Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect
ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Reducing the Sampling Frequency of Groundwater Monitoring Wells

OR SEARCH CITATIONS

My Activity
Publications
CONTENT TYPES

Figure 1Loading Img
Download Hi-Res ImageDownload to MS-PowerPointCite This:Environ. Sci. Technol. 1996, 30, 1, 355-358
    Communication

    Reducing the Sampling Frequency of Groundwater Monitoring Wells
    Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

    View Author Information
    Environmental Restoration Program, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, L-206, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, California 94551, and Savannah River Technology Center, Westinghouse Savannah River Company, P.O. Box 616, Aiken, South Carolina 29802
    Other Access Options

    Environmental Science & Technology

    Cite this: Environ. Sci. Technol. 1995, 30, 1, 355–358
    Click to copy citationCitation copied!
    https://doi.org/10.1021/es950335u
    Published December 1, 1996
    Copyright © 1996 American Chemical Society
    Request reuse permissions
    Copyright © 1996 American Chemical Society

    Subjects

    what are subjects

    Note: In lieu of an abstract, this is the article's first page.

    Free first page

    Read this article

    To access this article, please review the available access options below.

    Get instant access

    Purchase Access

    Read this article for 48 hours. Check out below using your ACS ID or as a guest.

    Recommended

    Access through Your Institution

    You may have access to this article through your institution.

    Your institution does not have access to this content. Add or change your institution or let them know you’d like them to include access.

    *

     Corresponding author telephone:  510-423-2005; e-mail address:  [email protected].

    †

     Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.

    ‡

     Westinghouse Savannah River Company.

    Cited By

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

    This article is cited by 22 publications.

    1. Natalia Malina, Sidney Millner, Ann Sullivan Ojeda. “First alert” for Drinking Water Quality: Commercial Water Quality Testing Kits for Community-Engaged Research. ACS ES&T Water 2024, 4 (4) , 1346-1355. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestwater.3c00481
    2. Gayathri Gopalakrishnan, Barbara S. Minsker, and Albert J. Valocchi . Monitoring Network Design for Phytoremediation Systems Using Primary and Secondary Data Sources. Environmental Science & Technology 2011, 45 (11) , 4846-4853. https://doi.org/10.1021/es1042657
    3. Erica Pensini, Thamara Laredo, Laura Earnden, Alejandro G. Marangoni, Saeed Mirzaee Ghazani. A ‘three in one’ complexing agent enables copper desorption from polluted soil, its removal from groundwater and its detection. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 2021, 624 , 126840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.126840
    4. Jim Leu, Deyi Hou. Remedial process optimization and sustainability benefits. 2020, 279-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-817982-6.00011-2
    5. Shengqi Qi, Deyi Hou, Jian Luo. Optimization of groundwater sampling approach under various hydrogeological conditions using a numerical simulation model. Journal of Hydrology 2017, 552 , 505-515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.07.016
    6. T.R. Crompton. Metals in Surface, Ground, and Mineral Waters. 2015, 161-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802654-0.00004-0
    7. J. Zhang, C. Zhang. Sampling and sampling strategies for environmental analysis. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry 2012, 92 (4) , 466-478. https://doi.org/10.1080/03067319.2011.581371
    8. James T. Gibbs, Javier Santillan, Mozella Callier, Ronald Porter. Best management practices for environmental restoration programs. Remediation Journal 2010, 21 (1) , 57-77. https://doi.org/10.1002/rem.20272
    9. Deyi Hou, Rong-Jin Leu. Optimizing the Remedial Process at a Petroleum Hydrocarbon Contaminated Site Using a Three-Tier Approach. Journal of Environmental Engineering 2009, 135 (11) , 1171-1180. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000083
    10. Patrick Reed, Joshua B. Kollat, V.K. Devireddy. Using interactive archives in evolutionary multiobjective optimization: A case study for long-term groundwater monitoring design. Environmental Modelling & Software 2007, 22 (5) , 683-692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.12.021
    11. Kirk Cameron. Better Optimization of Long-Term Monitoring Networks. Bioremediation Journal 2004, 8 (3-4) , 89-107. https://doi.org/10.1080/10889860490887464
    12. Meng Ling, Hanadi S. Rifai, Julia J. Aziz, Charles J. Newell, James R. Gonzales, Javier M. Santillan. Strategies and Decision-Support Tools for Optimizing Long-Term Groundwater Monitoring Plans—MAROS 2.0. Bioremediation Journal 2004, 8 (3-4) , 109-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/10889860490887491
    13. Pradeep Mugunthan, Christine A. Shoemaker. Time Varying Optimization for Monitoring Multiple Contaminants under Uncertain Hydrogeology. Bioremediation Journal 2004, 8 (3-4) , 129-146. https://doi.org/10.1080/10889860490887509
    14. Maureen Ridley, Donald MacQueen. Sampling Plan Optimization: A Data Review and Sampling Frequency Evaluation Process. Bioremediation Journal 2004, 8 (3-4) , 167-175. https://doi.org/10.1080/10889860490887572
    15. Patrick M. Reed, Barbara S. Minsker. Striking the Balance: Long-Term Groundwater Monitoring Design for Conflicting Objectives. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 2004, 130 (2) , 140-149. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2004)130:2(140)
    16. Maureen Ridley, Donald MacQueen. Sampling Plan Optimization: A Data Review and Sampling Frequency Evaluation Process. Groundwater Monitoring & Remediation 2004, 24 (1) , 74-80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6592.2004.tb00707.x
    17. George Pinder. Optimization and Modeling for Remediation and Monitoring. 2003https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203494158.ch3
    18. Julia J. Aziz, Meng Ling, Hanadi S. Rifai, Charles J. Newell, James R. Gonzales. MAROS: A Decision Support System for Optimizing Monitoring Plans. Groundwater 2003, 41 (3) , 355-367. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2003.tb02605.x
    19. Estella A. Atekwana, William A. Sauck, Gamal Zidan Abdel Aal, D. Dale Werkema. Geophysical Investigation of Vadose Zone Conductivity Anomalies at a Hydrocarbon Contaminated Site: Implications for the Assessment of Intrinsic Bioremediation. Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics 2002, 7 (3) , 103-110. https://doi.org/10.4133/JEEG7.3.103
    20. Kirk Cameron, Philip Hunter. Using spatial models and kriging techniques to optimize long‐term ground‐water monitoring networks: a case study. Environmetrics 2002, 13 (5-6) , 629-656. https://doi.org/10.1002/env.582
    21. Gregory E. Granato, Kirk P. Smith. Robowell: An Automated Process for Monitoring Ground Water Quality Using Established Sampling Protocols. Groundwater Monitoring & Remediation 1999, 19 (4) , 81-89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6592.1999.tb00243.x
    22. Markus Stoeppler. Sampling: an Introduction. 1997, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60632-8_1
    Download PDF
    Go to Environmental Science & Technology
    Get e-Alerts
    Get e-Alerts

    Environmental Science & Technology

    Cite this: Environ. Sci. Technol. 1995, 30, 1, 355–358
    Click to copy citationCitation copied!
    https://doi.org/10.1021/es950335u
    Published December 1, 1996
    Copyright © 1996 American Chemical Society
    Request reuse permissions

    Article Views

    343

    Altmetric

    -

    Citations

    22
    Learn about these metrics

    Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

    Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

    The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.