logo
CONTENT TYPES

Figure 1Loading Img

Affinity Proteomic Profiling of Plasma, Cerebrospinal Fluid, and Brain Tissue within Multiple Sclerosis

View Author Information
Affinity Proteomics, SciLifeLab, School of Biotechnology, KTH − Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm 171 21, Sweden
Department of Neuroscience, SciLifeLab, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm 171 77, Sweden
§ Neuroimmunology Unit, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Tomtebodavägen 18A, Stockholm 171 77, Sweden
Pathology Department, VU Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam 1081 HV, The Netherlands
*E-mail: [email protected]. Tel: +46 (0)8 5248 1482.
Cite this: J. Proteome Res. 2014, 13, 11, 4607-4619
Publication Date (Web):September 18, 2014
https://doi.org/10.1021/pr500609e
Copyright © 2014 American Chemical Society
Authors ChoiceACS AuthorChoice
with CC-BY license
Article Views
2272
Altmetric
-
Citations
LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

PDF (7 MB)
Supporting Info (1)»

Abstract

The brain is a vital organ and because it is well shielded from the outside environment, possibilities for noninvasive analysis are often limited. Instead, fluids taken from the spinal cord or circulatory system are preferred sources for the discovery of candidate markers within neurological diseases. In the context of multiple sclerosis (MS), we applied an affinity proteomic strategy and screened 22 plasma samples with 4595 antibodies (3450 genes) on bead arrays, then defined 375 antibodies (334 genes) for targeted analysis in a set of 172 samples and finally used 101 antibodies (43 genes) on 443 plasma as well as 573 cerebrospinal spinal fluid (CSF) samples. This revealed alteration of protein profiles in relation to MS subtypes for IRF8, IL7, METTL14, SLC30A7, and GAP43. Respective antibodies were subsequently used for immunofluorescence on human post-mortem brain tissue with MS pathology for expression and association analysis. There, antibodies for IRF8, IL7, and METTL14 stained neurons in proximity of lesions, which highlighted these candidate protein targets for further studies within MS and brain tissue. The affinity proteomic translation of profiles discovered by profiling human body fluids and tissue provides a powerful strategy to suggest additional candidates to studies of neurological disorders.

SPECIAL ISSUE

This article is part of the Proteomics of Human Diseases: Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Treatment special issue.

Introduction

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common cause of chronic neurological disability in young adults.(1) It is a neurodegenerative and inflammatory disorder of the central nervous system (CNS), has three major subtypes, and leads to the formation of multifocal demyelinating white matter lesions and gray matter lesions.(2) Although most patients with relapsing remitting MS (RRMS) later develop secondary progressive MS (SPMS), steady progression of neurological damage without periods of remission or recovery from symptoms,(3, 4) periods of relapses, and remissions (RR-rel and RR-rem) may persist without worsening of symptoms for years. Current diagnosis of MS currently relies on a combination of several clinical investigations, such as magnetic resonance imaging of the brain and identification of oligoclonal IgG in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF).(5) However, additional indicators of disease are needed because interindividual variations in neuropathological features and clinical manifestations complicate both an early-stage diagnosis and prediction of disease progression.(6, 7)
Hereto, proteins in CNS tissue potentially hold much of the sought-after information. However, and as true for other neurological diseases, it is a challenge to access samples of brain tissue for discovery-driven approaches. To otherwise gain insights into disease-related mechanism and pathophysiology, disease-specific protein profiles can be searched for in systemic plasma or proximal CSF.(8-11) The current scarcity of so-far reported disease-specific proteins within MS(12) may be due to several reasons such as the limited number of samples and the aforementioned disease heterogeneity.
Affinity-based assays can be particularly useful to address this challenge because they allow efficient and subsequent use of binding reagents across different analysis platforms and sample materials. Affinity reagents used in the presented study were from the Human Protein Atlas (HPA),(13) which since 2005(14) has produced polyclonal antibodies against more than 80% of all human protein encoding genes and is an initiative aiming to generate affinity reagents for the proteome.(15) Besides using affinity reagents on well-established platforms such as immunohistochemistry, microarray-based assays can be used to screen hundreds of protein targets in hundreds of body fluid samples with minimal requirements on sample volume.(16)
In the presented study, we used affinity proteomic methods to discover MS related protein profiles in body fluids for subsequent tissue analysis. Starting from an initial screening, follow-up and targeted assays were performed on suspension bead arrays for multiplexed profiling of plasma and CSF of MS patients. We then chose the identified targets to study disease processes in sections from human MS brain tissues in combination with markers for astrocytes, microglia, and infiltrating macrophages.

Materials and Methods

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Samples

EDTA plasma samples utilized in the untargeted discovery stage were obtained from an in-house biobank of samples collected during routine neurological diagnostic workup at the neurology clinic of Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm, Sweden. The set of paired plasma and CSF samples utilized in the verification stage contained samples collected at three hospitals within Sweden. All patients were examined and diagnosed by a neurologist and fulfilled the McDonald criteria.(17) Patients with MS were classified as RRMS, SPMS, or primary progressive MS (PPMS), where the first subtype was subdivided further into patients during relapse (RR-rel) or remission (RR-rem). Samples from patients with a single demyelinating event, the so-called clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), were also included in the study. The control group consisted of individuals with other neurological diseases (ONDs) and ONDs with signs of inflammation (iOND). The individuals with OND had a variety of neurological signs and symptoms similar to MS, such as sensory symptoms, visual disturbance, headache, and so on, while the iOND group consisted of individuals with other inflammation-driven diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), neuropathy, or viral/bacterial infections, for example, borreliosis, meningitis, or herpes encephalitis (Table 1A–D). Study enrolment followed the recommendations of the Declaration of Helsinki and approval by the Ethics Committee of the Karolinska Institute (DNR 2009/2104-31-2). Oral and written information was given to the patients, and informed consent in writing was received before inclusion. All samples were prepared according to standard procedures and stored at −80 °C until usage.
Table 1. (A) Demographics of Plasma Samples Used for Targeted Discovery, (B) Demographics of Plasma Samples Used for Verification, (C) Demographics of CSF Specimen, and (D) Demographics of Plasma Samples Used for IRF8 Verification
(A)
   age
sample groupN% femalemedianrange
OND64674019–68
CIS-rem13623325–60
CIS-rel5805137–63
RR-rem46743219–57
RR-rel14572922–56
SPMS20705235–68
PPMS10605244–62
total172   
(B)
   age
sample groupN% femalemedianrange
OND101724119–68
iOND83724318–83
CIS-rem28753421–60
CIS-rel11823723–63
RR-rel147743917–70
RR-rem38553822–60
SPMS35545428–68
total443   
(C)
   age
sample groupN% femalemedianrange
iOND91724118–83
OND148744019–68
CIS-rem11823723–63
CIS-rel31773321–60
RR-rem42624022–68
RR-rel193753817–70
SPMS43535435–68
PPMS14645235–62
total573   
(D)
   age
sample groupN% femalemedianrange
CIS17823725–50
RR-rem17743725–50
SPMS16604733–61
total50   
Tissue brain sections from 15 patients with MS were obtained from tissues collected at autopsy, and patient characteristics are listed in Supplementary Table 1 in the Supporting Information. The rapid autopsy regimen of The Netherlands Brain Bank in Amsterdam (coordinated by Dr. I. Huitinga) was used to acquire the samples, with the approval of the Medical Ethical Committee of the VU University Medical Center. All patients and controls had given informed consent for autopsy and use of their brain tissue for research purposes. All patient material was coded to ensure anonymity throughout tissue processing. The clinical neuropathological diagnosis for MS tissues was confirmed by Prof. P. van der Valk. Tissue samples from MS cases were obtained after ex vivo magnetic resonance imaging scanning, as previously described by De Groot et al.(18) Classification of lesion staging was based on immunohistochemical detection of cells that express major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II/HLA-DR and the presence of proteolipid protein (PLP) to reveal areas of myelin loss.(18) A set of healthy control human brains from patients who had no infections or history of serious illness or head trauma was obtained from the Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, SciLifeLab Uppsala, Stockholm.(19)

Antibodies and Bead Array Generation

The majority of the antibodies utilized in this study were generated within the Human Protein Atlas project, as previously described,(20) and additional antibodies were obtained through various commercial sources (see Supplementary Table 2 in the Supporting Information). Antibodies for the initial plasma screening were not selected based on their target protein but as they became available from the Human Protein Atlas.(21) However, in the targeted screening, the selection was made based on prior knowledge of disease relation according to literature and in-house multidisease studies including other neurodegenerative diseases (Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and mild cognitive impairment).
Bead arrays were created as previously described(22) with modifications that relate to normalizing the concentration of antibodies using liquid handling (EVO150, TECAN) by diluting 1.6 μg of each antibody into 100 μL of 0.05 M MES buffer (pH 4.5). All antibodies were then coupled to carboxylated, color-coded magnetic beads (MagPlex-C, Luminex) to create bead arrays of up to 384-plex. The coupling of each antibody on the beads was confirmed via R-phycoerythrin-conjugated donkey antirabbit IgG antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch), where all antibodies revealed median fluorescence intensity (MFI) values of 15 000–19 000 AU.

Plasma Profiling

Plasma samples stored at −80 °C were thawed at 4 °C, centrifuged for 10 min at 3000 rpm, and then transferred into 96-well microtiter plates with a liquid handling system (EVO150, TECAN). Sample locations were randomized according to a plate layout design, which allowed a balanced distribution of samples across multiple plates in terms of both categorical variables and the quantitative variable of age. Samples were then labeled with biotin, as previously described(23) and transferred by liquid handling (Selma, CyBio). The 1:10 diluted and biotinylated samples were subsequently utilized without removal of excess biotin and diluted 1:50 in an assay buffer composed of 0.5% (w/v) poly(vinyl alcohol) and 0.8% (w/v) polyvinylpyrrolidone (Sigma) in 0.1% casein in PBS (PVXC) supplemented with 0.5 mg/mL nonspecific rabbit IgG (Bethyl), yielding a total sample dilution of 1:500. Diluted samples were heat-treated for 30 min at 56 °C and cooled to 20 °C for 15 min in a thermocycler (Techne, TC-PLUS), and 45 μL of heat-treated samples was added to 5 μL of the antibody suspension bead array distributed into a 384-well microtiter plate (Greiner BioOne). The incubation took place overnight on a shaker (Grant) at ambient temperature. Beads were then washed with 3 × 60 μL PBS-T (1 × PBS pH 7.4, 0.05% Tween20) using a plate washer (EL406, Biotek), followed by an incubation for 10 min with 50 μL of a stop solution containing 0.4% paraformaldehyde in PBS. Beads were washed with 1 × 60 μL of PBS-T, and 50 μL of 0.5 μg/mL R-phycoerythrin-labeled streptavidin (Invitrogen) in PBS-T was added and incubated for 20 min. Finally, beads were washed with 3 × 60 μL and measured in 60 μL of PBS-T. Measurements were performed using a FlexMap3D instrument (Luminex). For each sample and bead ID, 50 events were collected, and binding to beads was reported as MFI and used for data analysis.

CSF Profiling

Immediately after lumbar puncture, cells were removed from CSF supernatant by centrifugation at 350g, and samples were frozen at −80 °C. As previously described,(23) all CSF samples were diluted 1:2 in PBS supplemented with 0.5% BSA (Sigma) and 0.1% rabbit IgG (Bethyl) at labeling, where a 10-fold molar excess of biotin over protein amount was utilized. Before incubation with the antibody bead array, samples were diluted 1:8 in PVXC buffer, heat-treated at 56 °C for 30 min, and cooled to 20 °C for 15 min. Incubation and the following sample processing was performed according to the described plasma procedure.

Western Blot Analysis

A plasma pool from four MS patients and IRF8 overexpressing lysate (LY419485, OriGene) was diluted 1:50 and 1:100 in LDS sample buffer and sample reducing agent (both from NuPAGE Invitrogen) dissolved in Milli-Q water. Samples were heated to 95 °C for 5 min, loaded on a Bis-Tris 4–12% gel (Invitrogen) and run at constant 200 V using a XCell SureLock mini-cell electrophoresis system (Invitrogen) with MOPS SDS running buffer (Invitrogen). A Novex X-Cell II blot module (Invitrogen) was used for transferring proteins onto a 0.45 μm PVDF membrane (Invitrogen) at constant 30 V. Membranes were blocked with blocking reagents for ELISA for 2 h prior overnight incubation at 4 °C with primary antibodies (1 μg/mL). Membranes were washed three times in TBS-T (1 × TBS pH 7.5, 0.05% Tween20) and detection was enabled using HRP-labeled antirabbit, antimouse (both Dako), and antisheep antibodies (R&D) together with a chemiluminescent substrate (Immun-Star Western C Kit, Biorad).

Epitope Mapping

Epitope mapping of antibodies was performed on high-density peptide arrays as previously described,(24) where each array contained 12-mer peptides with 11-residue overlap to the next peptide, thereby covering the regions of the protein fragments used for antibody generation.

Data Analysis

Data Processing

The data analysis was performed in the statistical computing software R.(25) Data sets from the initial untargeted screening and the targeted discovery, both generated with 384-plex assays, were preprocessed in the following steps: sample outliers were detected by robust principal component analysis (rPCA) using the “rrcov” R package, and for these samples, all MFI values for the outliers were removed.(26) The refined data were subjected to probabilistic quotient normalization (PQN),(27) followed by plate normalization, which for each antibody intensity profile adjusts the mean of each plate toward the mean of all plates by the local average of other antibodies.(28) For verification of protein profiles in plasma, the data generated by the 101-plex bead array on two 384-well plates (denoted plates #1 and #2) were subjected to outlier removal and PQN normalization, as previously described. Plates #1 and #2, with a similar distribution of samples per patient group, were normalized independently and treated as two separate data sets. Out of 579 patient samples, 443 were used for statistical analysis (Table 1B) after carefully excluding samples classified as outliers (N = 13), samples from a compromised delivery (N = 118), and PPMS samples (N = 5). The data sets were further processed by a linear regression normalization of log-transformed data, where the MFI values for each antibody were adjusted by four covariates: shipment, labeling plate, age, and gender. The gender covariate was added to the intensity ≈ shipment + plate + age normalization only if it significantly (Anova P value <0.05) contributed to the model. The data set obtained for verification of IRF8 in plasma was not processed prior statistical analysis due to the small number of samples analyzed. For the data obtained from CSF analysis using the 101-plex bead array, PQN normalization was performed, and in total 28 sample outliers were removed by rPCA.

Statistical Analysis

All p values from two-group comparisons were generated by Mann–Whitney tests using log-transformed data. If stated, p values were adjusted for multiple testing by Bonferroni correction. Lasso logistic regression implemented in the “penalized” R-package(29, 30) was applied to build a multivariate classification model for two patient groups. The tuning parameter lambda for the pairwise classifier was determined by five-fold cross-validation, and the optimal lambda was chosen to have maximum cross-validated likelihood.(30) Because during cross-validation each random separation of the data into subsets gives rise to a variation of the optimal value, the cross-validations with dissimilar splits were repeated 100 times to obtain a stable parameter. The Lasso model was fitted with the mean of 100 lambdas to all data in plate #1 from the plasma verification phase. Then, the classification accuracy was assessed using the data from the separate set of samples in plate #2. The selection of contributing variables in the resulting antibody panel was performed simultaneously by Lasso. Variation in the data was assessed for plate #1 and plate #2 by the percentage of coefficients of variation (% CV), which was calculated as the average % CV across all antibody profiles in 16 replicates of a pooled sample. For correlation network analysis in plasma and in CSF, the data were log-transformed, mean-centered, and scaled before combining both plates. Correlation was calculated using Spearman rank correlation coefficients (Rho) in separate correlation matrices for the different patient groups. Rho values, both in plasma and CSF, were further visualized in correlation network diagrams(31) using Cytoscape.(32) This data set was also used for unsupervised hierarchical clustering (Euclidian distances) of SPMS and CIS samples and a direct plasma-CSF correlation for paired samples. Jalview software(33) was used for sequence alignment and tree construction of peptide sequences revealed by epitope mapping; for all peptide sequences with signals over local background >3, multiple sequence alignments were performed by ClustalO and BLOSUM62 was used for tree construction. The logos were created using WebLogo,(34) and a similarity search was performed using the NCBI BLASTP (ver. 2.2.29) algorithm and scored with PAM30 matrices.

Tissue Analysis

Immunofluorescence

Multiple immunofluorescence immunohistochemistry was performed on 7 μm thick human cortex sections containing chronic and acute lesions cut from paraffin-embedded blocks on a sliding microtome and mounted onto glass slides coated with 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (Sigma). Sections containing human cortex cores (⌀ 2 mm) from individuals without clinical signs of neuropsychiatric disease part served as controls. All sections were stained on an automated Leica Bond RX system. Briefly, sections were deparaffinized (Bond Dewax solution AR9222), rehydrated, and treated for 40 min in an EDTA-based pH 9.0 solution (Bond Epitope Retrieval solution 2 AR9640) to unmask the antigens. Slides were then incubated in normal donkey serum for 30 min, followed by the addition of the primary antibody cocktail mix (containing IBA-1 and one HPA antibody) diluted in Bond Primary antibody diluent (AR9352) for 8 h at room temperature. Sections were washed 3 × 15 min in PBS and incubated for 90 min at room temperature with secondary antibody cocktail mix (Cy3-labelled anti-rabbit and Cy5-labelled anti-goat) diluted 1/200 in 0.2 M PB. Sections were washed 3 × 15 min in PBS and subsequently incubated for 8 h with 488-conjugated mouse anti-GFAP antibody (diluted in Bond Primary antibody diluent) at room temperature. Slides were washed 3 × 15 min in PBS and counterstained with Hoechst 33342 (diluted 1:10 000 in PBS) for 30 min at room temperature. Finally, slides were incubated for 30 min in 1% Sudan Black solution in 70% ethanol to quench autofluorescence and mounted in PVA-DABCO.

Slide Scanning Microscopy

Fluorescence microscope images were acquired on a Vslide slide scanning microscope (MetaSystems, Alltlussheim, Germany) equipped with a CoolCube 1 camera (12 bit gray scale), 10× and 20× objectives and filter sets for DAPI (EX350/50 - EM470/40), FITC (EX493/16 – EM527/30), Cy3 (EX546/10 – EM580/30), Cy3.5 (EX581/10 – EM617/40), and Cy5 (EX630/20–647/long pass). Whole microscope slides were scanned at 2.5 × , and tissue was detected based on the Hoechst 33342 signal. After generating a position map, all tissue-covered areas were scanned using 20× primary objective. Individual field of view images were stitched to generate a large four-channel fluorescence image of the entire specimen with microscopic resolution. Images obtained with Vslide were analyzed using Metaviewer (Metasystems).

Laser-Scanning Microscopy

On the basis of the generated tissue scans, areas with clear inflammatory processes and more “healthy” appearing areas were selected for further investigation. Images were acquired on a 780LSM confocal laser-scanning microscope (Zeiss). Emission spectra for each dye were limited as follows: Hoechst (420–485 nm), Cy2 (505–530 nm), Cy3 (560–610 nm), and Cy5 (640–720 nm). Coexistence was defined as immunosignals being present without physical signal separation in ≤1.0 μm optical slices at 40× (Plan-Neofluar 40 × /1.30) or 63× (Plan-Apochromat 63 × /1.40) primary magnification. Images obtained with the Zeiss confocal microscope were analyzed using the ZEN software package (Zeiss).

Results

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Here we employed an affinity proteomics approach to identify proteins related to MS by using antibodies on three different types of sample material: plasma, CSF, and brain tissue. Starting with multiplexed antibody suspension bead arrays, protein profiles were generated in three sets of plasma samples as well as in partially paired CSF samples. Lastly, the interesting antibodies were chosen to stain sections from MS brain tissues (Figure 1).

Figure 1

Figure 1. Study overview. Over initial screening and targeted discovery analysis, protein profiles were generated in plasma from more than 170 000 immunoassays on antibody suspension bead arrays. In the screening phase, 3450 unique proteins targeted by 4595 antibodies were profiled for untargeted discovery in 22 plasma samples from MS cases and nondiseased controls. 384 antibodies toward 334 proteins, including 48 proteins that had been selected from the initial screening, were then used for a targeted discovery in plasma from a total of 172 different individuals diagnosed with MS, CIS, or OND. To confirm initial findings, we evaluated 43 protein targets in additional sample material on a 101-plex focused bead array. A set of 443 plasma samples–out of which 124 had been included in the prior stage–and 573 CSF samples were analyzed. These body fluid profiling efforts resulted in candidate targets that were subsequently evaluated by immunofluorescence analysis of post-mortem brain tissue sections from MS patients. One of these candidate antibodies, anti-IRF8, was further verified in an independent set of 50 plasma samples and characterized by Western blot analysis and epitope mapping.

Initial Discovery Screening

Protein profiles were generated from plasma with 4595 HPA antibodies targeting 3450 unique proteins in 12 rounds of analysis on 384-plex bead arrays. Plasma from 16 MS patients (8 RRMS, 4 SPMS, 4 PPMS) and 6 nondiseased controls was analyzed, alongside 760 other serum and plasma samples within cancer, cardiovascular, and neurodegenerative diseases (data not shown). Antibodies that revealed profiles of significant differences (p < 0.05) between the 16 MS cases and 6 nondiseased controls were evaluated for further investigations. These were selected if they were (i) MS-specific in comparison with the other profiled neurodegenerative diseases or (ii) of potential relevance according to the biological processes related to a specific target. This investigation resulted in a refined list of 56 antibodies against 48 target proteins (Supplementary Table 2A in the Supporting Information), including one of the highlighted targets of the herein presented study, methyltransferase-like protein 14 (METTL14).

First Targeted Discovery Across MS Subtypes

Following the previously described initial discovery analysis based on 3450 targets, 296 additional protein targets were selected based on a thorough and inclusive literature search, including proteomic studies in blood or CSF,(35-42) a genome wide association study,(43) blood transcriptome analysis,(44) and other related works(10, 23, 41, 45-54) as well as previous results from internal neuroscience related protein profiling efforts. Subsequently, this first targeted 384-plex bead array for 334 proteins was created to profile an additional set of 172 plasma samples (Table 1). The SPMS-CIS (CIS-rel and CIS-rem combined) comparison revealed elevated protein profiles in SPMS for interleukin 7 (IL7, HPA019590; adjusted p = 0.001) and S100 calcium binding protein A8 (S100A8, HPA024372; adjusted p = 0.02). Similar differences with these two protein profiles were also found when comparing RRMS (RR-rel and RR-rem combined)-CIS (adjusted p = 0.03). An antibody targeting myotrophin (MTPN, HPA019735), showed higher intensities in the SPMS subtype compared with CIS (adjusted p = 0.01). Additional SPMS-CIS differences were revealed for interferon regulatory factor 8 (IRF8, HPA002531; p = 0.03) and serine proteinase inhibitor member 3 (SERPINA3, HPA002560; p = 0.009), when p values were not adjusted for multiple testing. For follow-up experiments, these tentative candidates as well as antibodies generated against different epitopes of the same proteins were included.

Second Targeted Analysis Across MS Subtypes

A second focused bead array was built on the above indications and by adding antibodies from a previous CSF profiling study.(23) This list was again supplemented with other internally identified targets from screening an independent MS-related serum sample cohort (data not shown). The resulting 101-plex bead array addressed 43 proteins (Supplementary Table 2B in the Supporting Information), and was used to analyze an extended set of 443 plasma samples from patients with OND, iOND, CIS, RRMS, and SPMS (Table 1B). Here assays were performed in two separate 384-well plates with %CV of 6.5 for plate #1 and 5.1 for plate #2.
In concordance with the findings above, two-group univariate comparisons revealed most significant differences between SPMS-CIS groups (Figure 2A,B, Supplementary Table 4 in the Supporting Information) and by antibodies against IL7, IRF8, METTL14, the zinc transporter solute carrier family 30 member 7 (SLC30A7), as well as the growth associated protein 43 (GAP43). For these five candidates, we observed no gender effects (p > 0.05) but an interindividual spread in MFI values within each subtype and even prior normalization (Supplementary Figure 1 in the Supporting Information). Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) were reproducible (Supplementary Figure 2 in the Supporting Information); as an example, anti-IRF8 HPA002531 showed a high correlation (plate1: spearman Rho = 0.91; plate2: Rho = 0.89) when this antibody was utilized in a different bead array composition on the very same set of samples. These SPMS-CIS differences were further illustrated by unsupervised hierarchical clustering of plasma protein profiles for these two patient groups (Figure 2C). Models for multiparameter comparison across disease subtypes were then calculated using Lasso logistic regression and summarized in Table 2 and Supplementary Figure 3 in the Supporting Information; area under the curve (AUC) values of up to 0.80 could be achieved with antibody panels consisting of varying number of antibodies. An IRF8 contribution was found for all but the RRMS-SPMS comparison.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Candidate protein profiles in plasma and CSF. (A) Antibodies targeting IRF8, IL7, METTL14, SLC30A7, and GAP43 revealed differential levels in plasma from 443 individuals (left panel). For the same antibodies, corresponding plots are shown for 573 CSF individuals (right panel), with 418 individuals overlapping between plasma and CSF. Data shown are both normalized and scaled. For visualization purposes, outliers are not shown. (B) Overview of two-group comparisons performed between the main MS subtypes, for each of the five proteins and on both plasma and CSF. (C) Unsupervised hierarchical cluster analysis for CIS and SPMS plasma using the five antibodies resulted in two main clusters, each being enriched for either of the two subtypes. No gender-related enrichment was observed, and by definition, SPMS patients were older than those of CIS. The corresponding plot for CSF can be found as Supplementary Figure 5 in the Supporting Information.

Table 2. Multivariate Analysisa
comparisonAUCgene namesENSG IDantibodies
RRMS vs CIS0.72IRF8ENSG00000140968HPA002531
METTL14ENSG00000145388HPA038001
CIS vs SPMS0.80ANXA1ENSG00000135046HPA011271
IL7ENSG00000104432HPA019590
IRF8ENSG00000140968HPA002531
METTL14ENSG00000145388HPA038001
TJP2ENSG00000119139HPA001813
OND vs SPMS0.78ALPK2ENSG00000198796HPA029801
ANXA1ENSG00000135046HPA011271
APEX1ENSG00000100823HPA002564
DNMT3BENSG00000088305HPA001595
IL7ENSG00000104432HPA019590
IRF8ENSG00000140968HPA002531
SLC30A7ENSG00000162695HPA018034
TJP2ENSG00000119139HPA001813
ZFP36L1ENSG00000185650HPA035423
RRMS vs SPMS0.77ALPK2ENSG00000198796HPA029801
ANXA1ENSG00000135046HPA011271
DNMT3BENSG00000088305HPA001595
IL7ENSG00000104432HPA019590
SLC30A7ENSG00000162695HPA018034
TJP2ENSG00000119139HPA001813
ZFP36L1ENSG00000185650HPA035423
a

Lasso logistic models were fitted to plate 1 data for pair-wise classifications. The performance of each model was evaluated using the data from a separate set of individuals in plate 2. Only classifiers with AUC > 0.7 are shown. Corresponding ROC curves are shown in Supplementary Figure 4 in the Supporting Information.

Verification Analysis for IRF8

For further evaluation of differences between SPMS, CIS, and RRMS, an independent set of plasma samples was analyzed (Table 1D), where RRMS and CIS subtypes were age- and gender-matched, while diagnosis of SPMS is inherently related to older age. In contrast with previous analysis, METTL14, SLC30A7, IL7, and GAP43 did not reveal statistically significant differences (data not shown), and there was a significant difference for IRF8 (HPA002531) between genders (p = 0.02). But as shown in Figure 3, a separate analysis using the 37 female patients revealed elevated IRF8 levels for SPMS compared with CIS (p = 0.001) and RRMS (p = 0.0005).

Figure 3

Figure 3. Analysis of IRF8 in an independent set of plasma samples. Signal intensities from HPA002531 (IRF8) in 50 plasma samples (CIS, RRMS (RR-rem), and SPMS). Although the signal intensities differed between males and females (left), a comparison only within the 37 female individuals revealed statistically significant and elevated signal intensities in SPMS samples compared with RRMS and CIS samples.

These indications lead to focus on IRF8 as the main target of interest. Three available antibodies against IRF8 were analyzed in Western blot using a cell lysate overexpressing this regulatory factor. This revealed a single band at the predicted 50 kDa range detected by all three antibodies. When analyzing a pool of plasma samples, only HPA002531 showed a single band at a slightly lower molecular mass of ±40 kDa (Supplementary Figure 4A in the Supporting Information). In addition, epitope mapping was performed on high-density peptide arrays for HPA002531 on peptides covering the protein fragment that had been selected to generate this antibody. Two epitopes with consensus peptide sequences, PYKVYRIVPEE and MEIAEVDSVVPVNN, were found (Supplementary Figure 4B in the Supporting Information). A homology search for the first consensus sequence revealed 100% similarity to the 106–116 amino acid region of IRF8 (E value =1 × 105), whereas the second consensus sequence showed a nonsignificant similarity of 64% to the predicted human protein GA-binding protein subunit beta-2 isoform X6 (GABPB2, E value =1.3).

Profiling of Paired CSF Samples

The targeted 101-plex bead array was then used to analyze a set of 573 CSF samples (Table 1C). As previously reported,(23) a subset of these CSF samples (n = 339) had been analyzed and revealed that levels for GAP43 and SERPINA3 were altered between MS subtypes and controls. The current analysis with 573 samples shown in Figure 2A (see Supplementary Figure 5A in the Supporting Information for analysis of the new 234 sample subset) confirmed these observations. GAP43 was detected at lower levels in SPMS compared with RRMS, OND, and iOND groups (p < 0.007). Also, antibodies against SERPINA3 confirmed pervious analysis and showed higher levels in RRMS and iOND groups (p < 0.001, Supplementary Figure 5A in the Supporting Information). For both targets, profiles obtained by paired antibodies revealed correlating intensities (Supplementary Figure 5B in the Supporting Information). Apart from GAP43, protein profiles determined in CSF did not confirm indications found in plasma (Figure 2 B). A correlation analysis between paired plasma and CSF samples did not reveal congruence in protein profiles with −0.5 < Rho < 0.5 (data not shown).

Correlation Networks Across MS Subtypes

In the second targeted analysis phase, we also studied differential correlation of protein profiles across MS subtypes in plasma and CSF to investigate the relation between the five highlighted protein profiles within each subtype. As shown for plasma in Figure 4, network analysis revealed a prominent positive correlation between SLC30A7 and GAP43 in all subtypes. Also, a higher correlation between IL7 and IRF8 profiles was found in SPMS compared with other groups. In CSF, however, a positive correlation between SLC30A7 and IL7 was observed in all subtypes. Notably, profiles for IL7 and METTL14 were most similar in SPMS, while METTL14 was concordant with IRF8 in CIS, however, discordant in relapsing RRMS. Thus, indications for subtype specific networks were shown, and intranetwork relations were found to be dependent on the type of the analyzed body fluid.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Correlation networks of candidate profiles in plasma and CSF. Network diagrams were generated to summarize correlation relationships between the five highlighted proteins for subtypes of MS and OND and both plasma (left panel) and CSF (right panel). For all combinations of these five proteins, Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was calculated between MFI values for any given two proteins within each sample group and sample type, and the correlations were visualized in the network diagrams. The strength and direction of correlation coefficients were visualized with different line widths and colors. The network diagrams demonstrate considerable differences in correlation relations across these five proteins within plasma and CSF. Note, for example, the strong positive correlation between SLC30A7 and GAP43 exclusively unveiled in plasma samples of all sample groups. Furthermore, two correlation relations were uniquely revealed for the SPMS subgroup: the positive correlations between IL7 and IRF8 in plasma and IL7 and METTL14 in CSF.

Distribution of Identified Targets in the MS Brain

Following the analysis of body fluid samples, antibodies identified for IRF8, METTL14, IL7, GAP43, SERPINA3, and SLC30A7 were applied to brain tissue sections from MS patients (Table 3 and Supplementary Table 1 in the Supporting Information). A multiplex fluorescence approach was used to investigate the expression and distribution of the MS associated proteins in the vicinity of lesions and to identify the cellular distribution of selected targets in glia cells either by expression or phagocytosis. For tissue staining, the identified antibodies were combined with antibodies for the astrocyte marker glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and the microglia marker ionized calcium adapter molecule 1 (IBA1). On the basis of GFAP immunoreactivity and Sudan Black counterstaining, single or multiple lesions could be identified. The majority of lesions were localized at the border between gray and white matter expanding into the latter (Figure 5A–D). Most plaques were active lesions characterized by large numbers of microglia cells within and surrounding the plaque (Figure 5E).

Figure 5

Figure 5. Expression of candidate proteins in human MS brain tissue. Selected antibodies were applied to three to four cortical brain sections containing a single or multiple lesions. (A–D) Schematic drawing of the specimens illustrating gray (blue color) and white matter (light gray color) structures and identified lesion sites (red color). (E) All specimens were stained with antibodies against the astrocyte marker GFAP and microglia marker IBA1 in combination with antibodies directed against the selected targets. Panel E shows the distribution of GFAP and IBA-1 immunoreactivity at the border of a plaque. The presence of numerous IBA1-immunoreactive microglia indicates that this is an active lesion (E1). (F) IRF8-immunoreactivity could only be detected in neuron-like cells throughout the examined brain sections including the gray matter near lesions. (G) Neuron-like mainly nuclear staining pattern was observed for METTL14. In addition, a nuclear staining in microglia (open arrowheads in G) could also be identified. (H) IL7-immunoreactivity was limited to sparsely distributed neuron-like cells and (I) GFAP+ astrocytes in MS affected areas. (J) Differences in GAP43-immunoreactivity within a single section could be observed. In areas lacking signs of sclerosis, GAP43-immunoreactivity revealed a network of fibers with strongest intensity in the deeper cortical layers. (K) In lesion sites characterized by the strong activation of astrocytes and expression of GFAP, the amount of GAP43 immunoreactivity fibers was markedly reduced. (L,M) Immunohistochemistry for SERPINA3 (L) and SLC30A7 (M) revealed labeling of IBA1+ microglia for both (open arrowheads in L and M) while immunoreactivity could also be detected in the lumen of brain capillaries (arrows in L and M). Scale bars: 1 cm (A–D), 100 μm (E), 20 μm (E1,J–M), 10 μm (F–I).

Table 3. Annotation of Candidate Expression in Brain Tissuea
locationantibodygene nameannotation
neuronalHPA015600GAP43MS: intense axon-like staining pattern
normal: N/A
HPA019590IL7MS: moderate to strong expression in neurons (soma and processes) and some blood vessels
normal: weak to moderate in perikarya
HPA002531IRF8MS: strong staining in perikarya (including axonal processes) and blood vessels
normal: moderate staining in neuronal perikarya
HPA038001METTL14MS: moderate to strong staining in neurons (mainly nuclear and some processes and some inflammatory cells)
Normal: moderate to strong expression, mostly nuclear
glialHPA018034SLC30A7MS: moderate immunoreactivity in blood vessels and microglia
normal: N/A
HPA024372S100A8MS: strong expression in macrophages and some blood vessels
normal: no expression detected
endothelialHPA000893SERPINA3MS: almost exclusively expressed in blood vessels
normal: no expression detected
a

Summary of the staining pattern observed for candidate markers on normal and MS brain tissue.

All selected antibodies revealed reactivity in the MS brain. IRF8 antibody HPA002531 (Figure 5F) prominently stained the majority of neurons in the proximity of lesions but also in distal healthy appearing areas of the examined brain section. The anti-IRF8 immunoreactivity was restricted to the cytosolic compartment of neurons, and no clear coexistence of IRF8 with the glial markers GFAP and IBA-1 could be observed. For METTL14, a second antibody (HPA038002) was used and revealed a cytosolic and nuclear staining pattern in neuron-like cells (Figure 5G) from both lesion affected and more healthy appearing areas. This antibody also showed reactivity in IBA1+ microglia, but in these cells, METTL14 immune-reactivity was mainly nuclear. The IL7 antibody HPA019590 revealed weak to moderate staining of a few neuron-like cells in the proximity of lesions (Figure 5H) and a subset of GFAP+ cells in sclerotic areas (Figure 5I). Antibody HPA015600 targeting GAP43 revealed an axon-like staining pattern with highest staining intensity in the multiform layer of the cortex (Figure 5J). A clear decrease in anti-GAP43 immunoreactivity near plaques compared with less affected areas in the same sample could be observed (Figure 5K). SERPINA3 immunoreactivity was mainly found in the lumen of smaller and larger blood vessels (HPA000893, Figure 5L) and moderate immunoreactivity could be observed in IBA1+ microglia cells. No clear difference in staining intensity between plaques and more healthy appearing areas could be identified. Antibody HPA018034 recognizing the zinc transporter SLC30A7 revealed a weak immunoreactivity in the lumen of blood vessels and labeled IBA1+ microglia (Figure 5M).
These findings show that possible sources of the identified targets in blood plasma and CSF were neurons (IRF8, METTL14, IL7, and GAP43) and glia cells (IL7, METTL14) in the vicinity of lesions. This supports the hypothesis that proteins expressed in the brain can leak or be transported by macrophages into the bloodstream and can effectively be detected in plasma samples. SERPINA3 and SLC30A7 were mainly located in the lumen of blood vessels, indicating that these proteins can be involved in a peripheral component of the MS pathology.

Discussion

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

In this study, we have employed an affinity proteomics approach to profile proteins in the context of MS. Starting with unbiased assays on multiplexed antibody suspension bead arrays, a large number of antibodies were utilized to identify MS-subtype-related proteins in plasma. We then built two, subsequently smaller targeted arrays for analysis of an extended study of MS sample sets using both plasma and CSF. From these investigations, antibodies targeting IRF8, IL7, SLC30A7, METTL14, and GAP43 were most indicative for disease state and progression and consequently chosen for immunofluorescence analysis of post-mortem brain tissue sections from MS patients.
Affinity proteomics is an alternative to mass spectrometry with a conceptual difference because target selection is usually conducted prior analysis. Thus, many affinity-based approaches are hypothesis-driven and generally do not incorporate large numbers of antibodies for discovery purposes. In our initial discovery screening, antibodies were included without considering any protein-disease relation, and were selected for further analysis if they revealed differential protein profiles only between the MS cases and controls and not in the sample sets belonging to other neurodegenerative diseases. This highlighted the profile for METTL14, which was subsequently confirmed to be differential between the CIS and SPMS groups. We further made use of the flexibility of the chosen bead array methodology and supplemented the first indications with targets suggested by literature. Profiling additional plasma samples as well as CSF samples led to a short list of candidate antibody targets, which we finally analyzed in rare brain tissue from diseased individuals as well as from non-MS individuals. While information about potential disease relation was available for IRF8, GAP43, SLC30A7, and IL7, little is known about the function of METTL14 and its potential relation to MS pathogenesis. As previously indicated,(55) a disease-centric selection of antibodies provides more candidates than untargeted discovery; however, they hold the potential of extending the existing knowledge.
Multiple sclerosis is widely considered to be a heterogeneous disease, indicating that further subclassification and staging might be required to better understand the differential pathophysiology. At this point, we cannot propose a novel biomarker or signature that now allows us to better classify MS, but we have shown by multivariate, as well as network analysis, that the five highlighted proteins in plasma may serve as a good basis to extend the current understanding of the disease, yet far more samples (thousands) and dedicated assays may be required to confirm that the indications we present here are valid for samples from different collections, clinics, nations, and ethnicities. It is further suggested to follow-up on or include some of the proposed candidates in coming analysis of biobanks and consider the use of multiplexed methods for multiparallel determination of MS-related proteins. An intrinsic challenge will remain in finding markers for this disease because individuals diagnosed with SPMS are generally older than those suffering from other subtypes of MS. In part, this means that associations found for a subtype may also be driven by age, gender, or other variables than disease and need to be taken into account during the statistical evaluation.
We have recently developed assays for CSF analysis on the bead array platform, which we utilized for protein profiling(23) as well as for autoantibody profiling.(56) In the presented work, basically no correlation of protein levels between paired plasma and CSF samples could be shown, which might be related to where (organ proximity) and when (related to event) the sample had been taken. For the studied MS subtypes, correlation networks based on the highlighted proteins were different in plasma compared with CSF. Such discrepancy may though be explained by the complexity of the samples as well as changes in target abundance and resulting analytical sensitivity. We found GAP43 to reveal statistically significant differences for both plasma and CSF. However, when comparing gene expression of all selected targets (Supplementary Table 5 in the Supporting Information) in different organs and tissue types,(57) GAP43 has 25 times higher expression in the brain compared with all other analyzed tissues. Interestingly, all other targets suggested as potential markers in plasma but not in CSF were highly expressed in multiple peripheral organs and tissue types. Even though the presence of target proteins in brain was confirmed, this suggests that a majority of target proteins detected in body fluids could originate from other tissues or appear as a consequence of an immune response. An alternative explanation for absence of targets detected in plasma but not in CSF might come from the direct interaction of (juxtavascular) microglia with the bloodstream, as found for METTL14, SERPINA3, and SLC30A7 in IBA1+ microglia (Figure 5G,L,M).
There is still a great need for noninvasive tools to diagnose neurological disorders and monitor disease progression and efficiency of therapeutic intervention. Physiological readouts, neuroimaging, and analysis of CSF and plasma are the only acceptable diagnostic tools available to neurologists. Technological advances now enable us to use small sample quantities to detect target proteins at concentrations as low as in the range of high pg/mL in multiplex, thus making it possible to detect proteins expressed by brain cells in CSF or plasma. As indicated in this study, the challenging aspect of such an approach is to understand the relations between altered protein levels in systemic or proximal body fluids and the ongoing pathological processes in the brain. Future approaches might benefit from focusing on genes highly expressed or enriched in certain (diseased) areas of the brain or as compared with peripheral organs. As shown for GAP43 and degeneration of neurons, proteins present within these neurons can be detectable in CSF and plasma, and it would be interesting to see if other cell-type-specific proteins could also be detected in both body fluids.
Among the candidates and besides the aforementioned GAP43, we obtained most supportive evidence for antibody-based detection of IRF8. It is a transcription factor with a known function in interferon signaling, response to infection, and for the development of microphages and other myeloid lineages.(58, 59) Alleles in the vicinity of the IRF8 gene have been associated with MS susceptibility,(60, 61) suggesting that disease susceptibility is potentially linked to the regulation of IRF8 transcription. Moreover, a very recent study in mouse models and neuroinflammation showed that IRF8–/– mice were resistant to experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis and that expression of IRF8 in antigen-presenting cells facilitated disease onset and progression.(62) We, for instance, found that profiles from IL7 and IRF8 were similar in SPMS plasma but not in CSF, and the antibody reactivity in tissue was located to the majority of neurons close to lesions. Still, more insights need to be obtained to further define the role of IRF8 in disease development, but our study shows that using affinity proteomics tools across different samples types and analytical assays may contribute to that aim. Regarding IL7, we recently obtained elevated levels in plasma from the IL7 antibody HPA019590 when studying childhood malaria,(55) and as shown elsewhere, levels of IL7 were increased in relation to RRMS.(63) Less is known about METTL14, which was newly linked to methylation of nuclear RNA,(64) as well as about the zinc transporter SLC30A7.
In summary, integrative affinity proteomic approaches were used for analysis of plasma, CSF and brain tissue to identify candidate proteins, in particular, IRF8, for further investigations. We demonstrated the broad-scale applicability of antibodies across different samples types and platforms and indicate that the use of multiplexed affinity-proteomics methods holds a promise for identification of proteins, which can be investigated further for an improved understanding of molecular mechanism of neurological diseases such as MS. Further studies across different biobanks are now needed to determine the contribution of our findings to a better understanding of the MS and its subtypes.

Supporting Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

S-Table 1: Demographics of brain tissue samples. S-Table 2A: Antibodies suggested by discovery screening. S-Table 2B: Antibodies used for second, focused 101-plex bead array. S-Table 3: Antibody performance in plasma and CSF. S-Table 4: Antibodies used for analysis of brain tissue. S-Table 5: RNA expression levels (FPKM) related to candidate proteins. S-Figure 1: Protein profiles prior normalization. S-Figure 2: Experimental reproducibility of candidate profiles. S-Figure 3: ROC curves from multivariate analysis. S-Figure 4: Western blot and epitope mapping of IRF8. S-Figure 5: Candidate profiles in CSF. S-Figure 6: Hierarchical clustering of SPMS and CIS in CSF. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

Author Contributions

S.B. and B.A.

contributed equally.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Terms & Conditions

Electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. The American Chemical Society holds a copyright ownership interest in any copyrightable Supporting Information. Files available from the ACS website may be downloaded for personal use only. Users are not otherwise permitted to reproduce, republish, redistribute, or sell any Supporting Information from the ACS website, either in whole or in part, in either machine-readable form or any other form without permission from the American Chemical Society. For permission to reproduce, republish and redistribute this material, requesters must process their own requests via the RightsLink permission system. Information about how to use the RightsLink permission system can be found at http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Acknowledgment

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

We thank the whole group of Biobank Profiling-Affinity Proteomics at SciLifeLab Stockholm and the entire staff of the Human Protein Atlas for their efforts in generating the antibodies. We also thank the clinical teams and biobank staff who helped with sample collection. We thank Hjalmar Brismar and Hans Blom at SciLifeLab for providing access to microscopes. This work was supported by grants from the Swedish Research Council, the Swedish Brain Foundation, the AFA Foundation, as well as SciLifeLab and the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation.

Abbreviations

AUC

area under curve

CIS

clinically isolated syndrome

CSF

cerebrospinal fluid

CV

coefficient of variation

GAP43

growth associated protein 43

GFAP

glial fibrillary acidic protein

HPA

Human Protein Atlas

IBA1

ionized calcium adapter molecule 1

IL7

interleukin 7

IRF8

interferon regulatory factor 8

METTL14

methyltransferase-like protein 14

MFI

median fluorescence intensity

MS

multiple sclerosis

OND

other neurological diseases

iOND

OND with signs of inflammation

PCA

principal component analysis

PPMS

primary progressive MS

PrEST

protein epitope signature tag

PQN

probabilistic quotient normalization

ROC

receiver operating characteristics

RRMS

relapsing remitting MS

SLC30A7

zinc transporter solute carrier family 30 member 7

SPMS

secondary progressive MS

References

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article references 64 other publications.

  1. 1
    Karussis, D. The diagnosis of multiple sclerosis and the various related demyelinating syndromes: a critical review J. Autoimmun. 2014, 48–49, 134 142
  2. 2
    Milo, R.; Miller, A. Revised diagnostic criteria of multiple sclerosis Autoimmun. Rev. 2014, 13 (4–5) 518 524
  3. 3
    Leary, S. M.; Porter, B.; Thompson, A. J. Multiple sclerosis: diagnosis and the management of acute relapses Postgrad. Med. J. 2005, 81 (955) 302 308
  4. 4
    Keegan, B. M.; Noseworthy, J. H. Multiple sclerosis Annu. Rev. Med. 2002, 53, 285 302
  5. 5
    Polman, C. H. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria Ann. Neurol. 2011, 69 (2) 292 302
  6. 6
    Disanto, G. Heterogeneity in multiple sclerosis: scratching the surface of a complex disease Autoimmune Dis. 2010, 2011, 932351
  7. 7
    Lucchinetti, C. Heterogeneity of multiple sclerosis lesions: implications for the pathogenesis of demyelination Ann. Neurol. 2000, 47 (6) 707 717
  8. 8
    Kroksveen, A. C. Proteomics of human cerebrospinal fluid: discovery and verification of biomarker candidates in neurodegenerative diseases using quantitative proteomics J. Proteomics 2011, 74 (4) 371 388
  9. 9
    Tumani, H. Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers in multiple sclerosis Neurobiol. Dis. 2009, 35 (2) 117 127
  10. 10
    Bielekova, B.; Martin, R. Development of biomarkers in multiple sclerosis Brain 2004, 127 (Pt 7) 1463 1478
  11. 11
    Farias, A. S. Ten years of proteomics in multiple sclerosis Proteomics 2014, 14 (4–5) 467 480
  12. 12
    Comabella, M.; Montalban, X. Body fluid biomarkers in multiple sclerosis Lancet Neurol 2014, 13 (1) 113 126
  13. 13
    Uhlen, M. Towards a knowledge-based Human Protein Atlas Nat. Biotechnol. 2010, 28 (12) 1248 1250
  14. 14
    Uhlen, M. A human protein atlas for normal and cancer tissues based on antibody proteomics Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2005, 4 (12) 1920 1932
  15. 15
    Stoevesandt, O.; Taussig, M. J. Affinity proteomics: the role of specific binding reagents in human proteome analysis Expert Rev. Proteomics 2012, 9 (4) 401 414
  16. 16
    Ayoglu, B. Systematic antibody and antigen-based proteomic profiling with microarrays Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn. 2011, 11 (2) 219 234
  17. 17
    McDonald, W. I. Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis Ann. Neurol. 2001, 50 (1) 121 127
  18. 18
    De Groot, C. J. Post-mortem MRI-guided sampling of multiple sclerosis brain lesions: increased yield of active demyelinating and (p)reactive lesions Brain 2001, 124 (Pt 8) 1635 1645
  19. 19
    Kampf, C. Production of tissue microarrays, immunohistochemistry staining and digitalization within the human protein atlas J. Vis. Exp. 2012, 63) 3620
  20. 20
    Nilsson, P. Towards a human proteome atlas: high-throughput generation of mono-specific antibodies for tissue profiling Proteomics 2005, 5 (17) 4327 4337
  21. 21
    Sjoberg, R. Validation of affinity reagents using antigen microarrays New Biotechnol. 2012, 29 (5) 555 563
  22. 22
    Drobin, K.; Nilsson, P.; Schwenk, J. M. Highly multiplexed antibody suspension bead arrays for plasma protein profiling Methods Mol. Biol. 2013, 1023, 137 145
  23. 23
    Haggmark, A. Antibody-based profiling of cerebrospinal fluid within multiple sclerosis Proteomics 2013, 13 (15) 2256 2267
  24. 24
    Forsstrom, B. Proteome-wide epitope mapping of antibodies using ultra-dense peptide arrays Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2014, 13, 1585 1597
  25. 25
    Ihaka, R.; Gentleman, R. R: a language for data analysis and graphics J. Comput. Graphical Statistics 1996, 5, 299 3214
  26. 26
    Hubert, M.; Rousseeuw, P. J.; Branden, K. V. ROBPCA: A new approach to robust principal component analysis Technometrics 2005, 47 (1) 64 79
  27. 27
    Dieterle, F. Probabilistic quotient normalization as robust method to account for dilution of complex biological mixtures. Application in 1H NMR metabonomics Anal. Chem. 2006, 78 (13) 4281 4290
  28. 28
    Hong, M.-G., Multi-Dimensional Normalization of Plate Effects in the Application of Affnity Proteomics for Plasma Profiling, unpublished.
  29. 29
    Goeman, J. J. L1 penalized estimation in the Cox proportional hazards model Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift 2010, 52 (1) 70 84
  30. 30
    Tibshirani, R. Regression shrinkage and selection via the Lasso Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B-Methodological 1996, 58 (1) 267 288
  31. 31
    Britschgi, M. Modeling of pathological traits in Alzheimer’s disease based on systemic extracellular signaling proteome Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2011, 10 (10) M111 008862
  32. 32
    Smoot, M. E. Cytoscape 2.8: new features for data integration and network visualization Bioinformatics 2011, 27 (3) 431 432
  33. 33
    Waterhouse, A. M. Jalview Version 2--a multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench Bioinformatics 2009, 25 (9) 1189 1191
  34. 34
    Crooks, G. E. WebLogo: a sequence logo generator Genome Res. 2004, 14 (6) 1188 90
  35. 35
    Suk, K. Combined analysis of the glia secretome and the CSF proteome: neuroinflammation and novel biomarkers Expert Rev. Proteomics 2010, 7 (2) 263 274
  36. 36
    Stoop, M. P. Proteomics comparison of cerebrospinal fluid of relapsing remitting and primary progressive multiple sclerosis PLoS One 2010, 5 (8) e12442
  37. 37
    Sakurai, T. Identification of antibodies as biological markers in serum from multiple sclerosis patients by immunoproteomic approach J. Neuroimmunol. 2011, 233 (1–2) 175 180
  38. 38
    Ottervald, J. Multiple sclerosis: Identification and clinical evaluation of novel CSF biomarkers J. Proteomics 2010, 73 (6) 1117 1132
  39. 39
    Noben, J. P. Lumbar cerebrospinal fluid proteome in multiple sclerosis: characterization by ultrafiltration, liquid chromatography, and mass spectrometry J. Proteome Res. 2006, 5 (7) 1647 1657
  40. 40
    Hammack, B. N. Proteomic analysis of multiple sclerosis cerebrospinal fluid Mult. Scler. 2004, 10 (3) 245 260
  41. 41
    Alexander, J. S. Alterations in serum MMP-8, MMP-9, IL-12p40 and IL-23 in multiple sclerosis patients treated with interferon-beta1b Mult. Scler. 2010, 16 (7) 801 809
  42. 42
    Sawcer, S. Genetic risk and a primary role for cell-mediated immune mechanisms in multiple sclerosis Nature 2011, 476 (7359) 214 219
  43. 43
    Gandhi, K. S. The multiple sclerosis whole blood mRNA transcriptome and genetic associations indicate dysregulation of specific T cell pathways in pathogenesis Hum. Mol. Genet. 2010, 19 (11) 2134 2143
  44. 44
    Zeis, T. Normal-appearing white matter in multiple sclerosis is in a subtle balance between inflammation and neuroprotection Brain 2008, 131 (Pt 1) 288 303
  45. 45
    Valdo, P. Enhanced expression of NGF receptors in multiple sclerosis lesions J. Neurol., Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2002, 61 (1) 91 98
  46. 46
    Thangarajh, M. Increased levels of APRIL (a proliferation-inducing ligand) mRNA in multiple sclerosis J. Neuroimmunol. 2005, 167 (1–2) 210 214
  47. 47
    Tanaka, M. Anti-aquaporin 4 antibody in Japanese multiple sclerosis: the presence of optic spinal multiple sclerosis without long spinal cord lesions and anti-aquaporin 4 antibody J. Neurol., Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2007, 78 (9) 990 992
  48. 48
    Solomon, B. D. Neuropilin-1 attenuates autoreactivity in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2011, 108 (5) 2040 2045
  49. 49
    Reder, A. T. MxA: a biomarker for predicting multiple sclerosis disease activity Neurology 2010, 75 (14) 1222 1223
  50. 50
    Ramanathan, M. In vivo gene expression revealed by cDNA arrays: the pattern in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients compared with normal subjects J. Neuroimmunol. 2001, 116 (2) 213 219
  51. 51
    Mc Guire, C. Oligodendrocyte-specific FADD deletion protects mice from autoimmune-mediated demyelination J. Immunol. 2010, 185 (12) 7646 7653
  52. 52
    Lindsey, J. W.; Agarwal, S. K.; Tan, F. K. Gene expression changes in multiple sclerosis relapse suggest activation of T and non-T cells Mol. Med. 2011, 17 (1–2) 95 102
  53. 53
    Harris, V. K. Bri2–23 is a potential cerebrospinal fluid biomarker in multiple sclerosis Neurobiol. Dis. 2010, 40 (1) 331 339
  54. 54
    Alcina, A. The autoimmune disease-associated KIF5A, CD226 and SH2B3 gene variants confer susceptibility for multiple sclerosis Genes Immun. 2010, 11 (5) 439 445
  55. 55
    Bachmann, J. Affinity proteomics reveals elevated muscle proteins in plasma of children with cerebral malaria PLoS Pathog. 2014, 10 (4) e1004038
  56. 56
    Ayoglu, B. Autoantibody profiling in multiple sclerosis using arrays of human protein fragments Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2013, 12 (9) 2657 2672
  57. 57
    Fagerberg, L. Analysis of the human tissue-specific expression by genome-wide integration of transcriptomics and antibody-based proteomics Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2014, 13 (2) 397 406
  58. 58
    Tamura, T. The IRF family transcription factors in immunity and oncogenesis Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2008, 26, 535 584
  59. 59
    Wang, H.; Morse, H. C., 3rd. IRF8 regulates myeloid and B lymphoid lineage diversification Immunol. Res. 2009, 43 (1–3) 109 117
  60. 60
    International Multiple Sclerosis Genetics Consortium. The genetic association of variants in CD6, TNFRSF1A and IRF8 to multiple sclerosis: a multicenter case-control study PLoS One 2011, 6 (4) e18813
  61. 61
    De Jager, P. L. Meta-analysis of genome scans and replication identify CD6, IRF8 and TNFRSF1A as new multiple sclerosis susceptibility loci Nat. Genet. 2009, 41 (7) 776 782
  62. 62
    Yoshida, Y. The transcription factor IRF8 activates integrin-mediated TGF-beta signaling and promotes neuroinflammation Immunity 2014, 40 (2) 187 198
  63. 63
    Romme Christensen, J. Cellular sources of dysregulated cytokines in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis J. Neuroinflammation 2012, 9, 215
  64. 64
    Liu, J. A METTL3-METTL14 complex mediates mammalian nuclear RNA N6-adenosine methylation Nat. Chem. Biol. 2014, 10 (2) 93 95

Cited By


This article is cited by 29 publications.

  1. Loïc Dayon, Ornella Cominetti, Jérôme Wojcik, Antonio Núñez Galindo, Aikaterini Oikonomidi, Hugues Henry, Eugenia Migliavacca, Martin Kussmann, Gene L. Bowman, Julius Popp. Proteomes of Paired Human Cerebrospinal Fluid and Plasma: Relation to Blood–Brain Barrier Permeability in Older Adults. Journal of Proteome Research 2019, 18 (3) , 1162-1174. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.8b00809.
  2. Jochen M. Schwenk, Gilbert S. Omenn, Zhi Sun, David S. Campbell, Mark S. Baker, Christopher M. Overall, Ruedi Aebersold, Robert L. Moritz, and Eric W. Deutsch . The Human Plasma Proteome Draft of 2017: Building on the Human Plasma PeptideAtlas from Mass Spectrometry and Complementary Assays. Journal of Proteome Research 2017, 16 (12) , 4299-4310. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.7b00467.
  3. Visith Thongboonkerd , Joshua LaBaer , Gilberto B. Domont . Recent Advances of Proteomics Applied to Human Diseases. Journal of Proteome Research 2014, 13 (11) , 4493-4496. DOI: 10.1021/pr501038g.
  4. Annika Andersson, Julia Remnestål, Bengt Nellgård, Helian Vunk, David Kotol, Fredrik Edfors, Mathias Uhlén, Jochen M. Schwenk, Leopold L. Ilag, Henrik Zetterberg, Kaj Blennow, Anna Månberg, Peter Nilsson, Claudia Fredolini. Development of parallel reaction monitoring assays for cerebrospinal fluid proteins associated with Alzheimer's disease. Clinica Chimica Acta 2019, 494, 79-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2019.03.243.
  5. Sahl Khalid Bedri, Ola B. Nilsson, Katharina Fink, Anna Månberg, Carl Hamsten, Burcu Ayoglu, Ali Manouchehrinia, Peter Nilsson, Tomas Olsson, Jan Hillert, Hans Grönlund, Anna Glaser, . Plasma protein profiling reveals candidate biomarkers for multiple sclerosis treatment. PLOS ONE 2019, 14 (5) , e0217208. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217208.
  6. Kimi Drobin, Ghazaleh Assadi, Mun-Gwan Hong, Eni Andersson, Claudia Fredolini, Björn Forsström, Anna Reznichenko, Tahmina Akhter, Weronica E Ek, Ferdinando Bonfiglio, Mark Berner Hansen, Kristian Sandberg, Dario Greco, Dirk Repsilber, Jochen M Schwenk, Mauro D’Amato, Jonas Halfvarson. Targeted Analysis of Serum Proteins Encoded at Known Inflammatory Bowel Disease Risk Loci. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases 2019, 25 (2) , 306-316. DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izy326.
  7. Sharad Purohit, Tiehai Li, Wanyi Guan, Xuezheng Song, Jing Song, Yanna Tian, Lei Li, Ashok Sharma, Boying Dun, David Mysona, Sharad Ghamande, Bunja Rungruang, Richard D. Cummings, Peng George Wang, Jin-Xiong She. Multiplex glycan bead array for high throughput and high content analyses of glycan binding proteins. Nature Communications 2018, 9 (1) DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-02747-y.
  8. Ziqing Chen, Tea Dodig-Crnković, Jochen M. Schwenk, Sheng-ce Tao. Current applications of antibody microarrays. Clinical Proteomics 2018, 15 (1) DOI: 10.1186/s12014-018-9184-2.
  9. Sanna Byström, Martin Eklund, Mun-Gwan Hong, Claudia Fredolini, Mikael Eriksson, Kamila Czene, Per Hall, Jochen M. Schwenk, Marike Gabrielson. Affinity proteomic profiling of plasma for proteins associated to area-based mammographic breast density. Breast Cancer Research 2018, 20 (1) DOI: 10.1186/s13058-018-0940-z.
  10. Sanam Foroutan Parsa, Atieh Vafajoo, Azin Rostami, Reza Salarian, Mohammad Rabiee, Navid Rabiee, Ghazal Rabiee, Mohammadreza Tahriri, Amir Yadegari, Daryoosh Vashaee, Lobat Tayebi, Michael R. Hamblin. Early diagnosis of disease using microbead array technology: A review. Analytica Chimica Acta 2018, 1032, 1-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2018.05.011.
  11. Claire Bridel, Anand J. C. Eijlers, Wessel N. van Wieringen, Marleen Koel-Simmelink, Cyra E. Leurs, Menno M. Schoonheim, Joep Killestein, Charlotte E. Teunissen. No Plasmatic Proteomic Signature at Clinical Disease Onset Associated With 11 Year Clinical, Cognitive and MRI Outcomes in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Patients. Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience 2018, 11 DOI: 10.3389/fnmol.2018.00371.
  12. Atieh Vafajoo, Azin Rostami, Sanam Foroutan Parsa, Reza Salarian, Navid Rabiee, Ghazal Rabiee, Mohammad Rabiee, Mohammadreza Tahriri, Daryoosh Vashaee, Lobat Tayebi, Michael R. Hamblin. Multiplexed microarrays based on optically encoded microbeads. Biomedical Microdevices 2018, 20 (3) DOI: 10.1007/s10544-018-0314-4.
  13. Hongxiang Mu, Jing Sun, Linwei Li, Jie Yin, Nan Hu, Weichao Zhao, Dexin Ding, Lan Yi. Ionizing radiation exposure: hazards, prevention, and biomarker screening. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2018, 25 (16) , 15294-15306. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-2097-9.
  14. Sanna Byström, Claudia Fredolini, Per-Henrik Edqvist, Etienne-Nicholas Nyaiesh, Kimi Drobin, Mathias Uhlén, Michael Bergqvist, Fredrik Pontén, Jochen M. Schwenk. Affinity Proteomics Exploration of Melanoma Identifies Proteins in Serum with Associations to T-Stage and Recurrence. Translational Oncology 2017, 10 (3) , 385-395. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2017.03.002.
  15. Linda Ottoboni, Arianna Merlini, Gianvito Martino. Neural Stem Cell Plasticity: Advantages in Therapy for the Injured Central Nervous System. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology 2017, 5 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2017.00052.
  16. Elin Birgersson, Jochen M. Schwenk, Burcu Ayoglu. Bead-Based and Multiplexed Immunoassays for Protein Profiling via Sequential Affinity Capture. 2017,,, 45-54. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7057-5_4.
  17. Maria Mikus, Kimi Drobin, Marcus Gry, Julie Bachmann, Johan Lindberg, Getnet Yimer, Eleni Aklillu, Eyasu Makonnen, Getachew Aderaye, James Roach, Ian Fier, Caroline Kampf, Jens Göpfert, Hugo Perazzo, Thierry Poynard, Camilla Stephens, Raúl J. Andrade, M Isabel Lucena, Nadir Arber, Mathias Uhlén, Paul B. Watkins, Jochen M. Schwenk, Peter Nilsson, Ina Schuppe-Koistinen. Elevated levels of circulating CDH5 and FABP1 in association with human drug-induced liver injury. Liver International 2017, 37 (1) , 132-140. DOI: 10.1111/liv.13174.
  18. Maria Bruzelius, Maria Jesus Iglesias, Mun-Gwan Hong, Laura Sanchez-Rivera, Beata Gyorgy, Juan Carlos Souto, Mattias Frånberg, Claudia Fredolini, Rona J. Strawbridge, Margareta Holmström, Anders Hamsten, Mathias Uhlén, Angela Silveira, Jose Manuel Soria, David M. Smadja, Lynn M. Butler, Jochen M. Schwenk, Pierre-Emmanuel Morange, David-Alexandre Trégouët, Jacob Odeberg. PDGFB, a new candidate plasma biomarker for venous thromboembolism: results from the VEREMA affinity proteomics study. Blood 2016, 128 (23) , e59-e66. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2016-05-711846.
  19. Julia Remnestål, David Just, Nicholas Mitsios, Claudia Fredolini, Jan Mulder, Jochen M Schwenk, Mathias Uhlén, Kim Kultima, Martin Ingelsson, Lena Kilander, Lars Lannfelt, Per Svenningsson, Bengt Nellgård, Henrik Zetterberg, Kaj Blennow, Peter Nilsson, Anna Häggmark-Månberg. CSF profiling of the human brain enriched proteome reveals associations of neuromodulin and neurogranin to Alzheimer's disease. PROTEOMICS - Clinical Applications 2016, 10 (12) , 1242-1253. DOI: 10.1002/prca.201500150.
  20. Carl Hamsten, Emil Wiklundh, Hans Grönlund, Jochen M. Schwenk, Mathias Uhlén, Anders Eklund, Peter Nilsson, Johan Grunewald, Anna Häggmark-Månberg. Elevated levels of FN1 and CCL2 in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from sarcoidosis patients. Respiratory Research 2016, 17 (1) DOI: 10.1186/s12931-016-0381-0.
  21. Sravani Musunuri, Payam Emami Khoonsari, Maria Mikus, Magnus Wetterhall, Anna Häggmark-Mänberg, Lars Lannfelt, Anna Erlandsson, Jonas Bergquist, Martin Ingelsson, Ganna Shevchenko, Peter Nilsson, Kim Kultima, . Increased Levels of Extracellular Microvesicle Markers and Decreased Levels of Endocytic/Exocytic Proteins in the Alzheimer’s Disease Brain. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 2016, 54 (4) , 1671-1686. DOI: 10.3233/JAD-160271.
  22. Ulrika Qundos, Kimi Drobin, Cecilia Mattsson, Mun-Gwan Hong, Ronald Sjöberg, Björn Forsström, David Solomon, Mathias Uhlén, Peter Nilsson, Karl Michaëlsson, Jochen M. Schwenk. Affinity proteomics discovers decreased levels of AMFR in plasma from Osteoporosis patients. PROTEOMICS - Clinical Applications 2016, 10 (6) , 681-690. DOI: 10.1002/prca.201400167.
  23. Burcu Ayoglu, Elin Birgersson, Anja Mezger, Mats Nilsson, Mathias Uhlén, Peter Nilsson, Jochen M. Schwenk. Multiplexed protein profiling by sequential affinity capture. PROTEOMICS 2016, 16 (8) , 1251-1256. DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201500398.
  24. Anna Häggmark, Jochen M. Schwenk, Peter Nilsson. Neuroproteomic profiling of human body fluids. PROTEOMICS - Clinical Applications 2016, 10 (4) , 485-502. DOI: 10.1002/prca.201500065.
  25. Lorelei D. Shoemaker, Harley I. Kornblum. Neural Stem Cells (NSCs) and Proteomics. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 2016, 15 (2) , 344-354. DOI: 10.1074/mcp.O115.052704.
  26. Claudia Fredolini, Sanna Byström, Elisa Pin, Fredrik Edfors, Davide Tamburro, Maria Jesus Iglesias, Anna Häggmark, Mun-Gwan Hong, Mathias Uhlen, Peter Nilsson, Jochen M Schwenk. Immunocapture strategies in translational proteomics. Expert Review of Proteomics 2016, 13 (1) , 83-98. DOI: 10.1586/14789450.2016.1111141.
  27. Tomas Olsson, Fredrik Piehl. The Immunobiology of Multiple Sclerosis. 2016,,, 180-191. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-374279-7.15007-6.
  28. Christer Wingren, Carl Borrebaeck. Antibody Microarrays. 2015,,, 1-9. DOI: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0004026.pub2.
  29. Yetrib Hathout. Proteomic methods for biomarker discovery and validation. Are we there yet?. Expert Review of Proteomics 2015, 12 (4) , 329-331. DOI: 10.1586/14789450.2015.1064771.
  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Study overview. Over initial screening and targeted discovery analysis, protein profiles were generated in plasma from more than 170 000 immunoassays on antibody suspension bead arrays. In the screening phase, 3450 unique proteins targeted by 4595 antibodies were profiled for untargeted discovery in 22 plasma samples from MS cases and nondiseased controls. 384 antibodies toward 334 proteins, including 48 proteins that had been selected from the initial screening, were then used for a targeted discovery in plasma from a total of 172 different individuals diagnosed with MS, CIS, or OND. To confirm initial findings, we evaluated 43 protein targets in additional sample material on a 101-plex focused bead array. A set of 443 plasma samples–out of which 124 had been included in the prior stage–and 573 CSF samples were analyzed. These body fluid profiling efforts resulted in candidate targets that were subsequently evaluated by immunofluorescence analysis of post-mortem brain tissue sections from MS patients. One of these candidate antibodies, anti-IRF8, was further verified in an independent set of 50 plasma samples and characterized by Western blot analysis and epitope mapping.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Candidate protein profiles in plasma and CSF. (A) Antibodies targeting IRF8, IL7, METTL14, SLC30A7, and GAP43 revealed differential levels in plasma from 443 individuals (left panel). For the same antibodies, corresponding plots are shown for 573 CSF individuals (right panel), with 418 individuals overlapping between plasma and CSF. Data shown are both normalized and scaled. For visualization purposes, outliers are not shown. (B) Overview of two-group comparisons performed between the main MS subtypes, for each of the five proteins and on both plasma and CSF. (C) Unsupervised hierarchical cluster analysis for CIS and SPMS plasma using the five antibodies resulted in two main clusters, each being enriched for either of the two subtypes. No gender-related enrichment was observed, and by definition, SPMS patients were older than those of CIS. The corresponding plot for CSF can be found as Supplementary Figure 5 in the Supporting Information.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Analysis of IRF8 in an independent set of plasma samples. Signal intensities from HPA002531 (IRF8) in 50 plasma samples (CIS, RRMS (RR-rem), and SPMS). Although the signal intensities differed between males and females (left), a comparison only within the 37 female individuals revealed statistically significant and elevated signal intensities in SPMS samples compared with RRMS and CIS samples.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. Correlation networks of candidate profiles in plasma and CSF. Network diagrams were generated to summarize correlation relationships between the five highlighted proteins for subtypes of MS and OND and both plasma (left panel) and CSF (right panel). For all combinations of these five proteins, Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was calculated between MFI values for any given two proteins within each sample group and sample type, and the correlations were visualized in the network diagrams. The strength and direction of correlation coefficients were visualized with different line widths and colors. The network diagrams demonstrate considerable differences in correlation relations across these five proteins within plasma and CSF. Note, for example, the strong positive correlation between SLC30A7 and GAP43 exclusively unveiled in plasma samples of all sample groups. Furthermore, two correlation relations were uniquely revealed for the SPMS subgroup: the positive correlations between IL7 and IRF8 in plasma and IL7 and METTL14 in CSF.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. Expression of candidate proteins in human MS brain tissue. Selected antibodies were applied to three to four cortical brain sections containing a single or multiple lesions. (A–D) Schematic drawing of the specimens illustrating gray (blue color) and white matter (light gray color) structures and identified lesion sites (red color). (E) All specimens were stained with antibodies against the astrocyte marker GFAP and microglia marker IBA1 in combination with antibodies directed against the selected targets. Panel E shows the distribution of GFAP and IBA-1 immunoreactivity at the border of a plaque. The presence of numerous IBA1-immunoreactive microglia indicates that this is an active lesion (E1). (F) IRF8-immunoreactivity could only be detected in neuron-like cells throughout the examined brain sections including the gray matter near lesions. (G) Neuron-like mainly nuclear staining pattern was observed for METTL14. In addition, a nuclear staining in microglia (open arrowheads in G) could also be identified. (H) IL7-immunoreactivity was limited to sparsely distributed neuron-like cells and (I) GFAP+ astrocytes in MS affected areas. (J) Differences in GAP43-immunoreactivity within a single section could be observed. In areas lacking signs of sclerosis, GAP43-immunoreactivity revealed a network of fibers with strongest intensity in the deeper cortical layers. (K) In lesion sites characterized by the strong activation of astrocytes and expression of GFAP, the amount of GAP43 immunoreactivity fibers was markedly reduced. (L,M) Immunohistochemistry for SERPINA3 (L) and SLC30A7 (M) revealed labeling of IBA1+ microglia for both (open arrowheads in L and M) while immunoreactivity could also be detected in the lumen of brain capillaries (arrows in L and M). Scale bars: 1 cm (A–D), 100 μm (E), 20 μm (E1,J–M), 10 μm (F–I).

  • References

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    This article references 64 other publications.

    1. 1
      Karussis, D. The diagnosis of multiple sclerosis and the various related demyelinating syndromes: a critical review J. Autoimmun. 2014, 48–49, 134 142
    2. 2
      Milo, R.; Miller, A. Revised diagnostic criteria of multiple sclerosis Autoimmun. Rev. 2014, 13 (4–5) 518 524
    3. 3
      Leary, S. M.; Porter, B.; Thompson, A. J. Multiple sclerosis: diagnosis and the management of acute relapses Postgrad. Med. J. 2005, 81 (955) 302 308
    4. 4
      Keegan, B. M.; Noseworthy, J. H. Multiple sclerosis Annu. Rev. Med. 2002, 53, 285 302
    5. 5
      Polman, C. H. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria Ann. Neurol. 2011, 69 (2) 292 302
    6. 6
      Disanto, G. Heterogeneity in multiple sclerosis: scratching the surface of a complex disease Autoimmune Dis. 2010, 2011, 932351
    7. 7
      Lucchinetti, C. Heterogeneity of multiple sclerosis lesions: implications for the pathogenesis of demyelination Ann. Neurol. 2000, 47 (6) 707 717
    8. 8
      Kroksveen, A. C. Proteomics of human cerebrospinal fluid: discovery and verification of biomarker candidates in neurodegenerative diseases using quantitative proteomics J. Proteomics 2011, 74 (4) 371 388
    9. 9
      Tumani, H. Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers in multiple sclerosis Neurobiol. Dis. 2009, 35 (2) 117 127
    10. 10
      Bielekova, B.; Martin, R. Development of biomarkers in multiple sclerosis Brain 2004, 127 (Pt 7) 1463 1478
    11. 11
      Farias, A. S. Ten years of proteomics in multiple sclerosis Proteomics 2014, 14 (4–5) 467 480
    12. 12
      Comabella, M.; Montalban, X. Body fluid biomarkers in multiple sclerosis Lancet Neurol 2014, 13 (1) 113 126
    13. 13
      Uhlen, M. Towards a knowledge-based Human Protein Atlas Nat. Biotechnol. 2010, 28 (12) 1248 1250
    14. 14
      Uhlen, M. A human protein atlas for normal and cancer tissues based on antibody proteomics Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2005, 4 (12) 1920 1932
    15. 15
      Stoevesandt, O.; Taussig, M. J. Affinity proteomics: the role of specific binding reagents in human proteome analysis Expert Rev. Proteomics 2012, 9 (4) 401 414
    16. 16
      Ayoglu, B. Systematic antibody and antigen-based proteomic profiling with microarrays Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn. 2011, 11 (2) 219 234
    17. 17
      McDonald, W. I. Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis Ann. Neurol. 2001, 50 (1) 121 127
    18. 18
      De Groot, C. J. Post-mortem MRI-guided sampling of multiple sclerosis brain lesions: increased yield of active demyelinating and (p)reactive lesions Brain 2001, 124 (Pt 8) 1635 1645
    19. 19
      Kampf, C. Production of tissue microarrays, immunohistochemistry staining and digitalization within the human protein atlas J. Vis. Exp. 2012, 63) 3620
    20. 20
      Nilsson, P. Towards a human proteome atlas: high-throughput generation of mono-specific antibodies for tissue profiling Proteomics 2005, 5 (17) 4327 4337
    21. 21
      Sjoberg, R. Validation of affinity reagents using antigen microarrays New Biotechnol. 2012, 29 (5) 555 563
    22. 22
      Drobin, K.; Nilsson, P.; Schwenk, J. M. Highly multiplexed antibody suspension bead arrays for plasma protein profiling Methods Mol. Biol. 2013, 1023, 137 145
    23. 23
      Haggmark, A. Antibody-based profiling of cerebrospinal fluid within multiple sclerosis Proteomics 2013, 13 (15) 2256 2267
    24. 24
      Forsstrom, B. Proteome-wide epitope mapping of antibodies using ultra-dense peptide arrays Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2014, 13, 1585 1597
    25. 25
      Ihaka, R.; Gentleman, R. R: a language for data analysis and graphics J. Comput. Graphical Statistics 1996, 5, 299 3214
    26. 26
      Hubert, M.; Rousseeuw, P. J.; Branden, K. V. ROBPCA: A new approach to robust principal component analysis Technometrics 2005, 47 (1) 64 79
    27. 27
      Dieterle, F. Probabilistic quotient normalization as robust method to account for dilution of complex biological mixtures. Application in 1H NMR metabonomics Anal. Chem. 2006, 78 (13) 4281 4290
    28. 28
      Hong, M.-G., Multi-Dimensional Normalization of Plate Effects in the Application of Affnity Proteomics for Plasma Profiling, unpublished.
    29. 29
      Goeman, J. J. L1 penalized estimation in the Cox proportional hazards model Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift 2010, 52 (1) 70 84
    30. 30
      Tibshirani, R. Regression shrinkage and selection via the Lasso Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B-Methodological 1996, 58 (1) 267 288
    31. 31
      Britschgi, M. Modeling of pathological traits in Alzheimer’s disease based on systemic extracellular signaling proteome Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2011, 10 (10) M111 008862
    32. 32
      Smoot, M. E. Cytoscape 2.8: new features for data integration and network visualization Bioinformatics 2011, 27 (3) 431 432
    33. 33
      Waterhouse, A. M. Jalview Version 2--a multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench Bioinformatics 2009, 25 (9) 1189 1191
    34. 34
      Crooks, G. E. WebLogo: a sequence logo generator Genome Res. 2004, 14 (6) 1188 90
    35. 35
      Suk, K. Combined analysis of the glia secretome and the CSF proteome: neuroinflammation and novel biomarkers Expert Rev. Proteomics 2010, 7 (2) 263 274
    36. 36
      Stoop, M. P. Proteomics comparison of cerebrospinal fluid of relapsing remitting and primary progressive multiple sclerosis PLoS One 2010, 5 (8) e12442
    37. 37
      Sakurai, T. Identification of antibodies as biological markers in serum from multiple sclerosis patients by immunoproteomic approach J. Neuroimmunol. 2011, 233 (1–2) 175 180
    38. 38
      Ottervald, J. Multiple sclerosis: Identification and clinical evaluation of novel CSF biomarkers J. Proteomics 2010, 73 (6) 1117 1132
    39. 39
      Noben, J. P. Lumbar cerebrospinal fluid proteome in multiple sclerosis: characterization by ultrafiltration, liquid chromatography, and mass spectrometry J. Proteome Res. 2006, 5 (7) 1647 1657
    40. 40
      Hammack, B. N. Proteomic analysis of multiple sclerosis cerebrospinal fluid Mult. Scler. 2004, 10 (3) 245 260
    41. 41
      Alexander, J. S. Alterations in serum MMP-8, MMP-9, IL-12p40 and IL-23 in multiple sclerosis patients treated with interferon-beta1b Mult. Scler. 2010, 16 (7) 801 809
    42. 42
      Sawcer, S. Genetic risk and a primary role for cell-mediated immune mechanisms in multiple sclerosis Nature 2011, 476 (7359) 214 219
    43. 43
      Gandhi, K. S. The multiple sclerosis whole blood mRNA transcriptome and genetic associations indicate dysregulation of specific T cell pathways in pathogenesis Hum. Mol. Genet. 2010, 19 (11) 2134 2143
    44. 44
      Zeis, T. Normal-appearing white matter in multiple sclerosis is in a subtle balance between inflammation and neuroprotection Brain 2008, 131 (Pt 1) 288 303
    45. 45
      Valdo, P. Enhanced expression of NGF receptors in multiple sclerosis lesions J. Neurol., Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2002, 61 (1) 91 98
    46. 46
      Thangarajh, M. Increased levels of APRIL (a proliferation-inducing ligand) mRNA in multiple sclerosis J. Neuroimmunol. 2005, 167 (1–2) 210 214
    47. 47
      Tanaka, M. Anti-aquaporin 4 antibody in Japanese multiple sclerosis: the presence of optic spinal multiple sclerosis without long spinal cord lesions and anti-aquaporin 4 antibody J. Neurol., Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2007, 78 (9) 990 992
    48. 48
      Solomon, B. D. Neuropilin-1 attenuates autoreactivity in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2011, 108 (5) 2040 2045
    49. 49
      Reder, A. T. MxA: a biomarker for predicting multiple sclerosis disease activity Neurology 2010, 75 (14) 1222 1223
    50. 50
      Ramanathan, M. In vivo gene expression revealed by cDNA arrays: the pattern in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients compared with normal subjects J. Neuroimmunol. 2001, 116 (2) 213 219
    51. 51
      Mc Guire, C. Oligodendrocyte-specific FADD deletion protects mice from autoimmune-mediated demyelination J. Immunol. 2010, 185 (12) 7646 7653
    52. 52
      Lindsey, J. W.; Agarwal, S. K.; Tan, F. K. Gene expression changes in multiple sclerosis relapse suggest activation of T and non-T cells Mol. Med. 2011, 17 (1–2) 95 102
    53. 53
      Harris, V. K. Bri2–23 is a potential cerebrospinal fluid biomarker in multiple sclerosis Neurobiol. Dis. 2010, 40 (1) 331 339
    54. 54
      Alcina, A. The autoimmune disease-associated KIF5A, CD226 and SH2B3 gene variants confer susceptibility for multiple sclerosis Genes Immun. 2010, 11 (5) 439 445
    55. 55
      Bachmann, J. Affinity proteomics reveals elevated muscle proteins in plasma of children with cerebral malaria PLoS Pathog. 2014, 10 (4) e1004038
    56. 56
      Ayoglu, B. Autoantibody profiling in multiple sclerosis using arrays of human protein fragments Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2013, 12 (9) 2657 2672
    57. 57
      Fagerberg, L. Analysis of the human tissue-specific expression by genome-wide integration of transcriptomics and antibody-based proteomics Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2014, 13 (2) 397 406
    58. 58
      Tamura, T. The IRF family transcription factors in immunity and oncogenesis Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2008, 26, 535 584
    59. 59
      Wang, H.; Morse, H. C., 3rd. IRF8 regulates myeloid and B lymphoid lineage diversification Immunol. Res. 2009, 43 (1–3) 109 117
    60. 60
      International Multiple Sclerosis Genetics Consortium. The genetic association of variants in CD6, TNFRSF1A and IRF8 to multiple sclerosis: a multicenter case-control study PLoS One 2011, 6 (4) e18813
    61. 61
      De Jager, P. L. Meta-analysis of genome scans and replication identify CD6, IRF8 and TNFRSF1A as new multiple sclerosis susceptibility loci Nat. Genet. 2009, 41 (7) 776 782
    62. 62
      Yoshida, Y. The transcription factor IRF8 activates integrin-mediated TGF-beta signaling and promotes neuroinflammation Immunity 2014, 40 (2) 187 198
    63. 63
      Romme Christensen, J. Cellular sources of dysregulated cytokines in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis J. Neuroinflammation 2012, 9, 215
    64. 64
      Liu, J. A METTL3-METTL14 complex mediates mammalian nuclear RNA N6-adenosine methylation Nat. Chem. Biol. 2014, 10 (2) 93 95
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    S-Table 1: Demographics of brain tissue samples. S-Table 2A: Antibodies suggested by discovery screening. S-Table 2B: Antibodies used for second, focused 101-plex bead array. S-Table 3: Antibody performance in plasma and CSF. S-Table 4: Antibodies used for analysis of brain tissue. S-Table 5: RNA expression levels (FPKM) related to candidate proteins. S-Figure 1: Protein profiles prior normalization. S-Figure 2: Experimental reproducibility of candidate profiles. S-Figure 3: ROC curves from multivariate analysis. S-Figure 4: Western blot and epitope mapping of IRF8. S-Figure 5: Candidate profiles in CSF. S-Figure 6: Hierarchical clustering of SPMS and CIS in CSF. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

    Terms & Conditions

    Electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. The American Chemical Society holds a copyright ownership interest in any copyrightable Supporting Information. Files available from the ACS website may be downloaded for personal use only. Users are not otherwise permitted to reproduce, republish, redistribute, or sell any Supporting Information from the ACS website, either in whole or in part, in either machine-readable form or any other form without permission from the American Chemical Society. For permission to reproduce, republish and redistribute this material, requesters must process their own requests via the RightsLink permission system. Information about how to use the RightsLink permission system can be found at http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

OOPS

You have to login with your ACS ID befor you can login with your Mendeley account.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect

This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By continuing to use the site, you are accepting our use of cookies. Read the ACS privacy policy.

CONTINUE