ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Fast and Efficient Sub-Band Gap Photodetection in Al:ZnO/Si Heterojunction by Enhanced Photoexcited Hole Transport via Interfacial Defect States
My Activity
  • Open Access
Article

Fast and Efficient Sub-Band Gap Photodetection in Al:ZnO/Si Heterojunction by Enhanced Photoexcited Hole Transport via Interfacial Defect States
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

Open PDF

ACS Photonics

Cite this: ACS Photonics 2025, 12, 1, 62–70
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.4c01057
Published December 18, 2024

Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 .

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This study focuses on sub-band gap photodetection in n+-Al:ZnO/n-Si isotype heterojunction-based photodiodes via interfacial defects induced by metal oxide films. Through comparative studies on the photoresponse of Schottky junction-based photodiodes with the modified electronic band structure by controlling the structural and electrical properties of Al:ZnO films, as well as the Si substrate’s doping level, we investigate the underlying mechanisms of interfacial defect states for sub-band gap photodetection in Si. Our analysis suggests that these interfacial defects not only act as additional sources for photoexcited carrier generations but also serve as pathways for photogenerated holes in the Si valence band, enabling their flow into the Al:ZnO film and improving the operating speed. Time-resolved photocurrent measurements under near-infrared illumination illustrate an enhancement in photocurrent with lower oxygen partial pressures (0 mTorr) attributed to alterations in the energy band structure caused by interfacial defect states. Significantly, the Al:ZnO/Si photodiode fabricated under optimized conditions exhibits a photoresponse of 2.48 mA/W at 1310 nm with fast rise/fall times of 5.5/5.25 μs at 1 kHz and a 3 dB bandwidth of approximately 150 kHz, without introducing additional bulk trap states in Si. In light of these findings, the combination of simple fabrication and excellent switching speed of interfacial defect-mediated Si photodiodes has the potential to significantly impact the technologies of Si photonics and advanced Si-based photoelectric devices.

This publication is licensed under

CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 .
  • cc licence
  • by licence
  • nc licence
  • nd licence
Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society

1. Introduction

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The growing demand for near-infrared (NIR) photodetection, with applications in biomedical imaging, gas sensing, energy conversion, and optical communication, has attracted significant interest in developing cost-efficient NIR photodiodes. (1−4) In particular, recent advances in integrated silicon (Si) photonics, predominantly operating within telecommunication wavelengths, have intensified the focus on NIR photodetection at room temperature within the Si platform. As the most mature semiconductor, Si has traditionally been a robust photodetection platform due to its remarkable quantum efficiency under light illumination with wavelengths below 1100 nm. However, its inherent limitation, an indirect band gap of 1.12 eV, restricts its applicability for NIR photodetection below this band gap energy.
To broaden the spectral range for sub-band gap photodetection, researchers have explored various strategies for material integration on Si, including germanium (Ge), (5,6) indium selenide (In2Se3), (7) III–V compound semiconductors (GaAs, InAs), (8,9) and silicon–germanium (SiGe). (10) While these approaches have effectively demonstrated efficient photodetection at telecommunication wavelengths, they often encounter practical challenges like incompatibility with complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) technology, limited bandwidth, and high manufacturing costs. (11) To expand Si photodetection into the NIR spectrum, considerable efforts have been directed toward manipulating intrinsic properties, such as absorption and doping. (12) Recent breakthroughs include hyperdoped Si by ion-implanting other materials such as metals and chalcogens (Te, Se, and S), (13−19) demonstrating high photoresponsivity across an extended spectral range, even reaching into the mid-infrared (MIR) spectrum. (20,21) Although introducing deep-level trap states in Si’s inherent band gap enhances photoresponse performance, it can result in slow response speeds (∼ms). This is because trap energy states impede electron transport, thus limiting their use in high-speed optoelectronic devices.
An alternative method to achieve sub-band gap photoresponse in Si via defect states involves NIR photodetection assisted by surface defect states. (12) Introducing impurities to the Si surface through foreign atoms or molecules can modify the surface electronic states in Si, enabling carrier generation under sub-band gap illumination. Such surface defect states can be simply induced by depositing films on the Si surface, commonly termed interfacial defect states. Isotype heterojunction-based Schottky photodiodes have recently highlighted the potential of NIR photodetection in Si by inducing interfacial defect states by depositing n-type metal oxide films on n-type Si substrates. (22−26) While numerous studies on Schottky-based photodetection using metals and metal oxides, known for their fast photoresponse, have been reported, a comprehensive analysis of their operational speed has not yet been provided. (4,27,28)
Therefore, this paper investigates the characteristics of Si photodiodes incorporating aluminum-doped zinc oxide (Al:ZnO) films for NIR photodetection, proposing Schottky-based photodetection through interfacial defect states. A Schottky junction is constructed at the Al:ZnO/Si isotype heterojunction for the generation of electron–hole pairs (EHP) in the depletion region of the n-type Si substrate, as illustrated in Figure 1. Using structural analyses (AFM, XRD, and XPS) and examining the impact of the Si substrate’s doping level and the electrical properties of Al:ZnO films on photodetection, we emphasize the underlying mechanisms by which interfacial defects act as sources for generating photoexcited electron–hole pairs and establish pathways for channeling photogenerated carriers (holes) from Si into Al:ZnO, thereby facilitating the movement of photoexcited holes and enhancing the switching speed (∼μs). Additionally, the photoresponse characteristics of Si photodiodes were measured at various NIR wavelengths, including the two main telecommunication wavelengths (1310 and 1550 nm). Specifically, at 1310 nm and room temperature under zero-bias conditions, the photodiode achieved a photoresponse of 2.48 mA/W when paired with Al:ZnO films deposited at a low oxygen partial pressure (0 mTorr). Furthermore, we quantify the frequency and temporal response of Al:ZnO/Si Schottky photodiodes, revealing rapid rise/fall times of 5.5/5.25 μs at 1 kHz without degradation while preserving a steady photoresponse at high frequencies with a 3 dB bandwidth of approximately 150 kHz. Since photodiodes for optical communication wavelengths require fast switching speeds to process large amounts of data, our research can provide a unique approach to achieving high-speed photodetection in the telecommunication wavelength.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the 50 nm thick Al:ZnO/n-type Si planar photodiode. Interfacial defects establish pathways for channeling photogenerated carriers (holes) in the depletion region of the n-type Si.

2. Materials and Methods

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

2.1. Sample Preparation

A monocrystalline n-type (100) silicon substrate, polished on both sides with a thickness of 500 μm, was chosen for the experiment. Each sample underwent a thorough cleaning with acetone and methanol. To ensure an optimal surface condition, the native oxide layer was effectively removed using a buffered oxide etcher (BOE) solution for 15 s. Al:ZnO films were centrally deposited via pulsed laser deposition (PLD) to fabricate the Al:ZnO/Si photodiodes. For the device’s cathode, a 10 nm thick Ti layer and a 120 nm thick Au layer were deposited at the substrate’s corner through e-beam evaporation. The Al:ZnO films were deposited on Si substrates using a KrF excimer laser (Coherent) operating at a wavelength of 248 nm for source material ablation. 3 wt % aluminum-doped ZnO target with a purity of 99.99% (Toshima) was purchased. During the Al:ZnO film deposition, the substrate temperature was set at 165 °C. The laser beam’s repetition rate and energy density were set to 5 Hz and 2.9J/cm2. To provide a better description of the sample preparation, schematic fabrication procedures and an optical microscope image are presented in Figure 2.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Schematic fabrication procedures of the 50 nm thick Al:ZnO/n-type Si planar photodiode and its optical microscope image.

2.2. Sample Characterization

Surface imaging and roughness analyses were performed using atomic force microscopy (AFM, Park Systems XE-100). Structural analyses of the samples were carried out with high-resolution X-ray diffraction (HRXRD, Rigaku ATX-G) employing CuKα (λ = 1.5406 Å) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, ULVAC-PHI PHI 5000 VersaProbe). For electrical characterization, a semiconductor parameter analyzer (Keithley 4200) was used to measure current–voltage (IV) characteristics, while the ultrafast IV module (Keithley 4225-PMU) was employed for current–time (It) characteristic measurements. All of the evaluations were conducted at room temperature. Optical power monitoring was executed by using a hand-held optical power meter and a wand-style photodiode power sensor (Newport 918D-ST-IR). Transmission data were collected using a UV–visible spectrophotometer (Shimadzu UV-3600), spanning 875–1575 nm wavelengths.

3. Results and Discussion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

As depicted in Figure 1, we constructed planar photodiodes with a 50 nm thick Al:ZnO film on an n-type Si substrate. We prepared three photodiodes with each Al:ZnO film deposited at different oxygen partial pressures: 0, 10, and 50 mTorr. We used commercially available phosphorus (P)-doped n-type Si substrates with a resistivity range of 10–30 Ω·cm, and the substrate’s resistivity was determined to be 18.6 Ω·cm by a Hall measurement.
Figure 3a illustrates the surface morphology of the Al:ZnO film, as captured by AFM. The Al:ZnO film exhibits a notably smooth surface, with root-mean-squared (RMS) roughness values of 0.49, 0.19, and 0.25 nm for films deposited at oxygen partial pressures of 0, 10, and 50 mTorr, respectively. These RMS values reveal that the surface at 0 mTorr is comparatively rougher than at higher pressures, with a slight increase in roughness as oxygen partial pressure rises. This trend can be expected by the high kinetic energy of particles in the plasma plume at 0 mTorr due to less scattering with oxygen atoms in the chamber, which leads to increase RMS roughness. (29−31) As shown in Figure 3b, HRXRD measurements indicated that the intensity of XRD peaks from the (002) plane decreased as the partial oxygen pressure decreased. Concurrently, the (002) peak shifted to lower angles, transitioning from 34.4 to 33.9°. This observation suggests that Al:ZnO films deposited at lower oxygen partial pressures experienced significant lattice strain and a deterioration in film crystallinity, likely attributed to the presence of defect states at the interface between Al:ZnO and Si.

Figure 3

Figure 3. (a) Atomic force microscope images of the Al:ZnO thin film under different oxygen partial pressures (Poxygen): 0 mTorr (top), 10 mTorr (middle), and 50 mTorr (bottom). (b) High-resolution X-ray diffraction patterns under different oxygen partial pressures (Poxygen): 0 (blue), 10 (cyan), and 50 mTorr (purple). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy measurements were performed at various oxygen partial pressures (Poxygen): (c) 0 mTorr, (d) 10, and (e) 50 mTorr. Circles represent the experimental data points, and the fitting curves (solid lines) are the sum of the individual components (O1, O2, and O3) obtained by deconvoluting the spectra. Red lines represent the baseline for each spectrum. O1, the peak at the lowest binding energy, corresponds to O2– ions in the wurtzite ZnO lattice. O2, the peak at the intermediate binding energy, is related to oxygen vacancies within the oxygen-deficient regions of the ZnO matrix, with a more pronounced O2 peak signifying a higher concentration of defect states in Al:ZnO. O3, the peak at the highest binding energy, is associated with loosely bound oxygen species on the ZnO surface.

To investigate the relation between oxygen partial pressure and defects further, XPS was conducted, as shown in Figure 3c–e. The O 1s peaks were deconvoluted using near-Gaussian subpeaks into three different peaks (O1, O2, and O3). The lower binding energy peak (O1, 531.0 ± 0.1 eV) is attributed to the O2– ions from the wurtzite ZnO lattice, while the intermediate binding energy peak (O2, 531.6 ± 0.3 eV) is correlated with oxygen vacancies in the oxygen-deficient region within the ZnO matrix. The higher binding energy peak (O3, 532.8 ± 0.2 eV) originates from loosely bound oxygen on the surface of ZnO. It is noted that the relative ratio of the O2 peak increased as the oxygen partial pressure decreased. (32−36) Thus, structural analyses with XRD and XPS demonstrate that a decrease in the oxygen partial pressure during the deposition of Al:ZnO films can generate oxygen vacancy defects.
Figure 4a displays the dark IV characteristics of Al:ZnO/Si photodiodes, confirming that a Schottky contact was successfully established between the Al:ZnO films and the n-type Si substrate regardless of the oxygen partial pressure during Al:ZnO deposition. Interestingly, when the oxygen partial pressure decreased, both the forward and reverse currents of the photodiode increased. This result suggests the presence of interfacial trap states because such defect states can provide additional pathways for carriers to tunnel through the barrier in both forward and reverse bias conditions. Time-resolved photocurrent (It) measurements for all photodiodes under NIR light illumination at a wavelength of 1310 nm are presented in Figure 4b. The incident laser operated at a frequency of 1 kHz, with a pulse width of 500 μs, and an intensity of 9.61 mW. As the oxygen partial pressure increased, we observed a significant reduction in photocurrent and a corresponding rise in response time. To show this tendency, photocurrent values at 10 and 50 mTorr are magnified by a factor of 3. Additionally, to illustrate the behavior of the fabricated photodiodes as a function of oxygen partial pressure, we tabulated the parameters at a wavelength of 1310 nm and an intensity of 9.61 mW, as shown in Table 1.

Figure 4

Figure 4. (a) Dark IV characteristics and (b) time-resolved photocurrent (It) graphs of the photodiodes with different oxygen partial pressures (Poxygen): 0 (blue), 10 (cyan), and 50 mTorr (purple). (c) Energy band structure of the Al:ZnO/Si Schottky junction is illustrated under both dark conditions (cases I and II) and illuminated conditions (cases III and IV), respectively. Ec, Ev, and Ef represent the energy of the conduction band, the valence band, and the Fermi level, respectively. Eg_Al: ZnO and Eg_Si denote the Al:ZnO and the Si band gap. Blue and red circles indicate the holes and electrons, respectively, under illuminated conditions. In the oxygen-deficient condition, numerous interfacial defect energy states, denoted as “Et_interface” are generated on the surface of the Al:ZnO/Si Schottky junction (case I). As light illuminates the junction, photogenerated electrons move toward the Ti/Au electrode, while for the charge-neutral condition, holes move to the Al:ZnO using Et_interface (case III). On the other hand, in the oxygen-sufficient condition, a “no defect” condition is established (case II). Since hole transport is limited, photoexcited electron–hole pairs cannot contribute to photocurrent (case IV).

Table 1. Parameters of Fabricated Photodiodes with Varying Oxygen Partial Pressure at a Wavelength of 1310 nm and Intensity of 9.61 mW
oxygen partial pressure [mTorr]dark current [μA]photocurrent [μA]responsivity [mA/W]detectivity [× 109 Jones]rise/fall time [μs]
00.1223.992.486.185.5/5.25
100.100.880.0820.2371/210
500.050.520.0490.1962/225
This observation can be explained by the role of interfacial defect states, as depicted in Figure 4c, which illustrates the energy band structure of the Al:ZnO/Si Schottky junction under two distinct scenarios: one with defect states in both the Si bulk and at the interface and the other with defect states solely in the Si bulk. As the dark IV curve shows, the Al:ZnO/Si isotype heterojunction forms a Schottky barrier (ϕSB). This barrier can be calculated as 0.3 eV using the equation ϕSB = χAl: ZnO–χSi, where χAl: ZnO (4.35 eV) and χSi (4.05 eV) are the electron affinity of Al:ZnO and Si, respectively. (37−39) Additionally, the position of the Fermi energy relative to the conduction band minimum in Al:ZnO was determined based on references discussing the relationship between the carrier density of Al:ZnO and its work function. (40,41) We deduced that the Fermi energy level of Al:ZnO lies within the conduction band based on the electron concentration of our Al:ZnO film (1 × 1021 cm–3), which was determined through ellipsometry analysis using the Lorentz–Drude oscillator model. (42) In Figure 4c, Et_bulk represents all types of Si bulk defect energy states, which include intrinsic defect states caused by crystalline defects and extrinsic defects resulting from dopants. Meanwhile, Et_interface denotes interfacial defect energy states induced by the Al:ZnO film.
When NIR sub-band gap light is incident upon the device (from the left in the band structure illustration), electrons from the valence band are excited to available bulk defect states and the interfacial defect states. The internal electric field, resulting from the upward band-bending in the depletion region (W), forces these electrons into the conduction band, a phenomenon known as trap-assisted tunneling. (43,44) To maintain net charge neutrality in the depletion region, the interfacial defect trap states provide pathways for holes in the Si valence band to inject holes into Al:ZnO. In contrast, without defects at the interface, photogenerated holes and electrons in the depletion region will recombine under zero-bias conditions.
In an oxygen-deficient atmosphere, the number of oxygen vacancies increases. These vacancies can create defect energy states below the conduction band edge, (36) which is consistent with the XPS results, as shown in Figure 3c–e. Therefore, these defect states act as pathways for channeling photogenerated carriers. Thus, the Si Schottky photodiode with an Al:ZnO film deposited at the low oxygen partial pressure exhibits an abundance of interfacial trap states. These states serve as both carrier paths and additional sources of carrier emission, leading to a high NIR photoresponse. In comparison, very low photocurrent in the Si photodiode with Al:ZnO film deposited at oxygen partial pressures of 10 and 50 mTorr may indicate the presence of a few surface defects, even when Al:ZnO films are deposited at a high partial oxygen pressure. In conclusion, Al:ZnO film deposition on Si can efficiently extract photoexcited carriers in a Schottky junction by inducing interfacial defects, achieving a significant photoresponse without introducing additional defect states into the Si substrate.
We further investigated the role of interfacial defects by fabricating photodiodes with 50 nm thick Al:ZnO films deposited at oxygen partial pressure of 0 mTorr on Si substrates with various resistivity values. The commercially available resistivities were 0.1–0.5, 1–10, and 10–30 Ω·cm for P-doped Si substrate and 0.01–0.02 for antimony (Sb)-doped Si substrate. Hall measurement confirmed the substrate’s resistivity to be 0.01, 0.19, 9.83, and 18.6 Ω·cm. The dark IV characteristics of all Al:ZnO/Si photodiodes were characterized, as shown in Figure 5a. Notably, a distinct transition from Schottky to Ohmic contact was observed as the resistivity of Si substrate decreased. This transition was attributed to variations in the thickness of the depletion region, dependent on the doping level of n-type Si. Using the equation Wd=2εSiΦB/(qnSi), where εSi is the dielectric constant of Si and nSi is the carrier density of Si, we estimated the depletion width (W) to be 0.942, 0.720, 0.108, and 0.011 μm for Si substrate with the resistivity of 18.6, 9.83, 0.19, and 0.01 Ω·cm, respectively. The carrier density of the Si substrate was calculated based on the resistivity of Si. (45) As shown in Figure 5b, the heavily doped Si (P-doped, 0.19 Ω·cm) photodiode exhibits a reduced depletion width (WHD), leading to a sufficiently narrow barrier that allows for direct electron tunneling through the interface. Consequently, considerable alterations in the electronic band structure of the Al:ZnO/Si junction arise from changes in the Si doping levels.

Figure 5

Figure 5. (a) Dark IV characteristics of the photodiodes with Si substrate resistivity values of 0.01, 0.19, 9.83, and 18.6 Ω·cm. (b) Energy band structure of the Al:ZnO/Si Schottky junction for the lightly doped n-type Si substrate (I) and the heavily doped n+-type Si substrate (II). ϕSB denotes the Schottky barrier of the photodiode. WLD and Vbi_LD represent the depletion width and the built-in potential of the lightly doped Si-based photodiode, respectively, while WHD and Vbi_HD denote the depletion width and the built-in potential of the heavily doped Si-based photodiode, respectively.

With insights into the modification in the electronic band structure caused by the change in the resistivity of the Si substrate, we carried out It measurements on all samples (Figure 6a) under NIR light with a wavelength of 1310 nm, allowing us to gain insights into the origin and mechanism of the photocurrent. We observed that as the substrate resistivity decreased, the photoresponse of the photodiodes correspondingly diminished. Notably, the Si substrate with a resistivity of 0.01 Ω·cm showed almost no photoresponse. This result implies that narrowing the depletion region limits the available defect states that act as sources for photoexcited carriers, resulting in the absence of photocurrent under Ohmic contact conditions. A notable observation was the 2.5-fold reduction in photocurrent when the depletion width shrank by nearly 9 times, as we changed the resistivity of the Si substrate from 18.6 to 0.19 Ω·cm. This result suggests that interfacial defects can also act as sources for photoemission. Even with a significant reduction in bulk defects attributed to the narrowed depletion width, interfacial defects persisted in both samples, given that the Al:ZnO films were consistently deposited under the same conditions. In Figure 6b, we compare the rise/fall time of photodiodes with Si resistivities of 9.83, 18.6, and 0.19 Ω·cm, as well as a commercial germanium photodiode (Ge PD, Thorlabs Inc.). The rise/fall time of the Ge PD is measured to be around 2 μs at zero-bias condition, and the photodiodes with Si resistivity of 9.83 and 18.6 Ω·cm exhibit approximately 5.5/5.25 μs. This demonstrates that the Al:ZnO film photodiode with an appropriate substrate performs similarly to the commercial Ge PD. Likewise, it shows comparable performance to previous studies on Si-based sub-band gap photodetectors utilizing the hot carrier effect. (46) In contrast, the photodiode with Si resistivity of 0.19 Ω·cm displayed rise and fall times of 48.0 and 35.0 μs, respectively, despite the decrease in the series resistivity of the photodiode. We anticipate that the delayed temporal response in the 0.19 Ω·cm Si-based photodiodes is due to increased extrinsic defect densities from heavy doping, similar to the slow operating speeds observed in hyperdoped Si-based photodiodes. (47)

Figure 6

Figure 6. (a) Time-resolved photocurrent (It) graphs of photodiodes with Si substrate resistivity values of 0.01, 0.19, 9.83, and 18.6 Ω·cm. Photocurrent was measured at a wavelength of 1310 nm, a frequency of 1 kHz, and an input light intensity of 9.61 mW. (b) Rise and fall times of photodiodes with Si substrate resistivity values of 0.01, 0.19, 9.83, and 18.6 Ω·cm and a commercial Ge PD (gray dotted line). Rise and fall times are calculated using the data within the magenta dashed lines at 0.1 and 0.9.

Lastly, we fabricated Si photodiodes with Al:ZnO films of varying thickness (20, 50, 100, and 150 nm) on an 18.6 Ω·cm Si substrate, with the Al:ZnO films deposited at a 0 mTorr oxygen partial pressure. In Figure 7a, the dark IV characteristics reveal that Al:ZnO/Si photodiodes form distinct Schottky contacts regardless of the film thickness. Notably, as the film thickness increases, there is a gradual increase in forward bias, which can be attributed to the enhanced Al:ZnO film conductance. Figure 7b illustrates the photoresponsivity of all samples at three different NIR wavelengths (904, 1310, and 1550 nm). Intriguingly, photoresponse at 904 nm increases with Al:ZnO thickness, while responses at 1310 and 1550 nm decrease as Al:ZnO thickness increases. This phenomenon can be attributed to the thickness-dependent transmission of the Al:ZnO film within the NIR spectrum.

Figure 7

Figure 7. (a) Dark IV characteristics and (b) photoresponsivity at wavelengths of 904 (violet), 1310 (pink), and 1550 nm (olive) of the photodiodes with varying Al:ZnO film thicknesses of 20, 50, 100, and 150 nm. (c) Transmission spectrum of Al:ZnO films deposited on a quartz substrate with thicknesses of 20, 50, and 150 nm, respectively.

Figure 7c presents the transmission spectrum of Al:ZnO films deposited on a quartz substrate with a thickness identical to that deposited on the Si substrate for the photodiode. As heavily doped Al:ZnO behaves like a metallic film, it reflects light above the plasma wavelength, intensifying with increased thickness. In comparison, the transmission of the Al:ZnO film at the wavelength of 904 nm experiences a reduction of less than 10% as the thickness increases from 20 to 150 nm, while the transmission at 1550 nm diminishes by 40%. Consequently, the responsivity of the photodiode at 1310 and 1550 nm decreases correspondingly with the increasing Al:ZnO thickness. Despite a slight drop in transmission, the incremental rise in photoresponsivity at 904 nm can be attributed to improved conductance with increased Al:ZnO thickness, as shown in the IV characteristics.
Based on the photoresponsivity and temporal response, we determined the optimal condition of the Al:ZnO/Si photodiode operating at a wavelength of 1310 nm. A star-shaped symbol in Figure 7b marks this condition. The best resistivity of the Si substrate is 18.6 Ω·cm, with the optimal 50 nm thick Al:ZnO film. It can be confirmed that the optimal thickness is 50 nm from Table 2 (varying AZO thickness), which tabulates the parameters at a wavelength of 1310 nm and an intensity of 9.61 mW.
Table 2. Parameters of Fabricated Photodiodes with Varying AZO Thickness at a Wavelength of 1310 nm and Intensity of 9.61 mW
AZO thickness [nm]dark current [μA]photocurrent [μA]responsivity [mA/W]detectivity [× 109 Jones]rise/fall time [μs]
200.2118.531.913.588.75/12
500.1223.992.486.185.5/5.25
1000.1818.221.883.805.5/4.75
1500.2316.491.693.055.25/4.5
We quantified the frequency response under zero-bias conditions, as shown in Figure 8. The responsivity of the 50 nm thick Al:ZnO-based Si photodiode at low-frequency operation is approximately 2.48 mA/W and exhibits a 3 dB bandwidth of approximately 150 kHz. The inset of Figure 8 presents the relationship between the on/off current and laser intensity. It is noted that the on–off current at low-frequency operation exhibits a linear response concerning the laser intensity, verifying that the photoexcited carrier generation in the devices is not the result of nonlinear transitions such as carrier multiplication and two-photon absorption. We also calculated specific detectivity (D*) by the following equation:
D*=RASn=RA2qIdark
In this equation, R represents the responsivity at the specific wavelength; A denotes the area of the photodiode; Sn is the noise spectral density (NSD) of the shot noise, which mainly contributes to dark current; (47−52) q is the charge of the electron; and Idark is the dark current of the device. Based on this equation, the peak detectivity of the device at a wavelength of 1310 nm is calculated by 6.1834 × 109 cm·Hz1/2/W (Jones).

Figure 8

Figure 8. Frequency response of the photodiode at a wavelength of 1310 nm under zero-bias conditions. 3 dB bandwidth (f3dB) is indicated by the magenta dotted lines at 150 kHz. The inset of the figure shows the relationship between the on–off current and laser intensity.

4. Conclusions

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

We report sub-band gap photodetection in Al:ZnO/Si Schottky junction-based photodiode resulting from efficient transport of photoexcited carriers in extrinsic Si (P-doped) via interfacial defects induced by Al:ZnO film. Through the analytical comparison study, we determined the optimal conditions for the photodiode to achieve high responsivity and fast switching speed. To compare this work with relevant studies, such as hyperdoped black silicon, 2D materials, and hot carrier devices, we tabulated the performance metrics, including operation wavelength, bias voltage, responsivity, detectivity, and rise/fall time, as shown in Table 3. This comparison highlights that our Al:ZnO/Si photodiodes achieve fast switching speeds through a simple Schottky junction structure, using interfacial defects as channels for photogenerated carriers. These characteristics indicate their potential for application in high-speed optoelectronic devices. Furthermore, a theoretical model for defect states would guide the design of materials to develop improved interface defect-mediated Si photodiodes. Fundamentally, Al:ZnO/Si photodiodes operate with low energy consumption due to zero biasing; therefore, these photodiodes would be advantageous for energy-efficient optical interconnects in on-chip Si photonics in the telecommunication regime.
Table 3. Comparison of Relevant Works
devicewavelength [nm]bias voltage [V]responsivity [mA/W]detectivity [Jones]rise/fall time [μs]ref
N hyperdoped black Silicon1310–105.3 3400 (21)
Ar hyperdoped black Silicon1310–129751.14 × 1010  (17)
Te hyperdoped black Silicon1550–256.82.54 × 109  (15)
TiN/Ge160000.07396.51 × 105∼100,000 (6)
Au/n-Si131001.6 7.5/8 (46)
MoS2 film15501 (VDS)∼ 1.1∼ 1.7 × 105  (48)
AgNPs/MoS2 film15501 (VDS)∼ 3.9∼ 5.8 × 105 
n+-ZnO/n-Si300–940–1.52001.12 × 101264 (26)
300–9400121.8 × 1011 
Au/TiO2–x/p-Si125001   (28)
TiN/TiO2–x/p-Si1250–0.454  
n+-Al:ZnO/n-Si131002.486.1834 × 1095.5/5.25this work

Data Availability

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The data supporting this study’s findings are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Authors
  • Author
    • Geunpil Kim - Nanophotonics Research Center, Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST), Seoul 02792, Republic of KoreaSchool of Electrical Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of KoreaOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1126-2914
  • Author Contributions

    G.K.: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing-original draft. B.C.L.: Funding acquisition, Writing-review and editing. J.K.: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Writing-review and editing.

  • Funding

    This work was partially supported by the Institute of Information and Communications Technology Planning and Evaluation (IITP) grant funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (No. RS-2023-00223082, Development of Quantum Technology for High-Precision Gravity Sensing) and by the R&D Program (2E32541) funded by the Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST). This study was also partially supported by the Nanomedical Devices Development Project of the NNFC in 2023 (No. 1711160154).

  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 52 other publications.

  1. 1
    Casalino, M.; Coppola, G.; De La Rue, R. M.; Logan, D. F. State-of-the-art all-silicon sub-bandgap photodetectors at telecom and datacom wavelengths. Laser & Photonics Reviews 2016, 10 (6), 895921,  DOI: 10.1002/lpor.201600065
  2. 2
    Blanco, M.; Villarroya, I. NIR spectroscopy: a rapid-response analytical tool. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 2002, 21 (4), 240250,  DOI: 10.1016/S0165-9936(02)00404-1
  3. 3
    Wang, X.; Dai, Y.; Liu, R.; He, X.; Li, S.; Wang, Z. L. Light-Triggered Pyroelectric Nanogenerator Based on a pn-Junction for Self-Powered Near-Infrared Photosensing. ACS Nano 2017, 11 (8), 83398345,  DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.7b03560
  4. 4
    Jin, Y.; Seok, J.; Yu, K. Highly Efficient Silicon-Based Thin-Film Schottky Barrier Photodetectors. ACS Photonics 2023, 10 (5), 13021309,  DOI: 10.1021/acsphotonics.2c01923
  5. 5
    Michel, J.; Liu, J.; Kimerling, L. C. High-performance Ge-on-Si photodetectors. Nat. Photonics 2010, 4 (8), 527534,  DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2010.157
  6. 6
    Shinde, S. L.; Ishii, S.; Nagao, T. Sub-Band Gap Photodetection from the Titanium Nitride/Germanium Heterostructure. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2019, 11 (24), 2196521972,  DOI: 10.1021/acsami.9b01372
  7. 7
    Wu, C.-Y.; Kang, J.-W.; Wang, B.; Zhu, H.-N.; Li, Z.-J.; Chen, S.-R.; Wang, L.; Yang, W.-H.; Xie, C.; Luo, L.-B. Defect-induced broadband photodetection of layered γ-In2Se3 nanofilm and its application in near infrared image sensors. Journal of Materials Chemistry C 2019, 7 (37), 1153211539,  DOI: 10.1039/C9TC04322E
  8. 8
    Cao, G.; Wang, F.; Peng, M.; Shao, X.; Yang, B.; Hu, W.; Li, X.; Chen, J.; Shan, Y.; Wu, P. Multicolor Broadband and Fast Photodetector Based on InGaAs–Insulator–Graphene Hybrid Heterostructure. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2020, 6 (3), 1901007  DOI: 10.1002/aelm.201901007
  9. 9
    Barton, J. B.; Cannata, R. F.; Petronio, S. M. InGaAs NIR focal plane arrays for imaging and DWDM applications. In Infrared Detectors and Focal Plane Arrays VII; SPIE, 2002; Vol. 4721, pp. 3747.
  10. 10
    Chen, H.; Galili, M.; Verheyen, P.; De Heyn, P.; Lepage, G.; De Coster, J.; Balakrishnan, S.; Absil, P.; Oxenlowe, L.; Van Campenhout, J. 100-Gbps RZ Data Reception in 67-GHz Si-Contacted Germanium Waveguide p-i-n Photodetectors. Journal of Lightwave Technology 2017, 35 (4), 722726,  DOI: 10.1109/JLT.2016.2593942
  11. 11
    Brouckaert, J.; Roelkens, G.; Van Thourhout, D.; Baets, R. Thin-Film III–V Photodetectors Integrated on Silicon-on-Insulator Photonic ICs. Journal of Lightwave Technology 2007, 25 (4), 10531060,  DOI: 10.1109/JLT.2007.891172
  12. 12
    Casalino, M.; Coppola, G.; Iodice, M.; Rendina, I.; Sirleto, L. Near-Infrared Sub-Bandgap All-Silicon Photodetectors: State of the Art and Perspectives. Sensors 2010, 10 (12), 1057110600,  DOI: 10.3390/s101210571
  13. 13
    Zhao, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Jing, J.; Gao, R.; Liao, Z.; Zhang, W.; Liu, G.; Wang, Y.; Wang, K.; Xue, C. Black silicon for near-infrared and ultraviolet photodetection: A review. APL Mater. 2023, 11 (2), 021107  DOI: 10.1063/5.0133770
  14. 14
    Mailoa, J. P.; Akey, A. J.; Simmons, C. B.; Hutchinson, D.; Mathews, J.; Sullivan, J. T.; Recht, D.; Winkler, M. T.; Williams, J. S.; Warrender, J. M. Room-temperature sub-band gap optoelectronic response of hyperdoped silicon. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5 (1), 3011,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4011
  15. 15
    Jia, Z.; Wu, Q.; Jin, X.; Huang, S.; Li, J.; Yang, M.; Huang, H.; Yao, J.; Xu, J. Highly responsive tellurium-hyperdoped black silicon photodiode with single-crystalline and uniform surface microstructure. Opt. Express 2020, 28 (4), 5239,  DOI: 10.1364/OE.385887
  16. 16
    Fu, J.; Yang, D.; Yu, X. Hyperdoped Crystalline Silicon for Infrared Photodetectors by Pulsed Laser Melting: A Review. Phys. Status Solidi (a) 2022, 219 (14), 2100772  DOI: 10.1002/pssa.202100772
  17. 17
    Li, C.; Zhao, J.-H.; Liu, X.-H.; Ren, Z.-Y.; Yang, Y.; Chen, Z.-G.; Chen, Q.-D.; Sun, H.-B. Record-Breaking-High-Responsivity Silicon Photodetector at Infrared 1.31 and 1.55 μm by Argon Doping Technique. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2023, 70 (5), 23642369,  DOI: 10.1109/TED.2023.3261823
  18. 18
    Berencén, Y.; Prucnal, S.; Liu, F.; Skorupa, I.; Hübner, R.; Rebohle, L.; Zhou, S.; Schneider, H.; Helm, M.; Skorupa, W. Room-temperature short-wavelength infrared Si photodetector. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7 (1), 43688,  DOI: 10.1038/srep43688
  19. 19
    Qiu, X.; Yu, X.; Yuan, S.; Gao, Y.; Liu, X.; Xu, Y.; Yang, D. Trap Assisted Bulk Silicon Photodetector with High Photoconductive Gain, Low Noise, and Fast Response by Ag Hyperdoping. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2018, 6 (3), 1700638  DOI: 10.1002/adom.201700638
  20. 20
    Wang, M.; García-Hemme, E.; Berencén, Y.; Hübner, R.; Xie, Y.; Rebohle, L.; Xu, C.; Schneider, H.; Helm, M.; Zhou, S. Silicon-Based Intermediate-Band Infrared Photodetector Realized by Te Hyperdoping. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2021, 9 (4), 2001546  DOI: 10.1002/adom.202001546
  21. 21
    Li, C.-H.; Wang, X.-P.; Zhao, J.-H.; Zhang, D.-Z.; Yu, X.-Y.; Li, X.-B.; Feng, J.; Chen, Q.-D.; Ruan, S.-P.; Sun, H.-B. Black silicon IR photodiode supersaturated with nitrogen by femtosecond laser irradiation. IEEE Sensors Journal 2018, 18 (9), 35953601,  DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2018.2812730
  22. 22
    Li, X.; Deng, Z.; Li, J.; Li, Y.; Guo, L.; Jiang, Y.; Ma, Z.; Wang, L.; Du, C.; Wang, Y. Hybrid nano-scale Au with ITO structure for a high-performance near-infrared silicon-based photodetector with ultralow dark current. Photonics Research 2020, 8 (11), 16621670,  DOI: 10.1364/PRJ.398450
  23. 23
    Kim, H.-S.; Kumar, M. D.; Patel, M.; Kim, J. High-performing ITO/CuO/n-Si photodetector with ultrafast photoresponse. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical 2016, 252, 3541,  DOI: 10.1016/j.sna.2016.11.014
  24. 24
    Akgul, G.; Akgul, F. A.; Mulazimoglu, E.; Unalan, H. E.; Turan, R. Fabrication and characterization of copper oxide-silicon nanowire heterojunction photodiodes. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2014, 47 (6), 065106  DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/47/6/065106
  25. 25
    Kim, J.; Krayer, L. J.; Garrett, J. L.; Munday, J. N. Interfacial Defect-Mediated Near-Infrared Silicon Photodetection with Metal Oxides. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11 (50), 4751647524,  DOI: 10.1021/acsami.9b14953
  26. 26
    Mondal, S.; Halder, S.; Basak, D. Ultrafast and Ultrabroadband UV–vis-NIR Photosensitivity under Reverse and Self-Bias Conditions by n+-ZnO/n-Si Isotype Heterojunction with > 1 kHz Bandwidth. ACS Applied Electronic Materials 2023, 5 (2), 12121223,  DOI: 10.1021/acsaelm.2c01668
  27. 27
    Lv, P.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, X.; Deng, W.; Jie, J. High-Sensitivity and Fast-Response Graphene/Crystalline Silicon Schottky Junction-Based Near-IR Photodetectors. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2013, 34 (10), 13371339,  DOI: 10.1109/LED.2013.2275169
  28. 28
    Güsken, N. A.; Lauri, A.; Li, Y.; Matsui, T.; Doiron, B.; Bower, R.; Regoutz, A.; Mihai, A.; Petrov, P. K.; Oulton, R. F. TiO2–x-Enhanced IR Hot Carrier Based Photodetection in Metal Thin Film–Si Junctions. ACS Photonics 2019, 6 (4), 953960,  DOI: 10.1021/acsphotonics.8b01639
  29. 29
    Haško, D.; Bruncko, J. AFM surface analysis of ZnO layers prepared by pulsed laser deposition at different oxygen pressures. Vacuum 2009, 84 (1), 166169,  DOI: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2009.05.009
  30. 30
    Zhang, Z.; Zhou, F.; Wei, X.; Liu, M.; Sun, G.; Chen, C.; Xue, C.; Zhuang, H.; Man, B. Effects of oxygen pressures on pulsed laser deposition of ZnO films. Physica E: Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures 2007, 39 (2), 253257,  DOI: 10.1016/j.physe.2007.05.028
  31. 31
    Kumar, V.; Ntwaeaborwa, O.; Swart, H. Effect of oxygen partial pressure during pulsed laser deposition on the emission of Eu doped ZnO thin films. Physica B: Condensed Matter 2020, 576, 411713  DOI: 10.1016/j.physb.2019.411713
  32. 32
    Chen, T.; Liu, S.-Y.; Xie, Q.; Detavernier, C.; Van Meirhaeghe, R.; Qu, X.-P. The effects of deposition temperature and ambient on the physical and electrical performance of DC-sputtered n-ZnO/p-Si heterojunction. Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process. 2010, 98, 357365,  DOI: 10.1007/s00339-009-5386-9
  33. 33
    Gandla, S.; Gollu, S. R.; Sharma, R.; Sarangi, V.; Gupta, D. Dual role of boron in improving electrical performance and device stability of low temperature solution processed ZnO thin film transistors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015, 107 (15), 152102,  DOI: 10.1063/1.4933304
  34. 34
    Abliz, A.; Huang, C.-W.; Wang, J.; Xu, L.; Liao, L.; Xiao, X.; Wu, W.-W.; Fan, Z.; Jiang, C.; Li, J. Rational design of ZnO:H/ZnO bilayer structure for high-performance thin-film transistors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8 (12), 78627868,  DOI: 10.1021/acsami.5b10778
  35. 35
    Tu, Y.; Chen, S.; Li, X.; Gorbaciova, J.; Gillin, W. P.; Krause, S.; Briscoe, J. Control of oxygen vacancies in ZnO nanorods by annealing and their influence on ZnO/PEDOT: PSS diode behaviour. Journal of Materials Chemistry C 2018, 6 (7), 18151821,  DOI: 10.1039/C7TC04284A
  36. 36
    Vempati, S.; Mitra, J.; Dawson, P. One-step synthesis of ZnO nanosheets: a blue-white fluorophore. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2012, 7, 470,  DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-7-470
  37. 37
    Tong, C.; Kumar, M.; Yun, J.-H.; Kim, J.; Kim, S. J. High-Quality ITO/Al-ZnO/n-Si Heterostructures with Junction Engineering for Improved Photovoltaic Performance. Applied Sciences 2020, 10 (15), 5285,  DOI: 10.3390/app10155285
  38. 38
    Swami, S. K.; Khan, J. I.; Dutta, V.; Lee, J.; Laquai, F.; Chaturvedi, N. Spray-Deposited Aluminum-Doped Zinc Oxide as an Efficient Electron Transport Layer for Inverted Organic Solar Cells. ACS Applied Energy Materials 2023, 6 (5), 29062913,  DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.2c03858
  39. 39
    Lee, E.; Park, J.; Yim, M.; Kim, Y.; Yoon, G. Characteristics of piezoelectric ZnO/AlN–stacked flexible nanogenerators for energy harvesting applications. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015, 106 (2), 023901  DOI: 10.1063/1.4904270
  40. 40
    Jia, J.; Takasaki, A.; Oka, N.; Shigesato, Y. Experimental observation on the Fermi level shift in polycrystalline Al-doped ZnO films. J. Appl. Phys. 2012, 112 (1), 013718  DOI: 10.1063/1.4733969
  41. 41
    Kim, T.; Choo, D. C.; No, Y.; Choi, W.; Choi, E. H. High work function of Al-doped zinc-oxide thin films as transparent conductive anodes in organic light-emitting devices. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2006, 253 (4), 19171920,  DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2006.03.032
  42. 42
    Kim, J.; Carnemolla, E. G.; DeVault, C.; Shaltout, A. M.; Faccio, D.; Shalaev, V. M.; Kildishev, A. V.; Ferrera, M.; Boltasseva, A. Dynamic control of nanocavities with tunable metal oxides. Nano Lett. 2018, 18 (2), 740746,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b03919
  43. 43
    Campabadal, F.; Milian, V.; Aymerich-Humet, X. Trap-Assisted Tunneling in MIS and Schottky Structures. Physica Status Solidi (a) 1983, 79 (1), 223236,  DOI: 10.1002/pssa.2210790125
  44. 44
    Racko, J.; Pecháček, J.; Mikolášek, M.; Benko, P.; Grmanova, A.; Harmatha, L.; Breza, J. Trap-assisted tunneling in the Schottky barrier. Radioengineering 2013, 22 (1), 240244
  45. 45
    Masetti, G.; Severi, M.; Solmi, S. Modeling of carrier mobility against carrier concentration in arsenic-, phosphorus-, and boron-doped silicon. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 1983, 30 (7), 764769,  DOI: 10.1109/T-ED.1983.21207
  46. 46
    Kim, G.; Kim, H.; Jeon, Y.-U.; Kim, I. S.; Kim, S. J.; Kim, S.; Kim, J. Scalable hot carrier–assisted silicon photodetector array based on ultrathin gold film. Nanophotonics 2024, 13 (7), 10491057,  DOI: 10.1515/nanoph-2023-0656
  47. 47
    Huang, S.; Wu, Q.; Jia, Z.; Jin, X.; Fu, X.; Huang, H.; Zhang, X.; Yao, J.; Xu, J. Black Silicon Photodetector with Excellent Comprehensive Properties by Rapid Thermal Annealing and Hydrogenated Surface Passivation. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2020, 8 (7), 1901808  DOI: 10.1002/adom.201901808
  48. 48
    Park, M.; Kang, G.; Ko, H. Plasmonic-tape-attached multilayered MoS2 film for near-infrared photodetection. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10 (1), 11340,  DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-68127-7
  49. 49
    Qi, Z.; Zhai, Y.; Wen, L.; Wang, Q.; Chen, Q.; Iqbal, S.; Chen, G.; Xu, J.; Tu, Y. Au nanoparticle-decorated silicon pyramids for plasmon-enhanced hot electron near-infrared photodetection. Nanotechnology 2017, 28 (27), 275202,  DOI: 10.1088/1361-6528/aa74a3
  50. 50
    Kim, C.; Yoo, T. J.; Chang, K. E.; Kwon, M. G.; Hwang, H. J.; Lee, B. H. Highly responsive near-infrared photodetector with low dark current using graphene/germanium Schottky junction with Al2O3 interfacial layer. Nanophotonics 2021, 10 (5), 15731579,  DOI: 10.1515/nanoph-2021-0002
  51. 51
    Wu, D.; Guo, J.; Wang, C.; Ren, X.; Chen, Y.; Lin, P.; Zeng, L.; Shi, Z.; Li, X. J.; Shan, C.-X. Ultrabroadband and High-Detectivity Photodetector Based on WS2/Ge Heterojunction through Defect Engineering and Interface Passivation. ACS Nano 2021, 15 (6), 1011910129,  DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.1c02007
  52. 52
    Choi, W.; Cho, M. Y.; Konar, A.; Lee, J. H.; Cha, G.-B.; Hong, S. C.; Kim, S.; Kim, J.; Jena, D.; Joo, J. High-Detectivity Multilayer MoS2 Phototransistors with Spectral Response from Ultraviolet to Infrared. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24 (43), 58325836,  DOI: 10.1002/adma.201201909

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
Citation Statements
Explore this article's citation statements on scite.ai

This article is cited by 1 publications.

  1. Zhi‐Xiang Yin, Hao Chen, Sheng‐Feng Yin, Dan Zhang, Xin‐Gui Tang, Vellaisamy A L Roy, Qi‐Jun Sun. Recent Progress on Heterojunction‐Based Memristors and Artificial Synapses for Low‐Power Neural Morphological Computing. Small 2025, 21 (17) https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202412851

ACS Photonics

Cite this: ACS Photonics 2025, 12, 1, 62–70
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.4c01057
Published December 18, 2024

Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 .

Article Views

666

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the 50 nm thick Al:ZnO/n-type Si planar photodiode. Interfacial defects establish pathways for channeling photogenerated carriers (holes) in the depletion region of the n-type Si.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Schematic fabrication procedures of the 50 nm thick Al:ZnO/n-type Si planar photodiode and its optical microscope image.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. (a) Atomic force microscope images of the Al:ZnO thin film under different oxygen partial pressures (Poxygen): 0 mTorr (top), 10 mTorr (middle), and 50 mTorr (bottom). (b) High-resolution X-ray diffraction patterns under different oxygen partial pressures (Poxygen): 0 (blue), 10 (cyan), and 50 mTorr (purple). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy measurements were performed at various oxygen partial pressures (Poxygen): (c) 0 mTorr, (d) 10, and (e) 50 mTorr. Circles represent the experimental data points, and the fitting curves (solid lines) are the sum of the individual components (O1, O2, and O3) obtained by deconvoluting the spectra. Red lines represent the baseline for each spectrum. O1, the peak at the lowest binding energy, corresponds to O2– ions in the wurtzite ZnO lattice. O2, the peak at the intermediate binding energy, is related to oxygen vacancies within the oxygen-deficient regions of the ZnO matrix, with a more pronounced O2 peak signifying a higher concentration of defect states in Al:ZnO. O3, the peak at the highest binding energy, is associated with loosely bound oxygen species on the ZnO surface.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. (a) Dark IV characteristics and (b) time-resolved photocurrent (It) graphs of the photodiodes with different oxygen partial pressures (Poxygen): 0 (blue), 10 (cyan), and 50 mTorr (purple). (c) Energy band structure of the Al:ZnO/Si Schottky junction is illustrated under both dark conditions (cases I and II) and illuminated conditions (cases III and IV), respectively. Ec, Ev, and Ef represent the energy of the conduction band, the valence band, and the Fermi level, respectively. Eg_Al: ZnO and Eg_Si denote the Al:ZnO and the Si band gap. Blue and red circles indicate the holes and electrons, respectively, under illuminated conditions. In the oxygen-deficient condition, numerous interfacial defect energy states, denoted as “Et_interface” are generated on the surface of the Al:ZnO/Si Schottky junction (case I). As light illuminates the junction, photogenerated electrons move toward the Ti/Au electrode, while for the charge-neutral condition, holes move to the Al:ZnO using Et_interface (case III). On the other hand, in the oxygen-sufficient condition, a “no defect” condition is established (case II). Since hole transport is limited, photoexcited electron–hole pairs cannot contribute to photocurrent (case IV).

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. (a) Dark IV characteristics of the photodiodes with Si substrate resistivity values of 0.01, 0.19, 9.83, and 18.6 Ω·cm. (b) Energy band structure of the Al:ZnO/Si Schottky junction for the lightly doped n-type Si substrate (I) and the heavily doped n+-type Si substrate (II). ϕSB denotes the Schottky barrier of the photodiode. WLD and Vbi_LD represent the depletion width and the built-in potential of the lightly doped Si-based photodiode, respectively, while WHD and Vbi_HD denote the depletion width and the built-in potential of the heavily doped Si-based photodiode, respectively.

    Figure 6

    Figure 6. (a) Time-resolved photocurrent (It) graphs of photodiodes with Si substrate resistivity values of 0.01, 0.19, 9.83, and 18.6 Ω·cm. Photocurrent was measured at a wavelength of 1310 nm, a frequency of 1 kHz, and an input light intensity of 9.61 mW. (b) Rise and fall times of photodiodes with Si substrate resistivity values of 0.01, 0.19, 9.83, and 18.6 Ω·cm and a commercial Ge PD (gray dotted line). Rise and fall times are calculated using the data within the magenta dashed lines at 0.1 and 0.9.

    Figure 7

    Figure 7. (a) Dark IV characteristics and (b) photoresponsivity at wavelengths of 904 (violet), 1310 (pink), and 1550 nm (olive) of the photodiodes with varying Al:ZnO film thicknesses of 20, 50, 100, and 150 nm. (c) Transmission spectrum of Al:ZnO films deposited on a quartz substrate with thicknesses of 20, 50, and 150 nm, respectively.

    Figure 8

    Figure 8. Frequency response of the photodiode at a wavelength of 1310 nm under zero-bias conditions. 3 dB bandwidth (f3dB) is indicated by the magenta dotted lines at 150 kHz. The inset of the figure shows the relationship between the on–off current and laser intensity.

  • References


    This article references 52 other publications.

    1. 1
      Casalino, M.; Coppola, G.; De La Rue, R. M.; Logan, D. F. State-of-the-art all-silicon sub-bandgap photodetectors at telecom and datacom wavelengths. Laser & Photonics Reviews 2016, 10 (6), 895921,  DOI: 10.1002/lpor.201600065
    2. 2
      Blanco, M.; Villarroya, I. NIR spectroscopy: a rapid-response analytical tool. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 2002, 21 (4), 240250,  DOI: 10.1016/S0165-9936(02)00404-1
    3. 3
      Wang, X.; Dai, Y.; Liu, R.; He, X.; Li, S.; Wang, Z. L. Light-Triggered Pyroelectric Nanogenerator Based on a pn-Junction for Self-Powered Near-Infrared Photosensing. ACS Nano 2017, 11 (8), 83398345,  DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.7b03560
    4. 4
      Jin, Y.; Seok, J.; Yu, K. Highly Efficient Silicon-Based Thin-Film Schottky Barrier Photodetectors. ACS Photonics 2023, 10 (5), 13021309,  DOI: 10.1021/acsphotonics.2c01923
    5. 5
      Michel, J.; Liu, J.; Kimerling, L. C. High-performance Ge-on-Si photodetectors. Nat. Photonics 2010, 4 (8), 527534,  DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2010.157
    6. 6
      Shinde, S. L.; Ishii, S.; Nagao, T. Sub-Band Gap Photodetection from the Titanium Nitride/Germanium Heterostructure. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2019, 11 (24), 2196521972,  DOI: 10.1021/acsami.9b01372
    7. 7
      Wu, C.-Y.; Kang, J.-W.; Wang, B.; Zhu, H.-N.; Li, Z.-J.; Chen, S.-R.; Wang, L.; Yang, W.-H.; Xie, C.; Luo, L.-B. Defect-induced broadband photodetection of layered γ-In2Se3 nanofilm and its application in near infrared image sensors. Journal of Materials Chemistry C 2019, 7 (37), 1153211539,  DOI: 10.1039/C9TC04322E
    8. 8
      Cao, G.; Wang, F.; Peng, M.; Shao, X.; Yang, B.; Hu, W.; Li, X.; Chen, J.; Shan, Y.; Wu, P. Multicolor Broadband and Fast Photodetector Based on InGaAs–Insulator–Graphene Hybrid Heterostructure. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2020, 6 (3), 1901007  DOI: 10.1002/aelm.201901007
    9. 9
      Barton, J. B.; Cannata, R. F.; Petronio, S. M. InGaAs NIR focal plane arrays for imaging and DWDM applications. In Infrared Detectors and Focal Plane Arrays VII; SPIE, 2002; Vol. 4721, pp. 3747.
    10. 10
      Chen, H.; Galili, M.; Verheyen, P.; De Heyn, P.; Lepage, G.; De Coster, J.; Balakrishnan, S.; Absil, P.; Oxenlowe, L.; Van Campenhout, J. 100-Gbps RZ Data Reception in 67-GHz Si-Contacted Germanium Waveguide p-i-n Photodetectors. Journal of Lightwave Technology 2017, 35 (4), 722726,  DOI: 10.1109/JLT.2016.2593942
    11. 11
      Brouckaert, J.; Roelkens, G.; Van Thourhout, D.; Baets, R. Thin-Film III–V Photodetectors Integrated on Silicon-on-Insulator Photonic ICs. Journal of Lightwave Technology 2007, 25 (4), 10531060,  DOI: 10.1109/JLT.2007.891172
    12. 12
      Casalino, M.; Coppola, G.; Iodice, M.; Rendina, I.; Sirleto, L. Near-Infrared Sub-Bandgap All-Silicon Photodetectors: State of the Art and Perspectives. Sensors 2010, 10 (12), 1057110600,  DOI: 10.3390/s101210571
    13. 13
      Zhao, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Jing, J.; Gao, R.; Liao, Z.; Zhang, W.; Liu, G.; Wang, Y.; Wang, K.; Xue, C. Black silicon for near-infrared and ultraviolet photodetection: A review. APL Mater. 2023, 11 (2), 021107  DOI: 10.1063/5.0133770
    14. 14
      Mailoa, J. P.; Akey, A. J.; Simmons, C. B.; Hutchinson, D.; Mathews, J.; Sullivan, J. T.; Recht, D.; Winkler, M. T.; Williams, J. S.; Warrender, J. M. Room-temperature sub-band gap optoelectronic response of hyperdoped silicon. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5 (1), 3011,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4011
    15. 15
      Jia, Z.; Wu, Q.; Jin, X.; Huang, S.; Li, J.; Yang, M.; Huang, H.; Yao, J.; Xu, J. Highly responsive tellurium-hyperdoped black silicon photodiode with single-crystalline and uniform surface microstructure. Opt. Express 2020, 28 (4), 5239,  DOI: 10.1364/OE.385887
    16. 16
      Fu, J.; Yang, D.; Yu, X. Hyperdoped Crystalline Silicon for Infrared Photodetectors by Pulsed Laser Melting: A Review. Phys. Status Solidi (a) 2022, 219 (14), 2100772  DOI: 10.1002/pssa.202100772
    17. 17
      Li, C.; Zhao, J.-H.; Liu, X.-H.; Ren, Z.-Y.; Yang, Y.; Chen, Z.-G.; Chen, Q.-D.; Sun, H.-B. Record-Breaking-High-Responsivity Silicon Photodetector at Infrared 1.31 and 1.55 μm by Argon Doping Technique. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2023, 70 (5), 23642369,  DOI: 10.1109/TED.2023.3261823
    18. 18
      Berencén, Y.; Prucnal, S.; Liu, F.; Skorupa, I.; Hübner, R.; Rebohle, L.; Zhou, S.; Schneider, H.; Helm, M.; Skorupa, W. Room-temperature short-wavelength infrared Si photodetector. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7 (1), 43688,  DOI: 10.1038/srep43688
    19. 19
      Qiu, X.; Yu, X.; Yuan, S.; Gao, Y.; Liu, X.; Xu, Y.; Yang, D. Trap Assisted Bulk Silicon Photodetector with High Photoconductive Gain, Low Noise, and Fast Response by Ag Hyperdoping. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2018, 6 (3), 1700638  DOI: 10.1002/adom.201700638
    20. 20
      Wang, M.; García-Hemme, E.; Berencén, Y.; Hübner, R.; Xie, Y.; Rebohle, L.; Xu, C.; Schneider, H.; Helm, M.; Zhou, S. Silicon-Based Intermediate-Band Infrared Photodetector Realized by Te Hyperdoping. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2021, 9 (4), 2001546  DOI: 10.1002/adom.202001546
    21. 21
      Li, C.-H.; Wang, X.-P.; Zhao, J.-H.; Zhang, D.-Z.; Yu, X.-Y.; Li, X.-B.; Feng, J.; Chen, Q.-D.; Ruan, S.-P.; Sun, H.-B. Black silicon IR photodiode supersaturated with nitrogen by femtosecond laser irradiation. IEEE Sensors Journal 2018, 18 (9), 35953601,  DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2018.2812730
    22. 22
      Li, X.; Deng, Z.; Li, J.; Li, Y.; Guo, L.; Jiang, Y.; Ma, Z.; Wang, L.; Du, C.; Wang, Y. Hybrid nano-scale Au with ITO structure for a high-performance near-infrared silicon-based photodetector with ultralow dark current. Photonics Research 2020, 8 (11), 16621670,  DOI: 10.1364/PRJ.398450
    23. 23
      Kim, H.-S.; Kumar, M. D.; Patel, M.; Kim, J. High-performing ITO/CuO/n-Si photodetector with ultrafast photoresponse. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical 2016, 252, 3541,  DOI: 10.1016/j.sna.2016.11.014
    24. 24
      Akgul, G.; Akgul, F. A.; Mulazimoglu, E.; Unalan, H. E.; Turan, R. Fabrication and characterization of copper oxide-silicon nanowire heterojunction photodiodes. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2014, 47 (6), 065106  DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/47/6/065106
    25. 25
      Kim, J.; Krayer, L. J.; Garrett, J. L.; Munday, J. N. Interfacial Defect-Mediated Near-Infrared Silicon Photodetection with Metal Oxides. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11 (50), 4751647524,  DOI: 10.1021/acsami.9b14953
    26. 26
      Mondal, S.; Halder, S.; Basak, D. Ultrafast and Ultrabroadband UV–vis-NIR Photosensitivity under Reverse and Self-Bias Conditions by n+-ZnO/n-Si Isotype Heterojunction with > 1 kHz Bandwidth. ACS Applied Electronic Materials 2023, 5 (2), 12121223,  DOI: 10.1021/acsaelm.2c01668
    27. 27
      Lv, P.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, X.; Deng, W.; Jie, J. High-Sensitivity and Fast-Response Graphene/Crystalline Silicon Schottky Junction-Based Near-IR Photodetectors. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2013, 34 (10), 13371339,  DOI: 10.1109/LED.2013.2275169
    28. 28
      Güsken, N. A.; Lauri, A.; Li, Y.; Matsui, T.; Doiron, B.; Bower, R.; Regoutz, A.; Mihai, A.; Petrov, P. K.; Oulton, R. F. TiO2–x-Enhanced IR Hot Carrier Based Photodetection in Metal Thin Film–Si Junctions. ACS Photonics 2019, 6 (4), 953960,  DOI: 10.1021/acsphotonics.8b01639
    29. 29
      Haško, D.; Bruncko, J. AFM surface analysis of ZnO layers prepared by pulsed laser deposition at different oxygen pressures. Vacuum 2009, 84 (1), 166169,  DOI: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2009.05.009
    30. 30
      Zhang, Z.; Zhou, F.; Wei, X.; Liu, M.; Sun, G.; Chen, C.; Xue, C.; Zhuang, H.; Man, B. Effects of oxygen pressures on pulsed laser deposition of ZnO films. Physica E: Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures 2007, 39 (2), 253257,  DOI: 10.1016/j.physe.2007.05.028
    31. 31
      Kumar, V.; Ntwaeaborwa, O.; Swart, H. Effect of oxygen partial pressure during pulsed laser deposition on the emission of Eu doped ZnO thin films. Physica B: Condensed Matter 2020, 576, 411713  DOI: 10.1016/j.physb.2019.411713
    32. 32
      Chen, T.; Liu, S.-Y.; Xie, Q.; Detavernier, C.; Van Meirhaeghe, R.; Qu, X.-P. The effects of deposition temperature and ambient on the physical and electrical performance of DC-sputtered n-ZnO/p-Si heterojunction. Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process. 2010, 98, 357365,  DOI: 10.1007/s00339-009-5386-9
    33. 33
      Gandla, S.; Gollu, S. R.; Sharma, R.; Sarangi, V.; Gupta, D. Dual role of boron in improving electrical performance and device stability of low temperature solution processed ZnO thin film transistors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015, 107 (15), 152102,  DOI: 10.1063/1.4933304
    34. 34
      Abliz, A.; Huang, C.-W.; Wang, J.; Xu, L.; Liao, L.; Xiao, X.; Wu, W.-W.; Fan, Z.; Jiang, C.; Li, J. Rational design of ZnO:H/ZnO bilayer structure for high-performance thin-film transistors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8 (12), 78627868,  DOI: 10.1021/acsami.5b10778
    35. 35
      Tu, Y.; Chen, S.; Li, X.; Gorbaciova, J.; Gillin, W. P.; Krause, S.; Briscoe, J. Control of oxygen vacancies in ZnO nanorods by annealing and their influence on ZnO/PEDOT: PSS diode behaviour. Journal of Materials Chemistry C 2018, 6 (7), 18151821,  DOI: 10.1039/C7TC04284A
    36. 36
      Vempati, S.; Mitra, J.; Dawson, P. One-step synthesis of ZnO nanosheets: a blue-white fluorophore. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2012, 7, 470,  DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-7-470
    37. 37
      Tong, C.; Kumar, M.; Yun, J.-H.; Kim, J.; Kim, S. J. High-Quality ITO/Al-ZnO/n-Si Heterostructures with Junction Engineering for Improved Photovoltaic Performance. Applied Sciences 2020, 10 (15), 5285,  DOI: 10.3390/app10155285
    38. 38
      Swami, S. K.; Khan, J. I.; Dutta, V.; Lee, J.; Laquai, F.; Chaturvedi, N. Spray-Deposited Aluminum-Doped Zinc Oxide as an Efficient Electron Transport Layer for Inverted Organic Solar Cells. ACS Applied Energy Materials 2023, 6 (5), 29062913,  DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.2c03858
    39. 39
      Lee, E.; Park, J.; Yim, M.; Kim, Y.; Yoon, G. Characteristics of piezoelectric ZnO/AlN–stacked flexible nanogenerators for energy harvesting applications. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015, 106 (2), 023901  DOI: 10.1063/1.4904270
    40. 40
      Jia, J.; Takasaki, A.; Oka, N.; Shigesato, Y. Experimental observation on the Fermi level shift in polycrystalline Al-doped ZnO films. J. Appl. Phys. 2012, 112 (1), 013718  DOI: 10.1063/1.4733969
    41. 41
      Kim, T.; Choo, D. C.; No, Y.; Choi, W.; Choi, E. H. High work function of Al-doped zinc-oxide thin films as transparent conductive anodes in organic light-emitting devices. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2006, 253 (4), 19171920,  DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2006.03.032
    42. 42
      Kim, J.; Carnemolla, E. G.; DeVault, C.; Shaltout, A. M.; Faccio, D.; Shalaev, V. M.; Kildishev, A. V.; Ferrera, M.; Boltasseva, A. Dynamic control of nanocavities with tunable metal oxides. Nano Lett. 2018, 18 (2), 740746,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b03919
    43. 43
      Campabadal, F.; Milian, V.; Aymerich-Humet, X. Trap-Assisted Tunneling in MIS and Schottky Structures. Physica Status Solidi (a) 1983, 79 (1), 223236,  DOI: 10.1002/pssa.2210790125
    44. 44
      Racko, J.; Pecháček, J.; Mikolášek, M.; Benko, P.; Grmanova, A.; Harmatha, L.; Breza, J. Trap-assisted tunneling in the Schottky barrier. Radioengineering 2013, 22 (1), 240244
    45. 45
      Masetti, G.; Severi, M.; Solmi, S. Modeling of carrier mobility against carrier concentration in arsenic-, phosphorus-, and boron-doped silicon. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 1983, 30 (7), 764769,  DOI: 10.1109/T-ED.1983.21207
    46. 46
      Kim, G.; Kim, H.; Jeon, Y.-U.; Kim, I. S.; Kim, S. J.; Kim, S.; Kim, J. Scalable hot carrier–assisted silicon photodetector array based on ultrathin gold film. Nanophotonics 2024, 13 (7), 10491057,  DOI: 10.1515/nanoph-2023-0656
    47. 47
      Huang, S.; Wu, Q.; Jia, Z.; Jin, X.; Fu, X.; Huang, H.; Zhang, X.; Yao, J.; Xu, J. Black Silicon Photodetector with Excellent Comprehensive Properties by Rapid Thermal Annealing and Hydrogenated Surface Passivation. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2020, 8 (7), 1901808  DOI: 10.1002/adom.201901808
    48. 48
      Park, M.; Kang, G.; Ko, H. Plasmonic-tape-attached multilayered MoS2 film for near-infrared photodetection. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10 (1), 11340,  DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-68127-7
    49. 49
      Qi, Z.; Zhai, Y.; Wen, L.; Wang, Q.; Chen, Q.; Iqbal, S.; Chen, G.; Xu, J.; Tu, Y. Au nanoparticle-decorated silicon pyramids for plasmon-enhanced hot electron near-infrared photodetection. Nanotechnology 2017, 28 (27), 275202,  DOI: 10.1088/1361-6528/aa74a3
    50. 50
      Kim, C.; Yoo, T. J.; Chang, K. E.; Kwon, M. G.; Hwang, H. J.; Lee, B. H. Highly responsive near-infrared photodetector with low dark current using graphene/germanium Schottky junction with Al2O3 interfacial layer. Nanophotonics 2021, 10 (5), 15731579,  DOI: 10.1515/nanoph-2021-0002
    51. 51
      Wu, D.; Guo, J.; Wang, C.; Ren, X.; Chen, Y.; Lin, P.; Zeng, L.; Shi, Z.; Li, X. J.; Shan, C.-X. Ultrabroadband and High-Detectivity Photodetector Based on WS2/Ge Heterojunction through Defect Engineering and Interface Passivation. ACS Nano 2021, 15 (6), 1011910129,  DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.1c02007
    52. 52
      Choi, W.; Cho, M. Y.; Konar, A.; Lee, J. H.; Cha, G.-B.; Hong, S. C.; Kim, S.; Kim, J.; Jena, D.; Joo, J. High-Detectivity Multilayer MoS2 Phototransistors with Spectral Response from Ultraviolet to Infrared. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24 (43), 58325836,  DOI: 10.1002/adma.201201909