 2156 DOI: 10.1021/nn204930y
  13. 13
    Bernardino de la Serna, J.; Perez-Gil, J.; Simonsen, A. C.; Bagatolli, L. A. Cholesterol Rules J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 40715 40722 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M404648200
  14. 14
    Bernardino de la Serna, J.; Hansen, S.; Berzina, Z.; Simonsen, A. C.; Hannibal-Bach, H. K.; Knudsen, J.; Ejsing, C. S.; Bagatolli, L. A. Compositional and Structural Characterization of Monolayers and Bilayers Composed of Native Pulmonary Surfactant from Wild Type Mice Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Biomembr. 2013, 1828, 2450 2459 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2013.07.008
  15. 15
    Heinrich, M. C.; Capraro, B. R.; Tian, A.; Isas, J. M.; Langen, R.; Baumgart, T. Quantifying Membrane Curvature Generation of Drosophila Amphiphysin N-BAR Domains J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2010, 1, 3401 3406 DOI: 10.1021/jz101403q
  16. 16
    López-Montero, I.; Rodríguez-García, R.; Monroy, F. Artificial Spectrin Shells Reconstituted on Giant Vesicles J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2012, 3, 1583 1588 DOI: 10.1021/jz300377q
  17. 17
    Caschera, F.; Bernardino de la Serna, J.; Löffler, P. M. G.; Rasmussen, T. E.; Hanczyc, M. M.; Bagatolli, L. A.; Monnard, P.-A. Stable Vesicles Composed of Monocarboxylic or Dicarboxylic Fatty Acids and Trimethylammonium Amphiphiles Langmuir 2011, 27, 14078 DOI: 10.1021/la203057b
  18. 18
    Walde, P.; Cosentino, K.; Engel, H.; Stano, P. Giant Vesicles: Preparations and Applications ChemBioChem 2010, 11, 848 865 DOI: 10.1002/cbic.201000010
  19. 19
    Méléard, P.; Bagatolli, L. A.; Pott, T. Giant Unilamellar Vesicle Electroformation: From Lipid Mixtures to Native Membranes under Physiological Conditions Methods Enzymol. 2009, 465, 161 176 DOI: 10.1016/S0076-6879(09)65009-6
  20. 20
    Dimova, R.; Aranda, S.; Bezlyepkina, N.; Nikolov, V.; Riske, K. A.; Lipowsky, R. A Practical Guide to Giant Vesicles. Probing the Membrane Nanoregime via Optical Microscopy J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2006, 18, S1151 76 DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/18/28/S04
  21. 21
    Reeves, J. P.; Dowben, R. M. Formation and Properties of Thin-Walled Phospholipid Vesicles J. Cell. Physiol. 1969, 73, 49 60 DOI: 10.1002/jcp.1040730108
  22. 22
    Angelova, M. I.; Dimitrov, D. S. Liposome Electroformation Faraday Discuss. Chem. Soc. 1986, 81, 303 DOI: 10.1039/dc9868100303
  23. 23
    Pautot, S.; Frisken, B. J.; Weitz, D. A. Production of Unilamellar Vesicles Using an Inverted Emulsion Langmuir 2003, 19, 2870 2879 DOI: 10.1021/la026100v
  24. 24
    Yamada, A.; Le Berre, M.; Yoshikawa, K.; Baigl, D. Spontaneous Generation of Giant Liposomes from an Oil/water Interface ChemBioChem 2007, 8, 2215 2218 DOI: 10.1002/cbic.200700473
  25. 25
    Stachowiak, J. C.; Richmond, D. L.; Li, T. H.; Liu, A. P.; Parekh, S. H.; Fletcher, D. A. Unilamellar Vesicle Formation and Encapsulation by Microfluidic Jetting Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105, 4697 4702 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0710875105
  26. 26
    Arriaga, L. R.; Datta, S. S.; Kim, S.-H.; Amstad, E.; Kodger, T. E.; Monroy, F.; Weitz, D. A. Ultrathin Shell Double Emulsion Templated Giant Unilamellar Lipid Vesicles with Controlled Microdomain Formation Small 2014, 10, 950 956 DOI: 10.1002/smll.201301904
  27. 27
    Bi, H.; Yang, B.; Wang, L.; Cao, W.; Han, X. Electroformation of Giant Unilamellar Vesicles Using Interdigitated ITO Electrodes J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 7125 DOI: 10.1039/c3ta10323d
  28. 28
    Aimon, S.; Manzi, J.; Schmidt, D.; Poveda Larrosa, J. A.; Bassereau, P.; Toombes, G. E. S. Functional Reconstitution of a Voltage-Gated Potassium Channel in Giant Unilamellar Vesicles PLoS One 2011, 6e25529 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025529
  29. 29
    Fidorra, M.; Duelund, L.; Leidy, C.; Simonsen, A. C.; Bagatolli, L. A. Absence of Fluid-Ordered/Fluid-Disordered Phase Coexistence in Ceramide/POPC Mixtures Containing Cholesterol Biophys. J. 2006, 90, 4437 4451 DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.105.077107
  30. 30
    Montes, L.-R.; Alonso, A.; Goñi, F. M.; Bagatolli, L. A. Giant Unilamellar Vesicles Electroformed from Native Membranes and Organic Lipid Mixtures under Physiological Conditions Biophys. J. 2007, 93, 3548 3554 DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.107.116228
  31. 31
    Lecuyer, S.; Ristenpart, W. D.; Vincent, O.; Stone, H. A. Electrohydrodynamic Size Stratification and Flow Separation of Giant Vesicles Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008, 92104105 DOI: 10.1063/1.2894182
  32. 32
    Herold, C.; Chwastek, G.; Schwille, P.; Petrov, E. P. Efficient Electroformation of Supergiant Unilamellar Vesicles Containing Cationic Lipids on ITO-Coated Electrodes Langmuir 2012, 28, 5518 5521 DOI: 10.1021/la3005807
  33. 33
    Sezgin, E.; Sadowski, T.; Simons, K. Measuring Lipid Packing of Model and Cellular Membranes with Environment Sensitive Probes Langmuir 2014, 30, 8160 8166 DOI: 10.1021/la501226v
  34. 34
    Silvius, J. R. Role of Cholesterol in Lipid Raft Formation: Lessons from Lipid Model Systems Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Biomembr. 2003, 1610, 174 183 DOI: 10.1016/S0005-2736(03)00016-6
  35. 35
    Veatch, S. L.; Keller, S. L. Organization in Lipid Membranes Containing Cholesterol Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002, 89268101 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.268101
  36. 36
    Söderlund, T.; Alakoskela, J.-M. I.; Pakkanen, A. L.; Kinnunen, P. K. J. Comparison of the Effects of Surface Tension and Osmotic Pressure on the Interfacial Hydration of a Fluid Phospholipid Bilayer Biophys. J. 2003, 85, 2333 2341 DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74657-8
  37. 37
    Lis, L. J.; Lis, W. T.; Parsegian, V. A.; Rand, R. P. Adsorption of Divalent Cations to a Variety of Phosphatidylcholine Bilayers Biochemistry 1981, 20, 1771 1777 DOI: 10.1021/bi00510a010
  38. 38
    Suwalsky, M.; Castro, R.; Villena, F.; Sotomayor, C. P. Cr(III) Exerts Stronger Structural Effects than Cr(VI) on the Human Erythrocyte Membrane and Molecular Models J. Inorg. Biochem. 2008, 102, 842 849 DOI: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2007.11.020
  39. 39
    Binder, H.; Zschörnig, O. The Effect of Metal Cations on the Phase Behavior and Hydration Characteristics of Phospholipid Membranes Chem. Phys. Lipids 2002, 115, 39 61 DOI: 10.1016/S0009-3084(02)00005-1
  40. 40
    Ohki, S.; Düzgünes, N. Divalent Cation-Induced Interaction of Phospholipid Vesicle and Monolayer Membranes Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Biomembr. 1979, 552, 438 449 DOI: 10.1016/0005-2736(79)90188-3
  41. 41
    Stohs, S. J.; Bagchi, D. Oxidative Mechanisms in the Toxicity of Metal Ions Free Radicals Biol. Med. 1995, 18, 321 336 DOI: 10.1016/0891-5849(94)00159-H
  42. 42
    Ayuyan, A. G.; Cohen, F. S. Lipid Peroxides Promote Large Rafts: Effects of Excitation of Probes in Fluorescence Microscopy and Electrochemical Reactions during Vesicle Formation Biophys. J. 2006, 91, 2172 2183 DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.106.087387
  43. 43
    Mills, J. K.; Needham, D. Lysolipid Incorporation in Dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine Bilayer Membranes Enhances the Ion Permeability and Drug Release Rates at the Membrane Phase Transition Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Biomembr. 2005, 1716, 77 96 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2005.08.007
  44. 44
    Fuller, N.; Rand, R. P. The Influence of Lysolipids on the Spontaneous Curvature and Bending Elasticity of Phospholipid Membranes Biophys. J. 2001, 81, 243 254 DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(01)75695-0
  45. 45
    Sparling, M. L.; Zidovetzki, R.; Muller, L.; Chan, S. I. Analysis of Membrane Lipids by 500 MHz 1H NMR Anal. Biochem. 1989, 178, 67 76 DOI: 10.1016/0003-2697(89)90358-8
  46. 46
    Nieva-Echevarría, B.; Goicoechea, E.; Manzanos, M. J.; Guillén, M. D. Usefulness of 1H NMR in Assessing the Extent of Lipid Digestion Food Chem. 2015, 179, 182 190 DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.01.104
  47. 47
    Kriat, M.; Vion-Dury, J.; Confort-Gouny, S.; Favre, R.; Viout, P.; Sciaky, M.; Sari, H.; Cozzone, P. J. Analysis of Plasma Lipids by NMR Spectroscopy: Application to Modifications Induced by Malignant Tumors J. Lipid Res. 1993, 34, 1009 1019
  48. 48
    MacKenzie, A.; Vyssotski, M.; Nekrasov, E. Quantitative Analysis of Dairy Phospholipids by 31P NMR J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2009, 86, 757 763 DOI: 10.1007/s11746-009-1403-6
  49. 49
    McIntyre, J. C.; Sleight, R. G. Fluorescence Assay for Phospholipid Membrane Asymmetry Biochemistry 1991, 30, 11819 11827 DOI: 10.1021/bi00115a012
  50. 50
    Gruber, H. J.; Schindler, H. External Surface and Lamellarity of Lipid Vesicles: A Practice-Oriented Set of Assay Methods Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Biomembr. 1994, 1189, 212 224 DOI: 10.1016/0005-2736(94)90068-X
  51. 51
    Sezgin, E.; Waithe, D.; Bernardino de la Serna, J.; Eggeling, C. Spectral Imaging to Measure Heterogeneity in Membrane Lipid Packing ChemPhysChem 2015, 16, 1387 1394 DOI: 10.1002/cphc.201402794
  52. 52
    Parasassi, T.; De Stasio, G.; Ravagnan, G.; Rusch, R. M.; Gratton, E. Quantitation of Lipid Phases in Phospholipid Vesicles by the Generalized Polarization of Laurdan Fluorescence Biophys. J. 1991, 60, 179 189 DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(91)82041-0
  53. 53
    Bligh, E. G.; Dyer, W. J. A Rapid Method of Total Lipid Extraction and Purification Can. J. Biochem. Physiol. 1959, 37, 911 DOI: 10.1139/o59-099

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
Citation Statements
Explore this article's citation statements on scite.ai

This article is cited by 50 publications.

  1. Hongmei Bi. Positioning Formation and Controllable Fabrication of Lipid Vesicles Using Patterned Substrates. ACS Omega 2025, 10 (20) , 20794-20800. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.5c01927
  2. Lauren F. Bailey, Jayachandran Vavolil Prabhakaran, Vinod Kumar Vishwapathi, Chandrashekhar V. Kulkarni. Electroformation of Particulate Emulsions Using Lamellar and Nonlamellar Lipid Self-Assemblies. Langmuir 2021, 37 (49) , 14527-14539. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.1c02721
  3. Joseph Pazzi, Anand Bala Subramaniam. Nanoscale Curvature Promotes High Yield Spontaneous Formation of Cell-Mimetic Giant Vesicles on Nanocellulose Paper. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2020, 12 (50) , 56549-56561. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c14485
  4. Valerio Pereno, Junjun Lei, Dario Carugo, Eleanor Stride. Microstreaming inside Model Cells Induced by Ultrasound and Microbubbles. Langmuir 2020, 36 (23) , 6388-6398. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c00536
  5. Vaishnavi Girish, Joseph Pazzi, Alexander Li, Anand Bala Subramaniam. Fabrics of Diverse Chemistries Promote the Formation of Giant Vesicles from Phospholipids and Amphiphilic Block Copolymers. Langmuir 2019, 35 (28) , 9264-9273. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b01621
  6. Joseph Pazzi, Melissa Xu, Anand Bala Subramaniam. Size Distributions and Yields of Giant Vesicles Assembled on Cellulose Papers and Cotton Fabric. Langmuir 2019, 35 (24) , 7798-7804. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b03076
  7. Zhen‐Hong Luo, Gong‐Yu Shi, Nan‐Nan Deng. Easy, Rapid and High‐Throughput Production of Single and Multicompartment Liposomes by Vortex Emulsification. ChemSystemsChem 2025, 7 (3) https://doi.org/10.1002/syst.202400085
  8. Xiao Xu, Qi Tang, Yating Gao, Shaoqin Chen, Yingying Yu, Hongliang Qian, David Julian McClements, Chongjiang Cao, Biao Yuan. Recent developments in the fabrication of food microparticles and nanoparticles using microfluidic systems. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 2025, 65 (12) , 2199-2213. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2024.2329967
  9. Joseph Pazzi, Anand Bala Subramaniam. Dynamics of giant vesicle assembly from thin lipid films. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 2024, 661 , 1033-1045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2024.02.022
  10. Qian Xu, Zeping Zhang, Pauline Po Yee Lui, Liang Lu, Xiaowu Li, Xing Zhang. Preparation and biomedical applications of artificial cells. Materials Today Bio 2023, 23 , 100877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100877
  11. Hyojun Kim, Yeonho Choi, So Yeon Kim, Ki Joo Pahk. Increased intracellular diffusivity of macromolecules within a mammalian cell by low-intensity pulsed ultrasound. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 2023, 100 , 106644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2023.106644
  12. Karthika S. Nair, Harsha Bajaj. Advances in giant unilamellar vesicle preparation techniques and applications. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science 2023, 318 , 102935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2023.102935
  13. Fatma Doğan Güzel, Jaspreet Kaur, Zahra Zendeh. Cheap portable electroformed giant unilamellar vesicles preparation kit. Journal of Liposome Research 2023, 33 (2) , 183-188. https://doi.org/10.1080/08982104.2022.2149777
  14. Chih Hung Lo, Jialiu Zeng. Application of polymersomes in membrane protein study and drug discovery: Progress, strategies, and perspectives. Bioengineering & Translational Medicine 2023, 8 (1) https://doi.org/10.1002/btm2.10350
  15. Nilesh Kumar, Saloni Samant, Kamini Singh, Shamlan M. S. Reshamwala. Minimal Cells and Genome Minimization: Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approaches to Construct Synthetic Cells. 2023, 17-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7911-8_2
  16. Subramanian Siva, Jun-O Jin, Inho Choi, Myunghee Kim. Nanoliposome based biosensors for probing mycotoxins and their applications for food: A review. Biosensors and Bioelectronics 2023, 219 , 114845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2022.114845
  17. Shreya Pramanik, Jan Steinkühler, Rumiana Dimova, Joachim Spatz, Reinhard Lipowsky. Binding of His-tagged fluorophores to lipid bilayers of giant vesicles. Soft Matter 2022, 18 (34) , 6372-6383. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2SM00915C
  18. Deepthi Priyanka Damera, Amit Nag. Exploring the membrane fluidity of phenyl boronic acid functionalized polymersomes using the FRAP technique and their application in the pH-sensitive release of curcumin. New Journal of Chemistry 2022, 46 (23) , 11329-11340. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2NJ01330D
  19. Xu-Chun Song, Zi-Han Zhou, Ya-Lan Yu, Nan-Nan Deng. Microfluidic production of liposomes through liquid-liquid phase separation in ternary droplets. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering 2022, 16 (6) , 1017-1022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-021-2118-y
  20. Ali Yazdizadeh Kharrazi, Amir Zare, Nils Chapin, Seyedkhashayar Ghavami, Amir Pandi. Synthetic minimal cells and their applications. 2022, 83-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824469-2.00030-0
  21. A.K. Jayaram, A.M. Pappa, S. Ghosh, Z.A. Manzer, W.C. Traberg, T.P.J. Knowles, S. Daniel, R.M. Owens. Biomembranes in bioelectronic sensing. Trends in Biotechnology 2022, 40 (1) , 107-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2021.06.001
  22. Bruna G. Carvalho, Bruno T. Ceccato, Mariano Michelon, Sang W. Han, Lucimara G. de la Torre. Advanced Microfluidic Technologies for Lipid Nano-Microsystems from Synthesis to Biological Application. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14 (1) , 141. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14010141
  23. Bapi Gorain, Bandar E. Al-Dhubiab, Anroop Nair, Prashant Kesharwani, Manisha Pandey, Hira Choudhury. Multivesicular Liposome: A Lipid-based Drug Delivery System for Efficient Drug Delivery. Current Pharmaceutical Design 2021, 27 (43) , 4404-4415. https://doi.org/10.2174/1381612827666210830095941
  24. Zvonimir Boban, Ivan Mardešić, Witold Karol Subczynski, Marija Raguz. Giant Unilamellar Vesicle Electroformation: What to Use, What to Avoid, and How to Quantify the Results. Membranes 2021, 11 (11) , 860. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11110860
  25. Lihua Jiang, Qiong Wang, Jincan Lei, Ke Tao, Jing Huang, Shixian Zhao, Ning Hu, Jun Yang. Mechanism study of how lipid vesicle electroformation is suppressed by the presence of sodium chloride. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 2021, 206 , 111951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.111951
  26. Toshinori Shimanouchi, Tetsuya Hayashi, Kazuki Toramoto, Saki Fukuma, Keita Hayashi, Kazuma Yasuhara, Yukitaka Kimura. Microfluidic and hydrothermal preparation of vesicles using sorbitan monolaurate/polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monolaurate (Span 20/Tween 20). Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 2021, 205 , 111836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.111836
  27. Wei Yuan, Jiafang Piao, Yuanchen Dong. Advancements in the preparation methods of artificial cell membranes with lipids. Materials Chemistry Frontiers 2021, 5 (14) , 5233-5246. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1QM00501D
  28. Himadri Gourav Behuria, Bijesh Kumar Biswal, Santosh Kumar Sahu. Electroformation of liposomes and phytosomes using copper electrode. Journal of Liposome Research 2021, 31 (3) , 255-266. https://doi.org/10.1080/08982104.2020.1800729
  29. Xuejing Wang, Hang Du, Zhao Wang, Wei Mu, Xiaojun Han. Versatile Phospholipid Assemblies for Functional Synthetic Cells and Artificial Tissues. Advanced Materials 2021, 33 (6) https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202002635
  30. Andrew Fuhrer, Amir M. Farnoud. Characterization of Lipid Order and Domain Formation in Model Membranes Using Fluorescence Microscopy and Spectroscopy. 2021, 271-282. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0814-2_15
  31. A. Marek, A. De Grazia, X. Régal, D. Carugo, F. Pierron. Quantifying Ultrasonic Deformation of Cell Membranes with Ultra-High-Speed Imaging. 2021, 21-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59765-8_5
  32. Himadri Gourav Behuria, Santosh Kumar Sahu. An Anti-microbial Terpenoid Fraction from Gymnema sylvestre Induces Flip-flop of Fluorescent-Phospholipid Analogs in Model Membrane. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 2020, 192 (4) , 1331-1345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-020-03399-3
  33. K. R. Prathyusha, Ignacio Pagonabarraga, P. B. Sunil Kumar. Modification of lipid membrane compressibility induced by an electric field. Physical Review E 2020, 102 (6) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.102.062413
  34. Leitgeb Maja, Knez Željko, Primožič Mateja. Sustainable technologies for liposome preparation. The Journal of Supercritical Fluids 2020, 165 , 104984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2020.104984
  35. C. Has, P. Sunthar. A comprehensive review on recent preparation techniques of liposomes. Journal of Liposome Research 2020, 30 (4) , 336-365. https://doi.org/10.1080/08982104.2019.1668010
  36. Loredana Leggio, Giuseppe Arrabito, Vittorio Ferrara, Silvia Vivarelli, Greta Paternò, Bianca Marchetti, Bruno Pignataro, Nunzio Iraci. Mastering the Tools: Natural versus Artificial Vesicles in Nanomedicine. Advanced Healthcare Materials 2020, 9 (18) https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202000731
  37. Adnan Morshed, Buddini Iroshika Karawdeniya, Y.M. Nuwan D.Y. Bandara, Min Jun Kim, Prashanta Dutta. Mechanical characterization of vesicles and cells: A review. ELECTROPHORESIS 2020, 41 (7-8) , 449-470. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.201900362
  38. G. S. Valchev, L. S. Vladimirova-Mihaleva, V. M. Vassilev. On the experimental setup for liposome electroformation. 2020, 080007. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0033867
  39. Kilian Vogele, Tobias Pirzer, Friedrich C. Simmel. Genetically Encoded Membranes for Bottom‐Up Biology. ChemSystemsChem 2019, 1 (4) https://doi.org/10.1002/syst.201900016
  40. Juracy Leandro dos Santos, Sebastião Antônio Mendanha, Sílvio Leão Vieira, Cristhiane Gonçalves. Portable Proportional-Integral-Derivative controlled chambers for giant unilamellar vesicles electroformation. Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express 2019, 5 (4) , 047002. https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/ab1a1b
  41. Emeline Rideau, Frederik R. Wurm, Katharina Landfester. Self‐Assembly of Giant Unilamellar Vesicles by Film Hydration Methodologies. Advanced Biosystems 2019, 3 (6) https://doi.org/10.1002/adbi.201800324
  42. Rumiana Dimova. Giant Vesicles and Their Use in Assays for Assessing Membrane Phase State, Curvature, Mechanics, and Electrical Properties. Annual Review of Biophysics 2019, 48 (1) , 93-119. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biophys-052118-115342
  43. Pashiini Supramaniam, Oscar Ces, Ali Salehi-Reyhani. Microfluidics for Artificial Life: Techniques for Bottom-Up Synthetic Biology. Micromachines 2019, 10 (5) , 299. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi10050299
  44. Fabio Bianchi, Valerio Pereno, Julian H. George, Mark S. Thompson, Hua Ye. Membrane Mechanical Properties Regulate the Effect of Strain on Spontaneous Electrophysiology in Human iPSC-Derived Neurons. Neuroscience 2019, 404 , 165-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.02.014
  45. Richard Mayne, Neil Phillips, Andrew Adamatzky. Towards experimental P-systems using multivesicular liposomes. Journal of Membrane Computing 2019, 1 (1) , 20-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41965-018-00006-7
  46. Zhenyu Wang, Chaoxiong Wu, Ting Fan, Xianwei Han, Qiong Wang, Jincan Lei, Jun Yang. Electroformation and collection of giant liposomes on an integrated microchip. Chinese Chemical Letters 2019, 30 (2) , 353-358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2018.12.001
  47. Fatih Inci. Lipid Bilayers and Liposomes on Microfluidics Realm: Techniques and Applications. 2019, 213-223. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11596-8_9
  48. Javier Alejandro Bellon, Marcelo Javier Pino, Natalia Wilke. Low-cost equipment for electroformation of Giant Unilamellar Vesicles. HardwareX 2018, 4 , e00037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ohx.2018.e00037
  49. Marzieh Mohammadi, Sahar Taghavi, Khalil Abnous, Seyed Mohammad Taghdisi, Mohammad Ramezani, Mona Alibolandi. Hybrid Vesicular Drug Delivery Systems for Cancer Therapeutics. Advanced Functional Materials 2018, 28 (36) https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201802136
  50. Xiaohong Wang, Jinfeng Liu, Peizhou Wang, Andrew DeMello, Lingyan Feng, Xiaoli Zhu, Weijia Wen, Rimantas Kodzius, Xiuqing Gong. Synthesis of Biomaterials Utilizing Microfluidic Technology. Genes 2018, 9 (6) , 283. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes9060283

ACS Omega

Cite this: ACS Omega 2017, 2, 3, 994–1002
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.6b00395
Published March 16, 2017

Copyright © 2017 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under CC-BY.

Article Views

6624

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Schematic of vesicle electroformation from a dry lipid bilayer deposited on a substrate. Vesicles are formed upon hydration and the application of an alternating electric field, (not to scale).

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Vesicles swelling from electroformation electrodes: (a) hydrated lipid layer commencing the swelling process, (b) DiI-labeled single-vesicle swelling while attached to the electroformation electrodes, and (c) vesicles forming, swelling, and detaching along the electrode.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. (a) Size distribution of DOPC vesicles as a function of electrode material. The white bars represent vesicles formed using platinum wires as electrodes, whereas the gray bars represent vesicles formed using stainless steel electrodes. (b) Comparison of average vesicle diameters (±standard deviation) of platinum and stainless steel electrodes. Three independent experiments were conducted, and over 1500 vesicles were analyzed for each electrode material.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. Simultaneous electroformation of vesicles with dissimilar membrane properties. (a) Generalized polarization (GP) of the vesicles as a function of initial lipid-film formulation. (b) Representative GP false-colored images of four vesicles with different GP values.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. (a) Vesicle diameters as a function of lipid composition (b) Lipid packing of DOPC vesicles as a function of electrode material.

    Figure 6

    Figure 6. 1H NMR spectra of lipids extracted from electroformed GUVs (top trace) and large multilamellar vesicles (LMVs) (bottom trace). The residual solvent peaks of chloroform (7.26 ppm) and methanol (3.49 ppm) were removed for clarity. The inset shows a magnified view of the olefinic and head group protons.

    Figure 7

    Figure 7. Fluorescence intensity measurements of DOPC/NBD-PE vesicles. The fluorescence of intact vesicles is represented from time = 0 to arrow 1. At arrow 1, the quencher is added to the suspension, and the intensity is recorded until a stable value is reached. The emission drop is a measure of the number of fluorophores in outer leaflets. At arrow 2, Triton X-100 is added to lyse the vesicles, and fluorescence is recorded until a new stable value is reached. The corresponding emission drop is a measure of the number of fluorophores in inner leaflets. After each addition, the plate was removed from the plate reader and shaken for several minutes (the time axis is correspondingly cut for clarity).

    Figure 8

    Figure 8. Vesicle electroformation devices for high-yield production and formation visualization. (a) Scalable device with five electroformation chambers and needles held by brass screws. (b) Monitoring device with six chambers, brass screws, and stainless steel sheets for electrical connection between common electrodes.

  • References


    This article references 53 other publications.

    1. 1
      Lingwood, D.; Simons, K. Lipid Rafts as a Membrane-Organizing Principle Science 2010, 327, 46 50 DOI: 10.1126/science.1174621
    2. 2
      Bagatolli, L. A.; Gratton, E. A Correlation between Lipid Domain Shape and Binary Phospholipid Mixture Composition in Free Standing Bilayers: A Two-Photon Fluorescence Microscopy Study Biophys. J. 2000, 79, 434 447 DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76305-3
    3. 3
      Dietrich, C.; Bagatolli, L. A.; Volovyk, Z. N.; Thompson, N. L.; Levi, M.; Jacobson, K.; Gratton, E. Lipid Rafts Reconstituted in Model Membranes Biophys. J. 2001, 80, 1417 1428 DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(01)76114-0
    4. 4
      Korlach, J.; Schwille, P.; Webb, W. W.; Feigenson, G. W. Characterization of Lipid Bilayer Phases by Confocal Microscopy and Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1999, 96, 8461 8466 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.96.15.8461
    5. 5
      Feigenson, G. W.; Buboltz, J. T. Ternary Phase Diagram of Dipalmitoyl-PC/Dilauroyl-PC/Cholesterol: Nanoscopic Domain Formation Driven by Cholesterol Biophys. J. 2001, 80, 2775 2788 DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(01)76245-5
    6. 6
      Veatch, S. L.; Keller, S. L. Separation of Liquid Phases in Giant Vesicles of Ternary Mixtures of Phospholipids and Cholesterol Biophys. J. 2003, 85, 3074 3083 DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74726-2
    7. 7
      Sun, T.-L.; Sun, Y.; Lee, C.-C.; Huang, H. W. Membrane Permeability of Hydrocarbon-Cross-Linked Peptides Biophys. J. 2013, 104, 1923 1932 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.03.039
    8. 8
      Nishimura, K.; Matsuura, T.; Sunami, T.; Fujii, S.; Nishimura, K.; Suzuki, H.; Yomo, T. Identification of Giant Unilamellar Vesicles with Permeability to Small Charged Molecules RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 35224 DOI: 10.1039/C4RA05332J
    9. 9
      Staykova, M.; Lipowsky, R.; Dimova, R. Membrane Flow Patterns in Multicomponent Giant Vesicles Induced by Alternating Electric Fields Soft Matter 2008, 4, 2168 DOI: 10.1039/b811876k
    10. 10
      Fenz, S. F.; Sengupta, K. Giant Vesicles as Cell Models Integr. Biol. 2012, 4, 982 DOI: 10.1039/c2ib00188h
    11. 11
      Nappini, S.; Al Kayal, T.; Berti, D.; Nordèn, B.; Baglioni, P. Magnetically Triggered Release From Giant Unilamellar Vesicles: Visualization By Means Of Confocal Microscopy J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2011, 2, 713 718 DOI: 10.1021/jz2000936
    12. 12
      Dubavik, A.; Sezgin, E.; Lesnyak, V.; Gaponik, N.; Schwille, P.; Eychmüller, A. Penetration of Amphiphilic Quantum Dots through Model and Cellular Plasma Membranes ACS Nano 2012, 6, 2150 2156 DOI: 10.1021/nn204930y
    13. 13
      Bernardino de la Serna, J.; Perez-Gil, J.; Simonsen, A. C.; Bagatolli, L. A. Cholesterol Rules J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 40715 40722 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M404648200
    14. 14
      Bernardino de la Serna, J.; Hansen, S.; Berzina, Z.; Simonsen, A. C.; Hannibal-Bach, H. K.; Knudsen, J.; Ejsing, C. S.; Bagatolli, L. A. Compositional and Structural Characterization of Monolayers and Bilayers Composed of Native Pulmonary Surfactant from Wild Type Mice Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Biomembr. 2013, 1828, 2450 2459 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2013.07.008
    15. 15
      Heinrich, M. C.; Capraro, B. R.; Tian, A.; Isas, J. M.; Langen, R.; Baumgart, T. Quantifying Membrane Curvature Generation of Drosophila Amphiphysin N-BAR Domains J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2010, 1, 3401 3406 DOI: 10.1021/jz101403q
    16. 16
      López-Montero, I.; Rodríguez-García, R.; Monroy, F. Artificial Spectrin Shells Reconstituted on Giant Vesicles J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2012, 3, 1583 1588 DOI: 10.1021/jz300377q
    17. 17
      Caschera, F.; Bernardino de la Serna, J.; Löffler, P. M. G.; Rasmussen, T. E.; Hanczyc, M. M.; Bagatolli, L. A.; Monnard, P.-A. Stable Vesicles Composed of Monocarboxylic or Dicarboxylic Fatty Acids and Trimethylammonium Amphiphiles Langmuir 2011, 27, 14078 DOI: 10.1021/la203057b
    18. 18
      Walde, P.; Cosentino, K.; Engel, H.; Stano, P. Giant Vesicles: Preparations and Applications ChemBioChem 2010, 11, 848 865 DOI: 10.1002/cbic.201000010
    19. 19
      Méléard, P.; Bagatolli, L. A.; Pott, T. Giant Unilamellar Vesicle Electroformation: From Lipid Mixtures to Native Membranes under Physiological Conditions Methods Enzymol. 2009, 465, 161 176 DOI: 10.1016/S0076-6879(09)65009-6
    20. 20
      Dimova, R.; Aranda, S.; Bezlyepkina, N.; Nikolov, V.; Riske, K. A.; Lipowsky, R. A Practical Guide to Giant Vesicles. Probing the Membrane Nanoregime via Optical Microscopy J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2006, 18, S1151 76 DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/18/28/S04
    21. 21
      Reeves, J. P.; Dowben, R. M. Formation and Properties of Thin-Walled Phospholipid Vesicles J. Cell. Physiol. 1969, 73, 49 60 DOI: 10.1002/jcp.1040730108
    22. 22
      Angelova, M. I.; Dimitrov, D. S. Liposome Electroformation Faraday Discuss. Chem. Soc. 1986, 81, 303 DOI: 10.1039/dc9868100303
    23. 23
      Pautot, S.; Frisken, B. J.; Weitz, D. A. Production of Unilamellar Vesicles Using an Inverted Emulsion Langmuir 2003, 19, 2870 2879 DOI: 10.1021/la026100v
    24. 24
      Yamada, A.; Le Berre, M.; Yoshikawa, K.; Baigl, D. Spontaneous Generation of Giant Liposomes from an Oil/water Interface ChemBioChem 2007, 8, 2215 2218 DOI: 10.1002/cbic.200700473
    25. 25
      Stachowiak, J. C.; Richmond, D. L.; Li, T. H.; Liu, A. P.; Parekh, S. H.; Fletcher, D. A. Unilamellar Vesicle Formation and Encapsulation by Microfluidic Jetting Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105, 4697 4702 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0710875105
    26. 26
      Arriaga, L. R.; Datta, S. S.; Kim, S.-H.; Amstad, E.; Kodger, T. E.; Monroy, F.; Weitz, D. A. Ultrathin Shell Double Emulsion Templated Giant Unilamellar Lipid Vesicles with Controlled Microdomain Formation Small 2014, 10, 950 956 DOI: 10.1002/smll.201301904
    27. 27
      Bi, H.; Yang, B.; Wang, L.; Cao, W.; Han, X. Electroformation of Giant Unilamellar Vesicles Using Interdigitated ITO Electrodes J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 7125 DOI: 10.1039/c3ta10323d
    28. 28
      Aimon, S.; Manzi, J.; Schmidt, D.; Poveda Larrosa, J. A.; Bassereau, P.; Toombes, G. E. S. Functional Reconstitution of a Voltage-Gated Potassium Channel in Giant Unilamellar Vesicles PLoS One 2011, 6e25529 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025529
    29. 29
      Fidorra, M.; Duelund, L.; Leidy, C.; Simonsen, A. C.; Bagatolli, L. A. Absence of Fluid-Ordered/Fluid-Disordered Phase Coexistence in Ceramide/POPC Mixtures Containing Cholesterol Biophys. J. 2006, 90, 4437 4451 DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.105.077107
    30. 30
      Montes, L.-R.; Alonso, A.; Goñi, F. M.; Bagatolli, L. A. Giant Unilamellar Vesicles Electroformed from Native Membranes and Organic Lipid Mixtures under Physiological Conditions Biophys. J. 2007, 93, 3548 3554 DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.107.116228
    31. 31
      Lecuyer, S.; Ristenpart, W. D.; Vincent, O.; Stone, H. A. Electrohydrodynamic Size Stratification and Flow Separation of Giant Vesicles Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008, 92104105 DOI: 10.1063/1.2894182
    32. 32
      Herold, C.; Chwastek, G.; Schwille, P.; Petrov, E. P. Efficient Electroformation of Supergiant Unilamellar Vesicles Containing Cationic Lipids on ITO-Coated Electrodes Langmuir 2012, 28, 5518 5521 DOI: 10.1021/la3005807
    33. 33
      Sezgin, E.; Sadowski, T.; Simons, K. Measuring Lipid Packing of Model and Cellular Membranes with Environment Sensitive Probes Langmuir 2014, 30, 8160 8166 DOI: 10.1021/la501226v
    34. 34
      Silvius, J. R. Role of Cholesterol in Lipid Raft Formation: Lessons from Lipid Model Systems Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Biomembr. 2003, 1610, 174 183 DOI: 10.1016/S0005-2736(03)00016-6
    35. 35
      Veatch, S. L.; Keller, S. L. Organization in Lipid Membranes Containing Cholesterol Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002, 89268101 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.268101
    36. 36
      Söderlund, T.; Alakoskela, J.-M. I.; Pakkanen, A. L.; Kinnunen, P. K. J. Comparison of the Effects of Surface Tension and Osmotic Pressure on the Interfacial Hydration of a Fluid Phospholipid Bilayer Biophys. J. 2003, 85, 2333 2341 DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74657-8
    37. 37
      Lis, L. J.; Lis, W. T.; Parsegian, V. A.; Rand, R. P. Adsorption of Divalent Cations to a Variety of Phosphatidylcholine Bilayers Biochemistry 1981, 20, 1771 1777 DOI: 10.1021/bi00510a010
    38. 38
      Suwalsky, M.; Castro, R.; Villena, F.; Sotomayor, C. P. Cr(III) Exerts Stronger Structural Effects than Cr(VI) on the Human Erythrocyte Membrane and Molecular Models J. Inorg. Biochem. 2008, 102, 842 849 DOI: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2007.11.020
    39. 39
      Binder, H.; Zschörnig, O. The Effect of Metal Cations on the Phase Behavior and Hydration Characteristics of Phospholipid Membranes Chem. Phys. Lipids 2002, 115, 39 61 DOI: 10.1016/S0009-3084(02)00005-1
    40. 40
      Ohki, S.; Düzgünes, N. Divalent Cation-Induced Interaction of Phospholipid Vesicle and Monolayer Membranes Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Biomembr. 1979, 552, 438 449 DOI: 10.1016/0005-2736(79)90188-3
    41. 41
      Stohs, S. J.; Bagchi, D. Oxidative Mechanisms in the Toxicity of Metal Ions Free Radicals Biol. Med. 1995, 18, 321 336 DOI: 10.1016/0891-5849(94)00159-H
    42. 42
      Ayuyan, A. G.; Cohen, F. S. Lipid Peroxides Promote Large Rafts: Effects of Excitation of Probes in Fluorescence Microscopy and Electrochemical Reactions during Vesicle Formation Biophys. J. 2006, 91, 2172 2183 DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.106.087387
    43. 43
      Mills, J. K.; Needham, D. Lysolipid Incorporation in Dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine Bilayer Membranes Enhances the Ion Permeability and Drug Release Rates at the Membrane Phase Transition Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Biomembr. 2005, 1716, 77 96 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2005.08.007
    44. 44
      Fuller, N.; Rand, R. P. The Influence of Lysolipids on the Spontaneous Curvature and Bending Elasticity of Phospholipid Membranes Biophys. J. 2001, 81, 243 254 DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(01)75695-0
    45. 45
      Sparling, M. L.; Zidovetzki, R.; Muller, L.; Chan, S. I. Analysis of Membrane Lipids by 500 MHz 1H NMR Anal. Biochem. 1989, 178, 67 76 DOI: 10.1016/0003-2697(89)90358-8
    46. 46
      Nieva-Echevarría, B.; Goicoechea, E.; Manzanos, M. J.; Guillén, M. D. Usefulness of 1H NMR in Assessing the Extent of Lipid Digestion Food Chem. 2015, 179, 182 190 DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.01.104
    47. 47
      Kriat, M.; Vion-Dury, J.; Confort-Gouny, S.; Favre, R.; Viout, P.; Sciaky, M.; Sari, H.; Cozzone, P. J. Analysis of Plasma Lipids by NMR Spectroscopy: Application to Modifications Induced by Malignant Tumors J. Lipid Res. 1993, 34, 1009 1019
    48. 48
      MacKenzie, A.; Vyssotski, M.; Nekrasov, E. Quantitative Analysis of Dairy Phospholipids by 31P NMR J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2009, 86, 757 763 DOI: 10.1007/s11746-009-1403-6
    49. 49
      McIntyre, J. C.; Sleight, R. G. Fluorescence Assay for Phospholipid Membrane Asymmetry Biochemistry 1991, 30, 11819 11827 DOI: 10.1021/bi00115a012
    50. 50
      Gruber, H. J.; Schindler, H. External Surface and Lamellarity of Lipid Vesicles: A Practice-Oriented Set of Assay Methods Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Biomembr. 1994, 1189, 212 224 DOI: 10.1016/0005-2736(94)90068-X
    51. 51
      Sezgin, E.; Waithe, D.; Bernardino de la Serna, J.; Eggeling, C. Spectral Imaging to Measure Heterogeneity in Membrane Lipid Packing ChemPhysChem 2015, 16, 1387 1394 DOI: 10.1002/cphc.201402794
    52. 52
      Parasassi, T.; De Stasio, G.; Ravagnan, G.; Rusch, R. M.; Gratton, E. Quantitation of Lipid Phases in Phospholipid Vesicles by the Generalized Polarization of Laurdan Fluorescence Biophys. J. 1991, 60, 179 189 DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(91)82041-0
    53. 53
      Bligh, E. G.; Dyer, W. J. A Rapid Method of Total Lipid Extraction and Purification Can. J. Biochem. Physiol. 1959, 37, 911 DOI: 10.1139/o59-099
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.6b00395.

    • Cost breakdown of the electroformation chamber, limit of detection in NMR experiments, and unilamellarity experimental data; photograph of electroformation chamber (PDF)

    • Video of the formation of vesicles on an SS304 electrode upon the application of an external electric field at t = 3 s (scale bar = 20 μm) (AVI)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.