Diaminated Starch: A Competitor of Chitosan with Highly Mucoadhesive Properties due to Increased Local Cationic Charge Density

The purpose of this study was to synthesize diaminated starch as a novel mucoadhesive polymer. Starch was tosylated and then reacted with ethylenediamine. The degree of amination was determined by 2,4,6-trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid assay. Properties of diaminated starch including solubility, cytotoxicity, swelling behavior, and mucoadhesion were compared to chitosan. Diaminated starch displayed 2083 ± 121.6 μmol of diamine substructures/g of polymer. At pH 6, diaminated starch exhibited a ζ potential of 6 mV, whereas it was close to zero in the case of unmodified starch. In addition, diaminated starch displayed water solubility over the entire pH range and minor cytotoxicity. The novel polymer showed pronounced swelling behavior in water increasing its initial weight 18- and 6-fold at pH 5 and 6, respectively. Moreover, diaminated starch exhibited 92-fold higher-mucoadhesivity properties than those of chitosan. According to these results, diaminated starch might be a promising novel excipient for the design of mucoadhesive formulations.


INTRODUCTION
Due to mucoadhesive polymers, the residence time of most drug delivery systems on mucosal surfaces such as the intraoral, ocular, or vaginal mucosa can be substantially prolonged. Consequently, a more sustained therapeutic effect of the incorporated drug can be provided. 1 Among noncovalently binding mucoadhesive polymers, cationic polymers such as chitosan exhibit comparatively highly mucoadhesive properties as these polymers can form ionic bonds with anionic substructures such as sialic acid and sulfonic acid moieties of mucus glycoproteins. 2,3 So far, established mucoadhesive cationic polymers, however, have various drawbacks strongly limiting their application. Chitosan, for instance, precipitates at pH > 6, quaternary ammonium chitosans exhibit poor mucoadhesive properties, and polyethyleneimines and poly-(amidoamine) dendrimers are less biodegradable and comparatively toxic. 4−8 To overcome these shortcomings, recently, starch was aminated with primary amine groups resulting in high solubility and improved mucoadhesivity. In comparison to chitosan, this novel polymer provided almost 10-fold longer residence time on intestinal mucosa and showed even less celltoxic effects. 9 Encouraged by these results, it was the aim of this study to design an improved aminated starch derivative exhibiting a comparatively higher cationic charge density. To increase the positive charge density and hydrogen-bonding sites, a diaminated starch with primary and secondary amine groups using ethylenediamine as a ligand was generated. The introduction of vicinal cationic substructures on the polymer should additionally improve the stability of ionic bonds with anionic substructures of the mucus as when the ion pair between one of these cationic moieties with an anionic moiety of mucus dissociates, there is still another cationic moiety in close proximity available in order to maintain the electrostatic attraction. Generally, it is well known that the stability of ionic complexes increases with the increasing number of either neighboring anionic or neighboring cationic charges on each component. Zhou et al., for instance, could achieve tremendous improvement in the adsorptive binding of anionic dyes exhibiting the same sulfonic acid substructure as found in mucus due to the covalent attachment of ethylenediamine to chitosan. 10 As aminated starch was previously synthesized via oxidative ring opening of glucose units resulting in partial destruction of the polysaccharide, 9 it was an additional aim of this study to introduce these diamine substructures without ring opening. First, starch was tosylated through toluene sulfonyl chloride, and subsequently, tosylated starch was aminated by ethylenediamine. In the following, the new polymer was characterized regarding solubility, cytotoxicity, swelling behavior, and mucoadhesive properties.  12 Briefly, 3.0 g of tosylated starch was dissolved in 50 mL of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and heated up to 80°C. Then, 25 mL of ethylenediamine was added, and the reaction mixture was heated up to 100°C and stirred for 6 h at this temperature. The color of the reaction mixture changed to reddish brown. After cooling down to room temperature, the reaction mixture was added dropwise to 1300 mL of cold isopropanol in order to precipitate the targeted compound. After centrifugation at 12,300 rpm at 2°C for 15 min, the precipitate was washed with 400 mL of isopropanol and two times with 400 mL of ethanol. It was then dissolved in 4 mL of demineralized water, dialyzed for three days against demineralized water, and finally freeze-dried.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Starch having been treated in exactly the same way as described above but omitting TsCl served as the negative control. The purification of synthesized diaminated starch was evaluated by a thin-layer chromatography (TLC) technique and TNBS assay. n-Butanol:acetic acid:water (3:1:4) was used for TLC as the mobile phase. Plates were sprayed with 0.3 m/v ninhydrin in ethanol used for detection of primary amines and heated up to 100°C.
where 161 is the molecular weight of the starch repeating unit without one hydrogen, 155 is the molecular weight of the tosylate group, and S is the sulfur content. The degree of amination was calculated using the following equation (eq 2): where 59 is the molecular weight of the diamine group and N is the nitrogen content in diaminated starch. A thermo alpha FT-IR spectrophotometer (Bruker, Billerica, U.S.A.) in arrangement with its associated software Opus Version 7.0 (Bruker) was used to study unmodified starch, tosylated starch, and diaminated starch. The FT-IR spectra of the compounds were recorded with 24 scans at 22°C in a wavenumber range from 4000 to 400 cm −1 at a resolution of 1 cm −1 . 1 H NMR and 13 C NMR spectra of tosylated starch and diaminated starch were recorded by a Bruker 500 MHz NMR spectrometer using DMSO-d 6 as the solvent at 25°C. UV−vis spectra were obtained using a Tecan infinite M200 spectrophotometer (Grodig, Austria).
2.3.2. Determination of the Degree of Amination with TNBS. Primary amine groups of unmodified starch, diaminated starch, and chitosan were quantified by reactions with TNBS. 14 Briefly, 1.0 mg of each sample was dissolved in 1 mL of 0.01 M HCl, and then 200 μL of each solution was mixed with 300 μL of 8% (m/v) NaHCO 3 . Thereafter, 500 μL of 0.1% TNBS solution was added, and the reaction mixture was incubated in the dark for 2 h at 37°C. The absorbance of 100 μL of each sample was measured at 335 nm. The standard curve was obtained by a series of solutions with increasing concentrations of cysteine hydrochloride in 0.5% NaCl and a cysteine hydrochloride-free solution as reference. Each sample was measured three times.
2.3.3. Determination of the Degree of Modification via Titration. Titration is a common approach to determine the degree of deacetylation of chitosan based on the quantity of NaOH required to neutralize H + on protonated amine groups. 15 Briefly, 10 mg of diaminated starch, chitosan, and unmodified starch was dissolved in 10 mL of 0.01 M HCl and titrated with 0.01 M NaOH. Each sample was titrated three times separately.
The degree of deacetylation (DD) of chitosan was calculated using the following equation (eq 3): where 203 is the molecular weight of the chitin repeating unit, C 1 and C 2 are the concentrations of NaOH solution in molar at two inflexion points, V 1 and V 2 are the volumes of NaOH solution added up to two inflexion points in liters, m is the sample weight, and 42 is the molecular weight difference between repeating units of chitin and acetylated forms. The degree of amination (DAm) of starch was calculated by the following equation (eq 4): where 1/2 is due to having two amine groups per repeating unit, 162 is the molecular weight of the unmodified starch repeating unit, 42 is the difference between molecular weights of unmodified starch and diaminated starch repeating units, and the other parameters have the same meaning as described above. 2.4. ζ Potential Measurements. The ζ potential showing the surface electric charges of polymers in solution was used to assess the effect of diamine substructures on the surface electric charge of starch under acidic conditions. 16 The ζ potential of diaminated starch in comparison to chitosan and unmodified starch was determined in a concentration of 1 mg/mL in a 0.1 mM citric acid−sodium phosphate dibasic buffer at pH 3−7 at room temperature. ζ potential measurements were performed by Zetasizer Nano ZSP from Malvern Instruments.
2.5. Isoelectric Point Predictions. Chemicalize software in connection with ChemSpider software from ChemAxon (Cambridge, MA, U.S.A.) was utilized for structure-based predictions of isoelectric points of test compounds.
2.6. Solubility Studies. In order to compare the solubility of diaminated starch with that of chitosan, each polymer was dispersed in a series of buffer solutions including the citric acid−Na 2  Biomacromolecules pubs.acs.org/Biomac Article 2.7. In Vitro Cytotoxicity Studies. 2.7.1. Hemolysis Assay. Sterile 0.1 mM PBS, pH 6, was prepared by addition of potassium dihydrogen phosphate to sterile Dulbecco's PBS and sterilized through a sterile vacuum filter with a 0.22 μm pore size. Red blood cells (200 μL) were added to 1800 μL of unmodified starch, diaminated starch, and chitosan having been dissolved/dispersed in 0.1 M sterile Dulbecco's PBS at pH 6 and 7.4 in a final concentration of 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 5 mg/mL. Sterile 0.1 M PBS, pH 6 and 7.4, was used as a negative control, and 1% (v/v) Triton X-100 solution was used as a positive control. The mixtures were incubated at 300 rpm and 37°C for 4 h and then mixed by inversion every 15 min. At predetermined time points, mixtures were centrifuged at 13,400 rpm at 4°C for 5 min, and the absorbance of the supernatant was measured using a M200 multimode microplate reader (Tecan, Grodig, Austria). 18 Each concentration was evaluated in triplicate, and the percentage of hemolysis was calculated according to the following equation (eq 5): hemolysis % (sample absorbance negative control absorbance) (positive control absorbance negative control absorbance) 100 (5) 2.7.2. Resazurin Assay. Unmodified starch, diaminated starch, and chitosan were evaluated for in vitro cell viability via resazurin assay as described elsewhere. 19 In this test, a 24-well plate containing 25,000 Caco-2 cells per well in 500 μL of minimum essential medium (MEM) containing 10% (v/v) fetal calf serum (FCS) and penicillin/ streptomycin solution (100 units/0.1 mg/mL) was incubated at 37°C under a 5% CO 2 environment. The cell culture medium was replaced every 48 h for 14 days to obtain a monolayer. Cells were washed twice with preheated MEM without serum. Test solutions including 0.05, 0.1, and 0.2 mg/mL unmodified starch, diaminated starch, and chitosan were prepared in MEM. Since chitosan is not soluble at neutral pH, it was pre-dissolved in 0.01 M HCl followed by dilution with MEM until the final pH was 7.2. For the negative control, MEM and MEM containing 10% (v/v) HCl were used, whereas 1% (v/v) Triton X-100 served as a positive control. Prewarmed 500 μL of each solution was added in triplicate to the cells. Cells were incubated at 37°C in the 5% CO 2 environment for 4 h. Test solutions were removed from the wells, and cells were washed twice with preheated MEM. After that, 250 μL of resazurin solution (2.2 μM) was added to each well and incubated for 3 h at 37°C in the 5% CO 2 environment. Fluorescence of the supernatant of each well was measured at an excitation wavelength of 540 nm and emission wavelength at 590 nm. Cell viability of each sample was calculated by the following equation (eq 6): ( negative control absorbance average absorbance of each sample ) ( negative control absorbance positive control absorbance) 100 2.8. Evaluation of the Swelling Behavior. The swelling behavior of unmodified starch, diaminated starch, and chitosan was evaluated at predefined pH values by a gravimetric method. 20 First, 30 mg of each polymer was compressed with a constant compaction pressure of 11 kN applied for 1 min into 5.0 mm in diameter flat-faced tablets. Each tablet was fixed on a needle and incubated at 37°C in 5 mL of a 0.1 M hydrochloric acid−potassium chloride buffer (pH 1.2), 0.1 M glycine buffer (pH 3), 0.1 M acetate buffer (pH 5), and 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 6.8 and 7.4). At predetermined time points, tablets were removed from the aqueous medium and weighed after having removed unbound water from tablets with filter paper. Each experiment was performed three times, and the amount of water uptake was calculated using the following equation (eq 7): where W t is the weight of the swollen tablet at time t and W 0 is the initial weight of the tablet. Data are reported as mean ± SD. 2.9. Mucoadhesion Studies. 2.9.1. Rotating Cylinder Method. In order to compare the mucoadhesive properties of the unmodified and diaminated starch with chitosan, the rotating cylinder method was used. 21 Freshly excised intestinal porcine mucosa (4 × 5 cm) was fixed on a stainless-steel cylinder (apparatus: 6 rotating cylinders, 2 in.) using cyanoacrylate glue, and test tablets of unmodified starch, diaminated starch, and chitosan were attached on the mucosa. Thereafter, the cylinder was placed in the dissolution apparatus (Erweka) according to the European Pharmacopoeia, containing 900 mL of 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 6.8) at 37 ± 0.2°C, and rotated with 50 rpm. The detachment times were observed over 5 days, and the average times were reported.
2.9.2. Half-Pipe Method. Unmodified starch, diaminated starch, and chitosan were fluorescence-labeled by incorporation of fluorescence diacetate (FDA) for assessment of mucoadhesive properties. 22 Briefly, 20 mg of each polymer was hydrated in 20 mL of demineralized water, and the pH was adjusted to 6.5 with 0.1 M HCl, except with chitosan that was hydrated in 0.01 M HCl and then diluted with demineralized water. To each polymer solution, 1 mL of 0.1% (m/v) ethanolic FDA solution was added. After 24 h of stirring at room temperature, the solutions were freeze-dried.
For evaluation of mucoadhesive properties, half-cut 50 mL falcon tubes were placed at a 45°angle on a ramp-shaped device in an incubation chamber at 37°C and 100% relative humidity. Then, freshly excised porcine small intestine was cleaned, cut into pieces of 4 × 2 cm, and fixed on the falcon tubes. The mucosa was continuously rinsed with 2 M phosphate buffer pH 6.8 for 10 min at a flow rate of 1 mL/min through a pump (multichannel peristaltic pump, Ismatec, Germany). Thereafter, 10 mg of FDA-labeled samples were placed on the intestinal mucosa. Mucosa and test samples were continuously rinsed with a flow rate of 1 mL/min with phosphate buffer. After 30, 60, 120, and 180 min, the phosphate buffer having been rinsed from the mucosa was quantified.
Phosphate buffer of pH 6.8 containing 0.2% (m/v) FDA and pure phosphate buffer of pH 6.8 served as positive and negative controls. NaOH (2 mL, 5 M) was added to 1 mL of each test sample in order to hydrolyze FDA to sodium fluorescein. After incubation under shaking at 37°C for 30 min, reaction mixtures were centrifuged at 13,400 rpm for 5 min. Fluorescence intensity of 100 μL of each supernatant was measured at an excitation wavelength of 485 nm and emission wavelength of 535 nm. All experiments were performed in triplicate.
2.9.3. Tensile Studies. Tensile studies were performed according to a method having been described previously. 23 Unmodified starch, diaminated starch, and chitosan tablets were attached to a stainlesssteel flat disc with a cyanoacrylate adhesive. The porcine intestinal mucosa was attached on the bottom of a beaker utilizing a cyanoacrylate adhesive then 500 mL of 0.1 M phosphate buffer of pH 6.8 was added to the beaker at 37°C and placed on a balance, which was linked to a personal computer. The steel disc with the attached tablet was hung from a laboratory stand and brought into contact with the mucosa for 30 min at 37°C. After this incubation, the balance was pulled down at a rate of 0.1 mm/s. Obtained data were automatically transferred to Sarta Collect software (Sartorius AG, Austria). Maximum detachment force (MDF) and total work of adhesion (TWA) were calculated by this software for each tablet.
2.10. Statistical Data Analysis. GraphPad Prism 7 software was applied to analyze statistical data. All data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and t-test with p < 0.05 as a minimal level of significance, Biomacromolecules pubs.acs.org/Biomac Article and the results are expressed as means ± SD of at least three experiments.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
3.1. Characterization of Diaminated Starch. 3.1.1. Structural Characterization. Native starches are a blend of two polyglycans, amylose and amylopectin. Amylose is the linear fraction consisting of α-D-glucopyranose linked through α(1→4) linkages with an average molecular mass of 10 5 −10 6 g/mol, whereas amylopectin with a molecular mass of 10 6 −10 7 g/mol is the branched fraction containing short chains linking linear chains via α(1→6) linkages. 24,25 As the interpenetration of branched high-molecular mass polymers into the mucus gel layer essential for highly mucoadhesive properties is lower than that of linear polymers of comparatively lower molecular mass, a starch of high amylose content was chosen. According to the specification of the provider, the amylose content of the starch used in this study was at least 68%. Diamination of this starch was achieved in aqueous solution by tosylation and amination. Tosylated starch was synthesized in 0.4 M sodium hydroxide in the presence of triethylamine as a weak base without any organic solvents. Tosylated starch was aminated in ethylenediamine at 100°C. The synthetic pathway is illustrated in Figure 1. Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was used to confirm the successful purification of diaminated starch in comparison to control the sample and ethylenediamine as a reference.
As shown in Table 1, elemental analysis of tosylated starch revealed sulfur content of 10.54%, and based on which, the degree of tosylation was calculated to be 1.08. Diaminated starch showed nitrogen content of 10.03% corresponding to a degree of substitution of 0.73.
The formation of tosylated and diaminated starch was also confirmed via FT-IR spectroscopy.  28 The carbon resonance peaks at 145, 130, 129, and 125 ppm are ascribed to the tosyl group moiety, which disappeared in diaminated starch by replacing with ethylenediamine.
In contrast to previous studies focusing on the generation of cationic starch derivatives such as starch methylene dimethylamine, 29 starch amino acid conjugates, 30 or starch exhibiting quaternary ammonium substructures, 31 the cationic starch described in this study is, to our knowledge, the first exhibiting vicinal amino groups as ligands.
3.1.2. Degree of Amination. The amount of primary amine groups on the polymer was determined via TNBS assay. The results of diaminated starch, the negative control sample of diaminated starch, and chitosan were 2083 ± 121.6, 33 ± 4.5, and 3068 ± 157.3 μmol of primary amine groups/g, respectively. According to these results, a significant amount of amine groups is present on diaminated starch. Furthermore, the marginal amount of the remaining primary amine groups in the negative control sample provided evidence for the efficacy of the applied purification method for diaminated starch.
Potentiometric titration revealed one inflexion point for unmodified starch and two inflexion points for chitosan and diaminated starch as illustrated in Figure 4. The degree of deacetylation of chitosan was determined to be 83% being in accordance with the specification of the provider. For diaminated starch, a higher amount of NaOH was required to reach the second inflexion point as it contains more protonated amines in comparison to chitosan. The degree of amination of diaminated starch was determined to be 63.5% of repeating units, which was in agreement with the result of TNBS assay and close to the result of elemental analysis. However, diaminated starch exhibited more cationic amines    Biomacromolecules pubs.acs.org/Biomac Article per repeating unit in comparison to chitosan. The second inflexion point of diaminated starch was at pH ≥ 8, whereas that of chitosan was at pH 7. This shows that diaminated starch can maintain its cationic character at a higher pH because of the comparatively higher acidic pK of the secondary amine.
3.2. ζ Potential. Due to protonation of the amine groups, diaminated starch showed a pronounced positive ζ potential at an acidic pH, whereas the ζ potential of unmodified starch was close to zero. The ζ potential of diaminated starch and chitosan decreased with increasing pH. In contrast, unmodified starch did not show any pH-dependent changes in its ζ potential. Results of this study are illustrated in Figure 5. The ζ potentials of tested polymers at increasing pH are listed in detail in Table 2. 3.3. Isoelectric Points. Isoelectric points of diaminated starch, chitosan, and unmodified starch are illustrated in Figure  6. Diaminated starch shows +2 positive charges at pH ≤ 6 because of the primary and secondary amine groups. At pH 6 to 8, the charge of diaminated starch is +1. In contrast, chitosan bears a charge of +1 at pH ≤ 6.2. Due to the lack of amine groups, unmodified starch does not show any charge over the aforementioned pH range. The surface charge of diaminated starch that can be tuned by adjusting pH makes it a pH-responsive smart material for a wide variety of applications including stimuli-responsive drug delivery systems.
3.4. pH-Dependent Solubility. According to solubility studies, diaminated starch was entirely soluble at acidic, neutral, and basic pH, whereas chitosan showed solubility just at acidic pH as the protonation of its amine groups triggers electrostatic repulsion between the polymer chains. In the case of diaminated starch, this additional solubility improving effect does not seem to be necessary.
3.5. Cytotoxicity Studies. 3.5.1. Hemolysis Study. Blood biocompatibility of diaminated starch was evaluated by hemolysis assay. Toxic compounds such as Triton X-100 having been used as a positive control cause hemolysis of red blood cells and complete hemoglobin release. In contrast, unmodified starch was completely biocompatible and nontoxic. As shown in Figure 7, even in the highest applied concentration, the hemolytic activity of diaminated starch was less than 10%. At pH 6, the hemolytic activity of diaminated starch was in the same range as that of chitosan. Chitosan is well known for its hemostatic properties that are primarily based on electrostatic interactions between the positive charge of the surface of chitosan and the negative   Biomacromolecules pubs.acs.org/Biomac Article charge on the surface of red blood cells. 32 These ionic interactions of chitosan with red blood cells are likely also responsible for minor hemolytic activity of this polymer as already shown by Wang et al. 33 Our results showed strongly pH-dependent hemolytic activity of chitosan. Being dissolved at pH 6, its hemolytic activity was at least 10-fold higher at this pH than at pH 7.4. As the cationic surface charge of chitosan is more pronounced at pH 6 than at pH 7.4, more intensive interactions with the anionic surface of red blood cells can be assumed.

Cell
Viability. Cytotoxicity studies of diaminated starch, unmodified starch, and chitosan were carried on Caco-2 cells by resazurin colorimetric assay. Because of the ability of viable cells to reduce the resazurin to the highly fluorescent resorufin dye, the impact of the polymer on cell viability can be quantified. As depicted in Figure 8, more than 95% of the cells were viable and metabolically active after incubation with unmodified starch. Cell viability was above 90% in the case of chitosan and above 80% in the case of diaminated starch up to a concentration of 0.2 mg/mL.
Although cationic polymers, especially those containing amine groups like polyethyleneimine, show a high cytotoxic potential, diaminated starch demonstrated just minor toxicity to normal cells. In the resazurin assay, chitosan was less harmful to cells than diaminated starch, which may be explained by the precipitation of chitosan at neutral pH. In the hemolysis assay, chitosan showed slightly higher toxicity at pH 6 than at pH 7.4, whereas diaminated starch showed similar toxicity at both pH values. Polymers exhibiting a high density of cationic charges such as polyethyleneimine or polyallylamine are obviously cytotoxic. 34 However, toxicological concerns are minor when the density of cationic charges on polymers is lower. Aminated polymethacrylates such as Eudragit RL, RS, and E for instance are generally regarded as safe and used as coating materials in numerous pharmaceutical products. The same counts for chitosan and likely also for diaminated starch as the density of cationic charges is also comparatively low. In contrast to the abovementioned synthetic polymers, polysaccharides offer the additional advantage of biodegradability. As not all enzyme recognition sites on starch such as those for amylase were modified, diaminated starch is likely still biodegradable. According to these considerations, the minor cytotoxic effect of diaminated starch shown in Figure 8 does not seem to be a hindrance for further pharmaceutical developments.
3.6. Swelling Behavior. As shown in Figure 9, diaminated starch tablets exhibited significant swelling behavior due to water penetrability and protonation of amine groups at pH 1.2. After 120 min, their weight was even 53-fold higher. They appeared as transparent jelly balls. After 3 h, erosion intensified so that they dissolved completely. At pH 3 and 5, diaminated starch tablets swelled more slowly and reached up to 30-and 18-fold of their initial weights, respectively. At pH 6.8 and 7.4, diaminated starch tablets exhibited just minor swelling as illustrated in Figure 10. Unmodified starch showed generally poor water uptake properties, and tablets disintegrated completely and dispersed within 5 min. Chitosan tablets exhibited minor swelling at pH 1.2 and 3. They disintegrated after 15 min and finally dissolved completely by creating dense and viscous solutions. Chitosan tablets did not show any swelling at pH ≥ 5. They disintegrated and dispersed within 15 min at pH 5 and after 25 min at pH 6.8 and 7.4.
3.7. Mucoadhesive Properties. Mucoadhesion studies of diaminated starch, unmodified starch, and chitosan were performed by the rotating cylinder method. Diaminated starch showed significant mucoadhesive properties as tablets detached after 5 days and 3 h in average. In contrast, unmodified starch tablets started to disintegrate already after 10 min. As depicted in Figure 11, on average, after 1 h and 20 min, chitosan tablets detached and dispersed into the buffer solution.
Furthermore, the mucoadhesion properties of polymers were characterized by their residence time on the mucosa via the half-pipe method. 35 Diaminated starch and chitosan showed mucoadhesive properties for 3 h. Diaminated starch displayed significantly higher-mucoadhesivity properties than those of chitosan. Unmodified starch displayed no mucoadhesive properties being in agreement with previous studies. Results of this study are illustrated in Figure 12. Additional tensile studies confirmed the superior mucoadhesive properties of diaminated starch. The TWA and MDF of diaminated starch were 7.6-and 10.9-fold higher than those of chitosan,    Because of two amine groups in repeating units, diaminated starch exhibited higher-mucoadhesivity properties than those of aminated starch as described previously, 9 which can be attributed to two main reasons: (i) an increased local cationic charge density of diaminated starch providing stronger ionic interactions and (ii) the existence of two hydrogen-bonding sites on each repeating unit. Diaminated starch exhibits a higher level of tensile strength than that of chitosan due to elastic properties. In addition, the highly swelling properties of diaminated starch make it a good choice for drug delivery systems.

CONCLUSIONS
In this study, highly substituted diaminated starch (degree of substitution, DS, 0.65) was synthesized in an aqueous solution. Due to the presence of primary and secondary amines providing a higher local cationic charge density and more hydrogen-bonding sites, diaminated starch showed comparatively highly mucoadhesive properties. Good solubility, superior mucoadhesion properties, and minor cytotoxicity of diaminated starch seem to make it a useful cationic polysaccharide for drug delivery systems.