logo
CONTENT TYPES

Figure 1Loading Img

Lupin Peptides Lower Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol through an Up-regulation of the LDL Receptor/Sterol Regulatory Element Binding Protein 2 (SREBP2) Pathway at HepG2 Cell Line

View Author Information
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
§ HPF-Nutraceutics SRL, Milan, Italy
# Department of Chemistry, Materials and Chemical Engineering “Giulio Natta”, Polytechnic of Milan, Milan, Italy
*(A.A.) Phone: +39 02 503 19372. Fax: +39 02 503 19343. E-mail: [email protected].
Cite this: J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 29, 7151-7159
Publication Date (Web):June 27, 2014
https://doi.org/10.1021/jf500795b
Copyright © 2014 American Chemical Society
Authors ChoiceACS AuthorChoice
Article Views
1298
Altmetric
-
Citations
LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

PDF (3 MB)
Supporting Info (1)»

Abstract

Previous experiments in suitable animal models and in mild hypercholesterolemic individuals have shown that the consumption of lupin proteins may be useful for controlling total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels. With the objective of providing evidence that peptides deriving from the hydrolysis of lupin proteins may be responsible of the observed activities and for investigating the mechanism of action, HepG2 cells were treated with lupin peptides obtained by either pepsin (P) or trypsin (T) hydrolysis, and molecular and functional investigations were performed on the LDL receptor/SREBP2 pathway. For the first time, this paper provides experimental evidence that lupin peptides are able to interfere with the HMGCoAR activity, up-regulating the LDL receptor (136 and 84% vs the control for P and T peptides, respectively, at 1 mg/mL) and SREBP2 proteins (148 and 73% vs the control for P and T peptides, respectively, at 1 mg/mL) via the activation of PI3K/Akt/GSK3β pathways and increasing the LDL uptake at HepG2 cell line (40 and 50% vs the control for P and T peptides, respectively, at 1 mg/mL). These results may be useful in explaining the activities observed in vivo in animals and humans treated with lupin protein.

Introduction

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Lupin is a protein-rich grain legume, which has been domesticated for a long time and cultivated on different continents, for either animal or human nutrition. This generic term indicates four species: Lupinus albus (white lupin), Lupinus angustifolius (narrow-leaf lupin), Lupinus luteus (yellow lupin), and Lupinus mutabilis (Andean lupin). The seeds of these plants have some favorable features; in particular, the protein percentage is comparable to that of soybean,(1) and the content of indispensable amino acids is only slightly inferior. Lupin is also a good source of minerals,(1) unsaturated fatty acids,(2) vitamins,(1) and tocopherols,(3) whereas the concentrations of isoflavones(4) and other antinutrients are low.(5) Experiments in rats have shown that the nutritional quality of L. albus protein is satisfactory.(6) Old species contained undesirable quinolizidine alkaloids that in modern cultivars were decreased to very low amounts,(7) permitting the direct use of these seeds for different applications.(8, 9)
Besides these important nutritional features, lupin seed may also provide some health benefits, particularly in the area of hypertension(10) and dyslipidemia prevention. Some investigations in a rat model of hypercholesterolemia have demonstrated that diets containing either L. albus protein(11, 12) or L. angustifolius protein(13, 14) may significantly reduce both total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels versus control diets containing casein. The cholesterol-lowering activity of L. albus has also been confirmed in a hamster model of dyslipidemia.(15) Moreover, in a rabbit model of atheromatous plaque, L. albus protein has slowed plaque formation induced by a hyperlipidemic diet.(16) Finally, an uncontrolled clinical trial on L. albus(17) and two controlled on L. angustifolius(18, 19) have confirmed the hypocholesterolemic activity in humans. Despite these positive results, however, only very scarce data are available either on the mechanism of action or on the actual bioactive component(s) in lupin.
The favorable effects of plant proteins in cardiovascular prevention is well established; the first study on the hypocholesterolemic activity of soybean dates back to the 1970s.(20) Some relevant reviews and meta-analyses(21-23) summarize the numerous trials performed in the following years. In 1999 the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the health claim on the role of soybean protein in reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease.(24) The literature on soy may thus provide mechanistic information that may be also relevant in the case of other plant proteins, such as lupin. Studies in animal models and humans have demonstrated that the hypocholesterolemic effects of soy are due to the activation of LDL receptors (LDLR) that are relevant in the metabolic degradation of LDL-C. Soy protein was able to reverse the dramatic down-regulation of liver LDLR observed in rats on cholesterol/cholic acid dietary regimens versus casein,(25) and the expression of LDLR was increased in patients affected by familial hypercholesterolemia(26) and in moderately hypercholesterolemic individuals.(27) In parallel, in vitro and in vivo experiments have demonstrated that some specific soy peptides are responsible for the LDLR modulation.(28-32) Nevertheless, the mechanism at the molecular level has not been investigated in detail yet. These bioactive peptides, initially encrypted in the soy protein sequences, are probably enzymatically released during digestion and absorbed.(33)
The majority of plasma cholesterol is transported by the LDL fraction, and the cellular uptake of LDL is mediated by the LDLR. The circulating level of LDL is determined in large part by its rate of uptake through the hepatic LDLR pathway.(34, 35) Moreover, the LDLR plays a crucial role in Apo B turnover, being involved in determining the post-translation fate of apoB by increasing presecretory apoB degradation and mediating re-uptake of nascent lipoprotein particles.(36) In general, LDLR expression is finely tuned by changes in intracellular cholesterol.(37) A transcription factor known as the sterol-responsive element binding protein 2 (SREBP2) plays a critical role in LDLR mRNA expression.(38, 39) Among SREBP2 gene targets, the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMGCoA) reductase (HMGCoAR) is particularly important. This enzyme plays a key role in the intracellular cholesterol biosynthesis, because it is the rate-controlling enzyme in the mevalonate pathway. After synthesis, SREBP2 forms a complex with the SREBP cleavage-activating protein (SCAP) and is localized in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) as an inactive precursor (pro-SREBP2). Sterol deficiency results in the release of SREBP2/SCAP complex from ER and transport to the Golgi, where pro-SREBP2 is processed further, allowing the N-terminal fragment (mature SREBP2) to enter the nucleus and up-regulate transcription of LDLR and HMGCoAR.(40) In addition to SREBP2, other transcription factors may be involved in a context-dependent fashion in regulating the LDLR expression.
Recent studies(41, 42) identify a crucial signaling pathway, via phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt, as an important player in the regulation of cellular lipid metabolism. This pathway is the best known for its role in promoting cell growth, proliferation, and survival through increased glucose utilization and prevention of apoptosis.(43, 44) In particular, Akt has recently been implicated in a novel form of lipid metabolism regulation, through the SREBPs.(45) The physiological coordination between Akt and SREBPs pathways is needed to produce the lipids for new membrane synthesis, which in turn is required for growing and proliferating cells.(41, 42) Even though many studies have been focused on the SREBP-1c isoform,(45) new efforts are directed to explore and to investigate the link between Akt and SREBP2.(41, 46)
The objective of the present study was to characterize in detail the molecular mechanism at the basis of the cholesterol-lowering properties of L. albus protein observed in experimental and clinical investigations. On the basis of the hypothesis that the activity may depend on specific peptides encrypted in the protein sequences, a total protein extract from lupin seed was hydrolyzed either with pepsin (P peptides) or with trypsin (T peptides). The HepG2 cell line was treated with both kinds of peptides, and molecular and functional investigations were performed on the LDLR-SREBP2 and PI3K/Akt pathways, using a combination of techniques.

Materials and Methods

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Chemicals

Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), l-glutamine, fetal bovine serum (FBS), phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), penicillin/streptomycin, chemiluminescent reagent, and 96-well plates were purchased from Euroclone (Milan, Italy). Bovine serum albumin (BSA), RIPA buffer, HMGCoAR Assay Kit, 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT), and wortmannin were from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Antibodies against HMGCoAR were bought from Abcam (Cambridge, UK). Antibodies against β-actin, SREBP-2, rabbit Ig-HRP, and mouse Ig-HRP, PMSF, sodium orthovanadate inhibitors, and goat anti-rabbit Ig-HRP were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA, USA). Antibodies against the LDL receptor were from Pierce (Rockford, IL, USA). The inhibitor cocktail Complete Midi was from Roche (Basel, Switzerland). Mini protean TGX precast gel 7.5% and Mini nitrocellulose Transfer Packs were purchased from Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA, USA). LDL-DyLight 549 was from Cayman Chemical (Ann Arbor, MI, USA).

Preparation and Analysis of the Pepsin and Trypsin Peptide Mixtures

Lupin seeds of the species L. albus (cultivar Ares) were provided by Terrena (Matrignè-Ferchaud, France). The total protein extracts were obtained as previously reported.(47) Briefly, proteins were extracted from defatted flour with 100 mM Tris-HCl/0.5 M NaCl buffer, pH 8.2, for 2 h at 4 °C. The solid residue was eliminated by centrifugation at 6500g, for 20 min at 4 °C, and the supernatant was dialyzed against 100 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 8.2, for 24 h at 4 °C. The protein content was assessed according to the method of Bradford, using BSA as standard.
For the hydrolysis, the total protein extract was initially dissolved in Tris-HCl buffer 100 mM at pH 8, and then the pH was adjusted to the optimal hydrolysis conditions for each enzyme (pH 2 for pepsin and pH 8 for trypsin) by adding 1 M NaOH or 1 M HCl. The mixtures were incubated for 18 h, then the enzymes were inactivated, and the mixtures were purified by ultrafiltration through 3000 Da cutoff centrifuge filters (Amicon Ultra-0.5, Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) at 12000g for 30 min at 4 °C. The peptide concentration in the permeates was measured according to a literature method,(48) based on chelating the peptide bonds by Cu(II) in alkaline media and monitoring the change of absorbance at 330 nm. Details are reported in a previous paper.(47)
The hydrolyzed mixtures were acidified with formic acid to a final 10% concentration. Eight microliters of tryptic digest for each band was injected in a nanochromatographic system, UltiMate 3000 RSLC nano-System (Thermo Scientific). The peptide mixtures were loaded on a reversed-phase trap column (Acclaim PepMap100, C18, 100 Å, 100 μm i.d. × 2 cm, Thermo Scientific) for the cleanup and preconcentration. After cleanup, the valve was switched to place the trap column in series with a fused silica reverse-phase column (picoFrit column, C18, 2.7 μm, New Objective). The peptides were eluted with a 30 min gradient from 4% buffer A (2% acetonitrile and 0.1% formic acid in water) to 60% buffer B (2% water and 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile) at a constant flow rate of 300 nL/min. The chromatographic column was directly connected to an LTQ-XL mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific) equipped with a nano spray ion source. Full scan mass spectra were acquired in the mass range from m/z 350 to 2000 Da, and the five most intense ions were automatically selected and fragmented in the ion trap. Target ions already selected for mass spectrometry (MS/MS) were dynamically excluded for 30 s. The MS data were analyzed separately by Mascot search engine (version 2.3.01) using Proteome Discover software (v. 1.2.0 Thermo) and consulting Uniprot_viridiplantae (30,264 sequences, 184,678,199 residues). Oxidation of methionine residues was set as variable modifications; two missed cleavages were allowed to trypsin; peptide mass tolerance was set to 1 Da and fragment mass tolerance to 0.8 Da; and an ion source cutoff of 20 was chosen. The false discovery rate obtained by Proteome Discoverer, consulting the Mascot decoy database, was <0.01. Tables 1S and 2S in the Supporting Information list the proteins and the unmatched peptides, with all relevant peptide signals, peptide sequences, ion score, variable modifications and mass errors.

Cell Culture Conditions

HepG2 cell line was bought from ATCC (HB-8065, ATCC from LGC Standards, Milan, Italy). The HepG2 cell line was cultured in DMEM high-glucose with stable l-glutamine supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin (complete growth medium) and incubated at 37 °C under 5% CO2 atmosphere. HepG2 cells were used for no more than 20 passages after thawing because the increase of the number of passages may change the cell characteristics and impair assay results.

MTT

HepG2 cells (3 ×104/well) were seeded in 96-well plates and treated with 0.3, 0.5, 1.0, 2.5, 5.0, and 10.0 mg/mL of P and T peptides, respectively, or vehicle (100 mM Tris) in complete growth media for 48 h. Subsequently, the treatment solvent was aspirated and 100 μL/well of MTT filtered solution added for 48 h. After the incubation time, 0.5 mg/mL MTT solution was aspirated and 100 μL/well of MTT lysis buffer (8 mM HCl + 0.5% NP-40 in DMSO) added. After 5 min of slow shaking, the absorbance at 575 nm was read on an LT 4000 spectrophotometer.

HMGCoAR Activity Assay

The assay buffer, the NADPH, the substrate solution, and the HMG-CoA reductase were provided in the HMGCoAR Assay Kit (Sigma). The experiments were carried out following the manufacturer’s instructions at 37 °C. In particular, each reaction (200 μL) was prepared by adding the reagents in the following order: 1× assay buffer; 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.5 mg/mL of T peptides or 0.5, 1.0, and 2.5 mg/mL of P peptides or vehicle (C); NADPH (4 μL); substrate solution (12 μL); and finally HMG-CoA reductase (catalytic domain) (2 μL). Subsequently, the samples were mixed and the absorbance at 340 nm read by a Synergy H1 microplate reader from Biotek at times 0 and 10 min. The HMGC-CoA-dependent oxidation of NADPH and the inhibition properties of lupin peptides were measured by the absorbance reduction, which is directly proportional to the enzyme activity.

Western Blot Analysis

HepG2 cells (1.5 × 105/well, 24-well plate) were treated with 0.5, 1, and 2.5 mg/mL of P and T peptides for 24 h. For the experiments in the presence of wortmannin, cells were treated with 1 mg/mL P and 0.5 mg/mL T peptides in the presence or absence of 1 μM inhibitor for 24 h. After each treatment, cells were scraped in 40 μL of ice-cold lysis buffer (RIPA buffer + inhibitor cocktail + 1:100 PMSF + 1:100 sodium orthovanadate) and transferred in an ice-cold microcentrifuge tube. After centrifugation at 13300 rpm for 15 min at 4 °C, the supernatant was recovered and transferred into a new ice-cold tube. Total proteins were quantified according to the Bradford method, and 50 μg of total proteins was loaded on a precast 7.5% sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide (SDS-PAGE) gel at 130 V for 45 min. Subsequently, the gel was pre-equilibrated with 0.04% SDS in H2O for 15 min at room temperature and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane (Mini nitrocellulose Transfer Packs,) using a Trans-blot Turbo at 1.3 A and 25 V for 7 min. Target proteins, on milk-blocked membrane, were detected by primary antibodies as follows: rabbit anti-SREBP2, rabbit anti-LDLR, anti-HMGCoAR, antipospho-Akt (ser473), antipospho-GSK3α/β (ser21/ser9), and anti-β-actin. Secondary antibodies conjugated with HRP and a chemiluminescent reagent were used to visualize target proteins, and their signal was quantified using ImageJ software. The internal control, β-actin, was used to normalize loading variations. In the case of SREBP2, the band at 70 kDa, corresponding to the N-terminal fragment (mature SREBP2 protein), was detected and quantified.

Fluorescent LDL Uptake Cell-Based Assay

HepG2 cells (3 ×104/well) were seeded in 96-well plates and kept in complete growth medium for 2 days before treatment. The third day, cells were treated with 1.0 mg/mL P peptides and 0.25 mg/mL T peptides, respectively, or vehicle (100 mM Tris) for 24 h. For the experiments in the presence of the PI3K inhibitor, HepG2 cells were treated with 1.0 mg/mL P peptides and 0.5 mg/mL T peptides in the presence or absence of 100 nM wortmannin and in the presence of the only inhibitor, as control, in DMEM without FBS for 24 h. At the end of the treatment periods, the culture medium was replaced with 75 μL/well LDL-DyLight 549 working solution. The cells were additionally incubated for 2 h at 37 °C, and then the culture medium was aspirated and replaced with PBS 100 μL/well. The degree of LDL uptake was measured using the Synergy H1 fluorescent plate reader from Biotek (excitation and emission wavelengths 540 and 570 nm, respectively).

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were carried out by one-way ANOVA (Graphpad Prism 6) followed by Dunnett’s test. Values were expressed as means ± SEM; P values <0.05 were considered to be significant.

Results

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Preparation and Analysis of the Peptide Mixtures

A total protein extract from lupin seed was hydrolyzed with pepsin and trypsin to produce P peptides and T peptides, respectively. The two samples were analyzed by nano-LC-MS/MS. The chromatograms (Figure 1) showed two diverse profiles due to the different peptide compositions of the digested samples. The number of potentially bioactive peptides is very high in both samples, because more than 2000 peptides were detected in the pepsin-digested mixture and about 3000 in the trypsin-digested one (Tables 1S and 2S in the Supporting Information).

Figure 1

Figure 1. Nano-LC MS/MS of lupin peptide mixtures: (A, B) chromatogram and full scan mass spectrum of T peptides; (C, D) chromatogram and full scan mass spectrum of P peptides.

It was possible to assign only a small number of peptides to known lupin proteins by Mascot software consulting the Uniprot_viridiplantae database. The other peptides were sequenced, but not assigned to protein hits, possibly due to the very incomplete sequencing of lupin proteins. The recognized peptides in the P sample belong to the main storage proteins in lupin seed: 21 peptides to the vicilins [L. albus vicilin-like protein (Q53HY0) and L. albus β-conglutin (Q6EBC1)]; 7 peptides to the legumins [L. angustifolius conglutin-α 3 (F5B8V8)], and 8 peptides to γ-conglutin [L. albus conglutin-γ (Q9FSH9)], a sulfur-rich basic protein typical of lupin (4–5%).
The identified peptides in the T sample are the following: 16 peptides belong to the vicilins [L. albus vicilin-like protein (Q53HY0), L. albus β-conglutin precursor (Q6EBC1), and L. angustifolius conglutin β (B0YJF8)]; 4 to the legumins [L. angustifolius legumin-like protein (Q53I55)], and 2 to δ-conglutin, a 2S protein [L. albus conglutin δ seed storage protein precursor (Q99235)]. Two peptides were assigned to other plant proteins, probably because the lupin sequences are not present in the database: Zea mays actin partial (ADF3).

HepG2 Cell Viability

MTT experiments were performed to exclude the peptide doses with potential toxic effects on the HepG2 cell line. No significant cell mortality was observed up to 2.5 mg/mL after a 48 h treatment versus vehicle (C, 100 mM Tris), suggesting that neither P nor T peptides induce cell mortality in this dose range, whereas about 20 and 80% cell mortalities were observed at 5.0 and 10 mg/mL, respectively (Figure 2). For this reason, all of the following experiments, aimed at investigating the molecular and functional effects of P and T peptides, were conducted using doses of ≤2.5 mg/mL.

Figure 2

Figure 2. HepG2 cell viability after P and T peptide treatment. Bar graphs indicate the results of MTT cell viability assay of HepG2 cells after P and T peptide treatment for 48 h. Data points represent averages ± SEM of three independent experiments in triplicate. (∗∗) P < 0.001 and (∗∗∗) P < 0.0001 versus C. P, pepsin peptides; T, trypsin peptides; C, control.

Effects of P and T Peptides on the Catalytic Domain of HMGCoAR

To check the direct ability of P and T peptides to inhibit HMGCoAR, an in vitro assay was performed using the purified catalytic domain of this enzyme. Both P and T peptides were capable of inhibiting HMGCoAR, but with very different activities and potencies (Figure 3). In fact, P peptides inhibited the enzyme with a statistical significance (−17%) only at the maximum tested dose (2.5 mg/mL), whereas they are ineffective at 0.5 and 1.0 mg/mL. On the contrary, T peptides showed a statistically significant reduction of the HMGCoAR activity at all tested doses: in fact, the enzyme activity was reduced by 37% at 0.25 mg/mL, by 57% at 0.5 mg/mL, and by 61% at 1.0 and 2.5 mg/mL.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Lupin peptide effect on the catalytic domain of HMGCoAR. Bars indicate the effects of P peptides (0.5, 1.0, and 2.5 mg/mL) (A) and T peptides (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.5 mg/mL) (B) on HMGCoAR activity. HMGCoAR, physiologically, catalyzes the four-electron reduction of HMG-CoA to coenzyme A (CoA) and mevalonate (HMG-CoA + 2NADPH + 2H+ > mevalonate + 2NADP+ + CoA-SH). In this assay, the decrease in absorbance at 340 nm, which represents the oxidation of NADPH by the catalytic subunit of HMGCoAR in the presence of the substrate HMG-CoA, was measured spectrophotometrically. Data points represent averages ± SEM of three independent experiments in triplicate. (∗∗) P < 0.001 and (∗∗∗) P < 0.0001 versus C. P, pepsin peptides; T, trypsin peptides; C, control.

Lupin Peptides Mediate the Up-regulation of LDLR-SREBP2 at HepG2 Cells

HepG2 cells were treated for 24 h with P and T peptides at concentrations of 0.5, 1.0, and 2.5 mg/mL. Immunoblotting experiments showed that the treatments with lupin peptides induce an up-regulation of the SREBP2 protein level. In particular, P peptides up-regulate the SREBP2 protein level by 100, 148, and 162% versus the control, whereas T peptides increase the SREBP2 protein level by 80, 73, and 44% versus the control, after 0.5, 1.0, and 2.5 mg/mL treatments, respectively (Figure 4B).

Figure 4

Figure 4. Effect of P and T peptides on the SREBP2, LDLR, and HMGCoAR protein levels. HepG2 cells (1.5 × 105) were treated with 0.5, 1.0, and 2.5 mg/mL of P and T peptides for 24 h, respectively. SREBP2, LDLR, HMGCoAR, and β-actin immunoblotting signals were detected using specific anti-SREBP2, anti-LDLR, anti-HMGCoAR, and anti-β-actin primary antibodies, respectively (A). SREBP2 (B), LDLR (C), and HMGCoAR (D) signals were quantified by ImageJ software and normalized with β-actin signals. Bars represent averages of duplicate samples ± SEM of three independent experiments. (∗) P < 0.05 and (∗∗) P < 0.001 versus C. P, pepsin peptides; T, trypsin peptides; C, control.

In the same experiments, also the LDLR and HMGCoAR protein levels were measured by immunoblotting. Figure 4C shows that both P and T peptides are able to induce a statistically significant up-regulation of LDLR protein in HepG2 cells versus the control, but with different behaviors. In particular, at 0.5, 1.0, and 2.5 mg/mL P peptides mediate 147, 136, and 120% inductions of the LDLR protein, whereas T peptides mediate a ∼85% up-regulation at 0.5 and 1.0 mg/mL and a 61% up-regulation at 2.5 mg/mL versus the control (Figure 4C). These results are in agreement with the up-regulation of SREBP2 protein level.
Both P and T peptides affect the HMGCoAR levels (Figure 4D), but with very different behaviors and activities. Precisely, P peptides increase the synthesis of HMGCoAR by 82% at 0.5 mg/mL, by 212% at 1.0 mg/mL, and by 340% at 2.5 mg/mL versus the control, that is, in a dose-dependent manner. On the contrary, treatment with T peptides enhances the production of HMGCoAR by 233% at 0.5 mg/mL and by only 97% at 1.0 mg/mL, whereas it is practically inactive at 2.5 mg/mL.

Lupin Peptides Increase LDL Uptake at the HepG2 Cell Line

Fluorescent LDL uptake experiments were performed for evaluating the cholesterol-lowering properties of lupin peptides from a functional point of view. Precisely, the fluorescent LDL uptake was examined in HepG2 cells following a 24 h incubation with P and T peptides. Figure 5 shows that both P and T peptides are able to increase the LDL uptake versus the control in a statistically significant way. In particular, treatment with P peptides at concentrations of 1.0 and 2.5 mg/mL increases the LDL uptake by 42 and 45%, respectively, versus the control, whereas the LDL uptake increase was not statistically significant at 0.5 mg/mL. On the other hand, at concentrations of 0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 mg/mL T peptides significantly raise the LDL uptake by 52, 50, and 70%, respectively, versus the control.

Figure 5

Figure 5. LDL uptake after P and T peptide treatments. HepG2 cells (3 × 104) were treated with P (0.5, 1.0, and 2.5 mg/mL) and T (0.25, 05, and 1.0 mg/mL) peptides for 24 h. LDL-Dylight 549 (10.0 μg/mL) was incubated for an additional 2 h. Excess LDL-Dylight 549 was removed, cells were washed two times with PBS, and specific fluorescent LDL uptake was analyzed by Synergy H1 (Biotek). Data points represent averages ± SEM of three independent experiments in triplicate. (∗) P < 0.05 and (∗∗) P < 0.001 versus C. P, pepsin peptides; T, trypsin peptides; C, control.

Lupin Peptides Mediate LDLR-SREBP2 Up-regulation through the Activation of PI3K/Akt/GSK3β Kinases

To examine the effect of lupin peptides on the activation of Akt and GSK3β (its direct substrate), immunoblot analyses were performed on lysates from treated HepG2 cells using antibodies, which are specific for Akt phosphorylated at serine residue 473 and for GSK3β phosphorylated at serine residue 9. In accordance with the preceding immunoblot experiments, HepG2 cells were treated with P and T peptides at concentrations of 1.0 and 0.5 mg/mL, and the variation of phosphorylated Akt and GSK3β levels was investigated. Figure 6B shows that the treatments with lupin peptides increased the Akt phosphorylation in a dose-dependent manner: by 92 and 125%, respectively, after treatment with P peptides at 0.5 and 1.0 mg/mL and by 144 and 196%, respectively, after treatment with T peptides at 0.5 and 1.0 mg/mL.

Figure 6

Figure 6. Effect of P and T peptides on the activation of Akt (Ser473) and GSK3 (Ser9). HepG2 cells (1.5 × 105) were treated with 0.5 and 1 mg/mL of P and T peptides for 24 h, respectively. The phosphorylation levels of Akt (Ser473) (A) and GSK3 (Ser9) (C) and β-actin immunoblotting signals were detected using specific anti-posphoAkt (Ser473), anti-posphoGSK3β (Ser9), and anti-β-actin primary antibodies, respectively. PosphoAkt signals (B) and posphoGSK3β (D) were quantified by ImageJ software and normalized with β-actin signals. Bars represent averages of duplicate samples ± SEM of three independent experiments. (∗) P < 0.05, (∗∗) P < 0.001, and (∗∗∗) P < 0.0001 versus C. P, pepsin peptides; T, trypsin peptides; C, control; pAkt, posphoAkt; pGSK3β, posphoGSK3β.

Additionally, P peptides mediate a 60% increase of the phosphorylation level of GSK3β at 0.5 mg/mL and a 74% increase at 1.0 mg/mL versus the control. After T peptide treatments, instead, the GSK3β phosphorylation level was increased by 133% at 0.5 mg/mL and by only 75% at 1.0 mg/mL (Figure 6D).
Treatment with 1 μM wortmannin, a PI3K inhibitor, inhibited the Akt phosphorylation either in the presence or in the absence of both lupin peptide mixtures. Figure 7A shows a representative immunoblot and the relative intensity of the phospho-Akt bands. The quantification and normalization against actin bands from three different experiments, each performed in duplicate, is shown in Figure 7B. This figure clearly demonstrates that the wortmannin co-incubation with P and T peptides is able to reduce by about 40 and 50% the Akt phosphorylation level, abolishing the Akt phosphorylation induced by lupin peptides.

Figure 7

Figure 7. Involvement of PI3K/Akt pathway activation in the regulation of the LDLR–SREBP2 pathway through which lupin peptides mediate the cholesterol-lowering effects. HepG2 cells (1.5 × 105) were treated with 1.0 and 0.5 mg/mL of P and T peptides in the presence or absence of wortmannin for 24 h, respectively. The phosphorylation level of Akt (Ser473) (A) and β-actin immunoblotting signals were detected using specific anti-posphoAkt (Ser473) and anti-β-actin primary antibodies, respectively. Relative intensity of posphoAkt signals (B) was quantified by ImageJ software and normalized with β-actin signals. Panel C shows the LDL uptake after treatment with the PI3K inhibitor. HepG2 cells (3 × 104) were treated with P (1.0 mg/mL) and T (0.5 mg/mL) peptides in the presence or absence of wortmannin and inhibitor alone for 24 h. LDL-Dylight 549 (10.0 μg/mL) was incubated for additional 2 h. Excess LDL-Dylight 549 was removed, and cells were washed two times with PBS. Specific fluorescent LDL uptake was analyzed by Synergy H1 (Biotek). Bars represent averages of duplicate samples ± SEM of three independent experiments. pAkt, posphoAkt; P, pepsin peptides; T, trypsin peptides; C, control.

To confirm the involvement of the PI3K/Akt pathway activation in the regulation of the LDLR-SREBP2 pathway, functional LDL uptake experiments were performed in the presence of wortmannin. As Figure 7C shows, P peptides and T peptides are able to increase the LDL uptake with respect to the basal level, but these uptakes are blocked in the presence of wortmannin. Precisely, the LDL uptake is blocked at the basal level either in the presence of the inhibitor alone or in the co-incubation with P and T peptides, demonstrating that the LDL uptake induced by lupin peptides is abolished by treatment with this well-known PI3K inhibitor.

Discussion

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

As already indicated in the Introduction, some experimental studies(11-14) and a few clinical trials(17-19) gave clear indications that lupin proteins are able to induce hypocholesterolemic effects in vivo. The present investigation at HepG2 cells was aimed at providing some further information on the mechanism through which the lupin peptides may be responsible of the observed activities.
The main findings of this study are the following: (i) T peptides are able to directly interfere with the HMGCoAR activity, whereas P peptides are much less effective. (ii) Both P and T peptides modulate the cholesterol metabolism at HepG2 cell line, through the up-regulation of the pathway involving the LDLR. (iii) Both P and T peptide treatments increase the LDL-uptake. (iv) Activation of the Akt/GSK3β pathway is involved in the up-regulation of the LDLR-SREBP2 pathway.
HMGCoAR is the rate-controlling enzyme of cellular cholesterol biosynthesis pathway, and therefore it constitutes the target of numerous investigations aimed at lowering the rate of cholesterol biosynthesis.(49) Therefore, initially in vitro experiments were performed using the purified catalytic domain of the enzyme with the objective of clarifying whether lupin peptides were able to directly inhibit the activity of HMGCoAR. As shown in Figure 3, T peptides but not P peptides act as enzyme inhibitors.
The LDLR expression and the receptor protein localization at cellular membranes are strictly correlated to the intracellular cholesterol biosynthesis pathway. In fact, the transcription of the LDLR and the genes required for cholesterol and fatty acid synthesis are controlled by membrane-bound transcription factors called SREBPs,(50) and the intracellular cholesterol acts with a negative feedback inhibition mechanism.(51) The SREBP2 isoform is responsible for the LDLR and HMGCoAR transcription, and the SREBP2 maturation is regulated by the intracellular cholesterol homeostasis. Thus, the up-regulation of LDLR represents a useful strategy to control plasma LDL cholesterol levels. Our findings demonstrate that both lupin peptide mixtures are able to up-regulate the LDLR protein levels through an increase of SREBP2 protein. However, a detailed investigation of the LDLR pathway revealed that lupin peptides produce different effects on the HMGCoAR level. In particular, whereas P peptides are able to increase the enzyme protein level in a dose-dependent manner, T peptides up-regulate the enzyme protein levels in a significant way versus the control at 0.5 mg/mL; the increase remains statistically significant, but it is smaller at 1.0 mg/mL, and it is finally completely abolished at 2.5 mg/mL (Figure 4D).
These pieces of evidence suggest that both peptide mixtures modulate the cholesterol metabolism pathway through the induction of LDLR protein levels due to an increase of SREBP2 protein, although their potencies of induction are different.
In agreement with immunoblotting results, the increase of LDLR protein levels leads to an increase of LDL uptake (Figure 5). Our findings suggest that both P and T peptides are able to significantly induce the LDL clearance, and this result is strictly correlated to an increase of LDLR protein level.
Recently, studies have indicated that there are links between the Akt and the SREBP pathways: in fact, emerging evidence shows that Akt is implicated in the regulation of lipid metabolism through the activation of SREBPs.(45, 52-55) Luu and co-workers(41) showed that insulin-like growth factor-1, an inducer of Akt signaling, acutely increases SREBP2 activation. This study provided evidence that Akt contributes to the regulation of cholesterol metabolism through activating SREBP2.
Even if the precise target or targets of Akt remain elusive and not clarified, part of our investigation was dedicated to evaluating the effects of lupin peptides on the PI3K/Akt pathway. Our study provides experimental evidence that either P or T peptides from lupin protein are able to induce increases of Akt and GSK3β phosphorylation levels, which are completely abolished by treatment with a well-known PI3K inhibitor, such as wortmannin. A constitutively active form of Akt activated the LDLR.(53) Our findings clearly support this study, because both P and T peptides increase the LDLR protein levels and induce an increased fluorescent LDL uptake at HepG2 cells. Moreover, after treatment with both lupin peptides in the presence of wortmannin, LDL uptake is blocked versus the P and T treatments alone, demonstrating that the inhibition of PI3K/Akt has general effects on cellular lipid homeostasis, although the precise Akt target or targets are not definitely assigned yet.
In conclusion, this is the first study providing evidence that peptide mixtures obtained by the hydrolysis of lupin proteins are able to modulate the LDLR/SREBP2 pathway with the final effect of an increased LDL uptake. Because, as indicated above, both P peptides and T peptides are complex mixtures, it appears very difficult to sort out which may be the peptides responsible for the observed activities. It is, however, possible to affirm that the diversity in the behaviors of the two peptide mixtures derives from their different compositions. Further work will be necessary to investigate these aspects in detail. This is also the first study to investigate in detail the mechanism of the hypocholesterolemic activity of peptides deriving from a plant protein, because, even in the case of soy, only partial information is available.(26-32)

Supporting Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Tables 1S and 2S. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

Author Contributions

Ideation and design of experiments: C.L. Experiments: biotechnology, C.L. and C.Z.; mass spectrometry analysis, A.D.; peptide preparation, G.M.S.; analysis of data, C.L., C.Z., and A.D.; figure preparation, C.Z; retrieval of grants, A.A; manuscript writing, C.L. and A.A.

Funding Information

Research was funded by the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013), under Grant Agreement 285819. We are indebted to Regione Lombardia and HPF-Nutraceutics SRL (Milan, Italy) for the partial funding of a postdoctoral fellowship to C.Z. and to the Carlo Sirtori Foundation (Milan, Italy) for having provided most of the equipment used in this experimentation.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Terms & Conditions

Electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. The American Chemical Society holds a copyright ownership interest in any copyrightable Supporting Information. Files available from the ACS website may be downloaded for personal use only. Users are not otherwise permitted to reproduce, republish, redistribute, or sell any Supporting Information from the ACS website, either in whole or in part, in either machine-readable form or any other form without permission from the American Chemical Society. For permission to reproduce, republish and redistribute this material, requesters must process their own requests via the RightsLink permission system. Information about how to use the RightsLink permission system can be found at http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Abbreviations Used

HMGCoAR

3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl CoA reductase

LDL

low-density lipoprotein

LDLR

LDL receptor

L. albus

Lupinus albus

MTT

3-(4,5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide

SREBP2

sterol regulatory element binding protein 2

SCAP

SREBP cleavage-activating protein

ER

endoplasmic reticulum

P peptides

pepsin peptides

T peptides

trypsin peptides

PI3K

phosphoinositide 3-kinase

Akt

protein kinase B

GSK3β

glycogen synthase kinase-3β

References

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article references 55 other publications.

  1. 1
    Sujak, A.; Kotlarz, A.; Strobel, W. Compositional and nutritional evaluation of several lupin seeds Food Chem. 2006, 98, 711 719
  2. 2
    Boschin, G.; D’Agostina, A.; Annicchiarico, P.; Arnoldi, A. Effect of genotype and environment on fatty acid composition of Lupinus albus L. seed Food Chem. 2008, 108, 600 606
  3. 3
    Boschin, G.; Arnoldi, A. Legumes are valuable sources of tocopherols Food Chem. 2011, 127, 1199 1203
  4. 4
    Katagiri, Y.; Ibrahim, R. K.; Tahara, S. HPLC analysis of white lupin isoflavonoids Biosci., Biotechnol., Biochem. 2000, 64, 1118 1125
  5. 5
    Muzquiz, M.; Pedrosa, M. M.; Cuadrado, C.; Ayet, G.; Burbano, C.; Brenes, A. Variation of Alkaloids, Alkaloids Esters, Phytic Acid and Phytase Activity in Germinated Seed of Lupinus albus and L. luteus; Wageningen Pers: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 1998.
  6. 6
    Caligari, S.; Chiesa, G.; Johnson, S. K.; Camisassi, D.; Gilio, D.; Marchesi, M.; Parolini, C.; Rubio, L. A.; Sirtori, C. R. Lupin (Lupinus albus) protein isolate (L-ISO) has adequate nutritional value and reduces large intestinal weight in rats after restricted and ad libitum feeding Ann. Nutr. Metab. 2006, 50, 528 537
  7. 7
    Boschin, G.; Annicchiarico, P.; Resta, D.; D’Agostina, A.; Arnoldi, A. Quinolizidine alkaloids in seeds of lupin genotypes of different origins J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 3657 3663
  8. 8
    D’Agostina, A.; Antonioni, C.; Resta, D.; Arnoldi, A.; Bez, J.; Knauf, U.; Waesche, A. Optimization of a pilot-scale process for producing lupin protein isolates with valuable technological properties and minimum thermal damage J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 92 98
  9. 9
    Doxastakis, G.; Papageorgiou, M.; Mandalou, D.; Irakli, M.; Papalamprou, E.; D’Agostina, A.; Resta, D.; Boschin, G.; Arnoldi, A. Technological properties and non-enzymatic browning of white lupin protein enriched spaghetti Food Chem. 2007, 101, 57 64
  10. 10
    Boschin, G.; Scigliuolo, G. M.; Resta, D.; Arnoldi, A. Optimization of the enzymatic hydrolysis of lupin (Lupinus) proteins for producing ACE-inhibitory peptides J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 1846 1851
  11. 11
    Sirtori, C. R.; Lovati, M. R.; Manzoni, C.; Castiglioni, S.; Duranti, M.; Magni, C.; Morandi, S.; D’Agostina, A.; Arnoldi, A. Proteins of white lupin seed, a naturally isoflavone-poor legume, reduce cholesterolemia in rats and increase LDL receptor activity in HepG2 cells J. Nutr. 2004, 134, 18 23
  12. 12
    Bettzieche, A.; Brandsch, C.; Weisse, K.; Hirche, F.; Eder, K.; Stangl, G. Lupin protein influences the expression of hepatic genes involved in fatty acid synthesis and triacylglycerol hydrolysis of adult rats Br. J. Nutr. 2008, 99, 952 962
  13. 13
    Bettzieche, A.; Brandsch, C.; Schmidt, M.; Weisse, K.; Eder, K.; Stangl, G. Differing effect of protein isolates from different cultivars of blue lupin on plasma lipoproteins of hypercholesterolemic rats Biosci., Biotechnol., Biochem. 2008, 72, 3114 3121
  14. 14
    Parolini, C.; Rigamonti, E.; Marchesi, M.; Busnelli, M.; Cinquanta, P.; Manzini, S.; Sirtori, C.; Chiesa, G. Cholesterol-lowering effect of dietary Lupinus angustifolius proteins in adult rats through regulation of genes involved in cholesterol homeostasis Food Chem. 2012, 132, 1475 1479
  15. 15
    Fontanari, G.; Batistuti, J.; da Cruz, R.; Saldiva, P.; Areas, J. Cholesterol-lowering effect of whole lupin (Lupinus albus) seed and its protein isolate Food Chem. 2012, 132, 1521 1526
  16. 16
    Marchesi, M.; Parolini, C.; Diani, E.; Rigamonti, E.; Cornelli, L.; Arnoldi, A.; Sirtori, C. R.; Chiesa, G. Hypolipidaemic and anti-atherosclerotic effects of lupin proteins in a rabbit model Br. J. Nutr. 2008, 100, 707 710
  17. 17
    Naruszewicz, M.; Nowicka, G.; Klosiewicz-Latoszek, L.; Arnoldi, A.; Sirtori, C. Effect of lupin protein (Lupinus albus) on cardiovascular risk factors in smokers with mild hypercholesterolemia Circulation 2006, 114, 874 874
  18. 18
    Sirtori, C. R.; Triolo, M.; Bosisio, R.; Bondioli, A.; Calabresi, L.; De Vergori, V.; Gomaraschi, M.; Mombelli, G.; Pazzucconi, F.; Zacherl, C.; Arnoldi, A. Hypocholesterolaemic effects of lupin protein and pea protein/fibre combinations in moderately hypercholesterolaemic individuals Br. J. Nutr. 2012, 107, 1176 1183
  19. 19
    Bähr, M.; Fechner, A.; Kiehntopf, M.; Jahreis, G. Consuming a mixed diet enriched with lupin protein beneficially affects plasma lipids in hypercholesterolemic subjects: a randomized controlled trial Clin. Nutr. 2014, DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2014.03.008
  20. 20
    Sirtori, C. R.; Agradi, E.; Conti, F.; Mantero, O.; Gatti, E. Soybean-protein diet in the treatment of type-II hyperlipoproteinaemia Lancet 1977, 1, 275 277
  21. 21
    Sirtori, C. R.; Eberini, I.; Arnoldi, A. Hypocholesterolaemic effects of soya proteins: results of recent studies are predictable from the Anderson meta-analysis data Br. J. Nutr. 2007, 97, 816 822
  22. 22
    Anderson, J. W.; Johnstone, B. M.; Cook-Newell, M. E. Meta-analysis of the effects of soy protein intake on serum lipids N. Engl. J. Med. 1995, 333, 276 282
  23. 23
    Harland, J.; Haffner, T. Systematic review, meta-analysis and regression of randomised controlled trials reporting an association between an intake of circa 25 g soya protein per day and blood cholesterol Atherosclerosis 2008, 200, 13 27
  24. 24
    FDA. Food labeling health claims: soybean protein and coronary heart disease. Final rule. Fed. Regist. 1999, 64, 57699 57733.
  25. 25
    Sirtori, C. R.; Galli, G.; Lovati, M. R.; Carrara, P.; Bosisio, E.; Kienle, M. G. Effects of dietary proteins on the regulation of liver lipoprotein receptors in rats J. Nutr. 1984, 114, 1493 1500
  26. 26
    Lovati, M. R.; Manzoni, C.; Canavesi, A.; Sirtori, M.; Vaccarino, V.; Marchi, M.; Gaddi, G.; Sirtori, C. R. Soybean protein diet increases low density lipoprotein receptor activity in mononuclear cells from hypercholesterolemic patients J. Clin. Invest. 1987, 80, 1498 1502
  27. 27
    Baum, J. A.; Teng, H.; Erdman, J. W. J.; Weigel, R. M.; Klein, B. P.; Persky, V. W.; Freels, S.; Surya, P.; Bakhit, R. M.; Ramos, E.; Shay, N. F.; Potter, S. M. Long-term intake of soy protein improves blood lipid profiles and increases mononuclear cell low-density-lipoprotein receptor messenger RNA in hypercholesterolemic, postmenopausal women Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1998, 68, 545 551
  28. 28
    Manzoni, C.; Duranti, M.; Eberini, I.; Scharnag, H.; März, W.; Castiglioni, S.; Lovati, M. Subcellular localization of soybean 7S globulin in HepG2 cells and LDL receptor up-regulation by its alpha′ constituent subunit J. Nutr. 2003, 133, 2149 2155
  29. 29
    Duranti, M.; Lovati, M. R.; Dani, V.; Barbiroli, A.; Scarafoni, A.; Castiglioni, S.; Ponzone, C.; Morazzoni, P. The alpha′ subunit from soybean 7S globulin lowers plasma lipids and upregulates liver beta-VLDL receptors in rats fed a hypercholesterolemic diet J. Nutr. 2004, 134, 1334 1339
  30. 30
    Consonni, A.; Lovati, M. R.; Parolari, A.; Manzoni, C.; Morazzoni, P.; Magni, C.; Duranti, M. Heterologous expression and purification of the soybean 7S globulin α′ subunit extension region: in vitro evidence of its involvement in cell cholesterol homeostasis Protein Express. Purif. 2011, 80, 125 129
  31. 31
    Cho, S.; Juillerat, M.; Lee, C. Identification of LDL-receptor transcription stimulating peptides from soybean hydrolysate in human hepatocytes J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 4372 4376
  32. 32
    Mochizuki, Y.; Maebuchi, M.; Kohno, M.; Hirotsuka, M.; Wadahama, H.; Moriyama, T.; Kawada, T.; Urade, R. Changes in lipid metabolism by soy β-conglycinin-derived peptides in HepG2 cells J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 1473 1480
  33. 33
    Vermeirssen, V.; van Camp, J.; Verstraete, W. Bioavailability of angiotensin I converting enzyme inhibitory peptides Br. J. Nutr. 2004, 92, 357 366
  34. 34
    Brugger, D.; Schuster, H.; Zöllner, N. Familial hypercholesterolemia and familial defective apolipoprotein B-100: comparison of the phenotypic expression In 116 cases Eur. J. Med. Res. 1996, 1, 383 386
  35. 35
    Ishibashi, S.; Brown, M. S.; Goldstein, J. L.; Gerard, R. D.; Hammer, R. E.; Herz, J. Hypercholesterolemia in low density lipoprotein receptor knockout mice and its reversal by adenovirus-mediated gene delivery J. Clin. Invest. 1993, 92, 883 893
  36. 36
    Twisk, J.; Gillian-Daniel, D. L.; Tebon, A.; Wang, L.; Barrett, P. H.; Attie, A. D. The role of the LDL receptor in apolipoprotein B secretion J. Clin. Invest. 2000, 105, 521 532
  37. 37
    Hussain, M. M. Structural, biochemical and signaling properties of the low-density lipoprotein receptor gene family Front. Biosci. 2001, 6, D417 D428
  38. 38
    Castoreno, A. B.; Wang, Y.; Stockinger, W.; Jarzylo, L. A.; Du, H.; Pagnon, J. C.; Shieh, E. C.; Nohturfft, A. Transcriptional regulation of phagocytosis-induced membrane biogenesis by sterol regulatory element binding proteins Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102, 13129 13134
  39. 39
    Horton, J. D.; Shimomura, I.; Brown, M. S.; Hammer, R. E.; Goldstein, J. L.; Shimano, H. Activation of cholesterol synthesis in preference to fatty acid synthesis in liver and adipose tissue of transgenic mice overproducing sterol regulatory element-binding protein-2 J. Clin. Invest. 1998, 101, 2331 2339
  40. 40
    Brown, M. S.; Goldstein, J. L. The SREBP pathway: regulation of cholesterol metabolism by proteolysis of a membrane-bound transcription factor Cell 1997, 89, 331 340
  41. 41
    Luu, W.; Sharpe, L. J.; Stevenson, J.; Brown, A. J. Akt acutely activates the cholesterogenic transcription factor SREBP-2 Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2012, 1823, 458 464
  42. 42
    Nohturfft, A.; Zhang, S. C. Coordination of lipid metabolism in membrane biogenesis Annu. Rev. Cell. Dev. Biol. 2009, 25, 539 566
  43. 43
    Whiteman, E. L.; Cho, H.; Birnbaum, M. J. Role of Akt/protein kinase B in metabolism Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2002, 13, 444 451
  44. 44
    Song, G.; Ouyang, G.; Bao, S. The activation of Akt/PKB signaling pathway and cell survival J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2005, 9, 59 71
  45. 45
    Krycer, J. R.; Sharpe, L. J.; Luu, W.; Brown, A. J. The Akt-SREBP nexus: cell signaling meets lipid metabolism Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2010, 21, 268 276
  46. 46
    Du, X.; Kristiana, I.; Wong, J.; Brown, A. J. Involvement of Akt in ER-to-Golgi transport of SCAP/SREBP: a link between a key cell proliferative pathway and membrane synthesis Mol. Biol. Cell 2006, 17, 2735 2745
  47. 47
    Boschin, G.; Scigliuolo, G. M.; Resta, D.; Arnoldi, A. ACE-inhibitory activity of enzymatic protein hydrolysates from lupin and other legumes Food Chem. 2014, 145, 34 40
  48. 48
    Levashov, P. A.; Sutherland, D. S.; Besenbacher, F.; Shipovskov, S. A robust method of determination of high concentrations of peptides and proteins Anal. Biochem. 2009, 395, 111 112
  49. 49
    Endo, A. The discovery and development of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors J. Lipid Res. 1992, 33, 1569 1582
  50. 50
    Horton, J. D.; Goldstein, J. L.; Brown, M. S. SREBPs: transcriptional mediators of lipid homeostasis Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 2002, 67, 491 498
  51. 51
    Edwards, P. A.; Tabor, D.; Kast, H. R.; Venkateswaran, A. Regulation of gene expression by SREBP and SCAP Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2000, 1529, 103 113
  52. 52
    Demoulin, J. B.; Ericsson, J.; Kallin, A.; Rorsman, C.; Rönnstrand, L.; Heldin, C. H. Platelet-derived growth factor stimulates membrane lipid synthesis through activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and sterol regulatory element-binding proteins J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 35392 35402
  53. 53
    Zhou, R. H.; Yao, M.; Lee, T. S.; Zhu, Y.; Martins-Green, M.; Shyy, J. Y. Vascular endothelial growth factor activation of sterol regulatory element binding protein: a potential role in angiogenesis Circ. Res. 2004, 95, 471 478
  54. 54
    Hegarty, B. D.; Bobard, A.; Hainault, I.; Ferré, P.; Bossard, P.; Foufelle, F. Distinct roles of insulin and liver X receptor in the induction and cleavage of sterol regulatory element-binding protein-1c Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102, 791 796
  55. 55
    Eberlé, D.; Hegarty, B.; Bossard, P.; Ferré, P.; Foufelle, F. SREBP transcription factors: master regulators of lipid homeostasis Biochimie 2004, 86, 839 848

Cited By


This article is cited by 41 publications.

  1. Luca Dellafiora, Raffaele Pugliese, Carlotta Bollati, Fabrizio Gelain, Gianni Galaverna, Anna Arnoldi, Carmen Lammi. “Bottom-Up” Strategy for the Identification of Novel Soybean Peptides with Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitory Activity. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2020, 68 (7) , 2082-2090. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.9b07361.
  2. Carmen Lammi, Anna Arnoldi, Gilda Aiello. Soybean Peptides Exert Multifunctional Bioactivity Modulating 3-Hydroxy-3-Methylglutaryl-CoA Reductase and Dipeptidyl Peptidase-IV Targets in Vitro. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2019, 67 (17) , 4824-4830. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.9b01199.
  3. Carmen Lammi, Jacopo Sgrignani, Gabriella Roda, Anna Arnoldi, Giovanni Grazioso. Inhibition of PCSK9D374Y/LDLR Protein–Protein Interaction by Computationally Designed T9 Lupin Peptide. ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters 2019, 10 (4) , 425-430. DOI: 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.8b00464.
  4. Raffaele Pugliese, Carlotta Bollati, Fabrizio Gelain, Anna Arnoldi, Carmen Lammi. A Supramolecular Approach to Develop New Soybean and Lupin Peptide Nanogels with Enhanced Dipeptidyl Peptidase IV (DPP-IV) Inhibitory Activity. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2019, 67 (13) , 3615-3623. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b07264.
  5. Giovanni Grazioso, Carlotta Bollati, Jacopo Sgrignani, Anna Arnoldi, Carmen Lammi. First Food-Derived Peptide Inhibitor of the Protein–Protein Interaction between Gain-of-Function PCSK9D374Y and the Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptor. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2018, 66 (40) , 10552-10557. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b03233.
  6. Chiara Zanoni, Gilda Aiello, Anna Arnoldi, and Carmen Lammi . Hempseed Peptides Exert Hypocholesterolemic Effects with a Statin-Like Mechanism. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2017, 65 (40) , 8829-8838. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b02742.
  7. Carmen Lammi, Chiara Zanoni, Anna Arnoldi, and Giulio Vistoli . Peptides Derived from Soy and Lupin Protein as Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors: In Vitro Biochemical Screening and in Silico Molecular Modeling Study. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2016, 64 (51) , 9601-9606. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b04041.
  8. Carmen Lammi, Chiara Zanoni, Anna Arnoldi, and Giulio Vistoli . Two Peptides from Soy β-Conglycinin Induce a Hypocholesterolemic Effect in HepG2 Cells by a Statin-Like Mechanism: Comparative in Vitro and in Silico Modeling Studies. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2015, 63 (36) , 7945-7951. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.5b03497.
  9. Domancar Orona-Tamayo, María Elena Valverde, Octavio Paredes-López. Bioactive peptides from selected latin american food crops – A nutraceutical and molecular approach. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 2019, 59 (12) , 1949-1975. DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2018.1434480.
  10. Carmen Lammi, Carlotta Bollati, Davide Lecca, Maria Pia Abbracchio, Anna Arnoldi. Lupin Peptide T9 (GQEQSHQDEGVIVR) Modulates the Mutant PCSK9D374Y Pathway: in vitro Characterization of its Dual Hypocholesterolemic Behavior. Nutrients 2019, 11 (7) , 1665. DOI: 10.3390/nu11071665.
  11. Varun Kumar, P. Sharma, H.R. Bairagya, S. Sharma, T.P. Singh, Purnima Kaul Tiku. Inhibition of human 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl CoA reductase by peptides leading to cholesterol homeostasis through SREBP2 pathway in HepG2 cells. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics 2019, 1867 (6) , 604-615. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2019.04.002.
  12. Carmen Lammi, Carlotta Bollati, Fabrizio Gelain, Anna Arnoldi, Raffaele Pugliese. Enhancement of the Stability and Anti-DPPIV Activity of Hempseed Hydrolysates Through Self-Assembling Peptide-Based Hydrogels. Frontiers in Chemistry 2019, 6 DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2018.00670.
  13. Anna Arnoldi, Lammi Carmen, Gilda Aiello. Cholesterol-Reducing Foods: Proteins and Peptides. 2019,,, 323-329. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-100596-5.21754-X.
  14. Xiaojuan Guo, Wenting Shang, Padraig Strappe, Zhongkai Zhou, Chris Blanchard. Peptides derived from lupin proteins confer potent protection against oxidative stress. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 2018, 98 (14) , 5225-5234. DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.9059.
  15. Eric Banan-Mwine Daliri, Byong H. Lee, Deog H. Oh. Current trends and perspectives of bioactive peptides. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 2018, 58 (13) , 2273-2284. DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2017.1319795.
  16. Gian Luigi Gianfranceschi, Giuseppe Gianfranceschi, Luana Quassinti, Massimo Bramucci. Biochemical requirements of bioactive peptides for nutraceutical efficacy. Journal of Functional Foods 2018, 47, 252-263. DOI: 10.1016/j.jff.2018.05.034.
  17. Maciej Banach, Angelo Maria Patti, Rosaria Vincenza Giglio, Arrigo F.G. Cicero, Atanas G. Atanasov, Gani Bajraktari, Eric Bruckert, Olivier Descamps, Dragan M. Djuric, Marat Ezhov, Zlatko Fras, Stephan von Haehling, Niki Katsiki, Michel Langlois, Gustavs Latkovskis, G.B. John Mancini, Dimitri P. Mikhailidis, Olena Mitchenko, Patrick M. Moriarty, Paul Muntner, Dragana Nikolic, Demosthenes B. Panagiotakos, Gyorgy Paragh, Bernhard Paulweber, Daniel Pella, Christos Pitsavos, Željko Reiner, Giuseppe M.C. Rosano, Robert S. Rosenson, Jacek Rysz, Amirhossein Sahebkar, Maria-Corina Serban, Dragos Vinereanu, Michal Vrablík, Gerald F. Watts, Nathan D. Wong, Manfredi Rizzo. The Role of Nutraceuticals in Statin Intolerant Patients. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2018, 72 (1) , 96-118. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.040.
  18. Carmen Lammi, Chiara Zanoni, Anna Arnoldi, Gilda Aiello. YDFYPSSTKDQQS (P3), a peptide from lupin protein, absorbed by Caco-2 cells, modulates cholesterol metabolism in HepG2 cells via SREBP-1 activation. Journal of Food Biochemistry 2018, 42 (3) , e12524. DOI: 10.1111/jfbc.12524.
  19. Marcelo Rodrigues Marques, Alvaro Cerda, Gustavo Guadagnucci Fontanari, Daniel Carvalho Pimenta, Rosana Manólio Soares-Freitas, Mario Hiroyuki Hirata, Rosario Dominguez Crespo Hirata, José Alfredo Gomes Arêas. Transport of cowpea bean derived peptides and their modulator effects on mRNA expression of cholesterol-related genes in Caco-2 and HepG2 cells. Food Research International 2018, 107, 165-171. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.01.031.
  20. Suwen Liu, Lu You, Yuhua Zhao, Xuedong Chang. Wild Lonicera caerulea berry polyphenol extract reduces cholesterol accumulation and enhances antioxidant capacity in vitro and in vivo. Food Research International 2018, 107, 73-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.02.016.
  21. Ruth Boachie, Shixiang Yao, Chibuike C Udenigwe. Molecular mechanisms of cholesterol-lowering peptides derived from food proteins. Current Opinion in Food Science 2018, 20, 58-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.cofs.2018.03.006.
  22. Maria Hayes, Stephen Bleakley. Peptides from plants and their applications. 2018,,, 603-622. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-100736-5.00025-9.
  23. Shixiang Yao, Dominic Agyei, Chibuike C. Udenigwe. Structural Basis of Bioactivity of Food Peptides in Promoting Metabolic Health. 2018,,, 145-181. DOI: 10.1016/bs.afnr.2017.12.002.
  24. Suwen Liu, Zhanyi Wu, Shuo Guo, Xianjun Meng, Xuedong Chang. Polyphenol-rich extract from wild Lonicera caerulea berry reduces cholesterol accumulation by mediating the expression of hepatic miR-33 and miR-122, HMGCR, and CYP7A1 in rats. Journal of Functional Foods 2018, 40, 648-658. DOI: 10.1016/j.jff.2017.11.048.
  25. Chiara Pavanello, Carmen Lammi, Massimiliano Ruscica, Raffaella Bosisio, Giuliana Mombelli, Chiara Zanoni, Laura Calabresi, Cesare R. Sirtori, Paolo Magni, Anna Arnoldi. Effects of a lupin protein concentrate on lipids, blood pressure and insulin resistance in moderately dyslipidaemic patients: A randomised controlled trial. Journal of Functional Foods 2017, 37, 8-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.jff.2017.07.039.
  26. Arrigo F G Cicero, Alessandro Colletti, Gani Bajraktari, Olivier Descamps, Dragan M Djuric, Marat Ezhov, Zlatko Fras, Niki Katsiki, Michel Langlois, Gustavs Latkovskis, Demosthenes B Panagiotakos, Gyorgy Paragh, Dimitri P Mikhailidis, Olena Mitchenko, Bernhard Paulweber, Daniel Pella, Christos Pitsavos, Željko Reiner, Kausik K Ray, Manfredi Rizzo, Amirhossein Sahebkar, Maria-Corina Serban, Laurence S Sperling, Peter P Toth, Dragos Vinereanu, Michal Vrablík, Nathan D Wong, Maciej Banach. Lipid-lowering nutraceuticals in clinical practice: position paper from an International Lipid Expert Panel. Nutrition Reviews 2017, 75 (9) , 731-767. DOI: 10.1093/nutrit/nux047.
  27. Arrigo F G Cicero, Federica Fogacci, Alessandro Colletti. Potential role of bioactive peptides in prevention and treatment of chronic diseases: a narrative review. British Journal of Pharmacology 2017, 174 (11) , 1378-1394. DOI: 10.1111/bph.13608.
  28. Chiara Zanoni, Gilda Aiello, Anna Arnoldi, Carmen Lammi. Investigations on the hypocholesterolaemic activity of LILPKHSDAD and LTFPGSAED, two peptides from lupin β-conglutin: Focus on LDLR and PCSK9 pathways. Journal of Functional Foods 2017, 32, 1-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jff.2017.02.009.
  29. Arrigo F. G. Cicero, Federica Fogacci, Alessandro Colletti. Food and plant bioactives for reducing cardiometabolic disease risk: an evidence based approach. Food & Function 2017, 8 (6) , 2076-2088. DOI: 10.1039/C7FO00178A.
  30. Arrigo F.G. Cicero, Alessandro Colletti. Combinations of phytomedicines with different lipid lowering activity for dyslipidemia management: The available clinical data. Phytomedicine 2016, 23 (11) , 1113-1118. DOI: 10.1016/j.phymed.2015.10.011.
  31. Arrigo F.G. Cicero, Alessandro Colletti. Role of phytochemicals in the management of metabolic syndrome. Phytomedicine 2016, 23 (11) , 1134-1144. DOI: 10.1016/j.phymed.2015.11.009.
  32. Gilda Aiello, Elisa Fasoli, Giovanna Boschin, Carmen Lammi, Chiara Zanoni, Attilio Citterio, Anna Arnoldi. Proteomic characterization of hempseed ( Cannabis sativa L.). Journal of Proteomics 2016, 147, 187-196. DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2016.05.033.
  33. Carmen Lammi, Chiara Zanoni, Gilda Aiello, Anna Arnoldi, Giovanni Grazioso. Lupin Peptides Modulate the Protein-Protein Interaction of PCSK9 with the Low Density Lipoprotein Receptor in HepG2 Cells. Scientific Reports 2016, 6 (1) DOI: 10.1038/srep29931.
  34. Carmen Lammi, Chiara Zanoni, Simonetta Ferruzza, Giulia Ranaldi, Yula Sambuy, Anna Arnoldi. Hypocholesterolaemic Activity of Lupin Peptides: Investigation on the Crosstalk between Human Enterocytes and Hepatocytes Using a Co-Culture System Including Caco-2 and HepG2 Cells. Nutrients 2016, 8 (7) , 437. DOI: 10.3390/nu8070437.
  35. Carmen Lammi, Gilda Aiello, Giulio Vistoli, Chiara Zanoni, Anna Arnoldi, Yula Sambuy, Simonetta Ferruzza, Giulia Ranaldi. A multidisciplinary investigation on the bioavailability and activity of peptides from lupin protein. Journal of Functional Foods 2016, 24, 297-306. DOI: 10.1016/j.jff.2016.04.017.
  36. Francisco Cabello-Hurtado, Jean Keller, José Ley, Rosa Sanchez-Lucas, Jesús V. Jorrín-Novo, Abdelkader Aïnouche. Proteomics for exploiting diversity of lupin seed storage proteins and their use as nutraceuticals for health and welfare. Journal of Proteomics 2016, 143, 57-68. DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2016.03.026.
  37. Carmen Lammi, Chiara Zanoni, Laura Calabresi, Anna Arnoldi. Lupin protein exerts cholesterol-lowering effects targeting PCSK9: From clinical evidences to elucidation of the in vitro molecular mechanism using HepG2 cells. Journal of Functional Foods 2016, 23, 230-240. DOI: 10.1016/j.jff.2016.02.042.
  38. Kateřina Sedláková, Eva Straková, Pavel Suchý, Jana Krejcarová, Ivan Herzig. Lupin as a perspective protein plant for animal and human nutrition – a review. Acta Veterinaria Brno 2016, 85 (2) , 165-175. DOI: 10.2754/avb201685020165.
  39. Chibuike Udenigwe, Kirsti Rouvinen-Watt. The Role of Food Peptides in Lipid Metabolism during Dyslipidemia and Associated Health Conditions. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2015, 16 (12) , 9303-9313. DOI: 10.3390/ijms16059303.
  40. Carmen Lammi, Chiara Zanoni, Anna Arnoldi. Three Peptides from Soy Glycinin Modulate Glucose Metabolism in Human Hepatic HepG2 Cells. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2015, 16 (11) , 27362-27370. DOI: 10.3390/ijms161126029.
  41. Anna Arnoldi, Giovanna Boschin, Chiara Zanoni, Carmen Lammi. The health benefits of sweet lupin seed flours and isolated proteins. Journal of Functional Foods 2015, 18, 550-563. DOI: 10.1016/j.jff.2015.08.012.
  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Nano-LC MS/MS of lupin peptide mixtures: (A, B) chromatogram and full scan mass spectrum of T peptides; (C, D) chromatogram and full scan mass spectrum of P peptides.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. HepG2 cell viability after P and T peptide treatment. Bar graphs indicate the results of MTT cell viability assay of HepG2 cells after P and T peptide treatment for 48 h. Data points represent averages ± SEM of three independent experiments in triplicate. (∗∗) P < 0.001 and (∗∗∗) P < 0.0001 versus C. P, pepsin peptides; T, trypsin peptides; C, control.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Lupin peptide effect on the catalytic domain of HMGCoAR. Bars indicate the effects of P peptides (0.5, 1.0, and 2.5 mg/mL) (A) and T peptides (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.5 mg/mL) (B) on HMGCoAR activity. HMGCoAR, physiologically, catalyzes the four-electron reduction of HMG-CoA to coenzyme A (CoA) and mevalonate (HMG-CoA + 2NADPH + 2H+ > mevalonate + 2NADP+ + CoA-SH). In this assay, the decrease in absorbance at 340 nm, which represents the oxidation of NADPH by the catalytic subunit of HMGCoAR in the presence of the substrate HMG-CoA, was measured spectrophotometrically. Data points represent averages ± SEM of three independent experiments in triplicate. (∗∗) P < 0.001 and (∗∗∗) P < 0.0001 versus C. P, pepsin peptides; T, trypsin peptides; C, control.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. Effect of P and T peptides on the SREBP2, LDLR, and HMGCoAR protein levels. HepG2 cells (1.5 × 105) were treated with 0.5, 1.0, and 2.5 mg/mL of P and T peptides for 24 h, respectively. SREBP2, LDLR, HMGCoAR, and β-actin immunoblotting signals were detected using specific anti-SREBP2, anti-LDLR, anti-HMGCoAR, and anti-β-actin primary antibodies, respectively (A). SREBP2 (B), LDLR (C), and HMGCoAR (D) signals were quantified by ImageJ software and normalized with β-actin signals. Bars represent averages of duplicate samples ± SEM of three independent experiments. (∗) P < 0.05 and (∗∗) P < 0.001 versus C. P, pepsin peptides; T, trypsin peptides; C, control.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. LDL uptake after P and T peptide treatments. HepG2 cells (3 × 104) were treated with P (0.5, 1.0, and 2.5 mg/mL) and T (0.25, 05, and 1.0 mg/mL) peptides for 24 h. LDL-Dylight 549 (10.0 μg/mL) was incubated for an additional 2 h. Excess LDL-Dylight 549 was removed, cells were washed two times with PBS, and specific fluorescent LDL uptake was analyzed by Synergy H1 (Biotek). Data points represent averages ± SEM of three independent experiments in triplicate. (∗) P < 0.05 and (∗∗) P < 0.001 versus C. P, pepsin peptides; T, trypsin peptides; C, control.

    Figure 6

    Figure 6. Effect of P and T peptides on the activation of Akt (Ser473) and GSK3 (Ser9). HepG2 cells (1.5 × 105) were treated with 0.5 and 1 mg/mL of P and T peptides for 24 h, respectively. The phosphorylation levels of Akt (Ser473) (A) and GSK3 (Ser9) (C) and β-actin immunoblotting signals were detected using specific anti-posphoAkt (Ser473), anti-posphoGSK3β (Ser9), and anti-β-actin primary antibodies, respectively. PosphoAkt signals (B) and posphoGSK3β (D) were quantified by ImageJ software and normalized with β-actin signals. Bars represent averages of duplicate samples ± SEM of three independent experiments. (∗) P < 0.05, (∗∗) P < 0.001, and (∗∗∗) P < 0.0001 versus C. P, pepsin peptides; T, trypsin peptides; C, control; pAkt, posphoAkt; pGSK3β, posphoGSK3β.

    Figure 7

    Figure 7. Involvement of PI3K/Akt pathway activation in the regulation of the LDLR–SREBP2 pathway through which lupin peptides mediate the cholesterol-lowering effects. HepG2 cells (1.5 × 105) were treated with 1.0 and 0.5 mg/mL of P and T peptides in the presence or absence of wortmannin for 24 h, respectively. The phosphorylation level of Akt (Ser473) (A) and β-actin immunoblotting signals were detected using specific anti-posphoAkt (Ser473) and anti-β-actin primary antibodies, respectively. Relative intensity of posphoAkt signals (B) was quantified by ImageJ software and normalized with β-actin signals. Panel C shows the LDL uptake after treatment with the PI3K inhibitor. HepG2 cells (3 × 104) were treated with P (1.0 mg/mL) and T (0.5 mg/mL) peptides in the presence or absence of wortmannin and inhibitor alone for 24 h. LDL-Dylight 549 (10.0 μg/mL) was incubated for additional 2 h. Excess LDL-Dylight 549 was removed, and cells were washed two times with PBS. Specific fluorescent LDL uptake was analyzed by Synergy H1 (Biotek). Bars represent averages of duplicate samples ± SEM of three independent experiments. pAkt, posphoAkt; P, pepsin peptides; T, trypsin peptides; C, control.

  • References

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    This article references 55 other publications.

    1. 1
      Sujak, A.; Kotlarz, A.; Strobel, W. Compositional and nutritional evaluation of several lupin seeds Food Chem. 2006, 98, 711 719
    2. 2
      Boschin, G.; D’Agostina, A.; Annicchiarico, P.; Arnoldi, A. Effect of genotype and environment on fatty acid composition of Lupinus albus L. seed Food Chem. 2008, 108, 600 606
    3. 3
      Boschin, G.; Arnoldi, A. Legumes are valuable sources of tocopherols Food Chem. 2011, 127, 1199 1203
    4. 4
      Katagiri, Y.; Ibrahim, R. K.; Tahara, S. HPLC analysis of white lupin isoflavonoids Biosci., Biotechnol., Biochem. 2000, 64, 1118 1125
    5. 5
      Muzquiz, M.; Pedrosa, M. M.; Cuadrado, C.; Ayet, G.; Burbano, C.; Brenes, A. Variation of Alkaloids, Alkaloids Esters, Phytic Acid and Phytase Activity in Germinated Seed of Lupinus albus and L. luteus; Wageningen Pers: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 1998.
    6. 6
      Caligari, S.; Chiesa, G.; Johnson, S. K.; Camisassi, D.; Gilio, D.; Marchesi, M.; Parolini, C.; Rubio, L. A.; Sirtori, C. R. Lupin (Lupinus albus) protein isolate (L-ISO) has adequate nutritional value and reduces large intestinal weight in rats after restricted and ad libitum feeding Ann. Nutr. Metab. 2006, 50, 528 537
    7. 7
      Boschin, G.; Annicchiarico, P.; Resta, D.; D’Agostina, A.; Arnoldi, A. Quinolizidine alkaloids in seeds of lupin genotypes of different origins J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 3657 3663
    8. 8
      D’Agostina, A.; Antonioni, C.; Resta, D.; Arnoldi, A.; Bez, J.; Knauf, U.; Waesche, A. Optimization of a pilot-scale process for producing lupin protein isolates with valuable technological properties and minimum thermal damage J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 92 98
    9. 9
      Doxastakis, G.; Papageorgiou, M.; Mandalou, D.; Irakli, M.; Papalamprou, E.; D’Agostina, A.; Resta, D.; Boschin, G.; Arnoldi, A. Technological properties and non-enzymatic browning of white lupin protein enriched spaghetti Food Chem. 2007, 101, 57 64
    10. 10
      Boschin, G.; Scigliuolo, G. M.; Resta, D.; Arnoldi, A. Optimization of the enzymatic hydrolysis of lupin (Lupinus) proteins for producing ACE-inhibitory peptides J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 1846 1851
    11. 11
      Sirtori, C. R.; Lovati, M. R.; Manzoni, C.; Castiglioni, S.; Duranti, M.; Magni, C.; Morandi, S.; D’Agostina, A.; Arnoldi, A. Proteins of white lupin seed, a naturally isoflavone-poor legume, reduce cholesterolemia in rats and increase LDL receptor activity in HepG2 cells J. Nutr. 2004, 134, 18 23
    12. 12
      Bettzieche, A.; Brandsch, C.; Weisse, K.; Hirche, F.; Eder, K.; Stangl, G. Lupin protein influences the expression of hepatic genes involved in fatty acid synthesis and triacylglycerol hydrolysis of adult rats Br. J. Nutr. 2008, 99, 952 962
    13. 13
      Bettzieche, A.; Brandsch, C.; Schmidt, M.; Weisse, K.; Eder, K.; Stangl, G. Differing effect of protein isolates from different cultivars of blue lupin on plasma lipoproteins of hypercholesterolemic rats Biosci., Biotechnol., Biochem. 2008, 72, 3114 3121
    14. 14
      Parolini, C.; Rigamonti, E.; Marchesi, M.; Busnelli, M.; Cinquanta, P.; Manzini, S.; Sirtori, C.; Chiesa, G. Cholesterol-lowering effect of dietary Lupinus angustifolius proteins in adult rats through regulation of genes involved in cholesterol homeostasis Food Chem. 2012, 132, 1475 1479
    15. 15
      Fontanari, G.; Batistuti, J.; da Cruz, R.; Saldiva, P.; Areas, J. Cholesterol-lowering effect of whole lupin (Lupinus albus) seed and its protein isolate Food Chem. 2012, 132, 1521 1526
    16. 16
      Marchesi, M.; Parolini, C.; Diani, E.; Rigamonti, E.; Cornelli, L.; Arnoldi, A.; Sirtori, C. R.; Chiesa, G. Hypolipidaemic and anti-atherosclerotic effects of lupin proteins in a rabbit model Br. J. Nutr. 2008, 100, 707 710
    17. 17
      Naruszewicz, M.; Nowicka, G.; Klosiewicz-Latoszek, L.; Arnoldi, A.; Sirtori, C. Effect of lupin protein (Lupinus albus) on cardiovascular risk factors in smokers with mild hypercholesterolemia Circulation 2006, 114, 874 874
    18. 18
      Sirtori, C. R.; Triolo, M.; Bosisio, R.; Bondioli, A.; Calabresi, L.; De Vergori, V.; Gomaraschi, M.; Mombelli, G.; Pazzucconi, F.; Zacherl, C.; Arnoldi, A. Hypocholesterolaemic effects of lupin protein and pea protein/fibre combinations in moderately hypercholesterolaemic individuals Br. J. Nutr. 2012, 107, 1176 1183
    19. 19
      Bähr, M.; Fechner, A.; Kiehntopf, M.; Jahreis, G. Consuming a mixed diet enriched with lupin protein beneficially affects plasma lipids in hypercholesterolemic subjects: a randomized controlled trial Clin. Nutr. 2014, DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2014.03.008
    20. 20
      Sirtori, C. R.; Agradi, E.; Conti, F.; Mantero, O.; Gatti, E. Soybean-protein diet in the treatment of type-II hyperlipoproteinaemia Lancet 1977, 1, 275 277
    21. 21
      Sirtori, C. R.; Eberini, I.; Arnoldi, A. Hypocholesterolaemic effects of soya proteins: results of recent studies are predictable from the Anderson meta-analysis data Br. J. Nutr. 2007, 97, 816 822
    22. 22
      Anderson, J. W.; Johnstone, B. M.; Cook-Newell, M. E. Meta-analysis of the effects of soy protein intake on serum lipids N. Engl. J. Med. 1995, 333, 276 282
    23. 23
      Harland, J.; Haffner, T. Systematic review, meta-analysis and regression of randomised controlled trials reporting an association between an intake of circa 25 g soya protein per day and blood cholesterol Atherosclerosis 2008, 200, 13 27
    24. 24
      FDA. Food labeling health claims: soybean protein and coronary heart disease. Final rule. Fed. Regist. 1999, 64, 57699 57733.
    25. 25
      Sirtori, C. R.; Galli, G.; Lovati, M. R.; Carrara, P.; Bosisio, E.; Kienle, M. G. Effects of dietary proteins on the regulation of liver lipoprotein receptors in rats J. Nutr. 1984, 114, 1493 1500
    26. 26
      Lovati, M. R.; Manzoni, C.; Canavesi, A.; Sirtori, M.; Vaccarino, V.; Marchi, M.; Gaddi, G.; Sirtori, C. R. Soybean protein diet increases low density lipoprotein receptor activity in mononuclear cells from hypercholesterolemic patients J. Clin. Invest. 1987, 80, 1498 1502
    27. 27
      Baum, J. A.; Teng, H.; Erdman, J. W. J.; Weigel, R. M.; Klein, B. P.; Persky, V. W.; Freels, S.; Surya, P.; Bakhit, R. M.; Ramos, E.; Shay, N. F.; Potter, S. M. Long-term intake of soy protein improves blood lipid profiles and increases mononuclear cell low-density-lipoprotein receptor messenger RNA in hypercholesterolemic, postmenopausal women Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1998, 68, 545 551
    28. 28
      Manzoni, C.; Duranti, M.; Eberini, I.; Scharnag, H.; März, W.; Castiglioni, S.; Lovati, M. Subcellular localization of soybean 7S globulin in HepG2 cells and LDL receptor up-regulation by its alpha′ constituent subunit J. Nutr. 2003, 133, 2149 2155
    29. 29
      Duranti, M.; Lovati, M. R.; Dani, V.; Barbiroli, A.; Scarafoni, A.; Castiglioni, S.; Ponzone, C.; Morazzoni, P. The alpha′ subunit from soybean 7S globulin lowers plasma lipids and upregulates liver beta-VLDL receptors in rats fed a hypercholesterolemic diet J. Nutr. 2004, 134, 1334 1339
    30. 30
      Consonni, A.; Lovati, M. R.; Parolari, A.; Manzoni, C.; Morazzoni, P.; Magni, C.; Duranti, M. Heterologous expression and purification of the soybean 7S globulin α′ subunit extension region: in vitro evidence of its involvement in cell cholesterol homeostasis Protein Express. Purif. 2011, 80, 125 129
    31. 31
      Cho, S.; Juillerat, M.; Lee, C. Identification of LDL-receptor transcription stimulating peptides from soybean hydrolysate in human hepatocytes J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 4372 4376
    32. 32
      Mochizuki, Y.; Maebuchi, M.; Kohno, M.; Hirotsuka, M.; Wadahama, H.; Moriyama, T.; Kawada, T.; Urade, R. Changes in lipid metabolism by soy β-conglycinin-derived peptides in HepG2 cells J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 1473 1480
    33. 33
      Vermeirssen, V.; van Camp, J.; Verstraete, W. Bioavailability of angiotensin I converting enzyme inhibitory peptides Br. J. Nutr. 2004, 92, 357 366
    34. 34
      Brugger, D.; Schuster, H.; Zöllner, N. Familial hypercholesterolemia and familial defective apolipoprotein B-100: comparison of the phenotypic expression In 116 cases Eur. J. Med. Res. 1996, 1, 383 386
    35. 35
      Ishibashi, S.; Brown, M. S.; Goldstein, J. L.; Gerard, R. D.; Hammer, R. E.; Herz, J. Hypercholesterolemia in low density lipoprotein receptor knockout mice and its reversal by adenovirus-mediated gene delivery J. Clin. Invest. 1993, 92, 883 893
    36. 36
      Twisk, J.; Gillian-Daniel, D. L.; Tebon, A.; Wang, L.; Barrett, P. H.; Attie, A. D. The role of the LDL receptor in apolipoprotein B secretion J. Clin. Invest. 2000, 105, 521 532
    37. 37
      Hussain, M. M. Structural, biochemical and signaling properties of the low-density lipoprotein receptor gene family Front. Biosci. 2001, 6, D417 D428
    38. 38
      Castoreno, A. B.; Wang, Y.; Stockinger, W.; Jarzylo, L. A.; Du, H.; Pagnon, J. C.; Shieh, E. C.; Nohturfft, A. Transcriptional regulation of phagocytosis-induced membrane biogenesis by sterol regulatory element binding proteins Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102, 13129 13134
    39. 39
      Horton, J. D.; Shimomura, I.; Brown, M. S.; Hammer, R. E.; Goldstein, J. L.; Shimano, H. Activation of cholesterol synthesis in preference to fatty acid synthesis in liver and adipose tissue of transgenic mice overproducing sterol regulatory element-binding protein-2 J. Clin. Invest. 1998, 101, 2331 2339
    40. 40
      Brown, M. S.; Goldstein, J. L. The SREBP pathway: regulation of cholesterol metabolism by proteolysis of a membrane-bound transcription factor Cell 1997, 89, 331 340
    41. 41
      Luu, W.; Sharpe, L. J.; Stevenson, J.; Brown, A. J. Akt acutely activates the cholesterogenic transcription factor SREBP-2 Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2012, 1823, 458 464
    42. 42
      Nohturfft, A.; Zhang, S. C. Coordination of lipid metabolism in membrane biogenesis Annu. Rev. Cell. Dev. Biol. 2009, 25, 539 566
    43. 43
      Whiteman, E. L.; Cho, H.; Birnbaum, M. J. Role of Akt/protein kinase B in metabolism Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2002, 13, 444 451
    44. 44
      Song, G.; Ouyang, G.; Bao, S. The activation of Akt/PKB signaling pathway and cell survival J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2005, 9, 59 71
    45. 45
      Krycer, J. R.; Sharpe, L. J.; Luu, W.; Brown, A. J. The Akt-SREBP nexus: cell signaling meets lipid metabolism Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2010, 21, 268 276
    46. 46
      Du, X.; Kristiana, I.; Wong, J.; Brown, A. J. Involvement of Akt in ER-to-Golgi transport of SCAP/SREBP: a link between a key cell proliferative pathway and membrane synthesis Mol. Biol. Cell 2006, 17, 2735 2745
    47. 47
      Boschin, G.; Scigliuolo, G. M.; Resta, D.; Arnoldi, A. ACE-inhibitory activity of enzymatic protein hydrolysates from lupin and other legumes Food Chem. 2014, 145, 34 40
    48. 48
      Levashov, P. A.; Sutherland, D. S.; Besenbacher, F.; Shipovskov, S. A robust method of determination of high concentrations of peptides and proteins Anal. Biochem. 2009, 395, 111 112
    49. 49
      Endo, A. The discovery and development of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors J. Lipid Res. 1992, 33, 1569 1582
    50. 50
      Horton, J. D.; Goldstein, J. L.; Brown, M. S. SREBPs: transcriptional mediators of lipid homeostasis Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 2002, 67, 491 498
    51. 51
      Edwards, P. A.; Tabor, D.; Kast, H. R.; Venkateswaran, A. Regulation of gene expression by SREBP and SCAP Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2000, 1529, 103 113
    52. 52
      Demoulin, J. B.; Ericsson, J.; Kallin, A.; Rorsman, C.; Rönnstrand, L.; Heldin, C. H. Platelet-derived growth factor stimulates membrane lipid synthesis through activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and sterol regulatory element-binding proteins J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 35392 35402
    53. 53
      Zhou, R. H.; Yao, M.; Lee, T. S.; Zhu, Y.; Martins-Green, M.; Shyy, J. Y. Vascular endothelial growth factor activation of sterol regulatory element binding protein: a potential role in angiogenesis Circ. Res. 2004, 95, 471 478
    54. 54
      Hegarty, B. D.; Bobard, A.; Hainault, I.; Ferré, P.; Bossard, P.; Foufelle, F. Distinct roles of insulin and liver X receptor in the induction and cleavage of sterol regulatory element-binding protein-1c Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102, 791 796
    55. 55
      Eberlé, D.; Hegarty, B.; Bossard, P.; Ferré, P.; Foufelle, F. SREBP transcription factors: master regulators of lipid homeostasis Biochimie 2004, 86, 839 848
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    Tables 1S and 2S. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

    Terms & Conditions

    Electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. The American Chemical Society holds a copyright ownership interest in any copyrightable Supporting Information. Files available from the ACS website may be downloaded for personal use only. Users are not otherwise permitted to reproduce, republish, redistribute, or sell any Supporting Information from the ACS website, either in whole or in part, in either machine-readable form or any other form without permission from the American Chemical Society. For permission to reproduce, republish and redistribute this material, requesters must process their own requests via the RightsLink permission system. Information about how to use the RightsLink permission system can be found at http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

OOPS

You have to login with your ACS ID befor you can login with your Mendeley account.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect

This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By continuing to use the site, you are accepting our use of cookies. Read the ACS privacy policy.

CONTINUE